Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 27 July 2023
Sec. Microbial Physiology and Metabolism

LuxR402 of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a regulates the correct configuration of cell envelopes

  • Environmental Protection Department, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain

Although there is some evidence to suggest that LuxR-solo proteins participate in inter-species or even inter-kingdom communication, most of the LuxR-solo protein functions are unknown. We have characterized the LuxR402 regulator of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a, a bacterial strain with the ability to establish high numbers in the plant rhizosphere and able to degrade a wide range of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. LuxR402 controls the aggregation state of the bacterial culture; cultures of a mutant strain lacking this regulator flocculate in less than 3 h without agitation. We have demonstrated that the bacterial surface of the mutant is highly hydrophobic and that the mutant cells assimilate sugars slower than the wild-type. The flocculation mechanism has been demonstrated to be involved in the survival of the strain under unfavorable conditions; the luxR402 gene is repressed and produces flocculation in the presence of salicylate, a substrate that, although being assimilated by Novosphingobium, is toxic to cells at high concentrations. The flocculation of cultures in industrial setups has mainly been achieved through the addition of chemicals; these studies open up the possibility of controlling the flocculation by regulating the level of expression of the luxR402 gene.

1. Introduction

Regulatory proteins of the LuxR family have been extensively studied in bacterial quorum sensing (Fuqua et al., 1994; Fuqua, 2006; Papenfort and Bassler, 2016). luxI and luxR, which encode the synthetase of the acyl-homoserine lactone, and the regulator, respectively, are frequently sequentially encoded in the bacterial chromosome (Smith and Ahmer, 2003). However, approximately 75% of the luxR genes annotated in the data bases in proteobacteria correspond to luxR solos (Hudaiberdiev et al., 2015). There is some evidence that points toward the participation of LuxR-solo proteins in inter-species and even inter-kingdom communication, but most of the LuxR-solo protein functions are unknown (Fuqua and Greenberg, 2002; Subramoni and Venturi, 2009; Brachmann et al., 2013; Brameyer et al., 2014; Bez et al., 2021).

Novosphingobium sp. HR1a is able to degrade low-, medium- and high-molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (Segura et al., 2017), and it has shown excellent potential for rhizoremediation (Molina et al., 2021). Furthermore, this strain is able to grow in marine media (Segura et al., 2017). The ability to confront changing environments has been correlated with the number of transcription regulators in the genome (Cases et al., 2003), as these environmental bacteria have to co-ordinate the responses toward different inputs, such as temperature, oxygen tension, the presence of other organisms, antimicrobial compounds and others. In Novosphingobium sp. HR1a genome, 8 genes have been annotated as putative LuxR regulators in RAST server (Aziz et al., 2008), but the involvement of most of them in bacterial physiology remains unknown. Genes HWN72_19575 and HWN72_19576 are closely related to the genes encoding the canonical LuxR and LuxI proteins respectively, whilst LuxR874 (HWN72_04325) has recently been involved in plant-bacteria interactions, affecting clover root development and root colonization (Molina et al., submitted). During a preliminary screening of the phenotypes associated with the other LuxR-solos in Novosphingobium sp. HR1a, we observed that the knockout mutant in the luxR-like gene HWN72_01945 (named here luxR402) flocculated faster than the wild-type when cultures are in repose, without agitation. Because of the relevance of flocculation in biotechnological processes, we carried out a detailed analysis of this mutant. Our starting hypothesis is that cells of the luxR402 knockout mutant should have their surfaces altered allowing cellular aggrupation. As LuxR402 is a regulator of the luxR-solo family, we thought that phenotypes, normally associated with quorum sensing (QS) regulation (i.e., motility on different surfaces), should be different between the mutant and the wild-type strains. Novosphingobium sp. HR1a has been described as a good colonizing strain of clover roots, and therefore, we studied if vegetal compounds, previously identified in root exudates, have an effect on growth or in the expression of the luxR402 gene. Therefore, through hydrophobicity test, microscopy analysis, and proteomic as well as motility tests, we showed that the mutant strain has an altered cellular surface. We used transcriptomic analysis to determine the physiological status of the luxR402 knockout mutant, identifying that the carbohydrate assimilation pathway and TCA cycle were affected in the mutant. Accordingly, the mutant presented poorer growth than the wild-type when growing with different carbon sources. Our results indicated that LuxR402 regulates the ability of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a to aggregate under stressful conditions as a defense mechanism against some environmental cues.

2. Results

2.1. The flocculation phenotype of the luxR402 knockout mutant is correlated with an altered cellular morphology and surface

In liquid cultures the Novosphingobium sp. HR1a knockout mutant in HWN72_01945 (named luxR402) formed aggregates and these aggregates flocculated both in LB rich media and in M9 minimal medium with glucose as the only carbon source when the cultures were maintained without agitation. This phenotype was observable since the exponential phase of growth but became clearer after reaching the late exponential and stationary growth phase (Figure 1A). The phenotype is evident after 3 h of standstill. To demonstrate that the phenotype was specifically determined by LuxR402, we cloned the HWN72_01945 gene into the pBBRMCS5 vector (Kovach et al., 1995) under the lacZ promoter and we introduced the resultant plasmid into the wild-type and luxR402 mutant strains. The complemented mutant did not flocculate as fast as the mutant (Figure 1B), although it still flocculated faster than the wild-type (not shown). Therefore, we were able to specifically assign the flocculation phenotype to the absence of a functional LuxR402.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. (A) Flocculation of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a luxR402 knockout mutant in cultures grown overnight in M9 minimal medium plus glucose. The photograph was taken after 3 h without shaking. (B) Complementation of the luxR402 knockout mutant phenotype. Cultures of the wild-type and mutant strains with the empty plasmid pBBR1MCS-5, HR1a (p0) and 402 (p0) respectively, and cultures of the wild-type and mutant strains with the plasmid containing HWN72_01945, HR1a (p402) and 402 (p402), respectively, were grown in LB media up to the stationary phase of growth. The photographs were taken 3 h after the agitation was stopped.

Colonies of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a grown in plates with M9 minimal medium plus glucose had a mucoid aspect that was less visible in the luxR402 knockout mutant (Figure 2A). Furthermore, the cellular mass in Novosphingobium sp. HR1a colonies was slippery when manipulated, whilst in the mutant strain it was stickier. These results suggest that LuxR402 was involved in the polysaccharide production. In an attempt to characterize the nature of the polysaccharide, we added Congo red to the plates, a dye that binds to some β-D-glucans, dyeing the colonies with an intense red color. As shown in Figure 2B, the wild-type colony did not take on a strong red color and the mutant strain presented only a slightly more intense red color, suggesting that β-glucans were not the main exopolysaccharides in any of the strains. Neither Novosphingobium sp. HR1a nor the luxR402 knockout mutant swam in 0.3% agar plates (not shown). Typical swarming was not observed in the wild-type strain when grown in 0.5% agar plates, although the mutant colony presented a smaller diameter than the wild-type (Figures 2C,D). Twitching and biofilm formation after twitching was more evident in the wild-type than in the mutant strain (Figures 2E,F).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. (A) Aspect of colonies resulting of the drop sampling of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a (HR1a) and of the luxR402 mutant (402) cultivated in minimal medium M9 containing glucose as the only carbon source after 4 days at 30°C. (B) Aspect of the colonies in presence of Congo red under similar conditions. (C) Aspect of the colonies after growing for 5 days in 0.5% agar plates (swarming). (D) Size of the colonies (diameter) of the wild-type HR1a and mutant (luxR402) strains carrying the empty plasmid p0, or the plasmid with the luxR402 gene (p402), after growing in 0.5% agar plates for 5 days in 0.5% agar plates. (E) Aspect of the colonies after growing of 5 days in 1% agar plates (twitching) upper part and the biofilm that was formed after twitching, stained with crystal violet. (F) Optical density measured at 595 nm of the biofilms, formed after twitching, of the wild-type (HR1a) and mutant (luxR402) strains and the strains carrying the empty plasmid (p0) and the plasmid carrying the luxR402 gene (p402). Asterisks indicate statistically differences between the wild-type and the other strains (***p ≤ 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, n = 4–7).

When the wild-type and luxR402 mutant strains were analyzed under scanning microscopy, we observed that while the cells of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a presented the typical bacillary morphology, the mutant cells presented a coccoid morphology (Figure 3). The cells of mutant luxR402 were visualized as aggregates whilst wild-type cells were observed as independent units that, in many cases, were under division, suggesting that they were actively growing. Furthermore, in the mutant strain, cell size was smaller, extracellular material could be observed adhered to the cell envelop, whilst in the wild-type strain appendages (probably pili and/or fimbriae) could be seen.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Scanning microscopy photographs of the wild-type and luxR402 knockout mutant strains after being cultivated in liquid M9 minimal medium plus glucose up to the exponential phase of growth.

To study the hydrophobicity of the cellular surfaces, we analyzed the bacterial adhesion to the hydrocarbons (BATH). After exposition to n-hexane, most of the mutant cells remained in the interphase between the water and organic solvent layers, whereas most of the wild-strain cells remained in the water layer (Figure 4), indicating that cells from Novosphingobium sp. HR1a were more hydrophilic (BATH = 22 ± 9.5%) than those of the luxR402 knockout mutant (BATH = 86.7 ± 2.7%).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. (A) Photograph of the cultures after being exposed to n-hexane 10 min after agitation. (B) BATH values in the wild-type and mutant strains and in the strains carrying the empty plasmid p0 and the plasmid encoding the luxR402 gene (p402). ***indicate statistically differences between the wild-type and the other strains (p ≤ 0.001; n = 4).

All these phenotypes indicate that LuxR402 has an important role in the reduction of the flocculation, in the cellular and colony morphology and in external surface hydrophobicity in Novosphingobium sp. HR1a.

2.2. The lack of LuxR402 modifies the protein content of the cell surface of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a

Given the cell surface differences that we observed between the wild-type strain and the luxR402 knockout mutant, we carried out a proteomic analysis to identify secreted proteins or proteins attached to the outer membrane, by analyzing the proteins released to the media after vigorous agitation. Peptides that mapped within ribosomal and other cytoplasmic proteins were identified at low levels in the wild type (3 ± 0.27%) and mutant luxR402 (5 ± 3.6%) cultures, suggesting that partial cellular lysis during the procedure or during the growth culture had occurred. However, there were no significant differences between the two strains, suggesting that cell integrity was not more compromised in the mutant than in the wild-type strain. Thirty-nine proteins were significantly differentially identified. Two proteins were less expressed in the wild-type strain than in the mutant; these proteins were involved in carbohydrate metabolism (Table 1). An over-representation of proteins related with oxidative phosphorylation (carbohydrate uptake, ATP synthase, cytochrome related proteins, succinate dehydrogenase, amongst others) was observed in the wild-type in comparison with the mutant strain. The decreased expression of these proteins in the mutant strain correlated with the longer lag phase observed when glucose was used as the sole carbon source. To unequivocally assign a role to the LuxR402 regulator in this phenotype, we complemented the mutant strain with p402. When we introduced the plasmid expressing the luxR402 gene in the mutant strain, the lag phase was similar in the mutant and complemented strains, however, growth rate was higher in the complemented strain than in the mutant strain (Figure 5B) and similar to that of the wild-type strain (Figure 5). The introduction of plasmid expressing luxR402 in the wild-type strain also affected the growth, increasing the lag phase of the culture. Therefore, the modifications in the level of expression of the luxR402 gene during exponential phase of the growth clearly affect the growth of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a in M9 minimal media. We tested the growth of the bacteria in 17 different carbon sources and in all the cases, the mutant clearly presented a longer lag phase than the wild-type strain, and, a slightly lower growth rate (Figures 5, 6 and Supplementary Figure S1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. List of proteins identified with different number of peptides when comparing wild-type vs luxR402.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. (A) Growth of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a strains (circles) and mutant luxR402 strains (triangles) in M9 minimal medium plus glucose. Black symbols correspond to strains without plasmids; grey symbols to strains with pBRRMCS5, and white symbols to strains expressing the luxR402 gene. (B) Table with the lag phases and growth rate of the different strains. Growth was measured with the Bioscreen device.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. (A) Growth (black symbols) and expression from the luxR402 promoter, measured as relative fluorescence of GFP (empty symbols) of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a (Prlux402-GFP) (circles) and luxR402 (Prlux402-GFP) mutant (squares) in (A) glucose, (B) fructose and (C) xylose as the sole carbon source. Tables showed the growth rate (μ h−1) of the wild-type and mutant strains in each carbon source. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of the six experiments carried out in microplates. Growth and fluorescence were measured with a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader.

A number of peptidoglycan biosynthesis proteins and a protein involved in the transport/assembly of lipopolysaccharide proteins were identified at lower levels in the mutant than in the wild-type suggesting that the cell envelop differs between wild-type and mutant strains, supporting the hypothesis about the involvement of luxR402 gene in the control of the cell surface composition.

2.3. luxR402 is expressed at the stationary phase of growth in the wild-type strain, but it is transitorily expressed during exponential phase in the mutant strain

To study the expression from the luxR402 promoter throughout the growth phase, we constructed a biosensor in which the luxR402 promoter drove the expression of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). The expression from the luxR402 promoter increased significantly at the stationary phase of growth when grown with glucose as the only carbon source (Figure 6A). In the absence of a functional LuxR402 protein, the expression from the luxR402 promoter started to increase at the beginning of the exponential phase of growth, to remain constant until the beginning of the stationary phase of growth where the luxR402 promoter became active again (Figure 6A). The expression level in the mutant strain at the stationary phase of growth was higher than in the wild-type strain. These results suggest that LuxR402 regulates their own expression (Figure 6A). This expression is coherent with the flocculation phenotype of the mutant strain that started to be observable from the beginning of the exponential phase of growth. Similar induction patterns were observed when the strains were grown with fructose (Figure 6B) or xylose (Figure 6C) as the sole carbon source, although in xylose the expression levels of the luxR402 promoter were higher than in the other sugars.

2.4. The carbohydrate metabolism, the TCA cycle and the oxidative phosphorylation of the luxR402 knockout mutant was altered during the exponential phase of growth

To reveal the effect that the regulatory protein luxR402 had over the gene expression when growing in glucose and because of the different expression of the luxR402 promoter during the exponential phase of growth of the wild-type and mutant strains, we carried out a transcriptomic analysis during this phase of growth. We found that 411 genes were up-regulated (padj < 0.05) in the mutant strain, whilst 644 were down-regulated (Supplementary Figure S2A and Supplementary Table S1). The gene ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway analysis (Supplementary Figure S2B) suggest that carbohydrate metabolism, signal transduction and transport functions are mainly altered in the mutant strain. Amongst the down-regulated genes, those related with carbon metabolism, TCA cycle, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and oxidative phosphorylation were the most abundant (Supplementary Figure S2C), whilst the genes related with two component regulatory systems, peptidoglycan synthesis and ribosome were up-regulated in the mutant (Supplementary Figure S2D).

Only five genes were down-regulated with log2FC ≤ −2 in the mutant when compared with the wild-type strain (Table 2). Four of these genes (HWN72_20595 to HWN72_20610) encoded functions related with carbohydrate transport and utilization and with the phosphotransferase transport system (PTS). HWN72_20595 (putative OprB) was also previously identified in our proteomic analysis (Table 1), supporting the transcriptomic results. The decreased expression of the sugar transport and PTS system in the mutant strain, correlated with the longer lag phase previously observed previously in different carbon sources (Figures 5, 6 and Supplementary Figure S1).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. List of genes up- or down-regulated in the mutant strain when compared with the wild-type.

Gene HWN72_14810 encodes a hypothetical protein but contiguous to this gene, probably forming an operon, gen HWN72_14815 encoded a putative polysaccharide biosynthesis tyrosine auto-kinase, whose expression is down-regulated with a log2FC of −1.82 (Table 2). Ten genes were up-regulated in the mutant strain, amongst them, genes involved in the interconversion of methionine and cysteine, and the luxR402 gene, confirming the previous results about their own regulation (Figure 6).

2.5. luxR402 promoter responded to the external addition of N-(3-hydroxyoctanoyl)-DL-homoserine lactone and aromatic compounds

LuxR solo proteins have been involved in the interspecies and/or inter-kingdom communication. To demonstrate the implication of LuxR402 in this communication, we analyzed the expression of the luxR402 promoter after the addition of different homoserine lactones (AHLs), and different signals of plant stress. The luxR402 promoter responded to the external addition of N-(3-hydroxyoctanoyl)-DL-homoserine lactone; there was an increase in the expression of the GFP during the exponential phase of growth in the wild-type strain, whilst no such increase was observed in the luxR402 mutant (Figure 7D). There was not response when n-hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone, n-octanoyl-L-homoserine lactone, or n-dodecanoyl-L-homoserine lactone were added to the media (Figures 7A, 7B, 7C and 7E).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Growth (black symbols) and GFP expression from the luxR402 promoter (open symbols) of the wild-type strain (circles) and mutant strain (squares) in the presence of: (A) DMSO; (B) n-hexanoyl-DL-homoserine lactone (C6-HSL); (C) n-octanoyl-DL-homoserine lactone (C8-HSL); (D) n-3-hydroxyoctanoyl-DL-homoserine lactone (OH-C8-HSL); (E); n-dodecanoyl-DL-homoserine lactone (C12-HSL).

We also tested the effect of salicylate, a plant-derived compound involved in plant responses against certain types of stress (Raza et al., 2022), hormones (jasmonic acid, indole acetic acid) and other vegetal compounds (phenylacetate, phenylactate, coumarine, γ-amino butyric acid or protocatechuic acid) as inductors of the expression of the luxR402 gene. No effect was observed with most of compounds tested (not shown), however we did perceive a clear effect in the presence of salicylate and coumarine. The presence of 5 mM salicylate retarded the growth of both strains when compared with growth with only glucose (Figure 8A); this delay in growth was stronger in the luxR402 knockout mutant than in the wild-type (Figures 8A,B). Furthermore, expression from the luxR402 promoter was totally repressed in the wild-type strain, whilst the expression in the mutant strain was induced (Figure 8B). The maximal relative fluorescence from the luxR402 promoter in the mutant strain in the presence of salicylate was ≈ 40 units/OD660nm at 36 h (Figure 8B) whilst in the absence of this compound was around 22 units/OD660nm at 34 h (Figure 6A). The growth and expression pattern was similar when we added 1 mM coumarin, another plant defense metabolite, to the culture (Figure 8C). We have previously observed that cultures of strain HR1a were not able to grow in M9 minimal media with 5 mM salicylate, however they did grow if salicylate was added at 1 mM every 12 h (not shown). To further examined this process, we add 5 mM of salicylate into a glucose-grown culture after 6 h of growth and we culture the cells another 3 h. Then we let the culture over the table for 13 h. After this time, the flocculation of the Novosphingobium sp. HR1a culture was observed (Figure 8C).

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. (A) Table with the lag phase and growth rate of the cultures of the wild-type (HR1a) and mutant (luxR402) strains in glucose, glucose plus 5 mM salicylate and glucose plus 1 mM coumarine. (B) Growth (black symbols) and GFP expression from luxR402 promoter (empty symbols) of cultures of the wild-type strain (circles) and luxR402 knockout mutant (squares) growing with glucose plus 0.5 mM salicylate glucose plus 1 mM coumarin. (C) Flocculation of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a with salicylate: cultures at exponentially phase of growth (DO660nm ≈ 0.8) were challenged with 5 mM of salicylate and incubated with agitation for 3 h; photography was taken after 16 h without agitation. OD data was taken after 16 h without agitation or after 16 h after vortexing the culture. Statistical analysis was done comparing the OD of the HR1a strain in the presence/absence of salicylate (***indicate p < 0.001; n = 4).

2.6. The knockout luxR402 mutant is less resistant to the external addition of H2O2

The cell envelope is crucial for resistance to stress, and as luxR402 presented clear differences in cell surface when compared with the wild-type, we analyzed the growth of the two strains toward hypo- and hypersaline stress, the presence of antibiotics (ampicillin and chloramphenicol) and oxidative stress. Growth was not significantly affected by either hypo-, or hypersaline stress, or antibiotics, however, the growth of the luxR402 was clearly affected in the presence of 0.5 mM of H2O2 (Figure 9A). In fact, the presence of this concentration of H202 also produced a decreased in the growth rate in the wild-type (from 0.227 ± 0.002 μ−1 in the absence of this compound to 0.127 ± 0.01 μ−1 in the presence of H202).

FIGURE 9
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 9. (A) Growth curves of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a (black circles) and luxR402 knockout mutant (white circles) in M9 minimal media with glucose as the sole carbon source and in the presence of 0.5 mM H2O2. (B) Survival of the wild-type, luxR402 knockout mutant, and complemented strains 30 min after addition of 0.5 mM of H2O2. Dark grey bars indicate the number of CFUs in the different cultures before H2O2 addition (t = 0); medium dark grey bars indicate the number of CFUs at time 30 min and light grey bars the number of CFUs 30 min after H2O2 addition. There were no statistically significant differences among the initial number of CFUs in the cultures at the two different times without addition of H2O2 (Kruskal-Wallis One Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks, n = 6). t-test analyses were done for comparison of the number of CFUs of the same strain with and without H2O2 (asterisks in the upper part of the figure) and of the different strains versus wild-type when challenged with H2O2 (asterisks within the figure). **indicate p ≤ 0.01 and *indicate p ≤ 0.05; n = 4. (C) Analysis of the specific TTC-reducing activity of the cultures using TTC and number of CFUs at the time of the analysis.

To further investigate this phenotype, we grew the cultures until they reach an O.D. at 660 nm of 0.5; then we added 0.5 mM of H2O2 and we measured the survival after 30 min (Figure 9B). In the wild-type strain, we observed a decrease in the CFU numbers of around 1.5 orders of magnitude. The presence of the empty plasmid (p0) or of the plasmid with the luxR402 gene (p402) did not modify these numbers. However, in the mutant strain this decreased was of 3 orders of magnitude; the presence of the empty plasmid did not modify the number of CFUs after the shock, however, the expression of the luxR402 from the plasmid did increase the number of survival cells up to the same numbers than the wild-type strain (Figure 9B). The capacity of the different strains to reduce 2,3,5-triphenyl-2H-tetrazolium chloride (TTC) in presence of oxygen peroxide (0.25 mM) was higher in wild type than in the mutant strain, and this phenotype was complemented by plasmid p402 (Figure 9C). However, the number of CFUs under these conditions was not affected in the mutant when compared with the wild-type strain. These results suggested that, under these conditions, the specific TTC-reducing activity of the wild-type strain was higher than that in the mutant, and, again, this phenotype was complemented by the expression of the luxR402 gene.

3. Discussion

3.1. The luxR402 mutant cells flocculated and had an altered envelop

LuxR-solos are regulatory proteins that are thought to be involved in cell–cell communication, although not many LuxR-solos have been functionally characterized. We have identified a LuxR-solo protein, named LuxR402, which controls the auto-aggregation capacity of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a. Auto-aggregation has been described as a common strategy to skip the deleterious effects of certain environmental clues, such as the presence of toxic compounds, antibiotics, lack of nutrients and oxidative stress (Trunk et al., 2018). Although auto-aggregation is a common phenomenon in bacteria, it is still poorly understood. Curli, fimbriae, exopolysaccharides, DNA and extracellular proteins have been described as structures that may facilitate aggregation (Salehizadeh and Shojaosadati, 2001; Sun et al., 2015; Nouha et al., 2018). Novosphingobium sp. HR1a did not auto-aggregate under normal laboratory conditions, however, in the absence of the LuxR402 protein, cells formed clumps and finally flocculated.

Four lines of evidence indicated that the cellular surface in the mutant had very different properties when compared with the wild-type strain. The first evidence came from the different aspect of the bacterial colonies and the lack of stain with Congo red. The second line of evidence was related with the differences in motility; twitching motility (flagellar-independent motility) was reduced in the wild-type strain. Furthermore, although we did not visualize the typical rafts (Römling, 2005) formed during swarming in 0.5% agar plates in the colonies of the wild-type strain, the colony morphology of the luxR402 knockout mutant was clearly different. We cannot confirm that this behavior is related with swarming, but it clearly points to different properties in the cell surface. The third line of evidence came from the different morphologies of the cells that we observed under the microscope; whilst the wild-type cells presented the typical bacillary morphology of Novosphingobium (Liu et al., 2005; Li et al., 2017; de Lise et al., 2019), the mutant strain cells were coccoid. Finally, the hydrophobicity of the luxR402 knockout cells was higher than that of the wild-type strain.

Although some LuxR-like proteins have been previously seen to be involved in flocculation in Azospirillum brasilense, Azorhizobium caulinodans ORS571 and Sinorhizobium melitoti (Pereg-Gerk et al., 1998; Sorroche et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2020), in these organisms, contrary to what we have observed, the lack of the protein causes the absence of flocculation. The AclR1 of Azorhizobium caulinodans ORS571 has been involved in the positive regulation of cell motility and flocculation, whilst this protein is negatively regulates the exopolysaccharide production and biofilm formation (Liu et al., 2020). ExpR is a LuxR-type regulator that controls several functions in S. meliloti, amongst them, the exopolysaccharide I (EPS I) composed of succinoglycan and EPS II (galactoglucan) (Sorroche et al., 2010).

3.2. LuxR402 senses sugar availability in the medium and participates in sugar uptake and degradation

Although LuxR402 has the typical length of a LuxR protein (291 amino acids) and the conserved helix-turn-helix (HTH) domain, it only has conserved three out of the seven amino acids of the AHL binding domain. However, we have determined that this protein responds to the addition of external of N-(3-hydroxyoctanoyl)-DL-homoserine lactone, and that the pattern of expression is typical of the LuxR-regulators, and is expressed early on in the stationary phase of growth and is auto-regulated. One of the main differences in the luxR402 knockout mutant when compared with the wild-type strain (besides the higher level of expression of the luxR402 promoter) is the fact that luxR402 is transitorily expressed during the exponential phase in the mutant strain. The transcriptomic assays, carried out during this phase of growth when grown in glucose, reveal that the genes involved in sugar uptake and metabolism were down-regulated in the mutant. Our physiological studies indicate that in fact, the mutant strain grew more slowly in glucose than the wild-type strain. It has been described that under non-favorable growth conditions, bacterial cell surfaces become more hydrophobic, thus facilitating aggregation (Kjelleberg and Hermansson, 1984). The transition from bacillary forms to coccoid morphologies that formed biofilms under low-nutrient conditions has been described in Acinetobacter sp. (James et al., 1995). Therefore, it is conceivable that in the absence of a functional LuxR402, and through the decreased expression of the HWN72_20595, HWN72_20600 and HWN72_20605, genes involved in sugar uptake and utilization, the mutant cells “sensed” a lack of nutrients, which in turn modified their cellular surfaces to aggregate and survive these sensed starvation conditions.

The transcriptomic assays also revealed, amongst the most up-regulated genes in the mutant, some genes involved in the inter-conversion of homocysteine and methionine. These genes participate in the activated methyl cycle (AMC) a cycle that is involved in AHL biosynthesis. In this cycle, the enzyme S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) synthase synthesized SAM using methionine and ATP as substrates (Fontecave et al., 2004). AHLs are synthesized from precursors derived from fatty-acid biosynthesis and S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) (Val and Cronan, 1998) therefore, it is possible that LuxR402 could also be involved in the regulation of AHLs biosynthesis.

3.3. LuxR402, directly or indirectly, regulates the correct assembly of the cell envelopes in Novosphingobium sp. HR1a

The down-regulation of the putative regulatory protein involved in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis (HWN72_14815) could orchestrate, at least partially, this cellular surface modification, although more experimental work will have to be carried out to further advance in the regulation cascade. In agreement with the modification in LPS suggested by the transcriptomic results and identified in the physiological experiments, a significantly higher number of peptides related with peptidoglycan biosynthesis and LPS assembly were identified among the extracellular proteins that are more abundant in the wild-type strain than in the mutant strain. In E. coli, it has been described that murG inactivation (HWN72_12615) provokes the inactivation of peptidoglycan biosynthesis and alterations in cell shape (Mengin-Lecreulx et al., 1991), phenotypes that correlate with the lack of detection of peptides that mapped with MurG in the luxR402 mutant. As in the transcriptomic assays, the carbohydrate-selective porin OprB (HWN72_20595) was also identified at higher numbers amongst the extracytosolic proteins in the wild-type strain than in the mutant strain. The presence of higher amounts of proteins involved in the energy metabolism and cell division in the wild-type than in the mutant strain also supports a higher metabolic rate for Novosphingobium sp. HR1a.

In our micrographs of the luxR402 knockout mutant, we could observe some structures that resembled outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) (Figure 3). OMVs have been involved in environmental mechanisms of adaptation. Novosphingobium sp. PP1Y is a bacterial strain that lacks LPS on the outer membrane surface and that forms flocks during the late exponential growth phase (Notomista et al., 2011). The formation of these OMVs has been correlated with the secretion of proteases and glycosylases, possibly involved in acquiring nutrients from extracellular environment (de Lise et al., 2019). In the luxR402 knockout mutant (whose phenotype resembles that observed for Novosphingobium sp. PP1Y) we have observed an increase number of proteins related with polymer degradation (alginate) and also a glycosylase, suggesting that this increase could be a consequence of the “false detection” of nutrient scarcity in the cultures of the mutant strain.

When we challenged the cultures with an antibiotic that targeted cell wall biosynthesis (ampicillin) or with saline stresses, we did not observe significant differences in growth between the mutant and the wild-type strains suggesting that cell envelope integrity was not compromised in the mutant strain. However, addition of 0.5 mM H2O2 completely inhibits the growth of the mutant, while only retarding the growth of the wild-type, suggesting that cell envelope was less resistant to oxidative stress. This inability can be related with the decreased amount of catalases observed in the luxR402 knockout mutant (Table 1) and it can be partially supported by the fact that the transcriptomic analyses revealed that four catalases genes (HWN72_02305, HWN72_28310, HWN72_28660 and HWN72_30395) are down-regulated in the mutant strain, although with log2FC around 0.6–0.7 (Supplementary Table S1). However, we have demonstrated that the mutant cells have less specific TTC-reducing activity than the wild-type, an ability that is related with the correct conformation of the electron transfer chain, supporting the idea of an abnormal configuration of the cell envelope as the mechanism for H2O2 susceptibility. Furthermore, the presence of H2O2 (at 0.5 mM or 0.2 mM) did not modified the expression of the luxR402 promoter (not shown), supporting that the effect of this stress is an indirect consequence of the alteration in cell envelope configuration.

3.4. The presence of some toxic compounds inhibits the luxR402 gene expression and provokes flocculation

The presence of adverse environmental conditions, in addition to starvation, can also cause auto-aggregation as a defense mechanism against stress (Farrell and Quilty, 2002; Klebensberger et al., 2006; Maganha de Almeida and Quilty, 2016); i.e. Pseudomonas putida CP1, although capable of degrading mono-chlorophenols, formed aggregates in the culture media when any of these phenols were in the culture media at high concentrations (Farrell and Quilty, 2002). In our experiments, we observed the formation of these clumps in the presence of salicylate (5 mM), a compound that is toxic for the cells at higher concentrations, although it is metabolized by Novosphingobium sp. HR1a.

In P. aeruginosa PAO1, that is able to grow with SDS, it was shown that cellular aggregation occurs in response to SDS (Klebensberger et al., 2006). This phenotype is controlled by the signal transduction system SiaABCD that also controls the Psl polysaccharide, the CdrAB two-parter secretion system and the CupA fimbriae formation. SiaA is putative ser/thr phosphatase and SiaD a di-guanylate cyclase and mutants in siaA have decreased content of cyclic-diguanosine monophosphate, a cytosolic second messenger (Colley et al., 2016). Furthermore, the flocculation phenotype modulated by SiaABCD that have been described as energy-dependent process; it only occurred under high energy supply, meaning that it is an active process (Klebensberger et al., 2006). In Novosphigobium sp. HR1a, we have observed, not only that the stress produced by salicylate induced flocculation of the culture, but also that the expression from the luxR402 promoter in Novosphingobium sp. HR1a was completely eliminated in the presence of this compound. These results supported the idea that LuxR402 controls the flocculation phenotype as a resistance mechanism. By reducing luxR402 expression in the presence of these toxic compounds, the cells will form clumps that will allow the survival of the strain in the presence of these toxins. The fact that LuxR402 modulates the PTS systems also correlate the ability of the strains to “sense” their energetic status with the flocculation phenotype.

3.5. Flocculation as a biotechnological trait

Flocculation is a type of microbial behavior that can be applied in industrial fermentation and wastewater treatment (Ojima et al., 2015). Many microbial species, mainly bacteria, produce extracellular biopolymers that mediate flocculation (Yokoi et al., 1995; Wu et al., 2010; Mabinya et al., 2012; Bisht and Lal, 2019; Jang et al., 2020). Bioflocculants are, in general, environmental friendly (Salehizadeh and Shojaosadati, 2001; Nontembiso et al., 2011), nonetheless, the high production cost has been a limitation to industrial scale production and application (Wan et al., 2013; Dlangamandla et al., 2016; Mohammed and Dagang, 2019). The purpose of the flocculation in biotechnological processes is to be able to remove biomass once the bioprocess has finished and therefore, the bacteria are able to flocculate by themselves and are biotechnologically relevant. By modulating the level of expression of luxR402, we would be able to avoid the use of additional flocculants thus decreasing the costs of the biotechnological processes.

4. Materials and methods

4.1. Strains, plasmids, primers and media used

Strains, plasmids and primers used in this study are described in Supplementary Table S2.

4.2. Growth experiments

The strains were grown overnight in LB medium plus the corresponding antibiotic to be used as inocula for the different experiments. For the analysis of the growth of the mutant and wild-type strain, 200 μL M9 minimal medium plus the corresponding carbon source at a final concentration of 10 mM were dispensed into wells of honeycomb microplates (OY Growth Curves AB Ltd., Raisio, Finland). The wells were inoculated with the overnight culture at an initial optical density (DO660nm) of 0.1. The cultures were incubated at 28°C with maximal agitation in a FP-1100-C Bioscreen C MBR analyzer system (OY Growth Curves Ab Ltd., Raisio, Finland). Growth was monitored using a type at 30°C with continuous agitation. Turbidity was measured using a sideband filter at 420–580 nm every 60 min for 42 h. Assays were run in duplicate and were repeated for at least three independent experimental rounds. In experiments in which GFP measurements were taken, growth was analyzed in a Varioskan device as shown below.

Congo red was added in minimal solid medium M9-glucose at a concentration of 25 μg mL−1 (Vozza et al., 2016). Swarming plates were prepared as described in Kearns (2010). In both cases a drop of 10 μL of the overnight LB-grown cultures were deposited onto the plate and incubated at 30°C for 4 days. Twitching agar plates were prepared as described by Turnbull and Whitchurch (2014). Afterwards the solid medium was punched out of the bottom of the petri dish plate with a sterile 100 μL pipette tip that was previously submerged in the overnight cultures. After 4 days of incubation at 30°C, the agar media was removed and the plates were rinsed with water. The plates were incubated for 5 min at room temperature with crystal violet (0.4% w/v in water), and washed with water previous to the visualization of the biofilms formed by the different strains (Haley et al., 2014). After that, crystal violet was resuspended in 1 mL of 30% acetic acid (v/v) and absorbance was measured at 595 nm.

TTC reduction experiments were performed as indicated in Defez et al. (2017). Bacterial trains were cultivated in M9 minimal media with glucose plus 0.25 mM H2O2, till they reached OD660nm ≈ 1. At that time, number of CFUs was analyzed and 300 μL of these cultures were centrifuged, cells were harvested and resuspended in a phosphate buffer containing 24 mM of TTC. After 10 min of incubation at room temperature, cells were again centrifuged and pellets were resuspended in DMSO to solubilize formed formazan. The production of this compound was measured in a spectrophotometer at λ = 510 nm; results were normalized taking into account the number of CFUs.

4.3. Microscopy

M9-glucose liquid cultures of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a or luxR402 mutant strains were taken when the OD660nm was around 0.8. The samples were treated with a mixture 1:1 (v/v) of glutaraldehyde (2.5%) and p-formaldehyde (2%) in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH = 7.4) for 24 h at 4°C, and analyzed using a variable pressure scanning electron microscopy (Leo1430vp, 2 Zeiss dsm 950, 4 Supra40vp).

4.4. Bacteria adhesion to hydrocarbons (BATH)

Cell surface hydrophobicity was measured using the method described by Rosenberg et al. (1980). Briefly, exponentially grown cultures (OD660nm ≈ 0.8–1) were harvested by centrifugation (5,000 rpm, 10 min, 4°C) and washed twice with 0.8% (w/v) NaCl. The cells were then re-suspended in 4 mL of 0.8% NaCl (final OD660nm ≈ 0.6) and 0.6 mL of n-hexane were added. Solution was vortexed for 1 min and left for 10 min at room temperature. Afterwards, the OD660nm of the water layer was measured (A). BATH (%) was calculated as (1−A/0.6) × 100.

4.5. Construction of the mutant in luxR402

Genomic DNA of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a was used as template for the amplification of a 497 bp fragment of the gene orf402 using oligonucleotides 402-F and 402-R (Supplementary Table S2). This fragment was cloned into pMBL™-T plasmid, resulting in plasmid pMBL402. Plasmid pHP45ΩKm (Prentki and Krisch, 1984) was digested with BamHI and ScaI. The Ω-Km cassette exscinded from plasmid pHP45ΩKm was extracted from an agarose gel and ligated into pMBL402, previously cut with BamHI. The resulting plasmid pMBL402Km was transformed into Novosphingobium sp. HR1a by electroporation. The transformants that had integrated the plasmid into the host chromosome via homologous recombination were selected on LB plus kanamycin plates and checked by Southern blot hybridization (not shown).

4.6. Construction of pR402 reporter plasmid

The 295 intergenic region between orf402 and orf403 of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a was amplified with primers incorporating restriction sites (an EcoRI site in the primer designed to meet the 5’end and a PstI site in the primer designed to meet the 3’end). Upon amplification, the DNA was digested with EcoRI and PstI and ligated into the medium-copy number pSEVA637 vector (Silva-Rocha et al., 2013), previously cut with the same enzymes. The resulting plasmid pR402 was sequenced to verify the promoter sequence. This plasmid was electroporated into Novosphingobium sp. HR1a and/or the luxR402 knockout mutant. The transformants were selected in LB plates plus gentamycin; individual colonies were grown in liquid media and the plasmid was extracted and digested with EcoRI and PstI to verify the incorporation of the plasmid.

The analysis of luxR402 expression was carried out by microtiter plate-based assays with the strain Novosphingobium sp. HR1a (pR402) or Novosphingobium sp. HR1a luxR402 (pR402) knockout mutant using Greiner 96 black-welled plates. The overnight cultures grown in LB were diluted (after washing three times with distilled water) in M9 minimal medium supplemented with different carbon sources (at a concentration of 5 mM) to reach an initial OD660nm of 0.05. Growth (30°C with continuous shaking at 360 rpm) and fluorescence (excited at 485 nm and read at 535 nm) were monitored in a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Singapore). The measurements were normalized with the turbidity of the culture.

4.7. Complementation of the strain

The promoter region and the complete luxR402 (1,084 pb) was amplified using primers in which EcoRI and BamHI restriction sites were included (Supplementary Table S2) and, the DNA resulting from the amplification was digested with these restriction enzymes and ligated in the expression vector pBBR1MCS-5 (Kovach et al., 1995), previously digested with EcoRI and BamHI. The resulting plasmid p402 was sequenced in order to verify the sequence. Plasmid p402 and pBBR1MCS-5 were independently electroporated into Novosphingobium sp. HR1a and in the luxR402 knockout mutant. The transformants were selected in LB plates plus gentamycin (50 μg mL−1). Individual colonies were grown in liquid media and the plasmid was extracted and digested with EcoRI and BamHI to verify the incorporation of the plasmid. Positive colonies of each strain Novosphingobium sp. HR1a (p0), Novosphingobium sp. HR1a (p402), Novosphingobium sp. HR1a luxR402 (p0), Novosphingobium sp. HR1a luxR402 (p402) were used in the complementation assay as indicated in the text.

4.8. RNA-seq experiments

Five mL of cultures at exponential phase of growth (OD660nm 0.8) grown in M9 minimal medium plus glucose of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a and the luxR402 mutant were centrifuged (6,000 rpm during 10 min) and the pellets were immediately frozen in liquid N2 and stored a −80°C.

Total RNA extraction and preparation of libraries were carried out as in Molina et al. (2021). Briefly, the RNA was extracted using the Trizol method (TRIzol RNA Isolation Reagents, Thermofisher Scientist), followed by DNAse treatment and purification with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). One microgram of RNA per sample was used to prepare the sequencing libraries, which were generated by Novogen (Hong Kong). Sequencing procedures and sequencing analysis was also done by Novogen as previously described (Molina et al., 2021). Two independent cultures of each strain were used for the analysis.

4.9. Proteomic analysis (iTRAQ)

20 mL sof overnight M9-glucose cultures of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a and the isogenic luxR402 mutant at early stationary phase of growth (OD660nm 1.8–2.1) were vigorously vortexed for 1 min before pelleting the cells by centrifugation (6,000 rpm, 4°C, 10 min). The supernatants were filtrated using a 22 μm filter (syringe filter 0.2 μm, Whatman) and sent for analysis to the proteomic facility at the CNB-CSIC (Madrid, Spain; http://proteo.cnb.csic.es/proteomica). 12 mL of each sample was concentrated using the Amicon® Ultra-4 filter units (Merck Millipore, cutoff MWCO 3,000) by centrifuging 4 mL of the supernatant at 4,000×g at 4°C for 30–40 min and the procedure was repeated 3 times. After concentration, the filter membrane was washed with 100 μL of 5% (v/v) SDS buffer. The final protein concentration was measured by a Bradford method compatible with the presence of detergents (A660 nm), protein quantities varied between 6 and 17 μg. The samples were dried and re-suspended in 100 μL of lysis buffer with 5% SDS supplemented with 100 mM Tris (2-Carboxyethyl) phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP) and 200 mM chloroacetamide (CAA) to reduce and alkylate the proteins. The samples were digested with 1 μg of trypsin. Tryptic peptides were cleaned using C18 stage tips and 800–1,000 ng of these peptides (quantified by QBIT) were analyzed by liquid nano-chromatograpy (Thermo Ultimate 3,000) (C18 reverse phase, 75 μm inner diameter and 25 cm length, flux 250 nLmin−1, 60 min), coupled to DDA mass spectrometry (Thermo Orbitrap Exploris OE240).

The obtained MS1 and MS2 specters were used to search, using Peaks 7.5, against, a database formed by 6,069 entries of Novosphingobium resinovorum SA1 and a list of common laboratory contaminants. Search parameters were set as follows: (i) peptide mass tolerance ±10 ppm for ion precursors and 0.02 Da for fragments masses; (ii) fix modification, cysteine carbamydomethylation as; and (iii) variable modifications, acetyl at the N-terminal and methionine oxidation [Gln- > pyro-Glu (N-term Q), Glu- > pyro-Glu (N-term E)].

We considered the number of total peptides as an estimate of the relative abundance of the protein. Only the proteins identified with more than 6 peptides were considered relevant.

4.10. Statistical analysis

Statistical differences between the different categories inside each experiment were determined using SigmaPlot 11 program, using t-test analysis or Mann–Whitney Rank Sum Test.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, GSE223267.

Author contributions

AS and LM carried out the experimental design and work, and writing the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by grant number BIO2017-85994-P financed by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ and “ERDF A way of making Europe” and Grant number PID2020-116766GB-I00 financed by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Angela Tate for the review of the English language and to Zulema Udaondo for her help with bio-informatic tools.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1205860/full#supplementary-material

References

Aziz, R. K., Bartels, D., Best, A. A., DeJongh, M., Disz, T., Edwards, R. A., et al. (2008). The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bez, C., Covaceuszach, S., Bertani, I., Choudhary, K. S., and Venturi, V. (2021). LuxR solos from environmental fluorescent pseudomonads. mSphere 6, e01322–e01320. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.01322-20

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bisht, V., and Lal, B. (2019). Exploration of performance kinetics and mechanism of action of a potential novel bioflocculant BF-VB2 on clay and dye wastewater flocculation. Front. Microbiol. 10:1288. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01288

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brachmann, A. O., Brameyer, S., Kresovic, D., Hitkova, I., Kopp, Y., Manske, C., et al. (2013). Pyrones as bacterial signaling molecules. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 573–578. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1295

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brameyer, S., Kresovic, D., Bode, H. B., and Heermann, R. (2014). LuxR solos in Photorhabdus species. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 4:166. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00166

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cases, I., de Lorenzo, V., and Ouzounis, C. A. (2003). Transcription regulation and environmental adaptation in bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 11, 248–253. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(03)00103-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Colley, B., Dederer, V., Carnell, M., Kjelleberg, S., Rice, S. A., and Klebensberger, J. (2016). SiaA/D interconnects c-di-GMP and RsmA signaling to coordinate cellular aggregation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in response to environmental conditions. Front. Microbiol. 7:179. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00179

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Lise, F., Mensitieri, F., Rusciano, G., Dal Piaz, F., Forte, G., di Lorenzo, F., et al. (2019). Novosphingobium sp. PP1Y as a novel source of outer membrane vesicles. J. Microbiol. 57, 498–508. doi: 10.1007/s12275-019-8483-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Defez, R., Andreozzi, A., and Bianco, C. (2017). Quantification of triphenyl-2H-tetrazoliumchloride reduction activity in bacterial cells. Bio Protoc. 7:e2115. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2115

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dlangamandla, C., Dyantyi, S. A., Mpentshu, Y. P., Ntwampe, S. K. O., and Basitere, M. (2016). Optimisation of bioflocculant production by a biofilm forming microorganism from poultry slaughterhouse wastewater for use in poultry wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 73, 1963–1968. doi: 10.2166/wst.2016.047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farrell, A., and Quilty, B. (2002). Substrate-dependent autoaggregation of Pseudomonas putida CP1 during the degradation of mono-chlorophenols and phenol. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28, 316–324. doi: 10.1038/sj.jim.7000249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fontecave, M., Atta, M., and Mulliez, E. (2004). S-adenosylmethionine: nothing goes to waste. Trends Biochem. Sci. 29, 243–249. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.03.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fuqua, C. (2006). The QscR quorum-sensing regulon of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an orphan claims its identity. J. Bacteriol. 188, 3169–3171. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.9.3169-3171.2006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fuqua, C., and Greenberg, E. P. (2002). Listening in on bacteria: acyl-homoserine lactone signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 685–695. doi: 10.1038/nrm907

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fuqua, W. C., Winans, S. C., and Greenberg, E. P. (1994). Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J. Bacteriol. 176, 269–275. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.2.269-275.1994

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haley, C. L., Kruczek, C., Qaisar, U., Colmer-Hamood, J. A., and Hamood, A. N. (2014). Mucin inhibits Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation by significantly enhancing twitching motility. Can. J. Microbiol. 60, 155–166. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2013-0570

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hudaiberdiev, S., Choudhary, K. S., Vera Alvarez, R., Gelencsér, Z., Ligeti, B., Lamba, D., et al. (2015). Census of solo LuxR genes in prokaryotic genomes. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 5:20. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

James, G. A., Korber, D. R., Caldwell, D. E., and Costerton, J. W. (1995). Digital image analysis of growth and starvation responses of a surface-colonizing Acinetobacter sp. J. Bacteriol. 177, 907–915. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.4.907-915.1995

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jang, G., Yoon, Y., and Choi, Y. D. (2020). Crosstalk with jasmonic acid integrates multiple responses in plant development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21:305. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kearns, D. B. (2010). A field guide to bacterial swarming motility. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 634–644. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2405

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kjelleberg, S., and Hermansson, M. (1984). Starvation-induced effects on bacterial surface characteristics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48, 497–503. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.3.497-503.1984

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klebensberger, J., Rui, O., Fritz, E., Schink, B., and Philipp, B. (2006). Cell aggregation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAO1 as an energy-dependent stress response during growth with sodium dodecyl sulfate. Arch. Microbiol. 185, 417–427. doi: 10.1007/s00203-006-0111-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kovach, M. E., Elzer, P. H., Steven Hill, D., Robertson, G. T., Farris, M. A., Roop, R. M., et al. (1995). Four new derivatives of the broad-host-range cloning vector pBBR1MCS, carrying different antibiotic-resistance cassettes. Gene 166, 175–176. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00584-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S., Liu, J., Sun, M., Ling, W., and Zhu, X. (2017). Isolation, characterization, and degradation performance of the 17β-estradiol-degrading bacterium Novosphingobium sp. E2S. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14:115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, W., Li, Y., Bai, X., Wu, H., Bian, L., and Hu, X. (2020). LuxR-type regulator AclR1 of Azorhizobium caulinodans regulates cyclic di-GMP and numerous phenotypes in free-living and symbiotic states. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interactions® 33, 528–538. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-19-0306-R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Z.-P., Wang, B.-J., Liu, Y.-H., and Liu, S.-J. (2005). Novosphingobium taihuense sp. nov., a novel aromatic-compound-degrading bacterium isolated from Taihu Lake, China. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55, 1229–1232. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63468-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mabinya, L. V., Cosa, S., Nwodo, U., and Okoh, A. I. (2012). Studies on bioflocculant production by Arthrobacter sp. raats, a freshwater bacteria isolated from Tyume River, South Africa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 1054–1065. doi: 10.3390/ijms13011054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maganha de Almeida, A. C., and Quilty, B. (2016). The response of aggregated Pseudomonas putida CP1 cells to UV-C and UV-A/B disinfection. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 32:185. doi: 10.1007/s11274-016-2138-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mengin-Lecreulx, D., Texier, L., Rousseau, M., and van Heijenoort, J. (1991). The murG gene of Escherichia coli codes for the UDP-N-acetylglucosamine: N-acetylmuramyl-(pentapeptide) pyrophosphoryl-undecaprenol N-acetylglucosamine transferase involved in the membrane steps of peptidoglycan synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 173, 4625–4636. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.15.4625-4636.1991

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mohammed, J. N., and Dagang, W. R. Z. W. (2019). Role of cationization in bioflocculant efficiency: a review. Environ. Process 6, 355–376. doi: 10.1007/s40710-019-00372-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Molina, L., Udaondo, Z., Montero-Curiel, M., Wittich, R.-M., García-Puente, A., and Segura, A. (2021). Clover root exudates favor Novosphingobium sp. HR1a establishment in the rhizosphere and promote Phenanthrene rhizoremediation. mSphere 6:e0041221. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00412-21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nontembiso, P., Sekelwa, C., Leonard, M. V., and Anthony, O. I. (2011). Assessment of bioflocculant production by Bacillus sp. gilbert, a marine bacterium isolated from the bottom sediment of Algoa Bay. Mar. Drugs 9, 1232–1242. doi: 10.3390/md9071232

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Notomista, E., Pennacchio, F., Cafaro, V., Smaldone, G., Izzo, V., Troncone, L., et al. (2011). The marine isolate Novosphingobium sp. PP1Y shows specific adaptation to use the aromatic fraction of fuels as the sole carbon and energy source. Microb. Ecol. 61, 582–594. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9786-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nouha, K., Kumar, R. S., Balasubramanian, S., and Tyagi, R. D. (2018). Critical review of EPS production, synthesis and composition for sludge flocculation. J. Environ. Sci. 66, 225–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.05.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ojima, Y., Nguyen, M. H., Yajima, R., and Taya, M. (2015). Flocculation of Escherichia coli cells in association with enhanced production of outer membrane vesicles. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 5900–5906. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01011-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Papenfort, K., and Bassler, B. L. (2016). Quorum sensing signal–response systems in gram-negative bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 576–588. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.89

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pereg-Gerk, L., Paquelin, A., Gounon, P., Kennedy, I. R., and Elmerich, C. (1998). A transcriptional regulator of the LuxR-UhpA family, FlcA, controls flocculation and wheat root surface colonization by Azospirillum brasilense Sp7. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interactions® 11, 177–187. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.3.177

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prentki, P., and Krisch, H. M. (1984). In vitro insertional mutagenesis with a selectable DNA fragment. Gene 29, 303–313. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90059-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Raza, A., Salehi, H., Rahman, M. A., Zahid, Z., Madadkar Haghjou, M., Najafi-Kakavand, S., et al. (2022). Plant hormones and neurotransmitter interactions mediate antioxidant defenses under induced oxidative stress in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 13:961872. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.961872

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Römling, U. (2005). Characterization of the rdar morphotype, a multicellular behaviour in Enterobacteriaceae. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 62, 1234–1246. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-4557-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosenberg, M., Gutnick, D., and Rosenberg, E. (1980). Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: a simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 9, 29–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1980.tb05599.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salehizadeh, H., and Shojaosadati, S. A. (2001). Extracellular biopolymeric flocculants. Biotechnol. Adv. 19, 371–385. doi: 10.1016/S0734-9750(01)00071-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Segura, A., Hernández-Sánchez, V., Marqués, S., and Molina, L. (2017). Insights in the regulation of the degradation of PAHs in Novosphingobium sp. HR1a and utilization of this regulatory system as a tool for the detection of PAHs. Sci. Total Environ. 590–591, 381–393. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.180

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva-Rocha, R., Martínez-García, E., Calles, B., Chavarría, M., Arce-Rodríguez, A., de las Heras, A., et al. (2013). The standard European vector architecture (SEVA): a coherent platform for the analysis and deployment of complex prokaryotic phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D666–D675. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, J. N., and Ahmer, B. M. M. (2003). Detection of other microbial species by Salmonella: expression of the SdiA regulon. J. Bacteriol. 185, 1357–1366. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.4.1357-1366.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sorroche, F. G., Rinaudi, L. V., Zorreguieta, Á., and Giordano, W. (2010). EPS II-dependent autoaggregation of Sinorhizobium meliloti planktonic cells. Curr. Microbiol. 61, 465–470. doi: 10.1007/s00284-010-9639-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Subramoni, S., and Venturi, V. (2009). LuxR-family ‘solos’: bachelor sensors/regulators of signalling molecules. Microbiology 155, 1377–1385. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.026849-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, P., Hui, C., Bai, N., Yang, S., Wan, L., Zhang, Q., et al. (2015). Revealing the characteristics of a novel bioflocculant and its flocculation performance in Microcystis aeruginosa removal. Sci. Rep. 5:17465. doi: 10.1038/srep17465

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trunk, T. S., Khalil, H. C., and Leo, J. (2018). Bacterial autoaggregation. AIMS Microbiol. 4, 140–164. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.1.140

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Turnbull, L., and Whitchurch, C. B. (2014). “Motility assay: twitching motility. In Pseudomonas methods and protocols” in Methods in molecular biology. eds. A. Filloux and J.-L. Ramos (New York, NY: Springer New York), 73–86.

Google Scholar

Val, D. L., and Cronan, J. E. (1998). In vivo evidence that S-Adenosylmethionine and fatty acid synthesis intermediates are the substrates for the LuxI family of autoinducer synthases. J. Bacteriol. 180, 2644–2651. doi: 10.1128/JB.180.10.2644-2651.1998

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vozza, N. F., Abdian, P. L., Russo, D. M., Mongiardini, E. J., Lodeiro, A. R., Molin, S., et al. (2016). A Rhizobium leguminosarum CHDL-(cadherin-like-) lectin participates in assembly and remodeling of the biofilm matrix. Front. Microbiol. 7:1608. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01608

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wan, C., Zhao, X.-Q., Guo, S.-L., Asraful Alam, M., and Bai, F.-W. (2013). Bioflocculant production from Solibacillus silvestris W01 and its application in cost-effective harvest of marine microalga Nannochloropsis oceanica by flocculation. Bioresour. Technol. 135, 207–212. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, H., Li, Q., Lu, R., Wang, Y., Zhuang, X., and He, N. (2010). Fed-batch production of a bioflocculant from Corynebacterium glutamicum. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37, 1203–1209. doi: 10.1007/s10295-010-0767-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yokoi, H., Natsuda, O., Hirose, J., Hayashi, S., and Takasaki, Y. (1995). Characteristics of a biopolymer flocculant produced by Bacillus sp. PY-90. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 79, 378–380. doi: 10.1016/0922-338X(95)94000-H

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: LuxR, flocculation, membrane envelop, nutrient starvation, stress

Citation: Segura A and Molina L (2023) LuxR402 of Novosphingobium sp. HR1a regulates the correct configuration of cell envelopes. Front. Microbiol. 14:1205860. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1205860

Received: 14 April 2023; Accepted: 10 July 2023;
Published: 27 July 2023.

Edited by:

Hari S. Misra, Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management (GITAM), India

Reviewed by:

Bodo Philipp, University of Münster, Germany
Ganesh Kumar Maurya, Banaras Hindu University, India

Copyright © 2023 Segura and Molina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Lázaro Molina, lazaro.molina@eez.csic.es

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.