Impact Factor 4.259 | CiteScore 4.30
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Microbiol., 23 July 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01656

Aspergillus Species and Antifungals Susceptibility in Clinical Setting in the North of Portugal: Cryptic Species and Emerging Azoles Resistance in A. fumigatus

  • 1Laboratory of Microbiology, Biological Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmacy of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • 2Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR/CIMAR), University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal
  • 3LAQV-REQUIMTE, Laboratory of Bromatology and Hydrology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • 4Microbiology Laboratory, Pathology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • 5Microbiology Service, Laboratorial Diagnostic Department, Instituto Português Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, EPE (IPOFG-Porto), Porto, Portugal
  • 6Laboratory of Microbiology, Service of Clinical Pathology, Centro Hospitalar S. João EPE, Porto, Portugal

Aspergillus spp. are agents of a broad-spectrum of diseases among humans. Their growing resistance to azoles, the cornerstone in the management of human aspergillosis, is a worrisome problem around the world. Considering lack of data from Portugal on this topic, particularly from the northern region, a retrospective surveillance study was planned to assess frequency of cryptic Aspergillus species and azoles resistance. A total of 227 clinical isolates, mainly from the respiratory tract (92.1%), collected from three hospitals serving a population of about three million people, were studied for their epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility patterns determined by the E.DEF.9.3 protocol of EUCAST. Employing molecular methods, seven Aspergillus complexes were identified; Aspergillus fumigatus sensu stricto was the most frequent isolate (86.7%). A 7.5% prevalence of cryptic species was found; A. welwitschiae (A. niger complex-3.1%) and A. lentulus (A. fumigatus complex-2.2%) were the most frequent. Amongst cryptic species, it was found a percentage of resistance to voriconazole, posaconazole and isavuconazole of 47.1, 82.4, and 100%, respectively. Five A. fumigatus sensu stricto showed pan-azole resistance. Sequencing their cyp51A gene revealed the presence of one isolate with TR46/Y121F/T289A mutation and two isolates with TR34/L98H mutation. This study emphasizes the need to identify strains to the species level and to evaluate their antifungal susceptibility in all human originated Aspergillus spp. isolates, particularly those from invasive aspergillosis.

Introduction

Aspergillus fumigatus is the leading cause of human aspergillosis, a mold infection that affects immunocompetent and particularly immunocompromised patients. It manifests as a broad-spectrum of diseases including aspergilloma, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA), and invasive aspergillosis (IA), the most critical clinical picture.

In the last two decades, other non-A. fumigatus namely A. flavus, A. terreus, and A. niger and cryptic species have been isolated with increased frequency as causative agents (Lass-Flörl et al., 2005; Krishnan et al., 2009; Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2012; Steinbach et al., 2012). Such change in epidemiology has been attributed to the increase in number of the immunocompromised populations, advances in detection, identification of fungal pathogens and the selective pressure caused by the extensive use of broad-spectrum antifungal agents (Richardson and Lass-Flörl, 2008; Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2012).

The high diversity of the involved species, their antifungal susceptibility patterns and the severity of the pathology require fast and reliable methods for identification. In the genomic era, molecular techniques became indispensable tools to complement macroscopic and microscopic exam. Methods that use the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), the β-tubulin and the calmodulin regions, are of utmost importance to discern between cryptic species, considered as members of the same complex and, therefore, exhibiting almost indistinguishable morphological properties (Peterson, 2012). Moreover, accurate identification at the species level is crucial, as the emergence of cryptic species is associated with specific patterns of antifungal susceptibility that influence patient management strategies and treatment outcomes (Balajee et al., 2007; Richardson and Lass-Flörl, 2008).

The cornerstone in the management of human aspergillosis is azole treatment. Voriconazole (VCZ) is recommended as the primary agent for IA or CPA, and alternative therapies are isavuconazole (ICZ), liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) and anidulafungin (ANI); posaconazole (PCZ) and VCZ are also recommended for prophylaxis. For treatment of ABPA, itraconazole (ITZ) is the first choice and VCZ and PCZ are the second ones (Patterson et al., 2016). Also recently, (Ullmann et al., 2018) published an extensive and detailed article regarding diagnosis and management of aspergillosis, summarizing recommendations of ESCMID, ECMM and ERS. However, since the 90's, reports of azole resistance in Aspergillus spp., particularly A. fumigatus-complex, became more frequent and now extends to the six continents (Mosquera and Denning, 2002; Howard et al., 2009; Van der Linden et al., 2015; Meis et al., 2016). Several resistance mechanisms have been reported in A. fumigatus strains, being mutations in the cyp51A gene one of them (Vermeulen et al., 2012). The presence of TR34/L98H mutation has been documented since 2007, and more recently, the emerging TR46/Y121F/T289A mutant has been founded in some countries (Verweij et al., 2007; Vermeulen et al., 2012; Meis et al., 2016). Two possible ways for resistance acquisition to azoles are recognized: “in vivo,” as consequence of azole treatment for long periods and associated to a single mutation; “de novo,” that seems to occur due to the widespread use of demethylation inhibitors in agriculture and frequently associated to a combination of a tendem repeat (TR) in the promoter region of cyp51A and amino acid mutation(s) (Hagiwara et al., 2016; Meis et al., 2016; Garcia-Rubio et al., 2017). Thus, antifungal susceptibility testing of clinical Aspergillus isolates is an important source of information in order to avoid therapeutic failures.

In the clinical setting, an important issue is the presence of cryptic species and the emergence of drug resistant Aspergillus strains. Thus, the purpose of the present retrospective epidemiological work was to analyse the distribution and characterize the species of Aspergillus collected from clinical setting in order to evaluate the presence of cryptic species, their susceptibility patterns to antifungal drugs, and the emergence of resistant strains, which are still unknown in Portugal, particularly in the northern region. In addition, we investigated the underlying resistance molecular mechanisms of A. fumigatus strains.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection

A total of 227 Aspergillus clinical strains isolated between January 2010 and March 2016, from biological samples belonging to 207 patients with proven or probable infections or colonization, were studied. They were admitted to the Centro Hospitalar do Porto (HSP1) and Centro Hospitalar São João (HSP2), two tertiary teaching hospitals, and Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto (HSP3), a hemato-oncological hospital; all of them located within 10 km of distance from each other and serve a population of three million people in north of Portugal.

Strains Identification: Morphological and Molecular Methods

The strains, preserved in 20% Sabouraud broth-glycerol at −80°C, were grown on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) for 3–4 days at 35°C in aerobic conditions. Morphological identification was performed using standard microbiological methods (De Hoog et al., 2001). The macroscopic features and the microscopic morphology were considered. For molecular identification at species level, the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology-sponsored Aspergillus Working Group recommendations were followed: amplification of a portion of the β-tubulin gene using primers Bt2a (5′-GGTAACCAAATCGGTGCTGCTTTC-3′) and Bt2b (5′-ACCCTCAGTGTAGTGACCCTTGGC-3′) (Glass and Donaldson, 1995). For some isolates, amplification of a portion of calmodulin gene was performed additionally, using CL1 (5′-GA(GA)T(AT)CAAGGAGGCCTTCTC-3′) and CL2A (5′-TTTTTGCATCATGAGTTGGAC-3′) primers (O'Donnell et al., 2000; Balajee et al., 2007). PCR reactions were performed using a direct DNA amplification kit, KAPA3G Plant PCR Kit® (KAPABIOSYSTEMS, Boston, USA). Briefly, one loop of each fungal isolate was collected from 3 to 5 day's cultures in SDA and suspended in 100 μL of ultrapure water. PCR was carried out in a 25 μL volume containing 2xKAPA3G Plant PCR Buffer (containing MgCl2 and dNTPs); an additional 0.5 mM MgCl2; 0.3 μM of each primer, and 0.5 Units of Taq DNA polymerase (KAPA3G Plant DNA Polymerase). Amplifications were running on a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, T100TM Thermal Cycler, California, USA) comprising an initial denaturation step at 95°C/15 min followed by 40 cycles of amplification (denaturation at 95°C/20 s, annealing at 58°C/15 s and extension at 72°C/min) and a final extension step at 72°C/1 min. A non-template negative control was included in each amplification reaction. Positive PCR products were purified using the GRS PCR & Gel Band Purification Kit (Grisp, Porto, Portugal), according to the manufacturer's instructions, and sent to sequencing in both directions with the primers used for amplification. Sequences obtained were manually verified by MEGA7 software package and aligned using the CLUSTALW algorithm. Afterwards, sequences were compared with GenBank and CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre databases. Identifications were based on database rankings and only similarity values ≥99% were considered. The nucleotide sequence representative of each identified species was deposited in the GenBank database (accession numbers from KY696642-47 and KY696649-52).

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

The 227 isolates were tested for in vitro antifungal susceptibility using the broth microdilution method as recommended by the protocol E.DEF9.3 of European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (EUCAST-E.DEF 9.3)1. The reference powders of amphotericin B (AMB, Sigma-Aldrich), L-AMB (Gilead), ANI (Pfizer), caspofungin (CAS, Merck), ITZ (Sigma-Aldrich), VCZ (Pfizer), PCZ (Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich), and ICZ (Basilea Pharmaceutica) were tested with a final concentration of 0.032-16 mg/L. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for AMB, L-AMB, and azoles, and minimal effective concentrations (MECs) for ANI and CAS were assessed. Quality control was assured using the strains recommended by EUCAST: Candida krusei ATCC6258 and A. fumigatus ATCC204305.

Considering the clinical breakpoints (CBPs) and epidemiological cut-offs (ECOFFs), available on EUCAST website (2017), was assessed the presence of resistant (R) and non-wild type (NWT) strains, respectively. For all Aspergillus species without CBPs or ECOFFs, were adopted the values established for A. fumigatus.

PCR Amplification and Sequencing of A. fumigatus Sensu stricto cyp51A Gene

For pan-azoles resistant A. fumigatus isolates (HSP3-115, HSP3-32, HSP2-18, HSP3-111, HSP1-6) and for three A. fumigatus isolate resistant to ITZ and PCZ (HSP2-67; HSP3-13; HSP3-22) the molecular identification of resistance mechanism was performed in the cyp51A gene. Moreover, one randomly A. fumigatus isolate without resistance to azoles (HSP2-12) was also analyzed. All isolates were previous identified as A. fumigatus by sequencing of part of the β-tubulin gene. The sequencing of cyp51A gene and its promotor were obtained, after DNA isolation, using a set of primers, PA-7/PA-5 and P450-A1/P450-A2 (Mellado et al., 2001; Diaz-Guerra et al., 2003). The PCR conditions were performed on the thermal cycler, comprising an initial denaturation step at 95°C/15 min followed by 35 cycles of amplification (denaturation at 95°C/30 s, annealing at 60°C/45 s and extension at 72°C/1 min, for PA-7/PA-5; denaturation at 95°C/30 s, annealing at 58°C/45 s and extension at 72°C/5 min, for P450-A1/P450-A2) and a final extension step at 72°C/1 min. A non-template negative control was included in each amplification reaction. Positive PCR products were purified using the purification kit previously described. The sequencing was done with a set of primers PA-7/PA-5, P450-A2, cyp51AR3, cyp51AR2 (Mellado et al., 2001; Diaz-Guerra et al., 2003; Prigitano et al., 2014) and a home-designed primer, 5'-GCAGTATGGCGATATCTTCACTT-3'. Sequences obtained were compared with the sequence under accession number AF338659 in GenBank, as wild type reference, in order to find out the mutations. The nucleotide sequence of each A. fumigatus isolate studied was deposited in the GenBank database (accession numbers from MH231594-MH231601 and MH040305).

Results

227 clinical isolates of Aspergillus were collected from 207 patients, who included 114 males and 93 females averaging 57.9 years-old (6 months-95 years). The characteristics of each isolate, such as gender, age at the time of sample, diagnostic, collection date, sample source and the molecular identification are presented as Supplementary Material (Table S1). Considering the diagnosis, the most prevalent underlying condition were hemato-oncological (23.2%), oncological (17.4%), lung disease (15.9%), and organs solid transplant (7.2%); most samples (92.1%) were isolated from the respiratory tract (Table S1).

Using morphological methods, six Aspergillus complexes were identified, whereas the molecular characterization revealed seven complexes. One isolate was morphologically identified only to the genus level, but molecular methods identified it as A. sydowii. Moreover, one misidentification at species complex level was found: morphologically characterized as A. fumigatus whilst molecular methods identified as A. nidulans.

A. fumigatus complex was found to be the most prevalent (86.7%), which is consistent with previous reports (Balajee et al., 2009; Lortholary et al., 2011; Steinbach et al., 2012). Also in agreement with published data (Krishnan et al., 2009; Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2012), we observed that the second most prevalent complex was A. flavus (6.2%) followed by A. niger (3.5%) and A. terreus complexes (1.8%).

With the use of β-tubulin sequencing, recognized as a suitable molecular taxonomic target, we were able to identify fungal species within a complex (Balajee et al., 2007; Peterson, 2012). 7.5% of isolates were identified as cryptic species: A. lentulus, A. thermomutatus, A. felis, A. welwitschiae, A. pseudodeflectus, and A. sydowii. Among them, A. welwitschiae (A. niger complex-3.1%) and A. lentulus (A. fumigatus complex-2.2%) were the most frequent. Less frequently A. thermomutatus and A. felis (A. fumigatus complex-0.4% each one); A. sydowii (A. versicolor complex-0.4%); A. pseudodeflectus (A. ustus complex-0.9%) were isolated.

MIC values for AMB, L-AMB and the four azoles (ITZ, VCZ, PCZ, and ICZ), and MEC values for ANI and CAS were determined for all isolates. Their range, geometric mean and MICs/MECs distributions are displayed in Table 1. In Table 2 are shown the number and percentage of resistant and NWT Aspergillus spp. vs. antifungal drugs, classified using the recently proposed interpretive CBPs and ECOFFs. For ANI and CAS there are not CBPs or ECOFFs established.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. MICs/MECs (mg/L) range, geometric mean (GM) and values distribution of the eight antifungals, according EUCAST protocol.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Number and percentage of resistant and non-wild type isolates of Aspergillus spp. to amphotericin B and four azoles.

Eight azole-resistant A. fumigatus sensu stricto isolates were studied. Mutations in the cyp51A gene were found in six; the TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A mutations, related with resistance to several azoles, were found in three isolates, showing a pan-azole resistance profile. Moreover, other mutations, F46Y/M172V/N248T/D255E/E427K, were found in other three azole-resistant A. fumigatus strains and no mutations were observed in two of the isolates (Table 3).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Cyp51A mutations and azoles MICs by EUCAST to A. fumigatus isolates.

Discussion

Among filamentous fungi, Aspergillus spp. are described as the most important agents of severe opportunistic infections and the genus Aspergillus encompasses different clinically relevant complexes: A. fumigatus complex, A. flavus complex, A. terreus complex, A. ustus complex and A. nidulans complex. In the present work, 227 clinical Aspergillus isolates were identified to verify their species distribution and estimate the prevalence of cryptic species in clinical setting.

Like in previous reports, in the present study A. fumigatus complex was the most frequently isolated. However, regional differences in the prevalence of these species have been reported: A. flavus was described as the second most common Aspergillus in medical centers of United States (Balajee et al., 2009), Europe (Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2013), Brazil (Negri et al., 2014), and regions with dry weather and/or arid conditions, as the Middle East (Krishnan et al., 2009); A. terreus was reported as the second most prevalent in Austria (Lackner et al., 2016); A. niger was second in Korea (Heo et al., 2015).

Apart from the identification of the species, these results raise the issue of the cryptic species prevalence in the clinical setting. Although precisely unknown, several reports indicate a frequency of 10–19%, which is slightly higher than the 7.5% of the present research and might be related to the origin of clinical samples, geographical differences or the underlying diseases (Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2013; Negri et al., 2014; Sabino et al., 2015).

In clinical settings, an important issue is the susceptibility patterns to antifungal drugs. This applies mainly to cryptic species, frequently reported as resistant, notably to azoles, which emphasize the relevance of their identification and susceptibility testing (Balajee et al., 2007; Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2013; Negri et al., 2014; Heo et al., 2015; Lamoth, 2016). However, also important the susceptibility testing for A. fumigatus sensu stricto, the most frequently isolated, considering the emergence of resistant strains.

For amphotericin, A. lenlutus, A. terreus, A. felis and 5 of 14 A. flavus/A. oryzae isolates showed high MIC values, and were categorized as resistant according to the CBPs. Considering the present and previous reported intrinsic resistance or variable susceptibility of these species (Van Der Linden et al., 2011) the therapy with AMB may not be a wise treatment option. AMB and L-AMB showed MIC values ≤ 2 mg/L for all the A. fumigatus sensu stricto isolates (190), suggesting overtime stability of AMB susceptibility on this species. The continuous surveillance of Aspergillus spp. susceptibility to AMB may properly address this issue.

Regarding ANI and CAS only 1.3 and 3.1% of the isolates showed MEC values higher than 0.5 mg/L, respectively. Although CBPs are not available, the MECs were in general lower for ANI than for CAS and particularly for ANI vs. A. fumigatus and their cryptic species, with none value higher than 0.5 mg/L. These observations corroborate ANI utilization on A. fumigatus infections, in associations with azoles and/or amphotericin, as recommended by Infectious Diseases Society of America (Patterson et al., 2016).

In general, the azoles' MICs for A. fumigatus sensu stricto obtained in this study were higher than previously reported (Perkhofer et al., 2009; Pfaller et al., 2011; Alastruey-Izquierdo et al., 2013; Astvad et al., 2017). However, most of the isolates were susceptible: 95.8% to ITZ, 97.4% to VCZ and 84.7% to PCZ. Although PCZ showed crude lower MICs, these were higher in isolates from the hemato-oncological hospital (21 of the 29 isolates resistant to PCZ, 72.4%), where it is regularly used as prophylactic treatment. Surprisingly, ICZ, a recently introduced antifungal drug, revealed high MIC values. Most of the isolates (59.4%) showed a MIC of 2 mg/L, being categorized as resistant, and 17.9% showed MICs >2 mg/L and were classified as NWT. Etest (data not showed) confirmed these high MIC values and similar results were reported by Arendrup et al. (2017). However, recently, Astvad et al. presented a prevalence of 13.7% of NWT strains to ICZ on a selection of 211 A. fumigatus isolates from years 2012-2014 (Astvad et al., 2017). Our prevalence of 17.9%, although higher, may reflect a longer period of evaluation (2010 to March 2016) in a distinct geography. Meanwhile, a recent study indicated that when A. fumigatus isolates have MIC = 2 mg/L the treatment of infected patients may still be successful with high doses ICZ (Buil et al., 2018).

Regarding the cryptic species A. lentulus, A. felis, A. thermomutatus, A. pseudodeflectus and A. sydowii, almost all showed a resistance phenotype to all azoles tested (47.1% to VCZ, 82.4% to PCZ, and 100% to ICZ), which agrees with the literature (Balajee et al., 2007; Richardson and Lass-Flörl, 2008). Exceptions were one isolate of A. lentulus categorized as intermediate to VCZ, A. felis susceptible to PCZ and A. sydowii susceptible to VCZ.

The emergence of A. fumigatus with azole-resistant phenotypes has been reported worldwide, resistance being frequently associated with cyp51A gene mutations (Verweij et al., 2007; Vermeulen et al., 2012; Meis et al., 2016). Considering mutations' acquisition origin, two routes were established in the last years; environmental, due to the use of azole drugs in agricultural practice; and patient-acquired, due to long periods of azole treatment (Meis et al., 2016; Garcia-Rubio et al., 2017).

Mutations in the cyp51A gene were found in six of the eight azole-resistant A. fumigatus sensu stricto isolates. The TR46/Y121F/T289A mutant isolate showed very high MIC values to all tested azoles (Monteiro et al., 2018), while the two TR34/L98H mutant isolates showed high MICs to ITZ than other azoles. Other azole-resistant A. fumigatus strains evidenced mutations (F46Y/M172V/N248T/D255E/E427K) are likely unrelated to azole resistance and were also reported in susceptible isolates (Howard and Arendrup, 2011). In two other azole-resistant isolates, no cyp51A gene mutations were found, suggesting that other mechanisms may be responsible. The source of mutations for these azole-resistant isolates was not established, but according to Meis (Meis et al., 2016) it is probably associated with the environmental route. In Portugal, strains of mutant resistant A. fumigatus have never been reported in the environment. However, an increasing prevalence of isolates with high MICs to azoles has suggested a selection of cryptic species with a resistance phenotype after use of antifungal pesticides, such as penconazole (Lago et al., 2014).

Regardless the possible limitations of this study, such as, the relatively low number of studied isolates when compared with reference laboratories (Astvad et al., 2017; Buil et al., 2018), or the lack of clinical details for all patients as prior azoles exposure, immunosuppression status or outcome, the results obtained may contribute to a better understanding of the presence and distribution of cryptic species of Aspergillus, their susceptibility patterns to antifungal drugs, the emergence of resistance to antifungals and the spread of mutations associated with azoles resistance.

Conclusions

The data expressed from this study highlight the presence of Aspergillus cryptic species in clinical settings, as well as their resistance to antifungals.

Azole–resistant A. fumigatus is a global issue. The emergence and spread of resistance mechanisms, associated with treatment failure in patients with IA, reinforce the need for antifungal susceptibility surveillance as well as to seek out mutations in resistance-linked genes. Moreover, it is important to understand the route of resistance selection in order to implement effective prevention and control measures.

Most Aspergillus infections, either with cryptic or resistant strains, affect immunocompromised patients, who are at higher risk for IA. Such important clinical implications emphasize the need to identify the strains to the species level and to perform antifungal susceptibility tests in all Aspergillus spp. isolates clinically relevant.

Author Contributions

EP and DP conceived and designed the experiments. EP, DP, and CM wrote the paper. CM, MM, and EP performed antifungal susceptibly tests. CM, MM, and MF performed the molecular identification at species level and sequencing cyp51A gene. DP, CL, and VL collected biological samples and clinical data, isolated and identified the strains by morphological methods. All the authors revised the manuscript and contributed for the final version.

Funding

This work was supported by Grant IN-PT-131-1755 from Gilead Sciences.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Tiago Guimarães; Helena Ramos; Maria Augusta Guimarães. MF is grateful to the projects NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000011- and UID/QUI/50006/2013-POCI/01/0145/FEDER/007265 with support from FCT/MEC through national funds and co-financed by FEDER, under the Partnership Agreement PT2020. This research was partially supported through national funds provided by FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) and ERDF through the COMPETE–POFC programme, under the Strategic Funding UID/Multi/04423/2013, in the framework of the programme PT2020.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01656/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

1. ^EUCAST DEFINITIVE DOCUMENT E.DEF 9.3. Method for the determination of broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal agents for conidia forming molds. December 2015.

References

Alastruey-Izquierdo, A., Mellado, E., and Cuenca-Estrella, M. (2012). Current section and species complex concepts in Aspergillus: recommendations for routine daily practice. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1273, 18–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06822.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alastruey-Izquierdo, A., Mellado, E., Peláez, T., Pemán, J., Zapico, S., Alvarez, M., et al. (2013). Population-based survey of filamentous fungi and antifungal resistance in Spain (FILPOP Study). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 3380–3387. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01287-13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arendrup, M. C., Verweij, P., and Nielsen, H. V. (2017). Evaluation of MIC strip isavuconazole test for susceptibility testing of wild-type and non-wild-type Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, e01659–16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01659-16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Astvad, K. M. T., Hare, R. K., and Arendrup, M. C. (2017). Evaluation of the in vitro activity of isavuconazole and comparator voriconazole against 2635 contemporary clinical Candida and Aspergillus isolates. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 23, 882–887. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.03.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Balajee, S. A., Houbraken, J., Verweij, P. E., Hong, S. B., Yaghuchi, T., Varga, J., et al. (2007). Aspergillus species identification in the clinical setting. Stud. Mycol. 59, 39–46. doi: 10.3114/sim.2007.59.05

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Balajee, S. A., Kano, R., Baddley, J. W., Moser, S. A., Marr, K. A., Alexander, B. D., et al. (2009). Molecular identification of Aspergillus species collected for the transplant-associated infection surveillance network. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47, 3138–3141. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01070-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buil, J. B., Brüggemann, R. J. M., Wasmann, R. E., Zoll, J., Meis, J. F., Melchers, W. J. G., et al. (2018). Isavuconazole susceptibility of clinical Aspergillus fumigatus isolates and feasibility of isavuconazole dose escalation to treat isolates with elevated MICs. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 73, 134–142. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx354

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Hoog, G. S., Guarro, J., Gene, J., and Figueras, M. J. (2001). Atlas of Clinical Fungi, 2nd Edn. Washington, DC: ASM Press.

Diaz-Guerra, T. M., Mellado, E., Cuenca-Estrella, M., and Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L. (2003). A point mutation in the 14α-sterol demethylase gene cyp51A contributes to itraconazole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47, 1120–1124. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.3.1120-1124.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Garcia-Rubio, R., Cuenca-Estrella, M., and Mellado, E. (2017). Triazole resistance in Aspergillus species: an emerging problem. Drugs 77, 599–613. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0714-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glass, N. L., and Donaldson, G. C. (1995). Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 1323–1330.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Hagiwara, D., Watanabe, A., Kamei, K., and Goldman, G. H. (2016). Epidemiological and genomic landscape of azole resistance mechanisms in Aspergillus fungi. Front. Microbiol. 7:1382. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heo, M. S., Shin, J. H., Choi, M. J., Park, Y. J., Lee, H. S., Koo, S. H., et al. (2015). Molecular identification and amphotericin B susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Aspergillus from 11 hospitals in Korea. Ann. Lab. Med. 35, 602–610. doi: 10.3343/alm.2015.35.6.602

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Howard, S. J., and Arendrup, M. C. (2011). Acquired antifungal drug resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: epidemiology and detection. Med. Mycol. 49, S90–S95. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2010.508469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Howard, S. J., Cerar, D., Anderson, M. J., Albarrag, A., Fisher, M. C., Pasqualotto, A. C., et al. (2009). Frequency and evolution of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus associated with treatment failure. Emerging Infect. Dis. 15, 1068–1076. doi: 10.3201/eid1507.090043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Krishnan, S., Manavathu, E. K., and Chandrasekar, P. H. (2009). Aspergillus flavus: an emerging non-fumigatus Aspergillus species of significance. Mycoses 52, 206–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01642.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lackner, M., Coassin, S., Haun, M., Binder, U., Kronenberg, F., Haas, H., et al. (2016). Geographically predominant genotypes of Aspergillus terreus species complex in Austria: a microsatellite typing study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 22, 270–276. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.10.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lago, M., Aguiar, A., Natário, A., Fernandes, C., Faria, M., and Pinto, E. (2014). Does fungicide application in vineyards induce resistance to medical azoles in Aspergillus species? Environ. Monit. Assess. 186, 5581–5593. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-3804-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lamoth, F. (2016). Aspergillus fumigatus-related species in clinical practice. Front. Microbiol. 7:683. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00683

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lass-Flörl, C., Griff, K., Mayr, A., Petzer, A., Gastl, G., Bonatti, H., et al. (2005). Epidemiology and outcome of infections due to Aspergillus terreus: 10-year single centre experience. Br. J. Haematol. 131, 201–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05763.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lortholary, O., Gangneux, J. P., Sitbon, K., Lebeau, B., de Monbrison, F., Le Strat, Y., et al. (2011). Epidemiological trends in invasive aspergillosis in France: the SAIF network (2005-2007). Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 17, 1882–1889. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03548.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meis, J. F., Chowdhary, A., Rhodes, J. L., Fisher, M. C., and Verweij, P. E. (2016). Clinical implications of globally emerging azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 371:1709. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0460

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mellado, E., Diaz-Guerra, T. M., Cuenca-Estrella, M., and Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L. (2001). Identification of two different 14-α sterol demethylase-related genes (cyp51A and cyp51B) in Aspergillus fumigatus and other Aspergillus species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39, 2431–2438. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2431-2438.2001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Monteiro, C., Faria, A. M., Pinheiro, D., Lameiras, C., and Pinto, E. (2018). First description of clinical Aspergillus fumigatus cyp51A TR46/Y121F/T289A mutant in Portugal. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 13, 190–191. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.04.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mosquera, J., and Denning, D. W. (2002). Azole cross-resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46, 556–557. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.2.556-557.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Negri, C. E., Gonçalves, S. S., Xafranski, H., Bergamasco, M. D., Aquino, V. R., Castro, P. T., et al. (2014). Cryptic and rare Aspergillus species in Brazil: prevalence in clinical samples and in vitro susceptibility to triazoles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 52, 3633–3640. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01582-14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

O'Donnell, K. L., Nirenberg, H. I., Aoki, T., and Cigelnik, E. (2000). A multigene phylogeny of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex: detection of additional phylogenetically distinct species. Mycoscience 41, 61–78. doi: 10.1007/BF02464387

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patterson, T. F., Thompson, G. R., Denning, D. W., Fishman, J. A., Hadley, S., Herbrecht, R., et al. (2016). Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 63, e1–e60. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw326

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Perkhofer, S., Lechner, V., and Lass-Flörl, C. (2009). In vitro activity of Isavuconazole against Aspergillus species and zygomycetes according to the methodology of the European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53, 1645–1647. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01530-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peterson, S. W. (2012). Aspergillus and Penicillium identification using DNA sequences: barcode or MLST? Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 95, 339–344. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4165-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pfaller, M., Boyken, L., Hollis, R., Kroeger, J., Messer, S., Tendolkar, S., et al. (2011). Comparison of the broth microdilution methods of the European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing and the clinical and laboratory standards institute for testing itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole against Aspergillus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49, 1110–1112. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02432-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prigitano, A., Venier, V., Cogliati, M., De Lorenzis, G., Esposto, M. C., and Tortorano, A. M. (2014). Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in the environment of northern Italy, May 2011 to June 2012. Euro Surveill. 19:20747. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.12.20747

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Richardson, M., and Lass-Flörl, C. (2008). Changing epidemiology of systemic fungal infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 14, 5–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.01978.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sabino, R., Ferreira, J. A., Moss, R. B., Valente, J., Veríssimo, C., Carolino, E., et al. (2015). Molecular epidemiology of Aspergillus collected from cystic fibrosis patients. J. Cyst. Fibros. 14, 474–481. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2014.10.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Steinbach, W. J., Marr, K. A., Anaissie, E. J., Azie, N., Quan, S. P., Meier-Kriesche, H. U., et al. (2012). Clinical epidemiology of 960 patients with invasive aspergillosis from the PATH Alliance registry. J. Infect. 65, 453–464. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.08.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ullmann, A. J., Aguado, J. M., Arikan-Akdagli, S., Denning, D. W., Groll, A. H., and Lagrou, K. (2018). Diagnosis and management os Aspergillus disease: executive summary of the 2017 ESCMID-ECMM-ERS guidelines. Clin Microbiol Infect. 24(Suppl. 1), e1–e38 doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.01.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van der Linden, J. W., Arendrup, M. C., Warris, A., Lagrou, K., Pelloux, H., Hauser, P. M., et al. (2015). Prospective multicenter international surveillance of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Emerging Infect. Dis. 21, 1041–1044. doi: 10.3201/eid2106.140717

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Der Linden, J. W., Warris, A., and Verweij, P. E. (2011). Aspergillus species intrinsically resistant to antifungal agents. Med. Mycol. 49, S82–S89. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2010.499916

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vermeulen, E., Maertens, J., Schoemans, H., and Lagrou, K. (2012). Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus due to TR46/Y121F/T289A mutation emerging in Belgium, July 2012. Euro Surveill. 17:20326. doi: 10.2807/ese.17.48.20326-en

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Verweij, P. E., Mellado, E., and Melchers, W. J. (2007). Multiple-triazole–resistant aspergillosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 356, 1481–1483. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc061720

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Aspergillus spp., molecular identification, cryptic species, antifungal susceptibility, azole-resistant A. fumigatus, cyp51A gene

Citation: Pinto E, Monteiro C, Maia M, Faria MA, Lopes V, Lameiras C and Pinheiro D (2018) Aspergillus Species and Antifungals Susceptibility in Clinical Setting in the North of Portugal: Cryptic Species and Emerging Azoles Resistance in A. fumigatus. Front. Microbiol. 9:1656. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01656

Received: 03 May 2018; Accepted: 03 July 2018;
Published: 23 July 2018.

Edited by:

Frederic Lamoth, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Switzerland

Reviewed by:

Mario Fernández-Ruiz, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Spain
Arnaud Riat, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Switzerland

Copyright © 2018 Pinto, Monteiro, Maia, Faria, Lopes, Lameiras and Pinheiro. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Eugénia Pinto, epinto@ff.up.pt