Impact Factor 4.019

The world's most-cited Microbiology journal

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Microbiol., 23 October 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02524

Expression Patterns, Genomic Conservation and Input Into Developmental Regulation of the GGDEF/EAL/HD-GYP Domain Proteins in Streptomyces

Mahmoud M. Al-Bassam1, Julian Haist2, Sara Alina Neumann2, Sandra Lindenberg2 and Natalia Tschowri2*
  • 1Division of Host-Microbe Systems and Therapeutics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
  • 2Institut für Biologie/Mikrobiologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany

To proliferate, antibiotic-producing Streptomyces undergo a complex developmental transition from vegetative growth to the production of aerial hyphae and spores. This morphological switch is controlled by the signaling molecule cyclic bis-(3′,5′) di-guanosine-mono-phosphate (c-di-GMP) that binds to the master developmental regulator, BldD, leading to repression of key sporulation genes during vegetative growth. However, a systematical analysis of all the GGDEF/EAL/HD-GYP proteins that control c-di-GMP levels in Streptomyces is still lacking. Here, we have FLAG-tagged all 10 c-di-GMP turnover proteins in Streptomyces venezuelae and characterized their expression patterns throughout the life cycle, revealing that the diguanylate cyclase (DGC) CdgB and the phosphodiesterase (PDE) RmdB are the most abundant GGDEF/EAL proteins. Moreover, we have deleted all the genes coding for c-di-GMP turnover enzymes individually and analyzed morphogenesis of the mutants in macrocolonies. We show that the composite GGDEF-EAL protein CdgC is an active DGC and that deletion of the DGCs cdgB and cdgC enhance sporulation whereas deletion of the PDEs rmdA and rmdB delay development in S. venezuelae. By comparing the pan genome of 93 fully sequenced Streptomyces species we show that the DGCs CdgA, CdgB, and CdgC, and the PDE RmdB represent the most conserved c-di-GMP-signaling proteins in the genus Streptomyces.

Introduction

Streptomyces are high G + C Gram-positive Actinobacteria with a great interest for medicine and industry, representing the most abundant natural source of antibiotics and other medically relevant secondary metabolites. Genome mining has revealed that they contain a huge number of natural product gene clusters that are silent under laboratory conditions and therefore represent a promising reservoir for the discovery of novel bioactive compounds (Rigali et al., 2018). Streptomyces mostly inhabit terrestrial ecosystems where they play an important role for nutrient recycling by secretion of different hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinases and cellulases (Ventura et al., 2007). During the vegetative phase, Streptomyces grow by extension of their hyphal tips and by initiating new lateral branches. It is due to this mode of growth that vegetative-phase colonies consist of tightly interwoven hyphae leading to a compact mycelium that appears bald and shiny on solid medium. As the colony matures, reproductive aerial hyphae are formed on the surface, which differentiate into long chains of pre-spore compartments and result in a fuzzy and white appearance of the colony. At the end of the life cycle, these compartments mature into pigmented spores that give Streptomyces colonies a characteristic color. Spores disperse, thus allowing the organism to spread to new environments. The correct order of morphological and physiological differentiation events is controlled by a fine-tuned cascade of Bld and Whi regulators (Bush et al., 2015). Bld regulators control the switch from the vegetative to aerial hyphae and Whi regulators are required for the transition from aerial hyphal growth to sporulation (Flärdh and Buttner, 2009; McCormick and Flärdh, 2012).

Recently, it has been discovered that some Streptomyces can adapt other modes of growth that deviate from the typical developmental cycle. When co-cultured with yeast, many Streptomyces spp. show exploratory growth by forming non-branching vegetative hyphae that lead to rapid colony expansion over solid surfaces (Jones et al., 2017). These explorer cells do not form aerial mycelium or spores and the exploratory behavior does not depend on known Bld or Whi regulators. In contrast, some Streptomyces venezuelae mutants undergo precocious hypersporulation, which bypasses the formation of aerial hyphae and leads to colonies that consist only of spores. These strains include bldD and bldO mutants and a strain that overexpresses a c-di-GMP phosphodiesterase (PDE) (Tschowri et al., 2014; Bush et al., 2017).

The developmental master regulator BldD is a two-domain DNA-binding repressor protein that is mainly present in the vegetative growth phase and directly controls the expression of 167 target genes in S. coelicolor (den Hengst et al., 2010). The BldD-regulon encompasses other bld regulators, several whi regulators, and genes encoding components of the cell division and chromosome segregation machineries. The critical physiological function of BldD is to shut off sporulation genes during vegetative growth but to allow expression of these genes in the later developmental stages for sporulation. BldD can only bind to the target DNA when it is in complex with the signaling molecule c-di-GMP. A c-di-GMP tetramer binds to the C-terminal domain of BldD, leading to the formation of a stable BldD dimer and an active repressor (Tschowri et al., 2014; Tschowri, 2016; Schumacher et al., 2017).

The ubiquitous bacterial second messenger c-di-GMP is metabolized by three different classes of proteins with specific domains that are named after conserved amino acids in their active sites (A-site). Formation of c-di-GMP from two molecules of GTP is mediated by GGDEF domain-containing diguanylate cyclases (DGCs). In close proximity to the A-site, most active DGCs also carry a conserved RxxD motif, termed the inhibitory site (I-site), which is involved in feedback control of DGC activity through product inhibition (Chan et al., 2004; Paul et al., 2007). Specific PDEs, which harbor the EAL domain or the less frequent HD-GYP domain, degrade the cyclic dinucleotide molecule (Christen et al., 2005; Schmidt et al., 2005; Ryan et al., 2006). Often, domains with opposite enzymatic activities are found in the same protein as GGDEF-EAL or GGDEF-HD-GYP tandems. Typically, in such proteins one of the two domains is enzymatically inactive, but a few bifunctional DGCs/PDEs exist (Tarutina et al., 2006). Often, these proteins also have diverse sensory domains (e.g., PAS, GAF) that enable cells to adjust second messenger levels in response to different environmental cues (Römling et al., 2013). Recent studies demonstrated that in S. coelicolor CdgA and CdgB are functional DGCs and RmdA and RmdB have PDE activity. Overexpression of either CdgA or CdgB and the deletion of cdgB inhibit morphological and physiological differentiation in S. coelicolor (den Hengst et al., 2010; Tran et al., 2011). Single deletions of either rmdA or rmdB delay S. coelicolor development, which is completely blocked in the rmdA rmdB double mutant (Hull et al., 2012).

A global analysis of an entire set of c-di-GMP metabolizing proteins in any Streptomyces strain is still lacking. Here, we have used S. venezuelae as a model species for studies of Streptomyces morphological development, which sporulates in liquid culture as opposed to the traditional model species S. coelicolor. As such, we aimed to determine which of the 10 c-di-GMP turnover enzymes affect development in these bacteria. To address this question, we have systematically deleted each of the 10 GGDEF, EAL, and HD-GYP proteins encoding genes and show that the DGCs CdgB and CdgC and the PDEs RmdA and RmdB are the only c-di-GMP-signaling enzymes that affect differentiation under tested conditions. By comparing the conservation of c-di-GMP metabolism genes in the genomes of 93 fully sequenced Streptomyces strains, we find that CdgB, CdgC, and RmdB belong to the most widely distributed proteins and thus very likely have a conserved role in the genus Streptomyces.

Results

C-di-GMP Turnover Proteins in S. venezuelae

Streptomyces venezuelae has 10 chromosomally encoded and one plasmid-encoded protein involved in c-di-GMP metabolism (Table 1). Four genes encode proteins with a GGDEF domain only, five genes encode composite proteins containing a GGDEF domain and an EAL domain, and two genes encode for proteins with a HD-GYP domain. For the genes encoding the GGDEF and EAL domain proteins we decided to keep the “cdg” designation, which stands for “c-di-GMP”, as is the case for the cdgA and cdgB homologues in S. coelicolor. We suggest hdgA and hdgB (HD-GYP), respectively, for vnz24090, coding for a conserved HD-GYP domain protein, and vnz24095 encoding a degenerate HD-GYP domain protein missing the key GYP residues.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Domain architecture and designations for GGDEF/EAL/HD-GYP domain-encoding genes in Streptomyces venezuelae.

The DGC function of CdgA and CdgB and the PDE activity of RmdA and RmdB of S. coelicolor have been demonstrated experimentally (den Hengst et al., 2010; Tran et al., 2011; Hull et al., 2012). CdgC has a highly degenerate EAL domain but a conserved GGDEF domain. CdgD, CdgE, and the plasmid-encoded pCdgG contain conserved GGDEF domains and can be assigned DGC function. The composite protein CdgF may represent a bifunctional protein since it has all the key residues in both the GGDEF and EAL domains to be enzymatically active. CdgC, CdgF, and RmdB are predicted to contain transmembrane helices. CdgA, CdgB, CdgC, CdgE, CdgF, and RmdA, all contain either PAS, PAC, GAF, or a combination of these N-terminal signaling domains but their specific functions and the signals they perceive remain unknown.

Expression Patterns of GGDEF-, EAL-, HD-GYP-Domain Proteins in S. venezuelae

When grown in liquid, S. venezuelae begins to differentiate after ca. 14 h of growth when vegetative hyphae start to fragment and spores begin to form. To determine the stages of growth that individual GGDEF-, EAL-, HD-GYP proteins are present and thus may affect development, we have analyzed their expression patterns at both the transcript and protein levels (Figure 1). Time-course microarray experiments were performed in the study by Bibb et al. (2012), to determine the transcriptional profile of S. venezuelae during submerged sporulation. Seven samples were taken at 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20 h of growth, spanning the complete morphological differentiation states of the bacterium (Bibb et al., 2012). We have extracted the transcription data for the chromosomally encoded c-di-GMP signaling genes from this microarray experiment and carried out quantile normalization and median polishing using the RMA method. The expression profiles show that rmdA and rmdB, coding for active PDEs, represent the most highly expressed genes in the analyzed set. Their transcripts were abundant throughout the life cycle from vegetative growth to sporulation. Similarly, cdgB and cdgD, coding for an active and a predicted DGC, respectively, were also expressed in all developmental stages. Transcripts of cdgC accumulated along the life cycle and achieved highest levels in the sporulation phase, and this is also true for hdgB, coding for a degenerate HD-GYP protein. cdgA, cdgE, cdgF, and hdgA were the least expressed genes under the conditions tested.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Expression profiles of c-di-GMP metabolism genes and proteins during submerged sporulation of S. venezuelae. (A) Expression data were extracted from microarray analyses in Bibb et al. (2012) and normalized with quantile normalization and median polish using the RMA method. Expression values are shown as Log2. (B) Western blot analysis of FLAG-tagged proteins. GGDEF/EAL/HD-GYP-domain proteins were FLAG-tagged and expressed in the corresponding mutants. Protein samples were harvested after indicated time of growth and following amounts of total protein were used for Western blotting: 5 μg for CdgB-FLAG; 10 μg for CdgE-FLAG, RmdB-FLAG and HdgB-FLAG; 15 μg for CdgA-FLAG, CdgC-FLAG, and RmdA-FLAG; 20 μg for CdgD-FLAG, CdgF-FLAG, HdgA-FLAG. co, wildtype sample as control.

To examine the expression of all the c-di-GMP-metabolizing proteins, we constructed alleles expressing C-terminally FLAG-tagged protein variants under the control of their native promoters. These alleles were cloned into the integrative vector pIJ10770 (Schlimpert et al., 2017), introduced into the corresponding deletion mutants at the ΦBT1 attachment site, and analyzed by Western blotting using a monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody. In each case, about 300 nucleotides upstream of the coding region were included in the constructs, in an attempt to incorporate the entire regulatory region. However, genomic organization suggests that cdgD is very likely arranged in one operon with vnz19765; therefore, the cdgD-FLAG construct contains the entire region upstream of cdgD up to vnz19770. Similarly, rmdA appears to be in an operon with vnz33670 and hdgB is very likely in an operon with hdgA and therefore these genes plus ca. 300 bp of their upstream region were included in the rmdA-FLAG and hdgB-FLAG constructs.

Due to pronounced differences in expression levels, the total protein amount used in this analysis was adjusted for individual proteins. For most of the GGDEF/EAL/HD-GYP domain proteins, the FLAG-tagged protein levels show that – considering the total protein loaded – the DGC CdgB and the PDE RmdB represent the most abundant c-di-GMP-signaling enzymes and CdgD, CdgF, and HdgA the least abundant c-di-GMP metabolizing proteins in S. venezuelae (Figure 1B). The protein levels of CdgA and RmdA appear to be constant in all developmental stages, whereas other proteins accumulate along the life cycle. Despite high transcription of cdgD (Figure 1A), we could hardly detect CdgD-FLAG in our Western blot analysis (Figure 1B). This suggests either that we have not included a relevant regulatory region in our construct or some post-transcriptional mechanism negatively affects CdgD levels.

CdgC, CdgF, RmdB, HdgA, and HdgB are predicted to contain transmembrane helices and thus to be bound to the cell membrane (Table 1). To experimentally validate this prediction, we separated the whole cell lysate from relevant strains expressing the FLAG-tagged alleles into soluble and membrane fraction using ultracentrifugation. Using the anti-FLAG antibody and Western blotting, we detected CdgC-FLAG, CdgF-FLAG, RmdB-FLAG, HdgA-FLAG, and HdgB-FLAG only in the membrane fraction (Supplementary Figure S2), confirming their membrane-bound localization.

CdgB, CdgC, RmdA, and RmdB Impact Morphological Differentiation in S. venezuelae

To determine which of the DGC(s) and PDE(s) are involved in the regulation of differentiation in S. venezuelae, we created deletion mutants for all 10 chromosomal genes encoding GGDEF/EAL/HD-GYP proteins. Macrocolony morphology analysis of mutant strains grown for up to 5 days on MYM agar at 30°C revealed that deletions of cdgB, cdgC, rmdA, and rmdB result in morphological phenotypes which deviate from the wildtype phenotype (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure S3). Complementation of these phenotypes with the FLAG-tagged alleles shows that the FLAG-tagged proteins are functional, and that the mutations are congenic with the wildtype strain (Supplementary Figure S4). S. venezuelae colonies turn green upon spore maturation due to the synthesis of a spore specific polyketide pigment. As shown in Figure 2, the cdgB mutant became green and produced mature spores reproducibly faster than the wildtype. Coverslip impression taken after 30 h of growth showed that ΔcdgB had already produced spores organized in characteristic chains whereas the wildtype strain still mainly consisted of non-divided filaments. Furthermore, the cdgB mutant formed colonies that are thicker compared to the wildtype colony and produced elaborated radial ridges on the surface.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Morphological differentiation is accelerated by the deletion of cdgB and cdgC and delayed by the deletion of rmdA and rmdB. (A) Time-course development of S. venezuelae wildtype and mutant macrocolonies grown on MYM agar for 5 days at 30°C. (B) Phase contrast microscopy images showing coverslip imprints from the upper layer of the macrocolonies grown for 30 h and 50 h in (A).

Deletion of cdgC resulted in the most striking macrocolony phenotype. This strain formed very flat colonies that did not turn green even after prolonged incubation and formed many radial wrinkle-like structures on the colony surface. The cdgC mutant did not produce the classical hair-like aerial hyphae but sporulated precociously, as shown by coverslip images taken after 30 h of incubation (Figure 2). However, the spores were not in chains but appeared as an irregular mass, reminiscent of the phenotype of an S. venezuelae strain that overproduces the active Escherichia coli PDE PdeH (YhjH), leading to hypersporulation (Tschowri et al., 2014). Similarly, bldD and bldO deletion mutants bypass aerial mycelium formation and form spores precociously (Tschowri et al., 2014; Bush et al., 2017). The pleiotropic phenotype of the cdgC mutant suggests that CdgC acts as one of the major determinants of c-di-GMP levels in the cell.

Deletion of either rmdA or rmdB severely inhibited S. venezuelae development, resulting in a prolonged bald morphology. The rmdA and rmdB mutant macrocolonies matured after 4 and 5 days, respectively, whereas the wildtype strain formed mature spores after just 2.5 days (Figure 2A). As expected, coverslip impression images show that, after 50 h of incubation, the rmdA and rmdB colonies consisted of pure vegetative hyphae (Figure 2B). Interestingly, the rmdB mutant needed 1 day longer than the rmdA mutant to become green, i.e., develop mature spores. The RmdA and RmdB proteins share conserved GGDEF and EAL domains but their N-terminal domains differ, with RmdA having a PAS-PAC domain and RmdB having a transmembrane domain (Table 1). The phenotypic similarity of the two mutants suggests that the functions of these two genes are not redundant, which is also consistent with their spatial segregation since RmdA is a cytosolic and RmdB a membrane-associated protein (Supplementary Figure S2).

CdgC Is an Active DGC in vitro and the GGDEF Active Site Is Essential for Its in vivo Function

The architecture of CdgC strongly suggests that this protein is an active DGC since it contains a highly conserved GGDEF domain but a degenerate EAL domain missing all the key residues involved in c-di-GMP cleavage. However, the enzymatic activity of CdgC has not yet been addressed in any study. To validate the predicted DGC activity of CdgC experimentally, we have purified the N-terminally His6-tagged cytosolic fraction of CdgC (ΔTM-CdgC) and tested it for in vitro DGC activity. A mutationally activated form of the C. crescentus PleD protein (PleD) served as our positive control (Paul et al., 2007). We used [32P]-GTP as substrate and separated the reactions by thin layer chromatography (TLC) (Christen et al., 2005). As shown in Figure 3A, ΔTM-CdgC produced c-di-GMP from GTP and is thus an active DGC.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. CdgC is an active DGC. (A) Synthesis of c-di-GMP from GTP was assayed in vitro using purified cytosolic fraction of CdgC (ΔTM-CdgC; TM: transmembrane) and PleD and visualized by thin layer chromatography. (B) The cdgC mutant and a strain carrying a chromosomal cdgC version with the ALLEF motif in the active site show green wildtype morphology when complemented with cdgC from the pMS82 vector but remain gray and do not form aerial mycelium with the empty vector. Overexpression of CdgB can partially suppress the cdgC deletion. Strains were grown for 3 days on MYM agar.

We confirmed DGC activity of CdgC also genetically. For that, we mutagenized the GGDEF active site to ALLEF in the chromosomal locus of cdgC and found that the resulting strain was phenotypically indistinguishable from the strain containing the complete cdgC deletion (Figure 3B). As in the null mutant, S. venezuelae carrying the mutagenized cdgC allele did not form aerial mycelium, remained gray on MYM plates even after prolonged (5 days) incubation (Figure 3B and data not shown) and showed precocious sporulation. For complementation, we cloned cdgC under the control of its native promoter into the integrative pMS82 vector and introduced this construct by conjugation into the ΔcdgC mutant and S. venezuelae expressing CdgC with the ALLEF motif instead of GGDEF in the active site. In contrast to the empty vector pMS82, expression of cdgC from the ΦBT1 phage integration site fully complemented both mutants.

To analyze whether the developmental phenotype caused by cdgC deletion can be suppressed by a heterologous DGC, we overexpressed CdgB from S. coelicolor using pIJ10350 described in Tran et al. (2011). pIJ10350 is a derivative of the integrative pIJ10257 vector containing cdgB under control of the strong constitutive ermEp promoter (Tran et al., 2011). Our data, presented in Figure 3B show that the cdgC phenotype could be partially suppressed by overexpressing the S. coelicolor CdgB, supporting the conclusion that changes in c-di-GMP levels is the main reason behind the hypersporulation phenotype of the cdgC mutant. However, the cdgC mutant overexpressing CdgB remains white even after 5 days of incubation. This could be due to differences in c-di-GMP levels resulting from cdgB overexpression, or to a CdgC-specific contribution to the developmental program that cannot be complemented by c-di-GMP synthesis derived from the overexpression of a heterologous DGC. Altogether, these results show that CdgC is an active DGC in vitro and fulfills its biological function via the GGDEF active site, but that it may also have a secondary role that is specific to this protein.

Distribution of the S. venezuelae GGDEF/EAL/HD-GYP Orthologs in the Streptomyces Pan Genome

Having learned that CdgB, CdgC, RmdA, and RmdB have crucial roles in controlling the coordinated progress of the S. venezuelae life cycle, we wondered to what extent these four proteins are conserved across Streptomyces species. To identify the core set of c-di-GMP turnover proteins and their overall distribution in the genus Streptomyces, we analyzed the pan genome of 93 Streptomyces species with completely sequenced genomes available at the NCBI database1. The genomes used in this study, and their accession numbers are listed in Supplementary Table S2. We functionally annotated the resulting gene clusters using the COG database and then searched for the relevant COG annotations for GGDEF, EAL, and HD-GYP domains (see Materials and Methods). We also included the developmental master regulator BldD in the analysis as it directly binds c-di-GMP and thus represents a key c-di-GMP signaling component in Streptomyces. We set chromosomally encoded c-di-GMP metabolism proteins of our model organism S. venezuelae as reference and used 45% identity cutoff to designate ortholog clusters (Chaudhari et al., 2016). By using these parameters, we identified 15 different GGDEF/EAL/HD-GYP domain proteins in the Streptomyces pan genome (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S3). The number of c-di-GMP-turnover proteins per strain varies from 5 (e.g., in S. sp CLI2509) up to 12 (e.g., in S. lincolnensis NRRL2936) with most strains having nine GGDEF/EAL/HD-GYP domain proteins.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. Distribution of c-di-GMP turnover genes in Streptomyces spp. Species are sorted in alphabetical order and the model streptomycete, S. venezuelae, is highlighted in red. The conservation of each gene across Streptomyces spp. is shown next to each gene name. Black boxes in each column represent the presence of gene orthologs calculated using the BPGA pipeline or blastp. White boxes represent absence of orthologous genes. TM, transmembrane.

bldD, cdgA, and cdgB are present in all 93 Streptomyces species (Figure 4), and we defined these as “core” genes. The genes encoding the PDE RmdB, the DGC CdgC, and the putative DGC CdgE are present in at least 91 of the analyzed strains and belong to the “soft-core” category of genes (see Materials and Methods; Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S3). RmdB is only absent in S. violaceoruber S21 and CdgC cannot be found in Streptomyces sp CLI2509. S. vietnamensis GIM40001 and Streptomyces sp WAC00288 lack a CdgE ortholog. The PDE RmdA is present in 82 fully sequenced Streptomyces and coexists with RmdB in 81 out of 93 species. However, S. violaceoruber S21, lacking RmdB, contains the PDE RmdA but no other EAL domain proteins, suggesting that RmdA is the major EAL-type PDE in this strain. We found HdgA orthologs in 76 and HdgB orthologs in 79 strains, respectively. Thirteen strains do not have any of the HD-GYP proteins, supporting the hypothesis that HD-GYP proteins do not fulfill a conserved function in c-di-GMP metabolism in Streptomyces.

Since we have learned that cdgB, cdgC, rmdA, and rmdB are c-di-GMP-signaling genes that affect development in S. venezuelae and are widely distributed in the genus Streptomyces, we wondered whether these genes are encoded in a conserved genetic context. As such, we calculated the bidirectional blast hit of the three genes located both downstream and upstream of bldD, cdgB, cdgC, rmdA, and rmdB and plotted the blast identity percent as heatmaps. Our data show that, apart from rmdA, the analyzed genetic regions are highly conserved (Supplementary Figure S5). The overall conservation of the genetic context of these c-di-GMP metabolism genes further supports the accuracy of our orthologue groups.

Extended Repertoire of GGDEF/EAL/HD-GYP Genes in the Streptomyces Pan Genome

EAL-GGDEF Domain Protein

Thirty of the analyzed Streptomyces strains encode for a c-di-GMP signaling protein that cannot be found in the S. venezuelae reference genome but is homologous to e.g., SAZ_08970 protein from S. albulus ZPM (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S3). The domain architecture of this protein is unique in Streptomyces. It contains an EAL domain on the N-terminus followed by a GGDEF domain in the C-terminal region. In the EAL domain, one key glutamic acid essential for the formation of the PDE active center is missing and the GGDEF motif is replaced by GGDDF (data not shown).

GGDEF Domain Proteins

Fifteen Streptomyces strains have stand-alone cytoplasmic GGDEF-domain proteins that are structurally similar to S. venezuelae CdgD but do not pass 45% sequence identity cut-off. All except TUE45_01367 from S. reticuli TUE45 have a conserved GGDEF motif and can be assigned DGC function. Notably, 13 of these strains do not have a CdgD protein, suggesting that these single GGDEF domains might be evolved variants of CdgD. However, Streptomyces sp. 452 contains two such proteins: DC008_23740, which is 61% identical to CdgD, and DC008_23810, which is 44% identical to CdgD, suggesting that the DC008_23810 arose by gene duplication.

6TM-GGDEF-EAL Domain Protein

In addition to the c-di-GMP turnover proteins present in S. venezuelae, S. peucetius subsp caesius ATCC27952 also has a GGDEF-EAL domain protein (CGZ69_35130) that is not present in S. venezuelae or any other sequenced Streptomyces strain. This protein is to 43% identical to S. venezuelae CdgF and is therefore not considered as a CdgF ortholog. However, as in CdgF, the GGDEF and EAL domains are highly conserved, suggesting that this protein might be bifunctional as well. Moreover, CGZ69_35130 is also predicted to be membrane-bound but seems to have six transmembrane helices instead of the 10 predicted for CdgF. Taken together, it is very likely that this gene arose by gene duplication and represents a modified copy of cdgF.

HD-GYP-LuxR Domain Protein

Streptomyces lunaelactis MM109 has acquired a c-di-GMP metabolism protein with a unique domain structure. SLUN_31535 has an N-terminal HD-GYP domain and a C-terminal HTH_LuxR-like DNA binding domain. This protein is 32% identical to HdgA from S. venezuelae but does not have the key GYP residues for c-di-GMP PDE activity.

Discussion

In the genus Streptomyces, the conserved master regulator BldD acts as a central hub that integrates c-di-GMP signals into the developmental program. During vegetative growth, it binds tetrameric c-di-GMP, dimerizes, and shuts off sporulation genes (Tschowri et al., 2014). S. venezuelae has 10 chromosomally encoded GGDEF/EAL/HD-GYP proteins. Except for HdgB, which has a degenerate active site in the HD-GYP domain, all the other proteins have conserved c-di-GMP-metabolizing domains and the potential to control c-di-GMP sensed by BldD or by a putative yet undiscovered additional c-di-GMP effector with a role in Streptomyces development. However, here we show that in S. venezuelae only the DGCs CdgB and CdgC and the PDEs RmdA and RmdB have a significant impact on morphological differentiation. The conservation of CdgB, CdgC, and RmdB reflects their importance in controlling Streptomyces sporulation, and we conclude that orthologs of these genes are likely to play equivalent roles across all Streptomyces species.

Deletion of the DGC genes cdgB and cdgC leads to enhanced sporulation, suggesting that BldD is less active in these mutants, likely due to reduced c-di-GMP levels. However, we see striking differences in the extent and mode of sporulation in these two mutants. Despite producing spores earlier than the wildtype, the cdgB mutant still undergoes the full life cycle including the erection of aerial hyphae that ultimately turn into spore chains (Figure 2). In contrast, the cdgC mutant bypasses aerial mycelium formation and forms spores directly from the hyphae on the surface of a S. venezuelae colony. Inactivation of cdgC strikingly mimics the hypersporulation phenotype seen when bldD is deleted or the PDE PdeH is overexpressed (Tschowri et al., 2014), suggesting that BldD becomes inactive as a repressor in the cdgC mutant because c-di-GMP levels are too low to drive dimerization of BldD. If so, CdgB and CdgC seem to influence c-di-GMP levels to different degrees, with CdgC being the most active DGC during vegetative growth. Alternatively, CdgC and BldD may form a locally acting module as reported for other c-di-GMP-dependent systems (Lindenberg et al., 2013; Sarenko et al., 2017). However, using bacterial two-hybrid analysis, we could not detect any interaction between CdgC and BldD (data not shown), and the observation that the cdgC phenotype can, at least partially, be suppressed by expressing CdgB, is also inconsistent with a locally acting module. CdgC is membrane bound (Supplementary Figure S2) and therefore could possibly receive activity-modulating signals via the N-terminal transmembrane or PAS-PAC sensory domains. Moreover, the degenerate EAL domain may affect the GGDEF-domain activity by binding a ligand or an interaction partner. How CdgC influences BldD activity remains to be uncovered in future work.

As in S. coelicolor, deletion of the PDEs rmdA or rmdB has an inhibitory effect on development in S. venezuelae, suggesting that in these strains BldD remains active as a repressor for a prolonged period, very likely due to elevated c-di-GMP levels. In S. coelicolor, both genes, rmdA and rmdB, must be deleted to achieve a block in differentiation and single deletions mildly inhibit spore production (Hull et al., 2012). In S. venezuelae, single deletions substantially delay the initiation of aerial mycelium formation and sporulation but after incubation of 4–5 days these strains develop mature green colonies with apparent wildtype morphology (Figure 2). As judged by rmdA and rmdB mutant phenotypes in these two Streptomyces species, it can be concluded that RmdA and RmdB are not redundant but impact a common signaling pathway. They also show a comparable expression pattern and belong to the most highly transcribed c-di-GMP metabolism genes (Figure 1A). However, RmdB is membrane-bound whereas RmdA is a cytosolic protein that may respond to specific signals perceived by the PAS–PAC sensory domain (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure S2). Moreover, deletion of rmdB arrests S. venezuelae in the vegetative growth phase for one day longer than deletion of rmdA (Figure 2), indicating that each of the two proteins also has a unique input into the development control.

CdgA, CdgB, CdgE, CdgC, RmdA, and RmdB are present in at least 90% of the Streptomyces strains, we have analyzed bioinformatically and thus represent the most important components of Streptomyces c-di-GMP-metabolism. Effects of cdgA deletion on development has not been addressed in any previous studies. But, in S. coelicolor, it has been shown that overexpression of CdgA with an intact GGDEF motif blocks the formation of aerial hyphae and the synthesis of the blue antibiotic actinorhodin, whereas overexpression of a mutagenized variant containing AADEF amino acids in the active site does not (den Hengst et al., 2010). Depending on the growth medium, overproduction of cdgB showed similar effects i.e., inhibition of aerial mycelium formation and actinorhodin synthesis in S. coelicolor. However, deletion of cdgB does not affect development of S. coelicolor when grown on SFM (soy flour mannitol) medium but delays development on R2 and R5 media. As uncovered in this work, CdgC is the key c-di-GMP producing enzyme with impact on developmental program progression since the S. venezuelae cdgC mutant has a pronounced developmental phenotype and bypasses aerial mycelium formation (Figure 2).

According to our western blot analysis, CdgE, CdgA, CdgF, HdgA, and HdgB are all expressed in wildtype (Figure 1B) but are not involved in developmental control, as judged by the mutant phenotypes (Supplementary Figure S3). It is likely that activating signals for these proteins are missing under the conditions tested. CdgD is the least conserved c-di-GMP turnover protein in Streptomyces, does not have any impact on development in S. venezuelae and was not detectable in our Western blot analysis (Figures 1B, 4 and Supplementary Figure S3). We cannot exclude that a relevant regulatory region is missing in our cdgD-FLAG construct, but in line with poor conservation of CdgD, it is likely that this GGDEF-protein is not produced in S. venezuelae and, e.g., post-transcriptional degradation could be involved.

The pan genome of 93 Streptomyces strains includes 15 genes encoding GGDEF/EAL/HD-GYP domains with the minimal set being five such genes, as found in, e.g., Streptomyces sp. CLI2509, and the maximal set being 12 genes, as found in e.g., S. lincolnensis NRRL2936. Four of the genes coding for c-di-GMP turnover enzymes found in the pan genome are unique to certain species or are present in very few species. Such diversity in the c-di-GMP metabolism genes in a genus is not unusual since e.g., in the genomes of Azospirillum strains, the number of genes encoding GGDEF/EAL proteins varies between 29 and 41 (Mata et al., 2018). However, the biological reasons underlying such diversification are difficult to explore but may involve adaptation to specific environmental niches.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains, Growth Conditions, and Conjugations

Escherichia coli BW25113 (Datsenko and Wanner, 2000) containing a λ RED plasmid, pIJ790, was grown in LB under aeration at 30°C and used to create disruption cosmids for the generation of the DGC/PDE mutant strains and to replace the kanR marker on the PI1_C11 cosmid with the apr-oriT region amplified from the pIJ773 template plasmid (Supplementary Table S1). HME68 (Thomason et al., 2014) was used for λ RED-mediated recombineering of the PI1_C11 apr-oriT cosmid with the single-strand oligonucleotide ssOligo ssRec5187 ALLEF (Supplementary Table S1) to create the G658A/G659L/D660L mutations in the cdgC locus on the cosmid. E. coli ET12567 containing pUZ8002 (Paget et al., 1999) was grown at 37°C and was used for conjugation experiments. S. venezuelae strains (Supplementary Table S1) were grown at 30°C in maltose-yeast extract-malt extract (MYM) medium (Stuttard, 1982) containing 50% tap water and 200 μl trace element solution (Kieser et al., 2000) per 100 ml and liquid cultures were inoculated with 106 CFU/ml spores. Conjugations between E. coli and S. venezuelae were carried out as previously described (Bibb et al., 2012). For S. venezuelae macrocolonies or patches 12 μl spores (2 × 105 CFU) in 20% glycerol were spotted on MYM-TAP agar and incubated at 30°C for up to 7 days.

Generation of S. venezuelae cdgC G658A/G659L/D660L Mutant Strain

To create the cdgC G658A/G659L/D660L mutation on the PI1_C11 kan::apr-oriT cosmid, recombineering using single-strand oligonucleotide ssOligo ssRec5187 ALLEF (Supplementary Table S1), and E. coli HME68 strain was performed as described in Costantino and Court (2003). The mutagenized cosmid was confirmed by PCR and Sanger sequencing and transformed into E. coli ET12567/pUZ8002 for conjugation into S. venezuelae. Conjugation plates were incubated at room temperature overnight before overlaying with apramycin. Ex-conjugants were re-streaked once on plates containing apramycin and nalidixic acid and then several times on non-selective medium. The desired mutants arising from a double crossing over were screened for apramycin sensitivity followed by PCR to confirm the cdgC G658A/G659L/D660L mutation. A PCR product comprising the cdgC PAS-PAC-GGDEF region was sequenced and the resulting strain was named SVSN1.

Construction of Complemented S. venezuelae Strains

For complementation analysis, cdgC and its promoter region were amplified using primers 5187-HindIII-pMS82-f and 5187-KpnI-pMS82-rev listed in Supplementary Table S1 and cloned into HindIII-KpnI cut pMS82 to create pSVOJ1. The plasmid was introduced into S. venezuelae cdgC G658A/G659L/D660L and ΔcdgC by conjugation, and the strains were named SVSN55 and SVSN3, respectively. The strain SVABK-4 resulted from the conjugation of pIJ10350 containing cdgB from S. coelicolor on the pIJ10257 vector into S. venezuelae ΔcdgC. To engineer S. venezuelae strains expressing c-di-GMP-proteins with a C-terminal, triple FLAG (MDYKDHDGDYKDHDIDYKDDDDK) affinity tag, the FLAG tag sequence was cloned into the pMS82 derivative pIJ10770 cut with XhoI and KpnI by using the 3xFLAG_XhoI_f and 3xFLAG_KpnI_r primers, creating p3xFLAG. The genes of interest including approximate 300 bp upstream of the open reading frames were then amplified using primers listed in Supplementary Table S1 and cloned in frame with the FLAG tag into the p3xFLAG vector. In the case of cdgD, rmdA and hdgB the corresponding upstream genes and their 5′ UTR were included in the constructs, due to potential operon organization. The resulting plasmids listed in Supplementary Table S1 were conjugated into the adequate c-di-GMP mutants, and the strains were subsequently used for Western blot analysis.

Western Blotting

For FLAG-tag-based Western blot analysis, samples were taken after 10 (or 12 in the case of CdgE-FLAG and CdgF-FLAG), 14, 16, 18, and 20 h of growth. S. venezuelae wildtype served as negative control and was harvested after 20 h of incubation. After washing in 1× PBS, the cell pellets were resuspended in 1× PBS containing cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Tablets (Roche) and lysed using a BeadBeater (Biozym; four cycles at 6.00 m/s; 30 s pulse; 60 s interval). Lysates were then centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 10 min at 4°C to remove cell debris and total protein concentration was determined using Bradford assay (Roth). Following amounts of total protein were loaded and separated on a SDS polyacrylamide gel: 5 μg for CdgB-FLAG; 10 μg for CdgE-FLAG, RmdB-FLAG and HdgB-FLAG; 15 μg for CdgA-FLAG, CdgC-FLAG, and RmdA-FLAG; 20 μg for CdgD-FLAG, CdgF-FLAG, HdgA-FLAG, and wildtype. Loading controls are shown in Supplementary Figure S1. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF, Roth) membrane by electroblotting. For detection, anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma) was used. Bound primary antibody was visualized by using anti-mouse IgG-HRP (Thermo Fisher Scientific) secondary antibody and ECL chemiluminescent detection reagent (Perkin Elmer).

Purification of CdgC and DGC Assay

For protein purification, the cytosolic part of cdgC was cloned into the pET15b (Novagen) vector using primers listed in Supplementary Table S1, which results in N-terminally His6-tagged gene product. E. coli Rosetta (Novagen) containing pET15b-ΔTM-cdgC (pSVSN2) was grown in LB with 100 μg/ml ampicillin at 37°C to an OD578nm of 0.6. Protein expression was induced by adding IPTG (50 μM final concentration) and cultivation was continued overnight at 16°C. Cells were harvested and lysed by passage through a French press, and the soluble fraction was used for native protein purification using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography according to standard protocols (Qiagen). Buffer containing cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Tablets (Roche) and 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0; 500 mM NaCl; 20 mM imidazole; 1 mM MgCl2; 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol; 0.1% Triton X 100 as well as 5% glycerol was used for lysis and washing steps. Prior activity assays, the purified protein was dialysed against a modified cyclase reaction buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MnCl2, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 5% glycerol).

Diguanylate cyclase reactions were performed according to Christen et al. (2005) with slight modifications. Two μM of purified His6-tagged ΔTM-CdgC in cyclase reaction buffer (see above) were incubated with 4 nM [α-32P]-GTP (Hartmann Analytic GmbH) at 30°C for 60 min. The reaction was stopped by heating to 95°C for 5 min and by mixing of 5 μl reaction with equal volume of 0.5 M EDTA pH 8.0. A reaction with purified PleD, a constitutively active DGC (Paul et al., 2007) was treated identically and served as positive control. Samples were separated on Polygram CEL 300 PEI cellulose TLC plates (Macherey–Nagel). Plates were developed in 1:1.5 (v/v) saturated NH4SO4 and 1.5 M KH2PO4, pH 3.6, and exposed on a Phosphor Imaging Screen (Fuji) after drying.

Phase-Contrast Microscopy

Coverslips were placed on the surface of S. venezuelae colony and put on a thin agarose pad on a microscope slide for microscopy. Cells were imaged using the Leica DM2000 LED microscope at 100× magnification. Digital images were organized using ADOBE photoshop software.

Pan Genome, Transcriptomic, and Domain Organization Analysis

Streptomyces species that had a complete genome assembly were downloaded from NCBI. A total of 93 genomes (Supplementary Table S2) were analyzed after excluding redundant genomes. Plasmids were excluded from the analysis and plasmid genbank records were removed from genbank files prior to conservation analysis. We employed the BPGA analysis tool (Chaudhari et al., 2016) for conservation and functional annotation of genes encoding c-di-GMP turnover enzymes. We set the id cutoff at 0.45. Downstream analyses were carried out using in-house python and perl scripts. Clusters containing c-di-GMP related genes were determined according to their COG annotations. The COG references used included: COG2199, COG2200, COG3706, COG3887, COG5001, COG2206, COG3437, COG3434, and COG4943. In addition, BldD was also included as it is known to conduct regulatory activity, which is modulated by c-di-GMP (Tschowri et al., 2014). The c-di-GMP clusters were classified into four categories: “core” (conserved in all 93 species), “soft core” (conserved in 88–92 species), “accessory” (conserved in 2–87 species), and “unique” (exclusively present in one species). We found that BPGA had few inconsistencies when protein ids% were around 50 or below. For the c-di-GMP metabolisms genes, NCBI blastp was used to validate the BPGA pipeline output for proteins that had 50% id or below. The modified output is highlighted in red in Supplementary Table S3. We also found some errors in the genbank files, and we highlighted those in green in Supplementary Table S3. Protein domain organization analysis was performed using SMART2.

Microarray Analysis

Microarray data for the wildtype strain were acquired from the ArrayExpress database, accession number E-MEXP-3612 (Bibb et al., 2012). The raw data corresponding to each of the time course experiments were quantile normalized and median polished using the RMA method (Irizarry et al., 2003). The mean normalized expression values were calculated from the biological replicates and reported as log2. The expression figure was compiled using an in-house python script.

Author Contributions

MA-B performed the bioinformatical analysis, made the figures, and wrote the paper. JH and SN performed the experiments and made the figures. SL performed the experiments. NT designed the study, created strains, made the figures, and wrote the paper. All authors read the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) Emmy Noether program and a priority program SPP1879 grant to NT (TS 325/1-1 and TS 325/2-1).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Ann-Brit Johanna Klatt for generation of the cSVAK-2 cosmid and the SVABK-4 strain and to Jakob Müller for construction of the pSVOJ1 plasmid. We thank Mark Buttner for reading the manuscript and providing constructive comments. We also acknowledge support by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02524/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

  1. ^ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  2. ^ http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de

References

Bibb, M. J., Domonkos, A., Chandra, G., and Buttner, M. J. (2012). Expression of the chaplin and rodlin hydrophobic sheath proteins in Streptomyces venezuelae is controlled by sigma(BldN) and a cognate anti-sigma factor, RsbN. Mol. Microbiol. 84, 1033–1049. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08070.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bush, M. J., Chandra, G., Findlay, K. C., and Buttner, M. J. (2017). Multi-layered inhibition of Streptomyces development: BldO is a dedicated repressor of whiB. Mol. Microbiol. 104, 700–711. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13663

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bush, M. J., Tschowri, N., Schlimpert, S., Flardh, K., and Buttner, M. J. (2015). c-di-GMP signalling and the regulation of developmental transitions in streptomycetes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 749–760. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3546

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chan, C., Paul, R., Samoray, D., Amiot, N. C., Giese, B., Jenal, U., et al. (2004). Structural basis of activity and allosteric control of diguanylate cyclase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 17084–17089.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Chaudhari, N. M., Gupta, V. K., and Dutta, C. (2016). BPGA- an ultra-fast pan-genome analysis pipeline. Sci. Rep. 6:24373. doi: 10.1038/srep24373

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Christen, M., Christen, B., Folcher, M., Schauerte, A., and Jenal, U. (2005). Identification and characterization of a cyclic di-GMP-specific phosphodiesterase and its allosteric control by GTP. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 30829–30837.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Costantino, N., and Court, D. L. (2003). Enhanced levels of lambda Red-mediated recombinants in mismatch repair mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 15748–15753. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2434959100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Datsenko, K. A., and Wanner, B. L. (2000). One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 6640–6645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120163297

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

den Hengst, C. D., Tran, N. T., Bibb, M. J., Chandra, G., Leskiw, B. K., and Buttner, M. J. (2010). Genes essential for morphological development and antibiotic production in Streptomyces coelicolor are targets of BldD during vegetative growth. Mol. Microbiol. 78, 361–379.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Flärdh, K., and Buttner, M. J. (2009). Streptomyces morphogenetics: dissecting differentiation in a filamentous bacterium. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 36–49. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1968

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hull, T. D., Ryu, M. H., Sullivan, M. J., Johnson, R. C., Klena, N. T., Geiger, R. M., et al. (2012). Cyclic Di-GMP phosphodiesterases RmdA and RmdB are involved in regulating colony morphology and development in Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Bacteriol. 194, 4642–4651. doi: 10.1128/JB.00157-12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Irizarry, R. A., Hobbs, B., Collin, F., Beazer-Barclay, Y. D., Antonellis, K. J., Scherf, U., et al. (2003). Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4, 249–264. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, S. E., Ho, L., Rees, C. A., Hill, J. E., Nodwell, J. R., and Elliot, M. A. (2017). Streptomyces exploration is triggered by fungal interactions and volatile signals. eLife 6:e21738. doi: 10.7554/eLife.21738

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kieser, T., Bibb, M. J., Buttner, M. J., Chater, K. F., and Hopwood, D. A. (2000). Practical Streptomyces Genetics. Norwich: The John Innes Foundation.

Google Scholar

Lindenberg, S., Klauck, G., Pesavento, C., Klauck, E., and Hengge, R. (2013). The EAL domain protein YciR acts as a trigger enzyme in a c-di-GMP signalling cascade in E. coli biofilm control. EMBO J. 32, 2001–2014. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.120

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mata, A. R., Pacheco, C. M., Cruz Perez, J. F., Saenz, M. M., and Baca, B. E. (2018). In silico comparative analysis of GGDEF and EAL domain signaling proteins from the Azospirillum genomes. BMC Microbiol. 18:20. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1157-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McCormick, J. R., and Flärdh, K. (2012). Signals and regulators that govern Streptomyces development. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 36, 206–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00317.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paget, M. S., Chamberlin, L., Atrih, A., Foster, S. J., and Buttner, M. J. (1999). Evidence that the extracytoplasmic function sigma factor sigmaE is required for normal cell wall structure in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J. Bacteriol. 181, 204–211.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Paul, R., Abel, S., Wassmann, P., Beck, A., Heerklotz, H., and Jenal, U. (2007). Activation of the diguanylate cyclase PleD by phosphorylation-mediated dimerization. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 29170–29177.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Rigali, S., Anderssen, S., Naome, A., and van Wezel, G. P. (2018). Cracking the regulatory code of biosynthetic gene clusters as a strategy for natural product discovery. Biochem. Pharmacol. 153, 24–34. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2018.01.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Römling, U., Galperin, M. Y., and Gomelsky, M. (2013). Cyclic di-GMP: the first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77, 1–52. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00043-12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ryan, R. P., Fouhy, Y., Lucey, J. F., Crossman, L. C., Spiro, S., He, Y. W., et al. (2006). Cell-cell signaling in Xanthomonas campestris involves an HD-GYP domain protein that functions in cyclic di-GMP turnover. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 6712–6717.

Google Scholar

Sarenko, O., Klauck, G., Wilke, F. M., Pfiffer, V., Richter, A. M., Herbst, S., et al. (2017). More than enzymes that make or break cyclic di-GMP-local signaling in the interactome of GGDEF/EAL domain proteins of Escherichia coli. mBio 8:e01639-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01639-17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schlimpert, S., Wasserstrom, S., Chandra, G., Bibb, M. J., Findlay, K. C., Flardh, K., et al. (2017). Two dynamin-like proteins stabilize FtsZ rings during Streptomyces sporulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, E6176–E6183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704612114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmidt, A. J., Ryjenkov, D. A., and Gomelsky, M. (2005). The ubiquitous protein domain EAL is a cyclic diguanylate-specific phosphodiesterase: enzymatically active and inactive EAL domains. J. Bacteriol. 187, 4774–4781.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Schumacher, M. A., Zeng, W., Findlay, K. C., Buttner, M. J., Brennan, R. G., and Tschowri, N. (2017). The Streptomyces master regulator BldD binds c-di-GMP sequentially to create a functional BldD2-(c-di-GMP)4 complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 6923–6933. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx287

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stuttard, C. (1982). Temperate phages of Streptomyces venezuelae: lysogeny and host specificity shown by phages SV1 and SV2. Microbiology 128, 115–121.

Google Scholar

Tarutina, M., Ryjenkov, D. A., and Gomelsky, M. (2006). An unorthodox bacteriophytochrome from Rhodobacter sphaeroides involved in turnover of the second messenger c-di-GMP. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 34751–34758.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Thomason, L. C., Sawitzke, J. A., Li, X., Costantino, N., and Court, D. L. (2014). Recombineering: genetic engineering in bacteria using homologous recombination. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 106 1, 11–39. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb0116s106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tran, N. T., Den Hengst, C. D., Gomez-Escribano, J. P., and Buttner, M. J. (2011). Identification and characterization of CdgB, a diguanylate cyclase involved in developmental processes in Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Bacteriol. 193, 3100–3108. doi: 10.1128/JB.01460-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tschowri, N. (2016). Cyclic dinucleotide-controlled regulatory pathways in Streptomyces species. J. Bacteriol. 198, 47–54. doi: 10.1128/JB.00423-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tschowri, N., Schumacher, M. A., Schlimpert, S., Chinnam, N. B., Findlay, K. C., Brennan, R. G., et al. (2014). Tetrameric c-di-GMP mediates effective transcription factor dimerization to control Streptomyces development. Cell 158, 1136–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ventura, M., Canchaya, C., Tauch, A., Chandra, G., Fitzgerald, G. F., Chater, K. F., et al. (2007). Genomics of Actinobacteria: tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71, 495–548. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00005-07

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: c-di-GMP, development, Streptomyces, GGDEF, EAL, HD-GYP

Citation: Al-Bassam MM, Haist J, Neumann SA, Lindenberg S and Tschowri N (2018) Expression Patterns, Genomic Conservation and Input Into Developmental Regulation of the GGDEF/EAL/HD-GYP Domain Proteins in Streptomyces. Front. Microbiol. 9:2524. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02524

Received: 21 August 2018; Accepted: 03 October 2018;
Published: 23 October 2018.

Edited by:

Marie-Joelle Virolle, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France

Reviewed by:

Olga Soutourina, UMR9198 Institut de Biologie Intégrative de la Cellule (I2BC), France
Paul Dyson, Swansea University, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2018 Al-Bassam, Haist, Neumann, Lindenberg and Tschowri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Natalia Tschowri, natalia.tschowri@hu-berlin.de

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Present address: Sandra Lindenberg, Ashfield Healthcare GmbH, Hirschberg, Germany