Impact Factor 5.640 | CiteScore 7.3
More on impact ›


Front. Microbiol., 22 May 2018 |

Investigating the Association Between the Caecal Microbiomes of Broilers and Campylobacter Burden

  • 1School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
  • 2Animal & Plant Health Agency, Weybridge, United Kingdom
  • 3School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • 4Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

One of the major transmission routes for the foodborne bacterial pathogen Campylobacter is undercooked poultry meat, contaminated from intestinal contents during processing. In broilers, Campylobacter can grow to very high densities in the caeca, and is often considered to be a commensal or an opportunistic pathogen in poultry. Reduction of caecal loads of Campylobacter may assist in lowering incidence rates of Campylobacter food poisoning. To achieve this, there needs to be a better understanding of the dynamics of Campylobacter colonization in its natural niche, and the effect of the local microbiome on colonization. Previous studies have shown that the microbiome differed between Campylobacter colonized and non-colonized chicken intestinal samples. To characterize the microbiome of Campylobacter-colonized broilers, caecal samples of 100 randomly selected birds from four farms were analyzed using amplified 16S rRNA gene sequences. Bacterial taxonomic analysis indicated that inter-farm variation was greater than intra-farm variation. The two most common bacterial groups were Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes which were present in all samples and constituted 29.7–63.5 and 30.2–59.8% of the bacteria present, respectively. Campylobacter was cultured from all samples, ranging from 2 to 9 log10 CFU g-1. There was no clear link between Campylobacter counts and Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, or Tenericutes levels in the 16S rRNA operational taxonomic unit (OTU)-based analysis of the caecal microbiome, but samples with high Campylobacter counts (>9 log CFU g-1) contained increased levels of Enterobacteriaceae. A decrease in Lactobacillus abundance in chicken caeca was also associated with high Campylobacter loads. The reported associations with Lactobacillus and Enterobacteriaceae match changes in the intestinal microbiome of chickens and mice previously reported for Campylobacter infection, and raises the question about temporality and causation; as to whether increases in Campylobacter loads create conditions adverse to Lactobacilli and/or beneficial to Enterobacteriaceae, or that changes in Lactobacilli and Enterobacteriaceae levels created conditions beneficial for Campylobacter colonization. If these changes can be controlled, this may open opportunities for modulation of chicken microbiota to reduce Campylobacter levels for improved food safety.


The pathogenic Campylobacter species Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli are common causative agents of bacterial gastroenteritis in humans (Nichols et al., 2012). One of the primary transmission routes is via ingestion of undercooked meat, especially poultry (Tam et al., 2009, 2012). During processing, caecal contents can contaminate the surface of the meat. If the bacteria survive further processing and food preparation, they can cause diarrheal disease and are also implicated in post-infectious sequelae such as Guillain–Barré syndrome (Hughes, 2005).

The presence of Campylobacter spp. in chicken carcasses is an important risk factor for food borne campylobacteriosis. Foodborne Campylobacter is the major cause of bacterial food poisoning with an estimated 280,000 cases each year in the United Kingdom (FSA, 2016). According to EFSA, up to 80% of cases can be attributed to contaminated poultry meat and a 10-fold decrease in the exposure levels from this source is likely to reduce the number of human Campylobacter cases by 50 to 90% across all Member States (EFSA, 2011). An EU baseline survey including data from 26 European Union Member States and two countries not belonging to the European Union showed that 75% of broiler batches carried Campylobacter in their caecal contents and 86% of skin samples were contaminated (EFSA, 2010). Moreover, the United Kingdom Food Standards Agency (FSA) reported that 61.3% of fresh, United Kingdom-produced, retail samples were contaminated (Jorgensen et al., 2017). Aiming to reduce the prevalence of Campylobacter in chicken, FSA has set up a joint target with industry to reduce contamination levels to less than 1000 colony forming units per gram of chicken skin (CFU g-1) because it is believed that chickens with this level, or higher, of Campylobacter contamination are the most likely to infect consumers (EFSA, 2011).

Reducing the prevalence of Campylobacter contamination in carcasses and in retail products could be achieved by decreasing the on-farm prevalence either by reducing the number of infected flocks and/or reducing levels within individual birds. Although several biosecurity measures have been suggested to reduce the occurrence of Campylobacter at poultry farms, including appropriate hygiene barriers, the use of house-specific boots and clothes, the use of overshoes and the effective use of boot dips, these have not been consistently successful (Fonseca et al., 2016). Once Campylobacter is present there is rapid transmission within the flock, which may be exacerbated by factors including stocking density and litter conditions (Conlan et al., 2007; Torok et al., 2009; Collett, 2012). The ability of a given strain to colonize the broiler gut will be dependent on the strain characteristics, the immune status and health of the bird and the composition of the existing microbiological population – the gut microbiome (Qu et al., 2008). The microbiome of individual birds, the flock and the environment can be considered as a single ecological system that will influence the occurrence, incidence, and burden of infection (Robinson et al., 2010). Through gaining detailed knowledge of the microbiome and of Campylobacter colonization we hope to inform interventions aimed at reducing the prevalence of Campylobacter in broilers. For example, through the informed use of probiotic bacteria. However, knowledge underpinning a rationale use of probiotics is currently limited.

Modern sequencing approaches are currently used to characterize the intestinal microbiome composition of broilers. Considering that all birds within a flock have the same age, feed, and similar genetics it may be expected that the profiles of individual birds within a flock would be similar. However, a recent study has shown that there is high bird to bird variation, within the same flock (Thibodeau et al., 2015). Knowledge of the magnitude of microbiome genetic variation within and between flocks is still lacking.

The overall aim of this study was to characterize the microbial communities of the caeca of broiler chickens in relation to the prevalence and burden of Campylobacter infection. It is generally accepted that caeca are the predominant sites for colonization of Campylobacter in broilers and the Campylobacter load in the caecum is an important risk factor for carcass contamination of commercial birds (Hermans et al., 2011). To accomplish the goals of this study we characterized the microbiome of 100 individual birds from four different flocks; compared individual samples in order to determine the intra-flock and inter-flock variation in the relative abundance of bacterial genera within the caeca; explored the association between presence and abundance of Campylobacter and other genera within the samples.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection and Preparation of DNA Samples

Four batches (each n = 25) of carcasses of conventionally reared broiler chickens (Table 1) were taken from a poultry processing plant and transported to the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) on the day of slaughter. Caeca were removed whole from the carcasses and a sample of the contents processed immediately for quantitative bacteriology (see below). An entire caecum and contents from each carcass were stored at -20°C until required. Caeca were left to thaw for 1 h at room temperature and their contents transferred to sterile universals and homogenized by stirring with sterile plastic sticks. Caecal contents (25 mg) were transferred to sample tubes for DNA extraction. Community DNA was isolated from the 100 individual caecal samples using Mo Bio Power Soil DNA kits (now DNeasy PowerSoil, Qiagen), following the manufacturer’s protocol.


TABLE 1. Age and average weight of all birds grouped by farms.

Campylobacter Culture

The levels of Campylobacter in all 100 birds were determined by quantitative bacteriology, as described previously (Wassenaar et al., 1993). Briefly, fresh caecal contents were suspended in sterile PBS (1/10, w/v) and serial dilutions plated onto 5% sheep’s blood agar plates containing Skirrow’s Campylobacter Selective Supplement (Oxoid) and cefoperazone (20 μg/ml; Sigma). Plates were incubated in a microaerobic incubator (Heraeus) (Gas composition: 8% O2, 7.5% CO2, 84.5% N2) at 42°C for 48 h.

PCR Amplification and rRNA Gene Sequencing

Aliquots of extracted DNA were amplified with universal primers for the V4 and V5 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. The primers U515F (5′-GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTA) and U927R (5′-CCCGYCAATTCMTTTRAGT) (Ellis et al., 2013) were designed to permit amplification of both bacterial and archaeal ribosomal RNA gene regions. Forward and reverse fusion primers consisted of the Illumina overhang forward (5′-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG) and reverse adapter (5′-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTAATAAGAGACAG) respectively. Amplification was performed with FastStart HiFi Polymerase (Roche Diagnostics, Ltd., United Kingdom) using the following cycling conditions: 95°C for 3 min; 25 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 35 s, 72°C for 1 min; followed by 72°C for 8 min. Amplicons were purified using 0.8 volumes of Ampure XP magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter). Each sample was then tagged with a unique pair of indices and the sequencing primer, using Nextera XT v2 Index kits, and 2x KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix using the following cycling conditions: 95°C for 3 min; 12 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s; followed by 72°C for 5 min. Index-tagged amplicons were purified using 0.8 volumes of Ampure XP magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter). The concentration of each sample was measured using the fluorescence-based Quantifluor assay (Promega). Concentrations were normalized before pooling all samples, each of which would be subsequently identified by its unique index combination. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq with 2 × 300 base reads according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, Cambridge, United Kingdom).

Data Analysis

Sequence reads obtained were processed according to the microbiome-helper pipeline1. Essentially paired end reads were merged based on overlapping ends using PEAR2, before filtering the data for base-calling quality and amplicon length. The processed sequences were then classified using the pick open reference OTUs process implemented in QIIME v1.9.1 (Caporaso et al., 2010) against the Greengenes 16S rRNA gene database3 using a 97% similarity cut-off. The resulting distribution of OTUs across the multiple samples was further analyzed using QIIME v1.9.1 to summarize the distributions and explore alpha (number of different types of sequences in a sample) and beta (how different types are distributed among samples) diversity. Individual samples were assigned to specific categories to explore intra-farm differences and the relationship between Campylobacter load and the composition of the microbiome. Relative abundance plots of microbial taxa were generated to visualize the differences between categories. Beta-diversity of the data set was calculated using the weighted UniFrac metric (Lozupone et al., 2006), which utilizes phylogenetic information, using a re-sampling size of 8500. Principal coordinate plots of the UniFrac distance matrices were then generated to investigate the relationships between microbial communities in each of the samples. Statistical testing for the logarithm of Campylobacter count data by farm was carried out using one-way ANOVA. Testing for the difference in microbial community composition between farms was carried out using the DirtyGenes test (Shaw et al., unpublished). A test for the difference in the percentage of Proteobacteria isolated from farms was conducted using non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskal–Wallis test) as the data were not normally distributed (D’Agostino & Pearson normality test). Pair-wise, between-farm comparisons were conducted using Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (GraphPad Prism version 7.03 for Windows, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, United States4). p-Value of 0.05 was used as cut off for statistical significance.

Data Availability

The sequencing reads (fastq files) have been submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive, with project number PRJEB23657. The individual reads of samples 1–100 (Supplementary Table 1) are available under accession numbers ERR2206851–ERR2206950, respectively.


After filtering the data for base-calling quality and amplicon length, 4.86 million sequences were retained for further analysis with a mean of 40,475 (SD: 12,478; minimum: 4007; maximum: 77,165) sequences per sample. After clustering with a similarity cut off of 97% these sequences were assigned to 96,553 OTUs. Alpha and beta-diversity was assessed using an evenness of 8,500 sequence reads per sample (maximizing the sample size whilst retaining the maximum number of samples in the analysis), which excluded a single sample from further analysis. Thus, the microbial diversity in the caeca of 99 birds was compared.

Community Composition of the Caecal Microbiomes and Significant Inter-Farm Variability

According to the sequence data, the caecal microbiome consists mainly of three phyla of bacteria: Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Tenericutes. The proportions of these phyla in the samples varied according to the farm of origin: Bacteroidetes (29.7–63.5%, SD: 14.2, and mean: 44.8), Firmicutes (30.2–59.8%, SD: 12.3, and mean: 45.4) and Tenericutes (2.8–6.8%, SD: 1.3, and mean: 5.1). The inter-farm variability is confirmed by there being a significant difference in the microbial community composition between the four farms (p < 0.001), as determined by the DirtyGenes test (Shaw et al., unpublished). In the samples coming from one of the farms (Farm 4), a significantly lower mean percentage (0.3%, range: 0 to 6.2%) of Proteobacteria was observed (Figure 1), compared with the mean percentage of this phylum in the other farms (0.8–3.0%, range: 0 to 25.4%), p-value < 0.0001.


FIGURE 1. Microbial diversity at phyla level of the samples coming from four different farms showing significant differences in community composition (p < 0.001, DirtyGenes test). The percentage of Proteobacteria from Farm 4 was significantly lower than from the other farms (p < 0.0001, Kruskal–Wallis test).

High Variability of Campylobacter Counts Both Within and Between Farms

All samples analyzed were culture-positive for Campylobacter spp. (Figure 2). There was considerable intra-farm variability between individual birds (2 to 9 log10 CFU g-1), and the inter-farm variability was also significant (p = 0.00016; one-way ANOVA). The samples coming from Farm 3 (samples 26–50) had the highest load of Campylobacter with five samples having more than 9 log10 CFU g-1 and further six having more than 8 log10 CFU g-1, when all other samples had lower loads and only two samples from the other farms had more than 8 log10 CFU g-1. Farm 3 also had the highest average bird weight, comparing all chickens that were slaughtered at roughly the same age (data not available for the chickens of Farm 4). The age of the chickens at the time of slaughter and their mean weights are shown in Table 1.


FIGURE 2. Campylobacter counts (CFU g-1) of individual birds per farm. There is a significant difference in Campylobacter counts between the farms (p = 0.00016, one-way ANOVA), despite considerable intra-farm variability.

High Campylobacter Counts Are Associated With the Presence of Proteobacteria

An association between Campylobacter counts and the composition of the caecal microbiome was also observed in our study. Analysis of the distribution graphs (Figure 3) indicates an increasing proportion of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, and a decreasing proportion of Bacteroidetes with increasing levels of Campylobacter. There is no clear trend for the proportion of Tenericutes, although samples with the highest Campylobacter counts (>9 log10 CFU g-1) had the lowest percentage of Tenericutes (0.62%), whereas the percentage of Proteobacteria is increased (14.56%) (Figure 3). The vast majority of these Proteobacteria (91%) belong to the Enterobacteriaceae family, which suggests that Campylobacter spp. colonization of the caeca could be associated with a change of their microbiota and that high counts of Campylobacter spp. could be linked with a high proportion of Enterobacteriaceae. Furthermore, the number of reads for Epsilonproteobacteria were also higher for chickens highly colonized by Campylobacter (>9 log10 CFU g-1).


FIGURE 3. Microbial diversity at phyla level of the samples according to their Campylobacter (log) counts (2 log CFU g-1 to 9 log CFU g-1).

For Lactobacillaceae the percentages are almost constant (2.46–4.89%) for the samples having Campylobacter counts from 3 to 7 log CFU g-1. There was a small decrease (2.07%) in samples having 8 log CFU g-1 and a considerable decrease (0.22%) for the samples having 9 log CFU g-1 (Figure 4). A statistical test on the differences in microbial communities between birds with the highest Campylobacter loads and the other birds would not give reliable results because the comparison is post hoc. However, the results do suggest that very high Campylobacter loads could be associated with low Lactobacillaceae loads, a hypothesis that could be tested in future studies.


FIGURE 4. Family bar plot of the microbiome of chicken caeca samples divided according to their Campylobacter load (2 log CFU g-1 to 9 log CFU g-1).

Inter-Farm Variation Is Greater Than Intra-Farm Variation

Analysis of community composition of the samples indicated that inter-farm variation was greater than intra-farm variation (Figure 5). Intra-farm variation was more obvious in Farm 3, which was the farm with the highest average weight of the birds of roughly the same age (the birds from Farm 4 were 5 days older at slaughter and their weights not recorded) and with the highest load of Campylobacter. The samples from Farm 4 were found to be quite closely related and their diversity was considerably lower than the other farms. In contrast, the samples from Farm 3 were found to have the highest diversity in their microbiota which potentially could be associated with their high load of Campylobacter and increased weight. Figure 6 depicts the principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of all samples labeled with Campylobacter counts (CFU g-1). Three out of four samples with the highest Campylobacter loads (9 log CFU g-1) cluster tightly together except for one sample that differs slightly. The pattern is similar for the other samples having high Campylobacter counts (8 log CFU g-1), while the samples with lower counts (less than 7 log CFU g-1) tend to be more diverse.


FIGURE 5. The principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plot of all samples divided by farm, based on pairwise weighted uniFrac distances between samples.


FIGURE 6. The PCoA plot of all samples divided by Campylobacter counts (CFU g-1), based on pairwise weighted uniFrac distances between samples.


The microbiome of the ceacal samples consisted mainly of three phyla of bacteria: Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Tenericutes and the proportions of these phyla varied substantially according to the farm of origin. In two recent studies, the microbial compositions of chicken caeca were reported as consisting of Firmicutes (22–81%), Proteobacteria (5–64%), and Bacteroidetes (1–30%) (Sofka et al., 2015) and Firmicutes (58.9%), Bacteroidetes (25.7%), and Proteobacteria (10.7%) (Mancabelli et al., 2016), respectively. The differences observed in these studies and ours may be due to a number of differing factors including environmental (location and diet), host (host genetics and age), and possibly levels of Campylobacter, all of which may influence the microbiota profiles of the birds.

The presence of Campylobacter in all samples in our study precluded a simple comparison between the caecal microbiomes of Campylobacter positive and negative birds. In a recent study (Sofka et al., 2015), it was found that the proportion of these phyla (Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes) in different samples varied substantially according to the presence of Campylobacter, though without statistical significance. A tendency was seen for Campylobacter negative samples to have higher amounts of Firmicutes, whereas a higher proportion of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes was found in Campylobacter positive samples. In our study, the birds from the farm with the highest Campylobacter counts had the highest percentage of Firmicutes and the lowest percentage of Bacteroidetes, which is the opposite of the findings from the previous study. However, the percentages of Proteobacteria were increased in both studies in birds with the highest counts of Campylobacter. Plots of the proportions of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Tenericutes, and Gammaproteobacteria with the Campylobacter cfu counts or the proportion of Epsilonprotebacterial reads showed no correlation with the first three categories, but a clear correlation with the last category (Sofka et al., 2015). Such links for the Enterobacteriaceae were previously reported (Bereswill et al., 2011; Dicksved et al., 2014; Sofka et al., 2015), but it is not clear whether higher levels of Campylobacter create conditions beneficial for Enterobacteriaceae, or vice versa.

A study by Singh et al. (2013) suggested that Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio based on 16S rRNA sequencing could be correlated with the weight of the birds and antibiotic treatment. A further study also suggested that antibiotic treatment altered gut and fecal bacterial species composition in chickens toward an increased abundance of Lactobacillus spp., Clostridiales and Enterobacteriaceae (Gong et al., 2008). These findings were partially confirmed by our study. Farm 3 was the farm with the highest ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes and the chickens taken from that farm were the ones with the highest weight. Unfortunately, no information was provided for the antibiotic use in this farm. However, the percentages of Clostridiales and Enterobacteriaceae gradually increased as the Campylobacter counts of the samples increased: Enterobacteriaceae were highest (13.3%) when the Campylobacter counts reached 9 log10 CFU g-1. For Clostridiales, their peak (53.99%) was in samples having 8 log10 CFU g-1 of Campylobacter counts and they presented a small decrease (38.33%) for the samples having 9 log10 CFU g-1 (data not shown).

For Lactobacillaceae, the percentages were highly consistent for all samples apart from a noteworthy decrease observed in samples having greater than 9 log10 CFU g-1. This is in line with previous studies. For example, a study in mice demonstrated that a diet-induced alteration of the intestinal microbiota, comprising an increase in the abundance of E. coli and a decrease in Lactobacillus was associated with a greater susceptibility to C. jejuni infection (Bereswill et al., 2011). Furthermore, another study reported an association between higher C. jejuni counts and lower abundance of Lactobacillus (Kaakoush et al., 2014). The same research group showed that not only Lactobacillus spp. were lower in abundance but Escherichia was a major contributor in chickens colonized with C. jejuni, since an increase in the abundance of E. coli and a decrease of Lactobacillus spp. were associated with a greater susceptibility to C. jejuni infection.

Recent studies (Hilbert et al., 2010; Haag et al., 2012; Dicksved et al., 2014; Kaakoush et al., 2014) have shown that Campylobacter closely interacts with other microorganisms, the intestinal microbiota is important for Campylobacter colonization in chickens (Kaakoush et al., 2014) and Campylobacter colonization leads to a change in the intestinal microbiota (Haag et al., 2012). According to another recent study (Sofka et al., 2015), the caecal microbiota in Campylobacter-free and Campylobacter colonized chickens differed considerably. The cultural colony counts of lactic acid bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, E. coli and total aerobic counts were found to be significantly higher in Campylobacter negative samples. The absence of Campylobacter-free samples didn’t allow our research to corroborate this. However, as mentioned previously, by taking into account the samples with the high and low Campylobacter loads, we can partially corroborate the finding since Lactobacillaceae were lower in abundance when Campylobacter load was more than 8 log10 CFU g-1 and Enterobacteriaceae reached its highest percentage for the samples having more than 8 log10 CFU g-1 Campylobacter load. Nevertheless, as the high-yield Campylobacter samples (more than 9 log CFU g-1) were all from the same farm, it is possible that there are confounding factors.

The PCoA of the data indicated that there was more between-farm variation in the complete microbial community composition than within-farm variation. The use of weighted uniFrac metrics to determine the distances between samples reveals differences that are due to changes in relative taxon abundance. Given the close proximity of the birds on a farm, the convergence of their caecal microbiomes is not surprising. Differences between farms could be linked to environment, diet or even the age of the birds.

The outcomes of the present study suggest that there is strong evidence that high counts of Campylobacter in broiler caeca are interrelated with the microbial community structure and particularly associated with an increase in the presence of Enterobacteriaceae. However, further studies need be done to establish causality and to investigate whether the presence of Campylobacter favors the growth of Enterobacteriaceae or vice versa. It is possible that a general dysbacteriosis leads to colonization by both Campylobacter and Enterobacteriaceae. Furthermore, it was found that a decrease in Lactobacillus abundance in chicken caeca could be linked to high Campylobacter loads. Therefore, it can be concluded that Campylobacter colonization might be associated with changes in the intestinal microbiota and the strategies to reduce colonization of Campylobacter in chickens could include shaping the chicken microbiota. The study of the chicken microbiota is considered necessary to provide new and effective approaches to fight Campylobacter colonization and improve public health.

Author Contributions

IS was the PI and wrote the manuscript. RE did the sequencing analysis and wrote parts of the manuscript. SC did the microbiological analysis and wrote parts of the manuscript. AV helped with the analysis of the data and wrote parts of the manuscript. DS did the statistical analysis of the data. JP helped with the design of the study and reviewed the manuscript. MC helped with the design of the study, wrote parts of the manuscript, and reviewed it. RLR helped with the design of the study and reviewed the manuscript. AC had the initial idea of this study, helped with the design of the study, and reviewed the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


We thank Laurence Shaw for the helpful discussion regarding statistical testing.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at:


  1. ^
  2. ^
  3. ^
  4. ^


Bereswill, S., Plickert, R., Fischer, A., Kuhl, A. A., Loddenkemper, C., Batra, A., et al. (2011). What you eat is what you get: novel Campylobacter models in the quadrangle relationship between nutrition, obesity, microbiota and susceptibility to infection. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 1, 237–248. doi: 10.1556/EuJMI.1.2011.3.8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., et al. (2010). QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Collett, S. R. (2012). Nutrition and wet litter problems in poultry. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 173, 65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Conlan, A. J., Coward, C., Grant, A. J., Maskell, D. J., and Gog, J. R. (2007). Campylobacter jejuni colonization and transmission in broiler chickens: a modelling perspective. J. R. Soc. Interface 4, 819–829. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2007.1015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dicksved, J., Ellstrom, P., Engstrand, L., and Rautelin, H. (2014). Susceptibility to Campylobacter infection is associated with the species composition of the human fecal microbiota. mBio 5:e01212-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01212-14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

EFSA (2010). Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Campylobacter in broiler batches and of Campylobacter and Salmonella on broiler carcasses in the EU, 2008. EFSA J. 8:1503.

Google Scholar

EFSA (2011). Scientific opinion on Campylobacter in broiler meat production: control options and performance objectives and/or targets at different stages of the food chain. EFSA J. 9:2105. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ellis, R. J., Bruce, K. D., Jenkins, C., Stothard, J. R., Ajarova, L., Mugisha, L., et al. (2013). Comparison of the distal gut microbiota from people and animals in Africa. PLoS One 8:e54783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054783

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fonseca, B. B., Fernandez, H., and Rossi, D. A. (2016). Campylobacter spp. and Related Organisms in Poultry: Pathogen-Host Interactions, Diagnosis and Epidemiology. Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-29907-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

FSA (2016). A UK Wide Microbiological Survey of Campylobacter contamination in Fresh Whole Chilled Chickens at Retail Sale. Available at: [accessed March 14, 2018].

Gong, J., Yu, H., Liu, T., Gill, J. J., Chambers, J. R., Wheatcroft, R., et al. (2008). Effects of zinc bacitracin, bird age and access to range on bacterial microbiota in the ileum and caeca of broiler chickens. J. Appl. Microbiol. 104, 1372–1382. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03699.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haag, L. M., Fischer, A., Otto, B., Plickert, R., Kuhl, A. A., Gobel, U. B., et al. (2012). Intestinal microbiota shifts towards elevated commensal Escherichia coli loads abrogate colonization resistance against Campylobacter jejuni in mice. PLoS One 7:e35988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035988

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hermans, D., Van Deun, K., Martel, A., Van Immerseel, F., Messens, W., Heydrickx, M., et al. (2011). Colonization factors of Campylobacter jejuni in the chicken gut. Vet. Res. 42:82. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-42-82

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hilbert, F., Scherwitzel, M., Paulsen, P., and Szostak, M. P. (2010). Survival of Campylobacter jejuni under conditions of atmospheric oxygen tension with the support of Pseudomonas spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 5911–5917. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01532-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hughes, R. A. C. (2005). Guillain-Barre syndrome. Lancet 366, 1653–1666. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67665-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jorgensen, F., Charlett, A., Arnold, E., Swift, C., Madden, B., and Elviss, N. C. (2017). A Microbiological Survey of Campylobacter Contamination in Fresh Whole UK-Produced Chilled Chickens At Retail Sale. Available at:

Kaakoush, N. O., Sodhi, N., Chenu, J. W., Cox, J. M., Riordan, S. M., and Mitchell, H. M. (2014). The interplay between Campylobacter and Helicobacter species and other gastrointestinal microbiota of commercial broiler chickens. Gut Pathog. 6:18. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-6-18

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lozupone, C., Hamady, M., and Knight, R. (2006). UniFrac - An online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context. BMC Bioinformatics 7:371. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-371

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mancabelli, L., Ferrario, C., Milani, C., Mangifesta, M., Turroni, F., Duranti, S., et al. (2016). Insights into the biodiversity of the gut microbiota of broiler chickens. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 4727–4738. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13363

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nichols, G. L., Richardson, J. F., Sheppard, S. K., Lane, C., and Sarran, C. (2012). Campylobacter epidemiology: a descriptive study reviewing 1 million cases in England and Wales between 1989 and 2011. BMJ Open 2:e001179. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001179

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qu, A., Brulc, J. M., Wilson, M. K., Law, B. F., Theoret, J. R., Joens, L. A., et al. (2008). Comparative metagenomics reveals host specific metavirulomes and horizontal gene transfer elements in the chicken cecum microbiome. PLoS One 3:e2945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002945

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Robinson, C. J., Bohannan, B. J., and Young, V. B. (2010). From structure to function: the ecology of host-associated microbial communities. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 74, 453–476. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00014-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, P., Karimi, A., Devendra, K., Waldroup, P. W., Cho, K. K., and Kwon, Y. M. (2013). Influence of penicillin on microbial diversity of the cecal microbiota in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 92, 272–276. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02603

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sofka, D., Pfeifer, A., Gleiss, B., Paulsen, P., and Hilbert, F. (2015). Changes within the intestinal flora of broilers by colonisation with Campylobacter jejuni. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 128, 104–110.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Tam, C. C., Higgins, C. D., Neal, K. R., Rodrigues, L. C., Millership, S. E., O’Brien, S. J., et al. (2009). Chicken consumption and use of acid-suppressing medications as risk factors for Campylobacter enteritis, England. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15, 1402–1408. doi: 10.3201/eid1509.080773

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tam, C. C., Rodrigues, L. C., Viviani, L., Dodds, J. P., Evans, M. R., Hunter, P. R., et al. (2012). Longitudinal study of infectious intestinal disease in the UK (IID2 study): incidence in the community and presenting to general practice. Gut 61, 69–77. doi: 10.1136/gut.2011.238386

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thibodeau, A., Fravalo, P., Yergeau, E., Arsenault, J., Lahaye, L., and Letellier, A. (2015). Chicken caecal microbiome modifications induced by Campylobacter jejuni colonization and by a non-antibiotic feed additive. PLoS One 10:e0131978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131978

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Torok, V. A., Hughes, R. J., Ophel-Keller, K., Ali, M., and Macalpine, R. (2009). Influence of different litter materials on cecal microbiota colonization in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 88, 2474–2481. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00381

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wassenaar, T. M., Van Der Zeijst, B. A., Ayling, R., and Newell, D. G. (1993). Colonization of chicks by motility mutants of Campylobacter jejuni demonstrates the importance of flagellin A expression. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139(Pt 6), 1171–1175. doi: 10.1099/00221287-139-6-1171

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: caecal microbiomes, broilers, Campylobacter infections, sequencing, microbial community

Citation: Sakaridis I, Ellis RJ, Cawthraw SA, van Vliet AHM, Stekel DJ, Penell J, Chambers M, La Ragione RM and Cook AJ (2018) Investigating the Association Between the Caecal Microbiomes of Broilers and Campylobacter Burden. Front. Microbiol. 9:927. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00927

Received: 15 February 2018; Accepted: 20 April 2018;
Published: 22 May 2018.

Edited by:

Adolfo J. Martinez-Rodriguez, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL), Spain

Reviewed by:

Odile Tresse, INRA Centre Angers-Nantes Pays de la Loire, France
Alexandre Thibodeau, Université de Montréal, Canada

Copyright © 2018 Sakaridis, Ellis, Cawthraw, van Vliet, Stekel, Penell, Chambers, La Ragione and Cook. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ioannis Sakaridis, Alasdair J. Cook,