- 1Infection and Inflammation, Department of Biotechnology, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, India
- 2Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India
- 3Department of Microbiology, Government Theni Medical College and Hospital, Theni, India
- 4Department of Biotechnology, Anna University, Chennai, India
- 5State Public Health Laboratory, Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Chennai, India
- 6Laboratory Center, Xiamen University Malaysia, Sepang, Malaysia
- 7Molecular Medicine and Virology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Background: Dengue virus (DENV) infection poses a serious health burden across the tropical and sub-tropical regions. The role of complement factors and acute-phase reactants in clinical dengue remains ambiguous.
Methods: The cross-sectional study enrolled 156 participants, with 114 confirmed clinical dengue cases and 42 healthy controls. Serological profiling (NS1, anti-DENV IgM, and anti-DENV IgG), estimation of serum acute-phase reactants, clinico-laboratory parameters, and viral load were performed to classify dengue patients under dengue with warning signs (DWS+, n = 35), dengue without warning signs (DWS-, n = 74), and severe dengue (n = 5) (based on varying grades of severity) in accordance with the 2009 WHO guidelines. Measurement of complement factors, i.e., C1 inhibitor (C1Inh) (n = 145), C1q (n = 152), C2 (n = 146), C3a (n = 153), C3b (n = 152), mannose-binding lectin (MBL) (n = 151), C5a (n = 150), and soluble complement receptor 1 (sCR1, also designated as sCD35) (n = 139), was performed using commercial ELISA, and their concentrations were correlated with acute-phase reactants, clinical laboratory parameters, grades of dengue severity, and platelet levels.
Results: Our analysis showed a significant alteration in early classical complement proteins, C1Inh, C1q, and C2. The levels of downstream factors and sCR1 remained largely unchanged across both the grades of dengue severity and primary/secondary dengue cohorts. Univariate analysis revealed NS1 positivity, IgG positivity, age, urea, and sCR1 as factors associated with disease severity. Our multivariate analysis showed sCR1 as the only independent predictor that correlated negatively with dengue severity. Every unit increase of sCR1 was associated with 22% reduced odds of dengue severity. Platelet counts showed a negative association with red cell distribution width (RDW) and basophils and a strong positive correlation with serum uric acid levels.
Conclusions: Our findings show that aberrant complement activation and levels of sCR1 could attribute to varying grades of dengue severity. Given its inverse association, the levels of sCR1 could likely render early prediction of dengue disease severity. The role of sCR1 in complement-mediated pathogenesis in dengue remains a gray area of investigation.
Introduction
Dengue virus (DENV), transmitted by female Aedes mosquitoes, represents a challenging global public health concern (1, 2). Globally, an estimated 3.9 billion people have become infected, mainly in the tropical and sub-tropical regions, with an eightfold increase in incidence reported in the last two decades (3). Notwithstanding that DENV infections are often asymptomatic, exacerbation could result in severe dengue (4). Four antigenically distinct serotypes, i.e., DENV1–DENV4, circulate in the population, while a fifth sylvatic serotype reportedly circulate among non-human primates (5, 6).
The disease spectrum and severity are protean and may vary from unapparent infection to life-threatening severe dengue, often marked by severe thrombocytopenia and multi-organ failure (7). Progression of the disease from mild to severe dengue is influenced by various factors like heterologous virus serotype and host inflammatory responses (8, 9). The 1997 WHO classification stratified dengue into dengue fever (DF), dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), and dengue shock syndrome (DSS), with a DF diagnosis emphasizing the requirement of laboratory confirmation. Furthermore, as per the revised 2009 WHO classification, dengue infection is also categorized (based on disease severity) as dengue with warning signs (DWS+), dengue without warning signs (DWS-), and severe dengue. DWS+ is characterized by symptoms/signs, including abdominal pain, recurrent vomiting, lethargy, hepatomegaly, hemoconcentration, and thrombocytopenia, whereas severe dengue includes severe plasma leakage, hemorrhage, and organ failure (10).
Of the various inflammatory pathways, the complement activation cascade holds key in dengue pathogenesis, and its role in clinical dengue largely remains obscure (11). The complement system bridges the innate and the adaptive immune systems (12, 13) via three major pathways, namely, the classical, the alternative, and the lectin pathways (14), and also the blood coagulation pathway. Complement activation culminates in heightened plasma levels of anaphylatoxins (especially C3a, C4a, and C5a), driving the infiltration of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) and natural killer (NK) cells, leading to excessive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which, at times, could entail endothelial dysfunction (i.e., vasodilation and increased vascular permeability) (15).
The complement system appears to play a role in dengue pathogenesis by inducing inflammation and tissue/organ damage. The mannose-binding lectin (MBL) pathway appears to limit viral replication in asymptomatic (self-limiting) and primary dengue (16). Elevated complement anaphylatoxins have been reported in severe secondary dengue, whereas soluble immune complexes during acute dengue disease will become bound by CR1 (CD35) expressed on erythrocytes (17) for disposal in the spleen. Owing to its regulatory role, CR1 (also designated as CD35) appears to limit inflammation and tissue damage (18). Despite these insights, there remains a lack of direct clinical data correlating complement levels with dengue disease severity. Here we quantitatively assessed key complement proteins and a myriad of other clinical laboratory parameters in dengue. We determined if complement factors and acute-phase reactants correlated with disease severity attributing to improved understanding of dengue pathogenesis and endeavored to identify surrogate biomarkers/therapeutic targets in severe dengue.
Materials and methods
Ethical approval
A prospective, cross-sectional case–control study was carried out in accordance with the Guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonization and the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) to fulfil the study objectives. The Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) of the Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai (ref. no. 114/03/2024/Faculty/SRB/SMCH) and the Government Theni Medical College and Hospital, Theni (ref. no. 2300/IEC/2024-26) reviewed all of the protocols and extended necessary approval for conducting the research. Written informed consents were duly obtained from all of the study volunteers/patients. Peripheral blood specimens were collected from the recruited participants in BD Vacutainer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) tubes for the extraction of serum by a trained phlebotomist. The serum aliquots were stored at -80 °C before transporting on dry ice to the study site, where it was maintained at -20 °C until use in the experiments. The schematic representation of the work flow pertinent to the investigations is illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the work flow in the cross-sectional case–control investigation (visual abstract created using CANVA and Biorender). Complement levels were measured in both primary (1°) and secondary (2°) dengue cohorts as well as across different severities of dengue infection based on the WHO 2007 classification. The serum specimens were collected from patients/volunteers and analyzed using commercial ELISA. C1Inh, C1 inhibitor; DWS-, dengue without warning signs; DWS+, dengue with warning signs; MBL, mannose-binding lectin; sCR1, soluble complement receptor 1.
Dengue diagnosis and clinical classification
This study prospectively recruited febrile patients with a suspicion of clinical dengue at the fever clinic and subsequently admitted at the medical center after confirmation using laboratory methods such as commercial ELISA-based detection of DENV-specific IgM antibodies or NS1 ELISA (19) as dengue infection. NS1 antigen testing was performed at the time of blood collection by the clinicians using a commercial NS1 ELISA kit (01PE40, Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA). Participants recruited at the clinical centers were classified as primary and secondary dengue infections. PanBio Dengue IgM (cat. no.: 01PE20, Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) and PanBio dengue IgG (cat. no.: 01PE10, Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) were employed for the characterization of IgM- and IgG-positive clinical samples. The samples were diluted 1:100 in both assays as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
For the anti-DENV IgM assay, samples with a value >11 PanBio units were considered positive, whereas samples with a value >22 PanBio units were considered positive for the anti-DENV IgG assay. Unless and otherwise mentioned, primary dengue infection was defined as those with an IgM/IgG ratio >1.2, and secondary dengue was defined as those with an IgM/IgG ratio ≤1.2 (20). Furthermore, dengue severity was classified using the WHO 2009 classification by specialist clinical practitioners (19). Healthy controls (HCs) were age- and sex-matched volunteers with no history of fever, chronic disease, or recent vaccination in the preceding 4 weeks. All HCs tested negative for dengue IgM or NS1 antigen at the time of enrolment. Blood samples were drawn during the acute phase between 3 and 5 days of dengue onset based on patient history and clinical assessment.
Quantification of dengue viremia and serotyping
The serum samples were subjected to quantification of DENV viremia using commercial platforms. Briefly, RNA was extracted from serum using a KingFisher™ Flex Purification system (ThermoFisher Scientific, Singapore) using HIPura Prefilled Medium Plates T (HiMedia, Mumbai, India). Subsequently, DENV viral load was quantified on QuantStudio 5 Real Time PCR (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using a commercial Dengue Real-Time PCR kit (cat. no.: 8013, Helini, Chennai, India) (21). The samples with confirmed viremia were used to identify the DENV serotype using a commercial DENV genotyping real-time PCR kit (cat. no.: 8014, Helini, Chennai, India).
Chemiluminescence immunoassay
The presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was measured in representative samples using a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) (VITROS 3600, Bridgend, UK). A total of 28 samples were selected randomly for the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody measurements. As per the instructions of the manufacturer, the serum samples were pre-diluted with saline solution before measurement using IgG Quantitative reagent pack (cat. no.: 6199960, Vitros Immunodiagnostics, Bridgend, UK).
Complement ELISA
The products of complement cascade activation were measured by using commercial ELISA. The following serum complement analytes were measured in the study participants as per the instructions of the manufacturers: mannose-binding lectin (MBL) (cat. no.: DMBL00, Biotechne, Minneapolis, USA; sensitivity: 0.002–0.029 ng/mL), C3b (cat. no.: ab195431, Abcam; sensitivity: 73 pg/mL), C3a (cat. no.: ab279352, Abcam; sensitivity: 63 pg/mL), C2 (cat. no.: ab254501, Abcam; sensitivity: 175.11 pg/mL), and C5a (cat. no.: ab193695, Abcam; sensitivity: 31 pg/mL), C1q (cat. no.: ab170246, Abcam; sensitivity: 64 pg/mL), C1 inhibitor (cat. no.: ab224883, Abcam; sensitivity: 10.9 pg/mL), and sCR1/sCD35 (cat. no.: ab277439, Abcam; sensitivity: 0.2 ng/mL).
Statistical analysis
The comparison of demographic and clinical data was expressed as an interquartile range. The P values were calculated using the Chi-square test for categorical variables, while the continuous variables were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. P value <0.05 was considered significant, and was used for the Post hoc Mann-Whitney U test. Univariate regression models were used to explore significant relationships with outcome variables, which were subsequently included in the multivariate model. The Hosmer–Lemeshow values for the binary model and linear model were P = 0.443 and 0.851, respectively. P-values <0.05, <0.01, <0.001, <0.0001 were marked as ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗, and ∗∗∗∗, respectively. All of the analyses were performed using PRISM Software Ver.6.0 (GraphPad, CA, USA) and SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corp, New York, USA).
Results
Clinico-demographic characteristics of the study cohort
The present study recruited 156 participants that encompassed DENV-infected patients (n = 114) and HCs (n = 42). Serological investigations (by commercial ELISA) revealed 92% participants (n = 104) positive for anti-DENV IgM, 31% (n = 35) positive for anti-DENV IgG, and 21.2% (n = 24) positive for DENV NS1, and 18 samples showed positivity for both DENV NS1 antigenemia and anti-DENV IgM levels. Based on the criteria discussed in the methodology, 26 patients were identified as secondary dengue infection cases for the study (Table 1). Of the 114 dengue-positive cases, 47.4% (n = 74) patients were classified under DWS-, 22.4% (n = 35) were categorized under DWS+, and 3.2% (n = 5) were included under severe dengue.
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics for demography, laboratory, and serum complement analytes at admission.
Viral load estimation was done for 80 samples, of which only nine samples were positive for dengue viremia. All nine DENV viremia samples were concurrently positive for DENV NS1, three were positive for both NS1 and IgM, and one was identified as secondary dengue. DENV serotyping was successful only in three of the viremic samples, and all were identified as DENV2. Similarly, of the 28 representative serum samples measured for SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels, all were observed to be reactive (cutoff for high positive >139 BAU/mL), with levels as high as 200 BAU/mL in all of the samples examined. SARS-CoV-2 IgG positivity was not significantly associated with dengue severity (95% CI = 1.435 (0.566–3.642); P = 0.44).
Complement factors C1q, C1Inh (C1 esterase), and C2 were differentially expressed and varied between grades of dengue severity
The analysis of complement components across the stages of DENV infection revealed that C1Inh levels were statistically significant between dengue patients and HCs (P < 0.01) and between HCs and primary dengue (P < 0.001) cohorts. The levels of C1q between dengue patients and HCs (P < 0.01) and between HCs and primary dengue (P < 0.01) were also statistically significant. We also found marked differential levels in C2 between dengue patients and HCs (P < 0.5) and between HCs and primary dengue (P < 0.05) cohorts. MBL showed a mild but significant variation (P < 0.05), suggesting a partial engagement of the lectin pathway (Figure 2). Conversely, activation products C3b, C3a, and C5a and the regulatory complement protein sCR1 did not vary significantly across groups in this dataset, which indicates that downstream complement activation may not be uniformly altered during disease advancement (P > 0.5).
Figure 2. Comparison of serum levels of complement proteins in healthy controls (HCs), dengue without warning signs (DWS-) as well as dengue with warning signs (DWS) and severe dengue. Levels of biomarkers were compared across the three study groups by Kruskal–Wallis test. Post hoc Mann–Whitney U-tests were subsequently performed for those complement biomarkers with a Kruskal–Wallis P-value of <0.05. P-value <0.05 (significant); *, <0.05; **, <0.01; ***, <0.001. HC, healthy controls; DWS-, dengue without warning signs; DWS+, dengue with warning signs; C1Inh, C1 inhibitor; sCR1, soluble complement receptor 1; MBL, mannose-binding lectin.
Expressions of C1Inh, C1q, and C2 were significantly altered across primary and secondary dengue patients
Having said that the levels of C1q, C1Inh, and C2 are varied across grades of dengue severity, we studied next if their expressions varied between primary and secondary dengue patients. A comparative analysis of complement among primary and secondary dengue patients and HCs revealed a selective pattern. Early complement proteins including C1Inh levels showed statistical significance between dengue patients and HCs (P = 0.0037) and between HCs and primary dengue (P = 0.0003) cohorts. The C1q levels between dengue patients and HCs (P = 0.0128) and between HCs and primary dengue (P = 0.0022) also revealed statistical significance (Figure 3). The C2 levels between dengue patients and HCs (P = 0.0005) and between HCs and primary dengue (P = 0.062) were markedly altered across patient groups, while activation products C3b, C3a, and C5a and regulatory protein, sCR1 (P > 0.5), did not vary significantly across groups in this dataset, which is consistent with its expression in the severity. MBL did not show any significant variation between the groups unlike in disease severity (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Comparison of serum levels of complement markers in healthy controls (HCs), 1° refers to patients with primary dengue and 2° to individuals with secondary dengue infections. Levels of biomarkers were compared across the three patient groups by Kruskal–Wallis test. Post hoc Mann–Whitney U-tests were subsequently performed for those biomarkers with a Kruskal–Wallis test P-value of <0.05. P-value <0.05 (significant); *, <0.05; **, <0.01; ***, <0.001. HCs, healthy controls; C1Inh, C1 inhibitor; sCR1, soluble complement receptor 1; MBL, mannose-binding lectin.
Every unit of increase in soluble CR1 levels was associated with 22% reduced odds of dengue disease severity
Next, we used univariate regression models to unveil significant relationships with outcome variables, which were subsequently included in a multivariate model. Univariate analysis revealed that sCR1, NS1 positivity, age, urea, and IgG positivity were significantly associated with dengue severity. However, in the multivariate logistic analysis, only sCR1 showed a significant association with disease severity, where this was associated with reduced odds of dengue severity by 22% (coef. = 0.776, 95% CI = 0.588–0.925; P = 0.046), suggesting a potential protective role (Figures 4A, B).
Figure 4. Factors that are associated with dengue disease severity and platelet counts. (A) Binary regression analysis of factors associated with the severity of dengue disease (DWS+ and severe dengue). (B) Multivariate analysis of factors associated with dengue disease severity. (C) Linear regression analysis of factors associated with blood platelet counts in dengue patients. (D) Multivariate analysis of factors associated with platelet counts in dengue patients. By using a univariate regression model, variables that showed a significant relationship with outcome variables (i.e., development of dengue with warning signs and or blood platelet counts) in the univariate model will then be included in the multivariate model. The Hosmer–Lemeshow values for binary model and linear model were P = 0.443 and P = 0.851, respectively. P-value <0.05 (significant); *, <0.05; **, <0.01; ****, <0.0001. Hb, hemoglobin; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; PCV, packed cell volume; RBC, red blood cell; RDW, red cell distribution width; sCR1, soluble complement receptor 1.
Serum uric acid levels were directly correlated with blood platelet levels in clinical dengue infection
We assessed a wide range of hematologic and biochemical parameters/analytes for their relationship with blood platelet counts. Significant negative associations were observed with red cell distribution width (RDW) and peripheral basophil counts (P = 0.003 and P < 0.0001, respectively), whereas sCR1 showed a negative trend but was not statistically significant (P = 0.056). Concurrently, the levels of serum uric acid showed a strongly positive correlation with blood platelet counts (P < 0.0001) (Figures 4C, D) by a multivariate analysis.
Complement anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a showed significant correlations with immune markers and dengue viremia
Spearman correlation analysis revealed strong positive correlations with liver function markers ALT, AST, ALKP, GGT, and bilirubin with each other. On the other hand, lipid profile components, for instance, low-density lipoproteins (LDL), high-density lipoproteins (HDL), triglycerides (TGL), very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), and cholesterol ratios showed both positive and negative correlations depending on the parameters. We also found correlations of certain acute phase inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) with neutrophils and lymphocytes. Certain renal function markers like creatinine, urea, and uric acid showed inter-correlations and some associations with plasma potassium and chloride electrolyte levels. We also found that the complement anaphylatoxins C3a, C5a, and C1q show correlations with immune markers and possibly DENV viral load (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Heatmap of significant Spearman correlations (P < 0.05) among clinical, biochemical, hematologic, and immunological parameters. Warm color indicates positive correlation, dark color indicates negative correlation, and bubble size represents the level of significance. ALKP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CRP, carbohydrate reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FT3, free triiodothyronine, FT4, free thyroxine; GGT, gamma glutamyl transpeptidase; Hb, hemoglobin; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; PCV, packed cell volume; PT/INR, prothrombin time/international normalized ratio; RBC, red blood cell; RDW, red cell distribution width; sCR1, soluble complement receptor 1; TGL, triglyceride; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; VLDL, very-low-density lipoprotein; WBC, white blood cell.
Discussion
In the current cross-sectional case–control investigation, we surveyed the role of various clinical laboratory parameters and immunological determinants, with particular emphasis on the complement system in DENV across varying grades of disease severity. Of the 156 study participants, 114 cases were serologically confirmed cases of DENV infection, with a predominance of IgM positivity and a small number of NS1-positive and secondary dengue cases. Viral RNA was also present in a minority of samples, all of which were NS1-positive, reinforcing the utility of NS1 as a marker of acute dengue viremia (22, 23). The low percentage of samples with dengue viremia could be attributed to the temporospatial inaccuracies in specimen collection (likely during the late acute phase (between days 3 and 5 of the onset of fever) when viremia has typically reduced, rather than assay failure. This is consistent with established dengue kinetics, where viral RNA falls rapidly in 4 to 5 days of illness (24).
Analysis of complement components across stages of infection revealed distinct alterations in the early classical complement proteins. C1Inh (regulatory), C1q, and C2 demonstrated severity-dependent variations, suggesting that the classical pathway plays a crucial role in dengue immunopathogenesis. Our observations are consistent with prior evidence indicating that the formation of an immune complex and antibody-mediated response can trigger the activation of a classical pathway in dengue (25, 26). Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of dengue virus infection has been one of the main hypotheses to explain the disease severity of dengue (26). In the presence of sub-neutralizing antibody, immune complexes can amplify the viral replication in phagocytic cells, which will, in turn, activate the complement system via cytokine cascade (9, 27). The elevated levels of C1Inh likely represent a host’s compensatory response aimed at counteracting excessive complement activation, thereby limiting the inflammation and the likely vascular activation mechanisms triggered (28). Similarly, the attrition in C1q levels is consistent with its consumption during immune-complex-driven activation, a well-defined hallmark of dengue disease, especially during secondary infection (26, 29).
Our study also observed that MBL did not have any significant differential expression across primary and secondary dengue groups, although it did show a differential expression between varying grades of dengue disease severity. This observation, in turn, is consistent with the functional biology of MBL as a lectin complement pathway protein that recognizes carbohydrate moieties (23, 30). Thus, the expression of MBL is not expected to vary remarkably between primary and secondary dengue, which primarily differentiates between humoral immune responses. On the contrary, the association of MBL with disease severity highlights its role in modulating host–virus interactions and complement activation during acute infection, making it more marker-associated with clinical outcome and not of disease severity (17, 30). Our investigations also showed that the downstream complement activation products, i.e., C3a, C3b, and C5a, and the complement regulatory protein sCR1 did not show any significant difference in expression in varying grades of disease severity, i.e., DWS+, DWS-, and severe dengue as well as primary/secondary dengue. This suggests that terminal complement activation is not uniformly altered during disease severity, possibly due to efficient regulation or localized activation.
The selective alterations in C1q, C1Inh, and C2 levels in overall patient cohort point to a preferential engagement of the classical pathway during early DENV infection. Significant shifts in the proximal classical complement factors and the lack of marked alterations in downstream components suggest the likely initiation of the classical pathway but not fully propagated across to the terminal effectors of complement activation (involving C6, C7, C8, and C9, which, however, could not be completely explored in the current study). This could still be speculated of the likely involvement of early immune-complex-driven activation but are tightly regulated, which remains to be explored. In contrast, a minimal variation in MBL in primary/secondary dengue cohort while indicating significant alterations in the dengue cohort indicates that the lectin pathway may seldom contribute to complement activation. This supports a suggestive interplay, where classical pathway may likely serve as the main axle of complement activation in DENV infection (17, 31).
One of the most important observations was the association between sCR1 and disease severity. By univariate analysis, several parameters, including age, NS1 positivity, and IgG positivity, were found to be associated with dengue severity, while multivariate modeling identified sCR1 as the only factor associated with dengue disease severity. Furthermore, higher sCR1 levels were protective, with each unit increase of sCR1 reducing the dengue severity by 22%. This suggests that sCR1 exhibits a regulatory role in controlling complement activation and preventing excessive inflammation and tissue injury during systemic infection (26, 32). Many previous studies have implicated uncontrollable complement activation as a contributor to plasma leakage, and our study hypothesizes the role of sCR1 as a protective regulator (33). In addition, sCR1 showed a negative association with platelet count but which did not reach statistical significance, implicating that its suggestive role is more closely related to dengue severity than to thrombocytopenia. It is important to note that the complement system also links to the coagulation systems, and hence the association between sCR1 and platelet requires greater attention. CR1 is a type I membrane protein that encompasses a family of complement receptors (CR2, CR3, and CR4) that are often expressed on a plethora of immune cells (34). Besides that, very low levels (~50 ng/mL) of CR1 occur as sCR1 in the plasma, likely released as a result of proteolytic shedding (34).
Hematologic and biochemical results associated with the platelet count also provided additional insights. In line with previous findings (35, 36), markers of immune dysregulation, such as RDW and basophil levels, were inversely correlated with the platelet levels. These findings are consistent with the ongoing hematologic derangement occurring in dengue thrombocytopenia (35, 36). Interestingly, uric acid levels showed a strong positive correlation with platelet count, raising the probability that altered purine metabolism or oxidative stress pathway can influence the hematologic recovery in DENV infection (37). However, this observation is only preliminary and requires further in-depth investigations. Uric acid functions as a major endogenous antioxidant, scavenging ROS and protecting the host against cellular damage (38). The observed positive correlation between uric acid and platelet levels and its implied negative correlation between dengue severity reflect excessive oxidative stress and antioxidant depletion, implying an uptake of uric acid metabolites and a decreased capacity of endogenous antioxidant defense due to disease severity (38).
The study has certain limitations that should be acknowledged. Potential confounders such as prior flavivirus infection, nutritional status, and other co-morbidities were not fully controlled. Although all of the representative samples tested were positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG, reducing intergroup variability related to COVID-19 exposure; this had no association with dengue severity. The relatively small sample size might limit the statistical power and generalizability of the findings. Although plaque reduction neutralization test (PNRT) helps in confirming DENV infection, this was not performed due to sample volume constraints. In addition, although we accessed complement activation, not all complement components (e.g., C4, C5b, C6, C7, C8, and C9) were measured. Furthermore, the cross-sectional study design limits the establishment of the causal relationship between the target analyte and disease exacerbation or mitigation over the period of disease progression, warranting longitudinal follow-up investigations to capture temporospatial disease dynamics. Moreover, high-throughput omics-based approaches such as transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and other validation experiments to identify relevant disease mediators or therapeutic targets are warranted. Lastly, the limited viremia positivity among the samples and restricted serotyping constrain the generalizability of serotype-dependent complement alterations. Taken together, these limitations suggest that the current findings should rather be considered as indicative, and further large-scale, longitudinal investigations encompassing all of the complement factors are warranted to validate the findings.
In conclusion, our investigation reinforces the importance of the complement system in dengue pathogenesis, with particular emphasis on the early classical pathway of complement activation. Furthermore, the association of sCR1 indicates its likelihood for use as a potential candidate biomarker of dengue severity, which, however, remains to be confirmed using longitudinal cohort studies. Given the strong positive correlation of serum uric acid with blood platelet counts, the relevance of uric acid (an endogenous antioxidant) can be elaborately studied in dengue. This study offers several avenues for future translational research aimed at improving dengue diagnostic, highlighting the complement factors’ potential utility as biomarker candidates in distinguishing disease severity or predicting clinical progression. Future studies incorporating longitudinal sampling, comprehensive profiling of terminal pathways, and larger, virologically diverse cohorts will be essential to validate the pathways explored herein for rendering translational validations in clinical dengue infection.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by The Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) of the Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, (Ref. No. 114/03/2024/Faculty/SRB/SMCH), and the Government Theni Medical College and Hospital, Theni (Ref. No. 2300/IEC/2024-26). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
AA: Writing – original draft, Data curation, Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing, Software. SS: Validation, Visualization, Formal Analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Resources. AM: Investigation, Supervision, Data curation, Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Formal Analysis, Validation. RV: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Software, Formal Analysis. SR: Formal Analysis, Data curation, Methodology, Resources, Conceptualization, Visualization, Validation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. RK: Investigation, Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Methodology, Data curation, Validation, Resources. YY: Resources, Visualization, Data curation, Validation, Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Software, Formal Analysis. ML: Visualization, Resources, Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Software, Formal Analysis. ES: Software, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Resources, Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Validation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Formal Analysis, Project administration.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. AA is funded by NFOBC-NBCFDC of the Ministry of Social Justice, Government of India Junior Research Fellowship. The study was funded by ML through AI52731, the Swedish Research Council (https://www.vr.se/english.html), The Joanna Cocozza Foundation for Children’s Medical Research, Linköping, Sweden. YY is funded by Xiamen University Research Fund (XMUMRF/2024-C14/ILAB/0006). The funders of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all of the national and international members of the Infectious Diseases Society of India (http://www.idsi.org.in) (IDSI), Chennai, for extending insightful discussions as well as logistic support. Dr. Meganathan Kannan, Blood and Vascular Biology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Central University of Tamil Nadu, is acknowledged for the thoughtful discussions extended on vascular and platelet mediators in dengue infection. The authors wholeheartedly thank the study volunteers, physicians and paramedical staff for all the supports rendered during the participant recruitment and specimen collection storage and shipment processes. Ms. Atchaya Muthuvel is acknowledged for logistic support.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) ES declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Pan P, Zhang Q, Liu W, Wang W, Lao Z, Zhang W, et al. Dengue virus M protein promotes NLRP3 inflammasome activation to induce vascular leakage in mice. J Virol. (2019) 93:e00996-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00996-19
2. Kurnia N, Kaitana Y, Salaki CL, Mandey LC, Tuda JSB, and Tallei TE. Study of dengue virus transovarial transmission in Aedes spp. in Ternate city using streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex immunohistochemistry’. Infect Dis Rep. (2022) 14:765–71. doi: 10.3390/idr14050078
3. Gowri Sankar S, Mowna Sundari T, and Alwin Prem Anand A. Emergence of dengue 4 as dominant serotype during 2017 outbreak in south India and associated cytokine expression profile. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2021) 11:681937. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.681937
4. Mukherjee S, Saha B, and Tripathi A. Clinical significance of differential serum-signatures for early prediction of severe dengue among Eastern Indian patients. Clin Exp Immunol. (2022) 208:72–82. doi: 10.1093/cei/uxac018
5. Mustafa MS, Rasotgi V, Jain S, and Gupta V. Discovery of fifth serotype of dengue virus (DENV-5): A new public health dilemma in dengue control. Med J Armed Forces India. (2015) 71:67–70. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.09.011
6. Vaddadi K, Gandikota C, Jain PK, Prasad VSV, and Venkataramana M. Co-circulation and co-infections of all dengue virus serotypes in Hyderabad, India 2014. Epidemiol Infect. (2017) 145:2563–74. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817001479
7. Imad HA, Phumratanaprapin W, Phonrat B, Chotivanich K, Prakaykaew C, Muangnoicharoen S, et al. Cytokine expression in dengue fever and dengue hemorrhagic fever patients with bleeding and severe hepatitis. Am J Trop Med Hygiene. (2020) 102:943–50. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0487
8. Mathew A and Rothman AL. Understanding the contribution of cellular immunity to dengue disease pathogenesis. Immunol Rev. (2008) 225:300–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00678.x
9. Nascimento EJM, Hottz ED, Garcia-Bates TM, Bozza F, Marques ET Jr, and Barratt-Boyes SM. Emerging concepts in dengue pathogenesis: interplay between plasmablasts, platelets, and complement in triggering vasculopathy. Crit Rev Immunol. (2014) 34:227–40. doi: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2014010212
10. Hadinegoro SRS. The revised WHO dengue case classification: does the system need to be modified? Paediatr Int Child Health. (2012) 32:33–8. doi: 10.1179/2046904712Z.00000000052
11. Panwar A, Kumar R, Goel R, Aggarwal S, Saraswat S, Bansal P, et al. Severe dengue in children associates with dysregulation of lipid homeostasis, complement cascade and retinol transport. Clin Trans Med. (2023) 13:e1271. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1271
12. Dunkelberger JR and Song W-C. Complement and its role in innate and adaptive immune responses. Cell Res. (2010) 20:34–50. doi: 10.1038/cr.2009.139
13. Killick J, Morisse G, Sieger D, and Astier AL. Complement as a regulator of adaptive immunity. Semin Immunopathol. (2018) 40:37–48. doi: 10.1007/s00281-017-0644-y
14. Nascimento EJM, Silva AM, Cordeiro MT, Brito CA, Gil LH, and Braga-Neto U. Alternative complement pathway deregulation is correlated with dengue severity. PLOS One. (2009) 4:e6782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006782
15. Carr JM, Cabezas-Falcon S, Dubowsky JG, Hulme-Jones J, and Gordon DL. Dengue virus and the complement alternative pathway. FEBS Lett. (2020) 594:2543–55. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13730
16. Avirutnan P, Hauhart RE, Marovich MA, Garred P, Atkinson JP, and Diamond MS. Complement-mediated neutralization of dengue virus requires mannose-binding lectin. mBio. (2011) 2:e00276-11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00276-11
17. Kraivong R, Punyadee N, Liszewski MK, Atkinson JP, and Avirutnan P. Dengue and the lectin pathway of the complement system. Viruses. (2021) 13:1219. doi: 10.3390/v13071219
18. Ramaglia V, Wolterman R, de Kok M, Vigar MA, Wagenaar-Bos I, King RH, et al. Soluble complement receptor 1 protects the peripheral nerve from early axon loss after injury. Am J Pathol. (2008) 172:1043–52. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070660
19. Sánchez JL, Salgado DM, Vega MR, Castro-Trujillo S, and Narváez CF. Utility of the WHO dengue guidelines in pediatric immunological studies. J Trop Pediatr. (2024) 70:fmae014. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmae014
20. Aggarwal C, Ahmed H, Sharma P, Reddy ES, Nayak K, Singla M, et al. Severe disease during both primary and secondary dengue virus infections in pediatric populations. Nat Med. (2024) 30:670–4. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02798-x
21. Selvavinayagam ST, Sankar S, Yong YK, Anshad AR, Chandramathi S, Somasundaram A, et al. Serosurveillance of dengue infection and correlation with mosquito pools for dengue virus positivity during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tamil Nadu, India – A state-wide cross-sectional cluster randomized community-based study. PLOS Global Public Health. (2024) 4:e0003608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003608
22. de la Cruz-Hernández SI, Flores-Aguilar H, González-Mateos S, Lopez-Martinez I, Alpuche-Aranda C, et al. Determination of viremia and concentration of circulating nonstructural protein 1 in patients infected with dengue virus in Mexico. Am Soc Trop Med Hygiene. (2013) 88:446–54. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0023
23. Giang NT, van Tong H, Quyet D, Xuan Hoan N, Nghia TH, Minh Nam N, et al. Complement protein levels and MBL2 polymorphisms are associated with dengue and disease severity. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:14923. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71947-2
24. Vaughn DW, Green S, Kalayanarooj S, Innis BL, Nimmannitya S, Suntayakorm S, et al. Dengue viremia titer, antibody response pattern, and virus serotype correlate with disease severity. J Infect Dis. (2000) 181:2–9. doi: 10.1086/315215
25. Fuchs A, Lin TY, Beasley DW, Stover CM, Schwaeble WJ, and Pierson TC. Direct complement restriction of flavivirus infection requires glycan recognition by mannose-binding lectin. Cell Host Microbe. (2010) 8:186–95. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.07.007
26. Diep NT, Giang NT, Diu NTT, Nam NM, Khanh LV, Quang HV, et al. Complement receptor type 1 and 2 (CR1 and CR2) gene polymorphisms and plasma protein levels are associated with the Dengue disease severity. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:17377. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44512-w
27. Byrne AB and Talarico LB. Role of the complement system in antibody-dependent enhancement of flavivirus infections. Int J Infect Dis. (2021) 103:404–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.039
28. Yamanaka A, Hendrianto E, Mulyatno KC, Susilowati H, Ginting AP, Sary DD, et al. Correlation between complement component levels and disease severity in dengue patients in Indonesia. Japanese J Infect Dis. (2013) 66:366–74. doi: 10.7883/yoken.66.366
29. Douradinha B, McBurney SP, Soares de Melo KM, Smith AP, Krishna NK, Barrat-Boyes SM, et al. C1q binding to dengue virus decreases levels of infection and inflammatory molecules transcription in THP-1 cells. Virus Res. (2014) 179:231–4. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2013.11.007
30. Ornelas AM, Xavier-de-Carvalho C, Alvarado-Arnez LE, Riberio-Alves M, Rossi AD, Tanuri A, et al. Association between MBL2 haplotypes and dengue severity in children from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Memórias do Inst Oswaldo Cruz. (2019) 114:e190004. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760190004
31. Sena MA, da Silva Castanha PM, Giles Guimarães AB, Oliveira PADS, da Silva MAL, Cordeiro MT, et al. Mannose-binding lectin levels and MBL2 gene polymorphisms are associated with dengue infection in Brazilian children at the early ages. Int J Infect Dis. (2022) 117:212–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.012
32. Liu D and Niu ZX. The structure, genetic polymorphisms, expression and biological functions of complement receptor type 1 (CR1/CD35). Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. (2009) 31:524–35. doi: 10.3109/08923970902845768
33. Schmidt CQ, Lambris JD, and Ricklin D. Protection of host cells by complement regulators. Immunol Rev. (2016) 274:152–71. doi: 10.1111/imr.12475
34. Wymann S, Dai Y, Nair AG, Cao H, Powers GA, Schnell A, et al. A novel soluble complement receptor 1 fragment with enhanced therapeutic potential. J Biol Chem. (2021) 296:100200. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.016127
35. Ojha A, Nandi D, Batra H, Singhal R, Annarapu GK, Bhattacharya S, et al. Platelet activation determines the severity of thrombocytopenia in dengue infection. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:41697. doi: 10.1038/srep41697
36. Castilho BM, Silva MT, Freitas ARR, Fulone I, and Lopes LC. Factors associated with thrombocytopenia in patients with dengue fever: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. (2020) 10:e035120. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035120
37. Gandhi L, Maisnam D, Rathore D, Chauhan P, Bonagiri A, and Venkataramana M. Differential localization of dengue virus protease affects cell homeostasis and triggers to thrombocytopenia. iScience. (2023) 26:107024. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107024
Keywords: acute-phase responses, complement, dengue, platelets, sCR1, uric acid
Citation: Anshad AR, Saravanan S, Murugesan A, Vighnesh R, Raju S, Kannan R, Yong YK, Larsson M and Shankar EM (2026) Aberrant systemic acute-phase complement responses in conjunction with soluble CR1 attribute to varying grades of dengue disease severity. Front. Immunol. 16:1731011. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1731011
Received: 23 October 2025; Accepted: 29 December 2025; Revised: 22 December 2025;
Published: 16 January 2026.
Edited by:
Qi Zhao, University of Macau, ChinaReviewed by:
Peter Natesan Pushparaj, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi ArabiaDiksha Mohapatra, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India
Copyright © 2026 Anshad, Saravanan, Murugesan, Vighnesh, Raju, Kannan, Yong, Larsson and Shankar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Esaki M. Shankar, c2hhbmthcmVtQGN1dG4uYWMuaW4=; Marie Larsson, bWFyaWUubGFyc3NvbkBsaXUuc2U=
Ravindran Vighnesh4