In the published article, there was an error in the Discussion section. The wording to describe the effect of four bacterial species on plant biostimulation and biocontrol against bacterial pathogens was not precise enough and might have led to some confusion.
A correction has been made to Discussion, Extensive genetic and genomic diversities within leaf-associated bacterial operational taxonomic units, second paragraph. Two sentences previously stated:
“Genome sequencing confirmed or refined the gyrB-based taxonomic affiliation of four OTUs, i.e., P. fungorum (OTU2), Methylobacterium sp. (OTU13) and the two Pseudomonas species P. moraviensis (OTU5) and P. siliginis (OTU6). All these four bacterial species have been shown to act as biocontrol agents, to affect root development, to promote vegetative growth and ultimately yield, of diverse plants such as A. thaliana, potato, strawberry, tomato ad wheat (Hultberg et al., 2010; Ul Hassan and Bano, 2015; Rafikova et al., 2016; Klikno and Kutschera, 2017; Rahman et al., 2018; Grossi et al., 2020). In addition, both P. moraviensis and P. siliginis have been identified as the main candidate bacterial species controlling most members of the root and leaf bacterial pathobiota, in particular P. viridiflava and X. campestris, across natural populations of A. thaliana located south-west of France (Bartoli et al., 2018).”
The corrected sentences appear below:
“Genome sequencing confirmed or refined the gyrB-based taxonomic affiliation of four OTUs, i.e., P. fungorum (OTU2), Methylobacterium sp. (OTU13) and the two Pseudomonas species P. moraviensis (OTU5) and P. siliginis (OTU6). All these four bacterial species have been shown to act either as biocontrol agents, or to affect root development, or to promote vegetative growth and ultimately yield, of diverse plants such as A. thaliana, potato, strawberry, tomato and wheat (Hultberg et al., 2010; Ul Hassan and Bano, 2015; Rafikova et al., 2016; Klikno and Kutschera, 2017; Rahman et al., 2018; Grossi et al., 2020). In addition, both P. moraviensis and P. siliginis have been identified in a large consortium of other bacterial species as candidate antagonists of the root and leaf bacterial pathobiota, in particular P. viridiflava and X. campestris, across natural populations of A. thaliana located south-west of France (Bartoli et al., 2018).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
BartoliC.FrachonL.BarretM.RigalM.Huard-ChauveauC.MayjonadeB.et al. (2018). In situ relationships between microbiota and potential pathobiota in Arabidopsis thaliana. ISME J.12, 2024–2038. 10.1038/s41396-018-0152-7
2
GrossiC. E. M.FantinoE.SerralF.ZawoznikM. S.Fernandez Do PortoD. A.UlloaR. M. (2020). Methylobacterium sp. 2A is a plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that has the potential to improve potato crop yield under adverse conditions. Front. Plant Sci.11:71. 10.3389/fpls.2020.00071
3
HultbergM.AlsbergT.KhalilS.AlsaniusB. (2010). Suppression of disease in tomato infected by Pythium ultimum with a biosurfactant produced by Pseudomonas koreensis. Biocontrol55, 435–444.
4
KliknoJ.KutscheraU. (2017). Regulation of root development in Arabidopsis thaliana by phytohormone-secreting epiphytic methylobacteria. Protoplasma254, 1867–1877. 10.1007/s00709-016-1067-7
5
RafikovaG. F.KorshunovaT. Y.MinnebaevL. F.ChetverikovS. P.LoginovO. N. (2016). A new bacterial strain, Pseudomonas koreensis IB-4, as a promising agent for plant pathogen biological control. Microbiology85, 333–341.
6
RahmanM.SabirA. A.MuktaJ. A.KhanM. M. A.Mohi-Ud-DinM.MiahM. G.et al. (2018). Plant probiotic bacteria Bacillus and Paraburkholderia improve growth, yield and content of antioxidants in strawberry fruit. Sci. Rep.8:2504. 10.1038/s41598-018-20235-1
7
Ul HassanT.BanoA. (2015). The stimulatory effects of L-tryptophan and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on soil health and physiology of wheat. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.15, 190–201.
Summary
Keywords
microbiota, commensal bacteria, genomic diversity, plant growth promotion, growth kinetics, seed inoculation, seedling inoculation, genotype-by-genotype interactions
Citation
Ramírez-Sánchez D, Gibelin-Viala C, Mayjonade B, Duflos R, Belmonte E, Pailler V, Bartoli C, Carrere S, Vailleau F and Roux F (2023) Corrigendum: Investigating genetic diversity within the most abundant and prevalent non-pathogenic leaf-associated bacteria interacting with Arabidopsis thaliana in natural habitats. Front. Microbiol. 14:1304377. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1304377
Received
29 September 2023
Accepted
02 October 2023
Published
11 October 2023
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
14 - 2023
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Ramírez-Sánchez, Gibelin-Viala, Mayjonade, Duflos, Belmonte, Pailler, Bartoli, Carrere, Vailleau and Roux.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Fabrice Roux fabrice.roux@inrae.fr
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
‡These authors share senior authorship
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.