Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol., 11 April 2023
Sec. Microbial Immunology
This article is part of the Research Topic Community Series in Immune Interactions with Pathogenic and Commensal Fungi: Volume II View all 7 articles

Intestinal colonization with Candida auris and mucosal immune response in mice treated with cefoperazone oral antibiotic

  • 1Department of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States
  • 2Purdue Institute for Immunology, Inflammation and Infectious Diseases (PI4D), West Lafayette, IN, United States

Candida auris, an emerging multi-drug resistant fungal pathogen, causes invasive infections in humans. The factors regulating the colonization of C. auris in host niches are not well understood. In this study, we examined the effect of antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis on C. auris intestinal colonization, dissemination, microbiome composition and the mucosal immune response. Our results indicate that mice treated with cefoperazone alone had a significant increase in C. auris intestinal colonization compared to untreated control groups. A significant increase in the dissemination of C. auris from the intestine to internal organs was observed in antibiotic-treated immunosuppressed mice. Intestinal colonization of C. auris alters the microbiome composition of antibiotic-treated mice. Relative abundance of firmicutes members mainly Clostridiales and Paenibacillus were considerably increased in the cefoperazone-treated mice infected with C. auris compared to cefoperazone-treated uninfected mice. Next, we examined the mucosal immune response of C. auris infected mice and compared the results with Candida albicans infection. The number of CD11b+ CX3CR1+ macrophages was significantly decreased in the intestine of C. auris infected mice when compared to C. albicans infection. On the other hand, both C. auris and C. albicans infected mice had a comparable increase of the number of Th17 and Th22 cells in the intestine. A significant increase in Candida-specific IgA was observed in the serum of C. auris but not in the C. albicans infected mice. Taken together, treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotic increased the colonization and dissemination of C. auris from the intestine. Furthermore, findings from this study for the first time revealed the microbiome composition, innate and adaptive cellular immune response to intestinal infection with C. auris.

Introduction

Fungal infections such as invasive candidiasis affect about 700,000 patients globally and result in high mortality rate of more than 40% among infected patients (13). Furthermore, indiscriminate use of anti-microbial drugs in COVID-19 patients resulted in the emergence of multidrug-resistant fungal pathogens such as Candida auris (4, 5). C. auris was recently classified as an urgent threat by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Antibiotic Threats Report (2019) and ranked in the critical priority group by the World Health Organization (WHO) in a recently released list of fungal priority pathogens (68). Furthermore, C. auris strains exhibit resistance to FDA-approved antifungal drugs partly through mutation in the target genes (1, 2, 4, 6). C. auris colonizes the human skin resulting in nosocomial transmission and outbreaks of invasive infections (5). Emerging evidence from recent clinical studies indicate that individuals on prior antibiotic therapy (30-45%) were highly susceptible to C. auris infections (35, 9). Furthermore, C. auris was detected in human stool samples, indicating that the intestine is a potential colonization site (1012). However, the effect of antibiotic treatment on intestinal colonization of C. auris is not clear.

Antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis and dysregulation in host defense increases the susceptibility to Candida albicans colonization and invasion from the intestine (1319). Invasive Candida infections originating from the initial colonization of the intestine and subsequent dissemination results in fatal infections in immunocompromised patients (2022). Therefore, understanding the factors regulating Candida intestinal colonization and mucosal antifungal defense is critical to develop novel therapeutic approaches to prevent and treat Candida infections (14, 2025). In this study, we investigated the effect of cefoperazone, a widely used FDA-approved broad-spectrum antibiotic, on C. auris intestinal colonization and mucosal immune defense against C. auris. Our findings suggest that treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotic alone increases the susceptibility to C. auris colonization, dissemination and alters the microbiome composition in the intestine. We examined the cellular and adaptive immune response in the intestine of C. auris infected mice and compared with C. albicans infected groups. Our findings are significant as they show that oral broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment is a major risk factor for intestinal colonization of C. auris and subsequent invasive infections.

Materials and methods

Strains and reagents.

Candida albicans SC5314 was provided by Dr. Andrew Koh (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, USA). Candida auris #0387 (South Asian strain) was obtained from Center for Disease Control (CDC) AR Isolate Bank, USA. The reagents and chemicals for all the experiments were purchased from the indicated vendors mentioned below. Yeast Peptone Dextrose (YPD) (242810, BD Difco, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), CHROMagar (CA222, CHROMagar, Paris, France), agar (BP1423-500, Fisher Bioreagents, Pittsburg, PA, USA), ampicillin (14417, Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), kanamycin-Sulfate (BP9069-5, Fisher Bioreagents, Pittsburg), formaldehyde (F79, Fisher Bioreagents, Pittsburg) and streptomycin (100556, MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA), cefoperazone (Sodium salt) (16113, Cayman Chemical), cyclophosphamide (PHR1404, Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), U-bottom 96 well plate (229190) from Cell Treat (Pepperell, MA, USA). RPMI-1640 (SH30027.02, Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA), HEPES (BP310-500, Fisher Bioreagents), fetal bovine serum (FBS-500-H, CPS Serum, Parkville, MO, USA), penicillin-streptomycin (P4333-100ML, Millipore Sigma), L-glutamine (G3126, Millipore Sigma), gentamycin (15710-072 Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), D-glucose (D16-500, Fisher Bioreagents), 0.5 M EDTA (15575-020, Life Technologies), MgCl2 hexahydrate (M2670, Millipore Sigma), CaCl2 hexahydrate (21108, Millipore Sigma), 10× Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) (20-021-CV, Corning, Corning, NY, USA), Percoll (GE17-0891-01, Millipore Sigma), 70 μm cell strainer (22-363-548, Fisher Scientific), collagenase Type 1 (17100-017, GIBCO). For immune cell staining, anti-mouse antibodies were purchased from BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA. Zombie Violet Dye, CD16/32 (Clone 93), CD3ϵ (FITC, 145-2C11), CD4(APC, GK1.5), Ly-6G (PE/Cyanine7, 1A8), CD11b (PE, M1/70), F4/80 (Alexa Fluor 700, BM8), CX3CR1(Alexa Fluor 488, SA011F11), IFNγ (Alexa Fluor 700, XMG1.2), IL17A (PE/Dazzle 594, TC11-18H10.1), IL5(PE, TRFK5). IL22 (APC, IL22JOP) anti-mouse antibody was purchased from Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA. The cell staining buffer, cell activation cocktail without brefeldin A(500X), monensin (1000X), intracellular staining permeable wash buffer (10X) and fixation wash buffer were purchased from BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA. IgA mouse uncoated ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoassay) kit (88-50450), IgG1mouse uncoated ELISA kit (88-50410), heparinized capillary tubes (22-260-950), ELISA wash buffer (00-0400-59), Nunc MaxiSorp flat bottom 96 well plate (50-112-3685) was purchased from Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA

Cefoperazone treatment and fungal infection in mice

All animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Purdue University. Sterile water supplemented with or without cefoperazone (0.5mg/ml) was given to 8-10 weeks old male and female C57BL/6J mice as described previously (17, 26). Cefoperazone-supplemented water was changed every 3 days till the end of the experiment. After 7 days of antibiotic treatment, mice were infected with C. auris CDC #0387 (or) C. albicans SC314 via oral gavage at a dose of about ~1 x 108 CFU (Colony Forming Units) per mouse. Fecal pellets were collected from individual mice from both antibiotic-treated and untreated groups on indicated days to determine the fungal load. At 12 days post infection, mice from both untreated and antibiotic-treatment group were euthanized and gut contents were collected. Gut contents were weighed and homogenized using 1× PBS and the supernatant was plated onto YPD-agar plates containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin, 50 μg/ml kanamycin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. C. auris and C. albicans colonies were confirmed by plating the supernatants onto ChromAgar plates. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours to determine the fungal load (CFU/gram of fecal matter).

C. auris dissemination in immunosuppressed mouse model

The dissemination potential of C. auris CDC #0387 was determined in cyclophosphamide-treated mice as described before (16). Briefly, mice treated with or without cefoperazone for 7 days were infected with C. auris. Three days post-infection, all mice were treated with 150 mg of cyclophosphamide per kilogram of mouse body weight by intraperitoneal injection. A second and third dose of cyclophosphamide was given at 5- and 7-days post-infection, respectively. Five days after the last dose of cyclophosphamide, the mice were euthanized to determine the fungal load in cecal contents, liver, and kidneys as described before (16).

Isolation and staining of immune cells from intestinal lamina propria (LP)

Mononuclear cells from large intestinal LP were isolated as described previously (27). Briefly, intestine removed from mice was kept in cold RPMI harvest media (RPMI-1640, 5% FBS (fetal bovine serum), 10mM D-Glucose, 4 mM sodium bicarbonate, 5mM HEPES, 2mM L-glutamine, 20 U/ml penicillin, 20µg/ml gentamycin) to remove mesenteric fat and fecal material. Intestinal pieces were washed three times with EDTA solution (1X Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS), 5mM HEPES, 2mM L-glutamine, 20 U/ml penicillin, 20µg/ml gentamycin, 1.3 mM EDTA, water,4 mM sodium bicarbonate) and digested with collagenase solution (100U/ml Type I collagenase, RPMI-1640, 5% FBS, 5mM HEPES, 2mM L-glutamine, 20 U/ml penicillin, 20µg/ml gentamycin, 1mM magnesium chloride, 1mM calcium chloride). The resulting digest was strained through a 70-micron cell strainer and mononuclear strains obtained were used for staining. Cell labeling was performed in a U-bottom 96 well plate. For surface staining, cells were washed with cell staining buffer and Fc receptors were blocked with anti-mouse CD16/32. Respective antibodies for surface markers were used at a 1:100 dilution. After surface staining, cells were fixed using fixation buffer. For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were stimulated for 4.5 hours with cell activation cocktail at 37°C at 5% CO2 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were next incubated with 1X intracellular staining perm wash buffer with indicated antibodies. Cells were washed and the flow cytometry data was acquired with a Attune NxT Flow Cytometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Eugene, OR).

Microbiome analysis

Groups of mice treated with either sterile water or cefoperazone-containing water for 7 days and infected with (or) without C. auris CDC #0387 strain. Antibiotic treatment was continued till the end of the experiment. After 10 days of infection, mice were euthanized and cecal contents were collected to analyze the microbiome composition using MiSeq Illumina platform as described before (17). Microbiome sequences were analyzed using Qiime2 and the sequences were aligned by mafft and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using fasttree as before (17).

ELISA to detect total and fungal specific IgA and IgG1

Mice pre-treated with cefoperazone and infected with C. auris or C. albicans were euthanized 10 days post-infection and the gut contents collected were used to measure the antibodies level. Uninfected antibiotic-treated mice were used as control. Blood samples collected from these mice through retro-orbital route were used to measure IgA and IgG1 level in the serum. Gut contents were resuspended in sterile 1X PBS to a concentration of 250 mg/ml. Samples were homogenized for 1 minute by vortexing and the homogenates were spun at 10,000g for 10 min and the supernatants were used for ELISA. Total IgA was quantified by diluting small intestine and serum samples to 1: 1000 and large intestine samples to 1: 100. Total IgG1 was quantified by diluting small intestine and large intestine samples to 1: 10 and serum samples to 1: 100. Total IgA and IgG1 were determined as per the manufacturer’s instructions (IgA, catalogue #88-50450 and IgG1, Catalogue#88-50410 from Invitrogen). To determine fungal specific IgA and IgG1 levels, C. albicans or C. auris lysates were prepared and ELISA was carried out as described elsewhere (18). Briefly, overnight culture of C. albicans and C. auris were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for an hour at 4°C. Then fungal suspensions were washed three times in molecular-grade water by centrifuging at 900 x g for 2 minutes and were freeze-thawed three times cycle of 10 minutes in dry ice and 75°C heat block. The suspensions were then sonicated for 8 cycles of 15 seconds on/30 seconds off and the debris were centrifuged for 4000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant collected was diluted to 1:50 in 1X PBS (coating buffer) and plates were coated for overnight at 4°C. To quantify fungal-specific IgA and IgG1, contents from large and small intestine, and serum samples were diluted to 1: 4. Next day, 96-well plates were washed 3 times with wash buffer (catalogue# 00-0400-59, Invitrogen) and the wells were blocked by adding 250μl of PBS containing 0.1% tween 20 and 1% BSA at room temperature (RT) for 2 hours. To detect IgG1 level, wells were washed two times after incubation and then 50μl of diluted samples and 50μl of PBS containing 0.1% tween 20 and 1% BSA were added. Then 50μl of detection antibody (horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse IgG polyclonal antibody, catalogue #88-50410, Invitrogen) was added and the plate was incubated for 2 hours at RT. To detect IgA level, 10μl of diluted samples and 90μl of PBS containing 0.1% tween 20 and 1% BSA were added to each well and incubated for 2 hours at RT. After incubation, wells were washed and 100μl of detection antibody (HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgA polyclonal antibody, catalogue#88-50450, Invitrogen) was added to each well and incubated for one hour at RT. Then wells are washed for the final time and 100μl of tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate solution was added to each well and incubated for 10-15 minutes at RT. The reaction was stopped by adding 2N H2SO4 and absorbance was measured at 450 nm to determine the O.D by spectrophotometer.

Statistics analysis

Statistical analysis was done using Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test using GraphPad Prism 9.2.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). P values of ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Cefoperazone treatment increases the intestinal colonization of C auris in mice

Groups of mice treated with sterile water or water containing cefoperazone were infected with C. auris CDC #0387 (South Asian strain) via oral gavage at a dose of ~1 × 108 colony forming units (CFU) per mouse. Antibiotic-treatment was continued throughout the experiment. Fecal pellets were collected from untreated control and antibiotic-treated groups on days 1, 4, 8 and 12 post-infection to determine the fungal load. The antibiotic-treated mice showed significantly higher C. auris load in fecal samples compared to untreated control groups from 1 to 12 days post-infection (Figure 1A). The fungal load was increased by almost 2 log10 on Day 1 and by more than 4 log10 in the fecal samples of antibiotic-treated mice. C. auris was undetectable in more than 50% of mice from the untreated control group (Figure 1A). After 12 days, mice were euthanized to determine the fungal load in gut contents including stomach, small intestine, cecum and colon. Gut contents from antibiotic-treated mice had a significantly higher (4-5 log10) fungal load compared to untreated control group (Figure 1B). Average fungal load in stomach and small intestine of antibiotic treated mice was 2.5- 5 x 106 CFU/gram of contents, whereas cecum and colon had 2.5 – 5 x 107 CFU/gram of contents (Figure 1B). On the other hand, fungal loads in the stomach, small intestine and cecum of untreated control groups were about 101- 102 CFU/gram of contents. No detectable level of C. auris was observed in more than 50% of gut contents from untreated control mice. Collectively, our findings indicate that treatment with a broad-spectrum antibiotic increased colonization of C. auris in the gastrointestinal tract.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Oral antibiotic treatment increased C. auris colonization in the gastrointestinal tract of mice. Groups of mice were pre-treated with either sterile drinking water (untreated control group) or cefoperazone for 7 days and infected with C. auris 0387 strain via oral gavage. Antibiotic-treatment was continued till the end of the experiment. (A) Fungal load in the fecal pellets collected on indicated days and colony forming units (CFU) were determined by plating the contents onto YPD agar containing antibiotics (ampicillin, kanamycin, and streptomycin). C. auris colonies were further confirmed by plating onto chromagar plates. (B) After 12 days, mice were euthanized and gut contents collected were used to determine the fungal load in stomach, small intestine, cecum and colon. Data are presented as mean ± SEM with n = 5 mice for each group. (C) Untreated and antibiotic-treated mice were infected with C. auris and treated with cyclophosphamide. After 5 days of infection, mice were euthanized to determine the fungal load in cecal contents, liver and kidney. The bars indicate the mean ± SEM with n = 10 mice for each group. Statistical significance was calculated using Mann-Whitney U test. **p ≤ 0.01; ****p ≤ 0.0001.

C. auris disseminate from the intestine of cefoperazone treated immunocompromised mice

To examine if C. auris disseminates from the intestine of immunocompromised mice to cause a systemic infection, mice treated with and without cefoperazone were infected with C. auris and treated with cyclophosphamide. After 5 days of infection, fungal loads in cecum, liver and kidney were determined. The fungal load was significantly increased in cecal contents, liver and kidney of the antibiotic-treated group compared to control mice that received water (Figure 1C). The fungal load in cecal content, liver and kidney of antibiotic-treated mice was about 107, 104 and 104 CFUs/gram compared with 102-103 CFUs/gram in control mice. Fungal organisms were undetectable in liver and kidney of eight control mice. Collectively, these results indicate a significant increase in dissemination of C. auris from the intestine to internal organs in the antibiotic-treated mice compared with untreated control groups following immunosuppressive treatment.

Intestinal colonization of C. auris in the antibiotic-treated mice alters the microbiome composition

Antibiotic treated mice infected with C. albicans alters the composition of gut microbiome (17). Therefore, we examined the microbiome composition in the cefoperazone-treated mice infected with C. auris. Our results indicate there is no considerable change in the microbiome composition in mice that received sterile water and infected with or without C. auris (Figures 2A-C). However, we observed considerable alteration in the microbiome composition between antibiotic-treated mice infected with and without C. auris (Figures 2A-C). Relative abundance of firmicutes members mainly Clostridiales and Paenibacillus were considerably increased in the cefoperazone-treated mice infected with C. auris compared to cefoperazone-treated uninfected mice (Figures 2A-C). Collectively, our results indicate that intestinal colonization of C. auris in the antibiotic-treated mice alters the microbiome composition.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Microbial composition at taxonomical level and abundance heatmap of gut microbial community in the cecal contents of uninfected and C. auris infected mice were shown here. Groups of mice treated with sterile water or cefoperazone containing water for 7 days were infected with and without C. auris. Group A (received sterile water without C. auris infection), Group B (received sterile water with C. auris infection), Group C (received antibiotic water without C. auris infection), and Group D (received antibiotic water with C. auris infection). Relative abundance of major phyla (A) and family level abundance (B), taxonomical abundance heatmap with top fifty abundant microbial species (C) among all four groups were plotted. The relative abundance score ranges from 0 to 0.5. Five mice per group was used for microbiome analysis.

Innate immune response in the intestine of C. auris and C. albicans-infected antibiotic treated mice

Innate immune cells such as macrophages and neutrophils play a critical role in host defense against C. albicans in the intestine (13, 28, 29). Furthermore, a recent study indicates that C. auris elicits less immunoinflammatory response than C. albicans (30). Therefore, we used groups of mice treated with cefoperazone and infected orally with C. auris or C. albicans to compare the innate immune cells between these two Candida species. Uninfected mice were used as a control. We examined three major innate immune cells; CD11b+ CX3CR1+ macrophages, CD11b+ F4/80+ macrophages and CD11b+ Ly-6G+ neutrophils in the large intestine of infected and uninfected groups. At day 1 post-infection, there was no significant change in the absolute cell number of three innate immune cells among all three groups (Figures 3B, E, H). After 10 days of infection, the absolute number of CD11b+ CX3CR1+ macrophages was significantly decreased in the intestine of C. auris infected mice compared to C. albicans-infected groups (Figures 3A, C). No significant change in the absolute number of CD11b+ F4/80+ macrophages (Figures 3D, F) and CD11b+ Ly-6G+ neutrophils (Figures 3G, I) were observed among all three groups. Taken together, decreased number of CD11b+ CX3CR1+ macrophages were observed in the intestine of C. auris-infected mice compared to C. albicans- infected groups.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Innate immune response in the intestine of C. auris and C. albicans infected mice groups. Mice treated with cefoperazone for 7 days and infected with C. auris 0387 (or) C. albicans SC5314. Antibiotic treatment was continued till the end of experiment and groups of uninfected mice were used as control. (A, D, G) Representative flow plots of CD11b+ CX3CR1+ macrophages, CD11b+ F4/80+ macrophages and CD11b+ Ly6G+ neutrophils from the large intestine of uninfected, C. auris (or) C. albicans infected mice after 10-12 days post infection was shown here. (B, E, H) Absolute number of CD11b+ CX3CR1+ macrophages, CD11b+ F4/80+ macrophages and CD11b+ Ly6G+ neutrophils from the large intestine of uninfected, C. auris (or) C. albicans infected mice after one day post infection was shown here. (C, F, I) Absolute number of CD11b+ CX3CR1+ macrophages, CD11b+ F4/80+ macrophages and CD11b+ Ly6G+ neutrophils from the large intestine of uninfected, C. auris (or) C. albicans infected mice after 10-12 days post infection was shown here. Each group had 7-10 mice and the data represents mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences between the groups was calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test with ns – nonsignificant, *p ≤ 0.05.

Adaptive immune response in the C. auris and C. albicans infected antibiotic treated mice

T helper cells such as Th1, Th17 and Th22 cells play a critical role in antifungal defense in the intestine (3136). Therefore, we examined the CD4 T helper cells in the intestine of uninfected, C. auris and C. albicans infected groups. The absolute number of CD4+ IFNγ+ T helper 1 cells were significantly increased in the C. auris infected group when compared to C. albicans infected group (Figures 4A, E). No difference in the absolute number of CD4+ IL5+ T helper 2 cells was observed among all the groups (Figures 4B, F). The absolute number of CD4+ IL17+ T helper 17 cells and CD4+ IL22+ T helper 22 were significantly increased in both C. auris and C. albicans-infected groups compared to uninfected groups (Figures 4C, G and D, H).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Adaptive immune response in the intestine of C. auris and C. albicans infected mice groups. Mice treated with cefoperazone for 7 days and infected with C. auris 0387 (or) C. albicans SC5314. Antibiotic treatment was continued till the end of experiment and groups of uninfected mice were used as control. After 10-12 days of infection, mice were euthanized to isolate and stain monocular cells from large intestine. Gut contents and serum were collected to assess the total and Candida-specific IgA and IgG level in C. auris-infected, C. albicans-infected and uninfected mice Representative flow plots and the absolute number of CD4+ IFNγ + T helper cells (A, E), CD4+ IL5+ T helper cells (B, F), CD4+ IL17+ T helper cells (C, G) and CD4+ IL22+ T helper cells (D, H) from the large intestine of uninfected, C. auris infected and C. albicans infected are shown. Total IgA (I) and Candida-specific IgA (J) levels in the small intestine (SI), large intestine (LI) and serum from uninfected, C. auris and C. albicans infected mice were shown. Total IgG1 (K) and Candida-specific IgG1 (L) levels in the small intestine (SI), large intestine (LI) and serum from uninfected, C. auris and C. albicans infected mice were shown. For immune cell analysis, all groups had 8-10 mice, except for C. albicans infected mice for IL22+ immune cell analysis had 5 mice. For IgA and IgG1 determination, each group had 5-8 mice. Data represent mean ± SEM. For immune cells, statistical significance was calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. For IgA and IgG1 analysis, statistical significance was calculated using Mann-Whitney U test, with ns indicates non-significant and *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01 ***p ≤ 0.001 were considered significant.

Next, we examined the B cell immune response in C. auris and C. albicans infected mice. Specifically, IgA and IgG1 play a critical role during C. albicans infection (19, 37). We examined the total and fungal specific IgA and IgG1 antibodies level in the intestinal contents and serum samples of uninfected, C. auris and C. albicans infected groups. Our results indicate that total IgA was not significantly altered in the gut contents and serum samples of uninfected, C. auris and C. albicans infected groups (Figure 4I). Fungus-specific IgA was not altered in the intestinal contents among all the groups (Figure 4J). However, C. auris-specific IgA was significantly increased in the serum samples of C. auris-infected mice compared to uninfected groups (Figure 4J). There was no change in C. albicans-specific IgA in the serum samples of C. albicans-infected mice compared to the uninfected group (Figure 4J). Total and fungal specific IgG1 were not significantly altered in the gut contents and serum samples of uninfected, C. auris and C. albicans infected groups (Figures 4K, L).

Collectively, Th1 cells were significantly increased in the intestine of C. auris-infected mice compared to the C. albicans-infected groups. The percentages of Th17 and Th22 cells were significantly increased in the intestine of both C. auris and C. albicans mice compared to uninfected mice. Serum samples of C. auris but not in the C. albicans-infected mice had a significant increase of Candida -specific IgA.

Discussion

C. auris was recently identified as one of the major Candida species in patients all over the world. Major risk factors for invasive C. auris infections include solid organ transplantation, diabetes, chronic kidney disease and prior antibiotic use (4, 6, 38). The colonization and host immune response to C. auris in different host niches is still not clear. Recent evidence suggests that prior antibiotic therapy increases the susceptibility to C. auris infections (35). Previous findings from our lab and other groups indicate that antibiotic treatment increases the colonization and dissemination of C. albicans from the intestine of immunosuppressed mice (14, 16, 17). Similar to C. albicans, in this study we demonstrated that cefoperazone treatment increased the susceptibility to C. auris colonization and dissemination from the intestine. In a recent study, the colonization and dissemination potential of invasive and non-invasive strains of C. auris were compared using a cocktail of antibiotics (vancomycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, metronidazole and colistin) and cortisone acetate, steroidal immunosuppressive drug (39). Invasive strains showed higher colonization and dissemination from the intestine compared to non-invasive strains. In our study, we used South Asian clade of C. auris (CDC 0387) which is known to cause invasive infections in humans and mice (40). Collectively, these findings indicate that murine gut serves as a potential colonization site and invasive strains of C. auris can disseminate from the intestine of antibiotic-treated immunosuppressed hosts (39).

Antibiotic treatment alters gut microbiome composition which play a major role in fungal colonization in the intestine (14, 17, 41). Furthermore, C. albicans infection alters the microbiome composition of antibiotic-treated mice (17, 42). Our results indicate that relative abundance of firmicutes members mainly Clostridiales and Paenibacillus were considerably increased in the antibiotic-treated mice infected with C. auris compared to uninfected mice. However, previous findings suggest that antibiotic-treated mice infected with C. albicans increases the relative abundance of Proteobacteria members (17, 42). Unlike C. albicans, C. auris is not a commensal organism. The difference in the microbiome composition of antibiotic-treated infected with C. albicans and C. auris is a future area to investigate.

While the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics is a major predisposing risk factor for increased fungal colonization, dysregulation in the host defense system contributes to dissemination of C. albicans from the intestine (1316). Recent evidence indicates that C. auris elicits less immune response compared to C. albicans (30). Therefore, we examined the mucosal immune response to C. auris and compared with C. albicans under antibiotic-treatment conditions. Surprisingly, the number of CD11b+ CX3CR1+ macrophages was significantly decreased in the intestine of C. auris-infected mice compared to C. albicans group. CD11b+ CX3CR1+ macrophages play a critical role in antifungal defense to C. albicans in the intestine (29). Tissue-resident macrophages is one of the key innate immune cells necessary to protect host from Candida infections (28). Macrophage depletion leads to decreased fungal clearance and higher mortality in mice (13). The reduction of CD11b+ CX3CR1+ macrophages in the intestine of C. auris-infected mice maybe an immune evasion strategy employed by this fungus. Previous finding indicates that C. auris (CDC 0387) persisted longer than C. albicans in the kidneys of infected mice (40). The authors speculated that the delayed clearance of C. auris was in part due to the differences in the innate immune recognition between C. auris and C. albicans (40, 43). In addition, alterations in intestinal microbiota can impair the turnover of CX3CR1+ macrophages in the intestine (44, 45). Future studies required to understand if microbiome alteration in the C. auris infected mice contribute to decreased number of CX3CR1+ phagocytes in the intestine. Furthermore, we observed a significant increase in fungal-specific IgA in the serum of C. auris but not in C. albicans infected mice compared to uninfected groups. A previous finding indicates that C. albicans but not Saccharomyces cerevisiae increased IgA in the small intestinal contents and serum samples of germ-free mice monocolonized with these fungi, respectively (19). In our model, conventional mice treated with cefoperazone antibiotic and infected with C. auris but not C. albicans increased fungus-specific IgA in serum. These results suggest that IgA response is species specific and may differ under germ-free and antibiotic-treated settings.

Taken together, broad-spectrum antibiotic increases the colonization and dissemination of C. auris from the intestine. Furthermore, our findings revealed that C. auris infection alters the microbiome composition in the antibiotic-treated mice. Differences in the mucosal immune response between C. auris and C. albicans infected mice were noticed under antibiotic-treated setting. Future studies on microbiota, metabolite and host interactions in the context of C. auris intestinal colonization is necessary to understand the pathogenesis of this emerging pathogen. Results from these studies will form a platform to develop novel microbiota and metabolite-based probiotic therapies to prevent and treat C. auris intestinal colonization and invasive infections in humans (46).

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by Purdue University.

Author contributions

DD performed the experiments, analyzed data, and prepared figures. HH reviewed flow analysis, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. ST designed the experiments, assisted in mice studies, and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Purdue University start-up funds to Shankar Thangamani.

Acknowledgments

We thank Abhishek Datta for assistance in cell isolation and flow cytometry techniques.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Du H, Bing J, Hu T, Ennis CL, Nobile CJ, Huang G. Candida auris: Epidemiology, biology, antifungal resistance, and virulence. PloS Pathog (2020) 16(10):e1008921. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008921

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Rybak JM, Cuomo CA, David Rogers P. The molecular and genetic basis of antifungal resistance in the emerging fungal pathogen candida auris. Curr Opin Microbiol (2022) 70:102208. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2022.102208

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lockhart SR, Etienne KA, Vallabhaneni S, Farooqi J, Chowdhary A, Govender NP, et al. Simultaneous emergence of multidrug-resistant candida auris on 3 continents confirmed by whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological analyses. Clin Infect Dis (2017) 64(2):134–40. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw691

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Ademe M, Girma F. Candida auris: From multidrug resistance to pan-resistant strains. Infect Drug Resist (2020) 13:1287–94. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S249864

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Shastri PS, Shankarnarayan SA, Oberoi J, Rudramurthy SM, Wattal C, Chakrabarti A. Candida auris candidaemia in an intensive care unit - prospective observational study to evaluate epidemiology, risk factors, and outcome. J Crit Care (2020) 57:42–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.01.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Ahmad S, Alfouzan W. Candida auris: Epidemiology, diagnosis, pathogenesis, antifungal susceptibility, and infection control measures to combat the spread of infections in healthcare facilities. Microorganisms (2021) 9(4):1–25. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040807

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Antimicrobial Resistance Division, Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, Global Coordination and Partnership. WHO fungal priority pathogens list to guide research, development and public health action, Geneva: World health organization. (Geneva: WHO) (2022). Available at: https://www.who.int/Publications/I/Item/9789240060241.

Google Scholar

8. Kadri SS. Key takeaways from the U.S. cdc’s 2019 antibiotic resistance threats report for frontline providers. Crit Care Med (2020) 48(7):939–45. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004371

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Rudramurthy SM, Chakrabarti A, Paul RA, Sood P, Kaur H, Capoor MR, et al. Candida auris candidaemia in Indian icus: Analysis of risk factors. J Antimicrob Chemother (2017) 72(6):1794–801. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Armstrong PA, Rivera SM, Escandon P, Caceres DH, Chow N, Stuckey MJ, et al. Hospital-associated multicenter outbreak of emerging fungus candida auris, Colombia, 2016. Emerg Infect Dis (2019) 25(7):1339–46. doi: 10.3201/eid2507.180491

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Zuo T, Zhan H, Zhang F, Liu Q, Tso EYK, Lui GCY, et al. Alterations in fecal fungal microbiome of patients with covid-19 during time of hospitalization until discharge. Gastroenterology (2020) 159(4):1302–10 e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Vallabhaneni S, Kallen A, Tsay S, Chow N, Welsh R, Kerins J, et al. Investigation of the first seven reported cases of candida auris, a globally emerging invasive, multidrug-resistant fungus-united states, may 2013-august 2016. Am J Transplant (2017) 17(1):296–9. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Koh AY, Kohler JR, Coggshall KT, Van Rooijen N, Pier GB. Mucosal damage and neutropenia are required for candida albicans dissemination. PloS Pathog (2008) 4(2):e35. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Fan D, Coughlin LA, Neubauer MM, Kim J, Kim MS, Zhan X, et al. Activation of hif-1alpha and ll-37 by commensal bacteria inhibits candida albicans colonization. Nat Med (2015) 21(7):808–14. doi: 10.1038/nm.3871

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Chelakkot C, Ghim J, Ryu SH. Mechanisms regulating intestinal barrier integrity and its pathological implications. Exp Mol Med (2018) 50(8):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s12276-018-0126-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Thangamani S, Monasky R, Lee JK, Antharam V, HogenEsch H, Hazbun TR, et al. Bile acid regulates the colonization and dissemination of candida albicans from the gastrointestinal tract by controlling host defense system and microbiota. J Fungi (Basel) (2021) 7(12):1–17. doi: 10.3390/jof7121030

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Gutierrez D, Weinstock A, Antharam VC, Gu H, Jasbi P, Shi X, et al. Antibiotic-induced gut metabolome and microbiome alterations increase the susceptibility to candida albicans colonization in the gastrointestinal tract. FEMS Microbiol Ecol (2020) 96(1):1–15. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiz187

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Doron I, Leonardi I, Li XV, Fiers WD, Semon A, Bialt-DeCelie M, et al. Human gut mycobiota tune immunity Via Card9-dependent induction of anti-fungal igg antibodies. Cell (2021) 184(4):1017–31 e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Ost KS, O’Meara TR, Stephens WZ, Chiaro T, Zhou H, Penman J, et al. Adaptive immunity induces mutualism between commensal eukaryotes. Nature (2021) 596(7870):114–8. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03722-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Mishra AA, Koh AY. Adaptation of candida albicans during gastrointestinal tract colonization. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep (2018) 5(3):165–72. doi: 10.1007/s40588-018-0096-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Shankar J, Solis NV, Mounaud S, Szpakowski S, Liu H, Losada L, et al. Using Bayesian modelling to investigate factors governing antibiotic-induced candida albicans colonization of the gi tract. Sci Rep (2015) 5:8131. doi: 10.1038/srep08131

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Zhai B, Ola M, Rolling T, Tosini NL, Joshowitz S, Littmann ER, et al. High-resolution mycobiota analysis reveals dynamic intestinal translocation preceding invasive candidiasis. Nat Med (2020) 26(1):59–64. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0709-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Samonis G, Gikas A, Anaissie EJ, Vrenzos G, Maraki S, Tselentis Y, et al. Prospective evaluation of effects of broad-spectrum antibiotics on gastrointestinal yeast colonization of humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (1993) 37(1):51–3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.1.51

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Cole GT, Halawa AA, Anaissie EJ. The role of the gastrointestinal tract in hematogenous candidiasis: From the laboratory to the bedside. Clin Infect Dis (1996) 22 Suppl 2:S73–88. doi: 10.1093/clinids/22.Supplement_2.S73

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Perez JC. Candida albicans dwelling in the mammalian gut. Curr Opin Microbiol (2019) 52:41–6. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2019.04.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Guinan J, Wang S, Hazbun TR, Yadav H, Thangamani S. Antibiotic-induced decreases in the levels of microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids correlate with increased gastrointestinal colonization of candida albicans. Sci Rep (2019) 9(1):8872. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45467-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Datta A, Hernandez-Franco JF, Park S, Olson MR, HogenEsch H, Thangamani S. Bile acid regulates mononuclear phagocytes and T helper 17 cells to control candida albicans in the intestine. J Fungi (Basel) (2022) 8(6):1–9. doi: 10.3390/jof8060610

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Netea MG, Joosten LA, van der Meer JW, Kullberg BJ, van de Veerdonk FL. Immune defence against candida fungal infections. Nat Rev Immunol (2015) 15(10):630–42. doi: 10.1038/nri3897

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Leonardi I, Li X, Semon A, Li D, Doron I, Putzel G, et al. Cx3cr1(+) mononuclear phagocytes control immunity to intestinal fungi. Science (2018) 359(6372):232–6. doi: 10.1126/science.aao1503

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Wang Y, Zou Y, Chen X, Li H, Yin Z, Zhang B, et al. Innate immune responses against the fungal pathogen candida auris. Nat Commun (2022) 13(1):3553. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31201-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Hernandez-Santos N, Gaffen SL. Th17 cells in immunity to candida albicans. Cell Host Microbe (2012) 11(5):425–35. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Piccinni MP, Vultaggio A, Scaletti C, Livi C, Gomez MJ, Giudizi MG, et al. Type 1 T helper cells specific for candida albicans antigens in peripheral blood and vaginal mucosa of women with recurrent vaginal candidiasis. J Infect Dis (2002) 186(1):87–93. doi: 10.1086/341129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Balish E, Wagner RD, Vazquez-Torres A, Pierson C, Warner T. Candidiasis in interferon-gamma knockout (Ifn-gamma-/-) mice. J Infect Dis (1998) 178(2):478–87. doi: 10.1086/515645

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Bishu S, Hernandez-Santos N, Simpson-Abelson MR, Huppler AR, Conti HR, Ghilardi N, et al. The adaptor Card9 is required for adaptive but not innate immunity to oral mucosal candida albicans infections. Infect Immun (2014) 82(3):1173–80. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01335-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Kirchner FR, LeibundGut-Landmann S. Tissue-resident memory Th17 cells maintain stable fungal commensalism in the oral mucosa. Mucosal Immunol (2021) 14(2):455–67. doi: 10.1038/s41385-020-0327-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Conti HR, Shen F, Nayyar N, Stocum E, Sun JN, Lindemann MJ, et al. Th17 cells and il-17 receptor signaling are essential for mucosal host defense against oral candidiasis. J Exp Med (2009) 206(2):299–311. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081463

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Ferreira-Gomes M, Wich M, Bode S, Hube B, Jacobsen ID, Jungnickel B. B cell recognition of candida albicans hyphae via tlr 2 promotes Igg1 and il-6 secretion for T(H)17 differentiation. Front Immunol (2021) 12:698849. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.698849

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Vu CA, Jimenez A, Anjan S, Abbo LM. Challenges and opportunities in stewardship among solid organ transplant recipients with candida auris bloodstream infections. Transpl Infect Dis (2022) 24(5):e13919. doi: 10.1111/tid.13919

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Abe M, Katano H, Nagi M, Higashi Y, Sato Y, Kikuchi K, et al. Potency of gastrointestinal colonization and virulence of candida auris in a murine endogenous candidiasis. PloS One (2020) 15(12):e0243223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243223

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Vila T, Montelongo-Jauregui D, Ahmed H, Puthran T, Sultan AS, Jabra-Rizk MA. Comparative evaluations of the pathogenesis of candida auris phenotypes and candida albicans using clinically relevant murine models of infections. mSphere (2020) 5(4):1–13. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00760-20

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Theriot CM, Koenigsknecht MJ, Carlson PE Jr., Hatton GE, Nelson AM, Li B, et al. Antibiotic-induced shifts in the mouse gut microbiome and metabolome increase susceptibility to clostridium difficile infection. Nat Commun (2014) 5:3114. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Mason KL, Erb Downward JR, Mason KD, Falkowski NR, Eaton KA, Kao JY, et al. Candida albicans and bacterial microbiota interactions in the cecum during recolonization following broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Infect Immun (2012) 80(10):3371–80. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00449-12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Johnson CJ, Davis JM, Huttenlocher A, Kernien JF, Nett JE. Emerging fungal pathogen candida auris evades neutrophil attack. mBio (2018) 9(4):1–9. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01403-18

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Honda M, Surewaard BGJ, Watanabe M, Hedrick CC, Lee WY, Brown K, et al. Perivascular localization of macrophages in the intestinal mucosa is regulated by Nr4a1 and the microbiome. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):1329. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15068-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Medina-Contreras O, Geem D, Laur O, Williams IR, Lira SA, Nusrat A, et al. Cx3cr1 regulates intestinal macrophage homeostasis, bacterial translocation, and colitogenic Th17 responses in mice. J Clin Invest (2011) 121(12):4787–95. doi: 10.1172/JCI59150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Kunyeit L, Kurrey NK, Anu-Appaiah KA, Rao RP. Probiotic yeasts inhibit virulence of non-albicans candida species. mBio (2019) 10(5):1–113. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02307-19

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Candida auris, antibiotic treatment, intestinal colonization, dissemination, mucosal immunity, Antifungal therapeutics

Citation: Das D, HogenEsch H and Thangamani S (2023) Intestinal colonization with Candida auris and mucosal immune response in mice treated with cefoperazone oral antibiotic. Front. Immunol. 14:1123200. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1123200

Received: 13 December 2022; Accepted: 29 March 2023;
Published: 11 April 2023.

Edited by:

Wenjie Fang, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, China

Reviewed by:

Pankaj Chandley, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India
Beth Fuchs, Rhode Island Hospital, United States

Copyright © 2023 Das, HogenEsch and Thangamani. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Shankar Thangamani, sthangam@purdue.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.