Abstract
Vasculitis is an autoimmune disease of unknown etiology that causes inflammation of the blood vessels. Large vessel vasculitis is classified as either giant cell arteritis (GCA), which occurs exclusively in the elderly, or Takayasu arteritis (TAK), which mainly affects young women. Various cell types are involved in the pathogenesis of large vessel vasculitis. Among these, dendritic cells located between the adventitia and the media initiate the inflammatory cascade as antigen-presenting cells, followed by activation of macrophages and T cells contributing to vessel wall destruction. In both diseases, naive CD4+ T cells are polarized to differentiate into Th1 or Th17 cells, whereas differentiation into regulatory T cells, which suppress vascular inflammation, is inhibited. Skewed T cell differentiation is the result of aberrant intracellular signaling, such as the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) or the Janus kinase signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathways. It has also become clear that tissue niches in the vasculature fuel activated T cells and maintain tissue-resident memory T cells. In this review, we outline the most recent understanding of the pathophysiology of large vessel vasculitis. Then, we provide a summary of skewed T cell differentiation in the vasculature and peripheral blood. Finally, new therapeutic strategies for correcting skewed T cell differentiation as well as aberrant intracellular signaling are discussed.
Introduction
Vasculitis is an autoimmune disorder that causes inflammation of blood vessels and multiple organ damage. Large vessel vasculitis (LVV) primarily affects the aorta and its major branches and can be divided into two disease categories: giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu’s arteritis (TAK) (1). GCA is common in individuals over 50 years of age, especially in their 60s to 80s (2). Symptoms related to GCA include fever, headache, jaw claudication, and visual disturbances (3). Polymyalgia rheumatica is often accompanied by extravascular manifestations (4). In contrast, TAK is common in patients under 50 years of age, especially in Asian women in their 20s to 40s (5). TAK results in fever, general malaise, pulselessness, renovascular hypertension, and aortic regurgitation (6). Ulcerative colitis and erythema nodosum are well-known extravascular manifestations (7, 8).
The pathological findings of these two diseases are indistinguishable and the pathological hallmark of these diseases is chronic granulomatous inflammation, which primarily involves activated CD4+ T cells and macrophages (9) (Figure 1). Cytokines released from activated CD4+ T cells are the main triggers of macrophage activation (10). In addition, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have revealed that human leukocyte antigens are critically involved in the pathomechanisms of both GCA and TAK (11, 12). These findings suggest that antigen presentation to T cells, particularly CD4+ T cells, plays a central role in the development of LVV.
Figure 1
Histology of giant cell arteritis. (A) Histological findings of a temporal artery biopsy from an 82-year-old woman with giant cell arteritis (hematoxylin and eosin staining, x40), showing intense cellular infiltration in the adventitia and luminal narrowing due to intimal hyperplasia. (B) High-power image of the biopsy (hematoxylin and eosin staining, x100). The red arrow indicates multinucleated giant cells. (C) CD4 staining of the biopsy (anti-CD4 staining, x100), showing accumulation of CD4+ T cells in the adventitia. (D) CD8 staining of the biopsy (Anti-CD8 staining, x100), showing slight accumulation of CD8+ T cells in the adventitia.
Recent studies have revealed remarkable heterogeneity in CD4+ T cells, leading to the discovery of T helper 1 (Th1), Th2, Th9, Th17, Th22, and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, as well as regulatory T cell subsets (13, 14). Each T cell subset plays a unique role by expressing specific transcription factors and cytokines. Technological advances at the single-cell level have allowed further subdivision of these subsets and have led to the discovery of novel T cell subsets. Accordingly, several T helper cell subsets have been identified in LVV (15, 16). Moreover, aberrant cellular signaling pathways in activated T cells and new T cell subsets, such as tissue-resident memory T cells, have been identified in LVV (17).
In this mini-review, we first outline the current knowledge regarding the immunopathogenesis of LVV, followed by a discussion of the roles of each T cell subset, newly discovered T cell subsets, and aberrant signaling pathways in T cells. Finally, we provide future therapeutic perspectives for LVV based on targeting of T cells.
The Updated Immunopathogenesis of GCA
Vascular inflammation begins with antigen recognition in vascular dendritic cells (vasDCs) (18, 19). Essentially every artery contains vasDCs, which allow for early detection of foreign antigens. Proliferation of T cells with the shared T cell receptor is confirmed in distinct vascular lesions of GCA (20), which indicates that T cells undergo clonal expansion after recognizing certain antigens. Herpes zoster virus and others have been proposed as antigens (21), but this has not yet been verified. VasDCs express unique Toll-like receptor patterns in each artery (22). In non-inflamed temporal arteritis, the vasDCs are immature and located at the media-adventitia border (23). Once activated, vasDCs expand and express costimulatory molecules such as CD80 and CD86. They also produce excess chemokines and cytokines, which prime naive CD4+ T cells and facilitate monocyte migration (24, 25). A recent study demonstrated that defective expression of programmed death ligand 1 in vasDCs also contributes to the maintenance of T cell activation (26, 27). Monocytes then differentiate into tissue macrophages, which are activated by cytokines, particularly interferon (IFN)-γ, released by activated T cells. Activated macrophages in turn start to produce large amounts of cytokines (e.g., IL-6) (28), chemokines (29, 30), proteolytic enzymes (e.g., matrix metalloprotease) (31, 32), and various growth factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor (33). These growth factors act on endothelial cells (ECs) and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), transforming them into myofibroblasts, and accelerate intimal hyperplasia and adventitial neoangiogenesis (34–36). Thus, the conventional inflammatory cascade in GCA includes three major players: vasDCs, CD4+ T cells, and macrophages. However, several new cell populations have emerged in the pathomechanisms of GCA.
First, neutrophils are not only important mediators of host defenses against pathogens but also contribute to many autoimmune diseases through neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) (37). Until recently, the role of neutrophils has been underestimated because of the rarity of vascular lesions in GCA; however, mapping of immune cell populations from GCA patients has shown that immature neutrophils generate high levels of reactive oxygen species and enhance protein oxidation, leading to endothelial barrier dysfunction in vascular lesions (38). These findings link the function of immature neutrophils to disease mechanisms.
Second, intimal hyperplasia is thought to be caused by transformation and expansion of ECs and VSMCs into myofibroblasts. Recently, however, it has been proposed that fibroblasts located in the adventitia start to produce α smooth muscle actin and collagen by an unknown trigger, phenotypically change into myofibroblasts, and migrate toward the intimal layer (39). As fibroblasts are also abundant in the vascular lesions of TAK (40), these cells could be therapeutically targeted in LVV.
Vasculitogenic T Cells in GCA
Th1 Cells
Analysis of the T cell population in vascular tissues and the circulatory system suggests polyclonal T cell activation (41–43)(Figure 2). Among these, Th1 cells appear to be the dominant cell population and are highly enriched in vascular tissues and the circulatory system in GCA (15, 44). Naive CD4+ T cells are induced to express transcription factor T-bet and differentiate into Th1 cells in the presence of IL-12 (13), which is abundant in GCA-affected arteries (45). IFN-γ released by Th1 cells not only stimulates macrophages and provides protective immunity against intracellular pathogens but also affects ECs, VSMCs, and fibroblasts. Although IFN-γ impairs the proliferation and survival of ECs in the tumor microenvironment (46, 47), it promotes angiogenesis via VEGF produced by tissue macrophages in GCA (10). IFN-γ induces VSCM proliferation in atherosclerosis (48). The direct effect on fibroblasts residing in blood vessels is unknown. However, upon stimulation with IFN-γ, synovial fibroblasts upregulate MHC class II expression and increase IL-6 production (49). Thus, IFN-γ derived from Th1 cells is implicated in several pathogenic events in GCA.
Figure 2
The imbalance between vasculitogenic T cells and vasculoprotective T cells in giant cell arteritis. (A) In non-inflamed arteries, vasculitogenic T cells and vasculoprotective T cells are well balanced in the blood, and both cell types are rare in the vasculature. (B) In giant cell arteritis (GCA), this balance is perturbed, and vasculitogenic T cells accumulate, while the number of vasculoprotective T cells decreases in the tissue and the blood. Vasculitogenic T cells include T helper 1 (Th1) cells, Th17 cells, IL-21-producing T cells, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-producing T cells, tissue-resident memory T (Trm) cells, Th9 cells, and Th22 cells. On the other hand, vasculoprotective T cells include CD4+ regulatory T cells and CD8+ regulatory T cells.
Th17 Cells
Compared to Th1 cells, all other functional T cell lineages occur at much lower frequencies (42), although Th17 cell numbers are increased in GCA (15). Naive CD4+ T cells express the master transcription factor RORγt and differentiate into Th17 cells in the presence of IL-6 and transforming growth factor β, which are abundant in the vascular lesions (50, 51). IL-23 appears to function in the expansion and maturation of Th17 cells at a late stage (13). Th17 cells produce IL-17, IL-21, and IL-22, and the IL-17 family includes six isoforms (IL-17A to IL-17F) (52). IL-17A not only provides host defense against extracellular pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, and mycobacteria but also participates in autoimmunity (53, 54). IL-17A acts on ECs, resulting in the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6 and chemokines (55). IL-17 is also involved in the proinflammatory response of VSMCs, inducing the release of cytokines such as IL-6 and granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (56).
What is the molecular basis for the increase in Th1 and Th17 cells in GCA? A recent study revealed that the VEGF-NOTCH1 axis plays a role in skewed T cell polarization (57). VEGF is primarily derived from tissue macrophages and is enriched in GCA plasma (58). The innermost ECs of the vasa vasorum respond to VEGF and upregulate the expression of NOTCH1 ligand, which in turn stimulates NOTCH1 receptor expressed on GCA CD4+ T cells. This NOTCH1 ligand-NOTCH1 interaction induces activation of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), shifting T cell differentiation toward Th1 and Th17 cells (57). mTOR is a serine/threonine protein kinase that constitutes the catalytic subunit of two distinct complexes: mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTORC2 (59). The mTOR pathway integrates a diverse set of environmental factors to direct cellular growth and is implicated in metabolic disorders, neurodegeneration, cancer, and aging (60). Recent studies have shown that mTORC1 regulates the differentiation of T helper cells and is involved in Th1 and Th17 development (61). Thus, the VEGF-NOTCH1-mTORC1 axis contributes to skewed T cell differentiation.
IL-21-Producing CD4+ T Cells
The number of IL-21-producing CD4+ T cells is also increased in vascular lesions and in the blood (44). IL-21-producing CD4+ T cells account for approximately 2.5% of the peripheral blood cells in healthy individuals, whereas this proportion increases to approximately 8% in patients with GCA, which cannot be explained by the frequency of Th17 cells. IL-21 is the main cytokine produced by Tfh cells, which help B cells to secrete IgG antibodies, but the Tfh-B cell signature is not upregulated in GCA (62). Thus, the cellular origin of IL-21 remains unclear. However, since IL-21 is able to shift T cell differentiation toward Th1 and Th17 phenotypes and decrease the number of regulatory T cells (Tregs) (44), this cytokine could be a therapeutic target for GCA.
GM-CSF-Producing T Cells and Other T Helper Cells
Recently, GM-CSF has emerged as a key cytokine in the pathogenesis of GCA (63–65). GM-CSF and GM-CSF receptors are highly expressed in GCA-affected arteries. Although Th1 and Th17 cells are the major sources of GM-CSF in the joints with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (66, 67), GM-CSF is produced by endothelial cells, macrophages, and T cells in vascular lesions of GCA. In ex vivo cultured arteries, anti-GM-CSF receptor antibodies have shown promise, decreasing T cell and macrophage numbers as well as proinflammatory cytokine expression (63). Other T helper cell subsets, such as Th9 and Th22 cells, are also implicated in the amplification of vascular inflammation (68, 69), although their precise role is still unclear.
Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells
The results of a study that enrolled patients with GCA confirmed by temporal artery biopsy (TAB) and prospectively performed a second TAB from the contralateral side to the first TAB showed residual inflammation in approximately half of the patients even after one year of treatment (70). The pathological analysis showing that T cells were the main residual cells prompted us to investigate tissue-resident memory T (Trm) cells. A subset of effector T cells resides in lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues without recirculation through the blood and gives rise to Trm cells (71, 72). A key feature of Trm cells is their ability to be retained in barrier tissues for prolonged periods of time and their rapid response when encountering the same antigen (73). Trm cells are characterized by the expression of C-type lectin CD69 and integrin CD103 (74). In our mouse model of LVV, approximately 10% of the CD4+ T cells infiltrating the vascular tissue expressed CD103. Interestingly, tissue residency of Trm cells requires signals from the JAK-STAT pathway and CD28 stimulation from tissue niches (17, 75). Further characterization of these Trm cells may lead to the development of therapeutic strategies to specifically eliminate them.
Vasculoprotective T Cells in GCA
Naturally occurring CD4+ Tregs, which express the transcription factor FoxP3 in the nucleus and CD25 on the cell surface, are a functionally distinct T cell subset actively engaged in the maintenance of immunological tolerance (76). Since IL-6 and IL-21 have been reported to inhibit Treg differentiation (44, 77) and these cytokines are highly enriched in the plasma of patients with GCA, the number of CD4+ Tregs is reduced in patients with GCA compared to healthy controls (44). However, accumulating evidence suggests that tocilizumab (TCZ), an IL-6 receptor inhibitor, restores not only the number of CD4+ Tregs but also the function of these cells (78–80). Accordingly, TCZ decreases relapse and has a steroid-tapering effect on GCA (81).
While CD4+ Tregs are well recognized and established, their CD8+ counterparts are still controversial in many regards, including their phenotypic identity and mechanisms of suppression (82); however, the immunosuppressive effects of CD8+ Tregs have been proven in some experimental models such as inflammatory bowel disease and graft-versus-host disease (83, 84). Compared with younger individuals, the number of CD8+ Tregs is reduced in the elderly, and these cells are significantly reduced in number and function in GCA patients (85). The functional defect of CD8+ Tregs is attributed to inadequate release of exosomes containing NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2), which inhibits neighboring CD4+ T cell activation by blocking the phosphorylation of ZAP-70, a proximal molecule directly involved in T cell receptor signaling (85, 86).
Vasculitogenic and Vasculoprotective T Cells in TAK
Similar to GCA, an increase in Th1 and Th17 cells has been reported in TAK (16, 87). This increase may stem from overactivation of the NOTCH1-mTOR pathway (88, 89) and/or an increase in the number of CD4+ IL-21-producing T cells (89, 90). In parallel, a decrease in CD4+ Treg numbers has also been documented (91). In contrast, unlike GCA, microarray analysis has demonstrated that the Tfh signature that includes CXCR5 and CCR6 is significantly increased in the blood and the aorta (62). Tfh cells may be partly responsible for the elevated levels of IL-21 in TAK. Moreover, it has been reported that CD8+ T cell infiltration is more common in TAK than in GCA (92). Recent immunophenotyping analysis using flow cytometry has added another piece of evidence showing that circulating CD8+ T cells were increased only during the active phase in TAK, but the number of these cells in GCA was stable irrespective of the disease activity (93). The contribution of CD8+ T cells to the pathomechanisms of TAK may be greater than their contribution in GCA.
Discussion
CD4+ T cells undoubtedly play a central role in LVV pathogenesis. Additionally, CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells actively engage in the disease mechanism of TAK, making it more complex than that of GCA (40). Indeed, abatacept (ABT), which selectively inhibits T cell activation by blocking the co-stimulatory signal, has been shown to improve the disease activity of RA and reduce the relapse rate in patients with GCA (94), but it failed to exhibit efficacy in TAK (95). However, the high relapse rate even in the ABT treatment arm in patients with GCA prompts us to explore better therapeutic options for LVV.
Considering the disease mechanism, the VEGF-NOTCH1-mTOR pathway as well as T cell polarizing cytokines, such as IL-12, IL-23, and IL-21, could be therapeutic targets to correct biased CD4+ T cell differentiation and suppress LVV. Anti-VEGF antibody, an mTOR inhibitor, and an IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor (e.g., ustekinumab) are on the market. Ustekinumab has been tested for GCA and TAK (96, 97), but the results obtained to date are not encouraging (98, 99).
Other therapeutic options include inhibition of released cytokines, including IL-17, GM-CSF, and IFN-γ. The efficacy and safety of anti-IL-17 and anti-GM-CSF receptor antibodies against GCA are being actively pursued in clinical trials, and the results obtained to date appear promising (100, 101). Signaling downstream of GM-CSF and IFN-γ involves the JAK-STAT pathway, and the efficacy of JAK inhibitors is widely recognized in RA (102), which raises expectations for the treatment of LVV (103). Indeed, in addition to IFN-γ, type I IFN is also highly expressed in the vascular lesions, and there have been several reports of increased activation of the JAK-STAT pathway in GCA- and TAK-T cells (17, 104–106).
Furthermore, GWAS has identified IL-12B as a susceptibility gene for TAK (12, 107), and the IL-12B risk allele is associated with vascular damage in TAK (108). IL-12 relies on the JAK-STAT pathway for intracellular signal transduction. Although the results of ustekinumab are not encouraging, JAK inhibitors may have potential for treating TAK (109).
In conclusion, recent research advances have shed new light on the role of T cells in the disease mechanisms of LVV. Several treatment options targeting T cells are expected to emerge in the near future.
Funding
This work was in part supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 20K17418 and a grant-in-aid of the Cardiovascular Research Fund, Tokyo, Japan and the Japan Rheumatism Foundation, Tokyo, Japan to RW.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
RW drafted the manuscript. MH revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
JennetteJCFalkRJBaconPABasuNCidMCFerrarioFet al. 2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum (2013) 65:1–11. doi: 10.1002/art.37715
2
GloorADBerryGJGoronzyJJWeyandCM. Age as a Risk Factor in Vasculitis. Semin Immunopathol (2022) 44(3):281–301. doi: 10.1007/s00281-022-00911-1
3
Van Der GeestKSMSandoviciMBrouwerEMackieSL. Diagnostic Accuracy of Symptoms, Physical Signs, and Laboratory Tests for Giant Cell Arteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Intern Med (2020) 180:1295–304. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3050
4
OkazakiSWatanabeRKondoHKudoMHarigaeHFujiiH. High Relapse Rate in Patients With Polymyalgia Rheumatica Despite the Combination of Immunosuppressants and Prednisolone: A Single Center Experience of 89 Patients. Tohoku J Exp Med (2020) 251:125–33. doi: 10.1620/tjem.251.125
5
NumanoF. Differences in Clinical Presentation and Outcome in Different Countries for Takayasu's Arteritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol (1997) 9:12–5. doi: 10.1097/00002281-199701000-00003
6
YoshidaMWatanabeRIshiiTMachiyamaTAkitaKFujitaYet al. Retrospective Analysis of 95 Patients With Large Vessel Vasculitis: A Single Center Experience. Int J Rheum Dis (2016) 19:87–94. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12777
7
ElbendaryAAbdel-HalimMRERagabG. Updates in Cutaneous Manifestations of Systemic Vasculitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol (2022) 34:25–32. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000847
8
WatanabeRIshiiTNakamuraKShiraiTFujiiHSaitoSet al. Ulcerative Colitis Is Not a Rare Complication of Takayasu Arteritis. Mod Rheumatol (2014) 24:372–3. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2013.854045
9
WeyandCMGoronzyJJ. Immune Mechanisms in Medium and Large-Vessel Vasculitis. Nat Rev Rheumatol (2013) 9:731–40. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.161
10
KaiserMYoungeBBjornssonJGoronzyJJWeyandCM. Formation of New Vasa Vasorum in Vasculitis. Production of Angiogenic Cytokines by Multinucleated Giant Cells. Am J Pathol (1999) 155:765–74. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65175-9
11
CarmonaFDVaglioAMackieSLHernandez-RodriguezJMonachPACastanedaSet al. A Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Risk Alleles in Plasminogen and P4HA2 Associated With Giant Cell Arteritis. Am J Hum Genet (2017) 100:64–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.11.013
12
TeraoCYoshifujiHMatsumuraTNaruseTKIshiiTNakaokaYet al. Genetic Determinants and an Epistasis of LILRA3 and HLA-B*52 in Takayasu Arteritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2018) 115:13045–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808850115
13
DongC. Cytokine Regulation and Function in T Cells. Annu Rev Immunol (2021) 39:51–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-061020-053702
14
SakaguchiSVignaliDARudenskyAYNiecREWaldmannH. The Plasticity and Stability of Regulatory T Cells. Nat Rev Immunol (2013) 13:461–7. doi: 10.1038/nri3464
15
DengJYoungeBROlshenRAGoronzyJJWeyandCM. Th17 and Th1 T-Cell Responses in Giant Cell Arteritis. Circulation (2010) 121:906–15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.872903
16
SaadounDGarridoMComarmondCDesboisACDomontFSaveyLet al. Th1 and Th17 Cytokines Drive Inflammation in Takayasu Arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol (2015) 67:1353–60. doi: 10.1002/art.39037
17
ZhangHWatanabeRBerryGJTianLGoronzyJJWeyandCM. Inhibition of JAK-STAT Signaling Suppresses Pathogenic Immune Responses in Medium and Large Vessel Vasculitis. Circulation (2018) 137:1934–48. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030423
18
SamsonMCorbera-BellaltaMAudiaSPlanas-RigolEMartinLCidMCet al. Recent Advances in Our Understanding of Giant Cell Arteritis Pathogenesis. Autoimmun Rev (2017) 16:833–44. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.05.014
19
WatanabeRGoronzyJJBerryGLiaoYJWeyandCM. Giant Cell Arteritis: From Pathogenesis to Therapeutic Management. Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol (2016) 2:126–37. doi: 10.1007/s40674-016-0043-x
20
Martinez-TaboadaVHunderNNHunderGGWeyandCMGoronzyJJ. Recognition of Tissue Residing Antigen by T Cells in Vasculitic Lesions of Giant Cell Arteritis. J Mol Med (Berl) (1996) 74:695–703. doi: 10.1007/s001090050074
21
GildenDWhiteTKhmelevaNHeintzmanAChoeABoyerPJet al. Prevalence and Distribution of VZV in Temporal Arteries of Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis. Neurology (2015) 84:1948–55. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001409
22
PryshchepOMa-KrupaWYoungeBRGoronzyJJWeyandCM. Vessel-Specific Toll-Like Receptor Profiles in Human Medium and Large Arteries. Circulation (2008) 118:1276–84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.789172
23
Ma-KrupaWJeonMSSpoerlSTedderTFGoronzyJJWeyandCM. Activation of Arterial Wall Dendritic Cells and Breakdown of Self-Tolerance in Giant Cell Arteritis. J Exp Med (2004) 199:173–83. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030850
24
KrupaWMDewanMJeonMSKurtinPJYoungeBRGoronzyJJet al. Trapping of Misdirected Dendritic Cells in the Granulomatous Lesions of Giant Cell Arteritis. Am J Pathol (2002) 161:1815–23. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64458-6
25
WagnerADWittkopUPrahstASchmidtWAGromnica-IhleEVorpahlKet al. Dendritic Cells Co-Localize With Activated CD4+ T Cells in Giant Cell Arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol (2003) 21:185–92.
26
WatanabeRZhangHBerryGGoronzyJJWeyandCM. Immune Checkpoint Dysfunction in Large and Medium Vessel Vasculitis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2017) 312:H1052–h1059. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00024.2017
27
ZhangHWatanabeRBerryGJVaglioALiaoYJWarringtonKJet al. Immunoinhibitory Checkpoint Deficiency in Medium and Large Vessel Vasculitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2017) 114:E970–e979. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616848114
28
WagnerADGoronzyJJWeyandCM. Functional Profile of Tissue-Infiltrating and Circulating CD68+ Cells in Giant Cell Arteritis. Evidence for Two Components of the Disease. J Clin Invest (1994) 94:1134–40. doi: 10.1172/JCI117428
29
Corbera-BellaltaMPlanas-RigolELozanoETerrades-GarciaNAlbaMAPrieto-GonzalezSet al. Blocking Interferon Gamma Reduces Expression of Chemokines CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 and Decreases Macrophage Infiltration in Ex Vivo Cultured Arteries From Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2016) 75:1177–86. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208371
30
WatanabeRHilhorstMZhangHZeisbrichMBerryGJWallisBBet al. Glucose Metabolism Controls Disease-Specific Signatures of Macrophage Effector Functions. JCI Insight (2018) 3(20):e123047. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.123047
31
Van SleenYJiemyWFPringleSVan Der GeestKSMAbdulahadWHSandoviciMet al. A Distinct Macrophage Subset Mediating Tissue Destruction and Neovascularization in Giant Cell Arteritis: Implication of the YKL-40/Interleukin-13 Receptor Alpha2 Axis. Arthritis Rheumatol (2021) 73:2327–37. doi: 10.1002/art.41887
32
WatanabeRMaedaTZhangHBerryGJZeisbrichMBrockettRet al. MMP (Matrix Metalloprotease)-9-Producing Monocytes Enable T Cells to Invade the Vessel Wall and Cause Vasculitis. Circ Res (2018) 123:700–15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313206
33
WeyandCMWatanabeRZhangHAkiyamaMBerryGJGoronzyJJ. Cytokines, Growth Factors and Proteases in Medium and Large Vessel Vasculitis. Clin Immunol (2019) 206:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2019.02.007
34
KaiserMWeyandCMBjornssonJGoronzyJJ. Platelet-Derived Growth Factor, Intimal Hyperplasia, and Ischemic Complications in Giant Cell Arteritis. Arthritis Rheum (1998) 41:623–33. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199804)41:4<623::AID-ART9>3.0.CO;2-6
35
LozanoESegarraMGarcia-MartinezAHernandez-RodriguezJCidMC. Imatinib Mesylate Inhibits In Vitro and Ex Vivo Biological Responses Related to Vascular Occlusion in Giant Cell Arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2008) 67:1581–8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.070805
36
PulsatelliLBoiardiLAssirelliEPazzolaGMuratoreFAddimandaOet al. Imbalance Between Angiogenic and Anti-Angiogenic Factors in Sera From Patients With Large-Vessel Vasculitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol (2020) 38 Suppl 124:23–30.
37
MichailidouDMustelinTLoodC. Role of Neutrophils in Systemic Vasculitides. Front Immunol (2020) 11:619705. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.619705
38
WangLAiZKhoyrattyTZecKEamesHLVan GrinsvenEet al. ROS-Producing Immature Neutrophils in Giant Cell Arteritis are Linked to Vascular Pathologies. JCI Insight (2020) 5(20):e139163. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.139163
39
ParreauSVedrenneNRegentARichardLSindouPMouthonLet al. An Immunohistochemical Analysis of Fibroblasts in Giant Cell Arteritis. Ann Diagn Pathol (2021) 52:151728. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2021.151728
40
WatanabeRBerryGJLiangDHGoronzyJJWeyandCM. Pathogenesis of Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis-Similarities and Differences. Curr Rheumatol Rep (2020) 22:68. doi: 10.1007/s11926-020-00948-x
41
SchaufelbergerCStemmeSAnderssonRHanssonGK. T Lymphocytes in Giant Cell Arteritic Lesions are Polyclonal Cells Expressing Alpha Beta Type Antigen Receptors and VLA-1 Integrin Receptors. Clin Exp Immunol (1993) 91:421–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1993.tb05919.x
42
WatanabeRHosgurEZhangHWenZBerryGGoronzyJJet al. Pro-Inflammatory and Anti-Inflammatory T Cells in Giant Cell Arteritis. Joint Bone Spine (2017) 84:421–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2016.07.005
43
WeyandCMSchonbergerJOppitzUHunderNNHicokKCGoronzyJJ. Distinct Vascular Lesions in Giant Cell Arteritis Share Identical T Cell Clonotypes. J Exp Med (1994) 179:951–60. doi: 10.1084/jem.179.3.951
44
TerrierBGeriGChaaraWAllenbachYRosenzwajgMCostedoat-ChalumeauNet al. Interleukin-21 Modulates Th1 and Th17 Responses in Giant Cell Arteritis. Arthritis Rheum (2012) 64:2001–11. doi: 10.1002/art.34327
45
Espigol-FrigoleGPlanas-RigolELozanoECorbera-BellaltaMTerrades-GarciaNPrieto-GonzalezSet al. Expression and Function of IL12/23 Related Cytokine Subunits (P35, P40, and P19) in Giant-Cell Arteritis Lesions: Contribution of P40 to Th1- and Th17-Mediated Inflammatory Pathways. Front Immunol (2018) 9:809. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00809
46
BeattyGPatersonY. IFN-Gamma-Dependent Inhibition of Tumor Angiogenesis by Tumor-Infiltrating CD4+ T Cells Requires Tumor Responsiveness to IFN-Gamma. J Immunol (2001) 166:2276–82. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.4.2276
47
KammertoensTFrieseCArinaAIdelCBriesemeisterDRotheMet al. Tumour Ischaemia by Interferon-Gamma Resembles Physiological Blood Vessel Regression. Nature (2017) 545:98–102. doi: 10.1038/nature22311
48
WangYBaiYQinLZhangPYiTTeesdaleSAet al. Interferon-Gamma Induces Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation and Intimal Expansion by Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Dependent Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Raptor Complex 1 Activation. Circ Res (2007) 101:560–9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.151068
49
KatoM. New Insights Into IFN-Gamma in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Role in the Era of JAK Inhibitors. Immunol Med (2020) 43:72–8. doi: 10.1080/25785826.2020.1751908
50
RocheNEFulbrightJWWagnerADHunderGGGoronzyJJWeyandCM. Correlation of Interleukin-6 Production and Disease Activity in Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis. Arthritis Rheum (1993) 36:1286–94. doi: 10.1002/art.1780360913
51
WeyandCMHicokKCHunderGGGoronzyJJ. Tissue Cytokine Patterns in Patients With Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis. Ann Intern Med (1994) 121:484–91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-7-199410010-00003
52
MiossecPKollsJK. Targeting IL-17 and TH17 Cells in Chronic Inflammation. Nat Rev Drug Discovery (2012) 11:763–76. doi: 10.1038/nrd3794
53
HirotaKHashimotoMYoshitomiHTanakaSNomuraTYamaguchiTet al. T Cell Self-Reactivity Forms a Cytokine Milieu for Spontaneous Development of IL-17+ Th Cells That Cause Autoimmune Arthritis. J Exp Med (2007) 204:41–7. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062259
54
MiossecPKornTKuchrooVK. Interleukin-17 and Type 17 Helper T Cells. N Engl J Med (2009) 361:888–98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0707449
55
FossiezFDjossouOChomaratPFlores-RomoLAit-YahiaSMaatCet al. T Cell Interleukin-17 Induces Stromal Cells to Produce Proinflammatory and Hematopoietic Cytokines. J Exp Med (1996) 183:2593–603. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.6.2593
56
PietrowskiEBenderBHuppertJWhiteRLuhmannHJKuhlmannCR. Pro-Inflammatory Effects of Interleukin-17A on Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Involve NAD(P)H- Oxidase Derived Reactive Oxygen Species. J Vasc Res (2011) 48:52–8. doi: 10.1159/000317400
57
WenZShenYBerryGShahramFLiYWatanabeRet al. The Microvascular Niche Instructs T Cells in Large Vessel Vasculitis via the VEGF-Jagged1-Notch Pathway. Sci Transl Med (2017) 9(399):eaal3322. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aal3322
58
BaldiniMMaugeriNRamirezGAGiacomassiCCastiglioniAPrieto-GonzalezSet al. Selective Up-Regulation of the Soluble Pattern-Recognition Receptor Pentraxin 3 and of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Giant Cell Arteritis: Relevance for Recent Optic Nerve Ischemia. Arthritis Rheum (2012) 64:854–65. doi: 10.1002/art.33411
59
LiuGYSabatiniDM. mTOR at the Nexus of Nutrition, Growth, Ageing and Disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2020) 21:183–203. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0199-y
60
ZoncuREfeyanASabatiniDM. mTOR: From Growth Signal Integration to Cancer, Diabetes and Ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2011) 12:21–35. doi: 10.1038/nrm3025
61
DelgoffeGMPollizziKNWaickmanATHeikampEMeyersDJHortonMRet al. The Kinase mTOR Regulates the Differentiation of Helper T Cells Through the Selective Activation of Signaling by Mtorc1 and Mtorc2. Nat Immunol (2011) 12:295–303. doi: 10.1038/ni.2005
62
DesboisACRegnierPQuiniouVLejoncourAMaciejewski-DuvalAComarmondCet al. Specific Follicular Helper T Cell Signature in Takayasu Arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol (2021) 73:1233–43. doi: 10.1002/art.41672
63
Corbera-BellaltaMAlba-RoviraRMuralidharanSEspigol-FrigoleGRios-GarcesRMarco-HernandezJet al. Blocking GM-CSF Receptor Alpha With Mavrilimumab Reduces Infiltrating Cells, Pro-Inflammatory Markers and Neoangiogenesis in Ex Vivo Cultured Arteries From Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2022) 81:524–36. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220873
64
JiemyWFVan SleenYVan Der GeestKSTen BergeHAAbdulahadWHSandoviciMet al. Distinct Macrophage Phenotypes Skewed by Local Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) and Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (M-CSF) are Associated With Tissue Destruction and Intimal Hyperplasia in Giant Cell Arteritis. Clin Transl Immunol (2020) 9:e1164. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1164
65
WagnerADWittkopUThalmannJWillmenTGodeckeVHodamJet al. Glucocorticoid Effects on Tissue Residing Immune Cells in Giant Cell Arteritis: Importance of GM-CSF. Front Med (Lausanne) (2021) 8:709404. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.709404
66
HirotaKHashimotoMItoYMatsuuraMItoHTanakaMet al. Autoimmune Th17 Cells Induced Synovial Stromal and Innate Lymphoid Cell Secretion of the Cytokine GM-CSF to Initiate and Augment Autoimmune Arthritis. Immunity (2018) 48:1220–1232.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.009
67
YamadaHHaraguchiASakurabaKOkazakiKFukushiJIMizu-UchiHet al. Th1 Is the Predominant Helper T Cell Subset That Produces GM-CSF in the Joint of Rheumatoid Arthritis. RMD Open (2017) 3:e000487. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000487
68
CicciaFRizzoAGugginoGCavazzaAAlessandroRMaugeriRet al. Difference in the Expression of IL-9 and IL-17 Correlates With Different Histological Pattern of Vascular Wall Injury in Giant Cell Arteritis. Rheumatol (Oxford) (2015) 54:1596–604. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev102
69
ZerbiniAMuratoreFBoiardiLCicciaFBonaciniMBelloniLet al. Increased Expression of Interleukin-22 in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis. Rheumatol (Oxford) (2018) 57:64–72. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex334
70
MaleszewskiJJYoungeBRFritzlenJTHunderGGGoronzyJJWarringtonKJet al. Clinical and Pathological Evolution of Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective Study of Follow-Up Temporal Artery Biopsies in 40 Treated Patients. Mod Pathol (2017) 30:788–96. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.10
71
IijimaNIwasakiA. Tissue Instruction for Migration and Retention of TRM Cells. Trends Immunol (2015) 36:556–64. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2015.07.002
72
MasopustDSoerensAG. Tissue-Resident T Cells and Other Resident Leukocytes. Annu Rev Immunol (2019) 37:521–46. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053214
73
TakamuraS. Niches for the Long-Term Maintenance of Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells. Front Immunol (2018) 9:1214. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01214
74
HiraharaKKokuboKAokiAKiuchiMNakayamaT. The Role of CD4(+) Resident Memory T Cells in Local Immunity in the Mucosal Tissue - Protection Versus Pathology. Front Immunol (2021) 12:616309. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.616309
75
ZhangHWatanabeRBerryGJNadlerSGGoronzyJJWeyandCM. CD28 Signaling Controls Metabolic Fitness of Pathogenic T Cells in Medium and Large Vessel Vasculitis. J Am Coll Cardiol (2019) 73:1811–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.049
76
SakaguchiSMikamiNWingJBTanakaAIchiyamaKOhkuraN. Regulatory T Cells and Human Disease. Annu Rev Immunol (2020) 38:541–66. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042718-041717
77
KishimotoTKangS. IL-6 Revisited: From Rheumatoid Arthritis to CAR T Cell Therapy and COVID-19. Annu Rev Immunol (2022) 40:323–48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-101220-023458
78
AdriawanIRAtschekzeiFDittrich-BreiholzOGarantziotisPHirschSRisserLMet al. Novel Aspects of Regulatory T Cell Dysfunction as a Therapeutic Target in Giant Cell Arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2022) 81:124–31. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220955
79
MiyabeCMiyabeYStrleKKimNDStoneJHLusterADet al. An Expanded Population of Pathogenic Regulatory T Cells in Giant Cell Arteritis is Abrogated by IL-6 Blockade Therapy. Ann Rheum Dis (2017) 76:898–905. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210070
80
SamsonMGreigertHCiudadMGerardCGhesquiereTTradMet al. Improvement of Treg Immune Response After Treatment With Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis. Clin Transl Immunol (2021) 10:e1332. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1332
81
StoneJHTuckwellKDimonacoSKlearmanMAringerMBlockmansDet al. Trial of Tocilizumab in Giant-Cell Arteritis. N Engl J Med (2017) 377:317–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613849
82
NiederlovaVTsyklauriOChadimovaTStepanekO. CD8(+) Tregs Revisited: A Heterogeneous Population With Different Phenotypes and Properties. Eur J Immunol (2021) 51:512–30. doi: 10.1002/eji.202048614
83
LiuHQiuFWangYZengQLiuCChenYet al. CD8+CD122+PD-1+ Tregs Synergize With Costimulatory Blockade of CD40/CD154, But Not B7/CD28, to Prolong Murine Allograft Survival. Front Immunol (2019) 10:306. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00306
84
Menager-MarcqIPomieCRomagnoliPVan MeerwijkJP. CD8+CD28- Regulatory T Lymphocytes Prevent Experimental Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Mice. Gastroenterology (2006) 131:1775–85. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.09.008
85
WenZShimojimaYShiraiTLiYJuJYangZet al. NADPH Oxidase Deficiency Underlies Dysfunction of Aged CD8+ Tregs. J Clin Invest (2016) 126:1953–67. doi: 10.1172/JCI84181
86
JinKParreauSWarringtonKJKosterMJBerryGJGoronzyJJet al. Regulatory T Cells in Autoimmune Vasculitis. Front Immunol (2022) 13:844300. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.844300
87
KongXSunYMaLChenHWeiLWuWet al. The Critical Role of IL-6 in the Pathogenesis of Takayasu Arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol (2016) 34:S21–7.
88
JiangWSunMWangYZhengMYuanZMaiSet al. Notch1 Licenses mTOR Hyperactivity and Drives Vascular Inflammation in Patients With Takayasu's Arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol (2022). doi: 10.1002/art.42103
89
Maciejewski-DuvalAComarmondCLeroyerAZaidanMLe JoncourADesboisACet al. mTOR Pathway Activation in Large Vessel Vasculitis. J Autoimmun (2018) 94:99–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.07.013
90
SavioliBSaluBRDe BritoMVVilela OlivaMLDe SouzaAWS. Silent Arterial Inflammation During the Apparent Remission State of Takayasu's Arteritis. What do Cytokines Tell Us? Clin Exp Rheumatol (2018) 36 Suppl 111:33–9.
91
JiaWFuZLWangXLuoJYanCLCaoJPet al. Decreased Absolute Number of Circulating Regulatory T Cells in Patients With Takayasu's Arteritis. Front Immunol (2021) 12:768244. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.768244
92
SekoYMinotaSKawasakiAShinkaiYMaedaKYagitaHet al. Perforin-Secreting Killer Cell Infiltration and Expression of a 65-kD Heat-Shock Protein in Aortic Tissue of Patients With Takayasu's Arteritis. J Clin Invest (1994) 93:750–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI117029
93
MatsumotoKSuzukiKYoshimotoKSekiNTsujimotoHChibaKet al. Significant Association Between Clinical Characteristics and Changes in Peripheral Immuno-Phenotype in Large Vessel Vasculitis. Arthritis Res Ther (2019) 21:304. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2068-7
94
LangfordCACuthbertsonDYtterbergSRKhalidiNMonachPACaretteSet al. A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Abatacept (CTLA-4Ig) for the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol (2017) 69:837–45. doi: 10.1002/art.40044
95
LangfordCACuthbertsonDYtterbergSRKhalidiNMonachPACaretteSet al. A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Abatacept (CTLA-4Ig) for the Treatment of Takayasu Arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol (2017) 69:846–53. doi: 10.1002/art.40037
96
ConwayRO'neillLGallagherPMccarthyGMMurphyCCVealeDJet al. Ustekinumab for Refractory Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective 52-Week Trial. Semin Arthritis Rheum (2018) 48:523–8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.04.004
97
TeraoCYoshifujiHNakajimaTYukawaNMatsudaFMimoriT. Ustekinumab as a Therapeutic Option for Takayasu Arteritis: From Genetic Findings to Clinical Application. Scand J Rheumatol (2016) 45:80–2. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2015.1060521
98
GonYYoshifujiHNakajimaTMurakamiKNakashimaROhmuraKet al. Long-Term Outcomes of Refractory Takayasu Arteritis Patients Treated With Biologics Including Ustekinumab. Mod Rheumatol (2021) 31:678–83. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1800560
99
MatzaMAFernandesADStoneJHUnizonySH. Ustekinumab for the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) (2021) 73:893–7. doi: 10.1002/acr.24200
100
CidMCUnizonySHBlockmansDBrouwerEDagnaLDasguptaBet al. Efficacy and Safety of Mavrilimumab in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Phase 2, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Ann Rheum Dis (2022) 81(5):653–61. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221865
101
VenhoffNSchmidtWALamprechtPTonyHPAppCSiederCet al. Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis: Study Protocol for a Randomized, Parallel Group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial. Trials (2021) 22:543. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05520-1
102
SmolenJSLandeweRBMBijlsmaJWJBurmesterGRDougadosMKerschbaumerAet al. EULAR Recommendations for the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis With Synthetic and Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: 2019 Update. Ann Rheum Dis (2020) 79:685–99. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655
103
WatanabeRHashimotoM. Perspectives of JAK Inhibitors for Large Vessel Vasculitis. Front Immunol (2022) 13:881705. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.881705
104
RégnierPLe JoncourAMaciejewski-DuvalADesboisACComarmondCRosenzwajgMet al. Targeting JAK/STAT Pathway in Takayasu's Arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2020) 79:951–9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216900
105
VieiraMRegnierPMaciejewski-DuvalALe JoncourADarasse-JezeGRosenzwajgMet al. Interferon Signature in Giant Cell Arteritis Aortitis. J Autoimmun (2022) 127:102796. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2022.102796
106
WatanabeRBerryGJLiangDHGoronzyJJWeyandCM. Cellular Signaling Pathways in Medium and Large Vessel Vasculitis. Front Immunol (2020) 11:587089. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.587089
107
TeraoCYoshifujiHKimuraAMatsumuraTOhmuraKTakahashiMet al. Two Susceptibility Loci to Takayasu Arteritis Reveal a Synergistic Role of the IL12B and HLA-B Regions in a Japanese Population. Am J Hum Genet (2013) 93:289–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.05.024
108
KadobaKWatanabeRIwasakiTNakajimaTKitagoriKAkizukiSet al. A Susceptibility Locus in the IL12B But Not LILRA3 Region is Associated With Vascular Damage in Takayasu Arteritis. Sci Rep (2021) 11:13667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93213-9
109
WatanabeR. JAK Inhibitors as Promising Agents for Refractory Takayasu Arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2022) 81:e67. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217577
Summary
Keywords
CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, giant cell arteritis, regulatory T cells, Takayasu arteritis
Citation
Watanabe R and Hashimoto M (2022) Vasculitogenic T Cells in Large Vessel Vasculitis. Front. Immunol. 13:923582. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.923582
Received
19 April 2022
Accepted
23 May 2022
Published
15 June 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Keiji Hirota, Kyoto University, Japan
Reviewed by
Chie Miyabe, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Japan
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Watanabe and Hashimoto.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ryu Watanabe, doctorwatanaberyu@yahoo.co.jp
This article was submitted to Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.