CORRECTION article

Front. Microbiol., 20 November 2018

Sec. Microbial Symbioses

Volume 9 - 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02812

Corrigendum: A Comparison of Techniques for Collecting Skin Microbiome Samples: Swabbing Versus Tape-Stripping

  • 1. Wellness Promotion Science Center, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan

  • 2. Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan

  • 3. Department of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan

  • 4. Advanced Health Care Science Research Unit, Innovative Integrated Bio-Research Core, Institute for Frontier Science Initiative, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan

Article metrics

View details

10

Citations

2,3k

Views

1k

Downloads

In the original article, there was an error in the sequence of the forward primer used in the real-time PCR.

The forward primer 5′-ACTGAGACACGGYCCA-3′ in the original text should read 5′-ACTGAGAYACGGYCCA-3′. The primer with the corrected sequence was actually used in the study; therefore, the results are not affected.

A correction has been made to Materials and Methods, Real-Time PCR:

To determine the copy number of the 16S rRNA gene in the DNA extracted from the swab or adhesive tape, real-time PCR was performed. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using universal primer pairs (F: 5′-ACTGAGAYACGGYCCA-3′; R: 5′-CTGCTGGCACGDAGTTAGCC-3′) (Wang and Qian, 2009) and a universal probe (5′-VIC-ACTGCTGCCTCCCGTA-NFQ-MGB-3′) (Gao et al., 2010) with the Thunderbird® Probe qPCR Mix (Toyobo Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan). A standard curve was drawn from a known amount of the 16S rRNA gene [100, 10, 1, and 0.1 pg of Propionibacterium acnes genomes, which are equivalent to 7.23 × 104, 7.23 × 103, 7.23 × 102, and 7.23 × 101 16S rRNA genes, respectively (Nadkarni et al., 2002; Miura et al., 2010; Stoddard et al., 2015)]. All the reactions were performed with the Mx3005P System (Agilent Technologies, CA, United States). The copy number of 16S rRNA gene was compared for the same size of skin area (4.4 × 4.4-cm square; Supplementary Figure 1, open squares).

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    GaoZ.Perez-PerezG. I.ChenY.BlaserM. J. (2010). Quantitation of major human cutaneous bacterial and fungal populations. J. Clin. Microbiol.48, 35753581. 10.1128/JCM.00597-10

  • 2

    MiuraY.IshigeI.SoejimaN.SuzukiY.UchidaK.KawanaS.et al. (2010). Quantitative PCR of Propionibacterium acnes DNA in samples aspirated from sebaceous follicles on the normal skin of subjects with or without acne. J. Med. Dent. Sci.57, 6574. 10.11480/jmds.570108

  • 3

    NadkarniM. A.MartinF. E.JacquesN. A.HunterN. (2002). Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. Microbiology148(Pt 1), 257266. 10.1099/00221287-148-1-257

  • 4

    StoddardS. F.SmithB. J.HeinR.RollerB. R.SchmidtT. M. (2015). rrnDB: improved tools for interpreting rRNA gene abundance in bacteria and archaea and a new foundation for future development. Nucleic Acids Res.43, D593D598. 10.1093/nar/gku1201

  • 5

    WangY.QianP. Y. (2009). Conservative fragments in bacterial 16S rRNA genes and primer design for 16S ribosomal DNA amplicons in metagenomic studies. PLoS ONE4:e7401. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007401

Summary

Keywords

skin microbiome, swabbing, tape stripping, bacterial culture, next generation sequencing

Citation

Ogai K, Nagase S, Mukai K, Iuchi T, Mori Y, Matsue M, Sugitani K, Sugama J and Okamoto S (2018) Corrigendum: A Comparison of Techniques for Collecting Skin Microbiome Samples: Swabbing Versus Tape-Stripping. Front. Microbiol. 9:2812. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02812

Received

31 October 2018

Accepted

01 November 2018

Published

20 November 2018

Approved by

Frontiers in Microbiology Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Volume

9 - 2018

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Shigefumi Okamoto

‡Present Address: Terumi Iuchi, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Komatsu University, Komatsu, Japan

This article was submitted to Microbial Symbioses, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics