Etiology, effects and management of comorbidities in multiple sclerosis: recent advances

Abstract

Comorbid conditions commonly affect people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Population-based studies indicate that people with MS have an increased incidence of ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, and psychiatric disorders as compared to people without MS. People with MS from underrepresented minority and immigrant groups have higher comorbidity burdens. Comorbidities exert effects throughout the disease course, from symptom onset through diagnosis to the end of life. At the individual level, comorbidity is associated with higher relapse rates, greater physical and cognitive impairments, lower health-related quality of life, and increased mortality. At the level of the health system and society, comorbidity is associated with increased health care utilization, costs and work impairment. A nascent literature suggests that MS affects outcomes from comorbidities. Comorbidity management needs to be integrated into MS care, and this would be facilitated by determining optimal models of care.

1 Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disorder of the central nervous system (CNS), the effects of which the effects of which may be measured at the population-level using epidemiologic measures such as incidence, prevalence and mortality, by assessing health system use and costs, or considering the effects on the individual including symptoms, impairment and disability. The effects of MS vary between individuals and within individuals over time. Efforts to predict long-term outcomes have emphasized disease-specific features and have neglected valuable information regarding biological and biographical information regarding lifetime exposures and experiences that may account for individual variability in outcomes. A growing body of evidence implicates genetic factors, race, ethnicity, social determinants of health, health behaviors, and comorbidity, as influencing MS outcomes (1–3).

Comorbidity is of interest to clinicians caring for people with MS because it is both common and potentially preventable or treatable, unlike unmodifiable factors such as genetics, that affect MS outcomes. Herein, we define comorbidity as the “total burden of illness other than the disease (MS) of interest” (4), and focus on chronic rather than transient conditions such as infection or concussion. Distinguishing comorbidities from complications which develop secondary to the underlying disease can be difficult in some situations, particularly for psychiatric disorders, but is relevant to management strategies. In 2015, following a workshop held under the auspices of the International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in MS, several recommendations were made including addressing gaps in knowledge regarding comorbidity in people with MS (Table 1) (5). Herein, we review progress regarding those recommendations, and consequent implications.

2 Search strategy and selection criteria

We searched PubMed for observational studies and randomized controlled trials published from January 1, 2015 to June 12, 2022 using a strategy adapted from a 2015 publication regarding comorbidity (see Supplemental Materials for search terms) (5). We identified studies in the reference lists of retrieved articles, and from the authors’ personal files. A previous systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of comorbidity in MS identified few studies about comorbidity in non-White populations, subgroups defined by age and sex, or outside North America and Europe (6). Therefore, we emphasized recent articles, and those focusing on previously understudied regions or populations. We selected population-based studies of incidence and prevalence where available. The role of comorbid health behaviors has been reviewed elsewhere (7, 8).

3 Prevalence, incidence and comparisons with other populations

A 2015 systematic review suggested that the most prevalent comorbidities among people with MS were depression (23.7%), anxiety (21.9%), hypertension (18.6%), hyperlipidemia (10.9%) and chronic lung disease (10.0%), although the reported estimates varied (6). More recent studies also exhibit variation in the estimated prevalence of comorbidities, reflecting variations in population characteristics including ethnicity, age, and sex, and use of small, select samples. Nonetheless, findings regarding which comorbidities are the most common among people with MS who live in regions underrepresented in the prior systematic review are broadly consistent with that review. For example, a cross-sectional study from Chile found that depression/anxiety affected 34.9% of 453 participants, followed by thyroid disease (15.7%), and hypertension (11.3%) (9). In Japan, the most prevalent comorbidities for employed people with MS were astigmatism (46%), gastroesophageal reflux disease and gastric ulcer (both 36%). Twenty-five percent of individuals had hyperlipidemia and 17% had major depression (10). Africa remains underrepresented.

Population-based studies from North America and the United Kingdom indicate that MS is associated with an increased incidence of ischemic heart disease (IHD), cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and venous thromboembolism post-diagnosis (Figure 1) (11, 12, 14). Similarly, the incidence of depression, anxiety disorders, and bipolar disorder is elevated pre- and post-MS diagnosis (Figure 1) (15). Younger age, female sex, lower socioeconomic status and urban residence are associated with an increased incidence of depression, anxiety disorder and bipolar disorder (13).

Figure 1

The incidence of most cancers did not differ between people with and without MS in recent population-based studies.^14,15 However, bladder cancer incidence (16, 17) and mortality were elevated (17). This may reflect increased frequency of urinary tract infections in MS, use of catheters or other factors. Although people with MS reportedly experience an increased incidence of CNS neoplasms (16), mortality rates did not differ in a study involving >50,000 people with MS and >250,000 controls (17), suggesting increased ascertainment in people with MS, due to frequent imaging. Reports of an increased incidence of lung cancer and melanoma have not been consistent across studies (16–18), although a recent Mendelian randomization study suggested a causal association between MS and lung cancer (19).

Comorbidity in the pediatric MS population has received less attention. In a retrospective cohort study, 92 children with MS had a higher rate of psychiatric comorbidity (including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) than 920 healthy children (hazard ratio [HR] 3.42; 2.46-4.76), and higher than 9108 children with non-CNS-related chronic immune-mediated diseases (HR 1.87; 1.38-2.53) (20). The burden of psychiatric comorbidity may have been underestimated in all populations because records were limited to hospital-based inpatient and outpatient care.

Other special populations with MS, including underrepresented ethnic and immigrant populations, also seem disproportionately affected by comorbidity. Although immigrants often have fewer medical conditions than the general population (‘the healthy immigrant effect’), immigrants with MS in Ontario, Canada had a higher prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders, migraines, diabetes, IHD, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease compared to controls (21). In studies from the United States, depression and anxiety were more frequent in Black and Hispanic/Latinx individuals with MS (22, 23). In another study, hypertension and other vascular conditions were more common among Hispanic/Latinx individuals with MS, but often went undiagnosed (24). Social determinants of health such as education access and quality, health insurance, health literacy, availability of nutritious food, and the built neighborhood environment, which disproportionately affect marginalized groups may also contribute to a heavier comorbidity burden in ethnic minorities and immigrants with MS (2). Whether reductions in these disparities and early detection of comorbidities in these populations can improve outcomes has not been explored.

4 Etiology of comorbidity

Several general mechanisms may explain comorbidity between MS and another condition. Broadly, two conditions may co-occur due to chance, improved detection because of increased surveillance, or due to specific etiologic mechanisms. The latter may occur because of shared genetic, environmental or behavioral risk factors, because one condition and/or its treatment causes another directly, or because two conditions are caused by an unrecognized third condition.

Recent evidence suggests that MS may directly cause some comorbidities, as identified using Mendelian randomization methods. One study suggested a causal effect of MS on lung cancer (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, p=0.0082) (19) and cardiovascular diseases, including IHD (OR 1.02, p=0.03) and myocardial infarction (25, 26), but conflicting evidence for stroke (25, 26). These findings are consistent with observations that the increased risk of IHD in persons with MS is not fully explained by traditional vascular risk factors (11). By contrast, no causal effect has been identified for MS on depression (27, 28), nor for lung cancer subgroups including adenocarcinoma or squamous cell cancer (19).

Shared environmental or behavioral risk factors, such as smoking, may account for the increased co-occurrence of some comorbidities. For example, smoking is a risk factor for MS and many comorbidities, including IHD. Emotional maltreatment during childhood was associated with increased odds of having an immune-mediated inflammatory disease, including MS (OR 2.37; 1.15-4.89) and for comorbid psychiatric disorders (OR 2.24; 1.58-3.16) (29). A Mendelian randomization study recently found obesity to be a common, causal risk factor for MS and depression (27).

Shared genetic architecture may also exist for MS and comorbidities. Using large scale genome-wide association study summary data, a significant positive genetic correlation was identified between MS and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (r_g=0.23, p=1.1x10^-8) (30) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD, r_g=0.28, p=2.01x10^-10) (31). Future studies using Mendelian randomization methods, genetic analyses or family-based study designs may further delineate the etiology of comorbidities in MS.

5 Effects of comorbidities

Comorbidities may exert effects throughout the disease course from the time of symptom onset to diagnosis and to the end of life, and they may also contribute to the effects of MS on the health system and society.

5.1 Diagnosis

A Danish study using health administrative data found increased odds of longer delays between MS symptom onset and diagnosis in the presence of comorbidities including cerebrovascular and cardiovascular conditions, diabetes, chronic lung disease and cancer (32). The moderating role of clinical characteristics was not examined.

5.2 Relapses

In studies with methods including self-report, medical records review, administrative data and clinical trial datasets, the presence of multiple comorbidities has been associated with more relapses (33–35), regardless of accounting for disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use. Negative studies have had small samples or low relapse rates that reduced statistical power. Among specific comorbidities, hyperlipidemia has been associated with increased relapse rates (34, 35). An analysis of the CombiRx clinical trial found dyslipidemia associated with an increased relapse rate (HR 1.32; 1.01-1.72) (34). A 1-point increase in the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), an aggregate measure of cardiovascular risk, was associated with an 31% increased rate of relapse (HR 1.31; 1.03-1.68) (36). Associations of migraine and relapse have been inconsistent (34, 35). Evaluation of the association between psychiatric comorbidity and relapses has been more limited; in the CombiRx trial anxiety was associated with an increased relapse rate (HR 1.25; 1.01-1.55) (34).

5.3 Cognitive impairment

Historically, studies of comorbidity and cognition focused on depression and reported effects on processing speed and memory, the most common cognitive impairments in MS (37). In one longitudinal study, within-person elevations in depressive symptoms were associated with worse processing speed (38). Recent studies have suggested elevated anxiety symptoms are associated with poorer processing speed, working memory and new learning (39–41). Similarities and differences in the effects of anxiety and depression on cognition in MS have been reported (38, 40, 41), but both comorbid anxiety and depression should be considered given evidence for their dissociable relationships with cognition (39).

Few studies have examined other comorbidities and cognition. A cross-sectional study found dissociable relationships of anxiety and diabetes with processing speed, memory and verbal fluency tests (42). Two large retrospective cohort studies examined effects of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and IHD, and comorbidity counts, on performance of a computer-administered test of processing speed (43, 44). The larger cross-sectional study reported those with ≥2 comorbidities had fewer correct responses but only hyperlipidemia was significantly associated with poorer scores (44). The longitudinal study reported those with ≥1 comorbidity had lower baseline test scores while those with ≥2 comorbidities showed a greater decline over time (43). However, they included depression with the vascular conditions in their comorbidity count and also identified significant effects of depression at baseline, and of incident depression during follow-up on processing speed.

Despite variable findings, recent studies suggest psychiatric and vascular comorbidities contribute importantly to cognitive impairment in MS. Prospective longitudinal studies including validated, responsive measures and assessing multiple cognitive domains are required to determine whether comorbidities contribute to specific cognitive impairments, whether shared etiological mechanisms exist for cognitive impairments in MS and comorbidities, whether comorbidities make unique contributions to cognitive impairment in MS or generalize across other conditions, and whether addressing comorbidities can reduce the risk or mitigate the severity of cognitive impairment in MS (45).

5.4 Physical impairment

While some small studies have not observed associations between comorbidity and physical impairments and disability (46), well-powered studies from Canada and Europe have consistently reported associations. In a study linking clinical and administrative data from 3,166 persons with MS, each additional physical (medical) comorbidity was associated with a larger annual increase in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (increase: 0.18/year; 0.09-0.28) (47). Among 251 individuals with MS from Italy, a 1-point increase in the FRS was associated with an increased rate of reaching an EDSS score of 6 (HR 1.62; 1.22-3.01) (36). In a retrospective cohort of 2,725 individuals from Serbia, hypertension and diabetes were associated with a shorter time to reaching EDSS scores of 4, 6 and 7 (48). Uniquely, an Australian study examined the association between genetic polymorphisms associated with dyslipidemia and disability progression, allowing examination of the association between dyslipidemia and disability progression while limiting reverse causality (49). Individuals with ≥6 risk alleles for dyslipidemia progressed 0.38 EDSS points faster per year than those with ≤3 alleles. These studies did not account for effect of comorbidity-related therapies.

Two population-based studies indicated that psychiatric comorbidity also affected disability progression. A Canadian retrospective study that linked clinical and administrative data identified 2,312 incident cases of MS followed an average of 10.5 years (50). One-third had a mood or anxiety disorder and these individuals experienced faster disability (EDSS) progression over time (0.28/year), after covariate adjustment. A subsequent Swedish retrospective cohort study found that depression was associated with shorter time to sustained EDSS scores of 3 (HR 1.50; 1.20-1.87), 4.0 (HR 1.79; 1.40-2.29) and 6 (HR 1.89; 1.38-2.57) (51).

5.5 Quality of life

Comorbidity is associated with an increased incidence of fatigue, disruptive pain, and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (52). Among 949 Canadians with MS, 54.5% of those with any comorbidity had disruptive pain at baseline versus 30.7% of those without comorbidity (OR 2.70; 2.07-3.54) (53). Among specific comorbidities, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis and peripheral vascular disease were associated with the presence of disruptive pain at baseline. Over the subsequent two years, chronic lung disease, anxiety, and thyroid disease were associated with worsening pain (53). In that same study, depression (β= -0.50) had nearly the same effect on HRQOL as disability status (β= -0.52), followed closely by anxiety (β= -0.34) (54). A cross-sectional Australian study found that comorbidity accounted for 18% of the variance in HRQOL (52); psychiatric comorbidity was the strongest contributor to lower HRQOL.

5.6 Imaging findings

Some studies link vascular and related traits like obesity with imaging outcomes in MS, but specific results vary (Table 2) (55–57). For example, a higher burden of vascular comorbidities was generally associated with worse MRI outcomes in people with MS, but findings of specific comorbidities contributing to the association have varied (34, 44, 46, 55–58, 60, 64, 66). Few recent studies have examined the relationship between psychiatric comorbidities and imaging outcomes; one small study in people with MS noted lower volumes of the putamen and nucleus accumbent in people with bipolar disorder relative to without bipolar disorder (59).

The inconsistencies across studies could reflect differences in the participant characteristics, comorbidity and imaging outcomes considered, lack of long-term follow-up in some cases, and differences in the methods for assessing comorbidity status. Most studies have been cross-sectional or small longitudinal studies (<100 patients). Larger longitudinal studies are needed.

5.7 Work impairment

Among 929 Australians with MS, those with any comorbidity averaged 1.2 days more lost productivity in the preceding four weeks than individuals without comorbidity (70). Similarly, a study among individuals diagnosed with MS within the last three years, found anxiety and depression were associated with both presenteeism and absenteeism (71).

5.8 Health care use

Comorbidity is associated with increased health care use, including hospitalizations, physician visits and prescription use. Among 2275 individuals with incident MS identified using administrative data from Saskatchewan, Canada, having any comorbidity was associated with an increased hospitalization rate (rate ratio [RR] 1.72; 1.48-1.99) (72). Nearly all comorbidities examined, including diabetes, hypertension, IHD, chronic lung disease, migraine, epilepsy and mood/anxiety disorders were associated with an increased rate of all-cause hospitalization. Another Canadian study that assessed a prevalent cohort of 4748 persons with MS and 24,154 controls tested whether mood/anxiety disorders interacted with the presence of MS to influence health care use (73). Generally, having an active rather than inactive (remitted) or no mood/anxiety disorder was associated with nearly two more days in hospital, two more physician visits and use of ≥2 prescription drug classes. The interaction between MS and mood/anxiety disorder was less than additive for physician visits, but more than additive for prescription drug use. An Italian study found that for each 1-point increase in the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the emergency room visit rates increased (HR 1.62; 1.54, 1.71) (74). However, the likelihood of an MS-related emergency room visit was not associated with the CCI score (74). All of these studies have lacked information about health behaviors, and MS clinical characteristics.

5.9 Mortality

People with MS continue to exhibit excess mortality versus people without MS (75); deaths due to cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, and suicide occur more often in people with MS (75). Several studies in North America and Europe observed that comorbidity is associated with an increased mortality rate among people with MS (76–79); this did not differ between immigrant and non-immigrant populations (3). Findings regarding the effects of epilepsy and chronic lung disease on mortality risk have been inconsistent, possibly due to small numbers of affected individuals in some studies (79–82). Vascular comorbidity and depression are consistently associated with increased mortality (77, 78). Two similarly designed retrospective cohort studies, one using administrative health claims data from Canada and one using primary care records and claims data from the United Kingdom, found a synergistic effect of depression and MS on mortality (77, 78), wherein the 13-14% of the mortality risk was due to the joint effect of depression and MS (77, 78). The increased prevalence of comorbidity and the increased deaths due to comorbidities in people with MS than those without MS, suggests that part of the survival gap observed could be mitigated by addressing comorbidity.

6 Management of MS in context of comorbidity

DMTs constitute a major aspect of MS management. Approvals for DMTs are based on explanatory rather than pragmatic randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving carefully selected participants with MS who are closely monitored according to protocols. These select individuals do not fully represent the broader MS population treated with a DMT in the ‘real-world’ clinical setting. Specifically, persons with comorbidities are often excluded from, or underrepresented in, these RCTs. Historically, RCTs of DMTs for MS have lacked racial and ethnic diversity of participants enrolled. The disproportionate burden of comorbidity borne by non-white individuals may exacerbate this problem and add to the challenges in clinical decision-making surrounding DMT initiation for the MS population living with comorbidity.

A population-based Canadian study of 10,698 persons with MS found that a higher total comorbidity burden (≥3 vs. none) and the presence of specific comorbidities (e.g., anxiety or IHD) were associated with a 22-28% lower hazard of initiating an injectable DMT, the only DMTs widely available at that time (83). Post-DMT initiation, comorbidities may also affect adherence, persistence, and by extension, effectiveness. In Canadian studies, the presence (versus absence) of any mental health disorder with an elevated risk for earlier discontinuation of the first DMT (injectable, oral or infusion, HR 1.22; 1.03-1.44) (84). In Sweden, prior depression or antidepressant use was associated with an earlier discontinuation of interferon-beta (HR 1.51; 1.15-1.98) and fingolimod (HR 1.47; 1.04–2.08) (85).

Two Italian studies focused on the relationship between comorbidity and a DMT switch or escalation (36, 86). The larger, multi-site study, comprising 2,076 persons with MS, found that the presence (vs absence) of any comorbidity was associated with an earlier safety or tolerability-related switch from the first DMT initiated (HR 1.42; 1.1-1.9). This association differed in magnitude across the different DMTs studied (interferon-beta, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod and natalizumab; interaction test, p = 0.04) (86). The second study involved 251 MS participants at one center and observed that a 1-point increase (worsening) on the FRS was associated with a 62% higher rate of DMT escalation (HR 1.62; 1.22-3.01) (36). Combined, these studies provide evidence of temporality between prior comorbidity and subsequent DMT uptake, adherence and persistence, and likely reflect some of the real-world decision-making by persons with MS and their providers. These findings suggest that the effect of comorbidities on DMT-related MS outcomes could be substantial.

The relationship between comorbidities and the DMTs can be bidirectional (Table 3); by triggering onset of new comorbidities, the DMTs could augment the comorbidity burden for persons with MS. Examples include alemtuzumab, whereby autoimmune disease can occur in approximately 30% of treated persons with MS, the most common being thyroid-related (88, 89). Even among the platform DMTs considered to have better safety profiles, exposure to interferon-beta has been associated with 1.8-fold increased odds of stroke and 1.6-fold increased odds of migraine (92). While these are relative risks such that the absolute risk for the individual is likely low (especially for stroke), given how commonly these drugs are used, the population-level burden could still be considerable. Conversely, some DMTs might lower the risk of accruing new comorbidities, or perhaps improve existing comorbidities. A meta-analysis, combining one observational study and three Phase 4 open label trials found that fingolimod may improve depressive symptoms (90). Whether these improvements extend to other DMTs and reflect a direct effect of drug or an indirect effect of improvements in MS disease activity remains unknown (90).

We need to better understand how bidirectional effects might vary by region, healthcare setting and DMT. Tackling (or harnessing) the bidirectional relationship between comorbidities and the DMTs to improve DMT-related outcomes will require a multipronged approach. This could include targeting specific populations (e.g., with anxiety) to optimize the DMT-related management of MS.

Limited information on the safety and efficacy of interventions is available to guide clinical care decisions for individuals with comorbidity. Frequently, concerns for safety and potential heterogeneity in treatment effects, result in narrow eligibility criteria for studies. Yet, multiple study designs and design features could be used to address these gaps (Table 4). Adaptive enrichment designs where trial enrollment criteria are adaptively learned from the trial data, could be used to address safety concerns in these populations (93). Using a group sequential approach with interim analyses, an adaptive enrichment strategy would allow for eligibility changes through the course of the trial to monitor and potentially exclude those patients based on safety concerns or those unlikely to benefit from the intervention. Rigorous Phase IV studies, when warranted, should be conducted to explicitly examine differential treatment effects. Finally, large longer-term studies are still required to establish the long-term safety outcomes (such as cancer) of the DMTs.

7 Management of comorbidity in the context of MS

Studies of multimorbidity (presence of ≥2 chronic conditions in an individual) in the general population suggest that multiple factors influence the quality of care (94). Individuals with multimorbidity use health care more, leading to more opportunities for reassessment of their conditions and treatment modifications (95). However, the presence of unrelated or discordant conditions may lead to suboptimal care of those conditions due to competing demands or poor coordination of care across providers, and may increase treatments and financial burdens. The adverse effects of comorbidity on multiple outcomes demonstrate the importance of prevention and effective management of comorbidity. However, it can be challenging to determine if management of a particular condition (e.g., MS) needs to be modified to consider comorbidities, for instance by changing treatment targets.

Consistent with the multimorbidity literature, MS may affect diagnosis and management of comorbidities. A Canadian study relying on electronic primary care records reported that the odds of good control of hypertension or diabetes did not differ between persons with or without MS (96). However, in a population-based retrospective cohort study examining management after acute myocardial infarction, people with MS were less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization within 30 days of hospitalization (OR 0.61; 0.49-0.77), had a longer time to revascularization (HR 0.78; 0.69-0.88), and were less likely to fill a prescription for beta-blockers, high dose statins, an ACE- inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, or dual anti-platelet therapy than people without MS (14). People with MS were also more likely to die 30 days after myocardial infarction (OR 1.46; 1.01-2.08). Similarly, people with MS with breast and colorectal cancer have increased mortality rates versus people without MS, even after accounting for age, sex, socioeconomic status and comorbidity (97, 98). Increased disability may account for some of this disparity but the mechanisms underlying the differences in care and outcomes are unknown.

Although comorbidity is distinct from multimorbidity, many of the same considerations for optimal care models could apply to MS care. The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline on multimorbidity recommends that clinicians actively consider whether an individual patient requires an approach to care that specifically accounts for multimorbidity, if the patient requests such care or if patient has certain features. For example, features such as finding it difficult to manage conditions, having mental and physical health conditions, frequently seeking unplanned care, and taking multiple medications, having frailty may warrant consideration of multimorbidity (99). Table 5 addresses key themes emerging from the general multimorbidity literature (95) and potential considerations for persons with MS.

Screening for depressive and anxiety disorders can be accomplished using any of several valid and reliable scales (100), and even single scale items (e.g. “I felt depressed”, “I felt like I needed help for my anxiety”) can perform effective screening (101). In the general population, routine screening is recommended for hypertension, diabetes, lipid disorders and obesity (Table 6 depicts US-based guidelines). However, optimal intervals for screening people with MS for comorbidities are unknown.

Pharmacologic and psychotherapy approaches are effective for managing depressive disorders in MS but limited evidence is available regarding anxiety disorders (102). In the general population, a scoping review involving 34 articles examining the association between physical activity or exercise and vascular comorbidity found lower levels of physical activity associated with a greater burden of comorbidity, as well as the converse association (103). As well, interventional studies involving aerobic or resistance exercise reduced serum triglyceride levels, and improved blood pressure and glucose tolerance (103). Promoting physical activity may likewise improve vascular comorbidity control in MS.

Benefits of pharmacologic treatment of vascular comorbidities on MS outcomes are poorly understood, but one open-label study found treatment of metabolic syndrome with either metformin (n = 20) or pioglitazone (n= 10) was associated with a reduced number of new/enlarging T2 lesions and gadolinium-enhancing lesions, and an increase in regulatory T cells (104). Understanding of the relationships between comorbidity and MS outcomes is critical for the design of clinical trials that test the impact of effectively managing comorbidity on MS-specific outcomes. The importance of clinical trials in establishing whether this approach will be effective cannot be underestimated; a beneficial effect on outcomes should not be assumed. This is illustrated by an examination of the role of lipids in murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), in which neither increasing nor decreasing blood cholesterol levels affected peripheral immune responses or infiltration of lymphocytes into the CNS or progression of EAE (105).

8 Studying comorbidity interventions

Pragmatic trials are a broad class of trials implementing a range of design features, including eligibility criteria, recruitment, setting, organization, flexibility of delivery and adherence, follow-up, and primary outcome and analysis, to increase applicability to real world settings (106). Trials can be designed with varying numbers and degrees of these features incorporated. One example of incrementally increasing the pragmatism of a trial would be to expand the eligibility criteria to include individuals with comorbidities and relaxing age restrictions. Pragmatic features can be incorporated into all aspects of a trial. For example, a registry-based clinical trial, a trial that use registries as a platform for recruitment, data collection, randomization, and follow-up, allows for greater generalizability of findings, increased efficiency in the conduct of a trial and increased ability to examine potential heterogeneous treatment effects (107). Registry-based trial designs could efficiently examine the effects of comorbidity treatment on MS. While not without limitations, a critical need exists to consider these designs in MS clinical trials and generate evidence that is more representative of the broader MS population.

9 Conclusions

Numerous comorbidities affect persons with MS more often than individuals without MS. At the level of the individual, comorbidity is associated with greater physical and cognitive impairments, lower health-related quality of life, and increased mortality. At the societal level, comorbidity is associated with increased health care utilization, work impairment, and costs. A nascent literature suggests that MS affects the care of, and outcomes from comorbidities. Comorbidity management needs to be integrated into MS care, and this would be facilitated by determining optimal models of care.

References

• 1

  GravesJSBarcellosLFSimpsonSBelmanALinRTaylorBVet al. The multiple sclerosis risk allele within the Ahi1 gene is associated with relapses in children and adults. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2018) 19:161–5. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.10.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AmezcuaLRiveraVMVazquezTCBaezconde-GarbanatiLLanger-GouldA. Health disparities, inequities, and social determinants of health in multiple sclerosis and related disorders in the us: a review. JAMA Neurol (2021) 78(12):1515–24. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.3416

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  RotsteinDMaxwellCTuKSchultzSEFungKMarrieRA. Risk of mortality in immigrants with multiple sclerosis in Ontario, Canada. Neuroepidemiology (2020) 54(2):148–56. doi: 10.1159/000506161

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  GijsenRHoeymansNSchellevisFGRuwaardDSatarianoWAvan den BosGA. Causes and consequences of comorbidity: a review. J Clin Epidemiol (2001) 54(7):661–74. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00363-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  MarrieRAMillerASormaniMPThompsonAWaubantETrojanoMet al. Recommendations for observational studies of comorbidity in multiple sclerosis. Neurology (2016) 86(15):1446–53. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002474

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  MarrieRAReiderNCohenJStuveOTrojanoMSorensenPSet al. A systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of comorbidity in multiple sclerosis: overview. Multiple Sclerosis J (2015) 21(3):263–81. doi: 10.1177/1352458514564491

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  WaubantELucasRMowryEGravesJOlssonTAlfredssonLet al. Environmental and genetic risk factors for Ms: an integrated review. Ann Clin Transl Neurol (2019) 6(9):1905–22. doi: 10.1002/acn3.50862

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  AlfredssonLOlssonT. Lifestyle and environmental factors in multiple sclerosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med (2019) 9(4):a028944. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028944

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  CiampiEUribe-San-MartinRSolerBMolnarKReyesDKellerKet al. Prevalence of comorbidities in multiple sclerosis and impact on physical disability according to disease phenotypes. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2020) 46:102565. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102565

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  OginoMShiozawaAOtaHOkamotoSHiroiSKawachiI. Treatment and comorbidities of multiple sclerosis in an employed population in Japan: analysis of health claims data. Neurodegenerative Dis Manage (2018) 8(2):97–103. doi: 10.2217/nmt-2017-0047

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  PalladinoRMarrieRAMajeedAChatawayJ. Evaluating the risk of macrovascular events and mortality among people with multiple sclerosis in England. JAMA Neurol (2020) 77(7):820–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0664

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  PerssonRLeeSYoodMUWagnerMMintonNNiemcrykSet al. Incident cardiovascular disease in patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis: a multi-database study. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2020) 37:101423. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101423

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  MarrieRAWalldRBoltonJMSareenJWalkerJRPattenSBet al. Increased incidence of psychiatric disorders in immune-mediated inflammatory disease. J Psychosomatic Res (2017) 101:17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.07.015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  MarrieRATremlettHKingwellESchafferSAYogendranMZhuFet al. Disparities in management and outcomes of myocardial infarction in multiple sclerosis: a matched cohort study. Multiple Sclerosis J (2020) 26(12):1560–8. doi: 10.1177/1352458519876038

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  MarrieRAWalldRBoltonJMSareenJWalkerJRPattenSBet al. Rising incidence of psychiatric disorders before diagnosis of immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci (2019) 28(3):333–42. doi: 10.1017/s2045796017000579

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  GryttenNMyhrKMCeliusEGBenjaminsenEKampmanMMidgardRet al. Risk of cancer among multiple sclerosis patients, siblings, and population controls: a prospective cohort study. Mult Scler (2020) 26(12):1569–80. doi: 10.1177/1352458519877244

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  MarrieRAMaxwellCMaharAEkumaOMcClintockCSeitzDet al. Cancer incidence and mortality rates in multiple sclerosis: a matched cohort study. Neurology (2021) 96(4):e501–e12. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000011219

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  NørgaardMVeresKDiddenEMWormserDMagyariM. Multiple sclerosis and cancer incidence: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2019) 28:81–5. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.12.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  GeFHuoZLiCWangRLiuYChenJet al. Lung cancer risk in patients with multiple sclerosis: a mendelian randomization analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2021) 51:102927. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102927

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  BoesenMSBlinkenbergMThygesenLCErikssonFMagyariM. School performance, psychiatric comorbidity, and healthcare utilization in pediatric multiple sclerosis: a nationwide population-based observational study. Multiple Sclerosis J (2021) 27(2):259–67. doi: 10.1177/1352458520959673

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  RotsteinDLMaxwellCTuKGatleyJPequenoPKoppAet al. High prevalence of comorbidities at diagnosis in immigrants with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis J (2021) 27(12):1902–13. doi: 10.1177/13524585211031791

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  ChanCKTianFPimentel MaldonadoDMowryEMFitzgeraldKC. Depression in multiple sclerosis across the adult lifespan. Mult Scler (2021) 27(11):1771–80. doi: 10.1177/1352458520979304

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  WangYTianFFitzgeraldKCBhattaraiJJNaismithRTHylandMet al. Socioeconomic status and race are correlated with affective symptoms in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2020) 41:102010. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  RobersMVChanCVajdiBChiong-RiveroHMartinezABurnettMEet al. Hypertension and hypertension severity in Hispanics/Latinx with Ms. Multiple Sclerosis J (2021) 27(12):1894–901. doi: 10.1177/13524585211019243

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  PengHWuXWenYLinJGuanW. Myocardial infarction and stroke risks in multiple sclerosis patients: a two-sample mendelian randomization study. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2022) 58:103501. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103501

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  YangFHuTHeKYingJCuiH. Multiple sclerosis and the risk of cardiovascular diseases: a mendelian randomization study. Front Immunol (2022) 13:861885. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.861885

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  HarroudAMarrieRAFitzgeraldKCSalterALuYPatelMet al. Mendelian randomization provides no evidence for a causal role in the bidirectional relationship between depression and multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis J (2021) 27(13):2077–84. doi: 10.1177/1352458521993075

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  BinzerSJiangXHillertJManouchehriniaA. Depression and multiple sclerosis: a bidirectional mendelian randomisation study. Multiple Sclerosis J (2021) 27(11):1799–802. doi: 10.1177/1352458521996601

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  WanABernsteinCNGraffLAPattenSBSareenJFiskJDet al. Childhood maltreatment and psychiatric comorbidity in immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. Psychosom Med (2022) 84(1):10–9. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001025

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  LiCYYangTMOuRWWeiQQShangHF. Genome-wide genetic links between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and autoimmune diseases. BMC Med (2021) 19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01903-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  YangYMuscoHSimpson-YapSZhuZWangYLinXet al. Investigating the shared genetic architecture between multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel diseases. Nat Commun (2021) 12(1):5641. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25768-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  ThormannASørensenPSKoch-HenriksenNLaursenBMagyariM. Comorbidity in multiple sclerosis is associated with diagnostic delays and increased mortality. Neurology (2017) 89(16):1668–75. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004508

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  MarckCHNeateSLTaylorKLWeilandTJJelinekGA. Prevalence of comorbidities, overweight and obesity in an international sample of people with multiple sclerosis and associations with modifiable lifestyle factors. PloS One (2016) 11(2):e0148573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148573

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  SalterAKowalecKFitzgeraldKCCutterGMarrieRA. Comorbidity is associated with disease activity in Ms: findings from the combirx trial. Neurology (2020) 95(5):e446–e56. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010024

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  KowalecKMcKayKAPattenSBFiskJDEvansCTremlettHet al. Comorbidity increases the risk of relapse in multiple sclerosis: a prospective study. Neurology (2017) 89(24):2455–61. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004716

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  PetruzzoMReiaAManiscalcoGTLuisoFLanzilloRRussoCVet al. The framingham cardiovascular risk score and 5-year progression of multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol (2021) 28(3):893–900. doi: 10.1111/ene.14608

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  ChiaravallotiNDDeLucaJ. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol (2008) 7(12):1139–51. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70259-X

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  MarrieRAPatelRBernsteinCNBoltonJMGraffLAMarriottJJet al. Anxiety and depression affect performance on the symbol digit modalities test over time in Ms and other immune disorders. Mult Scler (2021) 27(8):1284–92. doi: 10.1177/1352458520961534

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  LeavittVMBrandstadterRFabianMKatz SandIKlineovaSKriegerSet al. Dissociable cognitive patterns related to depression and anxiety in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler (2020) 26(10):1247–55. doi: 10.1177/1352458519860319

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  MorrowSARosehartHPantazopoulosK. Anxiety and depressive symptoms are associated with worse performance on objective cognitive tests in Ms. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci (2016) 28(2):118–23. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.15070167

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  WhitehouseCEFiskJDBernsteinCNBerriganLIBoltonJMGraffLAet al. Comorbid anxiety, depression, and cognition in Ms and other immune-mediated disorders. Neurology (2019) 92(5):e406–e17. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000006854

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  MarrieRAPatelRFigleyCRKornelsenJBoltonJMGraffLet al. Diabetes and anxiety adversely affect cognition in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2019) 27:164–70. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.018

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  AbbatemarcoJROntanedaDNakamuraKHusakSWangZAlshehriEet al. Comorbidity effect on processing speed test and mri measures in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2020) 46:102593. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102593

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  FitzgeraldKCDamianAConwayDMowryEM. Vascular comorbidity is associated with lower brain volumes and lower neuroperformance in a Large multiple sclerosis cohort. Multiple Sclerosis J (2021) 27(12):1914–23. doi: 10.1177/1352458520984746

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  SumowskiJFBenedictREnzingerCFilippiMGeurtsJJHamalainenPet al. Cognition in multiple sclerosis: state of the field and priorities for the future. Neurology (2018) 90(6):278–88. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004977

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  ShangrawKMurchisonCFSilbermannESpainRI. Effect of vascular comorbidity on visual and disability outcomes in a secondary progressive multiple sclerosis clinical trial cohort. Int J MS Care (2022) 24(4):169–74. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2021-049

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  ZhangTTremlettHZhuFKingwellEFiskJDBhanVet al. Effects of physical comorbidities on disability progression in multiple sclerosis. Neurology (2018) 90(5):e419–e27. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004885

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  MaricGPekmezovicTTamasOVeselinovicNJovanovicALalicKet al. Impact of comorbidities on the disability progression in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (2022) 145(1):24–9. doi: 10.1111/ane.13516

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  ZhangYZhouYvan der MeiIAFSimpsonSPonsonbyA-LLucasRMet al. Lipid-related genetic polymorphisms significantly modulate the association between lipids and disability progression in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (2019) 90(6):636–41. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319870

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  McKayKATremlettHFiskJDZhangTPattenSBKastrukoffLet al. Psychiatric comorbidity is associated with disability progression in multiple sclerosis. Neurology (2018) 90(15):e1316–e23. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000005302

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  BinzerSMcKayKABrennerPHillertJManouchehriniaA. Disability worsening among persons with multiple sclerosis and depression: a Swedish cohort study. Neurology (2019) 93(24):e2216–e23. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000008617

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  LoLMPTaylorBVWinzenbergTPalmerAJBlizzardLAhmadHet al. Estimating the relative contribution of comorbidities in predicting health-related quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol (2021) 268(2):569–81. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10195-w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  FiestKMFiskJDPattenSBTremlettHWolfsonCMcKayKAet al. Comorbidity is associated with pain-related activity limitations in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2015) 4(5):470–6. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.07.014

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  BerriganLIFiskJDPattenSBTremlettHWolfsonCWarrenSet al. Health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: direct and indirect effects of comorbidity. Neurology (2016) 86(15):1417–24. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002564

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  JakimovskiDGandhiSPaunkoskiIBergslandNHagemeierJRamasamyDPet al. Hypertension and heart disease are associated with development of brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a 5-year longitudinal study. Eur J Neurol (2019) 26(1):87–e8. doi: 10.1111/ene.13769

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  KappusNWeinstock-GuttmanBHagemeierJKennedyCMeliaRCarlEet al. Cardiovascular risk factors are associated with increased lesion burden and brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (2015) 87(2):181–7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-310051

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  MarrieRAPatelRFigleyCRKornelsenJBoltonJMGraffLAet al. Higher framingham risk scores are associated with greater loss of brain volume over time in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2021) 54:103088. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103088

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  PichlerAKhalilMLangkammerCPinterDRopeleSFuchsSet al. The impact of vascular risk factors on brain volume and lesion load in patients with early multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis J (2019) 25(1):48–54. doi: 10.1177/1352458517736149

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  LoreficeLFenuGCartaEFrauJCogheGContuFet al. Bipolar disorders and deep grey matter in multiple sclerosis: a preliminary quantitative mri study. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2020) 46:102564. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102564

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  GrazianoEHagemeierJWeinstock-GuttmanBRamasamyDPZivadinovR. Increased contrast enhancing lesion activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis migraine patients. NeuroImage Clin (2015) 9:110–6. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.07.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  KisterICamineroAMonteithTSolimanABaconTBaconJet al. Migraine is comorbid with multiple sclerosis and associated with a more symptomatic Ms course. J Headache Pain (2010) 11(5):417–25. doi: 10.1007/s10194-010-0237-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  MowryEMAzevedoCMcCullochCEOkudaDTLincolnRRWaubantEet al. Body mass index, but not vitamin d status, is associated with brain volume change in Ms. Neurology (2018) 91(24):e2256–e64. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006644

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  Manuel EscobarJCorteseMEdanGFreedmanMSHartungHPMontalbanXet al. Body mass index as a predictor of Ms activity and progression among participants in benefit. Mult Scler (2022) 28(8):1277–85. doi: 10.1177/13524585211061861

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  Ben-ZachariaABJanalMNBrodyAAWolinskyJLublinFCutterG. The effect of body mass index on brain volume and cognitive function in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a combirx secondary analysis. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis (2021) 13:13:11795735211042173. doi: 10.1177/11795735211042173

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  GaliotoRBerenholzOWangZConwayDSPlanchonSMRaoSM. Does obesity exacerbate brain lesion volume and atrophy in patients with multiple sclerosis? Mult Scler Relat Disord (2020) 46:102502. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102502

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  LoreficeLFrauJCogheGPitzalisRGessaIContuFet al. Assessing the burden of vascular risk factors on brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a case- control mri study. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2019) 27:74–8. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  FilippatouAGLambeJSotirchosESFitzgeraldKCAstonAMurphyOCet al. Association of body mass index with longitudinal rates of retinal atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler (2020) 26(7):843–54. doi: 10.1177/1352458519900942

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  ZivadinovRRajBRamanathanMTeterBDurfeeJDwyerMGet al. Autoimmune comorbidities are associated with brain injury in multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J neuroradiol (2016) 37(6):1010–6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4681

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  LoreficeLFenuGPitzalisRScalasGFrauJCogheGet al. Autoimmune comorbidities in multiple sclerosis: what is the influence on brain volumes? a case-control mri study. J Neurol (2018) 265(5):1096–101. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8811-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  ConradssonDMForslinMFinkKJohanssonUvon KochLJohanssonS. Employment status of people with multiple sclerosis in relation to 10-year changes in functioning and perceived impact of the disease. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2020) 46:102519. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102519

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  Sainz de la MazaSMaurinoJBorgesMMartín-MartínezJSotocaJAlonsoAet al. Measuring productivity loss in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2022) 58:103398. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103398

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  Al-SakranLMarrieRABlackburnDKnoxKEvansC. Impact of comorbidity on hospitalizations in individuals newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal population-based study. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2020) 40:101955. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.101955

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  MarrieRAWalldRBoltonJMSareenJPattenSBSingerAet al. Effect of mood and anxiety disorders on health care utilization in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis J (2021) 27(9):1411–20. doi: 10.1177/1352458520963880

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  MocciaMAffinitoGRongaBGiordanaRFumoMGLanzilloRet al. Emergency medical care for multiple sclerosis: a five-year population study in the campania region (South Italy). Multiple Sclerosis J (2022) 28(4):597–607. doi: 10.1177/13524585221074010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  ManouchehriniaATanasescuRTenchCRConstantinescuCS. Mortality in multiple sclerosis: meta-analysis of standardised mortality ratios. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (2016) 87(3):324–31. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-310361

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  SalterATyryTWangGFoxRJCutterGMarrieRA. Examining the joint effect of disability, health behaviors, and comorbidity on mortality in Ms. Neurol: Clin Pract (2016) 6(5):397–408. doi: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000000269

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  MarrieRAWalldRBoltonJMSareenJPattenSBSingerAet al. Psychiatric comorbidity increases mortality in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Gen Hosp Psychiatry (2018) 53:65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.06.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  PalladinoRChatawayJMajeedAMarrieRA. Interface of multiple sclerosis, depression, vascular disease, and mortality. A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study (2021) 97(13):e1322–e33. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012610

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  MahamudZBurmanJZelanoJ. Prognostic impact of epilepsy in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2020) 38:101497. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101497

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  ChouIJKuoCFTanasescuRTenchCRTileyCGConstantinescuCSet al. Epilepsy and associated mortality in patients with multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol (2019) 26(2):342–e23. doi: 10.1111/ene.13821

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  JickSSLiLFalconeGJVassilevZPWallanderMA. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis: results from a Large observational study in the uk. J Neurol (2015) 262(9):2033–41. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7796-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  MarrieRAElliottLMarriottJCossoyMBlanchardJLeungSet al. Effect of comorbidity on mortality in multiple sclerosis. Neurology (2015) 85(3):240–7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001718

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  ZhangTTremlettHLeungSZhuFKingwellEFiskJDet al. Examining the effects of comorbidities on disease-modifying therapy use in multiple sclerosis. Neurology (2016) 86(14):1287–95. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002543

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  ParksNEAndreouPMarrieRAFiskJDBhanVKirklandSA. Comorbidity and persistence of disease-modifying therapy use in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2021) 56:103249. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103249

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  LonginettiEFrisellTEnglundSReutforsJFangFPiehlF. Risk of depression in multiple sclerosis across disease-modifying therapies. Multiple Sclerosis J (2022) 28(4):632–41. doi: 10.1177/13524585211031128

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  LaroniASignoriAManiscalcoGTLanzilloRRussoCVBinelloEet al. Assessing association of comorbidities with treatment choice and persistence in Ms: a real-life multicenter study. Neurology (2017) 89(22):2222–9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004686

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  McKayKATremlettHPattenSBFiskJDEvansCFiestKet al. Determinants of non-adherence to disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: a cross-Canada prospective study. Mult Scler (2017) 23(4):588–96. doi: 10.1177/1352458516657440

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  RaumaIMustonenTSeppäJMUkkonenMMännikköMVerkkoniemi-AholaAet al. Safety of alemtuzumab in a nationwide cohort of Finnish multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol (2022) 269(2):824–35. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10664-w

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  ColesAJCohenJAFoxEJGiovannoniGHartungH-PHavrdovaEet al. Alemtuzumab care-Ms ii 5-year follow-up. Efficacy Saf findings (2017) 89(11):1117–26. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004354

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  GasimMBernsteinCNGraffLAPattenSBEl-GabalawyRSareenJet al. Adverse psychiatric effects of disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2018) 26:124–56. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  JalkhGAbi NahedRMacaronGRenselM. Safety of newer disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis. Vaccines (Basel) (2020) 9(1):12. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9010012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  de JongHJIKingwellEShiraniACohen TervaertJWHuppertsRZhaoYet al. Evaluating the safety of beta-interferons in Ms: a series of nested case-control studies. Neurology (2017) 88(24):2310–20. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004037

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  SimonNSimonR. Adaptive enrichment designs for clinical trials. Biostatistics (2013) 14(4):613–25. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxt010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  ZulmanDMAschSMMartinsSBKerrEAHoffmanBBGoldsteinMK. Quality of care for patients with multiple chronic conditions: the role of comorbidity interrelatedness. J Gen Internal Med (2014) 29(3):529–37. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2616-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  SkouSTMairFSFortinMGuthrieBNunesBPMirandaJJet al. Multimorbidity. Nat Rev Dis Primers (2022) 8(1):48. doi: 10.1038/s41572-022-00376-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  MarrieRAKosowanLSingerA. Management of diabetes and hypertension in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2020) 40:101987. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.101987

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  MarrieRAMaxwellCMaharAEkumaOMcClintockCSeitzDet al. Breast cancer survival in multiple sclerosis: a matched cohort study. Neurology (2021) 97(1):e13–22. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012127

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  MarrieRAMaxwellCMaharAEkumaOMcClintockCSeitzDet al. Colorectal cancer survival in multiple sclerosis: a matched cohort study. Neurology (2021) 97(14):e1447–e56. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012634

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Multimorbidity: clinical assessment and management. London, United Kingdom: Department of Health and Social Care (2016).

  • Google Scholar

• 100

  MarrieRAZhangLLixLMGraffLAWalkerJRFiskJDet al. The validity and reliability of screening measures for depression and anxiety disorders in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2017) 20:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.12.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  TennenhouseLGMarrieRABernsteinCNLixLM. Machine-learning models for depression and anxiety in individuals with immune-mediated inflammatory disease. J Psychosomatic Res (2020) 134:110126. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110126

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  FiestKMWalkerJRBernsteinCNGraffLAZarychanskiRAbou-SettaAMet al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions for depression and anxiety in persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2016) 5:12–26. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.10.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  EwanchukBWGharagozlooMPeelenEPiluttiLA. Exploring the role of physical activity and exercise for managing vascular comorbidities in people with multiple sclerosis: a scoping review. Mult Scler Relat Disord (2018) 26:19–32. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.08.022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  NegrottoLFarezMFCorrealeJ. Immunologic effects of metformin and pioglitazone treatment on metabolic syndrome and multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol (2016) 73(5):520–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.4807

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  VigneSDucDPeterBRebeaudJYersinYRuizFet al. Lowering blood cholesterol does not affect neuroinflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroinflamm (2022) 19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12974-022-02409-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  LoudonKTreweekSSullivanFDonnanPThorpeKEZwarensteinM. The precis-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ (2015) 350:h2147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2147

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  LiGSajobiTTMenonBKKorngutLLowerisonMJamesMet al. Registry-based randomized controlled trials- what are the advantages, challenges, and areas for future research? J Clin Epidemiol (2016) 80:16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar