Front. Microbiol., 16 February 2018
Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy

Prevalence and Genetic Basis of Antimicrobial Resistance in Non-aureus Staphylococci Isolated from Canadian Dairy Herds

Diego B. Nobrega1,2*, Sohail Naushad1,2, S. Ali Naqvi1,2, Larissa A. Z. Condas1,2, Vineet Saini1,2,3, John P. Kastelic1, Christopher Luby2,4, Jeroen De Buck1,2 and Herman W. Barkema1,2,5
  • 1Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
  • 2Canadian Bovine Mastitis and Milk Quality Research Network, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada
  • 3Population, Public and Indigenous Health Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
  • 4Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
  • 5Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance is a major concern for the dairy industry worldwide. Objectives were to determine: (1) phenotypic and genotypic prevalence of drug-specific resistance for 25 species of non-aureus staphylococci, and (2) associations between presence of resistance determinants and antimicrobial resistance. Broth micro-dilution was used to determine resistance profiles for 1,702 isolates from 89 dairy herds. Additionally, 405 isolates were sequenced to screen for resistance determinants. Antimicrobial resistance was clearly species-dependent. Resistance to quinupristin/dalfopristin was common in Staphylococcus gallinarum (prevalence of 98%), whereas S. cohnii and S. arlettae were frequently resistant to erythromycin (prevalence of 63 and 100%, respectively). Prevalence of resistance was 10% against β-lactams and tetracyclines. In contrast, resistance to antimicrobials critically important for human medicine, namely vancomycin, fluoroquinolones, linezolid and daptomycin, was uncommon (< 1%). Genes encoding multidrug-resistance efflux pumps and resistance-associated residues in deducted amino acid sequences of the folP gene were the most frequent mechanisms of resistance, regardless of species. The estimated prevalence of the mecA gene was 17% for S. epidermidis. Several genes, including blaZ, mecA, fexA, erm, mphC, msrA, and tet were associated with drug-specific resistance, whereas other elements were not. There were specific residues in gyrB for all isolates of species intrinsically resistant to novobiocin. This study provided consensus protein sequences of key elements previously associated with resistance for 25 species of non-aureus staphylococci from dairy cattle. These results will be important for evaluating effects of interventions in antimicrobial use in Canadian dairy herds.


Non-aureus staphylococci (NAS) have emerged as the most frequently isolated group of pathogens in intramammary infections (IMI) in dairy cows, with an estimated udder quarter-level prevalence of 26 cases per 100 quarters (Condas et al., 2017). Worldwide, mastitis remains one of the most frequent reasons for antimicrobial therapy in dairy herds (Mitchell et al., 1998; Brunton et al., 2012; Nobrega et al., 2017). Therefore, NAS are in relatively frequent contact with antimicrobials. Because of the high prevalence of these pathogens in the mammary gland, the presence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in this group of bacteria has potential to cause substantial damage to the dairy industry, animal health and welfare.

Whereas recent reports illustrate that NAS may harbor resistance determinants (Srednik et al., 2017b; Wipf et al., 2017) including genes considered potential public health hazards (Srednik et al., 2017a), the prevalence of AMR and respective resistance determinants in NAS isolated from dairy herds remains unknown. It is noteworthy that the vast majority of studies designed to estimate the prevalence of AMR in NAS isolated from dairy herds are regional and limit screening of resistance determinants to resistant isolates, usually by PCR or a similar approach. This methodology has two major limitations. First, PCR and its variants are usually designed to target few AMR genes (ARGs), limiting results to screened elements. Second, estimated prevalences of ARGs refer to the presence of genetic determinants in the phenotypically resistant population, whereas the same in the phenotypically susceptible population is unknown. The availability of such information would be important for interpreting patterns and trends of AMR, provide an estimate of the impact of various genes in drug-specific resistance, serve as a basis of risk assessment, and determine effects of interventions for controlling AMR.

Whether the presence of ARGs in NAS isolated from dairy cows poses an additional risk to human health is still unknown. An initial assessment relies on availability of information on AMR and resistance determinants in NAS isolated from dairy cattle. Data and samples collected from 89 dairy herds across Canada as part of a longitudinal study by the Canadian Bovine Mastitis Research Network provided a unique opportunity to study distribution of AMR, ARGs and other resistance determinants, e.g., mutations in NAS isolates. The objectives of this study were to: (1) estimate prevalence of drug-specific AMR in NAS isolated from Canadian dairy cows, (2) characterize genetic determinants of AMR associated with various drug-specific resistance profiles, and (3) study the association between the presence of resistance determinants and AMR in NAS isolated from Canadian dairy herds.

Materials and Methods

Herds and Sampling

Data for this study were obtained from the National Cohort of Dairy Farms of the Canadian Bovine Mastitis Research Network (Reyher et al., 2011). Eighty-nine herds from six Canadian provinces (Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, and the Maritimes provinces Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia) were selected to be representative of their respective province in terms of bulk tank somatic cell count, housing system, milking schedule, and breed of cattle. Herds were followed for almost 2 years from February 2007 to December 2008, and milk samples were collected following standardized procedures (Reyher et al., 2011; Saini et al., 2012b). Briefly, three sets of milk samples were collected. The first set included samples from all clinical mastitis cases observed for the duration of the study, as well as follow-up samples collected 2and 4 weeks after antimicrobial treatment. The second set included samples from 15 lactating cows per herd, systematically selected using a random sampling computer-driven method. Cows were re-sampled once every week (summer) or every 3 weeks (winter) for 6 weeks. The third set included samples from 15 cows sampled before drying off and after calving.

Isolates and NAS Identification

Overall, 115,294 milk samples were obtained longitudinally from 5,157 lactating cows. Bacteriological culture and identification were performed according to National Mastitis Council guidelines (National Mastitis Council, 1999). NAS were isolated from IMI (defined as ≥1,000 NAS cfu/mL of milk in pure culture) at least once from 2,091 cows. A random selection of one NAS isolate per cow was done, irrespective of the sampling set, resulting in 2,091 isolates obtained from 2,091 NAS-positive cows. From this total, 1,702 isolates were available to be included in the present study (57 from clinical and 1,645 non-clinical mastitis; including isolates from IMI and subclinical mastitis).

NAS isolates were previously characterized using partial sequencing of the rpoB gene and NCBI's BLAST, with a threshold of 97% identity was used to define a species (Condas et al., 2017). Where high identity for two distinct species was observed, full-length rpoB sequences were obtained and aligned against a database of 450 bovine NAS previously well-characterized (Naushad et al., 2016).

Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) Determination

Phenotypic AMR was obtained using minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for antimicrobials commonly administered to dairy cattle and humans, following the Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, 2016). Antimicrobials and concentrations evaluated were ampicillin (0.12–8 μg/ml), chloramphenicol (2–16 μg/ml), ceftiofur (0.5–4 μg/ml), cephalothin (2–16 μg/ml), ciprofloxacin (1–2 μg/ml), clindamycin (0.5–2 μg/ml), daptomycin (0.5–4 μg/ml), erythromycin (0.25–4 μg/ml), gentamicin (2–16 μg/ml), levofloxacin (0.25–4 μg/ml), linezolid (1–8 μg/ml), moxifloxacin (0.25–4 μg/ml), nitrofurantoin (32–64 μg/ml), oxacillin + 2% NaCl (0.25–4 μg/ml), penicillin (0.06–8 μg/ml), penicillin/novobiocin (1/2–8/16 μg/ml), pirlimycin (0.5–4 μg/ml), quinupristin/dalfopristin (0.5–4 μg/ml), rifampin (0.5–4 μg/ml), tetracycline (2–16 μg/ml), tigecycline (0.03–0.5 μg/ml), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (0.05/9.5–4/76 μg/ml), and vancomycin (0.25–32 μg/ml). Positive controls (antimicrobial-free wells) were included in all plates. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 was used as quality control strain. Breakpoints were defined according to CLSI (Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, 2008, 2016) with slight modifications (S. aureus oxacillin breakpoint was used instead of the coagulase-negative staphylococci breakpoint). For antimicrobials not described by CLSI (i.e., tigecycline), European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints were used (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 2017). AMR was defined as non-susceptibility to a given antimicrobial by combining intermediate and resistant categories into a single category. Therefore, isolates with MIC values equal or above the intermediate breakpoint were classified as resistant (Table S1). Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to at least three distinct antimicrobial classes.

Presence of Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants

Overall, 405 NAS (348 non-clinical mastitis and all 57 clinical mastitis isolates) were sequenced using a MiSeq platform after sample preparation using the Nextera XT DNA Library Prep kit from Illumina®. Selection was based on the inclusion of all clinical mastitis isolates available (n = 57), inclusion of all isolates for uncommon species (< 20 unique isolates available at the cow-level), random selection of one isolate for all other species until 385 isolates were included, and a final random selection of 20 MDR isolates. Genomes were assembled following a standardized protocol and submitted to NCBI under BioProject ID PRJNA342349 (Naushad et al., 2016). Prevalence of ARGs and other resistance determinants was evaluated using data from 4 databases: (1) ARG-ANNOT v3 (Antibiotic Resistance Gene-ANNOTation) (Gupta et al., 2014); (2) MegaRES v1.0.1 (Lakin et al., 2017); (3) Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database v1.1.6 (CARD) (Jia et al., 2017); and (4) ResFinder from the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (as of November 02, 2016) (Zankari et al., 2012). These four databases were merged into a single database containing ARGs protein sequences. Each entry was used as a query against the 405 NAS genomes using a personalized BLAST server. Initially, a single best hit for each query for each NAS genome was retrieved using a 30% similarity and 60% query coverage threshold. To prevent two similar but distinct queries returning hits to the same gene within a particular genome, each region of the genome could only map to a single query. Following this logic, if two queries returned strong hits for the same gene within the same isolate, one was discarded after comparison of the hits results. Hits were compared using a score defined as the product between pairwise identity and query coverage, and the hit with the highest score was selected. Next, the protein sequences of all returned hits were used as queries against the non-redundant database (nr) using NCBI's BLASTp (Altschul et al., 1990), where the best hit was considered definitive, provided it had >80% coverage and percent identity with the query. For resistance determinants that required additional confirmation (substitutions, residues composition), pairwise alignments were done using MEGA 7.0 (Kumar et al., 2016) where the presence of specific residues associated with AMR in Staphylococcus spp. was confirmed against reference sequences available in literature (Hampele et al., 1997; Aubry-Damon et al., 1998; Li et al., 1998; Schmitz et al., 1998; Guirao et al., 2001; Linde et al., 2001; Roychoudhury et al., 2001; Fujimoto-Nakamura et al., 2005; Trong et al., 2005; Friedman et al., 2006; Mwangi et al., 2007; Vickers et al., 2007; Yamada et al., 2008; Peleg et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2012; Davlieva et al., 2013; Kwak et al., 2013) (Figure 1). The following criteria were used to associate the presence of known mutations with AMR: (1) residues at a specific position previously associated with AMR in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS); and (2) residues at a specific position previously associated with AMR in any Staphylococcus spp. In order to screen for novel residues associated with AMR, protein sequences from resistant and susceptible isolates of the same species were aligned and the presence of residues were described for both groups.


Figure 1. Flow diagram for determining genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in 405 bovine non-aureus staphylococci (NAS).

Statistical Analyses

All statistical analyses were done using R 3.4.1 (R Core Team, 2017) and Stata 15 (Statacorp, 2017). Packages used for analyses included lme4 (Bates et al., 2015) and geepack (Halekoh et al., 2006). The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available upon request.

Prevalence Estimation of Phenotypic and Genotypic AMR

Prevalence or proportion of positive isolates was obtained using statistical models at the isolate level and expressed in percentage points. For prevalence estimation of ARGs and other resistance determinants, MDR isolates that were selected purposely were initially excluded, resulting in 385 NAS isolates (328 and 57 isolated from non-clinical and clinical mastitis, respectively). Generalized linear mixed models with herd-specific random effects were used to deal with the hypothetical lack of independence of isolates from the same herd. Models were fit separately for each species and antimicrobial (or resistance determinant) combination via maximum likelihood, with 30 quadrature points per scalar using the adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature (Bates et al., 2015). Estimated logits as well as its respective 95% confidence interval were converted back to proportions for presentation. For non-varying (all positive or all negative), and rare or uncommon outcomes (< 6 positive results), prevalence and its respective 95% exact confidence interval were estimated using the binomial distribution, where observations from different cows in the same herd were assumed to be independent. An initial assessment was done to compare results from clinical and non-clinical samples. Conditional on the species, no significant differences in the prevalence of drug-specific AMR or resistance determinants were observed when contrasting the two types of samples, non-clinical and clinical mastitis samples. Hence, they were combined for further analyses. As the residue composition of the AMR proteins is species-specific for NAS (Linde et al., 2001), the prevalence of mutations was only calculated for residues previously described as associated with AMR in Staphylococcus spp.

Finally, for prevalence estimation of the resistance determinants for the combined NAS, design weights were used at the isolate level to properly adjust for the possible bias introduced by the selection protocol, which favored the inclusion of a wide range of species. Weights were obtained using the ratio between the expected and observed proportion of a species being included in the sequencing protocol. The expected distribution of species was estimated from cow-level prevalence previously reported (Condas et al., 2017). Final weights were scaled to the sum of the total number of isolates sequenced in a particular herd (Carle, 2009). Weights were then used as scaled probability weights at the lowest level, using the melogit function in Stata 15.

Association between Phenotypic AMR and Genetic Determinants of Resistance

Marginal models using generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to estimate the difference in the logit of being resistant between isolates that did and did not harbor a resistance determinant. Resistance was used as a binary variable, whereas the variance function was defined according to the Bernoulli distribution. The logit link was used for mean modeling, and the log(OR) was used in an exchangeable structure of the covariance-matrix to account for the lack of independence introduced by isolates from the same herd (Lipsitz et al., 1991). Sandwich estimators of the variances were used to deal with any misspecification of covariance structures. Scaled probability weights used for prevalence estimation were used to adjust for the possible bias introduced by the selection protocol of sequenced isolates. Drug-specific AMR was considered the outcome, whereas the resistance determinants associated with the respective resistance profile were considered single predictors in separate analyses (i.e., tetK as the single predictor and tetracycline resistance as the outcome). For drug-specific AMR with < 6 positive outcomes or in the presence of zero cells, Fisher's Exact test was used.

To compare the estimated difference in the logit of being resistant conditional on the presence of >1 genetic mechanism, only resistance determinants associated with AMR at P < 0.10 were considered. Initially, pattern tables were generated where possible combinations between candidate genes were first observed. Generalized estimating equations were used as described above, with drug-specific AMR as an outcome. Genes as well as observed interactions were considered predictors. For these analyses, there was an implicit assumption that observed effects were neither confounded nor modified by resistance determinants not considered in the model. For all analyses, P < 0.05 was considered significant and P-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons, as described (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995).


Prevalence of Phenotypic AMR

On average, 19 NAS isolates per herd were included, ranging from four to 41 NAS per herd. The prevalence of AMR was highest for tetracycline, penicillin (10% for each), and erythromycin (6%) (Table 1). Staphylococcus arlettae had the highest prevalence of AMR, particularly against penicillin (61%), ampicillin (23%), erythromycin (100%), pirlimycin (18%) and clindamycin (99.9%). Prevalence of quinupristin/dalfopristin resistance was low or absent for all species except for S. gallinarum (98%) and S. sciuri (19%). Prevalence of MDR in NAS was 2 per 100 isolates, with S. arlettae (61%), S. epidermidis (6%), and S. saprophyticus (6%) being the most resistant species of the NAS commonly isolated from Canadian dairy herds (Table 1). No isolate was resistant to gentamicin, linezolid, cephalothin, vancomycin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, or nitrofurantoin. Five (10%) S. sciuri isolates were resistant to daptomycin, whereas two S. simulans and one S. epidermidis were tigecycline-resistant. Five (0.3%) NAS isolates were resistant to the combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (three S. epidermidis and two S. vitulinus). A single S. haemolyticus isolate was resistant to rifampin. Three S. epidermidis, one S. chromogenes and one S. saprophyticus were ceftiofur-resistant, and one of the three S. epidermidis isolates was also resistant to oxacillin. MIC50, MIC90 as well as range of drug-specific MIC values for the most common NAS species are presented in Table S2.


Table 1. Prevalence (Prev) of the phenotypic antimicrobial resistance per isolate for 25 non-aureus staphylococci species isolated from bovine quarter milk samples collected in 89 Canadian dairy herds.

Overall Frequency of Resistance Determinants

The most common genetic basis of resistance included the presence of AMR-associated residues in the dihydropteroate synthase gene deduced amino acid sequence (folP gene; all sequenced isolates, ranging from two to six residues), the putative multidrug export ATP-binding/permease protein SAV1866 (99% of the isolates), the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) multidrug efflux transporter NorA represented by the norA gene (91% of the isolates) and the DHA sub-family of MFS transporters (61% of the isolates). Drug-specific efflux pumps-coding genes identified included tet38, tetK, and tetL (21, 12, and 3% of all NAS sequenced, respectively), the mrsA gene (42 isolates; 10%), and the chloramphenicol/florfenicol efflux MFS transporter FexA represented by the fexA gene (five isolates; 1%). Non-synonymous mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) previously reported as associated with AMR were present for the parC and parE genes in isolates of S. devriesei and S. epidermidis, respectively. gyrB residues associated with resistance against aminocoumarins were present as the dominant pattern for several species intrinsically resistant to novobiocin. No AMR-associated residue was detected in the deduced amino acid sequence of the rpoB, rpoC and gyrA genes. erm genes, which encode for rRNA adenine N-6-methyltransferases, were present exclusively in S. epidermidis, S. cohnii, S. equorum, and S. chromogenes. No MLS-resistance mechanisms were present in S. gallinarum. The ABC-transporter encoding vgaA was detected in six isolates, whereas the virginiamycin B lyase encoding vgbB was present in a single S. xylosus isolate. van elements associated with vancomycin-resistance were not detected. The mecA1 gene was present in all S. sciuri isolates and the mecA sf was present in all S. fleuretti. No mutation was detected in the promoter region of these genes.

Prevalence of Resistance Determinants

The most prevalent resistance determinants, other than MDR efflux pumps and any AMR-associated residues, were tet38 efflux pumps (30%), macrolide phosphotransferase C (mphC; 10%) and the β-lactamase gene blaZ (6%) (Table 2). The prevalence of these elements varied systematically according to species (Table S3). The mecA gene was present in four S. epidermidis, with an estimated prevalence of 17% for that species. Aminoglycoside-inactivating enzymes had an estimated prevalence close to zero, although they were present in all isolates for some species (aph(3) gene for S. capitis; Table S3). The mphC and msrA genes, encoding the macrolide phosphotransferase C and the ABC transporter MsrA, respectively, were highly prevalent in S. equorum and S. arlettae, two of the species with the highest estimated prevalence of erythromycin resistance. Prevalence of several resistance determinants that were detected in at least one NAS, is available as a Supplementary File (Table S3).


Table 2. Prevalence (and 95% confidence interval) of antimicrobial resistance determinants (ARDs) per isolate associated with various antimicrobial classes in the 3 most frequently isolated bovine non-aureus staphylococci (NAS) species.

Gene Patterns

The most commonly observed gene patterns were the concomitant presence of norA, sav1866, tet38 and folP AMR-associated residues (51 isolates; 13%), presence of dha, norA, norB, sav1866, and folP and gyrB AMR-associated residues (49 isolates; 12%), and presence of norA, sav1866, and folP and mprF AMR-associated residues (27 isolates; 7%). Gene patterns commonly observed for resistant isolates when excluding MDR efflux pumps and AMR-associated residues included the single presence of the blaZ gene (21% of β-lactam-resistant isolates), tetK gene (22% of tetracycline-resistant isolates), concomitant presence of mphC and msrA (29% of erythromycin-resistant isolates) and the same pattern for MDR isolates (13% of MDR isolates; Figure 2).


Figure 2. Common gene patterns in susceptible non-aureus staphylococci isolates (A), isolates resistant to β-lactams (B), erythromycin (C), tetracycline (D), and in multidrug resistant (MDR) isolates (E) when excluding any MDR efflux pumps and antimicrobial resistance-associated residues in the deduced amino acid sequence of any gene evaluated.

Association between Resistance Determinants and AMR


The blaZ and mecA genes were strongly associated with β-lactam resistance (P < 0.001; Table 3). The blaZ gene was detected in all mecA-positive S. epidermidis. The mecA variants (mecA1, mecA sf) were not associated with β-lactam resistance.


Table 3. Relative frequency of drug-specific resistance in bovine non-aureus staphylococci isolates conditional on the presence or absence (% Resist | Gene status) of a particular antimicrobial resistance determinant (ARD).


Presence of the chloramphenicol/florfenicol MFS efflux transporter FexA always coincided with chloramphenicol resistance. If the fexA gene was absent, only 6.1% of isolates were chloramphenicol-resistant (Table 3).


Five S. sciuri were resistant to daptomycin, of which two were sequenced. The presence of a valine instead of a glycine at position 61 of the deduced amino acid sequence of the mprF gene was present for all S. sciuri and S. fleuretti (Figure 3). Hence, presence of this residue and daptomycin resistance were associated (P = 0.005; Table 3). Leucine instead of an isoleucine at position 420 of the same gene was conserved for some species (Figure 3), and not associated with resistance against daptomycin. A single substitution in the cardiolipin synthase (cls) deduced amino acid sequence was observed for five S. simulans (T33N) and was not associated with AMR. No residue substitution was detected when contrasting the cls deduced amino acid sequence from susceptible versus resistant S. sciuri. One daptomycin-resistant S. sciuri had a glutamine instead of a lysine at position 711 of the rpoC deduced amino acid sequence (K711Q). The same isolate had several substitutions in the deduced amino acid sequence of mprF gene, including N31S, I167F, A315V, T331N, N352D, V410I, T460I, E525Q, and D697E (positions based on NCBI's protein accession number ORI05006.1).


Figure 3. Consensus of residue composition of genes associated with drug-specific antimicrobial resistance for various non-aureus staphylococci species (NAS). Positions screened per gene deduced amino acid sequences, in addition to S. aureus wild and resistance-associated residues, are also presented. Presence of a red residue for a particular species indicates residues associated with antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus spp., according to the literature. 1SAG, S. agnetis; SAR, S. arlettae; SAU, S. auricularis; SCA, S. capitis; SCP, S. caprae; SCH, S. chromogenes; SCO, S. cohnii; SDE, S. devriesei; SEP, S. epidermidis; SEQ, S. equorum; SFL, S. fleuretti; SGA, S. gallinarum; SHA, S. haemolyticus; SHO, S. hominis; SHY, S. hyicus; SKL, S. kloosii; SNE, S. nepalensis; SPA, S. pasteuri; SSA, S. saprophyticus; SSC, S. sciuri; SSI, S. simulans; SSU, S. succinus; SVI, S. vitulinus; SWA, S. warneri; SXY, S. xylosus; 2Two-residues insertion at position 256; 3A, F, I, L, V, or Y; 4F, I, L, V, or Y; 5A, G, K, N, V, or Y; 6Position 140 for NAS; 142 for S. aureus; 7K, I or S.

Macrolides, Lincosamides and Streptogramins (MLS)

RNA-methyltransferases were associated with erythromycin resistance (P < 0.01). Although their presence always coincided with resistance against erythromycin, they were not present in the most common erythromycin-resistant patterns (Figure 2), as their prevalence was relatively low (< 1%; Table 2). In contrast, the mphC gene, which encodes the macrolide phosphotransferase C, although associated with erythromycin resistance, was also commonly observed in susceptible isolates, as well as in two of the three most common erythromycin resistance patterns (Figure 2). The efflux pump coding msrA gene was strongly associated with AMR (P < 0.001). In that regard, 97.2% of the isolates that harbored this determinant were considered erythromycin-resistant, whereas only 8.6% of isolates that did not have the same element were resistant. The concomitant presence of emr, msrA, and mphC was not detected in the present study. No interaction was observed between msrA and mphC. The final model contained estimates for both msrA (β^ = 4.34, SE = 0.93, P < 0.001) and mphC (β^ = 1.46, SE = 0.30, P < 0.001). The estimated odds ratio of erythromycin resistance associated with the msrA gene was 76.7 (95% CI 12.4–475) and 4.3 for mphC (95% CI 2.4–7.8), irrespective of the presence of the other. There was no association between the vga gene, which encodes a streptogramin A ABC transporter, and quinupristin/dalfopristin resistance (P = 1.00; Table 3).


tet38 was commonly detected in susceptible isolates (Figure 2). Other tetracycline efflux protein genes detected included tetK and tetL, both associated with tetracycline resistance (P < 0.001; Table 3), as well as tetM, which encodes for a tetracycline ribosomal protection protein. tetM was only present in two tetracycline-resistant S. simulans isolates. tetK and tetL were not together in the same isolate.

Other Antimicrobials

A single S. haemolyticus isolate was resistant to rifamycins but its sequence was not available. Intrinsically novobiocin-resistant NAS species such as S. sciuri, S. vitulinus, S. fleuretti, S. saprophyticus, S. cohnii, S. equorum, S. kloosii, S. arlettae, S. gallinarum, S. nepalensis, S. succinus, and S. xylosus, harbored residues other than arginine at the gyrB deduced amino acid sequence position 142 (140 for NAS); either a lysine (S. saprophyticus, S. cohnii, S. equorum, S. gallinarum, S. nepalensis, S. succinus and S. xylosus) or a leucine (S. sciuri, S. vitulinus, S. arlettae, and S. fleuretti). The single S. kloosii had an isoleucine at position 140 (Figure 3). MDR efflux pump genes were not associated with the MDR phenotype (Table 3).


In this study, the prevalence of AMR and corresponding resistance determinants in NAS isolated from dairy herds were estimated. Moreover, we determined whether resistance determinants were associated with drug-specific AMR. The relatively large sample size from 89 herds allowed estimation of the prevalence of genetic elements not limited to resistant isolates, and the diversity of species allowed searching for species-specific resistance mechanisms. Resistance to vancomycin, fluoroquinolones, linezolid and daptomycin was absent or uncommon. These drugs are considered critically important in human medicine and their use is restricted in food-producing animals in several countries. Resistance against highly important antimicrobials, frequently used in dairy herds (e.g., penicillins and tetracyclines) was relatively common. Some NAS species had species-specific patterns of resistance against specific antimicrobials. Moreover, prevalence of AMR genetic determinants was also species-specific; for example, the prevalence of the mecA elements was estimated to be 17% in S. epidermidis, but close to zero for other species isolated from bovine milk. It was also clear that some genetic determinants were involved in drug-specific AMR, whereas others were not. Finally, this study used a novel approach that combined bioinformatics tools with advanced statistical methods to estimate the true prevalence of resistance determinants, highlighting the importance of tools such as WGS for AMR studies.

It is estimated that, without urgent action, we are heading toward a post-antimicrobial era where 700,000 human deaths per year will be attributable to AMR (O'Neill, 2016). NAS account for up to 30% of all clinically relevant blood-stream infections in humans (Piette and Verschraegen, 2009). In comparison to nosocomial NAS isolates, where resistance to glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones, lincosamides, etc., is common, drastically limiting therapeutic options (May et al., 2014), presence of AMR was relatively uncommon for bovine isolates. Nevertheless, based on experience in human medicine, NAS are pathogens that potentially acquire resistance mechanisms and virulence genes, and are able to persist in presence of intense antimicrobial use. Irrespective of the apparent zoonotic potential that NAS isolates obtained from mastitic milk may have (Thorberg et al., 2006), NAS of animal origin are believed to be important reservoirs of ARGs, which is of utmost importance for human and veterinary medicine. Indeed, the mecA gene was frequently detected in S. epidermidis, the most common staphylococcal species recovered from humans (Becker et al., 2014).

Results for NAS (or CNS) were historically reported as a group. However, it recently became clear that these species should be treated individually, as risk factors can be species-specific (De Visscher et al., 2017). In our study, prevalence of AMR was clearly species-dependent. Some extreme cases were observed, such as streptogramins resistance for S. gallinarum, erythromycin resistance in S. cohnii, and erythromycin and penicillin resistance for S. arlettae. It is noteworthy that S. gallinarum is frequently isolated from poultry (Shi et al., 2015) but only occasionally infects dairy cows. In Canada, virginiamycin is used in poultry for growth promotion and prevention of infectious diseases. Its use has been associated with AMR (Aarestrup et al., 2001), and a high prevalence of streptogramin resistance in Enterococcus faecium was reported from Canadian poultry (Diarra et al., 2010). Based on our results, we hypothesized that S. gallinarum isolated from Canadian dairy cows carried resistance mechanisms that were developed/selected in response to the use of virginiamycin in poultry. Since no streptogramin-related resistance determinant was observed, including erm, vgb, msr, vga, vat, lsa genes among others, we were not able to make any inferences regarding the genetic basis of streptogramin resistance in NAS that could explain our findings. For S. arlettae, there was a high prevalence of erythromycin and penicillin resistance. Since the estimated prevalence of the mphC and msrA genes for this species was high, macrolide resistance was expected. However, we were not able to determine genetic mechanisms involved in penicillin resistance for S. arlettae. Perhaps recently discovered β-lactam resistance mechanisms (Andreis et al., 2017) other than those screened, were involved in penicillin resistance for S. arlettae. Preliminary screening for the recently described blaARL gene (GenBank APY23733.1) returned perfect hits for all S. arlettae sequenced in the present study, indicating that besides being highly prevalent in this species, this gene might confer β-lactam resistance in S. arlettae isolated from Canadian dairy herds (results not shown).

NAS and other Gram-positive bacteria are intrinsically resistant to aztreonam, temocillin, polymyxin B, colistin, and nalidixic acid (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 2016). Noteworthy, despite third-generation cephalosporins routinely being employed as treatment of staphylococcal infections in animals including mastitis, NAS are intrinsically resistant to ceftazidime (Wiktorowicz-Belzyt et al., 1997; European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 2016). In addition, species such as S. saprophyticus, S. cohnii, and S. xylosus share an intrinsic resistance to novobiocin, whereas specific resistance patterns are also known to exist (e.g., S. saprophyticus resistance to fusidic acid and fosfomycin, and S. capitis resistance to fosfomycin) (Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, 2016). Although it is well-established that acquired resistance to β-lactams, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, macrolides, lincosamides and chloramphenicol may occur in bovine NAS isolates (Oliver and Murinda, 2012; Klimiene et al., 2016), phenotypic AMR patterns observed suggest that intrinsic mechanisms of AMR might be present for a subset of NAS species. The most conceivable hypothesis is the presence of an intrinsic erythromycin resistance in S. arlettae. High-level erythromycin resistance in S. arlettae was reported (Lüthje and Schwarz, 2006), although the relatively low prevalence of this species limited further assessments. Here, we first observed this behavior in a relatively large number of isolates obtained from several geographical locations, and also elucidated genetic mechanisms that are likely to explain these findings.

Acquired ARGs are usually present within mobile DNA that is capable to move from one genome to another and also within a genome. The most prominent example are plasmid-encoded ARGs, which encompass resistance mechanisms to almost all classes of antimicrobials available (Bennett, 2008). Genes encoding aminoglycosides modifying enzymes detected in the present study are mostly often plasmid-encoded (Mingeot-Leclercq et al., 1999), which supports its role in drug-specific acquired resistance. blaZ-mediated penicillinase, the most prevalent mechanism of penicillin resistance in NAS, is on mobile elements of which the majority are chromosomally located for bovine Staphylococcus spp. isolates (Olsen et al., 2006). In terms of tetracycline resistance, tetK and tetL are generally present on small plasmids that may integrate into chromosomal DNA in S. aureus (Chopra and Roberts, 2001). Genes encoding efflux pumps can be present on plasmids (e.g., qacAB). However, their location on the chromosome followed by over-expression provides the bacterium an intrinsic resistance mechanism, without the need of new genetic material (Webber and Piddock, 2003). In our study, norA, norB, sav1866, mepA and msrA are known to be chromosomally located (Costa et al., 2013).

Presence of resistance determinants is frequently associated with AMR (Hu et al., 2017). In NAS, blaZ, mecA, fexA, erm, mphC, msrA, and tet genes were involved in drug-specific AMR. The most commonly observed patterns of acquired resistance mechanisms were that a subset of these elements was highly prevalent in resistant isolates, but not common in susceptible ones. Taken together, we inferred that when excluding MDR efflux pumps and any mutations in the deduced amino acid sequence of the folP, gyrB, and mprF genes, three elements (blaZ, msrA, and tetK) were crucial for the AMR-phenotype in NAS isolated from Canadian dairy herds. Their presence was followed by drug-specific AMR; however, in their absence, AMR was uncommon. Both blaZ and tetK were highly prevalent in S. epidermidis, whereas msrA was common in S. arlettae, S. cohnii, and S. equorum. These genes have been detected in NAS isolated from dairy cows (Bagcigil et al., 2012; Li et al., 2015; Bochniarz et al., 2016). Their dissemination undermines therapeutic options, since β-lactams, macrolides and tetracyclines are among the most commonly used antimicrobials in Canadian dairy herds (Saini et al., 2012a). Whether the prevalence of these elements is related to the use of antimicrobials in dairy cattle is yet to be determined. Of note, the majority of Gram-negative isolates usually carries a single type of tet gene, which was also observed for our Gram-positive NAS isolates (Chopra and Roberts, 2001).

MDR efflux pumps were observed for almost all isolates, corroborating previous findings (Antiabong et al., 2017). In general, efflux pumps need to be up-regulated to be associated with AMR; furthermore, several factors can have an impact on this regulation. Hence, their presence does not necessarily translate into the presence of AMR. Regulation of MDR efflux pumps is complex, with several regulators involved in the expression of these elements (Costa et al., 2013). Gene expression assays are required to determine the true impact of these elements in AMR. Still, some elements, e.g., the norA gene, are known to be associated with a low level of reduced susceptibility against fluoroquinolones (Kaatz and Seo, 1995). Therefore, use of a clinical breakpoint to define a resistant profile is likely to miss the true association between presence of these elements and AMR, especially if the increase in MIC resulting from their presence is relatively small. In the present study, no MDR efflux pump was associated with presence of the MDR phenotype, although the high prevalence of these elements in NAS was cause for concern.

Residues in the deduced amino acid sequence of the folP and mprF genes previously associated with AMR were common in NAS isolates. To our knowledge, this was the first study to screen for folP and mprF AMR-associated residues in NAS. Previous mutations resulting in the presence of these residues were described for S. aureus exclusively (Hampele et al., 1997; Friedman et al., 2006; Bayer et al., 2013), and there is the inherent risk of concluding that these mechanisms are associated with AMR in NAS because they are associated with AMR in S. aureus. Because no sulfonamide was included in the MIC test (only the combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole was tested), the role of folP mutations in sulfonamide resistance for NAS could not be determined. However, the estimated mean number of folP AMR-associated residues was higher in isolates resistant to the combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole than in susceptible isolates (5 vs. 3.75 residues respectively, results not shown). The mprF gene product, multipeptide resistance factor (MprF), is responsible for lysinylation of the phosphotidylglycerol and translocation of the same to the cell membrane, which results in a positively charged cell membrane. This membrane repels the active form of daptomycin (calcium-daptomycin), a cationic peptide (Bayer et al., 2013) reducing its efficacy. It is hypothesized that non-synonymous mutations in the mprF gene are responsible for a gain-of-function of the same. One specific substitution (G61V) was present on its deduced amino acid sequence for all S. sciuri, the only species resistant to daptomycin. If S. sciuri has a more positively charged cell membrane than other species, as a consequence of this or any other mprF mutation observed, this species could be less sensitive to daptomycin. In this study, we provided a list of candidate substitutions in the deduced amino acid sequences of the rpoC, mprF and cls genes that could be associated with daptomycin resistance in NAS. The availability of species-specific consensus sequences for key residues should aid in elucidating mechanisms of sulfonamide and lipopeptide resistance.

This study was apparently the first to report consensus protein sequences for the QRDR of 25 NAS species. gyrA residue 88 and parC residues 80 and 84 had species-specific compositions, as previously reported for a subset of NAS species (Linde et al., 2001). parC and parE mutations previously associated with increased MIC were rarely detected, except for S. devriesei, where the P144S substitution in the parC gene deduced amino acid sequence was relatively common. The role of each specific substitution observed toward fluoroquinolones resistance was not evaluated, as no NAS was resistant to fluoroquinolones (based on clinical breakpoints). Studies using a wider range of fluoroquinolones concentrations where the role of each substitution could be carefully evaluated would be useful to establish a causal association between specific substitution and AMR. Following the same logic, NAS isolated from species where the use of fluoroquinolones is higher would enhance representativeness of resistant isolates, since the estimated prevalence of fluoroquinolones resistance and associated mechanisms in NAS isolated from dairy cows was low. This result was somewhat expected, as QRDR mutations are a consequence of prolonged exposure to fluoroquinolones (Roychoudhury et al., 2001) and relative use of these antimicrobials in the Canadian dairy industry is low (Saini et al., 2012a).

Aminocoumarins are infrequently used in the dairy industry, except when combined with a β-lactam such as penicillin (Saini et al., 2012a). Novobiocin is commonly used for identification of NAS, as some species are intrinsically novobiocin-resistant (Schleifer et al., 1984; Cunha et al., 2004). Non-synonymous mutations in the gyrB and parE genes are associated with novobiocin-resistance in S. aureus (Fujimoto-Nakamura et al., 2005), whereas the presence of specific residues in the gyrB deduced amino acid sequence explains the intrinsic resistance of some NAS (Vickers et al., 2007). In the present study, novobiocin was tested only in combination with penicillin, because these two compounds are used together in all formulations containing novobiocin that are available for the Canadian dairy industry. This limited our assessment of species-specific mechanisms of novobiocin resistance that could have been evaluated if two populations (resistant and susceptible) were observed, conditional on the species. Nevertheless, all NAS intrinsically resistant to novobiocin harbored either a lysine, leucine or isoleucine at gyrB deduced amino acid sequence position 140. Since it is well-established that a lysine at position 140 is responsible for intrinsic resistance in S. saprophyticus (Vickers et al., 2007), we hypothesize that the presence of a lysine, leucine or isoleucine at position 140 is responsible for intrinsic novobiocin resistance in S. sciuri, S. vitulinus, S. fleuretti, S. cohnii, S. equorum, S. kloosii, S. arlettae, S. gallinarum, S. nepalensis, S. succinus, and S. xylosus.

This study demonstrated the importance of WGS in AMR studies. The presence of some resistance determinants was strongly associated with drug-specific AMR; furthermore, some specific mutations were probably the basis of intrinsic resistance. Hence, as sequencing technologies become more affordable and available resulting in studies similar to this one, prediction of resistance patterns based on the presence of key elements is achievable. For example, an infection caused by a NAS that harbors the msrA gene is likely to be unresponsive to erythromycin, assuming that in vivo results mimic those in vitro. Furthermore, WGS has the added benefit of species identification and classification (Mellmann et al., 2006; Naushad and Gupta, 2013). In addition, WGS can be done substantially faster than bacteriological culture followed by additional biochemical tests, and the availability of species identification provides an immeasurable advantage to WGS when contrasting it to standard laboratory techniques used in AMR studies. Species identification can provide insights regarding the likely outcome of an antimicrobial therapy. For example, the outcome of an antimicrobial therapy is likely to be different for an IMI caused by S. arlettae and the same caused by S. chromogenes (again assuming that in vivo results mimic the in vitro ones).

The dairy industry has undergone considerable changes over the last decade (Barkema et al., 2015). Antimicrobial use will be impacted by two relatively recent trends: (1) adoption of selective instead of blanket dry cow therapy, and (2) transition to organic farming practices. Because there is a well-established association between antimicrobial use and resistance, NAS isolated from herds that transitioned to organic or adopted the use of selective dry-cow therapy can be less resistant to antimicrobials following reduced antimicrobial use (Park et al., 2012). Yet, we believe that our results are still valid for the contemporary dairy industry, irrespective of both trends, for at least three reasons: First, the proportion of organic farms in Canada increased only slightly, from 1% in 2007 to 2% in 2016 (Canadian Dairy Information Centre, 2017), especially compared to European countries (Barkema et al., 2015). Secondly, the Canadian dairy industry has not yet adopted the use of selective dry cow therapy. Moreover, decreased antimicrobial use due to introduction of selective dry cow therapy might not affect the prevalence of AMR in NAS at all, based on preliminary results (Nobrega et al., submitted). Finally, the antimicrobial formulations available for the dairy industry did not change substantially over the last decade; essentially, the same classes of antimicrobials are still in use. Thus, drastic changes in prevalence of AMR in mastitis pathogens are not expected. In conclusion, under the assumption that other factors related to total antimicrobial use remained relatively constant for Canadian dairy industry over the last decade, our prevalence estimates should still be applicable to the modern dairy industry.

Our study had some limitations. First, we based all our prevalence estimation on samples from 89 dairy herds enrolled in a milk quality program (DHI). As herds not enrolled were not sampled, our estimates could be biased if the prevalence of AMR and resistance determinants in NAS depended on extraneous factors associated with enrolment (i.e., enrolled herds used more antimicrobials than non-enrolled herds, or vice-versa). Secondly, the absence of specific drugs (novobiocin, sulfonamides), outcomes (fluoroquinolones, vancomycin, linezolid resistance), broader range of MIC values (fluoroquinolones), isolates per species (S. caprae, S. auricularis, S. kloosii, S. fleuretti, S. nepalensis, S. hyicus), and sufficient number of resistant isolates (daptomycin and rifamycin), prevented us from further assessments of resistance mechanisms, including species-specific ones. Another limitation was that our genetic results depended on the queries used. As the number of species-specific queries increases in databases (i.e., blaALR for S. arlettae), the sensitivity of our methodology also increases, as well as the likelihood of finding resistance mechanisms. Moreover, the estimated prevalence of resistance determinants could also decrease significantly. For example, a query for the norA gene, a MFS efflux pump, could return high quality hits for a second MFS efflux pumps other than NorA. If at a later time, queries for such hypothetical second efflux pump become available, the estimated prevalence of the norA gene will decrease, because a region in the genome could only map to a single query in our methodology. Nevertheless, all returned hits were confirmed by BLASTp searches against NCBI's nr database. Although this did not eliminate the risk of false-positives, it provided an opportunity to confirm the original hits and exclude hits closely related to intrinsic components of the bacteria not associated with AMR. Similarly, more queries representing more resistance mechanisms could identify resistance determinants that we likely missed, such as those associated with streptogramins resistance in S. gallinarum. A limitation of our analyses regarding the association between the presence of ARGs and AMR was the loss of substantial information when dichotomizing the MIC results into resistant and susceptible isolates. The presence of a gene or residue might not be, by itself, enough to increase the MIC above the CLSI clinical threshold for defining resistance. Instead, the same element might be associated with a small increase in the MIC, enhancing the ability of the bacteria to survive in the presence of the antimicrobial and facilitating acquisition of other genetic elements. Similarly, MIC measurements are known to suffer from variability, characterized by a variation of one 2-fold dilution from its true value (Brown and Traczewski, 2009). In that regard, isolates with true MIC value close to or at the breakpoints (e.g., isolates with intermediate resistance harboring a resistance mechanism) can suffer from misclassification bias, where associations between presence of gene and resistance would be underestimated. Hence, analyses based on the actual MICs that were obtained from a broad range of dilutions should provide better estimates of true associations between ARGs and AMR in NAS. Finally, residue substitutions in S. aureus that are associated with AMR might not have the same effect in NAS.

In summary, prevalence of AMR in NAS isolated from Canadian dairy herds was higher for tetracycline, penicillin and erythromycin compared to other antimicrobials, and was NAS species-dependent. S. arlettae had the highest prevalence of MDR. No isolate was resistant to vancomycin, linezolid or fluoroquinolones. The most frequently identified resistance determinants were mutations in the folP gene and MDR efflux pumps, which were present in all isolates and not associated with the MDR phenotype. The blaZ, mecA, fexA, erm, mphC, msrA, and tet genes were associated with drug-specific AMR. There were specific residues in gyrB for NAS species intrinsically resistant to novobiocin. Finally, this study illustrated the importance of WGS in AMR studies.

Author Contributions

DN, VS, CL, JK, JD, and HB: conceived and designed the study; DN, LC, and SAN: performed laboratory activities; DN and SN: worked on the sequencing data; DN and SAN: performed statistical analyses; DN: wrote the first draft of the manuscript; JK, CL, VS, JD, and HB: revised the document for important intellectual content. All authors gave approval of the final version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.


This study was funded by three distinct sources; (1) NSERC Industrial Research Chair in Infectious Diseases of Dairy Cattle; (2) Canadian Bovine Mastitis and Milk Quality Research Network (CBMQRN) program, funded by Dairy Farmers of Canada and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada through the Dairy Research Cluster 2 Program; and (3) Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency. The Industrial Research Chair in Infectious Diseases of Dairy Cattle is funded by the Canada's Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Industrial Research Chair Program with industry contributions from Alberta Milk (Edmonton, AB, Canada), the Dairy Farmers of Canada (Ottawa, ON, Canada), Dairy Farmers of Manitoba (Winnipeg, MB, Canada), British Columbia Dairy Association (Burnaby, BC Canada), Westgen Endowment Fund (Milner, BC, Canada), Canadian Dairy Network (Guelph, ON, Canada), and CanWest DHI (Guelph, ON, Canada). DN was supported by the Alberta Innovates–Technology Futures (Alberta, Canada) Graduate Student Scholarship (GSS) program. Three authors (DN, SN, and SAN) were supported by a NSERC-CREATE in Milk Quality scholarship. The CBMRN data collections were financed by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Ottawa, ON, Canada), Alberta Milk (Edmonton, AB, Canada), Dairy Farmers of New Brunswick (Sussex, New Brunswick, Canada), Dairy Farmers of Nova Scotia (Lower Truro, NS, Canada), Dairy Farmers of Ontario (Mississauga, ON, Canada) and Dairy Farmers of Prince Edward Island (Charlottetown, PE, Canada), Novalait Inc. (Québec City, QC, Canada), Dairy Farmers of Canada (Ottawa, ON, Canada), Canadian Dairy Network (Guelph, ON, Canada), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (Ottawa, ON, Canada), Public Health Agency of Canada (Ottawa, ON, Canada), Technology PEI Inc. (Charlottetown, PE, Canada), Université de Montréal (Montréal, QC, Canada), and University of Prince Edward Island (Charlottetown, PE, Canada), through the CBMQRN (Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


We thank dairy producers, animal health technicians, and Canadian Bovine Mastitis Research Network (CBMRN) regional coordinators (Jean-Philippe Roy and Luc Des Côteaux, University of Montreal; Kristen Reyher, University of Prince Edward Island; Trevor De Vries, University of Guelph; and Herman Barkema, University of Calgary) for samples collected and stored by the National Cohort of Dairy Farms (NCDF).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00256/full#supplementary-material


Aarestrup, F. M., Seyfarth, A. M., Emborg, H. D., Pedersen, K., Hendriksen, R. S., and Bager, F. (2001). Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45, 2054–2059. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2054-2059.2001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Andreis, S. N., Perreten, V., and Schwendener, S. (2017). Novel beta-lactamase blaARL in Staphylococcus arlettae. mSphere 2:e00117-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00117-17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Antiabong, J. F., Kock, M. M., Bellea, N. M., and Ehlers, M. M. (2017). Diversity of multidrug efflux genes and phenotypic evaluation of the in vitro resistance dynamics of clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates using methicillin; a model beta-lactam. Open Microbiol. J. 11, 132–141. doi: 10.2174/1874285801711010132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aubry-Damon, H., Soussy, C. J., and Courvalin, P. (1998). Characterization of mutations in the rpoB gene that confer rifampin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42, 2590–2594.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Bagcigil, A. F., Taponen, S., Koort, J., Bengtsson, B., Myllyniemi, A. L., and Pyorala, S. (2012). Genetic basis of penicillin resistance of S. aureus isolated in bovine mastitis. Acta Vet. Scand. 54:69. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-54-69

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barkema, H. W., Von Keyserlingk, M. A., Kastelic, J. P., Lam, T. J., Luby, C., Roy, J. P., et al. (2015). Invited review: changes in the dairy industry affecting dairy cattle health and welfare. J. Dairy Sci. 98, 7426–7445. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9377

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Soft. 67:48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01

CrossRef Full Text

Bayer, A. S., Schneider, T., and Sahl, H. G. (2013). Mechanisms of daptomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: role of the cell membrane and cell wall. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1277, 139–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06819.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Becker, K., Heilmann, C., and Peters, G. (2014). Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 27, 870–926. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00109-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B 57, 289–300.

Google Scholar

Bennett, P. M. (2008). Plasmid encoded antibiotic resistance: acquisition and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria. Br. J. Pharmacol. 153(Suppl. 1), S347–S357. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707607

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bochniarz, M., Adaszek, Ł., Dziegiel, B., Nowaczek, A., Wawron, W., Dabrowski, R., et al. (2016). Factors responsible for subclinical mastitis in cows caused by Staphylococcus chromogenes and its susceptibility to antibiotics based on bap, fnbA, eno, mecA, tetK, and ermA genes. J. Dairy Sci. 99, 9514–9520. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11723

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, S. D., and Traczewski, M. M. (2009). In vitro antimicrobial activity of a new cephalosporin, ceftaroline, and determination of quality control ranges for MIC testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53, 1271–1274. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01021-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brunton, L. A., Duncan, D., Coldham, N. G., Snow, L. C., and Jones, J. R. (2012). A survey of antimicrobial usage on dairy farms and waste milk feeding practices in England and Wales. Vet. Rec. 171:296. doi: 10.1136/vr.100924

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Canadian Dairy Information Centre (2017). Production of Certified Organic Milk and Number of Producers in Canada. Available online at: http://www.dairyinfo.gc.ca/index_e.php?s1=dff-fcil&s2=farm-ferme&s3=org-bio&s4=can&page=org-bio_can. (Accessed January 13, 2018).

Carle, A. C. (2009). Fitting multilevel models in complex survey data with design weights: recommendations. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 9:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-49

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chopra, I., and Roberts, M. (2001). Tetracycline antibiotics: mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65, 232–260. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.65.2.232-260.2001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2008). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals; Approved Standard - 3rd Edn. CLSI document VET01S. Wayne, PA.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2016). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 26th Edn. CLSI document M100-S26. Wayne, PA.

Condas, L. A. Z., De Buck, J., Nobrega, D. B., Carson, D. A., Naushad, S., De Vliegher, S., et al. (2017). Prevalence of non-aureus staphylococci species causing intramammary infections in Canadian dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 100, 5592–5612. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12478

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Costa, S. S., Viveiros, M., Amaral, L., and Couto, I. (2013). Multidrug efflux pumps in Staphylococcus aureus: an update. Open Microbiol. J. 7, 59–71. doi: 10.2174/1874285801307010059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cunha, Mde. L., Sinzato, Y. K., and Silveira, L. V. (2004). Comparison of methods for the identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 99, 855–860. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02762004000800012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davlieva, M., Zhang, W., Arias, C. A., and Shamoo, Y. (2013). Biochemical characterization of cardiolipin synthase mutations associated with daptomycin resistance in enterococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 289–296. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01743-12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Visscher, A., Piepers, S., Haesebrouck, F., Supré, K., and De Vliegher, S. (2017). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species in bulk milk: prevalence, distribution, and associated subgroup- and species-specific risk factors. J. Dairy Sci. 100, 629–642. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11476

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Diarra, M. S., Rempel, H., Champagne, J., Masson, L., Pritchard, J., and Topp, E. (2010). Distribution of antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes in Enterococcus spp. and characterization of isolates from broiler chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 8033–8043. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01545-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (2016). EUCAST Expert Rules Version 3.1. Intrinsic Resistance and Exceptional Phenotypes. Available online at: http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Expert_Rules/Expert_rules_intrinsic_exceptional_V3.1.pdf. (Accessed January 13, 2018).

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (2017). Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters, Version 7.1. Available online at: http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_7.1_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf. (Accessed November 15, 2017).

Friedman, L., Alder, J. D., and Silverman, J. A. (2006). Genetic changes that correlate with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50, 2137–2145. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00039-06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fujimoto-Nakamura, M., Ito, H., Oyamada, Y., Nishino, T., and Yamagishi, J. (2005). Accumulation of mutations in both gyrB and parE genes is associated with high-level resistance to novobiocin in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49, 3810–3815. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.9.3810-3815.2005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guirao, G. Y., Martínez Toldos, M. C., Mora Peris, B., Alonso Manzanares, M. A., Gutiérrez Zufiaurre, M. N., Martínez Andrés, J. A., et al. (2001). Molecular diversity of quinolone resistance in genetically related clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and susceptibility to newer quinolones. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47, 157–161. doi: 10.1093/jac/47.2.157

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, S. K., Padmanabhan, B. R., Diene, S. M., Lopez-Rojas, R., Kempf, M., Landraud, L., et al. (2014). ARG-ANNOT, a new bioinformatic tool to discover antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial genomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 212–220. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01310-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Halekoh, U., Hojsgaard, S., and Yan, J. (2006). The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J. Stat. Softw. 15, 1–11. doi: 10.18637/jss.v015.i02

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hampele, I. C., D'Arcy, A., Dale, G. E., Kostrewa, D., Nielsen, J., Oefner, C., et al. (1997). Structure and function of the dihydropteroate synthase from Staphylococcus aureus. J. Mol. Biol. 268, 21–30. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0944

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, Y. Y., Wang, Y. L., Sun, Q. L., Huang, Z. X., Wang, H. Y., Zhang, R., et al. (2017). Colistin-resistance gene mcr-1 in children's gut flora. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 50, 593–597. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.06.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jia, B., Raphenya, A. R., Alcock, B., Waglechner, N., Guo, P., Tsang, K. K., et al. (2017). CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D566–D573. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaatz, G. W., and Seo, S. M. (1995). Inducible NorA-mediated multidrug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39, 2650–2655. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.12.2650

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klimiene, I., Virgailis, M., Pavilonis, A., Siugzdiniene, R., Mockeliunas, R., and Ruzauskas, M. (2016). Phenotypical and genotypical antimicrobial resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from cow mastitis. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 19, 639–646. doi: 10.1515/pjvs-2016-0080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, S., Stecher, G., and Tamura, K. (2016). MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kwak, Y. G., Truong-Bolduc, Q. C., Bin Kim, H., Song, K. H., Kim, E. S., and Hooper, D. C. (2013). Association of norB overexpression and fluoroquinolone resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from Korea. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68, 2766–2772. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt286

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lakin, S. M., Dean, C., Noyes, N. R., Dettenwanger, A., Ross, A. S., Doster, E., et al. (2017). MEGARes: an antimicrobial resistance database for high throughput sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D574–D580. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, L., Feng, W., Zhang, Z., Xue, H., and Zhao, X. (2015). Macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin resistance phenotypes and genotypes of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates from bovine mastitis. BMC Vet. Res. 11:168. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0492-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Deguchi, T., Yasuda, M., Kawamura, T., Kanematsu, E., Nishino, Y., et al. (1998). Alteration in the GyrA subunit of DNA gyrase and the ParC subunit of DNA topoisomerase IV in quinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42, 3293–3295.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Linde, H. J., Schmidt, M., Fuchs, E., Reischl, U., Niller, H. H., and Lehn, N. (2001). In vitro activities of six quinolones and mechanisms of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45, 1553–1557. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.5.1553-1557.2001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lipsitz, S. R., Laird, N. M., and Harrington, D. P. (1991). Generalized estimating equations for correlated binary data - using the odds ratio as a measure of association. Biometrika 78, 153–160. doi: 10.1093/biomet/78.1.153

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lüthje, P., and Schwarz, S. (2006). Antimicrobial resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci from bovine subclinical mastitis with particular reference to macrolide-lincosamide resistance phenotypes and genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57, 966–969. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

May, L., Klein, E. Y., Rothman, R. E., and Laxminarayan, R. (2014). Trends in antibiotic resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci in the United States, 1999 to 2012. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 1404–1409. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01908-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mellmann, A., Becker, K., Von Eiff, C., Keckevoet, U., Schumann, P., and Harmsen, D. (2006). Sequencing and staphylococci identification. Emerging Infect. Dis. 12, 333–336. doi: 10.3201/eid1202.050962

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mingeot-Leclercq, M. P., Glupczynski, Y., and Tulkens, P. M. (1999). Aminoglycosides: activity and resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43, 727–737.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Mitchell, J. M., Griffiths, M. W., Mcewen, S. A., Mcnab, W. B., and Yee, A. J. (1998). Antimicrobial drug residues in milk and meat: causes, concerns, prevalence, regulations, tests, and test performance. J. Food Prot. 61, 742–756. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-61.6.742

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mwangi, M. M., Wu, S. W., Zhou, Y., Sieradzki, K., de Lencastre, H., Richardson, P., et al. (2007). Tracking the in vivo evolution of multidrug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by whole-genome sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 9451–9456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609839104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

National Mastitis Council (1999). Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. Madison, WI: National Mastitis Council Inc.

Naushad, H. S., and Gupta, R. S. (2013). Phylogenomics and molecular signatures for species from the plant pathogen-containing order xanthomonadales. PLoS ONE 8:e55216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055216

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Naushad, S., Barkema, H. W., Luby, C., Condas, L. A., Nobrega, D. B., Carson, D. A., et al. (2016). Comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of bovine non-aureus staphylococci species based on whole-genome sequencing. Front. Microbiol. 7:1990. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01990

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nobrega, D. B., De Buck, J., Naqvi, S. A., Liu, G., Naushad, S., Saini, V., et al. (2017). Comparison of treatment records and inventory of empty drug containers to quantify antimicrobial usage in dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 100, 9736–9745. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

O'Neill, J. (2016). Tackling Drug-Resistant Infections Globally: Final Report and Recommendations. The Review on Antimicrobial Resistance. Available online at: https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160518_Finalpaper_withcover.pdf (Accessed January 13, 2018).

Oliver, S. P., and Murinda, S. E. (2012). Antimicrobial resistance of mastitis pathogens. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 28, 165–185. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.03.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Olsen, J. E., Christensen, H., and Aarestrup, F. M. (2006). Diversity and evolution of blaZ from Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57, 450–460. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki492

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, Y. K., Fox, L. K., Hancock, D. D., Mcmahan, W., and Park, Y. H. (2012). Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of mastitis pathogens isolated from dairy herds transitioning to organic management. J. Vet. Sci. 13, 103–105. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2012.13.1.103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peleg, A. Y., Miyakis, S., Ward, D. V., Earl, A. M., Rubio, A., Cameron, D. R., et al. (2012). Whole genome characterization of the mechanisms of daptomycin resistance in clinical and laboratory derived isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS ONE 7:e28316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028316

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Piette, A., and Verschraegen, G. (2009). Role of coagulase-negative staphylococci in human disease. Vet. Microbiol. 134, 45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

R Core Team (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Reyher, K. K., Dufour, S., Barkema, H. W., Des Coteaux, L., Devries, T. J., Dohoo, I. R., et al. (2011). The national cohort of dairy farms–a data collection platform for mastitis research in Canada. J. Dairy Sci. 94, 1616–1626. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3180

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roychoudhury, S., Twinem, T. L., Makin, K. M., Nienaber, M. A., Li, C., Morris, T. W., et al. (2001). Staphylococcus aureus mutants isolated via exposure to nonfluorinated quinolones: detection of known and unique mutations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45, 3422–3426. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3422-3426.2001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saini, V., McClure, J. T., Leger, D., Dufour, S., Sheldon, A. G., Scholl, D. T., et al. (2012a). Antimicrobial use on Canadian dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 95, 1209–1221. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4527

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saini, V., McClure, J. T., Léger, D., Keefe, G. P., Scholl, D. T., Morck, D. W., et al. (2012b). Antimicrobial resistance profiles of common mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 95, 4319–4332. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5373

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schleifer, K. H., Kilpperbalz, R., and Devriese, L. A. (1984). Staphylococcus-arlettae sp-nov, Staphylococcus-equorum sp-nov and Staphylococcus-kloosii sp-nov - 3 new coagulase-negative, novobiocin-resistant species from animals. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 5, 501–509. doi: 10.1016/S0723-2020(84)80007-7

CrossRef Full Text

Schmitz, F. J., Jones, M. E., Hofmann, B., Hansen, B., Scheuring, S., Lückefahr, M., et al. (1998). Characterization of grlA, grlB, gyrA, and gyrB mutations in 116 unrelated isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and effects of mutations on ciprofloxacin MIC. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42, 1249–1252.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Shi, D., Fang, D., Hu, X., Li, A., Lv, L., Guo, J., et al. (2015). Draft genome sequence of Staphylococcus gallinarum dsm 20610t, originally isolated from the skin of a chicken. Genome Announc. 3:e00580-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00580-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Srednik, M. E., Archambault, M., Jacques, M., and Gentilini, E. R. (2017a). Detection of a mecC-positive Staphylococcus saprophyticus from bovine mastitis in Argentina. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 10, 261–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Srednik, M. E., Tremblay, Y. D. N., Labrie, J., Archambault, M., Jacques, M., Fernández Cirelli, A., et al. (2017b). Biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance genes of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from cows with mastitis in Argentina. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 364:fnx001. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Statacorp (2017). Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp, LLC.

Thorberg, B. M., Kühn, I., Aarestrup, F. M., Brändström, B., Jonsson, P., and Danielsson-Tham, M. L. (2006). Pheno- and genotyping of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from bovine milk and human skin. Vet. Microbiol. 115, 163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.01.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trong, H. N., Prunier, A. L., and Leclercq, R. (2005). Hypermutable and fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49, 2098–2101. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.5.2098-2101.2005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vickers, A. A., Chopra, I., and O'Neill, A. J. (2007). Intrinsic novobiocin resistance in Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51, 4484–4485. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00708-07

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Webber, M. A., and Piddock, L. J. (2003). The importance of efflux pumps in bacterial antibiotic resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51, 9–11. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg050

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wiktorowicz-Belzyt, E., Wojak, I., and Janicka, G. (1997). [Susceptibility to cefazolin, cefamandole and ceftazidime in Staphylococcus strains]. Med. Dosw. Mikrobiol. 49, 35–43.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Wipf, J. R. K., Riley, M. C., Kania, S. A., Bemis, D. A., Andreis, S., Schwendener, S., et al. (2017). New macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance gene erm(48) on the novel plasmid pJW2311 in Staphylococcus xylosus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61:e00066-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00066-17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yamada, M., Yoshida, J., Hatou, S., Yoshida, T., and Minagawa, Y. (2008). Mutations in the quinolone resistance determining region in Staphylococcus epidermidis recovered from conjunctiva and their association with susceptibility to various fluoroquinolones. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 92, 848–851. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.129858

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zankari, E., Hasman, H., Cosentino, S., Vestergaard, M., Rasmussen, S., Lund, O., et al. (2012). Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, W., Shan, W., Ma, X., Chang, W., Zhou, X., Lu, H., et al. (2012). Molecular characterization of rifampicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a Chinese teaching hospital from Anhui, China. BMC Microbiol. 12:240. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial resistance genes, coagulase-negative staphylococci, dairy, mastitis, non-aureus staphylococci, prevalence

Citation: Nobrega DB, Naushad S, Naqvi SA, Condas LAZ, Saini V, Kastelic JP, Luby C, De Buck J and Barkema HW (2018) Prevalence and Genetic Basis of Antimicrobial Resistance in Non-aureus Staphylococci Isolated from Canadian Dairy Herds. Front. Microbiol. 9:256. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00256

Received: 08 December 2017; Accepted: 31 January 2018;
Published: 16 February 2018.

Edited by:

Xian-Zhi Li, Health Canada, Canada

Reviewed by:

Sebastian Guenther, University of Greifswald, Germany
Pascal Jean Jacques Sanders, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail (ANSES), France

Copyright © 2018 Nobrega, Naushad, Naqvi, Condas, Saini, Kastelic, Luby, De Buck and Barkema. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Diego B. Nobrega, diego.nobrega@ucalgary.ca