Associations between functional autoantibodies targeting GPCRs, antinuclear antibodies, and inflammatory cytokines TNF-α: a cross-sectional study of 19,810 individuals

Introduction: Functional autoantibodies targeting G protein–coupled receptors (GPCR-AAbs) have increasingly been implicated in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. However, their relationships with established autoimmune biomarkers, such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA), and key inflammatory cytokines remain insufficiently understood. This study aimed to investigate the associations between different functional GPCR-AAbs, ANA positivity, and inflammatory cytokines, with a particular focus on potential sex-specific effects.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 19,810 individuals from a large clinic-based cohort. Serum concentrations of functional GPCR-AAbs (Igβ1AR-AAb, Igβ2AR-AAb, IgM3MR-AAb, IgM4MR-AAb, IgETAR-AAb, and IgAT1R-AAb), ANA titers, and the inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were measured. Multivariable regression models were applied to assess associations between GPCR-AAbs, ANA positivity, and TNF-α levels, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, including age. Sex-stratified analyses were performed.

Results: Multiple GPCR-AAbs were significantly associated with ANA positivity, including Igβ1AR-AAb, Igβ2AR-AAb, IgM3MR-AAb, IgM4MR-AAb, IgETAR-AAb, and IgAT1R-AAb. These associations remained robust after adjustment for age and were more pronounced in females. In women, IgM4MR-AAb levels were independently associated with higher TNF-α concentrations (standardized coefficient = 0.28, p = 0.004). No significant associations between GPCR-AAbs and TNF-α were observed in men after age adjustment.

Discussion: This large-scale cross-sectional study identifies a selective inflammatory axis linking ANA, TNF-α, and functional GPCR-AAbs—particularly M4 muscarinic receptor autoantibodies—in a sex-specific manner. These findings suggest that GPCR-AAbs may complement ANA as early biomarkers of immune dysregulation and provide novel mechanistic insights into autoimmune activation. GPCR-AAbs may hold clinical relevance for risk stratification and therapeutic targeting in autoimmune diseases.

1 Introduction

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of membrane proteins in humans. They are widely expressed in both non-immune (e.g., neurons, cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells) and immune cells (e.g., monocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes), where they regulate diverse physiological functions including cell signaling, vascular tone, and immune modulation. Dysregulation of GPCR signaling has been implicated in numerous diseases, ranging from cardiovascular disorders to autoimmune conditions (1, 2). Autoantibodies targeting GPCRs (GPCR-AAbs) can act as functional ligands, mimicking or inhibiting natural ligands and thereby altering receptor-mediated signaling. These antibodies have been detected in various autoimmune diseases and are believed to contribute to disease pathogenesis through mechanisms such as vascular injury, immune cell activation, and tissue remodeling (3–6). Elevated levels of GPCR-AAbs—such as endothelin receptor type A autoantibodies (ETAR-AAb), angiotensin II type 1 receptor autoantibodies (AT1R-AAb), β1/β2-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies (B1AR-AAb, B2AR-AAb), C-X-C chemokine receptor type 3 autoantibodies (CXCR3-Ab) and muscarinic receptor autoantibodies (M3MR-AAb, M4MR-AAb)—have been associated with systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), lupus nephritis, and Sjögren’s syndrome (6–12). Despite the increasing recognition of GPCR-AAbs, their relationship to classical autoimmune markers—particularly antinuclear antibodies (ANA)—and inflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) remains unclear. Prior studies suggest that ANA and GPCR-AAbs may co-occur in autoimmune diseases and could exert synergistic pathogenic effects (13–16). However, direct comparative studies assessing their associations in large cohorts are lacking. In this cross-sectional study, we systematically evaluated serum levels of multiple GPCR-AAbs, ANA titers, TNF-α, IL-6 and CRP in a large cohort of 19,810 individuals. We aimed to elucidate the interplay between functional autoantibodies, classic autoimmune markers, and key cytokines—while also exploring potential sex-specific differences. Understanding these associations may yield novel insights into autoimmune pathophysiology and identify GPCR-AAbs as biomarkers or therapeutic targets.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Participants

This cross-sectional study collected data from individuals who underwent testing for G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) autoantibodies/antibodies at the Institute of Medical Diagnostics (IMD) Berlin-Potsdam, Berlin, Germany, over a five-year period from 2019 to 2024. A total of 19,810 individuals that had been tested for one or multiple GPCR autoantibodies/antibodies were included in this study. These biomarkers comprised β1-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies (B1AR-AAb), β2-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies (B2AR-AAb), M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor autoantibody (M3MR-AAb), M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor autoantibody (M4MR-AAb), protease-activated receptor-1 antibody (PAR1-Ab), and CXC motif chemokine receptor (CD183) antibody (CXCR3-Ab). Among the 19,810 individuals, 1,937 were additionally tested for antinuclear antibodies (ANA), 4,721 for tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), 1,000 for interleukin-6 (IL-6), and 309 for C-reactive protein (CRP).

The GPCR autoantibodies analyzed in this study was introduced into the diagnostic portfolio of the IMD Berlin-Potsdam based on their implicated role in disorders of autonomic regulation and immune dysregulation, particularly post–COVID-19 syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Consequently, a substantial proportion of individuals in this cohort were referred for testing in the context of evaluating these conditions. The cohort also includes patients tested by collaborating specialists (e.g., rheumatologists) for suspected classical systemic autoimmune diseases. This real-world cohort therefore represents a mixed clinic-based cohort with symptoms or diagnoses potentially linked to GPCR-mediated pathophysiology.

The Institute of Medical Diagnostics (IMD) Berlin-Potsdam is a certified medical laboratory in accordance with German state regulations for laboratory diagnostics in patient care. All assays performed in this laboratory are subject to rigorous internal and external quality controls, and regular audits are conducted to ensure continued certification for diagnostic testing. This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institute of Medical Diagnostics (IMD) Berlin-Potsdam, which waived the requirement for informed consent. The study adhered to both the institution’s ethical guidelines and the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki regarding the collection and use of data.

2.2 Clinical and laboratory parameters

The following clinical and laboratory parameters were collected: sex, age, ANA, anti-double stranded DNA autoantibodies (Anti-dsDNA-AAb), endothelin receptor type A autoantibodies (ETAR-AAb), angiotensin II receptor type 1 autoantibody (AT1R-AAb), β1-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies (B1AR-AAb), β2-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies (B2AR-AAb), M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor autoantibody (M3MR-AAb), M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor autoantibody (M4MR-AAb), protease-activated receptor 1 antibody (PAR1-Ab), CXC motif chemokine receptor (CD183) antibody (CXCR3-Ab), interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). All laboratory parameters were analyzed at the Institute of Medical Diagnostics (IMD) Berlin-Potsdam. GPCR autoantibodies were quantified using a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) provided by CellTrend GmbH, Germany. IL-6 and TNF-α were quantified by chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) provided by EUROIMMUN, Germany. CRP was measured using high-sensitivity automated immunoturbidimetric assays (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland).ANA was detected using the gold-standard indirect immunofluorescence test (IIFT) provided by EUROIMMUN, Germany. ANA titers were categorized into four levels: <1:100, 1:100, 1:320, and ≥1:1000.

2.3 Statistical analysis

The data were downloaded from the server of the Institute of Medical Diagnostics (IMD) Berlin-Potsdam and organized into an SPSS database. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corporation, New York, USA). All parameters were assessed for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Normally distributed parameters are presented as mean ± SEM, whereas non-normally distributed parameters are presented as median (P25, P75). The dataset was divided into two groups based on ANA titers: low ANA (<1:100) and high ANA (≥1:100). For between-group comparisons, the Mann–Whitney U test was applied to skewed (non-normally distributed) variables, whereas the t-test was used for variables that met the assumption of normality. Comparisons of non-normally distributed variables among the three groups were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Continuous variables exhibiting non-normal distributions were subjected to log10 transformation prior to inclusion in subsequent analyses. Correlations between continuous variables were assessed using Pearson’s correlation analysis, whereas correlations involving ordinal variables were analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (Spearman’s rho). Logistic regression analysis was employed for the evaluation of binary variables, whereas linear regression analysis was employed to assess continuous variables. All graphical representations were generated using GraphPad Prism version 10 (GraphPad Software Corporation, California, USA) and are presented as median (P25, P75). Statistical significance was defined as a p-value less than 0.05.

