ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Sec. Biology of Archaea
Volume 14 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1204876
A sweet new set of inducible and constitutive promoters in Haloferax volcanii
- 1Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States
- 2Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata, Argentina
Inducible promoters are one of cellular and molecular biology’s most important technical tools. The ability to deplete, replete, and overexpress genes on demand is the foundation of most functional studies. Here, we developed and characterized a new xylose-responsive promoter (Pxyl), the second inducible promoter system for the model haloarcheon Haloferax volcanii. Generating RNA-seq datasets from cultures in the presence of four historically used inducers (arabinose, xylose, maltose, and IPTG), we mapped upregulated genomic regions primarily repressed in the absence of the above inducers. We found a highly upregulated promoter that controls the expression of the xacEA (HVO_B0027-28) operon in the pHV3 chromosome. To characterize this promoter region, we cloned msfGFP (monomeric superfold green fluorescent protein) under the control of two upstream regions into a modified pTA962 vector: the first 250 bp (P250) and the whole 750 bp intergenic fragments (P750). The P250 sequence drove the expression of msfGFP constitutively, and its expression did not respond to the presence or absence of xylose. However, the P750 promoter showed not only to be repressed in the absence of xylose but also expressed higher levels of msfGFP than the previously described inducible promoter PtnaA in the presence of the inducer. Finally, we validated the inducible Pxyl promoter by reproducing morphological phenotypes already described in the literature. By overexpressing the tubulin-like FtsZ1 and FtsZ2, we observed similar but slightly more pronounced morphological defects than the tryptophan-inducible promoter PtnaA. FtsZ1 overexpression created larger, deformed cells, whereas cells overexpressing FtsZ2 were smaller but mostly retained their shape. In summary, this work contributes a new xylose-inducible promoter that could be used simultaneously with the well-established PtnaA in functional studies in H. volcanii in the future.
Inducible promoters have been essential tools for molecular and cell biology studies in bacteria and eukaryotes, allowing for control over the expression of genes of interest in terms of both timing and strength of expression. Among the multiple uses of inducible promoters are dynamic studies of gene expression in vivo, timed expression of tagged protein fusions, and depletion assays. On the other hand, constitutive promoters have a wide range of applications, from expressing selective marker genes to consistent overexpression of proteins.
Like most model organisms, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a breadth of inducible promoters, most relying on ethanol and sugars (Weinhandl et al., 2014). These have later been replaced by variations of bacterial promoters due to tighter control of the latter. Additionally, there are two kinds of light-induced promoters used in mammalian cell studies, based on a light-oxygen-voltage (LOV) domain from the fungus Neurospora crassa and the Arabidopsis photoreceptor (Kallunki et al., 2019), which have been used in the research and identification of essential signaling pathways such as mTOR and Hippo (Kallunki et al., 2019). In plants, there is also a variety of available inducible promoters that can be used in Arabidopsis thaliana and other model systems, both chemically induced by compounds distinct from those used in mammalian systems (ethanol, dexamethasone, and β-estradiol) (Borghi, 2010) as well as the promoter of the A. thaliana heat-shock protein HSP18.2 gene, which is a strong inducible promoter that is activated by heat shock (Takahashi and Komeda, 1989; Matsuhara et al., 2000). In 2020, a xylose-inducible promoter was first cloned and used to express heterologous proteins in the thermoacidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius (van der Kolk et al., 2020). Currently, the only inducible promoter available in the model haloarchaeaon Haloferax volcanii is the tryptophan-inducible PtnaA (Allers et al., 2010).
Proteins isolated from halophiles have been increasingly used in biotechnology, from cosmetics manufacturing to bioremediation (Haque et al., 2020). Methods for expressing and purifying halophilic proteins, which commonly misfold and aggregate when expressed in Escherichia coli (Allers, 2010) have been described in Haloferax volcanii (Large et al., 2007) using the PtnaA promoter. Overexpression of such proteins for purification could benefit from stronger inducible or strong constitutive promoters being available in H. volcanii. Likewise, as H. volcanii emerges as a well-studied archaeal model due to its relative ease of cultivation and established genetics (Pohlschroder and Schulze, 2019), the development of molecular biology tools that allow the expression of multiple genes simultaneously becomes essential.
Recently, Nußbaum and coworkers (Nußbaum et al., 2021) reported that experiments on the hierarchy of recruitment of SepF by FtsZ1 or FtsZ2 were not feasible due to a lack of a second inducible promoter in H. volcanii. Despite the considerable characterization of the metabolism and catabolism of sugars in H. volcanii (Johnsen et al., 2009, 2013, 2015), little is known about how these promoters behave under ectopic expression during live-cell imaging experiments. To address the needs of the Haloferax community, we have here characterized two versions of the same promoter region: a strong constitutive and a new xylose-inducible promoter to be used as a tool for genetic studies in H. volcanii.
Haloferax volcanii cultures
Cells were grown in 16×25 mm glass tubes with 3 mL of Hv-Cab, a semi-defined medium based on casamino acids that improve growth and cell shape maintenance (de Silva et al., 2021). Cultures were incubated at 42°C under constant agitation with the inducers D-xylose (Thermo Scientific Chemicals), L-arabinose (Thermo Scientific Chemicals), IPTG (Fisher Bioreagents), D-maltose (Fisher Bioreagents), or L-tryptophan (Thermo Scientific Chemicals) in the concentrations indicated. Plasmid and strain list can be found in Tables 1, 2.
Cloning and transformations
All oligos used to make our constructs can be found in Table 3. The eTR8 vector was constructed by Gibson assembly (Gibson et al., 2009) from two PCR fragments using the oligos oTR26 and oTR27 (msfGFP) and a linearized pTA962 digested with NdeI.
The eAD08 vector was constructed by Gibson assembly from two PCR fragments using the oligos oBL340 and oJM96 (to amplify the msfGFP fragment) and the linearized pTA962 digested with NcoI.
The pAL250::msfGFP and pAL750::msfGFP vectors were constructed by Gibson assembly from three PCR fragments using the oligos oBL169 and oBL345 (msfGFP, eTR8 as a template), oBL343 and oBL344 (the first 250 bp upstream to the HVO_B0027 start codon using the H. volcanii strain DS2 gDNA as a template) or oBL343 and oBL345 (the first 750 bp upstream to the HVO_B0027 start codon using the H. volcanii strain DS2 gDNA as a template), and a linearized pTA962 previously digested with KpnI and BamHI.
The pAL750 vector was created by Gibson assembly from three PCR fragments using the pAL::msfGFP vector as a template and the oligos oZC23 and oTR150 (pHV2 ori), oTR151 and oSB33 (pyrE2-Pxyl750 region), and oBL97 and oBL105 (E. coli oriC and AmpR cassette).
The pAL750::ftsZ1 and pAL750::ftsZ2 vectors were cloned by Gibson assembly of two fragments using the oligos oTR151 and oTR152 (ftsZ1) or oTR153 and oTR154 (ftsZ2) using the H. volcanii strain DS2 gDNA as a template, and a linear fragment of the pAL vector digested with NdeI.
All Gibson reactions were transformed into competent E. coli DH5ɑ cells and clones confirmed by whole-plasmid sequencing (Plasmidsaurus). Plasmid preps were then transformed into H. volcanii using the method previously described (Dyall-Smith, 2009), with 0.5 M EDTA (Thermo Scientific Catalog #J15694-AE) and PEG600 (Sigma, catalog # 87333-250G-F).
Cells were grown to an OD600 of ~0.5 and diluted to an OD600 of 0.05. Then, 200 μL of culture was placed in a 96-well flat-bottom plate (Corning Inc.). All wells surrounding the plate’s edge (A and H rows, 1 and 12 columns) were filled with 200 μL of water to prevent media evaporation. Growth curves of three biological triplicates were performed using an EPOCH 2 microplate spectrophotometer (Agilent) with constant orbital shaking at 42°C. Data points were collected every 30 min.
Microscopy and image analysis
Cells were grown in Hv-Cab (de Silva et al., 2021) or YPC medium (Allers et al., 2004) to mid-exponential or stationary OD600 without or with inducers as indicated. Cultures were then concentrated 10-fold by centrifuging (3,000xg for 2–5 min), and a 3 μL droplet of culture was placed on a 60×24 mm coverslip and gently covered with a 1.5×1.5 cm 0.25% Hv-Cab agarose pad (SeaKem LE Agarose, Lonza). Staining with Ethidium Bromide (Invitrogen, catalog #15585–011) was performed by adding 3 μg/mL of the dye into the cell culture and incubating at 42°C for 5 min. Cells were then imaged at 42°C using a Nikon TI-2 Nikon Inverted Microscope within an Okolab H201 enclosure. Phase-contrast and GFP-fluorescence images were acquired with a Hamamatsu ORCA Flash 4.0 v3 sCMOS Camera (6.5 μm/pixel), a CFI PlanApo Lambda 100x DM Ph3 Objective, and a Lumencor Sola II Fluorescent LED (380–760 nm). Image analysis was performed using FIJI (Schindelin et al., 2012). Cells were segmented using the rolling ball background subtraction (value = 20) on phase-contrast images, followed by thresholding (default) and using the analyze particles function with a minimum particle size of 0.2 μm2. The mask was then used to acquire shape descriptor data and applied to the GFP channel (after background subtraction) for fluorescence quantification.
RNA extraction and sequencing
All steps were performed at room temperature unless otherwise indicated. Cells were grown to an OD600 of ~0.5 in the presence of xylose (10 mM), arabinose (10 mM), IPTG (1 mM), and maltose (1 mM) and harvested by centrifugation (4,500xg for 10 min). RNA extraction was performed using 1 mL of TriZol (Invitrogen) per sample, followed by vigorous pipetting to lyse all cells in the sample. 200 μL of chloroform was added to the sample mixture, and samples were vortexed for 90 s. Samples were then centrifuged at 12,000xg at 4°C for 15 min, and the supernatant was collected and mixed with 2 μL of glycogen (Sigma Aldrich) and 400 μL of isopropanol (Thermo Scientific Chemicals). Samples were incubated overnight at −20°C. Samples were centrifuged at 21,000xg, 4°C for 30 min and washed twice with 75% ethanol (Zaffagni et al., 2022). Samples were treated with DNAse I (NEB) for 12 min at 37°C, followed by a second ethanol precipitation. Purified RNA was sent to SeqCenter LLC (Pittsburgh, United States, seqcenter.com) for ribosome depletion using Haloferax-specific probes (Supplementary Table S1) and sequencing. Results were mapped to the H. volcanii DS2 genome and analyzed using Geneious 2002.2. Transcripts per million separated by ORF and inducer can be found in Supplementary Table S2. The complete raw RNA-seq datasets presented in this study can be found in NCBI GEO online repositories: PRJNA953041 (no induction), PRJNA953037 (xylose), PRJNA953035 (IPTG), PRJNA953033 (Arabinose), PRJNA953034 (Maltose).
RNA-seq screening to identify new sugar-responsive promoters
To find native inducible promoters, we investigated four different sugars frequently used as inducers in other microbial models: arabinose (Guzman et al., 1995), xylose (Kim et al., 1996), maltose (Ming-Ming et al., 2006), and the sugar analog IPTG (Dubendorff and Studier, 1991). To determine the highest sugar concentrations we could use in H. volcanii cultures without compromising growth rates, cell size, and morphology, we titrated each sugar from 1 mM to 100 mM. Based on concentrations used to induce promoters in bacteria, we expected that concentrations higher than 1 mM could yield slow-growing, smaller cells. Surprisingly, we could only observe this outcome from cultures above 10 mM of xylose (Figures 1A,B). Therefore, we focused on concentrations at 10 mM.
Figure 1. RNA-seq map of inducer-responsive promoters in H. volcanii. (A) Growth curves of H. volcanii DS2 cells under different xylose concentrations. (B) Cell area measurements at different xylose concentrations by phase contrast microscopy from mid-exponential cultures. Datapoints (and means) were colored (pink, yellow, and blue), indicating different biological replicates. (C) Gene expression ratios mapped across the H. volcanii genome from RNA-seq datasets of mid-exponential cultures with and without 10 mM arabinose (orange), xylose (blue), maltose (green), and IPTG (pink). Numbers 1 and 2 indicate genomic regions where gene expression increased above 5-fold. Arrowheads indicate promising genomic regions that did not satisfy our arbitrary 5-fold cutoff. (D) Locus organization of regions 1 and 2. (E) Expression map (transcripts per million) of genomic regions from RNA-seq datasets without inducers (left) and the relative increase in expression (right) from uninduced (Cab), arabinose (Ara), and xylose (Xyl).
Next, we employed RNA-seq from mid-exponential cultures with or without each of the four inducers to map candidates for new inducible promoters. Using a set of specific probes for H. volcanii (Supplementary Table S1) (Pastor et al., 2022), the total ribosomal RNA detected in our samples was between 0.21 to 0.37% of the total number of reads from each sample. By comparing the relative fold change of transcripts per million, we obtained 58 genes from which mRNA levels were significantly upregulated (log2 fold change ≥1 and value of p ≤0.05) for xylose, 42 genes upregulated by maltose, 0 for IPTG, and 45 genes upregulated for arabinose. We identified 15 downregulated genes (log2 fold change ≤ −1 and value of p ≤0.05) for xylose, 44 genes for maltose, 3 for IPTG, and 10 for arabinose (Supplementary Table S2).
To create a shortlist of promoter candidates, we could further validate experimentally, we arbitrarily selected genes above 5-fold or higher ratio change upon the addition of the inducer (Figure 1C). Above this threshold, we assigned 1 promoter for maltose (HVO_0562–64); 4 for xylose (HVO_B0027-29, HVO_B0030-32, HVO_B0035, and HVO_B0036-38); 3 for arabinose (HVO_B0027-29, HVO_B0030-32, and HVO_B0035; and none for IPTG (Figures 1C,D). In the first two cases, candidate gene expression was upregulated upon adding xylose or arabinose (regions 1 and 2, Figure 1D). In contrast, the genomic region comprising gene HVO_B106 did not pass our requirements; it called our attention for being arabinose-specific and not being significantly upregulated under xylose addition (Figure 1C, orange arrowhead). Likewise, genes HVO_0562-HVO_0566 are specifically upregulated under maltose induction (Figure 1C, green arrowhead), and three regions (HVO_A0173, HVO_B0032, and HVO_B0303) respond to IPTG (Figure 1C, pink arrowheads).
Despite observing an approximately 10-fold increase in mRNA levels upon inducer addition, we wanted to ensure these genes were tightly controlled by an inducible promoter with precise linear titration power and not already constitutively expressed at a high basal expression level. To understand the basal expression levels of genes, including regions 1 and 2, we plotted the raw transcription profile (Figure 1E, left panel). We compared it to the transcriptional levels of all other genes (Figure 1E, right panel). As expected, after ribosomal RNA depletion, the transcripts with higher relative values in our datasets were the ones mapping to the S-layer glycoprotein (csg, over 26,000 TPM - Transcripts Per Million - across samples) and the translational factor EF1a transcripts (above 10,000 TPM across samples). On the other hand, both promoter regions 1 and 2 transcriptional levels are placed in the low quartile range of our dataset in the uninduced sample (1.44 TPM and 23.65 TPM, respectively).
Altogether, genomic regions 1 and 2 are promising candidates for new xylose- and arabinose-inducible promoters for H. volcanii. For the context of this work, and based on the dynamic range suggested by our RNA-seq dataset above, we focused on the characterization of the promoter regulating the gene xacE (HVO_B0027), or genomic region 1, under the induction of xylose.
A xacEA 5′ long upstream region is required for xacE repression in the absence of xylose
To test the xacE promoter region, we sub-cloned the fluorescent protein msfGFP under the control of two different putative promoter regions: 250 bp (P250) and 750 bp (P750) upstream to xacE (Figure 2A). Plasmids were then transformed into H. volcanii H26 (ΔpyrE2), and selected on plates without uracil. As a negative control, we used the H26 strain transformed with the empty pAL750 vector (labeled from now on as wild type). As a comparison, we analyzed the expression of msfGFP under the control of the popular inducible promoter PtnaA, which activates upon tryptophan addition (Allers et al., 2010). As a benchmark, we also inserted msfGFP under the control of PfdX, a strong and constitutive promoter used to express the pyrE2 gene in our vectors as a selective transformation marker (PfdX-msfGFP-pyrE2 operon).
Figure 2. Pxyl constructs can be either strong inducible or constitutive promoters. (A) Fragments of the 5′ intergenic region of xacE were used to clone into pAL vectors and map the P250 and P750 promoters tested in this work. (B) Phase-contrast and epifluorescence images of different constructs expressing the msfGFP fluorescent protein. (C) Mean msfGFP fluorescence measurements per cell from images shown in panel B. Each replicate means, and data points are independently labeled with different colors (pink, yellow, and blue). Datapoints (and means) were colored (pink, yellow, and blue), indicating different biological replicates. (D) Comparative background expression from constructs with and without glucose repression. Datapoints (and means) were colored (pink, yellow, and blue), indicating different biological replicates. (E) The dynamic range of PtnaA and Pxyl promoters across different inducer concentrations in raw numbers (top) and normalized (bottom) fold-changes. Shades indicate the 95% confidence interval from triplicate datasets.
Imaging of live cells by phase-contrast and epifluorescence microscopy showed cytoplasmic signal emitted by the msfGFP fluorescent protein from single cells (Figure 2B). Cells carrying empty plasmids (Figure 2B, first column) showed low auto-fluorescence at 488 nm excitation compared to cells carrying vectors inducing msfGFP under the control of PfdX and Pxyl promoters. For a quantitative picture of the induction power of each promoter, we segmented individual cells and measured the mean fluorescence per cell from three biological triplicates and graphed using SuperPlots (Lord et al., 2020; Goedhart, 2021). Surprisingly, the P250 promoter was insensitive to xylose and constitutively expressed 2-fold above the PfdX control (10,048 ± 2,256 and 4,967 ± 929 AU, respectively) (Figure 2C).
In contrast, the P750 promoter harboring the whole upstream intergenic sequence showed approximately a 5.5-fold repression (1,827 ± 848) without induction compared to P250. However, msfGFP levels of non-induced P750 cells were still relatively high, 5.7-fold higher than uninduced PtnaA cells (320 ± 14) (Figures 2B,C). To minimize the transcriptional leakage from P750, we tested whether H. volcanii cells would present catabolite repression upon adding glucose. This strategy has been successful in various bacterial and yeast systems (Gancedo, 1998; Deutscher, 2008). Adding 20 mM glucose to cultures decreased leakage of the Pxyl promoter, but msfGFP intensity is still 2.7-fold higher than PtnaA cells (Figure 2D).
However, different from the P250 promoter, adding 10 mM xylose to P750 cells resulted in a 10.3-fold increase (18,792 ± 4,129) in fluorescence intensity with a wider heterogeneity across the population compared to P250. Nevertheless, the unusual decrease in msfGFP expression observed between P250 and P750 suggests that xacE’s upstream region between 250 bp and 750 bp might have important regulatory elements.
We also inspected the dynamic range of our P750 promoter compared to PtnaA. By titrating xylose (0 to 25 μM) and tryptophan (0 to 2 mM), we observed a significant improvement from an 11.2-fold linear range for the PtnaA promoter to a 23-fold for the P750 promoter (Figure 2E). Providing the relatively higher leakage of the P750 promoter levels compared to PtnaA, we concluded that this new construct is a valuable tool for titration experiments and overexpression at high protein levels for functional studies and protein purification directly from H. volcanii. Notably, P250 could be used simultaneously with the above inducible promoters as another constitutive promoter in the Haloferax community.
Furthermore, we tested the ability to induce the P750 promoter in cells growing in Hv-YPC, a rich medium based on yeast extract instead of casamino acids (Allers et al., 2004). In contrast with Hv-Cab, cells at mid-exponential growth phase showed lower levels of promoter leakage (222 ± 188), 3.6-fold higher than in Hv-Cab (Figure 3). However, together with the tighter expression of P750, induced cells in Hv-YPC expressed msfGFP at 7.6 times lower than in Hv-Cab (1,636 ± 1,258), possibly due to catabolic repression in response to a component in yeast extract.
Figure 3. P750 shows different induction profiles in different media, at stationary phase, and upon adding arabinose. Epifluorescence microscopy quantification from exponential growing cells in Hv-Cab medium and Hv-YPC medium induced with 10 mM xylose (first and second plots). Expression of msfGFP was also recorded in cells grown to exponential phase in Hv-Cab medium with 10 mM arabinose (third plot). Cells grown in Hv-Cab to stationary phase and induced with 10 mM xylose (fourth plot).
In addition to Hv-YPC, we also measured the expression profile of P750 at stationary growth phase and upon the addition of arabinose instead of xylose (Figure 3). While we observed a similar induction profile from cells in stationary phase and under arabinose induction, both cases showed a wider signal distribution (9,851 ± 617 and 11,699 ± 797, respectively) compared to xylose-based induction during exponential growth (12,395 ± 800).
Overexpression of the tubulins FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 confirms reported morphological phenotypes
Recently, Liao and colleagues reported the role of two tubulin paralogs (FtsZ1 and FtsZ2) in H. volcanii’s cell division (Liao et al., 2021). The authors used PtnaA-controlled overexpression of FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 independently and observed distinct, specific morphological phenotypes related to the overexpression of each paralog. Cells under PtnaA-FtsZ1 overexpression were slightly larger but significantly misshaped compared to the control, whereas PtnaA-FtsZ2 cells looked significantly smaller but showed a more consistent morphology.
To confirm if those phenotypes are reproducible or even enhanced in our new Pxyl system, we cloned ftsZ1 and ftsZ2 in the pAL vector and analyzed the cell size and circularity compared to PtnaA-induced cells. Cells overexpressing ftsZ2 under the Pxyl promoter are slightly smaller (1.2-fold decrease in average cell area) than cells overexpressing ftsZ2 under the tryptophan-inducible PtnaA (Figure 4A). Meanwhile, cells overexpressing ftsZ1 under the Pxyl promoter seemed to have more drastic phenotypes than those overexpressing ftsZ1 using PtnaA, with deformed and enlarged cells (Figures 4A,C). Curiously, a fraction of the population exhibits narrow “cell bridges” connecting two enlarged cells (Figure 4B), similar to those previously described (Rosenshine et al., 1989; Sivabalasarma et al., 2021; Von Kügelgen et al., 2021). This indicates that, in our samples, the cell-to-cell bridges observed in phase contrast could be formed by a product of incomplete cell division.
Figure 4. Overexpression of ftsZ1 and ftsZ2 under the Pxyl promoter. (A) Phase-contrast microscopy showing wild-type cells and cells overexpressing ftsZ1 or ftsZ2 under the Pxyl (5 mM xylose) or PtnaA (2 mM tryptophan) promoters. (B) Representative cell bridge phase-contrast and epifluorescence images. DNA was stained with ethidium bromide. (C) Cell area and circularity measurements from cells overexpressing ftsZ1 and ftsZ2 with the Pxyl (5 mM xylose) and the PtnaA (2 mM tryptophan) promoters. Datapoints (and means) were colored (pink, yellow, and blue), indicating different biological replicates.
Inducible promoters have been an invaluable resource in basic molecular biology research for the past 60 years, since the early days of the “PaJaMa Experiments” (Lewis, 2011). The addition of xylose to the culture medium was first shown to induce the expression of genes in E. coli (Batt et al., 1985) and B. subtilis in 1988 (Gärtner et al., 1988). This report describes the characterization of a new xylose-inducible promoter for the halophilic archaeon H. volcanii, a well-studied archaeal model (Pohlschroder and Schulze, 2019).
Using RNA-seq in cultures growing with and without four different inducers, we identified multiple promoter regions in which transcript levels were upregulated upon the addition of arabinose (total of 23 promoters, 3 above the arbitrary cut-off), xylose (total of 18 promoters, 4 above the arbitrary cut-off), maltose (total of 6 promoters, none above the arbitrary cut-off) and IPTG (total of 2 promoters, none above the arbitrary cut-off). Interestingly, our most promising promoter chosen to be characterized was already noted in past studies using DNA microarrays and C13 isotope tracking (Johnsen et al., 2009) and further characterized in vitro and in vivo (Johnsen et al., 2013, 2015). Interestingly, their measurements ranged from 100- to 400-fold increase upon arabinose addition compared to our observations from RNA-seq (9.8-fold, Figure 1C) and live-cell microscopy (10.3-fold increase, Figure 2C). This apparent discrepancy possibly originated from the differences in the experimental design, as we used rich undefined media and Johnson and colleagues grew the cells in synthetic medium with glucose. Yet on another note, against the anecdotal knowledge among researchers in the field, the PtnaA promoter showed a relatively low leakage in cultures without tryptophan (Figure 2D). This is a conundrum that shall be addressed by the community in the future.
One interesting previously unmentioned feature of the transcriptional regulation of the xacEA operon is that the P750 promoter is not only significantly repressed in the absence of xylose, but P750 shows a 1.9-fold increase in msfGFP signal in comparison to the constitutive P250 promoter (Figure 2C). The mechanistic details are still elusive, but it is possible that the extreme upstream fragment is the target of transcriptional factors competing to repress and activate the expression of xacEA. A good candidate for an activator is XacR (HVO_B0040), an IclR transcriptional factor family shown to work both as a repressor and activator in the same cells (Krell et al., 2006; Pan et al., 2011). In agreement with previous observations in bacteria, XacR in H. volcanii was shown to be required to activate xacE expression in vivo (Johnsen et al., 2015).
We have shown that, through higher levels of expression than with the available promoter PtnaA, cells overexpressing the tubulin-like FtsZ1 had subtle but clear morphology defects (Figure 4) beyond those previously described (Liao et al., 2021). Interestingly, FtsZ2 overexpression under our Pxyl system did not result in a convincing change to PtnaA-FtsZ2 cells, in agreement with data suggesting that FtsZ2 proteins are more unstable compared to FtsZ1 (Liao et al., 2021). Alternatively, the FtsZ2 function could be coupled with other factors that are more limited in the cell, and therefore a higher concentration of FtsZ2 would not linearly scale with cell size.
On the other hand, our work falls short of covering further characterization of the new Pxyl promoter. The region characterized as necessary for repression without xylose (750 bp) is notably longer than expected. Future experiments generating truncates and point mutations will be important to locate regulatory elements such as the B recognition element (BRE) and TATA box, but also create improved versions driving higher or more controlled expression. Likewise, the characterization of other promoter regions that showed to be independently upregulated upon the addition of maltose and IPTG (Figure 1C) may expand the toolbox of inducible promoters in H. volcanii.
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: NCBI BioProject [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/], PRJNA953041 (no induction); PRJNA953037 (xylose); PRJNA953035 (IPTG); PRJNA953033 (Arabinose); PRJNA953034 (Maltose).
AB and TR conceived the study and wrote the first draft. AB, MC, TR, and KA designed the experiments. TR and KA performed the experiments and analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
This work was supported by the Human Frontiers Science Program funding (RGY0074/2021) and Life Sciences-Moore–Simons Project on the Origin of the Eukaryotic Cell (doi: 10.46714/735929LPI) awarded to AB. AB is a Pew Scholar in the Biomedical Sciences, supported by The Pew Charitable Trusts. MC was supported by the CONICET Partial Financing Program for Stays Abroad for Assistant Researchers.
The authors thank the Bisson Lab, Kiwi Shaw-Dodge, TB Manju, and Rosana De Castro (Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata) for their insightful comments on our manuscript. The authors appreciate Sebastian Kadener and Sinead Nguyen (Brandeis University) for their help in optimizing the total RNA extraction from H. volcanii. The authors also thank Amy Schmid and Mar Martinez-Pastor (Duke University) for sharing data on their ribodepletion probes prior to publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1204876/full#supplementary-material
Allers, T., Barak, S., Liddell, S., Wardell, K., and Mevarech, M. (2010). Improved strains and plasmid vectors for conditional overexpression of his-tagged proteins in Haloferax volcanii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 1759–1769. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02670-09
Allers, T., Ngo, H.-P., Mevarech, M., and Lloyd, R. G. (2004). Development of additional selectable markers for the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii based on the leuB and trpA genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 943–953. doi: 10.1128/aem.70.2.943-953.2004
Batt, C. A., Bodis, M. S., Picataggio, S. K., Claps, M. C., Jamas, S., and Sinskey, A. J. (1985). Analysis of xylose operon regulation by mud (Apr, lac) fusion: trans effect of plasmid coded xylose operon. Can. J. Microbiol. 31, 930–933. doi: 10.1139/m85-174
Borghi, L. (2010). “Inducible gene expression Systems for Plants” in Plant developmental biology: Methods and protocols, methods in molecular biology. eds. L. Hennig and C. Köhler (Totowa, NJ: Humana Press), 65–75.
de Silva, R. T., Abdul-Halim, M. F., Pittrich, D. A., Brown, H. J., Pohlschroder, M., and Duggin, I. G. (2021). Improved growth and morphological plasticity of Haloferax volcanii. Microbiology 167:001012. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001012
Dubendorff, J. W., and Studier, F. W. (1991). Controlling basal expression in an inducible T7 expression system by blocking the target T7 promoter with lac repressor. J. Mol. Biol. 219, 45–59. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90856-2
Dyall-Smith, M. (ed.) (2009). The halohandbook: Protocols for halobacterial genetics. Available at: https://haloarchaea.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Halohandbook_2009_v7.3mds.pdf
Gärtner, D., Geissendörfer, M., and Hillen, W. (1988). Expression of the Bacillus subtilis xyl operon is repressed at the level of transcription and is induced by xylose. J. Bacteriol. 170, 3102–3109. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.7.3102-3109.1988
Gibson, D. G., Young, L., Chuang, R.-Y., Venter, J. C., Hutchison, C. A., and Smith, H. O. (2009). Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 6, 343–345. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318
Goedhart, J. (2021). SuperPlotsOfData—a web app for the transparent display and quantitative comparison of continuous data from different conditions. Mol. Biol. Cell 32, 470–474. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E20-09-0583
Guzman, L. M., Belin, D., Carson, M. J., and Beckwith, J. (1995). Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J. Bacteriol. 177, 4121–4130. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.14.4121-4130.1995
Haque, R. U., Paradisi, F., and Allers, T. (2020). Haloferax volcanii for biotechnology applications: challenges, current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 104, 1371–1382. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-10314-2
Hartman, A. L., Norais, C., Badger, J. H., Delmas, S., Haldenby, S., Madupu, R., et al. (2010). The complete genome sequence of Haloferax volcanii DS2, a model archaeon. PLoS One 5:e9605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009605
Johnsen, U., Dambeck, M., Zaiss, H., Fuhrer, T., Soppa, J., Sauer, U., et al. (2009). D-xylose degradation pathway in the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 27290–27303. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.003814
Johnsen, U., Sutter, J.-M., Schulz, A.-C., Tästensen, J.-B., and Schönheit, P. (2015). XacR – a novel transcriptional regulator of D-xylose and L-arabinose catabolism in the haloarchaeon Haloferax volcanii. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 1663–1676. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12603
Johnsen, U., Sutter, J.-M., Zaiß, H., and Schönheit, P. (2013). L-arabinose degradation pathway in the haloarchaeon Haloferax volcanii involves a novel type of l-arabinose dehydrogenase. Extremophiles 17, 897–909. doi: 10.1007/s00792-013-0572-2
Krell, T., Molina-Henares, A. J., and Ramos, J. L. (2006). The IclR family of transcriptional activators and repressors can be defined by a single profile. Protein Soc. 15, 1207–1213. doi: 10.1110/ps.051857206
Large, A., Stamme, C., Lange, C., Duan, Z., Allers, T., Soppa, J., et al. (2007). Characterization of a tightly controlled promoter of the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii and its use in the analysis of the essential cct1 gene. Mol. Microbiol. 66, 1092–1106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05980.x
Liao, Y., Ithurbide, S., Evenhuis, C., Löwe, J., and Duggin, I. G. (2021). Cell division in the archaeon Haloferax volcanii relies on two FtsZ proteins with distinct functions in division ring assembly and constriction. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 594–605. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00894-z
Lord, S. J., Velle, K. B., Mullins, R. D., and Fritz-Laylin, L. K. (2020). SuperPlots: communicating reproducibility and variability in cell biology. J. Cell Biol. 219:e202001064. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202001064
Matsuhara, S., Jingu, F., Takahashi, T., and Komeda, Y. (2000). Heat-shock tagging: a simple method for expression and isolation of plant genome DNA flanked by T-DNA insertions. Plant J. 22, 79–86. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00716.x
Ming-Ming, Y., Wei-Wei, Z., Xi-Feng, Z., and Pei-Lin, C. (2006). Construction and characterization of a novel maltose inducible expression vector in Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol. Lett. 28, 1713–1718. doi: 10.1007/s10529-006-9146-z
Nußbaum, P., Gerstner, M., Dingethal, M., Erb, C., and Albers, S.-V. (2021). The archaeal protein SepF is essential for cell division in Haloferax volcanii. Nat. Commun. 12:3469. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23686-9
Pan, Y., Fiscus, V., Meng, W., Zheng, Z., Zhang, L.-H., Fuqua, C., et al. (2011). The Agrobacterium tumefaciens transcription factor BlcR is regulated via oligomerization. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 20431–20440. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.196154
Pastor, M. M., Sakrikar, S., Rodriguez, D. N., and Schmid, A. K. (2022). Comparative analysis of rRNA removal methods for RNA-Seq differential expression in halophilic Archaea. Biomol. Ther. 12:682. doi: 10.3390/biom12050682
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., et al. (2012). Fiji: an open source platform for biological image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019.Fiji A., C
Sivabalasarma, S., Wetzel, H., Nußbaum, P., van der Does, C., Beeby, M., and Albers, S.-V. (2021). Analysis of cell–cell bridges in Haloferax volcanii using Electron Cryo-tomography reveal a continuous cytoplasm and S-layer. Front. Microbiol. 11:612239. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.612239
van der Kolk, N., Wagner, A., Wagner, M., Waßmer, B., Siebers, B., and Albers, S.-V. (2020). Identification of XylR, the activator of arabinose/xylose inducible regulon in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius and its application for homologous protein expression. Front. Microbiol. 11:1066. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01066
Keywords: archaea, haloarchaea, Haloferax volcanii, inducible promoters, constitutive promoters, xylose-inducible promoter
Citation: Rados T, Andre K, Cerletti M and Bisson A (2023) A sweet new set of inducible and constitutive promoters in Haloferax volcanii. Front. Microbiol. 14:1204876. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1204876
Edited by:Arthur Charles-Orszag, University of California, San Francisco, United States
Reviewed by:Horia Todor, University of California, San Francisco, United States
Iain G. Duggin, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
Jörg Soppa, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
Copyright © 2023 Rados, Andre, Cerletti and Bisson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship