Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 23 June 2023
Sec. Evolutionary and Genomic Microbiology
This article is part of the Research Topic From Farm Gate to Food Plate: Current Challenges in Foodborne Microorganism Detection, Epidemiology, and Genetic Diversity View all 8 articles

Molecular epidemiological characteristics of Brucella in Guizhou Province, China, from 2009 to 2021

\r\nQinqin Tan,&#x;Qinqin Tan1,2Yue Wang&#x;Yue Wang1Ying LiuYing Liu1Zhongfa TaoZhongfa Tao3Chun YuChun Yu3Yan HuangYan Huang3Xinggui YangXinggui Yang1Xia Ying,Xia Ying1,2Yong Hu
Yong Hu2*Shijun Li,
Shijun Li1,2*
  • 1Laboratory Center, Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Guizhou Provincial, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
  • 2The Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, University of Guizhou Medical, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
  • 3Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Guizhou Provincial, Institute of Infectious Disease Control, Guiyang, Guizhou, China

Introduction: Brucellosis was made statutorily notifiable in 1955, in China, while in Guizhou Province, the pathogen of human brucellosis was isolated for the first time in 2011. However, currently, the brucellosis epidemic is becoming more and more severe in Guizhou Province. The type distribution and genetic characteristics of Brucella in Guizhou Province, as well as its evolutionary relationship with domestic and foreign strains, are still unclear.

Methods: MLST, MLVA, and rpoB typing techniques were used for the molecular epidemiological study of the 83 Brucella isolates in Guizhou province.

Results: Among the 83 Brucella strains, MLST identified three ST genotypes, of which ST39 is a newly reported type in China. MLVA-16 generated 49 genotypes, and MLVA-11 generated 5 known genotypes and 2 unreported genotypes. Six genotypes were identified by rpoB technology.

Discussion: MLVA has a high resolution, but differences at the Bruce 04 and 16 loci cannot exclude associations between epidemics, and combining MLST and rpoB typing methods for epidemiologic tracing can avoid erroneous judgments. Moreover, through the combined analysis of the three typing techniques, the possible origin of the new Brucella can be reasonably inferred, which is also conducive to promoting the subsequent research of the novel Brucella.

Introduction

Brucellosis, a zoonotic disease caused by Brucella spp., can be transmitted from animal reservoirs, such as cattle, sheep, and goats, to humans through ingestion of un-pasteurized animal products or direct contact with infected animals, placentas, or aborted fetuses (Pappas et al., 2006; Lai et al., 2017). Currently, the disease remains one of the most common bacterial zoonotic diseases in the world (Pappas et al., 2006; Cross et al., 2019; Suárez-Esquivel et al., 2020), with over half a million new cases annually and prevalence rates in some countries exceeding 10 cases per 100,000 population (Franco et al., 2007). In China, human brucellosis was first recorded in 1905 (Deqiu et al., 2002; Lai et al., 2017). In 1955, brucellosis was made statutorily notifiable in China (Lai et al., 2017). At present, brucellosis is endemic in 31 provinces or autonomous regions in China, most of which are prevalent in northern China, where people are economically dependent on ruminant livestock (Jiang et al., 2011). Meanwhile, B. melitensis and B. abortus are the main pathogenic bacteria of brucellosis epidemics in China (Tian et al., 2017b).

Brucellosis is prevalent in the northern pastoral provinces of China (Zhong et al., 2013; Lai et al., 2017; Jiang et al., 2020), whereas Guizhou, a non-pastoral province with a predominantly highland mountainous terrain, did not confirm the existence of human brucellosis epidemic etiologically until 2011 (Li et al., 2012). Brucella was first isolated from a goat in 2010 (Li et al., 2011) and a patient in 2011 (Li et al., 2012), and then the brucellosis epidemic in Guizhou Province spread rapidly, and sporadic and cluster epidemics have occurred frequently. By 2015, the brucellosis epidemic had covered nine cities and prefectures in Guizhou province, with only some counties not reported (Jiang et al., 2017). As brucellosis is an important zoonotic infection in Guizhou Province in recent years, currently, the prevention and control situation of brucellosis is becoming increasingly serious here. In addition, the epidemic situation of human brucellosis and the molecular characteristics of Brucella remain unclear. The genetic relationships among Brucella isolated from different hosts, different regions, and at different times need to be clarified. In addition, the evolutionary relationship among Brucella from Guizhou Province and other provinces in China and other countries remains to be revealed.

To answer these questions, several techniques are employed for analysis. The classical bio-typing methods cannot analyze the correlation among the Brucella, while most typing tools lack sufficient discriminatory power. To overcome these drawbacks, Brucella multi-locus sequence analysis (MLST) and multi-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) have been proposed as complementary technical approaches to classical bio-typing methods. MLST, a molecular typing method for discovering bacterial variants by determining the nucleotide sequences of multiple housekeeping genes of study subjects, with clear typing results and a Shared Database, is used for bacterial typing and genetic characterization studies (Whatmore et al., 2007; Cao et al., 2018b). MLVA, based on its high discriminatory power of a multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) and a shared database of genotype information, facilitates the tracking analysis of brucellosis outbreaks (Al Dahouk et al., 2007; Ma et al., 2016; Wareth et al., 2020). In recent years, genome sequencing provides a new platform for the study of bacteria. The single nucleotide polymorphism analysis of the rpoB (β subunit of RNA polymerase) gene region can be used not only for the Brucella species (types) identification but also for Brucella molecular epidemiological investigation studies (Marianelli et al., 2006; Tan et al., 2017).

The current study aimed to reveal the prevalence of human brucellosis in Guizhou Province in recent years and also to explore the molecular characteristics of Brucella isolates by combining MLVA, MLST, and rpoB genotyping techniques. The results of this study contribute to our understanding of the main transmission routes associated with this pathogen as well as provide a scientific basis for the prevention and control of brucellosis in Guizhou Province.

Materials and methods

Epidemiological data collection

Data on human brucellosis cases in Guizhou Province were collected from the online National Notifiable Infectious Disease Reporting Information System of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention for the period 2009–2021. Subsequently, statistical methods were used to analyze the regional distribution and population distribution characteristics of human brucellosis in Guizhou Province.

Brucella strains' information

A total of 83 Brucella strains were isolated from the nine cities/prefectures of Guizhou Province from 2009 to 2021. The species and biotypes of the 83 isolates have been characterized according to the conventional bio-typing tests, Brucella-specific surface proteins 31-PCR (BCSP31-PCR), and AMSO-PCR by using the procedures recommended by WS 269-2019 guidelines of China. The 83 isolates were defined as 81 B. melitensis (80 B. melitensis bv3 and 1 unspecified biotype), and 2 B. abortus bv3 (Table 1). The host origin of 83 isolates shows that four B. melitensis bv3 were isolated from goats, and the rest were isolated from humans (Supplementary Table S1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Basic information about the 83 Brucella strains in Guizhou Province.

Genomic DNA preparation

A total of 83 Brucella strains were resuscitated on Brucella agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 24–48 h. Then, the genomic DNA of Brucella, including the isolates and vaccine strains M5, A19, and S2 were extracted following the boiling lysis method mentioned in the national standard of “Diagnosis of Brucellosis” WS 269-2019.

MLST genotyping

It has been performed concerning the previously described method (Zhuang, 2015). The program of nine genomes was designed according to Whatmore et al., including 7 housekeeping genes, 1 outer membrane protein gene, and 1 intergenic fragment (Whatmore et al., 2007). The primer sequences of the MLST nine loci are shown in Table 2. Genomic DNA of vaccine strains, including B. melitensis M5, B. abortus A19, and B. suis S2, were used as positive controls to monitor PCR protocol. The PCR cycling parameters of MLST were as follows: 95°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for the 30 s, 63°C for 30 s, 72°C for 60 s, and an elongation at 72°C for 10 min. Then, the products were sent to the Biotechnology company for sequencing. Each gene sequence was entered into the MLST online database (https://pubmlst.org/bigsdb?db=pubmlst_brucella_seqdef&page=batchSequenceQuery) to specify its defined value. Subsequently, the profile of the nine genes was identified as a specific sequence type (ST) based on MLST online database. The ST genotypes of the Brucella were marked on the map of Guizhou Province for analysis of their distribution characteristics. The Web-based MLST database [https://pubmlst.org/bigsdb?db=pubmlst_brucella_seqdef&page=Download alleles (pubmlst.org)] was utilized to collect MLST genotypes of Brucella from different countries. A minimum spanning tree (MST) was constructed using BioNumerics software (version 8.0) based on ST data and an unweighted arithmetic mean algorithm (UPGMA) to show genetic relationships between 83 Brucella isolates and representative strains of Brucella from China and other countries.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The primers sequence of Brucella MLST, MLVA-16, and rpoB genotyping schemes.

MLVA genotyping

MLVA scheme was carried out according to the previous study (Al Dahouk et al., 2007), which is based on 16 loci including 8 minisatellite loci (panel 1) and 8 microsatellite loci (panel 2, subdivided into 2A and 2B). The primer sequences of the 16 loci are shown in Table 2. The genomic DNA of vaccine strains was used as positive controls to monitor the PCR protocol and calibrate the capillary electrophoresis platform. For the loci of panel 1 (bruce 06, 08, 11, 12, 42, 43, 45, and 55), PCR amplifications were performed in 20 μL reaction volumes, and the cycling parameters were as follows: 94°C for 3 min, and then 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 50 s, and elongation at 72°C for 3 min. The products were detected by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the differential sequences of each locus product were sent to the Biotechnology company for sequencing. Subsequently, the flanking sequences were removed and the values of the loci repeat sequences were calculated. For the loci of panel 2 (bruce 04, 07, 09, 16, 18, 19, 21, and 30), multiplex PCR combining a multicolor capillary electrophoresis approach was performed (Tan et al., 2022b). Specifically, the 5 ends of each locus forward primers within each reaction system were synthesized with 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM), 5-carboxy tetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA), and carboxy-X-rhodamine (ROX) fluorescent label, respectively (Table 2). The amplification of the loci was performed in 3 sets of 30 μl reaction volumes (Tan et al., 2022b). The cycling parameters were as follows: 96°C for 3 min, followed by 32 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 62°C for 60 s, and 72°C for 30 s, and an elongation step at 72°C for 5 min. The products were sent to a Biotechnology company for multicolor capillary electrophoresis, and the loci and values were identified according to the color presented in each graph of each specimen. In this study, fragment sizes were converted to repeat units according to the published allele numbering system (Al Dahouk et al., 2007). Differently, the repeat unit of 3 bp was used to calculate the value of locus Bruce 19 per sample (Sun et al., 2016).

Polymorphisms at each locus of the 83 Brucella isolates were quantified using the Hunter and Gaston diversity index (Hunter and Gaston, 1988). Then, the 16 loci profile of Brucella strains, including the 83 isolates, vaccine strains, and the representative strains of Brucella from different parts of China, were analyzed by BioNumerics software, based on classification coefficients and UPGMA, to clarify the affinities between the strains. Furthermore, The MLVA genotypes of the isolates were marked on the map of Guizhou for analysis of their distribution characteristics. The online database (http://mlva.u-psud.fr/) was used to identify the geographic origin of the 2 B. abortus isolates and collect MLVA genotypes from different countries. In the study, a total of 269 B. melitensis strains were included for analysis, including the American group (37), West Mediterranean group (29), East Mediterranean group (60), and China group (62). The MST was constructed based on the MLVA-11 profile of 269 B. melitensis to study the phylogeographic relationships (Liu et al., 2017).

The rpoB genotyping

The rpoB gene was performed using the scheme described previously (Marianelli et al., 2006). The primer sequences of the whole length of the rpoB gene with 4,134 bp are shown in Table 2. The genomic DNA of vaccine strains were used as positive controls to monitor PCR protocol. The amplifications were performed in 25 μl reaction volumes, and the cycling parameters were as follows: 94°C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 3 min, and elongation at 72°C for 7 min. The products were detected by 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the products with a target band of 4,134 bp were sent to the Biotechnology company for sequencing.

The rpoB gene sequences of Brucella isolates were compared with Brucella 16M using DNAMAN software to clarify the single nucleotide polymorphism loci of the isolates and determine the rpoB genotypes. Then, the geographical distribution of rpoB genotypes was analyzed for 83 isolates. Subsequently, a phylogenetic tree was constructed in MEGA software (version 7.0) with the neighbor-joining method among 88 Brucella strains, including 83 Brucella isolates, vaccine strains, B. abortus 2,308 (Gene ID: 3787856), and B. melitensis 16M (Gene ID: 29593532).

Results

The epidemiologic situation of human brucellosis in Guizhou Province

A total of 599 human brucelloses were reported during 2009–2021, which covered all the cities/prefectures in Guizhou Province, with large cases in Zunyi (Figure 1). The occupation of the patients includes peasants, pastoralists, students, domestic and non-working people, workers, catering food practitioners, etc., with farmers being the main group of brucellosis patients, accounting for 63.11%. The age distribution of the patients showed the largest proportion of 41–50 years old, with 28.38% (Figure 2).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Geographical distribution of the number of human brucellosis and genotype types of Brucella isolates in Guizhou Province, 2009–2021. The shade of blocks reflects the number of human cases over the 13 years. The shapes and colors of the icons represent the types of Brucella.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Population distribution characteristics of human brucellosis in Guizhou Province. The pie chart in the middle represents the proportional characteristics of the age distribution of brucellosis patients, and the legend is annotated on the left. The ring in the outer circle represents the proportional characteristics of the occupational distribution of brucellosis patients, and the legend is annotated on the right side.

MLST genotyping results

The 83 Brucella isolates, based on 9 loci MLST technology, were 3 known MLST genotypes: ST8 (N = 71; 85.54%), ST39 (N = 10; 12.05%), and ST2 (N = 2; 2.41%). Among the 81 B. melitensis, 71 strains were identified as ST8, and the other 10 were ST39. The 2 B. abortus were ST2 (Table 3).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. The MLST genotype characteristics of the 83 Brucella strains isolates.

The geographical distribution of the ST genotypes showed that the ST8 Brucella strains were widely distributed in the 9 cities/states in Guizhou Province, the ST39 were in Zunyi City and Qianxinan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, while the ST2 was only in Guiyang City (Figure 1).

The MST showed that the Brucella strains of ST8 are mainly distributed in Asia, Europe, and Africa, while the ST39 genotype strains are distributed only in Asia, including Guizhou Province, China (Figure 3). A close genetic distance between the genotype ST39 and ST8 of Brucella strains showed in the MST, and the allelic profiles also showed their differences only at the housekeeping gene glk (Table 3). Subsequently, the glk gene sequence comparison between ST8 and ST39 differed at only one base site (Figure 4).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. The clustering analysis MST (minimum spanning tree for categorical data) is based on MLST data of 401 Brucella across the world. Cluster A is an aggregation of B. melitensis, cluster B is composed of B. abortus, cluster C is composed of B. suis, B. canis, and B. neotomae while cluster D is composed of B. vois. A node represents a sequence type (ST), and the number represents the ST name. The node size is related to the number of strains, the more strains the larger the node, the less strains the smaller the node. The thickness of the line between the nodes is related to the genotypic affinity, with thicker and shorter lines representing closer affinity and thinner and longer lines representing more distant affinity.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. The glk gene sequence comparison between ST8 and ST39.

MLVA genotyping results

The fragment sizes of the VNTR of 16 loci of the 83 isolates were successfully obtained by sequencing and multicolor capillary electrophoresis. The 81 B. melitensis, the VNTR value, and the Hunter and Gaston diversity indexes of 16 loci were calculated (Table 4). Specifically, the four loci in panel 2B (Bruce 04, 09, 16, and 30) showed relatively high discriminatory power, with the HGDI values ranging from 0.722 to 0.756, while another seven loci (Bruce 06, 08, 11, 18, 19, 21, and 55) displayed only a single allele (HGDI = 0.000). For the 2 B. abortus strains, the Hunter and Gaston diversity indexes at each locus were 0.000, which means the 16 loci lacked discrimination between them.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. The HGDI of the 16 loci among the 81 B. melitensis isolates.

The 83 Brucella isolates, generated 49 MLVA genotypes based on the MLVA-16 profile, 33 of which were possessed by a single strain, and the other 16 genotypes were shared by two or more Brucella strains. The MLVA-11 profile of the 83 Brucella generated five known MLVA genotypes: 116, 125, 120, 115, and 72, and two unreported genotypes (NA1 and NA2). The MLVA-11 profiles showed that NA1 is different from genotype 120 at Bruce 12 with only one repeat-unit difference. Similarly, NA2 differs from genotype 116 only at Bruce 45 (Table 5).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. The MLVA-11 genotypes characteristics of the 83 Brucella strains isolates.

The clustering analysis showed that the 125 Brucella strains, including the 83 isolates, 3 vaccine strains, and 39 representative strains of Brucella from different parts of China, formed three clusters (Figure 5). In Cluster A, the 2 B. abortus strains shared a genotype with the B. abortus bv3 from Xingjiang and clustered together with vaccine strain A19. In Cluster B, the 119 B. melitensis strains clustered together with B. melitensis vaccine M5. The vaccine S2 is a separate group. On the branches of the tree, the two strains GZ-73 and GZ-75 of the purple branch shared a genotype and were isolated from a human and a goat in the same outbreak, respectively. The Brucella strains of shared genotypes on the green branches, which has a cross-regional and, to some extent, cross-year distribution. The Brucella strains of shared genotypes on the blue branches were from the same region but differ in time. The Brucella strains of shared genotype on the gray and two orange branches (M3 and M14 in the key column) were from the same region during the same period. In addition, the Brucella strains of shared genotypes on the orange branches showed that Guizhou shared three genotypes with both Inner Mongolia and Guangdong, followed by two shared genotypes with Xinjiang and Fujian, and one shared genotype with Qinghai, Shaanxi, and Yunnan. Finally, it can be seen that the vaccine M5 differs from the Brucella GZ-78 and the Brucella from Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia in a duplicated fragment at Bruce 16 (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Dendrogram based on the MLVA-16 profile (UPGMA method) shows the correlation between 83 Brucella strains in Guizhou Province, 3 vaccine strains, and 39 representative strains of Brucella from different parts of the country. The columns show the MLVA-16 genotypes profile, MLVA-11 (panels 1 and 2A) genotypes, identification numbers, the geographic location, the year of isolation, and species-biovar of the strains. In the key column, M and S are the shared genotype and single genotype codes of Brucella in Guizhou Province, respectively. The purple branches represent shared genotypes from different hosts. Gray branches represent shared genotypes from the same region during the same period; blue branches represent shared genotypes from the same region but did differ in the period of isolation; green branches represent shared genotypes from cross-regional distribution, and also, in part, a cross-year distribution; black branch represents monogenic Brucella. The orange branch shows the shared genotype between the Guizhou Province isolates and the domestic strains.

Based on MLVA-11 profiles, a total of 401 Brucella, including 83 Brucella from Guizhou Province and 318 Brucella from Domestic and foreign, were defined as 87 MLVA-11 genotypes. The MST showed that the genotype NA1 and NA2 had the closest genetic distance to the genotypes 120 and 116, respectively, and all of the B. melitensis isolates from Guizhou Province are the members of the “East Mediterranean” group (Figure 6). Genotype 116, the predominant genotype, was broadly distributed in Guizhou Province (Figures 1, 6). The 2 B. abortus, the MLVA-11 genotype 72, also belonged to the “East Mediterranean” group.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. The MST of 269 B. melitensis strains based on the MLVA-11 profiles. colors of the nodes correspond to the Geographical distribution of Brucella strains: Eastern Mediterranean group (red), American group (green), Western Mediterranean group (purple), Chinese group (yellow), and the Guizhou isolate of this study (blue). A node represents an MLVA-11 genotype, and the number represents the genotype name. The node size is related to the number of strains; the more the number of strains the larger the node, the less number the smaller the node. The thickness of the line between the nodes is related to the genotypic affinity, with thicker and shorter lines representing closer affinity and thinner and longer lines representing more distant affinity.

The rpoB genotyping results

A total of 83 Brucella isolates, using the rpoB gene sequence of B. melitensis 16M as a reference, identified six rpoB genotypes, including five rpoB genotypes of B. melitensis and one rpoB genotype of B. abortus. The 81 B. melitensis isolates generated 5 rpoB genotypes. Specifically, five Nucleotide polymorphisms were observed, two of which were new compared to previous studies (Tan et al., 2017), one at locus 582 involving a C to T substitution and the other at locus 1,135 involving a G to A substitution. Compared to the rpoB sequence of B. melitensis 16M, the Brucella isolates, involving C to T substitutions only at the 3,927 locus, which was named B. melitensis IIa1 in this study. A sequence based on IIa1, an additional variant locus 1,135, involving G to A substitution, was named B. melitensis IIa2, and an additional variant locus 1,886, involving C to T substitution was named B. melitensis IIb. Differ from the sequence of IIb, an additional variant locus 2,954, involving C to T substitution, which was named B. melitensis IIc. Finally, B. melitensis IId has an additional variant at locus 582 on the sequence of IIc (Table 6). The B. melitensis IIc was abundant in number, and widely distributed in eight cities/prefectures in the Province, except for Anshun (Figure 1).

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. The 5 rpoB genotypes characteristics of the 81 B. melitensis isolates.

The phylogenetic analysis of the 83 Brucella isolates, based on the rpoB gene, revealed a similar relationship to that proposed above. The 81 B. melitensis on the same evolutionary branch. The B. melitensis 16M was at the front of the evolutionary branch, and B. melitensis IIa1 evolved from it, then both the IIa2 and IIb evolved from IIa1, and then, IIc evolved from IIb and IId evolved from IIc (Figure 7).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. The Phylogenetic analysis of the 88 Brucella strains. Each color corresponds to one rpoB genotype, dark blue represents rpoB genotype B. suis I, blue represents rpoB genotype B. abortus II, green represents rpoB genotype B. abortus VI, red represents rpoB genotype of the reference sequence, pink represents rpoB genotype B. melitensis IIa1, purple represents rpoB genotype B. melitensis IIa2, dark yellow represents rpoB genotype B. melitensis IIb, orange-pink represents rpoB genotype B. melitensis IIc, and light orange represents rpoB genotype B. melitensis IId.

Five Nucleotide polymorphisms were observed in the 2 B. abortus (729, T to C; 804, G to T; 1,020, G to A; 2,211, T to C; 2,907, C to T). They were defined as B. abortus VI according to Marianelli C′ study (Marianelli et al., 2006). The rpoB genotypes of the three vaccine strains were defined according to their single nucleotide polymorphism loci concerning the study of Marianelli C' (Table 7) (12). Specifically, the rpoB genotype of M5, A19, and S2 is B. melitensis IIc, B. abortus II, and B. suis I, respectively. The phylogenetic analysis showed that the B. suis and the B. abortus belong to the same evolutionary branch and have a closer relationship (Figure 7).

TABLE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Table 7. The rpoB genotypes characteristics of the 2 B. abortus isolates, B. abortus 2,308, vaccine A19 and S2.

Discussion

In this study, three typing methods were applied to identify Brucella species in Guizhou Province. Although there were some incongruences in genotypes, all methods showed a consistent conclusion that there are two Brucella species in the sample analyzed. In Guizhou Province, B. meltenesis is the dominant species and infected goats are the main infection source of human brucellosis here. Meanwhile, the 2 B. abortus strains were isolated from two dairy farm veterinarians suggesting that cows are also the source of human brucellosis infection. The B. abortus is also a potential threat to Guizhou Province. The first B. melitensis of Guizhou Province was isolated in Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture in 2010 (Supplementary Table S1), and the highest number of human brucellosis cases was in Zunyi City, followed by Tongren and Bijie (Figure 1). All these areas have one thing in common is that they all share borders with neighboring provinces and cities, which provides a clue to the extra-provincial importation of the epidemic in Guizhou Province, and the shared genotype of MLVA-16 of Brucella in Guizhou and other places in China makes the inference of extra-provincial importation confirmed. It is worth noting that there are not many human brucelloses in Qianxinan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, but its genotypes are the most abundant in Guizhou Province. It indicates that livestock in the region may be small-scale farming, reducing the risk of large-scale transmission of brucellosis. It may be possible that most local farmers are not aware of brucellosis which causes the importation of the disease. Epidemiological surveys indicate that human brucellosis in Guizhou Province is concentrated in the group of farmers aged 41–50 years, mainly due to their direct contact with infected goats or cows. Therefore, the relevant authorities should strengthen the publicity and education of high-risk groups who keep goats or cows to improve their awareness of personal protection and reduce their brucellosis infection rate.

ST8 is the main prevalent genotype in Guizhou Province and China (Ma et al., 2016; Tian et al., 2017b; Cao et al., 2018b). It is widely distributed in Asia, Europe, and Africa, and it is also a popular genotype in foreign countries (Shome et al., 2016; Akar and Erganis, 2022; Dadar et al., 2022). ST2 of B. abortus in Guizhou Province is also the genotype of B. abortus widely epidemic in China (Piao et al., 2018). These findings reveal that the epidemiology patterns of brucellosis in Guizhou Province were compatible with domestic. In addition to that the ST39 was the newly reported genotype in China, which suggests that the epidemiology of brucellosis in this region may be distinctive. The first B. melitensis of ST39 was isolated in Zunyi City in 2013, and in the following 2 years, the Brucella of this genotype also has been isolated in the city. And then, 7 years later, in 2020–2021, the ST39 strains were isolated again in Qianxinan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture. Epidemiological investigations showed that the isolates with ST39 in Qianxinan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture were associated with mating activities but could not be traced back to a transmission chain associated with Zunyi City. This may be due to the failure to isolate the strains for various reasons or the presence of potential infection in some animals that were not detected. The polymorphism of one nucleotide locus of the glk gene between ST39 and ST8 (Figure 5) and the MST clustering (Figure 4) further confirmed their close relationship. Furthermore, the widespread prevalence of ST8 Brucella strains in Guizhou Province suggests that the ST39 type may be derived from the ST8 mutation. Therefore, the focus needs to be on the origin of the type.

Among the 81 B. melitensis strains in Guizhou Province, Hunter and Gaston's diversity indexes revealed that panel 2B loci (Bruce 04, 09, 16, and 30) of MLVA had a high discriminatory power in them. Interestingly, the six isolates from an aggregated epidemic were identified as three genotypes, and differences in the three genotypes were at loci 04 and 16 (Tan et al., 2022a). Coincidentally, the differences in three genotypes of the five Brucella strains, isolated in an aggregated epidemic reported by Tian Guozhong, were also at loci 04 and 16 (Tian et al., 2017a). Furthermore, Bruce 04 and 16 have been reported to be highly polymorphic in many studies (Al Dahouk et al., 2007; Sun et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2017). Although the Bruce 16 locus was included in the mutational events observed by Whatmore et al., no mutations were observed in both in vivo and in vitro tests. The results of in vivo tests on pigs may be biased considering that pigs are not the dominant host for B. melitensis (Whatmore et al., 2006). Therefore, differences between B. melitensis at loci 04 and 16 should not be used as a basis for excluding an epidemic association when using the MLVA technique for molecular epidemiological investigations of brucellosis outbreaks. In addition, the similarity among the three MLVA-16 genotypes in this aggregated outbreak in Guizhou Province was 85.4% (shaded area in Figure 5), and the data evidence that all the strains originated from the same outbreak are poor. However, the six Brucella strains all belonged to ST8 and rpoB IIc (Supplementary Table S1), which confirmed the close kinship between the isolates. So, combining MLST and rpoB typing methods for epidemiologic tracing can avoid erroneous judgments, which is essential for epidemiological traceability analysis. In this study, the difference between vaccine M5 and Brucella GZ-78 with only one repeat fragment at Bruce 16 was observed. Cases of brucellosis caused by vaccine strains do exist (Baoshan et al., 2021). It cannot be excluded whether the infection was caused by live vaccine strain M5. Guizhou Province is classified as a category II area by the Ministry of Agriculture and the National Health and Family Planning Commission, so a non-immune decontamination and surveillance strategy among animals is also the best choice for brucellosis prevention and control in Guizhou Province.

Forty-nine genotypes were generated based on the profile of 16 VNTR loci in the 83 Brucella isolates, 33 of which were possessed by a single strain, suggesting that they were derived from sporadic or unlinked epidemiological cases, revealing a scattered epidemic of brucellosis. The other 16 MLVA-16 shared genotypes were shared by 2 and more strains, suggesting a potential molecular epidemiological link between these strains and a possible aggregated outbreak involving multiple regions. The two strains of shared genotypes M15 from different hosts revealed the infection source of the patient from the molecular epidemiological perspective. The strains of shared genotypes, from the same area during the same period suggest the existence of an aggregated brucellosis outbreak in the area, while different regions during the same period suggest the presence of transit or circulation of infected animals and their products in different regions. Most of the Brucella strains of the shared genotype were isolated at Zunyi City and were found earlier (Figure 5), which may be related to the better medical conditions in Zunyi City. Also, the shared genotypic Brucella strains from different cities/states in the province revealed the intra-provincial spread of the brucellosis epidemic. The shared genotypes of Brucella strains between Guizhou and Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, Guangdong, Fujian, Qinghai, Shaanxi, and Yunnan, reveal the existence of the transfer and circulation of infected animals and their products between Guizhou Province and the aforementioned regions. Meanwhile, the results suggest that there is an out-of-province import of the brucellosis epidemic in Guizhou Province. Currently, the brucellosis-affected areas have expanded from northern pastureland provinces to southern coastal and southwestern areas (Zheng et al., 2018). So, Guizhou Province should strictly control the inspection and quarantine of animals across the region.

All of the Brucella isolates in Guizhou Province are members of the “East Mediterranean” group (Zhu et al., 2020), revealing the geographic origin of Brucella in Guizhou Province. The predominant genotype 116 of MLVA-11 genotypes of Brucella in Guizhou Province was consistent in most provinces of China (Liu et al., 2017, 2019, 2020; Tian et al., 2017b; Cao et al., 2018a; Li et al., 2020). Interestingly, the genotype 116 is also the predominant genotype of Brucella that continues to spread and expand from northern to southern China (Zhu et al., 2020). These findings confirm the out-of-province import of Brucella in Guizhou Province, which is consistent with the results confirmed by the shared genotype of MLVA-16. Genotype 72 of MLVA-11 of B. abortus in Guizhou Province shared the same genotype as Xinjiang strains (Figure 5) and was consistent with the genotype circulating in Inner Mongolia (Ma et al., 2020), suggesting a possible geographical origin of Brucella. This inference is also fully in line with the migration route of Brucella in China (Tian et al., 2017b; Zhu et al., 2020), which has high application value for the tracing of the epidemic. Of the two unreported genotypes, NA1 is different from genotype 120 at Bruce 12 with only one repeat-unit difference and NA2 differs from genotype 116 only at Bruce 45. Meanwhile, The MST showed that the genotype NA1 and NA2 had the closest genetic distance to the genotypes 120 and 116, respectively. These findings reveal the possible origin of the new genotypes. This inference is supported by combining the MLST and rpoB typing results of these strains.

Based on the complete rpoB gene sequence, the evolutionary analysis revealed the affinities and possible evolutionary relationships among these strains. All B. melitensis strains on an evolutionary branch, while B. suis and B. abortus belong to the other evolutionary branch, which revealed that B. melitensis is more distantly related to B. abortus and B. suis, while the relationship between B. abortus and B. suis is even closer. This result deviates from the close kinship between B. melitensis and B. abortus based on whole-genome sequencing analysis (Suárez-Esquivel et al., 2020; Abdel-Glil et al., 2022). Probably because of the small number of Brucella species in this study and the high interspecific DNA homology of bacteria of the genus Brucella (Hoyer and McCullough, 1968; Ficht, 2010; Suárez-Esquivel et al., 2020), the discriminatory power of the rpoB gene in the evolutionary analysis between Brucella species was slightly poor. However, the evolutionary analysis of the rpoB gene reveal the relationship between the various types of bacteria within Brucella species. The evolutionary relationship of the five rpoB genotypes of B. melitensis isolates in the upper and lower branches of the evolutionary tree further indicates the close kinship among B. melitensis in Guizhou Province, and also provides a strong laboratory basis for the provincial spread of the brucellosis epidemic. The evolutionary analysis of interspecific rpoB genes within the genus Brucella needs to be treated with caution. However, the evolutionary relationships within species can be presented, which contributes to the analysis of the traceability and evolutionary relationships among the intra-species bacteria.

The three typing techniques were consistent at the level of Brucella species discrimination, but to the gene type, MLVA had the highest resolution, the ropB genotype the second, and MLST the least (Supplementary Table S1). The 2 B. abortus strains were indistinguishable by three techniques, suggesting an origin from the same source of infection. By combining the three typing methods, all the Brucella strains of MLVA-11 type 116 belonged to the ST8, while producing IIc and IId by rpoB typing. The evolutionary analysis showed that IId was derived from the IIc mutation which the codon was synonymously mutated from ATC to ATT, but did not cause the amino acid change. Similarly, the six IIa2 genotype strains belonged to the ST8, while producing type 120 and NA1 by MLVA-11 typing, indicating a close affinity between the two types. It was also demonstrated by MST analysis (Figure 6). Therefore, the combination of three typing techniques can better analyze the new genotype strains and trace the strains. In addition, although the MLVA typing technique has a high resolution, differences in highly polymorphic loci are prone to misclassification, a combination of MLST with rpoB typing methods would be beneficial for the tracking and analysis of the epidemic. Therefore, the three techniques are combined and complement each other and can be better used for traceability analysis of epidemics.

Conclusion

The Brucella isolates in Guizhou Province are closely related to each other. Also, they have close affinities with Brucella in various parts of China. The brucellosis epidemic in Guizhou Province has both an intra-provincial spread and extra-provincial import transmission. Given that the majority of brucellosis-infected persons are among its high-risk groups, it is important that the relevant authorities strengthen the awareness and education of high-risk groups. Meanwhile, in the introduction of livestock, trade, and the circulation of its products implement strict inspection and quarantine. In short, the prevention and control of brucellosis in Guizhou Province require strong, multi-sectoral joint prevention and control.

The MLVA typing technique has a unique advantage in the traceability analysis of brucellosis epidemics due to its high resolution, but the difference at loci 04 and 16 cannot exclude the association between Brucella. So, combining MLST and rpoB typing methods for traceability analysis of outbreaks is of great importance. Moreover, by combining the three typing techniques, the possible origin of the new genotype Brucella can be reasonably inferred, which is also conducive to promoting the subsequent research of the novel bacteria.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

QT, YW, and SL designed the study. ZT, CY, and YHua collected the samples and epidemiological data. QT, XYa, XYi, and YHu analyzed the data. QT drafted the manuscript. SL revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

Funding was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Project (No. 82273758) and by the Science and Technology Department of Guizhou Province (Qiankehe Platform Talent [2018]5627).

Acknowledgments

We thank staff members at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Guiyang, Zunyi, Tongren, Anshun, Qiandongnan Miao and Dong Autonomous Prefecture, Qianxinan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Liupanshui, and Bijie for collecting the samples in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Author disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1188469/full#supplementary-material

References

Abdel-Glil, M. Y., Thomas, P., Brandt, C., Melzer, F., Subbaiyan, A., Chaudhuri, P., et al. (2022). Core genome multilocus sequence typing scheme for improved characterization and epidemiological surveillance of pathogenic brucella. J. Clin. Microbiol. 60, e0031122. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00311-22

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Akar, K., and Erganis, O. (2022). Evaluation of the genetic profiles of Brucella melitensis strain from Turkey using multilocus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) techniques. Vet. Microbiol. 269, 109423. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2022.109423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Al Dahouk, S., Fleche, P. L., Nockler, K., Jacques, I., Grayon, M., Scholz, H. C., et al. (2007). Evaluation of Brucella MLVA typing for human brucellosis. J. Microbiol. Methods 69, 137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.12.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baoshan, L., Yinbo, Y., Jingbo, Z., Yi, Z., Jianghua, Y., Dawei, C., et al. (2021). Combined nucleic acid assays for diagnosis of A19 vaccine-caused human brucellosis. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 68, 368–374. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13685

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, X., Li, Z., Liu, Z., Fu, B., Liu, Y., Shang, Y., et al. (2018a). Molecular epidemiological characterization of Brucella isolates from sheep and yaks in northwest China. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 65, e425–e433. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12777

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, X., Shang, Y., Liu, Y., Li, Z., and Jing, Z. (2018b). Genetic characterization of animal brucella isolates from Northwest region in China. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2186027. doi: 10.1155/2018/2186027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cross, A. R., Baldwin, V. M., Roy, S., Essex-Lopresti, A. E., Prior, J. L., and Harmer, N. J. (2019). Zoonoses under our noses. Microbes. Infect. 21, 10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2018.06.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dadar, M., Alamian, S., Tadayon, K., Ashford, R. T., and Whatmore, A. M. (2022). Molecular characterization of zoonotic Brucella species isolated from animal and human samples in Iran. Acta Trop. 229, 106363. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106363

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deqiu, S., Donglou, X., and Jiming, Y. (2002). Epidemiology and control of brucellosis in China. Vet. Microbiol. 90, 165–182. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00252-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ficht, T. (2010). Brucella taxonomy and evolution. Future Microbiol. 5, 859–866. doi: 10.2217/fmb.10.52

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Franco, M. P., Mulder, M., Gilman, R. H., and Smits, H. L. (2007). Human brucellosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 7, 775–786. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70286-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoyer, B. H., and McCullough, N. B. (1968). Homologies of deoxyribonucleic acids from Brucella ovis, canine abortion organisms, and other Brucella species. J. Bacteriol. 96, 1783–1790. doi: 10.1128/jb.96.5.1783-1790.1968

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hunter, P. R., and Gaston, M. A. (1988). Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26, 2465–2466. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.11.2465-2466.1988

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, H., Fan, M., Chen, J., Mi, J., Yu, R., Zhao, H., et al. (2011). MLVA genotyping of Chinese human Brucella melitensis biovar 1, 2 and 3 isolates. BMC Microbiol. 11, 256. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, H., O'callaghan, D., and Ding, J. B. (2020). Brucellosis in China: history, progress and challenge. Infect. Dis. Poverty 9, 55. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00673-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, H. B., Huang, Y., Yu, C., Zhou, J. Z., Tang, G. P., and Zhu, Y. (2017). Analysis the epidemiological characteristics of human brucellosis in Guizhou Province from 2009 to 2015. Med. Pest Control. 33, 625–627. doi: 10.7629/yxdwfz201706011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lai, S., Zhou, H., Xiong, W., Gilbert, M., Huang, Z., Yu, J., et al. (2017). Changing epidemiology of human brucellosis, China, 1955–2014. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 23, 184–194. doi: 10.3201/eid2302.151710

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S. J., Wang, Y., Chen, H., Tian, K. C., Tang, G. P., Wang, D. M., et al. (2011). Isolation and Identification of Brucella melitensis firstly isolated from goat in Guizhou province. Chin. J. Zoonoses 27, 515–518. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2011.06.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S. J., Wang, Y., Wang, D. M., Tian, K. C., Liu, Y., Ma, Q., et al. (2012). Etiologic diagnosis and analysis of the first case of human brucellosis in Guizhou province. Chin. J. Endemiol. 31, 643–645. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-4955.2012.06.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Wang, X. M., Zhu, X., Wang, M., Cheng, H., Li, D., et al. (2020). Molecular characteristics of brucella isolates collected from humans in Hainan Province, China. Front. Microbiol. 11, 452. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00452

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Z. G., Di, D. D., Wang, M., Liu, R. H., Zhao, H. Y., Piao, D. R., et al. (2017). MLVA genotyping characteristics of human brucella melitensis isolated from ulanqab of inner Mongolia, China. Front. Microbiol. 8, 6. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Z. G., Wang, M., Ta, N., Fang, M. G., Mi, J. C., Yu, R. P., et al. (2020). Seroprevalence of human brucellosis and molecular characteristics of Brucella strains in Inner Mongolia Autonomous region of China, from 2012 to 2016. Emerg. Microbes. Infect. 9, 263–274. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1720528

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Z. G., Wang, M., Zhao, H. Y., Piao, D. R., Jiang, H., and Li, Z. J. (2019). Investigation of the molecular characteristics of Brucella isolates from Guangxi Province, China. BMC Microbiol. 19, 292. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1665-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, J. Y., Wang, H., Zhang, X. F., Xu, L. Q., Hu, G. Y., Jiang, H., et al. (2016). MLVA and MLST typing of Brucella from Qinghai, China. Infect. Dis. Poverty 5, 26. doi: 10.1186/s40249-016-0123-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, S. Y., Liu, Z. G., Zhu, X., Zhao, Z. Z., Guo, Z. W., Wang, M., et al. (2020). Molecular epidemiology of Brucella abortus strains from cattle in Inner Mongolia, China. Prev. Vet. Med. 183, 105080. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marianelli, C., Ciuchini, F., Tarantino, M., Pasquali, P., and Adone, R. (2006). Molecular characterization of the rpoB gene in Brucella species: new potential molecular markers for genotyping. Microbes Infect. 8, 860–865. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.10.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pappas, G., Papadimitriou, P., Akritidis, N., Christou, L., and Tsianos, E. V. (2006). The new global map of human brucellosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 6, 91–99. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70382-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Piao, D. R., Liu, X., Di, D. D., Xiao, P., Zhao, Z. Z., Xu, L. Q., et al. (2018). Genetic polymorphisms identify in species/biovars of Brucella isolated in China between 1953 and 2013 by MLST. BMC Microbiol. 18, 7. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1149-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shome, R., Krithiga, N., Shankaranarayana, P. B., Jegadesan, S., Udayakumar, S. V., Shome, B. R., et al. (2016). Genotyping of Indian antigenic, vaccine, and field Brucella spp. using multilocus sequence typing. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries 10, 237–244. doi: 10.3855/jidc.6617

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suárez-Esquivel, M., Chaves-Olarte, E., Moreno, E., and Guzmán-Verri, C. (2020). Brucella genomics: macro and micro evolution. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 7749. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207749

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, M. J., Di, D. D., Li, Y., Zhang, Z. C., Yan, H., Tian, L. L., et al. (2016). Genotyping of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus strains currently circulating in Xinjiang, China. Infect. Genet. Evol. 44, 522–529. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.07.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, K. K., Tan, Y. C., Chang, L. Y., Lee, K. W., Nor'e, S. S., Yee, W. Y., et al. (2017). Geographical distribution of Brucella melitensis inferred from rpoB gene variation. J. Infect Dev. Ctries 11, 420–425. doi: 10.3855/jidc.7598

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, Q. Q., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Tao, Z. F., Yang, X. G., Ma, Q., et al. (2022a). Etiological investigation and molecular epidemiology of an aggregated epidemic of brucellosis in Guizhou Province. J. Pathogen Biol. 17, 802–806. doi: 10.13350/j.cjpb.220712

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, Q. Q., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, X. G., Ying, X., Hu, Y., et al. (2022b). Optimization of multi-locus variable number tandem repeat sequence analysis method for Brucella. Modern Prevent. Med. 49, 4372–4378. doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202204571

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tian, G. Z., Cui, B. Y., Piao, D. R., Zhao, H. Y., Li, L. Y., Liu, X., et al. (2017b). Multi-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis of Chinese Brucella strains isolated from 1953 to 2013. Infect Dis. Poverty 6, 89. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0296-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tian, G. Z., Cui, B. Y., Zhao, H. Y., Jiang, H., and Piao, D. R. (2017a). Studies on epidemiology and molecular characteristics of Brucella melitensis during an outbreak of brucellosis. Dis. Surveill. 32, 211–215. doi: 10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2017.03.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wareth, G., El-Diasty, M., Melzer, F., Schmoock, G., Moustafa, S. A., El-Beskawy, M., et al. (2020). MLVA-16 Genotyping of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis Isolates from Different Animal Species in Egypt: Geographical Relatedness and the Mediterranean Lineage. Pathogens 9, 498. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9060498

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Whatmore, A. M., Perrett, L. L., and Macmillan, A. P. (2007). Characterisation of the genetic diversity of Brucella by multilocus sequencing. BMC Microbiol. 7, 34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-34

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Whatmore, A. M., Shankster, S. J., Perrett, L. L., Murphy, T. J., Brew, S. D., Thirlwall, R. E., et al. (2006). Identification and characterization of variable-number tandem-repeat markers for typing of Brucella spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 1982–1993. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02039-05

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, R., Xie, S., Lu, X., Sun, L., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2018). A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiology and clinical manifestations of human brucellosis in China. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 5712920. doi: 10.1155/2018/5712920

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhong, Z., Yu, S., Wang, X., Dong, S., Xu, J., Wang, Y., et al. (2013). Human brucellosis in the People's Republic of China during 2005-2010. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 17, e289–292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.12.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, X., Zhao, Z., Ma, S., Guo, Z., Wang, M., Li, Z., et al. (2020). Brucella melitensis, a latent “travel bacterium,” continual spread and expansion from Northern to Southern China and its relationship to worldwide lineages. Emerg. Microbes. Infect. 9, 1618–1627. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1788995

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhuang, Y. B. (2015). Analysis of the genotyping for Brucella clinical isolates using different typing methods (Master thesis). Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, China. Available online at: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/v=3uoqIhG8C475KOm_zrgu4lQARvep2SAkfRP2_0Pu6EiJ0xua_6bqBq2HMIDSRQcVPlaZGoiN2Ugppxuitz538yf0JHQmTSVd&uniplatform=NZKPT&src=copy

Keywords: brucellosis, Brucella, MLVA, MLST, rpoB, Guizhou Province

Citation: Tan Q, Wang Y, Liu Y, Tao Z, Yu C, Huang Y, Yang X, Ying X, Hu Y and Li S (2023) Molecular epidemiological characteristics of Brucella in Guizhou Province, China, from 2009 to 2021. Front. Microbiol. 14:1188469. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1188469

Received: 17 March 2023; Accepted: 31 May 2023;
Published: 23 June 2023.

Edited by:

John R. Battista, Louisiana State University, United States

Reviewed by:

Mostafa Y. Abdel-Glil, Friedrich Loeffler Institut, Germany
Pankaj Dhaka, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India

Copyright © 2023 Tan, Wang, Liu, Tao, Yu, Huang, Yang, Ying, Hu and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Shijun Li, zjumedjun@163.com; Yong Hu, huyong1979@gmc.edu.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.