Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Immunol., 26 January 2026

Sec. T Cell Biology

Volume 17 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1783936

This article is part of the Research TopicCommunity Series in the Role of CD1- and MR1-restricted T cells in Immunity and Disease: Volume IIIView all 7 articles

Editorial: Community series in the role of CD1- and MR1-restricted T cells in immunity and disease: volume III

  • 1Department of Immunology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
  • 2Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States

Cluster of differentiation 1 (CD1) and major histocompatibility antigen (MHC) complex-related protein 1 (MR1) are members of the MHC class Ib family of antigen-presenting molecules that control the development and functions of unique subsets of T lymphocytes (16). CD1d and MR1 expression by CD4+8+ thymocytes facilitates the development of invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells and mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells, respectively. These T cell subsets display a highly restricted T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire, with hardwired effector functions reminiscent of cells of the innate immune system, a property they share with γδ T cells (2, 7). These three unconventional T cell subsets may influence each other by competing for homeostatic factors or niches, and potentially display redundant functions (8). The unique properties of these innate-like T cell subsets were discussed in Volumes I and II of this Community Series. Volume III, which contains one original research article and five review articles, provides examples of the most recent work in this field.

The review by Rotolo et al. discusses the therapeutic potential of iNKT cells in cancer, infections, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The anti-tumor activities of iNKT cells and their prototypical ligand, α-galactosylceramide (α-GC), have been well documented (9, 10). The review article discusses encouraging results of clinical trials with iNKT cells. The authors discuss the feasibility of employing allogeneic, off-the-shelf iNKT cell preparations, since these cells do not mediate GVHD and might even suppress alloreactivity. Recent progress in this field includes clinical preparations of various engineered iNKT effectors such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified iNKT cells, induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived iNKT cells, and iPSC-CAR-iNKT cells, which may accelerate the development of safe and effective iNKT cell therapies. Moreover, the review discusses iNKT cell-based combination therapies with radiotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, immune modulators, and others.

The review by Laub et al. covers tumor immunotherapy by mainly focusing on MR1-restricted T cells, as compared with iNKT cells and γδ T cells. The advantage of utilizing unconventional T cells for immunotherapy is based on their public TCRs that recognize non-peptidic antigens presented by non-polymorphic or minimally polymorphic MHC class I-like molecules. While MR1 is ubiquitously expressed, it is largely confined to intracellular compartments in the absence of specific ligands (11). Hence, target cells for MR1-restricted T cells need to produce endogenous activating ligands. MR1-restricted T cells can be activated or inhibited by a variety of self-, tumor-, or microbial-derived products and drug-like molecules such as vitamin B-related metabolites, nucleosides, nucleoside adducts, and their synthetic analogues. The authors discuss the properties of human MR1-restricted T cell clones that recognize specific MR1 allomorphs on a wide range of tumor cells but not healthy cells, suggesting a new avenue for MR1-based immunotherapies. Finally, they discuss the current status and future perspectives of clinical trials for cancer immunotherapies conducted with these unconventional T cell subsets.

The review by Palacios et al. discusses the function of iNKT cells in humoral immunity via direct and indirect interactions with B cells, as facilitated by iNKT cell ligands. They review various α-GC analogues that preferentially activate type 1 or 2 immunity, anatomical structures of the secondary lymphoid organs that facilitate iNKT-B cell interactions, intricate cognate and non-cognate interactions between these cells, and their roles in pathological settings such as autoimmunity, infection and metabolic disease. They propose that interactions between iNKT cells and B cells mediated by specific ligands could be exploited to induce specific immunoglobulin isotypes and effector functions to advance vaccine development.

Seminal studies in the field reported the capacity of members of the CD1 family to present mycobacterial lipids to CD1-restricted T lymphocytes (12). These studies spurred the discovery of a burgeoning family of unconventional T cells that recognize non-peptidic antigens presented by MHC class Ib proteins. The review by Milton and Mansour describes the antigen-presenting functions of each member of the CD1 family, and further discusses the responses of subsets of CD1-restricted αβ and γδ T cells to mycobacterial infections and autoantigens. They also highlight earlier findings that different mammalian species express different numbers of CD1 genes, which has important implications for selecting appropriate animal species to model disease (13). Importantly, they remind readers that toll-like receptor signaling can modulate CD1-mediated T cell responses, including those directed against mycobacterial infections. Prospects for incorporating this knowledge into new vaccine candidates are discussed.

MAIT cells can be activated by cytokines such as IL-12 and IL-18, even in the absence of TCR signals (14), and the effector functions of these cells can be modulated by type I interferons, IL-7, IL-15, and IL-23 (15). The review by Camard et al. discusses MAIT cells that are thymically pre-programmed to produce type 1 or 3 cytokines (i.e., MAIT1 or MAIT17 cells, respectively), the peripheral tissues they occupy, and their functions in tissue repair and cytocidal activity, which may be influenced by the specific cytokine milieu in which they reside, even under physiological conditions. The review then considers the contributions of these cells to bacterial and viral infections that are either dependent or independent of TCR engagement. Finally, they discuss the impact of human inborn errors of immunity, due to defects in genes related to MR1, RORγt and related cytokines and cytokine receptors, on MAIT cell functions and their contributions to health and disease.

Finally, the original research article by Zhang and Lu presents a bibliometric analysis of the iNKT cell literature in the Web of Science Core Collection (WSCC) database. Over three thousand studies were pared down by removing meeting abstracts, editorials, corrections, retracted papers, etc., to reach a final list of 2,579 studies that were analyzed for temporal distribution of publications, country of origin, institutional networks, journals, and specific scientists associated with top-ranked research. Such analysis can provide insight into the progression of a research field through specific milestones and collaborations, in efforts to make informed decisions about future research directions.

In summary, the articles contained in Volume III of this Community Series provide a snapshot of the biology and potential medical applications of CD1- and MR1-restricted T cells. We hope that these articles will spawn new studies with the ultimate goal to bring unconventional T cells from the lab to patient care.

Author contributions

KI: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. LK: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all colleagues who contributed and/or reviewed manuscripts for Volume III of this Community Series. Work in the authors’ labs was supported by the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (to KI), the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (to KI), the Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (to KI), the National Institutes of Health (to LVK), and the American Heart Association (to LVK).

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Godfrey DI, Uldrich AP, McCluskey J, Rossjohn J, and Moody DB. The burgeoning family of unconventional T cells. Nat Immunol. (2015) 16:1114–23. doi: 10.1038/ni.3298

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Legoux F, Salou M, and Lantz O. Unconventional or preset αβ T cells: evolutionarily conserved tissue-resident T cells recognizing nonpeptidic ligands. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. (2017) 33:511–35. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060725

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Mayassi T, Barreiro LB, Rossjohn J, and Jabri B. A multilayered immune system through the lens of unconventional T cells. Nature. (2021) 595:501–10. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03578-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Van Kaer L, Postoak JL, Song W, and Wu L. Innate and innate-like effector lymphocytes in health and disease. J Immunol. (2022) 209:199–207. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2200074

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Mori L, Lepore M, and De Libero G. The immunology of CD1- and MR1-restricted T cells. Annu Rev Immunol. (2016) 34:4789–510. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-1120008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Salio M, Silk JD, Jones EY, and Cerundolo V. Biology of CD1- and MR1-restricted T cells. Annu Rev Immunol. (2014) 32:323–66. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120243

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Jameson J, Witherden D, and Havran WL. T-cell effector mechanisms: γδ and CD1d-restricted subsets. Curr Opin Immunol. (2003) 15:349–53. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(03)00045-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Pellicci DG, Koay HF, and Berzins SP. Thymic development of unconventional T cells: how NKT cells, MAIT cells and γδ T cells emerge. Nat Rev Immunol. (2020) 20:756–70. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0345-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Cui J, Shin T, Kawano T, Sato H, Kondo E, Toura I, et al. Requirement for Vα14 NKT cells in IL-12-mediated rejection of tumors. Science. (1997) 278:1623–6. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5343.1623

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kawano T, Cui J, Koezuka Y, Toura I, Kaneko Y, Motoki K, et al. CD1d-restricted and TCR-mediated activation of Vα14 NKT cells by glycosylceramides. Science. (1997) 278:1626–9. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5343.1626

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Riegert P, Wanner V, and Bahram S. Genomics, isoforms, expression, and phylogeny of the MHC class I-related MR1 gene. J Immunol. (1998) 161:4066–77. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.161.8.4066

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Beckman EM, Porcelli SA, Morita CT, Behar SM, Furlong ST, and Brenner MB. Recognition of a lipid antigen by CD1-restricted αβ+ T cells. Nature. (1994) 372:691–4. doi: 10.1038/372691a0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Reinink P and Van Rhijn I. Mammalian CD1 and MR1 genes. Immunogenetics. (2016) 68:515–23. doi: 10.1007/s00251-016-0926-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ussher JE, Bilton M, Attwod E, Shadwell J, Richardson R, de Lara C, et al. CD161++ CD8+ T cells, including the MAIT cell subset, are specifically activated by IL-12 + IL-18 in a TCR-independent manner. Eur J Immunol. (2014) 44:195–203. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343509

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Chiba A, Murayama G, and Miyake S. Mucosal-associated invariant T cells in autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:1333. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01333

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: CD1, immune-mediated disease, immunity, MR1, mucosal-associated invariant T cells, natural killer T cells, non-peptide antigens, unconventional T cells

Citation: Iwabuchi K and Van Kaer L (2026) Editorial: Community series in the role of CD1- and MR1-restricted T cells in immunity and disease: volume III. Front. Immunol. 17:1783936. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1783936

Received: 09 January 2026; Accepted: 15 January 2026; Revised: 09 January 2026;
Published: 26 January 2026.

Edited and reviewed by:

Mariolina Salio, Immunocore, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2026 Iwabuchi and Van Kaer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Kazuya Iwabuchi, YWtpbWFyaUBraXRhc2F0by11LmFjLmpw; Luc Van Kaer, bHVjLnZhbi5rYWVyQHZ1bWMub3Jn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.