Abstract
Bacterial persisters are a sub-population of phenotypic variants that tolerate high concentrations of antibiotics within the genetically homogeneous cells. They resume division upon the removal of drugs. Bacterial persistence is one of major causes of antibiotic treatment failure and recurrent infection. Cell dormancy, triggered by toxin/antitoxin pair, (p)ppGpp, SOS response and ATP levels, is known to be the mechanistic basis for persistence. However, recent studies have demonstrated that bacteria with active metabolism can maintain persistence by lowering intracellular antibiotic concentration via an efflux pump. Additionally, others and our work have showed that cell wall deficient bacteria (CWDB), including both L-form and spheroplasts that produced by β-lactam antibiotics, are associated with antibiotic persistence. They are not dormant cells as their cell walls have been completely damaged. In this review, we discuss the various types of persisters and highlight the contribution of non-walled bacteria on bacterial persistence.
Introduction
Bacterial persisters refer to a subpopulation of non-growing bacteria that are able to survive the transient exposure to high concentration of an antibiotic (Balaban et al., 2019). Bacterial persisters were first described by Joseph Bigger in 1944, who found a small sub-population of Staphylococci survived from the killing by penicillin. These bacterial survivors subsequently recovered growth and maintained antibiotic susceptibility after removal of the drug (Bigger, 1944). Harris Moyed found that the persistence associated with a toxin and anti-toxin system (Moyed and Bertrand, 1983). Subsequently, Balaban et al. (2004) confirmed the survival of persisters using microfluidic devices and live imaging. Unlike the heritable resistance, bacterial persistence is a trait found only in a small fraction of cells that are isogenic, and thus are the phenotypic variants of the bacterial population produced stochastically or induced by environmental factors (Harms et al., 2016). In recent decades, additional to antibiotic resistance, persisters were recognized as another major cause of the antibiotic treatment failure and recalcitrance of bacterial infections (Hall-Stoodley et al., 2004; Harms et al., 2016; Gollan et al., 2019), and considered as the main reason for the antibiotic tolerance of biofilms (Lewis, 2001; Spoering and Lewis, 2001; Yan and Bassler, 2019). Importantly, persistence is believed to facilitate and promote the evolution and emergence of resistance (Cohen et al., 2013; Levin-Reisman et al., 2017; Windels et al., 2019; Liu J. et al., 2020).
In the past 20 years, the understanding on the mechanistic formation of persistence has made extensive advances. Cell dormancy is considered as the fundamental mechanistic basis of persister formation: bacterial persisters are in a dormant state, and the pathways containing the drug target in such dormant cells are inactive, and thus antibiotics cannot exert their lethal effects even they successfully bind to their targets. The bacterial cells undergone antibiotic treatment therefore are not damaged and maintain an intact cellular structure (Fisher et al., 2017). However, recent study suggested that bacterial persisters from ofloxacin treatment originated from metabolically active cells (Goormaghtigh and Van Melderen, 2019). Other studies also showed that bacteria can actively employ efflux pumps to facilitate persistence formation (Pu et al., 2016, 2017). The studies suggested that such bacterial persisters are not passive dormant cells. This notion was further reinforced by several other works showing that antibiotic treatment generated the non-walled bacterial cells which form an important type of persisters (Cross et al., 2019; Mickiewicz et al., 2019; Zou et al., 2020). In this review, we will briefly introduce the dormant persisters and attempt to discuss the non-walled bacteria as the bacterial persisters.
Bacterial Persistence by Cell Dormancy
Several mechanisms could trigger the cells to enter the dormancy, including toxin-antitoxin (TA) system (Balaban et al., 2004; Keren et al., 2004; Lewis, 2007; Dorr et al., 2010), alarmone molecule, SOS response and intracellular ATP level (Dorr et al., 2009; Shan et al., 2017; Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
(p)ppGpp
The alarmone (p)ppGpp includes a guanosine pentaphosphate and guanosine tetraphosphate. It is synthesized and degraded mainly by RelA-SpoT homolog (RSH) family enzymes (Hauryliuk et al., 2015). This alarmone can be induced and accumulated during stringent response, including responses to amino acid starvation or other nutrition limitations, such as fatty acids, carbon and nitrogen (Gaca et al., 2015; Brown, 2019). For example, in response to nutrient starvation, GTPase Obg-mediated persistence in E. coli required (p)ppGpp to activate the transcriptional expression of type I HokB-SokB TA module. Finally, the elevated levels of HokB toxin resulted in membrane depolarization, leading to cell dormancy (Verstraeten et al., 2015). Upon production, (p)ppGpp also directly inhibits RNA polymerase or several enzymes involved in translation process as well as GTP biosynthesis, resulting in the translation repression and growth arrest that facilitate bacterial survival under various environmental stress (Magnusson et al., 2005; Hauryliuk et al., 2015; Figure 1). By systematical examination on the relationship of 15 common persister genes with (p)ppGpp, Liu et al. (2017) identified that two genes, namely dnaK and recA, were implicated in persistence to ampicillin and gentamicin and the persistence level dependent on (p)ppGpp,while other genes exhibited various relationship with (p)ppGpp. In addition, they found that the persister gene interaction with (p)ppGpp was affected by culture age, cell concentrations and antibiotics. Despite the elevated levels of (p)ppGpp plays an important role in the formation of persisters (Korch et al., 2003; Svenningsen et al., 2019), the detailed mechanism mediated by (p)ppGpp needs to be further investigated.
Toxin-Antitoxin Systems
Toxin-antitoxin systems are ubiquitous modules identified in almost all bacteria. The systems consist of a toxin and a corresponding antitoxin. The toxin is an element that is able to inhibit diversely important cellular processes, including cell wall synthesis, ATP synthesis, protein translation and DNA replication, and the antitoxin can prevent the function of the cognate toxin (Yamaguchi et al., 2011; Hall et al., 2017). Toxin of the TA system is typically a protein, whereas the antitoxin is diverse, and can be a non-coding RNA in type I and III TA systems, or a protein in the other TA systems (Page and Peti, 2016; Hall et al., 2017). Till today, seven different types of TA systems, namely type I–VII, have been identified according to the nature of antitoxins and their various mechanisms of action (Yamaguchi et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2021).
hipA (for high persistence A) is the first toxin gene in Escherichia coli K-12 that associated with bacterial persistence identified by Harris Moyed when he screened for the mutants with higher frequency of persistence to ampicillin treatment (Moyed and Bertrand, 1983). The identified high-persistence allele, hipA7, increased the frequency of persistence by 10,000 folds (Moyed and Bertrand, 1983; Moyed and Broderick, 1986; Scherrer and Moyed, 1988). Characterization of hipA7 allele revealed two mutations (G22S and D291A) that confer the increased persistence via diminishing the binding of HipA to HipB and the affinity of HipBA for its own operator, thus leading to increased HipA to trigger cell dormancy (Schumacher et al., 2015). It is now known that HipA is the toxin of the type II TA system HipBA, and functions as a protein kinase that inhibits cell growth by phosphorylating the glutamyl-tRNA synthetase at the conserved Ser239 site (Germain et al., 2013). Overexpression of HipA produces a high frequency of persister cells, and deletion of HipBA causes a decrease in persister formation in both stationary and biofilm cells in the presence of mitomycin C or ciprofloxacin (Lewis, 2005; Korch and Hill, 2006). The toxic effects on cell growth caused by HipA can be neutralized by the antitoxin HipB through forming the high order HipA-HipB-DNA complexes, which obstructs the active sites of HipA, leading to its inactivation (Black et al., 1994; Schumacher et al., 2009). However, it is worthy to note that several studies shown that deletion of HipBA did not affect the frequency of persister cells under other conditions (Black et al., 1994; Luidalepp et al., 2011). These controversial results may suggest that the contribution of HipBA to persister formation needs further studies.
Additional to HipAB TA system, several other TA systems also contribute to the formation of bacterial persisters and their tolerances to various stresses (Tripathi et al., 2014; Hu et al., 2015; Kamruzzaman and Iredell, 2019; Ma et al., 2019; Ronneau and Helaine, 2019; Masuda et al., 2020). For instance, ectopic expression of YafQ, the toxin of YafQ-DinJ module, augmented persistence by reducing tryptophanase production which converts tryptophan into indole (Hu et al., 2015), and single-gene deletion of this module increased persister fraction and enhanced the tolerance to heat by about 10-fold (Masuda et al., 2020). Interestingly, elevated production of GhoT, the toxin of GhoT/GhoS type V TA system, increased persistence upon oxidative stress controlled by MqsR/MqsA type II TA (Wang et al., 2013). MazEF, another type II TA system, mediates growth arrest and persister formation in response to antibiotic treatment, resulting in the increase in bacterial survival (Tripathi et al., 2014). Bacteria, including the pathogenic bacteria, carries abundant TA systems in their genomes. For example, Mycobacterium tuberculosis encodes about 88 putative TA loci in the genome, and some of them have been proven to contribute to the increased persistence (Ramage et al., 2009; Han et al., 2010; Sala et al., 2014). A type I RNA antitoxin, SprF1 in Staphylococcus aureus, enhanced persister cell formation by binding ribosomes and then attenuating translation process under hyperosmotic stress (Pinel-Marie et al., 2021). S. aureus encodes 67 putative TA loci (Habib et al., 2018) and the TA system SprG/SprF has been shown to associate with the induction of cell stasis during internalization in human macrophages (Riffaud et al., 2019), suggesting that TA system significantly contribute to bacterial persistence during their infections in vivo.
SOS Response
The SOS response is a conserved DNA repairing and regulatory mechanism, triggered by single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) originated from double-strand breaks during replication fork stalling, replication-transcription collisions and transcription stalling, or DNA damaging agents, such as UV irradiation, antibiotics, oxidative agents, and high external pressure (Baharoglu and Mazel, 2014). The induction mechanism of SOS response has been well-understood. In brief, RecA is recruited by RecBCD or RecFOR onto ssDNA to form RecA filaments, which trigger the autocatalytic cleavage of LexA. The inactivation of LexA results in derepression of the SOS regulon (Courcelle and Hanawalt, 2001). Importantly, the SOS response not only triggers the repairment of damaged DNA, but also causes changes in genome plasticity and gene expression, inducing bacterial persistence under harsh environments (Baharoglu and Mazel, 2014; Figure 1). It has been shown that, upon sub-minimum inhibitory concentration (sub-MIC) of ciprofloxacin treatment, the majority of persister cells formed in a manner dependent on the SOS response, rather than being pre-existing or produced in stochastic manner (Dorr et al., 2009). The dissociation rate of LexA from DNA targets orchestrates the bacterial SOS response, and the activity of LexA directly modifies the formation frequency of bacterial persistent cells produced by DNA damage (Butala et al., 2011). Additionally, SOS response induces several genes of TA modules in E. coli through the LexA regulon, such as hokE, yafN/yafO, and tisAB/istR (Pedersen and Gerdes, 1999; Fernandez De Henestrosa et al., 2000; Vogel et al., 2004; Singletary et al., 2009). The TisB toxin induced by ciprofloxacin-mediated SOS response resulted in the decrease in proton motive force and ATP levels, leading to the cell dormancy and multi-drug tolerance (Dorr et al., 2010; Figure 1).
Intracellular ATP Levels
Although numerous studies point to the central role of TA systems and (p)ppGpp in the formation of bacterial persistence, they may not be responsible for the persistence in all scenario. The study on S. aureus found that deletion of all TA modules and ppGpp synthases had no effect on persister formation under various growth phase or antibiotic treatment (Conlon et al., 2016). Instead, the persisters were produced by stochastically entering into the stationary phase accompanied by the decrease in the intracellular ATP level, suggesting that loss in energy production induces persister formation and drug tolerance (Conlon et al., 2016; Figure 1). Consistently, the inactivation of a potassium transporter system (Kdp-ATPase) in Mycobacterium marinum was shown to reduce the fraction of persister formation in bacteria exposed to rifampicin by the increased intracellular ATP levels (Liu X. et al., 2020). Accumulated evidence have demonstrated that intracellular ATP level plays critical contribution to the multidrug tolerance (Manuse et al., 2021). Using a persister reporter rrnB P1 with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), Shan et al. (2017) demonstrated that upon fluoroquinolones treatment lowering ATP levels promoted persister formation in E. coli by inhibiting translation process and the activity of drug targets (Figure 1). This process is independent of TA expression and (p)ppGpp regulation induced by stresses (Shan et al., 2017). Decreased ATP levels could promote the formation of protein aggresome (Pu et al., 2019). The protein aggresome was thought to be an indicator of bacterial dormancy depth and its clearance was required for persister cells to resuscitate and regrowth (Pu et al., 2019). Taken together, the control of intracellular ATP level is a potentially general mechanism for bacterial persistence.
Bacterial Persistence by Active Efflux Pumps
Efflux systems were well-known to contribute to the drug resistance of various bacterial species. Gene inactivation showed that the lack of efflux pumps rendered mutants hyper-susceptible to multiple antimicrobial agents (Li et al., 1994, 2004; Ramon-Garcia et al., 2009). For instance, deletion of lfrA, a gene encoding the first reported multidrug efflux pump in Mycobacterium smegmatis, led to the decrease in MICs by 2–8-fold to fluoroquinolones and acriflavine (Li et al., 2004). MIC determination and time-dependent killing study also showed that carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), an efflux pump inhibitor disrupting membrane potential, was able to rescue the colistin susceptibility in a number of intrinsically colistin resistant bacteria, such as Proteus spp., Serratia marcescens, Morganella morganii, and Providencia spp. (Baron and Rolain, 2018). Recent work indicated that active efflux system also contributed to the formation of persister cells (Pu et al., 2016, 2017; Figure 2). Using single-cell fluorescence microscopy combined with transcriptome analysis, Pu et al. (2016) revealed that TolC, an energy-dependent outer-membrane protein of efflux family, promoted bacterial persistence in E. coli by rapidly exporting the antibiotic molecules, leading to a substantially lower intracellular concentration of drugs accumulated in persisters than that in the sensitive populations (Figure 2). The mechanism of persisters formation through stochastic induction of TolC pumping suggests that bacteria could use an active defense strategy, rather than the well-known passive cell dormancy, for persistence (Du Toit, 2016; Gerdes and Semsey, 2016; Pu et al., 2017). Additionally, using the in vivo model of Mycobacterium marinum-infected zebrafish, Adams et al. (2011) demonstrated that the efflux pumps of Mycobacterium induced by macrophage infection not only promoted intracellular survival, but also mediated drug tolerance. Supportively, proteomic analysis on persisters and non-persisters found that a number of membrane transport proteins were up-regulated in persisters (Sulaiman et al., 2018).
FIGURE 2
Antibiotic Tolerance by Forming Cell Wall Deficient Bacteria
Regardless the persistence caused by cell dormancy or active efflux pump, bacterial persisters maintained their intact cellular structure. However, recent work showed that cell wall deficient bacteria (CWDB) might be another form of bacterial persisters (Figure 3). The bacterial cell wall is a rigid, mesh-like complex structure surrounding the cytoplasmic membrane in most bacteria. It is mainly made of polysaccharide strands cross-linked by short peptides, called peptidoglycan (PG) (Vollmer et al., 2008). The main function of PG is to maintain the cell shape and structure integrity and withstand environmental osmotic forces from burst (Huang et al., 2008). Due to the critical role of cell wall in almost all bacteria and its absence in eukaryotic cells, hundreds of antibiotics, including glycopeptides, lipopeptides, and β-lactams, have been developed by targeting the cellular pathway of PG biosynthesis and cross-linking (Schneider and Sahl, 2010). Bacteria without cell wall would be quickly lysed due to the osmotic pressure. However, some bacteria develop special mechanism to overcome the osmotic pressure and survive without cell wall. The CWDB include “L-form” bacteria and spheroplast.
FIGURE 3
“L-Form” Bacteria Associated Antibiotic Tolerance
The term “L-form” bacteria were first reported in 1935 by Emmy Klieneberger who discovered pleomorphic organisms when she attempted to isolate the pleuropneumonia-like organisms from rats’ blood (Klieneberger, 1935). These pleomorphic bacteria were later proved by Dienes to be the derivative from bacilli of Streptobacillus moniliformis (Dienes, 1939). Subsequently, Dienes successfully isolated L-form variants from other bacterial species and observed their reversions into the parent-form bacilli (Dienes, 1947, 1948). At present, L-forms refers to CWDB that are normally coated with cell-wall, and the L-form bacteria can only survive and proliferate with osmotic supportive media, and switch back to the walled state under appropriate culture conditions (Errington, 2013). A wide range of bacteria, either Gram-negative or Gram-positive, is able to enter into the L-form state in the presence of inhibitors of cell wall synthesis on osmoprotective media (Domingue and Woody, 1997; Errington, 2013; Figure 3). Importantly, Kawai et al. (2018) recently reported that two Gram-positive bacteria, namely B. subtilis and S. aureus, were induced L-form formation during intracellular infection by host lysozyme or other immune effectors to protect bacteria from β-lactam killing. Two classes of genetic changes were shown to be required for L-form growth in Bacillus subtilis. Class I mutations support L-form proliferation by driving excess membrane synthesis, which includes overexpressing of accDA, altogether encoding the carboxyltransferase subunit of acetyl coenzyme A (CoA) carboxylase, and the inhibition of PG precursor pathway (Mercier et al., 2013). Class II mutations promote L-form growth by reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) damage. Most of the mutations occur in or near the ispA, which encodes geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase in the isoprenoid synthetic pathway, resulted in the inhibition of electron transport chain activity (Julsing et al., 2007; Leaver et al., 2009; Kawai et al., 2015). Different from normal bacterial cells, the division of L-form is independent of the FtsZ-dependent machine but occurs by extrusion and resolution mechanism (Leaver et al., 2009). Due to the deficiency in cell wall, L-forms are insensitive to a range of antibiotics that target cell wall (Barbuti, 1976; Domingue and Woody, 1997). L-forms of M. tuberculosis showed phenotypic resistance to high concentrations of ethambutol (EMB) compared to the sensitivity of the parental strain (Slavchev et al., 2016).
Spheroplast Associated Antibiotic Tolerance and Persistence
Spheroplast is coined to describe the spherical shape of Gram-negative bacteria with partial or complete lack of cell wall through mechanic or enzymatic method (Sun et al., 2014). spheroplast has been employed for studies in various fields, such as the properties of cytoplasmic membrane, iron channels via patch clamp analysis, and characterization of antimicrobial peptides (Martinac et al., 1987; Sun et al., 2014, 2016; Wei et al., 2016). The association of spheroplast with bacterial persistence emerged only recently. Dorr and his colleague firstly showed that Vibrio cholerae could form spherical non-walled cell upon a wide variety of cell wall- acting antibiotics, and the resultant cells became tolerant to these antibiotics and survived in culture media (Dorr et al., 2015). The formation of spherical antibiotic-tolerant bacterial cells was not only observed in V. cholerae but also in several other bacterial pathogens, including Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella aerogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Monahan et al., 2014; Dorr et al., 2015; Cross et al., 2019; Zou et al., 2020).
In our recent study, we investigated the morphologies of persisters in A. baumannii upon treatment with different classes of antibiotics, including β-lactam fluoroquinolone, and aminoglycoside. We found that a fraction of enlarged spherical cells constitutes a major sub-population of bacterial survivors from β-lactam antibiotics treatment (Zou et al., 2020). With the aid of the fluorescent D-amino acid analog HCC-amino-D-alanine (HADA) to label the peptidoglycan (PG) of the cell walls, these bacteria were shown to completely lose their cell walls upon β-lactam antibiotics treatment (Zou et al., 2020). Without the protection by cell wall, the volume of the non-walled bacteria was significantly increased (Zou et al., 2020). The non-walled cells are bona fide persisters but not the viable-but-non-culturable cells (VBNCs) as the subsequent time-lapse microscopy revealed that such non-walled spheroplasts survived at least for 7.5 h in the culture media and resuscitated and started to divide upon the removal of drugs (Zou et al., 2020). The non-walled spheroplast bacteria were not only observed in vitro in the culture media but also in vivo in the animal model (Zou et al., 2020). By using a strain expressing GFP reporter in a Galleria mellonella model, we demonstrated that β-lactam antibiotics therapy on the infected animal promoted the formation of spherical A. baumannii persisters in vivo (Zou et al., 2020).
The non-walled spheroplast bacteria is distinct from the “L-form” bacteria as the “L-form” bacteria were mostly achieved artificially by growing them on osmoprotective media in the presence of high levels of cell-wall acting antibiotics (Errington et al., 2016; Kawai et al., 2018). In contrast, the non-walled spheroplast bacteria survive in the media without any osmoprotective agent. The cell proliferation was observed for L-form bacteria but not for spheroplast bacteria (Leaver et al., 2009; Zou et al., 2020). As these non-walled spheroplasts have lost the cell wall, they presumably have an active metabolism and not in dormant state during the β-lactam antibiotics treatment (Zou et al., 2020).
The Clinical Significance of Cell Wall Deficient Bacteria and Therapeutic Implication
Cell wall deficient bacteria, regardless L-form bacteria or spheroplast, have been reported to associate with a wide range of recurrent infection diseases (Table 1; Onwuamaegbu et al., 2005). Urinary tract infections (UTI) are commonly caused by uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC), especially in women and elderly, and the recurrence of infection is a major problem due to the persistence of this pathogen in the epithelium of the bladder (Brumbaugh and Mobley, 2012). A recent work demonstrated that cell wall deficient state of UPEC frequently presented in fresh urine of elderly patients suffering with recurrent urinary tract infection, and CWDB induced by antibiotics in urine were able to switch back into walled state upon the removal of drugs, which suggests the possibility of forming CWDB as a route to evade antibiotics in the recurrent infections in vivo (Mickiewicz et al., 2019). Similar to UPEC, Staphylococcus aureus is a major pathogen responsible for community- and hospital-acquired infections (Schito, 2006). It is the causes for various diseases, such as dermatitis, mastitis, toxemia, and sepsis. Animal infection model experiments suggested that cell wall deficient S. aureus persisters possessed the ability to produce incompetent phagocytosis by alveolar macrophages and led to the latent and chronic lung infections (Michailova et al., 2007). In addition, the transformation process of M. tuberculosis to CWDB was observed in clinically drug resistant isolates from patients, indicating the association of cell-wall deficient state with antibiotic resistance (Michailova et al., 2005). Despite accumulated clinical reports and experimental analyses suggested that CWDB might be involved in the pathogenesis and chronic recurrent infections, the detailed mechanism underlying the formation and switch regulation of non-walled persisters need to be further investigated.
TABLE 1
| Cell type | Bacteria | Isolated from patients | References |
| L-form | Nocardia | Chronic mycetoma | Beaman et al., 1976 |
| L-form | UPEC | Recurrent UTI | Mickiewicz et al., 2019 |
| L-form | Enterococcus faecalis | Chronic bacteriuria | Gutman et al., 1965 |
| L-form | Klebsiella spp. | Chronic bacteriuria | Gutman et al., 1965 |
| Small granule-like forms | Corynebacterium | Subacute endocarditis | Wittler et al., 1960 |
| CWD | Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Sarcoidosis | Almenoff et al., 1996 |
| CWD | Mycobacteria | Tuberculous meningitis | Alexander-Jackson, 1945 |
Cell wall-deficient bacteria associated with chronic diseases.
UPEC, urinary pathogenic E. coli; UTI, urinary tract infection; CWD, cell wall-deficient.
The finding of CWDB in persistence and chronic infection provide potential therapeutic approaches to eradicate persisters and cure the chronic infections. Using a combination of agents targeting cell membrane and β-lactam antibiotics, the efficacy of bacterial killing was significantly enhanced (Zou et al., 2020). Similarly, synergistic effects of macrolide antibiotics and cell wall targeting antibiotics was also observed to eradicate the L-form cells of P. aeruginosa (Kasai et al., 1982). Cell wall deficient forms of B. subtilis were demonstrated hypersensitive to daptomycin and nisin, both of which target the cytoplasmic membrane, indicating a potential therapeutic approach to combine antibiotics targeting cell wall and cell membrane to combat persistence infections (Wolf et al., 2012).
Conclusion Remarks
Bacterial persistence has recently been recognized as the one of the major causes of infection relapses and emergence of antibiotic resistance. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of persistence formation may provide important implications for the development of novel drugs/approaches targeting the latent persisters. Dormancy has been well-known as the fundamental mechanism of persistence formation. However, recent findings suggest that bacteria may employ diverse strategies for persistence. Other than entering the dormancy to overcome the antibiotic slaughter, bacteria could actively battle with antibiotics for persistence. Further studies are needed to further understand the molecular mechanism of persisters and find solutions to control their infections.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
JZh initiated the concept. JZo, BP, JQ, and JZh wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the Research Committee of the University of Macau (Grant No. MYRG2019-000050-FHS) and the Macau Science and Technology Development Fund (Grant Nos. FDCT/0058/2018/A2 and FDCT/0113/2019/A2) for providing financial support to JZh for this research, and Science and Technology Program of Shenzhen (JCYJ20190809144005609) and the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2020A1515010586) for providing financial support to JQ.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AdamsK. N.TakakiK.ConnollyL. E.WiedenhoftH.WingleeK.HumbertO.et al (2011). Drug tolerance in replicating mycobacteria mediated by a macrophage-induced efflux mechanism.Cell14539–53. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.022
2
Alexander-JacksonE. (1945). A hitherto undemonstrated zoogleal form of mycobacterium tuberculosis.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.46127–152. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1945.tb36166.x
3
AlmenoffP. L.JohnsonA.LesserM.MattmanL. H. (1996). Growth of acid fast L forms from the blood of patients with sarcoidosis.Thorax51530–533. 10.1136/thx.51.5.530
4
BaharogluZ.MazelD. (2014). SOS, the formidable strategy of bacteria against aggressions.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.381126–1145. 10.1111/1574-6976.12077
5
BalabanN. Q.HelaineS.LewisK.AckermannM.AldridgeB.AnderssonD. I.et al (2019). Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.17441–448.
6
BalabanN. Q.MerrinJ.ChaitR.KowalikL.LeiblerS. (2004). Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch.Science3051622–1625. 10.1126/science.1099390
7
BarbutiS. (1976). [Studies of some biochemical characteristics and antibiotic sensitivity of 30 L strains of Staphylococcus aureus].Ann. Sclavo1844–52.
8
BaronS. A.RolainJ. M. (2018). Efflux pump inhibitor CCCP to rescue colistin susceptibility in mcr-1 plasmid-mediated colistin-resistant strains and Gram-negative bacteria.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.731862–1871. 10.1093/jac/dky134
9
BeamanB. L.BurnsideJ.EdwardsB.CauseyW. (1976). Nocardial infections in the United States, 1972-1974.J. Infect. Dis.134286–289. 10.1093/infdis/134.3.286
10
BiggerJ. W. (1944). Treatment of Staphylococcal infections with penicillin by intermittent sterilisation.Lancet244479–500.
11
BlackD. S.IrwinB.MoyedH. S. (1994). Autoregulation of hip, an operon that affects lethality due to inhibition of peptidoglycan or DNA synthesis.J. Bacteriol.1764081–4091. 10.1128/jb.176.13.4081-4091.1994
12
BrownD. R. (2019). Nitrogen starvation induces persister cell formation in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.201:e00622-18. 10.1128/JB.00622-18
13
BrumbaughA. R.MobleyH. L. (2012). Preventing urinary tract infection: progress toward an effective Escherichia coli vaccine.Expert Rev. Vaccines11663–676. 10.1586/erv.12.36
14
ButalaM.KloseD.HodnikV.RemsA.PodlesekZ.KlareJ. P.et al (2011). Interconversion between bound and free conformations of LexA orchestrates the bacterial SOS response.Nucleic Acids Res.396546–6557. 10.1093/nar/gkr265
15
CohenN. R.LobritzM. A.CollinsJ. J. (2013). Microbial persistence and the road to drug resistance.Cell Host Microbe13632–642. 10.1016/j.chom.2013.05.009
16
ConlonB. P.RoweS. E.GandtA. B.NuxollA. S.DoneganN. P.ZalisE. A.et al (2016). Persister formation in Staphylococcus aureus is associated with ATP depletion.Nat. Microbiol.1:16051.
17
CourcelleJ.HanawaltP. C. (2001). Participation of recombination proteins in rescue of arrested replication forks in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli need not involve recombination.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.988196–8202. 10.1073/pnas.121008898
18
CrossT.RansegnolaB.ShinJ. H.WeaverA.FauntleroyK.VanNieuwenhzeM. S.et al (2019). Spheroplast-mediated carbapenem tolerance in Gram-negative pathogens.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.63:e00756-19. 10.1128/AAC.00756-19
19
DienesL. (1939). L organisms of Klieneberger and Streptobacillus Moniliformis.J. Infect. Dis.6524–42.
20
DienesL. (1947). Isolation of pleuropneumonia-like organisms from H. Influenzae with the aid of penicillin.Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.64166–168. 10.3181/00379727-64-15734p
21
DienesL. (1948). The isolation of L type cultures from Bacteroides with the aid of penicillin and their reversion into the usual Bacilli.J. Bacteriol.56445–456. 10.1128/jb.56.4.445-456.1948
22
DomingueG. J.Sr.WoodyH. B. (1997). Bacterial persistence and expression of disease.Clin. Microbiol. Rev.10320–344.
23
DorrT.DavisB. M.WaldorM. K. (2015). Endopeptidase-mediated beta lactam tolerance.PLoS Pathog.11:e1004850. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004850
24
DorrT.LewisK.VulicM. (2009). SOS response induces persistence to fluoroquinolones in Escherichia coli.PLoS Genet.5:e1000760. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000760
25
DorrT.VulicM.LewisK. (2010). Ciprofloxacin causes persister formation by inducing the TisB toxin in Escherichia coli.PLoS Biol.8:e1000317. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000317
26
Du ToitA. (2016). Bacterial physiology: persisters are under the pump.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.14332–333. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.72
27
ErringtonJ. (2013). L-form bacteria, cell walls and the origins of life.Open Biol.3:120143. 10.1098/rsob.120143
28
ErringtonJ.MickiewiczK.KawaiY.WuL. J. (2016). L-form bacteria, chronic diseases and the origins of life.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.371:20150494. 10.1098/rstb.2015.0494
29
Fernandez De HenestrosaA. R.OgiT.AoyagiS.ChafinD.HayesJ. J.OhmoriH.et al (2000). Identification of additional genes belonging to the LexA regulon in Escherichia coli.Mol. Microbiol.351560–1572. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01826.x
30
FisherR. A.GollanB.HelaineS. (2017). Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.15453–464. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.42
31
GacaA. O.Colomer-WinterC.LemosJ. A. (2015). Many means to a common end: the intricacies of (p)ppGpp metabolism and its control of bacterial homeostasis.J. Bacteriol.1971146–1156. 10.1128/JB.02577-14
32
GerdesK.SemseyS. (2016). Microbiology: pumping persisters.Nature53441–42.
33
GermainE.Castro-RoaD.ZenkinN.GerdesK. (2013). Molecular mechanism of bacterial persistence by HipA.Mol. Cell52248–254. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.045
34
GollanB.GrabeG.MichauxC.HelaineS. (2019). Bacterial persisters and infection: past, present, and progressing.Annu. Rev. Microbiol.73359–385. 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115650
35
GoormaghtighF.Van MelderenL. (2019). Single-cell imaging and characterization of Escherichia coli persister cells to ofloxacin in exponential cultures.Sci. Adv.5:eaav9462. 10.1126/sciadv.aav9462
36
GutmanL. T.TurckM.PetersdorfR. G.WedgwoodR. J. (1965). Significance of bacterial variants in urine of patients with chronic bacteriuria.J. Clin. Invest.441945–1952. 10.1172/JCI105300
37
HabibG.ZhuQ.SunB. (2018). Bioinformatics and functional assessment of toxin-antitoxin systems in Staphylococcus aureus.Toxins10:473. 10.3390/toxins10110473
38
HallA. M.GollanB.HelaineS. (2017). Toxin-antitoxin systems: reversible toxicity.Curr. Opin. Microbiol.36102–110. 10.1016/j.mib.2017.02.003
39
Hall-StoodleyL.CostertonJ. W.StoodleyP. (2004). Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.295–108. 10.1038/nrmicro821
40
HanJ. S.LeeJ. J.AnandanT.ZengM.SripathiS.JahngW. J.et al (2010). Characterization of a chromosomal toxin-antitoxin, Rv1102c-Rv1103c system in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.400293–298. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.08.023
41
HarmsA.MaisonneuveE.GerdesK. (2016). Mechanisms of bacterial persistence during stress and antibiotic exposure.Science354:aaf4268. 10.1126/science.aaf4268
42
HauryliukV.AtkinsonG. C.MurakamiK. S.TensonT.GerdesK. (2015). Recent functional insights into the role of (p)ppGpp in bacterial physiology.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.13298–309. 10.1038/nrmicro3448
43
HuY.KwanB. W.OsbourneD. O.BenedikM. J.WoodT. K. (2015). Toxin YafQ increases persister cell formation by reducing indole signalling.Environ. Microbiol.171275–1285. 10.1111/1462-2920.12567
44
HuangK. C.MukhopadhyayR.WenB.GitaiZ.WingreenN. S. (2008). Cell shape and cell-wall organization in Gram-negative bacteria.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10519282–19287. 10.1073/pnas.0805309105
45
JulsingM. K.RijpkemaM.WoerdenbagH. J.QuaxW. J.KayserO. (2007). Functional analysis of genes involved in the biosynthesis of isoprene in Bacillus subtilis.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.751377–1384. 10.1007/s00253-007-0953-5
46
KamruzzamanM.IredellJ. (2019). A ParDE-family toxin antitoxin system in major resistance plasmids of Enterobacteriaceae confers antibiotic and heat tolerance.Sci. Rep.9:9872. 10.1038/s41598-019-46318-1
47
KasaiT.TomitaT.KanegasakiS.HommaJ. Y. (1982). Synergistic effects of a macrolide and a cell wall-affecting antibiotic on Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in vivo. 3. Incorporation of [14C]midecamycin acetate (MOM) into P. aeruginosa pretreated with cell wall-affecting antibiotics.J. Antibiot.351086–1092. 10.7164/antibiotics.35.1086
48
KawaiY.MercierR.WuL. J.Dominguez-CuevasP.OshimaT.ErringtonJ. (2015). Cell growth of wall-free L-form bacteria is limited by oxidative damage.Curr. Biol.251613–1618. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.031
49
KawaiY.MickiewiczK.ErringtonJ. (2018). Lysozyme counteracts beta-lactam antibiotics by promoting the emergence of L-form bacteria.Cell1721038–1049.e10. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.021
50
KerenI.ShahD.SpoeringA.KaldaluN.LewisK. (2004). Specialized persister cells and the mechanism of multidrug tolerance in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.1868172–8180. 10.1128/JB.186.24.8172-8180.2004
51
KlienebergerE. (1935). The natural occurrence of pleuropneumonia-like organism in apparent symbiosis with Streptobacillus moniliformis and other bacteria.J. Pathol. Bacteriol.4093–105. 10.1002/path.1700400108
52
KorchS. B.HillT. M. (2006). Ectopic overexpression of wild-type and mutant hipA genes in Escherichia coli: effects on macromolecular synthesis and persister formation.J. Bacteriol.1883826–3836. 10.1128/JB.01740-05
53
KorchS. B.HendersonT. A.HillT. M. (2003). Characterization of the hipA7 allele of Escherichia coli and evidence that high persistence is governed by (p)ppGpp synthesis.Mol. Microbiol.501199–1213. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03779.x
54
LeaverM.Dominguez-CuevasP.CoxheadJ. M.DanielR. A.ErringtonJ. (2009). Life without a wall or division machine in Bacillus subtilis.Nature457849–853. 10.1038/nature07742
55
Levin-ReismanI.RoninI.GefenO.BranissI.ShoreshN.BalabanN. Q. (2017). Antibiotic tolerance facilitates the evolution of resistance.Science355826–830. 10.1126/science.aaj2191
56
LewisK. (2001). Riddle of biofilm resistance.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45999–1007. 10.1128/AAC.45.4.999-1007.2001
57
LewisK. (2005). Persister cells and the riddle of biofilm survival.Biochemistry70267–274. 10.1007/s10541-005-0111-6
58
LewisK. (2007). Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.548–56. 10.1038/nrmicro1557
59
LiX. Z.LivermoreD. M.NikaidoH. (1994). Role of efflux pump(s) in intrinsic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance to tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and norfloxacin.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.381732–1741. 10.1128/AAC.38.8.1732
60
LiX. Z.ZhangL.NikaidoH. (2004). Efflux pump-mediated intrinsic drug resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.482415–2423. 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2415-2423.2004
61
LiuJ.GefenO.RoninI.Bar-MeirM.BalabanN. Q. (2020). Effect of tolerance on the evolution of antibiotic resistance under drug combinations.Science367200–204. 10.1126/science.aay3041
62
LiuS.WuN.ZhangS.YuanY.ZhangW.ZhangY. (2017). Variable persister gene interactions with (p)ppGpp for persister formation in Escherichia coli.Front. Microbiol.8:1795. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01795
63
LiuX.WangC.YanB.LyuL.TakiffH. E.GaoQ. (2020). The potassium transporter KdpA affects persister formation by regulating ATP levels in Mycobacterium marinum.Emerg. Microbes Infect.9129–139. 10.1080/22221751.2019.1710090
64
LuidaleppH.JoersA.KaldaluN.TensonT. (2011). Age of inoculum strongly influences persister frequency and can mask effects of mutations implicated in altered persistence.J. Bacteriol.1933598–3605. 10.1128/JB.00085-11
65
MaD.MandellJ. B.DoneganN. P.CheungA. L.MaW.RothenbergerS.et al (2019). The toxin-antitoxin MazEF drives Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation, antibiotic tolerance, and chronic infection.mBio10:e01658-19. 10.1128/mBio.01658-19
66
MagnussonL. U.FarewellA.NystromT. (2005). ppGpp: a global regulator in Escherichia coli.Trends Microbiol.13236–242. 10.1016/j.tim.2005.03.008
67
ManuseS.ShanY.Canas-DuarteS. J.BakshiS.SunW. S.MoriH.et al (2021). Bacterial persisters are a stochastically formed subpopulation of low-energy cells.PLoS Biol.19:e3001194. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001194
68
MartinacB.BuechnerM.DelcourA. H.AdlerJ.KungC. (1987). Pressure-sensitive ion channel in Escherichia coli.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.842297–2301.
69
MasudaY.SakamotoE.HonjohK. I.MiyamotoT. (2020). Role of toxin-antitoxin-regulated persister population and indole in bacterial heat tolerance.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.86:e00935-20. 10.1128/AEM.00935-20
70
MercierR.KawaiY.ErringtonJ. (2013). Excess membrane synthesis drives a primitive mode of cell proliferation.Cell152997–1007. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.043
71
MichailovaL.KussovskiV.RadouchevaT.JordanovaM.BergerW.RinderH.et al (2005). Morphological variability and cell-wall deficiency in Mycobacterium tuberculosis ‘heteroresistant’ strains.Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.9907–914.
72
MichailovaL.KussovskyV.RadouchevaT.JordanovaM.MarkovaN. (2007). Persistence of Staphylococcus aureus L-form during experimental lung infection in rats.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.26888–97. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00567.x
73
MickiewiczK. M.KawaiY.DrageL.GomesM. C.DavisonF.PickardR.et al (2019). Possible role of L-form switching in recurrent urinary tract infection.Nat. Commun.10:4379.
74
MonahanL. G.TurnbullL.OsvathS. R.BirchD.CharlesI. G.WhitchurchC. B. (2014). Rapid conversion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to a spherical cell morphotype facilitates tolerance to carbapenems and penicillins but increases susceptibility to antimicrobial peptides.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.581956–1962. 10.1128/AAC.01901-13
75
MoyedH. S.BertrandK. P. (1983). hipA, a newly recognized gene of Escherichia coli K-12 that affects frequency of persistence after inhibition of murein synthesis.J. Bacteriol.155768–775. 10.1128/jb.155.2.768-775.1983
76
MoyedH. S.BroderickS. H. (1986). Molecular cloning and expression of hipA, a gene of Escherichia coli K-12 that affects frequency of persistence after inhibition of murein synthesis.J. Bacteriol.166399–403. 10.1128/jb.166.2.399-403.1986
77
OnwuamaegbuM. E.BelcherR. A.SoareC. (2005). Cell wall-deficient bacteria as a cause of infections: a review of the clinical significance.J. Int. Med. Res.331–20. 10.1177/147323000503300101
78
PageR.PetiW. (2016). Toxin-antitoxin systems in bacterial growth arrest and persistence.Nat. Chem. Biol.12208–214. 10.1038/nchembio.2044
79
PedersenK.GerdesK. (1999). Multiple hok genes on the chromosome of Escherichia coli.Mol. Microbiol.321090–1102. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01431.x
80
Pinel-MarieM. L.BrielleR.RiffaudC.Germain-AmiotN.PolacekN.FeldenB. (2021). RNA antitoxin SprF1 binds ribosomes to attenuate translation and promote persister cell formation in Staphylococcus aureus.Nat. Microbiol.6209–220. 10.1038/s41564-020-00819-2
81
PuY.KeY.BaiF. (2017). Active efflux in dormant bacterial cells – new insights into antibiotic persistence.Drug Resist. Updat.307–14. 10.1016/j.drup.2016.11.002
82
PuY.LiY.JinX.TianT.MaQ.ZhaoZ.et al (2019). ATP-dependent dynamic protein aggregation regulates bacterial dormancy depth critical for antibiotic tolerance.Mol. Cell73143–156.e4. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.022
83
PuY.ZhaoZ.LiY.ZouJ.MaQ.ZhaoY.et al (2016). Enhanced efflux activity facilitates drug tolerance in dormant bacterial cells.Mol. Cell62284–294. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.035
84
RamageH. R.ConnollyL. E.CoxJ. S. (2009). Comprehensive functional analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis toxin-antitoxin systems: implications for pathogenesis, stress responses, and evolution.PLoS Genet.5:e1000767. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000767
85
Ramon-GarciaS.MartinC.ThompsonC. J.AinsaJ. A. (2009). Role of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis P55 efflux pump in intrinsic drug resistance, oxidative stress responses, and growth.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.533675–3682. 10.1128/AAC.00550-09
86
RiffaudC.Pinel-MarieM. L.PascreauG.FeldenB. (2019). Functionality and cross-regulation of the four SprG/SprF type I toxin-antitoxin systems in Staphylococcus aureus.Nucleic Acids Res.471740–1758. 10.1093/nar/gky1256
87
RonneauS.HelaineS. (2019). Clarifying the link between toxin-antitoxin modules and bacterial persistence.J. Mol. Biol.4313462–3471. 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.03.019
88
SalaA.BordesP.GenevauxP. (2014). Multiple toxin-antitoxin systems in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Toxins61002–1020. 10.3390/toxins6031002
89
ScherrerR.MoyedH. S. (1988). Conditional impairment of cell division and altered lethality in hipA mutants of Escherichia coli K-12.J. Bacteriol.1703321–3326. 10.1128/jb.170.8.3321-3326.1988
90
SchitoG. C. (2006). The importance of the development of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.Clin. Microbiol. Infect.12(Suppl. 1) 3–8. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01343.x
91
SchneiderT.SahlH. G. (2010). An oldie but a goodie – cell wall biosynthesis as antibiotic target pathway.Int. J. Med. Microbiol.300161–169.
92
SchumacherM. A.BalaniP.MinJ.ChinnamN. B.HansenS.VulicM.et al (2015). HipBA-promoter structures reveal the basis of heritable multidrug tolerance.Nature52459–64.
93
SchumacherM. A.PiroK. M.XuW.HansenS.LewisK.BrennanR. G. (2009). Molecular mechanisms of HipA-mediated multidrug tolerance and its neutralization by HipB.Science323396–401. 10.1126/science.1163806
94
ShanY.Brown GandtA.RoweS. E.DeisingerJ. P.ConlonB. P.LewisK. (2017). ATP-dependent persister formation in Escherichia coli.mBio8:e02267-16. 10.1128/mBio.02267-16
95
SingletaryL. A.GibsonJ. L.TannerE. J.McKenzieG. J.LeeP. L.GonzalezC.et al (2009). An SOS-regulated type 2 toxin-antitoxin system.J. Bacteriol.1917456–7465. 10.1128/JB.00963-09
96
SlavchevG.MichailovaL.MarkovaN. (2016). L-form transformation phenomenon in Mycobacterium tuberculosis associated with drug tolerance to ethambutol.Int. J. Mycobacteriol.5454–459. 10.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.06.011
97
SpoeringA. L.LewisK. (2001). Biofilms and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have similar resistance to killing by antimicrobials.J. Bacteriol.1836746–6751. 10.1128/JB.183.23.6746-6751.2001
98
SulaimanJ. E.HaoC.LamH. (2018). Specific enrichment and proteomics analysis of Escherichia coli persisters from rifampin pretreatment.J. Proteome Res.173984–3996. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00625
99
SunY.SunT. L.HuangH. W. (2014). Physical properties of Escherichia coli spheroplast membranes.Biophys. J.1072082–2090.
100
SunY.SunT. L.HuangH. W. (2016). Mode of action of antimicrobial peptides on E. coli spheroplasts.Biophys. J.111132–139. 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.05.037
101
SvenningsenM. S.VeressA.HarmsA.MitaraiN.SemseyS. (2019). Birth and resuscitation of (p)ppGpp induced antibiotic tolerant persister cells.Sci. Rep.9:6056. 10.1038/s41598-019-42403-7
102
TripathiA.DewanP. C.SiddiqueS. A.VaradarajanR. (2014). MazF-induced growth inhibition and persister generation in Escherichia coli.J. Biol. Chem.2894191–4205. 10.1074/jbc.M113.510511
103
VerstraetenN.KnapenW. J.KintC. I.LiebensV.Van den BerghB.DewachterL.et al (2015). Obg and membrane depolarization are part of a microbial bet-hedging strategy that leads to antibiotic tolerance.Mol. Cell599–21. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.011
104
VogelJ.ArgamanL.WagnerE. G.AltuviaS. (2004). The small RNA IstR inhibits synthesis of an SOS-induced toxic peptide.Curr. Biol.142271–2276. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.003
105
VollmerW.BlanotD.de PedroM. A. (2008). Peptidoglycan structure and architecture.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.32149–167. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00094.x
106
WangX.LordD. M.HongS. H.PetiW.BenedikM. J.PageR.et al (2013). Type II toxin/antitoxin MqsR/MqsA controls type V toxin/antitoxin GhoT/GhoS.Environ. Microbiol.151734–1744. 10.1111/1462-2920.12063
107
WangX.YaoJ.SunY. C.WoodT. K. (2021). Type VII toxin/antitoxin classification system for antitoxins that enzymatically neutralize toxins.Trends Microbiol.29388–393. 10.1016/j.tim.2020.12.001
108
WeiL.LaBouyerM. A.DarlingL. E.ElmoreD. E. (2016). Bacterial spheroplasts as a model for visualizing membrane translocation of antimicrobial peptides.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.606350–6352. 10.1128/AAC.01008-16
109
WindelsE. M.MichielsJ. E.FauvartM.WenseleersT.Van den BerghB.MichielsJ. (2019). Bacterial persistence promotes the evolution of antibiotic resistance by increasing survival and mutation rates.ISME J.131239–1251. 10.1038/s41396-019-0344-9
110
WittlerR. G.MaliziaW. F.KramerP. E.TuckettJ. D.PritchardH. N.BakerH. J. (1960). Isolation of a Corynebacterium and its transitional forms from a case of subacute bacterial endocarditis treated with antibiotics.J. Gen. Microbiol.23315–333. 10.1099/00221287-23-2-315
111
WolfD.Dominguez-CuevasP.DanielR. A.MascherT. (2012). Cell envelope stress response in cell wall-deficient L-forms of Bacillus subtilis.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.565907–5915. 10.1128/AAC.00770-12
112
YamaguchiY.ParkJ. H.InouyeM. (2011). Toxin-antitoxin systems in bacteria and archaea.Annu. Rev. Genet.4561–79. 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132412
113
YanJ.BasslerB. L. (2019). Surviving as a community: antibiotic tolerance and persistence in bacterial biofilms.Cell Host Microbe2615–21. 10.1016/j.chom.2019.06.002
114
ZouJ.KouS. H.XieR.VanNieuwenhzeM. S.QuJ.PengB.et al (2020). Non-walled spherical Acinetobacter baumannii is an important type of persister upon beta-lactam antibiotic treatment.Emerg. Microbes Infect.91149–1159. 10.1080/22221751.2020.1770630
Summary
Keywords
persister, dormancy, cell wall deficient bacteria, spheroplast, L-form
Citation
Zou J, Peng B, Qu J and Zheng J (2022) Are Bacterial Persisters Dormant Cells Only?. Front. Microbiol. 12:708580. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.708580
Received
12 May 2021
Accepted
15 December 2021
Published
02 February 2022
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Frank Schreiber, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Germany
Reviewed by
Roxane M. Piazza, Butantan Institute, Brazil; Tanel Tenson, University of Tartu, Estonia; Wonsik Lee, Sungkyunkwan University, South Korea
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Zou, Peng, Qu and Zheng.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jiuxin Qu, qujiuxin@163.comJun Zheng, zhjunyy@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.