Phagocytic Integrins: Activation and Signaling

Abstract

Phagocytic integrins are endowed with the ability to engulf and dispose of particles of different natures. Evolutionarily conserved from worms to humans, they are involved in pathogen elimination and apoptotic and tumoral cell clearance. Research in the field of integrin-mediated phagocytosis has shed light on the molecular events controlling integrin activation and their effector functions. However, there are still some aspects of the regulation of the phagocytic process that need to be clarified. Here, we have revised the molecular events controlling phagocytic integrin activation and the downstream signaling driving particle engulfment, and we have focused particularly on α_Mβ₂/CR3, α_Xβ₂/CR4, and a brief mention of α_Vβ₅/α_Vβ₃integrins.

Introduction

Phagocytosis entails the engulfment and disposal of particles in sequential steps, including particle recognition, cytoskeletal remodeling, membrane protrusion, particle engulfment, and phagolysosomal digestion (1, 2). The role of integrins in phagocytosis is evolutionarily conserved and can be observed in Caenorhabditis elegans INA-1/PAT-3, which is involved in clearance of apoptotic cells (3), and Drosophila αPS3/βν, which has roles in microbial defense and apoptotic cell removal (4, 5) (Table 1). In mammals, the orthologues α_Vβ₃/α_Vβ₅ are expressed in professional and non-professional phagocytes (endothelial, epithelial, fibroblast, and neuronal and mesenchymal cells) with a role in phosphatidylserine-rich apoptotic/necrotic body clearance. Professional phagocytes in mammals express complement receptors α_Mβ₂/CR3 and α_Xβ_2/CR4, which are involved in host defense and tissue homeostasis (45). Other integrins with reduced phagocytic capacity (α₅β₁, α₂β₁, α₃β₁, and α₆β₁) are involved in phagocytosis of fibrillar or denatured extracellular matrix components (Table 1).

Integrins are characterized by requiring activation to be functional. This review has focused on the main events determining β₂ integrin activation and downstream signaling in relation to cytoskeletal remodeling and particle engulfment, and it makes a special mention of the main differences between other phagocytic integrins, especially those involved in apoptotic cell clearance.

Integrin Structure and Activation

Phagocytic integrins are heterodimeric (α and β subunit) receptors. Subunits are divided into ectodomains, a transmembrane helix, and short cytoplasmic tails. The α-subunit ectodomains contain Mg²⁺-binding metal-ion-dependent adhesive sites (MIDAS) and Adjacent to MIDAS (AdMIDAS), which binds inhibitory Ca²⁺ or activating Mn²⁺ (46, 47). Ligand binding can occur either at the αI-domain (α-subunit) in α_X, α_M, and α₂ or at the α/β-chain interface in integrins without the αI domain (Figure 1A, Table 1).

Figure 1

Integrins are tightly regulated by conformational changes, a hallmark of which is cytoplasmic tail separation (48). Integrin conformations are described according to the state of the headpiece (open/closed; H⁺/H⁻) and leg ectodomains (extended/bent; E⁺/E⁻) (49). Resting integrins remain in an inactive/“bent” (E⁻H⁻) conformation with the lowest free energy (−4.0 kcal/mol for α₅β₁) with respect to fully activated integrins (50). E⁻H⁻is characterized by a closed ligand-binding site and clasped membrane proximal regions (51). In activated integrins (E⁺H⁺), the hybrid domain (β-subunit) swings away from the α-chain, and the membrane proximal regions unclasp. This correlates with the rearrangement of the MIDAS and opening of the ligand binding site (51).

Structural and mutational studies have investigated models of integrin activation to explore whether integrin extension or leg separation occurs first. Mutations and deletions of the CD-loop (β-subunit terminal domain) have been proposed to keep integrins from extending and have shown no impact on α_Vβ₃ and α_IIbβ₃ activation (52); there is little proof that mutations in this region affects β₂ integrins (53), strongly indicating that releasing these constraints is not enough to induce activation.

Structural studies (54) have demonstrated that α_Xβ₂ follows the “switch-blade” model of activation, where leg separation occurs first, releasing constraints of the bent conformation and opening of the ligand-binding site resulting in an intermediate/low affinity conformation E⁺H⁻ (55). The E⁺H⁻ conformation has a free energy between 1.6 and 0.5 kcal/mol, meaning the high affinity conformation is thermodynamically favored (50, 56). Mutations in the EGF3 repeat of the β₂-subunit have also been shown to induce a high affinity conformation through destabilizing the thermodynamically favorable bent conformation and facilitating leg separation (57). It is noteworthy that an E⁻H⁺ conformation has been described for α_Lβ₂ and α_Mβ₂, allowing integrins to bind ICAM in cis, which may regulate neutrophil function (58); however, the specifics of how this activation takes place remain unknown.

Integrin activity is regulated by changes in affinity and aggregation, with the latter affecting receptor avidity. Cytoplasmic proteins bind to α- or β-subunits causing tail separation, stabilizing their high affinity conformation (48, 59). This can be triggered either through signaling from other receptors (“inside-out” signaling, Figure 1B), direct ligand-binding, or experimentally, using Mn²⁺ (“outside-in” signaling, Figure 1C), which triggers downstream signaling pathways (60).

Inside-Out Signaling

Rap1 as a Signaling Node

Early studies in complement-dependent phagocytosis using mutants of small GTPases pointed to Rap1 as the main regulator of α_Mβ₂ activity (61) and to it being required for β₁-mediated phagocytosis (62). Rap1 acted as a node, connecting different signaling pathways (chemokines, fMLP, PAF, and TNFα) for integrin activation (63). Rap1-GTP loading is induced by specific Guanine–Nucleotide Exchange Factors (GEFs), being Epac1 (dependent on cyclic AMP; cAMP) and CalDAG-GEFs (dependent on Ca²⁺/Diacylglycerol; DAG), amongst the best characterized (Figure 1B). Epac1 expression was found to increase during monocyte-macrophage differentiation, correlating with the acquisition of immunoregulatory functions (64), and in neutrophilic HL-60 cells, pharmacological activation of Epac1 increased Rap1-GTP and complement-dependent phagocytosis (65). RasGRP3/CalDAG-GEFIII exhibited similar effects, promoting Rap1 activation and phagocytosis (66). Mutations in CalDAG-GEF1 produced leukocyte adhesion deficiency syndrome (LADIII) with defective neutrophil-endothelial adhesion (67), and mouse CalDAG-GEF1⁻/⁻ macrophages showed reduced integrin activation (68). Rap1 activation can be induced by Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (69); however, the signaling pathways remain poorly defined. In neutrophils, secreted myeloid-related proteins (MRPs) 8 and 14 bind to TLR4 causing Rap1 activation and β₂-dependent adhesion (70). In macrophages, low concentrations of TLR3/4/9 agonists induced RasGRP3-dependent Rap1 activation (71). Activation of α_Mβ₂ by TLR2/TLR4 required Rac1-GTP loading, PI3K activity, and cytohesin-1 binding to the β₂ subunit (72).The role of cytohesin-1 is controversial, as the use of cytohesin-1 siRNAs and inhibitors results in an increase in the α_Mβ₂ affinity conformation (73).

Talin1 and Kindlin-3

Talin1 and Kindlin-3 are the best-characterized integrin activators. Both belong to the FERM family but interact with distinct NPXY motifs in the cytoplasmic tails of β₁, β₂, and β₃, and they thus contribute differently to activation (74). Although Talin-binding is required for efficient β₅ activation during adhesion, it is dispensable for phagocytosis (75). α_Vβ₅ requires an unknown mediator that recognizes a YEMAS motif proximal to the NPXY. A candidate could be the FERM family FRMD5, as it promotes β₅-Kindlin-2 interaction and induces ROCK activation during adhesion (76), yet there is no information of its relevance in phagocytosis.

Talin1 contains an N-terminal globular head with a linear FERM domain and a C-terminal rod domain organized in 13 subdomains (R1-R13), which contains a dimerization domain, an integrin binding site, three F-actin binding sites, and several Vinculin and RIAM binding sites (77, 78). The FERM domain has four subdomains (F0-F1-F2-F3), where F3 contains the primary integrin-binding site (IBS) that interacts with the membrane-proximal NPXY motif conserved in β-integrin tails (59, 79, 80). In resting leukocytes, Talin1 remains auto-inhibited due to an interaction between F2F3 and R9 subdomains, which mask the primary IBS (81). Several Talin1 activation mechanisms have been proposed. By binding to PIP5Kγ, Talin1 is recruited to the plasma membrane where the F2F3 domain binds to phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P₂), disrupting the head–tail interaction and exposing the IBS (82, 83). Additionally, RIAM–Talin1 interaction was described as necessary for Talin1 activation and recruitment to integrin tails (Figure 1B) (84).

Hematopoietic cell-specific Kindlin-3 is mutated in LADIII, causing β₁/β₂/β₃ activation defects (85, 86) and preventing neutrophils adhesion to iC3b and ICAM-1 (87). Kindlin-3 binds to the membrane-distal NPKF sequence in the β₂ subunit tail without excluding Talin1 binding (Figure 1B) (87). Studies of their individual contributions to activation revealed that Kindlin-3 is not sufficient to induce the high-affinity state of α_Lβ₂, whereas Talin1 promotes full activation (88). Whether binding of Talin1 and Kindlin-3 is sequential or simultaneous and their exact contribution to integrin activation remains to be explored. The signaling events directing Kindlin-3 to integrins also remain elusive, as in T cells, Kindlin-3 localization at immune synapses depends on Rap1 and Mst-1/RapL signaling (89), whereas no such interaction has been described for phagocytic cells.

RIAM–Talin1 Interaction

RIAM (Rap1-Interacting Adaptor Molecule or APBB1IP) was identified as a Rap1 effector that promoted a β₂ and β₁ high affinity state, increasing T-cell adhesion and spreading (90). RIAM binds to Rap1-GTP through a central Ras-association domain (RA), to PI(4,5)P₂ through a Pleckstrin-Homology (PH) domain and to VASP, Profilin, and PLCγ1 via proline-rich regions (90–94). RIAM also interacts with Talin1 through its N-terminus and Talin1 has several RIAM-binding sites located at F3, R2, R3, R8, and R11 subdomains (77). Binding of RIAM to Talin1 releases Talin1 from its autoinhibition (Figure 1B) (95).

The Rap1-RIAM-Talin1-Integrin pathway also operates in complement-dependent phagocytosis. Studies in Talin1-silenced THP-1 cells revealed that Rap1 and Talin1 regulated each other's localization at phagocytic cups (96). Reduced RIAM expression in human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), neutrophilic HL-60 cells, and THP-1 cells diminished levels of high affinity α_Mβ₂ and reduced complement-dependent phagocytosis and Talin1 recruitment to phagocytic cups (65). Complement-dependent phagocytosis, cell adhesion to ICAM, and ROS production were also impaired in mouse RIAM^−/− macrophages and neutrophils (97). Additionally, RIAM deficiency in vivo had a profound effect on β₂ activity but a moderate effect on β₁- or β₃-dependent functions (98).

Besides RIAM, Rap1 effectors RapL and RGS14 (Regulator of G-Protein Signalling-14) have been proposed to regulate α_Mβ₂ activation by inside-out signaling (Figure 1B). The former is proposed to interact with α_M-subunit inducing integrin tail separation and integrin activation (99); however, RapL has only been shown to interact with a GFFKR motif in α_L cytoplasmic tail, and there is no direct evidence that it plays a role in α_Mβ₂ activation (100). For RGS14, the integrin activation mechanism is unknown but seems to be dependent on Talin1-binding to β₂ (101).

Recently, a direct interaction between Rap1-GTP and Talin1 was described at Talin1 F0 and F1 subdomains (102–105). Synergistic interaction between this region and an F1 lipid-interacting helix facilitates relocation of Talin1 and its integrin-activating function (Figure 1B) (105, 106). This pathway could be relevant for fast cell responses, as disruption in mice impaired platelet aggregation, neutrophil adhesion, extravasation, and phagocytosis but had no effect on macrophage adhesion and migration (104).

Outside-In Signaling

Outside-in signaling during phagocytosis initiates upon ligand interaction, stabilizing the active conformation, separating integrin tails, allowing for the binding of actin cytoskeletal linkers (Talin1 and/or Kindlin-3), and reorganizing cytoskeletal constraints, as described in the picket-fence model (2). This generates the force needed to drive membrane extension and particle engulfment/internalization (Figure 1C). Regulators have been described in focal complex-like formations at the phagocytic cup (107).

Clustering and Tyrosine Kinases

One of the earliest events in outside-in signaling could be ligand-induced clustering, a process requiring Talin1 and/or Kindlin-3 (74, 108). Kindlin-3-induced clustering is reported to activate Src family kinases (SFKs) (109, 110) by the exclusion of tyrosine phosphatases such as CD45 (68). Size exclusion of these membrane-bound phosphatases with large extracellular domains seems to be a common feature of integrin-mediated close-contact immune processes, such as Dectin-1 and FcγRIII phagocytosis and immune synapse formation (68, 111, 112). This process does not exclude SFKs but favors their activation due to removing the inhibitory effect of these phosphatases (109, 110). However, there are as of yet only indirect evidences (109, 110) that phosphatases such as CD45 are excluded during integrin-mediated phagocytosis.

SFKs appear to be exclusively involved in “outside-in” signaling, as SFK-deficient cells produced reduced ROS after integrin clustering (113), whereas ICAM-1 adhesion and complement-dependent phagocytosis were normal in pre-activated SFK-deficient cells (114, 115).

A requirement for SFK activation has been described for β₁, β₂, and β₃ integrins (109, 114, 116). Hck, Fgr, and Lyn are the representative SFKs in myeloid cells. Hck co-localized with α_Mβ₂ at phagocytic cups of complement-opsonized zymosan (117, 118), and the Hck knockout phenocopied the α_M knockout (119). However, in U937 macrophage-like cells, Hck and Fgr siRNA, unlike Lyn, had no effect on particle internalization (120), and genetic restitution of Fgr-deficient cells inhibited adhesion, spreading, and Syk activation (121). In contrast, the Hck^−/−Fgr^−/−Lyn^−/− triple knockout showed no inhibition in CR3-mediated phagocytosis (122), which may point to compensatory roles of other ubiquitously expressed SFKs. Despite the research into outside-in activation of SFKs, the exact mechanism and individual contribution of each SFK have yet to be dissected.

SFK activity precedes activation of tyrosine kinases Syk and FAK family member Pyk2. Syk is necessary for phagocytosis of iC3b-opsonized beads/zymosan and localizes at phagocytic cups (107, 123), whereas Pyk2 contributes to clearance of complement-opsonized bacteria (124). Clustering of β₂ integrins results in Syk activation (125), which in turn triggers Pyk2 signaling (126). Pharmacological inhibition of Syk and FAK kinases points to non-redundant functions during phagocytosis and to a possible sequential activation (107).

Phosphoinositides Coordinate GTPases and Cytoskeletal Rearrangements

Phagocytosis requires sequential enrichment of phosphoinositides (PIPs) in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane (127). PIP enrichment recruits GEFs for small GTPases, which are sequentially activated (128), and other components of integrin adhesion complexes.

PI(4,5)P₂ enrichment can be induced by lipid redistribution due to particle-induced plasma membrane deformation (129) and/or by SFK or Talin1-induced PIP5Kγ activity (83, 130, 131). PI(4,5)P₂ enrichment strengthens Talin1 anchoring (81) and recruits different factors involved in F-actin dynamics, like the actin-depolymerizing-factor ADF/Cofilin, whose activity is inhibited by PI(4,5)P₂ (132), or the formin mDia (133, 134). Additionally, RIAM binds PI(4,5)P₂ and may recruit VASP and Profilin, which could also contribute to actin polymerization (90, 93) (Figure 1C).

PI(3,4)P₂ recruits and induces Vinculin activation through disrupting an auto-inhibitory interaction (135). This is dependent on Syk activity and, to a lesser extent, on FAK/Pyk2 and is upstream from ROCK activation (107). In focal complexes, RIAM contributes to Vinculin binding to Talin1, as RIAM-Talin1 interaction unmasks a Vinculin binding site in Talin1 (77). Afterwards, Vinculin binding to F-actin and α-actinin favors filament bundling and force generation (136, 137).

Increased PI(3,4,5)P₃ at CR3-phagocytic cups (138) depends on PI3K (139) and Syk (126), and both are activated downstream of Kindlin-induced clustering (140). PI(3,4,5)P₃ enrichment recruits Vav1/3, which are GEFs for the RhoA family GTPases (128). Complement-dependent phagocytosis requires Vav1 to activate RhoA (61, 141) but also RhoG with no participation from Cdc42 and Rac1 (142). However, expression of constitutively active Rac1 rescues the defective engulfment of Vav1-3 knockouts (143). This discrepancy could be explained by the overlapping roles of RhoG and Rac1 (144, 145) (Figure 1C).

In the final steps leading to engulfment, RhoA-GTP initiates the ROCK-MLCK-myosin signaling pathway and actomyosin contractility (146). RhoA is enriched at phagocytic cups, and its localization is modulated by motifs in β₂-integrin tails (141). Premature activation of RhoA is inhibited by Rap-GTP through ARAP3, a dual GAP for Rho and Arf GTPases, which is recruited by PI(3,4,5)P₃ and PI(3,5)P₂ (147). Finally, mDia contributes to phagosome closure (107, 133) and particle engulfment by connecting the actin cytoskeleton to microtubules (148) (Figure 1C).

Signaling During Phagocytosis of Apoptotic Cells

During apoptotic cell phagocytosis by mammalian α_Vβ₅/α_Vβ₃, a p130Cas-CrkII-Dock180-Elmo module induces Rac1 activation, which is responsible for cytoskeletal remodeling and phagosome formation (149, 150). Other known signals include the activation of SFKs, as signals from the Mer-TK receptor recruit phosphorylated FAK to mammalian β₅ in a Src-dependent manner (151), and Syk and Pyk2 activation has been shown to occur for α_Vβ₃ (152, 153). There is also evidence that Rac-1 activation is dependent on RhoG and its GEF Trio (154, 155), whereas RhoA inhibits engulfment (156), and the role of Cdc42 remains unclear (157–159).

An orthologous pathway using the CED-2-CED-5-CED10 module has been described for C. elegans INA-1, which activates the Rac ortholog and requires activation of SRC-1(Src-ortholog) (3). Similarly in Drosophila, severed axon clearance requires Src42A and Shark—the Src and Syk orthologs, respectively (160, 161)—pointing to an evolutionarily conserved pathway operating in apoptotic cell removal.

Discussion and Future Perspectives

There are still critical gaps in the knowledge of phagocytic integrin signaling, specifically concerning proximal events and their hierarchy. There are several proposed alternative Talin1-recruitment mechanisms, but their contributions and significance are yet to be established. Rap1-Talin1 interaction is evolutionarily conserved and might constitute a mechanism for short-term adhesions (105), whereas Rap1-RIAM-Talin1 contacts would have a faster recruitment of effector proteins. In this line, it is yet to be established if RIAM is required for outside-in signaling, formation, and recycling of the focal adhesion-like complexes distributed in phagocytic cups (107).

Different F-actin nucleators/elongators are described to participate in CR3-mediated phagocytosis; however, their localization, recruitment, and relative contributions are unknown. The regulation of small GTPases, which control actin dynamics, remains obscure; there is scarce evidence of GEF and GAP spatiotemporal localization in phagocytic cups, and it is well established that GTPases negatively regulate each other, which also raises questions on signal termination and negative-feedback loops.

Many structural and signaling proteins required for phagocytic integrin function have potential post-translational modification-dependent functions, and, although there are several candidates, little work has been undertaken to establish Ser/Thr kinase and phosphatase recruitment and localization within the phagocytic cup.

Fine-grain elucidation of the molecular mechanisms involved in integrin-mediated phagocytosis will yield invaluable information on possible control points for phagocyte functions (antigenic capture, pathogen, tumor or apoptotic body elimination, etc.). Indeed, complement-opsonized immune complexes and particles may be presented directly by subcapsular sinus macrophages to naïve B cells or conveyed to dendritic cells for B-cell presentation. This process requires cooperation between antigen-presenting cell α_Mβ₂/α_Xβ₂ and B-cell CR1, CR2, and/or Fc receptors (162–165). Manipulation of this pathway may inform new vaccine strategies (166).

References

• 1.

  RosalesCUribe-QuerolE. Phagocytosis: a fundamental process in immunity. BioMed Res Int. (2017) 2017:9042851. 10.1155/2017/9042851

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2.

  NiedergangFGrinsteinS. How to build a phagosome: new concepts for an old process. Curr Opin Cell Biol. (2018) 50:57–63. 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.01.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3.

  HsuTYWuYC. Engulfment of apoptotic cells in C. elegans is mediated by integrin alpha/SRC signaling. Curr Biol. (2010) 20:477–86. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.062

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4.

  NonakaSNagaosaKMoriTShiratsuchiANakanishiY. Integrin alphaPS3/betanu-mediated phagocytosis of apoptotic cells and bacteria in Drosophila. J Biol Chem. (2013) 288:10374–80. 10.1074/jbc.M113.451427

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5.

  NagaosaKOkadaRNonakaSTakeuchiKFujitaYMiyasakaTet al. Integrin betanu-mediated phagocytosis of apoptotic cells in Drosophila embryos. J Biol Chem. (2011) 286:25770–7. 10.1074/jbc.M110.204503

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6.

  ReichertFRotshenkerS. Complement-receptor-3 and scavenger-receptor-AI/II mediated myelin phagocytosis in microglia and macrophages. Neurobiol Dis. (2003) 12:65–72. 10.1016/S0969-9961(02)00008-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7.

  LiXUtomoACullereXChoiMMMilnerDAJrVenkateshDet al. The β-glucan receptor Dectin-1 activates the integrin Mac-1 in neutrophils via Vav protein signaling to promote Candida albicans clearance. Cell Host Microbe. (2011) 10:603–15. 10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8.

  RojasADelgado-LópezFGonzálezIPérez-CastroRRomeroJRojasI. The receptor for advanced glycation end-products: a complex signaling scenario for a promiscuous receptor. Cell Signall. (2013) 25:609–14. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.11.022

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9.

  SpringerTAAndersonDC. Leukocyte complement receptors and adhesion proteins in the inflammatory response: insights from an experiment of nature. Biochem Soc Symp. (1986) 51:47–57.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 10.

  GaitherTAVargasIInadaSFrankMM. The complement fragment C3d facilitates phagocytosis by monocytes. Immunology. (1987) 62:405–11.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 11.

  DavisGE. The Mac-1 and p150, 95 β2 integrins bind denatured proteins to mediate leukocyte cell-substrate adhesion. Exp Cell Res. (1992) 200:242–52. 10.1016/0014-4827(92)90170-D

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12.

  HespanholMRMantovaniB. Phagocytosis by macrophages mediated by receptors for denatured proteins - dependence on tyrosine protein kinases. Braz J Med Biol Res. (2002) 35:383–9. 10.1590/S0100-879X2002000300015

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13.

  Agramonte-HeviaJGonzález-ArenasABarreraDVelasco-VelázquezM. Gram-negative bacteria and phagocytic cell interaction mediated by complement receptor 3. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. (2002) 34:255–66. 10.1016/S0928-8244(02)00408-X

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14.

  JonesHEStridJOsmanMUronen-HanssonHDixonGKleinNet al. The role of beta2 integrins and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in the phagocytosis of dead Neisseria meningitidis. Cell Microbiol. (2008) 10:1634–45. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01154.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15.

  van BruggenRDrewniakAJansenMvan HoudtMRoosDChapelHet al. Complement receptor 3, not Dectin-1, is the major receptor on human neutrophils for beta-glucan-bearing particles. Mol Immunol. (2009) 47:575–81. 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.09.018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16.

  Le CabecVColsCMaridonneau-PariniI. Nonopsonic phagocytosis of zymosan and Mycobacterium kansasii by CR3 (CD11b/CD18) involves distinct molecular determinants and is or is not coupled with NADPH oxidase activation. Infect Immun. (2000) 68:4736–45. 10.1128/IAI.68.8.4736-4745.2000

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17.

  ReichertFSlobodovUMakranzCRotshenkerS. Modulation (inhibition and augmentation) of complement receptor-3-mediated myelin phagocytosis. Neurobiol Dis. (2001) 8:504–12. 10.1006/nbdi.2001.0383

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18.

  LishkoVKYakubenkoVPUgarovaTPPodolnikovaNP. Leukocyte integrin Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18, alphaMbeta2, CR3) acts as a functional receptor for platelet factor 4. J Biol Chem. (2018) 293:6869–82. 10.1074/jbc.RA117.000515

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19.

  ZhangXBajicGAndersenGRChristiansenSHVorup-JensenT. The cationic peptide LL-37 binds Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) with a low dissociation rate and promotes phagocytosis. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2016) 1864:471–8. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.02.013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20.

  SchackLStapulionisRChristensenBKofod-OlsenESkov SorensenUBVorup-JensenTet al. Osteopontin enhances phagocytosis through a novel osteopontin receptor, the alphaXbeta2 integrin. J Immunol. (2009) 182:6943–50. 10.4049/jimmunol.0900065

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21.

  Juul-MadsenKQvistPBendtsenKLLangkildeAEVestergaardBHowardKAet al. Size-selective phagocytic clearance of fibrillar alpha-synuclein through conformational activation of complement receptor 4. J Immunol. (2020) 204:1345–61. 10.4049/jimmunol.1900494

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22.

  LeeWSodekJMcCullochCA. Role of integrins in regulation of collagen phagocytosis by human fibroblasts. J Cell Physiol. (1996) 168:695–704. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199609)168:3<695::AID-JCP22>3.0.CO;2-X

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23.

  AbrahamLCDiceJFLeeKKaplanDL. Phagocytosis and remodeling of collagen matrices. Exp Cell Res. (2007) 313:1045–55. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.12.019

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24.

  BarthNDMarwickJAVendrellMRossiAGDransfieldI. The “phagocytic synapse” and clearance of apoptotic cells. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1708. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01708

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25.

  ThorneRFMarshallJFShafrenDRGibsonPGHartIRBurnsGF. The integrins α3β1 and α6β1 physically and functionally associate with CD36 in human melanoma cells - requirement for the extracellular domain of CD36. J Biol Chem. (2000) 275:35264–75. 10.1074/jbc.M003969200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26.

  CoopmanPJThomasDMGehlsenKRMuellerSC. Integrin alpha 3 beta 1 participates in the phagocytosis of extracellular matrix molecules by human breast cancer cells. Mol Biol Cell. (1996) 7:1789–804. 10.1091/mbc.7.11.1789

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27.

  ZhaoMWJinMLHeSSpeeCRyanSJHintonDR. A distinct integrin-mediated phagocytic pathway for extracellular matrix remodeling by RPE cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (1999) 40:2713–23.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 28.

  Vernon-WilsonEFAuradeFBrownSB. CD31 promotes beta1 integrin-dependent engulfment of apoptotic Jurkat T lymphocytes opsonized for phagocytosis by fibronectin. J Leukoc Biol. (2006) 79:1260–7. 10.1189/jlb.1005571

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29.

  BlystoneSDGrahamILLindbergFPBrownEJ. Integrin alpha v beta 3 differentially regulates adhesive and phagocytic functions of the fibronectin receptor alpha 5 beta 1. J Cell Biol. (1994) 127:1129–37. 10.1083/jcb.127.4.1129

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30.

  BambergerMEHarrisMEMcDonaldDRHusemannJLandrethGE. A cell surface receptor complex for fibrillar beta-amyloid mediates microglial activation. J Neurosci. (2003) 23:2665–74. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-02665.2003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31.

  KoenigsknechtJLandrethG. Microglial phagocytosis of fibrillar β-amyloid through a β1 integrin-dependent mechanism. J Neurosci. (2004) 24:9838–46. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2557-04.2004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32.

  NishiCTodaSSegawaKNagataS. Tim4-and MerTK-mediated engulfment of apoptotic cells by mouse resident peritoneal macrophages. Mol Cell Biol. (2014) 34:1512–20. 10.1128/MCB.01394-13

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33.

  FadokVAWarnerMLBrattonDLHensonPM. CD36 is required for phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by human macrophages that use either a phosphatidylserine receptor or the vitronectin receptor (αvβ3). J Immunol. (1998) 161:6250–7.

  • Google Scholar

• 34.

  FinnemannSCNandrotEF. MerTK activation during RPE phagocytosis in vivo requires αVβ5 integrin. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2006) 572:499–503. 10.1007/0-387-32442-9_69

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35.

  DransfieldIZagórskaALewEMichailKLemkeG. Mer receptor tyrosine kinase mediates both tethering and phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. Cell Death Dis. (2015) 6:e1646. 10.1038/cddis.2015.18

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36.

  AkakuraSSinghSSpataroMAkakuraRKimJ-IAlbertMLet al. The opsonin MFG-E8 is a ligand for the αvβ5 integrin and triggers DOCK180-dependent Rac1 activation for the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. Exp Cell Res. (2004) 292:403–16. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2003.09.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37.

  HanayamaRTanakaMMiwaKShinoharaAIwamatsuANagataS. Identification of a factor that links apoptotic cells to phagocytes. Nature. (2002) 417:182. 10.1038/417182a

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38.

  IshimotoYOhashiKMizunoKNakanoT. Promotion of the uptake of PS liposomes and apoptotic cells by a product of growth arrest-specific gene, gas6. J Biochem. (2000) 127:411–7. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022622

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39.

  AndersonHAMaylockCAWilliamsJAPaweletzCPShuHShacterE. Serum-derived protein S binds to phosphatidylserine and stimulates the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. Nat Immunol. (2003) 4:87. 10.1038/ni871

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40.

  SavillJDransfieldIHoggNHaslettC. Vitronectin receptor-mediated phagocytosis of cells undergoing apoptosis. Nature. (1990) 343:170–3. 10.1038/343170a0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41.

  MoodleyYRigbyPBundellCBuntSHayashiHMissoNet al. Macrophage recognition and phagocytosis of apoptotic fibroblasts is critically dependent on fibroblast-derived thrombospondin 1 and CD36. Am J Pathol. (2003) 162:771–9. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63874-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42.

  GreenbergMESunMZhangRFebbraioMSilversteinRHazenSL. Oxidized phosphatidylserine–CD36 interactions play an essential role in macrophage-dependent phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. J Exp Med. (2006) 203:2613–625. 10.1084/jem.20060370

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43.

  BöttcherAGaiplUSFürnrohrBGHerrmannMGirkontaiteIKaldenJRet al. Involvement of phosphatidylserine, αvβ3, CD14, CD36, and complement C1q in the phagocytosis of primary necrotic lymphocytes by macrophages. Arthr Rheumat. (2006) 54:927–38. 10.1002/art.21660

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44.

  ShiratsuchiAMoriTSakuraiKNagaosaKSekimizuKLeeBLet al. Independent recognition of Staphylococcus aureus by two receptors for phagocytosis in Drosophila. J Biol Chem. (2012) 287:21663–72. 10.1074/jbc.M111.333807

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45.

  GreenbergSGrinsteinS. Phagocytosis and innate immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. (2002) 14:136–45. 10.1016/S0952-7915(01)00309-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46.

  ValdramidouDHumphriesMJMouldAP. Distinct roles of β1 metal ion-dependent adhesion site (MIDAS), adjacent to MIDAS (ADMIDAS), and ligand-associated metal-binding site (LIMBS) cation-binding sites in ligand recognition by integrin α2β1. J Biol Chem. (2008) 283:32704–14. 10.1074/jbc.M802066200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47.

  ZhangKChenJ. The regulation of integrin function by divalent cations. Cell Adhes Migr. (2012) 6:20–9. 10.4161/cam.18702

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48.

  AnthisNJWegenerKLYeFKimCGoultBTLoweEDet al. The structure of an integrin/talin complex reveals the basis of inside-out signal transduction. EMBO J. (2009) 28:3623–32. 10.1038/emboj.2009.287

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49.

  FanZLeyK. Leukocyte arrest: biomechanics and molecular mechanisms of β2 integrin activation. Biorheology. (2015) 52:353–77. 10.3233/BIR-15085

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50.

  LiJSpringerTA. Energy landscape differences among integrins establish the framework for understanding activation. J Cell Biol. (2018) 217:397–412. 10.1083/jcb.201701169

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51.

  LuoB-HCarmanCVSpringerTA. Structural basis of integrin regulation and signaling. Annu Rev Immunol. (2007) 25:619–47. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141618

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52.

  ZhuJLuoB-HBarthPSchonbrunJBakerDSpringerTA. The structure of a receptor with two associating transmembrane domains on the cell surface: integrin αIIbβ3. Mol Cell. (2009) 34:234–49. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.022

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53.

  GuptaVGyllingAAlonsoJLSugimoriTIanakievPXiongJ-Pet al. The β-tail domain (βTD) regulates physiologic ligand binding to integrin CD11b/CD18. Blood. (2007) 109:3513–20. 10.1182/blood-2005-11-056689

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54.

  XieCZhuJChenXMiLNishidaNSpringerTA. Structure of an integrin with an alphaI domain complement receptor type 4. EMBO J. (2010) 29:666–79. 10.1038/emboj.2009.367

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55.

  LefortCTHyunY-MSchultzJBLawF-YWaughREKnaufPAet al. Outside-in signal transmission by conformational changes in integrin Mac-1. J Immunol. (2009) 183:6460–8. 10.4049/jimmunol.0900983

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56.

  LiJSuYXiaWQinYHumphriesMJVestweberDet al. Conformational equilibria and intrinsic affinities define integrin activation. EMBO J. (2017) 36:629–45. 10.15252/embj.201695803

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57.

  ZangQSpringerTA. Amino acid residues in the PSI domain and cysteine-rich repeats of the integrin β2 subunit that restrain activation of the integrin αXβ2. J Biol Chem. (2001) 276:6922–9. 10.1074/jbc.M005868200

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58.

  FanZMcArdleSMarkiAMikulskiZGutierrezEEngelhardtBet al. Neutrophil recruitment limited by high-affinity bent β 2 integrin binding ligand in cis. Nat Commun. (2016) 7:12658. 10.1038/ncomms12658

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59.

  CalderwoodDAYanBde PeredaJMAlvarezBGFujiokaYLiddingtonRCet al. The phosphotyrosine binding-like domain of talin activates integrins. J Biol Chem. (2002) 277:21749–58. 10.1074/jbc.M111996200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60.

  HarburgerDSCalderwoodDA. Integrin signalling at a glance. J Cell Sci. (2009) 122:159–63. 10.1242/jcs.018093

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61.

  CaronEHallA. Identification of two distinct mechanisms of phagocytosis controlled by different Rho GTPases. Science. (1998) 282:1717–21. 10.1126/science.282.5394.1717

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62.

  AroraPDContiMARavidSSacksDBKapusAAdelsteinRSet al. Rap1 activation in collagen phagocytosis is dependent on nonmuscle myosin II-A. Mol Biol Cell. (2008) 19:5032–46. 10.1091/mbc.e08-04-0430

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63.

  CaronESelfAJHallA. The GTPase Rap1 controls functional activation of macrophage integrin alphaMbeta2 by LPS and other inflammatory mediators. Curr Biol. (2000) 10:974–8. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00641-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64.

  BrynTMahicMEnserinkJMSchwedeFAandahlEMTaskénK. The cyclic AMP-Epac1-Rap1 pathway is dissociated from regulation of effector functions in monocytes but acquires immunoregulatory function in mature macrophages. J Immunol. (2006) 176:7361–70. 10.4049/jimmunol.176.12.7361

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65.

  Medrano-FernandezIReyesROlazabalIRodriguezESanchez-MadridFBoussiotisVAet al. RIAM (Rap1-interacting adaptor molecule) regulates complement-dependent phagocytosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2013) 70:2395–410. 10.1007/s00018-013-1268-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66.

  BotelhoRJHarrisonREStoneJCHancockJFPhilipsMRJongstra-BilenJet al. Localized diacylglycerol-dependent stimulation of Ras and Rap1 during phagocytosis. J Biol Chem. (2009) 284:28522–32. 10.1074/jbc.M109.009514

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67.

  PasvolskyRFeigelsonSWKilicSSSimonAJTal-LapidotGGrabovskyVet al. A LAD-III syndrome is associated with defective expression of the Rap-1 activator CalDAG-GEFI in lymphocytes, neutrophils, and platelets. J Exp Med. (2007) 204:1571–82. 10.1084/jem.20070058

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68.

  FreemanSAGoyetteJFuruyaWWoodsECBertozziCRBergmeierWet al. Integrins form an expanding diffusional barrier that coordinates phagocytosis. Cell. (2016) 164:128–40. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.048

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69.

  MoonEYPyoS. Lipopolysaccharide stimulates Epac1-mediated Rap1/NF-kappaB pathway in Raw 264.7 murine macrophages. Immunol Lett. (2007) 110:121–5. 10.1016/j.imlet.2007.04.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70.

  PruensterMKurzARChungKJCao-EhlkerXBieberSNussbaumCFet al. Extracellular MRP8/14 is a regulator of beta2 integrin-dependent neutrophil slow rolling and adhesion. Nat Commun. (2015) 6:6915. 10.1038/ncomms7915

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71.

  TangSChenTYuZZhuXYangMXieBet al. RasGRP3 limits Toll-like receptor-triggered inflammatory response in macrophages by activating Rap1 small GTPase. Nat Commun. (2014) 5:4657. 10.1038/ncomms5657

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72.

  SendideKReinerNELeeJSBourgoinSTalalAHmamaZ. Cross-talk between CD14 and complement receptor 3 promotes phagocytosis of mycobacteria: regulation by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and cytohesin-1. J Immunol. (2005) 174:4210–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.174.7.4210

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73.

  El AzreqMAGarceauVBourgoinSG. Cytohesin-1 regulates fMLF-mediated activation and functions of the beta2 integrin Mac-1 in human neutrophils. J Leukoc Biol. (2011) 89:823–36. 10.1189/jlb.0410222

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74.

  CalderwoodDACampbellIDCritchleyDR. Talins and kindlins: partners in integrin-mediated adhesion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2013) 14:503–17. 10.1038/nrm3624

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75.

  SinghSD'melloVen HenegouwenPBBirgeRB. A NPxY-independent β5 integrin activation signal regulates phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2007) 364:540–8. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.10.049

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76.

  HuJNiuMLiXLuDCuiJXuWet al. FERM domain-containing protein FRMD5 regulates cell motility via binding to integrin β5 subunit and ROCK1. FEBS Lett. (2014) 588:4348–56. 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.10.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77.

  GoultBTZacharchenkoTBateNTsangRHeyFGingrasARet al. RIAM and vinculin binding to talin are mutually exclusive and regulate adhesion assembly and turnover. J Biol Chem. (2013) 288:8238–49. 10.1074/jbc.M112.438119

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78.

  HemmingsLReesDJOhanianVBoltonSJGilmoreAPPatelBet al. Talin contains three actin-binding sites each of which is adjacent to a vinculin-binding site. J Cell Sci. (1996) 109(Pt 11):2715–26.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 79.

  WegenerKLPartridgeAWHanJPickfordARLiddingtonRCGinsbergMHet al. Structural basis of integrin activation by talin. Cell. (2007) 128:171–82. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.048

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80.

  Garcia-AlvarezBde PeredaJMCalderwoodDAUlmerTSCritchleyDCampbellIDet al. Structural determinants of integrin recognition by talin. Mol Cell. (2003) 11:49–58. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00823-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81.

  DeddenDSchumacherSKelleyCFZachariasMBiertümpfelCFässlerRet al. The architecture of Talin1 reveals an autoinhibition mechanism. Cell. (2019) 179:120–31 e13. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.034

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82.

  LingKDoughmanRLFirestoneAJBunceMWAndersonRA. Type I gamma phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase targets and regulates focal adhesions. Nature. (2002) 420:89–93. 10.1038/nature01082

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83.

  Di PaoloGPellegriniLLetinicKCestraGZoncuRVoronovSet al. Recruitment and regulation of phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase type 1 gamma by the FERM domain of talin. Nature. (2002) 420:85–9. 10.1038/nature01147

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84.

  LeeH-SLimCJPuzon-McLaughlinWShattilSJGinsbergMH. RIAM activates integrins by linking talin to ras GTPase membrane-targeting sequences. J Biol Chem. (2009) 284:5119–27. 10.1074/jbc.M807117200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85.

  MalininNLZhangLChoiJCioceaARazorenovaOMaYQet al. A point mutation in KINDLIN3 ablates activation of three integrin subfamilies in humans. Nat Med. (2009) 15:313–8. 10.1038/nm.1917

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86.

  SvenssonLHowarthKMcDowallAPatzakIEvansRUssarSet al. Leukocyte adhesion deficiency-III is caused by mutations in KINDLIN3 affecting integrin activation. Nat Med. (2009) 15:306–12. 10.1038/nm.1931

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87.

  MoserMBauerMSchmidSRuppertRSchmidtSSixtMet al. Kindlin-3 is required for beta2 integrin-mediated leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells. Nat Med. (2009) 15:300–5. 10.1038/nm.1921

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88.

  LefortCTRossaintJMoserMPetrichBGZarbockAMonkleySJet al. Distinct roles for talin-1 and kindlin-3 in LFA-1 extension and affinity regulation. Blood. (2012) 119:4275–82. 10.1182/blood-2011-08-373118

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89.

  KondoNUedaYKitaTOzawaMTomiyamaTYasudaKet al. NDR1-dependent regulation of kindlin-3 controls high-affinity LFA-1 binding and immune synapse organization. Mol Cell Biol. (2017) 37:e00424–16. 10.1128/MCB.00424-16

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90.

  LafuenteEMvan PuijenbroekAAKrauseMCarmanCVFreemanGJBerezovskayaAet al. RIAM, an Ena/VASP and Profilin ligand, interacts with Rap1-GTP and mediates Rap1-induced adhesion. Dev Cell. (2004) 7:585–95. 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.07.021

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91.

  ColoGPLafuenteEMTeixidoJ. The MRL proteins: adapting cell adhesion, migration and growth. Eur J Cell Biol. (2012) 91:861–8. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2012.03.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92.

  HanJLimCJWatanabeNSorianiARatnikovBCalderwoodDAet al. Reconstructing and deconstructing agonist-induced activation of integrin alphaIIbbeta3. Curr Biol. (2006) 16:1796–806. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.035

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93.

  PatsoukisNBardhanKWeaverJDSariDTorres-GomezALiLet al. The adaptor molecule RIAM integrates signaling events critical for integrin-mediated control of immune function and cancer progression. Sci Signal. (2017) 10:eaam8298. 10.1126/scisignal.aam8298

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94.

  PatsoukisNLafuenteEMMeranerPsub KimJDombkowskiDLiLet al. RIAM regulates the cytoskeletal distribution and activation of PLC-γ1 in T cells. Sci Signal. (2009) 2:ra79. 10.1126/scisignal.2000409

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95.

  YangJZhuLZhangHHirbawiJFukudaKDwivediPet al. Conformational activation of talin by RIAM triggers integrin-mediated cell adhesion. Nat Commun. (2014) 5:5880. 10.1038/ncomms6880

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96.

  LimJDupuyAGCritchleyDRCaronE. Rap1 controls activation of the alpha(M)beta(2) integrin in a talin-dependent manner. J Cell Biochem. (2010) 111:999–1009. 10.1002/jcb.22788

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97.

  KlapprothSSperandioMPinheiroEMPrunsterMSoehnleinOGertlerFBet al. Loss of the Rap1 effector RIAM results in leukocyte adhesion deficiency due to impaired beta2 integrin function in mice. Blood. (2015) 126:2704–12. 10.1182/blood-2015-05-647453

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98.

  StrittSWolfKLorenzVVogtleTGuptaSBoslMRet al. Rap1-GTP-interacting adaptor molecule (RIAM) is dispensable for platelet integrin activation and function in mice. Blood. (2015) 125:219–22. 10.1182/blood-2014-08-597542

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99.

  HanCJinJXuSLiuHLiNCaoX. Integrin CD11b negatively regulates TLR-triggered inflammatory responses by activating Syk and promoting degradation of MyD88 and TRIF via Cbl-b. Nat Immunol. (2010) 11:734–42. 10.1038/ni.1908

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100.

  TohyamaYKatagiriKPardiRLuCSpringerTAKinashiT. The critical cytoplasmic regions of the αL/β2 integrin in Rap1-induced adhesion and migration. Mol Biol Cell. (2003) 14:2570–82. 10.1091/mbc.e02-09-0615

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101.

  LimJThompsonJMayRCHotchinNACaronE. Regulator of G-protein signalling-14 (RGS14) regulates the activation of alphaMbeta2 integrin during phagocytosis. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e69163. 10.1371/journal.pone.0069163

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102.

  GoultBTBouaouinaMElliottPRBateNPatelBGingrasARet al. Structure of a double ubiquitin-like domain in the talin head: a role in integrin activation. EMBO J. (2010) 29:1069–80. 10.1038/emboj.2010.4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103.

  LagarrigueFGingrasARPaulDSValadezAJCuevasMNSunHet al. Rap1 binding to the talin 1 F0 domain makes a minimal contribution to murine platelet GPIIb-IIIa activation. Blood Adv. (2018) 2:2358–68. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018020487

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104.

  BrombergerTKlapprothSRohwedderIZhuLMittmannLReichelCAet al. Direct Rap1/Talin1 interaction regulates platelet and neutrophil integrin activity in mice. Blood. (2018) 132:2754–62. 10.1182/blood-2018-04-846766

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105.

  BrombergerTZhuLKlapprothSQinJMoserM. Rap1 and membrane lipids cooperatively recruit talin to trigger integrin activation. J Cell Sci. (2019) 132:jcs.235531. 10.1242/jcs.235531

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106.

  GingrasARLagarrigueFCuevasMNValadezAJZorovichMMcLaughlinWet al. Rap1 binding and a lipid-dependent helix in talin F1 domain promote integrin activation in tandem. J Cell Biol. (2019) 218:1799–809. 10.1083/jcb.201810061

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107.

  JaumouilléVCartagena-RiveraAXWatermanCM. Coupling of β 2 integrins to actin by a mechanosensitive molecular clutch drives complement receptor-mediated phagocytosis. Nat Cell Biol. (2019) 21:1357–69. 10.1038/s41556-019-0414-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108.

  YeFPetrichBGAnekalPLefortCTKasirer-FriedeAShattilSJet al. The mechanism of kindlin-mediated activation of integrin αIIbβ3. Curr Biol. (2013) 23:2288–95. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.09.050

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109.

  Arias-SalgadoEGLizanoSSarkarSBruggeJSGinsbergMHShattilSJ. Src kinase activation by direct interaction with the integrin β cytoplasmic domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2003) 100:13298–302. 10.1073/pnas.2336149100

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110.

  XiaoRXiX-DChenZChenS-JMengG. Structural framework of c-Src activation by integrin β3. Blood. (2013) 121:700–6. 10.1182/blood-2012-07-440644

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111.

  JunghansVSantosAMLuiYDavisSJJönssonP. Dimensions and interactions of large T-cell surface proteins. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:2215. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02215

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112.

  DavisSJVan Der MerwePA. The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond. Nat Immunol. (2006) 7:803–9. 10.1038/ni1369

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113.

  LowellCAFumagalliLBertonG. Deficiency of Src family kinases p59/61hck and p58c-fgr results in defective adhesion-dependent neutrophil functions. J Cell Biol. (1996) 133:895–910. 10.1083/jcb.133.4.895

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114.

  GiagulliCOttoboniLCaveggionERossiBLowellCConstantinGet al. The Src family kinases Hck and Fgr are dispensable for inside-out, chemoattractant-induced signaling regulating β2 integrin affinity and valency in neutrophils, but are required for β2 integrin-mediated outside-in signaling involved in sustained adhesion. J Immunol. (2006) 177:604–11. 10.4049/jimmunol.177.1.604

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115.

  WetzelDMRhodesELLiSMcMahon-PrattDKoleskeAJ. The Src kinases Hck, Fgr and Lyn activate Arg to facilitate IgG-mediated phagocytosis and Leishmania infection. J Cell Sci. (2016) 129:3130–43. 10.1242/jcs.185595

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116.

  WuLBernard-TrifiloJALimYLimS-TMitraSKUryuSet al. Distinct FAK-Src activation events promote α5β1 and α4β1 integrin-stimulated neuroblastoma cell motility. Oncogene. (2008) 27:1439–48. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210770

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117.

  Astarie-DequekerCCarrenoSCougouleCMaridonneau-PariniI. The protein tyrosine kinase Hck is located on lysosomal vesicles that are physically and functionally distinct from CD63-positive lysosomes in human macrophages. J Cell Sci. (2002) 115:81–9.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 118.

  TangR.-H.LawSATanS-M. Selective recruitment of src family kinase Hck by leukocyte integrin αMβ2 but not αLβ2 or αXβ2. FEBS Lett. (2006) 580:4435–42. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.06.099

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119.

  HirahashiJMekalaDVan ZiffleJXiaoLSaffaripourSWagnerDDet al. Mac-1 signaling via Src-family and Syk kinases results in elastase-dependent thrombohemorrhagic vasculopathy. Immunity. (2006) 25:271–83. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.05.014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120.

  AdachiRSuzukiK. Lyn, one of the Src-family tyrosine kinases expressed in phagocytes, plays an important role in β2 integrin-signalling pathways in opsonized zymosan-activated macrophage-like U937 cells. Cell Biochem Funct. (2007) 25:323–33. 10.1002/cbf.1393

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121.

  VinesCMPotterJWXuYGeahlenRLCostelloPSTybulewiczVLet al. Inhibition of β2 integrin receptor and Syk kinase signaling in monocytes by the Src family kinase Fgr. Immunity. (2001) 15:507–19. 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00221-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122.

  Fitzer-AttasCJLowryMCrowleyMTFinnAJMengFDeFrancoALet al. Fcγ receptor–mediated phagocytosis in macrophages lacking the Src family tyrosine kinases Hck, Fgr, and Lyn. J Exp Med. (2000) 191:669–82. 10.1084/jem.191.4.669

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123.

  ShiYTohyamaYKadonoTHeJMiahSSHazamaRet al. Protein-tyrosine kinase Syk is required for pathogen engulfment in complement-mediated phagocytosis. Blood. (2006) 107:4554–62. 10.1182/blood-2005-09-3616

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124.

  PaoneCRodriguesNIttnerESantosCBuntruAHauckCR. The tyrosine kinase Pyk2 contributes to complement-mediated phagocytosis in murine macrophages. J Innate Immun. (2016) 8:437–51. 10.1159/000442944

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125.

  YanSRHuangMBertonG. Signaling by adhesion in human neutrophils: activation of the p72syk tyrosine kinase and formation of protein complexes containing p72syk and Src family kinases in neutrophils spreading over fibrinogen. J Immunol. (1997) 158:1902–10.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 126.

  MócsaiAZhouMMengFTybulewiczVLLowellCA. Syk is required for integrin signaling in neutrophils. Immunity. (2002) 16:547–58. 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00303-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127.

  BohdanowiczMCosíoGBackerJMGrinsteinS. Class I and class III phosphoinositide 3-kinases are required for actin polymerization that propels phagosomes. J Cell Biol. (2010) 191:999–1012. 10.1083/jcb.201004005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128.

  MaoYFinnemannSC. Regulation of phagocytosis by Rho GTPases. Small GTPases. (2015) 6:89–99. 10.4161/21541248.2014.989785

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129.

  MuLTuZMiaoLRuanHKangNHeiYet al. A phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate redistribution-based sensing mechanism initiates a phagocytosis programing. Nat Commun. (2018) 9:4259. 10.1038/s41467-018-06744-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130.

  LingKDoughmanRLIyerVVFirestoneAJBairstowSFMosherDFet al. Tyrosine phosphorylation of type Iγ phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase by Src regulates an integrin–talin switch. J Cell Biol. (2003) 163:1339–49. 10.1083/jcb.200310067

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131.

  YagoTZhangNZhaoLAbramsCSMcEverRP. Selectins and chemokines use shared and distinct signals to activate β2 integrins in neutrophils. Blood Adv. (2018) 2:731–44. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017015602

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132.

  SenjuYKalimeriMKoskelaEVSomerharjuPZhaoHVattulainenIet al. Mechanistic principles underlying regulation of the actin cytoskeleton by phosphoinositides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2017) 114:E8977–86. 10.1073/pnas.1705032114

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133.

  Colucci-GuyonENiedergangFWallarBJPengJAlbertsASChavrierP. A role for mammalian diaphanous-related formins in complement receptor (CR3)-mediated phagocytosis in macrophages. Curr Biol. (2005) 15:2007–12. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.051

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134.

  LewkowiczEHeritFLe ClaincheCBourdonclePPerezFNiedergangF. The microtubule-binding protein CLIP-170 coordinates mDia1 and actin reorganization during CR3-mediated phagocytosis. J Cell Biol. (2008) 183:1287–98. 10.1083/jcb.200807023

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135.

  BakolitsaCde PeredaJMBagshawCRCritchleyDRLiddingtonRC. Crystal structure of the vinculin tail suggests a pathway for activation. Cell. (1999) 99:603–13. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81549-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136.

  Roca-CusachsPDel RioAPuklin-FaucherEGauthierNCBiaisNSheetzMP. Integrin-dependent force transmission to the extracellular matrix by α-actinin triggers adhesion maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2013) 110:E1361–70. 10.1073/pnas.1220723110

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137.

  BoisPRBorgonRAVonrheinCIzardT. Structural dynamics of α-actinin-vinculin interactions. Mol Cell Biol. (2005) 25:6112–22. 10.1128/MCB.25.14.6112-6122.2005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138.

  DewittSTianWHallettMB. Localised PtdIns (3, 4, 5) P3 or PtdIns (3, 4) P2 at the phagocytic cup is required for both phagosome closure and Ca2+ signalling in HL60 neutrophils. J Cell Sci. (2006) 119:443–51. 10.1242/jcs.02756

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 139.

  SchymeinskyJThenCSindrilaruAGerstlRJakusZTybulewiczVLet al. Syk-mediated translocation of PI3Kδ to the leading edge controls lamellipodium formation and migration of leukocytes. PLoS ONE. (2007) 2:e1132. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001132

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140.

  XueZ.-H.FengCLiuW-LTanS-M. A role of kindlin-3 in integrin αMβ2 outside-in signaling and the Syk-Vav1-Rac1/Cdc42 signaling axis. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e56911. 10.1371/journal.pone.0056911

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141.

  WiedemannAPatelJCLimJTsunAvan KooykYCaronE. Two distinct cytoplasmic regions of the β2 integrin chain regulate RhoA function during phagocytosis. J Cell Biol. (2006) 172:1069–79. 10.1083/jcb.200508075

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142.

  TzircotisGBragaVMCaronE. RhoG is required for both FcγR-and CR3-mediated phagocytosis. J Cell Sci. (2011) 124:2897–902. 10.1242/jcs.084269

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143.

  HallABGakidisMAMGlogauerMWilsbacherJLGaoSSwatWet al. Requirements for Vav guanine nucleotide exchange factors and Rho GTPases in FcγR-and complement-mediated phagocytosis. Immunity. (2006) 24:305–16. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.02.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144.

  WennerbergKEllerbroekSMLiuR-YKarnoubAEBurridgeKDerCJ. RhoG signals in parallel with Rac1 and Cdc42. J Biol Chem. (2002) 277:47810–7. 10.1074/jbc.M203816200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145.

  Prieto-SánchezRMBusteloXR. Structural basis for the signaling specificity of RhoG and Rac1 GTPases. J Biol Chem. (2003) 278:37916–25. 10.1074/jbc.M301437200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146.

  OlazabalIMCaronEMayRCSchillingKKnechtDAMacheskyLM. Rho-kinase and myosin-II control phagocytic cup formation during CR, but not FcγR, phagocytosis. Curr Biol. (2002) 12:1413–8. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01069-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147.

  KrugmannSAndersonKRidleySRissoNMcGregorACoadwellJet al. Identification of ARAP3, a novel PI3K effector regulating both Arf and Rho GTPases, by selective capture on phosphoinositide affinity matrices. Mol Cell. (2002) 9:95–108. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00434-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148.

  PalazzoAFCookTAAlbertsASGundersenGG. mDia mediates Rho-regulated formation and orientation of stable microtubules. Nat Cell Biol. (2001) 3:723. 10.1038/35087035

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149.

  AlbertMLKimJ-IBirgeRB. α v β 5 integrin recruits the CrkII–Dock180–Rac1 complex for phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. Nat Cell Biol. (2000) 2:899–905. 10.1038/35046549

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150.

  GumiennyTLBrugneraETosello-TrampontA-CKinchenJMHaneyLBNishiwakiKet al. CED-12/ELMO, a novel member of the CrkII/Dock180/Rac pathway, is required for phagocytosis and cell migration. Cell. (2001) 107:27–41. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00520-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151.

  WuYSinghSGeorgescuM-MBirgeRB. A role for Mer tyrosine kinase in αvβ5 integrin-mediated phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. J Cell Sci. (2005) 118:539–53. 10.1242/jcs.01632

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152.

  SanjayAHoughtonANeffLDiDomenicoEBardelayCAntoineEet al. Cbl associates with Pyk2 and Src to regulate Src kinase activity, αvβ3 integrin-mediated signaling, cell adhesion, osteoclast motility. J Cell Biol. (2001) 152:181–96. 10.1083/jcb.152.1.181

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153.

  MiyazakiTSanjayANeffLTanakaSHorneWCBaronR. Src kinase activity is essential for osteoclast function. J Biol Chem. (2004) 279:17660–6. 10.1074/jbc.M311032200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154.

  NakayaMTanakaMOkabeYHanayamaRNagataS. Opposite effects of rho family GTPases on engulfment of apoptotic cells by macrophages. J Biol Chem. (2006) 281:8836–42. 10.1074/jbc.M510972200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155.

  DeBakkerCDHaneyLBKinchenJMGrimsleyCLuMKlingeleDet al. Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells is regulated by a UNC-73/TRIO-MIG-2/RhoG signaling module and armadillo repeats of CED-12/ELMO. Curr Biol. (2004) 14:2208–16. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.029

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156.

  Tosello-TrampontA.-C.Nakada-TsukuiKRavichandranKS. Engulfment of apoptotic cells is negatively regulated by Rho-mediated signaling. J Biol Chem. (2003) 278:49911–9. 10.1074/jbc.M306079200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157.

  LeverrierYRidleyAJ. Requirement for Rho GTPases and PI 3-kinases during apoptotic cell phagocytosis by macrophages. Curr Biol. (2001) 11:195–9. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00047-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 158.

  LeverrierYLorenziRBlundellMPBrickellPKinnonCRidleyAJet al. Cutting edge: the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein is required for efficient phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. J Immunol. (2001) 166:4831–4. 10.4049/jimmunol.166.8.4831

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159.

  MaoYFinnemannSC. Essential diurnal Rac1 activation during retinal phagocytosis requires αvβ5 integrin but not tyrosine kinases focal adhesion kinase or Mer tyrosine kinase. Mol Biol Cell. (2012) 23:1104–14. 10.1091/mbc.e11-10-0840

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160.

  MacDonaldJMBeachMGPorpigliaESheehanAEWattsRJFreemanMR. The Drosophila cell corpse engulfment receptor Draper mediates glial clearance of severed axons. Neuron. (2006) 50:869–81. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.028

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161.

  ZiegenfussJSBiswasRAveryMAHongKSheehanAEYeungY-Get al. Draper-dependent glial phagocytic activity is mediated by Src and Syk family kinase signalling. Nature. (2008) 453:935–9. 10.1038/nature06901

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162.

  BajicGYatimeLSimRBVorup-JensenTAndersenGR. Structural insight on the recognition of surface-bound opsonins by the integrin I domain of complement receptor 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2013) 110:16426–31. 10.1073/pnas.1311261110

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 163.

  PhanTGGrigorovaIOkadaTCysterJG. Subcapsular encounter and complement-dependent transport of immune complexes by lymph node B cells. Nat Immunol. (2007) 8:992–1000. 10.1038/ni1494

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164.

  GrayEECysterJG. Lymph node macrophages. J Innate Immun. (2012) 4:424–36. 10.1159/000337007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165.

  GonzalezSFDegnSEPitcherLAWoodruffMHeestersBACarrollMC. Trafficking of B cell antigen in lymph nodes. Ann Rev Immunol. (2011) 29:215–33. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101255

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166.

  BachmannMFJenningsGT. Vaccine delivery: a matter of size, geometry, kinetics and molecular patterns. Nat Rev Immunol. (2010) 10:787–96. 10.1038/nri2868

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar