Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 07 August 2025

Sec. Microbiotechnology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1556322

Enhancing PQQ production in Acinetobacter calcoaceticus through uniform design and support vector regression

Yu-han Li,&#x;Yu-han Li1,2Su-hang Yao,&#x;Su-hang Yao1,2Yan ZhouYan Zhou2Xiu-lan He,Xiu-lan He2,3Zhe-ming Yuan,Zhe-ming Yuan4,5Qiu-long HuQiu-long Hu1Cheng-wen Shen
Cheng-wen Shen1*Xin Li,
Xin Li2,6*Yuan Chen
Yuan Chen5*
  • 1National Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Utilization of Botanical Functional Ingredients, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
  • 2Hunan Province Microbiology Research Institute, Changsha, China
  • 3Central South University Graduate School Long Ping Branch, Changsha, China
  • 4Yuelushan Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha, China
  • 5Hunan Engineering & Technology Research Centre for Agricultural Big Data Analysis & Decision-Making, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
  • 6Hunan Engineering Research Center for Endophytic Microbial Resources Mining and Utilization, Changsha, China

A novel machine learning-assisted approach for formula optimization, termed UD-SVR, is introduced by combining uniform design with support vector regression. This method was employed to optimize both the formulation and fermentation conditions for pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) production by Acinetobacter calcoaceticus. In just two rounds of 66 experimental treatments, UD-SVR effectively optimized a formulation involving eight factors at the shake-out level scale, enhancing PQQ production from 43.65 mg/L to 73.40 mg/L—an impressive 68.15% increase. Notably, the optimized formulation is also cost-effective, featuring minimized consumption of pivotal elements like carbon and nitrogen sources. The machine learning-supported UD-SVR method presents an inclusive resolution for optimizing experimental designs and analyses in multi-factor, multi-level formulations, characterized by robust guidance, lucid interpretability, and heightened efficiency in optimization.

1 Introduction

Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ), stands as a pivotal cofactor among the oxidoreductases residing on bacterial cell membranes (Duine and Frank, 1980). Beyond its involvement in enzymatic catalysis during redox reactions, PQQ assumes a critical role in electron transfer mechanisms (Song et al., 2023), showcasing robust antioxidant characteristics (Gao et al., 2004; Willner et al., 2007). Its profound impacts extend to promoting metabolic activities, growth, development, and fostering resilience (Yao et al., 2024; Rucker et al., 2021). It represents a novel biocomposite material within the industrial domain, offering unparalleled safeguarding for biomolecules (Liang et al., 2015).

Presently, the primary approaches for PQQ production encompass chemical synthesis and microbial fermentation (Choi et al., 2008). Despite the higher production achieved through chemical synthesis, this method is encumbered by intricate synthesis steps, elevated production costs (Paz et al., 1996; Qin et al., 2022), difficulties in managing by-products, low product recovery rates, and environmental pollution concerns. In contrast, microbial fermentation stands out for its straightforward process, gentle reaction conditions, cost-effectiveness, and enhanced productivity (Ke et al., 2021), establishing itself as the predominant method for industrial-scale PQQ production in contemporary times (Ren et al., 2023). The current forefront of PQQ production via microbial fermentation revolves around the selection of superior high-production strains, as well as the optimization of culture media compositions and fermentation condition (Liu et al., 2020; Luna and Boiardi, 2008). For instance, utilized artificial neural networks and response surface methodology to fine-tune the culture media components for the Methylobacillus sp. Zju323 strain. Their investigation pinpointed cobalt chloride hexahydrate, magnesium sulfate heptahydrate, and p-Aminobenzoic acid as three pivotal factors significantly impacting PQQ production, resulting in a notable 35% increase in PQQ production post-optimization. Furthermore, Zhang et al. (2022) employed a hybrid approach combining atmospheric pressure room temperature plasma mutagenesis with high-throughput screening, successfully identifying a mutant strain exhibiting heightened PQQ production, enhancing PQQ production from 31.4 mg/L to 48.4 mg/L.

Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (A. calcoaceticus) is a Gram-negative bacterium in the family Moraxellaceae of the class Gammaproteobacteria. It is strictly aerobic, grows at temperatures ranging from 20°C to 35°C, and is widely distributed in soil, water, wastewater, and food. It also exhibits notable halotolerance and plant growth–promoting properties (Oteino et al., 2015). Our laboratory previously isolated an A. calcoaceticus strain capable of fermentative PQQ production. Notably, its PQQ biosynthetic pathway requires only four genes, compared with six in Klebsiella pneumoniae and seven in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1, representing a streamlined system for cofactor synthesis (Schwarzenbacher et al., 2004; Puehringer et al., 2008). Moreover, A. calcoaceticus exhibits broad substrate specificity and high product purity, utilizing carbon sources such as ethanol, methanol, glycerol and polyols. These characteristics underscore the organism’s strong potential for fermentative PQQ production. However, under standard media compositions and fermentation conditions, PQQ production reached only 43.65 mg/L. Optimization of fermentation parameters is therefore essential to enhance yield; yet traditional one-factor-at-a-time experiments are time-consuming, costly and fail to capture interactive effects, and although orthogonal and uniform designs address some interactions, their low resolution limits efficacy (Duine and Frank, 1980; Yuan et al., 2007). To overcome these constraints, machine-learning–assisted methods have been increasingly applied to fermentation optimization (Sharma and Mishra, 2023; Xu et al., 2025). Support vector machines (SVM) (Che et al., 2017), in particular, excel with small datasets, prompting us to develop a uniform design–support vector regression (UD-SVR) strategy for medium and process parameter optimization. This innovative technique, rooted in machine learning principles, optimized eight key fermentation parameters encompassing carbon and nitrogen levels, fermentation temperature, pH, among others, tailored specifically for A. calcoaceticus. Following two iterative cycles comprising 66 optimization trials, the PQQ fermentation production surged to 73.40 mg/L, showcasing a substantial 68.15% enhancement over the initial production levels.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Strain and medium

The PQQ-producing A. calcoaceticus CDWB36, isolated and characterized by our laboratory, is securely preserved in a − 80°C freezer, encapsulating its biological essence for further scientific exploration.

Liquid LB medium: peptone 10.0 g/L, yeast powder 5.0 g/L, sodium chloride 10.0 g/L, pH 7.0 ± 0.2. Solid LB medium: liquid LB medium supplemented with 15.0 g/L agar. Initial fermentation medium: yeast powder 10.0 g/L, anhydrous ammonium sulfate 2.0 g/L, L-glutamic acid 1.0 g/L, L-tyrosine 1.0 g/L, Na2HPO4 2.0 g/L, KH2PO4 1.4 g/L, MgSO4·7H2O 1.0 g/L, calcium chloride 0.4 g/L, trace elements solution 0.4 g/L, pH adjusted to 7.0 ± 0.2, inoculum volume 1%, temperature 28°C. Trace elements solution: FeSO4·7H2O 80.0 mg/L, ZnSO4·7H2O 22.5 mg/L, NaCl 15.0 mg/L, KI 0.3 mg/L, H3BO3 3.0 mg/L, CuSO4 5.0 mg/L.

2.2 Bacterial culture and fermentation

The strain was introduced into LB medium and cultured at 28°C for 24 h. A small portion was subsequently transferred into 150 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 mL of LB liquid fermentation medium for continued activation. After24 hours of shaking at 180 rpm and 28°C, the fermentation medium was inoculated with 1% of the activated culture and incubate at 180 rpm and 28°C for 7 days.

2.3 Measurement method for PQQ production

Using spectral analysis (Letokhov, 1975), we detected various concentrations (1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 25, 50, 100 mg/L) of PQQ standard solutions. To eliminate interference, the absorbance value of the blank fermentation medium was subtracted during sample testing. A standard curve was established with PQQ concentration on the x-axis and OD330 on the y-axis (Supplementary Figure S1).

For cultures subjected to different fermentation conditions, each treatment was sampled three times, with each replicate measured in duplicate. Subsequently, 1 mL of fermentation liquid was centrifuged at 4°C and 12,000 rpm for 2 min. The supernatant was then collected, and the absorbance at 330 nm (OD330) was measured using a Hitachi UV3000 spectrophotometer. The PQQ concentrations were calculated by averaging the OD330 values from three replicates, based on the standard curve.

2.4 Optimization process of UD-SVR

In the optimization process, we used the hybrid-level module of DPS software to generate a uniform design for the experimental designs. The experiments were then conducted, and the PQQ productions under various treatments were measured. Next, nonlinear feature screening with an SVR model was conducted to identify the key factors influencing PQQ production. Based on the retained factors, an SVR prediction model was trained to forecast PQQ production across all possible treatment combinations (Xiao et al., 2021). Frequency-based statistical optimization was subsequently applied to the predicted values to determine the optimal level for each factor. Depending on the outcome, either a new round of uniform design was initiated or the optimization process was concluded (Fang et al., 2013).

2.5 Modeling and evaluation

The SVR model (Tan and Zhang, 2016) was constructed utilizing functions from the Python sklearn library. The optimization of hyperparameters was executed through 5-fold cross-validation (5-CV), including kernel functions, C, and γ. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated using the mean square error (MSE) (Yuan et al., 2007), calculated by the formula below (Equation 1):

MSE = ( y i y ̂ i ) 2 n     (1)

Here, y i , y ̂ i and n are the observed value, predicted value and sample size, respectively. Based on the 5-CV strategy, model optimization was performed over different kernel functions and the hyperparameters C and γ. The candidate kernel types included linear, polynomial, radial basis function (RBF), and sigmoid. The penalty parameter C was searched within the range [2−5, 215], and the kernel coefficient γ was varied from 2−15 to 23. The hyperparameter tuning was conducted using the GridSearchCV function from the Python package scikit-learn. Lower MSE scores across the parameter grid indicate better predictive performance of the corresponding hyperparameter combination.

2.6 Nonlinear feature screening

Given a dataset D = {yi, xij} (i = 1, 2, …, n; j = 1, 2, …, m), containing n samples (treatments) and m features (factors), we first performed 5-CV with SVR using all m features to compute the initial cross-validation MSE, denoted as MSE0. Subsequently, for each feature j, we removed that feature and performed the 5-CV to obtain MSEj (j = 1, 2, …, m). If the minimum value in the set of MSEj is smaller than the initial MSE (MSE0), the feature corresponding to the minimum MSEj, is removed, and the next round of screening proceeds. Otherwise, the feature selection process terminates.

2.7 Full combination prediction and frequency statistical optimization

Through a nonlinear feature screening process, features with minimal influence on PQQ yield were eliminated to reduce the impact of irrelevant factors on model performance. Subsequently, an SVR prediction model was constructed using only the retained factors, with the optimal kernel function and hyperparameters determined via 5-CV. All possible treatment combinations based on the levels of the retained factors were then generated and used as inputs to the trained model, yielding predicted PQQ production values. Based on these predictions, treatments with high expected yields (using a threshold of 50 mg/L in this study) were selected. The frequency of occurrence of each factor level among these high-yield treatments was then analyzed; a higher frequency suggests a greater likelihood that the corresponding level contributes to enhanced PQQ production. If the most frequent level of a given factor coincides with the upper or lower bound of its tested range, this implies that the optimal level may lie beyond the current range, warranting a subsequent round of uniform design experiments with an expanded level range in the indicated direction.

3 Results

3.1 Initial fermentation medium and the upper and lower limits of each factor

Utilizing the fermentation parameters delineated in the methodology sections (2.1) as the foundational framework, the PQQ production for the A. calcoaceticus stood at 43.65 mg/L. Initial experimental findings underscored the substantial impact of eight factors—namely, yeast powder, anhydrous ammonium sulfate, L-glutamic acid, L-tyrosine, calcium chloride quantities within the fermentation composition, along with the inoculation volume, fermentation temperature, and pH levels—on the PQQ production of the A. calcoaceticus. Consequently, this investigation proceeded to refine these eight key factors through the utilization of UD-SVR. The stipulated ranges for each factor were delineated in Table 1, while the outcomes of the initial 40 systematically designed treatments (N1 ~ N40) by UD and their corresponding PQQ production were detailed in Supplementary Table S1. Within this cohort of 40 treatments, the pinnacle PQQ production reached 65.56 mg/L, marking a notable 50% escalation compared to the foundational formula. Notably, five treatments exhibited production surpassing 50 mg/L, representing 12.5% of all treatments, while 13 treatments demonstrated production exceeding 43 mg/L, representing 32.5%. The lowest PQQ production recorded was 10.12 mg/L.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The predetermined ranges for each factor in the initial optimization phase.

3.2 Optimal kernel function selection and nonlinear factor screening results

Using PQQ production data from the initial set of 40 treatments as the dependent variable (y), and the eight factors slated for optimization as independent variables (x1-x8), the RBF emerged as the optimal choice following SVR and the criterion of minimizing MSE during a 5-CV. Additionally, after a process of nonlinear factor screening, six key factors were singled out: the levels of yeast powder (x1), anhydrous ammonium sulfate (x2), L-glutamic acid (x3), L-tyrosine (x4), as well as the fermentation temperature (x6) and pH level (x8). Within the prescribed ranges for each factor as outlined in Table 1, the impact of calcium chloride (x5) content and inoculation volume (x7) on PQQ production was deemed negligible. Details of the factor screening procedure were elaborated in Table 2.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Nonlinear factor screening process and MSE values.

3.3 Frequency statistical optimization through full combination prediction

Through meticulous feature selection, a new dataset was curated, featuring 6 input characteristics and 40 samples. The RBF was chosen as the optimal function, with hyperparameters C and γ fine-tuned through grid search to construct an SVR training model. The resulting model achieved a 5-CV MSE of 19.97 and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.88 (Supplementary Figure S2), indicating strong predictive performance. Subsequently, predictions were generated for the PQQ production across all 125,000 comprehensive combinations of x1 (5 levels), x2 (5 levels), x3 (5 levels), x4 (5 levels), x6 (4 levels), and x8 (5 levels).

The average prediction among the 125,000 values stands at 33.92 mg/L, with the highest reaching 63.24 mg/L and the lowest at 10.86 mg/L. Notably, 719 instances surpass the 50 mg/L in these forecasts. Subsequently, a thorough examination of the frequency distribution of each retained factor’s levels was conducted based on these instances (Figure 1). In scenarios where the prediction exceeds 50 mg/L, a predominant pattern emerges concerning yeast powder usage: instances featuring 7 mg/L and 10 mg/L are prevalent, with 318 and 306 occurrences respectively, while instances with 13 mg/L of yeast powder are notably fewer at 95. This observation underscores that an increase in yeast powder quantity does not necessarily translate to improved outcomes. Consequently, for the forthcoming optimization phase, a reduction in yeast powder quantity warrants exploration. The trajectory of anhydrous ammonium sulfate usage mirrors that of yeast powder, signaling a necessity for further reduction in its utilization during the subsequent optimization iteration. Regarding L-glutamic acid, there is a trend towards decreased usage, peaking at 1.0 g/L (235 occurrences), with a notable presence of 224 occurrences at 0.5 g/L as well. While no extrapolation is imperative in the next optimization cycle, it is crucial to consider both the 0.5 g/L and 1.0 g/L levels. Contrary to the trends observed in anhydrous ammonium sulfate and L-glutamic acid, the trend in L-tyrosine usage necessitates extrapolation towards increased quantities. Despite the instances with a L-tyrosine usage of 2.0 g/L (251 occurrences) being fewer than those at 2.5 mg/L (306 occurrences), the highest predicted value corresponds to a L-tyrosine usage of 2.0 g/L. Hence, for the subsequent optimization phase, extrapolation based on the 2.0 g/L and 2.5 g/L levels is advised. The temperature trend aligns with the pattern observed in L-tyrosine usage, warranting extrapolation based on 28°C and 29°C in the forthcoming optimization cycle. Notably, a conspicuous peak is evident at a pH value of 6.5, suggesting that it can be fixed at 6.5 without necessitating further extrapolation.

Figure 1
Six scatter plots labeled A to F show the relationship between PQQ concentration (mg/L) and various factors. Each plot features color-coded dots representing data points, with an overlaid blue line indicating trend direction. Variables include yeast powder (g/L), anhydrous ammonium sulfate (g/L), L-glutamic acid (g/L), L-tyrosine (g/L), temperature (°C), and pH. Vertical and horizontal axes display corresponding units and scales, with the line shifting up or down to highlight trends across different levels of each variable.

Figure 1. Frequency distribution of the six retained factors. (A–F) represent the frequency distributions of yeast powder, anhydrous ammonium sulfate, L-glutamic acid, L-tyrosine, temperature, and pH, respectively. The left y-axis of each subgraph corresponds to the predicted PQQ production values (scatterplot), while the right y-axis represents the frequency of occurrence for each level (blue line plot).

3.4 Second-round uniform design

Informed by the initial round of factor screening and statistical frequency optimization, three factors—calcium chloride, inoculum volume, and pH—have been earmarked for stabilization. Notably, calcium chloride and inoculum volume, lacking in retained significance, are consequently anchored at their median values of 0.4 g/L and 0.4%, respectively. The pH level, as per the statistical frequency optimization outcomes, is set at a fixed value of 6.5. Subsequent to the statistical frequency optimization findings, yeast powder, anhydrous ammonium sulfate, L-glutamic acid, L-tyrosine, and fermentation temperature—comprising a total of five factors—have been utilized to craft a uniform design of 26 treatments across 2–3 levels. The specific ranges for each factor are meticulously outlined in Table 3, while the intricate particulars of every treatment and the corresponding quantified PQQ production are catalogued in Supplementary Table S2.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Predefined ranges for each factor in the second round of optimization.

Within the cohort of 26 treatments during the subsequent phase, the pinnacle production peaks at 71.42 mg/L, representing a notable 63.62% surge in contrast to the foundational formulation. This pinnacle attainment aligns with yeast powder at 5.0 g/L, anhydrous ammonium sulfate at 1 g/L, L-glutamic acid at 0.5 g/L, L-tyrosine at 2.0 g/L, and a constant temperature of 30°C. Noteworthy is the presence of 15 groups surpassing the 50.0 mg/L production, constituting 57.69% of the aggregate, alongside 22 groups surpassing 43.0 mg/L, accounting for 84.62%. The treatment production with the lowest PQQ production registers at 30.81 mg/L. Evidently, subsequent to the initial optimization phase, a substantial upsurge in PQQ production is discernible across each treatment in the ensuing round (p value of t-test is 2.3043e-05).

3.5 Full combination prediction and optimal combination verification

Utilizing the 26 treatments as the training set from the second round experiment, the radial basis kernel emerged as the optimal choice for the kernel function. Following meticulous grid optimization, the pivotal hyperparameters C and γ were pinpointed, culminating in the construction of a robust SVR training model. Forecasts were made for PQQ production across all 108 comprehensive treatment combinations, encompassing yeast powder (3 levels), anhydrous ammonium sulfate (2 levels), L-glutamic acid (2 levels), L-tyrosine (3 levels), and fermentation temperature (3 levels). The zenith of these predictions peaked at 70.25 mg/L, linked to yeast powder at 5 g/L, anhydrous ammonium sulfate at 0.5 g/L, L-glutamic acid at 0.5 g/L, L-tyrosine at 2 g/L, and a temperature set at 30°C. This formula harmonized closely with the optimal blend derived from the second-round uniform design, with the sole alteration being the decrease in anhydrous ammonium sulfate from 1.0 g/L to 0.5 g/L, underscoring the model’s robust predictive capacity. Subsequent experimental validation of this formula production a notable PQQ production of 73.40 mg/L, showcasing a remarkable 68.15% enhancement compared to the standard formulation.

4 Conclusion

Optimization of a complex 8-factor formulation was meticulously undertaken using the UD-SVR method across two rounds of uniform design, encompassing a total of 66 treatments. The measured PQQ content surged impressively from the initial scheme’s 43.65 mg/L to a notable 73.40 mg/L. The refined formulation tailored for PQQ production by A. calcoaceticus featured precise fermentation conditions: yeast powder at 5 g/L, anhydrous ammonium sulfate at 0.5 g/L, L-glutamic acid at 0.5 g/L, L-tyrosine at 2.0 g/L, Na2HPO4 at 2.0 g/L, KH2PO4 at 1.4 g/L, MgSO4·7H2O at 1.0 g/L, and calcium chloride at 0.4 g/L. Essential trace elements were meticulously included: FeSO4·7H2O at 80.0 mg/L, ZnSO4·7H2O at 22.5 mg/L, KI at 0.3 mg/L, H3BO3 at 3.0 mg/L, CuSO4 at 5.0 mg/L, NaCl at 15.0 mg/L, maintaining a pH of 6.5. The inoculation rate stood at 0.5%, with a fermentation temperature set at 30°C and a duration of 7 days.

In comparison to the initial formulation, the optimized scheme not only substantially amplified PQQ production from A. calcoaceticus but also effectively curtailed fermentation costs. Noteworthy adjustments included halving the yeast powder requirement from 10.0 g/L to 5.0 g/L, marking a significant 50% reduction. Furthermore, the initial formulation, demanding a total nitrogen source of 4.0 g/L (anhydrous ammonium sulfate: L-glutamic acid: L-tyrosine = 2:1:1), was refined in the optimized scheme to a more efficient 3.0 g/L ratio (0.5:0.5:2). The optimized strategy also challenged the nitrogen source ratio derived from single-factor experiments by elevating the proportion of L-tyrosine.

This study primarily honed the PQQ production capacity of A. calcoaceticus at the laboratory flask level. Future pursuits should encompass the integration of mutagenesis techniques to cultivate high-production strains and further refine fermentation conditions at the bioreactor and industrial scales to augment PQQ production capacity.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

Y-hL: Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft. S-hY: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YZ: Validation, Writing – original draft. X-lH: Investigation, Writing – original draft. Z-mY: Writing – original draft, Software. Q-lH: Resources, Writing – review & editing. C-wS: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. XL: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. YC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Visualization.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Policy Projects of Science Technology Aid to Xinjiang, Science and Technology Aid to Tibet (2024WK4003), Hunan Agricultural University for Supporting Young Interdisciplinary Scholars (2024XKJC04), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32172464, 32472617) and Scientific Research Foundation of Hunan Provincial Education Department (22A0158).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1556322/full#supplementary-material

References

Che, J., Yang, Y., Li, L., Li, Y., and Zhu, S. (2017). A modified support vector regression: integrated selection of training subset and model. Appl. Soft Comput. 53, 308–322. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.12.053

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, O., Kim, J. J., Kim, G., Jeong, Y., Moon, J. S., Park, C., et al. (2008). Pyrroloquinoline quinone is a plant growth promotion factor produced by pseudomonas fluorescens B16. Plant Physiol. 146, 657–668. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.112748

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Duine, J. A., and Frank, J. (1980). The prosthetic group of methanol dehydrogenase. Purification and some of its properties. Biochem. J. 187, 221–226. doi: 10.1042/bj1870221

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fang, F., Zang, G. L., Sun, M., and Yu, H. Q. (2013). Optimizing multi-variables of microbial fuel cell for electricity generation with an integrated modeling and experimental approach. Appl. Energ. 110, 98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.017

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, H., Wang, Y., Yang, J., Qiu, M., Lei, Z., Zhang, W., et al. (2004). Microbial synthesis of pyrroloquinoline quinone. World J. Microb. Biotechnol. 40:31. doi: 10.1007/s11274-023-03833-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ke, C., Ren, Y., Gao, P., Han, J., Tao, Y., Huang, J., et al. (2021). Separation and purification of pyrroloquinoline quinone from fermentation broth by pretreatment coupled with macroporous resin adsorption. Sep. Purif. Technol. 257:117962. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117962

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Letokhov, V. S. (1975). Nonlinear high resolution laser spectroscopy. Science 190, 344–351. doi: 10.1126/science.1179214

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liang, K., Ricco, R. C., Doherty, M., Styles, M. J., Bell, S., Kirby, N., et al. (2015). Biomimetic mineralization of metal-organic frameworks as protective coatings for biomacromolecules. Nat. Commun. 6:7240. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8240

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, M., Yang, X., Ren, Y., Xia, H., Huang, J., and Ke, C. (2020). Two-stage oxygen supply strategy for enhancing fed-batch production of pyrroloquinoline quinone in Hyphomicrobium denitrificans FJNU-6. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 104, 6615–6622. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10690-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Luna, M. F., and Boiardi, J. L. (2008). Growth yields and glucose metabolism of N2-fixing Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus at different culture pH values. World J. Microb. Biot. 24, 587–590. doi: 10.1007/s11274-007-9507-3

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Oteino, N., Lally, R. D., Kiwanuka, S., Lloyd, A., Ryan, D., Germaine, K. J., et al. (2015). Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic Pseudomonas isolates. Front. Microbiol. 6:745. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00745

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Paz, M. A., Martin, P., Flückiger, R., Mah, J., and Gallop, P. M. (1996). The catalysis of redox cycling by pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ), PQQ derivatives, and isomers and the specificity of inhibitors. Anal. Biochem. 238, 145–149. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0267

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Puehringer, S., Metlitzky, M., and Schwarzenbacher, R. (2008). The pyrroloquinoline quinone biosynthesis pathway revisited: a structural approach. BMC Biochem. 9, 1–11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2091-9-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, Z., Yu, S., Chen, J., and Zhou, J. (2022). Dehydrogenases of acetic acid bacteria. Biotechnol. Adv. 54:107863. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107863

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ren, Y., Yang, X., Ding, L., Liu, D., Tao, Y., Huang, J., et al. (2023). Adaptive evolutionary strategy coupled with an optimized biosynthesis process for the efficient production of pyrroloquinoline quinone from methanol. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 16:11. doi: 10.1186/s13068-023-02261-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rucker, R., Jonscher, K., and Chowanadisai, W. (2021). Comparative effects of pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) and resveratrol (RSV) on mitochondriogenesis in mice. FASEB J. 35. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.2021.35.S1.05142

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwarzenbacher, R., Stenner-Liewen, F., Liewen, H., Reed, J. C., and Liddington, R. C. (2004). Crystal structure of PqqC from Klebsiella pneumoniae at 2.1 Å resolution. Proteins 56, 401–403. doi: 10.1002/prot.2008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, D., and Mishra, A. (2023). Synergistic effects of ternary mixture formulation and process parameters optimization in a sequential approach for enhanced L-asparaginase production using agro-industrial wastes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 12, 1614–7499. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26977-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, Y., Huang, R., Li, L., Du, K., Zhu, F., Song, C., et al. (2023). Humic acid-dependent respiratory growth of Methanosarcina acetivorans involves pyrroloquinoline quinone. ISME J. 17, 2103–2111. doi: 10.1038/s41396-023-01520-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, M., and Zhang, Z. (2016). Wind turbine modeling with data-driven methods and radially uniform designs. IEEE T. Ind. Inform. 12, 1261–1269. doi: 10.1109/TII.2016.2532321

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Willner, I., Baron, R., and Willner, B. (2007). Integrated nanoparticle-biomolecule systems for biosensing and bioelectronics. Biosens. Bioelectron. 22, 1841–1852. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.09.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, D., Guo, L., Liu, W., and Hou, M. (2021). Efficient RCS prediction of the conducting target based on physics-inspired machine learning and experimental design. IEEE T. Ind. Inform. 69, 2274–2289. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2020.3027594

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, F., Su, L. H., Gao, H., Wang, Y., Ben, R., Hu, K. H., et al. (2025). Harnessing near-infrared and Raman spectral sensing and artificial intelligence for real-time monitoring and precision control of bioprocess. Bioresour. Technol. 421:132204. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132204

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, S. H., Tao, Y., Chen, F., Zhu, L. W., Zhang, Q. Z., Shen, C. W., et al. (2024). The effect of exogenous pyrroloquinoline quinine on the fermentation and antibacterial activity of bacillus velezensis. J. Jilin Agric. Univ. 4, 1–15. doi: 10.13327/j.jjlau.2024.20494

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, Y. X., Zhong, S. H., Li, Q., Zhu, Z. R., Lou, Y. G., Wang, L., et al. (2007). Functional analysis of rice NPR1-like genes reveals that OsNPR1 / NH1 is the rice orthologue conferring disease resistance with enhanced herbivore susceptibility. Plant. Biotechnol. J. 5, 313–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00243

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Liu, M. S., Qin, Z. J., Zeng, W. Z., and Zhou, J. W. (2022). Breeding and fermentation optimization of high titer pyrrorole-quinoline quinone strain. Food Fermentation Ind. 48, 56–64. doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.030228

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Acinetobacter calcoaceticus , PQQ, uniform design, support vector regression, formulation optimization

Citation: Li Y-h, Yao S-h, Zhou Y, He X-l, Yuan Z-m, Hu Q-l, Shen C-w, Li X and Chen Y (2025) Enhancing PQQ production in Acinetobacter calcoaceticus through uniform design and support vector regression. Front. Microbiol. 16:1556322. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1556322

Received: 06 January 2025; Accepted: 18 July 2025;
Published: 07 August 2025.

Edited by:

Mingfeng Cao, Xiamen University, China

Reviewed by:

Xue Peng Yang, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, China
Shin-ichiro Suye, Fukui University of Technology, Japan

Copyright © 2025 Li, Yao, Zhou, He, Yuan, Hu, Shen, Li and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Cheng-wen Shen, c2hlbmN3QGh1bmF1LmVkdS5jbg==; Xin Li, czIwMDcyMDMyNzJAeWVhaC5uZXQ=; Yuan Chen, Y2hlbnl1YW4wNTEwQDEyNi5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.