Impact Factor 5.511

Among the world's top 10 most-cited Immunology journals

Opinion ARTICLE

Front. Immunol., 13 April 2017 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00438

HiJAKing Innate Lymphoid Cells?

  • 1Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Laboratory Affiliated to Istituto Pasteur Italia – Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Roma, Italy
  • 2Translational Immunology Section, Office of Science Technology (OST), NIAMS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA

The family of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) consists of a heterogeneous group of cytokine-producing cells that have features in common with adaptive T helper (Th) cells. Cytokines acting through the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways are key players in both Th and ILC biology. Observations in animal models, supported by evidence from humans, have highlighted the importance of the downstream events evoked by the cytokines that signal through the common IL-2 γ-chain receptor. Similarly, it is reasonable to assume that therapeutic targeting of this signaling cascade will also modulate ILC effector function in disease. Since a major limitation of gene knockout studies in mice is the complete loss of ILC populations, including NK cells, we believe that an attractive, alternative, strategy would be to study the role of cytokine signaling in the regulation of ILC function by pharmacological manipulation of these pathways instead. Here, we discuss the potential of JAK inhibitors as a drug class to elucidate mechanisms underlying ILC biology and to inform the design of new therapeutic strategies for inflammatory and autoimmune disorders.

Distinctive Features of ILC Subsets

In the last 10 years, ILCs have emerged as a new class of lymphocytes with the ability to regulate and amplify the immune response through a variety of effector functions that parallel those of T lymphocytes (1, 2). We now divide ILCs into three groups based on their pattern of cytokine expression (3). NK cells are the only subset with cytolytic ability and, along with other IFN-γ-producing subsets, fall in the group of type 1 ILCs. One major difference between NK cells and other ILC1 is their tissue distribution; while ILC1 are mainly tissue-resident cells, NK cells recirculate in the body (47). Type 2 ILCs consist of cells producing IL-13 and IL-5, including nuocytes, natural helper cells, and innate type 2 helper cells. These cells are involved in the resolution of parasitic infections and in allergic airway inflammation (8). The type 3 group comprises cells producing IL-22 and/or IL-17, including lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi)-like cells and a subset expressing NK cell markers (NCR) named NCR+ ILC3. Type 3 ILCs are enriched at mucosal sites and contribute in maintaining the integrity at intestinal barriers but also play a key role in promoting inflammation in mouse models of colitis (9). Although a potential role in inflammatory bowel disease can be indirectly inferred in humans, further studies are needed to better understand their function (3, 10).

Generation and development of ILC functional diversity depends on complex network of lineage-defining and signal-dependent transcription factors (LDTFs and SDTFs) that control both ILC and Th cell differentiation (11). The pathways delineating ILC subsets can be simplified according to the requirement of four LDTFs: Eomes for NK cells, T-bet for ILC1, GATA-3 for ILC2, and RORγt for ILC3. However, these TFs also have broad lineage-defining activity and there is considerable overlap among them (1218). Thus, as for Th cells, the boundaries among ILC lineages are blurred and plasticity across the three groups has been observed both in humans and mice (1923).

One substantial difference between ILCs and T cells is that commitment to ILC lineage is independent of the presence of pathogens and occurs early in development (24). In fact, ILC precursors share epigenetic features with mature ILCs (25, 26). Importantly, a common feature of all ILCs is their requirement for IL-15 and IL-7, two JAK-dependent cytokines that utilize the common γ chain receptor (IL2RG) (2). The non-redundant function of these two cytokines makes the JAK/STAT pathway the main signaling cascade involved in ILC development and homeostasis (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the downstream signaling pathway of cytokines sharing the common γ chain receptor: IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21. All depend on the same set of Janus kinases (JAKs), JAK1 and JAK3, but may use a different combination signal transducer and activator of transcription (STATs). When cytokines bind to their respective receptors, JAK–STAT phosphorylation occurs. JAK inhibitors blocking JAK1, JAK3, or both are shown. NK cells and ILC1 depend on IL-15, while ILC2 and lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi)-like cells require IL-7 for development and maintenance. Finally, NCR+ ILC3 subset relies on IL-7 and IL-15.

ILC Development and Homeostasis: All Roads Lead to JAK3?

The JAK/STAT pathway transduces signals downstream of type I and type II cytokine receptors and has been described in great details elsewhere (27). Its importance was demonstrated in genetically modified animals and in patients (28). Individuals with mutations of IL-7Rα, IL-2R common γ chain (IL2Rγ), and JAK3 develop severe combined immunodeficiency. Given that these defects are restricted to the immune system, compounds blocking the enzymatic activity of JAKs have been developed as immunosuppressants to be used in immune-mediated diseases. While mutations in IL7Rα cause a T(−), B(+), and NK(+) immunodeficiency, the latter two mutations result in a T(−), B(+), and NK(−). Recently, no ILCs were found in patients with JAK3 and IL-2Rγ mutations (29). Notably, after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in non-myeloablative conditioning regimens, patients remained ILC(−), while ILCs were partially reconstituted only in myeloablative HSCT. Altogether, these findings highlight the importance of common γ chain cytokines on the development of T, NK cells, and ILCs.

The non-redundant role of IL-15 in the regulation of NK cell differentiation and homeostasis has long been appreciated (3033). Recently, a critical role for IL-15 has been also shown for several subsets of tissue-resident ILC1 (3436). Conversely, IL-7 is required for ILC2 and ILC3 development and maintenance (37, 38). Nonetheless, not all the subsets conform to this dualistic model. For instance, NCR+ ILC3 require IL-7 as do other ILC3 subsets, but IL-15 also affects their maintenance (35, 38). Moreover, IL-7Rα-deficient mice show a more severe defect in ILC2 and LTi-like ILC3 numbers as compared to IL-7-deficient mice, probably because of the cytokine TSLP, which also signals through the IL-7Rα (39, 40). Finally, T cell-derived IL-2 also regulates the number of NK cells, and this effect becomes evident in the absence of regulatory T cells (41). Overall, among the signaling molecules downstream of all these cytokines, JAK3 and JAK1 appear to have a critical role as gatekeeper of the signals leading to activation of SDTF like the STATs.

ILCs: Facts and STATs

It is not surprising that STATs have a major role in ILC functions since they transduce signals received by cytokine–cytokine receptor interactions. For example, the role of STAT5 in NK cells has been investigated using several mouse models that show the key role of this TF in the biology of NK cells (4245). However, in terms of lineage diversification, the requirement of STATs between ILCs and Th cells does not overlap.

The traditional “monolithic” view of Th differentiation relies on the paradigm “one STAT/one subset.” In this model, STAT4 is the main driver of Th1 development, STAT6 is critical for Th2, and STAT3 for Th17/22 (46). Although Th differentiation is now thought to be a fluid process based on networks of TFs, activation of selected STATs is still thought to drive the generation of distinct Th subsets. In contrast, ILC diversification is not driven by selective activation of STATs. Notably, several studies have shown no role for STAT4 in the regulation of type 1 ILC differentiation, STAT6 for ILC2 nor STAT3 for ILC3 (6, 47, 48). However, activation of distinct STATs is important for ILC function: deficiency of STAT4 profoundly affects NK cell and ILC1 responses during infections. Similarly, STAT6-deficient ILC2 produce less IL-13, while STAT3 controls production of IL-22 in ILC3 (6, 18, 4750). Thus, the paradigm “one STAT/one subset” better reflects the effector functions of distinct ILCs, whereas lineage diversification is probably obtained through early expression of LDTFs, also known as the “master regulators.” What regulates the regulators is still unknown, but the JAK/STAT pathway represents an obvious candidate and could be modulated during ILC activation and alter their effector function.

Targeting JAKs in ILCs

Given the critical role of IL-2Rγ-using cytokines for ILCs, targeting their signaling cascade could be used to modulate ILC function. The non-selective JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, is currently approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. In this context, ex vivo treatment of CD4+ T cells with tofacitinib affects the differentiation programs of Th cells (51) and alters the expression of rheumatoid arthritis risk genes endowed with super enhancer structure (52). Tofacitinib and other “first generation” JAK inhibitors block multiple JAKs and, therefore, inhibit the actions of a large variety of cytokines. Several JAK-selective inhibitors are being developed. Molecules like decernotinib and PF-06651600 (JAK3 selective) are already in late-phase clinical development, but they are also useful tools to understand the biological role of JAK3 in ILCs. On the other hand, given that several of the cytokines mentioned above also signal through JAK1, compounds like filgotinib (JAK1 selective but with some activity on JAK2), upadacitinib, and PF-04965842 (JAK1 selective) could be very helpful to understand the biological role of each the JAKs (53). Interestingly, tofacitinib has shown promising results in the treatment of ulcerative colitis but a lack of efficacy in Crohn’s disease whereas filgotinib has shown some efficacy. Given the role that ILCs have in the gastrointestinal immune response, we are tempted to speculate that altering the effector functions of ILCs could contribute to these different responses.

In homeostatic condition, mice treated with JAK inhibitors show no major changes in the pool of adaptive immune cells, with the only exception being FoxP3+ regulatory T cells, which decrease following JAK1 inhibition (54). On the other hand, JAK3 and JAK1 inhibition significantly decreased the frequency of NK cells (5456). At the transcriptional level, NK cell effector programs are similarly affected by both JAK1 and JAK3 inhibition (54). Similar results have been obtained using NK cells treated ex vivo with IL-2, where activation of several target genes is inhibited by targeting both JAK1 and JAK3. From a therapeutic point of view, it is interesting to note that a JAK1-selective inhibitor is more effective than a JAK3-selective inhibitor in blocking secondary autocrine responses induced by IFN-γ released by activated NK cells (54).

Conclusion

Innate lymphoid cells are now recognized as critical components of the immune response and translational studies have shown that they also play a role in immune-mediated diseases (5759). Like Th cells, ILCs are dependent on specific cytokines signaling through JAK1 and JAK3 for their development and acquisition of effector function. Single gene knockout animals have limited use in the study of ILCs as they cause significant perturbation of immune compartments. We suggest that the availability of drugs that specifically block the JAK/STAT pathway can be very useful in the study of ILCs and may, to an extent, obviate the need for gene knockout animals in the study of ILC biology. Furthermore, JAK inhibitors are already in clinical use, so the effect of these drugs on ILCs in patients being treated in the clinic for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases will also shortly be evident.

Author Contributions

GS and MG wrote the manuscript. ML designed the figure, wrote the manuscript, and made the necessary edits. The final manuscript was a result of the joint efforts of all the authors.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Behdad Afzali, Dr. Daniella Schwartz, Dr. Yasuko Furumoto, and Ms. Nathalia Gazaniga for the helpful criticism and discussion.

References

1. Eberl G, Colonna M, Di Santo JP, McKenzie AN. Innate lymphoid cells. Innate lymphoid cells: a new paradigm in immunology. Science (2015) 348(6237):aaa6566. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa6566

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Spits H, Di Santo JP. The expanding family of innate lymphoid cells: regulators and effectors of immunity and tissue remodeling. Nat Immunol (2011) 12(1):21–7. doi:10.1038/ni.1962

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Spits H, Artis D, Colonna M, Diefenbach A, Di Santo JP, Eberl G, et al. Innate lymphoid cells – a proposal for uniform nomenclature. Nat Rev Immunol (2013) 13(2):145–9. doi:10.1038/nri3365

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Peng H, Jiang X, Chen Y, Sojka DK, Wei H, Gao X, et al. Liver-resident NK cells confer adaptive immunity in skin-contact inflammation. J Clin Invest (2013) 123(4):1444–56. doi:10.1172/JCI66381

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Gasteiger G, Fan X, Dikiy S, Lee SY, Rudensky AY. Tissue residency of innate lymphoid cells in lymphoid and nonlymphoid organs. Science (2015) 350(6263):981–5. doi:10.1126/science.aac9593

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. O’Sullivan TE, Rapp M, Fan X, Weizman OE, Bhardwaj P, Adams NM, et al. Adipose-resident group 1 innate lymphoid cells promote obesity-associated insulin resistance. Immunity (2016) 45(2):428–41. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2016.06.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Bernardini G, Sciume G, Santoni A. Differential chemotactic receptor requirements for NK cell subset trafficking into bone marrow. Front Immunol (2013) 4:12. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2013.00012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Morita H, Moro K, Koyasu S. Innate lymphoid cells in allergic and nonallergic inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2016) 138(5):1253–64. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Song C, Lee JS, Gilfillan S, Robinette ML, Newberry RD, Stappenbeck TS, et al. Unique and redundant functions of NKp46+ ILC3s in models of intestinal inflammation. J Exp Med (2015) 212(11):1869–82. doi:10.1084/jem.20151403

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Forkel M, Mjosberg J. Dysregulation of group 3 innate lymphoid cells in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep (2016) 16(10):73. doi:10.1007/s11882-016-0652-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Shih HY, Sciume G, Poholek AC, Vahedi G, Hirahara K, Villarino AV, et al. Transcriptional and epigenetic networks of helper T and innate lymphoid cells. Immunol Rev (2014) 261(1):23–49. doi:10.1111/imr.12208

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Yagi R, Zhong C, Northrup DL, Yu F, Bouladoux N, Spencer S, et al. The transcription factor GATA3 is critical for the development of all IL-7Ralpha-expressing innate lymphoid cells. Immunity (2014) 40(3):378–88. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2014.01.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Serafini N, Klein Wolterink RG, Satoh-Takayama N, Xu W, Vosshenrich CA, Hendriks RW, et al. GATA3 drives development of RORgammat+ group 3 innate lymphoid cells. J Exp Med (2014) 211(2):199–208. doi:10.1084/jem.20131038

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Zhong C, Cui K, Wilhelm C, Hu G, Mao K, Belkaid Y, et al. Group 3 innate lymphoid cells continuously require the transcription factor GATA-3 after commitment. Nat Immunol (2016) 17(2):169–78. doi:10.1038/ni.3318

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Sciume G, Hirahara K, Takahashi H, Laurence A, Villarino AV, Singleton KL, et al. Distinct requirements for T-bet in gut innate lymphoid cells. J Exp Med (2012) 209(13):2331–8. doi:10.1084/jem.20122097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Klose CS, Kiss EA, Schwierzeck V, Ebert K, Hoyler T, d’Hargues Y, et al. A T-bet gradient controls the fate and function of CCR6-RORgammat+ innate lymphoid cells. Nature (2013) 494(7436):261–5. doi:10.1038/nature11813

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Rankin LC, Groom JR, Chopin M, Herold MJ, Walker JA, Mielke LA, et al. The transcription factor T-bet is essential for the development of NKp46+ innate lymphocytes via the Notch pathway. Nat Immunol (2013) 14(4):389–95. doi:10.1038/ni.2545

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Rankin LC, Girard-Madoux MJ, Seillet C, Mielke LA, Kerdiles Y, Fenis A, et al. Complementarity and redundancy of IL-22-producing innate lymphoid cells. Nat Immunol (2016) 17(2):179–86. doi:10.1038/ni.3332

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Cella M, Otero K, Colonna M. Expansion of human NK-22 cells with IL-7, IL-2, and IL-1beta reveals intrinsic functional plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2010) 107(24):10961–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1005641107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Bernink JH, Krabbendam L, Germar K, de Jong E, Gronke K, Kofoed-Nielsen M, et al. Interleukin-12 and -23 control plasticity of CD127(+) group 1 and group 3 innate lymphoid cells in the intestinal lamina propria. Immunity (2015) 43(1):146–60. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2015.06.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Ohne Y, Silver JS, Thompson-Snipes L, Collet MA, Blanck JP, Cantarel BL, et al. IL-1 is a critical regulator of group 2 innate lymphoid cell function and plasticity. Nat Immunol (2016) 17(6):646–55. doi:10.1038/ni.3447

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Silver JS, Kearley J, Copenhaver AM, Sanden C, Mori M, Yu L, et al. Inflammatory triggers associated with exacerbations of COPD orchestrate plasticity of group 2 innate lymphoid cells in the lungs. Nat Immunol (2016) 17(6):626–35. doi:10.1038/ni.3443

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Huang Y, Guo L, Qiu J, Chen X, Hu-Li J, Siebenlist U, et al. IL-25-responsive, lineage-negative KLRG1(hi) cells are multipotential ’inflammatory’ type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Nat Immunol (2015) 16(2):161–9. doi:10.1038/ni.3078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Gronke K, Kofoed-Nielsen M, Diefenbach A. Innate lymphoid cells, precursors and plasticity. Immunol Lett (2016) 179:9–18. doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2016.07.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Shih HY, Sciume G, Mikami Y, Guo L, Sun HW, Brooks SR, et al. Developmental acquisition of regulomes underlies innate lymphoid cell functionality. Cell (2016) 165(5):1120–33. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Lim AI, Li Y, Lopez-Lastra S, Stadhouders R, Paul F, Casrouge A, et al. Systemic human ILC precursors provide a substrate for tissue ILC differentiation. Cell (2017) 168(6):1086–100.e1010. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. O’Shea JJ, Murray PJ. Cytokine signaling modules in inflammatory responses. Immunity (2008) 28(4):477–87. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2008.03.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. O’Shea JJ, Plenge R. JAK and STAT signaling molecules in immunoregulation and immune-mediated disease. Immunity (2012) 36(4):542–50. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2012.03.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Vely F, Barlogis V, Vallentin B, Neven B, Piperoglou C, Ebbo M, et al. Evidence of innate lymphoid cell redundancy in humans. Nat Immunol (2016) 17(11):1291–9. doi:10.1038/ni.3553

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Ranson T, Vosshenrich CA, Corcuff E, Richard O, Muller W, Di Santo JP. IL-15 is an essential mediator of peripheral NK-cell homeostasis. Blood (2003) 101(12):4887–93. doi:10.1182/blood-2002-11-3392

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Vosshenrich CA, Ranson T, Samson SI, Corcuff E, Colucci F, Rosmaraki EE, et al. Roles for common cytokine receptor gamma-chain-dependent cytokines in the generation, differentiation, and maturation of NK cell precursors and peripheral NK cells in vivo. J Immunol (2005) 174(3):1213–21. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.174.3.1213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Kennedy MK, Glaccum M, Brown SN, Butz EA, Viney JL, Embers M, et al. Reversible defects in natural killer and memory CD8 T cell lineages in interleukin 15-deficient mice. J Exp Med (2000) 191(5):771–80. doi:10.1084/jem.191.5.771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Huntington ND. The unconventional expression of IL-15 and its role in NK cell homeostasis. Immunol Cell Biol (2014) 92(3):210–3. doi:10.1038/icb.2014.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Satoh-Takayama N, Vosshenrich CA, Lesjean-Pottier S, Sawa S, Lochner M, Rattis F, et al. Microbial flora drives interleukin 22 production in intestinal NKp46+ cells that provide innate mucosal immune defense. Immunity (2008) 29(6):958–70. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2008.11.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Klose CS, Flach M, Mohle L, Rogell L, Hoyler T, Ebert K, et al. Differentiation of type 1 ILCs from a common progenitor to all helper-like innate lymphoid cell lineages. Cell (2014) 157(2):340–56. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Cortez VS, Fuchs A, Cella M, Gilfillan S, Colonna M. Cutting edge: salivary gland NK cells develop independently of Nfil3 in steady-state. J Immunol (2014) 192(10):4487–91. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1303469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Moro K, Yamada T, Tanabe M, Takeuchi T, Ikawa T, Kawamoto H, et al. Innate production of T(H)2 cytokines by adipose tissue-associated c-Kit(+)Sca-1(+) lymphoid cells. Nature (2010) 463(7280):540–4. doi:10.1038/nature08636

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Satoh-Takayama N, Lesjean-Pottier S, Vieira P, Sawa S, Eberl G, Vosshenrich CA, et al. IL-7 and IL-15 independently program the differentiation of intestinal CD3-NKp46+ cell subsets from Id2-dependent precursors. J Exp Med (2010) 207(2):273–80. doi:10.1084/jem.20092029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Vonarbourg C, Mortha A, Bui VL, Hernandez PP, Kiss EA, Hoyler T, et al. Regulated expression of nuclear receptor RORgammat confers distinct functional fates to NK cell receptor-expressing RORgammat(+) innate lymphocytes. Immunity (2010) 33(5):736–51. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Hoyler T, Klose CS, Souabni A, Turqueti-Neves A, Pfeifer D, Rawlins EL, et al. The transcription factor GATA-3 controls cell fate and maintenance of type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Immunity (2012) 37(4):634–48. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2012.06.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Gasteiger G, Hemmers S, Bos PD, Sun JC, Rudensky AY. IL-2-dependent adaptive control of NK cell homeostasis. J Exp Med (2013) 210(6):1179–87. doi:10.1084/jem.20122571

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Yao Z, Cui Y, Watford WT, Bream JH, Yamaoka K, Hissong BD, et al. Stat5a/b are essential for normal lymphoid development and differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2006) 103(4):1000–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507350103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Eckelhart E, Warsch W, Zebedin E, Simma O, Stoiber D, Kolbe T, et al. A novel Ncr1-Cre mouse reveals the essential role of STAT5 for NK-cell survival and development. Blood (2011) 117(5):1565–73. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-06-291633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Imada K, Bloom ET, Nakajima H, Horvath-Arcidiacono JA, Udy GB, Davey HW, et al. Stat5b is essential for natural killer cell-mediated proliferation and cytolytic activity. J Exp Med (1998) 188(11):2067–74. doi:10.1084/jem.188.11.2067

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Lin JX, Li P, Liu D, Jin HT, He J, Ata Ur Rasheed M, et al. Critical role of STAT5 transcription factor tetramerization for cytokine responses and normal immune function. Immunity (2012) 36(4):586–99. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2012.02.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. O’Shea JJ, Paul WE. Mechanisms underlying lineage commitment and plasticity of helper CD4+ T cells. Science (2010) 327(5969):1098–102. doi:10.1126/science.1178334

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Nussbaum JC, Van Dyken SJ, von Moltke J, Cheng LE, Mohapatra A, Molofsky AB, et al. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells control eosinophil homeostasis. Nature (2013) 502(7470):245–8. doi:10.1038/nature12526

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Guo X, Qiu J, Tu T, Yang X, Deng L, Anders RA, et al. Induction of innate lymphoid cell-derived interleukin-22 by the transcription factor STAT3 mediates protection against intestinal infection. Immunity (2014) 40(1):25–39. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Sun JC, Madera S, Bezman NA, Beilke JN, Kaplan MH, Lanier LL. Proinflammatory cytokine signaling required for the generation of natural killer cell memory. J Exp Med (2012) 209(5):947–54. doi:10.1084/jem.20111760

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Miyagi T, Gil MP, Wang X, Louten J, Chu WM, Biron CA. High basal STAT4 balanced by STAT1 induction to control type 1 interferon effects in natural killer cells. J Exp Med (2007) 204(10):2383–96. doi:10.1084/jem.20070401

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Ghoreschi K, Jesson MI, Li X, Lee JL, Ghosh S, Alsup JW, et al. Modulation of innate and adaptive immune responses by tofacitinib (CP-690,550). J Immunol (2011) 186(7):4234–43. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1003668

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Vahedi G, Kanno Y, Furumoto Y, Jiang K, Parker SC, Erdos MR, et al. Super-enhancers delineate disease-associated regulatory nodes in T cells. Nature (2015) 520(7548):558–62. doi:10.1038/nature14154

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Telliez JB, Dowty ME, Wang L, Jussif J, Lin T, Li L, et al. Discovery of a JAK3-selective inhibitor: functional differentiation of JAK3-selective inhibition over pan-JAK or JAK1-selective inhibition. ACS Chem Biol (2016) 11(12):3442–51. doi:10.1021/acschembio.6b00677

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Moodley D, Yoshida H, Mostafavi S, Asinovski N, Ortiz-Lopez A, Symanowicz P, et al. Network pharmacology of JAK inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2016) 113(35):9852–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.1610253113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Schonberg K, Rudolph J, Vonnahme M, Parampalli Yajnanarayana S, Cornez I, Hejazi M, et al. JAK inhibition impairs NK cell function in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer Res (2015) 75(11):2187–99. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Valenzuela F, Papp KA, Pariser D, Tyring SK, Wolk R, Buonanno M, et al. Effects of tofacitinib on lymphocyte sub-populations, CMV and EBV viral load in patients with plaque psoriasis. BMC Dermatol (2015) 15:8. doi:10.1186/s12895-015-0025-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Wohlfahrt T, Usherenko S, Englbrecht M, Dees C, Weber S, Beyer C, et al. Type 2 innate lymphoid cell counts are increased in patients with systemic sclerosis and correlate with the extent of fibrosis. Ann Rheum Dis (2016) 75(3):623–6. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207388

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Cols M, Rahman A, Maglione PJ, Garcia-Carmona Y, Simchoni N, Ko HB, et al. Expansion of inflammatory innate lymphoid cells in patients with common variable immune deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2016) 137(4):1206–15.e1201–6. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.09.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Roan F, Stoklasek TA, Whalen E, Molitor JA, Bluestone JA, Buckner JH, et al. CD4+ group 1 innate lymphoid cells (ILC) form a functionally distinct ILC subset that is increased in systemic sclerosis. J Immunol (2016) 196(5):2051–62. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1501491

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: innate lymphoid cells, cytokines, Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways, autoimmune diseases, JAK inhibitors

Citation: Sciumè G, Le MT and Gadina M (2017) HiJAKing Innate Lymphoid Cells? Front. Immunol. 8:438. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00438

Received: 03 March 2017; Accepted: 29 March 2017;
Published: 13 April 2017

Edited by:

Philippe Saas, Etablissement Français du Sang BFC, France

Reviewed by:

Marina Cella, Washington University School of Medicine, USA
Paola Vacca, Università degli studi di Genova, Italy

Copyright: © 2017 Sciumè, Le and Gadina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Massimo Gadina, gadinama@mail.nih.gov