Pilar Vigil1
Jaime Meléndez
Grace Petkovic
Juan Pablo Del Río- 1Reproductive Health Research Institute (RHRI), Santiago, Chile
- 2Arrowe Park Hospital, Department of Paediatrics, Wirral CH49 5PE, Merseyside, United Kingdom
- 3Unidad de Psiquiatría Infantil y del Adolescente, Clínica Psiquiátrica Universitaria, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- 4Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Millennium Science Initiative, Santiago, Chile
Obesity in women of reproductive age has a number of adverse metabolic effects, including Type II Diabetes (T2D), dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease. It is associated with increased menstrual irregularity, ovulatory dysfunction, development of insulin resistance and infertility. In women, estradiol is not only critical for reproductive function, but they also control food intake and energy expenditure. Food intake is known to change during the menstrual cycle in humans. This change in food intake is largely mediated by estradiol, which acts directly upon anorexigenic and orexigenic neurons, largely in the hypothalamus. Estradiol also acts indirectly with peripheral mediators such as glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Like estradiol, GLP-1 acts on receptors at the hypothalamus. This review describes the physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms governing the actions of estradiol during the menstrual cycle on food intake and energy expenditure and how estradiol acts with other weight-controlling molecules such as GLP-1. GLP-1 analogs have proven to be effective both to manage obesity and T2D in women. This review also highlights the relationship between steroid hormones and women's mental health. It explains how a decline or imbalance in estradiol levels affects insulin sensitivity in the brain. This can cause cerebral insulin resistance, which contributes to the development of conditions such as Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s disease. The proper use of both estradiol and GLP-1 analogs can help to manage obesity and preserve an optimal mental health in women by reducing the mechanisms that trigger neurodegenerative disorders.
Introduction
Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30, affects around 42% of adults in the United States (1). During the period 2017-2018, women had a higher prevalence of severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) than men (11.5% vs. 6.9%, respectively) (1), though overall obesity prevalence rates were similar (42.1% and 43.0%, respectively).
Obesity is associated with a number of disorders that affect the reproductive system. Such disorders include: ovulatory dysfunction, such as found in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS); disorders of pregnancy, (e.g., preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and recurrent pregnancy loss), endometriosis; and cancers (2, 3). There is growing concern about how the increasing obesity rate in adolescent women will impact their long-term health. The prevalence of obesity among adolescent girls (12–19 years) in 2015/2016 was 20.9% (4) and 3–11% of these obese adolescent girls had PCOS (5, 6). This may be explained by the fact that obesity and related comorbidities, such as insulin resistance, alter the functioning of the hypothalamic–pituitary–ovarian axis, decreasing ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropin stimulation (3, 7). Insulin also stimulates follicular growth through its action at the theca cells (8). This causes disorganized follicular growth and increases ovarian production and secretion of testosterone (9). Ultimately, this can, in turn, affect ovulation. Amongst PCOS patients, those who are obese are most at risk of insulin resistance (10). By contrast, only half (50%) of normal weight PCOS patients are insulin resistant (9).
The reproductive system modulates body weight regulation. Food intake is known to change during the menstrual and/or estrous cycle, with women significantly reducing their food intake in the peri-ovulatory period (11–13). Therefore, in principle, ovulatory dysfunction may increase the risk of obesity, as women will lack this usual period of “reduced appetite”. This link between reproductive function and body weight control is largely mediated by the female sex steroid hormones, particularly estradiol and progesterone. In general, estradiol regulates homeostatic nutrition in women by decreasing food intake and increasing energy expenditure (13) (Figure 1). Female reductions in food intake during the peri-ovulatory period are a consequence of the anorectic action of estradiol. Estradiol acts at the level of the cortex, hypothalamus and brainstem (14). The anorectic and thermogenic effects of estradiol can be direct, through genomic and non-genomic mechanisms, or indirect, through activation of peripheral mediators such as cholecystokinin (CCK), insulin, leptin and GLP-1.
Figure 1 Potential interaction between meal-related gastrointestinal signals and estradiol on control of the body weight in women. Meal-related gastrointestinal signals (CCK, GLP-1, others) act through a paracrine-neuronal pathway (shown in purple and red). These meal-related gastrointestinal signals act paracrinally upon vagal afferent neurons (VAN). The VANs activate secondary neurons located in the NTS, in the brainstem. The NTS integrates a variety of peripheral signals, and in turn activates tertiary neurons located in different nuclei in the hypothalamus. These hypothalamic nuclei control feeding behavior. Circulating estradiol (shown in green) modulates the responsiveness to these gastrointestinal satiety signals by acting on all levels of this paracrine-neuronal pathway: The VAN, NTS and the hypothalamic nuclei. Gastrointestinal satiety signals also act directly upon the hypothalamic nuclei through a hormonal pathway (shown in purple). Additionally, estradiol (green) has a direct anorexigenic effect at the level of the hypothalamic nuclei (PVH, LH and ARC), thereby reducing food intake. Metabolic signals such as insulin and leptin also influence centers in the hypothalamus to regulate body weight. Brown adipose tissue (BAT) thermogenesis contributes to regulation of body weight by increasing energy expenditure. Estradiol acts all three points of the VMH-SNS-BAT pathway to increase thermogenesis. Within the VMH hypothalamic nucleus, estradiol acts by inhibiting AMPK. Thus, estradiol increases energy expenditure by increasing BAT thermogenesis, and WAT browning. This, in combination with estradiol’s effects to decrease food intake, can result in weight loss. NST, nucleus of the solitary tract; DMH, dorsomedial hypothalamus; LH, lateral hypothalamus; PVH, paraventricular hypothalamus; ARC, arcuate nucleus; VMH, ventromedial hypothalamus; BAT, brown adipose tissue; WAT, white adipose tissue.
A reduction in estradiol levels, as found in the menopause, would therefore be expected to result in increased food intake (with the estradiol activity lost). Thus, a loss of estradiol post-menopause, may contribute to the development of obesity, and systemic and cerebral insulin resistance (15). Insulin resistance and T2D, both of which are associated with obesity and ovulatory dysfunction, cause abnormalities in the proper functioning of the central nervous system (CNS). Indeed, both are linked to neurodegenerative disorders (15, 16). Estradiol and GLP-1 (and its analogs) have been proposed as novel therapeutic approaches to restore not only body weight in women but also to prevent the development of neurodegenerative disorders (17, 18).
This review describes the physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms that govern the actions of estradiol on food intake and energy expenditure during the menstrual cycle (13). We highlight how GLP-1 and estrogen are thought to have synergistic effects and summarize recent work on the use of GLP-1 conjugates as agents to manage obesity, T2D and central insulin resistance. Finally, we consider potential future uses of estradiol and GLP-1 conjugates in protecting against cerebral insulin resistance, and resultant neurodegenerative disorders.
Menstrual cycle and appetite control: Implications for weight regulation
The CNS, particularly the hypothalamus, plays a key role in homeostatic feeding. Brain nuclei such as the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST), the arcuate (ARC), the paraventricular region of the hypothalamus (PVH), control meal size of and modulate feelings of satiety. Additional brain regions are also involved in feeding. Such regions include: the primary and secondary taste regions (insula and orbitofrontal cortex); as well as the hippocampus; and cognitive control regions (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal cortex and cingulate cortex) (19, 20). Eating behavior depends on the simultaneous operation of these homeostatic pathways together with a more flexible non-homeostatic pathway. The non-homeostatic pathway differs between individuals because of variations in hormonal status, epigenetic markers and personal experiences. Evidence from human and animal studies indicates that food intake fluctuates during the menstrual cycle, because gonadal steroid hormones (estradiol and progesterone) are key regulators of energy uptake.
There is strong evidence for a link between the menstrual and/or estrous cycle and appetite. For example, in laboratory studies, ovariectomized female rats increase their food intake. Their food intake can be normalized by the administration of physiological doses of -estradiol but not progesterone (11, 13, 21, 22). Other behavioral studies in rats have also demonstrated that estradiol controls meal size (23). In clinical studies, food intake is lower in the periovulatory phase and greater in the early follicular and luteal phases (11, 24, 25). The periovulatory decrease in food intake coincides with a surge in circulating estradiol levels and is the result of decreased meal size rather than decreased meal frequency (26, 27). The types of foods eaten also change with the menstrual cycle. Food cravings and binge eating of specific food items are reported more frequently by women in the luteal phase (28–30). Most (29–38) though not all (39–41) studies, have shown increased caloric intake in the luteal phase. The specific macronutrient composition of the increased calories consumed in the luteal phase varies, but most often results from either increased fat (32, 35, 38) or carbohydrate intake (35, 36, 38). Intake of sweet foods also decreases in the peri-ovulatory period (29, 42) and protein intake increases in the luteal phase (43). Orosensory stimuli affect organism’s selection and preference for particular foods. Estradiol levels affect how women psychologically perceive food (13, 44, 45). Across the menstrual cycle, neuronal responses to images of food change (46–49). When a subject is presented with high energy-food pictures in the periovulatory (as compared with the luteal phase), the brain areas linked to food intake show increased responsiveness (44). Dopaminergic reward activity to high energy foods is enhanced in the periovulatory phase (50, 51). Although the evidence is still controversial, the odor detection threshold may vary across the menstrual cycle. The threshold appears lower during the ovulatory and luteal phase (when estradiol levels are high) and higher during menstruation and early follicular phase (when estradiol levels are low) (44, 47, 52). Interestingly, it seems that the usual cyclical change in food intake is absent in anovulatory cycles (33, 43). This is explained by the absence of the estradiol´s rise and fall, impacting both appetite and ovulation. Anovulatory cycles can be associated with either low or, by contrast, constantly elevated estradiol levels (53). Both estradiol states could be linked to increased appetite. Evidently, a low estradiol level may be insufficient to trigger the usual anorectic effects. However, it may also be that at constant, high levels of estradiol (as in anovulatory cycles, or in hormonal preparations), its anorexic effects are blunted.
Menstrual cycle and eating disorders
In addition to influencing food intake in healthy states, estradiol and progesterone have also been implicated in the etiology and expression of eating disorders (54–56). Eating disorders are one of the most sex differentiated forms of psychopathology, with the female-to-male ratio ranging from 4:1 to 10:1 (57). Binge eating and emotional eating are significantly higher during the mid-luteal and pre-menstrual phases of women’s menstrual cycle as compared to the follicular/ovulatory phases (54, 55, 58, 59). Progesterone levels are positively associated with increased binge eating across the menstrual cycle (54, 55). Whilst physiological levels of estradiol are inversely associated with binge eating, it appears that abnormally high levels of estradiol are actually positively associated with binge eating and emotional eating (13). Importantly, in all previous studies, hormonal effects on binge eating and emotional eating were independent of covariates that could also change across the menstrual cycle, such as negative affect and body mass index (BMI) (54, 55, 59, 60). Laboratory studies suggest estradiol may act on serotonergic neurons to inhibit binge eating (61) and this effect is partially mediated by insulin. Thus, increased insulin resistance may decrease the serotonergic neurons responsiveness to estradiol. This in turn, may increase the risk of binge eating. Even in healthy women, increased insulin resistance has been reported during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle in healthy women (62). This could partially explain the differences in eating behavior observed across the menstrual cycle. Evidence suggests that women with an eating disorder may display differential insulin sensitivity to the changes in ovarian hormone levels (60, 62, 63).
It is interesting to speculate as to whether progesterone-only contraceptives could indirectly alter insulin sensitivity (64, 65). Many women receive progesterone only medications. Such medications disrupt the normal ovulatory process. Estradiol levels are therefore decreased (66). This reduction in estradiol and its insulin sensitizing effects could potentially decrease food intake and body weight in some women (67).
Gonadotropins and adiposity
Although, gonadotropin hormone analogs have been used clinically for decades in assisted reproductive therapies and in the treatment of various infertility disorders (68), novel applications of gonadotropins targeting extra-gonadal tissues (69), especially adipose tissue and liver are emerging (70–73). Recent evidence suggests a possible role for FSH in regulating lipid metabolism and fat accumulation.
Postmenopausal women have low estradiol, elevated FSH, concomitant bone loss, and increased body fat). The rise of FSH at menopause in response to ovarian failure has been associated with menopausal adiposity (70) and hepatic steatosis (72) in women. Using mouse models, high circulating FSH has been confirmed as a major contributor to gonadectomy-induced obesity (70–72). hese findings suggested that FSH, as well as low estradiol, are potential targets for controlling fat accumulation and treating obesity.
In an ovariectomized mouse model, an antibody (for humans and mice) to FSHβ (was initially found to inhibit bone resorption and stimulate bone synthesis (61). Later, the same antibody was found to increase BAT thermogenesis and prevent (71) ovariectomy-induced weight gain and fat accumulation in mice (74). Mechanistically, FSH vaccination treatment inhibited lipid biosynthesis by inactivating PPARγ adipogenic signaling pathway and simultaneously enhancing adipocyte thermogenesis via upregulating UCP1 (uncoupling protein 1) expression in both visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissues (74).
Although evidence that FSH is a key factor in fat accumulation is robust, this is so far applicable only to some rodent models. Thus far, there are contradictory findings in both human and other rodent studies.
Estradiol pathways in the regulation of body weight
Estradiol mechanisms of action
As mentioned earlier, the hypothalamus integrates most of the neural and humoral afferent signals coordinating energy intake and expenditure (19). Among hypothalamic nuclei, the effects of the ARC on appetite are well-studied. The ARC contains two main types of neuronal systems: appetite-suppressing POMC neurons (75, 76); and, appetite-stimulating NPY/AgRP neurons (75, 77). Both these neuron systems express estrogen receptors: ERα is predominantly expressed in the POMC (proopiomelanocortin) neurons, while both ERα and ERβ are present in neuropeptide Y (NPY) and agouti-related protein peptide (AgRP) neurons (78, 79).
POMC is a precursor polypeptide, which after being released, is cleaved into smaller active peptides. One such peptide (α-MSH) is particularly important for appetite control. α-MSH is most known for its role in melanin production in skin through the activation of MC1R. However, it has an anorexigenic effect when it activates other receptors (MC3R and MC4R) located in the ARC and lateral hypothalamus (LH) (75). Indeed, mice that are deficient for MC4R or POMC are characteristically obese due to hyperphagia (80, 81). Estradiol has an anorexigenic effect by increasing POMC neuronal activity. Estradiol’s action on these neurons is both direct and indirect. Estradiol indirectly increases POMC activity through its effects on NPY/AgRP neurons (82, 83). Estradiol inhibits NPY/AgRP neurons primarily through glutamate and β-endorphin release (84). NPY and AgRP antagonize the action of α-MSH on MC3R and MC4R, thus having an orexigenic effect (85). Mice that overexpress AgRP are hyperphagic and obese. MC4R is also known to be important for appetite control in humans. MC4R mutations are the most frequent cause of monogenic obesity in humans (75).
Estradiol also decreases appetite directly by increasing anorexigenic gene expression in POMC neurons and decreasing the expression of orexigenic genes in NPY/AgRP neurons (84, 86). Interestingly, as female rats get older, these genes become less responsive to estradiol (87). Estradiol also has non-genomic effects. These effects are mediated by: Gq-mER (Gq-coupled membrane ER); GPER (G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor); and by ERα and ERβ present in the plasma membrane (88–91). Gq-mER is present in the hypothalamus and its expression is restricted to NPY/AgRP neurons where it decreases neuronal activity (82, 83, 92). GPER is expressed in a number of other hypothalamic nuclei, such as the PVH, the supraoptic nucleus and the medial preoptic area (mPOA) (93). GPER deficiency causes increased adiposity, insulin resistance, and metabolic dysfunction in mice (90).
Estradiol, AMPK and thermogenesis
Estradiol also affects weight regulation by impacting thermogenesis. Thermogenesis is the dissipation of energy through heat production. This increased energy expenditure contributes to weight loss. Thermogenesis may occur through both shivering and non-shivering mechanisms (94). Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is a specialized fat depot characterized by increased energy expenditure and heat production (95). Its expansion and/or activation can protect against diet-induced obesity. The classical thermogenesis pathway revolves around the sympathetic nervous system-catecholamine-uncoupling protein 1 axis. UCP1 is a proton channel which allows dissipation of the proton gradient across the mitochondrial matrix, without adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production. This dissipation generates energy in the form of heat. Activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) releases catecholamines (e.g. norepinephrine) which increase UCP1 activity. Centrally, several hypothalamic regions, most especially the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH), are known to regulate this pathway. Electrical or pharmacological stimulation of this nucleus increases BAT thermogenesis (96–101). Estradiol modulates thermogenesis at three points on this VMH-SNS-BAT pathway: 1) through its effects on the VMH nucleus 2) through its effects on SNS signaling 3) directly through its effects on BAT.
Within the VMH nucleus, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) appears to be a key mediator of estradiol’s effects. AMPK is a so-called ‘cellular energy sensor’ (102, 103). It senses the ADP:ATP and AMP:ATP ratios and alters ATP production as a cell requires (104). AMPK activation in the VMH decreases energy expenditure (105–107) and AMPK inhibition increases energy expenditure (Figure 1). Animal models have shown that estradiol increases energy expenditure through increased thermogenesis and lipolysis of BAT. Estradiol-induced BAT thermogenesis and its consequent body weight loss can be prevented by activation of AMPK in the VMH (108). This suggests that estradiol may increase thermogenesis by the inhibiting AMPK at the VMH nucleus of the hypothalamus. AMPK also acts as an important mediator for other peripheral modulators of thermogenesis (109). Such modulators include thyroid hormone, GLP-1, and leptin (109, 110). AMPK may also mediate other effects of estrogens, e.g. on glucose homeostasis (111).
Estradiol acts at the second point of the VMH-SNS-BAT pathway by increasing norepinephrine turnover, thus increasing non-shivering thermogenesis (112, 113). It also acts on BAT tissue directly, though interestingly not on UCP1 (114–116).
It is important to mention that BAT is a specialized fat depot characterized by increased energy expenditure and heat production (95). Its expansion and/or activation can protect against diet-induced obesity. Beige adipocytes that share some common characteristics with brown adipocytes such as high mitochondria content and uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) expression can be induced in white adipose tissue (WAT). This process is called WAT browning (117).
Interactions between estrogens and peripheral feedback signals controlling appetite
Thus far we have considered estradiol’s direct effects on the central control of appetite. Estradiol’s central effects on appetite are also modulated by a number of other peripheral signals (Figure 1). These signals include peptides secreted by the gastrointestinal tract (CCK, GLP-1), the pancreas (glucagon and insulin) and adipose tissue (leptin).
CCK interaction with estradiol in satiety control
Cholecystokinin (CCK) is a key controller of meal-ending satiation in animals and humans (118–121). CCK is particularly known for its local effects in the gastrointestinal system. It is produced by cells lining the duodenum and its name derives from its effect on the gallbladder, causing it to contract and release bile into the intestine. However, further work has since revealed that CCK is also important for satiety. Indeed, CCK has moved from being considered a local gut hormone, to being recognized as an almost ubiquitous chemical messenger (122). We will consider its effect on peripheral and central satiety control mechanisms.
Peripherally administered CCK reduces food intake (123). This effect is mediated by the vagus nerve. CCK increases vagal excitability (124–127). The vagus in turn stimulates second order neurons in the NST (128, 129), located in the medulla of the brainstem (Figure 1). NST plays a key role in appetite. This is perhaps unsurprising given that it integrates gustatory and visceral input from cranial nerves VII, IX, and X (130). The NST, in turn, signals to a number of other brain centres that impact satiety. In summary, CCK activates vagal fibres, which in turn activate NST neurons, inducing a feeling of satiety.
Evidence for estradiol’s interaction with CCK comes from studies of ovariectomized rats. In ovariectomized rats, subcutaneous replacement of estradiol potentiates suppression of total food intake induced by CCK (22, 131, 132). Furthermore, estradiol potentiates endogenous CCK-induced suppression of food intake in both hormone-replaced ovariectomized and estrous control females (133–136). Estradiol modulates vagal nerve reactivity and NST activity. In ovariectomized rats, replacement of estradiol in this nucleus reduces food intake and this effect is blunted by co-administration of an ERα antagonist (137, 138). Estradiol augments the density of axonal projections and the excitability of vagal afferent neurons (139). The sensitivity of the vagal nerve to estradiol fluctuates through the estrous cycle, as ERα expression changes in response to circulating estradiol levels (140).
Thus far, we have focused on peripherally produced CCK. However, as previously indicated, CCK is now known to be produced almost ubiquitously, including in the brain. CCK producing neurons are known to be important for appetite control. Estradiol has been shown to impact this central CCK expression. For example, administering physiological doses of estradiol dramatically increases CCK mRNA levels in the posterodorsal medial amygdaloid nucleus (MeApd) and in the central part of the mPOA. These regions are part of the limbic-hypothalamic circuit (141). There is evidence to suggest that, as in the NST, CCK and estradiol also act synergistically in the limbic-hypothalamic circuit. This is indicated by CCK expression in pertinent brain regions (e.g. hypothalamus) changing with estrous cycle phase in rats. Specifically, CCK expression is highest during the pro-estrous phase when plasma estradiol levels are at their highest (132, 133, 142). Taken together, it is likely that estradiol’s anorexigenic effects are due not only to estradiol’s direct effects on appetite, but also due to its interaction with other molecules, such as CCK.
Leptin
Leptin is an adipocyte-derived hormone that reflects energy storage (143). In normal conditions, leptin prevents body weight gain by suppressing feeding (144, 145) and increasing energy expenditure (146–148). In general, leptin down-regulates orexigenic peptides, and up-regulates anorexigenic peptides, leading to a reduction in food intake. In particular, leptin modulates the signals for satiety found in the ARC. For example, when leptin levels are reduced, POMC expression is also reduced and NPY expression is increased (149). Furthermore, as mentioned, POMC is a precursor for α-MSH, which helps control appetite. α -MSH antagonists antagonize leptin’s anorexigenic effect (150). It must be remembered that estradiol exerts some of its direct effects on satiety through these same neuronal populations. Interestingly, both estradiol and leptin receptors colocalize in kisspeptinergic neurons, which are considered to be the link between nutrition (metabolism) and reproduction (ovulatory function) (151).
These neurons are present in the ARC, VMH, and POA (152). Such co-localization raises the question: might leptin and estradiol interact centrally? The answer appears to be yes. In the pro-estrous (high estradiol) phase of the estrous cycle, estradiol increases leptin mRNA expression and serum leptin levels (153). Furthermore, it has been shown that physiological high estradiol levels correlate with increased leptin sensitivity and that reduced leptin sensitivity after oophorectomy can be restored with estrogen treatment (154). Deletion of leptin receptors in vagal afferent neurons disrupts estrogen signaling, body weight, food intake and hormonal controls of feeding in female mice (140). Thus, estradiol and leptin interact to inhibit nutrient uptake. Clinically, it is interesting to consider how this may alter the usual pattern of cyclical feeding changes in obese women. Leptin resistance, commonly found in obese women, is likely to blunt the peri-ovulatory anorexigenic effect of estradiol. It is already known that leptin resistance also disrupts ovulatory function by inhibiting the kisspeptinergic system (151). This ovulatory dysfunction leads to abnormal estradiol values, thus likely further affecting physiological body weight regulation.
Insulin
Insulin affects energy balance regulation (155). Basal plasma insulin concentrations are proportional to body adiposity (156). Insulin’s secretion and synthesis are affected by a number of genetic, environmental and epigenetic factors. For example, dietary choices impact insulin secretion and synthesis (157). Insulin, like leptin, stimulates anorexigenic pathways, thereby causing reduced food intake. Insulin receptors are expressed on hypothalamic neurons, predominantly in ARC (158). Insulin affects appetite by reducing the expression of NPY neurons in the ARC (159). Again, this is where estradiol also exerts a number of direct effects on appetite, thus raising the possibility of estradiol-insulin interactions to alter food intake.
Furthermore, estradiol and insulin are thought to interact at the peripheral level. For example, estradiol may protect against the development of metabolic syndrome by impacting insulin sensitivity. The post-menopausal drop in estradiol levels is thought to explain, at least partially, the increase in metabolic disorders in post-menopausal women (160–163). In support of this hypothesis, hormone replacement therapies (HRT) that include estradiol have been shown to improve insulin sensitivity and lower blood glucose levels (164–166). This improvement in insulin sensitivity reduces the incidence of diabetes in postmenopausal women (167–169). Support for estradiol altering insulin sensitivity has also been reported in rodents, since estradiol deficient animals are more likely to develop insulin resistance (170, 171).
The clinical implications of this interaction extend beyond hypo-estrogenic states (e.g. post-menopause). A number of women have a hyper-estrogenic state. This can be as a consequence of endocrinopathies (such as PCOS) or simply of their life stage (e.g. perimenopause). Supra-physiological concentrations of estradiol induce a decrease in the expression of insulin receptors, thereby contributing to the development of insulin resistance (172, 173). High doses of estradiol also significantly decrease the amount of insulin receptors and the insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) levels in muscle and adipose tissue in vitro (174). These changes induce a greater release of intracellular calcium given the high concentrations of estradiol, inducing a greater release of insulin into the bloodstream, contributing to sustained hyperinsulinemia. Over time, insulin resistance contributes to the development of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, and sustained hyperinsulinemia contributes to the generation and/or maintenance of ovulatory dysfunction (175, 176).
Overall, this evidence suggests that abnormally high or low levels of estradiol can both lead increased insulin resistance in the brain and peripheral tissues. This means that insulin resistance may be more likely to develop during hyper-estrogenic periods of a woman’s life. Such periods include adolescence, pregnancy and the perimenopause. Women could be more at risk of weight gain during these stages.
GLP-1
GLP-1 is secreted by the pancreas and by intestinal L-cells in response to glucose-induced insulin release (177, 178). It also reduces glucagon secretion in response to a nutrient load (179). Whilst it has a paracrine or endocrine role in the periphery, centrally GLP-1 is an important neuroendocrine agent. GLP-1 is produced in various brain regions including the hypothalamus, the hippocampus, the hindbrain, and the mesolimbic system (180). Both human and animal studies have demonstrated that GLP-1 contributes to the physiological control of appetite and meal size (108, 181–186). Suppression of GLP-1R expression in NST neurons in animal models causes an increase in food intake due to an increase in meal size (187). By contrast, central injections GLP-1R agonists cause a reduction in food intake (188). This anorexic response is largely mediated by neuronal areas within the hypothalamus and brainstem (189–193). Many of these areas are also the ones where estradiol acts to control appetite (194–197). As mentioned earlier, estradiol impacts vagal nerve fiber excitability and density. In the same way, GLP-1R expression in vagal afferent neurons has also been found to be important for affecting food intake and meal size (198). Such co-localization in the sites of GLP and estradiol activity raises the possibility of estradiol and GLP-1 interacting to alter food intake. Support for this hypothesis comes from the finding that, in ovariectomized rats, estradiol replacement enhances peripheral GLP-1 induced suppression on food intake (199, 200).
Estradiol, brain insulin sensitivity and resistance
The activation of estrogenic pathways exerts a neuroprotective effect in the CNS through four different mechanisms [reviewed in (53)]. Low estradiol values may be found in obese women with ovulatory dysfunction and in women during the peri-menopausal and post-menopausal periods. This means that such women lose the neuroprotective effect of estradiol. Briefly, estradiol improves neuronal survival through:
1. Activation of anti-apoptotic and cell survival pathways (90, 201). Estradiol promotes anti-apoptotic pathways by enhancing the transcription of anti-apoptotic genes such as B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) (202) and inactivating pro-apoptotic proteins such as BAD (BCL2 associated agonist of cell death) (203, 204).
2. Regulation of bioenergetics systems. Estradiol increases glucose availability and ATP production in neuronal mitochondria (205). It does this by increasing the number of glucose transporters, glucose uptake and the activity of glycolytic enzymes in aerobic glycolysis (201). It also helps ensure neurons meet their high energy demands appropriately.
3. Regulation of neurogenesis. Estradiol stimulates proliferation of neural progenitor cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner (201, 206).
4. Increased cell survival through protection against free-radical damage. Estradiol reduces oxidative damage and its consequent apoptotic process (205).
Mitochondria are commonly considered the cellular powerhouse sustaining life. Mitochondria produce ATP, enabling stress adaptation for survival. During the production of ATP, the transport of electrons generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) that damage macromolecules, such as mitochondrial DNA, proteins and lipids. This macromolecular damage can contribute to mitochondrial stress. Estradiol regulates mitochondrial morphology and function (207). Estrogens and androgens protect mitochondria against the degenerative effects that occur with aging (208). Estradiol inhibits the activation of cell death caused by ROS (209). When estradiol levels start to decline as women age or they transit to menopause, the protective effect of estradiol is lost (210). As a consequence, when estradiol levels are reduced, ROS levels increase and cause mitochondrial dysfunction. Mitochondrial dysfunction is associated with an imbalance between pro- and anti-oxidants (210). As this dysfunction worsens, significant mitochondrial damage can occur. This damage triggers tissue events associated with cellular senescence as loss of replicative capacity. In the brain, neuronal damage and alteration of cognitive processes occur. Mitochondrial dysfunction occurs in all individuals with age (211). However, the post-menopausal drop in estradiol levels exacerbates this mitochondrial dysfunction. Sex hormone treatment during menopause transition helps reverse the deleterious effects of the drop in estradiol (212).
Insulin also has neuroprotective effects. Insulin action has been found to improve visual and spatial episodic memory, working memory, declarative memory, and learning processes (reviewed in (16)). The neuronal mitochondrial dysfunction that follows a drop in estradiol levels in women causes insulin insensitivity and eventually brain insulin resistance to develop (16, 213, 214).
A proper brain insulin action has been shown to improve mood and counteract cognitive dysfunction in dementia (215). Patients with chronic diabetes are more likely to suffer cognitive impairment, and a number of neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer´s Disease (AD), Parkinson’s Disease and other forms of dementia. All these disorders share the following pathophysiological features: amyloid β accumulation, tau hyperphosphorylation, cerebral vasculopathy, inflammation, and oxidative stress in the CNS. These features are indicative of impaired insulin sensitivity in neurons and glial cells (15, 216–218). The term “Type III diabetes” has been proposed to describe AD that may develop from glucose and insulin dysregulation at the CNS (213, 219).
Finally, is important to highlight that physiological brain insulin sensitivity has also been identified as a predictor of successful weight loss (220). Evidence shows that a high cerebral sensitivity to insulin is related to weight loss (220). Conversely, cerebral insulin resistance leads to increased body weight and obesity. Reduced cerebral insulin sensitivity disrupts the neural controlling food intake. This result in overeating and weight gain (221).
GLP-1 analogs and weight regulation
Weight control is key to combatting obesity and T2D. Recently, attention has turned to using GLP-1 analogs, or GLP-1/glucagon co-agonism to treat these disorders [for review see (222–228)]. For example, liraglutide is a once-daily, subcutaneously administered, GLP-1 receptor agonist (229–232). Results obtained from clinical trials show that it can aid weight loss (229, 230, 233). Indeed, a meta-analysis suggested that GLP-1 agonists may improve weight loss and insulin resistance in obese/overweight women than metformin does (234). Liraglutide has both peripheral and central effects. Peripherally, liraglutide delays gastric emptying, thus increasing the production of other peripheral satiety signals (235). Central administration of liraglutide in laboratory studies results in weight loss through decreased food intake (188, 236). This is mediated by the ARC, PVH, and LH hypothalamic nuclei (188, 236). Liraglutide action in the VMH also increases thermogenesis by increasing UCP1 expression in BAT and WAT (white adipose tissue) (188). Like estradiol, liraglutide inhibits AMPK activity in VMH neurons (188) and alters SNS activity as part of the VMH-SNS-BAT pathway. This is shown by the fact that catecholamine (specifically β3-AR) antagonists block the liraglutide-induced increase in UCP1 levels in BAT and WAT (188, 236).
Estrogens for weight control
Post-menopause, women tend to gain weight. This weight gain is often attributed to aging in general as well as to hormonal changes. As discussed earlier, estradiol levels affect mitochondria. Mitochondria are considered to be the cellular ‘hub’ of aging (210). Estradiol receptors are located in both the inner and outer mitochondrial membranes, as well as in the cell plasma membrane, cell cytoplasm and nucleus (209). The menopausal drop in estradiol will thus affect the process of ATP synthesis and so will alter cellular metabolic pathways. Mitochondrial dysfunction will induce cellular senescence, most especially in brain, adipose and muscle tissues, thus affecting cellular metabolic control, fat distribution and weight gain.
In premenopausal women, there is significant interest in whether supra-physiological concentrations of estradiol, as found in combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC), impact women’s weight (237). This is complicated by the fact that combined contraceptives contain not only estrogens, but also progestins. Thus far, a 2014 Cochrane review found that there was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of CHCs on weight (237). The review found only four trials comparing CHCs with placebo, of which only one followed patients for over a year (238), whilst the remaining three followed weight changes over only 6-9 cycles. A review in which progestin-only contraceptives were studied highlighted the importance of the follow-up period, since longer follow-up periods (2-3 years) showed twice the degree of weight gain as compared to shorter studies (1 year) (239). Thus, the Cochrane review may have been somewhat limited by not just the number of women studied but the duration of clinical trials.
In the post-menopausal population, a 2005 Cochrane review found no effect of estradiol (opposed or unopposed) on women´s weight (240). However, since this review, a subsequent study (KEEPS study) found that BMI increased significantly less (by 1.09kg/m2) in women on HRT rather than placebo (241, 242). Such findings are in keeping with a 2009 HRT study (243) finding that women randomized to HRT gained less weight than those on placebo.
The evidence shown above reinforces the fact that estradiol as a main regulator of mitochondrial function would be an essential factor for healthy weight maintenance in women.
GLP-1 and estradiol conjugates
Estradiol and GLP-1 conjugates share many effects and common pathways in weight control (244). Laboratory studies investigating a potential synergistic interaction between estradiol and GLP-1 have given inconsistent results. One study showed little synergy between exogenously administered labile estradiol-GLP-1 conjugates (245). However, another study noted sex- differences, which could be related to sex steroid levels, in the response to GLP-1 agonists (246). The main differences in GLP-1 activity that have been found between males and females are: i) increased weight loss caused by the GLP-1 agonist, liraglutide, in women as compared with men (247); ii) more immediate increases in GLP-1 levels immediately post-exercise in women during the follicular-phase than in men (248) and iii) increased reward circuits activation following GLP-1 administration in female rats as compared to male rats. Further work is needed to investigate whether it is estradiol that mediates these sex differences in GLP-1 activity. Endogenous GLP-1 levels have been shown to be lower in the follicular phase compared with the luteal phase (27). This is thought to be due to slower gastric emptying during the follicular phase (27). The luteal phase of the menstrual cycle has higher levels of estradiol and progesterone. It would be interesting to observe whether exogenous GLP-1 is more efficacious in women when administered during this hormonal phase as compared with the follicular phase. If so, then perhaps therapeutic GLP-1 could be given more infrequently, but synchronized to women’s hormonal cycles.
Concomitant use of GLP-1 and estradiol conjugates has been primarily limited by the oncogenic and gynecological side-effects that have been attributed to estrogens. Furthermore, weight loss associated with GLP-1 administration alone often fails to meet the required weight reduction for a particular woman (249). Recently, researchers have attempted to circumvent such shortcomings through unimolecular polypharmacy. For example, Finan et al have developed a stable GLP-1-estradiol conjugate (245). They found that a stable GLP-1-estradiol conjugate caused greater weight loss in obese male mice than either GLP-1 controls or labile GLP-1-estradiol conjugates. In labile conjugates, the estradiol rapidly disseminates throughout the circulation in an untargeted fashion. Thus, conjugation appears key to improving GLP-1 and estradiol synergistic effects on weight. The weight loss achieved through the stable conjugate was mainly due to appetite suppression and a decrease in food-intake. Glycemic control and insulin sensitivity were also improved.
Promisingly, this conjugate did not have off-target effects in female mice. Neither the GLP-1 control nor the stable conjugate resulted in an increased uterine weight in ovariectomized mice. This finding indicates that side effects as endometrial hyperplasia would not be expected if administered to women. By contrast, the labile conjugate, which rapidly degrades to release estradiol, did result in increased uterine weight, suggesting off-target effects. Furthermore, LH and FSH levels in mice treated with the GLP-1-estradiol conjugate were unchanged. Thus, the conjugate did not appear to interfere with the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis.
The authors suggest that the GLP-1-estradiol compound allows targeted delivery of estradiol to the CNS. Thus, conjugate estradiol delivery differs significantly from peripheral administration of estradiol as in HRT for example. Indeed, when mice lacking GLP-1 receptors in the CNS were given the GLP-1-estradiol analogue, weight loss was equivalent only to that of GLP-1 administered peripherally. The conjugate also had beneficial effects on glucose homeostasis. This could be due to an additional effect on hepatic glucose production (245). Furthermore, in New Zealand obese mice, the GLP-1-estradiol conjugate protects against carbohydrate-induced hyperglycemia (250). This was largely due to it causing a reduction in appetite, mediated by an induction of POMC expression. Although peripheral effects of the estradiol-GLP-1 conjugates are anticipated, most evidence suggests that the conjugate acts centrally to suppress food-reward (250). These proof-of-concept studies raise interesting possibilities for therapeutic strategies in humans. There is no research, to the authors’ knowledge, investigating GLP-1 analogs in the postmenopausal population specifically. However, in a recent meta-analysis showing the beneficial effects of GLP-1 analogs on weight loss, over 57% of participants were female, and the median age at randomization was 55 years (233). Given that the average age at menopause is 51 years, it is highly likely that a significant number of participants were peri- or post-menopausal women. Furthermore, given that other anti-diabetic treatments such as SGLT-2 inhibitors are feared to adversely affect bone health, there is increasing interest in the benefits of GLP-1 analogs for diabetic post-menopausal women (251). Given the neuroprotective effects of both GLP-1 and estradiol, it would also be interesting to know how such agents might reduce neurodegeneration, especially in menopausal women.
Conclusions and future directions
Obesity in women is a global problem. The comorbidities associated with it decrease their quality and life expectancy. Estradiol is crucial not only in reproductive function, but for the regulation of body weight. It has been showed that normal peri-ovulatory estradiol concentrations have anorexigenic effects. Conversely, stages of a woman’s life, such as adolescence, perimenopause and menopause, that are associated with reduced estradiol, are also associated with weight gain. Conditions, such as pregnancy, in which estradiol levels are high, are a high-risk time where susceptible women are more at risk of developing metabolic comorbidities such as obesity and gestational diabetes. Furthermore, ovulatory dysfunction, such as occurs in PCOS, is associated with weight gain and insulin resistance. Estradiol regulates body weight by decreasing appetite and increasing feelings of satiety. Estradiol controls appetite by acting at specific hypothalamic nuclei, such as the ARC or LH. Estradiol also interacts with peripherally synthetized peptides, such as CCK, leptin and insulin. One of these mediators, GLP-1, acts similarly to and, potentially, synergistically with estradiol. Although GLP-1 analogs were initially characterized as antidiabetic agents, they are increasingly being recognized as anti-obesity agents. The reduction in weight gain when GLP-1 analogs are administered is partially explained by their effects on the CNS. The synergistic effects of GLP-1 analogs combined with estradiol conjugates are promising. If translated to human studies, such conjugates could help women to maintain a healthy body weight and preserve their mental function. This could be particularly important for women whose estradiol levels are abnormal, perhaps as a result of ovarian dysfunction, or whose estradiol levels drop, as part of the normal estradiol decline during menopause. GLP-1-estradiol analogues could perhaps be used in the future to improve central insulin sensitivity. As central insulin resistance appears to be a risk factor for neurodegenerative disorders, these analogues might provide interesting avenues to protect against neurodegeneration and conditions such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Considering the above, future lines of research should focus on the proper dose, timing, safety and frequency when administering GLP-1 analogs and conjugated estradiol as a treatment for body weight disorders.
Author contributions
PV, JM, GP, and JDR: bibliographic search, writing, review and/or revision of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among adults: United states, 2017-2018. NCHS Data Brief (2020) 360):1–8. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/index.htm.
2. Yumuk V, Tsigos C, Fried M, Schindler K, Busetto L, Micic D, et al. European Guidelines for obesity management in adults. Obes Facts (2015) 8(6):402–24. doi: 10.1159/000442721
3. Gambineri A, Laudisio D, Marocco C, Radellini S, Colao A, Savastano S. Female infertility: which role for obesity? Int J Obes Suppl (2019) 9(1):65–72. doi: 10.1038/s41367-019-0009-1
4. Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United states, 2015–2016. In: NCHS data brief, no 288, vol. 288). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. NCHS Data Brief (2017). p. 1–8. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db288.pdf.
5. Bozdag G, Mumusoglu S, Zengin D, Karabulut E, Yildiz BO. The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod (2016) 31(12):2841–55. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew218
6. Naz SG, Tehrani, Ramezani F, Alavi Majd H, Ahmadi F. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Reprod Biomed (2019) 17(8):533–42. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v17i8.4818
7. Silvestris E, de Pergola G, Rosania R, Loverro G. Obesity as disruptor of the female fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol (2018) 16(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0336-z
8. Liu T, Qin QY, Qu JX, Wang HY, Yan J. Where are the theca cells from: The mechanism of theca cells derivation and differentiation. Chin Med J (Engl) (2020) 133(14):1711–8. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000850
9. Vigil P, Cortes M, del Rio MJ, Godoy A. Sindrome de ovario poliquistico. In: Guzman E, Lalonde A, editors. Selección de temas en ginecoobstetricia, Santiago, Chile: Publimpacto (2007). p. 563–78.
10. Vigil P, Contreras P, Alvarado JL, Godoy A, Salgado AM, Cortés ME. Evidence of subpopulations with different levels of insulin resistance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod (2007) 22(11):2974–80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem302
11. Geary N, Asarian L. Modulation of appetite by gonadal steroid hormones. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci (2006) 361(1471):1251–63. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1860
12. Hirschberg AL. Sex hormones, appetite and eating behaviour in women. Maturitas (2012) 71(3):248–56. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.12.016
13. Leeners B, Geary N, Tobler PN, Asarian L. Ovarian hormones and obesity. Hum Reprod Update (2017) 23(3):300–21. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw045
14. Xu Y, López M. Central regulation of energy metabolism by estrogens. Mol Metab (2018) 15:104–15. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.05.012
15. Tumminia A, Vinciguerra F, Parisi M, Frittitta L. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and alzheimer’s disease: Role of insulin signalling and therapeutic implications. Int J Mol Sci (2018) 19(11):1–17. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113306
16. Kullmann S, Heni M, Hallschmid M, Fritsche A, Preissl H, Häring HU. Brain insulin resistance at the crossroads of metabolic and cognitive disorders in humans. Physiol Rev (2016) 96(4):1169–209. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00032.2015
17. Hölscher C. Central effects of GLP-1: New opportunities for treatments of neurodegenerative diseases. J Endocrinol (2014) 221(1):T31–T41. doi: 10.1530/JOE-13-0221
18. McClean PL, Hölscher C. Liraglutide can reverse memory impairment, synaptic loss and reduce plaque load in aged APP/PS1 mice, a model of alzheimer’s disease. Neuropharmacology (2014) 76(PART A):57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.08.005
19. Kalra SP, Dube MG, Pu S, Xu B, Horvath TL, Kalra PS. Interacting appetite-regulating pathways in the hypothalamic regulation of body weight. Endocr Rev (1999) 20(1):68–100. doi: 10.1210/edrv.20.1.0357
20. Williams G, Bing C, Cai XJ, Harrold JA, King PJ, Liu XH. The hypothalamus and the control of energy homeostasis: Different circuits, different purposes. Physiol Behav (2001) 74(4–5):683–701. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00612-6
21. Davidsen L, Vistisen B, Astrup A. Impact of the menstrual cycle on determinants of energy balance: A putative role in weight loss attempts. Int J Obes (2007) 31(12):1777–85. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803699
22. Butera PC, Bradway DM, Cataldo NJ. Modulation of the satiety effect of cholecystokinin by estradiol. Physiol Behav (1993) 53(6):1235–8. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(93)90387-U
23. Eckel LA. Estradiol: A rhythmic, inhibitory, indirect control of meal size. Physiol Behav (2004) 82(1):35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.04.023
24. Dye L, Blundell JE. Menstrual cycle and appetite control: Implications for weight regulation. Hum Reprod (1997) 12(6):1142–51. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.6.1142
25. van Vugt DA. Brain imaging studies of appetite in the context of obesity and the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod Update (2009) 16(3):276–92. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp051
26. Pohle-Krauza RJ, Carey KH, Pelkman CL. Dietary restraint and menstrual cycle phase modulated l-phenylalanine-induced satiety. Physiol Behav (2008) 93(4–5):851–61. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.11.051
27. Brennan IM, Feltrin KL, Nair NS, Hausken T, Little TJ, Gentilcore D, et al. Effects of the phases of the menstrual cycle on gastric emptying, glycemia, plasma GLP-1 and insulin, and energy intake in healthy lean women. Am J Physiol - Gastrointest Liver Physiol (2009) 297(3):602–10. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00051.2009
28. Hill AJ, Heaton-Brown L. The experience of food craving: A prospective investigation in healthy women. J Psychosom Res (1994) 38(8):801–14. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90068-X
29. Bowen DJ, Grunberg NE. Variations in food preference and consumption across the menstrual cycle. Physiol Behav (1990) 47(2):287–91. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90144-S
30. Cohen IT, Sherwin BB, Fleming AS. Food cravings, mood, and the menstrual cycle. Horm Behav (1987) 21(4):457–70. doi: 10.1016/0018-506X(87)90004-3
31. Dalvit-McPhillips SP. The effect of the human menstrual cycle on nutrient intake. Physiol Behav (1983) 31(2):209–12. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(83)90120-8
32. Johnson WG, Corrigan SA, Lemmon CR, Bergeron KB, Crusco AH. Energy regulation over the menstrual cycle. Physiol Behav (1994) 56(3):523–7. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90296-8
33. Barr SI, Janelle KC, Prior JC. Energy intakes are higher during the luteal phase of ovulatory menstrual cycles. Am J Clin Nutr (1995) 61(1):39–43. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/61.1.39
34. Martini MC, Lampe JW, Slavin JL, Kurzer MS. Effect of the menstrual cycle on energy and nutrient intake. Am J Clin Nutr (1994) 60(6):895–9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/60.6.895
35. Cross GB, Marley J, Miles H, Willson K. Changes in nutrient intake during the menstrual cycle of overweight women with premenstrual syndrome. Br J Nutr (2001) 85(4):475–82. doi: 10.1079/BJN2000283
36. Wurtman JJ, Brzezinski A, Wurtman RJ, Laferrere B. Effect of nutrient intake on premenstrual depression. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1989) 161(5):1228–34. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90671-6
37. Pliner P, Fleming AS. Food intake, body weight, and sweetness preferences over the menstrual cycle in humans. Physiol Behav (1983) 30(4):663–6. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(83)90240-8
38. Brzez1nski AA, Wurtman JJ, Wurtman RJ, Gleason R, Greenfield J, Nader T. D-fenfluramine suppresses the increased calorie and carbohydrate intakes and improves the mood of women with premenstrual depression. Obstet Gynecol (1990) 76(2):296–301. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(91)90645-l
39. Lundman B, Asplund K, Norberg A. Metabolic control, food intake and mood during the menstrual cycle in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. Int J Nurs Stud (1994) 31(4):391–401. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(94)90079-5
40. Piers LS, Diggavi SN, Rijskamp J, Van Raaij JMA, Shetty PS, Hautvast JGAJ. Resting metabolic rate and thermic effect of a meal in the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle in well-nourished Indian women. Am J Clin Nutr (1995) 61(2):296–302. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/61.2.296
41. Bryant M, Truesdale KP, Dye L. Modest changes in dietary intake across the menstrual cycle: Implications for food intake research. Br J Nutr (2006) 96(5):888–94. doi: 10.1017/BJN20061931
42. Fong AKH, Kretsch MJ. Changes in dietary intake, urinary nitrogen, and urinary volume across the menstrual cycle. Am J Clin Nutr (1993) 57(1):43–6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/57.1.43
43. Gorczyca AM, Sjaarda LA, Mitchell EM. Changes in macronutrient, micronutrient, and food group intakes throughout the menstrual cycle in healthy, premenopausal women. Eur J Nutr (2016) 55(3):1181–8. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-0931-0
44. Derntl B, Schöpf V, Kollndorfer K, Lanzenberger R. Menstrual cycle phase and duration of oral contraception intake affect olfactory perception. Chem Senses (2013) 38(1):67–75. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjs084
45. Alonso-Alonso M, Ziemke F, Magkos F, Barrios FA, Brinkoetter M, Boyd I, et al. Brain responses to food images during the early and late follicular phase of the menstrual cycle in healthy young women: Relation to fasting and feeding. Am J Clin Nutr (2011) 94(2):377–84. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.010736
46. Alberti-Fidanza A, Fruttini D, Servili M. Gustatory and food habit changes during the menstrual cycle. Int J Vitam Nutr Res (1998) 68(2):149–53. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600654
47. Navarrete-Palacios E, Hudson R, Reyes-Guerrero G, Guevara-Guzmán R. Lower olfactory threshold during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle. Biol Psychol (2003) 63(3):269–79. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00076-0
48. Than TT, Delay ER, Maier ME. Sucrose threshold variation during the menstrual cycle. Physiol Behav (1994) 56(2):237–9. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90189-9
49. Pletzer B, Crone JS, Kronbichler M, Kerschbaum H. Menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptive-dependent changes in intrinsic connectivity of resting-state brain networks correspond to behavioral changes due to hormonal status. Brain Connect (2016) 6(7):572–85. doi: 10.1089/brain.2015.0407
50. Dreher JC, Schmidt PJ, Kohn P, Furman D, Rubinow D, Berman KF. Menstrual cycle phase modulates reward-related neural function in women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2007) 104(7):2465–70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605569104
51. Frank TC, Kim GL, Krzemien A, Van Vugt DA. Effect of menstrual cycle phase on corticolimbic brain activation by visual food cues. Brain Res (2010) 1363:81–92. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.071
52. Caruso S, Grillo C, Agnello C, Maiolino L, Intelisano G, Serra A. A prospective study evidencing rhinomanometric and olfactometric outcomes in women taking oral contraceptives. Hum Reprod (2001) 16(11):2288–94. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2288
53. Del Río JP, Alliende MI, Molina N, Serrano FG, Molina S, Vigil P. Steroid hormones and their action in women’s brains: The importance of hormonal balance. Front Public Heal (2018) 6:1–15. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00141
54. Klump KL, Keel PK, Culbert KM. Ovarian hormones and binge eating: exploring associations in community samples. Psychol Med (2008) 38(12):1749–57. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708002997
55. Edler C, Lipson SF, Keel PK. Ovarian hormones and binge eating in bulimia nervosa. Psychol Med (2007) 37(1):131–41. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706008956
56. Klump KL, Keel PK, Sisk C, Burt SA. Preliminary evidence that estradiol moderates genetic influences on disordered eating attitudes and behaviors during puberty. Psychol Med (2010) 40(10):1745–53. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709992236
57. Hay P. Current approach to eating disorders: a clinical update. Intern Med J (2020) 50(1):24–9. doi: 10.1111/imj.14691
58. Lester NA, Keel PK, Lipson SF. Symptom fluctuation in bulimia nervosa: Relation to menstrual-cycle phase and cortisol levels. Psychol Med (2003) 33(1):51–60. doi: 10.1017/S0033291702006815
59. Klump KL, Racine SE, Hildebrandt B, Alexandra Burt S, Neale M, Sisk CL, et al. Influences of ovarian hormones on dysregulated eating: A comparison of associations in women with versus women without binge episodes. Clin Psychol Sci (2014) 2(5):545–59. doi: 10.1177/2167702614521794
60. Klump KL, Keel PK, Racine SE, Burt AA, Neale M, Sisk CL, et al. The interactive effects of estrogen and progesterone on changes in emotional eating across the menstrual cycle. J Abnorm Psychol (2013) 122(1):131–7. doi: 10.1037/a0029524
61. Zhu LL, Blair H, Cao J, Yuen T, Latif R, Guo L, et al. Blocking antibody to the β-subunit of FSH prevents bone loss by inhibiting bone resorption and stimulating bone synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2012) 109(36):14574–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212806109
62. Trout KK, Basel-Brown L, Rickels MR, Schutta MH, Petrova M, Freeman EW, et al. Insulin sensitivity, food intake, and cravings with premenstrual syndrome: A pilot study. J Women’s Heal (2008) 17(4):657–65. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0594
63. Racine SE, Culbert KM, Keel PK, Sisk CL, Alexandra Burt S, Klump KL. Differential associations between ovarian hormones and disordered eating symptoms across the menstrual cycle in women. Int J Eat Disord (2012) 45(3):333–44. doi: 10.1002/eat.20941
64. Godsland IF, Walton C, Felton C, Proudler A, Patel A, Wynn V. Insulin resistance, secretion, and metabolism in users of oral contraceptives. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1992) 74(1):64–70. doi: 10.1210/jcem.74.1.1530790
65. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Baillargeon JP, Iuorno MJ, Jakubowicz DJ, Nestler JE. Controversies in endocrinology - a modern medical quandary: Polycystic ovary syndrome, insulin resistance, and oral contraceptive pills. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2003) 88(5):1927–32. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021528
66. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Dunaif A. Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome revisited: An update on mechanisms and implications. Endocr Rev (2012) 33(6):981–1030. doi: 10.1210/er.2011-1034
67. Sutter-Dub MT, Kaaya A, latif SA, Sodoyez-Goffaux F, Sodoyez JC, Sutter BCJ. Progesterone and synthetic steroids produce insulin resistance at the post-receptor level in adipocytes of female rats. Steroids (1988) 52(5–6):583–608. doi: 10.1016/0039-128X(88)90125-0
68. Anderson RC, Newton CL, Anderson RA, Millar RP. Gonadotropins and their analogs: Current and potential clinical applications. Endocr Rev (2018) 39(6):911–37. doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00052
69. Zaidi M, New M, Blair H, Zalone A. Actions of pituitary hormones beyond traditional targets. J Endocrinol (2018) 237(3):R83–98. doi: 10.1530/JOE-17-0680
70. Liu XM, Chan HC, Ding GL, Cai J, Song Y, Wang TT, et al. FSH regulates fat accumulation and redistribution in aging through the Gαi/Ca2+/CREB pathway. Aging Cell (2015) 14(3):409–20. doi: 10.1111/acel.12331
71. Liu P, Ji Y, Yuen T, Rendina-Ruedy E, DeMambro VE, Dhawan S, et al. Blocking FSH induces thermogenic adipose tissue and reduces body fat. Obstet Gynecol Surv (2017) 72(10):601–2. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000525900.85600.c2
72. Quinn M, Xu X MR. Estrogen deficiency promotes hepatic steatosis via a glucocorticoid receptor-dependent mechanism in mice. Cell Rep (2018) 22(10):2690–701. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.041
73. Cui H, Zhao G, Liu R, Zheng M, Chen J, Wen J. FSH stimulates lipid biosynthesis in chicken adipose tissue by upregulating the expression of its receptor FSHR. J Lipid Res (2012) 53(5):909–17. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M025403
74. Han X, Guan Z, Xu M, Zhang Y, Yao H, Meng F, et al. A novel follicle-stimulating hormone vaccine for controlling fat accumulation. Theriogenology (2020) 148:103–11. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.03.005
75. Ellacott KLJ, Cone RD. The central melanocortin system and the integration of short- and long-term regulators of energy homeostasis. Recent Prog Horm Res (2004) 59:395–408. doi: 10.1210/rp.59.1.395
76. Yang YK, Harmon CM. Recent developments in our understanding of melanocortin system in the regulation of food intake. Obes Rev (2003) 4(4):239–48. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2003.00104.x
77. Rossi M, Kim MS, Morgan DGA, Small CJ, Edwards CMB, Sunter D, et al. A c-terminal fragment of agouti-related protein increases feeding and antagonizes the effect of alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone in vivo. Endocrinology (1998) 139(10):4428–31. doi: 10.1210/endo.139.10.6332
78. De Souza FSJ, Nasif S, López-Leal R, Levi DH, Low MJ, Rubinsten M. The estrogen receptor α colocalizes with proopiomelanocortin in hypothalamic neurons and binds to a conserved motif present in the neuron-specific enhancer nPE2. Eur J Pharmacol (2011) 660(1):181–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.10.114
79. Roepke TA. Oestrogen modulates hypothalamic control of energy homeostasis through multiple mechanisms. J Neuroendocrinol (2009) 21(2):141–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01814.x
80. Richard CD, Tolle V, Low MJ. Meal pattern analysis in neural-specific proopiomelanocortindeficient mice. Eur J Pharmacol (2011) 660(1):131–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.12.022
81. Zemel MB, Shi H. Pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) deficiency and peripheral melanocortins in obesity. Nutr Rev (2000) 58(6):177–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2000.tb01857.x
82. Roepke TA, Ronnekleiv OK, Kelly MJ. Physiological consequences of membrane-initiated estrogen signaling in the brain. Front Biosci (2011) 16(4):1560–73. doi: 10.2741/3805
83. Smith A, Rønnekleiv O, Kelly M. Gq-mER signaling has opposite effects on hypothalamic orexigenic and anorexigenic neurons. Steroids (2014) 0, 31–5. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2013.11.007
84. Stincic TL, Grachev P, Bosch MA, Rønnekleiv OK, Kelly MJ. Estradiol drives the anorexigenic activity of proopiomelanocortin neurons in female mice. eNeuro (2018) 5(4):1–18. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0103-18.2018
85. Pillot B, Duraffourd C, Bégeot M, Joly A, Luquet S, Houberdon I, et al. Role of hypothalamic melanocortin system in adaptation of food intake to food protein increase in mice. PloS One (2011) 6(4):e19107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019107
86. Olofsson LE, Pierce AA, Xu AW. Functional requirement of AgRP and NPY neurons in ovarian cycle-dependent regulation of food intake. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2009) 106(37):15932–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904747106
87. Santollo J, Yao D, Neal-Perry G, Etgen AM. Middle-aged female rats retain sensitivity to the anorexigenic effect of exogenous estradiol. Behav Brain Res (2012) 232(1):159–64. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.04.010
88. Levin ER. Plasma membrane estrogen receptors. Trends Endocrinol Metab (2009) 20(10):477–82. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2009.06.009
89. Qiu LR, Germann J, Spring S, Alm C, Vousden DA, Palmert MR, et al. Hippocampal volumes differ across the mouse estrous cycle, can change within 24hours, and associate with cognitive strategies. Neuroimage (2013) 83:593–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.074
90. Arevalo MA, Azcoitia I, Garcia-Segura LM. The neuroprotective actions of oestradiol and oestrogen receptors. Nat Rev Neurosci (2015) 16(1):17–29. doi: 10.1038/nrn3856
91. Sharma G. G-Protein-Coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) and sex-specific metabolic homeostasis. Adv Exp Med Biol (2017) 1043:427–53. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-70178-3_20
92. Qiu J, Bosch MA, Tobias SC, Krust A, Graham SM, Murphy SJ, et al. A G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor is involved in hypothalamic control of energy homeostasis. J Neurosci (2006) 26(21):5649–55. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0327-06.2006
93. Marraudino M, Carrillo B, Bonaldo B, Llorente R, Campioli E, Garate I, et al. G Protein-coupled estrogen receptor immunoreactivity in the rat hypothalamus is widely distributed in neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, fluctuates during the estrous cycle, and is sexually dimorphic. Neuroendocrinology (2021) 111(7):660–77. doi: 10.1159/000509583
94. Chouchani ET, Kazak L, Spiegelman BM. New advances in adaptive thermogenesis: UCP1 and beyond. Cell Metab (2019) 29(1):27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.11.002
95. Harms M, Seale P. Brown and beige fat: Development, function and therapeutic potential. Nat Med (2013) 19(10):1252–63. doi: 10.1038/nm.3361
96. Perkins MN, Rothwell NJ, Stock MJ, Stone TW. Activation of brown adipose tissue thermogenesis by the ventromedial hypothalamus. Nature (1981) 289(5796):401–2. doi: 10.1038/289401a0
97. Yoshimatsu H, Egawa M, Bray GA. Sympathetic nerve activity after discrete hypothalamic injections of l-glutamate. Brain Res (1993) 601(1–2):121–8. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91702-T
98. López M, Varela L, Vázquez MJ, Rodríguez-Cuenca S. Hypothalamic AMPK and fatty acid metabolism mediate thyroid regulation of energy balance. Nat Med (2010) 16(9):1001–8. doi: 10.1038/nm.2207
99. Whittle AJ, Carobbio S, Martins L, Slawik M, Hondares E, Vázquez MJ, et al. BMP8B increases brown adipose tissue thermogenesis through both central and peripheral actions. Cell (2012) 149(4):871–85. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.066
100. Seoane-Collazo P, Martínez De Morentin PB, Fernø J, Diéguez C, Nogueiras R, López M. Nicotine improves obesity and hepatic steatosis and ER stress in diet-induced obese male rats. Endocrinology (2014) 155(5):1679–89. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1839
101. Martínez De Morentin PB, González-García I, Martins L, Lage R, Fernández-Mallo D, Martínez-Sánchez N, et al. Estradiol regulates brown adipose tissue thermogenesis via hypothalamic AMPK. Cell Metab (2014) 20(1):41–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.031
102. López M, Nogueiras R, Tena-Sempere M, Diéguez C. Hypothalamic AMPK: A canonical regulator of whole-body energy balance. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2016) 12(7):421–32. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.67
103. Liu H, Xu Y, Hu F. AMPK in the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus: A key regulator for thermogenesis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2020) 11:1–13. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.578830
104. Hardie DG, Ross FA, Hawley SA. AMPK: A nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2012) 13(4):251–62. doi: 10.1038/nrm3311
105. Morrison SF, Madden CJ, Tupone D. Central neural regulation of brown adipose tissue thermogenesis and energy expenditure. Cell Metab (2014) 19(5):741–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.02.007
106. Minokoshi Y, Alquier T, Furukawa H, Kim YB, Lee A, Xue B, et al. AMP-kinase regulates food intake by responding to hormonal and nutrient signals in the hypothalamus. Nature (2004) 428(6982):569–74. doi: 10.1038/nature02440
107. López M, Lage R, Saha AK, Pérez-Tilve D, Vázquez MJ, Varela L, et al. Hypothalamic fatty acid metabolism mediates the orexigenic action of ghrelin. Cell Metab (2008) 7(5):389–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.03.006
108. Liu J, Conde K, Zhang P, Lilascharoen V. Enhanced AMPA receptor trafficking mediates the anorexigenic effect of endogenous glucagon like peptide-1 in the paraventricular hypothalamus. Neuron (2017) 96(4):897–909. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.042
109. Hardie DG. Targeting an energy sensor to treat diabetes. Sci (80- ). (2017) 357(6350):455–6. doi: 10.1126/science.aao1913
110. Stark R, Ashley SE, Andrews ZB. AMPK and the neuroendocrine regulation of appetite and energy expenditure. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2013) 366(2):215–23. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2012.06.012
111. Lin SC, Hardie DG. AMPK: Sensing glucose as well as cellular energy status. Cell Metab (2018) 27(2):299–313. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.10.009
112. Cannon B, Nedergaard J. Brown adipose tissue: Function and physiological significance. Physiol Rev (2004) 84(1):277–359. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2003
113. Yoshida T, Nishioka H, Yoshioka K, Kondo M. Reduced norepinephrine turnover in interscapular brown adipose tissue of obese rats after ovariectomy. Metabolism (1987) 36(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(87)90054-0
114. Rodríguez AM, Monjo M, Roca P, Palou A. Opposite actions of testosterone and progesterone on UCP1 mRNA expression in cultured brown adipocytes. Cell Mol Life Sci (2002) 59(10):1714–23. doi: 10.1007/PL00012499
115. Monjo M, Rodríguez AM, Palou A, Roca P. Direct effects of testosterone, 17β-estradiol, and progesterone on adrenergic regulation in cultured brown adipocytes: Potential mechanism for gender-dependent thermogenesis. Endocrinology (2003) 144(11):4923–30. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-0537
116. Rodriguez-Cuenca S, Monjo M, Frontera M, Gianotti M, Proenza AM, Roca P. Sex steroid receptor expression profile in brown adipose tissue. Effects Hormonal Status Cell Physiol Biochem (2007) 20(6):877–86. doi: 10.1159/000110448
117. Cousin B, Cinti S, Morroni M, Raimbault S, Ricquier D, Penicaud L, et al. Occurrence of brown adipocytes in rat white adipose tissue: Molecular and morphological characterization. J Cell Sci (1992) 103(4):931–42. doi: 10.1242/jcs.103.4.931
118. Beglinger C, Degen L. Fat in the intestine as a regulator of appetite - role of CCK. Physiol Behav (2004) 83(4):617–21. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.07.031
119. Langhans W, Geary N. Overview of the physiological control of eating. Forum Nutr (2010) 63:9–53. doi: 10.1159/000264392
120. Ritter RC. Gastrointestinal mechanisms of satiation for food. Physiol Behav (2004) 81(2):249–73. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.02.012
121. Smith GP. Cholecystokinin and treatment of meal size: proof of principle. Obes (Silver Spring) (2006) 14 Suppl 4:16931501. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.300
122. Rehfeld JF. Cholecystokinin-from local gut hormone to ubiquitous messenger. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2017) 8:1–8. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00047
123. Gibbs J, Young RC, Smith GP. Cholecystokinin elicits satiety in rats with open gastric fistulas. Nature (1973) 245(5424):323–5. doi: 10.1038/245323a0
124. Dun NJ, Wu SY, Lin CW. Excitatory effects of cholecystokinin octapeptide on rat nodose ganglion cells in vitro. Brain Res (1991) 556(1):161–4. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)90562-A
125. Gaisano GG, Park SJ, Daly DM, Beyak MJ. Glucagon-like peptide-1 inhibits voltage-gated potassium currents in mouse nodose ganglion neurons. Neurogastroenterol Motil (2010) 22(4):0–1. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01430.x
126. Koda S, Date Y, Murakami N, Shimbara T, Hanada T, Toshinai K, et al. The role of the vagal nerve in peripheral PYY 3-36-induced feeding reduction in rats. Endocrinology (2005) 146(5):2369–75. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1266
127. Peters JH, Ritter RC, Simasko SM. Leptin and CCK modulate complementary background conductances to depolarize cultured nodose neurons. Am J Physiol - Cell Physiol (2006) 290(2):427–32. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00439.2005
128. De Lartigue G. Putative roles of neuropeptides in vagal afferent signaling. Physiol Behav (2014) 0:155–69. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.03.011
129. Lee SJ, Krieger JP, Vergara M, Quinn D. Blunted vagal cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript promotes hyperphagia and weight gain. Cell Rep (2020) 30(6):2028–39. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.045
130. Smith DV. Taste: Vertebrate central pathways. In: Squire LR, editor. Encyclopedia of neuroscience (California, USA: Elsevier Ltd.) (2009).
131. Lindén A, Uvnäs-Moberg K, Forsberg G, Bednar I, Södersten P. Involvement of cholecystokinin in food intake: III. oestradiol potentiates the inhibitory effect of cholecystokinin octapeptide on food intake in ovariectomized rats. J Neuroendocrinol (1990) 2(6):797–801. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.1990.tb00641.x
132. Geary N, Trace D, McEwen B, Smith GP. Cyclic estradiol replacement increases the satiety effect of CCK-8 in ovariectomized rats. Physiol Behav (1994) 56(2):281–9. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90196-1
133. Dulawa SC, Vanderweele DA. Cholecystokinin and estradiol synergistically potentiate satiety in rats. Peptides (1994) 15(5):913–8. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(94)90050-7
134. Eckel LA, Geary N. Endogenous cholecystokinin’s satiating action increases during estrus in female rats. Peptides (1999) 20(4):451–6. doi: 10.1016/S0196-9781(99)00025-X
135. Asarian L, Geary N. Cyclic estradiol treatment phasically potentiates endogenous cholecystokinin’s satiating action in ovariectomized rats. Peptides (1999) 20(4):445–50. doi: 10.1016/S0196-9781(99)00024-8
136. Asarian L, Geary N. Estradiol enhances cholecystokinin-dependent lipid-induced satiation and activates estrogen receptor-α-expressing cells in the nucleus tractus solitarius of ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology (2007) 148(12):5656–66. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0341
137. Thammacharoen S, Lutz TA, Geary N, Asarian L. Hindbrain administration of estradiol inhibits feeding and activates estrogen receptor-α-expressing cells in the nucleus tractus solitarius of ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology (2008) 149(4):1609–17. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0340
138. Thammacharoen S, Kitchanukitwattana P, Suwanapaporn P, Chaiyabutr N. Effects of hindbrain infusion of an estrogen receptor antagonist on estrogenic modulation of eating behavior. Neurophysiology (2017) 49(1):72–7. doi: 10.1007/s11062-017-9631-0
139. Huang KP, Raybould HE. Estrogen and gut satiety hormones in vagus-hindbrain axis. Peptides (2020) 133:1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2020.170389
140. Huang KP, Ronveaux CC, De Lartigue G, Geary N, Asarian L, Raybould HE. Deletion of leptin receptors in vagal afferent neurons disrupts estrogen signaling, body weight, food intake and hormonal controls of feeding in female mice. Am J Physiol - Endocrinol Metab (2019) 316(4):E568–77. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00296.2018
141. Micevych P, Eckersell CB, Holland K, Smith A. Induction of CCK mRNA levels in the limbic-hypothalamic circuit: Time course and site-specific effects of estrogen. J Neurobiol (1996) 30(4):465–79. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199608)30:4<465::AID-NEU3>3.0.CO;2-1
142. Hilke S, Hökfelt T, Darwish M, Theodorsson E. Cholecystokinin levels in the rat brain during the estrous cycle. Brain Res (2007) 1144(1):70–3. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.107
143. Leibel RL, Chung WK, Chua SC. The molecular genetics of rodent single gene obesities. J Biol Chem (1997) 272(51):31937–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.51.31937
144. Alingh Prins A, de Jong-Nagelsmit A, Keijser J, Strubbe JH. Daily rhythms of feeding in the genetically obese and lean zucker rats. Physiol Behav (1986) 38(3):423–6. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90115-0
145. McLaughlin CL, Baile CA. Ontogeny of feeding behavior in the zucker obese rat. Physiol Behav (1981) 26(4):607–12. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(81)90132-3
146. Trayhurn P, Thurlby PL, James WPT. Thermogenic defect in pre-obese ob/ob mice [17]. Nature (1977) 266(5597):60–2. doi: 10.1038/266060a0
147. Dauncey MJ. Activity-induced thermogenesis in lean and genetically obese (ob/ob) mice. Experientia (1986) 42(5):547–9. doi: 10.1007/BF01946696
148. Dauncey MJ, Brown D. Role of activity-induced thermogenesis in twenty-four hour energy expenditure of lean and genetically obese (Ob/Ob) mice. Q J Exp Physiol (1987) 72(4):549–59. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1987.sp003096
149. Gao Q, Horvath TL. Cross-talk between estrogen and leptin signaling in the hypothalamus. Am J Physiol - Endocrinol Metab (2008) 294(5):E817–E826. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00733.2007
150. Satoh N, Ogawa Y, Katsuura G, Numata Y, Masuzaki H, Yoshimasa Y, et al. Satiety effect and sympathetic activation of leptin are mediated by hypothalamic melanocortin system. Neurosci Lett (1998) 249(2–3):107–10. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00401-7
151. Cortés ME, Carrera B, Rioseco H, Pablo del Río J, Vigil P. The role of kisspeptin in the onset of puberty and in the ovulatory mechanism: A mini-review. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol (2015) 28(5):286–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.09.017
152. Diano S, Kalra SP, Sakamoto H, Horvath TL. Leptin receptors in estrogen receptor-containing neurons of the female rat hypothalamus. Brain Res (1998) 812(1–2):256–9. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00936-6
153. Fungfuang W, Nakada T, Nakao N, Terada M, Yokosuka M, Gizurarson S, et al. Serum leptin concentrations, leptin mRNA expression, and food intake during the estrous cycle in rats. Lab Anim Res (2013) 29(1):1. doi: 10.5625/lar.2013.29.1.1
154. Clegg DJ, Brown LM, Woods SC, Benoit SC. Gonadal hormones determine sensitivity to central leptin and insulin. Diabetes (2006) 55:978–87. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.55.04.06.db05-1339
155. Schwartz MW, Figlewicz DP, Baskin DG, Woods SC, Porte D. Insulin in the brain: A hormonal regulator of energy balance. Endocr Rev (1992) 13(3):387–414. doi: 10.1210/edrv-13-3-387
156. Kolb H, Kempf K, Röhling M, Martin S. Insulin: too much of a good thing is bad. BMC Med (2020) 18(224):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01688-6
157. Kaiyala KJ, Prigeon RL, Kahn SE, Woods SC, Schwartz MW. Obesity induced by a high-fat diet is associated with reduced brain insulin transport in dogs. Diabetes (2000) 49(9):1525–33. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.9.1525
158. Pardini AW, Nguyen HT, Figlewicz DP, Baskin DG, Williams DL, Kim F, et al. Distribution of insulin receptor substrate-2 in brain areas involved in energy homeostasis. Brain Res (2006) 1112(1):169–78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.109
159. Frankish HM, Dryden S, Hopkins D, Wang Q, Williams G. Neuropeptide y, the hypothalamus, and diabetes: Insights into the central control of metabolism. Peptides (1995) 16(4):757–71. doi: 10.1016/0196-9781(94)00200-P
160. Krotkiewski M, Bjorntorp P, Sjostrom L, Smith U. Impact of obesity on metabolism in men and women. importance of regional adipose tissue distribution. J Clin Invest (1983) 72(3):1150–62. doi: 10.1172/JCI111040
161. Laws A, Hoen HM, Selby JV, Saad MF, Haffner SM, Howard BV. Differences in insulin suppression of free fatty acid levels by gender and glucose tolerance status: Relation to plasma triglyceride and apolipoprotein b concentrations. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (1997) 17(1):64–71. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.17.1.64
162. Frias JP, Macaraeg GB, Ofrecio J, Yu JG, Olefsky JM, Kruszynska YT. Decreased susceptibility to fatty acid-induced peripheral tissue insulin resistance in women. Diabetes (2001) 50(6):1344–50. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.6.1344
163. Ford ES. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome defined by the International Diabetes Federation among adults in the U.S. Diabetes Care (2005) 28(11):2745–9. http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/28/11/2745. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2745
164. Crespo CJ, Smit E, Snelling A, Sempos CT, Andersen RE. Hormone replacement therapy and its relationship to lipid and glucose metabolism in diabetic and nondiabetic postmenopausal women: Results from the third national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III). Diabetes Care (2002) 25(10):1675–80. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.10.1675
165. Espeland MA, Marcovina SM, Miller V, Wood PD, Wasilauskas C, Sherwin R, et al. Effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on lipoprotein(a) concentration. Circulation (1998) 97(10):979–86. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.97.10.979
166. Saglam K, Polat Z, Yilmaz MI, Gulec M. Effects of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy on insulin resistance. Endocrine (2002) 18(3):211–4. doi: 10.1385/ENDO:18:3:211
167. Bonds DE, Larson JC, Schwartz AV, Strotmeyer ES, Robbins J, Rodriguez BL, et al. Risk of fracture in women with type 2 diabetes: The women’s health initiative observational study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2006) 91(9):3404–10. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0614
168. Margolis KL, Bonds DE, Rodabough RJ, Tinker L, Phillips LS, Allen C, et al. Effect of oestrogen plus progestin on the incidence of diabetes in postmenopausal women: Results from the women’s health initiative hormone trial. Diabetologia (2004) 47(7):1175–87. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1448-x
169. Salpeter SR, Walsh JME, Ormiston TM, Greyber E, Buckley NS, Salpeter EE. Meta-analysis: Effect of hormone-replacement therapy on components of the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women. Diabetes Obes Metab (2006) 8(5):538–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2005.00545.x
170. Louet JF, LeMay C, Mauvais-Jarvis F. Antidiabetic actions of estrogen: Insight from human and genetic mouse models. Curr Atheroscler Rep (2004) 6(3):180–5. doi: 10.1007/s11883-004-0030-9
171. Kumagai S, Holmäng A, Björntorp P. The effects of oestrogen and progesterone on insulin sensitivity in female rats. Acta Physiol Scand (1993) 149(1):91–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1993.tb09596.x
172. Meyer MR, Clegg DJ, Prossnitz ER, Barton M. Obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes: Sex differences and role of estrogen receptors. Acta Physiol (Oxf) (2011) 203(1):259–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02237.x
173. De Paoli M, Zakharia A, Werstuck GH. The role of estrogen in insulin resistance: A review of clinical and preclinical data. Am J Pathol (2021) 191(9):1490–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.05.011
174. González C, Alonso A, Grueso NA, Esteban MM, Fernández S, Patterson AM. Effect of treatment with different doses of 17-β-estradiol on the insulin receptor. Life Sci (2002) 70(14):1621–30. doi: 10.1016/S0024-3205(02)01489-3
175. Goodarzi MO, Dumesic DA, Chazenbalk G, Azziz R. Polycystic ovary syndrome: Etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2011) 7(4):219–31. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2010.217
176. Ezeh U, Pisarska MD, Azziz R. Association of severity of menstrual dysfunction with hyperinsulinemia and dysglycemia in polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod (2022) 37(3):553–64. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac001
177. Drucker DJ. Mechanisms of action and therapeutic application of glucagon-like peptide-1. Cell Metab (2018) 27(4):740–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.001
178. Jones B, Bloom SR, Buenaventura T, Tomas A, Rutter GA. Control of insulin secretion by GLP-1. Peptides (2018) 100:75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2017.12.013
179. Mojsov S, Weir GC, Habener JF. Insulinotropin: Glucagon-like peptide I (7-37) co-encoded in the glucagon gene is a potent stimulator of insulin release in the perfused rat pancreas. J Clin Invest (1987) 79(2):616–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI112855
180. Kanoski SE, Hayes MR, Skibicka KP. GLP-1 and weight loss: Unraveling the diverse neural circuitry. Am J Physiol - Regul Integr Comp Physiol (2016) 310(10):R885–95. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00520.2015
181. Trapp S, Richards JE. The gut hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 produced in brain: Is this physiologically relevant? Curr Opin Pharmacol (2013) 13(6):964–9. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2013.09.006
182. Barrera JG, Jones KR, Herman JP, D’Alessio DA, Woods SC, Seeley RJ. Hyperphagia and increased fat accumulation in two models of chronic CNS glucagon-like peptide-1 loss of function. J Neurosci (2011) 31(10):3904–13. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2212-10.2011
183. Beglinger C, Degen L. Gastrointestinal satiety signals in humans - physiologic roles for GLP-1 and PYY? Physiol Behav (2006) 89(4):460–4. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.05.048
184. Grill HJ, Hayes MR. Hindbrain neurons as an essential hub in the neuroanatomically distributed control of energy balance. Cell Metab (2012) 16(3):296–309. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.06.015
185. Hayes MR, Bradley L, Grill HJ. Endogenous hindbrain glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activation contributes to the control of food intake by mediating gastric satiation signaling. Endocrinology (2009) 150(6):2654–9. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-1479
186. Williams DL. Minireview: Finding the sweet spot: Peripheral versus central glucagon-like peptide 1 action in feeding and glucose homeostasis. Endocrinology (2009) 150(7):2997–3001. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0220
187. Alhadeff AL, Mergler BD, Zimmer DJ, Turner CA, Reiner DJ, Schmidt HD, et al. Endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor signaling in the nucleus tractus solitarius is required for food intake control. Neuropsychopharmacology (2017) 42(7):1471–9. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.246
188. Beiroa D, Imbernon M, Gallego R, Senra A, Herranz D, Villarroya F, et al. GLP-1 agonism stimulates brown adipose tissue thermogenesis and browning through hypothalamic AMPK. Diabetes (2014) 63(10):3346–58. doi: 10.2337/db14-0302
189. Kanoski SE, Fortin SM, Arnold M, Grill HJ, Hayes MR. Peripheral and central GLP-1 receptor populations mediate the anorectic effects of peripherally administered GLP-1 receptor agonists, liraglutide and exendin-4. Endocrinology (2011) 152(8):3103–12. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-0174
190. Hayes MR, De Jonghe BC, Kanoski SE. Role of the glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor in the control of energy balance. Physiol Behav (2010) 100(5):503–10. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.02.029
191. Hayes MR, Skibicka KP, Grill HJ. Caudal brainstem processing is sufficient for behavioral, sympathetic, and parasympathetic responses driven by peripheral and hindbrain glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor stimulation. Endocrinology (2008) 149(8):4059–68. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1743
192. Larsen PJ, Tang-Christensen M, Holst JJ, Ørskov C. Distribution of glucagon-like peptide-1 and other preproglucagon-derived peptides in the rat hypothalamus and brainstem. Neuroscience (1997) 77(1):257–70. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(96)00434-4
193. McMahon LR, Wellman PJ. PVN infusion of GLP-1-(7-36) amide suppresses feeding but does not induce aversion or alter locomotion in rats. Am J Physiol - Regul Integr Comp Physiol (1998) 274(1 43-1):23–9. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1998.274.1.R23
194. Musatov S, Chen W, Pfaff DW, Mobbs CV, Yang XJ, Clegg DJ, et al. Silencing of estrogen receptor α in the ventromedial nucleus of hypothalamus leads to metabolic syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2007) 104(7):2501–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610787104
195. Merchenthaler I, Lane MV, Numan S, Dellovade TL. Distribution of estrogen receptor α and β in the mouse central nervous system: In vivo autoradiographic and immunocytochemical analyses. J Comp Neurol (2004) 473(2):270–91. doi: 10.1002/cne.20128
196. Österlund M, G.j.m. Kuiper G, Gustafsson JÅ, Hurd YL. Differential distribution and regulation of estrogen receptor-α and -β mRNA within the female rat brain. Mol Brain Res (1998) 54(1):175–80. doi: 10.1016/S0169-328X(97)00351-3
197. Palmer K, Gray JM. Central vs. peripheral effects of estrogen on food intake and lipoprotein lipase activity in ovariectomized rats. Physiol Behav (1986) 37(1):187–9. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90404-x
198. Krieger JP, Arnold M, Pettersen KG, Lossel P, Langhans W, Lee SJ. Knockdown of GLP-1 receptors in vagal afferents affects normal food intake and glycemia. Diabetes (2016) 65(1):34–43. doi: 10.2337/db15-0973
199. Asarian L, Abegg K, Geary N, Schiesser M, Lutz TA, Bueter M. Estradiol increases body weight loss and gut-peptide satiation after roux-en-Y gastric bypass in ovariectomized rats. Gastroenterology (2012) 143(2):325–327.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.008
200. Asarian L, Geary N. Sex differences in the physiology of eating. Am J Physiol - Regul Integr Comp Physiol (2013) 305(11):R1215–67. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00446.2012
201. Rettberg JR, Yao J, Brinton RD. No title. Front Neuroendocr (2014) 35(1):8–30. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.08.001
202. Gollapudi L, Oblinger MM. Estrogen and NGF synergistically protect terminally differentiated, ERα-transfected PC12 cells from apoptosis. J Neurosci Res (1999) 56(5):471–81. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19990601)56:5<471::AID-JNR3>3.0.CO;2-1
203. Nilsen J, Brinton RD. Mechanism of estrogen-mediated neuroprotection: Regulation of mitochondrial calcium and bcl-2 expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2003) 100(5):2842–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0438041100
204. Murphy AN, Bredesen DE, Cortopassi G, Wang E, Fiskum G. Bcl-2 potentiates the maximal calcium uptake capacity of neural cell mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1996) 93(18):9893–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9893
205. Irwin RW, Yao J, Hamilton RT, Cadenas E, Brinton RD, Nilsen J. Progesterone and estrogen regulate oxidative metabolism in brain mitochondria. Endocrinology (2008) 149(6):3167–75. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1227
206. Diaz Brinton R. Estrogen-induced plasticity from cells to circuits: predictions for cognitive function. Trends Pharmacol Sci (2009) 30(4):212–22. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2008.12.006
207. Klinge CM. Estrogenic control of mitochondrial function. Redox Biol (2020) 31:101435. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101435
208. López-Lluch G. Mitochondrial activity and dynamics changes regarding metabolism in ageing and obesity. Mech Ageing Dev (2017) 162:108–21. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2016.12.005
209. Klinge CM. Estrogenic control of mitochondrial function and biogenesis. J Cell Biochem (2008) 105(6):1342–51. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21936
210. Lejri I, Grimm A, Eckert A. Mitochondria, estrogen and female brain aging. Front Aging Neurosci (2018) 10:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00124
211. Lane RK, Hilsabeck T, Rea SL. The role of mitochondrial dysfunction in age-related diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta - Bioenerg (2015) 1847(11):1387–400. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2015.05.021
212. Russell JK, Jones CK, Newhouse PA. The role of estrogen in brain and cognitive aging. Neurotherapeutics (2019) 16(3):649–65. doi: 10.1007/s13311-019-00766-9
213. Bae CS, Song J. The role of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) in type 3 diabetes: GLP-1 controls insulin resistance, neuroinflammation and neurogenesis in the brain. Int J Mol Sci (2017) 18(11):16–8. doi: 10.3390/ijms18112493
214. Kandimalla R, Thirumala V, Reddy PH. Is alzheimer’s disease a type 3 diabetes? a critical appraisal. Biochim Biophys Acta (2017) 1863(5):1078–89. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.08.018
215. Pugazhenthi S, Qin L, Reddy H. Common neurodegenerative pathways in obesity, diabetes, and alzheimer’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta (2017) 1863(5):1037–45. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.04.017
216. Kullmann S, Kleinridders A, Small DM, Fritsche A, Häring HU, Preissl H, et al. Central nervous pathways of insulin action in the control of metabolism and food intake. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2020) 8(6):524–34. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30113-3
217. Frölich L, Blum-Degen D, Riederer P, Hoyer S. A disturbance in the neuronal insulin receptor signal transduction in sporadic alzheimer’s disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci (1999) 893:290–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb07839.x
218. Sandyk R. The relationship between diabetes mellitus and parkinson’s disease. Int J Neurosci (1993) 69(1–4):125–30. doi: 10.3109/00207459309003322
219. Nguyen TT, Ta QTH, Nguyen TKO, Nguyen TTD, Giau VV. Type 3 diabetes and its role implications in alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci (2020) 21(9):1–16. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093165
220. Kullmann S, Valenta V, Wagner R, Tschritter O, Machann J, Häring HU, et al. Brain insulin sensitivity is linked to adiposity and body fat distribution. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):1–6. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15686-y
221. Ryan JP, Karim HT, Aizenstein HJ, Helbling NL. Insulin sensitivity predicts brain network connectivity following a meal. Neuroimage (2018) 171:268–76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.024
222. Williams DM, Nawaz A, Evans M. Drug therapy in obesity: A review of current and emerging treatments. Diabetes Ther (2020) 11(6):1199–216. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00816-y
223. Hope DCD, Vincent ML, Tan TMM. Striking the balance: GLP-1/Glucagon Co-agonism as a treatment strategy for obesity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2021) 12:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.735019
224. Trujillo J. Safety and tolerability of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Pharm Ther (2020) 45(S1):43–60. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13225
225. Gardner H, Hamdy O. Oral GLP1 analog: Where does the tide go? Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes (2020) 13:1–7. doi: 10.1177/1179551420984130
226. Kanamarlapudi V, Reed J, Bain S. Recent advances in understanding the role of glucagon-like peptide 1. F1000Res. (2020) 9:1–14. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.20602.1
227. Lafferty RA, O’Harte FPM, Irwin N, Gault VA, Flatt PR. Proglucagon-derived peptides as therapeutics. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2021) 12:1–29. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.689678
228. Sharma D, Verma S, Vaidya S, Kalia K, Tiwari V. Recent updates on GLP-1 agonists: Current advancements & challenges. BioMed Pharmacother (2018) 108:952–62. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.08.088
229. Apovian CM, Aronne LJ, Bessesen DH, McDonnell ME, Murad MH, Pagotto U, et al. Pharmacological management of obesity: An endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2015) 100(2):342–62. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-3415
230. Astrup A, Carraro R, Finer N, Harper A, Kunesova M, Lean MEJ, et al. Safety, tolerability and sustained weight loss over 2 years with the once-daily human GLP-1 analog, liraglutide. Int J Obes (2012) 36(6):843–54. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.158
231. Vilsbøll T, Zdravkovic M, Le-Thi T, Krarup T. Liraglutide, a long-acting human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, given as monotherapy significantly improves glycemic control and lowers body weight without risk of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care (2007) 30(6):1608–10. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2593
232. Nauck MA, Petrie JR, Sesti G, Mannucci E, Courrèges JP, Lindegaard ML, et al. A phase 2, randomized, dose-finding study of the novel once-weekly human GLP-1 analog, semaglutide, compared with placebo and open-label liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care (2016) 39(2):231–41. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0165
233. Vosoughi K, Atieh J, Khanna L, Khoshbin K, Prokop LJ, Davitkov P, et al. Association of glucagon-like peptide 1 analogs and agonists administered for obesity with weight loss and adverse events: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. EClinMed (2021) 42:101213. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101213
234. Ma R, Ding X, Wang Y, Deng Y, Sun A. The therapeutic effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and metformin on polycystic ovary syndrome: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Med (Baltimore) (2021) 100(23):e26295. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026295
235. Holst JJ. Incretin hormones and the satiation signal. Int J Obes (2013) 37(9):1161–8. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.208
236. Lockie SH, Heppner KM, Chaudhary N, Chabenne JR, Morgan DA, Veyrat-Durebex C, et al. Direct control of brown adipose tissue thermogenesis by central nervous system glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor signaling. Diabetes (2012) 61(11):2753–62. doi: 10.2337/db11-1556
237. Gallo MF, Lopez LM, Grimes DA, Carayon F, Schulz KF, Helmerhorst FM. Combination contraceptives: Effects on weight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2014) 2014(1):1–89. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003987.pub5
238. Procter-Gray E, Cobb KL, Crawford SL, Bachrach LK, Chirra A, Sowers M, et al. Effect of oral contraceptives on weight and body composition in young female runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc (2008) 40(7):1205–12. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31816a0df6
239. Lopez LM, Ramesh S, Chen M, Edelman A, Otterness C, Trussell J, et al. Progestin-only contraceptives : e ects on weight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2016) (8):1–83. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008815.pub4
240. Kongnyuy EJ, Norman RJ, Flight IHK, Rees MC. Oestrogen and progestogen hormone replacement therapy for peri-menopausal and post-menopausal women: weight and body fat distribution. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1999) 2011(4):216–7. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001018
241. Miller VM, Naftolin F, Asthana S, Black DM, Brinton EA, Budoff MJ, et al. The kronos early estrogen prevention study (KEEPS): What have we learned? Menopause (2019) 26(9):1071–84. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001326
242. Cintron D JPB, Bailey K. Plasma orexin a levels in recently menopausal women during and 3 years following use of hormone therapy. Maturitas (2017) 99:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.01.016
243. Jensen LB, Vestergaard P, Hermann AP, Gram J, Eiken P, Abrahamsen B, et al. Tends to reduce weight gain in early postmenopausal Women. Am Soc Bone Miner Res (2003) 18(2):333–42. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.2.333
244. Režić T, Blaslov K, Kruljac I, Rahelić D, Vrkljan M, Renar IP. The possible synergistic action of sex hormones and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists on body mass decline in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Med Hypotheses (2019) 131:109308. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109308
245. Finan B, Yang B, Ottaway N. Targeted estrogen delivery reverses the metabolic syndrome. Nat Med (2012) 18(12):1847–56. doi: 10.1038/nm.3009
246. Vogel H, Wolf S, Rabasa C, Rodriguez-Pacheco F, Babaei CS, Stöber F, et al. GLP-1 and estrogen conjugate acts in the supramammillary nucleus to reduce food-reward and body Weight. Neuropharmacology (2016) 110:396–406. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.07.039
247. Wilding JPH, Overgaard RV, Jacobsen LV, Jensen CB. Exposure–response analyses of liraglutide 3.0mg for weight management. Diabetes Obes Metab (2016) 18:491–9. doi: 10.1111/dom.12639
248. Hazell TJ, Townsend LK, Hallworth JR, Doan J, Copeland JL. Sex differences in the response of total PYY and GLP-1 to moderate-intensity continuous and sprint interval cycling exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol (2017) 117(3):431–40. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3547-7
249. Amori RE, Lau J, Pittas AG. Efficacy and safety of incretin therapy in type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc (2007) 298(2):194–206. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.2.194
250. Schwenk RW, Baumeier C, Finan B, Kluth O, Brauer C, Joost HG, et al. GLP-1–oestrogen attenuates hyperphagia and protects from beta cell failure in diabetes-prone new Zealand obese (NZO) mice. Diabetologia (2015) 58(3):604–14. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3478-3
Keywords: GLP-1, estrogens, body weight, menstrual cycle, mental health
Citation: Vigil P, Meléndez J, Petkovic G and Del Río JP (2022) The importance of estradiol for body weight regulation in women. Front. Endocrinol. 13:951186. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.951186
Received: 23 May 2022; Accepted: 18 October 2022;
Published: 07 November 2022.
Edited by:
Hubert Vaudry, Université de Rouen, FranceReviewed by:
Fernando Lizcano, Universidad de La Sabana, ColombiaHiroto Kobayashi, Yamagata University, Japan
Copyright © 2022 Vigil, Meléndez, Petkovic and Del Río. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Juan Pablo Del Río, delrio.juanpablo@gmail.com