Abstract
Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV (DPP4), originally identified as an aminopeptidase in 1960s, is an ubiquitously expressed protease presented as either a membrane-bound or soluble form. DPP4 cleaves dipeptide off from the N-terminal of its substrates, altering the bioactivity of its substrates. Subsequent studies reveal that DPP4 is also involved in various cellular processes by directly binding to a number of ligands, including adenosine deaminase, CD45, fibronectin, plasminogen, and caveolin-1. In recent years, many novel functions of DPP4, such as promoting fibrosis and mediating virus entry, have been discovered. Due to its implication in fibrotic response and immunoregulation, increasing studies are focusing on the potential role of DPP4 in inflammatory disorders. As a moonlighting protein, DPP4 possesses multiple functions in different types of cells, including both enzymatic and non-enzymatic functions. However, most of the review articles on the role of DPP4 in autoimmune disease were focused on the association between DPP4 enzymatic inhibitors and the risk of autoimmune disease. An updated comprehensive summary of DPP4’s immunoregulatory actions including both enzymatic dependent and independent functions is needed. In this article, we will review the recent advances of DPP4 in immune regulation and autoimmune rheumatic disease.
Introduction
Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV (DPP4), also known as CD26, was first discovered as a protease in 1966 (1). DPP4 is mainly expressed on the cell surface, forming a homodimer. It is widely expressed on epithelial cells in various tissues (kidney, bile ducts, liver, lung and intestine), some endothelia cells, leukocyte subsets and fibroblasts (2, 3). The full length of human DPP4 is 766 amino acids (AA), including a short 6-AA cytoplasmic tail, a 22-AA transmembrane hydrophobic segment, and a 738-AA extracellular portion (2, 4, 5). In addition to the membrane-bound form, DPP4 can also be cleaved off from the cell membrane and released into plasma and other body fluids, forming a soluble form that lacks cytoplasmic domain and transmembrane domain. Since the catalytic domain is located in the extracellular portion, soluble DPP4 maintains the enzymatic activity (2).
The substrates of DPP4 have a unique feature of amino acid sequence: with alanine or proline as the preferred residue at the second amino acid. The substrates of DPP4 are categorized into incretin peptides, chemokines and cytokines, and neuropeptides. By cleaving X-Pro or X-Ala dipeptides off from the N-terminal, DPP4 regulates the biological function of its substrates. For example, DPP4 converts glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) (7–36) and (7-37) into inactive forms GLP-1(9-36) and GLP-1(9-37), which are unable to bind GLP-1 receptor and induce insulin release from pancreatic β cells (6).
Later studies identified DPP4 as the adenosine deaminase (ADA) binding protein. By transducing costimulatory signal in T cells upon stimulation with ADA, DPP4 is considered as a T cell activation marker (7). In 2013, DPP4 was discovered as an entry receptor for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) (8). By binding to spike protein on the surface of MERS-CoV, DPP4 expressed on the epithelial cells in respiratory system mediates the entry of the virus into the host cell (9–11). In addition, DPP4 had also been identified as a co-receptor for human immunodeficiency virus (12). However, later studies indicate that CCR5 is the major co-receptor for the entry of human immunodeficiency virus into CD4+ T cells (13, 14) The selective expression of CCR5 on DPP4+ T cell subsets may partially explain the association between HIV infection and DPP4 expression (15). A recent study identified a novel implication of DPP4 in scarring and wound healing (16). The author discovered a subpopulation of fibroblast expressing DPP4 is responsible for the bulk of connective tissue deposition in dermal scars. Inhibition of DPP4 reduced scar formation in a mouse model of wound healing. Another study reported that a mesenchymal progenitor cell population expressing DPP4 displayed a highly proliferative and multipotent phenotype and regulated the differentiation of adipocytes (17).
Autoimmune diseases are a group of chronic disorders characterized by autoimmune-mediated damage in multiple systems. Elevation of diverse inflammatory cytokines or chemokines, along with activation of multiple immune cells, could be observed in patients with autoimmune disease. In a number of autoimmune diseases, such as systemic sclerosis and IgG4-related disease, fibrosis also plays a critical role in their pathogenesis. With its involvement in immune regulation and fibrosis, DPP4 may have a pivotal implication in the development of autoimmune disease. Clinical evidence has suggested an association between the use of DPP4 enzymatic inhibitors and several autoimmune disorders, which is summarized by Zhao group and Sahoo group in 2014 and 2021 respectively (18, 19). While DPP4 has been considered a moonlighting protein due to its multifunctional features in different types of cells, an updated comprehensive summary of DPP4’s immunoregulatory actions including both enzymatic dependent and independent functions is needed. This review focuses on emerging evidence of DPP4 in immune regulation and attempts to build a bridge between DPP4 and autoimmune diseases.
The Role of DPP4 in Immune System
DPP4 is expressed in many types of immune cells, including T cells, B cells, natural killer cells (NKs), dendritic cells (DCs), and macrophages (Table 1) (36). The expression level of DPP4 is also associated with the activation status of immune cells. Both enzymatic dependent and independent functions of DPP4 are involved in the regulation of immune function (Figure 1).
Table 1
| Expression | DPP4 Function | References | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CD4+ T cells | |||
| Th1 | High expression | Co-stimulation | (20) |
| Th2 | Relative low expression | Elevated DPP4 expression was associated with the production of Th2 cytokines | (20, 21) |
| Th17 | High expression | Co-stimulation, correlated with Th17 cytokine production | (22, 23) |
| Treg | Low expression | (24) | |
| CD8+ T cells | High/negative expression | Co-stimulation | (25, 26) |
| B cells | Low expression | Co-stimulation, promote DNA synthesis, Ig production, and Ig isotype switching | (27, 28) |
| DCs | Positive expression | Modulate adenosine concentration by DPP4/ADA interaction, recruit Th1 | (29, 30) |
| NK | Low expression | Co-stimulation, maintain cytotoxicity | (31, 32) |
| Macrophage | Positive expression | Regulatie M1/M2 macrophage polarization | (33, 34) |
| Fibroblast | Specific subpopulation | Activation marker | (16, 35) |
The expression and function of DPP4 in immune cells.
Figure 1
Immunoregulatory function of DPP4: enzymatic and non-enzymatic functions of DPP4 in immune cells and fibroblast are shown. DC, dendritic cell; DPP4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M; KLK5, kallikrein-related peptidase 5; sDPP4, soluble DPP4; Th1, type 1 helper T cell; Th17, type 17 helper T cell.
T Cells
The expression of DPP4 in T cells is variable in different subpopulation and tightly regulated by the level of cell activation (37). Previous research suggested that both Th1 and Th2 express DPP4 on the surface, whereas Th1 cells express significant higher amount of DPP4 than Th2 cells (20). Flow cytometry analysis of DPP4 expression in different CD4+ T helper subsets shows that the expression of DPP4 is highest in Th17 compared to Th1 and Th2 (22). On the contrary, DPP4 expression is low on Treg cells and has been regarded as a negative regulator of Treg function (38). In CD8+ T cells, by providing co-stimulatory signal, DPP4 represents a specific marker of successful memory development (25, 26).
During the thymus maturation, DPP4 is considered as a maker of differential regulation of human lymphocytes activation (39). DPP4-deficient animal models show decreased number of overall lymphocytes and decreased proportion of CD4+T cells and memory T cells, while naïve T cells relatively increase (27, 40, 41).
In in vitro studies, inhibition of DPP4 induced immunosuppressive cytokine TGF-β, but decreased production of proinflammatory cytokines including IL-2, IL-6, and IFN-γ (41–43). There was a debate that DPP4 only exerts T cells activation function via its enzymatic activity (44, 45). However, later studies confirmed that DPP4 may also promotes T cell activation and proliferation by enzymatic independent actions. DCs, as most potent antigen-presenting cells(APCs), are pivotal in directing activation and differentiation of naïve T cells (46, 47). DPP4 and some adenosine receptors, including A1R, A2AR and A2BR, serve as binding proteins for extracellular ADA (48). Ecto-ADA anchored on DC surface through A2BR and DPP4 on T cells compose a ternary complex and potentiates Th1-like cell activation and high production levels of Th1 cytokines such as IFN-γ, IL-6 and TNF-α, but without affecting Th2 cytokine production (49). Another study reported that A2AR can also compose similar ternary complex (50). Direct interaction of DPP4 on T cell with ADA or its activating antibody results in the recruitment of CD45 in lipid raft, forming a signaling complex. The DPP4/CD45 complex then enhances the phosphorylation of downstream CD3-ζ, p56lck, and zap-70, providing co-stimulatory signal for T cell activation (51, 52). Additionally, DPP4 on T cells interacts may also directly interact with caveolin-1 on APCs. This interaction triggers CARMA1-mediated nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation and its downstream signaling, resulting in T cells proliferation in a TCR/CD3-dependent manner (53). Co-stimulatory blockade of DPP4 by DPP4 deletion or pharmacological inhibition results in a significant reduction of IL-17 and IL-21 cytokines from CD4+ T cells, suggesting a critical role of DPP4 in Th17 activation (23).
B Cells
DPP4 is expressed at a very lower level (less than 2%) in unstimulated CD20+ B cells, but significantly upregulated to around 50% through specific stimuli [including St. aureus and pokeweed mitogen(PWM)]. This result suggests a potential involvement of DPP4 in B cells activation (28). Incubation with DPP4 inhibitors suppress DNA synthesis and IgM secretion by B cells in a dose-dependent manner (28). In supporting this, DPP4 knockout mice, displayed a markedly decreased production of IgG after immunization by PWM. The decreased production of IL-4 and IL-2, delayed IFN-γ secretion in sera possibly contribute to the decreased Immunoglobulin production and impaired immunoglobulin isotype switching to IgG1, IgG2a and IgE (27). DPP4 is expressed in some B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cell linage and associated with the prognosis (54). In conclusion, DPP4 may serve as an activation marker for B cells, although its exact role in B cell biology is still not completely understood.
NKs
A serial of studies revealed that DPP4 might be a characteristic surface marker of NKs. In normal condition, NKs express DPP4 at a low frequency, but is dramatically increased to 30% after IL-2 stimulation (31, 55, 56). Researchers utilized peripheral blood CD16+CD56+ NK cell to confirm that DPP4 could be induced by IL-2, IL-15 or IL-12, and regarded as a potential activation marker for NK cells (57). DPP4 is able to induce protein tyrosine phosphorylation and elicit a CD16-dependent lytic response in NKs (58). In addition, DPP4 was reported to sustain NK cytotoxicity against lung cancer (6, 32).
DCs
The expression of DPP4 on DC was first detected on a restricted subpopulation in afferent lymph nodes (29).Flow cytometry analysis further suggested DPP4 was expressed at high levels on cDCs (59–61). Moreover, the expression of DPP4 on DCs was higher in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) from obese mice and humans compared with lean controls (30). During in vitro DCs differentiation, a significant increase in DPP4 expression was detected, suggesting a link between DPP4 expression and maturation of DCs (30). DPP4 positive DCs contribute to adaptive immunity, especially Th1-like responses. On one hand, DPP4 expressed on DC confers the ability to modify the macrophage-derived chemokines, which may attract Th1 cells (29). On the other hand, DPP4 modulates adenosine concentration and inflammation in the microenvironment of VAT by binding to ADA (30).
Macrophages
DPP4 expression is also detected on macrophages from visceral adipose tissue in both high fat diet-induced and genetically obese mice, and the expression increased with functional maturation of macrophages (30). A long-term DPP4 inhibition reduced inflammation in VAT via downregulating proinflammatory genes in adipose tissue macrophages, and prevented monocyte migration and actin polymerization (33). Likewise, DPP4 inhibitions by alogliptin (62) and shRNA silencing (63) suppressed macrophages infiltration and accumulation. Like in DCs, DPP4 expression on macrophage was able to promote T-cell proliferation via modulating adenosine concentrations in micro-environment (30).
Enzymatic Degradation of Immunoregulating Small Molecules
As discussed above, DPP4 is able to process a number of cytokines and chemokines by cleavage of N-terminal dipeptides.
Stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), also as known as CXCL12, is a chemoattractant for T cells, hematopoietic progenitor cells, and adipose-derived regenerative cells (64–66). SDF-1 can be proteolytic cleaved by DPP4 and converted into CXCL12(3-68) (67). CXCL12(3-68) failed to induce CXCR4-mediated β-arrestin recruitment and downstream activation of IP3, Akt or ERK1/2, and thus losing its chemoattractant properties to lymphocytes. Co-administration of DPP4 inhibitor sitagliptin significantly enhanced the ability of intact SDF-1, but not CXCL12(3-68), to induce intra-articular lymphocyte infiltration (67). In addition to inactivating SDF-1, DPP4 also regulates SDF-1-mediated lymphocyte migration through direct interaction with its receptor CXCR4. DPP4 binds to CXCR4 on T lymphocytes and SDF-1 is able to induce the internalization of CXCR4/DPP4 complex. Interestingly, internalized CXCR4 is rapidly recycled back to the plasma membrane while DPP4 is clustered in intracellular vesicles, suggesting a self-regulatory mechanism of SDF-1 in reducing DPP4-dependendt inactivation (68). Other chemokines identified to be truncated by DPP4 include IP10, MIP, MIG, I-TAC, MDC, RANTES, etc. (Table 2).
Table 2
| Peptide | N-terminus | Species | Functional change after truncation | Physiological Function | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemokines and cytokines | |||||
| CXCL9(Mig) | TP↓VVRK… | Human | Reduce activity | Lymphocyte chemotaxis | (69) |
| CXCL10 (IP-10) | VP↓LSRT | Human | Reduce activity | Lymphocyte chemotaxis | (69, 70) |
| CXCL11(I-TAC) | FP↓MFKR | Human | Reduce activity | Lymphocyte chemotaxis | (69, 71) |
| CXCL12(SDF-1a) | KP↓VSLS… | Human | Reduce activity | Lymphocyte chemotaxis | (67, 69) |
| CCL2(MCP-1) | QP↓DAV… | Human | Increase activity | Angiogenesis | (72) |
| CCL3(MIP-1α) | AP↓YGA… | Murine | Increase activity | Monocyte chemotaxis | (34) |
| CCL3L1(LD78β) | AP↓LAAD… | Human | Affinity alteration | Monocyte chemotaxis | (73, 74) |
| CCL5(RANTES) | SP↓YSSD… | Human | Reduce activity | Macrophage CSF | (75) |
| CCL11(Eotaxin) | GP↓ASV… | Human | Reduce activity | Eosinophil chemotaxis | (69, 76) |
| CCL22(MDC) | GP↓YG↓AN | Human | Reduce activity | Lymphocyte chemotaxis | (77, 78) |
| Cytokines | |||||
| IL-3 | AP↓MTQ… | Human | Reduce activity | Cell proliferation | (79) |
| GM-CSF | AP↓ARS… | Human | Reduce activity | Cell proliferation | (79) |
| G-CSF | AT↓PLG… | Human | Reduce activity | Cell proliferation | (79) |
| EPO | AT↓PLG… | Human | Reduce activity | Cell proliferation | (79) |
| FGF2 | PA↓LPE… | Human | loss nuclear localization signal | Inhibition in vitro lead to metastatic potential of prostate cancer cells | (80, 81) |
| Incretin hormones | |||||
| GLP-1 | HA↓EGTFTSD- | Human | Inactivation | Postprandial insulin response | (82) |
| GLP-2 | HA↓DG↓SF… | Human | Inactivation | Glucose control | (82) |
| GIP | YA↓EGTF… | Human | Inactivation | Postprandial insulin response | (82) |
| PACAP | HS↓EG↓IF… | Human | Inactivation | Neural regulation of islet | (82) |
| GRP | VP↓LP↓AG… | Human | Inactivation | Neural regulation of islet | (82) |
| Neuropeptides | |||||
| Neuropeptide Y | YP↓SKPDNPG | Human | Affinity alteration | inhibit exocrine pancreas function, feeding | (83) |
| Peptide YY | YP↓IKPEAPG | Human | Affinity alteration | Multiple function in renal, digestive system and food intake | (84) |
Summary of DPP4 substrates.
Other cytokines degraded by DPP4 include fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), IL-3, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), IL-3, and erythropoietin (EPO) (79–81). Many interleukin family members such as IL-2/-5/-10/-13/-17/-22/-23/-27/-28 also possess potential cleavage site of DPP4 (80). However, further biochemical and biological studies are needed to identify whether the putative DPP4 truncation sites are true truncation sites for those peptides.
The Role of DPP4 in Fibrosis
Fibroblasts are spindle-shaped cells responsible for the synthesis of extracellular matrix and collagen in connective tissue (85, 86). Although fibroblasts are not conventional immune cells, they play an important role in immune regulation and autoimmune disease. Fibroblasts may also act as an antigen present cell to promote proliferation, activation, and recruitment of adaptive immune cells via both direct cell-to-cell interaction and secretion of cytokines (87, 88). The expression of DPP4 was found to at a high level in capsule fibroblasts compared to medulla fibroblasts in the thymus of mice, suggesting that DPP4 may serve as a segregate marker to distinguish different fibroblast subsets (35). Fibroblasts are center actor in fibrosis and wound healing (16, 89). SFRP2/DPP4 define a major fibroblast population in human skin (90). The expression of DPP4 allows isolation of a fibrogenic, scar forming lineage and inhibition of DPP4 reduces cutaneous scarring during wound healing (16). Another study suggested that the expression of DPP4 in the skin fibroblast was upregulated in patients with systemic sclerosis compared with that of healthy individuals. DPP4 regulates TGF-β-induced fibroblast activation in skin fibrosis and DPP4 characterizes an activated population of fibroblasts characterized by the expression of collagen and myofibroblast markers. Genetic deletion or pharmacologic inhibition of DPP4 in fibroblasts suppressed their proliferation, migration, and collagen production (91). Hui-Chun Ku et al. reported that DPP4 activated dermal fibroblasts via PAR2 and downstream NF-κB/SMAD signaling (92). Expression of DPP4 was increased in the thickening peritoneum of chlorhexidine gluconate-induced peritoneal fibrosis model of rats. Increased expression of DPP4 in diabetes was found to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition and peritoneal fibrosis, which could be relieved by pharmacological or genetic inactivation of DPP4 (93). Moreover, DPP4 binding to extracellular matrix proteins (such as collagen and fibronectin) and extracellular matrix degrading enzymes (such as plasminogen and streptokinase) probably contributes to cells spreading and metastasis (5, 94, 95). Streptokinase, plasminogen and its metabolite plasmin bind to cysteine-rich region of DPP4, resulting in a rapid increase of intracellular Ca2+ response and subsequent activation of fibroblast (5, 96). The binding of DPP4 with plasminogen also regulates the homeostasis of extracellular matrix by promoting the secretion of matrix metalloproteinases and conversion of plasminogen to plasmin (97). In addition, production of plasmin is able to degrade BP180, an autoantigen found in autoimmune skin disease bullous pemphigoid. Therefore, DPP4 may be involved in the maintaining of BP180 immunotolerance and the prevention of BP autoantibody production (98).
The Role of DPP4 in Autoimmune Disease
DPP4 in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic progressive autoimmune disease causing pain, swelling, stiffness and loss of function of joints. Although the exact cause and pathogenesis are unclear, it’s a consensus that T cell activation plays an important role in the initiation and maintaining of inflammation in RA (99). Various factors involved in T cell activation, including CD28, CD40, CTLA4, ILRA/IL2, IL-21, have been found to increase in RA (100). As an activation marker of T cells, DPP4 has received increasing attention in RA. Serum DPP4 concentration is significantly decreased in patients with RA compared to the control group (101), and this decrease is inversely correlated to disease activity (102). However, DPP4 expression on the surface of circulating lymphocytes and monocytes showed no significant differences between early RA patients and healthy controls (102, 103). Another study suggested that DPP4 expression on peripheral blood CD4+ T cells was higher in active RA compared to inactive RA and controls. However, its expression on synovial fluid T cells from RA was lower than that from osteoarthritis patients (104). The decrease of DPP4 activity also occurs in synovial fluids, fluid mononuclear cells (FMNC) and synovial membrane in RA compared with osteoarthritis (105–107). Interestingly, Anti-DPP4 autoantibodies have been observed in RA patients and may be used as a biomarker for early diagnosis of RA (108), which suggests that DPP4 may contributes to the immunopathology of RA.
SDF-1, a substrate of DPP4, is thought to play a central role in inflammatory cell recruitment via interacting with its receptor CXCR4. In murine model of antigen-induced arthritis, DPP4 deficiency resulted in preservation of serum active SDF-1 and enhanced infiltration of CXCR4-positive inflammatory cells in arthritic joints (109). The plasma level of DPP4 was lower than that in osteoarthritis and negatively correlated with plasma inflammation marker C-reactive protein (109). The level of SDF-1 was inversely correlated with the number of DPP4+ T cells in synovial fluids from patients with RA (105). Since the synovial level of SDF-1 was strongly correlated with the disease activity score (DAS28 CRP) and inflammation markers (serum C-reactive protein and IL-6) (109, 110), the decrease of synovial DPP4 in RA may lead to synovial inflammation via SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. These results indicate a critical role of DPP4/SDF1/CXCR4 in synovial inflammation in RA.
A recent study indicates that exogenous DPP4 or overexpression of DPP4 in synovial fibroblasts reduced the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-3 from fibroblasts (111). Bone erosion is a severe consequence in RA progression. In a recent study, DPP4 was found to be highly expressed in osteoclast and its expression was suppressed by an anti-resorptive agent denosumab, suggesting that osteoclast-derived DPP4 may be an important link between energy metabolism and bone remodeling (112). It is shown that the invasion of synovial fibroblasts into cartilage was enhanced by the inhibition of DPP4 in a mouse model of RA (113). However, in a streptozotocin-induced diabetic model of rat, DPP4 inhibitor was shown to attenuate the bone loss and improve mechanical bone strength, probably through reducing CTX-I-dependent bone resorption (114).
Clinical observation on patients prescribed with DPP4 inhibitors may offer critical information on role of DPP4 enzymatic activities in RA. DPP4 inhibitors-associated newly onset RA cases have been reported by several groups (115–117). However, larger-scale population studies failed to identify an association between RA and DPP4i utilization compared to other antidiabetic therapies (118–121). Future randomized controlled trials are required to investigate the exact effects of DPP4 enzymatic inhibition on the development of RA.
DPP4 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic multi-system autoimmune disease with many patients presenting with a characteristic butterfly rash (erythematous rash over the cheeks and bridge of the nose). Since most patients present high titers of autoreactive antibodies and disease activity is correlated with autoantibody titers, SLE used to be considered as an adaptive immune system disorder (122).
Serum DPP4 activities were significantly decreased in mice with lupus erythematosus-like syndrome compared to healthy mice, indicating a potential involvement of DPP4 in the pathogenesis of SLE (4). Likewise, clinical evidences demonstrate lower levels of DPP4 in the serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells of SLE patients compared to health controls (4, 123, 124). Wong et al. reported that surface expression of DPP4 on CD4+ T cell and invariant natural killer T (iNKT) lymphocytes were reduced in SLE patients, accompanied with reduced circulating iNKT and elevated Th1 response (125). DPP4 mRNA expression analysis via qPCR showed 3.6-fold higher in SLE group than in the healthy control group, whereas no significant correlation with disease activity (50).
Recent population-cohort studies from Taiwan and Korea showed that DPP4 inhibitors was associated with a reduced risk of SLE (126, 127). However, high-level clinical evidence on the relation between DPP4 inhibition and SLE is limited.
DPP4 in Systemic Sclerosis
Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), also known as scleroderma, is another severe autoimmune disease characterized by diffuse cutaneous and visceral fibrosis (128). Early research reported an increase in both absolute number and percentage of peripheral blood CD4+DPP4+T in scleroderma patients, and the levels of DPP4 expression in T cells correlated with disease activity (129). Circulating soluble DPP4 was also significantly decreased in SSc patients, compared to controls (101). Compared to limited cutaneous SSc, the soluble DPP4 levels further reduced in diffuse cutaneous SSc (130), which supports the hypothesis that DPP4 activity is associated with fibrosis progress in SSc.
Myofibroblasts are main collagen-producing cells in tissue fibrosis (131). In SSc skin, myofibroblasts contribute to tissue tension and skin/joint contractures (132, 133). As discussed above, DPP4 is critical for the activation of fibroblast. DPP4-positive fibroblasts express a high level of profibrotic genes including collagen-1, collagen-3, and fibronectin (134). Additionally, stimulation with recombinant human DPP4 promotes the production of fibronectin in lung fibroblast, suggesting a role of DPP4 in fibroblast activation and tissue remodeling (135). A recent study discovered that DPP4-expressing fibroblasts are responsible for collagen deposition in dermal scars and inhibition of DPP4 reduced scar formation in a mouse model of wound healing (16). The following studies demonstrated that SFRP2/DPP4 fibroblast subpopulation is the progenitor of fibrogenic fibroblasts in SSc skin (136) and DPP4 activated NF-κB and SMAD signaling through PAR2, leading to the activation of dermal fibroblasts (92).
Utilization of DPP4 inhibitors sitagliptin and vildagliptin in murine model of bleomycin-induced skin fibrosis showed a marked anti-fibrotic effect as evidenced by ameliorated dermal thickness, hydroxyproline content, and accumulation of myofibroblasts through suppressing TGF-β-induced ERK signaling pathway (91). Vildagliptin also effectively attenuated fibrosis and inflammation in bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis (137). Although animal studies have suggested a prospective application of DPP4 inhibitors in SSc, there are limited clinical trials investigating the role of DPP4 inhibitors in patients with SSc.
DPP4 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a typical autoimmune-mediated digestive system disease including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Although there are differences between CD and UC, they both are characterized by chronic relapsing progressive process and multi-organ involvement in later stage. The serum DPP4 level and enzymatic activity in patients with IBD were decreased significantly compared to healthy control or patients with remissive conditions, and the extent of decrease was correlated with disease activity (138–141). In addition, responders to treatments had a higher serum DPP4 level compared to nonresponders (139). DPP4 activity in the fecal was found to reduce in active UC patients, but increase in CD patients, when compared to remitters (142). These results suggest that DPP4 activity is a potential biomarker for monitoring IBD activity and therapeutic response (143). A model of TNBS-induced colitis in DPP4-/- mice showed higher serum levels of neuropeptide Y (NPY), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and IL-6, which are all substrates of DPP4, compared to C57BL/6 mice. The levels of VIP and IL-6 in the colon and brain tissues were also increased in DPP4-/- mice during the acute inflammation phase of colitis. IL-10 in the brain was found to reduce in wild-type mice, but increase in DPP4-/- mice, suggesting a potential role of DPP4 in regulating neuroimmune response in colitis development (144). In dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis, DPP4-/- mice showed increased CD8+ T cells and NKT cells in the spleen, as well as increased macrophage infiltration and enhanced expression of NF-κB p65 subunit in colon mucosa (145),. Additionally, GLP-1 and GLP-2 promote the repair of injured intestinal epithelia and regulate T cell differentiation and functions, and those functions are inhibited by DPP4 enzymatic cleavage (146, 147). The protective effect of DPP4 inhibitors on IBD has been observed in animal studies. DSS-induced colitis in mice was improved by administration of DPP4 inhibitor ER-319711, as demonstrated by less colon shortening and weight loss (148). Likewise, anagliptin treatment also facilitates the restoration of intestinal mucosal damage in DSS-induced colitis in C57BL/6 mice (149). However, clinical evidence about the effect of DPP4 inhibitor on IBD is limited and inconsistent. A cross-sectional study observed an increased risk of several autoimmune diseases including Crohn’s disease, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, and Psoriasis in patients on DPP4 inhibition therapy (150). Abrahami et al. also reported an association between the use of DPP4 inhibitor and increased risk of IBD (hazard ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 2.49) (151). Nevertheless, another real-world investigation of 895,747 patients on either DPP4 inhibition therapy or other anti-diabetic treatment suggested that the use of DPP4 inhibitors was not associated with increased IBD risk (152). A meta-analysis involving 16 individual studies also reported a non-significant increase in the risk of IBD after exposure to DPP4 inhibitor when using a random-effects model (Relative risk 1.52; 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 3.24). However, this finding was driven by the inclusion of a large study and further surveillance on this effect is warranted (153).
DPP4 in Autoimmune Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), also known as autoimmune diabetes, is characterized by immune-mediated destruction of pancreatic β cells and insufficiency of insulin secretion in early ages (154). Serum DPP4 activity was found to increase in patients with T1DM and the elevation is correlated with duration of diabetes (155–157). Although DPP4i has been used as either mono-therapy or combined therapy for T2DM over a decade, there is limited evidence supporting its application in T1DM. The effect of DPP4 inhibition on lowering HbA1c in patients with T1DM was not consistent in clinical trials (158–161).
Despite inconsistent findings in clinical investigations, the role of DPP4 in T1DM progression and inflammatory process has received sufficient attention in preclinical studies. Imbalanced Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg responses are important features of T1DM. DPP4 inhibition leads to decreased Th1 response, increase of Th2 cytokines, and restoration of Treg/Th17 imbalance (98). GLP-1, a substrate of DPP4, was reported to possess anti-inflammatory property in pancreas and adipose tissue by reducing the production of inflammatory cytokines and infiltration of immune cells (162). Therefore, the inhibition of DPP4 contribute to anti-inflammatory process in pancreatic. In NOD mice trial treated with DPP4 inhibitor MK0431, the survival of islet graft was prolonged, accompanied by a decreased migration of CD4+ T cells into pancreas through a pathway involving cAMP/PKA/Rac1 activation (163). In another T1DM mouse model induced by low-dose streptozotocin, sitagliptin not only reduced blood glucose level, but also improved inflammation in pancreas by increasing CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+ T cells and reducing inflammatory cells (such as CD11b+ cells and CD4+CD26+ T cells) (164). Therefore, preclinical studies indicate that DPP4 inhibition may improve T1DM through mechanisms involving both incretin effect and anti-inflammatory action.
DPP4 in Other Autoimmune Diseases
In addition to diseases mentioned above, involvement of DPP4 in other autoimmune diseases are displayed in Table 3. However, given the lower incidence of certain autoimmune disease, limited evidences are accessible. Case reports and retrospective studies of DPP4i utilization in T2DM patients demonstrated an association between the use of DPP4i and bullous pemphigoid, a severe autoimmune skin disease (18, 173–177). Importantly, DPP4i-induced bullous pemphigoid does not remit fully after withdrawal of DPP4i, suggesting that DPP4i induces and aggravate the process of bullous pemphigoid rather than a reversible side effect of DPP4i (18). Although the exact mechanisms underlying DPP4i-associated bullous pemphigoid is currently unclear, the breakdown of immunotolerance of BP180, the major autoantigen of bullous pemphigoid, might be a key reason. As mentioned above, DPP4 is involved in the immunotolerance of BP180 by regulating the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin that is responsible for the degradation of BP180 (98). A case-control study found that salivary DPP4 activity was increased in the patients with Sjögren’s syndrome (SS), and there was a positive correlation between DPP4 activity and MMP9 level (166). A serial of studies reported that DPP4 is associated with chondrocyte physiology and inhibition of DPP4 suppresses the degradation of ECM, which is considered to help the amelioration of osteoarthritis (169, 178, 179). In addition, DPP4 inhibition was also reported to improve psoriasis (172), probably by inhibiting T cell activation (171). Collectively, further animal and clinical studies are required to identify the exact role of DPP4 in the development of autoimmune diseases.
Table 3
| Expression | Mechanisms | Effect of DPP4 inhibitor on disease phenotype | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RA | Decreased in serum (101) | Limit the recruitment of inflammatory cells (109, 110) Involved in bone erosion (114) | Inconsistent: several case reports indicate DPP4 inhibitors induce RA (117, 126), some studies reported no association or reduced risk of RA (120) |
| SLE | Decreased in serum (4, 123, 124) | Evidence limited | Reduce risk (126) |
| SSc | Increased in T cells (129) | Indication of activated fibroblast | Limited evidence in humans; Animal study shows DPP4 inhibition meliorates fibrosis in vivo (91, 137) |
| IBD | Decreased serum activity (140, 165) | Regulate neuroimmune response (145) Impair tissue recovery by inactivation of GLP-2 (147) | Biomarker for treatment response (143) DPP4i promote prognosis in animals (149) Increased IBD risks (150, 151), or no impact (152, 153) |
| SS | Increased in saliva (166) | Regulate expression of MMP9 (166) | Evidence limited |
| OA | No significant alteration (167) | Upregulate AGE-induced MMPs (168) Promote bone formation by inactivating GLP-1 (168) | Improve ECM loss (168, 169) |
| Psoriasis | Increased at mRNA level in lesion (170) | inhibit T cell activation (171) | Improve psoriasis severity (172) |
The role of DPP4 in autoimmune diseases.
Discussion
This review discusses the role of DPP4 in immune system and its role in pathogenesis of different autoimmune diseases. Apparently, the expression of DPP4 is significantly affected in different autoimmune conditions. However, DPP4 is not a specific marker of any autoimmune disease, as its ubiquitous expression limits the potential of DPP4 as a precise biomarker. In addition to autoimmune disease, immune cell-derived DPP4 may also other disease conditions such as type 2 diabetes. Studies have demonstrated that immune cells, especially circulating CD4+ T helper cells, are important source of plasma DPP4 activity which is responsible for postprandial glucose intolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes (180, 181). In patients with type 2 diabetes, kallikrein-related peptidase 5, an enzyme responsible for the shedding of DPP4 from cell membrane, was induced in CD4+ T cells, suggesting that immune cell-derived DPP4 is responsible for reduced incretin effect in diabetes patients (180). Experimental and clinical investigations suggest that DPP4 may play a dual role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases and the inhibition of DPP4 results distinct outcome in different disease condition. A possible reason is that DPP4, as a moonlighting protein, possesses diverse functions including enzymatic degradation of various substrates and enzymatic independent interaction with many ligands. In addition, while DPP4 is widely expressed in many types of cells, DPP4 expression in different cell population may also have distinct functions. To dissect the exact role of DPP4 in autoimmune diseases, future efforts may focus on the role of DPP4 in different types of cells, the temporal and spatial characteristics of DPP4 expression (especially in different stages of disease), unrecognized ligands for DPP4, and strategies targeting the non-enzymatic activity of DPP4. Taken together, DPP4 is a promising target of autoimmune diseases although its exact mechanisms in these conditions remain elucidated.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81974254, 31870906, 82170470, and 81670431).
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
JH performed literature search. JH, XXL, YW, XLL, and SG drafted the manuscript. LD, XR, and JZ revised the manuscript. All author reviewed the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Hopsu-HavuVKGlennerGG. A New Dipeptide Naphthylamidase Hydrolyzing Glycyl-Prolyl-Beta-Naphthylamide. Histochemie (1966) 7(3):197–201. doi: 10.1007/BF00577838
2
De MeesterIKoromSVan DammeJScharpéS. CD26, Let it Cut or Cut it Down. Immunol Today (1999) 20(8):367–75. doi: 10.1016/S0167-5699(99)01486-3
3
ThulPJÅkessonLWikingMMahdessianDGeladakiAAit BlalHet al. A Subcellular Map of the Human Proteome. Science (2017) 356(6340):eaal3321. doi: 10.1126/science.aal3321
4
HagiharaMOhhashiMNagatsuT. Activities of Dipeptidyl Peptidase II and Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV in Mice With Lupus Erythematosus-Like Syndrome and in Patients With Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Chem (1987) 33(8):1463–5. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/33.8.1463
5
KlemannCWagnerLStephanMvon HörstenS. Cut to the Chase: A Review of CD26/dipeptidyl Peptidase-4’s (DPP4) Entanglement in the Immune System. Clin Exp Immunol (2016) 185(1):1–21. doi: 10.1111/cei.12781
6
VahlTPPatyBWFullerBDPrigeonRLD'AlessioDA. Effects of GLP-1-(7-36)NH2, GLP-1-(7-37), and GLP-1- (9-36)NH2 on Intravenous Glucose Tolerance and Glucose-Induced Insulin Secretion in Healthy Humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2003) 88(4):1772–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021479
7
LambeirA-MDurinxCScharpéSDe MeesterI. Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV From Bench to Bedside: An Update on Structural Properties, Functions, and Clinical Aspects of the Enzyme DPP IV. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci (2003) 40(3):209–94. doi: 10.1080/713609354
8
RajVSMouHSmitsSLDekkersDHWMüllerMADijkmanRet al. Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 is a Functional Receptor for the Emerging Human Coronavirus-EMC. Nature (2013) 495(7440):251–4. doi: 10.1038/nature12005
9
WangNShiXJiangLZhangSWangDTongPet al. Structure of MERS-CoV Spike Receptor-Binding Domain Complexed With Human Receptor DPP4. Cell Res (2013) 23(8):986–93. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.92
10
LuGHuYWangQQiJGaoFLiYet al. Molecular Basis of Binding Between Novel Human Coronavirus MERS-CoV and its Receptor CD26. Nature (2013) 500(7461):227–31. doi: 10.1038/nature12328
11
MeyerholzDKLambertzAMMcCrayPBJr. Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Distribution in the Human Respiratory Tract: Implications for the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. Am J Pathol (2016) 186(1):78–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.09.014
12
CallebautCKrustBJacototEHovanessianAG. T Cell Activation Antigen, CD26, as a Cofactor for Entry of HIV in CD4+ Cells. Science (1993) 262(5142):2045–50. doi: 10.1126/science.7903479
13
AlkhatibGCombadiereCBroderCCFengYKennedyPEMurphyPMet al. CC CKR5: A RANTES, MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta Receptor as a Fusion Cofactor for Macrophage-Tropic HIV-1. Science (1996) 272(5270):1955–8. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5270.1955
14
DengHLiuREllmeierWChoeSUnutmazDBurkhartMet al. Identification of a Major Co-Receptor for Primary Isolates of HIV-1. Nature (1996) 381(6584):661–6. doi: 10.1038/381661a0
15
WuLPaxtonWAKassamNRuffingNRottmanJBSullivanNet al. CCR5 Levels and Expression Pattern Correlate With Infectability by Macrophage-Tropic HIV-1, In Vitro. J Exp Med (1997) 185(9):1681–91. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.9.1681
16
RinkevichYWalmsleyGGHuMSMaanZNNewmanAMDrukkerMet al. Skin Fibrosis. Identification and Isolation of a Dermal Lineage With Intrinsic Fibrogenic Potential. Science (2015) 348(6232):aaa2151. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa2151
17
MerrickDSakersAIrgebayZOkadaCCalvertCMorleyMPet al. Identification of a Mesenchymal Progenitor Cell Hierarchy in Adipose Tissue. Science (2019) 364(6438):eaav2501. doi: 10.1126/science.aav2501
18
RoyASahooJNarayananNMeruguCKamalanathanSNaikD. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor-Induced Autoimmune Diseases: Current Evidence. World J Diabetes (2021) 12(9):1426–41. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i9.1426
19
ZhaoYYangLWangXZhouZ. The New Insights From DPP-4 Inhibitors: Their Potential Immune Modulatory Function in Autoimmune Diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev (2014) 30(8):646–53. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2530
20
WillheimMEbnerCBaierKKernWSchrattbauerKThienRet al. Cell Surface Characterization of T Lymphocytes and Allergen-Specific T Cell Clones: Correlation of CD26 Expression With T(H1) Subsets. J Allergy Clin Immunol (1997) 100(3):348–55. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(97)70248-3
21
LunSWMWongCKKoFWSHuiDSCLamCWK. Increased Expression of Plasma and CD4+ T Lymphocyte Costimulatory Molecule CD26 in Adult Patients With Allergic Asthma. J Clin Immunol (2007) 27(4):430–7. doi: 10.1007/s10875-007-9093-z
22
BengschBSeigelBFleckenTWolanskiJBlumHEThimmeR. Human Th17 Cells Express High Levels of Enzymatically Active Dipeptidylpeptidase IV (Cd26). J Immunol (2012) 188(11):5438–47. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103801
23
YamadaYJangJHDe MeesterIBaertsLVliegenGInciI. CD26 Costimulatory Blockade Improves Lung Allograft Rejection and is Associated With Enhanced Interleukin-10 Expression. J Heart Lung Transplant (2016) 35(4):508–17. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.11.002
24
SalgadoFJPérez-DíazAVillanuevaNMLamasOAriasPNogueiraM. CD26: A Negative Selection Marker for Human Treg Cells. Cytometry A (2012) 81(10):843–55. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22117
25
HatanoROhnumaKYamamotoJDangNHMorimotoC. CD26-Mediated Co-Stimulation in Human CD8(+) T Cells Provokes Effector Function via Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Production. Immunology (2013) 138(2):165–72. doi: 10.1111/imm.12028
26
IbegbuCCXuY-XFillosDRadziewiczHGrakouiAKourtisAP. Differential Expression of CD26 on Virus-Specific CD8(+) T Cells During Active, Latent and Resolved Infection. Immunology (2009) 126(3):346–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02899.x
27
YanSMarguetDDobersJReutterWFanH. Deficiency of CD26 Results in a Change of Cytokine and Immunoglobulin Secretion After Stimulation by Pokeweed Mitogen. Eur J Immunol (2003) 33(6):1519–27. doi: 10.1002/eji.200323469
28
BuhlingFJunkerUReinholdDNeubertKJägerLAnsorgeS. Functional Role of CD26 on Human B Lymphocytes. Immunol Lett (1995) 45(1-2):47–51. doi: 10.1016/0165-2478(94)00230-O
29
GliddonDRHowardCJ. CD26 is Expressed on a Restricted Subpopulation of Dendritic Cells In Vivo. Eur J Immunol (2002) 32(5):1472–81. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200205)32:5<1472::AID-IMMU1472>3.0.CO;2-Q
30
ZhongJRaoXDeiuliisJBraunsteinZNarulaVHazeyJet al. A Potential Role for Dendritic Cell/Macrophage-Expressing DPP4 in Obesity-Induced Visceral Inflammation. Diabetes (2013) 62(1):149–57. doi: 10.2337/db12-0230
31
BuhlingFKunzDReinholdDUlmerAJErnstMFladHDet al. Expression and Functional Role of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (CD26) on Human Natural Killer Cells. Nat Immun (1994) 13(5):270–9.
32
ShinguKHelfritzAZielinska-SkowronekMMeyer-OlsonDJacobsRSchmidtREet al. CD26 Expression Determines Lung Metastasis in Mutant F344 Rats: Involvement of NK Cell Function and Soluble CD26. Cancer Immunol Immunother (2003) 52(9):546–54. doi: 10.1007/s00262-003-0392-9
33
ShahZKampfrathTDeiuliisJAZhongJPinedaCYingZet al. Long-Term Dipeptidyl-Peptidase 4 Inhibition Reduces Atherosclerosis and Inflammation via Effects on Monocyte Recruitment and Chemotaxis. Circulation (2011) 124(21):2338–49. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.041418
34
ZhugeFNiYNagashimadaMNagataNXuLMukaidaNet al. DPP-4 Inhibition by Linagliptin Attenuates Obesity-Related Inflammation and Insulin Resistance by Regulating M1/M2 Macrophage Polarization. Diabetes (2016) 65(10):2966–79. doi: 10.2337/db16-0317
35
NittaTTsutsumiMNittaSMuroRSuzukiECNakanoKet al. Fibroblasts as a Source of Self-Antigens for Central Immune Tolerance. Nat Immunol (2020) 21(10):1172–80. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0756-8
36
GorrellMDWicksonJMcCaughanGW. Expression of the Rat CD26 Antigen (Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV) on Subpopulations of Rat Lymphocytes. Cell Immunol (1991) 134(1):205–15. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(91)90343-A
37
TanakaT. Cloning and Functional Expression of the T Cell Activation Antigen CD26. J Immunol (1993) 150(5):2090.
38
MandapathilMHilldorferBSzczepanskiMJCzystowskaMSzajnikMRenJet al. Generation and Accumulation of Immunosuppressive Adenosine by Human CD4+CD25highFOXP3+ Regulatory T Cells. J Biol Chem (2010) 285(10):7176–86. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.047423
39
DangNHTorimotoYShimamuraKTanakaTDaleyJFSchlossmanSFet al. 1f7 (CD26): A Marker of Thymic Maturation Involved in the Differential Regulation of the CD3 and CD2 Pathways of Human Thymocyte Activation. J Immunol (1991) 147(9):2825–32.
40
KlemannCSchadeJPabstRLeitnerSStillerJvon HörstenSet al. CD26/dipeptidyl Peptidase 4-Deficiency Alters Thymic Emigration Patterns and Leukcocyte Subsets in F344-Rats Age-Dependently. Clin Exp Immunol (2009) 155(2):357–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03839.x
41
FrerkerNRaberKBodeFSkripuletzTNaveHKlemannCet al. Phenotyping of Congenic Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 (DP4) Deficient Dark Agouti (DA) Rats Suggests Involvement of DP4 in Neuro-, Endocrine, and Immune Functions. Clin Chem Lab Med (2009) 47(3):275–87. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2009.064
42
SchÖnEDemuthHUEichmannEHorstHJKörnerIJKoppJet al. Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV in Human T Lymphocytes. Impaired Induction of Interleukin 2 and Gamma Interferon Due to Specific Inhibition of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV. Scand J Immunol (1989) 29(2):127–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1989.tb01108.x
43
ReinholdDBankUBühlingFTägerMBornIFaustJet al. Inhibitors of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (DP IV, CD26) Induces Secretion of Transforming Growth Factor-Beta 1 (TGF-Beta 1) in Stimulated Mouse Splenocytes and Thymocytes. Immunol Lett (1997) 58(1):29–35. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2478(97)02716-8
44
TanakaTKameokaJYaronASchlossmanSFMorimotoC. The Costimulatory Activity of the CD26 Antigen Requires Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Enzymatic Activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1993) 90(10):4586–90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4586
45
von BoninAHuhnJFleischerB. Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV/CD26 on T Cells: Analysis of an Alternative T-Cell Activation Pathway. Immunol Rev (1998) 161:43–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.1998.tb01570.x
46
BanchereauJSteinmanRM. Dendritic Cells and the Control of Immunity. Nature (1998) 392(6673):245–52. doi: 10.1038/32588
47
LanzavecchiaASallustoF. Dynamics of T Lymphocyte Responses: Intermediates, Effectors, and Memory Cells. Science (2000) 290(5489):92–7. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5489.92
48
HerreraCCasadóVCiruelaFSchofieldPMallolJLluisCet al. Adenosine A2B Receptors Behave as an Alternative Anchoring Protein for Cell Surface Adenosine Deaminase in Lymphocytes and Cultured Cells. Mol Pharmacol (2001) 59(1):127–34. doi: 10.1124/mol.59.1.127
49
PachecoRMartinez-NavioJMLejeuneMClimentNOlivaHGatellJMGallartTet al. CD26, Adenosine Deaminase, and Adenosine Receptors Mediate Costimulatory Signals in the Immunological Synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2005) 102(27):9583–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501050102
50
ValizadehMAhmadzadehABehzadiMYeganehF. CD26 mRNA Expression in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Rheumatol Res (2018) 3(2):77–82. doi: 10.22631/rr.2018.69997.1045
51
IshiiTOhnumaKMurakamiATakasawaNKobayashiSDangNHet al. CD26-Mediated Signaling for T Cell Activation Occurs in Lipid Rafts Through its Association With CD45RO. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2001) 98(21):12138–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.211439098
52
TorimotoYDangNHVivierETanakaTSchlossmanSFMorimotoC. Coassociation of CD26 (Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV) With CD45 on the Surface of Human T Lymphocytes. J Immunol (1991) 147(8):2514–7.
53
OhnumaKUchiyamaMYamochiTNishibashiKHosonoOTakahashiNet al. Caveolin-1 Triggers T-Cell Activation via CD26 in Association With CARMA1. J Biol Chem (2007) 282(13):10117–31. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609157200
54
MatuszakMLewandowskiKCzyżAKiernicka-ParulskaJPrzybyłowicz-ChaleckaAJarmuż-SzymczakMet al. The Prognostic Significance of Surface Dipeptidylpeptidase IV (CD26) Expression in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Leuk Res (2016) 47:166–71. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2016.06.002
55
BiulingFTonevitskiAGKiusterUAnzorgeS. Study of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV as a Surface Marker of Human Natural Killer Cells. Biull Eksp Biol Med (1990) 110(10):411–3.
56
YamabeTTakakuraKSugieKKitaokaYTakedaSOkuboYet al. Induction of the 2B9 Antigen/Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV/CD26 on Human Natural Killer Cells by IL-2, IL-12 or IL-15. Immunology (1997) 91(1):151–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1997.00230.x
57
BuhlingFReinholdDLendeckelUFaustJNeubertKAnsorgeS. CD26 is Involved in Regulation of Cytokine Production in Natural Killer Cells. Adv Exp Med Biol (1997) 421:141–7. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9613-1_18
58
MaduenoJAMuñozEBlazquezVGonzalezRAparicioPPeñaJ. The CD26 Antigen is Coupled to Protein Tyrosine Phosphorylation and Implicated in CD16-Mediated Lysis in Natural Killer Cells. Scand J Immunol (1993) 37(4):425–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1993.tb03313.x
59
SchutzFHacksteinH. Identification of Novel Dendritic Cell Subset Markers in Human Blood. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2014) 443(2):453–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.11.112
60
NakanoHMoranTPNakanoKGerrishKEBortnerCDCookDN. Complement Receptor C5aR1/CD88 and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4/CD26 Define Distinct Hematopoietic Lineages of Dendritic Cells. J Immunol (2015) 194(8):3808–19. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402195
61
TalkerSCBaumannABarutGTKellerIBruggmannRSummerfieldA. Precise Delineation and Transcriptional Characterization of Bovine Blood Dendritic-Cell and Monocyte Subsets. Front Immunol (2018) 9:2505. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02505
62
IkedoTMinamiMKataokaHHayashiKNagataMFujikawaRet al. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Anagliptin Prevents Intracranial Aneurysm Growth by Suppressing Macrophage Infiltration and Activation. J Am Heart Assoc (2017) 6(6):e004777. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004777
63
GhorpadeDSOzcanLZhengZNicoloroSMShenYChenEet al. Hepatocyte-Secreted DPP4 in Obesity Promotes Adipose Inflammation and Insulin Resistance. Nature (2018) 555(7698):673–7. doi: 10.1038/nature26138
64
ZarubaMMFranzWM. Role of the SDF-1-CXCR4 Axis in Stem Cell-Based Therapies for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. Expert Opin Biol Ther (2010) 10(3):321–35. doi: 10.1517/14712590903460286
65
AiutiAWebbIJBleulCSpringerTGutierrez-RamosJC. The Chemokine SDF-1 is a Chemoattractant for Human CD34+ Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells and Provides a New Mechanism to Explain the Mobilization of CD34+ Progenitors to Peripheral Blood. J Exp Med (1997) 185(1):111–20. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.1.111
66
KondoKShintaniSShibataRMurakamiHMurakamiRImaizumiMet al. Implantation of Adipose-Derived Regenerative Cells Enhances Ischemia-Induced Angiogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol (2009) 29(1):61–6. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.166496
67
JanssensRMortierABoffDRuytinxPGouwyMVantiltBet al. Truncation of CXCL12 by CD26 Reduces its CXC Chemokine Receptor 4- and Atypical Chemokine Receptor 3-Dependent Activity on Endothelial Cells and Lymphocytes. Biochem Pharmacol (2017) 132:92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.03.009
68
HerreraCMorimotoCBlancoJMallolJArenzanaFLluisCet al. Comodulation of CXCR4 and CD26 in Human Lymphocytes. J Biol Chem (2001) 276(22):19532–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004586200
69
ProostPSchutyserEMentenPStruyfSWuytsAOpdenakkerGet al. Amino-Terminal Truncation of CXCR3 Agonists Impairs Receptor Signaling and Lymphocyte Chemotaxis, While Preserving Antiangiogenic Properties. Blood (2001) 98(13):3554–61. doi: 10.1182/blood.V98.13.3554
70
Barreira da SilvaRYatimNFietteLIngersollMAAlbertML. Dipeptidylpeptidase 4 Inhibition Enhances Lymphocyte Trafficking, Improving Both Naturally Occurring Tumor Immunity and Immunotherapy. Nat Immunol (2015) 16(8):850–8. doi: 10.1038/ni.3201
71
HollandeCBoussierJZiaiJNozawaTBondetVPhungWet al. Inhibition of the Dipeptidyl Peptidase DPP4 (CD26) Reveals IL-33-Dependent Eosinophil-Mediated Control of Tumor Growth. Nat Immunol (2019) 20(3):257–64. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0321-5
72
QinCJZhaoLHZhouXZhangHLWenWTangLet al. Inhibition of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Prevents High Fat Diet-Induced Liver Cancer Angiogenesis by Downregulating Chemokine Ligand 2. Cancer Lett (2018) 420:26–37. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.064
73
ProostPMentenPStruyfSSchutyserEDe MeesterIVan DammeJ. Cleavage by CD26/dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Converts the Chemokine LD78beta Into a Most Efficient Monocyte Attractant and CCR1 Agonist. Blood (2000) 96(5):1674–80. doi: 10.1182/blood.V96.5.1674
74
StruyfSMentenPLenaertsJPPutWD'HaeseADe ClercqEet al. Diverging Binding Capacities of Natural LD78beta Isoforms of Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1alpha to the CC Chemokine Receptors 1, 3 and 5 Affect Their Anti-HIV-1 Activity and Chemotactic Potencies for Neutrophils and Eosinophils. Eur J Immunol (2001) 31(7):2170–8. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200107)31:7<2170::AID-IMMU2170>3.0.CO;2-D
75
OraveczTPallMRoderiquezGGorrellMDDittoMNguyenNYet al. Regulation of the Receptor Specificity and Function of the Chemokine RANTES (Regulated on Activation, Normal T Cell Expressed and Secreted) by Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (CD26)-Mediated Cleavage. J Exp Med (1997) 186(11):1865–72. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.11.1865
76
StruyfSProostPScholsDDe ClercqEOpdenakkerGLenaertsJPet al. CD26/dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Down-Regulates the Eosinophil Chemotactic Potency, But Not the Anti-HIV Activity of Human Eotaxin by Affecting its Interaction With CC Chemokine Receptor 3. J Immunol (1999) 162(8):4903–9.
77
ProostPStruyfSScholsDOpdenakkerGSozzaniSAllavenaPet al. Truncation of Macrophage-Derived Chemokine by CD26/dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Beyond its Predicted Cleavage Site Affects Chemotactic Activity and CC Chemokine Receptor 4 Interaction. J Biol Chem (1999) 274(7):3988–93. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.7.3988
78
StruyfSProostPSozzaniSMantovaniAWuytsADe ClercqEet al. Enhanced Anti-HIV-1 Activity and Altered Chemotactic Potency of NH2-Terminally Processed Macrophage-Derived Chemokine (MDC) Imply an Additional MDC Receptor. J Immunol (1998) 161(6):2672–5.
79
BroxmeyerHEHoggattJO'LearyHAMantelCChittetiBRCooperSet al. Dipeptidylpeptidase 4 Negatively Regulates Colony-Stimulating Factor Activity and Stress Hematopoiesis. Nat Med (2012) 18(12):1786–96. doi: 10.1038/nm.2991
80
OuXO’LearyHABroxmeyerHE. Implications of DPP4 Modification of Proteins That Regulate Stem/Progenitor and More Mature Cell Types. Blood (2013) 122(2):161–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-02-487470
81
WesleyUVMcGroartyMHomoyouniA. Dipeptidyl Peptidase Inhibits Malignant Phenotype of Prostate Cancer Cells by Blocking Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Signaling Pathway. Cancer Res (2005) 65(4):1325–34. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1852
82
AhrénBHughesTE. Inhibition of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Augments Insulin Secretion in Response to Exogenously Administered Glucagon-Like Peptide-1, Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide, Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide, and Gastrin-Releasing Peptide in Mice. Endocrinology (2005) 146(4):2055–9. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1174
83
FrerkerNWagnerLWolfRHeiserUHoffmannTRahfeldJUet al. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) Cleaving Enzymes: Structural and Functional Homologues of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4. Peptides (2007) 28(2):257–68. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2006.09.027
84
UnniappanSMcIntoshCHDemuthHUHeiserUWolfRKiefferTJ. Effects of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV on the Satiety Actions of Peptide YY. Diabetologia (2006) 49(8):1915–23. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0310-8
85
Manuguerra-GagneRBoulosPRAmmarALeblondFAKroslGPichetteVet al. Transplantation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promotes Tissue Regeneration in a Glaucoma Model Through Laser-Induced Paracrine Factor Secretion and Progenitor Cell Recruitment. Stem Cells (2013) 31(6):1136–48. doi: 10.1002/stem.1364
86
KalluriRZeisbergM. Fibroblasts in Cancer. Nat Rev Cancer (2006) 6(5):392–401. doi: 10.1038/nrc1877
87
Carmona-RiveraCCarlucciPMMooreELingampalliNUchtenhagenHJamesEet al. Synovial Fibroblast-Neutrophil Interactions Promote Pathogenic Adaptive Immunity in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Sci Immunol (2017) 2(10):eaag3358. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aag3358
88
TranCNDavisMJTesmerLAEndresJLMotylCDSmudaCet al. Presentation of Arthritogenic Peptide to Antigen-Specific T Cells by Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes. Arthritis Rheum (2007) 56(5):1497–506. doi: 10.1002/art.22573
89
HendersonNCRiederFWynnTA. Fibrosis: From Mechanisms to Medicines. Nature (2020) 587(7835):555–66. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2938-9
90
TabibTMorseCWangTChenWLafyatisR. SFRP2/DPP4 and FMO1/LSP1 Define Major Fibroblast Populations in Human Skin. J Invest Dermatol (2018) 138(4):802–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.09.045
91
SoareAGyörfiHAMateiAEDeesCRauberSWohlfahrtTet al. Dipeptidylpeptidase 4 as a Marker of Activated Fibroblasts and a Potential Target for the Treatment of Fibrosis in Systemic Sclerosis. Arthritis Rheumatol (2020) 72(1):137–49. doi: 10.1002/art.41058
92
LeeSYWuSTLiangYJSuMJHuangCWJaoYHet al. Soluble Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Induces Fibroblast Activation Through Proteinase-Activated Receptor-2. Front Pharmacol (2020) 11:552818. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.552818
93
LiYCSungPHYangYHChiangJYYipHKYangCC. Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Promotes Peritoneal Fibrosis and its Inhibitions Prevent Failure of Peritoneal Dialysis. Commun Biol (2021) 4(1):144. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01652-x
94
LösterKZeilingerKSchuppanDReutterW. The Cysteine-Rich Region of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (CD 26) is the Collagen-Binding Site. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1995) 217(1):341–8. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1995.2782
95
ChengHCAbdel-GhanyMPauliBU. A Novel Consensus Motif in Fibronectin Mediates Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Adhesion and Metastasis. J Biol Chem (2003) 278(27):24600–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303424200
96
Gonzalez-GronowMKaczowkaSGawdiGPizzoSV. Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (DPP IV/CD26) is a Cell-Surface Plasminogen Receptor. Front Biosci (2008) 13:1610–8. doi: 10.2741/2785
97
Gonzalez-GronowMKaczowkaSGawdiGPizzoSV. Interaction of Plasminogen With Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Initiates a Signal Transduction Mechanism Which Regulates Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 by Prostate Cancer Cells. Biochem J (2001) 355(Pt 2):397–407. doi: 10.1042/bj3550397
98
ShaoSXuQYuXPanRChenY. Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors and Their Potential Immune Modulatory Functions. Pharmacol Ther (2020) 209:107503. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107503
99
PanayiGSLanchburyJSKingsleyGH. The Importance of the T Cell in Initiating and Maintaining the Chronic Synovitis of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheum (1992) 35(7):729–35. doi: 10.1002/art.1780350702
100
McInnesIBSchettG. The Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis. N Engl J Med (2011) 365(23):2205–19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1004965
101
SinnathuraiPLauWVieira de RibeiroAJBachovchinWWEnglertHHoweGet al. Circulating Fibroblast Activation Protein and Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Sclerosis. Int J Rheum Dis (2018) 21(11):1915–23. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13031
102
CorderoOJSalgadoFJMera-VarelaANogueiraM. Serum Interleukin-12, Interleukin-15, Soluble CD26, and Adenosine Deaminase in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Int (2001) 21(2):69–74. doi: 10.1007/s002960100134
103
GrujicMMaticIZCrnogoracMDVelickovicADKolundzijaBCorderoOJet al. Activity and Expression of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV on Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Patients With Early Steroid and Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Naive Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Chem Lab Med (2017) 55(1):73–81. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-1279
104
MuscatCBertottoAAgeaEBistoniOErcolaniRTognelliniRet al. Expression and Functional Role of 1F7 (CD26) Antigen on Peripheral Blood and Synovial Fluid T Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Clin Exp Immunol (1994) 98(2):252–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1994.tb06134.x
105
SromovaLMareckovaHSedovaLBalaziovaESedoA. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV in Synovial Fluid and in Synovial Fluid Mononuclear Cells of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Chim Acta (2010) 411(15-16):1046–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.03.034
106
BuljevicSDetelDPucarLBMihelicRMadarevicTSestanBet al. Levels of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV/CD26 Substrates Neuropeptide Y and Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Rheumatol Int (2013) 33(11):2867–74. doi: 10.1007/s00296-013-2823-z
107
KamoriMHagiharaMNagatsuTIwataHMiuraT. Activities of Dipeptidyl Peptidase II, Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV, Prolyl Endopeptidase, and Collagenase-Like Peptidase in Synovial Membrane From Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis. Biochem Med Metab Biol (1991) 45(2):154–60. doi: 10.1016/0885-4505(91)90016-E
108
CorderoOJVarela-CalviñoRLópez-GonzálezTGrujicMJuranicZMouriñoCet al. Anti-CD26 Autoantibodies are Involved in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Show Potential Clinical Interest. Clin Biochem (2017) 50(16-17):903–10. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.06.001
109
BussoNWagtmannNHerlingCChobaz-PéclatVBischof-DelaloyeASoAet al. Circulating CD26 is Negatively Associated With Inflammation in Human and Experimental Arthritis. Am J Pathol (2005) 166(2):433–42. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62266-3
110
KanbeKChibaJInoueYTaguchiMYabukiA. SDF-1 and CXCR4 in Synovium are Associated With Disease Activity and Bone and Joint Destruction in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Golimumab. Mod Rheumatol (2016) 26(1):46–50. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2015.1054088
111
HanCKLeeWFHsuCJHuangYLLinCYTsaiCHet al. DPP4 Reduces Proinflammatory Cytokine Production in Human Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Fibroblasts. J Cell Physiol (2021) 236(12):8060–9. doi: 10.1002/jcp.30494
112
KanbeKChibaJInoueYTaguchiMYabukiA. Identification of Osteoclast-Osteoblast Coupling Factors in Humans Reveals Links Between Bone and Energy Metabolism. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):87. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14003-6
113
OspeltCMertensJCJüngelABrentanoFMaciejewska-RodriguezHHuberLCet al. Inhibition of Fibroblast Activation Protein and Dipeptidylpeptidase 4 Increases Cartilage Invasion by Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Fibroblasts. Arthritis Rheum (2010) 62(5):1224–35. doi: 10.1002/art.27395
114
GlorieLBehetsGJBaertsLDe MeesterID'HaesePCVerhulstA. DPP IV Inhibitor Treatment Attenuates Bone Loss and Improves Mechanical Bone Strength in Male Diabetic Rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (2014) 307(5):E447–55. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00217.2014
115
YokotaKIgakiN. Sitagliptin (DPP-4 Inhibitor)-Induced Rheumatoid Arthritis in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Case Report. Intern Med (2012) 51(15):2041–4. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.7592
116
PadronSRogersEDemory BecklerMKesselmanM. DPP-4 Inhibitor (Sitagliptin)-Induced Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis. BMJ Case Rep (2019) 12(8):e228981. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-228981
117
MascoloARafanielloCSportielloLSessaMCimmarutaDRossiFet al. Dipeptidyl Peptidase (DPP)-4 Inhibitor-Induced Arthritis/Arthralgia: A Review of Clinical Cases. Drug Saf (2016) 39(5):401–7. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0399-8
118
KatheNShahASaidQPainterJT. DPP-4 Inhibitor-Induced Rheumatoid Arthritis Among Diabetics: A Nested Case-Control Study. Diabetes Ther (2018) 9(1):141–51. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0353-5
119
DourosAAbrahamiDYinHYuOHYRenouxCHudsonM. Use of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and New-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Epidemiology (2018) 29(6):904–12. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000891
120
CharoenngamNRittiphairojTPonvilawanBUngprasertP. Use of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors is Associated With a Lower Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Diabetes Metab Syndr (2021) 15(1):249–55. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.12.042
121
WangMLiMXieY. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Rheumatoid Arthritis Risk. Endocr J (2021) 68(6):729–38. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ20-0647
122
DemaBCharlesN. Advances in Mechanisms of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Discov Med (2014) 17(95):247–55.
123
StancÍkováMLojdaZLukácJRuzickováM. Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol (1992) 10(4):381–5.
124
KobayashiHHosonoOMimoriTKawasakiHDangNHTanakaHet al. Reduction of Serum Soluble CD26/dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Enzyme Activity and its Correlation With Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J Rheumatol (2002) 29(9):1858–66.
125
WongPTWongCKTamLSLiEKChenDPLamCW. Decreased Expression of T Lymphocyte Co-Stimulatory Molecule CD26 on Invariant Natural Killer T Cells in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Immunol Invest (2009) 38(5):350–64. doi: 10.1080/08820130902770003
126
SeongJMYeeJGwakHS. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors Lower the Risk of Autoimmune Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Br J Clin Pharmacol (2019) 85(8):1719–27. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13955
127
ChenYCChenTHSunCCChenJYChangSSYeungLet al. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and the Risks of Autoimmune Diseases in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Taiwan: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Acta Diabetol (2020) 57(10):1181–92. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01533-5
128
DentonCPKhannaD. Systemic Sclerosis. Lancet (2017) 390(10103):1685–99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30933-9
129
FioccoURosadaMCozziLOrtolaniCDe SilvestroGRuffattiAet al. Early Phenotypic Activation of Circulating Helper Memory T Cells in Scleroderma: Correlation With Disease Activity. Ann Rheum Dis (1993) 52(4):272–7. doi: 10.1136/ard.52.4.272
130
TamakiZKuboMYazawaNMimuraYAshidaRTomitaMet al. Serum Levels of Soluble CD26 in Patients With Scleroderma. J Dermatol Sci (2008) 52(1):67–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2008.05.004
131
HinzB. Myofibroblasts. Exp Eye Res (2016) 142:56–70. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.07.009
132
KissinEYMerkelPALafyatisR. Myofibroblasts and Hyalinized Collagen as Markers of Skin Disease in Systemic Sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum (2006) 54(11):3655–60. doi: 10.1002/art.22186
133
ZiemekJManAHinchcliffMVargaJSimmsRWLafyatisR. The Relationship Between Skin Symptoms and the Scleroderma Modification of the Health Assessment Questionnaire, the Modified Rodnan Skin Score, and Skin Pathology in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis. Rheumatol (Oxford) (2016) 55(5):911–7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew003
134
XinYWangXZhuMQuMBogariMLinLet al. Expansion of CD26 Positive Fibroblast Population Promotes Keloid Progression. Exp Cell Res (2017) 356(1):104–13. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.04.021
135
ShiobaraTChibanaKWatanabeTAraiRHoriganeYNakamuraYet al. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 is Highly Expressed in Bronchial Epithelial Cells of Untreated Asthma and it Increases Cell Proliferation Along With Fibronectin Production in Airway Constitutive Cells. Respir Res (2016) 17:28. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0342-7
136
TabibTHuangMMorseNPapazoglouABeheraRJiaMet al. Myofibroblast Transcriptome Indicates SFRP2(hi) Fibroblast Progenitors in Systemic Sclerosis Skin. Nat Commun (2021) 12(1):4384. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24607-6
137
LiuYQiY. Vildagliptin, a CD26/DPP4 Inhibitor, Ameliorates Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis via Regulating the Extracellular Matrix. Int Immunopharmacol (2020) 87:106774. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106774
138
HildebrandtMRoseMRüterJSalamaAMönnikesHKlappBF. Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (DP IV, CD26) in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Scand J Gastroenterol (2001) 36(10):1067–72. doi: 10.1080/003655201750422675
139
Pinto-LopesPAfonsoJPinto-LopesRRochaCLagoPGonçalvesRet al. Serum Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4: A Predictor of Disease Activity and Prognosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis (2020) 26(11):1707–19. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izz319
140
MagroDOKotzePGMartinezCARCamargoMGGuadagniniDCalixtoARet al. Changes in Serum Levels of Lipopolysaccharides and CD26 in Patients With Crohn’s Disease. Intest Res (2017) 15(3):352–7. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.352
141
MoranGWO'NeillCPadfieldPMcLaughlinJT. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Expression is Reduced in Crohn’s Disease. Regul Pept (2012) 177(1-3):40–5. doi: 10.1016/j.regpep.2012.04.006
142
Pinto-LopesPMeloFAfonsoJPinto-LopesRRochaCMeloDet al. Fecal Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4: An Emergent Biomarker in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clin Transl Gastroenterol (2021) 12(3):e00320. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000320
143
MeloFJPinto-LopesPEstevinhoMMMagroF. The Role of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 as a Therapeutic Target and Serum Biomarker in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review. Inflammation Bowel Dis (2021) 27(7):1153–65. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa324
144
BaticicLet al. Neuroimmunomodulative Properties of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV/CD26 in a TNBS-Induced Model of Colitis in Mice. J Cell Biochem (2011) 112(11):3322–33. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23261
145
DetelDDetelDKucicNBuljevicSPugelEPVarljenJ. Influence of CD26/dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Deficiency on Immunophenotypic Changes During Colitis Development and Resolution. J Physiol Biochem (2016) 72(3):405–19. doi: 10.1007/s13105-016-0491-7
146
DuanLRaoXBraunsteinZToomeyACZhongJ. Role of Incretin Axis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front Immunol (2017) 8:1734. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01734
147
NingMMYangWJGuanWBGuYPFengYLengY. Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor Sitagliptin Protected Against Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Experimental Colitis by Potentiating the Action of GLP-2. Acta Pharmacol Sin (2020) 41(11):1446–56. doi: 10.1038/s41401-020-0413-7
148
BanHBambaSImaedaHInatomiOKoboriASasakiMet al. The DPP-IV Inhibitor ER-319711 has a Proliferative Effect on the Colonic Epithelium and a Minimal Effect in the Amelioration of Colitis. Oncol Rep (2011) 25(6):1699–703. doi: 10.3892/or.2011.1223
149
MimuraSAndoTIshiguroKMaedaOWatanabeOUjiharaMet al. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Anagliptin Facilitates Restoration of Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol (2013) 48(10):1152–9. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.832366
150
KridinKAmberKKhamaisiMComaneshterDBatatECohenAD. Is There an Association Between Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Autoimmune Disease? A Population-Based Study. Immunol Res (2018) 66(3):425–30. doi: 10.1007/s12026-018-9005-8
151
AbrahamiDDourosAYinHYuOHYRenouxCBittonAet al. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Incidence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Population Based Cohort Study. BMJ (2018) 360:k872. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k872
152
WangTYangJYBuseJBPateVTangHBarnesELet al. Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors and Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Real-World Evidence in U.S. Adults. Diabetes Care (2019) 42(11):2065–74. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0162
153
RadelJAPenderDNShahSA. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Risk: A Meta-Analysis. Ann Pharmacother (2019) 53(7):697–704. doi: 10.1177/1060028019827852
154
RoepBOTreeTIM. Immune Modulation in Humans: Implications for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2014) 10(4):229–42. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2014.2
155
IwabuchiAKamodaTSaitoMNozueHIzumiIHiranoTet al. Serum Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Activity in Children With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab (2013) 26(11-12):1093–7. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2013-0122
156
VargaTSomogyiABarnaGWichmannBNagyGRáczKet al. Higher Serum DPP-4 Enzyme Activity and Decreased Lymphocyte CD26 Expression in Type 1 Diabetes. Pathol Oncol Res (2011) 17(4):925–30. doi: 10.1007/s12253-011-9404-9
157
OsawaSKawamoriDKatakamiNTakaharaMSakamotoFKatsuraTet al. Significant Elevation of Serum Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Activity in Young-Adult Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (2016) 113:135–42. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.12.022
158
EllisSLSnell-BergeonJKRodionovaASHazenfieldRMGargSK. Effect of Sitagliptin on Glucose Control in Adult Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot, Double-Blind, Randomized, Crossover Trial. Diabetes Med (2011) 28(10):1176–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03331.x
159
FarngrenJPerssonMSchweizerAFoleyJEAhrénB. Vildagliptin Reduces Glucagon During Hyperglycemia and Sustains Glucagon Counterregulation During Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2012) 97(10):3799–806. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2332
160
GargSKMoserEGBodeBWKlaffLJHiattWRBeatsonCet al. Effect of Sitagliptin on Post-Prandial Glucagon and GLP-1 Levels in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Investigator-Initiated, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Endocr Pract (2013) 19(1):19–28. doi: 10.4158/EP12100.OR
161
Hari KumarKVShaikhAPrustyP. Addition of Exenatide or Sitagliptin to Insulin in New Onset Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized, Open Label Study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (2013) 100(2):e55–8. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.01.020
162
CechinSRPérez-ÁlvarezIFenjvesEMolanoRDPileggiABerggrenPOet al. Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Exenatide in Human Pancreatic Islets. Cell Transplant (2012) 21(4):633–48. doi: 10.3727/096368911X576027
163
KimSJNianCDoudetDJMcIntoshCH. Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Inhibition With MK0431 Improves Islet Graft Survival in Diabetic NOD Mice Partially via T-Cell Modulation. Diabetes (2009) 58(3):641–51. doi: 10.2337/db08-1101
164
DavansoMRCaliari-OliveiraCCouriCEBCovasDTde Oliveira LealAMVoltarelliJCet al. DPP-4 Inhibition Leads to Decreased Pancreatic Inflammatory Profile and Increased Frequency of Regulatory T Cells in Experimental Type 1 Diabetes. Inflammation (2019) 42(2):449–62. doi: 10.1007/s10753-018-00954-3
165
Tejera-AlhambraMCasrougeAde AndrésCRamos-MedinaRAlonsoBVegaJet al. Low DPP4 Expression and Activity in Multiple Sclerosis. Clin Immunol (2014) 150(2):170–83. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2013.11.011
166
GarretoLCharneauSMandacaruSCNóbregaOTMottaFNde AraújoCNet al. Mapping Salivary Proteases in Sjogren’s Syndrome Patients Reveals Overexpression of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4/Cd26. Front Immunol (2021) 12:686480. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.686480
167
Solau-GervaisEZerimechFLemaireRFontaineCHuetGFlipoRM. Cysteine and Serine Proteases of Synovial Tissue in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis. Scand J Rheumatol (2007) 36(5):373–7. doi: 10.1080/03009740701340172
168
HuNGongXYinSLiQChenHLiYet al. Saxagliptin Suppresses Degradation of Type II Collagen and Aggrecan in Primary Human Chondrocytes: A Therapeutic Implication in Osteoarthritis. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol (2019) 47(1):3239–45. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1647223
169
GaoFWangYWuM. Teneligliptin Inhibits IL-1beta-Induced Degradation of Extracellular Matrix in Human Chondrocytes. J Cell Biochem (2020) 121(11):4450–7. doi: 10.1002/jcb.29662
170
van LingenRGvan de KerkhofPCSeygerMMde JongEMvan RensDWPollMKet al. CD26/dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV in Psoriatic Skin: Upregulation and Topographical Changes. Br J Dermatol (2008) 158(6):1264–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08515.x
171
NishiokaTShinoharaMTanimotoNKumagaiCHashimotoK. Sitagliptin, a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV Inhibitor, Improves Psoriasis. Dermatology (2012) 224(1):20–1. doi: 10.1159/000333358
172
LynchMMalaraATimoneyIVenckenSAhernTAwdehFet al. Sitagliptin and Narrow-Band Ultraviolet-B for Moderate Psoriasis (DINUP): A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial. Dermatology (2021) p:1–8. doi: 10.1159/000514494
173
GuoJYChenHHYangYCWuPYChangMPChenCC. The Association of Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Inhibitors and Other Risk Factors With Bullous Pemphigoid in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Diabetes Complicat (2020) 34(3):107515. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2019.107515
174
TasanenKVarpuluomaONishieW. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor-Associated Bullous Pemphigoid. Front Immunol (2019) 10:1238. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01238
175
AouidadIFiteCMarinhoEDeschampsLCrickxBDescampsV. A Case Report of Bullous Pemphigoid Induced by Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors. JAMA Dermatol (2013) 149(2):243–5. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.1073
176
LeeSGLeeHJYoonMSKimDH. Association of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor Use With Risk of Bullous Pemphigoid in Patients With Diabetes. JAMA Dermatol (2019) 155(2):172–7. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4556
177
KridinKBergmanR. Association of Bullous Pemphigoid With Dipeptidyl-Peptidase 4 Inhibitors in Patients With Diabetes: Estimating the Risk of the New Agents and Characterizing the Patients. JAMA Dermatol (2018) 154(10):1152–8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2352
178
ZhangPChenYZhaoHDuH. Protective Effects of Alogliptin Against TNF-Alpha-Induced Degradation of Extracellular Matrix in Human Chondrocytes. Int Immunopharmacol (2019) 68:179–84. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.11.007
179
ZhuSGuYWangWBaiJGeGZhangWet al. Sitagliptin Ameliorates Advanced Glycation End-Product (AGE)-Induced Degradation of Extracellular Matrix in Human Primary Chondrocytes. Am J Transl Res (2019) 11(5):2775–83.
180
NargisTKumarKGhoshARSharmaARudraDSenDet al. KLK5 Induces Shedding of DPP4 From Circulatory Th17 Cells in Type 2 Diabetes. Mol Metab (2017) 6(11):1529–39. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.09.004
181
WangZGrigoCSteinbeckJvon HörstenSAmannKet al. Soluble DPP4 Originates in Part From Bone Marrow Cells and Not From the Kidney. Peptides (2014) 57:109–17. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2014.05.006
Summary
Keywords
autoimmune, autoinflammatory, DPP4, inflammation, dipeptidyl peptidase
Citation
Huang J, Liu X, Wei Y, Li X, Gao S, Dong L, Rao X and Zhong J (2022) Emerging Role of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 in Autoimmune Disease. Front. Immunol. 13:830863. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.830863
Received
07 December 2021
Accepted
14 February 2022
Published
04 March 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Simone Mader, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany
Reviewed by
Kaisa Tasanen, University of Oulu, Finland; Partha Chakrabarti, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology (CSIR), India; Denis Babkov, Volgograd State Medical University, Russia
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Huang, Liu, Wei, Li, Gao, Dong, Rao and Zhong.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jixin Zhong, zhongjixin620@163.com; Xiaoquan Rao, xqrao@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn; Lingli Dong, tjhdongll@163.com
This article was submitted to Inflammation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.