SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Endocrinol., 29 June 2022

Sec. Obesity

Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.919087

G Allele of the rs1801282 Polymorphism in PPARγ Gene Confers an Increased Risk of Obesity and Hypercholesterolemia, While T Allele of the rs3856806 Polymorphism Displays a Protective Role Against Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • SL

    Shujin Li 1†

  • CH

    Chuan He 2†

  • HN

    Haiyan Nie 3

  • QP

    Qianyin Pang 3

  • RW

    Ruixia Wang 3

  • ZZ

    Zhifu Zeng 3

  • YS

    Yongyan Song 1*

  • 1. Central Laboratory, Clinical Medical College and Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, China

  • 2. Department of Cardiology, Clinical Medical College and Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, China

  • 3. Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu, China

Article metrics

View details

34

Citations

7,7k

Views

2,3k

Downloads

Abstract

Background:

The relationships between the rs1801282 and rs3856806 polymorphisms in nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) gene and obesity indexes as well as serum lipid levels have been extensively investigated in various studies, but the results were inconsistent and even contradictory.

Methods:

PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, CNKI and VIP databases were searched for eligible studies. The random-effTPDEects model was used, and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to estimate the differences in obesity indexes and serum lipid levels between the subjects with different genotypes in a dominant model. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by Cochran’s x2-based Q-statistic test. Publication bias was identified by using Begg’s test.

Results:

One hundred and twenty studies (70,317 subjects) and 33 studies (18,353 subjects) were identified in the analyses for the rs1801282 and rs3856806 polymorphisms, respectively. The G allele carriers of the rs1801282 polymorphism had higher levels of body mass index (SMD = 0.08 kg/m2, 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.12 kg/m2, p < 0.001), waist circumference (SMD = 0.12Ā cm, 95% CI = 0.06 to 0.18Ā cm, p < 0.001) and total cholesterol (SMD = 0.07 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.11 mmol/L, p < 0.01) than the CC homozygotes. The T allele carriers of the rs3856806 polymorphism had lower levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (SMD = -0.09 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.15 to -0.03 mmol/L, p < 0.01) and higher levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (SMD = 0.06 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.10 mmol/L, p < 0.01) than the CC homozygotes.

Conclusions:

The meta-analysis suggests that the G allele of the rs1801282 polymorphism confers an increased risk of obesity and hypercholesterolemia, while the T allele of the rs3856806 polymorphism displays a protective role against dyslipidemia, which can partly explain the associations between these polymorphisms and cardiovascular disease.

Systematic Review Registration:

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier [CRD42022319347].

Introduction

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs), belonging to the nuclear receptor superfamily, are ligand-inducible transcription factors (1). PPARs have three members in human beings: PPARα, PPARβ/Ī“ and PPARγ. Of them, PPARγ is the most important one and plays an intricate role in various biological processes (2). Eight PPARγ isoforms (PPARγ1, PPARγ2, PPARγ3, etc.) have been identified in human beings according to NCBI’s reference sequence database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Upon activation by exogenous and endogenous lipid ligands, PPARγ binds to retinoid X receptor (RXR) to form a regulatory complex and is capable of stimulating adipogenesis (3), promoting adipocyte differentiation (4), and increasing insulin sensitivity (5). PPARγ is closely related to lipid disorders and obesity based on its fundamental role in lipid and glucose metabolism.

Human PPARγ gene (namely PPARG) is located on chromosome 3p25.3 and consists of nine exons: exons A1, A2, B, and 1-6 (FigureĀ 1) (2). According to NCBI’s RefSeq database, sixteen PPARG mRNA variants have been identified so far in human beings due to alternative splicing and differential promoter usage. PPARγ gene is highly polymorphic, and thousands of genetic variants have been recorded in NCBI’s dbSNP database. Among these variants, a missense variant (rs1801282, also known as p.Pro12Ala) located in exon B has been extensively explored with regard to its significant relationships with obesity indexes and serum lipid levels (FigureĀ 1) (2). The rs1801282 polymorphism is formed by a single-nucleotide variance from cytosine (C) to guanine (G), resulting in a proline-to-alanine substitution in PPARγ2 polypeptide. Another genetic locus, the rs3856806 polymorphism (also known as p.His477His, c.161C>T or c.1431C>T), has also been investigated widely, although not as much as the rs1801282 polymorphism. The rs3856806 polymorphism is a synonymous variant and is located in exon 6 of PPARG (FigureĀ 1). This genetic variation is formed by a single-nucleotide variance from C to thymine (T), but the corresponding amino acid residue in PPARγ2 polypeptide does not change after nucleotide substitution.

FigureĀ 1

Scientific reports of the associations between the rs1801282 and rs3856806 polymorphisms and obesity indexes as well as serum lipid levels were inconsistent and even conflicting (2). Some studies indicated that the G allele of the rs1801282 polymorphism was associated with higher levels of body mass index (BMI) (6–17), waist circumference (WC) (17–20), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) (14–18), total cholesterol (TC) (21–27), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (24–29) and triglycerides (TG) (30–38), and lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (38–41), whereas the research data from other laboratories did not support these findings and even yielded contradictory results (42–61). There were also significant inconsistencies amongst published data in the relationships between the rs3856806 polymorphism and obesity indexes as well as serum lipid levels in various populations (62–71).

Herein, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed based on previous publications over the past two decades to determine the relationships between the rs1801282 and rs3856806 polymorphisms and obesity indexes as well as serum lipid levels. This work can provide an opportunity to unveil the interrelationships among PPARγ gene polymorphisms, metabolic disorders and cardiovascular disease.

Methods

Literature Search Strategy

The present meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022319347) and conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, CNKI and VIP databases were searched comprehensively from inception to December 2021. The keywords used for the literature searches were (ā€œperoxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaā€ or ā€œPPARĪ³ā€ or ā€œPPARGā€), (ā€œpolymorphismā€ or ā€œmutationā€ or ā€œvariantā€ or ā€œvarianceā€ or ā€œrs1801282ā€ or ā€œrs3856806ā€ or ā€œPro12Alaā€ or ā€œ1431C>Tā€ or ā€œ161C>Tā€ or ā€œHis477Hisā€) and (ā€œbody mass indexā€ or ā€œwaist circumferenceā€ or ā€œwaist-to-hip ratioā€ or ā€œBMIā€ or ā€œWCā€ or ā€œWHRā€) and (ā€œlipidā€ or ā€œtotal cholesterolā€ or ā€œlow-density lipoprotein cholesterolā€ or ā€œhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterolā€ or ā€œtriglycerideā€ or ā€œTCā€ or ā€œLDL-Cā€ or ā€œHDL-Cā€ or ā€œTGā€). The variables of this meta-analysis were limited to three obesity indexes including BMI, WC and WHR, and four serum lipid parameters including TC, LDL-C, HDL-C and TG. All articles that reported the associations of the rs1801282 and rs3856806 polymorphisms with obesity indexes and serum lipid levels were reviewed and screened.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) The sample size and genotype distribution were clearly provided; 2) At least one of the seven variables (i.e., BMI, WC, WHR, TG, TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C) was presented; 3) Data were displayed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or mean ± standard error (SE). Exclusion criteria: 1) Animal studies; 2) Incomplete data; 3) Repeatedly published articles; 4) Case reports; 5) Conference abstracts.

Data Extraction

Data were extracted independently by three reviewers. The data from each included study were as follows: first author’s name, year of publication, ethnicity, age, gender, health status, sample size, mean obesity indexes, mean lipid variables, and the SD or SE values by genotypes. SD values were calculated if SE values were given. Unit used for lipid variables was ā€œmmol/Lā€ in this meta-analysis, and datum conversion was conducted if data were presented as ā€œmg/dLā€ or other units. All data were double-checked after extraction. Any disagreements were resolved by careful examination and group discussion.

Meta-Analysis

The STATA software package (Version 10, StataCorp, USA) was used for the present meta-analysis. A dominant model was employed because most of the included studies reported results in a dominant way (i.e., CC vs [CG + GG] for the rs1801282 polymorphism; CC vs [CT + TT] for the rs3856806 polymorphism). If there were more than one subgroup in a study (e.g., the subgroups with different ethnicities or health conditions), each subgroup was treated as an independent comparison in the meta-analysis. The subgroup analyses were performed with at least 5 comparisons for the rs1801282 polymorphism, and 3 comparisons for the rs3856806 polymorphism to ensure adequate statistical power. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the differences in obesity indexes and serum lipid levels between the genotypes. The random-effects model was used in the meta-analysis for the reason that it provides a more conservative result than the fixed effects model. Heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed by Cochran’s x2-based Q-statistic test. Heterogeneity was considered statistically significant if p ≤ 0.05. Furthermore, subgroup analyses and Galbraith plots were applied to detect the potential sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to ethnicities, health conditions, genders and ages of the subjects. The subgroups classified by ethnicity included European Caucasians, American Caucasians, Australian Caucasians, East Asians, South Asians, West Asians, South Americans, and Africans. The subgroups classified by health condition included coronary artery disease (CAD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), metabolic syndrome (MetS), polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), overweight/obesity, and general population/controls/healthy subjects; The subgroups classified by gender were males and females; The subgroups classified by age were adults (≄ 18 years) and children/adolescents (< 18 years). Publication bias was evaluated by using Begg’s test and visualized by Begg’s funnel plots, and p ≤ 0.05 the indicates the presence of a publication bias in the meta-analysis. The trim-and-fill method was used to adjust the results if a publication bias was present. All p values were two-tailed.

Results

Characteristics of the Enrolled Studies

The flow diagram of the literature search process is shown in FigureĀ 2.A total of 137 studies (6–142) were identified and included in this meta-analysis. Characteristics of the included studies are presented in Tables S1 and S2. The enrolled articles were published between 1998 and 2021, and written either in English (132 articles, 96.35%) or in Chinese (5 articles, 3.65%). Forty-eight studies, 5 studies, 2 studies, 44 studies, 9 studies, 8 studies, 7 studies, 7 studies and 7 studies involved European Caucasians, American Caucasians, Australian Caucasians, East Asians, South Asians, West Asians, South Americans, Africans and other ethnicities, respectively. Eleven studies, 29 studies, 4 studies, 10 studies, 23 studies and 77 studies involved CAD patients, T2DM patients, MetS patients, PCOS patients, overweight/obesity patients and general population/control subjects/healthy subjects, respectively. Six studies only involved males, 20 studies only involved females, and the rest studies involved both genders. One hundred and twenty-five studies involved adults, and the rest 12 studies involved children or adolescents. The subjects from 68 studies were divided into subgroups according to health conditions, genders or ethnicities, and each subgroup was considered as an independent comparison.

FigureĀ 2

One hundred and twenty studies were enrolled in the meta-analysis for the rs1801282 polymorphism. Among them, 100 studies, 44 studies, 40 studies, 104 studies, 83 studies, 103 studies and 104 studies presented the data for BMI, WC, WHR, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C and TG, respectively (Tables S3 and S4). Thirty-three studies were enrolled in the meta-analysis for the rs3856806 polymorphism, and 27 studies, 10 studies, 9 studies, 28 studies, 24 studies, 30 studies and 30 studies presented the data for BMI, WC, WHR, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C and TG, respectively (Tables S5 and S6).

Summary Statistics

One hundred and seventy-six comparisons (70,137 subjects) and 53 comparisons (18,353 subjects) were distinguished for the rs1801282 and rs3856806 polymorphisms, respectively. One hundred and fifty comparisons, 168 comparisons, 54 comparisons, 142 comparisons, 117 comparisons, 146 comparisons and 151 comparisons were enrolled to compare the differences in BMI, WC, WHR, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C and TG levels for the rs1801282 polymorphism, respectively (Tables S3 and S4). Forty-five comparisons, 16 comparisons, 14 comparisons, 46 comparisons, 41 comparisons, 49 comparisons and 50 comparisons were enrolled to compare the differences in BMI, WC, WHR, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C and TG levels, respectively, for the rs3856806 polymorphism (Tables S5 and S6). For the rs1801282 polymorphism, 83.32% of the subjects had CC genotype (58,438 subjects), and 16.94% of the subjects had CG or GG genotype (11,879 subjects). Regarding the rs3856806 polymorphism, 66.06% of the subjects had CC genotype (12,124 subjects), and 33.94% of the subjects had CT or TT genotype (6,229 subjects).

Associations of the PPARG rs1801282 Polymorphism With Obesity Indexes and Serum Lipid Levels

The associations between the rs1801282 polymorphism and obesity indexes are shown in TableĀ 1. The pooled analyses in the whole population showed that the G allele carriers had significantly higher levels of BMI (SMD = 0.08 kg/m2, 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.12 kg/m2, p < 0.001) and WC (SMD = 0.12Ā cm, 95% CI = 0.06 to 0.18Ā cm, p < 0.001) than the CC homozygotes. The G allele carriers also had marginally insignificantly higher levels of WHR (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.17, p = 0.08) than the CC homozygotes. The associations between the rs1801282 polymorphism and serum lipid levels are shown in TableĀ 2. The pooled analyses in the whole population showed that the G allele carriers had significantly higher levels of TC (SMD = 0.07 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.11 mmol/L, p < 0.01) than the CC homozygotes. There were no significant differences in LDL-C, HDL-C or TG levels between the subjects with different genotypes of the rs1801282 polymorphism (TableĀ 2).

TableĀ 1

Groups or subgroupsComparisons (Subjects)SMD (95% CI)PHeterogeneityPSMD
BMI
ā€ƒAll subjects143 (57,461)0.08 (0.04, 0.12)< 0.001< 0.001
ā€ƒEast Asians38 (14,512)0.12 (0.03, 0.20)0.010.01
ā€ƒSouth Asians11 (6,254)0.23 (0.02, 0.45)< 0.0010.03
ā€ƒWest Asians12 (2,171)0.15 (-0.07, 0.36)0.0010.21
ā€ƒEuropean Caucasians54 (19,913)0.01 (-0.04, 0.06)0.010.65
ā€ƒAmerican Caucasians5 (4,118)0.07 (-0.003, 0.15)0.530.06
ā€ƒSouth Americans8 (1,692)-0.02 (-0.20, 0.15)0.220.78
ā€ƒAfricans9 (2,370)0.35 (-0.06, 0.75)< 0.0010.09
ā€ƒCAD patients7 (1,395)0.40 (-0.06, 0.86)< 0.0010.09
ā€ƒT2DM patients27 (8,506)0.13 (0.02, 0.23)< 0.0010.02
ā€ƒOverweight/obesity patients19 (4,600)0.16 (0.01, 0.31)< 0.0010.04
ā€ƒMetS patients5 (648)0.09 (-0.23, 0.41)0.160.57
ā€ƒPCOS patients9 (1,212)-0.14 (-0.31, 0.03)0.350.10
ā€ƒGeneral population/control subjects/healthy subjects70 (37,286)0.05 (0.01, 0.09)< 0.0010.02
ā€ƒAdults131 (51,030)0.09 (0.05, 0.13)< 0.001< 0.001
ā€ƒChildren/adolescents12 (6,431)-0.02 (-0.09, 0.04)0.770.50
ā€ƒMales20 (7,376)0.08 (0.004, 0.16)0.100.04
ā€ƒFemales38 (11,576)0.03 (-0.04, 0.10)0.010.47
WC
ā€ƒAll subjects71 (31,963)0.12 (0.06, 0.18)< 0.001< 0.001
ā€ƒEast Asians14 (4,409)0.14 (0.02, 0.25)0.170.03
ā€ƒSouth Asians6 (1,891)0.14 (-0.18, 0.46)< 0.0010.39
ā€ƒWest Asians6 (812)-0.004 (-0.29, 0.28)0.0010.21
ā€ƒEuropean Caucasians28 (14,483)0.04 (-0.01, 0.09)0.360.09
ā€ƒSouth Americans6 (726)0.03 (-0.17, 0.23)0.490.77
ā€ƒAfricans6 (1,741)1.02 (0.09, 1.94)< 0.0010.03
ā€ƒT2DM patients7 (1,114)0.33 (0.14, 0.52)0.190.001
ā€ƒOverweight/obesity patients11 (3,649)0.13 (-0.02, 0.28)0.010.09
ā€ƒMetS patients5 (648)-0.01 (-0.25, 0.24)0.560.96
ā€ƒGeneral population/control subjects/healthy subjects40 (21,337)0.06 (0.01, 0.11)0.020.02
ā€ƒAdults63 (26,705)0.14 (0.07, 0.21)< 0.001< 0.001
ā€ƒChildren/adolescents8 (5,258)0.02 (-0.07, 0.11)0.280.63
ā€ƒMales11 (4,309)0.05 (-0.05, 0.15)0.220.30
ā€ƒFemales21 (5,685)0.24 (0.04, 0.44)< 0.0010.02
WHR
ā€ƒAll subjects51 (18,050)0.08 (-0.01, 0.17)< 0.0010.08
ā€ƒEast Asians15 (5,250)0.23 (0.09, 0.37)0.02< 0.01
ā€ƒSouth Asians5 (1,717)0.06 (-0.26, 0.38)< 0.010.72
ā€ƒEuropean Caucasians19 (6,490)-0.06 (-0.18, 0.07)< 0.0010.36
ā€ƒT2DM patients7 (2,424)0.25 (0.08, 0.43)0.06< 0.01
ā€ƒOverweight/obesity patients6 (2,533)0.12 (-0.10, 0.35)0.030.28
ā€ƒPCOS patients6 (715)0.35 (-0.41, 1.10)< 0.0010.37
ā€ƒGeneral population/control subjects/healthy subjects26 (10,992)-0.05 (-0.15, 0.05)< 0.0010.31
ā€ƒAdults46 (16,182)0.10 (0.001, 0.19)< 0.0010.05
ā€ƒChildren/adolescents5 (1,868)-0.02 (-0.13, 0.08)0.780.68
ā€ƒMales5 (1,348)0.03 (-0.10, 0.15)0.810.68
ā€ƒFemales20 (5,592)0.07 (-0.15, 0.29)< 0.0010.54

Meta-analysis between the rs1801282 polymorphism in PPARG and obesity indexes.

PPARG, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma gene; SMD, standardized mean difference; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; MetS, metabolic syndrome; PCOS, polycystic ovarian syndrome; WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio.

TableĀ 2

Groups or subgroupsComparisons (Subjects)SMD (95% CI)PHeterogeneityPSMD
TC
ā€ƒAll subjects141 (48,494)0.07 (0.02, 0.11)< 0.001< 0.01
ā€ƒEast Asians39 (13,645)0.11 (0.02, 0.20)< 0.0010.02
ā€ƒSouth Asians10 (7,328)0.07 (-0.01, 0.14)0.410.07
ā€ƒWest Asians11 (1,777)0.19 (0.02, 0.36)0.030.03
ā€ƒEuropean Caucasians48 (16,667)0.01 (-0.04, 0.06)0.040.67
ā€ƒSouth Americans10 (1,929)-0.06 (-0.25, 0.13)0.050.52
ā€ƒAfricans9 (1,442)0.68 (-0.03, 1.39)< 0.0010.06
ā€ƒCAD patients8 (1,658)0.48 (0.15, 0.82)< 0.0010.01
ā€ƒT2DM patients23 (7,657)0.11 (0.03, 0.20)0.070.01
ā€ƒOverweight/obesity patients22 (5,333)0.07 (-0.02, 0.16)0.190.11
ā€ƒMetS patients5 (648)0.26 (0.02, 0.51)0.540.04
ā€ƒPCOS patients9 (1,314)0.58 (-0.13, 1.28)< 0.0010.11
ā€ƒGeneral population/control subjects/healthy subjects61 (27,499)0.01 (-0.04, 0.06)< 0.0010.73
ā€ƒAdults124 (43,583)0.08 (0.03, 0.13)< 0.001< 0.01
ā€ƒChildren/adolescents14 (4,911)-0.03 (-0.11, 0.05)0.360.43
ā€ƒMales15 (5,218)0.01 (-0.06, 0.08)0.420.79
ā€ƒFemales33 (8,869)0.08 (-0.07, 0.23)< 0.0010.31
LDL-C
ā€ƒAll subjects117 (37,849)0.02 (-0.02, 0.07)< 0.0010.28
ā€ƒEast Asians28 (8,004)0.07 (-0.04, 0.17)< 0.010.21
ā€ƒSouth Asians7 (6,029)0.02 (-0.06, 0.09)0.830.65
ā€ƒWest Asians9 (1,465)0.14 (-0.02, 0.31)0.140.09
ā€ƒEuropean Caucasians45 (14,672)-0.03 (-0.08, 0.03)0.020.36
ā€ƒSouth Americans7 (1,102)-0.20 (-0.41, 0.02)0.150.07
ā€ƒAfricans8 (1,200)0.46 (-0.01, 0.94)< 0.0010.06
ā€ƒCAD patients7 (1,440)0.39 (-0.08, 0.87)< 0.0010.11
ā€ƒT2DM patients19 (4,406)0.01 (-0.10, 0.13)0.020.80
ā€ƒOverweight/obesity patients20 (4,831)0.05 (-0.03, 0.12)0.800.23
ā€ƒMetS patients5 (882)0.26 (0.02, 0.49)0.870.03
ā€ƒPCOS patients8 (1,130)0.33 (-0.15, 0.81)< 0.0010.18
ā€ƒGeneral population/control subjects/healthy subjects48 (21,623)0.004 (-0.04, 0.04)0.140.86
ā€ƒAdults100 (32,938)0.03 (-0.02, 0.08)< 0.0010.22
ā€ƒChildren/adolescents14 (4,911)-0.03 (-0.10, 0.04)0.690.40
ā€ƒMales15 (5,142)-0.04 (-0.16, 0.07)0.010.45
ā€ƒFemales30 (7,983)0.08 (-0.03, 0.19)< 0.0010.14
HDL-C
ā€ƒAll subjects144 (52,515)0.004 (-0.04, 0.04)< 0.0010.85
ā€ƒEast Asians34 (9,600)-0.02 (-0.13, 0.08)< 0.0010.64
ā€ƒSouth Asians11 (7,579)-0.09 (-0.25, 0.08)< 0.0010.31
ā€ƒWest Asians11 (1,777)-0.09 (-0.28, 0.11)< 0.010.38
ā€ƒEuropean Caucasians57 (22,402)0.03 (-0.03, 0.08)< 0.0010.36
ā€ƒAmerican Caucasians5 (3,635)0.04 (-0.04, 0.12)0.550.38
ā€ƒSouth Americans10 (1,929)0.06 (-0.06, 0.19)0.730.33
ā€ƒAfricans7 (2,196)0.09 (-0.08, 0.26)0.370.31
ā€ƒCAD patients7 (1,440)-0.10 (-0.42, 0.23)< 0.0010.56
ā€ƒT2DM patients21 (5,403)0.08 (-0.02, 0.17)0.080.11
ā€ƒOverweight/obesity patients24 (6,204)-0.11 (-0.24, 0.02)< 0.0010.11
ā€ƒMetS patients5 (648)0.04 (-0.23, 0.30)0.340.79
ā€ƒPCOS patients8 (1,214)0.44 (-0.03, 0.90)< 0.0010.07
ā€ƒGeneral population/control subjects/healthy subjects61 (28,523)0.01 (-0.02, 0.05)0.400.40
ā€ƒAdults128 (48,016)0.01 (-0.04, 0.05)< 0.0010.74
ā€ƒChildren/adolescents13 (4,499)-0.001 (-0.08, 0.08)0.410.99
ā€ƒMales18 (5,765)-0.04 (-0.11, 0.03)0.540.28
ā€ƒFemales34 (9,411)0.09 (-0.01, 0.18)< 0.0010.07
TG
ā€ƒAll subjects146 (53,204)0.04 (-0.02, 0.11)< 0.0010.18
ā€ƒEast Asians36 (11,861)0.11 (0.01, 0.21)< 0.0010.03
ā€ƒSouth Asians11 (7,598)0.004 (-0.16, 0.16)< 0.0010.96
ā€ƒWest Asians11 (1,777)0.33 (0.09, 0.57)< 0.0010.01
ā€ƒEuropean Caucasians52 (20,331)-0.04 (-0.16, 0.09)< 0.0010.58
ā€ƒAmerican Caucasians5 (3,635)-0.02 (-0.09, 0.07)0.940.72
ā€ƒSouth Americans9 (1,208)-0.10 (-0.30, 0.11)0.100.37
ā€ƒAfricans12 (3,141)0.14 (-0.13, 0.40)< 0.0010.31
ā€ƒCAD patients9 (1,897)0.09 (-0.07, 0.25)0.170.25
ā€ƒT2DM patients22 (6,261)0.13 (-0.39, 0.12)< 0.0010.30
ā€ƒOverweight/obesity patients23 (6,031)0.05 (-0.08, 0.17)< 0.0010.47
ā€ƒPCOS patients8 (1,130)0.32 (-0.15, 0.78)< 0.0010.18
ā€ƒGeneral population/control subjects/healthy subjects64 (28,505)0.07 (-0.02, 0.16)< 0.0010.14
ā€ƒAdults129 (48,449)0.05 (-0.02, 0.12)< 0.0010.15
ā€ƒChildren/adolescents13 (4,499)-0.01 (-0.10, 0.07)0.320.79
ā€ƒMales17 (5,910)0.03 (-0.05, 0.10)0.330.50
ā€ƒFemales32 (7,502)0.07 (-0.05, 0.18)< 0.0010.29

Meta-analysis between the rs1801282 polymorphism in PPARG and serum lipid levels.

PPARG, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma gene; SMD, standardized mean difference; CI, confidence interval; TC, total cholesterol; CAD, coronary artery disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; MetS, metabolic syndrome; PCOS, polycystic ovarian syndrome; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.

Subgroup analyses were conducted according to ethnicities, health conditions, ages and genders of the subjects. In East Asians, the G allele carriers had higher levels of BMI (SMD = 0.12 kg/m2, 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.20 kg/m2, p = 0.01), WC (SMD = 0.14Ā cm, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.25Ā cm, p = 0.03), WHR (SMD = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.37, p < 0.01), TC (SMD = 0.11 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.20 mmol/L, p = 0.02) and TG (SMD = 0.11 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.21 mmol/L, p = 0.03) than the CC homozygotes. In West Asians, the G allele carriers had higher levels of TC (SMD = 0.19 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.36 mmol/L, p = 0.03) and TG (SMD = 0.33 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.57 mmol/L, p = 0.01) than the CC homozygotes. The G allele carriers had higher levels of BMI (SMD = 0.23 kg/m2, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.45 kg/m2, p = 0.03) and WC (SMD = 1.02Ā cm, 95% CI = 0.09 to 1.94Ā cm, p < 0.03) than non-carriers in South Asians and Africans, respectively. Notably, no significant associations between the rs1801282 polymorphism and obesity indexes or serum lipid levels were detected in European Caucasians and American Caucasians. In patients with T2DM, the G allele carriers had higher levels of BMI (SMD = 0.13 kg/m2, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.23 kg/m2, p = 0.02), WC (SMD = 0.33Ā cm, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.52Ā cm, p = 0.001), WHR (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.43, p < 0.01) and TC (SMD = 0.11 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.20 mmol/L, p = 0.01) than the CC homozygotes. In patients with MetS, the G allele carriers had higher levels of TC (SMD = 0.26 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.51 mmol/L, p = 0.04) and LDL-C (SMD = 0.26 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.49 mmol/L, p = 0.03) than the CC homozygotes. The G allele carriers had higher levels of BMI (SMD = 0.16 kg/m2, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.31 kg/m2, p = 0.04) and TC (SMD = 0.48 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.82 mmol/L, p = 0.01) than non-carriers in overweight/obesity patients and CAD patients, respectively. In general population/control subjects/healthy subjects, the G allele carriers had higher levels of BMI (SMD = 0.05 kg/m2, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.09 kg/m2, p = 0.02) and WC (SMD = 0.06Ā cm, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.11Ā cm, p = 0.02) than the CC homozygotes.

Significant interactions between the rs1801282 polymorphism and age as well as gender on obesity indexes or serum lipid levels have been detected. The G allele carriers had higher levels of BMI (SMD = 0.09 kg/m2, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.13 kg/m2, p < 0.001), WC (SMD = 0.14Ā cm, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.21Ā cm, p < 0.001), WHR (SMD = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.001 to 0.19, p = 0.05) and TC (SMD = 0.08 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.13 mmol/L, p < 0.01) than the CC homozygotes in adults, but not in children and adolescents. Higher levels of BMI (SMD = 0.08 kg/m2, 95% CI = 0.004 to 0.16 kg/m2, p = 0.04) in the G allele carriers than in the CC homozygotes were observed only in males, and higher levels of WC (SMD = 0.24Ā cm, 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.44Ā cm, p = 0.02) in the G allele carriers than in the CC homozygotes were present only in females.

Associations of the PPARG rs3856806 Polymorphism With Obesity Indexes and Serum Lipid Levels

As shown in TableĀ 3, no significant associations between the rs3856806 polymorphism and obesity indexes were found in the pooled analyses in the whole population or in the subgroups according to ethnicities, health conditions or genders of the subjects. The associations between the rs3856806 polymorphism and serum lipid levels are shown in TableĀ 4. The pooled analyses in the whole population showed that the T allele carriers had lower levels of LDL-C (SMD = -0.09 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.15 to -0.03 mmol/L, p < 0.01) and higher levels of HDL-C (SMD = 0.06 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.10 mmol/L, p < 0.01) than the CC homozygotes. There were no significant differences in TC or TG levels between the subjects with different genotypes of the rs3856806 polymorphism (TableĀ 4). Subgroup analyses were conducted according to ethnicities, health conditions and genders of the subjects. Reduced levels of TC (SMD = -0.22 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.35 to -0.08 mmol/L, pĀ < 0.01), LDL-C (SMD = -0.26 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.49 to -0.03 mmol/L, p = 0.03) and TG (SMD = -0.14 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.26 to -0.02 mmol/L, p = 0.02) in the T allele carriers than in the CC homozygotes were detected in Australian Caucasians, but not in European Caucasians, American Caucasians or other ethnicities. The T allele carriers had higher levels of HDL-C (SMD = 0.15 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.27 mmol/L, p = 0.01) than the CC homozygotes in patients with CAD, but not in patients with other clinical symptoms or in general population/control subjects/healthy subjects.

TableĀ 3

Groups or subgroupsComparisons (Subjects)SMD (95% CI)PHeterogeneityPSMD
BMI
ā€ƒAll subjects45 (16,600)-0.01 (-0.07, 0.05)< 0.0010.78
ā€ƒEast Asians20 (5,707)0.04 (-0.08, 0.15)< 0.0010.56
ā€ƒSouth Asians7 (5,333)-0.05 (-0.17, 0.06)0.030.35
ā€ƒWest Asians3 (307)-0.16 (-0.39, 0.07)0.360.18
ā€ƒEuropean Caucasians7 (2,772)0.05 (-0.11, 0.21)0.010.54
ā€ƒAustralian Caucasians3 (1,294)-0.03 (-0.14, 0.09)0.570.68
ā€ƒCAD patients6 (1,863)-0.04 (-0.24, 0.17)< 0.010.73
ā€ƒT2DM patients7 (1,375)-0.08 (-0.24, 0.09)0.100.36
ā€ƒOverweight/obesity patients5 (556)-0.11 (-0.85, 0.63)< 0.0010.77
ā€ƒGeneral population/control subjects/healthy subjects16 (9,450)0.03 (-0.06, 0.11)0.0010.54
ā€ƒMales6 (1,381)0.39 (-0.04, 0.83)< 0.0010.08
ā€ƒFemales5 (1,087)-0.16 (-0.45, 0.12)< 0.0010.27
WC
ā€ƒAll subjects16 (5,787)0.003 (-0.06, 0.07)0.320.93
ā€ƒEast Asians4 (1,644)0.01 (-0.14, 0.17)0.090.87
ā€ƒSouth Asians3 (1,021)-0.11 (-0.37, 0.14)0.150.39
ā€ƒAustralian Caucasians3 (1,294)0.04 (-0.08, 0.16)0.380.53
ā€ƒEuropean Caucasians3 (837)0.01 (-0.20, 0.22)0.260.92
ā€ƒGeneral population/control subjects/healthy subjects8 (3,352)-0.01 (-0.09, 0.07)0.790.77
ā€ƒMales3 (1,003)0.05 (-0.18, 0.28)0.090.68
ā€ƒFemales5 (1,333)0.02 (-0.12, 0.17)0.240.77
WHR
ā€ƒAll subjects14 (5,198)-0.02 (-0.11, 0.06)0.090.58
ā€ƒEast Asians3 (984)0.00 (-0.13, 0.13)1.001.00
ā€ƒAustralian Caucasians3 (1,294)-0.11 (-0.37, 0.16)0.010.42
ā€ƒEuropean Caucasians3 (1,090)-0.03 (-0.13, 0.18)0.310.73
ā€ƒGeneral population/control subjects/healthy subjects8 (3,485)-0.02 (-0.12, 0.08)0.170.72

Meta-analysis between the rs3856806 polymorphism in PPARG and obesity indexes.

PPARG, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma gene; SMD, standardized mean difference; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio.

TableĀ 4

Groups or subgroupsComparisons (Subjects)SMD (95% CI)PHeterogeneityPSMD
TC
ā€ƒAll subjects46 (16,716)-0.04 (-0.09, 0.02)< 0.0010.18
ā€ƒEast Asians24 (6,999)-0.03 (-0.10, 0.05)< 0.010.52
ā€ƒSouth Asians6 (5,059)0.03 (-0.03, 0.09)0.440.34
ā€ƒWest Asians4 (590)-0.03 (-0.32, 0.27)0.040.87
ā€ƒAustralian Caucasians3 (1,294)-0.22 (-0.35, -0.08)0.30< 0.01
ā€ƒEuropean Caucasians4 (1,587)0.03 (-0.14, 0.19)0.160.76
ā€ƒCAD patients8 (2,587)-0.01 (-0.13, 0.12)0.050.90
ā€ƒT2DM patients7 (1,375)-0.02 (-0.19, 0.16)0.070.85
ā€ƒOverweight/obesity patients5 (556)0.06 (-0.19, 0.30)0.280.66
ā€ƒGeneral population/control subjects/healthy subjects15 (9,143)0.02 (-0.06, 0.09)0.010.60
ā€ƒMales3 (568)-0.001 (-0.28, 0.27)0.951.00
ā€ƒFemales5 (1,018)-0.10 (-0.23, 0.03)< 0.0010.14
LDL-C
ā€ƒAll subjects41 (14,279)-0.09 (-0.15, -0.03)< 0.001< 0.01
ā€ƒEast Asians22 (6,067)-0.08 (-0.16, 0.01)< 0.010.08
ā€ƒSouth Asians5 (4,373)0.01 (-0.05, 0.08)0.960.67
ā€ƒWest Asians4 (590)-0.05 (-0.35, 0.24)0.040.72
ā€ƒAustralian Caucasians3 (1,294)-0.26 (-0.49, -0.03)0.040.03
ā€ƒCAD patients8 (2,182)0.01 (-0.12, 0.13)0.060.93
ā€ƒT2DM patients6 (1,235)-0.06 (-0.23, 0.11)0.130.51
ā€ƒOverweight/obesity patients4 (440)0.03 (-0.23, 0.28)0.570.83
ā€ƒGeneral population/control subjects/healthy subjects12 (6,962)-0.09 (-0.18, 0.01)0.020.04
ā€ƒMales3 (568)-0.02 (-0.64, 0.60)0.020.95
ā€ƒFemales5 (1,018)-0.11 (-0.24, 0.02)0.960.10
HDL-C
ā€ƒAll subjects49 (17,161)0.06 (0.02, 0.10)0.10< 0.01
ā€ƒEast Asians25 (6,806)0.06 (-0.02, 0.13)0.020.12
ā€ƒSouth Asians7 (4,911)0.01 (-0.04, 0.07)0.520.62
ā€ƒWest Asians4 (590)0.02 (-0.18, 0.21)0.280.86
ā€ƒEuropean Caucasians5 (1,953)0.06 (-0.05, 0.17)0.670.28
ā€ƒAustralian Caucasians3 (1,294)0.11 (-0.01, 0.23)0.910.08
ā€ƒCAD patients8 (2,182)0.15 (0.04, 0.27)0.100.01
ā€ƒT2DM patients7 (1,375)0.12 (-0.04, 0.29)0.090.15
ā€ƒOverweight/obesity patients4 (440)-0.12 (-0.38, 0.13)0.860.35
ā€ƒGeneral population/control subjects/healthy subjects17 (9,105)0.07 (0.02, 0.12)0.33< 0.01
ā€ƒMales5 (1,087)-0.05 (-0.21, 0.11)0.300.56
ā€ƒFemales7 (1,664)-0.03 (-0.13, 0.08)0.900.65
TG
ā€ƒAll subjects50 (17,357)-0.06 (-0.12, 0.01)< 0.0010.10
ā€ƒEast Asians25 (6,806)-0.06 (-0.18, 0.06)< 0.0010.34
ā€ƒSouth Asians7 (5,327)-0.02 (-0.08, 0.04)0.760.49
ā€ƒWest Asians4 (590)0.09 (-0.23, 0.41)0.030.59
ā€ƒAustralian Caucasians3 (1,294)-0.14 (-0.26, -0.02)0.820.02
ā€ƒEuropean Caucasians6 (2,153)0.02 (-0.08, 0.13)0.670.68
ā€ƒCAD patients8 (2,587)-0.15 (-0.34, 0.04)< 0.0010.12
ā€ƒT2DM patients7 (1,375)-0.14 (-0.52, 0.24)< 0.0010.48
ā€ƒOverweight/obesity patients5 (556)-0.17 (-0.42, 0.08)0.280.19
ā€ƒGeneral population/control subjects/healthy subjects17 (9,185)0.06 (-0.03, 0.15)< 0.0010.21
ā€ƒMales5 (1,087)-0.01 (-0.14, 0.13)0.480.92
ā€ƒFemales7 (1,664)-0.03 (-0.15, 0.10)0.220.69

Meta-analysis between the rs3856806 polymorphism in PPARG and serum lipid levels.

PPARG, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma gene; SMD, standardized mean difference; CI, confidence interval; TC, total cholesterol; CAD, coronary artery disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

Heterogeneity Analysis

Galbraith plots were employed to analyze the heterogeneity in the present meta-analysis. For the rs1801282 polymorphism, there was significant heterogeneity in the pooled analyses in the whole population for all three obesity indexes (TableĀ 1) and four lipid variables (TableĀ 2). Twelve comparisons, 7 comparisons, 6 comparisons, 6 comparisons, 6 comparisons, 11 comparisons and 18 comparisons were identified as the main contributors to the heterogeneity for the analyses of BMI, WC, WHR, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C and TG, respectively (Table S7). The heterogeneity was significantly decreased or removed after exclusion of the outlier comparisons, while the results of the pooled analyses in the whole population did not change significantly (BMI: SMD = 0.04 kg/m2, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.07 kg/m2, PSMD < 0.01, PHeterogeneity = 0.30; WC: SMD = 0.06Ā cm, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.09Ā cm, PSMD < 0.01, PHeterogeneity = 0.22; WHR: SMD = 0.03 kg/m2, 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.08 kg/m2, PSMD = 0.20, PHeterogeneity = 0.15; TC: SMD = 0.02 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.04 mmol/L, PSMD = 0.02, PHeterogeneity = 0.44; LDL-C: SMD = 0.01 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.03 mmol/L, PSMD = 0.66, PHeterogeneity = 0.64; HDL-C: SMD = 0.01 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.04 mmol/L, PSMD = 0.36, PHeterogeneity = 0.84; TG: SMD = -0.02 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.05 to 0.003 mmol/L, PSMD = 0.09, PHeterogeneity = 0.55).

Regarding the rs3856806 polymorphism, there was significant heterogeneity in the pooled analyses in the whole population for BMI, TC, LDL-C and TG (TablesĀ 3 and 4). Five comparisons, 6 comparisons, 4 comparisons and 7 comparisons were identified as the main contributors to the heterogeneity in the association analyses in the whole population between the rs3856806 polymorphism and BMI, TC, LDL-C and TG, respectively (Table S8). The heterogeneity was significantly decreased or removed after exclusion of the outlier studies, and the pooled results in the whole population did not change significantly for BMI (SMD = -0.001 kg/m2, 95% CI = -0.04 to 0.04 kg/m2, PSMD = 0.96, PHeterogeneity = 0.18), TC (SMD = -0.02 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.06 to 0.02 mmol/L, PSMD = 0.26, PHeterogeneity = 0.30), and LDL-C (SMD = -0.05 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.09 to -0.01 mmol/L, PSMD < 0.01, PHeterogeneity = 0.46). However, the pooled results for TG became significant after exclusion of the outlier studies (SMD = -0.04 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.08 to -0.003 mmol/L, PSMD = 0.04, PHeterogeneity = 0.23).

Publication Bias

Begg’s test was conducted to identify the publication bias in the present meta-analysis. No publication bias was found in the association analyses between the rs1801282 polymorphism and BMI (Z = 1.65, p = 0.10) (Figure S1), WHR (Z = 0.95, p = 0.34) (Figure S2), LDL-C (Z = 1.61, p = 0.11) (Figure S3), HDL-C, (ZĀ = 1.60, p = 0.11) (Figure S4) or TG (Z = 1.06, p = 0.29) (Figure S5). Publication bias was observed in the association analyses between the rs1801282 polymorphism and WC (Z = 2.02, p = 0.04) (Figure S6) as well as TC (Z = 2.16, p = 0.03) (Figure S7). The trim-and-fill method was employed to adjust the publication bias, and the pooled results of both variables did not change after adjustment.

Publication bias was also evaluated for the association analyses between the rs3856806 polymorphism and obesity indexes as well as serum lipid variables, and no publication bias was detected for BMI (Z = 1.16, p = 0.24) (Figure S8), WC (Z = 0.23, p = 0.82) (Figure S9), WHR (Z = 1.31, p = 0.19) (Figure S10), TC (Z = 0.40, p = 0.69) (Figure S11), LDL-C (Z = 0.01, p = 0.99) (Figure S12), HDL-C (Z = 0.03, p = 0.98) (Figure S13) and TG (Z = 1.20, p = 0.23) (Figure S14).

Discussion

PPARγ plays an essential role in the regulation of lipid metabolism. Being activated by endogenous and exogenous lipid ligands, PPARγ exerts its function as a transcription factor and mainly up-regulates the transcription of enzymes or transporters that play key roles in lipid metabolic pathways such as reverse cholesterol transport (143, 144), cholesterol transformation (143, 144), lipogenesis (145, 146), and fatty acid oxidation (147, 148). Therefore, variations in PPARG may lead to abnormal expression of this gene and/or dysfunction of PPARγ, resulting in aberrant expressions of PPARγ-targeted genes. The relationships between the rs1801282 and rs3856806 polymorphisms and CAD have been clarified by several previous meta-analyses (149–151). Wu etĀ al. (149) performed a meta-analysis enrolled 22 studies and 23,375 subjects, and found that the GG genotype of the rs1801282 polymorphism conferred a higher risk of CAD than the CC genotype (OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.68, p = 0.04). Qian etĀ al. (150) did a meta-analysis enrolled 9 studies and 3,878 subjects, and the results suggested that the T allele carriers of the rs3856806 polymorphism had a lower CAD risk than the CC homozygotes (OR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.59 to 0.82, p < 0.001). Gonzlez-Castro etĀ al. (151) expanded the sample size to 21 studies and 15,980 subjects, and confirmed Qian’s finding that the T allele of the rs3856806 polymorphism was a protective allele against CAD (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.52, p < 0.001).

The significant associations between the rs1801282 and rs3856806 polymorphisms and CAD prompted us to conduct the present meta-analysis to determine the relationships between these polymorphisms and obesity indexes as well as serum lipid levels since obesity and dyslipidemia are well-known risk factors for CAD (152–155). Indeed, this meta-analysis demonstrated that the G allele carriers of the rs1801282 polymorphism had significantly higher levels of BMI, WC and TC than the CC homozygotes; the T allele carriers of the rs3856806 polymorphism displayed lower levels of LDL-C, but higher levels of HDL-C than the CC homozygotes. These findings are in line with the previous meta-analyses which concluded that the G allele of the rs1801282 polymorphism was associated with an increased risk, while the T allele of the rs3856806 polymorphism was correlated with a reduced risk of CAD (149–151). To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis being done to date in the academic field to investigate the relationships of the rs1801282 and rs3856806 polymorphisms in PPARγ gene with obesity indexes, although there was a meta-analysis investigating the associations of the two polymorphisms with circulating lipid levels by Li and colleagues (156) in 2015. However, Li’s meta-analysis (156) mistakenly treated c.161C>T and c.1431C>T as two polymorphic loci. In fact, they are the same polymorphic locus with different names. c.161C>T was named according to the position of this variant in exon 6 of PPARγ gene since it is located at 161 bp downstream of the first nucleotide of exon 6 of PPARG (FigureĀ 3A), and c.1431C>T was defined based on the position of this variant in PPARγ2 mRNA, as it is located at 1,431 bp downstream of the start genetic codon (FigureĀ 3B). In addition, the present meta-analysis enrolled more studies (138 articles vs. 74 articles) and had larger sample size (78,652 vs.54,953), and thereby had a higher statistical power and more reliable results than Li’s meta-analysis (156).

FigureĀ 3

In terms of the mechanisms underlying the associations between the rs1801282 and rs3856806 polymorphisms and obesity indexes as well as serum lipid levels, the first idea that comes to our mind is that the two polymorphisms lead to abnormal expression of PPARG and/or dysfunction of PPARγ, resulting in aberrant expressions of PPARγ-targeted genes. Indeed, Pihlajamäki et al. (157) examined the PPARG gene expression pattern of different genotypes of the rs1801282 polymorphism in human adipose tissues, and observed that the GG genotype was associated with a significantly higher mRNA expression level compared to the CC genotype. Other polymorphic loci in PPARγ gene have also been reported to modulate the gene expression of PPARG. The rs10865710 polymorphism (c.-681C>G) is located in the upstream promoter region of PPARγ3 gene and formed by a transversion from C to G. Lu et al. (158) observed that G allele of the rs10865710 polymorphism significantly reduced the DNA-binding activity of transcription factor CREB2 to PPARγ3 promoter. The rs948820149 polymorphism (c.-807A>C) is located in PPARγ2 promoter and C allele of this polymorphism was found to significantly down-regulate PPARγ2 expression by modulating the DNA-binding activity of transcription factor GRβ to PPARγ2 promoter (159). Another two promoter polymorphisms c.-1633C>T and c.-1572G>A in PPARG were also verified to regulate the expression efficiency of PPARG in Erhualian pigs (160). So far, there is no direct evidence that the PPARG polymorphisms affect the function of PPARγ.

Significant heterogeneity was detected in the association analyses between the rs1801282 polymorphism and obesity indexes as well as serum lipid levels. The outlier studies were identified by using Galbraith plots, and no significant changes in SMD values as well as their 95% CIs were found after excluding the outlier studies, which indicates that the associations between the rs1801282 polymorphism and the obesity indexes as well as serum lipid levels are robust. There are some limitations to the current study. First, this meta-analysis only enrolled the studies published in English and Chinese as it was difficult to get the full articles published in other languages. Second, the subgroup analyses were only conducted for ethnicities, health conditions, genders and ages of the subjects due to limitation on the amount of accessible data.

Conclusions

The G allele carriers of the PPARG rs1801282 polymorphism had higher levels of BMI, WC and TC than the CC homozygotes; the T allele carriers of the PPARG rs3856806 polymorphism had lower levels of LDL-C and higher levels of HDL-C than the CC homozygotes; the effects of the PPARG rs1801282 and rs3856806 polymorphisms on obesity indexes and/or serum lipid levels are modulated by ethnicities, health conditions, genders and ages of the subjects.

Funding

This project was supported by the Medical Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Provincial Health Commission [21PJ124], and the Scientific Research Project of Clinical Medical College and Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University [Y2021010].

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

YS, SL, and CH conceived of the systematic review and meta-analysis, participated in the design, and drafted the manuscript. HN, QP, RW, and ZZ carried out the literature searches and collected the data. YS and SL performed the statistical analyses. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.919087/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    FrancqueSSzaboGAbdelmalekMFByrneCDCusiKDufourJFet al. Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: The Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol (2021) 18(1):24–39. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-00366-5

  • 2

    SongYYLiSJHeC. Pparγ Gene Polymorphisms, Metabolic Disorders, and Coronary Artery Disease. Front Cardiovasc Med (2022) 9:808929. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.808929

  • 3

    FujimoriKUnoSKurodaKMatsumotoCMaeharaT. Leukotriene C4 Synthase is a Novel Pparγ Target Gene, and Leukotriene C4 and D4 Activate Adipogenesis Through Cysteinyl LT1 Receptors in Adipocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res (2021) 1869(3):119203. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.119203

  • 4

    LaiFWangJTangHBianXLuKHeGet al. Adipogenic Differentiation was Inhibited by Downregulation of Pparγ Signaling Pathway in Aging Tendon Stem/Progenitor Cells. J Orthop Surg Res (2021) 16(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02720-y

  • 5

    LiuJZhaoHYangLWangXYangLXingYet al. The Role of CD36-Fabp4-Pparγ in Skeletal Muscle Involves Insulin Resistance in Intrauterine Growth Retardation Mice With Catch-Up Growth. BMC Endocr Disord (2022) 22(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00921-4

  • 6

    TaiESCorellaDDeurenberg-YapMAdiconisXChewSKTanCEet al. Differential Effects of the C1431T and Pro12Ala PPARgamma Gene Variants on Plasma Lipids and Diabetes Risk in an Asian Population. J Lipid Res (2004) 45(4):674–85. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M300363-JLR200

  • 7

    DanawatiCWNagataMMoriyamaHHaraKYasudaHNakayamaMet al. A Possible Association of Pro12Ala Polymorphism in Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma2 Gene With Obesity in Native Javanese in Indonesia. Diabetes Metab Res Rev (2005) 21(5):465–9. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.543

  • 8

    MatteviVSZembrzuskiVMHutzMH. Effects of a PPARG Gene Variant on Obesity Characteristics in Brazil. Braz J Med Biol Res (2007) 40(7):927–32. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2006005000114

  • 9

    MoriniETassiVCapponiDLudovicoODallapiccolaBTrischittaVet al. Interaction Between PPARgamma2 Variants and Gender on the Modulation of Body Weight. Obes (Silver Spring) (2008) 16(6):1467–70. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.225

  • 10

    YaffeKKanayaAMLindquistKHsuehWCCummingsSRBeamerBet al. Health ABC Study. PPAR-Gamma Pro12Ala Genotype and Risk of Cognitive Decline in Elders. Neurobiol Aging (2008) 29(1):78–83. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.09.010

  • 11

    Ben AliSBen YahiaFSediriYKallelAFtouhiBFekiMet al. Gender-Specific Effect of Pro12Ala Polymorphism in Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma-2 Gene on Obesity Risk and Leptin Levels in a Tunisian Population. Clin Biochem (2009) 42(16-17):1642–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.08.019

  • 12

    PassaroADalla NoraEMarcelloCDi VeceFMorieriMLSanzJMet al. Pparγ Pro12Ala and ACE ID Polymorphisms Are Associated With BMI and Fat Distribution, But Not Metabolic Syndrome. Cardiovasc Diabetol (2011) 10:112. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-10-112

  • 13

    HsiaoTJLinE. The Pro12Ala Polymorphism in the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma (PPARG) Gene in Relation to Obesity and Metabolic Phenotypes in a Taiwanese Population. Endocrine (2015) 48(3):786–93. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0407-7

  • 14

    KimKSChoiSMShinSUYangHSYoonY. Effects of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma 2 Pro12Ala Polymorphism on Body Fat Distribution in Female Korean Subjects. Metabolism (2004) 53(12):1538–43. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2004.06.019

  • 15

    RamĆ­rez-SalazarMPĆ©rez-LuqueEFajardo-AraujoMGarzaSMMalacaraJM. Effect of the Pro12Ala Polymorphism of the PPAR Gamma 2 Gene on Response to Pioglitazone Treatment in Menopausal Women. Menopause (2008) 15(6):1151–6. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31816d5b2d

  • 16

    FanLWuSYanY. Association of PPAR Gamma Pro12Ala Polymorphism With Coronary Heart Disease. Clin Med China (2010) 26(10):1043–6. doi: 10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-6315.2010.10.013

  • 17

    BhagatNAgrawalMLuthraKVikramNKMisraAGuptaR. Evaluation of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of Pro12Ala in Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ and Gly308Ala in Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Genes in Obese Asian Indians: A Population-Based Study. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes (2010) 3:349–56. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S13514

  • 18

    ZakiMHassanNEl-BassyouniHTKamalSBashaWAzmyOet al. Association of the Pro12Ala Polymorphism With the Metabolic Parameters in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Open Access Maced J Med Sci (2017) 5(3):275–80. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2017.088

  • 19

    FranksPWJablonskiKADelahantyLHansonRLKahnSEAltshulerDet al. The Pro12Ala Variant at the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Gene and Change in Obesity-Related Traits in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetologia (2007) 50(12):2451–60. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0826-6

  • 20

    FranckNLƤnneTAstrandOEngvallJLindstrƶmTOstgrenCJet al. Cardiovascular Risk Factors Related to the Pparγ Pro12Ala Polymorphism in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes are Gender Dependent. Blood Press (2012) 21(2):122–7. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2011.623349

  • 21

    LiLChengLXNsengaRHeMAWuTC. Association Between Pro12Ala Polymorphism of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma 2 and Myocardial Infarction in the Chinese Han Population. Clin Cardiol (2006) 29(7):300–4. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960290706

  • 22

    EreqatSNasereddinAAzmiKAbdeenZAminR. Impact of the Pro12Ala Polymorphism of the PPAR-Gamma 2 Gene on Metabolic and Clinical Characteristics in the Palestinian Type 2 Diabetic Patients. PPAR Res (2009) 2009:874126. doi: 10.1155/2009/874126

  • 23

    FernĆ”ndezECarrizoEConnellLBaptistaT. Pro12Ala Polymorphism of the PPAR-γ2 Gene, Metabolic Syndrome and Response to Metformin in Clozapine-Treated Patients. Schizophr Res (2012) 137(1-3):262–3. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.02.005

  • 24

    ShenDHaD. Relationship Between Pro12ala Variant of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ2 Gene and Coronary Heart Disease, or Lipids Metabolic Disorders. Med J Wuhan University (2005) 26(2):253–6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8852.2005.02.034

  • 25

    SaeidiSChamaie-NejadFEbrahimiANajafiFRahimiZVaisi-RayganiAet al. Pparγ Pro12Ala and C161T Polymorphisms in Patients With Acne Vulgaris: Contribution to Lipid and Lipoprotein Profile. Adv Med Sci (2018) 63(1):147–51. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2017.09.003

  • 26

    JiangJLanJDuX. Association of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma 2 Variants With Coronary Heart Disease. Zhejiang Med (2016) 38(7):485–8. doi: CNKI:SUN:ZJYE.0.2016-07-013

  • 27

    HasanNSKamelSAHamedMAwadallahERahmanAHAMusaNIet al. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ Polymorphism (Rs1801282) Is Associated With Obesity in Egyptian Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Genet Eng Biotechnol (2017) 15(2):409–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.08.002

  • 28

    HungYPLeeNYLinSHChangHCWuCJChangCMet al. Effects of Pparγ and RBP4 Gene Variants on Metabolic Syndrome in HIV-Infected Patients With Anti-Retroviral Therapy. PLoS One (2012) 7(11):e49102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049102

  • 29

    Vales-VillamarínCde DiosOPérez-NadadorIGavela-PérezTSoriano-GuillénLGarcésC. Pparγ2 Pro12Ala Polymorphism Is Associated in Children With Traits Related to Susceptibility to Type 2 Diabetes. Front Pharmacol (2021) 12:763853. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.763853

  • 30

    BarbieriMRizzoMRPapaMAcamporaRDe AngelisLOlivieriFet al. Role of Interaction Between Variants in the PPARG and Interleukin-6 Genes on Obesity Related Metabolic Risk Factors. Exp Gerontol (2005) 40(7):599–604. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2005.05.004

  • 31

    HamadaTKotaniKTsuzakiKSanoYMurataTTabataMet al. Association of Pro12Ala Polymorphism in the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma2 Gene With Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein in the General Population. Metabolism (2007) 56(10):1345–9. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2007.05.017

  • 32

    YoussefSMMohamedNAfefSKhaldounBHFadouaNFadhelNMet al. A Pro 12 Ala Substitution in the Pparγ2 Polymorphism may Decrease the Number of Diseased Vessels and the Severity of Angiographic Coronary Artery. Coron Artery Dis (2013) 24(5):347–51. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328361a95e

  • 33

    BhattSPNigamPMisraAGuleriaRLuthraKPandeyRMet al. Association of Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor-γ Gene With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Asian Indians Residing in North India. Gene (2013) 512(1):143–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.09.067

  • 34

    LiuFMeiXZhangYQiHWangJWangYet al. Association of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptorγ Gene Pro12Ala and C161T Polymorphisms With Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients. Mol Biol Rep (2014) 41(11):7555–65. doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3645-0

  • 35

    GuSJGuoZRZhouZYHuXSWuMZhangN. Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor γ Polymorphisms as Risk Factors for Dyslipidemia. Mol Med Rep (2014) 10(5):2759–63. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2553

  • 36

    BecerEƇırakoğluA. Effect of the Pro12Ala Polymorphism of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ2 Gene on Lipid Profile and Adipokines Levels in Obese Subjects. Balkan J Med Genet (2017) 20(1):71–80. doi: 10.1515/bjmg-2017-0007

  • 37

    RahimiZChamaie-NejadFSaeidiSRahimiZEbrahimiAShakibaEet al. The Association of Pparγ Pro12Ala and C161T Polymorphisms With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Their Influence on Lipid and Lipoprotein Profiles. Int J Fertil Steril. (2018) 12(2):147–51. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2018.5270

  • 38

    SwarbrickMMChapmanCMMcQuillanBMHungJThompsonPLBeilbyJP. A Pro12Ala Polymorphism in the Human Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma 2 Is Associated With Combined Hyperlipidaemia in Obesity. Eur J Endocrinol (2001) 144(3):277–82. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1440277

  • 39

    DedoussisGVTheodorakiEVManiosYYiannakourisNPanagiotakosDPapoutsakisCet al. The Pro12Ala Polymorphism in PPARgamma2 Gene Affects Lipid Parameters in Greek Primary School Children: A Case of Gene-to-Gender Interaction. Am J Med Sci (2007) 333(1):10–5. doi: 10.1097/00000441-200701000-00002

  • 40

    Yilmaz-AydoganHKurnazOKurtOAkadam-TekerBKucukhuseyinOTekeliAet al. Effects of the PPARG P12A and C161T Gene Variants on Serum Lipids in Coronary Heart Disease Patients With and Without Type 2 Diabetes. Mol Cell Biochem (2011) 358(1-2):355–63. doi: 10.1007/s11010-011-0987-y

  • 41

    AberleJHopferIBeilFUSeedorfU. Association of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Delta +294T/C With Body Mass Index and Interaction With Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha L162V. Int J Obes (Lond). (2006) 30(12):1709–13. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803345

  • 42

    GonzĆ”lez SĆ”nchezJLSerrano RĆ­osMFernĆ”ndez PerezCLaaksoMMartĆ­nez LarradMT. Effect of the Pro12Ala Polymorphism of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma-2 Gene on Adiposity, Insulin Sensitivity and Lipid Profile in the Spanish Population. Eur J Endocrinol (2002) 147(4):495–501. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1470495

  • 43

    AndrulionytĆØLZacharovaJChiassonJLLaaksoMSTOP-NIDDM Study Group. Common Polymorphisms of the PPAR-Gamma2 (Pro12Ala) and PGC-1alpha (Gly482Ser) Genes Are Associated With the Conversion From Impaired Glucose Tolerance to Type 2 Diabetes in the STOP-NIDDM Trial. Diabetologia (2004) 47(12):2176–84. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1577-2

  • 44

    TavaresVHirataRDRodriguesACMonteOSallesJEScalissiNet al. Association Between Pro12Ala Polymorphism of the PPAR-Gamma2 Gene and Insulin Sensitivity in Brazilian Patients With Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab (2005) 7(5):605–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2004.00453.x

  • 45

    StefańskiAMajkowskaLCiechanowiczAFrankowMSafranowKParczewskiMet al. Association Between the Pro12Ala Variant of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma2 Gene and Increased 24-H Diastolic Blood Pressure in Obese Patients With Type II Diabetes. J Hum Hypertens (2006) 20(9):684–92. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002040

  • 46

    HelwigURubinDKioszJSchreiberSFƶlschURNothnagelMet al. The Minor Allele of the PPARgamma2 Pro12ala Polymorphism Is Associated With Lower Postprandial TAG and Insulin Levels in non-Obese Healthy Men. Br J Nutr (2007) 97(5):847–54. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507665179

  • 47

    RheeEJKwonCHLeeWYKimSYJungCHKimBJet al. No Association of Pro12Ala Polymorphism of PPAR-Gamma Gene With Coronary Artery Disease in Korean Subjects. Circ J (2007) 71(3):338–42. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.338

  • 48

    LiLLMaXLRanJXSunXFXuLMRenJet al. Genetic Polymorphism of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma 2 Pro12Ala on Ethnic Susceptibility to Diabetes in Uygur, Kazak and Han Subjects. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol (2008) 35(2):187–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2007.04796.x

  • 49

    LuZDongBMoXChenTWuHZhangYet al. Pro12Ala Polymorphism in PPAR Gamma 2 Associated With Essential Hypertension in Chinese Nonagenarians/Centenarians. Exp Gerontol. (2008) 43(12):1108–13. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2008.08.046

  • 50

    BendlovĆ”BVejražkovĆ”DVčelĆ”kJLukÔŔovĆ”PBurkoňovĆ”DKuneÅ”ovĆ”Met al. PPARgamma2 Pro12Ala Polymorphism in Relation to Free Fatty Acids Concentration and Composition in Lean Healthy Czech Individuals With and Without Family History of Diabetes Type 2. Physiol Res (2008) 57(Suppl 1):S77–90. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.931492

  • 51

    MontagnanaMFavaCNilssonPMEngstrƶmGHedbladBLippiGet al. The Pro12Ala Polymorphism of the PPARG Gene Is Not Associated With the Metabolic Syndrome in an Urban Population of Middle-Aged Swedish Individuals. Diabetes Med (2008) 25(8):902–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02510.x

  • 52

    ChaeSJKimJJChoiYMKimJMChoYMMoonSY. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma and Its Coactivator-1alpha Gene Polymorphisms in Korean Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Gynecol Obstet Invest (2010) 70(1):1–7. doi: 10.1159/000279309

  • 53

    ChistiakovDAPotapovVAKhodirevDSShamkhalovaMSShestakovaMVNosikovVV. The PPARgamma Pro12Ala Variant Is Associated With Insulin Sensitivity in Russian Normoglycaemic and Type 2 Diabetic Subjects. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res (2010) 7(1):56–62. doi: 10.1177/1479164109347689

  • 54

    JermendyAKƶrnerAKovĆ”csMMadĆ”csyLCsehK. PPAR-Gamma2 Pro12ala Polymorphism is Associated With Post-Challenge Abnormalities of Glucose Homeostasis in Children and Adolescents With Obesity. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab (2011) 24(1-2):55–9. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2011.111

  • 55

    GarauletMSmithCEHernĆ”ndez-GonzĆ”lezTLeeYCOrdovĆ”sJM. Pparγ Pro12Ala Interacts With Fat Intake for Obesity and Weight Loss in a Behavioural Treatment Based on the Mediterranean Diet. Mol Nutr Food Res (2011) 55(12):1771–9. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201100437

  • 56

    GuanJYiHWuXSuKTaoMYinS. Pro12Ala Polymorphism in Human Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Gamma is Associated With Hyperlipidaemia in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Hypopnoea Syndrome. J Laryngol Otol (2011) 125(10):1042–8. doi: 10.1017/S002221511100123X

  • 57

    DomeniciFABrochadoMJMartinelli AdeLZucolotoSda CunhaSFVannucchiH. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors Alpha and Gamma2 Polymorphisms in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Study in Brazilian Patients. Gene (2013) 529(2):326–31. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.06.091

  • 58

    BaldaniDPSkrgaticLCerneJZFerkPSimunicVGersakK. Association of PPARG Pro12Ala Polymorphism With Insulin Sensitivity and Body Mass Index in Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. BioMed Rep (2014) 2(2):199–206. doi: 10.3892/br.2013.215

  • 59

    StryjeckiCPeralta-RomeroJAlyassAKaram-AraujoRSuarezFGomez-ZamudioJet al. Association Between PPAR-γ2 Pro12Ala Genotype and Insulin Resistance Is Modified by Circulating Lipids in Mexican Children. Sci Rep (2016) 6:24472. doi: 10.1038/srep24472

  • 60

    AlmeidaSMFurtadoJMMascarenhasPFerrazMEFerreiraJCMonteiroMPet al. FTO, MC4R, and PPARG-2 Polymorphisms With Obesity Traits and Metabolic Phenotypes in School-Aged Children. Endocrine (2018) 60(3):466–78. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1587-3

  • 61

    SzkupMBrodowskiJJurczakAStanisławskaMGrochansE. Seeking Genetic Determinants of Selected Metabolic Disorders in Women Aged 45-60. Ann Agric Environ Med (2020) 27(3):407–12. doi: 10.26444/aaem/112579

  • 62

    ZhouXChenJXuW. Association Between C1431T Polymorphism in Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ Gene and Coronary Artery Disease in Chinese Han Population. Mol Biol Rep (2012) 39(2):1863–8. doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-0931-y

  • 63

    MaedaAGohdaTFunabikiKHorikoshiSTominoY. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Gene Polymorphism Is Associated With Serum Triglyceride Levels and Body Mass Index in Japanese Type 2 Diabetic Patients. J Clin Lab Anal (2004) 18(6):317–21. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20045

  • 64

    SongYRaheelTMJiaADaiGLiuLLongXet al. Rs10865710 Polymorphism in PPARG Promoter Is Associated With the Severity of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Artery Disease in a Chinese Population. Postgrad Med J (2021). postgradmedj-2021-140354. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140354

  • 65

    WeiWMWuXYLiSTShenQ. PPARG Gene C161T CT/TT Associated With Lower Blood Lipid Levels and Ischemic Stroke From Large-Artery Atherosclerosis in a Han Population in Guangdong. Neurol Res (2016) 38(7):620–4. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2016.1189056

  • 66

    WanJXiongSChaoSXiaoJMaYWangJet al. PPARgamma Gene C161T Substitution Alters Lipid Profile in Chinese Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol (2010) 9:13. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-13

  • 67

    WangXLOosterhofJDuarteN. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma C161→T Polymorphism and Coronary Artery Disease. Cardiovasc Res (1999) 44(3):588–94. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(99)00256-4

  • 68

    ChiaPPFanSHSayYH. Screening of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) α, γ and α Gene Polymorphisms for Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome Association in the Multi-Ethnic Malaysian Population. Ethn Dis (2015) 25(4):383–90. doi: 10.18865/ed.25.4.383

  • 69

    Grygiel-GorniakBMosorMMarcinkowskaJPrzyslawskiJNowakJ. Impact of the PPAR Gamma-2 Gene Polymorphisms on the Metabolic State of Postmenopausal Women. J Biosci (2016) 41(3):427–37. doi: 10.1007/s12038-016-9633-x

  • 70

    TavaresVHirataRDRodriguesACMonteOSallesJEScallissiNet al. Effect of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma C161T Polymorphism on Lipid Profile in Brazilian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Endocrinol Invest (2005) 28(2):129–36. doi: 10.1007/BF03345355

  • 71

    HaseebAIliyasMChakrabartiSFarooquiAANaikSRGhoshSet al. Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma and Their Association With Plasma Levels of Resistin and the Metabolic Syndrome in a South Indian Population. J Biosci (2009) 34(3):405–14. doi: 10.1007/s12038-009-0047-x

  • 72

    MeirhaegheAFajasLHelbecqueNCottelDLebelPDallongevilleJet al. A Genetic Polymorphism of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Gene Influences Plasma Leptin Levels in Obese Humans. Hum Mol Genet (1998) 7(3):435–40. doi: 10.1093/hmg/7.3.435

  • 73

    OhEYMinKMChungJHMinYKLeeMSKimKWet al. Significance of Pro12Ala Mutation in Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma2 in Korean Diabetic and Obese Subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2000) 85(5):1801–4. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.5.6499

  • 74

    MoriHIkegamiHKawaguchiYSeinoSYokoiNTakedaJet al. The Pro12 –>Ala Substitution in PPAR-Gamma Is Associated With Resistance to Development of Diabetes in the General Population: Possible Involvement in Impairment of Insulin Secretion in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes (2001) 50(4):891–4. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.4.891

  • 75

    PengDZhaoSLiJNieS. Relationship Between Pparγ C161→T Substitution and Coronary Heart Disease. Chin Circ J (2002) 17(5):370–3. doi: CNKI:SUN:ZGXH.0.2002-05-021

  • 76

    SchneiderJKreuzerJHamannANawrothPPDugiKA. The Proline 12 Alanine Substitution in the Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-Gamma2 Gene Is Associated With Lower Lipoprotein Lipase Activity In Vivo. Diabetes (2002) 51(3):867–70. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.3.867

  • 77

    VaccaroOManciniFPRuffaGSabatinoLIovineCMasulliMet al. Fasting Plasma Free Fatty Acid Concentrations and Pro12Ala Polymorphism of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR) Gamma2 Gene in Healthy Individuals. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) (2002) 57(4):481–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2002.01618.x

  • 78

    YamamotoYHiroseHMiyashitaKNishikaiKSaitoITaniyamaMet al. PPAR(gamma)2 Gene Pro12Ala Polymorphism May Influence Serum Level of an Adipocyte-Derived Protein, Adiponectin, in the Japanese Population. Metabolism (2002) 51(11):1407–9. doi: 10.1053/meta.2002.35586

  • 79

    SongJSakatsumeMNaritaIGotoSOmoriKTakadaTet al. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma C161T Polymorphisms and Survival of Japanese Patients With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy. Clin Genet (2003) 64(5):398–403. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00154.x

  • 80

    ArashiroRKatsurenKFukuyamaSOhtaT. Effect of Trp64Arg Mutation of the Beta3-Adrenergic Receptor Gene and C161T Substitution of the Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Gamma Gene on Obesity in Japanese Children. Pediatr Int (2003) 45(2):135–41. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-200X.2003.01685.x

  • 81

    ErikssonJLindiVUusitupaMForsĆ©nTLaaksoMOsmondCet al. The Effects of the Pro12Ala Polymorphism of the PPARgamma-2 Gene on Lipid Metabolism Interact With Body Size at Birth. Clin Genet (2003) 64(4):366–70. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00150.x

  • 82

    IwataEYamamotoIMotomuraTTsubakimoriSNohnenSOhmotoMet al. The Association of Pro12Ala Polymorphism in PPARgamma2 With Lower Carotid Artery IMT in Japanese. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (2003) 62(1):55–9. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8227(03)00161-X

  • 83

    NiskanenLLindiVErkkilƤASiveniusKLuomaJYlƤ-HerttualaSet al. Association of the PRO12ALA Polymorphism of the PPAR-Gamma2 Gene With Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein and Cardiolipin Autoantibodies in Nondiabetic and Type 2 Diabetic Subjects. Metabolism (2003) 52(2):213–7. doi: 10.1053/meta.2003.50039

  • 84

    RobitailleJDesprĆ©sJPPĆ©russeLVohlMC. The PPAR-Gamma P12A Polymorphism Modulates the Relationship Between Dietary Fat Intake and Components of the Metabolic Syndrome: Results From the QuĆ©bec Family Study. Clin Genet (2003) 63(2):109–16. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00026.x

  • 85

    BarattaRDi PaolaRSpampinatoDFiniGMarucciACocoAet al. Evidence for Genetic Epistasis in Human Insulin Resistance: The Combined Effect of PC-1 (K121Q) and PPARgamma2 (P12A) Polymorphisms. J Mol Med (Berl) (2003) 81(11):718–23. doi: 10.1007/s00109-003-0466-3

  • 86

    ChaoTHLiYHChenJHWuHLShiGYLiuPYet al. The 161TT Genotype in the Exon 6 of the Peroxisome-Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Gene Is Associated With Premature Acute Myocardial Infarction and Increased Lipid Peroxidation in Habitual Heavy Smokers. Clin Sci (Lond) (2004) 107(5):461–6. doi: 10.1042/CS20040014

  • 87

    OrioFJrPalombaSCascellaTDi BiaseSLabellaDRussoTet al. Lack of an Association Between Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma Gene Pro12Ala Polymorphism and Adiponectin Levels in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2004) 89(10):5110–5. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0109

  • 88

    PintĆ©rovĆ”DCernĆ”MKolostovĆ”KNovotaPCimburovĆ”MRomzovĆ”Met al. The Frequency of Alleles of the Pro12Ala Polymorphism in PPARgamma2 is Different Between Healthy Controls and Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Folia Biol (Praha) (2004) 50(5):153–6. doi: 10.1142/9789812703057_0014

  • 89

    BuzzettiRPetroneARibaudoMCAlemannoIZavarellaSMeinCAet al. The Common PPAR-Gamma2 Pro12Ala Variant Is Associated With Greater Insulin Sensitivity. Eur J Hum Genet (2004) 12(12):1050–4. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201283

  • 90

    PischonTPaiJKMansonJEHuFBRexrodeKMHunterDet al. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ2 P12A Polymorphism and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in US Men and Women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (2005) 25(8):1654–8. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000171993.78135.7e

  • 91

    HahnSFingerhutAKhomtsivUKhomtsivLTanSQuadbeckBet al. The Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Gamma Pro12Ala Polymorphism Is Associated With a Lower Hirsutism Score and Increased Insulin Sensitivity in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) (2005) 62(5):573–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02261.x

  • 92

    VƤnttinenMNuutilaPPihlajamƤkiJHƤllstenKVirtanenKALautamƤkiRet al. The Effect of the Ala12 Allele of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma2 Gene on Skeletal Muscle Glucose Uptake Depends on Obesity: A Positron Emission Tomography Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2005) 90(7):4249–54. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-0101

  • 93

    MousavinasabFTƤhtinenTJokelainenJKoskelaPVanhalaMOikarinenJet al. Common Polymorphisms in the PPARgamma2 and IRS-1 Genes and Their Interaction Influence Serum Adiponectin Concentration in Young Finnish Men. Mol Genet Metab (2005) 84(4):344–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2004.11.008

  • 94

    Zouari BouassidaKChouchaneLJellouliKChĆ©rifSHaddadSGabboujSet al. The Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptorgamma2 (PPARgamma2) Pro12Ala Variant: Lack of Association With Type 2 Diabetes in Obese and non Obese Tunisian Patients. Diabetes Metab (2005) 31(2):119–23. doi: 10.1016/S1262-3636(07)70177-5

  • 95

    MoonMKChoYMJungHSParkYJYoonKHSungYAet al. Genetic Polymorphisms in Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma are Associated With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity in the Korean Population. Diabetes Med (2005) 22(9):1161–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01599.x

  • 96

    BuzzettiRPetroneACaiazzoAMAlemannoIZavarellaSCapizziMet al. PPAR-Gamma2 Pro12Ala Variant Is Associated With Greater Insulin Sensitivity in Childhood Obesity. Pediatr Res (2005) 57(1):138–40. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000147728.62185.21

  • 97

    ScaglioniSVerduciESalvioniMBiondiMLRadaelliGAgostoniCet al. PPAR-Gamma2 Pro12Ala Variant, Insulin Resistance and Plasma Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Childhood Obesity. Pediatr Res (2006) 60(4):485–9. doi: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000238259.41560.00

  • 98

    RheeEJOhKWLeeWYKimSYOhESBaekKHet al. Effects of Two Common Polymorphisms of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma Gene on Metabolic Syndrome. Arch Med Res (2006) 37(1):86–94. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.04.008

  • 99

    YilmazMErgünMAKarakoƧAYurtƧuECakirNArslanM. Pro12Ala Polymorphism of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma Gene in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol (2006) 22(6):336–42. doi: 10.1080/09513590600733357

  • 100

    CardonaFMorcilloSGonzalo-MarĆ­nMGarrido-SanchezLMacias-GonzalezMTinahonesFJ. Pro12Ala Sequence Variant of the PPARG Gene Is Associated With Postprandial Hypertriglyceridemia in non-E3/E3 Patients With the Metabolic Syndrome. Clin Chem (2006) 52(10):1920–5. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2006.069690

  • 101

    LiuYYuanZLiuYZhangJYinPWangDet al. PPARgamma Gene C161T Substitution Is Associated With Reduced Risk of Coronary Artery Disease and Decreased Proinflammatory Cytokine Expression. Am Heart J (2007) 154(4):718–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.009

  • 102

    KimKLeeSValentineRJ. Association of Pro12ala Polymorphism in the Peroxisome Proliferative-Activated Receptor Gamma2 Gene With Obesity and Hypertension in Korean Women. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) (2007) 53(3):239–46. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.53.239

  • 103

    KotaniKSaigaKKurozawaYSakaneNSanoYTabataM. The Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma2 Gene Pro12Ala Polymorphism and Serum C-Reactive Protein in General Japanese Population. Clin Chim Acta (2007) 383(1-2):178–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2007.05.002

  • 104

    ZafarmandMHvan der SchouwYTGrobbeeDEde LeeuwPWBotsML. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma-2 P12A Polymorphism and Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Heart Disease and Ischemic Stroke: A Case-Cohort Study and Meta-Analyses. Vasc Health Risk Manage (2008) 4(2):427–36. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s2397

  • 105

    DongxiaLQiHLisongLJinchengG. Association of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptorgamma Gene Pro12Ala and C161T Polymorphisms With Metabolic Syndrome. Circ J (2008) 72(4):551–7. doi: 10.1253/circj.72.551

  • 106

    BadiiRBenerAZirieMAl-RikabiASimsekMAl-HamaqAOet al. Lack of Association Between the Pro12Ala Polymorphism of the PPAR-Gamma 2 Gene and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Qatari Consanguineous Population. Acta Diabetol (2008) 45(1):15–21. doi: 10.1007/s00592-007-0013-8

  • 107

    HuiYYu-YuanLYu-QiangNWei-HongSYan-LeiDXiao-BoLet al. Effect of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors-Gamma and Co-Activator-1alpha Genetic Polymorphisms on Plasma Adiponectin Levels and Susceptibility of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Chinese People. Liver Int (2008) 28(3):385–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01623.x

  • 108

    JorsalATarnowLLajerMEkJHansenTPedersenOet al. The PPAR Gamma 2 Pro12Ala Variant Predicts ESRD and Mortality in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes and Diabetic Nephropathy. Mol Genet Metab (2008) 94(3):347–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2008.03.014

  • 109

    EvangelistiLAttanasioMLucariniLSofiFMarcucciRGiglioliCet al. PPARgamma Promoter Polymorphisms and Acute Coronary Syndrome. Atherosclerosis (2009) 205(1):186–91. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.11.009

  • 110

    RegieliJJJukemaJWDoevendansPAZwindermanAHvan der GraafYKasteleinJJet al. PPAR Gamma Variant Influences Angiographic Outcome and 10-Year Cardiovascular Risk in Male Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease Patients. Diabetes Care (2009) 32(5):839–44. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1819

  • 111

    KotronenAYki-JƤrvinenHAminoffABergholmRPietilƤinenKHWesterbackaJet al. Genetic Variation in the ADIPOR2 Gene Is Associated With Liver Fat Content and Its Surrogate Markers in Three Independent Cohorts. Eur J Endocrinol (2009) 160(4):593–602. doi: 10.1530/EJE-08-0900

  • 112

    MilewiczATworowska-BardziƱskaUDunajskaKJĆŖdrzejukDLwowF. Relationship of PPARgamma2 Polymorphism With Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome in Postmenopausal Polish Women. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes (2009) 117(10):628–32. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1112154

  • 113

    MirzaeiHAkramiSMGolmohammadiTDoostiMHeshmatRNakhjavaniMet al. Polymorphism of Pro12Ala in the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma2 Gene in Iranian Diabetic and Obese Subjects. Metab Syndr Relat Disord (2009) 7(5):453–8. doi: 10.1089/met.2008.0099

  • 114

    XitaNLazarosLGeorgiouITsatsoulisA. The Pro12Ala Polymorphism of the PPAR-Gamma Gene Is Not Associated With the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Hormones (Athens) (2009) 8(4):267–72. doi: 10.1007/BF03401274

  • 115

    Ji-RongYBi-RongDChang-QuanHZhen-ChanLHong-MeiWYan-LingZet al. Pro12Ala Polymorphism in PPARgamma2 Associated With Depression in Chinese Nonagenarians/Centenarians. Arch Med Res (2009) 40(5):411–5. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2009.05.005

  • 116

    KoikaVMarioliDJSaltamavrosADVervitaVKoufogiannisKDAdonakisGet al. Association of the Pro12Ala Polymorphism in Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma2 With Decreased Basic Metabolic Rate in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol (2009) 161(2):317–22. doi: 10.1530/EJE-08-1014

  • 117

    DedoussisGVVidraNButlerJPapoutsakisCYannakouliaMHirschhornJNet al. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma (PPARgamma) Pro12Ala Polymorphism and Risk for Pediatric Obesity. Clin Chem Lab Med (2009) 47(9):1047–50. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2009.242

  • 118

    GaoLWangLYunHSuLSuX. Association of the PPARgamma2 Gene Pro12Ala Variant With Primary Hypertension and Metabolic Lipid Disorders in Han Chinese of Inner Mongolia. Genet Mol Res (2010) 9(3):1312–20. doi: 10.4238/vol9-3gmr833

  • 119

    ZhangQZhaiCWangYGuoYDingZJinX. Influences of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma 2 Genetic Polymorphism on the Effects of Dietary Intervention to the Blood Lipids Abnormalities. China J Prev Med (2010) 44(1):39–43. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2010.01.011

  • 120

    de KortSWHokken-KoelegaAC. The PPAR-Gamma Pro12Ala Polymorphism Associates With Weight Gain During GH-Treatment in Short Children Born Small for Gestational Age. Eur J Endocrinol (2010) 162(1):49–52. doi: 10.1530/EJE-09-0631

  • 121

    LiuLZhengTWangFWangNSongYLiMet al. Pro12Ala Polymorphism in the PPARG Gene Contributes to the Development of Diabetic Nephropathy in Chinese Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Diabetes Care (2010) 33(1):144–9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1258

  • 122

    HsiehMCLinKDTienKJTuSTHsiaoJYChangSJet al. Common Polymorphisms of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma (Pro12Ala) and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma Coactivator-1 (Gly482Ser) and the Response to Pioglitazone in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Metabolism (2010) 59(8):1139–44. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2009.10.030

  • 123

    DongiovanniPRamettaRFracanzaniALBenedanLBorroniVMaggioniPet al. Lack of Association Between Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors Alpha and Gamma2 Polymorphisms and Progressive Liver Damage in Patients With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Case Control Study. BMC Gastroenterol (2010) 10:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-102

  • 124

    Bouchard-MercierAGodinGLamarcheBPĆ©russeLVohlMC. Effects of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors, Dietary Fat Intakes and Gene-Diet Interactions on Peak Particle Diameters of Low-Density Lipoproteins. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics (2011) 4(1):36–48. doi: 10.1159/000324531

  • 125

    DedoussisGVManiosYKourlabaGKanoniSLagouVButlerJet al. An Age-Dependent Diet-Modified Effect of the Pparγ Pro12Ala Polymorphism in Children. Metabolism (2011) 60(4):467–73. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.04.007

  • 126

    RamakrishnanLSachdevHSSharmaMAbrahamRPrakashSGuptaDet al. Relationship of APOA5, Pparγ and HL Gene Variants With Serial Changes in Childhood Body Mass Index and Coronary Artery Disease Risk Factors in Young Adulthood. Lipids Health Dis (2011) 10:68. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-10-68

  • 127

    ChenCHLuMLKuoPHChenPYChiuCCKaoCFet al. Gender Differences in the Effects of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ2 Gene Polymorphisms on Metabolic Adversity in Patients With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry (2011) 35(1):239–45. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.11.014

  • 128

    EstivaletAALeiriaLBDoraJMRheinheimerJBouƧasAPMaiaALet al. D2 Thr92Ala and Pparγ2 Pro12Ala Polymorphisms Interact in the Modulation of Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Obes (Silver Spring) (2011) 19(4):825–32. doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.231

  • 129

    BhattSPMisraASharmaMLuthraKGuleriaRPandeyRMet al. Ala/Ala Genotype of Pro12Ala Polymorphism in the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ2 Gene Is Associated With Obesity and Insulin Resistance in Asian Indians. Diabetes Technol Ther (2012) 14(9):828–34. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0277

  • 130

    CurtiMLRogeroMMBaltarVTBarrosCRSiqueira-CataniaAFerreiraSR. FTO T/A and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ Pro12Ala Polymorphisms But Not ApoA1 -75 are Associated With Better Response to Lifestyle Intervention in Brazilians at High Cardiometabolic Risk. Metab Syndr Relat Disord (2013) 11(3):169–76. doi: 10.1089/met.2012.0055

  • 131

    YangJGongHLiuWTaoT. The Association of Pro12Ala Polymorphism in the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma2 Gene With the Metabolic Characteristics in Chinese Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Int J Clin Exp Pathol (2013) 6(9):1894–902. doi: 10.1155/2013/416870

  • 132

    PeiQHuangQYangGPZhaoYCYinJYSongMet al. PPAR-γ2 and PTPRD Gene Polymorphisms Influence Type 2 Diabetes Patients' Response to Pioglitazone in China. Acta Pharmacol Sin (2013) 34(2):255–61. doi: 10.1038/aps.2012.144

  • 133

    Arnaiz-VillenaAFernĆ”ndez-HonradoMArecesCEnrĆ­quez-de-SalamancaMAbd-El-Fatah-KhalilSCocaCet al. Amerindians Show No Association of PPAR-γ2 Gene Ala12 Allele and Obesity: An "Unthrifty" Variant Population Genetics. Mol Biol Rep (2013) 40(2):1767–74. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-2230-7

  • 134

    ChehaibiKNouiraSMahdouaniKHamdiSRouisMSlimaneMN. Effect of the Pparγ C161T Gene Variant on Serum Lipids in Ischemic Stroke Patients With and Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Mol Neurosci (2014) 54(4):730–8. doi: 10.1007/s12031-014-0326-3

  • 135

    RochaRMBarraGBRosaƉCGarciaƉCAmatoAAAzevedoMF. Prevalence of the Rs1801282 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism of the PPARG Gene in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome. Arch Endocrinol Metab (2015) 59(4):297–302. doi: 10.1590/2359-3997000000086

  • 136

    RotterISkonieczna-Å»ydeckaKKosik-BogackaDAdlerGRyłALaszczyńskaM. Relationships Between FTO Rs9939609, MC4R Rs17782313, and Pparγ Rs1801282 Polymorphisms and the Occurrence of Selected Metabolic and Hormonal Disorders in Middle-Aged and Elderly Men - a Preliminary Study. Clin Interv Aging (2016) 11:1723–32. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S120253

  • 137

    LiXZhangBLZhangXGSuXL. Correlation Between PPARg2 Gene Pro12Ala Polymorphism and Cerebral Infarction in an Inner Mongolian Han Chinese Population. Genet Mol Res (2016) 15(2):gmr7332. doi: 10.4238/gmr.15027332

  • 138

    PriyaSSSankaranRRamalingamSSairamTSomasundaramLS. Genotype Phenotype Correlation of Genetic Polymorphism of PPAR Gamma Gene and Therapeutic Response to Pioglitazone in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus- A Pilot Study. J Clin Diagn Res (2016) 10(2):FC11–4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16494.7331

  • 139

    ZhengJSChenJWangLYangHFangLYuYet al. Replication of a Gene-Diet Interaction at CD36, NOS3 and PPARG in Response to Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplements on Blood Lipids: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. EBioMedicine (2018) 31:150–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.04.012

  • 140

    ChmurzynskaAMuzsikAKrzyżanowska-JankowskaPMądryEWalkowiakJBajerskaJ. PPARG and FTO Polymorphism can Modulate the Outcomes of a Central European Diet and a Mediterranean Diet in Centrally Obese Postmenopausal Women. Nutr Res (2019) 69:94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2019.08.005

  • 141

    GarcĆ­a-RicobarazaMGarcĆ­a-BermĆŗdezMTorres-EspinolaFJSegura MorenoMTBleyereMNDĆ­az-PrietoLEet al. Association Study of Rs1801282 PPARG Gene Polymorphism and Immune Cells and Cytokine Levels in a Spanish Pregnant Women Cohort and Their Offspring. J BioMed Sci (2020) 27:101. doi: 10.1186/s12929-020-00694-3

  • 142

    Carrillo-VenzorMAErives-AnchondoNRMoreno-GonzÔlezJGMoreno-BritoVLicón-TrilloAGonzÔlez-RodríguezEet al. Pro12Ala PPAR-γ2 and +294T/C PPAR-Γ Polymorphisms and Association With Metabolic Traits in Teenagers From Northern Mexico. Genes (Basel) (2020) 11(7):776. doi: 10.3390/genes11070776

  • 143

    LvOWangLLiJMaQZhaoW. Effects of Pomegranate Peel Polyphenols on Lipid Accumulation and Cholesterol Metabolic Transformation in L-02 Human Hepatic Cells via the Pparγ-ABCA1/CYP7A1 Pathway. Food Funct (2016) 7(12):4976–83. doi: 10.1039/C6FO01261B

  • 144

    ZhangFLiuPHeZZhangLHeXLiuFet al. Crocin Ameliorates Atherosclerosis by Promoting the Reverse Cholesterol Transport and Inhibiting the Foam Cell Formation via Regulating Pparγ/LXR-α. Cell Cycle (2022) 21(2):202–18. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2021.2015669

  • 145

    JieJLingLYiYTaoLLiaoXGaoPet al. Tributyltin Triggers Lipogenesis in Macrophages via Modifying Pparγ Pathway. Environ pollut (2021) 271:116331. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116331

  • 146

    SchubertMBecherSWallertMMaeßMBAbhariMRennertKet al. The Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR)-γ Antagonist 2-Chloro-5-Nitro-N-Phenylbenzamide (GW9662) Triggers Perilipin 2 Expression via PparĪ“ and Induces Lipogenesis and Triglyceride Accumulation in Human THP-1 Macrophages. Mol Pharmacol (2020) 97(3):212–25. doi: 10.1124/mol.119.117887

  • 147

    LegchenkoEChouvarinePBorchertPFernandez-GonzalezASnayEMeierMet al. Pparγ Agonist Pioglitazone Reverses Pulmonary Hypertension and Prevents Right Heart Failure via Fatty Acid Oxidation. Sci Transl Med (2018) 10(438):eaao0303. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aao0303

  • 148

    SikderKShuklaSKPatelNSinghHRafiqK. High Fat Diet Upregulates Fatty Acid Oxidation and Ketogenesis via Intervention of PPAR-γ. Cell Physiol Biochem (2018) 48(3):1317–31. doi: 10.1159/000492091

  • 149

    WuZLouYJinWLiuYLuLLuG. The Pro12Ala Polymorphism in the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma-2 Gene (Pparγ2) is Associated With Increased Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One (2012) 7(12):e53105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053105

  • 150

    QianYLiPZhangJShiYChenKYangJet al. Association Between Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Alpha, Delta, and Gamma Polymorphisms and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: A Case-Control Study and Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) (2016) 95(32):e4299. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004299

  • 151

    GonzĆ”lez-CastroTBTovilla-ZĆ”rateCAJuĆ”rez-RojopIEHernĆ”ndez-DĆ­azYLópez-NarvĆ”ezMLRodrĆ­guez-PĆ©rezCet al. PON2 and PPARG Polymorphisms as Biomarkers of Risk for Coronary Heart Disease. biomark Med (2018) 12(3):287–97. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2017-0227

  • 152

    Baghbani-OskoueiAGholampourdehakiM. Anthropometric Measures and the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease. Caspian J Intern Med (2020) 11(2):183–90. doi: 10.22088/cjim.11.2.183

  • 153

    SolymanzadehFRokhafrozDAsadizakerMDastoorpoorM. Prediction of Risk of Coronary Artery Disease Based on Framingham Risk Score in Association With Shift Work Among Nurses. Int J Occup Saf Ergon (2022) 1–6. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.2024403

  • 154

    AgrawalSKlarqvistMDREmdinCPatelAPParanjpeMDEllinorPTet al. Selection of 51 Predictors From 13,782 Candidate Multimodal Features Using Machine Learning Improves Coronary Artery Disease Prediction. Patterns (N Y) (2021) 2(12):100364. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100364

  • 155

    YusufSHawkenSOunpuuSDansTAvezumALanasFet al. Effect of Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors Associated With Myocardial Infarction in 52 Countries (the INTERHEART Study): Case-Control Study. Lancet (2004) 364(9438):937–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9

  • 156

    LiQChenRBieLZhaoDHuangCHongJ. Association of the Variants in the PPARG Gene and Serum Lipid Levels: A Meta-Analysis of 74 Studies. JĀ Cell Mol Med (2015) 19(1):198–209. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12417

  • 157

    PihlajamƤkiJSchwabUKaminskaDƅgrenJKuusistoJKolehmainenMet al. Dietary Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and the Pro12Ala Polymorphisms of PPARG Regulate Serum Lipids Through Divergent Pathways: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial. Genes Nutr (2015) 10(6):43. doi: 10.1007/s12263-015-0493-z

  • 158

    LuHWenDSunJZengLDuJDuDet al. Enhancer Polymorphism Rs10865710 Associated With Traumatic Sepsis is a Regulator of PPARG Gene Expression. Crit Care (2019) 23(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2707-z

  • 159

    WuLSongYZhangYLiangBDengYTangTet al. Novel Genetic Variants of Pparγ2 Promoter in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Its Molecular Regulation in Adipogenesis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2021) 11:499788. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.499788

  • 160

    WangHXiongKSunWFuYJiangZYuDet al. Two Completely Linked Polymorphisms in the PPARG Transcriptional Regulatory Region Significantly Affect Gene Expression and Intramuscular Fat Deposition in the Longissimus Dorsi Muscle of Erhualian Pigs. Anim Genet (2013) 44(4):458–62. doi: 10.1111/age.12025

Summary

Keywords

peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, polymorphism, rs1801282, rs3856806, obesity, dyslipidemia

Citation

Li S, He C, Nie H, Pang Q, Wang R, Zeng Z and Song Y (2022) G Allele of the rs1801282 Polymorphism in PPARγ Gene Confers an Increased Risk of Obesity and Hypercholesterolemia, While T Allele of the rs3856806 Polymorphism Displays a Protective Role Against Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Endocrinol. 13:919087. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.919087

Received

13 April 2022

Accepted

30 May 2022

Published

29 June 2022

Volume

13 - 2022

Edited by

Alexandre Gabarra Oliveira, SĆ£o Paulo State University, Brazil

Reviewed by

Cassiano Merussi Neiva, São Paulo State University, Brazil; Irene Leal-Berumen, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Mexico

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Yongyan Song,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

This article was submitted to Obesity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Endocrinology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics