Impact Factor 4.259 | CiteScore 4.30
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Microbiol., 05 April 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00656

Genomic Structural Variations Affecting Virulence During Clonal Expansion of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae Biovar 3 in Europe

Giuseppe Firrao1,2*, Emanuela Torelli1, Cesare Polano1, Patrizia Ferrante3, Francesca Ferrini1, Marta Martini1, Simone Marcelletti3, Marco Scortichini3* and Paolo Ermacora1*
  • 1Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
  • 2Istituto Nazionale Biostrutture e Biosistemi, Rome, Italy
  • 3Council for Agricultural Research and Analysis of Agricultural Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Olive, Fruit Trees and Citrus, Rome, Italy

Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) biovar 3 caused pandemic bacterial canker of Actinidia chinensis and Actinidia deliciosa since 2008. In Europe, the disease spread rapidly in the kiwifruit cultivation areas from a single introduction. In this study, we investigated the genomic diversity of Psa biovar 3 strains during the primary clonal expansion in Europe using single molecule real-time (SMRT), Illumina and Sanger sequencing technologies. We recorded evidences of frequent mobilization and loss of transposon Tn6212, large chromosome inversions, and ectopic integration of IS sequences (remarkably ISPsy31, ISPsy36, and ISPsy37). While no phenotype change associated with Tn6212 mobilization could be detected, strains CRAFRU 12.29 and CRAFRU 12.50 did not elicit the hypersensitivity response (HR) on tobacco and eggplant leaves and were limited in their growth in kiwifruit leaves due to insertion of ISPsy31 and ISPsy36 in the hrpS and hrpR genes, respectively, interrupting the hrp cluster. Both strains had been isolated from symptomatic plants, suggesting coexistence of variant strains with reduced virulence together with virulent strains in mixed populations. The structural differences caused by rearrangements of self-genetic elements within European and New Zealand strains were comparable in number and type to those occurring among the European strains, in contrast with the significant difference in terms of nucleotide polymorphisms. We hypothesize a relaxation, during clonal expansion, of the selection limiting the accumulation of deleterious mutations associated with genome structural variation due to transposition of mobile elements. This consideration may be relevant when evaluating strategies to be adopted for epidemics management.

Introduction

Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) is the causal agent of bacterial canker of green-fleshed (Actinidia deliciosa) and yellow-fleshed kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) (Scortichini et al., 2012). The pathogen was first isolated in Japan (Takikawa et al., 1989), where the disease was reported since 1984 and, subsequently, in Italy (Scortichini, 1994) and South Korea (Koh et al., 1994). In the years 2008–2011, sudden and repeated epidemics of bacterial canker developed firstly in central Italy (Balestra et al., 2009; Ferrante and Scortichini, 2009, 2010), and, subsequently, in all the other major areas of kiwifruit cultivation such as New Zealand (Everett et al., 2011), and Chile (EPPO, 2016). In Europe, the epidemics spread to Portugal, France, Spain, Switzerland, Germany, Slovenia and Greece (Abelleira et al., 2011; Dreo et al., 2014; Cunty et al., 2015b; Holeva et al., 2015; EPPO, 2016).

Genomic and genetic analyses have soon revealed that the Psa strains causing the 2008–2011 epidemics differed significantly from those previously found in Italy (Marcelletti et al., 2011) and that the first outbreaks of kiwifruit bacterial canker in Italy (Ferrante et al., 2015) were caused by a rapid and clonal expansion of the pathogen in the cultivated areas (Marcelletti and Scortichini, 2011). Then, the availability of strains isolated in China, the area of origin of many Actinidia spp., and the intensive use of Illumina sequencing of bacterial genomes (Mazzaglia et al., 2012; Butler et al., 2013; McCann et al., 2013, 2017) and VNTR analysis (Cesbron et al., 2015; Ciarroni et al., 2015; Cunty et al., 2015a) paved the way to the understanding of the epidemiology of this important disease.

At present, Psa is subdivided into four biovars, three of which with distinct phylogeographic structure. Strains belonging to biovar 1 produce phaseolotoxin and have been isolated in Japan and Italy before 2008. Strains of biovar 2 produce coronatine instead of phaseolotoxin and have been isolated only in South Korea. Strains belonging to biovar 3 produce neither phaseolotoxin nor coronatine and are responsible for the global outbreak of bacterial canker of kiwifruit in recent years. Strains of biovar 5 are found only in a limited local area of Japan (Saga Prefecture), they do not produce phaseolotoxin nor coronatine and are distinct but related to biovar 2 (Fujikawa and Sawada, 2016). A fifth clade, initially identified as Psa biovar 4, has been recently described as a new pathovar, P.s. pv. actinidifoliorum (Cunty et al., 2015b; Ferrante and Scortichini, 2015). Genome analysis performed so far is consistent with the hypothesis that all Psa biovars originated from a single natural source population and established subsequent outbreaks on cultivated kiwifruit. McCann et al. (2013) highlighted the overall clonal population structure with signatures of within-pathovar, intra-biovar recombination.

Psa biovar 3 is distinct from other biovars for the virulence and the sudden world-wide epidemic spread, that has unveiled major weakness of our kiwifruit cultivation system, while calling for efforts in the clarification of its dynamics in view of future prevention. Several genome-wide diversity studies revealed that epidemics in Europe, New Zealand and Chile of Psa biovar 3 originated from independent introductions of a single founder variant from China (Mazzaglia et al., 2012; Butler et al., 2013; McCann et al., 2013) which, however, is not deemed the center of origin of the biovar 3 (McCann et al., 2017).

In this work, we examined a sampling of the Psa population that originated in Europe from the putative single introduction that occurred in 2008. Through the analysis of Illumina sequence data-sets of 11 European and one non-European Psa genomes, and through the reconstruction and comparison of two complete genomes, a picture emerged that accounts for the significant differences in the modes of genome evolution of this bacterium before and after the clonal expansion associated with the pandemic. DNA mobilization due to transposable elements was a major cause of structural differences and, at least in one case, resulted in the disruption of genes relevant in pathogen-host interaction, with an effective reduction of strain virulence on kiwifruit.

Materials and Methods

Strains and Sequencing

The strains investigated in this work and their genome data accessions are listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Strains and sequences used in this work.

Genomic DNA was extracted from 1 ml of 24 h old cultures grown in Nutrient Broth with agitation using a Wizard DNA purification kit (Promega Italia, Padova, Italy) following the manufacturer's instructions. DNA was measured and checked for quality using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop products, Wilmington, DE, USA). Illumina libraries were prepared as described previously (Scortichini et al., 2013) and sent to the Istituto di Genomica Applicata (Udine, Italy) for sequencing on an Illumina Genome Analyser IIx (Illumina, USA). An average of 14 million single (50 nts) reads were obtained, filtered for quality using Prinseq (Schmieder and Edwards, 2011) and further processed. The sequence reads of strain 7286, obtained by Mazzaglia et al. (2012) were downloaded from the Sequence Read Archive (SRA accession SRX105337; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra). The complete genome sequence of strain ICMP ICMP 18884 (Templeton et al., 2015) and ICMP 18708 (yet unpublished but made available by Poulter, R. T. M., Poulter, G. T. M., Stockwell, P. A., Lamont, I. L. and Butler, M. I.) were obtained from the NCBI nucleotide database and used as comparative reference for non-European strain.

Genomic DNA extracted from strains CRAFRU 12.29 and CRAFRU 14.08 was also sent for single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing to the University of Washington PacBio Sequencing Services. The genomes were then finished with Sanger sequencing using a primer walking approach on PCR fragments amplified from putatively adjacent contig ends, as resulted by scaffolding using ICMP 18708 as a reference; fragments were sent for sequencing to Genelab, Casaccia, Italy. Sequences were edited and manipulated using Seaview (Gouy et al., 2010) and Ugene (Okonechnikov et al., 2012).

Sequence Analysis

Preliminary read alignments and alignment manipulation were carried out using widely used tools such as BWA 0.5.5 (Li and Durbin, 2009), SAMtools 0.1.16 (Li et al., 2009) and PICARD tools (http://picard.sourceforge.net). SNP calling was carried out with the GATK package (McKenna et al., 2010); SNPs call was supported by a depth of coverage of at least 5 and a consensus of at least 95% of the aligned reads. Briefly, reads of each strain were preprocessed for quality using SGA [1], aligned on either CRAFRU 14.08 or ICMP 18884 chromosomes using BWA, indexed, sorted and reformatted using SAMtools, organized into reads-groups by PICARD tools; the resulting sam file was processed by GATK, and the output VCFs read by a bash script that checked each SNP for support and organized the results in a table for manual examination. Tablet (Milne et al., 2010) was used for the visualization of the alignments.

The genome assemblies for SMRT sequencing data were first generated using the hierarchical genome-assembly process (HGAP) [2], then Illumina reads were mapped and searched as described above for SNPs to identify incongruences; the alignments were then inspected with Tablet. For the genome of CRAFRU 14.08, the 4 gaps remaining were closed by Sanger sequencing using a primer walking approach. Once completed, the genomes were aligned with Mauve (Darling et al., 2004) and MUMmer (Delcher et al., 2002). The insertion thus identified were exported and annotated using Blast, the ISFinder database (Siguier et al., 2006), and the annotation service of Insertion Sequences (IS) provided by the ISsaga (Insertion Sequence semi-automatic genome annotation) engine (Varani et al., 2011).

Reads of several strains were aligned to the complete genome as described and visualized with IGV (Robinson et al., 2011), allowing the visual comparison of mapped reads densities. On the basis of the information gained by visual inspection, specific regions were selected for targeted assembly, that was carried out with Mapsembler2 ver. 2.2.4 (Peterlongo and Chikhi, 2011).

For reference based assemblies of relatively small DNA regions such as PAC_ICE2, and for the assembly of unmapped reads for gene discovery, the Illumina reads of the 12 European strains were processed with Edena (Hernandez et al., 2008). From the same datasets, full genomes were drafted with SPAdes (Bankevich et al., 2012) and scaffolded with Ragout (Kolmogorov et al., 2014) having the complete genome of CRAFRU 14.08 as a reference. Using Mauve and MUMmer the drafts were aligned to complete genomes, visualized and the polymorphic regions exported. Mobile elements and repeats were identified with Juxtaposer [3], the ISsaga engine, and the Tandem Repeats Finder program (http://tandem.bu.edu).

Structural variations were also searched using the split-read, (i.e., chimeric read) approach [4] with the aid of the program bbduck of the suite BBMap (Bushnell B. - sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/).

The above listed tools were integrated with several ad-hoc Perl scripts into Bash scripts and run on Linux instances launched on the infrastructures of the DIAG (http://www.igs.umaryland.edu/resources/irc/) and CyVerse (Merchant et al., 2016) projects.

Plantlet Inoculations

To investigate whether or not Psa strains were impaired in their within plant colonization capabilities, micropropagated kiwifruit plantlets A. chinensis (cv. Soreli) at the stage of 6 leaves, provided by Azienda Agricola Fanna Giampaolo (Moimacco, Italy) were used for plantlet inoculation. Bacterial strains grown for 24 h in Nutrient Broth with agitation were washed twice and resuspended in 0.9% saline solution in concentration of 1–2 × 109 CFU/ml. Plantlets were cut from callus, dipped in the inoculum and transferred to a fresh medium. Control plants were dipped in sterile saline. Plantlets were inoculated in five repetitions per experiment. After 10 days the plantlets were collected, cut into two halves (about 3 cm from inoculation point), and DNA was extracted from each subsample according to standard protocols (Doyle and Doyle, 1990). The bacterial populations were quantified by qPCR according to published protocol (Gallelli et al., 2014). For statistical analysis, carried out with R (R Core Team, 2013), the median of three PCR reactions was used.

Leaf Inoculations

To compare the capability of strains to induce disease symptoms and to determine their growth in planta, Actinidia chinensis (cv. Dorì®) leaves were inoculated with the method described previously (Marcelletti et al., 2011). Leaf areas of approximately 1 cm in diameter were inoculated at the concentrations of 1–2 × 106 CFU/ml. For each experiment, 10 leaves were inoculated in four sites. Control plants were treated using solely sterile 0.85% NaCl. Two, 6, 15, and 22 days after inoculation, 10 leaf disks of about 0.5 cm of diameter were sampled and ground in 1 ml of sterile saline, then serial ten-fold dilutions were counted by colony growth onto nutrient agar supplemented with 3% of sucrose (NSA).

Hypersensitive responses were tested by infiltrating aqueous bacterial suspensions at 1–2 × 108 CFU/ml on fully expanded tobacco and eggplant leaves using a needless syringe. The development of typical hypersensitivity response was checked within 48 h after infiltration. Assays were repeated three times.

Other Wet Lab Methods

To determine the excised/integrated state of Tn6212, primers (Table S1) were designed on the inner and outer borders of the transposon. PCRs with primer pairs fX1/rX2; fX1/rX4, and fX3/rX4 were performed with the automated One Advanced thermocycler (EuroClone, Celbio, Milan, Italy) in 25 μl reactions containing 200 μM of each of the four dNTPs, 0.4 μM of each primer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.625 units of GoTaq Flexi DNA Polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and 1 μl of diluted bacterial DNA (5 ng/μl). The PCR program consisted of initial denaturation for 2 min at 94°C; 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 45 s at 58°C, 1 min at 72°C; and a final extension for 8 min at 72°C.

PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and captured with a DigiDoc-It imaging system (UVP, Cambridge, United Kingdom).

Results and Discussion

Differential Hypersensitive Response (HR) of Psa CRAFRU 12.29 and CRAFRU 12.50 Is due to Insertional Inactivation of the hrp Gene Cluster

Psa biovar 3 strains isolated in different regions of Europe were investigated to assess their phytopathogenic and genomic diversity. While most strains, as expected, induced HR in eggplant and tobacco leaves when infiltrated at concentrations of 1–2 × 108 CFU/ml, strains CRAFRU 12.50 and CRAFRU 12.29 failed in eliciting HR (not shown). Strains CRAFRU 12.50 and CRAFRU 12.29 were also compared with the reference strain CRAFRU 8.43 for their ability to colonize A. chinensis leaves. Visual observations clearly revealed differences between CRAFRU 8.43 (HR+), that caused leaf spots, on one hand, and CRAFRU 12.29 (HR–) and CRAFRU 12.50 (HR–), on the other, that failed in inciting foliar symptoms. The estimate of bacterial concentration in leaves in the 22 days after inoculation, reported in Figure 1, showed that the population sizes of strain CRAFRU 12.29 and CRAFRU 12.50 did not increase during the assay time, while those of the virulent strain CRAFRU 8.43 peaked up to 100 times the inoculum. Thus, although the bacterial populations of HR– strains did not increase as much as the wild type, the bacteria remained detectable after 22 days. Further experiments carried out on micropropagated plantlets inoculated by dipping, revealed that the CRAFRU 12.29 cells move within the stem and were detectable by PCR in the stem segments above the point of inoculation 10 days after the dipping (results not shown).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. (A) Symptoms on kiwifruit leaves 2 and 15 days post inoculation (dpi) with CRA-FRU 8.43, CRA-FRU 12.29, and CRA-FRU 12.50. (B) Population dynamics of Psa strains CRAFRU 8.43 (HR+), CRAFRU 12.29 (HR–), and CRAFRU12.50 (HR–) after inoculation of kiwifruit leaves.

In a preliminary SNPs analysis, based on Illumina sequencing data, only one nucleotide difference could be detected between the HR– strain CRAFRU 12.29 and the HR+ strain CRAFRU 14.08.

Hence, the genome sequences of strains CRAFRU 14.08 and CRAFRU 12.29 were completed by SMRT (Single Molecule, Real Time) and Sanger sequencing. The resulting finished chromosomes, as shown in the alignment of Figure 2, differ for several structural features.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Mauve alignment of the chromosomes of strains CRAFRU 14.08, CRAFRU 12.29, and ICMP 18708.

First of all, CRAFRU 14.08 displays a large inversion of about half of the chromosome (3,637,997 nts) as compared to CRAFRU 12.29. The inversion occurred by recombination of the two identical copies of the gene encoding an integrating conjugative element protein of the PFL_4705 family, that are located, together with some other complete and incomplete copies, at position 1850000–1858000 and 5488000–5500000 in the chromosome of CRAFRU 12.29. Chromosome inversions have been reported to affect gene expression and occasionally the phenotype (Cui et al., 2012). However, whether or not the large genome inversion in CRAFRU 14.08 is associated with phenotype could not be determined in the present study.

The second major difference in strain CRAFRU 12.29 concerns a 1,700 bp integrative sequence, encoding an integrase and an IS3/IS911 transposase. This small integrative unit was inserted in the hrpS gene, within a transcriptional unit that spans several components of the type III secretion system, including the gene encoding harpin, hrpZ (Figure 3). Since, according to annotation and Blast searches, there are no other copies of hrpZ in the genome of Psa CRAFRU 12.29, the lack of expression of hrpZ may conceivably be the reason for the reduced virulence on kiwifruit and inability to elicit HR on eggplant and tobacco leaves. The phenotype is indeed reminiscent of previously characterized hrpZ deletion mutants (He et al., 1993).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Drawing of part of the hrp cluster of Psa, with the location of the insertion of (A) ISPsy31 in strain CRAFRU 12.29 and (B) ISPsy36 in strain CRAFRU 12.50.

The mobilization of IS3/IS911 elements has been already reported by Butler et al. (2013), who found that in the comparison of Pac_ICE1 from four New Zealand strains (ICMP 18708, ICMP18800, TP1, and 6.1) the presence of an IS element of the type IS3/IS911 in strain 6.1 was the only difference. They designated this small transposable element ISPsy31 at the IS Finder database (Siguier et al., 2006) and we will follow this nomenclature. As remarked by Butler et al. (2013), ISPsy31 is predicted to have two, partially overlapping reading frames associated with a 21 frame shift (the typical pattern found in IS3/IS911 type elements). Hence, although ISPsy31 encodes no functions other than those involved in its mobility, it may significantly impact the behavior of the pathogen in its interaction with the host.

There are many copies of ISPsy31 in the Psa genome. In strain CRAFRU 12.29 we counted 52 complete and five incomplete copies in the chromosome, and two complete copies in the plasmid. With the notable exception of the one interrupting hrpS, all other ISPsy31 copies are in corresponding positions in the chromosomes of strains CRAFRU 12.29 and CRAFRU 14.08.

On the other hand, strain CRAFRU 14.08 genome displays (position 5223542–5224799) the insertion of another IS element of the IS3/IS911 family, related to but well distinct from ISPsy31, and designated as ISPsy37 at the ISFinder database (Siguier et al., 2006). There are two copies of this transposon in CRAFRU 14.08, and only a single occurrence in CRAFRU 12.29.

Finally, one variation associated with variable number tandem repeats (VNTR) was also scored at positions 2787533–2786633 in CRAFRU 14.08, in additions to two unique SNPs (see below). Differences between the chromosomes of CRAFRU 14.08 and CRAFRU 12.29 are summarized in Table S2.

The finding that a small transposon insertion caused the loss of the ability to elicit the HR response in CRAFRU 12.29 prompted us to investigate whether or not the phenotype of the second HR– strain, CRAFRU 12.50, was associated to the same genomic event. To this end, we comparatively analyzed the ILLUMINA data-sets for discrepancies in reads coverage between the HR– and HR+ strains. Read coverage for the genome of the HR- strain CRAFRU 12.50 was similar to all HR+ strains in the locus of insertion of ISPsy31 in CRAFRU 12.29, but was markedly different from any other genome in a locus 1,273 nts upstream (Figure S1). Sorting the CRAFRU 12.50 reads using Mapsembler (Peterlongo and Chikhi, 2011) with sequence starters located on both sides of this locus (corresponding to position 1,473,520 in CRAFRU) we could extend the left side starter by 24 nts upstream and the right starter by 25 nts downstream, revealing the boundaries of a transposon tentatively identified as a copy of ISPsy36, inserted in the hrpR gene (Figure 3B).

Structural Diversity in the Chromosomes of the European Population of Psa Biovar 3

The availability of finished genomes of European Psa strains allowed to precisely map SNPs in additional 10 genomes (Table 1) of strains isolated in Europe, using Illumina data, as summarized in Table 2 (to help following the results in this and the following sections, a tree based on distance among genomes of the Psa strains as deduced from SNPs and including all strains mentioned in this work has been included as Figure S2). According to SNP analysis, a single difference between the chromosomes of strains CRAFRU 14.08 and CRAFRU 12.29 was scored, at position 39328331 in CRAFRU 14.08. Comparison of the two finished chromosome sequences using MUMmer (Delcher et al., 2002) revealed an additional SNP at position 2736260; that position corresponds to a transposase gene that is present in several copies in the genome and therefore was not detectable by read mapping (Table S2). In summary, the SNP comparison of the 12 European Psa genomes revealed that they differ from each other in 0 to 8 sites, on a total of 19 polymorphisms detected.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. SNPs identified among the strains used in this work by Illumina reads mapping. Position relative to the chromosome of CRAFRU 14.08.

The SNP analysis reported here supports the assertion of Butler et al. (2013) that the clonal populations in New Zealand and Chile are undergoing divergence, but as yet the frequency of idiosyncratic SNPs is less than one per Mb. A similar rate was determined in this work for European strains, as it was also anticipated by Mazzaglia et al. (2012). However, these figures are significantly lower than those reported by McCann et al. (2013) who identified 28–70 polymorphisms among the four Italian strains included in their study. The explanation of this inconsistency may lay in the fact that for three out of the four strains compared by those Authors, they used the data from de novo draft assemblies deposited in the database by Marcelletti (Marcelletti et al., 2011), Butler (Butler et al., 2013), and Mazzaglia (Mazzaglia et al., 2012), respectively, and de novo assembly is much more error prone than the conservative read mapping method used in this work (Trivedi et al., 2014).

Mazzaglia et al. (2012) identified the presence, in the chromosome of Psa, of a divergent genomic island ~100 kb long, similar to PPHGI-1, an integrative conjugative elements (ICE) described earlier in P. syringae pv. phaseolicola (Pitman et al., 2005), and also similar to PsyrGI-6, an ICE of P. syringae pv. syringae B728a (Feil et al., 2005). The genomic island was analyzed in more detail by Butler et al. (2013), who named Pac_ICE2 the type shared by European strains of Psa (in contrast with Pac_ICE1, for New Zealand strains, Pac_ICE3, for Chilean).

Butler et al. (2013) reported that the islands in ICMP 18708 (New Zealand), ICMP 18744 (Italy) and ICMP 19455 (Chile) were broadly syntenic, although the sequences shared by the ICEs were significantly divergent (~85% identical). Two regions with high conservation were detected, corresponding to transposons named Tn6211 and Tn6212. While Tn6211 occupy distinct positions in each of the three ICE types, the second conserved region (bases 55201–71516 in Pac_ICE1 from ICMP 18708), designated Tn6212 and almost identical in all ICEs, was syntenic in the three ICE types.

Mapping of Illumina reads examined in this work revealed two distinct types of Pac_ICE2 among the 12 European Psa genomes. The Illumina reads from five strains (namely CRAFRU 12.50, CRAFRU 12.29, CRAFRU 14.21, CRAFRU 14.08, and CRAFRU 13.27) did not cover the about 16.3 kbp of Tn6212 (Figure 4). “Split reads” containing Tn6212 flanking sequences were also found suggesting that the transposon was excised.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Evidence of integration/excision of Tn6212. (Left) Agarose gels of PCR amplification products with (A) primers fX1/rX4 (686 bp) that amplify the chromosome region resulting from excision, (B) primers fX3/rX4 (739 bp) that amplify the downstream transposon junction, and (C) primers fX1/rX2 (933 bp) that amplify the upstream transposon junction, as indicated in the top scheme of PCR primers positions. (Right) Density of reads mapping on Tn6212 and flanking regions. The numbers indicate the CRAFRU strains.

PCR carried out with primers placed on the borders of Tn6212 (Figure 4) provided confirmation of the excision and loss of Tn6212 in the named five strains: with their DNA extracts as templates, both the PCRs with primers located on left end of Tn6212 and flanking region, and the PCRs with primers located on right end of Tn6212 and flanking region, failed to amplify a DNA fragment of the expected size. Conversely, PCRs with primers specific for the left and right flanking regions amplified a DNA fragment that was 686 bp in length, i.e., lacking the Tn6212 sequence. Unexpectedly, the DNA samples from the other strains were positive not only to PCRs designed to amplify the ends of Tn6212 and flanking regions, but also primed amplification of the 686 bp DNA fragment with primers specific for the left and right flanking regions.

Since the DNA samples were prepared from 24 h old liquid cultures started from single colonies, we hypothesize that Tn6212 may occur with high frequency in vitro, so that at the time of DNA extraction the sample contained a mixture of genomes with and without Tn6212 integration. A similar hypothesis may explain the incongruity of the results concerning strain CRAFRU 14.25, that showed reads coverage of the Tn6212 region but no amplification products with primers located on its ends. Since the sequencing was carried out more than 1 year before PCRs, we hypothesize that subculturing ultimately selected genomes missing Tn6212.

The evidence of optional and frequent excision of Tn6212 raised the question of its potential role in the interaction with the plant host, that could warrant its maintenance in the pathogen population over time and its detection in fresh strains.

Tn6212 has been reported to be the Psa specific part that distinguished ICEs of Psa and Ps. syringae pv. phaseolicola (Psp). McCann et al. (2013) pointed out the presence within the Tn6212 region of genes that may be implicated in the interaction with the plant host, such as those encoding a predicted enolase and various transporters, including an ortholog of DctT (a putative di- carboxylic acid transporter with N-terminus predicted to be targeted to the Type III Secretion System) and a methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein predicted to be involved in taxis toward malate.

In an attempt to detect differences in virulence and within-plant colonization of strains, we inoculated plantlets with strain CRAFRU 8.43 and CRAFRU 14.08 and, after 10 days incubation, estimated by qPCR the bacterial population in the point of inoculation (“bottom” in Figure 5) and in the stem segment 3 cm above (“Top” in Figure 5). Although the bacterial cell number estimated of CRAFRU 8.43 were higher, the detected difference was not statistically significant.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Boxplot of the estimated bacterial population in the upper (Top) and lower (Bottom) part of the stem 10 days after inoculation with strains CRAFRU 8.43 and CRAFRU 14.08.

The optional excision of Tn6212 is the only significant variation in ICE2 among the 12 genomes examined. In fact, ICE2 resulted identical in all strains except for a single polymorphism in strain CRAFRU 10.29 at position 51525.

Furthermore, we examined the results of Illumina re-sequencing of all Psa strains with the aim of discovering new genes possibly acquired during clonal expansion. Following reads mapping on the complete genome of strain CRAFRU 12.29, we selected and assembled the Illumina reads that were not mapped. After filtering for Tn6212 (missing in the reference) sequences, we obtained in total 175 contigs for a total of 105,000 nts. The encoded amino acids sequences whose function could be recognized according to RAST annotation were exclusively phage associated proteins (Table S4). Hence, we could find no evidence of gene gain in our sample of 12 European genomes, reveling a picture divergent from that described by Colombi et al. (2017) who showed the acquisition by strains isolated in New Zealand of exogenous integrative conjugative elements carrying copper resistance genes during clonal expansion.

To confirm that genome diversity in the European strains is mostly due to rearrangement of self-genetic elements, the Illumina dataset was used to investigate structural changes in the chromosomes of the collections of 10 European strains, with different approaches.

We mapped the Illumina reads from all strains on both the CRAFRU 12.29 and CRAFRU 14.08 chromosomes and visualized the alignments in the regions covering the structural changes that differentiate those chromosomes among themselves. As a result, we found that the ISPsy31 insertion in CRAFRU 12.29, as well as the ISPsy37 insertion and the large inversion in CRAFRU 14.08, and the ISPsy36 insertion in CRAFRU 12.50 were unique in the respective strain chromosomes and not shared by any other of the remaining European strains. We therefore focused on the detection of specific structural changes in the chromosomes of the other strains.

To this end, we prepared an inventory of the mobile elements that can be detected in the two complete chromosomes of European Psa, CRAFRU 12.29 and CRAFRU 14.08 (Figure S3), then mapped their ends on the assemblies of other strains to detect traces of transposon mobilization. By using this approach, we found contigs ending with sequences associated with mobile element borders that were not present in the reference chromosome. In particular, we found IS3 related sequences in unique positions in CRAFRU 12.64 and CRA 8.43, and an IS3 related sequence present in the same position in both CRAFRU 13.27 and CRAFRU 10.29.

The assemblies were also scaffolded using CRAFRU 12.29 genome as a reference and visualized, allowing the detection of an inversion around position 5508000 (CRAFRU 12.29 numbering) in strain CRAFRU 8.43.

Comparison of Chromosomes of European vs. New Zealand Psa Biovar 3 Strains

The comparison of the European strain CRAFRU 12.29 and the two complete genomes of New Zealand strains that were available from NCBI in October 2016, i.e., strains ICMP 18708 and ICMP 18884, showed substantial synteny of the chromosomes (Figure 2).

As previously noticed the sequences diverged largely in the ICE region, while divergence was much less in the rest of the genome. As it has already been reported for other strains (Butler et al., 2013) the ICE is inserted in a different lysine tRNA site in the genomes of European Psa strain CRAFRU 12.29 and in the New Zealand strain ICMP 18708/18884.

Excluding the ICE region, the chromosomes of the two New Zealand strains were identical to each other except for seven SNPs (including single nucleotide indels), according to the results of direct comparison using MUMmer (Delcher et al., 2002) and Mauve (Darling et al., 2004). Two of the indels occurred in homopolymer stretches and were not confirmed by our Illumina sequencing and reads mapping of strain ICMP 18884. Thus, the number of single nucleotide variations between the two New Zealand strains were similar to that occurring among the European strains. Conversely, 27 SNPs (including indels) and three sequence variations affecting multiple nucleotides were detected between the European Psa strain CRAFRU 12.29 and the New Zealand strain ICMP 18884 in the remaining (after exclusion of ICE) about 6 Mb of the chromosome (pos 1–5410820 and 5511674–6555571, strain ICMP 18708 numbering). This finding is in substantial agreement with the hypothesis that Psa strains originating the epidemics in Chile, New Zealand and Europe were independently invaded by Pac_ICE1/3, supporting the notion that this ICE may contain genetic elements that significantly affect the virulence of the pathogen.

In addition to SNPs, several genome rearrangement events distinguished the genome of the European Psa strain CRAFRU 12.29 and the New Zealand strains ICMP 18708/18884, as presented in Table S3. Major events include the insertion of a copy of a mobile selfish genetic element of the group named bacterial group II intron reverse transcriptase/maturase in CRAFRU 12.29 at positions 1023375–1025252. Proteins in this group have an N-terminal reverse transcriptase (RNA-directed DNA polymerase) domain (pfam00078) followed by an RNA-binding maturase domain (pfam08388). This mobile element is present in 14 copies in CRAFRU 12.29 and 13 copies in ICMP 18708/18884 genomes.

On the other hand, ICMP 18708 and ICMP 18884 are characterized by a similar event, the insertion of another distinct bacterial group II intron reverse transcriptase/maturase starting at position 5715260 and ending at position 5717133. Also this transcriptase/maturase is present in several identical copies in the Psa genomes, namely 14 copies in ICMP 18708 and 13 copies in CRAFRU 12.29, respectively. There are, in total, 54 protein annotated as bacterial group II intron reverse transcriptase/maturase in each of the two genomes in comparison. Another major difference between the two genomes concerns an insertion of two transposase genes at positions 3287490–3288700 in a DNA region that includes sequences encoding IS630 transposases, a phage invertase and related proteins that are associated with a 316 kb inversion in ICMP 18708/18884. Another IS630 insertion that is specific of ICMP 18708/18884 occurs in those genomes at position 6522179–6523356 (ICMP 18708 numbering). In ICMP 18708/18884 there are 61 complete and five incomplete IS630 transposases, while CRAFRU 12.29 displayed 59 complete and five incomplete copies of this gene. Two minor variations associated with repeats of variable lengths were also scored, one of which corresponding to the same repeat region that differentiated CRAFRU 14.08 from CRAFRU 12.29.

Conclusions

Mobile DNA elements contribute to bacterial evolution, as their ability to mobilize themselves and unrelated DNA in their proximity can lead to genome rearrangements that affect the microorganism phenotype (Bardaji et al., 2011). Their role in improving fitness and, potentially, pathogenicity and virulence of phytopathogenic bacteria is well established (Jackson et al., 2011). Many studies stressed the role of mobile DNA dependent gene gain in pathogen populations during epidemics, leading to the differentiation and development of more adapted clones (Holden et al., 2009; Mutreja et al., 2011; Santagati et al., 2012; Petrovska et al., 2016). Psa biovar 3 represents a relevant example of such a process, considering the primary role of mobile DNA mediated horizontal genetic transfer (particularly the gain of ICE) in its emergence as a pandemic pathogen of kiwifruit, according to several studies (Marcelletti et al., 2011; Butler et al., 2013; McCann et al., 2013, 2017).

However, Mobile DNA-induced mutations are often deleterious (Wu et al., 2015), and transposable elements have been regarded as a sort of genomic disease (Wagner, 2009). Loss of fitness due to the accumulation of deleterious mutations has been reported for small, obligate asexual populations, as these are incapable of reconstituting highly fit genotypes by recombination or back mutation (Lynch et al., 1993; Moran, 1996).

According to the results of a pangenomic study by Bolotin and Hershberg (2015), while non-clonal species diversify through a combination of changes to gene sequences (gene loss and gene gain), gene loss completely dominates as a source of genetic variation among clonal species, for which it needs to be taken into account as a potential dominant source of phenotypic variation. In the case of Psa biovar 3, we report here a relevant number (considering the small sample) of transposon mediated structural variations, occasionally impairing relevant phenotypic aspects of the interaction with the host, as occurred in the genome of strains CRAFRU 12.29 and CRAFRU 12.50 where a ISPsy31 insertion in the hrpS gene and a ISPsy36 insertion in the hrpR gene, respectively, disrupted the functionality of the TTSS. In all cases, structural variations implied rearrangement of self-genetic elements and not incorporation of external DNA.

There is a growing body of evidence supporting the hypothesis of two phases in the recent evolution of Psa biovar 3, with a landmark in the initiation of the worldwide pandemic in 2008. The SNP based comparisons (this work, McCann et al., 2017), as well as the evidence of independent invasions of ICE (Butler et al., 2013), suggest the preservation of within biovar diversity in the natural environment of the region of origin and during initial spread in China, before pandemic initiation. In this phase, acquisition of exogenous DNA through mobile DNA and selection for increased fitness were drivers of the evolution, promoting the emergence of adapted individuals. Also in this phase, recombination (intra- and inter-pathovar; McCann et al., 2013, 2017) and selection limited the proliferation of transposons and the deleterious mutations associated to DNA mobilization.

A new phase began with the introduction of adapted highly virulent strains from China into the kiwifruit cultivated areas in Europe, Chile and New Zealand. In Europe, Psa biovar 3 established and spread clonally in an ecological niche lacking competitive selection, such as that represented by the highly sensitive A. chinensis cv. Hort 16A. The results of this study show that the new phase was associated to an increase in the number of small transposons in the bacterial genome, with rearrangements leading to gene loss rather than to gain of functions by horizontal transfer. The data collected herein would suggest that clonal spread of the pathogen in a free ecological niche occurred with no access to the environmental gene pool, with diversification through rearrangement of self-genetic elements, and in the absence of the recombination-selection process that mitigates genome degeneration associated with transposon mobilization (Bast et al., 2016).

This suggestion is corroborated by the genome comparisons between European and New Zealand strain. According to the SNPs analysis presented in this and other papers (Mazzaglia et al., 2012; Butler et al., 2013), SNPs differences between the two geographically distinct groups of strains are one order of magnitude larger than within group SNPs differences, supporting the notion that the separation the European and New Zealand strains consistently predates the initiation of clonal expansion in Europe; conversely the mobile DNA associated structural differences are not larger between geographically distinct groups than within groups. This discrepancy, and the isolation of variant strains defective in virulence, are consistent with the view that the clonal expansion in the open niche of cultivated kiwifruit would be associated with genomic diversification through structural rearrangement with relaxation of the natural selection pressure against deleterious traits. This issue may be relevant for our understanding and management of epidemics.

Evidence of gene gain associated with the emergence of copper-resistant strains was recently reported by Colombi et al. (2017) for Psa in New Zealand, while we found no gene gain by European strains, variant strains resulting from rearrangement of self-genetic elements. The different outcomes of the surveys may be related with differences in the environmental conditions, epidemic dynamics or disease management, such as timing of the disease spread on the territory, introduction of tolerant cultivars, use of containment measures directed to the reduction of the inoculum size (particularly copper treatments) or to the reduction of pathogen dispersal and the establishment of conducive conditions for the epidemics (pruning, girdling, cultivation under cover), prevalence of the crop in the region (Vanneste, 2017).

Modern strategies for the management of destructive epidemics, such as that caused by Psa biovar 3 on kiwifruit, may benefit from the awareness of their effect on short-term genome evolution and population structure of the pathogen. The results presented in this paper would suggest that strategies that do not promote recombination and preserve the clonal structure of the invasive microorganism may be associated with lower risk of developing variant strains with enhanced fitness or virulence.

Author Contributions

GF, MS, and PE conceived the work, designed the experiments and wrote the paper. ET made the libraries. PF performed HR assays and leaf inoculations. FF carried out plantlets inoculation and quantitative PCRs. MM performed other wet lab methods. GF, CP, and SM analyzed the sequence data.

Funding

Financial support of this work was partially provided by the Region Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The following colleagues are gratefully acknowledged for sharing their strains with us: G.M. Balestra, Tuscia University, Viterbo, Italy; C. Morone, Regione Piemonte, Servizio Fitosanitario regionale, Torino, Italy; M.M. Lopez, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Moncada-Valencia, Spain; S. Poliakoff, ANSES, Angers, France. CyVerse, supported by the National Science Foundation under Award Numbers DBI-0735191 and DBI-1265383, and the Data Intensive Academic Grid (DIAG, sadly retired on Jan 2017), supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0959894 are acknowledged for providing computer resources. We are also grateful to Annalisa Polverari, University of Verona, Italy, for the critical reading and useful comments to the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00656/full#supplementary-material

References

Abelleira, A., Lopez, M. M., Penalver, J., Aguin, O., Mansilla, J. P., Picoaga, A., et al. (2011). First report of bacterial canker of kiwifruit caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in Spain. Plant Dis. 95, 1583–1583. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-11-0537

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Balestra, G. M., Mazzaglia, A., Quattrucci, A., Renzi, M., and Rossetti, A. (2009). Occurrence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in Jin Tao kiwi plants in Italy. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 48, 299–301. doi: 10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-2821

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bankevich, A., Nurk, S., Antipov, D., Gurevich, A. A., Dvorkin, M., Kulikov, A. S., et al. (2012). SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bardaji, L., A-orga, M., Jackson, R. W., Martínez-Bilbao, A., Yanguas-Casás, N., and Murillo, J. (2011). Miniature transposable sequences are frequently mobilized in the bacterial plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola. PLoS ONE 6:e025773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025773

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bast, J., Schaefer, I., Schwander, T., Maraun, M., Scheu, S., and Kraaijeveld, K. (2016). No accumulation of transposable elements in asexual arthropods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 697–706. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv261

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolotin, E., and Hershberg, R. (2015). Gene loss dominates as a source of genetic variation within clonal pathogenic bacterial species. Genome Biol Evol. 7, 2173–2187. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Butler, M. I., Stockwell, P. A., Black, M. A., Day, R. C., Lamont, I. L., and Poulter, R. T. M. (2013). Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae from recent outbreaks of kiwifruit bacterial canker belong to different clones that originated in China. PLoS ONE 8:e57464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057464

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cesbron, S., Briand, M., Essakhi, S., Gironde, S., Boureau, T., Manceau, C., et al. (2015). Comparative genomics of pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains of Xanthomonas arboricola unveil molecular and evolutionary events linked to pathoadaptation. Front. Plant Sci. 6:1126. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ciarroni, S., Gallipoli, L., Taratufolo, M. C., Butler, M. I., Poulter, R. T. M., Pourcel, C., et al. (2015). Development of a multiple loci variable number of tandem repeats analysis (MLVA) to unravel the intra-pathovar structure of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae populations worldwide. PLoS ONE 10:e0135310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Colombi, E., Straub, C., Künzel, S., Templeton, M. D., McCann, H. C., and Rainey, P. B. (2017). Evolution of copper resistance in the kiwifruit pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae through acquisition of integrative conjugative elements and plasmids. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 819–832. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13662

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cui, L., Neoh, H., Iwamoto, A., and Hiramatsu, K. (2012). Coordinated phenotype switching with large-scale chromosome flip-flop inversion observed in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, E1647–E1656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204307109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cunty, A., Cesbron, S., Poliakoff, F., Jacques, M.-A., and Manceau, C. (2015a). Origin of the outbreak in France of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae Biovar 3, the causal agent of bacterial canker of kiwifruit, revealed by a multilocus variable-Number tandem-repeat analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 6773–6789. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01688-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cunty, A., Poliakoff, F., Rivoal, C., Cesbron, S., Fischer-Le Saux, M., Lemaire, C., et al. (2015b). Characterization of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) isolated from France and assignment of Psa biovar 4 to a de novo pathovar: Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidifoliorum pv. nov. Plant Pathol. 64, 582–596. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12297

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Darling, A. C. E., Mau, B., Blattner, F. R., and Perna, N. T. (2004). Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 14, 1394–1403. doi: 10.1101/gr.2289704

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Delcher, A. L., Phillippy, A., Carlton, J., and Salzberg, S. L. (2002). Fast algorithms for large-scale genome alignment and comparison. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 2478–2483. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.11.2478

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Doyle, J. J., and Doyle, J. L. (1990). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12, 13–15.

Google Scholar

Dreo, T., Pirc, M., Ravnikar, M., Zezlina, I., Poliakoff, E., Rivoal, C., et al. (2014). First report of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae, the causal agent of bacterial canker of kiwifruit in Slovenia. Plant Dis. 98, 1578–1578. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-14-0513-PDN

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

EPPO (2016). EPPO Global Database. Available online at: https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/PHLLAM/distribution (Accessed December 2, 2016).

Everett, K. R., Taylor, R. K., Romberg, R. K., Rees-George, J., Fullerton, R. A., Vanneste, J. L., et al. (2011). First report of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae causing kiwifruit bacterial canker in New Zealand. Australas. Plant Dis. Notes 6, 67–71. doi: 10.1007/s13314-011-0023-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feil, H., Feil, W. S., Chain, P., Larimer, F., Di Bartolo, G., Copeland, A., et al. (2005). Comparison of the complete genome sequences of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a and pv. tomato DC3000. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 11064–11069. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504930102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferrante, P., and Scortichini, M. (2009). Identification of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae as causal agent of bacterial canker of yellow kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planchon) in central Italy. J. Phytopathol. 157, 768–770. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2009.01550.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferrante, P., and Scortichini, M. (2010). Molecular and phenotypic features of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae isolated during recent epidemics of bacterial canker on yellow kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) in central Italy. Plant Pathol. 59, 954–962. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02304.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferrante, P., and Scortichini, M. (2015). Redefining the global populations of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae based on pathogenic, molecular and phenotypic characteristics. Plant Pathol. 64, 51–62. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12236

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferrante, P., Takikawa, Y., and Scortichini, M. (2015). Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae strains isolated from past and current epidemics to Actinidia spp. reveal a diverse population structure of the pathogen. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 142, 677–689. doi: 10.1007/s10658-015-0643-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fujikawa, T., and Sawada, H. (2016). Genome analysis of the kiwifruit canker pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 5. Sci. Rep. 6:21399. doi: 10.1038/srep21399

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gallelli, A., Talocci, S., Pilotti, M., and Loreti, S. (2014). Real- time and qualitative PCR for detecting Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae isolates causing recent outbreaks of kiwifruit bacterial canker. Plant Pathol. 63, 264–276. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12082

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gouy, M., Guindon, S., and Gascuel, O. (2010). SeaView version 4: a multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 221–224. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp259

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, S. Y., Huang, H. C., and Collmer, A. (1993). Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae harpin Pss: a protein that is secreted via the Hrp pathway and elicits the hypersensitive response in plants. Cell 73, 1255–1266. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90354-S

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hernandez, D., François, P., Farinelli, L., Østerås, M., and Schrenzel, J. (2008). De novo bacterial genome sequencing: millions of very short reads assembled on a desktop computer. Genome Res. 18, 802–809. doi: 10.1101/gr.072033.107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Holden, M. T. G., Hauser, H., Sanders, M., Ngo, T. H., Cherevach, I., Cronin, A., et al. (2009). Rapid evolution of virulence and drug resistance in the emerging zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. PLoS ONE 4:e6072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Holeva, M. C., Glynos, P. E., and Karafla, C. D. (2015). First report of bacterial canker of kiwifruit caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in Greece. Plant Dis. 99, 723–723. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-14-0738-PDN

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jackson, R. W., Vinatzer, B., Arnold, D. L., Dorus, S., and Murillo, J. (2011). The influence of the accessory genome on bacterial pathogen evolution. Mob. Genet. Elements 1, 55–65. doi: 10.4161/mge.1.1.16432

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koh, J. K., Cha, B. J., Chung, H. J., and Lee, D. H. (1994). Outbreak and spread of bacterial canker in kiwifruit. Korean J. Plant Pathol. 10, 68–72.

Google Scholar

Kolmogorov, M., Raney, B., Paten, B., and Pham, S. (2014). Ragout-a reference-assisted assembly tool for bacterial genomes. Bioinformatics 30, i302– i309. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu280

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., and Durbin, R. (2009). Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., et al. (2009). The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lynch, M., Butcher, D., Bürger, R., and Gabriel, W. (1993). The mutational meltdown in asexual populations. J. Hered. 84, 339–344. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111354

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marcelletti, S., and Scortichini, M. (2011). Clonal outbreaks of bacterial canker caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae on Actinidia chinensis and A. deliciosa in Italy. J. Plant Pathol. 93, 479–483. Available online at: http://www.jstore.org/stable/41999021

Google Scholar

Marcelletti, S., Ferrante, P., Petriccione, M., Firrao, G., and Scortichini, M. (2011). Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae draft genomes comparison reveal strain-specific features involved in adaptation and virulence to Actinidia species. PLoS ONE 6:e27297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027297

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mazzaglia, A., Studholme, D. J., Taratufolo, M. C., Cai, R., Almeida, N. F., Goodman, T., et al. (2012). Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (PSA) isolates from recent bacterial canker of kiwifruit outbreaks belong to the same genetic lineage. PLoS ONE 7:e36518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036518

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McCann, H. C., Li, L., Liu, Y., Li, D., Hui, P., Zhong, C., et al. (2017). Origin and evolution of a pandemic lineage of the kiwifruit pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. Genome Biol. Evol. 9, 932–944. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx055

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McCann, H. C., Rikkerink, E. H. A., Bertels, F., Fiers, M., Lu, A., Rees-George, J., et al. (2013). Genomic analysis of the Kiwifruit pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae provides insight into the origins of an emergent plant disease. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003503. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003503

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McKenna, A., Hanna, M., Banks, E., Sivachenko, A., Cibulskis, K., Kernytsky, A., et al. (2010). The genome analysis toolkit: a mapreduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Merchant, N., Lyons, E., Goff, S., Vaughn, M., Ware, D., Micklos, D., et al. (2016). The iPlant collaborative: cyberinfrastructure for enabling data to discovery for the life sciences. PLOS Biol. 14:e1002342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002342

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Milne, I., Bayer, M., Cardle, L., Shaw, P., Stephen, G., Wright, F., et al. (2010). Tablet-next generation sequence assembly visualization. Bioinformatics 26, 401–402. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp666

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moran, N. A. (1996). Accelerated evolution and Muller's rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 2873–2878. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.2873

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mutreja, A., Kim, D. W., Thomson, N. R., Connor, T. R., Lee, J. H., Kariuki, S., et al. (2011). Evidence for several waves of global transmission in the seventh cholera pandemic. Nature 477, 462–465. doi: 10.1038/nature10392

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okonechnikov, K., Golosova, O., and Fursov, M. (2012). Unipro UGENE: a unified bioinformatics toolkit. Bioinformatics 28, 1166–1167. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peterlongo, P., and Chikhi, R. (2011). Mapsembler, Targeted Assembly of Larges Genomes on a Desktop Computer. Research Report, RR-7565, INRIA, 17.

Petrovska, L., Mather, A. E., AbuOun, M., Branchu, P., Harris, S. R., Connor, T., et al. (2016). Microevolution of monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium during epidemic, United Kingdom, 2005–2010. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 22, 617–624. doi: 10.3201/eid2204.150531

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pitman, A. R., Jackson, R. W., Mansfield, J. W., Kaitell, V., Thwaites, R., and Arnold, D. L. (2005). Exposure to host resistance mechanisms drives evolution of bacterial virulence in plants. Curr. Biol. 15, 2230–2235. doi: 10.1016/j.cub0.2005.10.074

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

R Core Team (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online at: http://www.R-project.org/

Robinson, J. T., Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Winckler, W., Guttman, M., Lander, E. S., Getz, G., et al. (2011). Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Santagati, M., Scillato, M., Patane, F., Aiello, C., and Stefani, S. (2012). Bacteriocin-producing oral streptococci and inhibition of respiratory pathogens. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 65, 23–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00928.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmieder, R., and Edwards, R. (2011). Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27, 863–864. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scortichini, M. (1994). Occurrence of Pseudomonas-syringae pv actinidiae on kiwifruit in Italy. Plant Pathol. 43, 1035–1038. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1994.tb01654.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scortichini, M., Marcelletti, S., Ferrante, P., and Firrao, G. (2013). A genomic redefinition of Pseudomonas avellanae species. PLoS ONE 8:e75794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075794

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scortichini, M., Marcelletti, S., Ferrante, P., Petriccione, M., and Firrao, G. (2012). Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae: a re-emerging, multi-faceted, pandemic pathogen. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13, 631–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00788.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Siguier, P., Pérochon, J., Lestrade, L., Mahillon, J., and Chandler, M. (2006). ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 34(suppl_1), D32–D36. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Takikawa, Y., Serizawa, S., and Ichikawa, T. (1989). Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae pv. nov. the causal bacterium of canker of kiwifruit in Japan. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn 55, 437–444. doi: 10.3186/jjphytopath.55.437

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Templeton, M. D., Warren, B. A., Andersen, M. T., Rikkerink, E. H. A., and Fineran, P. C. (2015). Complete DNA sequence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae, the causal agent of kiwifruit canker disease. Genome Announc. 3:e01054–15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01054-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trivedi, U. H., Cézard, T., Bridgett, S., Montazam, A., Nichols, J., Blaxter, M., et al. (2014). Quality control of next-generation sequencing data without a reference. Front Genet 5:111. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vanneste, J. L. (2017). The scientific, economic, and social impacts of the New Zealand outbreak of bacterial canker of kiwifruit (Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae). Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 55, 377–399. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035530

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Varani, A. M., Siguier, P., Gourbeyre, E., Charneau, V., and Chandler, M. (2011). ISsaga is an ensemble of web-based methods for high throughput identification and semi-automatic annotation of insertion sequences in prokaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. 12:R30. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r30

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wagner, A. (2009). Transposable elements as genomic diseases. Mol. Biosyst. 5, 32–35. doi: 10.1039/B814624C

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, Y., Aandahl, R. Z., and Tanaka, M. M. (2015). Dynamics of bacterial insertion sequences: can transposition bursts help the elements persist? BMC Evol. Biol. 15:288. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0560-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: bacterial canker, genomic diversity, hypersensitivity response (HR), Illumina technology, single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing

Citation: Firrao G, Torelli E, Polano C, Ferrante P, Ferrini F, Martini M, Marcelletti S, Scortichini M and Ermacora P (2018) Genomic Structural Variations Affecting Virulence During Clonal Expansion of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae Biovar 3 in Europe. Front. Microbiol. 9:656. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00656

Received: 22 January 2018; Accepted: 20 March 2018;
Published: 05 April 2018.

Edited by:

Sabrina Sarrocco, Università degli Studi di Pisa, Italy

Reviewed by:

Vittoria Catara, Università degli Studi di Catania, Italy
Jason Sahl, Northern Arizona University, United States

Copyright © 2018 Firrao, Torelli, Polano, Ferrante, Ferrini, Martini, Marcelletti, Scortichini and Ermacora. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Giuseppe Firrao, giuseppe.firrao@uniud.it
Marco Scortichini, marco.scortichini@crea.gov.it
Paolo Ermacora, paolo.ermacora@uniud.it

Present Address: Emanuela Torelli, ICOS Group, School of Computing Science, Centre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom