Impact Factor 4.259 | CiteScore 4.30
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Microbiol., 20 September 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02170

Taxonomic and Metabolic Incongruence in the Ancient Genus Streptomyces

  • 1Department of Plant Pathology, Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
  • 2Department of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, United States
  • 3Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, CA, United States
  • 4Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States

The advent of culture independent approaches has greatly facilitated insights into the vast diversity of bacteria and the ecological importance they hold in nature and human health. Recently, metagenomic surveys and other culture-independent methods have begun to describe the distribution and diversity of microbial metabolism across environmental conditions, often using 16S rRNA gene as a marker to group bacteria into taxonomic units. However, the extent to which similarity at the conserved ribosomal 16S gene correlates with different measures of phylogeny, metabolic diversity, and ecologically relevant gene content remains contentious. Here, we examine the relationship between 16S identity, core genome divergence, and metabolic gene content across the ancient and ecologically important genus Streptomyces. We assessed and quantified the high variability of average nucleotide identity (ANI) and ortholog presence/absence within Streptomyces, even in strains identical by 16S. Furthermore, we identified key differences in shared ecologically important characters, such as antibiotic resistance, carbohydrate metabolism, biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), and other metabolic hallmarks, within 16S identities commonly treated as the same operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Differences between common phylogenetic measures and metabolite-gene annotations confirmed this incongruence. Our results highlight the metabolic diversity and variability within OTUs and add to the growing body of work suggesting 16S-based studies of Streptomyces fail to resolve important ecological and metabolic characteristics.

Introduction

From driving the majority of global elemental cycling to mediating the complex interspecies interactions that balance health and disease, the diversity and ecology of microorganisms shapes our world (Falkowski et al., 2008; Lynch and Pedersen, 2016). Advances in molecular and computational techniques have allowed us to uncover the full genetic makeup of organisms across the tree of life and have shed light on their shared and distinct taxonomies, lifestyles, and metabolisms (Louca et al., 2018). Recent studies have found ecology can influence metabolic potential (Chevrette et al., 2019) and gene flow between microorganisms (Smillie et al., 2011). Thus, investigating the interplay between ecology and metabolism is necessary to understand the fitness landscapes influencing microbial evolution.

In bacterial communities, rather than species as for most plants and animals, the functional units of taxonomy are often defined by operational taxonomic units (OTUs). This is motivated by the absence of morphologically distinguishing traits and the inherent issues associated with bacterial species concepts. Since early studies by Woese and others focused on DNA sequence typing and molecular phylogenetics, the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene has been the foundation of microbial ecology and evolution. The vast majority of studies employ this locus as the marker to group bacteria into OTUs, often segregating taxa into groups sharing above 97% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity (Stegen et al., 2013; Ghoul and Mitri, 2016; Kim et al., 2017). However, lateral gene transfer, variable rates of evolution, and dependence upon arbitrary cutoffs greatly impact the 16S gene’s ability to describe shared genomic and metabolic characteristics. Despite high taxonomic diversity as described by OTUs, microbial communities from similar ecologies can exhibit convergence of genomic traits and functional markers (Farjalla et al., 2016). Furthermore, for context, the 18S rRNA gene, the eukaryotic small subunit rRNA with structural and functional homology to 16S in bacteria, is both highly conserved within groups and can show variability that does not necessarily track with evolutionary relationships (Figure 1A). Inconsistent assignment of taxonomic levels confounds the bacterial tree of life; the genetic diversity of the “species” Escherichia coli is on the order of many genera. Some genera may encompass hundreds of millions of years of divergence. This has motivated the redefinition of the bacterial tree of life based on genomic similarity at shared loci (Parks et al., 2018). Nevertheless, variable regions have large impacts on metabolism, and thus the fitness, of organisms and metabolic units are often the cargo of lateral transfer (McDonald and Currie, 2017).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. (A) Identity to closest human 18S rRNA gene match for several metazoans. Center, median; box, upper and lower quantiles; whiskers, 1.5× interquartile range; points, outliers. (B) Timeline depicting the origin of Streptomyces and the major split between Streptomyces Clades I and II in relation to other events of interest. MYA, million years ago; error bars, lower and upper confidence estimates. Geologic periods are in alternating colors.

As a group, the ecologically and industrially important genus Streptomyces is a bacterial taxon commonly found in soil and host-associated microbiomes (Hopwood, 2007; Andam et al., 2016; Chevrette et al., 2019). Originating at approximately the same time period as land plants (Figure 1B; McDonald and Currie, 2017), Streptomyces exhibit diverse biosynthetic capacities and their secondary metabolites are the primary source of antibiotics used clinically. Furthermore, Streptomyces can produce many other ecologically and medically important bioactive molecules and often dedicate 15% or more of their genomes to secondary metabolism (Chevrette and Currie, 2019). Streptomyces genomes are on average 8 megabases (Mb) in length (yet some strains are over 25% larger) and are composed of approximately 72% GC (Hopwood, 2007). While often studied as soil organisms, they readily associate with a diversity of eukaryotic hosts, including many different species of insects (Chevrette et al., 2019). Within Streptomyces lineages, diversification of metabolism can coincide with divergence (Choudoir et al., 2018) and variation in metabolic capacity can occur at even identical 16S (Antony-Babu et al., 2017). However, relatively little is known of the phylogenetic and genomic influences on metabolism across the Streptomyces phylogeny.

Here, we explore the discordance between taxonomic and metabolic diversity in Streptomyces to assess patterns across multiple phylogenetic levels. In 288 finished or near-finished Streptomyces genomes, we investigate the relationships between core genome, variable genome, and 16S rRNA gene identity to metabolic and ecologically relevant genetic elements. In a subset of 28 strains distributed across the Streptomyces phylogeny, we describe shifts in genomic content in relation to ecology and characterize their exo-metabolomic profiles.

Materials and Methods

Data Retrieval

All public Streptomyces genomes were retrieved from NCBI on 08/31/2018 and genomes with eight contigs or less were used as part of this study (n = 259). 29 additional genomes (28 Streptomyces and 1 Pseudonocardia outgroup) were sequenced and assembled, herein (see below). Genomes can be accessed at https://bitbucket.org/chevrm/streptomyces_metabolites/.

Growth Conditions

Mycelial agar plugs (1 mm diameter) were removed from actively-growing YMEA plates of the target strains, and inoculated in 5 ml of Hopwood minimal medium containing 5% (w/v) of glucose (five replicates of each strains). Cultures were incubated for 2 weeks at 30°C in a rotary shaker at 300 rpm. Cultures were centrifuged at 10,000 ×g for 10 min, and the supernatants were collected and stored at −20°C.

Sequencing and Assembly

Cultures were grown in rich medium supplemented with 0.5% glycine and cells were harvested by centrifugation. Cells were washed with 10.3% sucrose, resuspended in lysozyme solution (3 mg ml−1 lysozyme, Sigma, in 0.3 M sucrose, 25 mM Tris pH 8, and 25 mM EDTA pH 8), and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Proteinase K (Thermo Fisher; 20 mg ml−1) was added before incubation for 15 min at 42°C. Cells were lysed by adding 2% SDS and rocking for 5 min until lysis was complete. Neutral phenol and chloroform were added, and tubes were gently shaken until uniformly white. After centrifugation, the top layer was transferred to 3 M sodium acetate pH 6 and isopropanol. Tubes were gently mixed until DNA appeared. DNA was pelleted, supernatant was removed, and the pellet was resuspended in TE with 0.2 mg ml−1 RNaseA. Tubes were incubated 15 min at 28°C before adding 5 M NaCl and CTAB/NaCl solution. Tubes were incubated for 10 min at 55°C and cooled to 28°C. CHCl3 was added, tubes were gently shaken, and spun for 10 min at 28°C. The top layer was transferred to a new tube and extracted again with phenol and chloroform, followed by extraction with chloroform and precipitation with 3 M sodium acetate pH 6 and isopropanol. The pellet was washed in 70% ethanol and resuspended in water. DNA was quantified, checked for purity, and run on a gel to verify high molecular weight. Genomic DNA libraries for Illumina MiSeq 2 × 300 bp paired-end sequencing were prepared by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Biotechnology Center (TruSeq). Reads were corrected with MUSKET v1.1 (Liu et al., 2013), paired-ends were merged with FLASH v1.2.7 (Magoč and Salzberg, 2011), and assembled with SPAdes v3.11.0 (Bankevich et al., 2012).

Genomic Characterization

18S rRNA gene sequences annotated as Homo sapiens were gathered from the SILVA database (Quast et al., 2012) and aligned against all metazoans in SILVA with blastn (Altschul et al., 1990). Best, non-self hits to human are reported in Figure 1A. Timeline in Figure 1B was created from the following estimates: origin of H. sapiens 0.305 million years ago (MYA; 0.26–0.35 MYA low-high estimate) (Schlebusch et al., 2017), origin of primates 74.1 MYA (68.2–81.2 MYA low-high estimate) (Pozzi et al., 2014), origin of land plants 457.5 MYA (425–490 MYA low-high estimate) (Sanderson, 2003), origin of Streptomyces 382 MYA (250–514 MYA low-high estimate) (McDonald and Currie, 2017), and lowest common ancestor of the major Streptomyces Clades I and II 132 MYA (87–177 MYA low-high estimate) (McDonald and Currie, 2017).

Core genome phylogeny was generated using 93 TIGRFAM proteins in the core bacterial protein set (GenProp0799; http://www.jcvi.org/cgi-bin/genome-properties/GenomePropDefinition.cgi?prop_acc=GenProp0799). Genes were called with prodigal v2.6.0 (Hyatt et al., 2010) and GenProp0799 profile Hidden Markov Models were used to search each genome. HMMER v3.1b2 (Eddy, 2011) was used to identify protein sequences for each protein family. Each family was then aligned using MAFFT v7.245 (Katoh and Standley, 2013). Alignments were then converted to codon alignments and concatenated. The multi-locus phylogeny was generated using RAxML v8.1.24 (Stamatakis, 2014) under the GTRgamma substitution model with 100 rapid bootstraps. Core genome divergence was calculated as genome tree branch lengths scaled from 0 (no distance) to 1 (longest distance).

5S, 16S, and 23S rRNA genes were predicted from genomes with barrnap v0.9 (Seemann, 2014, 2018). Predicted rRNA genes with lengths within 20% of Streptomyces coelicolor 5S, 16S, and 23S (117, 1,738, and 3,179 bp, respectively) were aligned with mafft v7.310 (Katoh and Standley, 2013) and nucleotide percent identity at non-gapped alignment columns was calculated between each genome’s rRNA gene. In genomes where more than one 5S, 16S, or 23S rRNA gene was predicted, the highest percent identity match was used.

Genes were predicted with prodigal v2.6.2 (Hyatt et al., 2010) and orthologs were predicted with pyparanoid v0.3.1 (Melnyk et al., 2019). Functional characterization of orthologs was performed by best bitscore of DIAMOND blastp v0.9.24.125 (Buchfink et al., 2015) (query cover of >60%) to the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) database v2014 (Galperin et al., 2015). Resistance elements were predicted with RGI from the CARD database v2.0.3 (McArthur et al., 2013). Carbohydrate active enzyme (CAZy) families (Lombard et al., 2014) were identified with HMMER v3.2.1 (Eddy, 2011) (e-value cutoff 1e−5 for proteins >80aa, 1e−3 otherwise). Metabolic hallmarks were identified from profile hidden Markov models (pHMMs) from Louca et al. (2018) and Anantharaman et al. (2016) following presence/absence requirements in the Louca study. ANI between genomes was calculated via fastANI (Jain et al., 2018). BGCs were identified with antiSMASH v4.0.2 (Blin et al., 2017) and grouped into gene cluster families (GCFs) with BiG-SCAPE (Navarro-Muñoz et al., 2018) (distance <0.3).

For a subset of 29 strains, shared gene content was identified and visualized in anvi’o (Eren et al., 2015) via the pangenome pipeline (Delmont and Eren, 2018) (minbit = 0.5; mcl-inflation = 4; min-occurrence = 2). Also for these strains, genes were clustered using OrthoMCL implemented in get_homologues (Contreras-Moreira and Vinuesa, 2013). Clustering cutoffs of >75% pairwise alignment coverage and >75% percentage of amino acid sequence identity were imposed. An UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean) dendrogram was generated from the genome composition presence/absence matrix with Jaccard similarity and 100 bootstrap replications.

Partial 16S Amplicon Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from isolates using the Powersoil DNA isolation kit according to manufacturer’s specifications (MoBio). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using the universal bacterial primer set 27F (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3′) and 1,496 R (5′-CGG TTA CCT TGT TAC GAC TT-3′), of hypervariable regions V1-V9. PCR was performed in a standard 25 μl reaction with 1 μl DNA template (20 ng μl−1), 12.5 μl EconoTaq (Lucigen corporation), 1 μl combined 10 μM primers, and 12.5 μl water. Initial denaturation for 3 min at 95°C was followed by 3 min annealing at 58°C followed by 35 cycles of 10 s at 96°C and 2 min at 72°C, and a post-cycle extension at 72°C for 7 min. Amplicons were confirmed on 1.2% agarose electrophoresis gel prior to cleanup with Wizard SV Gel and PCR system (Promega). Big Dye sequencing reaction was then performed followed by a secondary clean-up prior to submission to UW Biotech for analysis (University of Wisconsin-Madison). 16S rRNA gene gene fragments were aligned using SINA (Pruesse et al., 2012). A phylogeny was generated with maximum likelihood method and 500 bootstrap replications in the MEGA v6 (Tamura et al., 2013).

Extraction and LC-MS

Frozen media samples (1 ml) were lyophilized dry, then extracted with 200 μl MeOH containing 10 μM internal standard (5–50 μM of 13C,15 N Cell Free Amino Acid Mixture, #767964, Sigma) followed by vortexing and water bath sonication for 10 min, vortexing again, then sonication for an additional 5 min. After centrifuging at 5,000 rcf for 5 min, supernatant was removed and centrifuge-filtered through a 0.22 PVDF membrane (Millipore, MultiScreen GV Filter Plate, Cat# MSGVS2210) for 3 min at 2,500 rcf into a 96-well plate. Extracts were dried in a SpeedVac and stored at −20°C.

In preparation for mass spectrometry, dried extracts were resuspended in 150 μl MeOH and sonicated in a water bath. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was performed on extracts using an Agilent 1290 LC stack, with MS and MS/MS data collected using a Q Exactive Orbitrap MS (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA). Full MS spectra were collected from m/z 70–1,050 at 70,000 FWHM resolution, with MS/MS fragmentation data acquired using 10, 20, and 30 V collision energies at 17,500 FWHM resolution. MS instrument parameters included a sheath gas flow rate of 50 (au), auxiliary gas flow rate of 20 (au), sweep gas flow rate of 2 (au), 3 kV spray voltage, and 400°C capillary temperature. Normal phase chromatography was performed using a HILIC column (Millipore SeQuant ZIC-HILIC, 150 mm × 2.1 mm, 5 μm, Cat# 50454) at 40°C and using a 2 μl injection volume for each sample. The column was equilibrated with 100% buffer B (95:5 ACN:H2O w/ 5 mM ammonium acetate) for 1.5 min at 0.45 ml/min, diluting buffer B down to 65% with buffer A (H2O w/ 5 mM ammonium acetate) for 13.5 min, down to 0% B over 3 min while increasing flow to 0.6 ml/min, and followed by isocratic elution in 100% buffer A for 5 min. Metabolites were identified based on exact mass and retention time coupled with comparing MS/MS fragmentation spectra to purchased standards.

LC-MS data was analyzed via previously described methods (Yao et al., 2015). A set of criteria were used to evaluate each of the detected metabolites and assign a level of confidence in the identification based on (1) absolute value of the difference in retention time from the standard, (2) mass error (ppm) of detected m/z versus theoretical m/z, and (3) MS/MS score comparing experimental MS/MS fragmentation pattern to standard. For retention time and MS/MS comparison, standards were run using the same LC-MS methods as samples. Compounds with the highest level of positive identification had detected m/z <5 ppm from theoretical standard, <0.5 min retention time difference from standard, as well as matching MS/MS fragmentation spectra to either an outside database (METLIN) or internal database generated from standards run and collected on a Q Exactive Orbitrap MS.

For each metabolite present (relative to media controls) in at least three of five replicates, abundances were summed for both positive and negative ion modes and the highest sum was used for subsequent analysis. Genomes and INCHI codes for each strain were then processed with MAGI (Erbilgin et al., 2019). For each metabolite, MAGI scores for each metabolite were then normalized on a scale of 0 to 1 by dividing by the top strain’s MAGI score for a given metabolite. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the peak intensity of identified metabolites was performed using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (Chong et al., 2018). Metabolites with >50% missing values were removed. Remaining missing values were replaced by half of the minimum value in the original data. Peak intensity values were transformed using a generalized log transformation function and scaled using the auto-scaling function. The heatmap was generated using Euclidean distance and Ward clustering algorithm.

Blomberg’s K (Blomberg et al., 2003) with respect to 16S, core genome, and gene composition trees was calculated for each metabolite. Significance (p) for each metabolite-tree pair was tested with 1,000 randomizations.

Results

Relationship Between rRNA Gene Identity and Core Genome Phylogenetic Divergence

Pairwise 16S, 23S, and 5S rRNA gene percent nucleotide identity was calculated between 288 strains (287 Streptomyces and 1 Pseudonocardia) and compared to core genome phylogenetic divergence (scaled branch length of phylogeny from 93 conserved bacterial genes) (Figure 2A). 16S rRNA gene similarity ranged from identical (100%) to approximately 88% (Streptomyces vs. Pseudonocardia). From 0 to ~0.15 core genome divergence, 16S rRNA gene identity drops from 100% to ~97%. This slope is reduced at ~0.15 to ~0.30 divergence where 16S identity remains relatively constant at ~97–96%. Streptomyces vs. Pseudonocardia comparisons (near 1.0 divergence) are ~88% 16S rRNA gene identity. The longer 23S rRNA gene has a steeper negative slope, with less rRNA gene identity than the shorter 16S or 5S. 5S, the shortest rRNA gene shown, has higher identity at low core genome divergence, but lower identity at higher divergence. Despite a relatively uniform representation of core genome divergence between 0 and ~0.6, all three rRNA genes have a large percentage drop at ~0.4–0.5, 16S from ~93 to ~90%, 5S from ~94 to 85%, and 23S from ~93 to ~90% before another drop to ~85%.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. (A) Relationship between core genome divergence and 5S, 16S, and 23S rRNA genes in Streptomyces. Dashed line = 97%; size of dot = number of pairwise comparisons. (B) Relationship between core genome divergence and shared gene families in Streptomyces. Size of dot = number of pairwise comparisons. (C) Distribution of gene families across the Streptomyces phylogeny.

Ortholog Distribution Relative to Core Genome Phylogenetic Divergence

Within genomes, 64,000 gene families were identified. Overlap in gene families (orthologs) relative to core genome divergence has a greater negative slope than rRNA genes (Figure 2B). Highly similar core genomes (i.e., ~0 core genome divergence) average over 6,000 orthologs shared, but this rapidly decreases until a core genome divergence of ~0.15. Here, the curve assumes an almost step-wise shape with plateaus at ~4,500, ~4,000, and ~3,500 gene families shared at ~0.15, ~0.2, and ~0.3 core genome divergence, respectively. Most gene families (51,888; 81% of orthologs) are found in less than 10% of strains and only 2,520 gene families are shared in 90% or more of the 287 Streptomyces (Figure 2C).

16S rRNA Gene Identity Versus Average Nucleotide Identity and Ortholog Composition

16S identity is not predictive of the average nucleotide identity (ANI) of pairwise aligned regions (Figure 3A). ANI average was 81.69% and ranged from 76.02 to 100%. At 100% 16S nucleotide identity, Streptomyces strains can have as low as 84.42% ANI, and across Streptomyces ANI and 16S identity do not exhibit a linear relationship (1:1 relationship shown as dotted diagonal, Figure 3A). From identical 16S sequences to the common OTU cutoff of 97% 16S identity (dotted line), ANI can range from 100% to as low as 78.30%, a range only slightly narrower than 100–87.61% 16S identity. Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) (Sc) from Clade II of the Streptomyces phylogeny had 82.02, 81.70, and 76.38% ANI against S. albus J1074 (Sa; Clade II), S. griseus NBRC 13350 (Sg; Clade I), and Pseudonocardia sp. SID8383 (outgroup), respectively (Figure 3A). Aligned regions (i.e., shared genetic material) averaged 4.12 Mb and can range from 11.97 Mb to as little as 0.93 Mb (Figure 3B). Sg had more aligned genome to Sc (4.40 Mb) than did Sa-Sc (4.13 Mb) despite Sg and Sc being from different lineages (Clade I and II, respectively; Figure 3B). Sg-Sc had more unaligned genome (8.45 Mb) than did Sa-Sc (7.27 Mb) (Figure 3C). At 100% 16S identity, Streptomyces can have as much as 8.26 Mb of unaligned, variable content between strains and at the 97% 16S OTU cutoff, this can increase to 13.81 Mb (Figure 3C). Shared gene families ranged from 921 to 2,264 with an average of 2175.5 (Figure 3D). Most Streptomyces over 94% 16S identity share over 2,000 gene families (Figure 3D), which is consistent with the “pan” Streptomyces genome (i.e., gene families occurring in over 90% of strains) of 2,520 orthologs (Figure 2C). While 16S identity roughly correlates with shared orthologs (Figure 3D), nearly identical strains by 16S (>99% identity) can have as many as 518 unshared gene families (Figure 3E). 16S correlation with presence/absence of gene families belonging to functional categories, including secondary metabolism, shows similar trends (Supplementary Figures S1,S2). Sg and Sc (Clade I vs. Clade II) have 2,259 shared and only 5 unshared gene families while Sa-Sc (both Clade II) had 2,239 shared and 25 unshared. Sc-P. sp. SID8383 had 1,170 shared and 1,094 unshared gene families.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. (A) Average nucleotide identity (ANI) compared to 16S rRNA gene identity in pairwise comparisons of Streptomyces. Diagonal line = 1:1 relationship. Length of the (B) ANI alignment length and (C) unaligned portions of both genomes compared to 16S identity in the same pairwise comparisons. Number of (D) shared and (E) unshared orthologs versus 16S identity. (A–E) Vertical line = 97% 16S identity; yellow = pairwise comparisons also in the subset from Figures 5, 6. Green = Clade II S. coelicolor A3(2) vs. Clade II S. albus J1074; blue = Clade II S. coelicolor A3(2) vs. Clade I S. griseus NBRC 13350; red = Clade II S. coelicolor A3(2) vs. Pseudonocardia sp. SID8383.

Metabolic and Functional Genomic Features

The amount of shared metabolic and functional genomic features present in two strains is strongly influenced by 16S identity cutoffs (e.g., for an OTU). For example, approximately two elements associated with antibiotic resistance are shared between strains with 100% 16S identity (Figure 4A). However, for Streptomyces strains that would group within the same OTU (i.e., >97% 16S identity), average overlap in resistance elements drops to near 0 (Figure 4A). Unique resistance elements are ~2 or ~4 at 97% 16S identity for strict and loose confidence calls, respectively (Figure 4A). Similarly, when biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) are grouped into gene cluster families (GCFs), there is a drop from ~21 to ~2 shared GCFs from 100 to >97% 16S identity (Figure 4B). Even at 100% 16S identity, an average of 10 GCFs are unique and increases to over 50 at >97% 16S (Figure 4B). The majority of GCFs have few members, indicating they are rare within Streptomyces, but some are seen in over 40 strains (Figure 4C). Most GCFs are previously undescribed, with no BiG-SCAPE (Navarro-Muñoz et al., 2018) matches in the MIBiG database (Figure 4C; Medema et al., 2015). ~92 and ~79 shared carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZy) families (Lombard et al., 2014) are seen at 100 and >97% 16S, respectively, while ~5 and ~40 unique CAZy families are seen at these 16S identities (Figure 4D). Metabolic hallmarks (e.g., nitrite respiration, arsenate reduction, urease, etc.) range from ~3.3 to ~3.0 shared hallmarks from 100 to >97% 16S (Figure 4E). At 100% 16S, there are on average no differences in metabolic hallmarks between strains, while at >97%, an average of 0.6 are unique (Figure 4E). Most Streptomyces exhibit the metabolic hallmarks of oxygen respiration, urease, and arsenate reduction and over a quarter of strains show hallmarks for nitrate respiration (Figure 4F). Formaldehyde oxidation, methanol oxidation, carbon fixation (via Rubisco), nitrate respiration, and nitric oxide respiration are rare in Streptomyces (Figure 4F).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Overlap between strains and unique between strains (A) resistance elements, (B) biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) families, (D) carbohydrate-active enzyme families, and (E) metabolic hallmarks compared to 16S identity thresholds. (A) Colors refer to stringency of CARD database matches, either loose or strict. (B) Colors refer to either full BGCs (BGCs with 0.5 kb or more flanking contig on both sides) or all BGCs including fragments. (C) Frequency of family sizes for gene cluster families. Colors signify whether GCF has a MIBiG match or is previously undescribed. (F) Fraction of Streptomyces strains with each metabolic hallmark (those with zero not shown).

Genomic Identity Across Isolate Sources

The genomic content of a subset of 28 Streptomyces strains (shown as yellow in Figure 3) and one Pseudonocardia (SID8383) was assessed and visualized in anvi’o (Figure 5; Eren et al., 2015). Strains are marked as either insect-associated (blue), plant-associated (green), fungus-associated (purple), or soil (tan). Dark content in each rail of the genome map represents presence of a gene while light regions signify absence. Genomes are arranged by ANI alignment coverage. Seven of 10 soil strains are found within the same ANI grouping. SID7817 (soil), SID4943 (insect-associated), and SID4952 (unknown source) are closely related by ANI coverage, but exhibit variable genetic regions consistent with Figure 3. The major soil groupings, while clustered together, also show variable content. Only minor differences can be seen between the basal insect-associated grouping of SID4943, SID1, and SID8360.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Anvi’o genome map of select Streptomyces. Each rail belongs to an individual genome and is colored according to its source (blue = insect-associated; green = plant-associated; purple = fungi-associated; soil = tan; gray = unknown). Presence (dark shading) and absence (light shading) are shown for all gene content in two or more strains. Strains are arranged by ANI alignment coverage and genes are arranged by presence/absence distance (both Euclidean clustering). Pseudonocardia SID8383 (inner rail) is used as an outgroup.

Phylogenetic Incongruence to Metabolic Capacity

Partial 16S rRNA gene (variable regions V1-V9), core genome, and genome composition (Jaccard similarity) yield discordant phylogenies (Figure 6A). While core genome and composition are the most similar, there is fine-scale discordance in the placement of clades (see green, gray, and SID4944, Figure 6A). Partial 16S gives a low-resolution (and often incorrect) phylogeny, as highlighted by large polytomies and the placement of SID4952 (gray, Figure 6A). Presence/absence clustering of GCFs (Figure 6B) shows some, but not perfect, concordance with core genome groupings. Similar groupings are seen in metabolic pathways through metabolite-gene association MAGI scores (Erbilgin et al., 2019) coupling genomics and metabolomics (Figure 6C, Supplementary Figure S3). A total of 73 metabolites were differentially produced between the strains (ANOVA, FDR < 0.05; Supplementary Figure S3). These metabolites mapped to 63 KEGG pathways in S. coelicolor (sco), 59 in S. avermitilis (sma), and 57 in S. griseus (sgr). Many of these metabolites participate in the metabolism of pyrimidine, purine, “arginine and proline,” “glycine, serine, and threonine”.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. (A) Discordant relationships between Streptomyces by different methods, partial 16S (V3 and V4), core genome phylogeny, or Jaccard similarity of genome composition (orthologs). (B) Presence/absence heatmap of biosynthetic gene cluster families (GCFs) in Streptomyces. Rows = strains, columns = GCFs. red = present; gray = absent. (C) Genome-metabolite MAGI scores (colors; scaled 0 to 1) in Streptomyces. Rows = strains; columns = reactions; clustering = Euclidean. (B,C) Annotation bar for strains (colors on row dendrogram) correspond to clades designated in (A) above. (D) Phylogenetic signal of metabolites with respect to trees in (A) above. Significance is marked by p < 0.01 (left of the dashed line).

Metabolites were tested against 16S, core genome, and genome composition tree topologies for phylogenetic signal. In all cases where a metabolite reached significance (p < 0.01) for at least one tree topology, at least one other topology was not significant (Figure 6D). For example, phylogenetic signal for adenine was significant in the 16S tree, but failed to reach significance in both the core genome and genome composition trees. Genome composition was relatively more associated with metabolites for D-galactosamine, quinoline-4-carboxylic acid, retinoic acid, and trehalose. Uridine, lactose, and N,N-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine best fit the core genome tree. Other metabolites (e.g., L-pipecolic acid, methylthioadenosine, dipalmitoyl cephalin) best fit the 16S tree.

Discussion

Closely related bacterial species will have genetic and metabolic overlap as dictated by the vertical inheritance of genes (see “overlap” panels in Figures 4A,B,D,E). However, the selective pressures that shape metabolic traits and non-vertical mechanisms of genetic exchange can give rise to unique evolutionary histories. Some traits may be strongly correlated with taxonomy while others may not. Here, we quantify how these shared characteristics correlate with common measures of taxonomic distance within Streptomyces. Inferring the lifestyle, metabolism, and ecology of microorganisms from genomic data requires descriptions at finer phylogenetic scales. As a field, microbial ecology is largely built on the foundation of using the 16S rRNA gene as a marker to understand bacterial ecology and evolution (Stegen et al., 2013; Ghoul and Mitri, 2016). Although the limitations of 16S have been recognized (Kim et al., 2017), we believe that better understanding and recognition of these limitations are crucial for the field. Here, we assess these limitations in describing the relationship between metabolism, ecologically important gene sets, core genome, and 16S identity in Streptomyces. Through our assessment of genomic and metabolic relatedness across Streptomyces, we show that the characters that contribute to metabolic diversity are not fully described by common groupings of taxonomic units. Within Streptomyces, 16S identity does not correlate with the most basic ecologically relevant genes, such as CAZy families and antibiotic resistance genes. However, shared content at the tips of the 16S tree (i.e., near identical by 16S) suggests there are groups of Streptomyces with highly conserved gene content that relates to ecology. While 16S has some utility in predicting coarse ecological characters (e.g., soil vs. insect-associated in Chevrette et al., 2019) or genus-level taxonomy, phenotypes and patterns that manifest at finer scales may prove elusive, even at high 16S identity. This suggests that if by 16S strains are not identical, an OTU is not a meaningful measure of ecologically relevant diversity. Furthermore, high variability even within identical 16S sequences suggests that future studies should move away from 16S-based descriptions of ecology or metabolic potential.

The advent of 16S sequencing has led to descriptions of microbial environments at unprecedented depth (Moyer et al., 1994; Ferris et al., 1996; Hugenholtz et al., 1998; Gao et al., 2007; Grice et al., 2009), and has even led to the discovery of archaea (Woese and Fox, 1977). These studies have provided the phylogenetic framework from which we define evolutionary relationships across microbial life. However, variation in species- and population-level processes (e.g., specialized metabolism, niche specialization, etc.) is not resolved by 16S identity, as rate of divergence within the 16S does not necessarily correlate with genomic diversity under the influence of unfixed selective pressure. By analogy, at an 18S cutoff of 97% most humans, deer, and dolphins would be grouped into the same OTU (Figure 1A). The diversity within Streptomyces presented here suggests we cannot infer lifestyle, function, or ecological phenotype from taxonomic markers.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study and high-resolution versions of each figure can be found in the https://bitbucket.org/chevrm/streptomyces_metabolites/src.

Author Contributions

MC and CC-S performed genomic analyses and metabolomic analyses. MC, CC-S, and CC wrote manuscript. KL, BB, and TN performed metabolomic experiments.

Funding

This project was supported through National Institutes of Health (NIH) U19 Al109673 and NIH U19 TW009872. Additional support was provided to MC through NIH National Research Service Award T32 GM008505. Funding for CC and MC was provided by the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research under Award Numbers DE-SC0018409 and DE-FC02-07ER64494. The work conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, a DOE Office of Science User Facility, is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02170/full#supplementary-material

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE S1 | Number of shared orthologs at different 16S rRNA gene identities in pairwise comparisons of Streptomyces, stratified by COG functional category. Yellow are pairwise comparisons also in the subset from Figures 5, 6; green = Clade II S. coelicolor A3(2) vs. Clade II S. albus J1074; blue = Clade II S. coelicolor A3(2) vs. Clade I S. griseus NBRC 13350; red = Clade II S. coelicolor A3(2) vs. Pseudonocardia sp. SID8383. [(C) energy production and conversion; (D) cell cycle control, cell division, and chromosome partitioning; (E) amino acid transport and metabolism; (F) nucleotide transport and metabolism; (G) carbohydrate transport and metabolism; (H) coenzyme transport and metabolism; (I) lipid transport and metabolism; (J) translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis; (K) transcription; (L) replication, recombination, and repair; (M) cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; (N) cell motility; (O) posttranslational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones; (P) inorganic ion transport and metabolism; (Q) secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism; (R) general function prediction only; (S) function unknown; (T) signal transduction mechanisms; (U) intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; (V) defense mechanisms; (W) extracellular structures].

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE S2 | Number of unique orthologs at different 16S rRNA gene identities in pairwise comparisons of Streptomyces, stratified by COG functional category. Yellow are pairwise comparisons also in the subset from Figures 5, 6; green = Clade II S. coelicolor A3(2) vs. Clade II S. albus J1074; blue = Clade II S. coelicolor A3(2) vs. Clade I S. griseus NBRC 13350; red = Clade II S. coelicolor A3(2) vs. Pseudonocardia sp. SID8383. [(C) energy production and conversion; (D) cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning; (E) amino acid transport and metabolism; (F) nucleotide transport and metabolism; (G) carbohydrate transport and metabolism; (H) coenzyme transport and metabolism; (I) lipid transport and metabolism; (J) translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis; (K) transcription; (L) replication, recombination, and repair; (M) cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; (N) cell motility; (O) posttranslational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones; (P) Inorganic ion transport and metabolism; (Q) secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism; (R) general function prediction only; (S) function unknown; (T) signal transduction mechanisms; (U) intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; (V) defense mechanisms; (W) extracellular structures].

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE S3 | Heatmap of average peak intensity for differential metabolites based on ANOVA (FDR < 0.05). The heatmap was generated using Euclidean distance and Ward clustering algorithm.

References

Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anantharaman, K., Brown, C. T., Hug, L. A., Sharon, I., Castelle, C. J., Probst, A. J., et al. (2016). Thousands of microbial genomes shed light on interconnected biogeochemical processes in an aquifer system. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–11. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13219

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Andam, C. P., Doroghazi, J. R., Campbell, A. N., Kelly, P. J., Choudoir, M. J., and Buckley, D. H. (2016). A latitudinal diversity gradient in terrestrial bacteria of the genus Streptomyces. MBio 7, e02200–e02215. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02200-15

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Antony-Babu, S., Stien, D., Eparvier, V., Parrot, D., Tomasi, S., and Suzuki, M. T. (2017). Multiple Streptomyces species with distinct secondary metabolomes have identical 16S rRNA gene sequences. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11363-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bankevich, A., Nurk, S., Antipov, D., Gurevich, A. A., Dvorkin, M., Kulikov, A. S., et al. (2012). SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blin, K., Wolf, T., Chevrette, M. G., Lu, X., Schwalen, C. J., Kautsar, S. A., et al. (2017). antiSMASH 4.0—improvements in chemistry prediction and gene cluster boundary identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, W36–W41. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx319

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., and Ives, A. R. (2003). Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717–745. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buchfink, B., Xie, C., and Huson, D. H. (2015). Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12, 59–60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chevrette, M. G., Carlson, C. M., Ortega, H. E., Thomas, C., Ananiev, G. E., Barns, K. J., et al. (2019). The antimicrobial potential of Streptomyces from insect microbiomes. Nat. Commun. 10:516. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08438-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chevrette, M. G., and Currie, C. R. (2019). Emerging evolutionary paradigms in antibiotic discovery. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 46, 257–271. doi: 10.1007/s10295-018-2085-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chong, J., Soufan, O., Li, C., Caraus, I., Li, S., Bourque, G., et al. (2018). MetaboAnalyst 4.0: towards more transparent and integrative metabolomics analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W486–W494. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky310

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choudoir, M., Pepe-Ranney, C., and Buckley, D. (2018). Diversification of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters coincides with lineage divergence in Streptomyces. Antibiotics 7:12. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics7010012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Contreras-Moreira, B., and Vinuesa, P. (2013). GET_HOMOLOGUES, a versatile software package for scalable and robust microbial pangenome analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 7696–7701. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02411-13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Delmont, T. O., and Eren, A. M. (2018). Linking pangenomes and metagenomes: the Prochlorococcus metapangenome. PeerJ 6:e4320. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4320

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eddy, S. R. (2011). Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7:e1002195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Erbilgin, O., Rübel, O., Louie, K. B., Trinh, M., de Raad, M., Wildish, T., et al. (2019). MAGI: a method for metabolite, annotation, and gene integration. ACS Chem. Biol. 14:204362. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.8b01107

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eren, A. M., Esen, Ö. C., Quince, C., Vineis, J. H., Morrison, H. G., Sogin, M. L., et al. (2015). Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for 'omics data. PeerJ 3:e1319. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1319

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Falkowski, P. G., Fenchel, T., and Delong, E. F. (2008). The microbial engines that drive Earth’s biogeochemical cycles. Science 320, 1034–1039. doi: 10.1126/science.1153213

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farjalla, V. F., Doebeli, M., Jacques, S. M. S., Parfrey, L. W., Srivastava, D. S., Louca, S., et al. (2016). High taxonomic variability despite stable functional structure across microbial communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1:15. doi: 10.1038/s41559-016-0015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferris, M. J., Muyzer, G., and Ward, D. M. (1996). Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of 16S rRNA-defined populations inhabiting a hot spring microbial mat community. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 340–346. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8593039

Google Scholar

Galperin, M. Y., Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I., and Koonin, E. V. (2015). Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D261–D269. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1223

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, Z., Tseng, C., Pei, Z., and Blaser, M. J. (2007). Molecular analysis of human forearm superficial skin bacterial biota. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 2927–2932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607077104

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghoul, M., and Mitri, S. (2016). The ecology and evolution of microbial competition. Trends Microbiol. 24, 833–845. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.06.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grice, E. A., Kong, H. H., Conlan, S., Deming, C. B., Davis, J., Young, A. C., et al. (2009). Topographical and temporal diversity of the human skin microbiome. Science 324, 1190–1192. doi: 10.1126/science.1171700

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hopwood, D. A. (2007). Streptomyces in nature and medicine: The antibiotic makers. New York: Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

Hugenholtz, P., Goebel, B. M., and Pace, N. R. (1998). Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. J. Bacteriol. 180, 4765–4774. Available at: http://jb.asm.org/content/180/18/4765.abstract

Google Scholar

Hyatt, D., Chen, G.-L., Locascio, P. F., Land, M. L., Larimer, F. W., and Hauser, L. J. (2010). Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jain, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Phillippy, A. M., Konstantinidis, K. T., and Aluru, S. (2018). High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Katoh, K., and Standley, D. M. (2013). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, D., Hofstaedter, C. E., Zhao, C., Mattei, L., Tanes, C., Clarke, E., et al. (2017). Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research. Microbiome 5:52. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Schröder, J., and Schmidt, B. (2013). Musket: a multistage k-mer spectrum-based error corrector for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 29, 308–315. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts690

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lombard, V., Golaconda Ramulu, H., Drula, E., Coutinho, P. M., and Henrissat, B. (2014). The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D490–D495. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1178

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Louca, S., Martiny, A. C., Polz, M. F., Doolittle, W. F., Nelson, M. B., Hahn, A. S., et al. (2018). Function and functional redundancy in microbial communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 936–943. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0519-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lynch, S. V., and Pedersen, O. (2016). The human intestinal microbiome in health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2369–2379. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1600266

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Magoč, T., and Salzberg, S. L. (2011). FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McArthur, A. G., Waglechner, N., Nizam, F., Yan, A., Azad, M. A., Baylay, A. J., et al. (2013). The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 3348–3357. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00419-13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McDonald, B. R., and Currie, C. R. (2017). Lateral gene transfer dynamics in the ancient bacterial genus Streptomyces. MBio 8:e00644–17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00644-17

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Medema, M. H., Kottmann, R., Yilmaz, P., Cummings, M., Biggins, J. B., Blin, K., et al. (2015). Minimum information about a biosynthetic gene cluster. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 625–631. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1890

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Melnyk, R. A., Hossain, S. S., and Haney, C. H. (2019). Convergent gain and loss of genomic islands drive lifestyle changes in plant-associated Pseudomonas. ISME J. 13, 704–714. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0372-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moyer, C. L., Dobbs, F. C., and Karl, D. M. (1994). Estimation of diversity and community structure through restriction fragment length polymorphism distribution analysis of bacterial 16S rRNA genes from a microbial mat at an active, hydrothermal vent system, Loihi Seamount, Hawaii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 871–879. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7512808

Google Scholar

Navarro-Muñoz, J., Selem-Mojica, N., Mullowney, M., Kautsar, S., Tryon, J., Parkinson, E., et al. (2018). A computational framework for systematic exploration of biosynthetic diversity from large-scale genomic data. bioRxiv [Preprint]:445270. doi: 10.1101/445270

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parks, D. H., Chuvochina, M., Waite, D. W., Rinke, C., Skarshewski, A., Chaumeil, P., et al. (2018). A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 996–1004. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4229

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pozzi, L., Burrell, A. S., Sterner, K. N., Hodgson, J. A., Disotell, T. R., and Raaum, R. L. (2014). Primate phylogenetic relationships and divergence dates inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 75, 165–183. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.02.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pruesse, E., Peplies, J., and Glöckner, F. O. (2012). SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 28, 1823–1829. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts252

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., et al. (2012). The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanderson, M. J. (2003). Molecular data from 27 proteins do not support a Precambrian origin of land plants. Am. J. Bot. 90, 954–956. doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.6.954

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schlebusch, C. M., Malmström, H., Günther, T., Sjödin, P., Coutinho, A., Edlund, H., et al. (2017). Southern African ancient genomes estimate modern human divergence to 350,000 to 260,000 years ago. Science 358, 652–655. doi: 10.1126/science.aao6266

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seemann, T. (2014). Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seemann, T. (2018). barrnap 0.9: Rapid ribosomal RNA prediction. Available at: https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap (Accessed January 1, 2019).

Google Scholar

Smillie, C. S., Smith, M. B., Friedman, J., Cordero, O. X., David, L. A., and Alm, E. J. (2011). Ecology drives a global network of gene exchange connecting the human microbiome. Nature 480, 241–244. doi: 10.1038/nature10571

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stamatakis, A. (2014). RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stegen, J. C., Lin, X., Fredrickson, J. K., Chen, X., Kennedy, D. W., Murray, C. J., et al. (2013). Quantifying community assembly processes and identifying features that impose them. ISME J. 7, 2069–2079. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.93

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A., and Kumar, S. (2013). MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Woese, C. R., and Fox, G. E. (1977). Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5088–5090. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.11.5088

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, Y., Sun, T., Wang, T., Ruebel, O., Northen, T., and Bowen, B. (2015). Analysis of metabolomics datasets with high-performance computing and metabolite atlases. Meta 5, 431–442. doi: 10.3390/metabo5030431

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Streptomyces, metabolism, 16S, phylogenomics, metabolites

Citation: Chevrette MG, Carlos-Shanley C, Louie KB, Bowen BP, Northen TR and Currie CR (2019) Taxonomic and Metabolic Incongruence in the Ancient Genus Streptomyces. Front. Microbiol. 10:2170. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02170

Received: 08 July 2019; Accepted: 04 September 2019;
Published: 20 September 2019.

Edited by:

Iain Sutcliffe, Northumbria University, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Francisco (Paco) Barona-Gomez, Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico
Govind Chandra, John Innes Centre (JIC), United Kingdom

Copyright © 2019 Chevrette, Carlos-Shanley, Louie, Bowen, Northen and Currie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Cameron R. Currie, currie@bact.wisc.edu