ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 08 November 2022

Sec. Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants

Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.887880

Diversity of endophytic fungi isolated from different plant parts of Acacia mangium, and antagonistic activity against Ceratocystis fimbriata, a causal agent of Ceratocystis wilt disease of A. mangium in Malaysia

  • 1. Mycology and Pathology Unit, Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, Malaysia

  • 2. Laboratory of Forest Pathology and Tree Health, Department of Forestry Science and Biodiversity, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang, Malaysia

  • 3. Bio Activity Programme, Natural Products Division, Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, Malaysia

  • 4. Pest and Disease Management Programme, Horticulture Research Centre, Malaysian Agriculture Research and Development (MARDI), Persiaran Mardi-UPM, Serdang, Malaysia

  • 5. Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang, Malaysia

  • 6. Laboratory of Food Safety and Food Integrity, Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

  • 7. Faculty of Tropical Forestry, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

Article metrics

View details

7

Citations

4,6k

Views

1,4k

Downloads

Abstract

Acacia mangium is an important wood for commercial products especially pulp and medium-density fibreboard. However, it is susceptible to Ceratocystis fimbriata infection, leading to Ceratocystis wilt. Therefore, the present work aimed to (i) establish the diversity of endophytic fungi in different plant parts of A. mangium,and (ii) evaluate the antifungal potentials of the isolated and identified endophytic fungi against C. fimbriata. Endophytic fungal identification was conducted by PCR amplification and sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and ITS4 regions of nuclear ribosomal DNA. A total of 66 endophytic fungi were successfully isolated from different parts of A. mangium; leaf (21), stem (13), petiole (12), root (9), flower (6), and fruit (5). The endophytic fungal isolates belonged to Ascomycota (95.5%) and Zygomycota (4.5%). For Ascomycota 13 genera were identified: Trichoderma (28.6%), Nigrospora (28.6%), Pestalotiopsis (12.7%), Lasiodiplodia (9.5%), Aspergillus (6.3%), Sordariomycetes (3%), and Neopestalotiopsis, Pseudopestalotiopsis, Eutiarosporella, Curvularia, Fusarium, Penicillium, and Hypoxylon each with a single isolate. For Zygomycota, only Blakeslea sp. (5%) was isolated. Against C. fimbriata, Trichoderma koningiopsis (AC 1S) from stem, Nigrospora oryzae (AC 7L) from leaf, Nigrospora sphaerica (AC 3F) from the flower, Lasiodiplodia sp. (AC 2 U) from fruit, Nigrospora sphaerica (AC 4P) from petiole, and Trichoderma sp. (AC 9R) from root exhibited strong inhibition for C. fimbriata between 58.33 to 69.23%. Thus, it can be concluded that certain endophytic fungi of A. mangium have the potential to be harnessed as anti-Ceratocystis agent in future biotechnological applications.

Introduction

Acacia mangium Willd., a fast-growing and flowering leguminous tree native to Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and Australia, has been introduced and cultivated into humid tropical lowland regions of Asia, South America, and Africa (Pinyopusarerk et al., 1993). In 1966, forest plantation of A. mangium began in Sabah, Malaysia, pioneered by D.I. Nicholson, an Australian forester. Commercial cultivation of A. mangium began in 1976 (Udarbe and Hepburn, 1986; Pinyopusarerk et al., 1993). The species was considered promising due to its stellar performance, superior growth, and multiple uses especially for pulp and medium-density fibreboard (Potter et al., 2006). Furthermore, pharmacological studies have also shown that the leaves of A. mangium exhibit antibacterial (Sarah Shafiei et al., 2017), antifungal (Mihara et al., 2005), antifilarial, and antihelmintic (Chaki et al., 2015) properties.

Despite its various commercial applications, A. mangium is susceptible to the infection of the ascomycetous pathogen, Ceratocystis fimbriata, which infects the wounds of A. mangium trees in plantations, and causes the Ceratocystis wilt disease (Kile, 1993; Roux and Wingfield, 2009; Tarigan et al., 2011; Brawner et al., 2015). Wounded tree caused by humans, other mammals including monkeys, elephants, squirrels or boring insects, and others factor such as wind, are likely to increase the disease spreading and tree mortality as the wound become the entrance for this Ceratocystis species to invade (Nasution et al., 2019). In Malaysia at the year of 2011, a severe case which was the first report of this disease infected approximately 40% of A. mangium trees in plantation at Tawau, Sabah. Later, this disease spreads to other regions on A. mangium plantation in Sabah such as Pitas, Kota Belud and Sipitang, where the incidence of this disease were about in range of 6–60% (Mandy and Wickneswari, 2014; Farid et al., 2018). Johor, Pahang and Sarawak were also reported faced the same disease problems to the A. mangium plantation in respective state. 50% out of 1,500 trees that were accessed in a 2-year-old Acacia mangium plantation in Johor have been infected by this disease (Farid et al., 2018). The main reason of this disease spreading and uncontrollable was due to lack of knowledge, researches and studies on how to overcome or prevent this disease to happen towards Acacia mangium trees (Lee, 2018).

There are no specific methods or guidelines established on how to handle this disease in Malaysia yet up to now. But there were several actions that commonly are used by the plantation managers to prevent the infection of this disease. As Ceratocystis species penetrate and invade the trees by wounds, this problems can be prevent by avoid the occurance of wound itself (Kile, 1993; Harrington, 2013; Nasution et al., 2019). Silviculture practice should be done in correct way and cautions. The timing of doing work for silviculture is also important to reduce the risk of disease development (Pilotti et al., 2016; Farid et al., 2018). Problems involved with wildlife in plantation areas also are count on in management such as establishment of wildlife management plan to overcome the conflicts occurred (Farid et al., 2018). Chemical control is one of application they used to delay the symptoms of the disease development and help the infected trees to live longer for at least 2 years (Blaedow, 2009; Nasution et al., 2019). Although the use of chemical fungicides are more preferred due to their rapid action, they are often associated with high production and application costs, human health hazards, restriction by domestic and international regulatory limits, trade bans, residual effects, environmental pollution, resistance development in pests, and potential elimination of beneficial natural enemies of the targeted pests (Yazid et al., 2020). Therefore, biological control is seen as a safer and cheaper alternative. Biological control is the use of living organisms (including microorganisms) to eliminate or reduce the density of pests / pathogens to safe levels (Wyckhuys et al., 2013). Often, indigenous organisms or microorganisms are utilised as biological control agent to minimise the risk of introducing foreign species that might grow uncontrollably and in turn become invasive. One such example of indigenous organisms or microorganisms is endophyte. The research is about using a microorganism (endophyte) to fight the pathogen (Ceratocystis fimbriata) which is one of biological control.

Like many other plant species, A. mangium is also associated with endophytes. Endophytes are usually bacteria or fungi that endosynbiotically live within a plant host without causing disease. These endophytes function to enhance the plant host growth and nutrient acquisition improve the plant host’s ability to tolerate abiotic stresses or decrease biotic stresses by enhancing the plant host’s resistance to infections (Farahat, 2020). Recently, an endophytic actinomycete of the genus Fodinicola was isolated from the roots of A. mangium, and has shown potential activity as a beneficial plant-growth promoter and specialised secondary metabolite producer (Phạm et al., 2020).

Despite endophytic fungi being regarded as new sources of novel bioactive compounds (Daouk et al., 1995; Cui et al., 2015), biological activities, and biotechnological developments, their true potential in controlling A. mangium diseases caused by C. fimbriata remains underexplored and underreported. Moreover, the leaf and root parts of A. mangium have been found to provide the habitats for various endophytic fungi (Mihara et al., 2005; Sarah Shafiei et al., 2017; Phạm et al., 2020). Nevertheless, besides leaf and root, other plant parts of the species should also be explored for endophytic fungi which might offer novel species or strains that possess valuable bioactive compounds useful in controlling the Ceratocystis wilt disease. Therefore, the objectives of the present work were (i) to establish the diversity of endophytic fungi in different plant parts of A. mangium, and (ii) to evaluate the antifungal potentials of the isolated and identified endophytic fungi against C. fimbriata.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

Ten seedlings of Acacia mangium (≈30–50 cm in height) and 2 A. mangium trees (≈30 cm in diameter at breast height) free from disease and insect infestation were randomly sampled, and identified at Serdang, Selangor (coordinate E 101 42.6333 N 2 59.1833). The root, stem, petiole, and leaf from healthy A. mangium seedlings were sampled in three replicates, respectively. In addition, three replicates of flower and fruit were also sampled from mature trees, respectively. Each plant part was cut into five 0.5 cm2 segments using a blade. These plant parts were washed thoroughly under running tap water to remove adherent debris on the surface.

Isolation of endophytic fungi

Plant part segments were surface-sterilised following the protocol suggested by Nuangmek et al. (2021). Briefly, the plant part segments were washed thoroughly under running tap water, immersed in 70% ethanol (Cerilliant Corporation, United States) for 1 min, soaked in 4% NaOCl (Malay-Sino Chemical, Malaysia) for 1 min, rinsed thrice in sterile distilled water, and blot-dried using a sterile filter paper. Next, the surface-sterilised plant part segments were excised 1–2 mm from the edge, and explant-plated onto a Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA; Merck Milipore, Germany). The PDA plates were incubated at 27°C for 7 d. Single hyphae growing out from the cultivated plant part segments were sub-cultured onto fresh PDA. Pure cultures were grouped according to the six types of plant parts (root, stem, petiole, leaf, flower, and fruit). Isolates were group based on colour and morphology on PDA (Yoo and Eom, 2012). Cultures were maintained on PDA for 5 d before sub-cultured into Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB; Neogen®, United States) while shaken at 150 rpm at 26°C for 3–6 d. Following incubation, the culture supernatant was filtered through Whatman filter paper (Cytiva™ Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Germany) before being used for genomic DNA extraction.

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

A total of 100 mg of fungal mycelia harvested from PDB was used for fungal genomic DNA extraction. Fungal genomic DNA was extracted as previously described by Landum et al. (2016), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, using the FAVORGEN Fungi/ Yeast Genomic DNA Extraction Mini Kit (Taiwan). The nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the fungal isolates were amplified using the forward primer, ITS-F (5’-CTT GGT CAT TTA GAG GAA GTA A-3′) and the reverse primer, ITS4 (5’-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3′; White et al., 1990). The final reaction volume was 25 μl, containing 12.5 μl of 2X PCRBio Tag Mix Red (PCR Biosystems, UK), 0.4 μM of forward and reverse primers, and 10 mg of genomic DNA template. For negative control, the DNA was replaced with distilled water to verify the absence of contamination. The PCR was carried out using MyCycler™ (Bio-Rad, USA), programmed for 5 min at 95°C; 30 cycles for 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 54.8°C, and 1 min at 72°C; and a final 10 min extension at 72°C. The PCR products were separated using 1% agarose gel in 1X TAE buffer (90 mM Tris-acetate and 2 nM EDTA, pH 8.0), stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/ml), and visualised using FluorChem TM (Alpha Innotech, USA). The PCR products were sequenced by Apical Scientific Sdn. Bhd. (Malaysia). The sequences were deposited in NCBI GenBank, and compared with those already deposited in there via BLAST searches.

Sequence and phylogenetic analyses

The resulting DNA sequences were aligned using MUSCLE software embedded in MEGA software version 10.0.5 (Kumar et al., 2018), and manually trimmed and edited to obtain the complete sequences. Homology searches were carried out using the BLAST program against the NCBI GenBank database.1 The Maximum Likelihood tree was constructed using MEGA software version 10.0.5 with all positions containing gaps and missing data were included for analysis. Clade supports were calculated based on 1,000 bootstrap replications. A total of 64 sequences of close relatives were downloaded from the NCBI GenBank, and combined with sequences of the 66 endophytic fungi isolated in the present work for phylogenetic tree construction. Two wood decay macrofungi namely Schizophyllum commune (phylum Basidiomycota, family Schizophyllaceae) and Phellinus gabonensis (phylum Basidiomycota, family Hymenochaetaceae) were included as out-group.

Antagonism assay

Endophytic fungal isolates were cultivated on PDA plates at 26°C for 7 days. The antagonistic activity was evaluated through the dual culture assay against C. fimbriata. The pathogenic C. fimbriata (FRIM1162) isolate used in this study was isolated from a infected Acacia mangium (Syazwan et al., 2021) and maintained at 27°C on PDA media at the Mycology & Pathology Unit, Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM). Briefly, a fungal disc of 5 mm in diameter was taken from C. fimbriata, and placed 3 cm from the margin of the PDA plate (9 cm in diameter). Next, a 5 mm disc of the endophytic fungus was placed 3 cm from the margin of the PDA plate, and directly opposite of the C. fimbriata disc. Inoculated PDA plates were incubated at room temperature for 7 days. PDA plates inoculated with C. fimbriata in the absence of endophytic fungus served as negative controls. The assay was performed in triplicates. Observations were carried out for 6 days, after which the mycelial radial growth of test pathogen (C. fimbriata) on a control plate (rl) and in the presence of the antagonistic fungus (r2) were measured, and the percentage inhibition (I%) in mycelial growth was calculated as: I% = [(r1 – r2) / r1] × 100 (Hajieghrari et al., 2008). The I% data were analysed statistically with ANOVA using the SAS statistical software. To examine the significance between endophytic fungal isolates, Fisher’s LSD was performed at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Identification of endophytic fungi

A total of 66 endophytic fungal isolates were successfully isolated from different parts of healthy A. mangium (Table 1); 21 from leaf, 12 from petiole, 13 from stem, nine from root, six from flower, and five from fruit. Correspondingly, 66 isolates were successfully amplified using primers ITS1 and ITS4. The endophytic fungal isolates mostly belonged to Ascomycota (95.5%) followed by Zygomycota (4.5%) based on the BLAST searches analysis (Table 2). For Ascomycota, 13 genera were identified; Trichoderma (28.6%), Nigrospora (28.6%), Pestalotiopsis (12.7%), Lasiodiplodia (9.5%), Aspergillus (6.3%), Sordariomycetes (3%), and genera that were represented by a single isolate were Neopestalotiopsis, Pseudopestalotiopsis, Eutiarosporella, Curvularia, Fusarium, Penicillium, and Hypoxylon. Only Blakeslea sp. (4.5%) of Zygomycota was identified in the present work (Table 1). All the fungal ITS rDNA sequences exhibited high similarity with existing sequences in the NCBI database (Table 1).

Table 1

Plant partIndividual nnumberTotal
Fruit12115
Flower121116
Leaf421411821
Petiole11114412
Stem211143113
Root232119
Total811614118111821366
PestalotiopsisPseudopestalotiopsisNeopestalotiopsisLasiodiplodiaEutiarosporellaAspergillusPenicilliumTrichodermaFusariumCurvulariaNigrosporaSordariomycetesHypoxylonBlakeslea

Endophytic fungi isolated from different plant part of healthy Acacia mangium.

Table 2

No.Endophytic isolate IDPlant partInhibition activities (%) (mean ± standard error)GenBank Accession numberITS region
Match identity (%)E-valueIdentification in GenBankBLAST match in GenBankPhylum, Class, Family
1AC 1RRoot55 ± 0.58MW25490299.280Blakeslea trisporaHQ248186Zygomycota, Zygomycetes, Choanephoraceae
2AC 2RRoot0 ± 0.00MW25490399.630Trichoderma gamsiiKX009501Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
3AC 3RRoot0 ± 0.00MW2549041000Aspergillus aculeatinusMK281555Ascomycota, Eurotiomycetes, Trichocomaceae
4AC 4RRoot44 ± 2.08MW25490599.380Nigrospora sphaericaMH368102Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
5AC 5RRoot20 ± 0.00MW25491399.210Aspergillus nigerMN474007Ascomycota, Eurotiomycetes, Trichocomaceae
6AC 6RRoot8.88 ± 0.66MW25491699.630Trichoderma spiraleMN227543Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
7AC 7RRoot14.28 ± 0.43MW25494299.170Sordariomycetes sp.JQ759985Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes,
8AC 8RRoot25 ± 2.89MW25495699.580Nigrospora oryzaeMN382281Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
9AC 9RRoot58.33 ± 5.02×1015MW25496499.810Trichoderma sp.MK870905Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
10AC 1SStem58.33 ± 5.02 ×1015MW25490799.810Trichoderma koningiopsisKY807125Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
11AC 2SStem33.33 ± 0.29MW25490999.790Nigrospora sphaericaKJ572188Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
12AC 3SStem0 ± 0.00MW25491499.630Pestalotiopsis vismiaeKP747709Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Sporocadaceae
13AC 4SStem0 ± 0.00MW25492099.810Pestalotiopsis sp.KY413701Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Sporocadaceae
14AC 5SStem45.45 ± 5.02 ×1015MW25492499.450Trichoderma sp.MK870688Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
15AC 6SStem20 ± 3.61MW25492599.150Lasiodiplodia theobromaeGQ502461Ascomycota, Dothideomycetes, Botryosphaeriaceae
16AC 7SStem45 ± 0.00MW25493199.250Trichoderma gamsiiKX009501Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
17AC 8SStem40 ± 0.00MW25493799.590Nigrospora oryzaeMN38228Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
18AC 9SStem0 ± 0.00MW25494099.630Trichoderma ovalisporumFJ442652Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
19AC 10SStem0 ± 0.00MW25494499.80Aspergillus nigerMN559950Ascomycota, Eurotiomycetes, Trichocomaceae
20AC 11SStem45.45 ± 2.60MW2549511000Sordariomycetes sp.KC178665Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes,
21AC 12SStem14.28 ± 0.30MW25495497.980Eutiarosporella sp.KX464132Ascomycota, Dothideomycetes, Botryosphaeriales
22AC 13SStem0 ± 0.00MW2549591000Nigrospora sp.MT556677Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
23AC 1 lLeaf55.55 ± 5.02 ×1015MW25490699.630Trichoderma gamsiiKM103313Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
24AC 2 lLeaf37.5 ± 1.44MW25490899.380Nigrospora sphaericaMN625838Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
25AC 3 lLeaf45.45 ± 0.75MW25491099.810Trichoderma gamsiiKX009501Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
26AC 4 lLeaf16.67 ± 9.53MW2549181000Curvularia pandanicolaMH275056Ascomycota, Dothideomycetes, Pleosporaceae
27AC 5 lLeaf16.67 ± 0.00MW25491999.630Pestalotiopsis microsporaMT597837Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Sporocadaceae
28AC 6 lLeaf45.45 ± 1.16MW25492199.810Pestalotiopsis microsporaEU137910Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Sporocadaceae
29AC 7 lLeaf58.3 ± 5.02 ×1015MW25492298.770Nigrospora oryzaeMN382281Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
30AC 8 lLeaf28.57 ± 2.51 ×1015MW25492399.580Fusarium chlamydosporumMT448890Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Nectriaceae
31AC 9 lLeaf0 ± 0.00MW25492699.380Nigrospora sphaericaMN566004Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
32AC 10 lLeaf30 ± 5.77MW25493499.570Lasiodiplodia theobromaeKF293981Ascomycota, Dothideomycetes, Botryosphaeriaceae
33AC 11 lLeaf12.5 ± 6.93MW25493699.630Trichoderma koningiopsisJQ617301Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
34AC 12 lLeaf0 ± 0.00MW25493899.440Pestalotiopsis neglectaMN006391Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Sporocadaceae
35AC 13 lLeaf22.22 ± 0.00MW25493999.620Trichoderma gamsiiKX009501Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
36AC 14 lLeaf0 ± 0.00MW25494399.580Nigrospora oryzaeJX966549Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
37AC 15 lLeaf33.33 ± 1.59MW25494599.790Nigrospora sp.MT561433Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
38AC 16 lLeaf45.45 ± 5.02 ×1015MW25494699.580Lasiodiplodia theobromaeMK696043Ascomycota, Dothideomycetes, Botryosphaeriaceae
39AC 17 lLeaf40 ± 5.77MW25494899.430Pestalotiopsis vismiaeKP747709Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Sporocadaceae
40AC 18 lLeaf25 ± 0.00MW25494999.590Nigrospora sphaericaMT043797Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
41AC 19 lLeaf0 ± 0.00MW25495099.80Aspergillus aculeatusKJ605160Ascomycota, Eurotiomycetes, Trichocomaceae
42AC 20 lLeaf40 ± 5.77MW25496299.590Nigrospora sphaericaMH368102Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
43AC 21 lLeaf0 ± 0.00MW25496399.580Nigrospora sphaericaMT561433Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
44AC 1PPetiole0 ± 0.00MW25491799.810Trichoderma crissumMK911703Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
45AC 2PPetiole0 ± 0.00MW25493299.790Nigrospora sphaericaMT561433Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
46AC 3PPetiole50 ± 4.91MW25493397.680Nigrospora sphaericaMN795570Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
47AC 4PPetiole58.33 ± 5.02 ×1015MW25493599.380Nigrospora sphaericaKJ572188Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
48AC 5PPetiole45.45 ± 5.02 ×1015MW25494799.790Nigrospora sphaericaMT561433Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
49AC 6PPetiole45 ± 5.77MW25495299.80Penicillium rolfsiiMK120600Ascomycota, Eurotiomycetes, Trichocomaceae
50AC 7PPetiole20 ± 5.77MW2549571000Trichoderma longibrachiatumFJ462745Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
51AC 8PPetiole30 ± 5.77MW25495899.370Neopestalotiopsis cubanaLC521857Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Pestalotiopsidaceae
52AC 9PPetiole45.45 ± 5.02 ×1015MW25496199.790Pestalotiopsis sp.JN116590Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Sporocadaceae
53AC 10PPetiole45.45 ± 5.02 ×1015MW25496599.570Lasiodiplodia theobromaeMT075441Ascomycota, Dothideomycetes, Botryosphaeriaceae
54AC 11PPetiole14.28 ± 0MW25496670.14.00E-20Trichoderma sp.GU973813Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
55AC 12PPetiole20 ± 5.77MW25496799.440Trichoderma koningiopsisMT102395Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
56AC 1FFlower8.88 ± 0.00MW25491199.280Blakeslea trisporaHQ248186Zygomycota, Zygomycetes, Choanephoraceae
57AC 2FFlower8.88 ± 5.14MW25491594.870Hypoxylon monticulosumKY610404Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypoxylaceae
58AC 3FFlower58.33 ± 5.02 ×1015MW2549271000Nigrospora sphaericaMT561433Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Trichosphaeriales
59AC 4FFlower40 ± 0.00MW25494199.620Trichoderma longibrachiatumMH745146Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
60AC 5FFlower45.45 ± 2.60MW25495399.590Pseudopestalotiopsis theaeKX401429Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Pestalotiopsidaceae
61AC 6FFlower45.45 ± 5.02 ×1015MW2549551000Trichoderma koningiopsisJQ278013Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae
62AC 1 UFruit8.88 ± 0.00MW2549121000Pestalotiopsis microsporeEU137910Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Sporocadaceae
63AC 2 UFruit69.23 ± 0.00MW25492899.790Lasiodiplodia theobromaeMK696044Ascomycota, Dothideomycetes, Botryosphaeriaceae
64AC 3 UFruit25 ± 2.89MW25492998.390Blakeslea trisporaHQ248186Zygomycota, Zygomycetes, Choanephoraceae
65AC 4 UFruit45 ± 2.89MW25493099.790Lasiodiplodia venezuelensisMH865369Ascomycota, Dothideomycetes, Botryosphaeriaceae
66AC 5 UFruit16.16 ± 0.00MW2549601000Trichoderma harzianumMF537642Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae

Percentage of identity matches of 66 fungal isolates from different plant parts of Acacia mangium based on ITS sequences using BLAST analyses, and their percentage of inhibition against Ceratocystis fimbriata.

The ITS sequences obtained in the present work were deposited in the NCBI GenBank (MW254902 - MW254967) for future reference. A total of 66 sequences of close relatives were downloaded from the NCBI GenBank, and combined with sequences of the 66 endophytic fungi for phylogenetic tree construction (Figure 1). Nine different orders were observed, of which six belonged to Ascomycota (Amphisphaeriales, Brotryosphaerialase, Eurotiales, Hypocreales, Pleosporales and Trichosphaeriales), one belonged to Zygomycota, and two belonged to Basidiomycota (out-group). Most of the endophytic fungal isolates clustered under the order Trichosphaeriales (20 isolates) belonged to genus Nigrospora, and under the order Hypocreales (19 isolates) belonged to genera Fusarium and Trichoderma. Tables 3 and 4 summarises these results.

Figure 1

Table 3

No.IDGenBank Accession no.Plant partAmphisphaeriales
1AC 3SMW254914StemPestalotiopsis vismiaePestalotiopsis clade (94% bootstrap)
2AC 4SMW254920StemPestalotiopsis sp.
3AC 9PMW254961PetiolePestalotiopsis sp.
4AC 5LMW254919LeafPestalotiopsis microspora
5AC 6LMW254921LeafPestalotiopsis microspora
6AC 12LMW254938LeafPestalotiopsis neglecta
7AC 1UMW254912FruitPestalotiopsis microspora
8AC 5FMW254953FlowerPseudopestalotiopsis theae
9AC 17LMW254948LeafPestalotiopsis vismiaePseudopestalotiopsis clade (77% bootstrap)
10AC 8PMW254958PetioleNeopestalotiopsis cubana BrotryosphaerialaseNeopestalotiopsis clade (77% bootstrap)
11AC 6SMW254925StemLasiodiplodia theobromaeLasiodiplodia clade (97% bootstrap)
12AC 10PMW254965PetioleLasiodiplodia theobromae
13AC 10LMW254934LeafLasiodiplodia theobromae
14AC 16LMW254946LeafLasiodiplodia theobromae
15AC 2UMW254928FruitLasiodiplodia theobromae
16AC 4UMW254930FruitLasiodiplodia venezuelensis
17AC 12SMW254954StemEutiarosporella sp. EurotialesEutiarosporella clade (97% bootstrap)
18AC 10SMW254944StemAspergillus nigerAspergillus clade (97% bootstrap)
19AC 3RMW254904RootAspergillus aculeatinus
20AC 5RMW254913RootAspergillus niger
21AC 19LMW254950LeafAspergillus aculeatus
22AC 6PMW254952PetiolePenicillium rolfsii HypocrealesPenicillium clade (97% bootstrap)
23AC 2RMW254903RootTrichoderma gamsiiTrichoderma clade (95% bootstrap)
24AC 6RMW254916RootTrichoderma spirale
25AC 9RMW254964RootTrichoderma sp.
26AC 1SMW254907StemTrichoderma koningiopsis
27AC 5SMW254924StemTrichoderma sp.
28AC 7SMW254931StemTrichoderma gamsii
29AC 9SMW254940StemTrichoderma ovalisporum
30AC 1PMW254917PetioleTrichoderma crissum
31AC 7PMW254957PetioleTrichoderma longibrachiatum
32AC 11PMW254966PetioleTrichoderma sp.
33AC 12PMW254967PetioleTrichoderma koningiopsis
34AC 1LMW254906LeafTrichoderma gamsii
35AC 3LMW254910LeafTrichoderma gamsii
36AC 11LMW254936LeafTrichoderma koningiopsis
37AC 13LMW254939LeafTrichoderma gamsii
38AC 4FMW254941FlowerTrichoderma longibrachiatum
39AC 5UMW254960FruitTrichoderma harzianum
40AC 6FMW254955FruitTrichoderma koningiopsis
41AC 8LMW254923LeafFusarium chlamydosporum PleosporalesFusarium clade (95% bootstrap)
42AC 4LMW254918LeafCurvularia pandanicolaCurvularia clade (95% bootstrap)
Hypocreales
43AC 4RMW254905RootNigrospora sphaericaNigrospora and Sordariomycete polytomy clade (95% bootstrap)
44AC 8RMW254956RootNigrospora oryzae
45AC 2SMW254909StemNigrospora sphaerica
46AC 8SMW254937StemNigrospora oryzae
47AC 13SMW254959StemNigrospora sp.
48AC 2PMW254932PetioleNigrospora sphaerica
49AC 3PMW254933PetioleNigrospora sphaerica
50AC 4PMW254935PetioleNigrospora sphaerica
51AC 5PMW254947PetioleNigrospora sphaerica
52AC 2LMW254908LeafNigrospora sphaerica
53AC 7LMW254922LeafNigrospora oryzae
54AC 9LMW254926LeafNigrospora sphaerica
55AC 14LMW254943LeafNigrospora oryzae
56AC 15LMW254945LeafNigrospora sp.
57AC 18LMW254949LeafNigrospora sphaerica
58AC 20LMW254962LeafNigrospora sphaerica
59AC 21LMW254963LeafNigrospora sphaerica
60AC 3FMW254927FlowerNigrospora sphaerica
61AC 7RMW254942RootSordariomycetes sp.
62AC 11SMW254951StemSordariomycetes sp. Hypocreales
63AC 2FMW254915FlowerHypoxylon monticulosumHypoxylon clade (99% bootstrap)

Endophytic fungal orders from the phylum Ascomycota.

Table 4

No.IDGenBank Accession numberPlant partMucorales
1AC 1RMW254902RootBlakeslea trisporaBlakeslea clade (99% bootstrap)
2AC 1FMW254911FlowerBlakeslea trispora
3AC 3UMW254929FruitBlakeslea trispora

Endophytic fungal order from the phylum Zygomycota.

Antagonism assay

All 66 endophytic fungal isolates were tested in the antagonism assay against C. fimbriata. After 5 days of incubation, six fungal isolates namely Trichoderma koningiopsis (AC 1S) stem, Nigrospora oryzae (AC 7L) leaf, Nigrospora sphaerica (AC 3F) flower, Lasiodiplodia sp. (AC 2 U) fruit, Nigrospora sphaerica (AC 4P) petiole, and Trichoderma sp. (AC 9R) root were observed to exhibit stronger inhibition where the mycelia of the antagonists had breached into C. fimbriata colony (Figure 2). Of these, four fungal isolates namely T. koningiopsis (AC 1S) stem, Lasiodiplodia sp. (AC 2 U) fruit, N. sphaerica (AC 4P) petiole, and Trichoderma sp. (AC 9R) root colonised almost 99% of the culture plate. Although N. sphaerica (AC 7 l) leaf and N. sphaerica (AC 3F) flower did not colonise the entire culture plate, there was no growth of C. fimbriata observed.

Figure 2

The inhibition percentages (I%) of endophytic fungi against the pathogen C. fimbriata in dual culture assay are shown in Figure 3. Lasiodiplodia sp. (AC 2 U) isolated from fruit recorded the highest I% (69.23%), followed by Trichoderma sp. (AC 9R) isolated from root, Nigrospora sphaerica (AC 4P) isolated from petiole, Nigrospora sphaerica (AC 3F) isolated from flower, Trichoderma koningiopsis (AC 1S) isolated from stem, and Nigrospora oryzae (AC 7L) isolated from leaf with value 58.33%, respectively.

Figure 3

Thirteen endophytic fungi from various plant parts of A. mangium showed no inhibition against C. fimbriata (Figure 4) namely A. aculeatinus (AC 3R) isolated from root, A. aculeatus (AC 19L) isolated from leaf, A. niger (AC 10S) isolated from stem, N. oryzae (AC 14L) isolated from leaf, Nigrospora sp. (AC 13S) isolated from stem, N. sphaerica (AC 9L) isolated from leaf, N. sphaerica (AC 2P) isolated from petiole, P. neglecta (AC 12L) isolated from leaf, Pestalotiopsis sp. (AC 4S) isolated from stem, P. vismiae (AC 3S) isolated from stem, T. crissum (AC 1P) isolated from petiole, T. gamsii (AC 2R) isolated from root, and T. ovalisporum (AC 9S) isolated from stem.

Figure 4

Diversity of endophytic fungi

Endophytic fungi are ubiquitous, and every plant species examined to date have been found colonised by them (Arnold et al., 2001). A single plant species may harbour hundreds of endophytes which may inhabit all available tissues, including leaves, petioles, stems, twigs, barks, xylems, roots, fruits, flowers, and seeds (Chapela and Boddy, 1988; Fisher et al., 1993; Saikkonen et al., 1998; Jena and Tayung, 2013). In the present work, endophytic fungi were isolated from different plant parts of A. mangium with the highest number of isolates found in leaf and dominated by the genera Trichoderma and Nigrospora. Trichoderma spp. were present in all plant parts, while Nigrospora spp. were present in all but fruit. In total, 66 endophytic fungal isolates were obtained from different plant parts of A. mangium.

Trichoderma and Nigrospora have also been reported as endophytes in other plants such as Rauvolfia serpentine, Prosopis cineraria, and Piper nigrum (Gehlot et al., 2008; Dutta et al., 2014; Sopialena et al., 2018). Trichoderma is also found in many ecosystems, and can reduce the severity of plant diseases by inhibiting the plant pathogens in the soil through their highly potent antagonistic and mycoparasitic activities (Hermosa et al., 2012). Moreover, as revealed by research in recent decades, some Trichoderma strains can interact directly with roots, thus increasing plant growth potential, resistance to disease, and tolerance to abiotic stresses (Mastouri et al., 2010; Hermosa et al., 2012; Brotman et al., 2013). Nigrospora is also a beneficial member of the foliar endophytic community due to its mutualistic existence with their host plants, and having a potential for biological control strategies (Zakaria et al., 2016). Other than Nigrospora, Pestalotiopsis also is a beneficial member of the foliar endophytic community due to its ability to switch its nutritional mode, thus able to stay as an endophyte or switch to saprophyte when necessary (Douanla-Meli et al., 2013; Hamzah et al., 2018). Besides Trichoderma, Nigrospora, and Pestalotiopsis, other fungal genera such as Lasiodiplodia, Sordariomycetes, and Aspergillus have also been reported as predominant endophytic fungi in other plants species (Li et al., 2012; del Castillo et al., 2016), and have an antagonism ability (Chen et al., 2010). Fusarium too is a common endophytic fungal genus found in trees (Zakaria et al., 2010). Although it is widely available in most tropical plants investigated in past studies (Warman and Aitken, 2018), we recorded a low isolation frequency of Fusarium. Our finding also revealed lesser-known fungal genera, namely Eutiarosporella, Curvularia, Glomerella, and Hypoxylon in A. mangium.

In the present work, ITS sequences identified 63 endophytic fungal isolates from the phylum Ascomycota, and three from Zygomycota. The phylum Ascomycota has been reported to be the most common endophytic fungal phylum when isolated using standard isolation protocols (Koukol et al., 2012; Hamzah et al., 2018). Fungi from the phylum Zygomycota have been reported to be culture-method dependent (Crozier et al., 2006; Hamzah et al., 2018), which might explain the small isolate number reported in the present work. Comparative studies also show that only a small fraction of microorganisms in nature can be cultured using conventional microbiological techniques (Amann et al., 1995). There are many factors that can affect the microbial viability under laboratory conditions, for example the lack of knowledge about their nutritional requirements.

Antagonism activities against Ceratocystis fimbriata

Fungal antagonism can manifest in many ways such as nutrition competition, niche exclusion, mycoparasitism, and the production of extracellular metabolites (Siameto et al., 2010). These metabolites, especially antibiotics and lytic enzymes, have been widely applied in various fields like crop-pathogen controls. Endophytic microorganisms isolated from plants can produce various novel bioactive metabolites (Ramasamy et al., 2010). The bioactive metabolites produced by plants, microorganisms, and organisms are useful for the discovery and development of new drugs.

In the present work, Lasiodiplodia sp., T. koningiopsis, N. sphaerica and Trichoderma sp. successfully inhibited the pathogen C. fimbriata in the dual culture assay. The ability to out-grow the pathogen in vitro suggested that these fungi competed for the space and nutrient with the pathogen. In theory, biological agents with antifungal properties are known to secrete certain enzymes which break down their competitors’ cell wall, thus restricting their growth (Sharon et al., 2001). The antagonism displayed by Lasiodiplodia sp. was more aggressive as compared to other endophytic fungi (Figure 3). This could be attributed to the production of lytic enzymes by Lasiodiplodia sp. (Anitha and Rabeeth, 2010). The antagonism displayed by Lasiodiplodia sp., T. koningiopsis, N. sphaerica and Trichoderma sp. could also be explained by their secretion of secondary metabolites into the growth medium, as well as nutrient depletion in the growth medium (Robinson et al., 2014). The antagonism displayed might also be influenced by the antibiotics or hydrolytic enzymes they produced (Kamala and Indira, 2011). The difference in antagonism magnitude observed in the present work could also be dependent on specific fungal species (Kai et al., 2007). Previously, Lasiodiplodia sp. from the flower of Viscum coloratum also exhibited antimicrobial activity which could be due to the presence of cyclo-(Trp-Ala), ICA, indole-3-carbaldehyde, mullein, and 2-phenylethano in their extract (Qian et al., 2014). Lasiodiplodia sp. isolated from the twig of Aegle marmelos has also been shown to have in vitro fibrinolytic activities (Meshram and Saxena, 2016). Another plant parts such as bark and leaf of Terminalia sp. has also been isolated with Lasiodiplodia sp. which not only exhibited antimicrobial and antioxidant activities, but also aided the plant to withstand stressful environmental conditions (Patil et al., 2014).

Conclusion

Diversity of endophytic fungi were successfully isolated from different parts of A. mangium, with Trichoderma spp. being the most prevalent, and were isolated from all six plant parts. Against C. fimbriata, the crude extracts from Trichoderma spp., N. sphaerica, and Lasiodiplodia sp. exhibited strong inhibition in the dual culture assay. Thus, it can be concluded that certain endophytic fungi of A. mangium have the potential to be harnessed as anti-Ceratocystis agent in future biotechnological applications.

Funding

The present work was financially supported by Universiti Putra Malaysia under the Putra Grant Scheme (GP-IPM/2017/9565600).

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/supplementary material.

Author contributions

RT designed the study, collected, identified plant materials, and edited the manuscript. RT and RZ conducted the experiments, drafted, and revised the manuscript. Data analysis performed by RT, MA, MM, NS, WAW-M-A, and AH. MH assisted in DNA extraction. RT, MA, MM, NS, and AH supervised. RT acquired funding. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Laboratory of Wood Deterioration and Protection, Department of Natural Resource Industry, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, Universiti Putra Malaysia for the research facilities.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    AmannR. I.LudwigW.SchleiferK. H. (1995). Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev.59, 143169. doi: 10.1128/mr.59.1.143-169.1995

  • 2

    AnithaA.RabeethM. (2010). Degradation of fungal cell walls of phytopathogenic fungi by lytic enzyme of Streptomyces griseus. African J. Plant Sci.4, 6166.

  • 3

    ArnoldA. E.MaynardZ.GilbertG. S. (2001). Fungal endophytes in dicotyledonous neotropical trees: patterns of abundance and diversity. Mycol. Res.105, 15021507. doi: 10.1017/S0953756201004956

  • 4

    BlaedowR. A. (2009). Use of the systemic fungicide propiconazole for oak wilt management: an assessment of uncharacterized host-pathogen-fungicide interactions. University of Minnesota.

  • 5

    BrawnerJ.JaparudinY.LapammuM.RaufR.BodenD.WingfieldM. J. (2015). Evaluating the inheritance of Ceratocystis acaciivora symptom expression in a diverse Acacia mangium breeding population. South. For.77, 8390. doi: 10.2989/20702620.2015.1007412

  • 6

    BrotmanY.LandauU.Cuadros-InostrozaÁ.TakayukiT.FernieA. R.ChetI.et al. (2013). Trichoderma-plant root colonization: escaping early plant defense responses and activation of the antioxidant machinery for saline stress tolerance. PLoS Pathog.9:1003221. doi: 10.1371/annotation/8b818c15-3fe0-4e56-9be2-e44fd1ed3fae

  • 7

    ChakiS.GhoshB.BandyopadyhayS.MookerjeeM.DasS.DastidarS. G. (2015). Detection of various phytochemical compounds from seeds of a. auriculiformis for possibilities of obtaining potent antimicrobial agents. Int. J. Biol. Pharm. Res.6, 120128.

  • 8

    ChapelaI. H.BoddyL. (1988). Fungal colonization of attached beech branches: II. Spatial and temporal organization of communities arising from latent invaders in bark and functional sapwood, under different moisture regimes. New Phytol.110, 4757. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1988.tb00236.x

  • 9

    ChenX. M.DongH. L.HuK. X.SunZ. R.ChenJ.GuoS. X. (2010). Diversity and antimicrobial and plant-growth-promoting activities of endophytic fungi in Dendrobium loddigesii Rolfe. J. Plant Growth Regul.29, 328337. doi: 10.1007/s00344-010-9139-y

  • 10

    CrozierJ.ThomasS. E.AimeM. C.EvansH. C.HolmesK. A. (2006). Molecular characterization of fungal endophytic morphospecies isolated from stems and pods of Theobroma cacao. Plant Pathol.55, 783791. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01446.x

  • 11

    CuiJ.GuoT.RenZ.ZhangN.WangM. (2015). Diversity and antioxidant activity of culturable endophytic fungi from alpine plants of Rhodiola crenulata, R. angusta, and R. sachalinensis. PLoS One10:0118204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118204

  • 12

    DaoukR. K.DagherS. M.SattoutE. J. (1995). Antifungal activity of the essential oil of Origanum syriacum L. J. Food Prot.58, 11471149. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-58.10.1147

  • 13

    Del CastilloD. S.ParraD.NocedaC.Pérez-MartínezS. (2016). Co-occurrence of pathogenic and non-pathogenic fusarium decemcellulare and Lasiodiplodia theobromae isolates in cushion galls disease of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.). J. Plant Pro. Res.56, 129138. doi: 10.1515/jppr-2016-0020

  • 14

    Douanla-MeliC.LangerE.MouafoF. T. (2013). Fungal endophyte diversity and community patterns in healthy and yellowing leaves of citrus Limon. Fungal Ecol.6, 212222. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2013.01.004

  • 15

    DuttaD.PuzariK. C.GogoiR.DuttaP. (2014). Endophytes: exploitation as a tool in plant protection. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol.57, 621629. doi: 10.1590/S1516-8913201402043

  • 16

    FarahatM. (2020). Alleviation of salinity stress in wheat by ACC deaminase-producing bacillus aryabhattai EWR29 with multifarious plant growth-promoting attributes. Plant Arch.20, 417429.

  • 17

    FaridA. M.SyazwanS. A.AzrulW. W. M.PatahayahM.SallehS. M.OngS. P. (2018). Ceratocystis fimbriata: A white listed invasive alien species (IAS) causing wilt disease on acacia Mangium plantation.

  • 18

    FisherP. J.PetriniO. S. B. C.SuttonB. C. (1993). A comparative study of fungal endophytes in leaves, xylem and bark of eucalyptus in Australia and England. Sydowia45, 338345.

  • 19

    GehlotP.BohraN. K.PurohitD. K. (2008). Endophytic mycoflora of inner bark of Prosopis cineraria—a key stone tree species of Indian desert. Am. Eurasian J. Botany1, 14.

  • 20

    HajieghrariB.Torabi-GiglouM.MohammadiM. R.DavariM. (2008). Biological potential of some Iranian Trichoderma isolates in the control of soil borne plant pathogenic fungi. Afr. J. Biotechnol.7, 967972.

  • 21

    HamzahT. N. T.LeeS. Y.HidayatA.TerhemR.Faridah-HanumI.MohamedR. (2018). Diversity and characterization of endophytic fungi isolated from the tropical mangrove species, Rhizophora mucronata, and identification of potential antagonists against the soil-borne fungus, Fusarium solani. Front. Microbiol.9:1707. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01707

  • 22

    HarringtonT. C. (2013). “Ceratocystis diseases”, in Infectious forest diseases. ed. P. Gonthier (Wallingford: CABI). 230255. doi: 10.1079/9781780640402.0230

  • 23

    HermosaR.ViterboA.ChetI.MonteE. (2012). Plant-beneficial effects of Trichoderma and of its genes. Microbiology158, 1725. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.052274-0

  • 24

    JenaS. K.TayungK. (2013). Endophytic fungal communities associated with two ethno-medicinal plants of Similipal biosphere reserve, India and their antimicrobial prospective. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci.3, S7S12. doi: 10.7324/JAPS.2013.34.S2

  • 25

    KaiN.EffimertU.BergG.PiechullaB. (2007). Volatiles of bacterial antagonists inhibit mycelial growth of the plant pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Arch. Microbiol.187, 351360. doi: 10.1007/s00203-006-0199-0

  • 26

    KamalaT.IndiraS. (2011). Evaluation of indigenous Trichoderma isolates from Manipur as biocontrol agent against Pythium aphanidermatum on common beans. 3 Biotech1, 217225. doi: 10.1007/s13205-011-0027-3

  • 27

    KileG. A. (1993). “Plant diseases caused by species of Ceratocystis sensu stricto and Chalara” in Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma: taxonomy, ecology, and pathogenicity. eds. WingfieldM.SeifertK.WebberJ. (Minnesota USA: The American Phytopathological Society St. Paul), 173183.

  • 28

    KoukolO.KolaríkM.KolárováZ.BaldrianP. (2012). Diversity of foliar endophytes in wind fallen Picea abies trees. Fungal Divers.54, 6977. doi: 10.1007/s13225-011-0112-2

  • 29

    KumarC. G.MongollaP.PombalaS. (2018). Lasiosan, a new exopolysaccharide from Lasiodiplodia sp. strain B2 (MTCC6000): structural characterization and biological evaluation. Process Biochem.72, 162169. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2018.06.014

  • 30

    LandumM. C.do Rosário FélixM.AlhoJ.GarciaR.CabritaM. J.ReiF.et al. (2016). Antagonistic activity of fungi of Olea europaea L. against Colletotrichum acutatum. Microbiol. Res.183, 100108. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.12.001

  • 31

    LeeS. S. (2018). Observations on the successes and failures of acacia plantations in Sabah and Sarawak and the way forward. J. Trop. For. Sci.30, 468475. doi: 10.26525/jtfs2018.30.5.468475

  • 32

    LiH. Y.ShenM.ZhouZ. P.LiT.WeiY. L.LinL. B. (2012). Diversity and cold adaptation of endophytic fungi from five dominant plant species collected from the Baima Snow Mountain, Southwest China. Fungal Divers.54, 7986. doi: 10.1007/s13225-012-0153-1

  • 33

    MandyMWickneswariR. (2014). Incidences and severity of vascular wilt in Acacia mangium plantations in Sabah, Malaysia. The 2014 UKM FST Postgraduate Colloquium. AIP Publishing LLC. 784789.

  • 34

    MastouriF.BjörkmanT.HarmanG. E. (2010). Seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum alleviates biotic, abiotic, and physiological stresses in germinating seeds and seedlings. Phytopathology100, 12131221. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-03-10-0091

  • 35

    MeshramV.SaxenaS. (2016). Potential fibrinolytic activity of an endophytic Lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae species. 3. Biotech6:114. doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0428-4

  • 36

    MiharaR.BarryK. M.MohammedC. L.MitsunagaT. (2005). Comparison of antifungal and antioxidant activities of Acacia mangium and A. auriculiformis heartwood extracts. J. Chem. Ecol.31, 789804. doi: 10.1007/s10886-005-3544-x

  • 37

    NasutionA.GlenM.BeadleC.MohammedC. (2019). Ceratocystis wilt and canker–a disease that compromises the growing of commercial acacia-based plantations in the tropics. Aust. For.82, 8093. doi: 10.1080/00049158.2019.1595347

  • 38

    NuangmekW.AiduangW.KumlaJ.LumyongS.SuwannarachN. (2021). Evaluation of a newly identified endophytic fungus, Trichoderma phayaoense for plant growth promotion and biological control of gummy stem blight and wilt of muskmelon. Front. Microbiol.12:634772. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.634772

  • 39

    PatilM. P.PatilR. H.PatilS. G.MaheshwariV. L. (2014). Endophytic mycoflora of Indian medicinal plant, Terminalia arjuna and their biological activities. Int. J. Biotech. Well. Indus.3, 5361. doi: 10.6000/1927-3037.2014.03.02.3

  • 40

    PhạmH. T. T.SuwannapanW.KoomsiriW.InahashiY.TakéA.MatsumotoA.et al. (2020). Fodinicola acaciae sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from the roots of Acacia mangium Willd. And its genome analysis. Microorganisms8:467. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8040467

  • 41

    PilottiM.Di LerniaG.ModestiV.LumiaV.BrunettiA. (2016). Outcome of Ceratocystis platani inoculations in Platanus× acerifolia in relation to season and inoculum dose. For. Biogeo. For.9, 608617. doi: 10.3832/ifor1594-008

  • 42

    PinyopusarerkK.LiangS. B.GunnB. V. (1993). “Taxonomy, distribution, biology and use as an exotic” in Acacia mangium, growing and utilization. FAO, Bangkok, Thailand, and Winrock international, MPTS monograph series no. eds. AwangK.TaylorD., vol. 3, 120.

  • 43

    PotterK.RimbawantoA.BeadleC. (2006). Heart rot and root rot in tropical acacia plantations. Proceedings of a workshop held in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 7–9 February 2006. Canberra, ACIAR Proceedings No. 124.

  • 44

    QianC. D.FuY. H.JiangF. S.XuX. H.ChengD. Q.DingB.et al. (2014). Lasiodiplodia sp. ME4-2, an endophytic fungus from the floral parts of Viscum coloratum, produces indole-3-carboxylic acid and other aromatic metabolites. BMC Microbiol.14:297. doi: 10.1186/s12866-014-0297-0

  • 45

    RamasamyK.LimS. M.BakarH. A.IsmailN.IsmailM. S.AliM. F.et al. (2010). Antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of Malaysia endophytes. Phytother. Res.24, 640643. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2891

  • 46

    RobinsonJ. G.NedergaardB. S.RogersW. J.FialkowJ.NeutelJ. M.RamstadD.et al. (2014). Effect of evolocumab or ezetimibe added to moderate-or high-intensity statin therapy on LDL-C lowering in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the LAPLACE-2 randomized clinical trial. J. Am. Med. Assoc.311, 18701883. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.4030

  • 47

    RouxJ.WingfieldM. J. (2009). Ceratocystis species: emerging pathogens of non-native plantation eucalyptus and acacia species. South. For.71, 115120. doi: 10.2989/SF.2009.71.2.5.820

  • 48

    SaikkonenK.FaethS. H.HelanderM.SullivanT. J. (1998). Fungal endophytes: a continuum of interactions with host plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.29, 319343. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.319

  • 49

    Sarah ShafieiS. N.AhmadK.IkhsanN. F. M.IsmailS. I.SijamK. (2017). Antibacterial activity of acacia spp. leaves extracts against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae and screening for active phytochemical contents. J. Agric. Vet. Sci.10, 4960.

  • 50

    SharonE.Bar-EyalM.ChetI.Herrera-EstrellaA.KleifeldO.SpiegelY. (2001). Biological control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica by Trichoderma harzianum. Phytopathology40, 20162020. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.03.011

  • 51

    SiametoE. N.OkothS.AmuguneN. O.ChegeN. C. (2010). Antagonism of Trichoderma harzianum isolates on soil borne plant pathogenic fungi from Embu District, Kenya. J. Yeast Fungal Res.1, 4754.

  • 52

    SopialenaS.SuyadiS.SahilM.NurdianaJ. (2018). The diversity of endophytic fungi associated with Piper nigrum in the tropical areas: a recent study from Kutai Kartanegara, Indonesia. Bio. J. Biol. Diversity19, 20282034. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d190607

  • 53

    SyazwanS. A.Mohd-FaridA.Wan-Muhd-AzrulW.-A.SyahmiH. M.ZakiA. M.OngS. P.et al. (2021). Survey, identification, and pathogenicity of Ceratocystis fimbriata Complex associated with wilt disease on Acacia mangium in Malaysia. Forests12:1782. doi: 10.3390/f12121782

  • 54

    TariganM.RouxJ.Van WyckM.TjahjonoB.WingfieldM. J. (2011). A new wilt and die-back disease of Acacia mangium associated with Ceratocystis manginecans and C. acaciivora sp. nov. in Indonesia. S. Afr. J. Bot.77, 292304. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2010.08.006

  • 55

    UdarbeM. P.HepburnA. J. (1986). “Development of Acacia mangium as plantation species in Sabah” in Australian acacias in developing countries. Proceedings of international workshop held at the forestry training Centre, Gympie. ed. TurnbullJ. W., vol. 16 (Queensland, Australia: Canberra, ACIAR Proceedings), 157159.

  • 56

    WarmanN. M.AitkenE. A. (2018). The movement of fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (sub-tropical race 4) in susceptible cultivars of banana. Frontiers. Plant Sci.9:1748. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01748

  • 57

    WhiteT. J.BrunsT.LeeS.TaylorJ. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocol.18, 315322. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1

  • 58

    WyckhuysK. A. G.LuY.MoralesH.VazquezL. L.LegaspiJ. C.EliopoulosP. A.et al. (2013). Current status and potential of conservation biological control for agriculture in the developing world. Biol. Control65, 152167. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.11.010

  • 59

    YazidS. N. E.SelamatJ.IsmailS. I.MaganN.SamsudinN. I. P. (2020). Phytopathogenic organisms and mycotoxigenic fungi: why do we control one and neglect the other? A biological control perspective in Malaysia. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.19, 643669. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12541

  • 60

    YooJ. J.EomA. H. (2012). Molecular identification of endophytic fungi isolated from needle leaves of conifers in Bohyeon Mountain. Korea. Mycobiol.40, 231235. doi: 10.5941/MYCO.2012.40.4.231

  • 61

    ZakariaL.JamilM. I. M.AnuarI. S. M. (2016). Molecular characterisation of endophytic fungi from roots of wild banana (Musa acuminata). Trop. Life Sci. Res.27, 153162. PMID:

  • 62

    ZakariaL.YaakopA. S.SallehB.ZakariaM. (2010). Endophytic fungi from paddy. Trop. Life Sci. Res.21, 101107.

Summary

Keywords

Acacia mangium, endophytic fungi, Ceratocystis fimbriata, Ceratocystis wilt, antagonism

Citation

Ahmad MF, Zahari R, Mohtar M, Wan-Muhammad-Azrul WA, Hishamuddin MS, Samsudin NIP, Hassan A and Terhem R (2022) Diversity of endophytic fungi isolated from different plant parts of Acacia mangium, and antagonistic activity against Ceratocystis fimbriata, a causal agent of Ceratocystis wilt disease of A. mangium in Malaysia. Front. Microbiol. 13:887880. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.887880

Received

02 March 2022

Accepted

04 October 2022

Published

08 November 2022

Volume

13 - 2022

Edited by

Giuseppe Ianiri, University of Molise, Italy

Reviewed by

Laith Khalil Tawfeeq Al-Ani, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia; Samantha Chandranath Karunarathna, Qujing Normal University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Razak Terhem,

This article was submitted to Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics