ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 08 March 2023

Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy

Volume 14 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1035547

First comparative genomic characterization of the MSSA ST398 lineage detected in aquaculture and other reservoirs

  • 1. National Reference Laboratory of Antibiotic Resistances and Healthcare Associated Infections, Department of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal

  • 2. Centre for the Studies of Animal Science, Institute of Agrarian and Agri-Food Sciences and Technologies, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

  • 3. AL4AnimalS, Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Lisbon, Portugal

  • 4. Division of Aquaculture, Upgrading and Bioprospecting, Portuguese Institute for the Sea and Atmosphere, IPMA, Lisbon, Portugal

  • 5. CIIMAR, Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal

  • 6. INIAV–Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, Oeiras, Portugal

  • 7. CIISA, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

Article metrics

View details

3

Citations

2,4k

Views

1k

Downloads

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus ST398 can cause diseases in several different animals. In this study we analyzed ten S. aureus ST398 previously collected in three different reservoirs in Portugal (humans, gilthead seabream from aquaculture and dolphin from a zoo). Strains tested against sixteen antibiotics, by disk diffusion or minimum inhibitory concentration, showed decreased susceptibility to benzylpenicillin (all strains from gilthead seabream and dolphin) and to erythromycin with an iMLSB phenotype (nine strains), and susceptibility to cefoxitin (methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, MSSA). All strains from aquaculture belonged to the same spa type, t2383, whereas strains from the dolphin and humans belonged to spa type t571. A more detailed analysis using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)-based tree and a heat map, showed that all strains from aquaculture origin were highly related with each other and the strains from dolphin and humans were more distinct, although they were very similar in ARG, VF and MGE content. Mutations F3I and A100V in glpT gene and D278E and E291D in murA gene were identified in nine fosfomycin susceptible strains. The blaZ gene was also detected in six of the seven animal strains. The study of the genetic environment of erm(T)-type (found in nine S. aureus strains) allowed the identification of MGE (rep13-type plasmids and IS431R-type), presumably involved in the mobilization of this gene. All strains showed genes encoding efflux pumps from major facilitator superfamily (e.g., arlR, lmrS-type and norA/B-type), ATP-binding cassettes (ABC; mgrA) and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE; mepA/R-type) families, all associated to decreased susceptibility to antibiotics/disinfectants. Moreover, genes related with tolerance to heavy metals (cadD), and several VF (e.g., scn, aur, hlgA/B/C and hlb) were also identified. Insertion sequences, prophages, and plasmids made up the mobilome, some of them associated with ARG, VF and genes related with tolerance to heavy metals. This study highlights that S. aureus ST398 can be a reservoir of several ARG, heavy metals resistance genes and VF, which are essential in the adaption and survival of the bacterium in the different environments and an active agent in its dissemination. It makes an important contribution to understanding the extent of the spread of antimicrobial resistance, as well as the virulome, mobilome and resistome of this dangerous lineage.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus can cause diseases in humans and animals constituting an important clinical and public health problem (WHO, 2018).

Firstly described in livestock, S. aureus ST398 has proven to be able to break barriers and become a successful bacterium in several environments and countries from all over the globe. This ST was previously described in numerous diseased and healthy mammal species, birds, and fish, as well as in humans (Heaton et al., 2020; Salgueiro et al., 2020a). Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in S. aureus is frequent, especially methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (WHO, 2018). Infections in humans can range from localized and a lower degree of severity, such as skin and soft tissue infections, to severe invasive illnesses, such as bloodstream infection and pneumonia, either associated with MRSA or with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) (Uhlemann et al., 2017; Kashif et al., 2019). Previous studies suggest that MRSA does not necessarily replace infections caused by MSSA, but causes additional infections (Mostofsky et al., 2011). In fact, some studies suggest that MSSA is responsible for most infections related to healthcare settings and community worldwide (Monaco et al., 2017; Uhlemann et al., 2017), with an increase in reports associated with invasive infections caused by CC398 lineage in patients with no livestock contact (Mama et al., 2021). However, little attention has been given to MSSA molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of pathogenicity (Uhlemann et al., 2017), not only regarding human but also animal reservoirs, namely in environments such as aquaculture. Studies with retail foods (Li et al., 2015) and pig farms (Eom et al., 2019) uncover MSSA ST398 harbouring multiple virulence and antibiotic resistance genes, some of which with a multidrug-resistant phenotype, confirming that MSSA ST398 can represent a health hazard. Staphylococcus spp. are not considered part of the commensal fish microbiota. Few studies have focused on Staphylococcus spp. as the etiological agent of infection in fish, however this genus was already associated with exophthalmia and hemorrhages in these animals (often resulting in death) (Austin and Austin, 2016; Oh et al., 2019; Algammal et al., 2020). On the contrary, there are several studies on outbreaks of human food poisoning caused by the consumption of infected fish (Much et al., 2009; Macori et al., 2016; Sergelidis and Angelidis, 2017). Closer proximity among humans and animals can promote the dissemination of pathogens between the two reservoirs, as already described for S. aureus ST398 (Price et al., 2012).

A better understanding of genetic diversity, ARG, VF, and MGE present in ST398 lineage from different reservoirs, is crucial to understand its importance, possible transmission routes and prevent its dissemination. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) gives a more complete and discriminative information than traditional methods, like Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) and spa type, making it suitable for this type of studies (Price et al., 2012; Lienen et al., 2021). Aquaculture has received very little attention when compared to terrestrial animals, so this study may show important characteristics of this reservoir as a potential danger to human health. Thus, using a WGS approach, our study intended to contribute to clarify the severity associated with the potential for spread of the ST398 lineage, also demonstrating the presence of determinants such as MGE and different ARG and VF circulating in different environments, and exploring how they are genetically related.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study design and bacterial identification

We analyzed ten S. aureus ST398 previously collected in three different reservoirs in Portugal: humans (n = 3; from pus, respiratory secretions, and unknown samples collected between 2015 and 2017), gilthead seabream from aquaculture (n = 6; 4 from muscles, 1 from skin, and 1 from gills samples collected in 2018) and a dolphin (n = 1; from a bronchoalveolar washing collected in 2011; Salgueiro et al., 2020a). Human strains belonged to a collection of the National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge (INSA) compiled in region A. On the other hand, the dolphin strain was collected in region B and belong to the collection of the National Institute of Agrarian and Veterinary Research. Regions A and B are approximately 550 km apart. Gilthead seabream samples were collected by the Portuguese Institute of Sea and Atmosphere in an aquaculture tank exposed to sea water, located in region B, and sent to INSA where preparation and bacterial isolation procedures were performed, as described elsewhere (Salgueiro et al., 2020b). Bacterial species identification was performed by VITEK 2 and amplification of the 16S rRNA gene, as previously described (Jones-Dias et al., 2016b).

2.2. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by: (1) disk diffusion (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) for the following antibiotics: cefoxitin (FOX; 30 μg), ciprofloxacin (CIP; 5 μg), levofloxacin (LEV; 5 μg), moxifloxacin (MOX; 5 μg), rifampicin (RIF; 5 μg), mupirocin (MUP; 200 μg), and fusidic acid (FUS; 10 μg); (2) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) through E-test® (BioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) or in-house broth microdilution for the following antibiotics: daptomycin (0.016–256 μg/ml), linezolid (0.5–2 μg/ml), teicoplanin (0.016–256 μg/ml), and vancomycin (0.016–256 μg/ml); (3) E-test® for benzylpenicillin (0.016–256 μg/ml); and (4) VITEK® 2 (BioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) for the following antibiotics: erythromycin (1–8 μg/ml), tetracycline (0.5–2 μg/ml), tigecycline (0.25–1 μg/ml), and fosfomycin (8–32 μg/ml). VITEK® 2 was also used to detect inducible clindamycin resistance. All antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed and interpreted according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST 2022) guidelines1, except for mupirocin (EUCAST 2016).

2.3. Whole-genome sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted with MagNA Pure 96 Instrument (Roche, Manheim, Germany) and quantified by Qubit Fluorometric Quantitation (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), according to manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries from 1 ng of genomic DNA were prepared, in two different sets, using the dual-indexed Nextera XT Illumina library preparation, before cluster generation and paired-end sequencing (2 × 150 bp) on a NextSeq 550 Illumina platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA), according to manufacturer’s instructions.

2.4. Genome annotation and resistome, virulome and mobilome analysis

Sequence reads were trimmed and filtered (primers and adapters sequence removal, and a minimum size cut-off of 50 bp), according to quality criteria (limit = 0.05), and assembled de novo using CLC Genomics Workbench version 21.0.3 (QIAGEN, Aarhus, Denmark), with default parameters, as previously described (Jones-Dias et al., 2016a). Online tools and databases available at the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (CGE;2) were used to confirm bacterial species [KmerFinder 3.2 (Larsen et al., 2014)], predict multilocus sequence type [MLST 2.0 (Larsen et al., 2012)] and spa type [spaTyper 1.0 (Bartels et al., 2014)], investigate the presence of antibiotic and disinfectant resistance genes [ResFinder 4.1 (Bortolaia et al., 2020)], virulence genes [VirulenceFinder 2.0 (Tetzschner et al., 2020)], plasmids [PlasmidFinder 2.1 (Carattoli et al., 2014)], and other mobile genetic elements [MobileElementFinder version 1.0.3 (Johansson et al., 2021), SCCmecFinder 1.2 (Ito et al., 2009)], and to estimate bacteria’s pathogenicity towards human hosts [PathogenFinder 1.1 (Cosentino et al., 2013)]. The Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database [CARD (Alcock et al., 2020)] was also used to investigate the presence of antibiotic resistance genes. PHASTER and ISsaga search web tools allowed the identification and annotation of prophage sequences and insertion sequences, respectively (Varani et al., 2011; Arndt et al., 2016). All analysis were performed using default parameters. A phylogenetic tree was constructed with 50 S. aureus ST398 strains (10 from our study and 40 from NCBI database; Supplementary Table S1), based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), using CSI Phylogeny 1.4 web tool with default parameters (Kaas et al., 2014). The same strains were used to perform a heat map representing the alignment percentage (AP) of these strains, using CLC Genomics Workbench version 21.0.3 with Euclidean distance and complete linkage parameters. CLC Genomics Workbench version 21.0.3 was also used to search for integrons, heavy metals tolerance genes, other VF, and agr-type, as well as to study the genetic environment of antibiotic resistance genes. Online tool RFPlasmid was used to predict chromosomal or plasmid location of the previously identified genes (van der Graaf-Van Bloois et al., 2021).

2.5. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The genomes of the ten strains included in this study were deposited in GenBank under BioProject number PRJNA795413 and accession numbers JAKFBA000000000 (INSaAq36), JAKFAZ000000000 (INSaAq61), JAKFAY000000000 (INSaAq69), JAKFAX000000000 (INSaAq83), JAKFAW000000000 (INSaAq134), JAKFAV000000000 (INSaAq156), JAKFAU000000000 (LV31741/11), JAKFAT000000000 (INSa869), JAKFAS000000000 (INSa910) and JAKFAR000000000 (INSa934). More information about number of reads/bases/contigs, consensus length, average coverage and contigs N50 is available in Supplementary Table S2.

3. Results and discussion

Our results show that all S. aureus ST398 strains studied, from different reservoirs, are very similar to each other, not only regarding ARG and VF, but also MGE, demonstrating the importance of the comparative study of different compartments. In Table 1, we can see that all S. aureus ST398 from aquaculture belong to the same spa type, t2383, already isolated in food-producing animals (pigs and calves) and in humans, associated with an outbreak in a residential care facility (Fanoy et al., 2009; Graveland et al., 2010; EFSA, ECDC, 2020; ECDC, EFSA, EMA, 2021). All the human and the dolphin strains belonged to the same spa type: t571. This ST-spa association is frequent in MSSA strains and was already described in several human samples, medical device surfaces, food producers, domestic animals, and retail food (Li et al., 2015; Moon et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020). Considering that ST398-t571 association is commonly found in humans and that the dolphin included in this study was from a zoo, with the present data we can hypothesize that a possible human to animal transmission may have occurred. For nine of the 10 strains studied, agr locus was non-typable, which is consistent with other studies (Li et al., 2015). For a more detailed analysis of relatedness, we constructed a SNPs-based tree (Figure 1), as well as a heat map (Figure 2), with the 10 strains from our study and 40 from NCBI database belonging to different reservoirs (Supplementary Table S1). Interestingly, SNPs analysis revealed a wide range of SNPs values among strains from ST398 lineage (minimum: 0; maximum: 16292; Supplementary Table S3), as already described by other studies (Uhlemann et al., 2017; Bouchami et al., 2020). As we can see in Figure 1, the SNPs-based tree divided the 10 strains from our study into three distinct clusters: one grouping all strains from human origin that were cluster together with LNJF01 strain (isolated from a human infection in France); the second with the dolphin’ strain and two animal-independent MSSA isolated in humans from Dominica and United States (AIDT01 and NC_017673, respectively); and the third with strains in aquaculture that cluster together with two strains isolated in Russia from ready to eat (RTE) food (JALJCA01 and JALJBZ01). This information is confirmed through the analysis of the heat map (Figure 2), where we can observe a high percentage of alignment (AP) between the strains previously mentioned adding LXGP01 (isolated in a human with bloodstream infection in France). The human strains from our study differ 148 to 231 SNPs from LNJF01 and LXGP01 strains (Supplementary Table S3). The S. aureus ST398 isolated in one dolphin differs 77 to 88 SNPs from AIDT01 and NC_017673 strains, respectively. On the other hand, our strains isolated in gilthead seabream from the same aquaculture farm differ 109 to 119 SNPs from JALJCA01 and JALJBZ01 strains. There is no consensus on the SNPs cut-off to define whether strains are related or not, with studies considering less than 15 SNPs to define that certain strains are related (Schürch et al., 2018), others consider less than 40 (Long et al., 2014; Price et al., 2014) or even 50 SNPs (Bouchami et al., 2020; all these cut-offs are highlighted in different colors in Supplementary Table S3). Using any of the criteria, S. aureus ST398 from humans in this study are very distinct from each other, which were collected in different years (minimum SNPs difference: 97 between INSa869 and INSa910; maximum SNPs difference: 149 between INSa869 and INSa934), and from the strains recovered from the dolphin and gilthead seabreams (minimum SNPs difference: 169 between INSa910 and INSaAq83; maximum SNPs difference between INSa934 and LV31741/INSaAq69; Supplementary Table S3). The strain isolated in a dolphin was also very distinct from the strains from gilthead seabream collected in an aquaculture farm (minimum SNPs difference: 178 with INSaAq83; maximum SNPs difference: 191 with INSaAq36). None of the strains with origin in the same aquaculture farm were indistinguishable, with a minimum SNPs difference of 3 (between INSaAq61 and INSaAq69/134 isolated in muscle and skin samples from 3 gilthead seabream) and a maximum SNPs difference of 33 (between INSaAq36 and INSaAq83 isolated both in muscle samples but from 2 different fish). Using the narrowest criteria (less than 15 SNPs), INSaAq83 is more closely related with INSaAq156 and the remaining strains from aquaculture with each other. Using the largest criteria (less than 50 SNPs), all strains from aquaculture origin are closely related. All these strains were from 5 gilthead seabream collected in the same aquaculture farm and possibly have a very recent common ancestor.

Table 1

ReservoirspaagrSPAR genesEfflux pumps related with AR and tolerance to heavy metalsVirulence factorsPlasmidsProphagesInsertion sequencesHPP (%)
Aquaculture (n = 6)t2383 (n = 6)NT (n = 6)BPN, ERY (n = 7)erm(T)-type (P), glpT-type* (C), murA* (C) (n = 7), blaZ (C, n = 5; P, n = 1)arlR (C), mgrA (C), mepA-type (C), mepR-type (C), lmrS-type (C), norA-type (C) (n = 6), norB-type (C; n = 5)scn (C/P), aur (C), hlgA-type (C), hlgB (C), hlgC (C), hlb (C), eno-type (C), pvl-type (C), cidA-type (C), operon cid-type (C) (n = 10)rep13-type (n = 7)Staphy_StauST398_4 (n = 6), Staphy_3MRA (n = 4), Staphy_53 (n = 2)ISSau1-type (n = 1), ISSau2-type (n = 4), ISSau3-type (n = 3), ISSau5-type (n = 6), ISSau8-type (n = 4)98 (n = 6)
Dolphin (n = 1)t571 (n = 4)I (n = 1)arlR (C), mgrA (C), mepA-type (C), mepR-type (C), norA-type (C), norB-type (C), lmrS-type (C) (n = 3)Staphy_StauST398_4 (n = 4)ISSep1-type, ISSau2-type, IS431R-type (n = 1)98.3 (n = 3)
Humans (n = 3)NT (n = 3)ERY (n = 2)erm(T)-type (P), glpT-type* (C), murA* (C) (n = 2)rep13-type (n = 2), rep24b-type (n = 1)ISSau1-type (n = 2), ISSau2-type (n = 3), ISSau3-type (n = 2), ISSau5-type (n = 1), ISSau8-type (n = 2)
ND (n = 1)ND (n = 1)mepA-type (C), norA-type (C), norB-type (C), lmrS-type (C) (n = 1)ND (n = 1)98.2 (n = 1)

Summary of the results of the investigation of spa type, agr, resistance profile, antibiotic/disinfectant resistance genes, virulence genes, plasmids, other mobile genetic elements, prophages, and bacteria’s pathogenicity towards human hosts, using several online tools and databases.

*These genes presented mutations F3I, A100V (in glpT), D278E, and E291D (in murA) usually related with fosfomycin resistance (detected by CARD). SP, Susceptibility profile; AR, Antibiotic Resistance; HPP, Human Pathogen Probability; NT, Not typable; ND, Not detected; BPN, benzylpenicillin; ERY, erythromycin; (P), predicted plasmid location; (C), predicted chromosomal location.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Erythromycin and penicillins are considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) as “critically/highly important antimicrobials” and commonly used in humans, aquaculture settings and veterinary medicine (Santos and Ramos, 2018; WHO, 2018; ECDC, EFSA, EMA et al., 2021). In our study, seven strains were resistant to benzylpenicillin and nine out of 10 had an iMLSB phenotype (with resistance to erythromycin plus inducible resistance to clindamycin) and the erm(T)-type gene. The genetic environment of erm(T)-type gene in all the positive strains (Figure 3), was the same: upstream of erm(T)-type gene, the genetic environment was composed by a rep gene (involved in replication), a gene encoding a metalloregulator ArsR/SmtB family transcription factor (involved in tolerance/resistance to heavy metals, such as zinc, cadmium, cobalt, arsenic and antimony), cadD gene (that encodes for cadmium resistance transporter CadD) and ermCL gene (that regulates the expression of erm genes); downstream the gene, a plasmid truncated replication protein was identified (Busenlehner et al., 2003; Koch et al., 2017; Kwong et al., 2017). The only distinct feature was in S. aureus ST398 recovered from a dolphin (LV31741/11) that presented an IS431R upstream the rep gene. All erm(T)-type genes were predicted to be located in plasmids, that may have played a role in the transmission between the different host species and environments. Six of the seven benzylpenicillin resistant strains with animal origin were positive for blaZ gene (except for INSAq83 isolated from muscle of gilthead seabream) and just one was predicted to be located in a plasmid (INSaAq156 isolated from gills of gilthead seabream). When analyzing the contigs that contained blaZ gene, we verified that the only difference between the strains from the gilthead seabream (excepting for INSaAq156) and the dolphin was the presence of phage’s genes in strains from aquaculture origin, namely Staphy_3MRA for INSaAq36, INSaAq61 and INSaAq134, and Staphy_53 for INSaAq69 (Table 1). The examination of the genetic environment nearby the blaZ gene (Figure 4) allow us to identify, upstream the gene in all strains, the two regulatory genes blaI and blaR1 controlling the blaZ expression (Takayama et al., 2018). All strains were susceptible to cefoxitin (values ranging from 26 to 35 mm in disk diffusion), thus were considered MSSA.

Figure 3

Figure 4

Although most of S. aureus studied (excepting INSa934 from human origin) presented mutations F3I and A100V in glpT gene and D278E and E291D in murA gene (usually related with fosfomycin resistance), all were susceptible to fosfomycin (MIC values ≤16 mg/l) as described by others (Falagas et al., 2009; Fu et al., 2016). More studies are needed to understand the mechanisms of fosfomycin resistance in Gram-positive bacteria, namely S. aureus (Xu et al., 2017). No resistance was detected among the other 13 antibiotics tested.

Excepting for one S. aureus from humans and another from aquaculture, all strains presented the same genes that encode efflux pumps from major facilitator superfamily (MFS; arlR, mgrA, lmrS-type and norA/B-type), ATP-binding cassette (ABC; mgrA) and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE; mepA/R-type) families, not only responsible for the decreased susceptibility to antibiotics/disinfectants, but also tolerance to heavy metals. These genes were all predicted to be in the chromosome.

Likewise, the virulome’s composition was very similar in all S. aureus ST398 studied and comprised genes related to host immune evasion (scn and chp), exoenzymes (aur) and toxins (hlgA/B/C, hlb, pvl-type and cidA/operon cid-type) production and adherence (eno-type). Genes scn and chp (located upstream scn gene) compose the immune evasion cluster (IEC) from type C (van Wamel et al., 2006). Some studies suggest that IEC is a human-specific characteristic, with type B as the most frequently found among clinical human isolates of S. aureus (van Wamel et al., 2006; Verkaik et al., 2011). IEC type C was present in 8 of the 10 strains studied, with INSaAq83 and INSaAq156 strains with only scn gene, which encodes the staphylococcal complement inhibitor (SCIN), responsible for preventing opsonophagocytosis and killing of S. aureus by neutrophils (Verkaik et al., 2011). This data suggest that S. aureus isolated in dolphin and gilthead seabream could have a human origin; the close contact between dolphins and humans in a zoo can explain this data, whereas the aquaculture setting may include intense human activity due to the exposure of the tanks to sea water, which can carry several bacteria and resistance determinants from different locations (Baquero et al., 2008; Hatosy and Martiny, 2015). Birds can also play a role in the transmission of bacteria and resistance determinants between different environments, including aquaculture (Marcelino et al., 2019; Zeballos-Gross et al., 2021). Price et al. (2012) also suggests that CC398 can be originated in humans as MSSA and subsequently disseminated to livestock. It is though that S. aureus has undergone some changes to adapt to this new host, such as the loss φSa3 prophage and the acquisition of the SCCmec cassette and tet(M) gene, conferring methicillin and tetracycline resistance, respectively, due to the use of broad-spectrum cephalosporins and tetracycline antibiotics in food producing animals. Posteriorly, this lineage was reintroduced in humans, followed by the reacquisition of φSa3 prophage, which usually harbors the genes encoding IEC. However, the boundaries between animal and human CC398 lineages are fading, with recent studies detecting livestock-associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) isolated in humans and positive for IEC genes; these observations may also indicate that the high evolutionary rate of MRSA in terms of virulence and genome content may cause the emergence and spread of more human-adapted strains with more virulent characteristics, which may be happening in MSSA as well (Diene et al., 2017; Avberšek et al., 2021). Prophage Staphy_StauST398_4 found in all strains from our study in the same contig as IEC type C (except for strains INSaAq83 and INSaAq156) was already associated with IEC genes (van der Mee-Marquet et al., 2013). Additionally, all strains were considered pathogenic to humans with mean values of 98% (Table 1).

The mobilome was formed by several insertion sequences, prophages, and plasmids (Table 1), some associated with ARG, VF and genes related with tolerance to heavy metals (Figures 3, 4). MGE can be involved in the acquisition of ARGs by horizontal gene transfer (Partridge et al., 2018), just like plasmids with erm(T)-type gene found in this study. This acquisition of new genetic material allows bacteria to adapt and survive in different environments and to the selective pressures exerted by the use of antibiotics (Lerminiaux and Cameron, 2019).

To our knowledge no other country reported the presence of the S. aureus ST398 lineage in aquaculture, namely in the perspective of this study, using WGS to compare different molecular characteristics between three reservoirs in Portugal: humans, aquaculture gilthead seabream and dolphins from a zoo. With this study we can conclude that for this lineage of S. aureus, the human, animal, and environmental health are linked, and that antibiotic resistant bacteria and ARG can be transmitted in different directions among these reservoirs. We also highlight that MGE and bacteriophages are found in aquatic environments and that S. aureus ST398 may harbor several heavy metals resistance genes and VF, playing an important role in their dissemination between different reservoirs. This study using 10 strains in a One Health approach (human and animal/aquatic environments), as well as the WGS as a high-throughput technology, makes an important contribution to the scientific community and clinical practitioners to understand the extent of the spread of AMR, and the virulome, mobilome and resistome of this dangerous bacterium. The results obtained can help to recognize ways to break transmission routes and prevent the spread of S. aureus ST398 in various reservoirs, apparently related or not. We also show that aquaculture has received very little attention when compared to terrestrial animals, however it may pose a potential danger to human health, demonstrated here in relation to the spread and/or acquisition of clinically relevant bacterial determinants.

Funding

VS has her Ph.D. fellowship granted by FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) with the reference SFRH/BD/133100/2017 co-financed by European Social Fund and the Operational Program for Human Capital (POCH), Portugal. This work was financial supported with funding from FCT/MCTES (UIDB/00211/2020) through national funds.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.

Author contributions

VS performed microbiological and molecular experiments, data analysis namely bioinformatics, and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. VM performed preliminary bioinformatics analysis. NB acquired laboratory data. EF acquired laboratory data and performed microbiological experiments. LC acquired laboratory data. MC acquired funding, conceived, and designed the study, supervised investigation, validated data analysis, reviewed and edited the manuscript. VS, VM, NB, EF, LC, and MC reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1035547/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    AlcockB. P.RaphenyaA. R.LauT. T. Y.TsangK. K.BouchardM.EdalatmandA.et al. (2020). CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res.48, D517D525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz935

  • 2

    AlgammalA. M.HettaH. F.ElkelishA.AlkhalifahD. H. H.HozzeinW. N.BatihaG. E. S.et al. (2020). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): one health perspective approach to the bacterium epidemiology, virulence factors, antibiotic-resistance, and zoonotic impact. Infect. Drug Resist.13, 32553265. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S272733

  • 3

    ArndtD.GrantJ. R.MarcuA.SajedT.PonA.LiangY.et al. (2016). PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res.44, W16W21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw387

  • 4

    AustinB.AustinD. A. (2016). Bacterial Fish Pathogens: Disease of Farmed and Wild Fish. 6thSwitzerland: Springer, Cham.

  • 5

    AvberšekJ.GolobM.PapićB.DermotaU.Grmek KošnikI.KušarD.et al. (2021). Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: establishing links between animals and humans on livestock holdings. Transbound. Emerg. Dis.68, 789801. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13745

  • 6

    BaqueroF.MartínezJ. L.CantónR. (2008). Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water environments. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.19, 260265. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.05.006

  • 7

    BartelsM. D.PetersenA.WorningP.NielsenJ. B.Larner-SvenssonH.JohansenH. K.et al. (2014). Comparing whole-genome sequencing with sanger sequencing for spa typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol.52, 43054308. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01979-14

  • 8

    BortolaiaV.KaasR. S.RuppeE.RobertsM. C.SchwarzS.CattoirV.et al. (2020). ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.75, 34913500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345

  • 9

    BouchamiO.FraquezaM. J.FariaN. A.AlvesV.LawalO. U.de LencastreH.et al. (2020). Evidence for the dissemination to humans of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 through the pork production chain: a study in a Portuguese slaughterhouse. Microorganisms8:1892. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121892

  • 10

    BusenlehnerL. S.PennellaM. A.GiedrocD. P. (2003). The SmtB/ArsR family of metalloregulatory transcriptional repressors: structural insights into prokaryotic metal resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.27, 131143. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00054-8

  • 11

    CarattoliA.ZankariE.Garciá-FernándezA.LarsenM. V.LundO.VillaL.et al. (2014). In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.58, 38953903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14

  • 12

    ChenL.TangZ. Y.CuiS. Y.MaZ. B.DengH.KongW. L.et al. (2020). Biofilm production ability, virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus from various veterinary hospitals. Pathogens9:264. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9040264

  • 13

    CosentinoS.LarsenM. V.AarestrupF. M.LundO. (2013). PathogenFinder–distinguishing friend from foe using bacterial whole genome sequence data. PLoS One8:e77302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077302

  • 14

    DieneS. M.CorvagliaA. R.FrançoisP.van der Mee-MarquetN.AmiraultP.LehianiO.et al. (2017). Prophages and adaptation of Staphylococcus aureus ST398 to the human clinic. BMC Genomics18:133. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3516-x

  • 15

    ECDC, EFSA, EMA (2021). Third joint inter‐agency report on integrated analysis of consumption of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from humans and food‐producing animals in the EU/EEA. EFSA J.19:e06712. doi: 10.2900/056892

  • 16

    EFSA, ECDC (2020). The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2017/2018. EFSA J.18:e06007. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6007

  • 17

    EomH. S.BackS. H.LeeH. H.LeeG. Y. (2019). Prevalence and characteristics of livestock-associated methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in the pork production chain in Korea. J. Vet. Sci.20:e69. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2019.20.e69

  • 18

    FalagasM. E.RoussosN.GkegkesI. D.RafailidisP. I.KarageorgopoulosD. E. (2009). Fosfomycin for the treatment of infections caused by gram-positive cocci with advanced antimicrobial drug resistance: a review of microbiological, animal and clinical studies. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs18, 921944. doi: 10.1517/13543780902967624

  • 19

    FanoyE.HelmhoutL. C.VaartW. L.Van DerWeijdemaK.Santen-VerheuvelM. G.VanThijsenS. F.et al. (2009). An outbreak of non-typeable MRSA within a residential care facility. Euro Surveill.14,:19080, doi: 10.2807/ese.14.01.19080-en

  • 20

    FuZ.MaY.ChenC.GuoY.HuF.LiuY.et al. (2016). Prevalence of fosfomycin resistance and mutations in murA, glpT, and uhpT in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples. Front. Microbiol.6:1544. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01544

  • 21

    GravelandH.WagenaarJ. A.HeesterbeekH.MeviusD.van DuijkerenE.HeederikD. (2010). Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in veal calf farming: human MRSA carriage related with animal antimicrobial usage and farm hygiene. PLoS One5:e10990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010990

  • 22

    HatosyS. M.MartinyA. C. (2015). The ocean as a global reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.81, 75937599. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00736-15

  • 23

    HeatonC. J.GerbigG. R.SensiusL. D.PatelV.SmithT. C. (2020). Staphylococcus aureus epidemiology in wildlife: a systematic review. Antibiotics9:89. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9020089

  • 24

    ItoT.HiramatsuK.OliveiraD. C.de LencastreH.ZhangK.WesthH.et al. (2009). Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.53, 49614967. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00579-09

  • 25

    JohanssonM. H. K.BortolaiaV.TansirichaiyaS.AarestrupF. M.RobertsA. P.PetersenT. N. (2021). Detection of mobile genetic elements associated with antibiotic resistance in Salmonella enterica using a newly developed web tool: MobileElementFinder. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.76, 101109. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa390

  • 26

    Jones-DiasD.ClementeL.MouraI. B.SampaioD. A.AlbuquerqueT.VieiraL.et al. (2016a). Draft genomic analysis of an avian multidrug resistant Morganella morganii isolate carrying qnrD1. Front. Microbiol.7:1660. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01660

  • 27

    Jones-DiasD.ManageiroV.CaniçaM. (2016b). Influence of agricultural practice on mobile bla genes: IncI1-bearing CTX-M, SHV, CMY and TEM in Escherichia coli from intensive farming soils. Environ. Microbiol.18, 260272. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13021

  • 28

    KaasR. S.LeekitcharoenphonP.AarestrupF. M.LundO. (2014). Solving the problem of comparing whole bacterial genomes across different sequencing platforms. PLoS One9:e104984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104984

  • 29

    KashifA.McClureJ. A.LakhundiS.PhamM.ChenS.ConlyJ. M.et al. (2019). Staphylococcus aureus ST398 virulence is associated with factors carried on prophage ϕSa3. Front. Microbiol.10:2219. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02219

  • 30

    KochM.WilliJ.PradereU.HallJ.PolacekN. (2017). Critical 23S rRNA interactions for macrolide-dependent ribosome stalling on the ErmCL nascent peptide chain. Nucleic Acids Res.45, 67176728. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx195

  • 31

    KwongS. M.RamsayJ. P.JensenS. O.FirthN. (2017). Replication of staphylococcal resistance plasmids. Front. Microbiol.8:2279. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02279

  • 32

    LarsenM. V.CosentinoS.LukjancenkoO.SaputraD.RasmussenS.HasmanH.et al. (2014). Benchmarking of methods for genomic taxonomy. J. Clin. Microbiol.52, 15291539. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02981-13

  • 33

    LarsenM. V.CosentinoS.RasmussenS.FriisC.HasmanH.MarvigR. L.et al. (2012). Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol.50, 13551361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11

  • 34

    LerminiauxN. A.CameronA. D. S. (2019). Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in clinical environments. Can. J. Microbiol.65, 3444. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2018-0275

  • 35

    LiG.WuC.WangX.MengJ. (2015). Prevalence and characterization of methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolates from retail foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol.196, 9497. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.12.002

  • 36

    LienenT.SchnittA.CunyC.MaurischatS.TenhagenB. A. (2021). Phylogenetic tracking of LA-MRSA ST398 intra-farm transmission among animals, humans and the environment on German dairy farms. Microorganisms9:1119. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9061119

  • 37

    LongS. W.BeresS. B.OlsenR. J.MusserJ. M. (2014). Absence of patient-to-patient intrahospital transmission of Staphylococcus aureus as determined by whole-genome sequencing. MBio5, e01692e01614. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01692-14

  • 38

    MacoriG.BellioA.BianchiD.GallinaS.AdrianoD.ZucconF.et al. (2016). Molecular typing of Staphylococcus aureus isolate responsible for staphylococcal poisoning incident in homemade food. Ital. J. Food Saf.5:5736. doi: 10.4081/ijfs.2016.5736

  • 39

    MamaO. M.AspirozC.Ruiz-RipaL.CeballosS.Iñiguez-BarrioM.CercenadoE.et al. (2021). Prevalence and genetic characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus CC398 isolates from invasive infections in Spanish hospitals, focusing on the livestock-independent CC398-MSSA clade. Front. Microbiol.12:623108. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.623108

  • 40

    MarcelinoV. R.WilleM.HurtA. C.González-AcuñaD.KlaassenM.SchlubT. E.et al. (2019). Meta-transcriptomics reveals a diverse antibiotic resistance gene pool in avian microbiomes. BMC Biol.17:31. doi: 10.1186/s12915-019-0649-1

  • 41

    MonacoM.de AraujoF. P.CrucianiM.CocciaE. M.PantostiA. (2017). Worldwide epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.409, 2156. doi: 10.1007/82_2016_3

  • 42

    MoonD. C.JeongS. K.HyunB.-H.LimS.-K. (2019). Prevalence and characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in pigs and pig farmers in Korea. Foodborne Pathog. Dis.16, 256261. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2018.2509

  • 43

    MostofskyE.LipsitchM.Regev-yochayG. (2011). Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus replacing methicillin-susceptible S. aureus?J. Antimicrob. Chemother.66, 21992214. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr278

  • 44

    MuchP.PichlerJ.KasperS. S.AllerbergerF. (2009). Foodborne outbreaks, Austria 2007. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr.121, 7785. doi: 10.1007/s00508-008-1125-z

  • 45

    OhW. T.JunJ. W.GiriS. S.YunS.KimH. J.KimS. G.et al. (2019). Staphylococcus xylosus infection in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) as a primary pathogenic cause of eye protrusion and mortality. Microorganisms7:330. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7090330

  • 46

    PartridgeS. R.KwongS. M.FirthN.JensenS. O. (2018). Mobile genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.31, e00088e00017. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00088-17

  • 47

    PriceJ. R.GolubchikT.ColeK.WilsonD. J.CrookD. W.ThwaitesG. E.et al. (2014). Whole-genome sequencing shows that patient-to-patient transmission rarely accounts for acquisition of Staphylococcus aureus in an intensive care unit. Clin. Infect. Dis.58, 609618. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit807

  • 48

    PriceL. B.SteggerM.HasmanH.AzizM.LarsenJ.AndersenP. S.et al. (2012). Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. MBio3, e00305e00311. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00305-11

  • 49

    SalgueiroV.ManageiroV.BandarraN. M.ClementeL.CaniçaM. (2020a). Genetic relatedness and diversity of Staphylococcus aureus from different reservoirs: humans and animals of livestock, poultry, zoo, and aquaculture. Microorganisms8:1345. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091345

  • 50

    SalgueiroV.ManageiroV.BandarraN. M.ReisL.CaniçaM. (2020b). Bacterial diversity and antibiotic susceptibility of Sparus aurata from aquaculture. Microorganisms8:1343. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091343

  • 51

    SantosL.RamosF. (2018). Antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture: current knowledge and alternatives to tackle the problem. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents52, 135143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.03.010

  • 52

    SchürchA. C.Arredondo-AlonsoS.WillemsR. J. L.GoeringR. V. (2018). Whole genome sequencing options for bacterial strain typing and epidemiologic analysis based on single nucleotide polymorphism versus gene-by-gene–based approaches. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.24, 350354. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.016

  • 53

    SergelidisD.AngelidisA. S. (2017). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a controversial food-borne pathogen. Lett. Appl. Microbiol.64, 409418. doi: 10.1111/lam.12735

  • 54

    TakayamaY.TanakaT.OikawaK.FukanoN.GotoM.TakahashiT. (2018). Prevalence of blaZ gene and performance of phenotypic tests to detect penicillinase in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Japan. Ann. Lab. Med.38, 155159. doi: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.2.155

  • 55

    TetzschnerA. M. M.JohnsonJ. R.JohnstonB. D.LundO.ScheutzF. (2020). In silico genotyping of Escherichia coli isolates for extraintestinal virulence genes by use of whole-genome sequencing data. J. Clin. Microbiol.58, e01269e01220. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01269-20

  • 56

    UhlemannA. C.McAdamP. R.SullivanS. B.KnoxJ. R.KhiabanianH.RabadanR.et al. (2017). Evolutionary dynamics of pandemic methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus ST398 and its international spread via routes of human migration. MBio8, e01375e01316. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01375-16

  • 57

    van der Graaf-Van BlooisL.WagenaarJ. A.ZomerA. L. (2021). RFPlasmid: predicting plasmid sequences from short-read assembly data using machine learning. Microb. Genom.7:000683. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000683

  • 58

    van der Mee-MarquetN.CorvagliaA. R.ValentinA. S.HernandezD.BertrandX.GirardM.et al. (2013). Analysis of prophages harbored by the human-adapted subpopulation of Staphylococcus aureus CC398. Infect. Genet. Evol.18, 299308. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.06.009

  • 59

    van WamelW. J. B.RooijakkersS. H. M.RuykenM.Van KesselK. P. M.Van StrijpJ. A. G. (2006). The innate immune modulators staphylococcal complement inhibitor and chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus are located on β-hemolysin-converting bacteriophages. J. Bacteriol.188, 13101315. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.4.1310-1315.2006

  • 60

    VaraniA. M.SiguierP.GourbeyreE.CharneauV.ChandlerM. (2011). ISsaga is an ensemble of web-based methods for high throughput identification and semi-automatic annotation of insertion sequences in prokaryotic genomes. Genome Biol.12:R30. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r30

  • 61

    VerkaikN. J.BenardM.BoelensH. A.De VogelC. P.NouwenJ. L.VerbrughH. A.et al. (2011). Immune evasion cluster-positive bacteriophages are highly prevalent among human Staphylococcus aureus strains, but they are not essential in the first stages of nasal colonization. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.17, 343348. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03227.x

  • 62

    WHO. (2018). Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine. 6th. Geneva: World Health Organization Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241515528 (Accessed November 30, 2022).

  • 63

    XuS.FuZ.ZhouY.LiuY.XuX.WangM. (2017). Mutations of the transporter proteins GlpT and UhpT confer fosfomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol.8:914. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00914

  • 64

    Zeballos-GrossD.Rojas-SerenoZ.Salgado-CaxitoM.PoetaP.TorresC.BenavidesJ. A. (2021). The role of gulls as reservoirs of antibiotic resistance in aquatic environments: a scoping review. Front. Microbiol.12:703886. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.703886

Summary

Keywords

Staphylococcus aureus, ST398, WGS, animals, humans, resistome, virulome, mobilome

Citation

Salgueiro V, Manageiro V, Bandarra NM, Ferreira E, Clemente L and Caniça M (2023) First comparative genomic characterization of the MSSA ST398 lineage detected in aquaculture and other reservoirs. Front. Microbiol. 14:1035547. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1035547

Received

02 September 2022

Accepted

13 February 2023

Published

08 March 2023

Volume

14 - 2023

Edited by

Patrick Rik Butaye, Ghent University, Belgium

Reviewed by

Olivier Denis, CHU Dinant Godinne UCL Namur, Belgium; Patrice François, Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève (HUG), Switzerland

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Manuela Caniça,

This article was submitted to Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics