Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 22 September 2025

Sec. Cardiovascular Imaging

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1670164

This article is part of the Research TopicCardiovascular Imaging Case Reports 2025: Emphasizing Uncommon Clinical ScenariosView all 10 articles

When the culprit lies outside the coronary artery: dual case report of coronary sinus of valsalva dissection presenting as STEMI


Kun Chen
Kun Chen*Mengjiao YuMengjiao YuYoupeng Ling
Youpeng Ling
  • Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, The First People’s Hospital of Changde City, Changde, China

Located sinus of Valsalva (SOV) dissection is a rare but critical condition that presents as inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We present two cases in which computed tomography angiography (CTA) was essential in identifying SOV dissection. In the first case, CTA confirmed a localized dissection of the right SOV. Surgical revascularization was delayed owing to initial diagnostic challenges and the family's hesitation, which ultimately led to a fatal outcome. In the second, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) confirmed extrinsic compression of the right coronary artery (RCA), and following emergency stent implantation, coronary blood flow was restored, conservative treatment achieved a favorable clinical outcome. These cases highlight the pivotal role of early CTA when angiographic findings are incongruent with the clinical presentation, the utility of IVUS in determining the etiology of coronary artery occlusion, and the critical importance of timely revascularization.

Introduction

Clinically, although STEMI secondary to aortic dissection (AD) is frequently encountered (13), STEMI caused by minor, localized SOV dissection represents an exceptionally rare and diagnostically challenging entity (4, 5). Patients may lack classic symptoms and signs of AD, but marked ST-segment elevation on ECG will still prompt immediate catheterization according to STEMI management protocols. Coronary angiography (CAG) and aortography may fail to detect minor SOV dissections (5). CTA provided a crucial diagnostic advantage by revealing aortic root pathology (6). Echocardiography and IVUS provided critical diagnostic clues suggestive of SOV dissection. Here, we report two cases of inferior STEMI caused by localized right SOV dissection, which had similar presentations but differing outcomes. CTA played a central diagnostic role in both cases and IVUS plays an important role in identifying atypical causes of ACS.

Case presentation 1

A 42-year-old man with no known comorbidities and a family history of AD presented with sudden-onset chest pain during esports gameplay. ECG showed inferior STEMI with complete heart block (Figure 1A). CAG revealed a normal left coronary system, but the RCA could not be engaged. Aortic root angiography showed no anomalous origin of the RCA; however, it suggested a possible dissection of the right SOV (Figures 1B–D; Supplementary Video 1). CTA revealed ascending aortic dilation and a localized dissection of the right SOV (Figures 2A–C; Supplementary Video 2). The emergency transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed dilation of the ascending aorta, measuring 43 mm in diameter. Despite the recommendation for immediate surgery, family hesitation delayed intervention. The operative findings showed that a dissection of SOV extending into the RCA ostium. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and sinus reconstruction were performed, however the patient developed cardiogenic shock and refractory ventricular arrhythmias. The family declined mechanical circulatory support (MCS), and the patient subsequently died.

Figure 1
Electrocardiogram (ECG) results are shown in grid format, displaying heart electrical activity over multiple leads in panel A. Panels B and C show angiographic images of coronary arteries, highlighting vessel structures. Panel D depicts an arrow indicating a possible area of interest within an aortogram, showing the aorta and surrounding vessels.

Figure 1. (A) ECG shows marked ST-segment elevation in leads II, III and avF, along with complete heart block (B,C). Coronary angiography shows no significant stenosis in the left coronary artery. (D) Aortic angiography reveals possible dissection of the right coronary sinus of valsava (red arrow).

Figure 2
CT scan images in three panels labeled A, B, and C, showing cross-sectional views of the chest. Each panel highlights an area with a red arrow, indicating specific regions of interest within the cardiac structure.

Figure 2. CTA images. Serial CTA images (A–C) show located right coronary sinus of valsava dissection (red arrow).

Timeline is shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Case presentation 2

A 71-year-old woman with hypertension presented with chest tightness and diaphoresis. ECG revealed inferior STEMI and sinus bradycardia (Figure 3A). CAG demonstrated complete proximal RCA occlusion (Figures 3B–D; Supplementary Video 3) without visible intraluminal plaque on IVUS, but persistent extrinsic compression (Figures 3F–I; Supplementary Video 4). A drug-eluting stent (DES) was deployed at the ostium of the RCA with restored flow (Figure 3E). IVUS confirmed complete ostial coverage of the RCA and good stent apposition (Supplementary Video 6). CTA demonstrated mild aortic root dilation and right SOV dissection (Figures 4A–C; Supplementary Video 7). TTE demonstrated an intramural hematoma originating at the ostium of the RCA within the right coronary sinus, with partial extension into the proximal RCA (Figure 4D). The patient declined surgery and was managed conservatively. She remained stable with no recurrent symptoms during follow-up.

Figure 3
Image set containing:\n\nA: Electrocardiogram (ECG) showing multiple leads with various heart waveforms on a grid.\n\nB-E: Angiographic images of coronary arteries, with E highlighting areas with yellow arrows indicating significant features.\n\nF-I: Intravascular ultrasound images displaying circular cross-sections of coronary arteries with red markers pointing to specific areas of interest.

Figure 3. (A) ECG shows marked ST_segement elevation in leads II, III and avF, along with sinus bradycardia. Coronary angiography shows no significant stenosis in the left coronary artery (B,C) and complete proximal RCA occlusion (D), A DES (yellow arrow) placement at the RCA ostium with restored antegrade flow (E). (F–I) IVUS shows extravascular dissection (red arrow) and hematoma compressing the RCA (area marked with red asterisks).

Figure 4
Medical imaging displays three CT scans labeled A, B, and C showing cross-sections of the chest with highlighted areas marked by red arrows. Image D is an ultrasound with a red arrow pointing to a specific region. Measurements and settings are visible on the ultrasound display.

Figure 4. Serial CTA images (A–C) show located right coronary sinus of valsava dissection (red arrow). Echocardiography (D) demonstrates an intramural hematoma originating at the ostium of the RCA within the right coronary sinus, with partial extension into the proximal RCA (red arrow).

Timeline is shown in Supplementary Table 2.

Discussion

It is uncommon for AD to initially present as STEMI, occurring in only 1%–2% of cases (7). Localized dissection of the SOV, a subtype of AD, likewise present with STEMI. This condition poses significant diagnostic challenges due to its nonspecific presentation and potential mimicry of STEMI (4). Etiologically SOV dissection can be categorized as either iatrogenic or spontaneous. Common iatrogenic causes include cardiac interventions (8) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) catheterization (9). Spontaneous dissections are often associated with underlying conditions such as hypertension, congenital or genetic disorders (e.g., Marfan syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome, bicuspid aortic valve) (10), vasculitides (e.g., Takayasu's arteritis) (11), and aortic atherosclerosis. Our cases showed no evidence of congenital or genetic disorders, nor of vasculitides.

Patients presenting with ST-segment elevation on ECG are typically managed according to STEMI protocols (3); however, dissection of SOV and STEMI require vastly different treatment approaches (12, 13). Diagnostic delay may occur when ischemic ECG changes mask aortic pathology (14, 15). Early recognition is critical, as inappropriate catheter-based intervention may delay definitive management and worsen outcomes (16). Thus, a high index of suspicion is essential when angiographic and clinical findings are discrepant.

A case of SOV dissection presenting as inferior STEMI was initially misdiagnosed as spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD). Despite stenting, severe heart failure occurred. TTE revealed severe aortic regurgitation. Surgery confirmed dissection involving the RCA, and valve replacement led to recovery (5). Another two cases of spontaneous SOV dissection accompanied by severe aortic regurgitation were diagnosed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). CAG showed no evidence of coronary involvement in both cases. Surgical treatment resulted in good outcomes (17). Our cases showed typical STEMI on ECG but no abnormal signs of AD. CAG confirmed coronary involvement, highlighting the critical nature of these cases.

CTA, TTE/TEE, and IVUS all have important roles in the evaluation of SOV dissection (5, 17, 18). CTA offers rapid and detailed anatomical evaluation but may miss diagnoses in cases of suboptimal image quality. While TTE/TEE can identify dissection flaps and assess valvular function, comprehensive surgical planning still relies on CTA. In selected cases, IVUS may provide critical diagnostic clues—such as a dissection flap or extraluminal hematoma—prompting further imaging evaluation (5). Ultimately, integrating multiple modalities ensure accurate diagnosis and guides appropriate intervention.

Analysis suggests that entry-point stenting can achieve favorable clinical outcomes in cases of iatrogenic SOV dissection (8). However, spontaneous SOV dissection may necessitate urgent surgical management, including sinus reconstruction, aortic valve repair or replacement, and coronary revascularization (12, 19). Localized SOV dissection presenting as STEMI with concomitant coronary occlusion is exceedingly rare. The immediate priority is restoration of coronary flow. However, even when stenting achieves reperfusion, surgical repair may still be necessary if the intimal flap re-occludes the coronary ostium or results in severe aortic regurgitation (5).

In our first case, the patient was obese, had a family history of AD, and experienced emotional stress prior to symptom onset. Aortic intimal flap obstruction of the RCA ostium led to failed catheter engagement and precluded PCI (20). Emergent CTA confirmed right SOV dissection, representing an absolute indication for emergency surgery. Unfortunately, the patient died after CABG and sinus reconstruction due to recurrent malignant arrhythmias and refractory cardiogenic shock. The poor outcome was multifactorial, involving a nondominant left circumflex artery with right-dominant circulation, prolonged vessel occlusion causing extensive myocardial necrosis, delayed diagnosis, family hesitation delaying intervention, and refusal of postoperative MCS (21).

In the second case, the patient had long-standing hypertension and a normal coronary angiogram six years prior. IVUS clearly demonstrated extrinsic RCA compression by a hematoma extending into the perivascular space. Despite balloon angioplasty, no sustained TIMI 3 flow was achieved. In this setting, urgent coronary reperfusion was a critical step to stabilize the patient and create a window for potential aortic surgery (22, 23). This patient recovered without surgery. Serial CTA and echocardiography showed progressive regression of the right SOV dissection with septal echogenic band formation, indicating spontaneous healing. The favorable outcome of conservative management was attributable to a limited dissection entry and confined hematoma, the dual role of the stent in restoring perfusion and sealing the entry, strict hemodynamic control combined with close follow-up imaging surveillance (Supplementary Video 8). This case underscores the potential of conservative management in selected patients with restored coronary perfusion and anatomically stable lesions.

Both cases illustrate the diagnostic challenges of localized SOV dissection, particularly when RCA involvement obscures the true etiology. The SOV dissection may obstruct the coronary ostium with an intimal flap or cause extrinsic compression by a hematoma—features that CAG may not detect. In contrast, CTA was definitive in both cases, echocardiography contributed supportive evidence, and IVUS provided crucial mechanistic insight.

Conclusion

Taken together, these cases emphasize the importance of maintaining diagnostic vigilance for SOV dissection in patients with STEMI-like presentations but atypical angiographic findings. Early use of imaging modalities such CTA, echocardiography and IVUS enables timely and accurate diagnosis. Moreover, individualized management strategies—including timely surgery when PCI fails, or conservative treatment when reperfusion is achieved—may optimize outcomes in this rare but life-threatening condition. Importantly, Close imaging follow-up is essential throughout the conservative management of SOV dissection.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First People's Hospital of Changde city). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants' legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

KC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MY: Writing – review & editing. YL: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1670164/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Singh AP, Kayal V, Nath RK. Aortic dissection with complete occlusion of left main coronary artery presenting as acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Cureus. (2021) 13:6. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15595

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Liu X, Zheng Y, Fan J. Stanford Type A aortic dissection presenting as acute inferior myocardial infarction. Bri J Hosp Med (Lond). (2022) 83:5. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2021.0568

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Zhu QY, Tai S, Tang L, Peng W, Zhou SH, Liu ZG, et al. STEMI could be the primary presentation of acute aortic dissection. Am J Emerg Med. (2017) 35:11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.05.010

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Ichihashi T, Ito T, Murai S, Ikehara N, Fujita H, Suda H. Acute myocardial infarction due to spontaneous, localized, acute dissection of the sinus of valsalva detected by intravascular ultrasound and electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography. Heart Vessels. (2016) 31:9. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0787-5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Yuge N, Manabe S, Sugimura K, Shimokawa H. Localized dissection of the sinus of valsalva mimicking spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. (2023) 36:6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad091

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Ma GN, Hong H, Alwalid O, Cao YK, Hu XH, Han P, et al. Utility of ECG-gated CTA for detecting and classifying coronary artery involvement in patients with type a aortic dissection and sinus of valsalva involvement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (2021) 217:6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.25744

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Erbel R, Alfonso F, Boileau C, Dirsch O, Eber B, Haverich A, et al. Diagnosis and management of aortic dissection. Eur Heart J. (2001) 22:18. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2782

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Boukhris M, Tomasello SD, Marzà F, Azzarelli S, Galassi AR. Iatrogenic aortic dissection complicating percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion. Can J Cardiol. (2015) 31:3. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.11.030

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Mijares-Rojas IA, Trujillo LG, Lecompte-Osorio PA, Martinez Trevino EF, Munagala M. Aortic dissection from an intra-aortic balloon pump: a dangerous complication to keep in mind. Cureus. (2023) 15:5. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39122

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kougioumtzoglou AM, Lam BCY, Bouma BJ, Groenink M, Scholte AJHA, Dolmaci OB, et al. Personalized external aortic root support, the Dutch experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2025). doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.07.041

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Sato S, Saito M, Tasaka T, Kinoshita M, Fujimoto K, Sumimoto T. Takayasu arteritis masquerading as an isolated sinus of valsalva dissection in a young adult. J Echocardiogr. (2025). doi: 10.1007/s12574-025-00702-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Writing Committee Members, ACC/AHA Joint Committee Members. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2022) 80(24):e223–393. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Rao SV, O’Donoghue ML, Ruel M, Rab T, Tamis-Holland JE, Alexander JH, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. (2025) 151:13. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Rapezzi C, Longhi S, Graziosi M, Biagini E, Terzi F, Cooke RMT, et al. Risk factors for diagnostic delay in acute aortic dissection. Am J Cardiol. (2008) 102:10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.07.013

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Harris KM, Strauss CE, Eagle KA, Hirsch AT, Isselbacher EM, Tsai TT, et al. Correlates of delayed recognition and treatment of acute type A aortic dissection: the international registry of acute aortic dissection (IRAD). Circulation. (2011) 124:18. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.110.006320

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Wang W, Wu J, Zhao X, You B, Li C. Type-A aortic dissection manifesting as acute inferior myocardial infarction: 2 case reports. Medicine (Baltimore). (2019) 98:43. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017662

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Nabati M, Bagheri B, Eslami S, Piran R. Spontaneous aortic dissection limited to the sinus of valsalva: report of two cases. J Tehran Heart Cent. (2016) 11(1):34–7. doi: 10.18502/jthc.v11i1.748

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Ichihashi T, Ito T, Murai S, Ikehara N, Fujita H, Suda H, et al. Acute myocardial infarction due to spontaneous, localized, acute dissection of the sinus of valsalva detected by intravascular ultrasound and electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography. Heart Vessels. (2016) 31:9. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0787-5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Bossone E, LaBounty TM, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update. Eur Heart J. (2018) 39:9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx319

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Zhu Z. Intimal tear of ascending aorta caused myocardial infarction. Available online at: https://esc365.escardio.org/presentation/288713 (Accessed July 16 2025).

Google Scholar

21. Ostadal P, Rokyta R, Karasek J, Kruger A, Vondrakova D, Janotka M, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the therapy of cardiogenic shock: results of the ECMO-CS randomized clinical trial. Circulation. (2023) 147:6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062949

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Shigihara S, Shirakabe A, Okazaki H, Asai K. Successful treatment of a patient with type-A acute aortic dissection with emergent percutaneous coronary intervention and thoracic endovascular aortic repair under percutaneous cardiopulmonary support: a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep. (2022) 6:9. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac344

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Noda K, Inoue Y, Matsuo J, Yokawa K, Uehara K, Sasaki H, et al. Type A aortic dissection with left coronary malperfusion. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2022) 70:2. doi: 10.1007/s11748-021-01728-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: sinus of valsalva dissection, computed tomography angiography, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, intravascular ultrasound

Citation: Chen K, Yu M and Ling Y (2025) When the culprit lies outside the coronary artery: dual case report of coronary sinus of valsalva dissection presenting as STEMI. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 12:1670164. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1670164

Received: 21 July 2025; Accepted: 5 September 2025;
Published: 22 September 2025.

Edited by:

Antonios Karanasos, General University Hospital of Patras, Greece

Reviewed by:

Denggang Fu, Indiana University, United States
Nino Cocco, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Italy

Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Yu and Ling. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Kun Chen, c2ltcGxlY2tAMTYzLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.