Abstract
SLC1A5 (solute carrier family 1, member 5) is a small neutral amino acid exchanger that is upregulated in rapidly proliferating lymphocytes but also in many primary human cancers. Furthermore, cancer cell lines have been shown to require SLC1A5 for their survival in vitro. One of SLC1A5’s primary substrates is the immunomodulatory amino acid glutamine, which plays an important role in multiple key processes, such as energy supply, macromolecular synthesis, nucleotide biosynthesis, redox homeostasis, and resistance against oxidative stress. These processes are also essential to immune cells, including neutrophils, macrophages, B and T lymphocytes. We show here that mice with a stop codon in Slc1a5 have reduced glutamine uptake in activated lymphocytes and primary fibroblasts. B and T cell populations and maturation in resting mice were not affected by absence of SLC1A5. Antibody production in resting and immunized mice and the germinal center response to immunization were also found to be normal. SLC1A5 has been recently described as a novel target for the treatment of a variety of cancers, and our results indicate that inhibition of SLC1A5 in cancer therapy may be tolerated well by the immune system of cancer patients.
Introduction
A well-known modification of metabolism in rapidly proliferating cells is the utilization of the amino acid glutamine in a linearized version of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, termed glutaminolysis. As a result, many cancer cells display an oncogene-dependent “addiction to glutamine” in vitro (1–3). These metabolic pathways are not unique to tumor cells but are also used by certain normal cell populations. Glutamine utilization in proliferating B and T lymphocytes, for instance, can be very high and even comparable to that of glucose (4–7). Indeed, both glucose and glutamine are only partially oxidized in proliferating lymphocytes, similar to tumor cells.
In glutaminolysis, the amino acid glutamine is first deaminated to glutamate, then glutamate is further deaminated to α-ketoglutarate. The latter is converted via malate and oxaloacetate into aspartate, alanine, pyruvate, citrate, and acetyl-CoA (8, 9). A major advantage of this linear pathway is that it is less sensitive to depletion of its intermediate metabolites, in contrast to the TCA cycle that is compromised by removal of intermediates (9).
To proliferating cells, glutamine is therefore a major anaplerotic nutrient, as well as a major source of energy (8, 10–12). Indeed, expression of glutaminase (GLS) isozymes, the enzymes that catalyze deamination of glutamine to glutamate, correlates with growth rate and malignancy of certain cancer cells (13). In cancer, glutamine also sustains proliferative signaling via mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation and enables replicative immortality by suppressing senescence and resisting cell death (12).
While glutamine can be transported by a large number of solute carriers (SLC) (14, 15), a limited number of transporters dominate in rapidly proliferating cells. Along with SLC1A5, the leucine-preferring amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1 or SLC7A5) is highly upregulated in multiple cancers (1, 16, 17). One suggestion has been that SLC1A5-mediated import of glutamine provides an exchange substrate for the uptake of leucine (18) and other essential amino acids via LAT1, to meet metabolic demands and signal to mTOR (16). Coupled with the discovery that the glutaminolytic switch is promoted by oncogenes and inhibited by tumor suppressors, this has driven the search for SLC1A5 inhibitors (19–22). Indeed, blocking of SLC1A5 has been shown to diminish or prevent tumor cell proliferation in different cancers (23–28). In other cancer cells, SLC1A5 and LAT1 rather play the role of “amino acid harmonizers,” rapid hetero-exchangers that maintain the optimal mix of all 20 proteinogenic amino acids in the cytosol (9), while Na+-amino acid co-transporters of the SLC38 family mediate net glutamine uptake to sustain glutaminolysis and proliferation (9). For this second group of cancers, SLC1A5 antagonists or inactivating mutations of SLC1A5 alone are insufficient to stop growth.
A significant concern in using amino acid transport inhibitors to treat cancer is the role of glutamine in the immune system. For example, B and T lymphocytes, which underpin the adaptive immune system, undergo phases of intense proliferation, both during their development and in order to fulfill their effector functions during immune responses. Because of the immune-modulatory effects of glutamine, and its requirement in strongly proliferating cells, the amino acid is crucial to normal development and effector functions of B and T cells (29–31).
In the hope of inhibiting SLC1A5 in cancer therapy, and because of the similar use of glutamine in cancer cells and the immune cells, understanding the role of SLC1A5 in the immune system is crucial. SLC1A5 has been shown to be required for rapid glutamine uptake during naïve T cell activation (32) because of its role in T cell receptor (TCR)-stimulated activation of mTORC1, which promotes cell growth and proliferation (33). Nakaya et al. (32) also found that SLC1A5-deficient mice had attenuated inflammatory T cell responses in experimental models of immunity and autoimmunity. In particular, the frequencies of CD4+ interferon γ-producing Th1 and IL-17-producing Th17 cells were significantly reduced. Furthermore, glutamine-deprived CD4+ T cells activated in the presence of cytokines that normally induce Th1 differentiation have been found to instead differentiate into Treg cells in vitro (34). Inhibiting SLC1A5 may therefore have adverse local and systemic effects on the immune system.
Here, we show that a C57BL/6 Slc1a5 mutant mouse strain has normal B and T cell development and normal B cell effector functions, indicating that SLC1A5 could be targeted with limited impact on immune function.
Materials and Methods
Mice and Procedures
All experimental mice were housed in specific pathogen-free conditions at the Australian Phenomics Facility (APF) located at the Australian National University (ANU). All animal procedures for this study were approved by the ANU Animal Ethics and Experimentation Committee under protocol A2014/62. For all experiments, we used male and female mice between 7 and 14 weeks old.
The ENU28:008:SLC1A5 mouse strain was generated at the APF through ENU mutagenesis on a pure C57BL/6 background, as described previously (35). The strain was maintained by breeding heterozygous (Slc1a5+/−) mice with wild-type C57BL/6NcrlAnu mice or with heterozygous mice to produce homozygous (Slc1a5−/−) pups. ASD513:C57BL/6NcrlAnu mice are wild-type C57BL/6 mice originally obtained from Charles River and maintained by the ANU APF. Rag1 KO (36) and SWHEL (37) mice have been previously described. ENU28:008:SLC1A5:Hc.Lc.Ly5a mice were generated by cross of ENU28:008:SLC1A5 mice and SWHEL mice. These mice will hereafter be referred to as Slc1a5+/+ or Slc1a5−/−SWHEL mice.
Mouse primary immunization was performed as previously described (38) by i.p. injection of 50 µg alum-precipitated ARS-CGG (Biosearch) and 1 × 108 heat- and formalin-inactivated Bordetella pertussis (BP) bacteria (Lee Laboratories) in 300 µL sterile PBS. Booster immunizations performed by i.p. injection of 50 µg ARS-CGG and 25 µg NP-Ficoll (Biosearch) in 300 µL sterile PBS. Antibody titers were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as described previously (38).
Glutamine Uptake
Glutamine uptake was assessed in Slc1a5+/+ and Slc1a5−/− cells as described previously (39). Briefly, Slc1a5+/+ and Slc1a5−/− splenocytes were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Sigma) supplemented with 10 mM HEPES pH 7.4 (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.1 mM non-essential amino acid solution (Gibco, Life Technologies), 1 mM sodium-pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich), 55 µM 2-Mercaptoethanol (Life Technologies), 2mM l-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin-100 μg/mL streptomycin (Life Technologies), and 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Life Technologies) (cRPMI) with 10 µg/mL LPS for 44–72 h to activate B cells and induce their proliferation. While this treatment also activates T cells, it mainly induces a proliferation of B cells and macrophages (40). Due to the large number of cells required for uptake experiments, splenocytes were used instead of purified B- and T-cells. The cell density of these suspensions was determined using an automated Vi-Cell XR counter (Beckman Coulter). Cells were then washed and resuspended at equal cellularity in Hanks (Na+) buffer (136.6 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 0.44 mM KH2PO4, 0.5 mM MgCl2 × 6H2O, 0.41 mM MgSO4, 2.7 mM Na2HPO4 × 2H2O, 4 mM Hepes buffer, 100 mM CaCl2, 2 mM glucose, adjusted to pH 7.5 with NaOH), followed by different incubation times at 37°C with Hanks (Na+) buffer containing 0.1 mM glutamine and 0.1% v/v [14C] glutamine (1.85 Mbq/mL). Transport was terminated after the indicated times by centrifugation of the 100 µL cell suspension in an 0.4 mL polyethylene tube (Sigma) containing 65 µL silicone oil (density 1.03 g/mL to strip the cells from their extracellular medium) on top of 30 µL 20% perchloric acid. Cells were then pelleted and resuspended in 750 µL ddH2O, followed by transfer of 500 µL homogenate into scintillation vials, and addition of 2.5 mL scintillation fluid. Radioactivity was measured by liquid scintillation counting. An aliquot of each B cell suspension was used to determine the protein content of each sample by Bradford assay (Sigma).
Flow Cytometry and FACS Analysis
Flow cytometric analyses were performed as previously described (41). Briefly, mice were euthanized using cervical dislocation and the organs collected in PBS + 2% heat-inactivated FBS (FACS buffer). The spleen and thymus were forced through a 70-µm cell strainer to create a homogenous single-cell suspension in FACS buffer. Bone marrow cells were isolated from mouse hind limbs by flushing the femur and tibia with FACS buffer followed by passing through a 70-µm cell strainer. Peritoneal cavity cells were collected by injection of 3 mL FACS buffer into the peritoneal cavity followed by redrawing. Cell numbers in the resulting cell suspensions were determined using an automated Vi-Cell XR counter (Beckman Coulter). Equal cell numbers—depending on organ and experiment between 1 and 2 × 106 cells per sample—were stained with antibodies at predetermined optimal dilutions in FACS buffer at 4°C, followed by analysis on an LSRII or an LSRFortessa (BD). Hen egg lysozyme (HEL)-binding B cells were detected by incubating the cells with HEL (Sigma) followed by staining with fluorescently labeled HyHEL9 antibody, which recognize a different epitope on HEL than the transgenic BCR. The HyHEL9 antibody was a kind gift of Professor Robert Brink from the Garvan Institute, Sydney. Conjugation to Alexa Fluor 647 was done in house using the Alexa Fluor 647 Antibody labeling kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All other antibodies were purchased from Biolegend, eBioscience, or BD Pharmingen and titrated in house for their optimal dilution. Compensation for multicolor stains and data acquisition were performed using the FACSDiva software (BD), and data analysis was performed using the FlowJo software (Tree Star).
B Cell Proliferation Assays
B cells were purified using a Pan B cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec) followed by negative sorting using the DepleteS protocol of the autoMACS Pro Separator (Miltenyi Biotec). 10 × 106 to 30 × 106 B cells were resuspended in 1 mL cRPMI l. The B cells were labeled with Cell Trace Violet (CTV, Invitrogen) by addition of CTV to obtain a final concentration of 12.5 µM followed by immediate vortexing to ensure rapid and homogeneous labeling of cells. Cells were incubated for 20 min at 37°C in the dark, and the CTV labeling reaction was terminated by addition of 12 mL cRPMI and two successive washes with cRPMI. Finally, cells were added to individual wells of a 96-well round-bottom plate at a concentration of 2 × 106 cells/mL and incubated for 10 min at 37°C to allow the CTV to undergo acetate hydrolysis. Finally, 100 µL of cRPMI or cRPMI containing different stimuli were added to each well resulting in a final cell concentration of 1 × 106 cells/mL. The following stimulus conditions were used: unstimulated (cRPMI only); anti-IgM (1 or 10 µg/mL) combined with anti-CD40 (10 µg/mL) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 10 µg/mL). Cells were incubated for 36–72 h in a humidified incubator at 37°C in 5% carbon dioxide (CO2) before staining.
Isolation and Culture of Primary Mouse Fibroblasts
Preparation of fibroblasts from mouse tail-tips was carried out as described by Takahashi et al. (42) without modification. Glutamine uptake in primary cultures was measured as described by Heckel et al. (43).
Generation of Bone Marrow Chimeras
Bone marrow chimeras were generated as described previously (38). In short, C57BL/6 Rag1 knockout mice were sublethally irradiated with 4.5 Gy followed by intravenous injection of 2 million bone marrow cells from either wild-type or Slc1a5−/− mutant mice or with a mix consisting of 50% wild-type and 50% Slc1a5−/− bone marrow cells (100 and 50–50% bone marrow chimeras, respectively). In the case of mixed bone marrow cells, the co-transferred wild-type cells were CD45.1 allotype marked to allow differentiation from the CD45.2 allotype Slc1a5−/− cells.
Statistical Analysis
All data were statistically analyzed using Graph Pad Prism 5.0f for Mac OS X. Comparison between two groups was done using an unpaired t-test. For the proliferation data shown in Figure 2, we used ANOVA with Sidak analysis for multiple comparisons.
Results
Sequencing of Slc1a5 mutant mice revealed a 1225T>A substitution mutation in Slc1a5 resulting in a premature stop codon at amino acid 224 of the 555 amino acid SLC1A5 protein.
To determine the impact of a Slc1a5 null allele, glutamine uptake assays were performed. Glutamine uptake in resting wild-type B cells was hardly detectable, but was found to increase drastically upon activation by LPS (Figure 1A). Thus, lack of SLC1A5 expression was assessed in LPS-activated B cells, where the rate of glutamine uptake was reduced to 62 and 77% of glutamine uptake in wild-type B cells, depending on whether transport was normalized to protein content or cell number, respectively (Figures 1B,C). This result is consistent with a significant, but not exclusive role of SLC1A5 in glutamine uptake in activated B-cells. To confirm functional SLC1A5 inactivation in a well-characterized cell type, we cultivated primary fibroblasts from tails of wild-type, SLC1A5+/− and SLC1A5−/− mice. As shown in Figure 1D, glutamine uptake was significantly reduced upon partial and complete inactivation of SLC1A5.
Figure 1
Given the strong increase in consumption of glutamine upon lymphocyte activation (4, 5), and the well-established importance of glutamine in metabolic pathways necessary for B and T cell proliferation (8, 30, 31), the proliferative capacity of wild-type and Slc1a5−/− B cells was assessed in vitro. Following TLR4-mediated or BCR- and CD40-mediated stimulation of purified B cells, cell proliferation was assessed based on dilution in fluorescence intensity of the intracellular dye CTV. While no difference was observed following treatment with soluble F(ab′)2 fragments of anti-IgM (hereafter referred to as anti-IgM) and anti-CD40 agonists after 44 or 72 h (Figures 2A,B), Slc1a5−/− B cells were found to have slower division kinetics in response to 44 h LPS stimulation (Figure 2C). The lack of any difference in proliferation after stimulation with anti-IgM and anti-CD40 agonists was likely due to weaker B cell proliferation in response to this stimulus relative to that in response to LPS stimulation. Thus, SLC1A5 deficiency decreases glutamine uptake rate in lymphocytes, but it only becomes limiting for B cell proliferation in response to strong stimulation.
Figure 2
Furthermore, the difference in proliferation of Slc1a5−/− and wild-type B cells was no longer observed after 72 h stimulation (Figure 2D), indicating that the delay in proliferation in response to LPS stimulation is only transient. This may be due to a rescue in glutamine uptake in Slc1a5−/− B cells by upregulation of redundant transporters—e.g., SLC38A2, which is known to be upregulated by stress such as amino acid depletion—or by the use of alternative metabolic pathways over time.
Stimulation of immune cell populations in vitro replicates the in vivo situation only partially. Therefore, we examined the effect of SLC1A5 deficiency on development and maturation of both B and T cells in vivo. Both cell types undergo several phases of strong proliferation during maturation, which may be affected by SLC1A5 deficiency. Flow cytometric analysis (Figure 3A) revealed that the total cell number in the bone marrow (Figure 3B) was not affected by SLC1A5 deficiency. Similarly, the frequencies of B cell subpopulations in the bone marrow (Figure 3C) and developing T cells in the thymus (Figure 4) were not affected by the lack of SLC1A5. Similarly, the B2 cell populations in the spleen (Figure 5) and the B1 cell populations in the peritoneal cavity (not shown) of wild-type and Slc1a5−/− mice were not significantly different, nor were the T cell populations in the spleen (Figure 6). Thus, global loss of SLC1A5 expression had no significant effect on the maintenance of cell populations of the adaptive immune system.
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
To detect subtle competitive disadvantages of Slc1a5−/− cells, B and T cell development and maturation was further investigated in the competitive in vivo environment of 100% and mixed bone marrow chimeras. Peripheral blood of 100% wild-type or Slc1a5−/− hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) recipients was collected 4 and 6 weeks post-irradiation, and the cell subsets present were found in equal proportions (data not shown). Moreover, lymphoid organs of both 100 and 50–50% bone marrow chimeras were harvested 7 weeks post-irradiation. No significant differences in B and T cell development and maturation were detected (Figure S1 in Supplementary Material).
To analyze immune cell function, Slc1a5−/− and Slc1a5+/+ mice were immunized with inactivated BP and alum-precipitated chicken gamma globulin (CGG), coupled to the hapten azo-benzene-arsonate (ABA). Both treatments resulted in similar primary and secondary antibody responses in wild-type and Slc1a5−/− mice (Figure 7). This indicates that antibody responses were unaffected by SLC1A5 deficiency. Finally, to further characterize Slc1a5−/− B cell effector function, we transferred approximately 6.5 × 104 SWHEL wild-type (expressing CD45.1) and 6.5 × 104Slc1a5−/− B cells (expressing CD45.1 and CD45.2; 1:1 ratio) into C57BL/6 mice and at the same time immunized them with sheep red blood cells conjugated to HEL. Analysis of B cell populations in the spleen 7 days post-immunization and adoptive transfer showed that Slc1a5−/− B cells were able to generate a functional germinal center (GC) response even when competing with WT cells (Figure 8). Thus, not only were B and T cell development unaffected in Slc1a5−/− mice, their B cell effector function was also normal.
Figure 7
Figure 8
Discussion
Metabolic rewiring is now recognized as a hallmark of cancer (44). More specifically, glutamine addiction has been identified as a potential target to treat cancer metabolism either through inhibition of enzymes in the glutaminolysis pathway or its associated glutamine transporters (12, 45, 46). Due to the upregulation of SLC1A5 and LAT1 in a wide spectrum of human cancers (16), both transporters are currently being investigated as therapeutic targets (20, 24, 28, 47, 48).
However, glutamine is also crucial to the immune system, both to terminally differentiated immune cells such as neutrophils (49) and macrophages (49–51), and to activated lymphocytes (30, 31). Despite this, studies on the role of SLC1A5 in immune cells, which are themselves crucial to combating cancer, have only recently begun. In C57BL/6 × 129/sv mice, Nakaya et al. recently showed that SLC1A5 plays a role in CD4 helper T cell differentiation, via integration of TCR signaling through mTOR (32), possibly by providing an exchange substrate for leucine import by LAT1. Furthermore, SLC1A5 played a role in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), a murine model of T cell-mediated autoimmunity (32). The study showed an effect of SLC1A5 deficiency on T cell development in 5-month-old C57BL/6 × 129/sv mice, but only mild effects in mice 6–7 weeks old, with reduced B cell numbers in the spleen (32). In line with these results, our investigation in mice on a pure C57BL/6 background showed no effect of SLC1A5 deficiency on T cell development in the spleen and thymus of 7–14-week-old mice (Figures 4 and 6). However, we also found no effect of SLC1A5 deficiency on B cell numbers in the spleen of these mice (Figure 5). This difference may be due to the different background of mice used in the two studies.
Moreover, our in depth characterization of B cell development in the bone marrow and spleen showed no differences in B cell progenitors and effector subsets between Slc1a5+/+ and Slc1a5−/− mice. Even in the sensitive and competitive in vivo environment of mixed bone marrow chimeras, Slc1a5−/− and wild-type HSCs demonstrated the same capacity to reconstitute the B and T cell compartments. The lack of effect of SLC1A5 deficiency on HSC development in the bone marrow is in line with reports demonstrating that long-term (LT) HSCs survive in a highly hypoxic environment and are characterized by strong glycolytic metabolism and upregulation of Hif-1α (52). These results indicate either that the function of SLC1A5 is redundant in developing lymphocytes, and/or that SLC1A5 deficiency can be compensated for by upregulation of other transporters. This is similar to the scenario described by Broer et al. (9) in 143B human osteosarcoma cells where net glutamine import is mediated in large part not by SLC1A5, but by the sodium neutral amino acid transporters SNAT1 and SNAT2 (9). Moreover, MCF-7 breast cancer cells are also resistant to silencing of SLC1A5 (28). In these cell lines, SLC1A5 is not required for net uptake of glutamine, but rather for avoiding an amino acid starvation response. This is in line with the earlier finding by Bode et al. (1) that competitive inhibition of SLC1A5-mediated glutamine uptake in human hepatoma cell lines blocked their proliferation only in cells lacking expression of SNAT1 and SNAT2, and exhibiting low mRNA levels of glutamine synthetase (1). Indeed, we showed here that despite the dramatic increase in glutamine flux across the plasma membrane observed in LPS-activated relative to resting lymphocytes, B and T cell proliferation was only transiently affected by SLC1A5 deficiency, and only under strong stimulus conditions. This finding, together with the findings of Bode et al. (1) and Broer et al. (9), indicates that as in 143B cells, MCF-7 cells, and the hepatoma cell lines HepG2 and Hep3B, SLC1A5 may act as an “amino acid harmonizer” in lymphocytes, while other transporters such as SNAT1 (SLC38A1) and SNAT2 (SLC38A2) mediate net import of glutamine. This is supported by gene expression data in the Immgen database (53) showing high expression, particularly of SLC38A2 across the immune system. B cells undergo phases of intense proliferation, but most likely under nutrient-replete conditions. Under these conditions, lack of SLC1A5 may not have a strong impact.
Nakaya et al. (32) demonstrated an effect of SLC1A5 deficiency on T cell effector function, with impaired differentiation of helper T cells toward the Th1 and Th17 subsets. The strong utilization of glutamine by activated lymphocytes is well documented (4–6, 30, 54, 55), as is the importance of glutamine to T cell differentiation and effector function (30, 31, 56, 57). However, the role of glutamine is relatively uncharacterized in B cells, and the role of SLC1A5 in B cell development and function is even less well known. Our findings that Slc1a5−/− mice elicit normal primary and secondary antibody responses to immunization and that Slc1a5−/− B cells are capable of generating a normal GC response (even when competing with wild-type B cells) indicate that B cell effector function is not significantly affected by SLC1A5 deficiency. We also did not find a reduction in the number of B cells in the spleen previously reported by Nakaya et al. (32). A likely explanation for this difference is the use of mice from a mixed 129/C57BL/6 background by Nakaya et al. and mice on a pure C57BL/6N background in our study.
In summary, our data indicate a significant but not exclusive role for SLC1A5 in glutamine uptake by activated lymphocytes, but a role that is neither indispensable to proliferation in response to mitogen stimulation, nor crucial to B and T cell development and B cell effector responses, in C57BL/6 mice. These results suggest that treatment of cancers with SLC1A5 inhibitors may only have a limited impact on the adaptive immune system.
Statements
Ethics statement
All animal procedures for this study were approved by the ANU Animal Ethics and Experimentation Committee under protocol A2014/62.
Author contributions
EM-F, AB, and MY performed experiments. AE and SB devised the study. EM-F, AB, AE, and SB contributed to data analysis and interpretations. EM-F, AE, and SB wrote the manuscript. All the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Grant 1105857 (SB) and Career Development Fellowship 1035858 (AE).
Acknowledgments
The authors want to thank Ms. Clara Young and Ms. Debbie Howard for excellent technical assistance and Dr. Yovina Sontani and Dr. Lisa Miosge for help with the breeding and initial characterization of the Slc1a5−/− mice. We also want to thank the staff of the Imaging and Cytometry Facility at The John Curtin School of Medical Research for help with flow cytometry and the staff of the Australian Phenomics Facility for animal husbandry and Genotyping of the mice.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00549/full#supplementary-material.
Figure S1Normal B cell reconstitution in mixed BM chimeras. We generated mixed BM chimeras by injecting a mix of CD45.1+ WT BM and CD45.2+ Slc1a5−/− bone marrow into sublethally irradiated CD45.2+ Rag1−/− recipients. As controls, we also used a mix of CD45.1+ WT with CD45.2+ WT BM cells. To test the efficiency of B cell reconstitution, we normalized the percentage of CD45.2+ B cells to the percentage of CD45.2+ T cells in the same mouse. Statistical analysis was done using a Student’s t-test. No statistical significant difference was found between the two sets of chimeras.
References
1
BodeBPFuchsBCHurleyBPConroyJLSuetterlinJETanabeKKet alMolecular and functional analysis of glutamine uptake in human hepatoma and liver-derived cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol (2002) 283(5):G1062–73.10.1152/ajpgi.00031.2002
2
FuchsBCBodeBP. Stressing out over survival: glutamine as an apoptotic modulator. J Surg Res (2006) 131(1):26–40.10.1016/j.jss.2005.07.013
3
YunevaMZamboniNOefnerPSachidanandamRLazebnikY. Deficiency in glutamine but not glucose induces MYC-dependent apoptosis in human cells. J Cell Biol (2007) 178(1):93–105.10.1083/jcb.200703099
4
ArdawiMSNewsholmeEA. Glutamine metabolism in lymphocytes of the rat. Biochem J (1983) 212(3):835–42.10.1042/bj2120835
5
BrandKWilliamsJFWeidemannMJ. Glucose and glutamine metabolism in rat thymocytes. Biochem J (1984) 221(2):471–5.10.1042/bj2210471
6
BrandKFeklWvon HintzensternJLangerKLuppaPSchoernerC. Metabolism of glutamine in lymphocytes. Metabolism (1989) 38(8 Suppl 1):29–33.10.1016/0026-0495(89)90136-4
7
NewsholmePCosta RosaLFNewsholmeEACuriR. The importance of fuel metabolism to macrophage function. Cell Biochem Funct (1996) 14(1):1–10.10.1002/cbf.644
8
LeALaneANHamakerMBoseSGouwABarbiJet alGlucose-independent glutamine metabolism via TCA cycling for proliferation and survival in B cells. Cell Metab (2012) 15(1):110–21.10.1016/j.cmet.2011.12.009
9
BroerARahimiFBroerS. Deletion of amino acid transporter ASCT2 (SLC1A5) reveals an essential role for transporters SNAT1 (SLC38A1) and SNAT2 (SLC38A2) to sustain glutaminolysis in cancer cells. J Biol Chem (2016) 291(25):13194–205.10.1074/jbc.M115.700534
10
CoryJGCoryAH. Critical roles of glutamine as nitrogen donors in purine and pyrimidine nucleotide synthesis: asparaginase treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In Vivo (2006) 20(5):587–9.
11
Munoz-PinedoCEl MjiyadNRicciJE. Cancer metabolism: current perspectives and future directions. Cell Death Dis (2012) 3:e248.10.1038/cddis.2011.123
12
HensleyCTWastiATDeBerardinisRJ. Glutamine and cancer: cell biology, physiology, and clinical opportunities. J Clin Invest (2013) 123(9):3678–84.10.1172/JCI69600
13
LoboCRuiz-BellidoMAAledoJCMarquezJNunez De CastroIAlonsoFJ. Inhibition of glutaminase expression by antisense mRNA decreases growth and tumourigenicity of tumour cells. Biochem J (2000) 348(Pt 2):257–61.10.1042/bj3480257
14
BroerSPalacinM. The role of amino acid transporters in inherited and acquired diseases. Biochem J (2011) 436:193–211.10.1042/BJ20101912
15
PochiniLScaliseMGalluccioMIndiveriC. Membrane transporters for the special amino acid glutamine: structure/function relationships and relevance to human health. Front Chem (2014) 2:61.10.3389/fchem.2014.00061
16
FuchsBCBodeBP. Amino acid transporters ASCT2 and LAT1 in cancer: partners in crime?Semin Cancer Biol (2005) 15(4):254–66.10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.04.005
17
NamikawaMKakizakiSKairaKTojimaHYamazakiYHoriguchiNet alExpression of amino acid transporters (LAT1, ASCT2 and xCT) as clinical significance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res (2015) 45(9):1014–22.10.1111/hepr.12431
18
NicklinPBergmanPZhangBTriantafellowEWangHNyfelerBet alBidirectional transport of amino acids regulates mTOR and autophagy.Cell (2009) 136(3):521–34.10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.044
19
BhutiaYDBabuERamachandranSGanapathyV. Amino acid transporters in cancer and their relevance to “glutamine addiction”: novel targets for the design of a new class of anticancer drugs. Cancer Res (2015) 75(9):1782–8.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3745
20
HassaneinMQianJHoeksemaMDWangJJacobovitzMJiXet alTargeting SLC1a5-mediated glutamine dependence in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer (2015) 137(7):1587–97.10.1002/ijc.29535
21
SchulteMLDawsonESSalehSACuthbertsonMLManningHC. 2-substituted Ngamma-glutamylanilides as novel probes of ASCT2 with improved potency. Bioorg Med Chem Lett (2015) 25(1):113–6.10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.10.098
22
CorbetCRagelleHPourcelleVVanvarenbergKMarchand-BrynaertJPreatVet alDelivery of siRNA targeting tumor metabolism using non-covalent PEGylated chitosan nanoparticles: identification of an optimal combination of ligand structure, linker and grafting method. J Control Release (2016) 223:53–63.10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.12.020
23
HassaneinMHoeksemaMDShiotaMQianJHarrisBKChenHet alSLC1A5 mediates glutamine transport required for lung cancer cell growth and survival. Clin Cancer Res (2013) 19(3):560–70.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2334
24
WillemsLJacqueNJacquelANeveuxNMacielTTLambertMet alInhibiting glutamine uptake represents an attractive new strategy for treating acute myeloid leukemia. Blood (2013) 122(20):3521–32.10.1182/blood-2013-03-493163
25
ShimizuKKairaKTomizawaYSunagaNKawashimaOOriuchiNet alASC amino-acid transporter 2 (ASCT2) as a novel prognostic marker in non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer (2014) 110(8):2030–9.10.1038/bjc.2014.88
26
WangQBeaumontKAOtteNJFontJBaileyCGvan GeldermalsenMet alTargeting glutamine transport to suppress melanoma cell growth. Int J Cancer (2014) 135(5):1060–71.10.1002/ijc.28749
27
WangQHardieRAHoyAJvan GeldermalsenMGaoDFazliLet alTargeting ASCT2-mediated glutamine uptake blocks prostate cancer growth and tumour development. J Pathol (2015) 236(3):278–89.10.1002/path.4518
28
van GeldermalsenMWangQNagarajahRMarshallADThoengAGaoDet alASCT2/SLC1A5 controls glutamine uptake and tumour growth in triple-negative basal-like breast cancer. Oncogene (2016) 35(24):3201–8.10.1038/onc.2015.381
29
LiPYinYLLiDKimSWWuG. Amino acids and immune function. Br J Nutr (2007) 98(2):237–52.10.1017/S000711450769936X
30
CarrELKelmanAWuGSGopaulRSenkevitchEAghvanyanAet alGlutamine uptake and metabolism are coordinately regulated by ERK/MAPK during T lymphocyte activation. J Immunol (2010) 185(2):1037–44.10.4049/jimmunol.0903586
31
MaciolekJAPasternakJAWilsonHL. Metabolism of activated T lymphocytes. Curr Opin Immunol (2014) 27:60–74.10.1016/j.coi.2014.01.006
32
NakayaMXiaoYZhouXChangJHChangMChengXet alInflammatory T cell responses rely on amino acid transporter ASCT2 facilitation of glutamine uptake and mTORC1 kinase activation. Immunity (2014) 40(5):692–705.10.1016/j.immuni.2014.04.007
33
HolzMKBlenisJ. Identification of S6 kinase 1 as a novel mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-phosphorylating kinase. J Biol Chem (2005) 280(28):26089–93.10.1074/jbc.M504045200
34
KlyszDTaiXRobertPACraveiroMCretenetGOburogluLet alGlutamine-dependent alpha-ketoglutarate production regulates the balance between T helper 1 cell and regulatory T cell generation. Sci Signal (2015) 8(396):ra97.10.1126/scisignal.aab2610
35
AndrewsTDWhittleBFieldMABalakishnanBZhangYShaoYet alMassively parallel sequencing of the mouse exome to accurately identify rare, induced mutations: an immediate source for thousands of new mouse models. Open Biol (2012) 2(5):120061.10.1098/rsob.120061
36
MombaertsPIacominiJJohnsonRSHerrupKTonegawaSPapaioannouVE.RAG-1-deficient mice have no mature B and T lymphocytes. Cell (1992) 68(5):869–77.10.1016/0092-8674(92)90030-G
37
PhanTGAmesburyMGardamSCrosbieJHasboldJHodgkinPDet alB cell receptor-independent stimuli trigger immunoglobulin (Ig) class switch recombination and production of IgG autoantibodies by anergic self-reactive B cells. J Exp Med (2003) 197(7):845–60.10.1084/jem.20022144
38
RandallKLLambeTJohnsonALTreanorBKucharskaEDomaschenzHet alDock8 mutations cripple B cell immunological synapses, germinal centers and long-lived antibody production. Nat Immunol (2009) 10(12):1283–91.10.1038/ni.1820
39
BroerSBroerAHamprechtB. Expression of the surface antigen 4F2hc affects system-L-like neutral-amino-acid-transport activity in mammalian cells. Biochem J (1997) 324(Pt 2):535–41.10.1042/bj3240535
40
Zanin-ZhorovATal-LapidotGCahalonLCohen-SfadyMPevsner-FischerMLiderOet alCutting edge: T cells respond to lipopolysaccharide innately via TLR4 signaling. J Immunol (2007) 179(1):41–4.10.4049/jimmunol.179.1.41
41
YabasMTehCEFrankenreiterSLalDRootsCMWhittleBet alATP11C is critical for the internalization of phosphatidylserine and differentiation of B lymphocytes. Nat Immunol (2011) 12(5):441–9.10.1038/ni.2011
42
TakahashiKOkitaKNakagawaMYamanakaS. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from fibroblast cultures. Nat Protoc (2007) 2(12):3081–9.10.1038/nprot.2007.418
43
HeckelTBroerAWiesingerHLangFBroerS. Asymmetry of glutamine transporters in cultured neural cells. Neurochem Int (2003) 43(4–5):289–98.10.1016/S0197-0186(03)00014-7
44
HanahanDWeinbergRA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell (2011) 144(5):646–74.10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
45
SoubaWW. Glutamine and cancer. Ann Surg (1993) 218(6):715–28.10.1097/00000658-199312000-00004
46
BoroughsLKDeBerardinisRJ. Metabolic pathways promoting cancer cell survival and growth. Nat Cell Biol (2015) 17(4):351–9.10.1038/ncb3124
47
PoletFMartherusRCorbetCPintoAFeronO. Inhibition of glucose metabolism prevents glycosylation of the glutamine transporter ASCT2 and promotes compensatory LAT1 upregulation in leukemia cells. Oncotarget (2016) 7(29):46371–83.10.18632/oncotarget.10131
48
SchulteMLKhodadadiABCuthbertsonMLSmithJAManningHC. 2-amino-4-bis(aryloxybenzyl)aminobutanoic acids: a novel scaffold for inhibition of ASCT2-mediated glutamine transport. Bioorg Med Chem Lett (2016) 26(3):1044–7.10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.12.031
49
NewsholmePCuriRPithon CuriTCMurphyCJGarciaCPires de MeloM. Glutamine metabolism by lymphocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils: its importance in health and disease. J Nutr Biochem (1999) 10(6):316–24.10.1016/S0955-2863(99)00022-4
50
WallaceCKeastD. Glutamine and macrophage function. Metabolism (1992) 41(9):1016–20.10.1016/0026-0495(92)90130-3
51
MurphyCNewsholmeP. Importance of glutamine metabolism in murine macrophages and human monocytes to l-arginine biosynthesis and rates of nitrite or urea production. Clin Sci (Lond) (1998) 95(4):397–407.10.1042/CS19980194
52
SimsekTKocabasFZhengJDeberardinisRJMahmoudAIOlsonENet alThe distinct metabolic profile of hematopoietic stem cells reflects their location in a hypoxic niche. Cell Stem Cell (2010) 7(3):380–90.10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.011
53
HengTSPainterMWConsortium Immunological Genome Project. The immunological genome project: networks of gene expression in immune cells. Nat Immunol (2008) 9(10):1091–4.10.1038/ni1008-1091
54
NewsholmeP. Why is l-glutamine metabolism important to cells of the immune system in health, postinjury, surgery or infection?J Nutr (2001) 131(9 Suppl):2515S–22S; discussion 2523S–4S.
55
DuranRVOppligerWRobitailleAMHeiserichLSkendajRGottliebEet alGlutaminolysis activates Rag-mTORC1 signaling. Mol Cell (2012) 47(3):349–58.10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.043
56
GerrietsVARathmellJC. Metabolic pathways in T cell fate and function. Trends Immunol (2012) 33(4):168–73.10.1016/j.it.2012.01.010
57
WahlDRByersdorferCAFerraraJLOpipariAWJrGlickGD. Distinct metabolic programs in activated T cells: opportunities for selective immunomodulation. Immunol Rev (2012) 249(1):104–15.10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01148.x
Summary
Keywords
SLC1A5, glutamine, B cells, glutaminolysis, ASCT2, glutamine uptake
Citation
Masle-Farquhar E, Bröer A, Yabas M, Enders A and Bröer S (2017) ASCT2 (SLC1A5)-Deficient Mice Have Normal B-Cell Development, Proliferation, and Antibody Production. Front. Immunol. 8:549. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00549
Received
12 December 2016
Accepted
24 April 2017
Published
12 May 2017
Volume
8 - 2017
Edited by
Maritza Romero, Augusta University, USA
Reviewed by
Matteo A. Russo, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Christopher Alan Jolly, University of Texas at Austin, USA
Updates
Copyright
© 2017 Masle-Farquhar, Bröer, Yabas, Enders and Bröer.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Anselm Enders, anselm.enders@anu.edu.au; Stefan Bröer, stefan.broeer@anu.edu.au
†Present address: Mehmet Yabas, Department of Genetics and Bioengineering, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
‡These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Nutritional Immunology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.