3 Results

3.1 GPCR autoantibodies are higher in the high ANA group

Using an ANA titer of 1:100 as the cutoff, the study cohort was divided into two groups: low ANA (<1:100), comprising 1,670 individuals, and high ANA (≥1:100), comprising 267 individuals. The high ANA group was characterized by a higher average age (Table 1). Levels of Anti-dsDNA-AAb and several GPCR autoantibodies—including B1AR-AAb, B2AR-AAb, M3MR-AAb, M4MR-AAb, ETAR-AAb, and AT1R-AAb—were significantly elevated in the high ANA group (Table 1, Figure 1A). No significant differences were observed between the groups in the levels of PAR1-Ab and CXCR3-Ab (Table 1). TNF-α and CRP levels were slightly higher in the high-ANA group compared with the low-ANA group; however, these differences were not statistically significant (Table 1).

Table 1

Table 1. Comparison of parameters between high and low ANA titer groups.

Figure 1

Figure 1. GPCR autoantibody levels across groups: Bar Chart with Scatter Overlay. (A) Differences in GPCR autoantibodies B1AR-AAb, B2AR-AAb, M3MR-AAb, M4MR-AAb, ETAR-AAb, and ATR1-AAb between the high and low ANA titer groups in the entire study cohort. (B) Differences in GPCR autoantibodies B1AR-AAb, B2AR-AAb, M3MR-AAb, M4MR-AAb, ETAR-AAb, and ATR1-AAb between the high and low ANA titer groups in the female study cohort. (C) Differences in GPCR autoantibodies B1AR-AAb, B2AR-AAb, M3MR-AAb, M4MR-AAb, ETAR-AAb, and ATR1-AAb between the high and low ANA titer groups in the male study cohort. Data were shown in median (P25, P75). Between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. ANA, Antinuclear antibodies; B1AR-AAb, ß1-Adrenergic receptor autoantibodies; B2AR-AAb, ß2-Adrenergic receptor autoantibodies; M3MR-AAb, M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor autoantibody; M4MR-AAb, M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor autoantibody; ETAR-AAb, Endothelin receptor type A autoantibodies; ATR1-AAb, Angiotensin II receptor type 1 autoantibody.

3.2 Sex-specific differences in GPCR autoantibodies between low and high ANA groups

The study cohort was stratified by sex, and each subgroup was further divided based on ANA titers using the 1:100 threshold. The analysis revealed that the levels of GPCR autoantibodies—including B1AR-AAb, B2AR-AAb, M3MR-AAb, M4MR-AAb, ETAR-AAb, and AT1R-AAb—remained significantly different between the high and low ANA groups within the female cohort. However, no such differences were observed in the male cohort (Table 1, Figures 1B, C).

3.3 ANA is positively associated with the GPCR autoantibodies lgB1AR-AAb, lgB2AR-AAb, lgM3MR-AAb, lgM4MR-AAb, lgETAR-AAb, and lgAT1R-AAb

Correlation analysis demonstrated positive associations between ANA titers and age, as well as with GPCR autoantibodies including lgB1AR-AAb, lgB2AR-AAb, lgM3MR-AAb, lgM4MR-AAb, lgETAR-AAb, and lgAT1R-AAb (Table 2). Logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age to control for potential confounding, identified lgB1AR-AAb (OR = 2.22, p = 0.0001), lgB2AR-AAb (OR = 1.98, p = 0.0001), lgETAR-AAb (OR = 4.99, p = 0.001), and lgAT1R-AAb (OR = 3.27, p = 0.007) as independent positive predictors of elevated ANA titers (Table 3). These associations also displayed sex-specific patterns. In the female cohort, both correlation and regression analyses confirmed positive relationships between ANA and lgB1AR-AAb, lgB2AR-AAb, lgM3MR-AAb, lgM4MR-AAb, lgETAR-AAb, and lgAT1R-AAb. In contrast, these associations were not observed in the male cohort (Tables 2, 3). Notably, after age adjustment, ANA remained associated with IgM3MR-AAb and IgM4MR-AAb in females, but not in the entire cohort.

Table 2

Table 2. Correlation analysis between ANA and other parameters.

Table 3

Table 3. The logistic regression analysis of ANA as a dependent variable.

3.4 The GPCR autoantibodies lgM4MR-AAb are positively correlated with lgTNF-α

Correlation analyses showed that lgTNF-α levels were positively associated with several GPCR autoantibodies—including lgB1AR-AAb, lgB2AR-AAb, lgM3MR-AAb, and lgM4MR-AAb—in both the female and male cohorts (Table 4). Furthermore, linear regression analysis incorporating age and all GPCR autoantibodies—lgB1AR-AAb, lgB2AR-AAb, lgM3MR-AAb, lgM4MR-AAb, lgETAR-AAb, lgAT1R-AAb, lgPAR1-Ab, and lgCXCR3-Ab—identified only lgM4MR-AAb as an independent predictor of elevated lgTNF-α (Table 5) in both the overall cohort (Standardized Coefficient = 0.24, p = 0.002) and the female cohort (Standardized Coefficient = 0.28, p = 0.004), but not in the male cohort. Figure 2 illustrates the correlation between lgM4MR-AAb and lgTNF-α. lgCXCR3-Ab (Standardized Coefficient = 0.08, p = 0.043) showed a weak association with lgTNF-α only in the overall study population. The relationship between lgB2AR-AAb and lgTNF-α showed inconsistent directions in the regression model and correlation analysis, and the association was very weak.

Table 4

Table 4. Correlation of lgTNF-α with other parameters.

Table 5

Table 5. The linear regression analysis of lgTNF-α as a dependent variable.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Correlation between lgTNF-α and lgM4MR-AAb in different study cohorts. The study cohort was divided into 10 groups based on the percentile of the actual lgM4MR-AAb value (every 10%), and the mean and SEM of lgTNF-α and lgM4MR-AAb in each group were plotted. Pearson’s correlation was applied for the correlation analysis. M4MR-AAb, M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor autoantibody; TNF-α, Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha. lg = log base 10.

In addition, the associations between GPCR autoantibodies and the inflammatory markers lgIL6 and lgCRP were also examined (Supplementary Tables S1, S2). The correlations between lgIL6 and lgB1AR-AAb or lgM4MR-AAb disappeared after adjusting for age (Supplementary Table S3). lgCRP was not associated with any GPCR autoantibody except for age; however, it should be noted that the sample size for lgCRP was limited (n = 309).

4 Discussion

4.1 Principal findings

In this large clinic-based cohort, we observed that elevated ANA titers were significantly associated with higher levels of multiple GPCR-AAbs, including lgB1AR-AAb, lgB2AR-AAb, lgM3MR-AAb, lgM4MR-AAb, lgETAR-AAb, and lgATR1-AAb, particularly in women. Among these autoantibodies, M4MR-AAb demonstrated strong correlation with serum TNF-α concentrations. These findings suggest a previously underappreciated link between classical autoimmunity markers and functionally active autoantibodies with pro-inflammatory potential.

4.2 Cooperative interaction of ANA and GPCR autoantibodies

In autoimmune diseases, both T and B lymphocytes are excessively activated (6). Activated B cells differentiate into plasma cells, producing a broad spectrum of autoantibodies, with antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and GPCR autoantibodies being particularly prominent (17). Fluctuations in ANA levels are often correlated with disease activity. According to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), ANA titers measured by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) are considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of SLE (18, 19). GPCR autoantibodies exert biological effects by binding to their corresponding receptors, mimicking the actions of endogenous ligands. Therefore, GPCR autoantibodies are regarded as effector molecules in specific pathological mechanisms of autoimmune diseases, such as lupus myocarditis (2, 12) and microvascular dysfunction in SSc (20, 21). Although both GPCR autoantibodies and ANAs are frequently detected in autoimmune diseases, the relationship between them remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the association between ANA titers and GPCR autoantibodies by stratifying participants according to ANA levels. Our findings demonstrated that individuals with higher ANA titers exhibited elevated levels of specific GPCR autoantibodies. This association was more pronounced in the female cohort, consistent with the higher prevalence of autoimmune diseases in women. Our findings support the hypothesis that ANA and GPCR autoantibodies not only coexist but may also exhibit functional interactions.

Among the various GPCR autoantibodies examined, those targeting receptors involved in the regulation of the cardiovascular and autonomic nervous systems—namely ETAR-AAb, ATR1-AAb, B1AR-AAb, B2AR-AAb, M3MR-AAb, and M4MR-AAb—showed the strong correlations with ANA titers. ETAR-AAb and AT1R-AAb can activate a variety of intracellular signaling pathways in both non-immune cells (such as endothelial and smooth muscle cells) and immune cells through binding to their respective receptors, ETAR and AT1R (21–24). A study involving 478 patients with SSc revealed that ETAR-AAb and AT1R-AAb levels were elevated, and higher levels of these autoantibodies were associated with more severe clinical symptoms (21). Another study further demonstrated that, compared to other forms of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), patients with SSc-associated PAH exhibited significantly higher and more prevalent levels of ETAR-AAb and AT1R-AAb (20). B1AR-AAb has been shown to induce calcium overload in cardiomyocytes and promote the release of inflammatory cytokines through excessive stimulation of B1AR (25–27). This may represent a key pathological mechanism underlying SSc-related cardiac involvement and lupus myocarditis (2, 12). In autoimmune diseases—particularly SLE and SSc—B2AR-AAb contributes to inflammation, disruption of immune tolerance, and microvascular dysfunction (28, 29). M3MR-AAb is highly prevalent among patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) who exhibit gastrointestinal involvement. Emerging evidence indicates that M3MR-AAb disrupts cholinergic neurotransmission, thereby mechanistically contributing to the gastrointestinal dysmotility characteristic of SSc (6, 30, 31). In Sjögren’s syndrome, M3MR-AAb blocks parasympathetic neurotransmission, leading to dry eyes/mouth, gastrointestinal dysmotility, and bladder dysfunction (32). Similar to M3MR-AAb, M4MR-AAb appears to mediate gastrointestinal dysfunction in autoimmune diseases (33) and may also contribute to autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysregulation by disrupting cholinergic modulation of cardiovascular function (34). Therefore, autoimmune diseases characterized predominantly by microvascular injury, myocarditis, or autonomic nervous system dysfunction, monitoring GPCR autoantibodies—especially ETAR-AAb, ATR1-AAb, B1AR-AAb, B2AR-AAb, M3MR-AAb, and M4MR-AAb—may offer a more sensitive indicator of disease activity than conventional autoantibodies. Further investigation into the cooperative relationship between ANAs and GPCR autoantibodies may facilitate the development of targeted therapeutic strategies for organ-specific damage in autoimmune diseases.

4.3 Association of GPCR autoantibodies with inflammatory cytokines

Excessive activation of immune cells and the overproduction of inflammatory cytokines are key pathological mechanisms in autoimmune diseases. Inflammatory cytokine TNF-α plays central role in the immune response and is involved in the pathogenesis of various autoimmune diseases (35). In this study cohort, we observed a positive correlation between M4MR-AAb levels and TNF-α. Mechanistically, M4 receptors are expressed on certain immune cell populations (e.g., T and B lymphocytes), forming part of the cholinergic regulatory machinery of the immune system (36). Under physiological conditions, acetylcholine engagement of these receptors modulates cytokine release—typically exerting an inhibitory effect on pro-inflammatory pathways. Animal studies have demonstrated that stimulation of central muscarinic receptors suppresses peripheral TNF levels during endotoxemia (37), and muscarinic signaling within the spleen can alter cytokine expression profiles of immune cells (38). Thus, blockade of M4 receptor function on immune cells by autoantibodies could impair this anti-inflammatory regulatory mechanism. Our findings are consistent with this theoretical framework. Although the regulatory mechanisms linking M4MR-AAb to TNF-α have not yet been fully elucidated, multiple studies have reported concomitant elevations of M4MR-AAb and TNF-α, as well as T- and B-cell activation, in several disease states (39, 40). Notably, in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) undergoing B-cell–depleting therapy with rituximab, clinical improvement was accompanied by a decline in elevated M4MR-AAb levels (40). Collectively, existing evidence together with our current analysis suggests that M4MR-AAbs and TNF-α constitute a critical nexus between autoimmunity and inflammation, and that their interaction may contribute to sustained immune activation and inflammatory manifestations in certain autoimmune disorders.

4.4 Sex-specific immune modulation

The observed female predominance in GPCR-AAb–TNF-α correlations aligns with well-established sex differences in immune regulation. Estrogen is known to amplify B cell activity and antibody production while also modulating T cell differentiation (41, 42). These sex-specific effects may explain the greater vulnerability of women to both ANA formation and GPCR-AAb–mediated inflammation.

4.5 Clinical implications

This study is based on a clinic-based cohort of 19,810 individuals, in which we observed statistically significant but weak associations between ANA and GPCR autoantibodies. GPCR autoantibodies may be broadly present in the general population, and elevated levels may indicate increased susceptibility to autoimmune diseases. GPCR-AAbs may serve as biomarkers of low-grade inflammation and immune activation in ANA-positive individuals, even in the absence of overt autoimmune disease. Their association with TNF-α suggests a role in the pathophysiological transition from preclinical to clinical autoimmunity. These findings raise the possibility of using GPCR-AAb profiles for early risk stratification and personalized monitoring strategies—particularly in women.

4.6 GPCR autoantibodies in post-COVID syndrome and chronic fatigue – links to our findings

Elevated GPCR autoantibodies, particularly against β-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors, are found in individuals with post-COVID syndrome and chronic fatigue (ME/CFS) and are thought to drive symptoms like fatigue, cognitive impairment, and autonomic dysfunction (43, 44). Given that 88.43% (n = 17,517) of the data were collected between 2022 and 2024, the dataset primarily represents the post–COVID-19 period (Supplementary Figure S1). Our findings suggest that elevated GPCR autoantibodies in post–COVID-19 individuals may actively contribute to immune dysregulation via effects on TNF-α, thereby playing a potential role in persistent post–COVID-19 syndrome. Although we compared autoantibody levels across the three testing-year groups (2019, 2020–2021, 2022–2024) using the Kruskal–Wallis test, no significant differences were detected (Supplementary Table S4). The pronounced imbalance in sample size across the groups may have reduced the statistical power of these comparisons.

5 Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, its cross-sectional design precludes causal inference. Longitudinal follow-up is needed to determine whether elevated GPCR-AAbs and TNF-α levels precede or result from immune activation. Second, the large clinic-based cohort consisted primarily of older individuals, potentially limiting generalizability to younger cohorts. Third, given that the data were obtained from a diagnostic laboratory, corresponding clinical symptom information was unavailable; additionally, only a limited set of inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP) was measured. Consequently, we are currently unable to establish a systematic and comprehensive link between mechanistic findings and clinical phenotypes, thereby limiting our ability to provide a more in-depth interpretation of the biological significance of these GPCR autoantibodies. Future longitudinal or mechanistic studies will be essential to determine whether these autoantibodies have predictive or pathogenic relevance. Lastly, the smaller number of male participants may have resulted in insufficient statistical power to detect weaker associations in men.

6 Conclusions

This is the first large-scale study to systematically demonstrate that elevated ANA titers are associated with increased levels of functional GPCR-AAbs, which in turn correlate with TNF-α in a sex-specific manner. These results provide new insights into the interface between classical autoimmune markers and functional autoantibodies and suggest a novel inflammatory axis potentially relevant to disease prediction and early intervention. Future research should focus on longitudinal validation, functional mechanistic studies, and integration of GPCR-AAbs into biomarker panels for autoimmune risk prediction.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

This study was conducted using anonymized retrospective laboratory data and was approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Institute of Medical Diagnostics (IMD) Berlin-Potsdam. The dataset was derived from routine diagnostic testing conducted at the Institute of Medical Diagnostics (IMD) Berlin-Potsdam. The Institute is a certified medical laboratory in accordance with German state regulations for laboratory diagnostics in patient care. All assays are performed in accordance with national quality standards and undergo regular internal and external audits to ensure continued certification. The study was conducted in compliance with the ethical standards of the IMD Berlin-Potsdam and the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The ethics committee/institutional review board waived the requirement of written informed consent for participation from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin. All data analyzed in this study were fully anonymized prior to analysis, and the investigators had no access to any personally identifiable information. Therefore, informed consent and separate ethical approval were not required.

Author contributions

XC: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Software. BK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing. BK: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Vv: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Software, Writing – review & editing. CR: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. BH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1743537/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Flock T, Hauser AS, Lund N, Gloriam DE, Balaji S, and Babu MM. Selectivity determinants of Gpcr-G-protein binding. Nature. (2017) 545:317–22. doi: 10.1038/nature22070

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Cabral-Marques O and Riemekasten G. Functional autoantibodies targeting G protein-coupled receptors in rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. (2017) 13:648–56. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.134

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Herda LR, Felix SB, and Boege F. Drug-like actions of autoantibodies against receptors of the autonomous nervous system and their impact on human heart function. Br J Pharmacol. (2012) 166:847–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01828.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Gleicher N, Barad D, and Weghofer A. Functional autoantibodies, a new paradigm in autoimmunity? Autoimmun Rev. (2007) 7:42–5. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2007.06.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Skiba MA and Kruse AC. Autoantibodies as endogenous modulators of Gpcr signaling. Trends Pharmacol Sci. (2021) 42:135–50. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.11.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Binda M, Moccaldi B, Civieri G, Cuberli A, Doria A, Tona F, et al. Autoantibodies targeting G-protein-coupled receptors: pathogenetic, clinical and therapeutic implications in systemic sclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25. doi: 10.3390/ijms25042299

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Goldblatt F, Gordon TP, and Waterman SA. Antibody-mediated gastrointestinal dysmotility in scleroderma. Gastroenterology. (2002) 123:1144–50. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.36057

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Shreiner AB, Murray C, Denton C, and Khanna D. Gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic sclerosis. J Scleroderma Relat Disord. (2016) 1:247–56. doi: 10.5301/jsrd.5000214

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Abe S, Tsuboi H, Kudo H, Asashima H, Ono Y, Honda F, et al. M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-reactive Th17 cells in primary Sjogren’s syndrome. JCI Insight. (2020) 5. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.135982

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Yu X, Riemekasten G, and Petersen F. Autoantibodies against muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M(3) in Sjogren’s syndrome and corresponding mouse models. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). (2018) 23:2053–64. doi: 10.2741/4689

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Enghard P, Humrich JY, Rudolph B, Rosenberger S, Biesen R, Kuhn A, et al. Cxcr3+Cd4+ T cells are enriched in inflamed kidneys and urine and provide a new biomarker for acute nephritis flares in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Arthritis Rheum. (2009) 60:199–206. doi: 10.1002/art.24136

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Jahns R, Schlipp A, Boivin V, and Lohse MJ. Targeting receptor antibodies in immune cardiomyopathy. Semin Thromb Hemost. (2010) 36:212–8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1251506

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Riemekasten G, Petersen F, and Heidecke H. What makes antibodies against G protein-coupled receptors so special? A novel concept to understand chronic diseases. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:564526. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.564526

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Deng C, Hu C, Chen S, Li J, Wen X, Wu Z, et al. Meta-analysis of anti-muscarinic receptor type 3 antibodies for the diagnosis of Sjogren syndrome. PLoS One. (2015) 10:e0116744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116744

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. El-Rhermoul FZ, Fedorowski A, Eardley P, Taraborrelli P, Panagopoulos D, Sutton R, et al. Autoimmunity in long Covid and Pots. Oxf Open Immunol. (2023) 4:iqad002. doi: 10.1093/oxfimm/iqad002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Aboseif A, Bireley JD, Li Y, Polston D, and Abbatemarco JR. Autoimmunity and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: implications in diagnosis and management. Cleve Clin J Med. (2023) 90:439–47. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.90a.22093

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Wang L, Wang FS, and Gershwin ME. Human autoimmune diseases: A comprehensive update. J Intern Med. (2015) 278:369–95. doi: 10.1111/joim.12395

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Meroni PL and Schur PH. Ana screening: an old test with new recommendations. Ann Rheum Dis. (2010) 69:1420–2. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.127100

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, Masi AT, McShane DJ, Rothfield NF, et al. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. (1982) 25:1271–7. doi: 10.1002/art.1780251101

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Becker MO, Kill A, Kutsche M, Guenther J, Rose A, Tabeling C, et al. Vascular receptor autoantibodies in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with systemic sclerosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2014) 190:808–17. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201403-0442OC

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Riemekasten G, Philippe A, Nather M, Slowinski T, Muller DN, Heidecke H, et al. Involvement of functional autoantibodies against vascular receptors in systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2011) 70:530–6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.135772

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Hilbrands L, Hoitsma A, and Wetzels J. Angiotensin II type 1-receptor activating antibodies in renal-allograft rejection. N Engl J Med. (2005) 352:2027–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200505123521921

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Gunther J, Kill A, Becker MO, Heidecke H, Rademacher J, Siegert E, et al. Angiotensin receptor type 1 and endothelin receptor type a on immune cells mediate migration and the expression of Il-8 and Ccl18 when stimulated by autoantibodies from systemic sclerosis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. (2014) 16:R65. doi: 10.1186/ar4503

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kill A and Riemekasten G. Functional autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis pathogenesis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. (2015) 17:34. doi: 10.1007/s11926-015-0505-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Xu B, Li M, Wang Y, Zhao M, Morotti S, Shi Q, et al. Grk5 controls Sap97-dependent cardiotoxic beta(1) adrenergic receptor-Camkii signaling in heart failure. Circ Res. (2020) 127:796–810. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.316319

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Pereira L, Cheng H, Lao DH, Na L, van Oort RJ, Brown JH, et al. Epac2 mediates cardiac Beta1-adrenergic-dependent sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ Leak and arrhythmia. Circulation. (2013) 127:913–22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.12.148619

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Du Y, Yan L, Wang J, Zhan W, Song K, Han X, et al. Beta1-adrenoceptor autoantibodies from Dcm patients enhance the proliferation of T lymphocytes through the Beta1-Ar/Camp/Pka and P38 Mapk pathways. PloS One. (2012) 7:e52911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052911

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Dharmalingam B, Singh P, Schramm P, Birklein F, Kaps M, Lips KS, et al. Autoantibodies from patients with complex regional pain syndrome induce pro-inflammatory effects and functional disturbances on endothelial cells in vitro. Pain. (2022) 163:2446–56. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002646

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Turki J and Liggett SB. Receptor-specific functional properties of beta 2-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies in asthma. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. (1995) 12:531–9. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.12.5.7742016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kawaguchi Y, Nakamura Y, Matsumoto I, Nishimagi E, Satoh T, Kuwana M, et al. Muscarinic-3 acetylcholine receptor autoantibody in patients with systemic sclerosis: contribution to severe gastrointestinal tract dysmotility. Ann Rheum Dis. (2009) 68:710–4. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.096545

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Singh J, Mehendiratta V, Del Galdo F, Jimenez SA, Cohen S, DiMarino AJ, et al. Immunoglobulins from scleroderma patients inhibit the muscarinic receptor activation in internal anal sphincter smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. (2009) 297:G1206–13. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00286.2009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Imamura M, Mukaino A, Takamatsu K, Tsuboi H, Higuchi O, Nakamura H, et al. Ganglionic acetylcholine receptor antibodies and autonomic dysfunction in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041332

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Sunami Y, Sugaya K, Miyakoshi N, Iwazaki O, and Takahashi K. Association of autoantibodies to muscarinic acetylcholine receptors with gastrointestinal symptoms and disease severity in patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. Immunol Res. (2022) 70:197–207. doi: 10.1007/s12026-021-09256-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Gunning WT 3rd, Kvale H, Kramer PM, Karabin BL, and Grubb BP. Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome is associated with elevated G-protein coupled receptor autoantibodies. J Am Heart Assoc. (2019) 8:e013602. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013602

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Jang DI, Lee AH, Shin HY, Song HR, Park JH, Kang TB, et al. The role of tumor necrosis factor alpha (Tnf-Alpha) in autoimmune disease and current Tnf-alpha inhibitors in therapeutics. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052719

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Fujii T, Mashimo M, Moriwaki Y, Misawa H, Ono S, Horiguchi K, et al. Expression and function of the cholinergic system in immune cells. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1085. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01085

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Pavlov VA, Ochani M, Gallowitsch-Puerta M, Ochani K, Huston JM, Czura CJ, et al. Central muscarinic cholinergic regulation of the systemic inflammatory response during endotoxemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2006) 103:5219–23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600506103

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Razani-Boroujerdi S, Behl M, Hahn FF, Pena-Philippides JC, Hutt J, and Sopori ML. Role of muscarinic receptors in the regulation of immune and inflammatory responses. J Neuroimmunol. (2008) 194:83–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.11.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Gunning WT 3rd, Stepkowski SM, Kramer PM, Karabin BL, and Grubb BP. Inflammatory biomarkers in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome with elevated G-protein-coupled receptor autoantibodies. J Clin Med. (2021) 10. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040623

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Loebel M, Grabowski P, Heidecke H, Bauer S, Hanitsch LG, Wittke K, et al. Antibodies to beta adrenergic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Brain Behav Immun. (2016) 52:32–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.09.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Khan D and Ansar Ahmed S. The immune system is a natural target for estrogen action: opposing effects of estrogen in two prototypical autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. (2015) 6:635. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00635

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Mohammad I, Starskaia I, Nagy T, Guo J, Yatkin E, Vaananen K, et al. Estrogen receptor alpha contributes to T cell-mediated autoimmune inflammation by promoting T cell activation and proliferation. Sci Signal. (2018) 11. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aap9415

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Sotzny F, Filgueiras IS, Kedor C, Freitag H, Wittke K, Bauer S, et al. Dysregulated autoantibodies targeting vaso- and immunoregulatory receptors in post Covid syndrome correlate with symptom severity. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:981532. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.981532

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Dotan A, David P, Arnheim D, and Shoenfeld Y. The autonomic aspects of the post-Covid19 syndrome. Autoimmun Rev. (2022) 21:103071. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103071

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar