REVIEW article

Front. Microbiol., 10 February 2022

Sec. Virology

Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.789882

The Complexity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the COVID-19 Pandemic

  • 1. Laboratory of Virology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil

  • 2. Graduate Program in Biology of Infectious and Parasitic Agents, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil

  • 3. Laboratory of Complex Diseases, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil

  • 4. University Center of the State of Pará, Belém, Brazil

  • 5. Center for Biological and Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, State University of Pará, Belém, Brazil

Article metrics

View details

27

Citations

10k

Views

14,7k

Downloads

Abstract

The pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) led to the death of millions of people worldwide and thousands more infected individuals developed sequelae due to the disease of the new coronavirus of 2019 (COVID-19). The development of several studies has contributed to the knowledge about the evolution of SARS-CoV2 infection and the disease to more severe forms. Despite this information being debated in the scientific literature, many mechanisms still need to be better understood in order to control the spread of the virus and treat clinical cases of COVID-19. In this article, we carried out an extensive literature review in order to bring together, in a single article, the biological, social, genetic, diagnostic, therapeutic, immunization, and even socioeconomic aspects that impact the SAR-CoV-2 pandemic. This information gathered in this article will enable a broad and consistent reading of the main aspects related to the current pandemic.

Introduction

On December 8, 2019, a viral infection, previously unidentified, characterized by severe pneumonia, was reported in an individual who frequented a small local fish and wildlife market in the city of Wuhan, Hubei Province, China (Lu H. et al., 2020). The analysis based on nucleotide sequencing technology of the virus genome isolated from the blood of sick individuals led to the identification of a new coronavirus as the causative agent of the outbreak (Gorbalenya et al., 2020). Initially, the infected individuals were those who visited the seafood market or consumed foods of animal origin probably infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Later, a more in-depth analysis through contact tracing of patients positive for COVID-19 revealed that several individuals with no history of trips to the seafood market also tested positive for the disease, indicating the possibility of transmission from person to person (Chan J. F. et al., 2020; Chen J. et al., 2020; Ji et al., 2020).

During the second week of January 2020, due to the travel season of the Spring Festival, the new SARS-CoV-2 spread to other provinces of China and thus to other countries (Lu H. et al., 2020). The first case of SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed outside of China was in Thailand on January 13, 2020. On January 16, 2020, the first case was confirmed in Japan. As of January 25, 2020, the number of confirmed cases had reached 2062, including in countries such as Hong Kong, Macao, Australia, Malaysia, Singapore, France, South Korea, Taiwan, United States, Vietnam, Nepal, and Sweden (Dhama et al., 2020). Due to the severity of this outbreak and its ability to spread internationally, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a global health emergency on January 31, 2020. On March 11, 2020, a pandemic was declared (Cucinotta and Vanelli, 2020). Data published by the WHO showed that up to December 3, 2021, 22,105,872 people had been confirmed infected by the new coronavirus, 614,964 had died, and 312,827,402 doses of vaccine were administered (World Health Organization [WHO], 2021a).

This review aims to explore and summarize the available evidence on the main viral characteristics, immune response, diagnostic methods, therapeutic options and candidate/approved vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, so that this information can serve as a basis for a better understanding of future studies on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2

Morphological, Genomic Structure and Replication of SARS-CoV-2

Coronaviruses are spherical, enveloped viruses of approximately 120 nm in diameter, containing a helical symmetry nucleocapsid, with a single-stranded RNA genome of positive polarity, non-segmented, 29.9 kb in size (NC_045512.2), and a GC content of 38% (Chan K. et al., 2020; Figure 1B). Its genome is composed of 13 open reading frames (ORFs) (Lu R. et al., 2020) encoding 7096 amino acids that constitute four structural proteins spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N) (Table 1) and 15 non-structural proteins (NSP1, NSP2, NSP3, NSP4, NSP5, NSP6, NSP7, NSP8, NSP9, NSP10, NSP12, NSP13, NSP14, NSP15, and NSP16), in addition to eight accessory proteins (3a, 3b, 6, 7a, 7b, 8b, 9b, and ORF14) that perform numerous functions in the processes of virus replication and assembly (Wu A. et al., 2020; Figure 1A). In comparison to SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 lacks protein 8a but has a longer 8b protein, with approximately 121 amino acids, and a shorter 3b protein, containing 22 amino acids (Chan K. et al., 2020; Wu A. et al., 2020). More than 380 amino acid substitutions, located mainly in the NSP3, NSP2, and S proteins, have been identified between SARS-CoV-2 isolates and the consensus sequence, leading to divergence in the functional and pathogenic traits between it and other coronaviruses (Wu A. et al., 2020). We synthesized the role of structural proteins in the SARS-CoV-2 replication cycle (Table 1).

FIGURE 1

TABLE 1

ProteinFunctionReferences
Spike (S)Divided into two subunits (S1 and S2) it is able to bind to the host cell through its receptor-binding domain. The S1 subunit is involved in binding the virus to the host cell membrane, while the S2 subunit acts in fusing the viral envelope with the cell membrane.Hoffmann et al., 2020; Lan et al., 2020; Wrapp et al., 2020
Nucleocapsid (N)It binds and packages viral RNA into ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNP) located inside the viral envelope, forming a separate layer from the M, E, and S envelope proteins. This protein is recruited into the replication-transcription complex by NSP3 and, therefore, it is believed to be also involved in viral genome replication.Chang et al., 2020; Cong et al., 2020; Yao et al., 2020
Envelope (E)Protein E has a transmembrane domain and is relatively small in size, with about 75 amino acids, which aid in the assembly and release of virions.Nieto-Torres et al., 2015;
Venkatagopalan et al., 2015; Lu R. et al., 2020
Membrane (M)It has about 222 amino acids and is the most present protein in the viral particle, giving definitive shape to the virion envelope. This protein works simultaneously with proteins E, N, and S and plays an important role in ribonucleic acid (RNA) packaging and virus assembly.Tang X. et al., 2020

SARS-CoV-2 structural proteins and their roles in the viral replication cycle.

The SARS-CoV-2 replication cycle begins with the binding of the S protein of the virus with the angiotensin-2 converting enzyme (ACE-2) of the host, considered the specific receptor of SARS-CoV-2 in human cells (Hoffmann et al., 2020). ACE2 is a type I membrane glycoprotein responsible for the conversion of angiotensin II into angiotensin 1–7 and is expressed in the lungs, nose, heart, intestine, and kidneys (Yan et al., 2020). The S protein of SARS-CoV-2 is a class I fusion protein that protects its fusion domain, keeping it hidden and inactive until the virus finds a host cell with its receptor, where it is then proteolytically cleaved into a hook-shaped structure that is necessary for its incorporation into the membrane of the target cell (Li and Petrovsky, 2016). The binding of the S protein to ACE-2 is dominated by polar contacts mediated by hydrophilic residues located in its C-terminal domain and promotes a cleavage event dependent on the endosomal cysteine proteases CatB and CatL or the transmembrane serine protease TMPRSS2, which exposes the protein S fusion peptide in order to favor viral entry (Hoffmann et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020a; Yan et al., 2020). Two possible new SARS-CoV-2 receptors were recently identified: the tyrosine kinase AXL receptor and the transmembrane surface glycoprotein CD147 (inducer of extracellular matrix metalloproteinase or basigin), both capable of interacting with the S protein (Wang et al., 2020b; Wang S. et al., 2021). In addition, the cell receptor neuropilin-1 (NRP1), expressed in the olfactory epithelium, also seems to facilitate SARS-CoV-2 infection by interacting with the S protein (Daly et al., 2020).

After viral entry, the SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA serves as a transcript that allows the translation of two polyproteins (pp1a and pp1ab), encoded in the 3′ two-thirds of the genome as ORF1a and ORF1b (Zhou P. et al., 2020). These polyproteins are cleaved by the action of two viral proteases (NSP3-PLpro and NSP5-Mpro), generating 16 non-structural proteins that are assembled into the replicase–transcriptase complex, which will later give rise to genomic and subgenomic RNAs (Fehr and Perlman, 2015). NSPs also induce cell membrane rearrangement to form double-membrane vesicles (DMVs), where the replication-transcription complex (RTC) is anchored (Ziebuhr et al., 2000; Angelini et al., 2013). The other third of the genome, at the 5′ end, encodes structural (S, E, M, and N) and accessory proteins (3a, 3b, 6, 7a, 7b, 8b, 9b, and ORF14) (Siu et al., 2008; Fehr and Perlman, 2015; Wu A. et al., 2020). In addition to complexes between viral proteins, different interaction complexes are formed between structural and non-structural proteins of the virus and host cell proteins (Srinivasan et al., 2020).

The replication of SARS-CoV-2 is a complex process that involves atypical RNA revision by NSP14, one of the non-structural proteins generated by the cleavage of the pp1ab polyprotein (Romano et al., 2020). Such a revision mechanism present in coronaviruses, unknown among RNA viruses before their discovery in SARS-CoV, results in replication error rates more than 10 times lower than those of other RNA viruses (approximately 10–6 mutations/nucleotide/cycle/nucleotide/cycle) (Rausch et al., 2020).

Structural proteins translated from subgenomic mRNAs are inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and pass through the secretory pathway to the ER–Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC), where the S protein is cleaved into two subunits, S1 and S2 (Jaimes et al., 2020). The newly synthesized viral genome forms a complex with the N protein in the ERGIC for the assembly of new SARS-CoV-2 particles in an event mediated by the M protein with contributions from the E protein (Siu et al., 2008; Tseng et al., 2013). New viral particles emerge from ERGIC and are transported through vesicles to be released into the extracellular medium by exocytosis (Ulasli et al., 2010; Figure 1C).

Taxonomic Classification

Coronaviruses belong to the family Coronaviridae, which contains four genera (Alphacoronavirus, Betacoronavirus, Deltacoronavirus, and Gammacoronavirus) and includes species with a single-stranded RNA genome with positive polarity and 26–32 kb (International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses [ICTV], 2019). SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the B strain of the genus Betacoronavirus, whose members infect only mammals (International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses [ICTV], 2020; Mittal et al., 2020). Coronaviruses are zoonotic viruses with high mutation rates that infect a wide variety of wild and domestic animals and can also infect humans. Evolutionary analyses have shown that Alphacoronavirus and Betacoronavirus have bats and rodents as reservoirs, while birds are possible reservoirs of Deltacoronavirus and Gammacoronavirus (Chan et al., 2013, 2015).

The Origin

Until 2002, coronaviruses were not known to cause serious infections in humans. This scenario changed with the emergence of SARS-CoV in an animal market located in southern China, which later affected more than 8,000 people, with 774 deaths worldwide (Drosten et al., 2003; Lau et al., 2003). In 2012, a new coronavirus was identified as responsible for Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV), infecting more than 2428 individuals and killing 838 (Zaki et al., 2012). SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV originated from bats and then jumped to another mammalian host, the civet of Himalayan palms (Paguma larvata) in the case of SARS-CoV and the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) in the case of MERS-CoV, before infecting humans (Song et al., 2005; Azhar et al., 2014).

SARS-CoV-2 is the third beta-coronavirus to infect humans. Identified in late 2019, it probably originated from bats and, over time, accumulated mutations that gave it the capacity for zoonotic transmission (Zhou P. et al., 2020). The bat coronavirus RaTG13 seems to be the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2, since it shares 93.1% identity in the nucleotide sequence of the S gene and 98% identity in the amino acid sequence of the S protein (Wrapp et al., 2020; Zhou P. et al., 2020). The transmission route of SARS-CoV-2 (or its direct ancestor) from bats to humans, either directly or through an intermediate animal species, remains undefined (Banerjee et al., 2021). The complete genomic sequences of SARS-CoV-2 obtained from five patients at an early stage of the outbreak were almost identical, and they had 79.6% similarity with the SARS-CoV sequences (Li et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020). Initially, the virus was named new coronavirus 2019 (2019-nCoV). On February 11, 2020, the Coronavirus Study Group of the International Committee of Virus Taxonomy officially named it SARS-CoV-2 based on phylogenetic analyses that showed similarity with SARS-CoV (Gorbalenya et al., 2020).

Genetic Variants of SARS-CoV-2

Since the beginning of the pandemic, the genome plasticity of SARS-CoV-2 was evidenciated with the detection of multiple sites in the genome under positive selection (Velazquez-Salinas et al., 2020). Viruses belonging to the same strain, but containing different subsets of mutations, can be classified as different variants that are characterized by their transmissibility, disease severity, and ability to escape humoral immunity. Increased transmissibility is demonstrated by the ability of a variant to compete with other variants and to exhibit a higher effective reproduction rate and/or secondary attack rate compared to other circulating variants (Korber et al., 2020; Volz et al., 2021). Next, we summarize the molecular characteristics of the main variants of SARS-CoV-2 (Table 2).

TABLE 2

Variant/WHO labelLineageDescriptionAdditional aminoacid/key mutations
Alpha (Davies et al., 2021; Galloway et al., 2021; Volz et al., 2021; Walensky et al., 2021)B. 1. 1. 7UK lineage of concern, associated with the N501Y mutation
United Kingdom, September-2020
+++ Transmissibility
++ Severity
+S: 484K
+S:452R
N501Y
P681H
Deletions: H69-V70
Y144/145
Beta (Tegally et al., 2021; Wibmer et al., 2021)B. 1. 351South Africa, May-2020
+Transmissibility
Severity: possible
+S:L18F
N501Y
K417N
E484K
Gamma (Candido et al., 2021; Wang P. et al., 2021)P.1Brazilian lineage with a number of spike mutations with likely functional significance E484K, K417T, and N501Y.
Brazil, Dez-2020
++ Transmissibility
Severity: possible
+S:681H
N501Y
K417T
E484K
Delta (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control [ECDC], 2021; Motozono et al., 2021)B. 1. 617. 2Predominantly India lineage with several spike mutations.
India, October-2020
+++ Transmissibility
+++ Severity
+S:417N
+S:484K
L452R
E484Q
Omicron (Callaway, 2021; Gao et al., 2021)B. 1. 1. 529Several mutations that are found in other variants of concern and that are thought to make the virus more infectious.
Multiple countries, November-2021
D614G
N501Y
K417N

Description/features of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

The mutations identified throughout the pandemic in the morphology of the virus clearly demonstrate, in addition to its adaptive capacity, its ability to develop evolutions in order to increase its ability to escape the host’s immune response, as well as make its entry into the cell easier, such mutations imply an increase in transmissibility or harmful alteration in the epidemiology of COVID-19; an increase in virulence or change in the clinical presentation of the disease; and/or diminished effectiveness of social and public health measures or available diagnostics, vaccines and therapies. Therefore, the wide vaccination coverage of the world population and the maintenance of measures to control the spread of the virus are the only efficient measures to contain these evolutions in the pathogenesis of the virus and in the effective control of the pandemic.

Genetics of the Human Host in SARS-CoV-2 Infection

The role of human host genetic variability in the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been extensively proposed due to the great heterogeneity in the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 and the variation in mortality rates between populations and ethnicities, which are strong indicators of the modulatory effect of host genetics on its pathogenesis (Chakravarty, 2021; Fricke-Galindo and Falfán-Valencia, 2021; Mohammadpour et al., 2021).

Studies on the genetic predisposition to COVID-19 have been of various kinds, such as meta-analyses (Benetti et al., 2020; Poulton et al., 2020; Rendeiro et al., 2020; Bernal et al., 2021), in silico approaches (Vique-Sanchez, 2020; Wang et al., 2020c; Calcagnile et al., 2021), in vitro (Hashizume et al., 2021), case–control studies (Amraei et al., 2020; Sakuraba et al., 2020), and case series (Asselta et al., 2020; Russo et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020d).

In case–control studies, there are two main approaches: (i) those rationally based on functional evidence (Lambert et al., 2005; Heurich et al., 2014; Cao et al., 2020; Maucourant et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020d; Secolin et al., 2021), which search for specific candidate genes and investigate allele frequencies or differences in gene expression levels; and (ii) those based on genomic searches, such as whole-genome sequencing (WGS) (Wang et al., 2020f), whole-exome sequencing (WES) Zhang et al., 2020b; Kosmicki et al., 2021), and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) (Ellinghaus et al., 2020; Hu J. et al., 2020; Pairo-Castineira et al., 2021). Supplementary File organizes the associations reported in the literature by cytogenetic location, discriminating the evidence of association by type of study (WGS, WES, GWAS, case-control, meta-analyses, and functional evidence). A total of 51 regions could be identified containing approximately 86 candidate genes.

In this context, altered immune responses, such as those caused by primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs), may be important in disease progression, where at least one case of death has already been reported during coronavirus infection (Szczawinska-Poplonyk et al., 2013). More severe viral infections have been associated with the presence of PID (Dropulic and Cohen, 2011), which constitute a group of more than 350 rare diseases that together have a considerable prevalence (McCusker et al., 2018). Genetically, PIDs are heterogeneous, most often monogenic. The registry of rare diseases ORPHANET1 recognizes at least 308 genes involved in PIDs, which makes their diagnosis complex and their prevalence underestimated.

Total exome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 identified 24 functional variants in eight genes, TLR3, UNC93B1, TICAM1, TBK1, IRF7, IFNAR2, IRF3, and IFNAR1 (Zhang et al., 2020a), of which the first six are on the list of 308 genes known to be associated with PID. Additionally, the ADAM17 gene, which is also on the list, has been implicated in the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to infect cells and modulate the inflammatory response (Heurich et al., 2014; Palau et al., 2020; Zipeto et al., 2020).

Few studies have addressed the direct relationship between PID and COVID-19 directly. A meta-analysis suggests a correlation between the prevalence of selective IgA deficiency, the most common PID, and the prevalence of COVID-19 (Naito et al., 2020). A case series with two men from two families indicated that mutations in the TLR7 gene, one of those implicated in PID, were present in these patients with severe COVID-19 (Van der Made et al., 2020). An important prospective study suggests a 10-fold higher mortality rate from COVID-19 in children with PID (Delavari et al., 2020).

Together, these observations show that studies on the genetic modulation of COVID-19 by PID-related genes are consistent. Thus, Supplementary File shows that of the 51 chromosomal regions associated with COVID-19, 37 (72.5%) also contain PID-related genes, as described in ORPHANET. Among these 51 regions, those present on chromosomes 6, 19, and 21 stand out. On chromosome 6, more specifically in the MHC class I and II regions (6p21.32, 6p21.33, 6p22.1), the evidence of association with COVID-19 comes from WGS, GWAS, functional (expression and affinity) studies, meta-analyses, and case–control studies, and this region contains several PID-related genes. On chromosome 19, the most consistently associated region is the one containing the KIR gene complex (19q13.42), whose evidence comes from case–control, meta-analysis, and functional studies (Sakuraba et al., 2020; Bernal et al., 2021; Rendeiro et al., 2021) and which contains PID-related genes. Two regions of chromosome 21 (21q22.11, 21q22.3) also have multiple lines of evidence showing an association with COVID-19, the most strongly associated being the one that contains the TMPRSS2 and MX1 genes. TMPRSS2 is already well established as an important marker for the ease of viral entry (Andolfo et al., 2020; Asselta et al., 2020; Latini et al., 2020; Sajuthi et al., 2020; Senapati et al., 2020; Vastrad et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020c; Mohammad et al., 2021; Schönfelder et al., 2021; Torre-Fuentes et al., 2021), while MX1 is a gene responsive to interferon and is closely directed to the activity of response to viral infections, including SARS-CoV-2 infection (Russo et al., 2020; Bizzotto et al., 2020).

The regulation of important genes in COVID-19 has also been addressed by epigenetic studies, which have shown that methylation patterns (Corley and Ndhlovu, 2020) and microRNA expression (Fulzele et al., 2020; Widiasta et al., 2020) are altered in the disease. The roles of microRNAs in the regulation of key genes in COVID-19 make them important candidate biomarkers. Another important aspect of their action is their binding to viral mRNAs to silence them and act as antivirals, as shown by in silico studies (Fulzele et al., 2020).

The genes involved in viral infection reported in the literature are ACE2, TMPRSS2, ADAM17, NRP1, and NRP2. One literature review (Fulzele et al., 2020) identified 12 relevant microRNAs in the regulation of ACE2 (miR-18, miR-125b, miR-132, miR-143, miR-181, miR-200, miR-145, miR-155, miR-212, miR-421, miR-482-3p, and miR-4262). In addition to these microRNAs experimentally deduced to target ACE2, an in silico search was performed in the miRDB database (Chen and Wang, 2020) for possible microRNAs targeting the ACE2, TMPRSS2, ADAM17, NRP1, and NRP2 genes. Only microRNAs with a score greater than 94 were considered. The search identified candidate microRNAs to be relevant biomarkers in the regulation of these genes. Additionally, seven microRNAs were described as candidates targeting the mRNAs of viral genes (Fulzele et al., 2020), making them an important group of markers.

Finally, a relevant group of microRNAs has been described as regulators of the inflammatory response (Tahamtan et al., 2018), of which some belong to the aforementioned list of microRNAs involved in regulating the expression of genes related to SARS-CoV-2 infection or targeting viral genes. Table 3 lists the microRNAs that may be relevant in COVID-19.

TABLE 3

MicroRNAs with in silico evidence of regulation of the expression of genes related to SARS-CoV-2 infection:
hsa-miR-124-3p, hsa-miR-1297, hsa-miR-153-5p, hsa-miR-26a-5p, hsa-miR-26b-5p, hsa-miR-3133, hsa-miR-3163, hsa-miR-331-3p, hsa-miR-33a-3p, hsa-miR-3646, hsa-miR-4465, hsa-miR-4500, hsa-miR-506-3p, hsa-miR-5094, hsa-miR-548ae-3p, hsa-miR-548ah-3p, hsa-miR-548aj-3p, hsa-miR-548am-3p, hsa-miR-548aq-3p, hsa-miR-548j-3p, hsa-miR-548x-3p, hsa-miR-578, hsa-miR-6844, hsa-miR-7977, hsa-miR-92a-1-5p
MicroRNAs with experimental evidence of regulation of ACE2 expression:
hsa-miR-125b, hsa-miR-145, hsa-miR-181, hsa-miR-200, hsa-miR-212, hsa-miR-421, hsa-miR-482-3p, hsa-miR-18, hsa-miR-132, hsa-miR-143, hsa-miR-155, hsa-miR-4262
MicroRNAs with in silico evidence of regulation of viral gene expression:
hsa-miR-15b-5p, hsa-miR-15a-5p, hsa-miR-548c-5p, hsa-miR-548d-3p, hsa-miR-409-3p, hsa-miR-30b-5p, hsa-miR-505-3p
MicroRNAs with evidence of regulation of the inflammatory response:
hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-24, hsa-miR-124, hsa-miR-145, hsa-miR-146, hsa-miR-149, hsa-miR-155, hsa-miR-181a, hsa-miR-181b, hsa-miR-181c, hsa-miR-181d

MicroRNAs possibly relevant in COVID-19, according to their type of evidence.

Correlating the most recent findings, host genetics linked to the immune response are strongly suggested as a predictor of the prognosis of COVID-19. Initial evidence pointing to genes such as ACE2 as important for viral entry into the host cell is not as relevant as was expected. Rather, viral entry is now more clearly linked to genes such as TMPRSS2 and MX1, which are near each other on chromosome 21. TMPRSS2 is crucial for the initial phenomena of infection and is responsible for the viral response related to interferon.

In this scenario, evidence emerged for specific immune response genes, such as KIR and MHC genes, in addition to a potential association with multiple PID genes. Therefore, the current data suggest that the influence of human host genetics on COVID-19 seems to be polygenic and focused on the genetic modulation of the immune response, making it increasingly less likely that the broad spectrum of COVID-19 manifestations is determined by oligogenic models. Additionally, the relevant role of multiple immunorelevant genes also favors the role of epigenetic regulation in these genes, especially microRNAs.

There are several pieces of evidence on the role of host genetics influencing the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the variability of genes involved in the immune response has a direct impact on the course of COVID-19, but the magnitude of genetic diversity makes this elucidation more complex. However, concentrating efforts in order to discover the key genes involved in viral pathogenesis, as well as in the escape of the immune response and, based on this, building a panel with the main findings, can strongly contribute to the targeting of cases, enabling a more accurate view on how the evolution of cases can occur, and thus outline a more effective preventive and therapeutic planning, contributing to a better dynamics of care services, as well as favoring the studies of vaccines used today and those that are still under research.

Transmission

The transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 is not known with precision. It is believed that the ingestion of infected animals as a food source is the main cause of zoonotic transmission (Ji et al., 2020). As SARS-CoV-2 is highly similar to SARS-CoV, bats could be the host of the new coronavirus. In addition, Malaysian pangolins (Manis javanica) can harbor coronaviruses very similar to SARS-CoV-2 and are a potential natural reservoir of the virus (Zhou P. et al., 2020). Human-to-human transmission can occur through droplets containing infectious particles spread by speech, coughing, or sneezing, which can reach the mucous membranes of the eyes, nose, or mouth as portals, or by direct contact with contaminated surfaces, such as stainless steel, plastic, glass, and cardboard for at least several hours (Doremalen et al., 2020; Fan et al., 2020; Xiang Ong et al., 2020). As respiratory viruses have the highest transmission rate when the patient is symptomatic, because it is during this period that the viral load reaches a peak, it is believed that the same occurs with COVID-19 (Zhou F. et al., 2020). However, the possibility of viral transmission from an asymptomatic individual (Bai et al., 2020) is not excluded because there is evidence of asymptomatic or presymptomatic spread of SARS-CoV-2, highlighting its ability to colonize and replicate in the throat during the initial infection (Arons et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2020; Wölfel et al., 2020).

The genetic material of SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in the feces, whole blood, and urine of patients with COVID-19, but it has not been documented whether transmission by these means is possible (Young et al., 2020). The possibility of fecal aerosol transmission was described in a report based on circumstantial evidence, and this may have caused the community outbreak of COVID-19 in a high-rise building in Canton, China (Kang et al., 2020). Little is known about the vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and further studies are needed to assess its transmissibility from pregnant woman to fetus (Chen H. et al., 2020; Hu X. et al., 2020). However, in March 2020, the first proven case of transplacental transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was described, involving a pregnant woman affected by COVID-19 during late pregnancy, with detection of the viral genome in the amniotic fluid collected before rupture of the placenta (Vivanti et al., 2020).

To date, there is no evidence of viral transmission from pets to humans. Ferrets and cats are highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, while dogs have low susceptibility; other animals, including pigs, chickens, and ducks, are not susceptible to the virus under experimental conditions (Shi et al., 2020). Interestingly, viral transmission between cats has been observed (Shi et al., 2020). Another study showed that 22 cats in France and two of 10 cats in China from patients with COVID-19 had SARS-CoV-2 infection with mild respiratory and digestive symptoms (Sailleau et al., 2020). This indicates that cats, being common pets, can theoretically transmit the virus to other animals and, possibly, humans. Still, there is no clear evidence that transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has occurred from cats to humans. In ferrets, SARS-CoV-2 is able to replicate in the upper respiratory tract without causing serious illness or death (Shi et al., 2020). Recently, an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in visions (Neovison mink) was reported on several farms in the Netherlands with transmission events to humans via respiratory droplets promoting secondary transmission of a mink SARS-CoV-2 variant back for humans (Oude Munnink et al., 2021; Shuai et al., 2021). Between April 26 and November 22, 2020, 14 outbreaks of COVID-19 occurred on commercial mink farms in Utah, one outbreak in a commercial mink farm in Wisconsin, and another in Oregon, USA (United States of America). Clinical signs included respiratory signs and sudden death from a total of 12,330 deaths among 145,757 susceptible animals (Eckstrand et al., 2021).

Repeat infections of SARS-CoV-2 between humans and animals (spillback) can lead to the emergence of new animal reservoirs, with risk of secondary infection (spillover) for humans through an animal reservoir, which can lead to the appearance of variants of SARS-CoV-2, as described above. Such events are of great concern, as the formation of wild virus reservoirs, the appearance of a mutant strain with increased transmissibility and severity of SARS-CoV-2 in humans puts efforts for the long-term control of COVID-19 at risk and they also threaten vulnerable animal populations that are particularly susceptible to lethal diseases.

Diagnosis of COVID-19

Faced with the pandemic caused by the new coronavirus, the early and safe diagnosis of the infection is extremely important to interrupt the transmission of the disease and assist in making decisions such as isolation and/or distancing of people, which will provide more time for public health implementation measures that may have positive impacts in reducing the problems associated with COVID-19.

According to the WHO, the diagnosis of COVID-19 can be clinical or epidemiological, using the International Code of Diseases (ICD) ICD-10 Z20.9 (contact with exposure to unspecified communicable disease) as a record. In the face of clinical manifestations suggestive of the disease and when laboratory confirmation is inconclusive or not available, the patient is considered infected and the ICD UO7.2 (unidentified virus - attributed to a clinical or epidemiological diagnosis of COVID) should be used for recording –19, when laboratory confirmation is inconclusive or unavailable. Includes diagnosis of a probable case or suspected case of COVID-19). On the other hand, those with a diagnosis confirmed by laboratory tests must be registered using the code ICD-UO7.1 (identified virus – attributed to a COVID-19 diagnosis confirmed by laboratory tests) (Brazil Ministério da Saúde, 2020).

The Brazilian Ministry of Health included new criteria for the characterization of COVID-19 cases, going beyond the laboratory tests already adopted. Given the difficulties of testing, the agency allowed for the following individuals to be deemed infected by the new coronavirus (Brazil Ministério da Saúde, 2020; Figure 2).

FIGURE 2

SARS-CoV-2 was initially characterized by sequencing its genome, which provided the necessary information to develop quantitative or real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for viral detection (Zhou P. et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2020). Different laboratory diagnostic tools are used in clinical practice to confirm cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection and differ in terms of sample type, collection time, specificity, and sensitivity (Table 4).

TABLE 4

TestType of samplePros and consReferences
RT-PCRNasopharyngeal smear or saliva. Collection within 7 days of symptomsGold standard test for detecting SARS-CoV-2. The accuracy of the test depends on the stage of the disease and the degree of viral multiplication. Higher sensitivities are reported depending on which genetic targets are used in performing the testXiao et al., 2020; Zou et al., 2020; Erster et al., 2021
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
IgM, IgA, IgG
SerumUseful for diagnosing previous infections. Important for population serological surveillance and research activities. It is not useful for diagnosing acute infection.
Descending titles over time (2–3 months)
Huang A. T. et al., 2020; Huang M. et al., 2020; Krajewski et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Lucas et al., 2020; Bichara et al., 2021
Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA)
(Antigen or antibody)
Nasal or nazopharinzeal smear, serum or whole bloodDetects acute infection through the presence of viral antigens. Previous infection by detection of antibodies. Average time 15–20 min. Low cost. Low sensitivity and specificity of 56.2 and 99.5%, respectivelyCanetti et al., 2020; Dinnes et al., 2020; Prazuck et al., 2020
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)Nasal or nazopharinzeal smearThe accuracy of the test depends on the stage of the disease and the degree of viral multiplication. Highly effective, fast results, and limited costBroughton et al., 2020; Huang W. E. et al., 2020; Bektaş et al., 2021; Jones et al., 2021; Juscamayta-López et al., 2021
CRISPR/CasNasal or nazopharinzeal smearHigh sensitivity and specificity rates and low analysis costs. With 100% sensitivity and specificityBroughton et al., 2020; Hou et al., 2020; Lucia et al., 2020
BiosensorsNazopharinzeal smearTecnologia rápida e altamente sensível. Ausência de reatividade cruzada com outros coronavirusSeo et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2021

Diagnostic methods for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of laboratory diagnostic methods. Currently, nucleic acid amplification methods represent the gold standard for the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection with several RT-PCR-based tests approved by different national and international regulatory agencies. However, despite the high sensitivity of RT-PCR, the need for trained professionals and expensive instruments and reagents that limit its application, especially in low-income countries, drive the development of diagnostic methods to overcome the limitations of RT-PCR, among them, low-cost diagnostic strategies are promising and can be used for the effective diagnosis of COVID-19 infection in low- and middle-income countries. Rapid antigen and antibody tests and immunoenzymatic serological tests represent the most widely used techniques for monitoring the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is important to note that, despite the low cost of such techniques, the low sensitivity and specificity of LFIAs and ELISAs, the use of such point-of-care tests enabled the implementation of effective health surveillance systems that allowed for the effective management of the COVID pandemic -19, thus limiting the number of infections.

The scientific community in a short period developed several useful methods to correctly diagnose a suspected case of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Despite the limitations of some laboratory diagnostic methods, it is necessary to take into account not only the test to be used but also the patient’s medical history, the time of exposure to individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2, the type of sample to be used, be collected and analyzed, and how to interpret the result. The integration of all these elements will provide a solid foundation for correctly diagnosing COVID-19 infection and effectively managing the COVID-19 pandemic.

Treatment Approaches

According to the WHO, there are still no specific drugs for COVID-19. In the early days of the pandemic, many governments around the world implemented, to some degree, measures recommended by the WHO to limit the spread of the virus, such as self-isolation, social distancing, hand washing, closing schools and universities, and mask wearing in public places (Prather et al., 2020). Due to the lack of specific therapy, some drugs used in other infectious diseases have been applied against COVID-19 (Table 5) in clinical practice, although their effectiveness is controversial.

TABLE 5

Drug nameClassMechanism of actionAdverse effectReferences
Chloroquine and HydroxychloroquineAntiparasiticInhibition of host cell receptor glycosylation to block viral entry, acidification of the endosomal and proteolytic process.High doses can lead to respiratory arrest, cardiac arrest, and hypokalemia.Savarino et al., 2003; Yamamoto et al., 2004; Eze et al., 2021
Lopinavir/RitonavirAntiviralInhibition of 3CL protease.
Inhibition of viral replication.
Risks for pediatric patientsChu et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2016
RemdesivirAntiviralRNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor.
Block viral replication
There is no information on whether overdosing can cause any adverse effectsHoehl et al., 2020; Li and De Clercq, 2020; Wang et al., 2020e
HeparinAnticoagulant and anti-inflammatoryHeparin binds to the RBD of the SARS-CoV-2 protein S, inhibiting viral infectionPlatelet count usually decreases to between days 5 and 12Kawase et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2015; Hoffmann et al., 2020; Mycroft-West et al., 2020; Tang N. et al., 2020; Yamamoto et al., 2020
TocilizumabMonoclonal antibodyIL-6 inhibiting receptor.
Cytokine storm reduction blockade.
Overdose-neutropeniaGuaraldi et al., 2020; Rosas et al., 2020
AnakinraImmune Response ModulatorMonoclonal antibody that acts against the IL-1 receptorRheumatoid arthritis (incidence > 10%)Conti et al., 2020
BaricitinibImmune Response ModulatorAntiviral activity
Inhibitor of clathrin-mediated endocytosis
Janus kinases 1 and 2 (JAK1/2 inhibitor)
Multiple adverse reactions
Cantini et al., 2020; Richardson et al., 2020
Camostat MesilateAntiviralTMPRSS2 inhibitor that prevents replication
Viral Blocks viral mutation
Rash, pruritus, nausea, abnormal values from laboratory tests and diarrheaUno, 2020
MolnupiravirAntiviralIt works by inducing mutagenesis in viral RNA, causing the newly formed RNA strand chain to terminateMild adverse effectsKabinger et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2021
PaxlovidAntiviralIt inhibits viral replication at a stage known as proteolysis, which occurs before viral RNA replicationAbsentWang et al., 2020g; Ahmad et al., 2021; Pfizer, 2021
https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizers-novel-covid-19-oral-antiviral-treatment-candidate

Medicines used in the treatment of COVID-19.

The unfortunate SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in early 2020 posed a challenge to all researchers to find potential therapeutic agents for treatment. There were extensive efforts to reuse approved drugs during the COVID-19 pandemic. This strategy offers several advantages over developing an entirely new drug, with reduced risk of failure because safety has already been evaluated. Currently, there are antiviral therapies developed to induce a direct effect on SARS-CoV-2, either by blocking viral entry into host cells or by controlling viral enzymes with a significant contribution to genome replication. A big step forward in the control of severe cases and deaths related to COVID-19.

Vaccine Platforms

Multiple vaccine platforms have already been approved for emergency use against COVID-19. As of August 19, 2021, 20 vaccine candidates were within the WHO evaluation process for commercialization (World Health Organization [WHO], 2021b; Table 6).

TABLE 6

ManufacturerVaccine namePlatformEvaluation statusStatus
BioNTech Manufacturing GmbHBNT162b2/COMIRNATY Tozinameran (INN)Nucleoside modified mRNAFinishedApproved for use
AstraZeneca, ABAZD1222 VaxzevriaRecombinant ChAdOx1 adenoviral vector encoding the Spike protein antigen of the SARS-CoV-2.FinishedApproved for use
Serum Institute of India Pvt. LtdCovishield (ChAdOx1_nCoV-19)Recombinant ChAdOx1 adenoviral vector encoding the spike protein antigen of the SARS-CoV-2.Main data finalizedApproved for use
Janssen–Cilag International NVRecombinant, Ad26.COV2.SRecombinant, replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 (Ad26) vectored vaccine encoding the (SARS-CoV-2) spike proteinFinishedApproved for use
Moderna BiotechmRNA-1273mRNA-based vaccine encapsulated in lipid nanoparticle (LNP)FinishedApproved for use
Beijing Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd. (BIBP)SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (Vero Cell), Inactivated (lnCoV)Inactivated, produced in Vero cellsFinishedApproved for use
Sinovac Life Sciences Co., Ltd.COVID-19 Vaccine (Vero Cell), Inactivated/CoronavacTMInactivated, produced in Vero cellsFinishedApproved for use
The Gamaleya National CenterSputnik VHuman Adenovirus Vector-based COVID-19 vaccineWaiting, waiting for submissionApproved for use
Bharat Biotech, IndiaSARS-CoV-2 Vaccine, Inactivated (Vero Cell)/COVAXINWhole-Virion Inactivated Vero cellsIn progressApproved for use
Sinopharm/WIBPInactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (Vero Cell)Inactivated, produced in Vero cellsIn progressIn progress. Not approved
CanSinoBioAd5-nCoVRecombinant novel coronavirus vaccine (adenovirus type 5 vector)-In progress. Not approved
NonavaxNVX-CoV2373/CovovaxRecombinant nanoparticle prefusion spike protein formulated with Matrix-M™ adjuvant–In progress. Not approved
SanofiCoV2 preS dTM-AS03 vaccineRecombinant, adjuvanted–In progress. Not approved
Serum Institute of India Pvt. LtdNVX-CoV2373/CovovaxRecombinant nanoparticle prefusion spike protein formulated with Matrix-M™ adjuvant–In progress. Not approved.
Clover BiopharmaceuticalsSCB-2019Novel recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike (S)-Trimer fusion protein–In progress. Not approved
UrevacZorecimeran (INN) concentrate and solvent for dispersion for injection; Company code: CVnCoV/CV07050101mRNA-based vaccine encapsulated in lipid nanoparticle (LNP)–In progress. Not approved
Vector State Research Center of Virology and BiotechnologyEpiVacCoronaPeptide antigen–In progress. Not approved
Zhifei LongcomRecombinant Novel Coronavirus Vaccine (CHO Cell)Recombinant protein subunit–In progress. Not approved
IMBCAMSSARS-CoV-2 Vaccine, Inactivated (Vero Cell)Inactivated–In progress. Not approved
BioCubaFarmaSoberana 01, Soberana 02 Soberana Plus AbdalaSARS-CoV-2 spike protein conjugated chemically to meningococcal B or tetanus toxoid or aluminum–In progress. Not approved

Vaccines available and in development for protecting against SARS-CoV-2.

Adapted from World Health Organization [WHO] (2021c). –, No information.

The efficacy of an effective vaccine depends on the long-term response of specific antibodies to viral antigens from plasma cells, as well as the development of persistent memory of T cells and B cells. In the case of SARS-CoV infection, adaptive humoral and cellular immune responses are crucial to the elimination of infection.

Due to the need to ensure the immunity of the population, clinical trials of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have accelerated their development process. To date, few adverse events have been reported in clinical trials of such vaccines, and the safety of those that have been tested more extensively is promising.

Along with safety, the efficacy of the vaccine is important. The FDA recommended that vaccines show at least 50% efficacy compared to placebo, defined primarily by (i) reduction in COVID-19 cases, (ii) reduction in COVID-19 severity, or (iii) reduction in COVID-19 severity infections by SARS-CoV-2 (Food and Drug Administration [FDA], 2020).

Inactivated Virus

Inactivated virus vaccines are being developed by isolating SARS-CoV-2 from samples of patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Then the virus is used to infect a cell line in the laboratory, after which it is chemically inactivated with β-propiolactone (Gao et al., 2020). This type of platform exposes the vaccinated individual to several viral proteins instead of a single target, and depending on the inactivation process, the structural integrity of the viral antigens can be affected to favor a T cell response toward a Th2 profile (Tregoning et al., 2020). In 2020, a pilot study of a candidate inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BBIBP-CorV) demonstrated high productivity and good genetic stability over the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Wang et al., 2020h).

Attenuated Virus

This type of platform simulates natural infection using deoptimized viral genomes that are not translated efficiently in hosts (Tregoning et al., 2020). With a low level of infection, these vaccines induce robust and long-lasting immune responses (Yong et al., 2019). However, the storage of these vaccines at low temperature and their contraindication in immunocompromised patients and the elderly may be considered disadvantages (Sarmiento et al., 2016).

Viral Vectors

Vaccines using recombinant virus vectors work similarly to an endogenous pathogen, expressing the target protein in the cytoplasm of the host cell. This location favors the response of cytotoxic T cells, establishing the cell-mediated immunity that is crucial for the elimination of virus-infected cells (Coughlan, 2020). Vaccines using adenoviral vectors can induce potent antibodies and T cell responses, with variations in intensity depending on the serotype (Tan et al., 2004). Currently, there are two vaccine candidates against SARS-CoV-2 in phase I/II clinical trials that use the measles virus (NCT04497298) or the vesicular stomatitis virus (NCT04569786) as a vector (Jon, 2020).

Nucleic Acid

In addition, DNA or RNA vaccination is also able to trigger humoral and cellular immune responses through the activation of CD4+ helper T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, respectively. Upon entering the cell, DNA vaccines are detected by a variety of innate immune receptors, such as interferon gene stimulator (STING)/TANK binding kinase 1 (TBK1). The IRF3 pathway, the inflammasome, and many other factors are involved in the mode of action of the DNA vaccine (Li and Petrovsky, 2016). Two studies have analyzed the immunogenicity of these vaccine platforms against SARS-CoV-2 in animal models (Smith et al., 2010; Patel et al., 2020).

Recombinant Protein Subunit

Subunit vaccines, particularly those based on the RBD of the SARS-CoV S protein, contain the main antigenic determinants that can induce neutralizing antibodies and CD8+ T cell responses (Bonavia et al., 2003; He et al., 2006). This characteristic provides useful information for designing safe and effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, since the RBD of the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 contains similar epitopes. However, they are vaccines that generally require adjuvants or nanoparticles to increase their immunogenicity. A subunit vaccine (StriFK-FH002C) prevented hamsters from transmitting the virus to other, unvaccinated hamsters in cohabitation, causing a lower viral load in the upper respiratory tract of hamsters vaccinated after the challenge, showing that the vaccine is a candidate for SARS-CoV-2 (Wu et al., 2021).

Despite this success, the goal of achieving global herd immunity through vaccination, which would allow for the abandonment of other non-pharmaceutical interventions and restrictions on our social, cultural, and recreational activities has not yet been achieved in all countries. This is due to a number of reasons and unexpected developments that challenged and delayed the progress of vaccination. One of the most striking developments has been the rapid local and global emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants with different transmission and immune evasion properties. This not only started new waves of infections but also impacted the evaluation of the vaccine’s efficacy in clinical trials. Another major obstacle to global immunity is represented by a strong imbalance in the worldwide distribution of vaccines. A global pandemic strategy combined between prevention measures and vaccination will minimize the burden of infection for the poor, but also for rich countries, and depends on the equitable distribution of vaccines to establish large-scale immunity at the global level and contain the COVID-19 pandemic.

Socioeconomic Aspects of the Pandemic

Individuals affected by COVID-19 are potentially at risk of physiological and economic harm. The decline of the economy began with the decrease in activity in the travel, tourism, and export sectors (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], 2020; Khan et al., 2020), but soon its generalized effects hindered production and consumption, with layoffs and bankruptcies in all sectors.

In 2020, the pandemic scenario accentuated the decline in the economies of Latin American and Caribbean countries, which have low economic growth (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], 2020). This scenario, together with the economic slowdown faced in previous years and the drop in activity caused by the pandemic, has negatively affected living standards and well-being in the countries of the region (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], 2020). The most vulnerable population will be low-income people, approximately 74% of whom work informally (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], 2020). By itself, the pandemic attempts to affect the present and the future with regard to the aspect of life of the people, which includes material goods (income, quality of employment, and housing) and aspects such as education, ability to form skills, in addition to emotional well-being (Khan et al., 2020; Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], 2020).

The global economic recovery is predicted to be slow; for 2021, it will increase almost 6% differently from the previous year, with an increase of 3.5%; however, this is far from sufficient to ensure the necessary impetus for growth of the gross domestic product worldwide (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], 2021). With the advancement of large-scale vaccination, the manufacturing sector is gradually growing as trade and the reopening of borders progress, promoting an increase in job creation (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], 2021). In contrast, there is caution about the arrival of enough vaccines for enterprises of low-income individuals, especially in underdeveloped or developing countries, enabling a further weakening of economic growth, with acute increase in poverty and potentially in financing problems because the global economic and social impact of keeping borders closed outweighs the costs of making vaccines, tests, and health supplies more widely available for these countries (Khan et al., 2020; Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], 2021).

With the increase in the unemployment rate, governments and central banks should intervene with increased spending and lower interest rates to increase consumer demand and investment, respectively (International Labour Organization [ILO], 2020). Even so, estimating the economic costs of a global disease at this time is still uncertain, since the pandemic has spiraling effects on the national and global economy, which means that any economic shock in a country will quickly spread to other countries due to the commercial and financial links associated with globalization (International Labour Organization [ILO], 2020).

Low- and middle-income countries remain vulnerable to the pandemic, in addition to suffering dramatic social and economic consequences. In this scenario, ensuring the emergence and success of the adoption of new forms of economic development and governance models would not only help to reduce the socioeconomic discrepancies affected by the pandemic, but also the risk associated with vulnerable populations. These social changes must be the result of a reflection that enables the generation of new behaviors, and reflections and actions on the socioeconomic aspects of the pandemic. However, this issue raised by COVID-19’s control policies appears to have received little attention in the relevant economic literature. And with that, the outbreak aggravated existing vulnerabilities, injustices, and distrust in society.

Final Considerations

This study presents an overview of the current context of COVID-19, offering a summary of the effects on health and socioeconomic status, viral characteristics, transmission, therapeutic options, vaccine prospects, immune response, and available diagnostic tools. It is possible that only when the pandemic ends will we be able to more accurately assess the economic and social consequences of this catastrophic event and that only then will we be able to extract sufficient knowledge to fight future epidemics, especially in matters of global public health.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Author contributions

AV conceptualized the idea of the article for review. MT performed the literature search, analyzed the cited articles, and wrote the manuscript. CB, MV, MQ, IV, ES, CC, and MA carefully reviewed the manuscript and made changes and additions to its intellectual content. All authors approved the submitted version.

Funding

The authors thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, # 301869/2017-0 and # 401235/2020-3), the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), and the Pro-Rectory of Research and Graduate Program of the Federal University of Pará (PROPESP/UFPA) for financial support.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.789882/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    AhmadB.BatoolM.AinQ. U.KimM. S.ChoiS. (2021). Exploring the binding mechanism of PF-07321332 SARS-CoV-2 protease inhibitor through molecular dynamics and binding free energy simulations.Int. J. Mol. Sci.22:9124. 10.3390/ijms22179124

  • 2

    AmorosoA.MagistroniP.VespasianoF.BellaA.BellinoS.PuotiF.et al (2021). HLA and AB0 polymorphisms may influence SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity.Transplantation105193–200. 10.1097/TP.0000000000003507

  • 3

    AmraeiR.YinW.NapoleonM. A.SuderE. L.BerriganJ.ZhaoQ.et al (2020). CD209L and CD209 are receptors for SARS-CoV-2.BioRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/2020.06.22.165803

  • 4

    AndolfoI.RussoR.LasorsaA. V.CantalupoS.RosatoB. E.BonfiglioF.et al (2020). Common variants at 21q22.3 locus influence MX1 gene expression and susceptibility to severe COVID-19.SSRN Electron. J.24:102322. 10.1101/2020.12.18.20248470

  • 5

    AngeliniM. M.AkhlaghpourM.NeumanB. W.BuchmeierM. J. (2013). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nonstructural proteins 3, 4, and 6 induce double-membrane vesicles.mBio4:e00524–13. 10.1128/mBio.00524-13

  • 6

    AnzurezA.NakaI.MikiS. (2021). Association of HLA-DRB1*09:01 with severe COVID-19.HLA9837–42. 10.1111/tan.14256

  • 7

    AronsM. M.HatfieldK. M.ReddyS. C.KimballA.JamesA.JacobsJ. R.et al (2020). Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections and transmission in a skilled nursing facility.N. Engl. J. Med.3822081–2090. 10.1056/NEJMoa2008457

  • 8

    AsseltaR.ParaboschiE. M.MantovaniA.DugaS. (2020). ACE2 and TMPRSS2 variants and expression as candidates to sex and country differences in COVID-19 severity in Italy.Aging1210087–10098. 10.1101/2020.03.30.20047878

  • 9

    AzharE. I.El-KafrawyS. A.FarrajS. A.HassanA. M.Al-SaeedM. S.HashemA. M.et al (2014). Evidence for Camel-to-Human Transmission of MERS Coronavirus.N. Engl. J. Med.3702499–2505. 10.1056/NEJMoa1401505

  • 10

    BaiY.YaoL.WeiT.TianF.JinD.ChenL.et al (2020). Presumed asymptomatic carrier transmission of COVID-19.J. Am. Med. Assoc.3231406–1407. 10.1001/jama.2020.2565

  • 11

    BanerjeeA.DoxeyA. C.MossmanK.IrvingA. T. (2021). Unraveling the zoonotic origin and transmission of SARS-CoV-2.Ecol. Evol.36180–184. 10.1016/j.tree.2020.12.002

  • 12

    BarqueraR.CollenE.DiD.BuhlerS.TeixeiraJ.LlamasB.et al (2020). Binding affinities of 438 HLA proteins to complete proteomes of seven pandemic viruses and distributions of strongest and weakest HLA peptide binders in populations worldwide.HLA96277–298. 10.1111/tan.13956

  • 13

    BektaşA.CovingtonM. F.AidelbergG.ArceA.MatuteT.NúñezI.et al (2021). Accessible LAMP-enabled rapid test (ALERT) for detecting SARS-CoV-2. Viruses13:742. 10.3390/v13050742

  • 14

    BenettiE.TitaR.SpigaO.CiolfiA.BiroloG.BrusellesA.et al (2020). ACE2 gene variants may underlie interindividual variability and susceptibility to COVID-19 in the Italian population.Eur. J. Hum. Genet.281602–1614. 10.1038/s41431-020-0691-z

  • 15

    BenlyamaniI.VenetF.CoudereauR.GossezM.MonneretG. (2020). Monocyte HLA-DR measurement by flow cytometry in COVID-19 patients: an interim review.Cytom. Part A971217–1221. 10.1002/cyto.a.24249

  • 16

    BernalE.GimenoL.AlcarazM. J.QuadeerA. A.MorenoM.Martínez-SánchezM. V.et al (2021). Activating Killer-cell Immunoglobulin-like receptors are associated with the severity of COVID-19.J. Infecs. Dis.224229–240. 10.1093/infdis/jiab228

  • 17

    BicharaC. D. A.AmorasE. S. G.VazG. L.TorresM. K. S.QueirozM. A. F.AmaralI. P. C.et al (2021). Dynamics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies post-COVID-19 in a Brazilian Amazon population.BMC Infect. Dis.21:443. 10.1186/s12879-021-06156-x

  • 18

    BirolR. L. W.BirolI. (2020). Retrospective in silico HLA predictions from COVID-19 patients reveal alleles associated with disease prognosis.medRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/2020.10.27.20220863

  • 19

    BizzottoJ.SanchisP.AbbateM.Lage-VickersS.LavignolleR.ToroA.et al (2020). SARS-CoV-2 infection boosts MX1 antiviral effector in COVID-19 patients.iScience23:101585. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101585

  • 20

    BonaccorsiI.CarregaP.Venanzi RulloE.DucatelliR.FalcoM.FreniJ.et al (2021). HLA-C*17 in COVID-19 patients: hints for associations with severe clinical outcome and cardiovascular risk.Immunol. Lett.23444–46. 10.1016/j.imlet.2021.04.007

  • 21

    BonaviaA.ZelusB. D.WentworthD. E.TalbotP. J.HolmesK. V. (2003). Identification of a receptor-binding domain of the spike glycoprotein of human coronavirus HCoV-229E.J. Virol.772530–2538. 10.1128/jvi.77.4.2530-2538.2003

  • 22

    BossoM.ThanarajT. A.Abu-FarhaM.AlanbaeiM.AbubakerJ.Al-MullaF. (2020). The two faces of ACE2: the role of ACE2 receptor and its polymorphisms in hypertension and COVID-19.Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev.18321–327. 10.1016/j.omtm.2020.06.017

  • 23

    Brazil Ministério da Saúde (2020). Diretrizes Para Diagnóstico e Tratamento da COVID-19.Brasília: Brazil Ministério da Saúde.

  • 24

    BroughtonJ. P.DengX.YuG.FaschingC. L.ServellitaV. (2020). CRISPR-Cas12-based detection of SARS-CoV-2.Nat. Biotechnol.38870–874. 10.1038/s41587-020-0513-4

  • 25

    CalcagnileM.ForgezP.IannelliA.BucciC.AlifanoM.AlifanoP. (2021). Molecular docking simulation reveals ACE2 polymorphisms that may increase the affinity of ACE2 with the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein.Biochimie180143–148. 10.1016/j.biochi.2020.11.004

  • 26

    CallawayE. (2021). Heavily mutated Omicron variant puts scientists on alert.Nature600:21. 10.1038/d41586-021-03552-w

  • 27

    CandidoS.MishraS.CrispimM. A. E.SalesF. C.De JesusJ. G.AndradeP. S.et al (2021). Genomics and epidemiology of a novel SARS-CoV-2 lineage in Manaus, Brazil.MedRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/2021.02.26.21252554

  • 28

    CanettiD.Dell’AcquaR.RiccardiN.Della TorreL.BigoloniA.MucciniC.et al (2020). SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM rapid test as a diagnostic tool in hospitalized patients and healthcare workers, at a large teaching hospital in northern italy, during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic.New Microbiol.43161–165. Epub 2020 Oct 31.

  • 29

    CantiniF.NiccoliL.MatarreseD.NicastriE.StobbioneP.GolettiD.et al (2020). Bariticinib therpay in COVID-19: a pilot study on safety and clinical impact.J. Infect.81318–356. 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.017

  • 30

    CaoY.LiL.FengZ.WanS.HuangP.SunX.et al (2020). Comparative genetic analysis of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2) receptor ACE2 in different populations.Cell Discov.64–7. 10.1038/s41421-020-0147-1

  • 31

    ChakravartyS. (2021). COVID-19: the effect of host genetic variations on host-virus interactions.J. Proteome Res.20139–153. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00637

  • 32

    ChanJ. F.YuanS.KokK. H.ToK. K.ChuH.YangJ.et al (2020). A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster.Lancet395514–523. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9

  • 33

    ChanJ. F. W.Kai-WangK.TseH.JinD. Y.YuenK. Y. (2013). Interspecies transmission and emergence of novel viruses: lessons from bats and birds.Trend Microbiol.21544–555. 10.1016/j.tim.2013.05.005

  • 34

    ChanJ. F. W.LauS. K. P.ToK. K. W.ChengV. C. C.WooP. C. Y.YuenK. Y.et al (2015). Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus: another zoonotic betacoronavirus causing SARS-like disease.Clin. Microbiol. Rev.2465–522. 10.1128/CMR.00102-14

  • 35

    ChanK.DoroskyD.SharmaP.AbbasiS. A.DyeJ. M.KranzD. M.et al (2020). Engineering human ACE2 to optimize binding to the spike protein of SARS coronavirus 2.Sience3691261–1265. 10.1126/science.abc0870

  • 36

    ChangC.HouM.ChangC.HsiaoC.HuangT. (2020). The SARS coronavirus nucleocapsid protein – Forms and functions.Antiviral Res.10339–50. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.12.009

  • 37

    ChenH.GuoJ.WangC.LuoF.YuX.ZhangW.et al (2020). Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records.Lancet395809–815. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30360-3

  • 38

    ChenJ.HuangC.ZhangY.ZhangS.JinM. (2020). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific antibodies in pets in Wuhan, China.J. Infect.81e68–e69. 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.045

  • 39

    ChenY.WangX. (2020). MiRDB: an online database for prediction of functional microRNA targets.Nucleic Acids Res.48D127–D131. 10.1093/nar/gkz757

  • 40

    ChuC. M.ChengV. C. C.HungI. F. N.WongM. M. L.ChanK. H.ChanK. S.et al (2004). Role of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of SARS: initial virological and clinical findings.Thorax59252–256.

  • 41

    CongY.UlasliM.SchepersH.MautheM.V’kovskiP.KriegenburgF.et al (2020). Nucleocapsid protein recruitment to replication-transcription complexes plays a crucial role in coronaviral life cycle.J. Virol.94:e01925–19. 10.1128/JVI.01925-19

  • 42

    ContiP.RonconiG.CaraffaA.GallengaC. E.RossR.FrydasI.et al (2020). Induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1 and IL-6) and lung inflammation by coronavirus-19 (COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2): anti-inflammatory strategies.J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents34327–331. 10.23812/CONTI-E

  • 43

    CorleyM.NdhlovuL. (2020). DNA methylation analysis of the COVID-19 host cell receptor, angiotensin i converting enzyme 2 gene (ACE2) in the respiratory system reveal age and gender differences.Med. Pharmacol.11:7107. 10.20944/preprints202003.0295.v1

  • 44

    CorrealeM.CroellaF.LeopizziA.MazzeoP.TricaricoL.MallardiA.et al (2021). The evolving phenotypes of cardiovascular disease during COVID - 19 pandemic.Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther.10.1007/s10557-021-07217-8[Epub ahead of print].

  • 45

    CoughlanL. (2020). Factors which contribute to the immunogenicity of non-replicating adenoviral vectored vaccines.Front. Immunol.11:909. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00909

  • 46

    CucinottaD.VanelliM. (2020). WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic.Acta Biomed.91157–160. 10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397

  • 47

    DalyJ. L.SimonettiB.KleinK.ChenK.WilliamsonM. K.Antón-PlágaroC.et al (2020). Neuropilin-1 is a host factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection.Science370861–865. 10.1126/science.abd3072

  • 48

    DaviesN. G.AbbottS.BarnardR. C.JarvisC. I.KucharskiA. J.MundayJ. D.et al (2021). Estimated transmissibility and impact of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England.Science372:eabg3055. 10.1126/science.abg3055

  • 49

    DelavariS.AbolhassaniH.AbolnezhadianF.BabahaF.IranparastS.AhanchianH.et al (2020). Impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on patients with primary immunodeficiency.J. Clin. Immunol.41345–355. 10.1007/s10875-020-00928-x

  • 50

    DhamaK.PatelS. K.PathakM.YatooM. I.TiwariR.MalikY. S.et al (2020). An update on SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 with particular reference to its clinical pathology, pathogenesis, immunopathology and mitigation strategies.Travel. Med. Infect. Dis.37:101755. 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101755

  • 51

    DinnesJ.DeeksJ. J.AdrianoA.BerhaneS.DavenportC.DittrichS.et al (2020). Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.8:CD013705. 10.1002/14651858.CD013705

  • 52

    DoremalenN.BushmakerT.MorrisD.HolbrookM.GambleA.WilliamsonB.et al (2020). Aerosol and surface stability of HCoV-19 (SARS-CoV-2) compared to SARS-CoV-1.Engl. J. Med.3821564–1567. 10.1056/NEJMc2004973

  • 53

    DropulicL. K.CohenJ. I. (2011). Severe viral infections and primary immunodeficiencies.Clin. Infect. Dis.53897–909. 10.1093/cid/cir610

  • 54

    DrostenC.GüntherS.PreiserW.WerfS.BrodtH. R.BeckerS.et al (2003). Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome.Engl. J. Med.3481967–1976. 10.1056/NEJMoa030747

  • 55

    EckstrandC. D.BaldwinT. J.RoodK. A.ClaytonM. J.LottJ. K.WolkingR. M.et al (2021). An outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 with high mortality in mink (Neovison vison) on multiple Utah farms.PLoS Pathog.17:e1009952. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009952

  • 56

    EdelsteinH.DiabetolC.EdelsteinM. H.GuettaT.BarneaA.WaldmanM.et al (2021). Expression of the SARS - CoV - 2 receptorACE2 in human heart is associated with uncontrolled diabetes, obesity, and activation of the renin angiotensin system.Cardiovasc. Diabetol.20:216. 10.1186/s12933-021-01275-w

  • 57

    EllinghausD.DegenhardtF.BujandaL.ButiM.AlbillosA.InvernizziP.et al (2020). Genomewide association study of severe Covid-19 with respiratory failure.N. Engl. J. Med.3831522–1534. 10.1056/nejmoa2020283

  • 58

    ErsterO.ShkediO.BenedekG.ZilberE.VarkovitzkyI.ShiraziR.et al (2021). Improved sensitivity, safety, and rapidity of COVID-19 tests by replacing viral storage solution with lysis buffer.PLoS One16:e0249149. 10.1371/journal.pone.0249149

  • 59

    European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control [ECDC] (2021). Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617 Variants in India and Situation in the EU/EEA– 11 May 2021.Stockholm: ECDC.

  • 60

    EzeP.MezueK. N.NdukaC. U.ObianyoI.EgbucheO. (2021). Efficacy and safety of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Am. J. Cardiovasc. Dis.1193–107.

  • 61

    FanJ.LiuX.PanW.DouglasM. W.BaoS. (2020). Epidemiology of coronavirus disease in gansu province, China, 2020.Emerg. Infect. Dis.261257–1265. 10.3201/eid2606.20025

  • 62

    FehrA. R.PerlmanS. (2015). Coronaviruses: an overview of their replication and pathogenesis. Fehr AR, Perlman S. Coronaviruses: an overview of their replication and pathogenesis.Methods Mol. Biol.12821–23. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2438-7_1

  • 63

    Food and Drug Administration [FDA] (2020). Research, Development and Licensure of Vaccines to Prevent COVID-19 Guidance for Industry. Available online at: https://www.fda.gov/media/139638/download (Acess 23 outubro de 2020).

  • 64

    Fricke-GalindoI.Falfán-ValenciaR. (2021). Genetics insight for COVID-19 susceptibility and severity: a review.Front. Immunol.12:622176. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.622176

  • 65

    FulzeleS.SahayB.YusufuI.LeeT. J.SharmaA.KolheR.et al (2020). COVID-19 virulence in aged patients might be impacted by the host cellular MicroRNAs abundance/profile.Aging Dis.11509–522. 10.14336/AD.2020.0428

  • 66

    GallowayS.PaulP.MacCannellD. R.JohanssonM. A.BrooksJ. T.MacNeilA.et al (2021). Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 Lineage.MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep.7095–99.

  • 67

    GaoQ.BaoL.MaoH.WangL.XuK.YangM.et al (2020). Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2.Science36977–81. 10.1126/science.abc1932

  • 68

    GaoS. J.GuoH.LuoG. (2021). Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) of SARS-CoV-2, a global urgent public health alert!.J. Med. Virol.10.1002/jmv.27491[Epub ahead of print].

  • 69

    GemmatiD.BramantiB.SerinoM. L.SecchieroP.ZauliG.TisatoV. (2020). COVID-19 and individual genetic susceptibility/receptivity: role of ACE1/ACE2 genes, immunity, inflammation and coagulation. might the double x-chromosome in females be protective against SARS-COV-2 compared to the single x-chromosome in males?Int. J. Mol. Sci.211–23. 10.3390/ijms21103474

  • 70

    GómezJ.AlbaicetaG. M.García-clementeM.López-larreaC. (2020). Angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACE, ACE2) gene variants and COVID-19 outcome.Gene762:145102.

  • 71

    GorbalenyaA. E.BakerS. C.de GrootR. J.DrostenC.GulyaevaA. A. (2020). The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2.Nat. Microbiol.5536–544. 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z

  • 72

    GuaraldiG.MeschiariM. M.Cozzi-LepriA.MilicJ.TonelliR.MenozziM.et al (2020). Tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.Lan. Rheumatol.2e474–e484. 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30173-9

  • 73

    HashizumeM.GonzalezG.OnoC.TakashimaA.IwasakiM. (2021). Population-specific ACE2 single-nucleotide polymorphisms have limited impact on SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in vitro.Viruses131–10. 10.3390/v13010067

  • 74

    HeY.LiJ.JiangS. (2006). A single amino acid substitution (R441A) in the receptor-binding domain of SARS coronavirus spike protein disrupts the antigenic structure and binding activity.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.344106–113. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.03.139

  • 75

    HeurichA.Hofmann-WinklerH.GiererS.LiepoldT.JahnO.PohlmannS. (2014). TMPRSS2 and ADAM17 cleave ACE2 differentially and only proteolysis by TMPRSS2 augments entry driven by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein.J. Virol.881293–1307. 10.1128/jvi.02202-13

  • 76

    HoehlS.RabenauH.BergerA.KortenbuschM.CinatlJ.BojkovaD.et al (2020). Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in returning travelers from Wuhan, China.Engl. J. Med.3821278–1280. 10.1056/NEJMc2001899

  • 77

    HoffmannM.Kleine-WeberH.KrügerN.MüllerM.DrostenC.PöhlmannS. (2020). The novel coronavirus 2019 (2019-nCoV) uses the SARS-coronavirus receptor ACE2 and the cellular protease TMPRSS2 for entry into target cells.Cell181271.e8–280.e8. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052

  • 78

    HouT.ZengW.YangM.ChenW.RenL. (2020). Development and evaluation of a rapid CRISPR-based diagnostic for COVID-19.PLoS Pathog.16:e1008705. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008705

  • 79

    HuJ.LiC.WangS.LiT.ZhangH. (2020). Genetic variants are identified to increase risk of COVID-19 related mortality from UK Biobank data.medRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/2020.11.05.20226761

  • 80

    HuX.GaoJ.LuoX.FengL.LiuW.ChenJ.et al (2020). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vertical transmission in neonates born to mothers with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia.Ostet. Gynecol.1361–3. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003926

  • 81

    HuangA. T.Garcia-CarrerasB.HitchingsM. D. T.YangB.KatzelnickL. C.RattiganS. M.et al (2020). A systematic review of antibody mediated immunity to coronaviruses: kinetics, correlates of protection, and association with severity.Nat. Commun.11:4704. 10.1038/s41467-020-18450-4

  • 82

    HuangM.LuQ.ZhaoH.ZhangY.SuiZ.FangL.et al (2020). Temporal antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients of coronavirus disease 2019.Cell. Discov.6:64. 10.1038/s41421-020-00209-2

  • 83

    HuangW. E.LimB.HsuC. C.XiongD.WuW.YuY.et al (2020). RT-LAMP for rapid diagnosis of coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.Microb. Biotechnol.13950–961. 10.1111/1751-7915.13586

  • 84

    HubacekJ. A.DusekL.MajekO.AdamekV. (2020). ACE I/D polymorphism in Czech first-wave SARS-CoV-2-positive survivors.Clin. Chim. Acta J.5191–5.

  • 85

    International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses [ICTV] (2019). Available online at: https://talk.ictvonline.org/taxonomy/p/taxonomy-history?taxnode_id=202001847 (Acess 31 de agosto de 2021).

  • 86

    International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses [ICTV] (2020). Available online at: https://talk.ictvonline.org/ictv-reports/ictv_9th_report/positive-sense-rna-viruses-2011/w/posrna_viruses/222/coronaviridae (Acess 21 de julho de 2020).

  • 87

    International Labour Organization [ILO] (2020). Available online at: https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/coronavirus/lang–en/index.htm (Acess 25 de outubro de 2020).

  • 88

    IshiiT. (2020). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I susceptible alleles against COVID-19 increase both infection and severity rate.Cureus121–12. 10.7759/cureus.12239

  • 89

    Iturrieta-ZuazoI.RitaC. G.García-SoidánA.de Malet Pintos-FonsecaA.Alonso-AlarcónN.Pariente-RodríguezR.et al (2020). Possible role of HLA class-I genotype in SARS-CoV-2 infection and progression: a pilot study in a cohort of Covid-19 Spanish patients.Clin. Immunol.219:108572. 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108572

  • 90

    JaimesJ.MilletJ.WhittakerG. (2020). Proteolytic cleavage of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and the role of the novel S1/S2.iScience23:101212. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101212

  • 91

    JiW.WangW.ZhaoX.ZaiJ.LiX. (2020). Cross species transmission of the newly identified coronavirus 2019-nCoV.J. Med. Virol.92433–440. 10.1002/jmv.25682

  • 92

    JonC. (2020). Merck One of big pharma’s biggest players, reveals its COVID-19 vaccine and therapy plans.Science10.1126/science.abd0121[Epub ahead of print].

  • 93

    JonesL.BakreA.NaikareH.KolheR.SanchezS.MosleyY. Y. C.et al (2021). Isothermal amplification and fluorescent detection of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-2 variant virus in nasopharyngeal swabs.PLoS One16:e0257563. 10.1371/journal.pone.0257563

  • 94

    Juscamayta-LópezE.ValdiviaF.HornaH.TarazonaD.LinaresL.RojasN.et al (2021). A multiplex and colorimetric reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for sensitive and rapid detection of novel SARS-CoV-2.Front. Cell infect. Microb.11:653616. 10.3389/fcimb.2021.653616

  • 95

    KabingerF.StillerC.SchmitzováJ.DienemannC.KokicG.HillenH. S.et al (2021). Mechanism of molnupiravir-induced SARS-CoV-2 mutagenesis.Nature28740–746. 10.1038/s41594-021-00651-0

  • 96

    KangM.WeiJ.YuanJ.GuoJ.ZhangY.HangJ.et al (2020). Probable evidence of fecal aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a high-rise building.Ann. Intern. Med.173974–980. 10.7326/M20-0928

  • 97

    KawaseM.ShiratoK.van der HoekL.TaguchiF.MatsuyamaS. (2012). Simultaneous treatment of human bronchial epithelial cells with serine and cysteine protease inhibitors prevents severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry.J. Virol.866537–6545. 10.1128/JVI.00094-12

  • 98

    KhanM.AdilS. F.AlkhathlanH. Z.TahirM. N.SaifS.KhanM.et al (2020). COVID-19: a global challenge with old history, epidemiology and progress so far.Molecules26:39. 10.3390/molecules26010039

  • 99

    KhorS. S.OmaeY.NishidaN.SugiyamaM.KinoshitaN.SuzukiT.et al (2021). HLA-A*11:01:01:01, HLA-C*12:02:02:01-HLA-B*52:01:02:02, age and sex are associated with severity of Japanese COVID-19 with respiratory failure.Front. Immunol.12:658570. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.658570

  • 100

    KimU.WonE.KeeS.JungS.JangH. (2016). Combination therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir, ribavirin and interferon-α for middle east respiratory syndrome.Antivir. Ther.21455–459. 10.3851/IMP3002

  • 101

    KorberB.FischerW. M.GnanakaranS.YoonH.TheilerJ.AbfaltererT.et al (2020). Tracking changes in SARS-CoV-2 spike: evidence that D614G increases infectivity of the COVID-19 virus.Cell182812–827. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.043

  • 102

    KosmickiJ. A.HorowitzJ. E.BanerjeeN.LancheR.MarckettaA.MaxwellE.et al (2021). Pan-ancestry exome-wide association analyses of COVID-19 outcomes in 586,157 individuals.Am. J. Hum. Genet.1081350–1355. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.05.017

  • 103

    KrajewskiR.GołębiowskaJ.MakuchS.MazurG.AgrawalS. (2020). Update on serologic testing in COVID-19.Clin. Chim Acta510746–750. 10.1016/j.cca.2020.09.015

  • 104

    LambertD. W.YarskiM.WarnerF. J.ThornhillP.ParkinE. T.SmithA. I.et al (2005). Tumor necrosis factor-α convertase (ADAM17) mediates regulated ectodomain shedding of the severe-acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2).J. Biol. Chem.28030113–30119. 10.1074/jbc.M505111200

  • 105

    LanJ.GeG.YuJ.ShanS.ZhouH.FanS.et al (2020). Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor.Nature81215–220. 10.1038/s41586-020-2180-5

  • 106

    LangtonD. J.BourkeS. C.LieB. A.ReiffG.NatuS.DarlayR.et al (2021). The influence of HLA genotype on the severity of COVID-19 infection.HLA9814–22. 10.1111/tan.14284

  • 107

    LatiniA.AgoliniE.NovelliA.BorgianiP.GianniniR.GravinaP.et al (2020). COVID-19 and genetic variants of protein involved in the SARS-CoV-2 entry into the host cells.Genes111–8. 10.3390/genes11091010

  • 108

    LauL. T.FungY. W. W.WongF. P. F.LinS. S. W.WangC. R.LiH. L.et al (2003). A real-time PCR for SARS-coronavirus incorporating target gene pre-amplification.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.3121290–1296. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.064

  • 109

    LehrerS.RheinsteinP. H. (2020). ABO blood groups, COVID-19 infection and mortality.Blood Cells, Mol. Dis.891–5. 10.1016/j.bcmd.2021.102571

  • 110

    LeiteM. D. M.Gonzalez-GalarzaF. F.SilvaB. C. C.da, MiddletonD.SantosE. J. M. (2021). Predictive immunogenetic markers in COVID-19.Hum. Immunol.82247–254. 10.1016/j.humimm.2021.01.008

  • 111

    LiG.De ClercqE. (2020). Therapeutic options for the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV).Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov.19149–150. 10.1038/d41573-020-00016-0

  • 112

    LiL.PetrovskyN. (2016). Molecular mechanisms for enhanced DNA vaccine immunogenicity.Expert Rev. Vaccines15313–329. 10.1586/14760584.2016.1124762

  • 113

    LiQ.GuanX.WuP.WangX.ZhouL.TongY.et al (2020). Early transmission dynamics in wuhan, china, of novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia.N. Engl. J. Med.3821199–1207. 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316

  • 114

    LitteraR.CampagnaM.DeiddaS.AngioniG.CipriS.MelisM.et al (2020). Human leukocyte antigen complex and other immunogenetic and clinical factors influence susceptibility or protection to SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity of the disease course. The sardinian experience.Front. Immunol.11:605688. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.605688

  • 115

    LorentD.NowakR.RoxoC.LenartowiczE.MakarewiczA.ZarembaB.et al (2021). Prevalence of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Pozna n, after the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Vaccines91–10.

  • 116

    LuH.StrattonC. W.TangY. W. (2020). Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: the mystery and the miracle.J. Med. Virol.92401–402. 10.1002/jmv.25678

  • 117

    LuR.ZhaoX.LiD.NiuP.YangB.WuH.et al (2020). Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding.Lancet395565–574. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8

  • 118

    LucasC.WongP.KleinJ.CastroT. B. R.SilvaJ.SundaramM.et al (2020). Yale IMPACT Team Longitudinal analyses reveal immunological misfiring in severe COVID-19.Nature584463–469. 10.1038/s41586-020-2588-y

  • 119

    LuciaC.FedericoP. B.AlejandraG. C. (2020). An ultrasensitive, rapid, and portable coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 sequence detection method based on CRISPR-Cas12.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/2020.02.29.971127

  • 120

    Martínez-SanzJ.JiménezD.Martínez-CampeloL.CruzR.VizcarraP.Sánchez-CondeM.et al (2021). Role of ACE2 genetic polymorphisms in susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 among highly exposed but non infected healthcare workers.Emerg. Microbes Infect.10493–496. 10.1080/22221751.2021.1902755

  • 121

    MaucourantC.FilipovicI.PonzettaA.AlemanS.CornilletM.HertwigL.et al (2020). Natural killer cell immunotypes related to COVID-19 disease severity.Sci. Immunol.51–14. 10.1126/SCIIMMUNOL.ABD6832

  • 122

    McCuskerC.UptonJ.WarringtonR. (2018). Primary immunodeficiency disorders.Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol.14142–152. 10.1016/S0095-4543(05)70085-3

  • 123

    MittalA.ManjunathK.RanjanR. K.KaushikS.KumarS.VermaV. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic: insights into structure, function, and hACE2 receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2.PLoS Pathog.16:e1008762. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008762

  • 124

    MohammadA.MaraS. K.AlshawafE.Abu-farhaM. (2020). Structural analysis of ACE2 variant N720D demonstrates a higher binding affinity to TMPRSS2.Life Sci.2591–7. 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118219

  • 125

    MohammadS.HashemiA.ThijssenM.YounesS.AlijanH. (2021). Human gene polymorphisms and their possible impact on the clinical outcome of SARS - CoV - 2 infection.Arch. Virol.1662089–2108. 10.1007/s00705-021-05070-6

  • 126

    MohammadpourS.Torshizi EsfahaniA.HalajiM.LakM.RanjbarR. (2021). An updated review of the association of host genetic factors with susceptibility and resistance to COVID-19.J. Cell. Physiol.23649–54. 10.1002/jcp.29868

  • 127

    MöhlendickB.SchönfelderK.BreuckmannK.ElsnerC.BabelN.BalfanzP.et al (2021). ACE2 polymorphism and susceptibility for SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity of COVID-19.Pharmacogenet. Genomics31165–171. 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000436

  • 128

    MotozonoC.ZahradnikM.IkedaT.SaitoA.TanT.NgareI.et al (2021). An emerging SARS-CoV-2 mutant evading cellular immunity and increasing viral infectivity.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/2021.04.02.438288

  • 129

    Mycroft-WestC. J.SuD.PaganiI.RuddT. R.ElliS.GandhiN. S.et al (2020). Heparin inhibits cellular invasion by SARS-CoV-2: structural dependence of the interaction of the spike S1 receptor-binding domain with heparin.Thromb. Haemost.1201700–1715. 10.1055/s-0040-1721319

  • 130

    NaemiF. M. A.Al-AdwaniS.Al-KhatabiH.Al-NazawiA. (2021). Association between the HLA genotype and the severity of COVID-19 infection among South Asians.J. Med. Virol.934430–4437. 10.1002/jmv.27003

  • 131

    NaitoY.TakagiT.YamamotoT.WatanabeS. (2020). Association between selective IgA deficiency and COVID-19.J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr.67122–125. 10.3164/jcbn.20-102

  • 132

    Nieto-TorresJ. L.Verdiá-BáguenaC.Jimenez-GuardeñoJ. M.Regla-NavaJ. A.Castaño-RodriguezC.Fernandez-DelgadoR.et al (2015). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus E protein transports calcium ions and activates the NLRP3 inflammasome.Virology485330–339. 10.1016/j.virol.2015.08.010

  • 133

    NovelliA.AndreaniM.BiancolellaM.LiberatoscioliL.PassarelliC.ColonaV. L.et al (2020). HLA allele frequencies and susceptibility to COVID-19 in a group of 99 Italian patients.HLA96610–614. 10.1111/tan.14047

  • 134

    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2020). Available online at: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/covid-19-na-regiao-da-america-latina-e-caribe-implicacoes-sociais-e-economicas-e-politicas-prioritarias-433b9d11/(accessed January 12, 2021).

  • 135

  • 136

    Oude MunninkB. B.SikkemaR. S.NieuwenhuijseD. F.MolenaarR. J.MungerE.MolenkampR.et al (2021). Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on mink farms between humans and mink and back to humans.Science371172–177. 10.1126/science.abe5901

  • 137

    Pairo-CastineiraE.ClohiseyS.KlaricL.BretherickA.RawlikK.PaskoD.et al (2021). Genetic mechanisms of critical illness in Covid-19.Nature59192–98. 10.1038/s41586-020-03065-y

  • 138

    PalauV.RieraM.SolerM. J. (2020). ADAM17 inhibition may exert a protective effect on COVID-19.Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.351071–1072. 10.1093/ndt/gfaa093

  • 139

    PanY.ZhangD.YangP.PoonL. L. M.WangQ. (2020). Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples.Lancet Infect. Dis.20411–412. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30113-4

  • 140

    PatelA.WaltersJ.ReuschelE. L.SchultheisK.ParzychE.GaryE. N.et al (2020). Intradermal-delivered DNA vaccine provides anamnestic protection in a rhesus macaque SARS-CoV-2 challenge model.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/2020.07.28.225649

  • 141

    Pfizer (2021). Pfizer and BioNTech Conclude Phase 3 Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate, Meeting All Primary Efficacy Endpoints. Available online at: https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-conclude-phase-3-study-covid-19-vaccine(accessed February 23, 2021).

  • 142

    PoultonK.WrightP.HughesP.SavicS.Welberry SmithM.GuiverM.et al (2020). A role for human leucocyte antigens in the susceptibility to SARS-Cov-2 infection observed in transplant patients.Int. J. Immunogenet.47324–328. 10.1111/iji.12505

  • 143

    PratherK. A.WangC. C.SchooleyR. T. (2020). Reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2.Science3681422–1424. 10.1126/science.abc6197

  • 144

    PrazuckT.ColinM.GiachèS.GubavuC.SeveA.RzepeckiV.et al (2020). Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.PLoS One15:e0237694. 10.1371/journal.pone.0237694

  • 145

    RauschJ. W.CapoferriA. A.KatusiimeM. G.PatroS. C.KearneyM. F. (2020). Low genetic diversity may be an Achilles heel of SARS-CoV-2.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.11724614–24616. 10.1073/pnas.2017726117

  • 146

    RendeiroA. F.CasanoJ.VorkasC. K.SinghH.MoralesA.DesimoneR. A.et al (2020). Longitudinal immune profiling of mild and severe COVID-19 reveals innate and adaptive immune dysfunction and provides an early prediction tool for clinical progression.medRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/2020.09.08.20189092

  • 147

    RendeiroA. F.CasanoJ.VorkasC. K.SinghH.MoralesA.DeSimoneR. A.et al (2021). Profiling of immune dysfunction in COVID-19 patients allows early prediction of disease progression.Life Sci. Alliance4:e202000955. 10.26508/lsa.202000955

  • 148

    RichardsonP.GriffinI.TuckerC. (2020). Baricitinib as potential treatment for 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease.Lancet395e30–e31. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30304-4

  • 149

    RomanoM.RuggieroA.SquegliaF.MagaG.BerisioR. (2020). A structural view of SARS-CoV-2 RNA replication machinery: RNA synthesis, proofreading and final capping.Cells9:1267. 10.3390/cells9051267

  • 150

    Romero-LópezJ. P.Carnalla-CortésM.Pacheco-OlveraD. L.Ocampo-GodínezJ. M.Oliva-RamírezJ.Moreno-ManjónJ.et al (2021). A bioinformatic prediction of antigen presentation from SARS-CoV-2 spike protein revealed a theoretical correlation of HLA-DRB1*01 with COVID-19 fatality in Mexican population: an ecological approach.J. Med. Virol.932029–2038. 10.1002/jmv.26561

  • 151

    RosasI. O.BräuN.WatersM.GoR.HunterB. D.BhaganiS.et al (2020). Tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.MedRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/2020.08.27.20183442

  • 152

    RosenbaumJ. T.HamiltonH.WeismanM. H.ReveilleJ. D.WinthropK. L.ChoiD. (2021). The effect of HLA-B27 on susceptibility and severity of COVID-19.J. Rheumatol.48621–622. 10.3899/JRHEUM.200939

  • 153

    RussoR.AndolfoI.LasorsaV. A.IolasconA.CapassoM. (2020). Genetic analysis of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 host protease TMPRSS2 in different populations.Front. Genet.11:872. 10.3389/fgene.2020.00872

  • 154

    SailleauC.DumarestM.VanhomwegenJ.DelaplaceM.CaroV.KwasiborskiA. (2020). First detection and genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in an infected cat in France.Transbound Emerg. Dis.672324–2328. 10.1111/tbed.13659

  • 155

    SajuthiS. P.DeFordP.LiY.JacksonN. D.MontgomeryM. T.EvermanJ. L.et al (2020). Type 2 and interferon inflammation regulate SARS-CoV-2 entry factor expression in the airway epithelium.Nat. Commun.11:5139. 10.1038/s41467-020-18781-2

  • 156

    SakurabaA.HaiderH.SatoT. (2020). Population difference in allele frequency of hla-c*05 and its correlation with covid-19 mortality.Viruses12:1333. 10.3390/v12111333

  • 157

    SarmientoJ. D.VilladaF.OrregoJ. C.FrancoJ. L.Trujillo-VargasC. M. (2016). Adverse events following immunization in patients with primary immunodeficiencies.Vaccine341611–1616. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.01.047

  • 158

    SavarinoA.BoelaertJ. R.CassoneA.MajoriG.CaudaR. (2003). Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today’s diseases.Lancet Infet. Dis.3722–727. 10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00806-5

  • 159

    SchindlerE.DribusM.DuffyB. F.GragertL.HockK.FarnsworthC. W. (2021). HLA genetic polymorphism in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Midwestern United States.HLA98370–379. 10.1111/tan.14387

  • 160

    SchönfelderK.BreuckmannK.ElsnerC.DittmerU.FisteraD.HerbstreitF.et al (2021). Transmembrane serine protease 2 polymorphisms and susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 infection: a German Case-Control Study.Front. Genet.12:667231. 10.3389/fgene.2021.667231

  • 161

    SecolinR.de AraujoT. K.GonsalesM. C.RochaC. S.NaslavskyM.De MarcoL.et al (2021). Genetic variability in COVID-19-related genes in the Brazilian population.Hum. Genome Var.8:15. 10.1038/s41439-021-00146-w

  • 162

    SenapatiS.KumarS.SinghA. K.BanerjeeP.BhagavatulaS. (2020). Assessment of risk conferred by coding and regulatory variations of TMPRSS2 and CD26 in susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection in human.J. Genet.99:53. 10.1007/s12041-020-01217-7

  • 163

    SeoG.LeeG.KimM. J.BaekS. H.ChoiM.KuK. B.et al (2020). Rapid detection of COVID-19 causative virus (SARS-CoV-2) in human nasopharyngeal swab specimens using field-effect transistor-based biosensor.ACS Nano145135–5142. 10.1021/acsnano.0c02823

  • 164

    ShaathH.VishnubalajiR.ElkordE.AlajezN. M. (2020). Single-cell transcriptome analysis highlights a role for neutrophils and inflammatory macrophages in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19.Cells91–19. 10.3390/cells9112374

  • 165

    ShiJ.WeZ.ZhongG.YangH.WangC.HuangB.et al (2020). Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals to SARS–coronavirus 2.Science3681016–1020. 10.1126/science.abb7015

  • 166

    ShkurnikovM.NersisyanS.JankevicT.GalatenkoA.GordeevI.VechorkoV.et al (2021). Association of HLA class I genotypes with severity of coronavirus disease-19.Front. Immunol.12:641900. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.641900

  • 167

    ShuaiL.ZhongG.YuanQ.WenZ.WangC.HeX.et al (2021). Replication, pathogenicity, and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in minks.Nat. Sci. Rev.8:nwaa291. 10.1093/nsr/nwaa291

  • 168

    SiuL. Y.LoK. J.ChanC. M.KienF.EscriouN.TsaoS. W.et al (2008). The M, E, and N structural proteins of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus are required for efficient assembly, trafficking, and release of virus-like particles.J. Virol.8211318–11330. 10.1128/JVI.01052-08

  • 169

    SmithL. R.WlochM. K.YeM.ReyesL. R.BoutsaboualoyS.DunneC. E.et al (2010). Phase 1 clinical trials of the safety and immunogenicity of adjuvanted plasmid DNA vaccines encoding influenza a virus H5 hemagglutinin.Vaccine282565–2572. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.029

  • 170

    SongH. D.TuC. C.ZhangG. W.WangS. Y.ZhengK.LeiL. C.et al (2005). Cross-host evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in palm civet and human.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1022430–2435. 10.1073/pnas.0409608102

  • 171

    SpinettiT.HirzelC.FuxM.WaltiL. N.SchoberP.StueberF.et al (2020). Reduced monocytic human leukocyte antigen-dr expression indicates immunosuppression in critically Ill COVID-19 patients.Anesth. Analg.131993–999. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005044

  • 172

    SrinivasanS.CuiH.GaoZ.LiuM.LuS.MkandawireW.et al (2020). Structural genomics of SARS-CoV-2 indicates evolutionary conserved functional regions of viral proteins.Viruses12:360. 10.3390/v12040360

  • 173

    StrafellaC.CaputoV.TermineA.BaratiS.GambardellaS.BorgianiP.et al (2020). Analysis of ace2 genetic variability among populations highlights a possible link with covid-19-related neurological complications.Genes111–10. 10.3390/genes11070741

  • 174

    Szczawinska-PoplonykA.Jonczyk-PotocznaK.BreborowiczA.Bartkowska-SniatkowskaA.FiglerowiczM. (2013). Fatal respiratory distress syndrome due to coronavirus infection in a child with severe combined immunodeficiency.Influenza Other Respi. Viruses7634–636. 10.1111/irv.12059

  • 175

    TahamtanA.Teymoori-RadM.NakstadB.SalimiV. (2018). Anti-inflammatory MicroRNAs and their potential for inflammatory diseases treatment.Front. Immunol.9:1377. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01377

  • 176

    TakagiA.MatsuiM. (2021). Identification of HLA-A*02:01-restricted candidate epitopes derived from the nonstructural polyprotein 1a of SARS-CoV-2 that may be natural targets of CD8 + T cell recognition in vivo.J. Virol.95:e01837–20. 10.1128/jvi.01837-20

  • 177

    TanY.GohP.FieldingB.ShenS.ChouC.FuJ.et al (2004). Profiles of antibody responses against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus recombinant proteins and their potential use as diagnostic markers.Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.11362–371. 10.1128/cdli.11.2.362-371.2004

  • 178

    TangN.BaiH.ChenX.GongJ.LiD.SunZ. (2020). Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy.J. Thromb. Haemost.181094–1099. 10.1111/jth.14817

  • 179

    TangX.WuC.LiX.SongY.YaoX.WuX.et al (2020). On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2.Natl. Sci. Rev.71012–1023. 10.1093/nsr/nwaa036

  • 180

    TegallyH.WilkinsonE.GiovanettiM.IranzadehA.FonsecaV.GiandhariJ.et al (2021). Detection of a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in South Africa.Nature592438–443. 10.1038/s41586-021-03402-9

  • 181

    TomitaY.IkedaT.SatoR.SakagamiT. (2020). Association between HLA gene polymorphisms and mortality of COVID-19: an in silico analysis.Immun. Inflamm. Dis.8684–694. 10.1002/iid3.358

  • 182

    Torre-FuentesL.Matías-GuiuJ.Hernández-LorenzoL.Montero-EscribanoP.PytelV.Porta-EtessamJ.et al (2021). ACE2, TMPRSS2, and furin variants and SARS-CoV-2 infection in Madrid, Spain.J. Med. Virol.93863–869. 10.1002/jmv.26319

  • 183

    ToyoshimaY.NemotoK.MatsumotoS.NakamuraY.KiyotaniK. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 genomic variations associated with mortality rate of COVID-19.J. Hum. Genet.651075–1082. 10.1038/s10038-020-0808-9

  • 184

    TregoningJ. S.BrownE. S.CheesemanH. M.FlightK. E.HighamS. L.LemmN. M.et al (2020). Vaccines for COVID-19.Clin. Exp. Immunol.202162–192. 10.1111/cei.13517

  • 185

    TsengY.ChangC.WangS.HuangK.WangC. (2013). Identifying SARS-CoV membrane protein amino acid residues linked to virus-like particle assembly.PLoS One8:e64013. 10.1371/journal.pone.0064013

  • 186

    UlasliM.VerheijeM. H.de HaanC. A. M.ReggioriF. (2010). Qualitative and quantitative ultrastructural analysis of the membrane rearrangements induced by coronavirus.Cell Microb.12844–861. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01437.x

  • 187

    UnoY. (2020). Camostat mesilate therapy for COVID-19.Intern. Emerg. Med.151577–1578. 10.1007/s11739-020-02345-9

  • 188

    Van der MadeC. I.SimonsA.Schuurs-HoeijmakersJ.Van Den HeuvelG.MantereT.KerstenS.et al (2020). Presence of genetic variants among young men with severe COVID-19.JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc.324663–673. 10.1001/jama.2020.13719

  • 189

    VastradB.VastradC.TengliA. (2020). Identification of potential mRNA panels for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) diagnosis and treatment using microarray dataset and bioinformatics methods.3 Biotech10:422. 10.1007/s13205-020-02406-y

  • 190

    Velazquez-SalinasL.ZarateS.EberlS.GladueD. P.NovellaI.BorcaM. V. (2020). Positive selection of ORF1ab, ORF3a, and ORF8 genes drives the early evolutionary trends of SARS-CoV-2 during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic.Front. Microbiol.11:550674. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.550674

  • 191

    VenkatagopalanP.DaskalovaS. M.LopezL. A.DolezalK. A.HogueaB. G. (2015). Coronavirus envelope (E) protein remains at the site of assembly.Virology47875–85. 10.1016/j.virol.2015.02.005

  • 192

    VietzenH.ZoufalyA.TraugottM.AberleJ. (2020). NK cell receptor NKG2C deletion and HLA-E variants are risk factors for severe COVID-19.Res. Square10.21203/rs.3.rs-34505/v1[Epub ahead of print].

  • 193

    Vique-SanchezJ. L. (2020). Potential inhibitors interacting in Neuropilin-1 to develop an adjuvant drug against COVID-19, by molecular docking.Bioorgan. Med. Chem.331–8. 10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116040

  • 194

    VivantiA. J.Vauloup-FellousC.PrevotS.ZupanV.SuffeeC.Do CaoJ.et al (2020). Transplacental transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Nat. Comm.11:3572. 10.1038/s41467-020-17436-6

  • 195

    VolzE.MishraS.ChandM.BarrettJ.JohnsonR.HopkinsS.et al (2021). Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Lineage B.1.1.7 in England: insights from linking epidemiological and genetic data.medRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1038/s41586-021-03470-x

  • 196

    WalenskyR. P.WalkeH. T.FauciA. S. (2021). SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in the United States-challenges and opportunities.JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc.3251037–1038. 10.1001/jama.2021.2294

  • 197

    WangQ.ZhangY.WuL.NiuS.SongC.ZhangZ.et al (2020a). Structural and functional basis of SARS-CoV-2 entry by using human ACE2.Cell181894–904.e9. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.045

  • 198

    WangK.ChenW.ZhangZ.DengY.LianJ.DuP.et al (2020b). CD147-spike protein is a novel route for SARS-CoV-2 infection to host cells.Sinal Transduto Alvo Ther.5:283. 10.1038/s41392-020-00426-x

  • 199

    WangJ.XuX.ZhouX.ChenP.LiangH.LiX.et al (2020c). Molecular simulation of SARS-CoV- 2 spike protein binding to pangolin ACE2 or human ACE2 natural variants reveals altered susceptibility to infection.J. Gen. Virol.101921–924. 10.1099/jgv.0.001452

  • 200

    WangW.ZhangW.ZhangJ.HeJ.ZhuF. (2020d). Distribution of HLA allele frequencies in 82 Chinese individuals with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).HLA96194–196. 10.1111/tan.13941

  • 201

    WangM.CaoR.ZhangL.YangX.LiuJ.XuM.et al (2020e). Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro.Cell Res.30269–271. 10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0

  • 202

    WangF.HuangS.GaoR.ZhouY.LaiC.LiZ.et al (2020f). Initial whole-genome sequencing and analysis of the host genetic contribution to COVID-19 severity and susceptibility.Cell Discov.6:83. 10.1038/s41421-020-00231-4

  • 203

    WangF.HouH.YaoY.WuS.HuangM.RanX.et al (2020g). Systemically comparing host immunity between survived and deceased COVID-19 patients.Cell. Mol. Immunol.17875–877. 10.1038/s41423-020-0483-y

  • 204

    WangH.ZhangY.HuangB.DengW.QuanY.WangW.et al (2020h). Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate, BBIBP-CorV, with potent protection against SARS-CoV-2.Cell182713.e4–721.e4. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.008

  • 205

    WangP.CasnerR. G.NairM. S.WangM.YuJ.CeruttiG.et al (2021). Increased resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variant P.1 to antibody neutralization.Cell Host Microbe29747.e4–751.e4. 10.1016/j.chom.2021.04.007

  • 206

    WangS.QiuZ.HouY.DengX.XuW.ZhengT.et al (2021). AXL is a candidate receptor for SARS-CoV-2 that promotes infection of pulmonary and bronchial epithelial cells.Cell Res.31126–140. 10.1038/s41422-020-00460-y

  • 207

    WibmerC. K.AyresF.HermanusT.MadzivhandilaM.KgagudiP.OosthuysenB.et al (2021). SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 escapes neutralization by South African COVID-19 donor plasma.Nat. Med.27622–625. 10.1038/s41591-021-01285-x

  • 208

    WidiastaA.SribudianiY.NugrahaprajaH.HilmantoD.SekarwanaN.RachmadiD. (2020). Potential role of ACE2-related microRNAs in COVID-19-associated nephropathy.Noncoding RNA Res.5153–166. 10.1016/j.ncrna.2020.09.001

  • 209

    WölfelR.CormanV. M.GuggemosW.SeilmaierM.ZangeS.MüllerM. A.et al (2020). Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019.Nature581465–469. 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x

  • 210

    WoolG. D.MillerJ. L. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 disease on platelets and coagulation.Pathobiology8815–27. 10.1159/000512007

  • 211

    World Health Organization [WHO] (2021a). Disponível em:https://covid19.who.int/region/amro/country/br (Acess 3 de dezembro de 2021).

  • 212

    World Health Organization [WHO] (2021b). Disponível em:https://www.who.int/pt/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/covid-19-vaccines (Acess 31 de agosto de 2021).

  • 213

    World Health Organization [WHO] (2021c). Disponível em:https://extranet.who.int/pqweb/sites/default/files/documents/Status_COVID_VAX_19August2021.pdf (Acess 31 de agosto de 2021).

  • 214

    WrappD.WangN.CorbettK. S.GoldsmithJ. A.HsiehC.AbionaO.et al (2020). Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation.Science3671260–1263. 10.1126/science.abb2507

  • 215

    WuA.PengY.HuangB.DingX.WangX.NiuP.et al (2020). Genome composition and divergence of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) originating in China.Cell Host Microbe27325–328. 10.1016/j.chom.2020.02.001

  • 216

    WuY.FengZ.LiP.YuQ. (2020). Relationship between ABO blood group distribution and clinical characteristics in patients with COVID-19.Clin. Chim. Acta J.5091–5. 10.1016/j.cca.2020.06.026

  • 217

    WuY.HuangX.YuanL.WangS.ZangY.XiongH. (2021). A recombinant spike protein subunit vaccine confers protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission in hamsters.Sci. Transl. Med.13:eabg1143. 10.1126/scitranslmed.abg1143

  • 218

    Xiang OngS. W.TanY. K.ChiaP. W.LeeT. H.NgO. K.WongM. S. Y.et al (2020). Air, surface environmental, and personal protective equipment contamination by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from a symptomatic patient.JAMA3231610–1612. 10.1001/jama.2020.3227

  • 219

    XiaoA. T.TongY. X.GaoC.ZhuL.ZhangY. J.ZhangS. (2020). Dynamic profile of RT-PCR findings from 301 COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.J. Clin. Virol.127:104346. 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104346

  • 220

    XuX.ChenP.WangJ.FengJ.ZhouH.LiX.et al (2020). Evolution of the novel coronavirus from the ongoing wuhan outbreak and modeling of its spike protein for risk of human transmission.Sci. China Life Sci.63457–460. 10.1007/s11427-020-1637-5

  • 221

    YamamotoM.KisoM.Sakai-TagawaY.Iwatsuki-HorimotoK.ImaiM.TakedaM.et al (2020). The anticoagulant nafamostat potently inhibits SARS-CoV-2 S protein-mediated fusion in a cell fusion assay system and viral infection in vitro in a cell-type-dependent manner.Viruses12:629. 10.3390/v12060629

  • 222

    YamamotoN.YangR.YoshinakaY.AmariS.NakanoT.CinatlJ.et al (2004). HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir inhibits replication of SARS-associated coronavirus.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.318719–725. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.04.083

  • 223

    YanR.ZhangY.LiY.XiaL.GouY.ZhouQ. (2020). Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2.Science3601444–1448.

  • 224

    YaoH.SongY.ChenY.WuN.XuJ.SunC.et al (2020). Molecular architecture of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.Cell183730.e13–738.e13. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.018

  • 225

    YongC. Y.OngH. K.YeapS. K.HoK. L.TanW. S. (2019). Recent advances in the vaccine development against Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus.Front. Microbiol.10:1781. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01781

  • 226

    YoungB. E.OngS. W. X.KalimuddinS.LowJ. G.TanS. Y.LohJ.et al (2020). Singapore 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak research team. Epidemiologic features and clinical course of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore.JAMA3231488–1494. 10.1001/jama.2020.3204

  • 227

    YungY. L.ChengC. K.ChanH. Y.XiaJ. T.LauK. M.WongR. S. M.et al (2021). Association of HLA-B22 serotype with SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility in Hong Kong Chinese patients.HLA97127–132. 10.1111/tan.14135

  • 228

    ZakiA. M.Van BoheemenS.BestebroerT. M.OsterhausA. D.FouchierR. A. (2012). Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia.N. Engl. J. Med.3671814–1820. 10.1056/NEJMoa1211721

  • 229

    ZhangQ.BastardP.LiuZ.Le PenJ.Moncada-VelezM.ChenJ.et al (2020b). Inborn errors of type I IFN immunity in patients with life-threatening COVID-19.Science80:eabd4570. 10.1126/science.abd4570

  • 230

    ZhangL.JacksonC. B.MouH.OjhaA.PengH.QuinlanB. D.et al (2020a). SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein D614G mutation increases virion spike density and infectivity.Nat. Commun.11:6013. 10.1038/s41467-020-19808-4

  • 231

    ZhangQ.LiuZ.Moncada-VelezM.ChenJ.OgishiM.BigioB.et al (2020c). Inborn errors of type I IFN immunity in patients with life-threatening COVID-19.Science80:370.

  • 232

    ZhaoH.LiuF.XieW.ZhouT. C.OuYangJ.JinL.et al (2021). Ultrasensitive supersandwich-type electrochemical sensor for SARS-CoV-2 from the infected COVID-19 patients using a smartphone.Sens. Actuators B Chem.327:128899. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128899

  • 233

    ZhouF.YuT.DuR.FanG.LiuY.LiuZ.et al (2020). Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.Lancet3951054–1062. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3

  • 234

    ZhouP.YangX. L.WangX. G.HuB.ZhangL.ZhangW.et al (2020). A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin.Nature579270–273. 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7

  • 235

    ZhouS.HillC. S.SarkarS.TseL. V.WoodburnB.SchinaziR. F.et al (2021). β-d-N4-hydroxycytidine inhibits SARS-CoV-2 through lethal mutagenesis but is also mutagenic to mammalian cells.J. Inf. Dis.224415–419. 10.1093/infdis/jiab247

  • 236

    ZhouY.VedanthamP.LuK.AgudeloJ.CarrionR.NunneleyJ. W.et al (2015). Protease inhibitors targeting coronavirus and filovirus entry.Antiviral Res.11676–84. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.01.011

  • 237

    ZhuF. C.GuanX. H.LiY. H.HuangJ. Y.JiangT.HouL. H.et al (2020). Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 years or older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.Lancet396479–488. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31605-6

  • 238

    ZiebuhrJ.SnijderE. L.GorbalenyaA. E. (2000). Virus-encoded proteinases and proteolytic processing in the Nidovirales.J. Gen. Virol.81853–879.

  • 239

    ZipetoD.PalmeiraJ. F.ArgañarazG. A.ArgañarazE. R. (2020). ACE2/ADAM17/TMPRSS2 interplay may be the main risk factor for COVID-19.Front. Immunol.11:576745. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.576745

  • 240

    ZouL.RuanF.HuangM.LiangL.HuangH.HongZ.et al (2020). SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients.N. Engl. J. Med.3821177–1179. 10.1056/NEJMc2001737

Summary

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, coronavirus, pandemic, infection

Citation

da Silva Torres MK, Bichara CDA, de Almeida MNS, Vallinoto MC, Queiroz MAF, Vallinoto IMVC, dos Santos EJM, de Carvalho CAM and Vallinoto ACR (2022) The Complexity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front. Microbiol. 13:789882. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.789882

Received

05 October 2021

Accepted

04 January 2022

Published

10 February 2022

Volume

13 - 2022

Edited by

Yuelong Shu, Sun Yat-sen University, China

Reviewed by

Lauro Velazquez-Salinas, Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), United States; Alexander Freiberg, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Antonio Carlos R. Vallinoto,

This article was submitted to Virology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics