Engineering Islets From Stem Cells: The Optimal Solution for the Treatment of Diabetes?

Abstract

Diabetes is a metabolic disease characterized by insulin deficiency. Bioengineering of stem cells with the aim to restore insulin production and glucose regulation has the potential to cure diabetic patients. In this review, we focus on the recent developments for bioengineering of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs), and pancreatic progenitor cells in view of generating insulin producing and glucose regulating cells for β-cell replacement therapies. Recent clinical trials using islet cells derived from stem cells have been initiated for the transplantation into diabetic patients, with crucial bottlenecks of tumorigenesis, post-transplant survival, genetic instability, and immunogenicity that should be further optimized. As a new approach given high expectations, bioengineered islets from stem cells occupies considerable potential for the future clinical application and addressing the treatment dilemma of diabetes.

Introduction

Diabetes is one of the major public health challenges of the 21st century and bears heavily to global health costs. An estimated number of 463 million adults (1 in 11) around the world are living with diabetes, and this number is projected to reach 700 million by 2045 (1). Type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes mellitus are three main categories of diabetes, and type 2 diabetes remarkably accounts for around 90% of diabetes cases worldwide (1). Although lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy are both efficient to treat type 2 diabetes, marked variability in outcomes still widely exists resulting in irregular monitoring, sub-optimal use of effective medicines and inevitable disease progression due to decline of β cell function. Therefore, innovative therapies are required to implement for delaying β cell lost, regeneration of endogenous β cell mass or replenishment of β cells with engineering islets from stem cells.

Stem cells are undifferentiated cells with self-renewal and differentiation into various cell types (2–4). Since 1960s, scientists have successively identified and isolated hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), bone marrow stem cells (MSCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and developed induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) (5). Thereinto, adult stem cells such as HSCs and MSCs are derived from bone marrow, skeletal muscle, fat, amniotic fluid, umbilical cord blood, skin, placenta and other tissues or organs, while embryonic stem cells are derived from embryonic tissues (6–9). IPSC are obtained through genetic reprogramming of somatic cells by ectopic expression of four transcription factors (OCt3/4, SOX2, C-MyC and Klf4) and have been generated from somatic cells such as mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF), adult mouse tail fibroblasts as well as human fibroblasts (10, 11) (Figure 1). Importantly, embryonic stem cells are totipotent and can differentiate into cell types derived from all three germ layers (12, 13). In contrast to embryonic stem cells, multipotent adult stem cells have limited self-renewal abilities and are prone to differentiate into specific adult tissue cells such as adipose tissue and muscle tissue (4).

Figure 1

With the continuous exploration of stem cells, an abundance of studies identified that cells such as MSCs and ESCs can grow indefinitely outside the body and maintain their ability to differentiate, which highlight their potentials as alternative sources of organ and tissue replacement (4, 14–16). Encouragingly, the results of emerging preclinical studies and clinical trials for diseases, such as diabetes have deepened our understanding of the use of stem cells in tissue engineering and cell therapy (17, 18). To date, new progress has been made in the treatment of brain diseases such as cerebral palsy (19–23), stroke (24–28), blood diseases (29), eye diseases (30–32) as well as diabetes (33–36), and the exploratory research on the treatment of diabetes with stem cells is developing in the right direction (36). In this review, we summarize the research field for stem cell differentiation and islet engineering, emphasizing on the efficacy of this new bioengineering technology applied for diabetes care, and elucidate current breakthroughs and future challenges of stem cell differentiation into islets.

iPSCs-Derived Islet Cells for Islet Replacement Therapies

In recent years, it has been demonstrated that iPSCs have unlimited self-renewal ability and can be differentiated into multiple cell types such as neural stem cells (NSCs) (37), cardiomyocytes (38), dopaminergic neurons (39) and hepatocellular like cells (40). IPSC-derived islet cells might constitute a new source for islet cell replacement therapies (41). In vitro, most iPSC-derived cell lines initially express pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 (PDX1) and then further differentiate into PDX1, glucose transporter 2 (Glut2), musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene family A (MafA) and insulin expressing end-stage cells. One specific iPSCs cell line was detected to first express SOX17 and gradually express the β-cell-specific marker SOX9, PDX1 at later stages. The co-expression of C-peptide and PDX1 at a final stage confirmed the differentiation into insulin-producing cells (42). Additionally, it was shown that in order to obtain insulin-secreting cells in vitro, factors such as retinoic acid (RA), glutamine, noggin, nicotinamide and growth factors such as keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) are essential for the directed iPSCs differentiation (42, 43). Therefore, owing to the tremendous research potential of iPSCs in β cell replacement therapies, these stem cells are promising for further drug development and transplant medicine applications.

Furthermore, tissue engineering techniques such as 3D bio-printing have been substantially evolved since the 1980s for human therapeutic applications, including the creation of a bio-artificial pancreas. 3D bio-printing involves the isolation and expansion of human cells, followed by the automated printing of biodegradable scaffolds containing such cells. 3D bio-printed scaffolds are under investigation for various applications such as therapeutic devises, and in vitro model systems for analyzing diseases or screening drugs (44, 45). Undoubtedly, 3D bioprinting and regenerative medicine cooperatively hold great promise in building and assembling a bioartificial pancreas.

Organoids are defined as 3D multi-cellular spheroids obtained in in vitro cultures. Numerous 3D cell culture methods using islet cells had been described to obtain hetero cellular islet organoids (46). Remarkably, such hetero cellular islet organoids may integrate different types of supporting cells, such as endothelial cells, into insulin-producing structures, which is a valuable strategy to increase neovascularization of transplanted islets (46). Therefore, using human pluripotent stem cells to create organoids that resemble human pancreatic islets in vivo could help to overcome the organ scarcity. Herein, Tao et al. produced human islet organoids from human iPSCs using a perfusable organ on-chip system. The system integrated functional β-cells obtained after induction of endoderm, followed by differentiation and amplification of pancreatic progenitor cells and maturation of endocrine cells (Figure 2) (47, 48). As described in Figure 2, the islet-like organ was generated by step wise incubation with essential differentiation factors. Starting from primary embryoids (EBs), endodermal production was induced by activin, pancreatic final endodermal production was induced by dorsomorphin and RA, and finally the insulin producing pancreatic β-cell was induced by nicotinamide. This islet-like organ was generated under dynamic perfusion system, a multilayered microfluidic device composed of four parts top and bottom polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) layers, through-hole PDMS membrane and polycarbonate porous membrane as separators (49). Fresh media was pumped through the upper and lower layers at 100µl per hour thereby providing continuous supply of media and nutrients for the formation and long-term culture of islet organs after EBs formation. In addition, produced islet-like organs contained heterogeneous islet-specific α- and β-like cells with sufficient cell viability. Simultaneously, during culture expression of pancreatic β-cell-specific genes and proteins such as PDX1 and NK homeobox 1 (NKX6-1), and C-peptide proteins related to insulin secretion were increased. Together, these results provide evidences that an islet-like organ generated through a perfusable islet-on-chip system is similar to the reproduction and development of human islets. And this technique offers a feasible and effective engineering method for generating functional islet-like organoids derived from iPSCs in a bionic microenvironment. Moreover, Yoshihara’ team also found that human iPSC-derived human islet-like organoids can rapidly restore glucose homeostasis after transplantation in diabetic immunodeficient mice (NOD/SCID) (50). The expression of immune checkpoint protein programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in organoids was restored and glycemic homeostasis was maintained during 50 days in immunocompetent diabetic mice. Further, interferon-γ ex vivo exposure of human islets as well as human islet-like organoids derived from iPSC induced strong endogenous PD-L1 expression. Transplantation of PD-L1-overexpressing islet-like organoids into immunocompetent mice showed that iPSCs were protected from graft rejection in both allo- and xenotransplant settings. However, no studies on the transplantation of PD-L1-overexpressing islet-like organoids generated from iPSCs in the setting of the human immune system have been reported, which indicates the lack of evidence on determining PD-L1 expression profile for protecting human cells against the allogeneic human immune system. Meanwhile, this vacancy may greatly stimulate the progress of related research topics.

Figure 2

Another previous study described that glucose-responsive β-like cells can be efficiently produced by a scalable suspension culture system from ESCs and iPSCs in vitro (51). These stem cell-derived β-like cells (SC-β) expressed cytoplasmic C-peptide and nuclear protein NKX6-1, which is similar to islet β-cells. Other studies that transplanted human SC-β-cells into immune-compromised mice also showed β-cell functionality in vivo. Glucose challenges appeared after SC-β transplantation and human insulin in the blood was measured within weeks after transplantation in mice (17, 52, 53). Consequently, the cell transplantation under the renal capsule of immune deficient mice rapidly reversed the progressive exacerbation of hyperglycemia. Besides, 18 weeks after transplantation, it was remarkably observed that the mice receiving SC-β maintained normal human insulin secretion. Thus, SC-β transplantation successfully improved hyperglycemia in diabetic mice. As an advantage for clinical application, SC-β-cells can be produced from iPSCs of patients to avoid allogenic rejection after transplantation (51). In the future, autologous SC-β cell transplantation in combination with Treg adoptive immunotherapies may selectively suppress autoimmunity in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), which could eliminate major obstacle for the cure of T1DM (54–56).

Despite the potential of iPSC to develop into a therapy for diabetic patients, important issues still need to be solved. The current limitations include: low reprogramming efficiency, reprogramming factors related to tumorigenesis, low survival and engraftment, loss of cell phenotype after transplantation, genetic instability, epigenomic instability and inherent immunogenicity need to be considered (57–61). Recently, a clinical case was reported describing the development of a teratoma in a diabetic patient after iPSCs-derived β cells transplantation (62). In this patient, β cells differentiated from autologous iPSCs were initially injected into the deltoid muscle where a mass with enlarged axillary lymph nodes were detected at two months after implantation. This tumor was characterized by rapid growth, local lymph node metastasis, more cellular atypia, and chemotherapy-resistance (62). As a milestone in regenerative medicine, iPSCs also shed new light on the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), one of the main causes of irreversible blindness. The researchers used the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cell sheets induced by autologous iPSCs from 2 patients with AMD through subretinal surgery. As a result, no serious adverse event was observed in 25 months of follow-up and no signs of rejection was noted without the administration of immunosuppressants in one patient, which provided valuable information on the feasibility and safety of iPSCs in the treatment of patients with macular degeneration and created a precedent for the clinical transformation of iPSCs in the field of regenerative medicine (63). In vivo tumorigenicity tests and a series of genomic analyses were both performed, although iPSCs-derived RPE cells had a low proliferation rate. In the iPSC-derived RPE cells obtained from Patient one, no genomic aberrations that were suggestive of tumorigenicity was found. However, three aberrations in DNA copy number (deletions) in iPSCs obtained from Patient two were detected, which could affect expression of genes encoded by both the deleted DNA and by DNA flanking the deletions (63). Based on the published information, the possible influence of these alterations on tumorigenicity could not be determined. In the reprogramming process to pluripotency and the cultivation of iPSCs, genetic instability was reported to be enhanced, potentially leading to additional genomic abnormalities (64). These genetic changes could negatively influence the performance and functional activities of iPSCs and increase tumorigenicity in replacing damaged tissues (65). Therefore, genomic stability must be maintained after reprogramming for further clinical uses.

As a renewable source of autologous cells, iPSCs have great prospects in regenerative medicine. It was generally accepted that autologous cells should be immune-tolerated by the recipient from whom the iPSCs are derived, whereas accumulating evidences remarkably revealed the rejections from autologous iPSC-derived cells, although the underlying related mechanisms remained controversial and still in the process of being gradually defined. As mentioned above, RPE cells derived from autologous iPSCs made the remission of AMD achievable. Even in non-ocular locations, they are also immune tolerated. However, smooth muscle cells (SMCs) produced from autologous iPSCs appeared to be significantly immunogenic, partly result from the abnormal expression of immunogenic antigens in iPSCs-derived SMCs (66). In C57BL/6 (B6) mouse transplantation model, immunogenic antigen-expressing B6 iPSCs and their differentiated target cells were immune tolerated under the kidney capsule but immune rejected when transplanted subcutaneously or intramuscularly owing to the lack of functional antigen presenting cells, indicating that the immune response toward antigens was also dependent on the immune environment of the transplantation site (67). Furthermore, autologous iPSCs and their derivatives were not inherently immunologically inert for autologous transplantation, due to de novo mutations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) probably produced in the process of reprogramming to the iPSCs stage, long-term culture and differentiation into target cells. And these mtDNA mutations could encode neoantigens and elicit highly specific immunological response based on the host’s major histocompatibility complex genotype, which implied the indispensability to recheck the mtDNA mutations iPSC-derived products (68). Aberrant gene expressions in some cells generated from iPSCs can cause T cell-dependent immunological response in syngeneic recipients (69). Therefore, the immunogenicity of therapeutically valuable cells produced from patient-specific iPSCs should be assessed before clinic application in patients. In order to adopt the optimum immunosuppressive strategy to allow their engraftment, detailed evaluation of the inherent immunogenicity profiles of iPSC-derived somatic cell lineages is considerably required.

ESCs-Derived β-Cells for Insulin Supplementation

Insulin-secreting cells derived from pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) have emerged as one of the most attractive therapeutic alternatives for diabetes (70). Recently, it was shown that after transplantation of in vitro-differentiated stem cell-derived islets into immune-compromised mice, islets acquire a mature β-cell gene expression profile and can control blood glucose in the long term (71). Moreover, under adherent and suspension culture conditions, ESCs spontaneously differentiated into insulin-secreting cells in vitro with a very high proportion as observed through insulin immunohistochemical staining (72). A refined method for generating more mature insulin-producing cells from human ES has been described by Wang et al. using a three-dimensional differentiation culture. Most important steps for ES differentiation into insulin-secreting structures were first outlined by Lumelsky et al. (73) (Figure 3). These three-dimensional clusters were similar in structure to normal islets and contained all cell types of the endocrine pancreas (73). In vitro studies revealed that glucose as well as various secretagogues could trigger insulin release from these structures through similar mechanisms as in human islets. After transplantation into diabetic mice, these insulin-producing cells underwent rapid vascularization and formed clusters of islet-like tissue. Further, others showed that transplantation of islet cell clusters at stage 4 of differentiation, enriched of NKX6-1-expressing pancreatic progenitor cells through the action of a PKC activator, accelerates the maturation of insulin-secreting cells in vivo. Gradually, differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into islet cells has been widely used (74–76).

Figure 3

Solid evidence unveils that extracellular matrix (ECM) not only provides structural information for cells, but also plays a guiding role in cell development, which is crucial for maintaining tissue homeostasis and of great significance in embryogenesis, tissue-specific development and stem cell differentiation (77, 78). Cell-stromal interactions can promote β-cell proliferation (79, 80), insulin secretion (81, 82) and islet development (83, 84). Oberg-welsh and his group have demonstrated that ECM significantly enhances insulin secretion in fetal pig islet-like cell clusters in vitro (85). Besides, islet-like organs derived from human embryonic stem cells were successfully developed in a biomimetic 3D scaffold by combining collagen with matrix gel (86, 87). The resulting cell clusters included pancreatic α, β, and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) cells, but most of the resulting islet cells did not express glucagon, somatostatin, or PP. Expression of mature β-cell-marker genes such as PDX1, neurogenin 3 (Ngn3), insulin, MafA and Glut2 was detected in these 3D-induced cell clusters, whereas PDX1, NKX6-1 and C-peptide was highly expressed. Additionally, insulin secretory granules, indicating mature β-cells, were also detected. Although, neither collagen nor matrix gel materials are approved for clinical use, the results shed the light on the feasibility of generating islet-like organs from ESCs. Future breakthroughs by using supporting materials may lead to further progress.

A new transplantation strategy was proposed by Song and Millman who developed a large-pore recyclable 3D printing device composed of biocompatible poly-lactic acid (PLA) for subcutaneous transplantation of SC-β-cells (88). Clusters of SC-β-cells derived from human embryonic stem cells were embedded in biodegradable fibrin gel and inserted in the device. Severe transient hypoxia within the device that occurred after transplantation was mitigated by finite element modeling of cell oxygen concentration and evaluation of oxygen diffusion in different sized cell clusters embedded in hydrogel slabs. These adaptations allowed the device to be operated at physiological oxygen levels. After subcutaneous transplantation of the device into immune-compromised mice, SC-β-cells containing device was found to function for 12 weeks. Retrieved devices were structurally intact. Despite the observed host-tissue invasion, the mechanical strength and recyclability of such a device represent a considerable progress in the field. Other previous methods transplanting islets or cell clusters encapsulated in semipermeable microcapsules composed of alginate are challenged similarly by pericapsular fibrotic overgrowth (PFO) of microcapsules and the difficulty to retrieve grafts (89–91). Therefore, such a retrievable devise is promising for the application of SC-β-cells in regenerative medicine and serves as a platform for future transplantation strategies.

Insulin-producing cells derived from stem cells can address organ donor shortage, while cell encapsulation can reduce or eliminate the need for immunosuppression, minimizing the risks associated with islet transplantation procedures (92–97). Islet encapsulation provides a physical semi-permeable barrier not only preventing immune cell infiltration but also allows diffusion from necessary smaller molecules such as oxygen, nutrients, glucose, and insulin through the microcapsule. This is crucial for achieving widespread clinical use of the technique (98–100). Therefore, transplantation of microencapsulated stem cell-derived islets may extend islet transplantation to a larger cohort of patients. The embedding of immature β-cells derived from human embryonic stem cells into a sodium alginate hydrogel alleviated the response to foreign bodies in vivo and rapidly established normal blood glucose for 25 weeks after its transplantation into the peritoneum of immunocompetent mice (101). Vegas et al. reported long-term glycemic correction using human SC-β-cells in an animal model of diabetic immunocompetent mice (102). SC-β-cells coated with alginate derivatives and intraperitoneally implanted into streptozotocin (STZ)-treated C57BL/6J mice corrected blood glucose levels for 174 days during follow up. Retrieved implants still contained viable insulin-producing cells and showed minimal fibrotic overgrowth. In addition, a novel encapsulation approach was reported by the group of Alice A Tomei, in which transplantation of conformal coated islets, from fully MHC-mismatched Balb/c mice, achieved long-term (>100 days) survival after transplantation into epididymal fat pad or mammary fat pad of diabetic immune competent C57BL/6 mice (103, 104). Conformal coating minimizes capsule thickness, complies with islet shape, reduces transplant volume compared to encapsulated islets and allows glucose stimulated insulin release in vitro without delay (105). Moreover, when SC-β-cells were transplanted into gonadal fat pad of diabetic immunodeficient NOD-SCID mice, it was found that both uncoated and conformal coated SC-β-cells reversed diabetes. Blood glucose levels were maintained at normal levels for more than 80 days as obtained with human islets, demonstrating thereby safety and efficacy of this β-cell replacement strategy (103). To date, a small number of encapsulation systems have been used clinically with obvious safety (106). For example, βAir devices are designed for clinical use to ensure oxygen levels necessary for maximum islet function while microcapsules remain in the body. The device consists of two main components, an alginate saline gel plate containing islet modules and a gas chamber. After subcutaneous implantation, islets are oxygenated daily. Islet cells in the lumen absorb oxygen through diffusion via the permeable membrane (107). Remarkably, one case report describes a patient whose islets remained fully functional during a 10-month study period (108). Apart βAir devices, Theracyte and Sernova Cell Pouch also offers clinical devices which allows for pre-vascularization prior to implantation (106, 109).

In addition, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated recently announced unprecedented and positive Day 90 data for the first patient achieving successful engraftment and substantial improvement of islet cell function from VX-880, an novel investigational embryonic stem cell-derived and fully differentiated pancreatic islet cell replacement therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes (110). In this Phase 1/2 clinical trial, VX-880 was generally well tolerated with significant improvements in multiple measures, including fasting and peak stimulated C-peptide, HbA1c, and daily exogenous insulin requirement dose (111, 112). These unprecedented results introduce a potentially transformative medicine and deliver a life-changing therapy for T1DM patients and confer the remarkable promotion on the following VX-880 clinical studies, although there are still uncertain problems that need to be further clarified, including unexpected side effects, whether the treatment effectiveness would last a lifetime, and whether repeated treatment would be necessary.

MSCs and Islet Co-transplantation for Islet Function Protection

Transplantation of microencapsulated islets has been extensively studied as a promising treatment for type 1 diabetes. Meanwhile, challenges remain especially in achieving long-term function and reducing inflammation at the graft site that would lead to early islet dysfunction. Further, insufficient angiogenesis around graft sites remains a major issue resulting in malnutrition and hypoxia of encapsulated islets (113, 114). On the other hand, although iPSCs and ESCs have received sustained attention over the years, their clinical transformation is still hampered by ethical issues and risk of teratoma formation (115, 116). Thus, other feasible stem cells demand further investigation to overcome the obstacles mentioned above. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells are multipotent stem cells, which are mainly used for cell and regenerative therapy (117) (Figure 4). MSCs can secrete various immunomodulatory molecules, such as leukemia suppressor factor (LIF) (118), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (119), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-stimulated gene 6 protein (TSG6) (120), and inhibit the infiltration of macrophages, neutrophils and monocytes into inflammatory sites by the release of TSG6. Besides, MSCs can restrict the fibrotic response by reducing myofibroblast differentiation and ECM deposition in fibroblasts and epithelial cells (121). In addition, MSCs also secrete angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) (122). These secreted factors support islets to build their own vascular system. Thus, these characteristics confer MSCs the potential for supporting various functions when co-transplanted with islet cells. Earlier studies have demonstrated that MSCs and islet co-transplantation protect islets from problems associated with instant blood-mediated inflammatory response (IBMIR) and fatigue, diarrhea, and immune pneumonia caused by long-term use of immunosuppressive therapy (123–127). In the MSCs and islet co-transplantation, MSCs produce a microenvironment conducive to islet repair and longevity in vitro (128), and promote insulin secretion (129) and islet transplantation results in STZ-induced diabetic mice (130). Therefore, MSCs seem to be ideal supporting cells for co-transplantation with islets, although there are still research gaps to be filled soon.

Figure 4

As a common scaffold in tissue engineering, 3D cell culture system and hydrogel compositions can be applied to mammalian cells, such as islets. The small pore size of hydrogel prevents immune cells from passing through, thus protecting the islet from immune rejection, promoting the exchange of oxygen and nutrients, and improving the results of islet transplantation (131, 132). Some scholars embedded adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AT-MSCs) and islets into maleimide-dextrolic anhydride polymer hydrogels to evaluate the therapeutic effect of AT-MSCs in hydrogel composites on type 1 diabetic mice (133). in vitro experiments revealed that AT-MSCs significantly increased insulin secretion. After transplantation, blood glucose dropped from more than 400mg/dl to less than 150mg/dl within 4 days and remained stable until day 32, indicating prime results in treating type 1 diabetes.

A 3D structured cell transplantation platform called CellSaic was reported recently and it consisted of cells and petaloid pieces of a medical recombinant peptide (RCP) (134). Unlike traditional animal collagen, these petaloid-shaped pieces increased the surface area for cell adhesion and maintained empty spaces within the scaffold, which permitted substance-diffusion within the scaffold-cell aggregates. The vascular-inducing effect of MSC-CellSaics occured through altered release of various cytokines and growth factors, such as interleukin-8 (IL-8), bFGF and VEGF (135). Therefore, Kogawa’s team compared graft survival among three transplant conditions, islets, microencapsulated islets and microencapsulated combined with MSC-CellSaics. Transplant material remained in a mesh bag under the skin of diabetic mice until recovery (135). During 4 weeks following transplantation, blood glucose levels were significantly reduced and no inflammatory response was observed around the mesh bag within 14 days after transplantation in the MSC-CellSaic combined transplantation group compared with other groups. Thus, MSC-CellSaics could inhibit inflammation and immune rejection in early transplantation. Co-transplantation of MSC-CellSaics with encapsulated islets might be a more efficient approach to increase vascularization of grafts and mitigate inflammatory rejection of microencapsulated islets.

There is increasing evidence that layered slices of cells to construct 3D functional tissue through tissue engineering techniques can help maintain cellular function with nutrition (136). Herein, Hirabaru’s team used MSC-sheets as a support for subcutaneous islet transplantation into STZ-induced diabetic SCID mice. Only mice transplanted with islets cultured on MSC-sheets showed normalized blood glucose levels for at least 84 days after transplantation and increased neovascularization compared to islets grafted alone (137). Therefore, this new technical approach using MSC-sheets demonstrated a protective effect on islet survival and function.

Reconstructing a favorable microenvironment allowing integrin interactions could improve the survival rate of isolated islets (129). For instance, the addition of tripeptide arginine glycine aspartic acid (ARG-GLy-ASP, RGD) to microcapsules improves viability and function of C2 and C12 myoblasts (138). Based on these evidences, Laporte et al. developed a biocompatible composite capsule by combining M-rich alginate, RGD G-rich alginate and MSCs (139). This capsule composition improved the deleterious effect of encapsulation on human islets in vitro, showing decreased caspase activity and increased VEGF secretion. Improved islet outcome was possibly related to the cytoprotective function of MSCs whose paracrine effect was enhanced by the presence of RGD motif (140, 141). Therefore, MSCs and RGD G-rich alginate capsules could substantially ameliorate survival and function of encapsulated human islets in vitro although further studies are still needed to validate these results in vivo.

To date, it remains obscure whether pericapsular fibrosis overgrowth (PFO) occurring in an allograft environment could be alleviated after co-inclusion of MSCs and islet. PFO mainly involves macrophages and fibroblasts, which is related to the low survival rate of encapsulated islets (142). Therefore, islet co-encapsulation with MSCs was investigated as a strategy against PFO. It was previously validated that tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) or interferon-γ (IFN-γ) can induce immunosuppressive activity of MSCs by producing cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) and PGE2 before transplantation (143). Thus, Vaithilingam et al. used the co-encapsulation of islets with MSCs either unstimulated or stimulated by a mixture of cytokines IFN-γ and TNF-α to test PFO and islet survival. C57BL/6 mice were used for the transplantation with strong immune response and fibrotic response that were similar to that in humans. The results indicated that a slight decrease of PFO in the stimulated mice was sufficient to significantly improve graft survival and islet activity (144). Immunosuppression in the stimulated MSC group was correlated to increased production of NO, which played a major role in regulating T cell immune response (145, 146). However, prior to clinical translation for patients with T1DM, further studies should be conducted using stimulated human bone-derived MSCs (BMSCs) co-encapsulated together with human islets in allograft settings using humanized mouse models.

Pancreatic Progenitor Cell as Another Resource of β-cells

Progenitor cells are considered as cells which have the ability to differentiate into a specific target cell. Studies have shown that β-cell progenitor cells derived from human embryonic stem cells express high levels of NKX6-1 and are prone to further mature into glucose-responsive β-cells (76). The key difference between progenitor cells and stem cells is that stem cells have an unlimited proliferation capacity, whereas progenitor cells can divide only a limited number of times (147). There are several theories about the origin of pancreatic progenitor cells. Mostly accepted is that islet progenitor cells are derived from pancreatic ducts, where they regenerate, differentiate and migrate to form new islets (148, 149). Studies have shown that islet formation starts early in embryonic development after birth, through the migration of pancreatic primordial cells out of epithelial ducts to form clusters of epithelial cells. Later-on these cells differentiate then into hormone-producing endocrine cells (150, 151). Formation of new islets, meaning the differentiation of islet progenitor cells into new islets, in or near ducts, has long been considered as an active process occurring after birth (152, 153). In a genealogy-tracing experiment to genetically label duct cells, the Cre-Lox system, in which Cre recombinase expression was driven by the promoter of carbonic anhydrase II (CAII), a marker of mature ducts cells, was used. Thus, pancreatic duct cells expressing CAII, have been shown to generate new islets as well as acini after birth and injury (154, 155). In addition, another potential source for β-cells is the islet itself. Ex vivo proliferation of β-cells or the plasticity of α-cells are still interesting concepts for generating β-cells (156). In conclusion, islet progenitor cells may exist not only in ductal epithelium, but also in islets itself (148, 157).

Several in vitro studies have shown that insulin-producing cells can be differentiated from adult pancreatic duct tissues (158, 159). Bonner-Weir et al. cultured adult duct tissue with matrix gel and observed islet buds composed of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) positive duct cells and insulin-positive cells (72). Other studies have also shown that some CK19-positive ductal epithelial cells differentiate into endocrine cells (160). Also, progenitor-like cells isolated from the adult pancreas formed tubular mature annular/dense colonies expressing PDX-1 and SOX9 and differentiated into endocrine/acinar colonies. Most endocrine/acinar colonies contained a majority of β-like cells which expressed and secreted insulin and C-peptide (161, 162). Further, duct cells under the action of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) differentiate into islet endocrine cells including β-cells in vitro (163, 164). In addition, it has been early substantiated that β-cells are regenerated by duct cell trans-differentiation. Islet and pancreatic regeneration are achieved by replication of β-cells near or inside the pancreatic ducts, or by progenitor cells expressing Ngn-3 (165, 166).

Interestingly, progenitor cells from outside of the pancreas, such as murine skeletal muscle-derived progenitor cells, have been differentiated into insulin-producing clusters by a differentiation protocol comprising four steps of culture. These progenitor cells transformed into mature β-cells during development and significantly reduced hyperglycemia and improved survival after transplantation into STZ-induced diabetic mice (167). Moreover, Yi Arial Zeng’s team identified a new population of protein C receptor-positive (Procr+) endocrine progenitor cells by single-cell RNA sequencing and that did not express known endocrine or exocrine differentiation markers of the adult mouse pancreas (168). In clonal density culture, islets can be formed stably, thus exerting its hypoglycemic function in vivo. It was also found that transplantation of pancreatic progenitor cells under the mammary fat pad or renal capsule did not affect their eventual differentiation into functional β-cells, despite no exposure to the “pancreatic” microenvironment (169). In conclusion, pancreatic progenitor cells capable of forming islet-like structures in vivo derived from human pluripotent stem cells represent a potential cell source for the treatment of type I diabetes.

Discussion and Summary

Worldwide, it is estimated that there are currently 463 million persons with diabetes and this number is projected to reach 578 million by 2030, and 700 million by 2045. About 10 percent of those have T1DM, while type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is the most common type of diabetes that accounts for about 90 percent of all diabetes cases. With a variety of common and predisposing complications, 10% of global health expenditure (USD 760 billion) is spent on the prevention and cure of diabetes.

In this review, we expose recent advances in the development and use of pancreatic progenitor cells, bone marrow stem cells (MSCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) as cell sources for engineering islets for future β-cell replacement therapies, with a focus on recent biotechnology engineering. Although a significant progress has been achieved for the development of islet clusters from human stem cells, only a few practical applications of bioengineering technology are realized in the treatment of diabetes. For the treatment of T1DM, novel attempts have focused on the development of bioengineering strategies such as microencapsulation with the aim to avoid immunosuppressive agents (170). For the treatment of T2DM, the exploration for new treatments includes stem cell differentiation, drug therapy and other methods (171). Although autologous iPSCs could theoretically be optimal for clinical use by avoiding immune rejection, long-term results of iPSC-differentiated cells transplantation still needs further confirmation.

Besides considerable advances made in the field, such as improved protocols for endocrine differentiation from SC, validation of therapeutic efficiency within animals and humans remains limited. Another challenge in this field is the lack of allogeneic and autoimmune humanized T1DM models to study the efficacy and safety of various stem cell therapy or devices. Given the major challenge remaining for the clinical applications, the hurdles include immune rejection, recurrence of autoimmunity, genetic stability and risk of tumorigenesis. Genetic instability could aggravate the risk of tumorigenicity, while de novo mutations in mtDNA obtained from reprogramming to the iPSCs stage, long-term culture and differentiation into target cells and the immune environment of the transplantation site could activate immune response in autologous transplantation. However, evidence on the efficacy of immunosuppressive molecules in suppressing allogeneic immune responses remains obscure. Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), a member of the CD28 T cell family, binds to programmed cell death (PD-1), and this could downregulate T cell proliferation and inhibit immune responses, which hypothetically prevents allograft rejection in organ transplantation (172). PD-L1 knockout caused the acceleration of cardiac allograft rejection in animal models, while clinical data from endomyocardial transplant biopsies and explant hearts indicated that the relative reduction of PD-L1 expression compared with PD-1 could be a defining pathologic feature (173). Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4-immunoglobulin fusion protein (CTLA4-Ig) blocks T cell co-stimulatory pathways while PD-L1 activates T cell inhibitory pathway, thus they function jointly in maintaining peripheral tolerance by suppressing T cell activity. The joint knock-in of CTLA4-Ig and PD-L1 in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) successfully led to the immunoprotection of hESCs-derived teratomas, fibroblasts, and cardiomyocytes in humanized mice (Hu-mice) (174). Besides, PD‐1/PD‐L1 checkpoint axis is substantiated with its predominant role in regulating immune response in human heart transplant recipients and a mouse model of heart transplant rejection. Reduced graft endothelial PD-L1 expression was negatively relevant to the proportion of CD8 +T-cell infiltration in human heart transplantation, meanwhile, the abrogation of graft endothelial PD-L1 expression may facilitate acute rejection and lead to decreased graft survival (175). Therefore, the protective strategies addressing immune response without requiring systemic immune suppression are urgent to be developed. Herein, systemic use of exogenous PD‐L1‐Ig, overexpression of PD‐L1 in transplanted cells and tissue overexpression of PD‐L1 before transplantation are three promising strategies in preclinical induction of immune tolerance with PD‐1 signaling (176). Furthermore, clinical data indicated the considerable relevance between PD-L1 expression in HSCs and degree of T cell apoptosis, which conferred further research potential in allogeneic transplantation of HSCs (177).

Future countermeasures and therapy strategies may benefit from a better knowledge of molecular pathways that affect immune conditions, such as the PD1/PD-L1 checkpoint axis, contribute to reducing graft rejection risk of patients, and effectively promote the development of stem cell-derived therapies. Also, ongoing research is needed to stimulate bioengineering technologies toward long-term functional medical devises for the radical cure of diabetes, and benefiting diabetic patients.

Funding

This study was sponsored by the National Science Foundation of China (81802504), the grant from Sichuan Medical Association (Q19037) and the grant from Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau (2021-YF05-00225-SN) for YW. CG-G and LB are supported by the Insuleman foundation, Child foundation and the foundation la Colombe. YW and LB are supported by Sichuan Science and Technology Bureau (No. 2022YFT0005 and 2019YFS0439). This study is also supported by grants from Health Commission of Sichuan Province (No.[2019]30), from Sichuan Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. 2020JC0114) and from Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research (No. Y-QL202101-0125).

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

• 1

  FederationID. Idf Diabetes Atlas Ninth Edition 2019. Brussels, Belgium: The International Diabetes Federation (2019).

  • Google Scholar

• 2

  WeissmanIL. Stem Cells Are Units of Natural Selection for Tissue Formation, for Germline Development, and in Cancer Development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2015) 112(29):8922–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505464112

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  DulakJSzadeKSzadeANowakWJózkowiczA. Adult Stem Cells: Hopes and Hypes of Regenerative Medicine. Acta Biochim Pol (2015) 62(3):329–37. doi: 10.18388/abp.2015_1023

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  KoliosGMoodleyY. Introduction to Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine. Respiration (2013) 85(1):3–10. doi: 10.1159/000345615

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  YinQ. Introduction to the Special Issue on Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine. Eur J Histochem (2020) 64(s2):3152. doi: 10.4081/ejh.2020.3152

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  ThomsonJAItskovitz-EldorJShapiroSSWaknitzMASwiergielJJMarshallVSet al. Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived From Human Blastocysts. Science (1998) 282(5391):1145–7. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  SpradlingADrummond-BarbosaDKaiT. Stem Cells Find Their Niche. Nature (2001) 414(6859):98–104. doi: 10.1038/35102160

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  PresnellSCPetersenBHeidaranM. Stem Cells in Adult Tissues. Semin Cell Dev Biol (2002) 13(5):369–76. doi: 10.1016/S1084952102000939

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  JiangYVaessenBLenvikTBlackstadMReyesMVerfaillieCM. Multipotent Progenitor Cells can be Isolated From Postnatal Murine Bone Marrow, Muscle, and Brain. Exp Hematol (2002) 30(8):896–904. doi: 10.1016/S0301-472X(02)00869-X

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  TakahashiKYamanakaS. Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells From Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors. Cell (2006) 126(4):663–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  TakahashiKTanabeKOhnukiMNaritaMIchisakaTTomodaKet al. Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells From Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors. Cell (2007) 131(5):861–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  KuciaMWuWRatajczakMZ. Bone Marrow-Derived Very Small Embryonic-Like Stem Cells: Their Developmental Origin and Biological Significance. Dev Dyn (2007) 236(12):3309–20. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21180

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BiswasAHutchinsR. Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem Cells Dev (2007) 16(2):213–22. doi: 10.1089/scd.2006.0081

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  GurusamyNAlsayariARajasinghSRajasinghJI. Adult Stem Cells for Regenerative Therapy. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci (2018) 160:1–22. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2018.07.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  SamsonrajRMRaghunathMNurcombeVHuiJHvan WijnenAJCoolSM. Concise Review: Multifaceted Characterization of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Use in Regenerative Medicine. Stem Cells Transl Med (2017) 6(12):2173–85. doi: 10.1002/sctm.17-0129

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  SiZWangXSunCKangYXuJWangXet al. Adipose-Derived Stem Cells: Sources, Potency, and Implications for Regenerative Therapies. BioMed Pharmacother (2019) 114:108765. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108765

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  KroonEMartinsonLAKadoyaKBangAGKellyOGEliazerSet al. Pancreatic Endoderm Derived From Human Embryonic Stem Cells Generates Glucose-Responsive Insulin-Secreting Cells In Vivo. Nat Biotechnol (2008) 26(4):443–52. doi: 10.1038/nbt1393

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  TrivediHLVanikarAVThakkerUFirozeADaveSDPatelCNet al. Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Combined With Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Synthesize Insulin. Transplant Proc (2008) 40(4):1135–9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.113

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  NguyenLTNguyenATVuCDNgoDVBuiAV. Outcomes of Autologous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells for Cerebral Palsy: An Open Label Uncontrolled Clinical Trial. BMC Pediatr (2017) 17(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0859-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  LiuXFuXDaiGWangXZhangZChengH. Comparative Analysis of Curative Effect of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Transplantation for Spastic Cerebral Palsy. J Transl Med (2017) 15(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12967-017-1149-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  BansalHSinghLVermaPAgrawalALeonJSundellIBet al. Administration of Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived Stem Cells for Treatment of Cerebral Palsy Patients: A Proof of Concept. J Stem Cells (2016) 11(1):37–49.

  • Google Scholar

• 22

  Mancías-GuerraCMarroquín-EscamillaARGonzález-LlanoOVillarreal-MartínezLJaime-PérezJCGarcía-RodríguezFet al. Safety and Tolerability of Intrathecal Delivery of Autologous Bone Marrow Nucleated Cells in Children With Cerebral Palsy: An Open-Label Phase I Trial. Cytotherapy (2014) 16(6):810–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.01.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  SharmaAGokulchandranNChopraGKulkarniPLohiaMBadhePet al. Administration of Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived Mononuclear Cells in Children With Incurable Neurological Disorders and Injury Is Safe and Improves Their Quality of Life. Cell Transplant (2012) 21 Suppl 1:S79–90. doi: 10.3727/096368912X633798

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  BangOYLeeJSLeePHLeeG. Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation in Stroke Patients. Ann Neurol (2005) 57(6):874–82. doi: 10.1002/ana.20501

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  LeeJSHongJMMoonGJLeePHAhnYHBangOYet al. A Long-Term Follow-Up Study of Intravenous Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Ischemic Stroke. Stem Cells (2010) 28(6):1099–106. doi: 10.1002/stem.430

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  HonmouOHoukinKMatsunagaTNiitsuYIshiaiSOnoderaRet al. Intravenous Administration of Auto Serum-Expanded Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Stroke. Brain (2011) 134(Pt 6):1790–807. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr063

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  BhasinASrivastavaMVKumaranSSMohantySBhatiaRBoseSet al. Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Chronic Stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra (2011) 1(1):93–104. doi: 10.1159/000333381

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  SavitzSIDinsmoreJWuJHendersonGVStiegPCaplanLR. Neurotransplantation of Fetal Porcine Cells in Patients With Basal Ganglia Infarcts: A Preliminary Safety and Feasibility Study. Cerebrovasc Dis (2005) 20(2):101–7. doi: 10.1159/000086518

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  BrioliAPerroneGPatriarcaFPezziANobileFBalleriniFet al. Successful Mobilization of PBSCs Predicts Favorable Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Novel Agents and Autologous Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant (2015) 50(5):673–8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.322

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  KimYJLeeHJRyuJSKimYHJeonSOhJYet al. Prospective Clinical Trial of Corneal Reconstruction With Biomaterial-Free Cultured Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cell Sheets. Cornea (2018) 37(1):76–83. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001409

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  PrabhasawatPEkpoPUiprasertkulMChotikavanichSTesavibulNPornpanichKet al. Long-Term Result of Autologous Cultivated Oral Mucosal Epithelial Transplantation for Severe Ocular Surface Disease. Cell Tissue Bank (2016) 17(3):491–503. doi: 10.1007/s10561-016-9575-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  Alió Del BarrioJLEl ZarifMde MiguelMPAzaarAMakdissyNHarbWet al. Cellular Therapy With Human Autologous Adipose-Derived Adult Stem Cells for Advanced Keratoconus. Cornea (2017) 36(8):952–60. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001228

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  CarlssonPOSchwarczEKorsgrenOLe BlancK. Preserved β-Cell Function in Type 1 Diabetes by Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Diabetes (2015) 64(2):587–92. doi: 10.2337/db14-0656

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  SkylerJSFonsecaVASegalKRRosenstockJMSB-DM003 Investigators. Allogeneic Mesenchymal Precursor Cells in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Safety and Tolerability Pilot Study. Diabetes Care (2015) 38(9):1742–9. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2830

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  BhansaliAAsokumarPWaliaRBhansaliSGuptaVJainAet al. Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study. Cell Transplant (2014) 23(9):1075–85. doi: 10.3727/096368913X665576

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  JavaidMSAshfaqUAMasoudMS. Potential of Stem Cells as Regenerative Medicine: From Preface to Advancements. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr (2017) 27(1):1–17. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2016018251

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  YuanTLiaoWFengNHLouYLNiuXZhangAJet al. Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Stem Cells Survive, Migrate, Differentiate, and Improve Neurologic Function in a Rat Model of Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion. Stem Cell Res Ther (2013) 4(3):73. doi: 10.1186/scrt224

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  MummeryCLZhangJNgESElliottDAElefantyAGKampTJ. Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Cardiomyocytes: A Methods Overview. Circ Res (2012) 111(3):344–58. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.227512

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  XiaoBNgHHTakahashiRTanEK. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Parkinson's Disease: Scientific and Clinical Challenges. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (2016) 87(7):697–702. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-312036

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  Roy-ChowdhuryNWangXGuhaCRoy-ChowdhuryJ. Hepatocyte-Like Cells Derived From Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Hepatol Int (2017) 11(1):54–69. doi: 10.1007/s12072-016-9757-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  PanGMuYHouLLiuJ. Examining the Therapeutic Potential of Various Stem Cell Sources for Differentiation Into Insulin-Producing Cells to Treat Diabetes. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) (2019) 80(1):47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ando.2018.06.1084

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  ZhangDJiangWLiuMSuiXYinXChenSet al. Highly Efficient Differentiation of Human ES Cells and iPS Cells Into Mature Pancreatic Insulin-Producing Cells. Cell Res (2009) 19(4):429–38. doi: 10.1038/cr.2009.28

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  RaikwarSPKimEMSivitzWIAllamargotCThedensDRZavazavaN. Human iPS Cell-Derived Insulin Producing Cells Form Vascularized Organoids Under the Kidney Capsules of Diabetic Mice. PloS One (2015) 10(1):e0116582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116582

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  HellerMBauerHKGoetzeEGielischMOzbolatITMoncalKKet al. Materials and Scaffolds in Medical 3D Printing and Bioprinting in the Context of Bone Regeneration. Int J Comput Dent (2016) 19(4):301–21.

  • Google Scholar

• 45

  SoetedjoAAPLeeJMLauHHGohGLAnJKohYet al. Tissue Engineering and 3D Printing of Bioartificial Pancreas for Regenerative Medicine in Diabetes. Trends Endocrinol Metab (2021) 32(8):609–22. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2021.05.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  AkolpogluMBInceogluYBozuyukUSousaAROliveiraMBManoJFet al. Recent Advances in the Design of Implantable Insulin Secreting Heterocellular Islet Organoids. Biomaterials (2021) 269:120627. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120627

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  TaoTWangYChenWLiZSuWGuoYet al. Engineering Human Islet Organoids From iPSCs Using an Organ-on-Chip Platform. Lab Chip (2019) 19(6):948–58. doi: 10.1039/C8LC01298A

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  PagliucaFWMeltonDA. How to Make a Functional β-Cell. Development (2013) 140(12):2472–83. doi: 10.1242/dev.093187

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  LiZGuoYYuYXuCXuHQinJ. Assessment of Metabolism-Dependent Drug Efficacy and Toxicity on a Multilayer Organs-on-a-Chip. Integr Biol (Camb) (2016) 8(10):1022–9. doi: 10.1039/C6IB00162A

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  YoshiharaEO'ConnorCGasserEWeiZOhTGTsengTWet al. Immune-Evasive Human Islet-Like Organoids Ameliorate Diabetes. Nature (2020) 586(7830):606–11. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2631-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  PagliucaFWMillmanJRGürtlerMSegelMVan DervortARyuJHet al. Generation of Functional Human Pancreatic β Cells In Vitro. Cell (2014) 159(2):428–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.040

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  SchulzTCYoungHYAgulnickADBabinMJBaetgeEEBangAGet al. A Scalable System for Production of Functional Pancreatic Progenitors From Human Embryonic Stem Cells. PloS One (2012) 7(5):e37004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  RezaniaABruinJERiedelMJMojibianMAsadiAXuJet al. Maturation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Pancreatic Progenitors Into Functional Islets Capable of Treating Pre-Existing Diabetes in Mice. Diabetes (2012) 61(8):2016–29. doi: 10.2337/db11-1711

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  BluestoneJABucknerJHFitchMGitelmanSEGuptaSHellersteinMKet al. Type 1 Diabetes Immunotherapy Using Polyclonal Regulatory T Cells. Sci Transl Med (2015) 7(315):315ra189. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad4134

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  GrimmAJKontosSDiaceriGQuaglia-ThermesXHubbellJAet al. Memory of Tolerance and Induction of Regulatory T Cells by Erythrocyte-Targeted Antigens. Sci Rep (2015) 5:15907. doi: 10.1038/srep15907

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  SerrIFürstRWAchenbachPSchermMGGökmenFHauptFet al. Type 1 Diabetes Vaccine Candidates Promote Human Foxp3(+)Treg Induction in Humanized Mice. Nat Commun (2016) 7:10991. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10991

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  ZhangYYaoLYuXOuJHuiNLiuS. A Poor Imitation of a Natural Process: A Call to Reconsider the iPSC Engineering Technique. Cell Cycle (2012) 11(24):4536–44. doi: 10.4161/cc.22575

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  van der BogtKESheikhAYSchrepferSHoytGCaoFRansohoffKJet al. Comparison of Different Adult Stem Cell Types for Treatment of Myocardial Ischemia. Circulation (2008) 118(14 Suppl):S121–9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.759480

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  NishinoKToyodaMYamazaki-InoueMFukawataseYChikazawaESakaguchiHet al. DNA Methylation Dynamics in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Over Time. PloS Genet (2011) 7(5):e1002085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002085

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  ListerRPelizzolaMKidaYSHawkinsRDNeryJRHonGet al. Hotspots of Aberrant Epigenomic Reprogramming in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Nature (2011) 471(7336):68–73. doi: 10.1038/nature09798

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  HardingJMirochnitchenkoO. Preclinical Studies for Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Therapeutics. J Biol Chem (2014) 289(8):4585–93. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R113.463737

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  HanLHeHYangYMengQYeFChenGet al. Distinctive Clinical and Pathologic Features of Immature Teratomas Arising From Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Beta Cell Injection in a Diabetes Patient. Stem Cells Dev (2022) 31(5-6):97–101. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-580493/v1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  MandaiMWatanabeAKurimotoYHiramiYMorinagaCDaimonTet al. Autologous Induced Stem-Cell-Derived Retinal Cells for Macular Degeneration. N Engl J Med (2017) 376(11):1038–46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1608368

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  HaufroidMMirgauxMLeherteLWoutersJ. Crystal Structures and Snapshots Along the Reaction Pathway of Human Phosphoserine Phosphatase. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol (2019) 75(Pt 6):592–604. doi: 10.1107/S2059798319006867

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  TurinettoVOrlandoLGiachinoC. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Advances in the Quest for Genetic Stability During Reprogramming Process. Int J Mol Sci (2017) 18(9):1952. doi: 10.3390/ijms18091952

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  ZhaoTZhangZNWestenskowPDTodorovaDHuZLinTet al. Humanized Mice Reveal Differential Immunogenicity of Cells Derived From Autologous Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell (2015) 17(3):353–9. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.07.021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  TodorovaDKimJHamzeinejadSHeJXuY. Brief Report: Immune Microenvironment Determines the Immunogenicity of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derivatives. Stem Cells (2016) 34(2):510–5. doi: 10.1002/stem.2227

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  DeuseTHuXAgbor-EnohSKochMSpitzerMHGravinaAet al. De Novo Mutations in Mitochondrial DNA of iPSCs Produce Immunogenic Neoepitopes in Mice and Humans. Nat Biotechnol (2019) 37(10):1137–44. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0227-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  ZhaoTZhangZNRongZXuY. Immunogenicity of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Nature (2011) 474(7350):212–5. doi: 10.1038/nature10135

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  AbdelalimEMBonnefondABennaceur-GriscelliAFroguelP. Pluripotent Stem Cells as a Potential Tool for Disease Modelling and Cell Therapy in Diabetes. Stem Cell Rev Rep (2014) 10(3):327–37. doi: 10.1007/s12015-014-9503-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  AugsornworawatPMaxwellKGVelazco-CruzLMillmanJR. Single-Cell Transcriptome Profiling Reveals β Cell Maturation in Stem Cell-Derived Islets After Transplantation. Cell Rep (2020) 32(8):108067. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108067

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  AssadySMaorGAmitMItskovitz-EldorJSkoreckiKLTzukermanM. Insulin Production by Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Diabetes (2001) 50(8):1691–7. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.8.1691

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  LumelskyNBlondelOLaengPVelascoIRavinRMcKayR. Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells to Insulin-Secreting Structures Similar to Pancreatic Islets. Science (2001) 292(5520):1389–94. doi: 10.1126/science.1058866

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  D'AmourKABangAGEliazerSKellyOGAgulnickADSmartNGet al. Production of Pancreatic Hormone-Expressing Endocrine Cells From Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Nat Biotechnol (2006) 24(11):1392–401. doi: 10.1038/nbt1259

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  JiangJAuMLuKEshpeterAKorbuttGFiskGet al. Generation of Insulin-Producing Islet-Like Clusters From Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem Cells (2007) 25(8):1940–53. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0761

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  RezaniaABruinJEXuJNarayanKFoxJKO'NeilJJet al. Enrichment of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived NKX6.1-expressing Pancreatic Progenitor Cells Accelerates the Maturation of Insulin-Secreting Cells In Vivo. Stem Cells (2013) 31(11):2432–42. doi: 10.1002/stem.1489

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  BonnansCChouJWerbZ. Remodelling the Extracellular Matrix in Development and Disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2014) 15(12):786–801. doi: 10.1038/nrm3904

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  MuncieJMWeaverVM. The Physical and Biochemical Properties of the Extracellular Matrix Regulate Cell Fate. Curr Top Dev Biol (2018) 130:1–37. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2018.02.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  BeattieGMRubinJSMallyMIOtonkoskiTHayekA. Regulation of Proliferation and Differentiation of Human Fetal Pancreatic Islet Cells by Extracellular Matrix, Hepatocyte Growth Factor, and Cell-Cell Contact. Diabetes (1996) 45(9):1223–8. doi: 10.2337/diab.45.9.1223

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  SchuppinGTBonner-WeirSMontanaEKaiserNWeirGC. Replication of Adult Pancreatic-Beta Cells Cultured on Bovine Corneal Endothelial Cell Extracellular Matrix. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim (1993) 29a(4):339–44. doi: 10.1007/BF02633963

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  WeberLMHaydaKNAnsethKS. Cell-Matrix Interactions Improve Beta-Cell Survival and Insulin Secretion in Three-Dimensional Culture. Tissue Eng Part A (2008) 14(12):1959–68. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0238

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  BoscoDMedaPHalbanPARouillerDG. Importance of Cell-Matrix Interactions in Rat Islet Beta-Cell Secretion In Vitro: Role of alpha6beta1 Integrin. Diabetes (2000) 49(2):233–43. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.2.233

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  HammarEParnaudGBoscoDPerrirazNMaedlerKDonathMet al. Extracellular Matrix Protects Pancreatic Beta-Cells Against Apoptosis: Role of Short- and Long-Term Signaling Pathways. Diabetes (2004) 53(8):2034–41. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.8.2034

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  RisFHammarEBoscoDPilloudCMaedlerKDonathMYet al. Impact of Integrin-Matrix Matching and Inhibition of Apoptosis on the Survival of Purified Human Beta-Cells In Vitro. Diabetologia (2002) 45(6):841–50. doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-0840-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  Oberg-WelshC. Long-Term Culture in Matrigel Enhances the Insulin Secretion of Fetal Porcine Islet-Like Cell Clusters In Vitro. Pancreas (2001) 22(2):157–63. doi: 10.1097/00006676-200103000-00008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  ZimmermannWHSchneiderbangerKSchubertPDidiéMMünzelFHeubachJFet al. Tissue Engineering of a Differentiated Cardiac Muscle Construct. Circ Res (2002) 90(2):223–30. doi: 10.1161/hh0202.103644

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  LüSHWangHBLiuHWangHPLinQXLiDXet al. Reconstruction of Engineered Uterine Tissues Containing Smooth Muscle Layer in Collagen/Matrigel Scaffold In Vitro. Tissue Eng Part A (2009) 15(7):1611–8. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0187

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  SongJMillmanJR. Economic 3D-Printing Approach for Transplantation of Human Stem Cell-Derived β-Like Cells. Biofabrication (2016) 9(1):015002. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/9/1/015002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  StrandBLCoronAESkjak-BraekG. Current and Future Perspectives on Alginate Encapsulated Pancreatic Islet. Stem Cells Transl Med (2017) 6(4):1053–8. doi: 10.1002/sctm.16-0116

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  VaithilingamVBalSTuchBE. Encapsulated Islet Transplantation: Where do We Stand? Rev Diabetes Stud (2017) 14(1):51–78. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2017.14.51

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  BastaGMontanucciPCalafioreR. Microencapsulation of Cells and Molecular Therapy of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: The Actual State and Future Perspectives Between Promise and Progress. J Diabetes Investig (2021) 12(3):301–9. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13372

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  van der TorrenCRZaldumbideADuinkerkenGBrand-SchaafSHPeakmanMStangéGet al. Immunogenicity of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Beta Cells. Diabetologia (2017) 60(1):126–33. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-4125-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  El-HalawaniSMGabrMMEl-FarMZakariaMMKhaterSMRefaieAFet al. Subcutaneous Transplantation of Bone Marrow Derived Stem Cells in Macroencapsulation Device for Treating Diabetic Rats; Clinically Transplantable Site. Heliyon (2020) 6(5):e03914. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03914

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  LudwigBLudwigS. Transplantable Bioartificial Pancreas Devices: Current Status and Future Prospects. Langenbecks Arch Surg (2015) 400(5):531–40. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1314-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  GiraldoJAWeaverJDStablerCL. Enhancing Clinical Islet Transplantation Through Tissue Engineering Strategies. J Diabetes Sci Technol (2010) 4(5):1238–47. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400525

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  DaoudJRosenbergLTabrizianM. Pancreatic Islet Culture and Preservation Strategies: Advances, Challenges, and Future Outlook. Cell Transplant (2010) 19(12):1523–35. doi: 10.3727/096368910X515872

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  OparaECMirmalek-SaniSHKhannaOMoyaMLBreyEM. Design of a Bioartificial Pancreas(+). J Investig Med (2010) 58(7):831–7. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e3181ed3807

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  ShapiroAM. Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes: Ongoing Challenges, Refined Procedures, and Long-Term Outcome. Rev Diabetes Stud (2012) 9(4):385–406. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2012.9.385

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  VogelG. Biomedicine. Stem Cell Recipe Offers Diabetes Hope. Science (2014) 346(6206):148. doi: 10.1126/science.346.6206.148

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  HirshbergB. Lessons Learned From the International Trial of the Edmonton Protocol for Islet Transplantation. Curr Diabetes Rep (2007) 7(4):301–3. doi: 10.1007/s11892-007-0048-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  DesaiTSheaLD. Advances in Islet Encapsulation Technologies. Nat Rev Drug Discovery (2017) 16(5):338–50. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.232

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  VegasAJVeisehOGürtlerMMillmanJRPagliucaFWBaderARet al. Long-Term Glycemic Control Using Polymer-Encapsulated Human Stem Cell-Derived Beta Cells in Immune-Competent Mice. Nat Med (2016) 22(3):306–11. doi: 10.1038/nm.4030

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  StockAAManzoliVToniTDAbreuMMPohYCYeLet al. Conformal Coating of Stem Cell-Derived Islets for β Cell Replacement in Type 1 Diabetes. Stem Cell Rep (2020) 14(1):91–104. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.11.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  ManzoliVVillaCBayerALMoralesLCMolanoRDTorrenteYet al. Immunoisolation of Murine Islet Allografts in Vascularized Sites Through Conformal Coating With Polyethylene Glycol. Am J Transplant (2018) 18(3):590–603. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14547

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  TomeiAAManzoliVFrakerCAGiraldoJVellutoDNajjarMet al. Device Design and Materials Optimization of Conformal Coating for Islets of Langerhans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2014) 11(29):10514–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402216111

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  ScharpDWMarchettiP. Encapsulated Islets for Diabetes Therapy: History, Current Progress, and Critical Issues Requiring Solution. Adv Drug Deliv Rev (2014) 67-68:35–73. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  NeufeldTLudwigBBarkaiUWeirGCColtonCKEvronYet al. The Efficacy of an Immunoisolating Membrane System for Islet Xenotransplantation in Minipigs. PloS One (2013) 8(8):e70150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070150

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  LudwigBReichelASteffenAZimermanBSchallyAVBlockNLet al. Transplantation of Human Islets Without Immunosuppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2013) 110(47):19054–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317561110

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  PepperARPawlickRGala-LopezBMacGillivaryAMazzucaDMWhiteDJet al. Diabetes Is Reversed in a Murine Model by Marginal Mass Syngeneic Islet Transplantation Using a Subcutaneous Cell Pouch Device. Transplantation (2015) 99(11):2294–300. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000864

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  KolataG. A Cure for Type 1 Diabetes? For One Man, It Seems to Have Worked [EB/OL] (2021). Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/27/health/diabetes-cure-stem-cells.html.

  • Google Scholar

• 111

  Vertex. Vertex Announces Positive Day 90 Data for the First Patient in the Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial Dosed With VX-880, a Novel Investigational Stem Cell-Derived Therapy for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes (2021). Available at: https://investors.vrtx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/vertex-announces-positive-day-90-data-first-patient-phase-12.

  • Google Scholar

• 112

  PetersAL. A Cure for Type 1 Diabetes?Not Yet, But We're Getting Closer[Eb/Ol] (2022). Available at: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/965208.

  • Google Scholar

• 113

  JoEHHwangYHLeeDY. Encapsulation of Pancreatic Islet With HMGB1 Fragment for Attenuating Inflammation. Biomater Res (2015) 19:21. doi: 10.1186/s40824-015-0042-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  BarkaiURotemAde VosP. Survival of Encapsulated Islets: More Than a Membrane Story. World J Transplant (2016) 6(1):69–90. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i1.69

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  AcostaNDGolubSH. The New Federalism: State Policies Regarding Embryonic Stem Cell Research. J Law Med Ethics (2016) 44(3):419–36. doi: 10.1177/1073110516667939

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  Gutierrez-ArandaIRamos-MejiaVBuenoCMunoz-LopezMRealPJMáciaAet al. Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Develop Teratoma More Efficiently and Faster Than Human Embryonic Stem Cells Regardless the Site of Injection. Stem Cells (2010) 28(9):1568–70. doi: 10.1002/stem.471

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  PatelDMShahJSrivastavaAS. Therapeutic Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine. Stem Cells Int 2013 (2013) p:496218. doi: 10.1155/2013/496218

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  ShiYWangYLiQLiuKHouJShaoCet al. Immunoregulatory Mechanisms of Mesenchymal Stem and Stromal Cells in Inflammatory Diseases. Nat Rev Nephrol (2018) 14(8):493–507. doi: 10.1038/s41581-018-0023-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  VasandanABJahnaviSShashankCPrasadPKumarAPrasannaSJ. Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Program Macrophage Plasticity by Altering Their Metabolic Status Via a PGE(2)-dependent Mechanism. Sci Rep (2016) 6:38308. doi: 10.1038/srep38308

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  WangGCaoKLiuKXueYRobertsAILiFet al. Kynurenic Acid, an IDO Metabolite, Controls TSG-6-mediated Immunosuppression of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Cell Death Differ (2018) 25(7):1209–23. doi: 10.1038/s41418-017-0006-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  ZanoniMCortesiMZamagniATeseiA. The Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Radiation-Induced Lung Fibrosis. Int J Mol Sci (2019) 20(16):3876. doi: 10.3390/ijms20163876

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  TaoHHanZHanZCLiZ. Proangiogenic Features of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Therapeutic Applications. Stem Cells Int 2016 (2016) p:1314709. doi: 10.1155/2016/1314709

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  FigliuzziMBonandriniBSilvaniSRemuzziA. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Help Pancreatic Islet Transplantation to Control Type 1 Diabetes. World J Stem Cells (2014) 6(2):163–72. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i2.163

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  BermanDMWillmanMAHanDKleinerGKenyonNMCabreraOet al. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhance Allogeneic Islet Engraftment in Nonhuman Primates. Diabetes (2010) 59(10):2558–68. doi: 10.2337/db10-0136

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  FigliuzziMCornoltiRPericoNRotaCMorigiMRemuzziGet al. Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Islet Graft Function in Diabetic Rats. Transplant Proc (2009) 41(5):1797–800. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.11.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  ItoTItakuraSTodorovIRawsonJAsariSShintakuJet al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Islet Co-Transplantation Promotes Graft Revascularization and Function. Transplantation (2010) 89(12):1438–45. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181db09c4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  LongoniBSzilagyiEQuarantaPPaoliGTTripodiSUrbaniSet al. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Prevent Acute Rejection and Prolong Graft Function in Pancreatic Islet Transplantation. Diabetes Technol Ther (2010) 12(6):435–46. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0154

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  JungEJKimSCWeeYMKimYHChoiMYJeongSHet al. Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Support Rat Pancreatic Islet Survival and Insulin Secretory Function In Vitro. Cytotherapy (2011) 13(1):19–29. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2010.518608

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  WangRNRosenbergL. Maintenance of Beta-Cell Function and Survival Following Islet Isolation Requires Re-Establishment of the Islet-Matrix Relationship. J Endocrinol (1999) 163(2):181–90. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1630181

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  MontanariEMeierRPHMahouRSeebachJDWandreyCGerber-LemaireSet al. Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Enhance Insulin Secretion From Human Islets Via N-cadherin Interaction and Prolong Function of Transplanted Encapsulated Islets in Mice. Stem Cell Res Ther (2017) 8(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0646-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  ErnstAUWangLHMaM. Interconnected Toroidal Hydrogels for Islet Encapsulation. Adv Healthc Mater (2019) 8(12):e1900423. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201900423

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  XuLGuoYHuangYXuYLuYWangZ. Hydrogel Materials for the Application of Islet Transplantation. J Biomater Appl (2019) 33(9):1252–64. doi: 10.1177/0885328219831391

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133

  Mohammadi AyenehdehJNiknamBRasouliSHashemiSMRahaviHRezaeiNet al. Immunomodulatory and Protective Effects of Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in an Allograft Islet Composite Transplantation for Experimental Autoimmune Type 1 Diabetes. Immunol Lett (2017) 188:21–31. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2017.05.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  NakamuraK. Cellsaic, A Cell Aggregate-Like Technology Using Recombinant Peptide Pieces for MSC Transplantation. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther (2019) 14(1):52–6. doi: 10.2174/1574888X13666180912125157

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  KogawaRNakamuraKMochizukiY. A New Islet Transplantation Method Combining Mesenchymal Stem Cells With Recombinant Peptide Pieces, Microencapsulated Islets, and Mesh Bags. Biomedicines (2020) 8(9):299. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8090299

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  ShimizuTYamatoMKikuchiAOkanoT. Cell Sheet Engineering for Myocardial Tissue Reconstruction. Biomaterials (2003) 24(13):2309–16. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00110-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  HirabaruMKurokiTAdachiTKitasatoAOnoSTanakaTet al. A Method for Performing Islet Transplantation Using Tissue-Engineered Sheets of Islets and Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Tissue Eng Part C Methods (2015) 21(12):1205–15. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2015.0035

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  SantosEGarateAPedrazJLOriveGHernándezRM. The Synergistic Effects of the RGD Density and the Microenvironment on the Behavior of Encapsulated Cells: In Vitro and In Vivo Direct Comparative Study. J BioMed Mater Res A (2014) 102(11):3965–72. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35073

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 139

  LaporteCTubbsEPierronMGallegoAMoisanALamarcheFet al. Improved Human Islets' Viability and Functionality With Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Arg-Gly-Asp Tripeptides Supplementation of Alginate Micro-Encapsulated Islets In Vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2020) 528(4):650–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.05.107

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  PinkseGGBouwmanWPJiawan-LalaiRTerpstraOTBruijnJAde HeerE. Integrin Signaling Via RGD Peptides and Anti-Beta1 Antibodies Confers Resistance to Apoptosis in Islets of Langerhans. Diabetes (2006) 55(2):312–7. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.55.02.06.db04-0195

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141

  HoSSMurphyKCBinderBYVissersCBLeachJK. Increased Survival and Function of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Spheroids Entrapped in Instructive Alginate Hydrogels. Stem Cells Transl Med (2016) 5(6):773–81. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0211

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  VaithilingamVFungCRatnapalaSFosterJVaghjianiVManuelpillaiUet al. Characterisation of the Xenogeneic Immune Response to Microencapsulated Fetal Pig Islet-Like Cell Clusters Transplanted Into Immunocompetent C57BL/6 Mice. PloS One (2013) 8(3):e59120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059120

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  PolchertDSobinskyJDouglasGKiddMMoadsiriAReinaEet al. IFN-Gamma Activation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treatment and Prevention of Graft Versus Host Disease. Eur J Immunol (2008) 38(6):1745–55. doi: 10.1002/eji.200738129

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  VaithilingamVEvansMDMLewyDMBeanPABalSTuchBE. Co-Encapsulation and Co-Transplantation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Reduces Pericapsular Fibrosis and Improves Encapsulated Islet Survival and Function When Allografted. Sci Rep (2017) 7(1):10059. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10359-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  HoffmanRAMahidharaRSWolf-JohnstonASLuLThomsonAWSimmonsRL. Differential Modulation of CD4 and CD8 T-Cell Proliferation by Induction of Nitric Oxide Synthesis in Antigen Presenting Cells. Transplantation (2002) 74(6):836–45. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200209270-00018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  NiedbalaWCaiBLiewFY. Role of Nitric Oxide in the Regulation of T Cell Functions. Ann Rheum Dis (2006) 65 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii37–40. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.058446

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  TuchBEGaoSYLeesJG. Scaffolds for Islets and Stem Cells Differentiated Into Insulin-Secreting Cells. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) (2014) 19:126–38. doi: 10.2741/4199

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  ZhangYQSarvetnickN. Development of Cell Markers for the Identification and Expansion of Islet Progenitor Cells. Diabetes Metab Res Rev (2003) 19(5):363–74. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.406

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  Bonner-WeirS. Life and Death of the Pancreatic Beta Cells. Trends Endocrinol Metab (2000) 11(9):375–8. doi: 10.1016/S1043-2760(00)00305-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  ZhangYQKritzikMSarvetnickN. Identification and Expansion of Pancreatic Stem/Progenitor Cells. J Cell Mol Med (2005) 9(2):331–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2005.tb00359.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  GuGBrownJRMeltonDA. Direct Lineage Tracing Reveals the Ontogeny of Pancreatic Cell Fates During Mouse Embryogenesis. Mech Dev (2003) 120(1):35–43. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00330-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  NoguchiH. Stem Cells for the Treatment of Diabetes. Endocr J (2007) 54(1):7–16. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.KR-86

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  OshimaYSuzukiAKawashimoKIshikawaMOhkohchiNTaniguchiH. Isolation of Mouse Pancreatic Ductal Progenitor Cells Expressing CD133 and c-Met by Flow Cytometric Cell Sorting. Gastroenterology (2007) 132(2):720–32. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.027

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  Bonner-WeirSInadaAYatohSLiWCAyeTToschiEet al. Transdifferentiation of Pancreatic Ductal Cells to Endocrine Beta-Cells. Biochem Soc Trans (2008) 36(Pt 3):353–6. doi: 10.1042/BST0360353

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  InadaANienaberCKatsutaHFujitaniYLevineJMoritaRet al. Carbonic Anhydrase II-positive Pancreatic Cells Are Progenitors for Both Endocrine and Exocrine Pancreas After Birth. Natl Acad Sci USA (2008) 105(50):19915–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805803105

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156

  LysyPAWeirGCBonner-WeirS. Making β Cells From Adult Cells Within the Pancreas. Curr Diabetes Rep (2013) 13(5):695–703. doi: 10.1007/s11892-013-0400-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157

  Bonner-WeirSWeirGC. New Sources of Pancreatic Beta-Cells. Nat Biotechnol (2005) 23(7):857–61. doi: 10.1038/nbt1115

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 158

  RachdiLGhaziLEBernexFPanthierJJCzernichowPScharfmannR. Expression of the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase KIT in Mature Beta-Cells and in the Pancreas in Development. Diabetes (2001) 50(9):2021–8. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.9.2021

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  ChenLBJiangXBYangL. Differentiation of Rat Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Into Pancreatic Islet Beta-Cells. World J Gastroenterol (2004) 10(20):3016–20. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i20.3016

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160

  SapirTShternhallKMeivar-LevyIBlumenfeldTCohenHSkutelskyEet al. Cell-Replacement Therapy for Diabetes: Generating Functional Insulin-Producing Tissue From Adult Human Liver Cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2005) 102(22):7964–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405277102

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161

  JinLFengTShihHPZerdaRLuoA. Colony-Forming Cells in the Adult Mouse Pancreas Are Expandable in Matrigel and Form Endocrine/Acinar Colonies in Laminin Hydrogel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2013) 110(10):3907–12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301889110

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162

  SlackJM. Metaplasia and Transdifferentiation: From Pure Biology to the Clinic. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2007) 8(5):369–78. doi: 10.1038/nrm2146

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 163

  BulottaAHuiHAnastasiEBertolottoCBorosLGDi MarioUet al. Cultured Pancreatic Ductal Cells Undergo Cell Cycle Re-Distribution and Beta-Cell-Like Differentiation in Response to Glucagon-Like Peptide-1. J Mol Endocrinol (2002) 29(3):347–60. doi: 10.1677/jme.0.0290347

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  ChaseLGUlloa-MontoyaFKidderBLVerfaillieCM. Islet-Derived Fibroblast-Like Cells Are Not Derived Via Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition From Pdx-1 or Insulin-Positive Cells. Diabetes (2007) 56(1):3–7. doi: 10.2337/db06-1165

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  DorYBrownJMartinezOIMeltonDA. Adult Pancreatic Beta-Cells Are Formed by Self-Duplication Rather Than Stem-Cell Differentiation. Nature (2004) 429(6987):41–6. doi: 10.1038/nature02520

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166

  XuXD'HokerJStangéGBonnéSDe LeuNXiaoXet al. Beta Cells Can Be Generated From Endogenous Progenitors in Injured Adult Mouse Pancreas. Cell (2008) 132(2):197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  LanKCWangCCYenYPYangRSLiuSHChanDC. Islet-Like Clusters Derived From Skeletal Muscle-Derived Stem/Progenitor Cells for Autologous Transplantation to Control Type 1 Diabetes in Mice. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol (2018) 46(sup3):S328–35. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1492421

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  WangDWangJBaiLPanHFengHCleversHet al. Long-Term Expansion of Pancreatic Islet Organoids From Resident Procr(+) Progenitors. Cell (2020) 180(6):1198–11.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.048

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  NostroMCSarangiFYangCHollandAElefantyAGStanleyEGet al. Efficient Generation of NKX6-1+ Pancreatic Progenitors From Multiple Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines. Stem Cell Rep (2015) 4(4):591–604. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.02.017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170

  WhiteAMShamulJGXuJStewartSBrombergJSHeX. Engineering Strategies to Improve Islet Transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes Therapy. ACS Biomater Sci Eng (2020) 6(5):2543–62. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01406

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 171

  YuCGFuYFangYZhangNSunRXZhaoDet al. Fighting Type-2 Diabetes: Present and Future Perspectives. Curr Med Chem (2019) 26(10):1891–907. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666171009115356

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  KuolNStojanovskaLNurgaliKApostolopoulosV. Pd-1/Pd-L1 in Disease. Immunotherapy (2018) 10(2):149–60. doi: 10.2217/imt-2017-0120

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  BishawiMBowlesDPlaMMOakesFChiangYSchroderJet al. PD-1 and PD-L1 Expression in Cardiac Transplantation. Cardiovasc Pathol (2021) 54:107331. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2021.107331

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 174

  RongZWangMHuZStradnerMZhuSKongHet al. An Effective Approach to Prevent Immune Rejection of Human ESC-derived Allografts. Cell Stem Cell (2014) 14(1):121–30. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 175

  Bracamonte-BaranWGilotraNAWonTRodriguezKMTalorMVOhBCet al. Endothelial Stromal Pd-L1 (Programmed Death Ligand 1) Modulates Cd8(+) T-Cell Infiltration After Heart Transplantation. Circ Heart Fail (2021) 14(10):e007982. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007982

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176

  MardomiAMohammadiNKhosroshahiHTAbediankenariS. An Update on Potentials and Promises of T Cell Co-Signaling Molecules in Transplantation. J Cell Physiol (2020) 235(5):4183–97. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29369

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177

  AbdellatifHShihaG. Pd-L1 Expression on Circulating Cd34+ Hematopoietic Stem Cells Closely Correlated With T-cell Apoptosis in Chronic Hepatitis C Infected Patients. Int J Stem Cells (2018) 11(1):78–86. doi: 10.15283/ijsc17047

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar