Impact Factor 5.640 | CiteScore 7.3
More on impact ›

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 09 October 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.573588

Aquimarina sp. Associated With a Cuticular Disease of Cultured Larval Palinurid and Scyllarid Lobsters

Mei C. Ooi1 *, Evan F. Goulden1 ,2 , Andrew J. Trotter1 , Gregory G. Smith1 and Andrew R. Bridle1
  • 1Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
  • 2Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Bribie Island Research Centre, Woorim, QLD, Australia

Shell (cuticular) disease manifests in various forms and affects many crustaceans, including lobsters. Outbreaks of white leg disease (WLD) with distinct signs of pereiopod tissue whitening and death have been observed in cultured larvae (phyllosomas) of ornate spiny lobster Panulirus ornatus, eastern rock lobster Sagmariasus verreauxi, and slipper lobster Thenus australiensis. This study aimed to characterise and identify the causative agent of WLD through morphological and molecular (16S rRNA gene and whole genome sequencing) analysis, experimental infection of damaged/undamaged P. ornatus and T. australiensis phyllosomas, and bacterial community analysis (16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing) of P. ornatus phyllosomas presenting with WLD during an outbreak. Bacterial communities of WLD-affected pereiopods showed low bacterial diversity and dominant abundance of Aquimarina spp. compared to healthy pereiopods, which were more diverse and enriched with Sulfitobacter spp. 16S rRNA gene Sanger sequencing of cultures from disease outbreaks identified the dominant bacterial isolate (TRL1) as a Gram-negative, long non-flagellated rod with 100% sequence identity to Aquimarina hainanensis. Aquimarina sp. TRL1 was demonstrated through comparative genome analysis (99.99% OrthoANIu) as the bacterium reisolated from experimentally infected phyllosomas presenting with typical signs of WLD. Pereiopod damage was a major predisposing factor to WLD. Histopathological examination of WLD-affected pereiopods showed masses of internalised bacteria and loss of structural integrity, suggesting that Aquimarina sp. TRL1 could enter the circulatory system and cause death by septicaemia. Aquimarina sp. TRL1 appears to have important genomic traits (e.g., tissue-degrading enzymes, gliding motility, and aggregate-promoting factors) implicated in the pathogenicity of this bacterium. We have shown that Aquimarina sp. TRL1 is the aetiological agent of WLD in cultured Palinurid and Scyllarid phyllosomas and that damaged pereiopods are a predisposing factor to WLD.

Introduction

Shell (cuticular) diseases of crustaceans are a global phenomenon with origins dating back more than a 100 million years (Klompmaker et al., 2016). Shell diseases typically present as “spots” that progress to necrotic lesions of varying severity on shell surfaces. Bacteria capable of degrading key cuticular biopolymers are frequently associated with these lesions (Vogan et al., 2008; Bell et al., 2012). Shell diseases affecting lobsters have been described in both wild populations and animals in post-capture holding facilities, and include epizootic shell disease (ESD) of American lobster Homarus americanus and tail fan necrosis of spiny (Palinurid) lobsters (reviewed by Shields, 2011). A number of behavioural and environmental drivers are hypothesised to facilitate cuticular disease, including abrasion and injury (Quinn et al., 2012), sea temperatures (Tlusty and Metzler, 2012), ocean acidification (Kunkel et al., 2012), and anthropogenic pollutants (Laufer et al., 2012). The most studied of lobster cuticular disease is ESD, which has spread along the East Coast of the United States, causing major losses in abundance, marketability, and economic value (Castro et al., 2012; Gomez-Chiarri and Cobb, 2012).

There is now an emerging view that many marine diseases including shell diseases are caused by dysbiosis of the healthy microbiome (Egan and Gardiner, 2016). Indeed, the current mechanistic view for ESD is that increased sea temperatures and anthropogenic contaminants suppress host defences and weaken the cuticle, driving dysbiosis of the cuticle bacteriome (Maynard et al., 2016). A number of studies on wild and cultured juvenile H. americanus have shown that bacterial communities of shell disease lesions harboured an increased abundance of certain strains, including Aquimarina macrocephali subsp. “homaria” when compared to healthy surfaces (Chistoserdov et al., 2012; Meres et al., 2012; Feinman et al., 2017), and conversely, when the strain was administered to abraded lobsters, it caused ESD-like lesions (Quinn et al., 2012). Another closely related bacterium, Aquimarina hainanensis was implicated in the mortalities in larvae of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Zheng et al., 2016) and mud crab Scylla serrata (Midorikawa et al., 2020). Chitinolytic virulence factors are common to bacteria that cause shell disease, and both A. macrocephali and A. hainanensis have demonstrated capacity for exoskeletal chitin degradation through chitin hydrolysis assays and analysis of genomes for chitinase-encoding genes (Ranson et al., 2018; Midorikawa et al., 2020).

Surveillance and diagnosis of emerging diseases (Goulden et al., 2012; Ooi et al., 2017) are required as aquaculture technologies for Palinurid and Scyllarid lobsters transition to commercial scale (Smith et al., 2017). Several disease conditions have been reported anecdotally within experimental hatcheries of Palinurid lobsters, ornate spiny lobster (Panulirus ornatus) and eastern rock lobster (Sagmariasus verreauxi), and the Scyllarid slipper lobster Thenus australiensis from around the Australasian region (pers. comm. the authors). One of the most devastating conditions affecting the planktonic larval (phyllosoma) stage is a cuticular affliction colloquially termed as white leg disease (WLD). WLD is characterised by signature whitening of the articulated appendages, including pereiopods, maxillipeds, antennae, and eyestalks. The infections typically progress from appendage extremities toward the cephalothoracic shield, which can result in: (1) loss of affected limb and incapacitation, (2) partial or total exuvial entrapment and mortality, or (3) infection of the cephalic shield, causing mortality 2–3 days after the initial signs of limb whitening. WLD outbreaks have been reported at experimental hatcheries in Western Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania in Australia, as well as in Tuaran, Malaysia. WLD was previously observed at UTAS during the culture of S. verreauxi and outbreaks have been observed consistently at the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS) since the initial culture of P. ornatus (2010). Preliminary investigations by the authors into the causative agent of WLD using 16S rRNA analysis have putatively identified Aquimarina hainanensis as responsible for WLD outbreaks at IMAS and a geographically distant Queensland hatchery. Outbreaks of this disease continue to occur in P. ornatus as well as the more recent culture of T. australiensis (2017) at IMAS. The precise drivers for WLD remain unclear, although preliminary studies conducted by researchers at IMAS have implicated prevailing culture water chemistry and density-dependent factors. Under high-density culture it is likely that collisions and mechanical damage facilitate cuticular infections and horizontal transfer through proximal contact and/or cannibalism (pers. obs. the authors).

Industry uptake and expansion of the Palinurid and Scyllarid aquaculture sectors will be contingent on characterising new, emerging and exotic diseases that pose threats to productivity. This study aimed to identify the causative agent of WLD by (1) using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to compare bacterial communities of healthy and WLD-affected P. ornatus phyllosomas from an outbreak, (2) isolating and characterising the isolate through morphological and molecular (16S rRNA gene and whole genome sequencing) methods, and (3) fulfilling Koch’s postulates through experimental infection.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Isolation

Bacterial communities were recovered from WLD outbreaks in P. ornatus, T. australiensis, and S. verreauxi experimental larviculture systems at IMAS, Hobart, Australia. All phyllosomas were collected individually into sterile seawater and placed on a sterile dissecting stage (Petri dish). To isolate culturable bacteria associated with WLD, individual WLD-affected pereiopods were removed aseptically by surgical blade and homogenised in sterile seawater. The homogenate was plated in triplicate on Zobell’s marine agar 2,216 (ZMA; Amyl Media, Australia) using spread plate method and incubated at 28°C for 48 h. Isolates were cultured to purity on ZMA at 28°C for 48 h and cryopreserved in marine broth (MB, Difco Laboratories, United States) with 30% (v/v) glycerol at −80°C. Isolates were revived in MB at 28°C with shaking (100 rpm) for assays. Samples used for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis of bacterial communities were from pereiopods of three healthy (no signs of WLD) and three WLD-affected P. ornatus phyllosomas removed as described and individually stored in 1 ml nucleic acid preservation solution (4 M ammonium sulphate, 25 mM sodium citrate, 10 mM EDTA, pH 5.2) at 4°C overnight followed by transfer to −20°C in preparation for further analysis (section “WLD-Associated Community Characterisation”).

WLD-Associated Community Characterisation

Total nucleic acid was extracted from preserved pereiopod samples (section “Bacterial Isolation”) using a similar protocol to section “Sanger Sequencing” with the modification of extraction buffer composition (4 M Urea, 1% SDS, 0.2 M NaCl, and 1 mM sodium citrate) supplemented with Proteinase K. The V1–V3 hypervariable region of bacterial 16S rRNA was amplified using barcoded fusion primers with the same PCR reactions, thermal cycling program, and gel electrophoresis as described by Ooi et al. (2017). Barcoded amplicon sample libraries were sent to Macrogen (Seoul, Korea) for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing using the 454 GS-FLX Titanium (Roche, United States) platform, and the sequences were deposited in NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject accession number PRJNA659570.

The 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing files were demultiplexed according to barcodes, and primers were trimmed in Geneious (Kearse et al., 2012). The sequences were processed for 16S rRNA amplicon analysis using CloVR pipeline (White et al., 2011) from Data Intensive Academic Grid computational cloud (DIAG, 2016). Chimeric and poor quality sequences were removed using UCHIME and QIIME. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) or clusters of filtered sequences with 95% nucleotide sequence identity were assigned to known taxa using the RDP Bayesian Classifier with a confidence threshold of 0.5. Files from CLoVR were uploaded to MicrobiomeAnalyst (Dhariwal et al., 2017) to examine sampling depth, alpha diversity, beta diversity, and OTU abundance. Data were filtered by removing OTUs (minimum two counts) with ≤10% prevalence and normalised by rarefying to the minimum library size, i.e., 4,881. MetagenomeSeq (fit feature model) compared OTU abundance (mean ± standard error) between two health statuses, and a false discovery rate-adjusted value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. A normality test was conducted before comparing each alpha diversity index between phyllosomas of different health statuses using independent samples t-test in SPSS v20, and considered significant when p < 0.05.

Bacterial Characterisation

Sanger Sequencing

Marine broth cultures of the predominant colony morphotype were centrifuged at 10,000 g. Total nucleic acid (TNA) was extracted from pellets in 300 μl of extraction buffer (4 M urea, 0.5% SDS, 50 mM TRIS, and 10 mM EDTA) at 55°C for 10 min. Protein was removed by precipitation using half of the total volume of 7.5 M ammonium acetate (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia). Nucleic acid was precipitated from the supernatant with an equal volume of isopropanol with 0.2 μg μl−1 pink co-precipitant (Bioline, Australia) and centrifuged at 16,000 g for 10 min. The nucleic acid pellet was rinsed twice with 60% ethanol and resuspended in 40 μl LC-MS grade water (LiChrosolv, Merck, Australia). TNA extracts were subject to PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. PCR reaction mixtures (10 μl) comprised 10 μl of 2 × MyTaq HS mix (Bioline), 400 nM each of 27F (5'-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3') and 1492R (5'-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3') 16S rRNA gene primers and 2 μl of 1:10 diluted TNA. The PCR was conducted using a C1000 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Australia) with the following thermal cycling program: initial denaturation for 3 min at 95°C, 28 cycles of denaturation for 15 s at 95°C, annealing for 30 s at 55°C, extension for 30 s at 72°C, and a final extension for 3 min at 72°C. PCR amplicons were purified using SureClean (Bioline) according to manufacturer’s instructions, quantified using a Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen, Life Technologies Australia). Samples were sent to the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF) for Sanger sequencing using the same primers as the amplification reactions. Sequences were edited using Geneious 8.1.7 software and identified using NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST).

Whole Genome Amplification (WGA)

Whole genome amplification was performed using a 2-day old MB cultures of original (section “Bacterial Isolation”) and reisolated Aquimarina sp. (section “Fulfilment of Koch’s Postulates”). Bacterial TNA was extracted as in section “Sanger Sequencing” with modifications to the extraction buffer composition (4 M urea, 0.5% SDS, 0.2 M NaCl, and 10% glycerol) and addition of Proteinase K (Bioline). RNA was digested using 1 μl of RNase A (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Australia) with 30 min incubation at 37°C and gDNA precipitated then resuspended in buffered water (10 mM TRIS, 0.025% Triton X-100). Genomic DNA was assessed by 0.5% agarose gel electrophoresis for high molecular weight DNA and absence of RNA, followed by quantification using a Qubit fluorometer. Samples were sequenced using 150 bp paired-end reads on a MiSeq sequencer (Illumina, United States) by AGRF, while long reads were obtained using the Rapid Barcoding Sequencing Kit (SQK-RBK004, Oxford Nanopore Technologies, United Kingdom) and a R9.4.1 flow cell in the portable MinION Mk1B nanopore sequencer. Long-read nanopore sequences produced by the MinION (FAST5 files from MinKNOW) were basecalled in high accuracy mode, filtered with minimum q score 7, and trimmed of barcodes using Guppy version 3.5.2 (configuration file dna_r9.4.1_450bps_hac.cfg).

The genomes of the original and reisolated Aquimarina sp. were assembled de novo from Illumina Miseq and long-read MinION sequences using the Unicycler hybrid assembly pipeline 0.4.8.0 (Wick et al., 2017) in Galaxy version 20.01 (Afgan et al., 2018). The quality of assembled genomes was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Genome Assemblies 5.0.2 (QUAST; Gurevich et al., 2013) for completeness using BUSCO version 3.0.2 with the bacteria_odb9 lineage (Seppey et al., 2019) and assembly graphs visualized using Bandage Image 0.8.1 (Wick et al., 2015). The species identities of the isolates were assessed from the assembled genomes using TrueBacID (Ha et al., 2019) and genes were annotated using the Rapid Annotation and Subsystem Technology (RAST) server (Aziz et al., 2008). A circular plot showing BLAST comparison of the Aquimarina sp. genomes was generated using BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG) version 0.95 (Alikhan et al., 2011) that incorporates NCBI nucleotide BLAST 2.10.1+. A genomic comparison between the initial and reisolated Aquimarina sp. was made using OrthoANI (Lee et al., 2016). The genome of original isolate Aquimarina sp. TRL1 was deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers CP053590 (chromosome) ‐ CP053591 (plasmid).

Morphology

Aquimarina sp. TRL1 MB cultures were heat fixed and Gram stained using standard methods (Smith and Hussey, 2005). Cell morphology was determined by transmission electron microscopy. Briefly, 1-day old MB cultures were vortexed for 3 s and deposited on a Formvar/carbon grid, negatively stained with 0.5% uranyl acetate, and examined with an electron microscope (Hitachi HT7700, Japan) at 80 kV.

Experimental Infection

Inoculum Preparation

Aquimarina sp. TRL1 MB cultures were washed by centrifugation (5 min at 4,500 g, RT) and resuspended in autoclaved artificial seawater (Instant Ocean, Aquarium Systems, France). Bacterial concentrations of inoculum preparations were estimated by a direct count using a Neubauer hemocytometer. Bacterial concentrations represented as CFU ml−1 were assessed by a drop plate method using 10 μl drops of 10-fold serial dilutions of inoculum (Herigstad et al., 2001).

Aquarium

The pathogenicity of Aquimarina sp. TRL1 toward phyllosomas of P. ornatus [stages 6–10, 86 days post hatch (dph)] and T. australiensis (stage 3, 12 dph) was examined by immersion challenge. Healthy phyllosomas without signs of WLD were quarantined and transferred to a biosecure PC2 aquatic facility for experimental manipulations (IMAS, Hobart, Australia). Phyllosomas (n = 4 per treatment group) were immersed either intact or with a single surgically damaged pereiopod in glass beakers containing autoclaved seawater (control) or autoclaved seawater with low (2.7 × 105 CFU ml−1 for P. ornatus; 8 × 106 CFU ml−1 for T. australiensis) or high (9.0 × 107 CFU ml−1 for P. ornatus; 4.5 × 108 CFU ml−1 for T. australiensis) concentrations of Aquimarina sp. TRL1 for 30 min. Phyllosomas were transferred to 5 L kreisel aquaria at a stocking density of 0.8 larva L−1. Flow through, ozonated, and UV-irradiated seawater was supplied at two exchanges h−1. The photoperiod was set at 12:12 h light:dark. Water quality was measured daily, and parameters were within the following ranges: temperature 26.1–29.8°C, pH 7.65–8.23, salinity 34.2–35.9 ppt, and dissolved oxygen 7.97–10.06 mg l−1 for P. ornatus systems; and temperature 27.1–29.6°C, pH 7.90–8.15, salinity 33.1–34.8 ppt, and dissolved oxygen 7.85–8.58 mg l−1 for T. australiensis systems. Animals were not fed during the experiment. Phyllosomas were evaluated daily for signs of WLD and mortality. Upon termination of the experiments at day 3 (P. ornatus) or day 4 (T. australiensis), phyllosomas were collected for reisolation of the pathogen and histopathological examination.

Fulfilment of Koch’s Postulates

Pereiopods of all phyllosomas were surgically removed and homogenised in autoclaved artificial seawater. Homogenates were spread plated on ZMA and incubated at 28°C for 1–4 days. Three dominant colony morphotypes from each homogenate were cultured to purity in MB. A real-time PCR that amplified a 156 bp amplicon of the 16S rRNA gene of Aquimarina spp. was used to screen pure MB cultures for representative isolates for sequencing. The PCR primer set was designed using Beacon Designer 8.10 (Premier Biosoft, United States). The specificity of the primer set was tested in silico against the NBCI nr nucleotide database and found to amplify Aquimarina spp. and closely related members of Flavobacteriaceae. Real-time PCR reaction mixture (10 μl) consisted of 5 μl of 2 × MyTaq HS mix with SYBR Green, 200 nM each of Aquimarina F1 (5'-CCTTACCAGGGCTTAAATGT-3') and R1 (5'-AACCTGCTAGCAACTAACAA-3') primers and 0.2 μl of bacterial culture. The real-time PCR was conducted using CFX Connect Real-Time System (Bio-Rad Laboratories) with the following thermal cycling program: 3 min at 95°C, 40 cycles of 10 s at 95°C, 20 s at 58°C, and 10 s at 72°C. Specificity of amplicons was examined using melt curve analysis performed at 95°C for 10 s, 58°C for 5 s, and gradually increased to 95°C. The positive isolates were subject to Sanger and whole genome sequencing.

Histology

Pereiopods of control (no lesions) and Aquimarina sp. TRL1-exposed (lesions) phyllosomas were fixed in seawater Davidson’s fixative (3:3:2:1 seawater:ethanol:formalin:acetic acid) for 24–48 h at room temperature before transferring to 70% ethanol. Fixed pereiopods were processed in a Leica TP1050 tissue processor (Leica Biosystems, Australia). Samples were embedded in paraffin using a Shandon Histocentre 3 embedding center (Thermo Electron Australia). Samples were sagitally sectioned at 4 μm using a Microm HM340 rotary microtome (Microm International, Germany) and stained with haematoxylin and eosin using a Shandon Linistain GLX automatic stainer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sections were examined using a Leica DM500 light microscope with images being captured using a Leica ICC50 W camera and processed using LAS EZ software (Leica Microsystems, Australia).

Results

Bacterial Communities Associated With WLD

The mean read length of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences was 486 bp. Good’s coverage ranged between 99.8 and 100% (Table 1). The observed OTUs (t 4 = −5.594, p = 0.013) and ACE indices (t 4 = −3.892, p = 0.042) were significantly lower in the diseased phyllosomas compared to the healthy animals (Table 1). This was consistent with the diseased phyllosomas library being significantly less diverse than the healthy animals according to the Shannon (t 4 = −4.383, p = 0.012) and Simpson indices (t 4 = −3.474, p = 0.028). The first axes of principal coordinate analyses based on Bray Curtis and weighted UniFrac distance matrices explained 99.1 and 99.6% of the OTUs variation between sample libraries (Figure 1). Both sets of PCoA analyses showed bacterial communities from healthy animals clustered distinctly from WLD-affected communities.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Sampling depth, richness, and alpha diversity indices for pereiopod sequence libraries of P. ornatus phyllosomas.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Principal coordinate analysis plots based on (A) Bray Curtis index and (B) weighted UniFrac distance methods showing similarity in pereiopod sequence libraries of P. ornatus phyllosomas.

Genus Aquimarina (phylum Bacteroidetes) was significantly more represented (p < 0.001) in the pereiopod of diseased P. ornatus phyllosomas (96.7 ± 1.5%) than that of healthy larvae (0.4 ± 0.2%; Figure 2). Conversely, the pereiopod libraries of healthy phyllosomas had significantly higher abundance of genera Sulfitobacter (phylum Proteobacteria; 84.0 ± 2.5%; p < 0.001) and Methylobacterium (phylum Proteobacteria; 7.1 ± 2.9%; p = 0.033) than that of diseased animals (Sulfitobacter 1.2 ± 0.6%; Methylobacterium 1.7 ± 0.8%).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Relative abundance of the bacterial (A) phyla and (B) genera in the pereiopods of P. ornatus phyllosomas (n = 3 per treatment group).

Characterisation of Aquimarina sp. TRL1

WGA and Identification

Whole genome assembly of the original Aquimarina sp. TRL1 isolate (section “Bacterial Isolation”) using short (1.11 Gb, 3,676,944 paired-end reads) and long-read nanopore (254.3 Mb, 109,909 reads, mean read length = 2,313.4 bases, read length N50 = 8,572 bases) sequences with the Unicycler hybrid assembler and assessed by QUAST provided a single circular contig representing the 5,351,143 bp circular chromosome and a separate 63,637 bp circular plasmid (Figure 3). As a measure of genome completeness, the analysis of single-copy orthologs using BUSCO showed 93.9% complete and single BUSCOs. Annotation of the Aquimarina sp. TRL1 genomes using the RAST server identified genes associated with tissue-degrading enzymes (including eight chitinase genes), physical attributes, stress resistance, iron uptake, and antibiotic resistance that are potentially related to its virulence factors (Supplementary Table 1). Additionally, five 16S rRNA genes were detected. The 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained from the WGA (one isolate from P. ornatus) or from Sanger sequencing (three isolates from each of P. ornatus, T. australiensis, and S. verreauxi) from WLD outbreaks were a 100% BLAST match to Aquimarina hainanensis (GenBank accession KP200684). However, as the genome for type strain A. hainanensis (Zheng et al., 2016) was unavailable, Aquimarina sp. TRL1 could not be definitively classified as A. hainanensis according to the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes (Chun et al., 2018). Nevertheless, the Aquimarina sp. TRL1 genome had 83.0% average nucleotide identity (ANI) when compared with the pathogen associated with ESD, A. macrocephali.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Circular representation and Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) comparison of the isolated Aquimarina sp. genomes analysed and generated using BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG). Circular tracks display (from the inside): (1) GC skew, (2) GC plot, (3) coding sequences of original Aquimarina sp. TRL1, (4) coding sequences of reisolated Aquimarina sp., and (5) encoded genes (16S rRNA, chitinase, antibiotic resistance and iron acquisition) in the chromosome and the plasmid region.

Morphology

The colony morphotype was odorous, yellow with convex round (~1 mm Ø) to rhizoid morphology after prolonged incubation. Aquimarina sp. TRL1 was a Gram-negative bacterium with non-flagellated, rod-shaped cells measuring 2.3–4.3 μm long and 0.3–0.4 μm wide (Figure 4). The cells typically formed mesh-like aggregates (Figure 4B), macroscopically observed as dense yellow agglomerates in broth cultures.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Transmission electron micrographs of Aquimarina sp. TRL1 from 1 d old marine broth cultures showing (A) an individual rod-shaped cell and (B) a mesh of cells.

Experimental Infection and Fulfilment of Koch’s Postulates

P. ornatus and T. australiensis phyllosomas exposed to high concentrations of Aquimarina sp. TRL1 exhibited white-yellow spot lesions on pereiopods as early as 1 day post-exposure. Lesions typically developed on surgically damaged pereiopods or one to two pereiopods of intact phyllosomas. The incidence of lesions was associated with the concentration of Aquimarina sp. TRL1, with more lesions observed in phyllosomas exposed to high concentrations. Necrotic spot lesions (Figures 5A,F) gradually progressed over 1–2 days to whitening of adjacent tissues (Figure 5B) in both species. For P. ornatus, this proceeded to detachment of segments or exopods (swimmeret) at the junction of the basis (Figure 5D) and ischio-merus (Figure 5C). P. ornatus phyllosomas also “curled” as the disease progressed, defined by the clustering of pereiopods and distortion of the cephalic shield. Moribundity and death was preceded by extensive and systemic tissue whitening of appendages and cephalic shield (Figure 5E). WLD lesions were not observed for intact or surgically damaged control phyllosomas of P. ornatus or T. australiensis.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Gross pathological changes (arrows) during white leg disease (WLD) progression of P. ornatus (A–E) and T. australiensis (F) phyllosomas. (A) Pereiopod spot lesion at junction of basis (Bs), ischio-merus (Is-me) and exopod (Expd). (B) Advanced lesion of exopod and plumose natatory setae (Pns). (C) Detachment of pereiopod at junction of basis and ischio-merus. (D) Detachment of pereiopod and exopod at basis joint. (E) Creeping tissue whitening of pereiopod basis and coxa (Cx) segments and cephalic shield (Cep). (F) Spot lesions on carpus (Cp) and exopod of surgically damaged pereiopod (T. australiensis).

Histological examinations of control P. ornatus showed structural integrity, with multinucleated muscle fibers and connective tissue underlying an intact cuticle (Figure 6A). Conversely, pereiopods with lesions from phyllosomas exposed to Aquimarina sp. TRL1 exhibited loss of muscle and cuticular architecture associated with masses of basophilic bacterial aggregations, which were denser at cuticular margins (Figures 6BE).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Sagittal sections of P. ornatus pereiopod muscle (Mu) and cuticular (Cu) architecture from (A) control phyllosomas and (B–E) phyllosomas exhibiting lesions following exposure to Aquimarina sp. TRL1. Bac: bacterial colonies. Sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin.

On the 3rd day of experimental infection, cumulative mortality was 50 and 75% for surgically damaged P. ornatus phyllosomas exposed to low or high concentrations of Aquimarina sp. TRL1, respectively (Table 2A). No mortality was observed for intact P. ornatus phyllosomas exposed to Aquimarina sp. TRL1 at low concentration; however, 75% mortality was observed for intact phyllosomas exposed to the high concentration. On the 4th day of experimental infection, mortality (50%) of T. australiensis phyllosomas occurred only in surgically damaged animals exposed to the high concentration of Aquimarina sp. TRL1 (Table 2B). There was no mortality in intact or surgically damaged control phyllosomas of P. ornatus or T. australiensis.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Cumulative mortality (%) of intact or surgically damaged (A)P. ornatus and (B)T. australiensis phyllosomas (n = 4 per treatment group) exposed to low or high concentrations of Aquimarina sp. TRL1.

For Aquimarina spp. real-time PCR-positive amplification products were recovered from phyllosomas of both species inoculated with the Aquimarina sp. TRL1 isolate. The culturable pereiopod communities from control P. ornatus and T. australiensis were PCR negative. The Sanger sequenced 16S rRNA PCR amplicons from the PCR-positive isolates from P. ornatus and T. australiensis shared 98.1–100% sequence similarity with Aquimarina hainanensis (KP200684). The complete genome of the reisolated Aquimarina sp. (section “Fulfilment of Koch’s Postulates”) from P. ornatus assembled using short (1.42 Gb, 4,686,658 paired-end reads) and nanopore long reads (244.7 Mb, 125,272 reads, mean read length = 1,935.2 bases, read length N50 = 6,449 bases) consisted of a 5,341,386 bp circular chromosome and a 63,637 bp circular plasmid that had 93.9% complete and single BUSCOs. The genomes of original (TRL1) and reisolated Aquimarina sp. (Figure 3) were highly similar by BLAST (>99%) with a 99.99% OrthoANIu value. The high nucleotide similarities between the reisolated and original Aquimarina sp. suggest that TRL1 had been reisolated and together with the typical signs of WLD lesions, rapid progression of disease and acute mortality exhibited by experimentally infected P. ornatus and T. australiensis phyllosomas, Koch’s postulates were fulfilled.

Discussion

The experimental infection in P. ornatus and T. australiensis confirmed the causative agent for WLD in cultured phyllosomas as Aquimarina sp. TRL1 through fulfilment of Koch’s postulates (Fredericks and Relman, 1996), whereby: (1) Aquimarina sp. TRL1 was present in diseased experimentally infected phyllosomas but absent in healthy control animals, (2) Aquimarina sp. TRL1 was successfully isolated from phyllosomas presenting with WLD and cultured to purity, (3) Aquimarina sp. TRL1 caused signs of WLD when introduced to healthy phyllosomas, and (4) Aquimarina sp. TRL1 was reisolated from experimentally infected lobsters presenting with WLD, as confirmed by Sanger and whole genome sequencing. Furthermore, A. hainanensis was isolated from S. verreauxi phyllosomas during a WLD outbreak. The identification of specific pathogens is critical to the development of rapid detection methods and surveillance, and in the notification of the broader aquaculture community of emergent issues (Stentiford et al., 2017).

Aquimarina sp. TRL1 is Gram-negative, yellow pigmented and non-flagellated bacterium typical of A. hainanensis strains (Zheng et al., 2016; Midorikawa et al., 2020) and other members of the Aquimarina genus (Yoon et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2012; Yu et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2018). The number of species assigned to the Aquimarina genus has been rapidly expanding in recent times, with many recovered from seawater including A. addita (Yi and Chun, 2011), A. aggregata (Wang et al., 2016), A. atlantica (Li et al., 2014a), A. celericrescens (Wang et al., 2018), A. litoralis (Oh et al., 2010), A. longa (Yu et al., 2013), A. megaterium (Yu et al., 2014), A. muelleri (Nedashkovskaya et al., 2005), and A. pacifica (Zhang et al., 2014) and marine organisms such as A. agarilytica and A. agarivorans from red alga (Lin et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2015); A. hainanensis and A. penaei from shrimp L. vannamei (Li et al., 2014b; Zheng et al., 2016); A. gracilis and A. mytili from mussel Mytilus coruscus (Park et al., 2012, 2013); and A. spongiae from sponge Halichondria oshoro (Yoon et al., 2011). In particular, A. hainanensis has been associated with shell diseases and mortality in a number of species of larval (Zheng et al., 2016; Midorikawa et al., 2020) and juvenile (Dan and Hamasaki, 2015) crustaceans, and this was confirmed by the findings of our study. Strains of A. hainanensis may be active over a range of temperature in cultured larvae of crustaceans, observed at 23°C for S. verreauxi (this study); 25°C for brine shrimp Artemia franciscana, freshwater shrimp Caridina multidentata, swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus, and mud crab S. serrata (Midorikawa et al., 2020); and 28°C for P. ornatus, T. australiensis (this study), and L. vannamei (Zheng et al., 2016). Moreover, susceptibility towards A. hainanensis appears to be species-dependent (Midorikawa et al., 2020) and was confirmed by observations of lower cumulative mortality in T. australiensis phyllosomas compared to P. ornatus in this study.

From the experimental infection, we found that Aquimarina sp. TRL1 and limb damage were important determinants of WLD. Firstly, WLD did not manifest in control phyllosomas in the absence of inoculated Aquimarina sp. TRL1, irrespective of intactness of pereiopods. Secondly, a low concentration of Aquimarina sp. TRL1 was able to induce WLD in P. ornatus phyllosomas with surgically damaged pereiopods. And thirdly, cumulative mortality was the same in P. ornatus phyllosomas, irrespective of intactness of pereiopods, at a high level of exposure to Aquimarina sp. TRL1. As it is unlikely that Aquimarina are present in larval rearing systems at the highest concentrations used in this study, together these results suggest broken appendages predispose phyllosomas to WLD. The fragile articulated limbs of phyllosomas are easily broken due to collisions, water turbulence, and handling, which leave the cuticle vulnerable to invasion by chitinolytic bacteria. Aquimarina sp. TRL1 is involved with the initiation of spot lesions of WLD that progress to tissue whitening and loss of pereiopod segments and function. This will likely impact swimming and foraging ability preceding starvation. However, death due to septicaemia and systemic infection as revealed by histopathology probably occurs well in advance given pelagic phyllosomas are inherently adapted to long periods of starvation (Smith et al., 2010).

The complete genome analysis of Aquimarina sp. TRL1 revealed numerous potential virulence factors including substrate-degrading enzymes, gliding, aggregate-forming ability, and antibiotic resistance. Multiple genes encoding chitinases were detected in Aquimarina sp. TRL1, and this feature is common among members of Aquimarina recovered from S. serrata (Midorikawa et al., 2020), H. americanus (Ranson et al., 2018), and seawater (Xu et al., 2015). Encoded genes for haemolysin, metalloprotease, and iron uptake mechanisms were also described as virulence factors for Aquimarina sp. associated with ESD in H. americanus (Ranson et al., 2018). The presence of genes encoding chitinases, lipases, and proteases suggests functions in the degradation of exoskeletal tissues, allowing Aquimarina sp. to breach epithelial barriers. Once Aquimarina sp. is internalised and pervades the circulatory system, the presence of superoxide dismutase genes similar to the fish pathogen Tenacibaculum maritimum (Pérez-Pascual et al., 2017) may enable protection from oxidative stress responses of host phagocytes. Aquimarina sp. TRL1 also encoded multiple transporter proteins involved in gliding motility, which is common throughout Flavobacteriaceae (Bernardet and Bowman, 2006). Gliding motility facilitates movement along surfaces and together with enzymatic degradation could account for the distinct “creeping” of tissue whitening of phyllosomas. The differences in the regulation of motility systems among strains could be a major determinant of pathogenicity (Hudson et al., 2019). Host attachment may also occur more rapidly in more virulent strains, as shown for Flavobacterium psychrophilum attached to the gills of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Nematollahi et al., 2003). The formation of mesh-like aggregations of Aquimarina sp. TRL1 likely facilitated attachment to phyllosoma appendages, as shown for larvae of S. serrata and P. trituberculatus larvae (Midorikawa et al., 2020). Genes encoding glycosyltransferase may secrete extracellular polysaccharides that help the formation of aggregates, as proposed for A. longa (Xu et al., 2015). The Aquimarina sp. TRL1 chromosome also revealed genes encoding resistance to beta-lactams, chloramphenicol, acriflavin, and polymyxin antibiotics. Therefore, aquaculture antibiotics, such as amoxicillin, penicillin, chloramphenicol (Liu et al., 2017), and acriflavin (Mohamed et al., 2000) are unlikely to be effective when treating Aquimarina sp. TRL1 infections.

In our study, the bacteriome of pereiopods from healthy P. ornatus phyllosomas collected from a larval rearing system was dominated by Sulfitobacter spp. These microorganisms are dominant members of wild P. ornatus phyllosomas with putative, yet to be ascertained roles in health (Payne et al., 2008). Sulfitobacter is common in the marine environment, able to metabolise sulphur compounds (Pujalte et al., 2014), and in interaction with phytoplankton produces bioactive metabolites that inhibit important aquaculture pathogens (Sharifah and Eguchi, 2012). Conversely, the bacteriome of WLD-affected pereiopods of P. ornatus phyllosomas collected from a larval rearing system was dominated by Aquimarina spp. The dominance of Aquimarina (96.7%) in WLD communities of P. ornatus is in stark contrast to Aquimarina populations (11.8%) involved in polymicrobial diseases, such as ESD in H. americanus (Quinn et al., 2012; Feinman et al., 2017). This suggests a more pivotal role for Aquimarina spp. in the aetiology of WLD, which supports our observations under experimental infection. Another possibility is that larvae are more susceptible to Aquimarina causing an acute WLD compared to a chronic ESD in older lobsters. Moreover, Aquimarina spp. have been found in low abundance in healthy organisms, including H. americanus (Meres et al., 2012) and red alga Delisea pulchra (Kumar et al., 2016), suggesting some species are capable of opportunistic infection under certain conditions. Dysbiosis may occur in the early stages of WLD, where opportunistic microorganisms like Aquimarina spp. are able to proliferate by outcompeting other microorganisms and overcoming host defences using genomic artillery (e.g., antibiotic resistance, iron uptake systems, and superoxide dismutase production) as described for Aquimarina sp. TRL1 in this study. Future work may examine the temporal and functional role of Aquimarina in WLD, and how microbial networks are impacted during the progression of the disease.

We have shown that Aquimarina sp. TRL1 is the aetiological agent of WLD in cultured Palinurid (P. ornatus) and Scyllarid (T. australiensis) larvae by fulfilling Koch’s postulates. Host species together with suboptimal culture condition is likely to influence the susceptibility of phyllosomas to WLD. Damaged pereiopods are a predisposing factor to WLD, particularly when phyllosomas are in a marine environment with a low concentration of Aquimarina sp. TRL1. Aquimarina sp. TRL1 appears to have important genomic traits (e.g., tissue-degrading enzymes, gliding motility, and aggregate-forming factors) involved in the pathogenicity and the distinct signs of tissue whitening in phyllosomas. The characterisation of WLD will allow the development of health management strategies for the emerging lobster aquaculture industry.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Author Contributions

AB, MO, AT, and GS conceived and designed the experiments. MO, AB, EG, and AT performed the experiments. MO and AB analysed the data. MO, AB, EG, AT, and GS wrote the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Disclaimer

The views expressed herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Australian Government or Australian Research Council.

Funding

This research was supported by the Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Hub for Sustainable Onshore Lobster Aquaculture (project number IH190100014).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Geoff Endo, Kate Picone, Molly Christensen, and Marnie Redhead for the preparation and assistance during the experimental infection phase.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2020.573588/full#supplementary-material

References

Afgan, E., Baker, D., Batut, B., van Den Beek, M., Bouvier, D., Čech, M., et al. (2018). The galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W537–W544. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky379

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alikhan, N. -F., Petty, N. K., Ben Zakour, N. L., and Beatson, S. A. (2011). BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 12:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aziz, R. K., Bartels, D., Best, A. A., DeJongh, M., Disz, T., Edwards, R. A., et al. (2008). The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bell, S. L., Allam, B., McElroy, A., Dove, A., and Taylor, G. T. (2012). Investigation of epizootic shell disease in American lobsters (Homarus americanus) from Long Island Sound: I. characterization of associated microbial communities. J. Shellfish Res. 31, 473–484. doi: 10.2983/035.031.0207

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bernardet, J. -F., and Bowman, J. P. (2006). “The genus Flavobacterium” in The prokaryotes. eds. M. Dworkin, S. Falkow, E. Rosenberg, K. -L. Schleifer, and E. Stackebrandt (Singapore: Springer), 481–531.

Google Scholar

Castro, K. M., Cobb, J. S., Gomez-Chiarri, M., and Tlusty, M. (2012). Epizootic shell disease in American lobsters Homarus americanus in southern New England: past, present and future. Dis. Aquat. Org. 100, 149–158. doi: 10.3354/dao02507

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chistoserdov, A. Y., Quinn, R. A., Gubbala, S. L., and Smolowitz, R. (2012). Bacterial communities associated with lesions of shell disease in the American lobster, Homarus americanus Milne-Edwards. J. Shellfish Res. 31, 449–463. doi: 10.2983/035.031.0205

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chun, J., Oren, A., Ventosa, A., Christensen, H., Arahal, D. R., da Costa, M. S., et al. (2018). Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 68, 461–466. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002516

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dan, S., and Hamasaki, K. (2015). Evaluation of the effects of probiotics in controlling bacterial necrosis symptoms in larvae of the mud crab Scylla serrata during mass seed production. Aquac. Int. 23, 277–296. doi: 10.1007/s10499-014-9815-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dhariwal, A., Chong, J., Habib, S., King, I. L., Agellon, L. B., and Xia, J. (2017). MicrobiomeAnalyst: a web-based tool for comprehensive statistical, visual and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, W180–W188. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx295

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

DIAG (2016). Data Intensive Academic Grid [Online]. Available at: http://diagcomputing.org/ (Accessed November 18, 2014).

Google Scholar

Egan, S., and Gardiner, M. (2016). Microbial dysbiosis: rethinking disease in marine ecosystems. Front. Microbiol. 7:991. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00991

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feinman, S. G., Martínez, A. U., Bowen, J. L., and Tlusty, M. F. (2017). Fine-scale transition to lower bacterial diversity and altered community composition precedes shell disease in laboratory-reared juvenile American lobster. Dis. Aquat. Org. 124, 41–54. doi: 10.3354/dao03111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fredericks, D., and Relman, D. A. (1996). Sequence-based identification of microbial pathogens: a reconsideration of Koch’s postulates. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 9, 18–33. doi: 10.1128/cmr.9.1.18

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gomez-Chiarri, M., and Cobb, J. S. (2012). Shell disease in the American lobster, Homarus americanus: a synthesis of research from the New England lobster research initiative: lobster shell disease. J. Shellfish Res. 31, 583–591. doi: 10.2983/035.031.0219

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goulden, E. F., Hall, M. R., Bourne, D. G., Pereg, L. L., and Høj, L. (2012). Pathogenicity and infection cycle of Vibrio owensii in larviculture of the ornate spiny lobster (Panulirus ornatus). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 2841–2849. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07274-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N., and Tesler, G. (2013). QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29, 1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ha, S. -M., Kim, C. K., Roh, J., Byun, J. -H., Yang, S. -J., Choi, S. -B., et al. (2019). Application of the whole genome-based bacterial identification system, TrueBac ID, using clinical isolates that were not identified with three matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems. Ann. Lab. Med. 39, 530–536. doi: 10.3343/alm.2019.39.6.530

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Herigstad, B., Hamilton, M., and Heersink, J. (2001). How to optimize the drop plate method for enumerating bacteria. J. Microbiol. Methods 44, 121–129. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00241-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hudson, J., Kumar, V., and Egan, S. (2019). Comparative genome analysis provides novel insight into the interaction of Aquimarina sp. AD1, BL5 and AD10 with their macroalgal host. Mar. Genomics 46, 8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.margen.2019.02.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., Cheung, M., Sturrock, S., et al. (2012). Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klompmaker, A. A., Chistoserdov, A. Y., and Felder, D. L. (2016). Possible shell disease in 100 million-year-old crabs. Dis. Aquat. Org. 119, 91–99. doi: 10.3354/dao02988

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, V., Zozaya-Valdes, E., Kjelleberg, S., Thomas, T., and Egan, S. (2016). Multiple opportunistic pathogens can cause a bleaching disease in the red seaweed Delisea pulchra. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 3962–3975. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13403

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kunkel, J. G., Nagel, W., and Jercinovic, M. J. (2012). Mineral fine structure of the American lobster cuticle. J. Shellfish Res. 31, 515–527. doi: 10.2983/035.031.0211

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Laufer, H., Chen, M., Johnson, M., Demir, N., and Bobbitt, J. M. (2012). The effect of alkylphenols on lobster shell hardening. J. Shellfish Res. 31, 555–563. doi: 10.2983/035.031.0215

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, I., Kim, Y. O., Park, S. -C., and Chun, J. (2016). OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 66, 1100–1103. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000760

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, G., Lai, Q., Sun, F., Liu, X., Xie, Y., Du, Y., et al. (2014a). Aquimarina atlantica sp. nov., isolated from surface seawater of the Atlantic Ocean. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 106, 293–300. doi: 10.1007/s10482-014-0196-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., Wang, L., Huang, H., Lai, Q., and Shao, Z. (2014b). Aquimarina penaei sp. nov., isolated from intestinal tract contents of Pacific white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 106, 1223–1229. doi: 10.1007/s10482-014-0292-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, B., Lu, G., Zheng, Y., Xie, W., Li, S., and Hu, Z. (2012). Aquimarina agarilytica sp. nov., an agarolytic species isolated from a red alga. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62, 869–873. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.027136-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, X., Steele, J. C., and Meng, X. -Z. (2017). Usage, residue, and human health risk of antibiotics in Chinese aquaculture: a review. Environ. Pollut. 223, 161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maynard, J., van Hooidonk, R., Harvell, C. D., Eakin, C. M., Liu, G., Willis, B. L., et al. (2016). Improving marine disease surveillance through sea temperature monitoring, outlooks and projections. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 371:20150208. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0208

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meres, N. J., Ajuzie, C. C., Sikaroodi, M., Vemulapalli, M., Shields, J. D., and Gillevet, P. M. (2012). Dysbiosis in epizootic shell disease of the American lobster (Homarus americanus). J. Shellfish Res. 31, 463–473. doi: 10.2983/035.031.0206

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Midorikawa, Y., Shimizu, T., Sanda, T., Hamasaki, K., Dan, S., Lal, M. T. B. M., et al. (2020). Characterization of Aquimarina hainanensis isolated from diseased mud crab Scylla serrata larvae in a hatchery. J. Fish Dis. 43, 541–549. doi: 10.1111/jfd.13151

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mohamed, S., Nagaraj, G., Chua, F., and Wang, Y. (2000). “The use of chemicals in aquaculture in Malaysia and Singapore. in Use of Chemicals in Aquaculture in Asia: Proceedings of the Meeting on the Use of Chemicals in Aquaculture in Asia. May 20–22, 1996; Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines (Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines: Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center), 127–140.

Google Scholar

Nedashkovskaya, O. I., Kim, S. B., Lysenko, A. M., Frolova, G. M., Mikhailov, V. V., Lee, K. H., et al. (2005). Description of Aquimarina muelleri gen. nov., sp. nov., and proposal of the reclassification of [Cytophaga] latercula Lewin 1969 as Stanierella latercula gen. nov., comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55, 225–229. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63349-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nematollahi, A., Decostere, A., Pasmans, F., Ducatelle, R., and Haesebrouck, F. (2003). Adhesion of high and low virulence Flavobacterium psychrophilum strains to isolated gill arches of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Dis. Aquat. Org. 55, 101–107. doi: 10.3354/dao055101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oh, Y. -S., Kahng, H. -Y., Lee, Y. S., Yoon, B. -J., Lim, S. -B., Jung, J. S., et al. (2010). Aquimarina litoralis sp. nov., isolated from a coastal seawater. J. Microbiol. 48, 433–437. doi: 10.1007/s12275-010-0088-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ooi, M. C., Goulden, E. F., Smith, G. G., Nowak, B. F., and Bridle, A. R. (2017). Developmental and gut-related changes to the microbiomes of the cultured juvenile spiny lobster Panulirus ornatus. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93:fix159. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix159

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, S. C., Choe, H. N., Baik, K. S., and Seong, C. N. (2012). Aquimarina mytili sp. nov., isolated from the gut microflora of a mussel, Mytilus coruscus, and emended description of Aquimarina macrocephali. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62, 1974–1979. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.032904-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, S. C., Choe, H. N., Baik, K. S., and Seong, C. N. (2013). Aquimarina gracilis sp. nov., isolated from the gut microflora of a mussel, Mytilus coruscus, and emended description of Aquimarina spongiae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 63, 1782–1787. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.044289-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Payne, M. S., Høj, L., Wietz, M., Hall, M. R., Sly, L., and Bourne, D. G. (2008). Microbial diversity of mid-stage Palinurid phyllosoma from Great Barrier Reef waters. J. Appl. Microbiol. 105, 340–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03749.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pérez-Pascual, D., Lunazzi, A., Magdelenat, G., Rouy, Z., Roulet, A., Lopez-Roques, C., et al. (2017). The complete genome sequence of the fish pathogen Tenacibaculum maritimum provides insights into virulence mechanisms. Front. Microbiol. 8:1542. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01542

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pujalte, M. J., Lucena, T., Ruvira, M. A., Arahal, D. R., and Macián, M. C. (2014). “The family Rhodobacteraceae” in The prokaryotes: Alphaproteobacteria and betaproteobacteria. ed. E. Rosenberg (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag), 439–512.

Google Scholar

Quinn, R. A., Metzler, A., Smolowitz, R. M., Tlusty, M., and Chistoserdov, A. Y. (2012). Exposures of Homarus americanus shell to three bacteria isolated from naturally occurring epizootic shell disease lesions. J. Shellfish Res. 31, 485–493. doi: 10.2983/035.031.0208

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ranson, H. J., LaPorte, J., Spinard, E., Chistoserdov, A. Y., Gomez-Chiarri, M., Nelson, D. R., et al. (2018). Draft genome sequence of the putative marine pathogen Aquimarina sp. strain I32. 4. Genome Announc. 6, e00313–e00318. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00313-18

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seppey, M., Manni, M., and Zdobnov, E. M. (2019). “BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness” in Gene prediction. ed. M. Kollmar (New York: Humana), 227–245.

Google Scholar

Sharifah, E. N., and Eguchi, M. (2012). Mixed cultures of the phytoplankton Nannochloropsis oculata and the marine bacterium Sulfitobacter sp. RO3 inhibit the growth of virulent strains of the major fish pathogen Vibrio anguillarum. Aquac. Sci. 60, 39–45. doi: 10.11233/aquaculturesci.60.39

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shields, J. D. (2011). Diseases of spiny lobsters: a review. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 106, 79–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2010.09.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, G. G., Fitzgibbon, Q., Battaglene, S. C., Simon, C., Goulden, E. F., Cundy, D., et al. (2017). “The why, where, and how of spiny lobster aquaculture (Panulirus ornatus)” in 11th International Conference & Wokshop on Lobster Biology & Management. 4–9 June; (Portland, Maine).

Google Scholar

Smith, A. C., and Hussey, M. A. (2005). Gram stain protocols. Washington DC, USA: American Society for Microbiology.

Google Scholar

Smith, G., Kenway, M., and Hall, M. (2010). Starvation and recovery ability of phyllosoma of the tropical spiny lobsters Panulirus ornatus and P. homarus in captivity. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. India 52, 249–256.

Google Scholar

Stentiford, G. D., Sritunyalucksana, K., Flegel, T. W., Williams, B. A., Withyachumnarnkul, B., Itsathitphaisarn, O., et al. (2017). New paradigms to help solve the global aquaculture disease crisis. PLoS Pathog. 13:e1006160. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006160

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tlusty, M. F., and Metzler, A. (2012). Relationship between temperature and shell disease in laboratory populations of juvenile American lobsters (Homarus americanus). J. Shellfish Res. 31, 533–542. doi: 10.2983/035.031.0213

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vogan, C. L., Powell, A., and Rowley, A. F. (2008). Shell disease in crustaceans—just chitin recycling gone wrong? Environ. Microbiol. 10, 826–835. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01514.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, N. -N., Li, C. -M., Li, Y. -X., and Du, Z. -J. (2018). Aquimarina celericrescens sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 68, 1683–1688. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002733

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Ming, H., Guo, W., Chen, H., and Zhou, C. (2016). Aquimarina aggregata sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 66, 3406–3412. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

White, J. R., Arze, C., Matalka, M., White, O., Angiuoli, S. V., and Fricke, W. F. (2011). CloVR-16S: phylogenetic microbial community composition analysis based on 16S ribosomal RNA amplicon sequencing—standard operating procedure, version 2. 0. 1–9.

Google Scholar

Wick, R. R., Judd, L. M., Gorrie, C. L., and Holt, K. E. (2017). Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wick, R. R., Schultz, M. B., Zobel, J., and Holt, K. E. (2015). Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31, 3350–3352. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, T., Yu, M., Lin, H., Zhang, Z., Liu, J., and Zhang, X. -H. (2015). Genomic insight into Aquimarina longa SW024T: its ultra-oligotrophic adapting mechanisms and biogeochemical functions. BMC Genomics 16:772. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2005-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yi, H., and Chun, J. (2011). Aquimarina addita sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61, 2445–2449. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.027433-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoon, B. -J., You, H. -S., Lee, D. -H., and Oh, D. -C. (2011). Aquimarina spongiae sp. nov., isolated from marine sponge Halichondria oshoro. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61, 417–421. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.022046-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, T., Yin, Q., Song, X., Zhao, R., Shi, X., and Zhang, X. -H. (2013). Aquimarina longa sp. nov., isolated from seawater, and emended description of Aquimarina muelleri. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 63, 1235–1240. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.041509-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, T., Zhang, Z., Fan, X., Shi, X., and Zhang, X. -H. (2014). Aquimarina megaterium sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 64, 122–127. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.055517-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., Yu, T., Xu, T., and Zhang, X. -H. (2014). Aquimarina pacifica sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 64, 1991–1997. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.062695-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Li, W., Yu, M., and Zhang, X. -H. (2016). Aquimarina hainanensis sp. nov., isolated from diseased Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei larvae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 66, 70–75. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000675

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Y. -X., Wang, C., Du, Z. -J., and Chen, G. -J. (2015). Aquimarina agarivorans sp. nov., a genome-sequenced member of the class Flavobacteriia isolated from Gelidium amansii. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 65, 2684–2688. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000323

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: white leg disease, Aquimarina sp., Koch’s postulates, cultured lobster, Palinurid larvae, Scyllarid larvae

Citation: Ooi MC, Goulden EF, Trotter AJ, Smith GG and Bridle AR Aquimarina sp. Associated With a Cuticular Disease of Cultured Larval Palinurid and Scyllarid Lobsters. Front. Microbiol. 11:573588. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.573588

Received: 17 June 2020; Accepted: 07 September 2020;
Published: 09 October 2020.

Edited by:

Jose M. Gonzalez, University of La Laguna, Spain

Reviewed by:

Marta Gomez-Chiarri, University of Rhode Island, United States
Lone Hoj, Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), Australia

Copyright © 2020 Ooi, Goulden, Trotter, Smith and Bridle. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Mei C. Ooi, mei.ooi@utas.edu.au