ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Injection Into Lymph Nodes: Beta Cell Function and Immune Responses in Recent Onset Type 1 Diabetes Patients
- 1Division of Pediatrics, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- 2Department of Endocrinology, Region Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden
- 3Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, and Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Forschergruppe Diabetes, Munich, Germany
- 4Crown Princess Victoria Children’s Hospital, Region Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden
In spite of intensive treatment Type 1 diabetes leads to serious complications. Preservation of residual beta cell function makes the disease milder, facilitates treatment, prevents complications and increase survival. So far immune interventions have had limited effect, and some serious adverse events and risks. In an open pilot trial we aimed to improve efficacy of GAD-alum treatment using lymph-node administration in combination with oral vitamin D. Here we report the clinical effect and focus on biomarkers for response to treatment. Patients (n = 12) aged 12 to 24 years with recent onset of Type 1 diabetes received 4 μg GAD-alum into lymph-node at day 30, 60, and 90, and oral Vitamin D 2000 U/d, days 1 to 120. Beta cell function was estimated by Mixed Meal Tolerance Tests. GADA, GADA subclasses, GAD65-induced cytokines and proliferation, and T cells markers were analyzed. The treatment was tolerable with no adverse events. Fasting C-peptide and insulin requirement remained stable at 15 months, while HbA1c was lower than baseline. Stimulated C-peptide showed no change at 6 months but declined after 15 months (81% of baseline). Eleven patients remained in partial remission (IDAAC < 9). Patients (n = 9) with better clinical outcome had reduced proportion of IgG1 and increased IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4, increased IL-10 secretion, and reduction of proliferation and CD8+ T cells activation. Patients with poorer clinical response had higher baseline levels of GAD65-induced cytokines and T-cell activation, and an increased ratio of effector/central memory T cells. Intra-lymphatic GAD treatment combined with Vitamin D might preserve beta cell function and improve clinical course in T1D. Patients with less benefit have a different quality of immune response both before and after treatment.
Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02352974.
Subcutaneous administration of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)65 formulated with aluminum hydroxide (GAD-alum) preserved residual insulin secretion in children and adolescents with recent-onset Type 1 diabetes (T1D) (1), but such treatment did not show efficacy in subsequent phase II (2) and phase III (3) trials. However, a meta-analyses suggested that the treatment most probably has beneficial effects (4). Heterogeneity of T1D makes it unlikely that a single agent or type of treatment will be effective in all patients. Hence, we need more knowledge to tailor treatment strategies and select suitable participants in T1D intervention trials. Small pilot studies can be useful in gaining insight before conducting large trials (5, 6).
In an attempt to render the presentation of GAD65 antigen more efficient, GAD-alum was injected into the lymph-nodes of six young adults with T1D in an open-label clinical trial. Vitamin D per os was added as a support (7). The treatment was safe, and preservation of C-peptide after 6 months appeared to be promising (8). Therefore, inclusion was increased, and also children included. This it to our knowledge the first clinical trial when autoantigen is given directly into lymph-nodes. Being a first-in-human pilot trial conclusions have to interpreted with caution. Here we give a preliminary report of the clinical effect in relation to immune response after 15 months.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Participants
The GAD antigen into lymph-nodes (DIAGNODE-1) is a single center open-labeled pilot clinical trial. Patients aged 12 to 24 years diagnosed with T1D, according to American Diabetes Association criteria, with less than 180 days duration were screened. Twelve children and young adults (4 females, 8 males; 12·6–23·1 years old) (Supplementary Figure 1) were eligible if fasting C-peptide was ≥ 0·12 nmol/L (0·36 ng/ml) and GAD65 antibodies levels (GADA) > 63·2 U (detection limit at 95th percentile), but <50 000 U. Full eligibility criteria are detailed in the study protocol. The protocol and consent documents were approved by appropriate independent ethics committees. All patients and caregivers of children gave their oral and written informed consent. The trial was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Linköping University, Sweden (Dnr 2014/153-31) and by the Medical Product Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
The Full Analysis Set (intention-to-treat) for the DIAGNODE-1 trial was defined as the population of patients who received at least one injection of GAD-alum (Diamyd®), taken part in the baseline visit and at least completed one follow-up visit. The control group was selected from the TN08 trial (2) evaluating Diamyd® and placebo, with patients in the age range 12-24 receiving placebo, completed baseline, and at least one follow-up visit (Supplementary Table 1).
Each patient received a primary injection of 4 μg each of GAD-Alum (Diamyd Medical, Stockholm) into an inguinal lymph node administrated by help of ultrasound technique, followed by two booster injections with one-month interval. They also received Vitamin D (Calciferol) in oral solution (2000 U/d) for 4 months, starting 1 month prior to first GAD-alum injection. All patients received intensive diabetes management, following the Swedish Guidelines. They were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 15 months with clinical examination, blood samples, and a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) (9). As this was a pilot trial, there was no single specified primary endpoint, but the following parameters were prespecified:
● Change in fasting C-peptide and C-peptide (90 min value and AUCmean 0-120 min) during an MMTT from baseline to month 6 and 15 months.
● Change of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline.
● Change of exogenous insulin dose (per kg body weight and 24 h) from baseline.
● Immunomodulatory effect of the treatment, with special emphasis in GAD-induced T cell responses, cytokine secretion, and GADA subclass distribution.
Laboratory analyses were performed at Linköping University, Sweden. Blood and serum samples were collected at baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 6, and 15 months. Samples were drawn during the morning hours and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated within 24 h using Leucosep (Greiner Bio One) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Serum C-peptide was determined using a solid phase-two side enzyme immunoassay (Mercodia, Uppsala), and results were validated with the inclusion of a Diabetes Antigen Control Human (Low/High) (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden). Inter and intra assay variation were 7% and 4% respectively.
Serum Antibodies and IgG Subclasses
Serum GAD autoantibodies (GADA) titers were estimated in duplicate by means of a radio-binding assay, using 35S-labeled recombinant human GAD65 (rhGAD65) as previously described (10).
GADA IgG 1, 2, 3, and 4 subclasses were measured by radio-binding assays (11) using IgG subclass specific biotin-labeled mouse-anti-human monoclonal antibodies bound on Streptavidin Sepharose High Performance beads (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Freiburg, Germany) (12). Results were expressed as delta cpm (IgG subclass-specific cpm − anti-rat IgM cpm) and converted to arbitrary units (AUs) proportional to the GADA IgG subclass-specific delta cpm of a local standard serum.
Lymphocyte Proliferation Assay
Proliferative responses were analyzed in PBMCs in the presence of 5 μg/ml rhGAD65 (Diamyd Medical, Stockholm, Sweden), CD3/CD28 beads (Gibco, Life Technologies AS, Oslo, Norway), or in medium alone. Stimulation index (SI) was calculated as the mean of triplicates in the presence of stimulus divided by the mean of triplicates with medium alone.
Cytokine Secretion Assay
PBMCs were cultured for 7 days with 5 μg/ml rhGAD65 (Diamyd Medical, Stockholm, Sweden) or in medium (AIM-V with β-mercaptoethanol) at 37°C in 5% CO2, as previously described (13). The cytokines IL-2, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17, tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), and interferon (IFN-γ) were measured in cell supernatants using Bio-Plex Pro Cytokine Panel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Data was collected using the Luminex 200™ (Luminex xMAP™ Corporation, Austin, TX USA). The antigen-induced secretion was calculated by subtracting the spontaneous secretion (i.e. secretion from PBMCs cultured in medium alone) from the one following stimulation with GAD65.
After washing in PBS containing 0·1% BSA, PBMCs were stained with Alexa-700-conjugated anti-CD3 (BD Biosciences Cat# 557943, RRID:AB_396952), Pacific Blue-conjugated anti-CD4 (BD Biosciences Cat# 558116, RRID:AB_397037), allophycocyanin (APC)-H7-conjugated anti-CD8 (BD Biosciences Cat# 560179, RRID:AB_1645481), PerCP-Cy5·5-conjugated anti-CD45RA (BD Biosciences Cat# 563429, RRID:AB_2738199), phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CCR7 (BioLegend Cat# 353203, RRID:AB_10916391), FITC-conjugated anti-CD127 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 11-1278-42, RRID:AB_1907342), and PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-CD25 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A15857, RRID:AB_2534627). Then, cells were fixed and permeabilized using FOXP3 staining buffer set (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 00-5523-00), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were then stained with APC-conjugated anti-FOXP3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 17-4776-41, RRID:AB_1603281) and acquired on a FACS Aria III (BD Biosciences) running FACS Diva v8 software (Becton Dickinson). Data were analyzed using Kaluza v1·3 (Beckman Coulter).
Paired t test was applied to calculate fasting and stimulated C-peptide, glycated hemoglobin, and insulin dose differences within a group. For the evaluation of significant differences between groups, Welch’s t test was used. As the immunological data did not follow normal distribution, Wilcoxon test was applied to analyze differences within groups. For the calculation of significant differences between groups, Mann-Whitney test was used. Spearman’s rank coefficient was applied for correlations. A probability level of <0·05 was considered statistically significant. Calculations were performed using GraphPad Prism 8·0·1 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Clinical Responses at 15 Months
The treatment was easy and tolerable, with no adverse events related to the treatment, except for mild transient reaction at the injection site in a few patients. Fasting C-peptide remained stable at 15 months. Stimulated C-peptide, measured as the area under the curve (AUC), showed no change at 6 months (mean AUC 98%), but declined after 15 months in relation to baseline (to 81%). There was no change in insulin dose from baseline to 15 months, while HbA1c decreased (Figure 1A). Fasting and stimulated C-peptide, HbA1c, and insulin dose was compared with data from patients who received placebo subcutaneously in a different GAD-alum trial (2). Some points for the samples differed between the studies, thus data at 15 months from the lymph-node group was compared to 12- and 18-months results from the control group. We observed less decline of fasting and stimulated C-peptide and lower insulin dose and HbA1c at 15 months in the DIAGNODE-1 patients compared to 12 and 18 months in controls (Figure 1B). Individual data are shown in Supplementary Table 2.
Figure 1 Clinical response from baseline (day 1) levels to 15 months. (A) Mean fasting and stimulated C-peptide (nmol/L), HbA1c (mmol/mol), and insulin dose (U/kg of body weight/24 h) in patients receiving GAD-alum injections into the lymph-node (n = 12) over time. (B) Patients receiving GAD-alum injections into the lymph-node (n = 12, blue circles) were compared to a group of patients with similar age who received placebo in another study where GAD-alum was given subcutaneously (n = 26, orange circles). Mean percentages of fasting and stimulated C-peptide, HbA1c, and insulin dose were compared between the groups at 3 and 6 months, and data from 15 months from the lymph-node group was compared to 12- and 18-months results from the placebo group. (C) Mean IDAAC in patients receiving GAD-alum injections into the lymph-node (n = 12, blue circles) and placebo (n = 26, orange circles) (left). Percentage of patients in partial remission, defined as IDAAC <9 (right). (D) Mean percentages of fasting and stimulated C-peptide (AUC), and insulin dose in patients stratified into Good Responders (GR, n = 9, loss < 30% AUC, dark blue squares) and Poor Responders (PR, n = 3, lowest quartile, loss ≥ 30% AUC, light blue squares) according to their C-peptide preservation at 15 months. Error bars indicate 95% CI. Differences between time points were determined by paired t Test. Welch’s t test was applied to calculate differences between groups.
Definition of partial remission as IDAAC < 9 (14) showed that 7/12 (58%) DIAGNODE-1 patients had IDAAC <9 at baseline; 11/12 (91%) at 15 months. In contrast, partial remission decreased in the control group over time from 18/26 (69%) at baseline to 10/24 (41%), and 5/20 (25%) at 12 and 18 months respectively (Figure 1C).
Patients were then stratified according to their C-peptide preservation at 15 months into Good Responders (GR, n = 9, no loss of fasting C-peptide and loss of C-peptide AUC< 30%) and Poor Responders (PR, n = 3, decreasing fasting C-peptide and loss of C-peptide AUC ≥ 30%) (Supplementary Table 2). GR individuals had a better preservation of stimulated C-peptide (Figure 1D, Supplementary Table 2), and their fasting C-peptide remained stable throughout the study and was higher than in the PR at 15 months (Figure 1D). Insulin requirement at 15 months was 19% lower in the GR than at baseline while insulin demand increased by 79% in PR patients (Figure 1D).
Immune Responses at 15 Months
A 52-fold change of GADA levels was observed at 15 months compared to baseline titers (Figure 2A). Analysis of the longitudinal changes of the GADA IgG 1-4 subclasses showed that IgG1 and IgG3 increased after the first injection, and were further enhanced after the second injection with no changes after the third dose, while IgG2 and IgG4 increased after the second injection, and were boosted by the third dose (Figure 2B).
Figure 2 Immune response from baseline (day 1) to 15 months in patients (n = 12) who received GAD-alum injections into the lymph-node. (A) Median values and fold change of GADA titers (U/ml). (B) Median levels of IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 GADA subclasses are shown as arbitrary units (AUs). Error bars indicate interquartile range. (C) GADA IgG subclass relative distribution at baseline (day 1), 3, 6, and 15 months. Frequencies of each subclasses were calculated with respect to the combined sum of the AUs of the four subclasses in each sample. (D) Cytokine secretion and proliferation induced by GAD65 upon in vitro PMBCs stimulation. Levels of IL-2, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17, IFN-γ, and TNF-α cytokines detected by Luminex in PBMCs supernatants after 7 days culture in medium alone or in the presence of GAD65 (5 µg/ml). GAD65-induced cytokine secretion levels are given after subtraction of spontaneous secretion from each individual and expressed as pg/ml. Proliferative responses to GAD65 in PBMCs cultured for 3 days with GAD65 (5 µg/ml), CD3/CD28 beads, or medium, and thereafter cells were pulsed with [3H] thymidine and harvested. Proliferation is expressed as stimulation index (SI) and calculated from the mean of triplicates in the presence of stimulus divided by the mean of triplicates with medium alone. Horizontal lines represent the median. Differences within the same group were calculated using Wilcoxon paired test.
Distribution of IgG subclasses, calculated as frequency of each subclass with respect to the combined sum of the AUs of all subclasses in each sample, showed a reduced proportion of IgG1 and a marked increase of IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 at 15 months (Figure 2C), in line with previous results at 6 months (12).
The two first injections of GAD-alum induced secretion of IL-17 and TNF-α. The third dose additionally enhanced IL-2, IL-5, IL-13, IFN-γ, while IL-10 was first detected at 15 months and significantly increased in relation to baseline levels (Figure 2D). GAD65-induced proliferation was significantly enhanced by the second injection, but the third dose reduced T-cell proliferation, that was undetectable in almost all patients at 15 months (Figure 2D).
The percentages of GAD65-induced CD4+ and CD8+ T cells did not vary along the study. Addition of the activation markers CD25 and CD127 showed that GAD65-stimulation mainly induced activated CD8+ T cells in baseline samples (Figure 3A), and that the proportion of these cells decreased significantly at 15 months (Figure 3A). T cell differentiation was determined according to expression level of CD45RA and CCR7 as näive (TN, CD45RA+CCR7+), central memory (TCM, CD45RA−CCR7+), and effector memory (TEM, CD45RA− CCR7- and CD45RA+CCR7-) cells. Higher proportion of TEM than TCM, both on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, was observed at baseline (ratio EM/CM 1·4 and 24·5, respectively, Figure 3B). We found a reduction of the TCM fraction from baseline to 15 months in parallel to an increase of TEM (ratio EM/CM 3·26 and 32·5) (Figure 3B).
Figure 3 Effect of intra-lymphatic injection of GAD-alum (n = 12) on T cells and cells with regulatory phenotype. (A) Median percentage of activated (CD25+CD127+) CD4+ (blue triangles) and CD8+ (orange circles) T cells after stimulation with GAD65 (5 µg/ml). (B) Gating strategy for naïve (TN, CD45RA+CCR7+, gray circles), central memory (TCM, CD45RA-CCR7+, orange squares), and effector memory (TEM, CD45RA-CCR7- and CD45RA+CCR7-, blue triangles) cells, and median percentage within CD4+ (up) and CD8+ (down) T cells. (C) Representative dot plot showing the expression of FOXP3 and CD25 on CD4+ T cells and median percentage of regulatory T cells within CD4+ T cells. (D) Gating strategy and median percentages for non-suppressive (nsTreg, CD45RA-FOXP3low, blue circles), resting (rTreg, CD45RA+FOXP3low, gray squares), and activated (aTreg, CD45RA-FOXP3high, orange triangles) regulatory T cells. Bars indicate interquartile range. Differences between time-points within the same group were calculated using Wilcoxon paired test.
The percentage of cells with Treg phenotype (CD4+FOXP3+CD25highCD127low/−) in non-stimulated PBMCs was slightly modified, but not significantly increased (5% to 6%, Figure 3C). Further analysis of Treg based on the expression of FOXP3 and CD45RA did not reveal variations in the activated effector pool (FOXP3high CD45RA−). However, a progressive increment of the non-suppressive cells (FOXP3lowCD45RA−) and a reduction of the resting (FOXP3low+CD45RA+) fraction, but not statistically significant, was observed (Figure 3D). Stimulation of samples with GAD65 did not show changes in any of the Treg subpopulations.
Biomarkers of Clinical Outcome
Stratification of the patients into GR and PR showed that baseline levels of GAD65-induced IL-2, IL-10, IFN-γ, and TNF-α were higher in PR patients (Figure 4A). GAD65-stimulation also induced CD4+ T cells with higher TEM/TCM ratio in PR (1·73) than in GR (0·68) patients. Furthermore, activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells seemed more pronounced in PR samples (mean % of activated cells, CD4+: 0·17 vs 0·46 and CD8+: 1·33 vs 2·37) (Figure 4A).
Figure 4 Immune responses in relation to clinical outcome. Patients were stratified into Good Responders (GR, n = 9, loss < 30% AUC, dark blue bars or squares) and Poor Responders (PR, n = 3, lowest quartile, loss ≥ 30% AUC, light blue bars or squares) according to their C-peptide preservation at 15 months. (A) Median baseline levels of GAD65-induced IL-2, IL-10, IFN-γ, and TNF-α cytokines detected by Luminex in PBMCs supernatants after 7 days culture in presence of medium or GAD65 (5 µg/ml). GAD65-induced cytokine secretion levels are given after subtraction of spontaneous secretion from each individual (pg/ml). Percentages of CD4+central memory (TCM, CD45RA-CCR7+) and effector memory (TEM, CD45RA-CCR7- and CD45RA+CCR7-) T cells, ratio TEM/TCM, and GAD65-induced activated CD8+ T cells. Bars indicate interquartile range. (B) Median values of GADA titers and GADA IgG subclass relative distribution. Frequencies of each subclasses were calculated with respect to the combined sum of the AUs of the four subclasses in each sample. (C) Median levels of GAD65-induced IL-10 cytokine and PBMCs proliferation. (D) Median percentages of resting Treg (rTreg), activated Treg (aTreg), and non-suppressive Treg (nsTreg) within total Treg. Statistical differences between groups were calculated using Mann-Whitney test, differences between time-points within the same group were calculated with Wilcoxon paired test.
Following the treatment, GADA subclasses distribution was characterized by a marked reduction of IgG1 in the GR patients, while IgG1 dominated the IgG subclasses proportion in PR subjects (Figure 4B). Higher levels of GAD65-induced IL-10 were observed in the GR patients, while IL-10 was undetectable at 15 months in PR patients (Figure 4C). Changes in the immune response at 15 months also showed a significant increase of non-suppressive FOXP3lowCD45RA− Tregs in the PR samples (Figure 4D).
Our study suggests that GAD-alum administration directly into lymph-nodes of T1D patients in combination with oral vitamin D may result in better preservation of C-peptide than seen in T1D patients of similar age (2, 15). Vitamin D is supposed to improve efficacy by its effect on the immune system, and the design of this study makes it impossible to discriminate the effect of GAD-alum from the effect of Vitamin D. However, in other studies with the same Vitamin D treatment, we have only seen some support for using Vitamin D, but no clear effect on beta cell preservation (16). The idea of a main effect due to GAD-alum is supported by the results showing that main changes after treatment are all antigen-specific, while non-specific immunomodulatory effects were not observed. It has been also described that Vitamin D alone in the dose administrated under the study does not give as pronounced effect on the immune system (7)
In contrast to some types of immune interventions, this treatment was easy and tolerable for the patients with no adverse events related to the treatment except for mild transient reaction at the injection site in a few patients. Reduction of proliferation and enhanced IL-10 suggest the induction of antigen-specific regulatory responses and tolerance as part of the immunological effect. Our data indicate a different quality of the immune response to GAD65 in patients with less benefit, both pre and post treatment. The immune response induced by lymph-node injections of GAD-alum seems to differ in many aspects from that when higher doses were injected subcutaneously (10, 13, 17). Recall response to GAD65 at 15 months showed reduction of CD8+ T cells activation, as well as a decrease of the TCM fraction, and increase of TEM cells both in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Although immunological memory is displayed by both fractions, TCM have limited effector function while TEM can rapidly produce effector cytokines upon antigenic stimulation (18). The apparent predominant proportion of CD4+ TEM cells at baseline was due to higher TEM fraction in the poor responders. This was an interesting observation, as CD4+ TCM are the predominant memory cells in the blood compartment (18). Higher GAD65-induced cytokine secretion was also found in baseline samples from the poor responders. When generated, antigen-specific memory T cells have to compete with pre-existing cells for access to survival factors (19). Thus, it might be possible that the frequency of pre-existing specific-effector T cell and a pro-inflammatory environment when autoantigens are administered, determine the nature of memory T cells generated by the treatment. If so, our data support the idea that selective depletion of specific-memory effector cells preceding autoantigen administration might improve efficacy.
Several cytokines were induced as part of immune response to GAD65. Among them, IL-5 and IL-13, which together with IL-4, are the major effector Th-2 cytokines, known to stimulate the switch of antibody isotypes in B cells, and T-helper cells differentiation, protect tissues from ongoing damage, and has potent anti-inflammatory activities, both in vitro and in vivo (20–22). Notably, rapid enhancement of GADA correlated with IL-5, and it was characterized by a shift in the subclass’s distribution, with a reduction of IgG1 following the third GAD-alum injection. Secretion of IL-5 started to increase at 3 months, when IgG1 levels began to wane, while the levels of the other subclasses continued rising. It can be argued that secretion of IFN-γ and TNF-α Th1-associated cytokines might not be desirable. However, cytokines can exert different effects depending on their concentrations and microenvironment (23–25). A role for TNF-α in regulating Th2-type responses as a critical component of IL-13-mediated protective effect (26) has been attributed to its Th2-promoting activity and influenced by the cytokine milieu (21). Thus, under the right circumstances, cytokines can exhibit either Th1 or Th2-promoting activities.
One of the postulated effects of antigen immune therapy is the induction of antigen-specific Tregs. The slight increase of Tregs observed at 15 months was observed when Tregs were defined by the expression of FOXP3, CD25high, and lacking CD127, commonly used for Tregs definition (27). However, further dissection of the Tregs pool revealed that the apparent increase of Tregs was explained by the increment of the percentage of non-suppressive cells, while the population of activated more suppressive Tregs remained unaltered. It cannot be excluded that the scarce number of GAD65-specific cells precluded their identification.
Modifications following therapy included the loss of GAD65-induced proliferation in parallel to an increase of GADA titers. This observation is in line with a previous study where increased antibody titers and lower proliferation against insulin has been shown in a prevention trial using intranasal insulin given to at-risk individuals, suggesting induction of tolerance (28). Reduction of proliferation together with enhanced levels of IL-10 and reduction of GAD65-induced activation of CD8+ T cells might suggest that induction of tolerance was part of the immunological effect. Thus, our data suggest the induction of antigen-specific regulatory responses and tolerance as part of the immunological effect of autoantigen administration into the lymph-nodes.
The increasing consensus on the heterogeneity of T1D brings focus to the matter that, as in many other autoimmune diseases, many of the patients participating in clinical trials have benefit from the treatments, while others have not (1, 29–31). Indeed, results from trials considered not effective in T1D are similar to those observed in other diseases, suggesting that the treatments work as effective in T1D (32). In this first-in-human pilot trial a large number of patients was not allowed. Consequently, it lacks power to show statistically significant results. We are aware of that the natural course in T1D means that some patients may have residual beta cell function for rather long time even without any intervention (33) and get a rather long partial remission defined as IDAAC <9 (34). This might even be prolonged in patients who participate in clinical trials, being extra motivated to treat their disease in an active way. Nevertheless, comparison of the results with data from placebo patients from another trial showed that those seemed to have a more rapid decline of C-peptide and less good clinical course than patients in our study. We are aware of that the controls are historical, but participating in a rather recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, using GAD-alum in the actively treated arm, with patients using similar modern therapy and similar follow-up. Still, conclusions need to be cautious.
In an effort to find biomarkers for clinical response we divided the patients into so-called Good Responders (9 patients) and Poor Responders (3 patients), based on the response criteria used in other studies (29). We found an interesting difference in immune response between Good Responders and Poor Responders but are aware of the very low number of patients. Although our results should be interpreted with caution, we report them to stimulate other studies to confirm or disapprove.
Intra-nodal administration of an autoantigen was easy to perform and tolerable for the patients. Although this open-label pilot study was not designed to measure efficacy, it looks as if the decline in secreted C-peptide slowed down, and the daily insulin requirement and HbA1c decreased in the patients. Here we also show that the pre-existing antigen-specific immune responses may be important for the outcome, raising the question whether further immunological parameters than positivity to autoantibodies should be used for patient selection. Subjects considered Good Responders showed immunological changes upon ex vivo stimulation including production of IL-10, lack of proliferation, reduction of CD8+ cells activation, and switch of GADA subclasses. Our results require confirmation in a well-powered randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (which is ongoing). It might be interesting to use intra-nodal administration of other autoantigens, or even together with other immunotherapeutic agents, both in T1D and other autoimmune diseases.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Research Ethics Committee, Linköping University, Sweden (Dnr 2014/153-31). Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.
FD, BT, and HB performed experiments and analyzed data. FD and HB contributed to prepare the manuscript. RC conceived the study, designed data set and data analysis, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. JL had the idea, designed DIAGNODE, conceived the study, and reviewed the manuscript. JW recruited and followed patients. PA performed the analysis of GADA subclasses. JL and RC are guarantors of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data, and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
This work was supported by Barndiabetesfonden (Swedish Child Diabetes Foundation), Swedish Diabetes research foundation, and an unrestricted grant from Diamyd Medical. The funders were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors thank all the participants who agreed to participate in the study and the authors of reference 2 who let us have data from their placebo group as controls for certain parameters. The authors are very grateful for MD Joachim Davidsson (Department of Radiology, Linköping University Hospital, Sweden) for his skillful performance of the needle guided lymph-node injections; to research nurses Sofia Sjöberg (Endocrine Clinic, Linköping University Hospital, Sweden) and Anette Nilsson (Crown Princess Victoria Children´s Hospital, Linköping, Sweden) for taking care of the patients. Ingela Johansson and Gosia Smolinska (Division of Pediatrics, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden), and Claudia Matzke (Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum München, and Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Forschergruppe Diabetes, Munich, Germany) are thanked for their skillful laboratory work. The authors would like to address the technical support from the flow cytometry core facility unit of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences from Linköping, Sweden. None of these individuals received compensation for their role in the study.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.564921/full#supplementary-material
GADA, glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies; GAD-alum, glutamic acid decarboxylase formulated in aluminum hydroxide; IDAAC, insulin dose adjusted HbA1c; LN, lymph node; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; SC, subcutaneous; Th cell, T helper cell; T1D, type 1 diabetes.
1. Ludvigsson J, Faresjo M, Hjorth M, Axelsson S, Cheramy M, Pihl M, et al. GAD treatment and insulin secretion in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med (2008) 359:1909–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804328
2. Wherrett DK, Bundy B, Becker DJ, DiMeglio LA, Gitelman SE, Goland R, et al. Antigen-based therapy with glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) vaccine in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet (2011) 378:319–27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60895-7
3. Ludvigsson J, Krisky D, Casas R, Battelino T, Castaño L, Greening J, et al. GAD65 antigen therapy in recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med (2012) 366:433–42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107096
4. Beam CA, MacCallum C, Herold KC, Wherrett DK, Palmer J, Ludvigsson J. GAD vaccine reduces insulin loss in recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes: findings from a Bayesian meta-analysis. Diabetologia (2017) 60:43–9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-4122-1
5. Atkinson MA, Roep BO, Posgai A, Wheeler DCS, Peakman M. The challenge of modulating β-cell autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2019) 7:52–64. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30112-8
6. Roep BO, Wheeler DCS, Peakman M. Antigen-based immune modulation therapy for type 1 diabetes: the era of precision medicine. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2019) 7:65–74. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30109-8
9. Greenbaum CJ, Mandrup-Poulsen T, McGee PF, Battelino T, Haastert B, Ludvigsson J, et al. Mixed-meal tolerance test versus glucagon stimulation test for the assessment of beta-cell function in therapeutic trials in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care (2008) 31:1966–71. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2451
10. Cheramy M, Skoglund C, Johansson I, Ludvigsson J, Hampe CS, Casas R. GAD-alum treatment in patients with type 1 diabetes and the subsequent effect on GADA IgG subclass distribution, GAD65 enzyme activity and humoral response. Clin Immunol (2010) 137:31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2010.06.001
12. Tavira B, Barcenilla H, Wahlberg J, Achenbach P, Ludvigsson J, Casas R. Intralymphatic Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase-Alum Administration Induced Th2-Like-Specific Immunomodulation in Responder Patients: A Pilot Clinical Trial in Type 1 Diabetes. J Diabetes Res (2018) 2018:9391845. doi: 10.1155/2018/9391845
13. Axelsson S, Cheramy M, Akerman L, Pihl M, Ludvigsson J, Casas R. Cellular and humoral immune responses in type 1 diabetic patients participating in a phase III GAD-alum intervention trial. Diabetes Care (2013) 36:3418–24. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2251
14. Max Andersen MLC, Hougaard P, Pörksen S, Nielsen LB, Fredheim S, Svensson J, et al. Partial remission definition: validation based on the insulin dose-adjusted HbA1c (IDAA1C) in 129 Danish children with new-onset type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes (2014) 15:469–76. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12208
15. Herold KC, Gitelman SE, Masharani U, Hagopian W, Bisikirska B, Donaldson D, et al. A single course of anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody hOKT3gamma1 (Ala-Ala) results in improvement in C-peptide responses and clinical parameters for at least 2 years after onset of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes (2005) 54:1763–9. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.6.1763
16. Ludvigsson J, Routray I, Elluru S, Leanderson P, Larsson HE, Rathsman B, et al. Combined vitamin D, ibuprofen and glutamic acid decarboxylase-alum treatment in recent onset Type I diabetes: lessons from the DIABGAD randomized pilot trial. Future Sci OA (2020) 6(7):FSO604. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2020-0078
17. Axelsson S, Hjorth M, Ludvigsson J, Casas R. Decreased GAD(65)-specific Th1/Tc1 phenotype in children with Type 1 diabetes treated with GAD-alum. Diabetes Med (2012) 29:1272–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03710.x
18. Sallusto F, Geginat J, Lanzavecchia A. Central memory and effector memory T cell subsets: function, generation, and maintenance. Annu Rev Immunol (2004) 22:745–63. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104702
25. Flaishon L, Topilski I, Shoseyov D, Hershkoviz R, Fireman E, Levo Y, et al. Cutting edge: anti-inflammatory properties of low levels of IFN-gamma. J Immunol (2002) 168:3707–11. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.8.3707
26. Artis D, Humphreys NE, Bancroft AJ, Rothwell NJ, Potten CS, Grencis RK. Tumor necrosis factor alpha is a critical component of interleukin 13–mediated protective T helper cell type 2 responses during helminth infection. J Exp Med (1999) 190:953–62. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.7.953
27. Liu W, Putnam AL, Xu-Yu Z, Szot GL, Lee MR, Zhu S, et al. CD127 expression inversely correlates with FoxP3 and suppressive function of human CD4+ T reg cells. J Exp Med (2006) 203:1701–11. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060772
28. Harrison LC, Honeyman MC, Steele CE, Stone NL, Sarugeri E, Bonifacio E, et al. Pancreatic beta-cell function and immune responses to insulin after administration of intranasal insulin to humans at risk for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care (2004) 27(10):2348–55. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.10.2348
29. Herold KC, Gitelman SE, Ehlers MR, Gottlieb PA, Greenbaum CJ, Hagopian W, et al. Teplizumab (anti-CD3 mAb) treatment preserves C-peptide responses in patients with new-onset type 1 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial: metabolic and immunologic features at baseline identify a subgroup of responders. Diabetes (2013) 62:3766–74. doi: 10.2337/db13-0345
30. Haller MJ, Gitelman SE, Gottlieb PA, Michels AW, Perry DJ, Schultz AR, et al. Antithymocyte Globulin Plus G-CSF Combination Therapy Leads to Sustained Immunomodulatory and Metabolic Effects in a Subset of Responders With Established Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes (2016) 65:3765–75. doi: 10.2337/db16-0823
31. Herold KC, Pescovitz MD, McGee P, Krause-Steinrauf H, Spain LM, Bourcier K, et al. Increased T cell proliferative responses to islet antigens identify clinical responders to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) therapy in type 1 diabetes. J Immunol (2011) 187:1998–2005. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100539
32. Bingley PJ, Wherrett DK, Shultz A, Rafkin LE, Atkinson MA, Greenbaum CJ. Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet: A Multifaceted Approach to Bringing Disease-Modifying Therapy to Clinical Use in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care (2018) 41:653–61. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0806
34. Nagl K, Hermann JM, Plamper M, Schröder C, Dost A, Kordonouri O, et al. Factors contributing to partial remission in type 1 diabetes: analysis based on the insulin dose-adjusted HbA1c in 3657 children and adolescents from Germany and Austria. Pediatr Diabetes (2017) 18:428–34. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12413
Keywords: autoantigen, immunotherapy, GAD-alum, type 1 diabetes, Vitamin D, intra-lymphatic treatment, lymph-node
Citation: Casas R, Dietrich F, Barcenilla H, Tavira B, Wahlberg J, Achenbach P and Ludvigsson J (2020) Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Injection Into Lymph Nodes: Beta Cell Function and Immune Responses in Recent Onset Type 1 Diabetes Patients. Front. Immunol. 11:564921. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.564921
Received: 22 May 2020; Accepted: 22 September 2020;
Published: 09 October 2020.
Edited by:Dimitrios Petrou Bogdanos, University of Thessaly, Greece
Reviewed by:Anne Cooke, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
Cong-Yi Wang, Tongji Medical College, China
Copyright © 2020 Casas, Dietrich, Barcenilla, Tavira, Wahlberg, Achenbach and Ludvigsson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Johnny Ludvigsson, Johnny.Ludvigsson@liu.se
†These authors have contributed equally to this work