Abstract
Since the pandemic started, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide. In patients with COVID-19, the gut microbiome (GM) has been supposed to be closely related to the progress of the disease. The gut microbiota composition and human genetic variation are also connected in COVID-19 patients, assuming a triangular relationship between the genome, GM, and COVID-19. Here, we reviewed the recent developments in the study of the relationship between gut microbiota and COVID-19. The keywords “COVID-19,” “microbiome,” and “genome” were used to search the literature in the PubMed database. We first found that the composition of the GM in COVID-19 patients varies according to the severity of the illness. Most obviously, Candida albicans abnormally increased while the probiotic Bifidobacterium decreased in severe cases of COVID-19. Interestingly, clinical studies have consistently emphasized that the family Lachnospiraceae plays a critical role in patients with COVID-19. Additionally, we have demonstrated the impact of microbiome-related genes on COVID-19. Specially, we focused on angiotensin-converting enzyme 2’s dual functions in SARS-CoV-2 infection and gut microbiota alternation. In summary, these studies showed that the diversity of GMs is closely connected to COVID-19. A triangular relationship exists between COVID-19, the human genome, and the gut flora, suggesting that human genetic variations may offer a chance for a precise diagnosis of COVID-19, and the important relationships between genetic makeup and microbiome regulation may affect the therapy of COVID-19.
1. Introduction
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused significant morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic disruption worldwide. COVID-19 is an ongoing pandemic that has affected about 572 million confirmed cases and 6 million deaths (WHO, 2021; Xu et al., 2021). The gut microbiome (GM) has been suggested to predict disease severity in patients with COVID-19 (Newsome et al., 2021). Although human gene expression has been linked to the composition of GM, its impact on COVID-19 is largely unknown. Furthermore, the relationship between genes, gut microbes, and COVID-19 remains to be determined.
The risk of acquiring COVID-19 and its adverse effects can be attributed to inherited and acquired variables related to gene expressions. According to a study, the increased prevalence of severe COVID-19 in males may be related to the position of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) on chromosome X (Gemmati et al., 2020). SARS-CoV down-regulated ACE2 expression in the myocardium can explain myocardial inflammation and injury and adverse cardiac outcome in SARS patients (Oudit et al., 2009). In this context, variants in these genes associated with differences in gene expression and protein function may explain the propensity of an individual to exhibit disease symptoms and the risk of adverse events. Moreover, some researchers hypothesized that regional differences in allele frequencies might explain different incidence and mortality rates (Cao et al., 2020; Yamamoto et al., 2020). These findings identified some specific genes associated with host antiviral immune response and inflammations in COVID-19, both of which may be suitable for targeted therapy with existing drugs.
In addition, the human GM (GM) is closely related to health and disease because of its extensive role in immunity, metabolic transformation, and signaling (Huttenhower et al., 2012; Sharon et al., 2014; Martin et al., 2019; Zheng et al., 2020). Evidence suggests that genetics can influence GM (Blekhman et al., 2015; Kolde et al., 2018). Large-scale human microbial genome-wide association studies have revealed the associations between human GM traits (relative taxon abundance and community diversity) and microbiome-associated variants (Bonder et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Hughes et al., 2020; Kurilshikov et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021; Rühlemann et al., 2021; Qin et al., 2022). Studies have shown significant changes in the fecal microbiome of patients with COVID-19, characterized by the depletion of beneficial symbionts and enrichment of opportunistic pathogens (Zuo et al., 2020a). Decreased abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) availability has been associated with severe COVID-19 (Zuo et al., 2021a).
Additionally, an increase of common pathogens in the GM has consistently been related to high infectivity, disease progression, or poor prognosis of COVID-19 patients (Newsome et al., 2021). Studies suggest that the worsening clinical course in patients with COVID-19 infection may partly be due to the activation of severe inflammation by disrupting GM and the growth of pathogenic bacteria (Wang et al., 2021). These results emphasized the importance of managing the GM in patients during and after COVID-19.
Interestingly, as a very important beneficial bacteria in the human gut, the imbalance of the family Lachnospiraceae is closely related to the severity of COVID-19 (Gaibani et al., 2021). Moreover, the study has found that various diseases with a triangular relationship between genes and microbes involve the core gut family Lachnospiraceae that exists in humans from infancy to adulthood (Vacca et al., 2020), which may provide a new perspective for the study of the pathogenesis of the novel coronavirus, as well as the possibility of microbial intervention for the novel coronavirus. Strengthening beneficial species of gut microbiota depleted during COVID-19 may be a new way to mitigate severe disease.
Most samples used for intestinal microflora detection are feces, and the sequencing methods are all shotgun metagenomics sequencing. Not all studies with SARS-CoV-2 infection demonstrate a similar effect on GM. The differences may be due to the composition of the host’s primitive intestinal microflora and the host health status, such as eating patterns, stress levels, and living conditions. While there are still some common features of GM alternations in COVID-19 patients, these will be discussed in the present review. Besides, although animal models (such as mouse models) are commonly used in the GM study related to human disease, fecal samples from SARS-COV-2 patients are more prevalent for gene expression or metabolism studies. Therefore, in the present review, we will focus on the data from SARS-COV-2 patients and not animal models.
Hence, we cautiously present these observations as the hypothesis for this study. We hypothesize that there is a triangle between the genome, GM, and COVID-19. We highlighted important aspects to consider for COVID-19 based on changes in gut microbiota, particularly the intestinal family Lachnospiraceae. We examined gene expression changes in patients during COVID-19 to understand how this knowledge could be applied to the current rapid development of COVID-19 based on genetic mechanisms. Finally, we discussed how to effectively and accurately target COVID-19 therapy based on the relationship between COVID-19 and gene-intestinal flora and briefly commented on possible solutions. The current research will lay the groundwork for paradigm shifts in which clinical studies are needed to assess the COVID-19 pathogenesis and provide important information on reversing COVID-19-induced adverse outcomes by regulating GM composition and gene expression.
2. Methods
Our study focused on the original investigation into the relationship between COVID-19 and the human genome and microbiota. The inclusion criterion for this review was data-based research and review articles in which authors used the terms “COVID-19,” “COVID-19 and gut microbiota/gut microbiome,” “COVID-19 and gut genome,” and “COVID-19 and Lachnospiraceae” in their titles or abstracts as well as in the main texts of the publication. Then, 363,197, 672, 120, and 21 articles are identified for the aboving four terms, respectively. All the literature used in this review was collected from the PubMed database. The study concentrated on publications released over the previous 3 years (from Jan 2020 to May 2023).
3. Results
3.1. The microbiome-related human genetic expression reflects disease severity in COVID-19 patients
The human genetic effect may provide an opportunity to accurately diagnose microbiome-associated disease and highlight genetic background relevance for microbiome modulation and treatment. Nonetheless, further studies need to study whether microbiota profiling can forecast the occurrence of gene-related COVID-19 and whether microbiota regulation can address COVID-19 by regulating gene expression. This review revealed that gastrointestinal inflammation is common in COVID-19 patients. Previous studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 infected the gastrointestinal tract cells (Carvalho et al., 2020; Jiao et al., 2021; Cheung et al., 2022), suggesting that the mechanism of gastrointestinal injury might be related to the abnormal expression of genes in the gut.
Interestingly, the observation of a recent pilot study showed that Bacteroides downregulated the expression of ACE2 in the gut and inversely correlated with SARS-CoV-2 in the fecal samples of patients (Zuo et al., 2020a). The data suggested that Bacteroides have the potential protective role against SARS-CoV-2 infection by preventing virus attachment and entry via ACE2. Recent evidence showed that ACE2 is the entry receptor and viral spike initiator protein for SARS-CoV-2 infection, influencing susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 infection (Hoffmann et al., 2020). Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) was abundantly expressed in intestinal epithelial cells, and SARS-CoV-2 invaded human cell through ACE2 (Penninger et al., 2021). On the other hand, ACE2 plays a crucial role in the negative regulation of gastrointestinal inflammation by controlling the small intestine’s tryptophan absorption (Hashimoto et al., 2012). The study showed that the expression of ACE2, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), and caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 (CARD9) decreased in the gut mucosa, and tryptophan metabolism was impaired in critical COVID-19 patients (Yokoyama et al., 2022). Moreover, gastrointestinal protective microorganisms such as Lactobacillales increased in the critical group (Yokoyama et al., 2022). Paradoxically, the expression of ACE2 in the lung protected mice from lung injury induced by SARS-CoV spike protein by attenuating the renin-angiotensin system (Kuba et al., 2005). ACE2 also inhibited intestinal inflammation in the gut by maintaining amino acids’ homeostasis and intestinal microbiota ecology (Hashimoto et al., 2012), suggesting that ACE2 might play a dual role in the GM mediating susceptibility to COVID-19 infection.
The gut microbiota interacts with the host immune system and metabolic system (Figure 1). Studies have shown that the cytokine levels (sICAM-1, MCP-1, IL-8, IP-10, IL-15, IL-1RA, and TSLP) and metabolites (e.g., quinoline) in the serum increased significantly, and MDC levels of the serum and beneficial microorganisms decreased significantly in the severe COVID-19 patients with fatal outcomes (Albrich et al., 2022). Similarly, there were multiple correlations between the metabolites of gut microbes and COVID-19 (e.g., SCFA, carbohydrates, and neurotransmitters). They were associated with inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IFN-γ, IL-6, and CXCL), which significantly elevated in the severe patients (Nagata et al., 2022). The multi-omics analysis suggested multiple gut microbiota-metabolite-immune function interrelationships in COVID-19 patients (Table 1).
Table 1
| Demographic features (sex/age) | Severe, no./total (%) | Major respiratory symptom | Organization | Key genetic changes | Effect on microbiota | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex, no./total (%): 7(47%); median age (years): 55 | Fever, Diarrhea cough | Gut | ACE2 was up-regulated | The abundance of Bacteroides decreased | (Zuo et al., 2020a) | |
| Male sex, no./total (%): 13 (68.4); median age (years): 49.6 | 6 (31.6) | Fever, general fatigue, cough, diarrhea | The small intestinal mucosa | ACE2, AHR, and CARD9 expression decreased in critical COVID-19 patients | The abundance of Lactobacillales increased, and tryptophan metabolism was impaired | (Yokoyama et al., 2022) |
| Male sex, no./total (%):120(70.0%); median age (years):64.3 | 130 (75.6) | Nausea/vomiting, diarrhea | Blood | sICAM-1, MCP-1, IL-8, IP-10, IL-15, IL-1RA, and TSLP were up-regulated, and MDC was downregulated in the severe COVID-19 patients with fatal outcomes | The quinolinate and other metabolites increased, and the abundance of Faecalibacterium, Agathobacter, Dorea, Coprococcus, Lachnospiraceae, and Bifidobacterium decreased in the severe COVID-19 patients with fatal outcomes | (Albrich et al., 2022) |
| Male sex, no./total (%):21(75.0%); median age (years): 52.1 | 12 (42.9) | Blood | In the severe patients, IFN-γ, IL-6, CXCL-9, and CXCL-10 were significantly elevated | The abundance of Streptococcus, Rothia, and Actinomyces spp. increased, and metabolites included maltose, isomaltose, sucrose, glyoxylic acid, xylobiose, N-acetylmannosamine, glutaric acid, and SCFAs decreased | (Nagata et al., 2022) |
The effect of microbiome-related human genetic expression on COVID-19.
3.2. GM diversity is a predictor of disease progression in COVID-19 patients
As one of the most important immune organs of humans, the gastrointestinal tract includes a variety of microorganisms, such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses (Zuo et al., 2018; Arbune et al., 2021). Many patients with COVID-19 complain of digestive symptoms like persistent diarrhea (Fandriks, 2010; Xiao et al., 2020). This symptom may be secondary to an inflammatory response caused by the virus (Feng et al., 2020; Hoffmann et al., 2020). As inflammatory cells such as neutrophils and lymphocytes enter the intestinal mucosa, the intestinal microflora may be destroyed, thus causing diarrhea (Xiao et al., 2020). Therefore, the intestinal microflora of humans infected with SARS-CoV-2 is widely changed. As shown in Figure 2, the richness of beneficial symbiotic bacteria and bacteriophages decreased, while the abundance of some harmful microorganisms increased (Xiao et al., 2020; Cao et al., 2021; Zuo et al., 2021b). In COVID-19 patients, the composition of the intestinal microbiome differs, which may relate to the disease severity. Compared with mild to moderate patients, severe to critically ill patients have more opportunistic pathogens (Cao et al., 2021). The severity of COVID-19 disease in COVID-19 patients was positively correlated with the richness of harmful bacteria.
Figure 1
Figure 2
In contrast, the richness of beneficial bacterium was negatively correlated with the severity of the disease (Zuo et al., 2020a, b; Sehli et al., 2021). These discrepancies were independent of the antibiotic treatments, strengthening that GM might be a sufficient predictor of disease severity (Wang et al., 2016; Lai et al., 2020; Sehli et al., 2021). Population-level studies suggested that the inflammatory modulated bacteria was likely to be the signature of disease severity. Specifically, anti-inflammatory bacteria are related to lower severity in virus-infected patients, while pro-inflammatory bacteria might result in higher severity (de Maio et al., 2021).
Among the harmful microorganisms, COVID-19-related candidiasis is a major gut complication (Lai et al., 2020; Salehi et al., 2020; Song et al., 2020; Mastrangelo et al., 2021). According to the study, Candida albicans usually cause a superficial skin and mucosal infection, however, in the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection, it will progress to a systemic illness that poses a serious risk of death (Gozalbo et al., 2014; Arastehfar et al., 2020; Lai et al., 2020; Zuo et al., 2020b; Bachtiar et al., 2022). COVID-19 will also damage the human immune response to Candida albicans, mainly by weakening the activation of various cellular immune factors (de Maio et al., 2021). On the other hand, the intestinal epithelium damaged by the toxins released by Candida albicans will provide a favorable environment for SARS-CoV-2 attachment, which may promote viral replication (Arbune et al., 2021; Aykac et al., 2021). Therefore, Candida albicans may be one of the most prevalent gut bacteria in severe COVID-19 patients.
Nevertheless, there was a significant decrease in bacterial diversity and Bifidobacterium abundance in patients with severe COVID-19, which may harm patients’ immune functions. Bifidobacterium is an essential component of probiotic pharmaceuticals. Probiotic therapy can be utilized to treat diarrhea caused by virus infection. By formation of biofilms in the intestines, it can protect the intestinal epithelium from various kinds of toxins (Fitri et al., 2023). Additionally, Bifidobacterium has anti-inflammatory properties that can increase the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines and decrease the pro-inflammatory cytokines (Li et al., 2023). Several studies have demonstrated that the presence of Bifidobacterium can aid in the eradication of SARS-COV-2 and lower the mortality rate of COVID-19 patients (d'Ettorre et al., 2020; Ivashkin et al., 2021). Notably, the change in Bifidobacterium abundance may indicate the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection symptoms (Chen et al., 2020; d'Ettorre et al., 2020; Ivashkin et al., 2021). Some studies have also shown that the presence of Bifidobacterium can assist in the elimination of SARS-CoV-2 pathogens and reduce the mortality of COVID-19 patients (Zuo et al., 2020b, 2021c; Yeoh et al., 2021).
In a word, the infection of SARA-CoV-2 will have a certain impact on the intestinal flora of the human body. Consistent with the alternation of GM, the intestinal microbial ecological network becomes sparse, leading to many SARS-CoV-2 viruses and diverse kinds of opportunistic bacteria, fungi, and eukaryotic viruses enriched in the intestine of patients (Zuo et al., 2021a; Zhang et al., 2022). The dysbiosis of gut microbiota may relate to the severity of COVID-19. Less commonly appreciated is that this phenomenon has existed in the patient for a long, even after the disease has subsided (Aykac et al., 2021). Intestinal microflora also pushes through various mechanisms to affect the spread and progress of the virus infection. Therefore, we can refer to the changes in the species and structure of intestinal microorganisms to infer the disease progression in COVID-19 patients (Table 2). Besides, it enlightens us that during the treatment of COVID-19 patients, we should monitor the abundance of human pathogenic bacteria to prevent bacterial co-infection and provide probiotic adjuvant therapy if necessary.
Table 2
| Disease severity | Demographic features (sex/age) | Outcomes | Changes in intestinal microbiota composition | Biomarker | Different gene expression | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex, no./total (%):67 (68%); median age (years): 55.5 | Fever 82 (83%) Cough81 (82%) Shortness of breath 31 (31%) Muscle ache 11 (11%) Confusion 9 (9%) Headache 8 (8%) Sore throat 5 (5%) Rhinorrhoea 4 (4%) Chest pain 2 (2%) Diarrhea 2 (2%) Nausea and vomiting 1 (1%) More than one sign or symptom 89 (90%) Fever, cough, and shortness of breath 15 (15%) | Some patients have bacterial and fungal infections, including Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Aspergillus flavus. Candida glabrata. Candida albicans | The concentrations of CRP, Procalcitonin, IL-6, and serum ferritin in the blood were higher than those in normal subjects | (d'Ettorre et al., 2020; Aykac et al., 2021) | ||
| 47 mild 45 moderate 5 severe 3 critical | Male sex, no./total (%):53 (53%); median age (years):36.4 | Fever 38 (38.0%) Diarrhea 17 (17.0%) Cough 40 (40.0%) Sputum 18 (18.0%) Sore throat 8 (8.0%) Rhinorrhea 19 (19.0%) Shortness of breath 9 (9.0%) | The composition of intestinal microorganisms in the patients changed significantly. A variety of intestinal symbiotic bacteria with known immunomodulatory potential, such as Bifidobacterium, were insufficient in the patients and were still very low after the disease subsided | The blood concentrations of CRP, GGT, AST, CXCL10, IL1, TNF-α, and LDH were higher than those in normal subjects | (Zuo et al., 2021c) | |
| Male sex, no./total (%):17 (57%); median age (years): 55 | Fever 26 (86.7%) Cough 26 (86.7%) Diarrhea 5 (16.7%) | The diversity of bacteria in the intestinal tract decreased significantly, and there were abundant opportunistic bacteria in the feces, such as Streptococcus, Rothia, V eillonella, Erysipelatoclostridium, and Actinomyces. The relative abundance of beneficial symbiotic bacteria decreased significantly, such as Lachnospiraceae and Bifidobacterium | The concentrations of CRP, Procalcitonin, ALT, AST, IL10, IL6, TNF-α, Creatinine, and LDH in the blood were higher than in normal subjects | (al Bataineh et al., 2021) | ||
| Male sex, no./total (%):7 (47%); median age (years): 55 | Fever 9 (60%) Cough 11 (73%) Diarrhea 7 (1%) Sputum 5 (33%). Rhinorrhea 3 (20%). Shortness of breath 4 (27%) | The number of pathogenic bacteria increased and enriched, and the number of beneficial symbiotic bacteria decreased, such as Prussiella and Lactobacillus, increased | (Zuo et al., 2020a; Qin et al., 2022) | |||
| Male sex, no./total (%):16 (53%); median age (years): 46 | Fever 17 (57%) Cough 20 (67%) Diarrhea 4 (13%) Sputum 9 (30%) Rhinorrhea 5 (17%) Rhinorrhea 5 (17%) Shortness of breath 4 (13%) | Candida albicans enrichment and highly heterogeneous flora structure occurred in the intestinal microflora of some patients | (Sehli et al., 2021) | |||
| Male sex, no./total (%):29 (48%); median age (years): 42.6 | Fever 35 (53%) Diarrhea 8 (12%) Cough 24 (36.4%) Sputum 12 (18.2%) Rhinorrhea (runny nose) 14 (21.2%) | The patients with COVID-19 were primarily characterized by a depletion of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Ruminococcus bromii, and F prausnitzii and enrichment of Bacteroides ovatus, Bacteroides dorei, and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron compared with non–COVID-19 controls | Compared with normal subjects, the ability of intestinal microorganisms to synthesize SCFA and L-isoleucine decreased, and urea synthesis increased in COVID-19 patients | (Yeoh et al., 2021) | ||
| 3 mild 7 moderate 3 severe | Male sex, no./total (%):6 (46%); median age (years):48 | The microbial diversity decreases, the richness of beneficial microorganisms decreases, and the richness of harmful microorganisms increases | The concentrations of C3 and IL-15 in blood were higher than those in normal subjects | PIGR was up-regulated ZEB1 was up-regulated Muc2 was up-regulated TRIB1 was up-regulated | (Zuo et al., 2021b) |
Effects of intestinal flora on disease progression in patients with COVID-19.
3.3. The intestinal family Lachnospiraceae is the crucial player in COVID-19 in patients
The gut family Lachnospiraceae exists from infancy to adulthood in humans (Vacca et al., 2020). Lachnospiraceae is enriched in pathway-degrading polysaccharides from dietary sources and is frequently connected with depressive syndromes, inflammatory conditions, and multiple sclerosis (Vacca et al., 2020). Interestingly, as a very important beneficial bacteria in the human gut, the imbalance of the family Lachnospiraceae is closely related to the severity of COVID-19 (Gaibani et al., 2021). Moreover, the study has found that various diseases with a triangular relationship between genes and microbes involve the core gut family Lachnospiraceae that exists in humans from infancy to adulthood (Vacca et al., 2020).
We explore the specific associations between the families of Lachnospiraceae (i. e., Blautia, Bacterium, Roseburia, and Dorea) and COVID-19. The imbalance of Lachnospiraceae is closely related to the severity of COVID-19. Studies indicated that the GM of COVID-19 patients showed a reduction in Lachnospiraceae (Gaibani et al., 2021). In particular, the fecal sample with high SARS-CoV-2 infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 had a lower abundance of Lachnospiraceae than those with low-to-none infectivity (Zuo et al., 2021a). When SARS-CoV-2 infection subsided, the abundance of Lachnospiraceae increased significantly (de Maio et al., 2021; Ren et al., 2021).
This dysbiosis of COVID-19 patients is featured by profound GM destruction with the depletion in the abundance of Lachnospiraceae, which is well known to be related to human health and produces a SCFA (Zhang et al., 2022). Moreover, it is also a microbial metabolite with a key role in human immunological and metabolic homeostasis (Markowitz et al., 2022). Therefore, Lachnospiraceae may contribute to the recovery of patients by reducing the inflammatory cytokine storm and promoting the improvement of the immune system. In contrast, some studies have found that the abundance of Lachnospiraceae was enriched in patients with COVID-19 (al Bataineh et al., 2021; de Maio et al., 2021). Although the results are controversial, Lachnospiraceae certainly plays a very important role in the occurrence and development of COVID-19 (Table 3). More analysis is needed to elucidate the metabolic aspect of the pathophysiology of COVID-19, considering that the microbiota changes of different patients are diverse or even opposite.
Table 3
| Demographic features (sex/age) | Severe, no./total (%) | Major respiratory symptom | The change of Lachnospiraceae | Genus level | Biomarker | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex, no./total (%): 38 (55.1%); median age (years): 73 | Fever, cough, dyspnoea | A reduction of Lachnospiraceae | Coprococcus, Blautia, Roseburia, and Lachnospira | (Gaibani et al., 2021) | ||
| Male sex, no./total (%):7(46.67%); median age (years): 22–75 | 3(20) | Fever, cough | The abundance of Lachnspiraceae was higher in fecal samples with low-to-none SARS-CoV-2 infectivity than those with high SARS-CoV-2 infectivity | Bacterium | Increased nucleotide and amino acid biosynthesis | (Zuo et al., 2021a) |
| Male sex, no./total (%): 23 (74%); median age (years): 67 | Gastrointestinal symptoms, respiratory failure | Lachnospiraceae was increased after the resolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection | Fusicantibacter and Roseburia | (de Maio et al., 2021) | ||
| Male sex, no./total (%): 14 (58%); median age (years): 48 | Fever, cough | Lachnospiraceae was increased after the resolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection | (Ren et al., 2021) | |||
| Male sex, no./total (%): 52 (61%); age > 18 (100%) | The abundance of Lachnospiraceae was enriched in patients with COVID-19 | Dorea, Blautia | Enrichment of lipid and amino acid metabolism | (al Bataineh et al., 2021) | ||
| Male sex, no./total (%): 24(51%); median age (years): 50 | The abundance of Lachnospiraceae was enriched in patients with COVID-19 | Bacterium | (Li et al., 2021) | |||
| Male sex, no./total (%): 43 (46%); median age (years): 52 | 36 (53.73) | Fever, cough | Lachnospiraceae was negatively correlated with fungi | Agathobacter, Dorea, and Roseburia | Increased IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α, lower albumin, higher ALT and GGT | (Lv et al., 2021) |
The role of the core intestinal family Lachnospiraceae in the occurrence of COVID-19.
In summary, it has been demonstrated that these genes can shape host-microbe interactions and gut ecology during the pathogenesis of COVID-19. At present, genome-wide association studies on severe COVID-19 have been published (Ellinghaus et al., 2020). However, few studies have shown the impact of microbe-associated human gene expression on COVID-19. We encourage future studies to identify additional SARS-CoV-2 related genes and modulate the dysbiosis induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection for demonstrating reduced lung injury and improved disease prognosis. Further studies on genes and genetic variants are important for preventing and assessing disease severity and individual risk in different populations. The scientific data will provide the basis for developing clinical diagnostic and prognostic tests suitable for high-risk patients with COVID-19. The influence of human genes on microbial abundance and COVID-19 may provide the opportunity for the precise diagnosis and the challenges for the probiotic therapies targetting microbial-related abundance changes.
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, with increasing reports indicating GM dysbiosis in COVID-19 patients, the triangle relationship among the GM, human genome, and virus infection will provide novel insights into the clinical management of COVID-19 patients. The disease severity has been reviewed to closely relate to the diversity and abundance of opportunistic gut pathogens. In many severe cases, viral infection provides a favorable environment for the occurrence of bacterial complications, and the existence of opportunistic pathogens will, in turn, promote viral infection, which may finally increase the morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 patients. Detailly, the abundant Candida albicans and lessened Bifidobacterium both harm the immune functions of severe COVID-19 patients. Especially the role of Lachnospiraceae should be highlighted. The abundance of Lachnospiraceae will affect the expressions of various host genes like IL-6, IL-4, and TNF-α. The changes in immune-related genes will consequently regulate the antiviral immune response, which may influence the progress of the disease.
Furthermore, ACE2 has been proven to play a dual role in the GM mediating susceptibility to COVID-19 infection. Bacteroides subspecies (Bacteroides subspecies) in fecal microflora of COVID-19 patients weaken the expression of ACE2 in the intestinal tract of mice, which may damage the spike protein-ACE2 interaction to recede virus infection. Another side is the SARS-CoV-2 infection promoting ACE2 modification in the intestine, which increases the susceptibility of the intestinal epithelium to opportunistic pathogens that induce intestinal inflammation and diarrhea. These findings establish triad relationships among the human genome, microbiome, and disease. Consequently, human genetic influences may offer opportunities for precision diagnostics of microbiome-associated diseases but also highlight the relevance of genetic background for microbiome modulation and therapeutics.
Funding
This work was supported by the Central Guidance on Local Science and Technology Development Fund of Hebei Province (226Z2901G), the Hundreds of Talents Program of Hebei Province, China (E2020050011), and the Advanced Talents Incubation Program of the Hebei University (521000981413) to JT.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
JT, NL, QX, and YC: conceptualization. JT: funding acquisition. YC, MH, WW, YW, and JT: investigation. YC, NL, and JT: writing—original draft. MH, WW, YW, and QX: writing—review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Glossary
| COVID-19 | Coronavirus disease 2019 |
| SARS-CoV-2 | Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 |
| GM | Gut microbiome |
| ACE2 | Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 |
| AHR | Aryl hydrocarbon receptor |
| CARD9 | Caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 |
| GGT | Gamma-glutamyl transferase |
| SCFA | Short chain fatty acid |
| AST | Aspartate amino transferase |
| ALT | Alanine aminotransferase |
| LDH | Lactate dehydrogenase |
| CXCL10 | C-X-C motif ligand 10 |
| TNF-α | Tumor necrosis factor-α |
| PIGR | Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor |
| ZEB1 | Zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 |
| TRIB1 | Tribbles pseudo kinase 1 |
| IL-1,-6,-10,-15 | Interleukin-1,-6,-10,-15 |
| CRP | C-reactive protein |
| C3 | Complement C3 |
References
1
al BatainehM. T.HenschelA.MousaM.DaouM.WaasiaF.KannoutH.et al. (2021). Gut microbiota interplay with COVID-19 reveals links to host lipid metabolism among middle eastern populations. Front. Microbiol.12:761067. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.761067
2
AlbrichW. C.GhoshT. S.Ahearn-FordS.MikaeloffF.LunjaniN.FordeB.et al. (2022). A high-risk gut microbiota configuration associates with fatal hyperinflammatory immune and metabolic responses to SARS-CoV-2. Gut Microbes14:2073131. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2073131
3
ArastehfarA.CarvalhoA.NguyenM. H.HedayatiM. T.NeteaM. G.PerlinD. S.et al. (2020). COVID-19-associated candidiasis (CAC): An underestimated complication in the absence of immunological predispositions?J. Fungi (Basel)6:211. doi: 10.3390/jof6040211
4
ArbuneM.IancuA. V.LupasteanuG.VasileM. C.StefanescuV. (2021). A challenge of COVID-19: associated infective endocarditis with Streptococcus gordonii in a young immunocompetent patient. Medicina (Kaunas)57:1298. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121298
5
AykacK.OzsurekciY.Cura YaylaB. C.EvrenK.Lacinel GurlevikS.OygarP. D.et al. (2021). Pneumococcal carriage in children with COVID-19. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother.17, 1628–1634. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1849516
6
BachtiarE. W.BachtiarB. M.KusumaningrumA.SunartoH.SoerosoY.SulijayaB.et al. (2022). ACE2 expression in saliva of patients with COVID-19 and its association with Candida albicans and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. F1000Research11:557. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.111965.1
7
BlekhmanR.GoodrichJ. K.HuangK.SunQ.BukowskiR.BellJ. T.et al. (2015). Host genetic variation impacts microbiome composition across human body sites. Genome Biol.16:191. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0759-1
8
BonderM. J.KurilshikovA.TigchelaarE. F.MujagicZ.ImhannF.VilaA. V.et al. (2016). The effect of host genetics on the gut microbiome. Nat. Genet.48, 1407–1412. doi: 10.1038/ng.3663
9
CaoY.LiL.FengZ.WanS.HuangP.SunX.et al. (2020). Comparative genetic analysis of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2) receptor ACE2 in different populations. Cell Disc.6:11. doi: 10.1038/s41421-020-0147-1
10
CaoJ.WangC.ZhangY.LeiG.XuK.ZhaoN.et al. (2021). Integrated gut virome and bacteriome dynamics in COVID-19 patients. Gut Microbes13, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1887722
11
CarvalhoA.AlqusairiR.AdamsA.PaulM.KothariN.PetersS.et al. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 gastrointestinal infection causing hemorrhagic colitis: implications for detection and transmission of COVID-19 disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol.115, 942–946. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000667
12
ChenN.ZhouM.DongX.QuJ.GongF.HanY.et al. (2020). Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet395, 507–513. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7
13
CheungC. C. L.GohD.LimX.TienT. Z.LimJ. C. T.LeeJ. N.et al. (2022). Residual SARS-CoV-2 viral antigens detected in GI and hepatic tissues from five recovered patients with COVID-19. Gut71, 226–229. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324280
14
de MaioF.IaniroG.CoppolaG.SantopaoloF.AbbateV.BiancoD. M.et al. (2021). Improved gut microbiota features after the resolution of SARSCoV2 infection. Gut Pathog.13:62. doi: 10.1186/s13099-021-00459-9
15
d'EttorreG.CeccarelliG.MarazzatoM.CampagnaG.PinacchioC.AlessandriF.et al. (2020). Challenges in the management of SARS-CoV2 infection: the role of Oral Bacteriotherapy as complementary therapeutic strategy to avoid the progression of COVID-19. Front. Med.7:389. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00389
16
FandriksL. (2010). The angiotensin II type 2 receptor and the gastrointestinal tract. J. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Syst.11, 43–48. doi: 10.1177/1470320309347788
17
FengQ.LiuD.LuY.LiuZ. (2020). The interplay of renin-angiotensin system and toll-like receptor 4 in the inflammation of diabetic nephropathy. J Immunol Res2020, 1–11. doi: 10.1155/2020/6193407
18
FitriL. E.SardjonoT. W.WinarisN.PawestriA. R.EndhartiA. T.NorahmawatiE.et al. (2023). Bifidobacterium longum administration diminishes Parasitemia and inflammation during plasmodium berghei infection in mice. J. Inflamm. Res.16, 1393–1404. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S400782
19
GaibaniP.D’AmicoF.BartolettiM.LombardoD.RampelliS.FornaroG.et al. (2021). The gut microbiota of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.11:670424. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.670424
20
GemmatiD.BramantiB.SerinoM. L.SecchieroP.ZauliG.TisatoV. (2020). COVID-19 and individual genetic susceptibility/receptivity: role of ACE1/ACE2 genes, immunity, inflammation and coagulation. Might the double X-chromosome in females be protective against SARS-CoV-2 compared to the single X-chromosome in males?Int. J. Mol. Sci.21:3474. doi: 10.3390/ijms21103474
21
GozalboD.ManeuV.GilM. L. (2014). Role of IFN-gamma in immune responses to Candida albicans infections. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed)19, 1279–1290. doi: 10.2741/4281
22
HashimotoT.PerlotT.RehmanA.TrichereauJ.IshiguroH.PaolinoM.et al. (2012). ACE2 links amino acid malnutrition to microbial ecology and intestinal inflammation. Nature487, 477–481. doi: 10.1038/nature11228
23
HoffmannM.Kleine-WeberH.SchroederS.KrügerN.HerrlerT.ErichsenS.et al. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cells181, 271–280.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052
24
HughesD. A.BacigalupeR.WangJ.RühlemannM. C.TitoR. Y.FalonyG.et al. (2020). Genome-wide associations of human gut microbiome variation and implications for causal inference analyses. Nat. Microbiol.5, 1079–1087. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0743-8
25
HuttenhowerC.GeversD.KnightR.AbubuckerS.BadgerJ. H.ChinwallaA. T.et al. (2012). Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature486, 207–214. doi: 10.1038/nature11234
26
IvashkinV.FominV.MoiseevS.BrovkoM.MaslennikovR.UlyaninA.et al. (2021). Efficacy of a probiotic consisting of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus PDV 1705, Bifidobacterium bifidum PDV 0903, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis PDV 1911, and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum PDV 2301 in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a randomized controlled trial. Probiot. Antimicrob. Proteins15, 460–468. doi: 10.1007/s12602-021-09858-5
27
JiaoL.LiH.XuJ.YangM.MaC.LiJ.et al. (2021). The gastrointestinal tract is an alternative route for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a nonhuman primate model. Gastroenterology160, 1647–1661. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.12.001
28
KoldeR.FranzosaE. A.RahnavardG.HallA. B.VlamakisH.StevensC.et al. (2018). Host genetic variation and its microbiome interactions within the human microbiome project. Genome Med.10:6. doi: 10.1186/s13073-018-0515-8
29
KubaK.ImaiY.RaoS.GaoH.GuoF.GuanB.et al. (2005). A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury. Nat. Med.11, 875–879. doi: 10.1038/nm1267
30
KurilshikovA.Medina-GomezC.BacigalupeR.RadjabzadehD.WangJ.DemirkanA.et al. (2021). Large-scale association analyses identify host factors influencing human gut microbiome composition. Nat. Genet.53, 156–165. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00763-1
31
LaiC. C.WangC. Y.HsuehP. R. (2020). Co-infections among patients with COVID-19: the need for combination therapy with non-anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents?J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect.53, 505–512. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.05.013
32
LiJ.WangJ.WangM.ZhengL.CenQ.WangF.et al. (2023). Bifidobacterium: a probiotic for the prevention and treatment of depression. Front. Microbiol.14:1174800. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1174800
33
LiS.YangS.ZhouY.DisomaC.DongZ.duA.et al. (2021). Microbiome profiling using shotgun metagenomic sequencing identified unique microorganisms in COVID-19 patients with altered gut microbiota. Front. Microbiol.12:712081. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.712081
34
LiuX.TangS.ZhongH.TongX.JieZ.DingQ.et al. (2021). A genome-wide association study for gut metagenome in Chinese adults illuminates complex diseases. Cell Discov.7:9. doi: 10.1038/s41421-020-00239-w
35
LvL.GuS.JiangH.YanR.ChenY.ChenY.et al. (2021). Gut mycobiota alterations in patients with COVID-19 and H1N1 infections and their associations with clinical features. Commun. Biol.4:480. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02036-x
36
MarkowitzR. H. G.LaBellaA. L.ShiM.RokasA.CapraJ. A.FergusonJ. F.et al. (2022). Microbiome-associated human genetic variants impact phenome-wide disease risk. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.119:e2200551119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2200551119
37
MartinA. M.SunE. W.RogersG. B.KeatingD. J. (2019). The influence of the gut microbiome on host metabolism through the regulation of gut hormone release. Front. Physiol.10:428. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00428
38
MastrangeloA.GerminarioB. N.FerranteM.FrangiC.Li VotiR.MucciniC.et al. (2021). Candidemia in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients: incidence and characteristics in a prospective cohort compared with historical non-COVID-19 controls. Clin. Infect. Dis.73, e2838–e2839. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1594
39
NagataN.TakeuchiT.MasuokaH.AokiR.IshikaneM.IwamotoN.et al. (2022). Human gut microbiota and its metabolites impact immune responses in COVID-19 and its complications. Gastroenterology164, 272–288. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.09.024
40
NewsomeR. C.GauthierJ.HernandezM. C.AbrahamG. E.RobinsonT. O.WilliamsH. B.et al. (2021). The gut microbiome of COVID-19 recovered patients returns to uninfected status in a minority-dominated United States cohort. Gut Microbes13, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1926840
41
OuditG. Y.KassiriZ.JiangC.LiuP. P.PoutanenS. M.PenningerJ. M.et al. (2009). SARS-coronavirus modulation of myocardial ACE2 expression and inflammation in patients with SARS. Eur. J. Clin. Investig.39, 618–625. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02153.x
42
PenningerJ. M.GrantM. B.SungJ. J. Y. (2021). The role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 in modulating gut microbiota, intestinal inflammation, and coronavirus infection. Gastroenterology160, 39–46. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.07.067
43
QinY.HavulinnaA. S.LiuY.JousilahtiP.RitchieS. C.TokolyiA.et al. (2022). Combined effects of host genetics and diet on human gut microbiota and incident disease in a single population cohort. Nat. Genet.54, 134–142. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00991-z
44
RenZ.WangH.CuiG.LuH.WangL.LuoH.et al. (2021). Alterations in the human oral and gut microbiomes and lipidomics in COVID-19. Gut70, 1253–1265. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323826
45
RühlemannM. C.HermesB. M.BangC.DomsS.Moitinho-SilvaL.ThingholmL. B.et al. (2021). Genome-wide association study in 8,956 German individuals identifies influence of ABO histo-blood groups on gut microbiome. Nat. Genet.53, 147–155. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00747-1
46
SalehiM.AhmadikiaK.MahmoudiS.KalantariS.JamalimoghadamsiahkaliS.IzadiA.et al. (2020). Oropharyngeal candidiasis in hospitalised COVID-19 patients from Iran: species identification and antifungal susceptibility pattern. Mycoses63, 771–778. doi: 10.1111/myc.13137
47
SehliS.AllaliI.ChahbouneR.BakriY.al IdrissiN.HamdiS.et al. (2021). Metagenomics approaches to investigate the gut microbiome of COVID-19 patients. Bioinformat. Biol. Insights15:117793222199942. doi: 10.1177/1177932221999428
48
EllinghausD.DegenhardtF.BujandaL.ButiM.AlbillosA.InvernizziP.et al. (2020). Genomewide association study of severe Covid-19 with respiratory failure. N. Engl. J. Med.383, 1522–1534. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2020283
49
SharonG.GargN.DebeliusJ.KnightR.DorresteinP. C.MazmanianS. K. (2014). Specialized metabolites from the microbiome in health and disease. Cell Metab.20, 719–730. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.10.016
50
SongG.LiangG.LiuW. (2020). Fungal co-infections associated with global COVID-19 pandemic: a clinical and diagnostic perspective from China. Mycopathologia185, 599–606. doi: 10.1007/s11046-020-00462-9
51
VaccaM.CelanoG.CalabreseF. M.PortincasaP.GobbettiM.De AngelisM. (2020). The controversial role of human gut Lachnospiraceae. Microorganisms8:573. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8040573
52
WangJ.ThingholmL. B.SkiecevičienėJ.RauschP.KummenM.HovJ. R.et al. (2016). Genome-wide association analysis identifies variation in vitamin D receptor and other host factors influencing the gut microbiota. Nat. Genet.48, 1396–1406. doi: 10.1038/ng.3695
53
WangH.WangH.SunY.RenZ.ZhuW.LiA.et al. (2021). Potential associations between microbiome and COVID-19. Front. Med. (Lausanne)8:785496. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.785496
54
WHO. WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. (2021). Available at: https://covid19.who.int/ (Accessed December 5, 2021).
55
XiaoF.SunJ.XuY.LiF.HuangX.LiH.et al. (2020). Infectious SARS-CoV-2 in feces of patient with severe COVID-19. Emerg. Infect. Dis.26, 1920–1922. doi: 10.3201/eid2608.200681
56
XuK.AnY.LiQ.HuangW.HanY.ZhengT.et al. (2021). Recombinant chimpanzee adenovirus AdC7 expressing dimeric tandem-repeat spike protein RBD protects mice against COVID-19. Emerg. Microb. Infect.10, 1574–1588. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1959270
57
YamamotoN.AriumiY.NishidaN.YamamotoR.BauerG.GojoboriT.et al. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 mortalities strongly correlate with ACE1 I/D genotype. Gene758:144944. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144944
58
YeohY. K.ZuoT.LuiG. C.ZhangF.LiuQ.LiA. Y. L.et al. (2021). Gut microbiota composition reflects disease severity and dysfunctional immune responses in patients with COVID-19. Gut70, 698–706. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323020
59
YokoyamaY.IchikiT.YamakawaT.TsujiY.KuronumaK.TakahashiS.et al. (2022). Impaired tryptophan metabolism in the gastrointestinal tract of patients with critical coronavirus disease 2019. Front. Med.9:941422. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.941422
60
ZhangF.WanY.ZuoT.YeohY. K.LiuQ.ZhangL.et al. (2022). Prolonged impairment of short-chain fatty acid and L-isoleucine biosynthesis in gut microbiome in patients with COVID-19. Gastroenterology162, 548–561.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.013
61
ZhengD.LiwinskiT.ElinavE. (2020). Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res.30, 492–506. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0332-7
62
ZuoT.KammM. A.ColombelJ. F.NgS. C. (2018). Urbanization and the gut microbiota in health and inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.15, 440–452. doi: 10.1038/s41575-018-0003-z
63
ZuoT.LiuQ.ZhangF.LuiG. C.TsoE. Y.YeohY. K.et al. (2021a). Depicting SARS-CoV-2 faecal viral activity in association with gut microbiota composition in patients with COVID-19. Gut70, 276–284. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322294
64
ZuoT.LiuQ.ZhangF.YeohY. K.WanY.ZhanH.et al. (2021c). Temporal landscape of human gut RNA and DNA virome in SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity. Microbiome9:91. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01008-x
65
ZuoT.WuX.WenW.LanP. (2021b). Gut microbiome alterations in COVID-19. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics19, 679–688. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2021.09.004
66
ZuoT.ZhanH.ZhangF.LiuQ.TsoE. Y. K.LuiG. C. Y.et al. (2020b). Alterations in fecal fungal microbiome of patients with COVID-19 during time of hospitalization until discharge. Gastroenterology159, 1302–1310.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.048
67
ZuoT.ZhangF.LuiG. C. Y.YeohY. K.LiA. Y. L.ZhanH.et al. (2020a). Alterations in gut microbiota of patients with COVID-19 during time of hospitalization. Gastroenterology159, 944–955.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.048
Summary
Keywords
COVID-19, genome, gut microbiota, infectious diseases, SARS-CoV-2
Citation
Tong J, Chen Y, He M, Wang W, Wang Y, Li N and Xia Q (2023) The triangle relationship between human genome, gut microbiome, and COVID-19: opening of a Pandora’s box. Front. Microbiol. 14:1190939. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1190939
Received
25 March 2023
Accepted
14 June 2023
Published
29 June 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited by
Rahul K. Suryawanshi, Gladstone Institutes, United States
Reviewed by
Vaibhav Upadhyay, University of California, San Francisco, United States; Chandrashekhar D. Patil, University of Illinois Chicago, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Tong, Chen, He, Wang, Wang, Li and Xia.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Qianfeng Xia, xiaqianfeng@hainmc.edu.cnJie Tong, tongjie2019@hbu.edu.cnNa Li, 28914358@qq.com
†ORCID: Na Li, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0789-0515
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.