Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 07 October 2025

Sec. Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1581312

This article is part of the Research TopicMicrobial Regulation of Plant Immunity: Mechanisms and ApplicationsView all 15 articles

Tar spot susceptibility of corn influences phyllosphere-associated bacterial and fungal microbiomes

  • 1Crop Production and Pest Control Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), West Lafayette, IN, United States
  • 2Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States

Tar spot, caused by the obligate fungal pathogen Phyllachora maydis, is a major economic concern for corn producers in the United States. To test the hypothesis that P. maydis can interact with other foliar microorganisms, we investigated phyllosphere microbiomes in relation to corn inbreds with differential tar spot symptoms under natural field infestation. Sixteen inbred lines were assessed for tar spot symptoms, and bacterial and fungal microbiomes were characterized using Illumina MiSeq Sequencing. Comparison of the phyllosphere microbiomes revealed distinct bacterial and fungal communities between resistant and susceptible lines in a sample-specific manner. Bacterial alpha diversity did not differ significantly between susceptible and resistant lines, while fungal diversity (richness, evenness, and phylogenetic diversity) was significantly higher in resistant lines. Beta diversity analysis revealed significant structural differences in both bacterial and fungal communities, with fungal differences more pronounced and driven by relative abundance. Resistant lines were associated with plant-beneficial bacterial genera such as Quadrisphaera, Klenkia and Nocardioides and fungal genera Cladosporium, Coniothyrium, Alternaria, Epicoccum, Bipolaris, Phyllozyma, and Papiliotrema, while susceptible lines were dominated by Erwiniaceae, Aureimonas, Pseudomonas, Microbacterium, and Deinococcus and fungal genera Hannaella, Paraphaeosphaeria, Sphaerellopsis and Phyllachora. Coniothyrium, a potential mycoparasite of P. maydis, was also detected but whether it is the same species that was identified in Central and South America is unknown. Our findings imply that P. maydis infection may result in a distinct, less diverse microbiome. Differential abundance analysis revealed enrichment of Erwiniaceae and Enterobacterales, particularly Amnibacterium in susceptible lines, and Microbacteriaceae in resistant lines. Correlation analysis between P. maydis reads and abundant taxa revealed a predominance of negative correlations, suggesting increased ecological niche differentiation driven by intense competition within the microbial community. These findings suggest that P. maydis infection is associated with a less diverse microbiome and that specific microbial taxa may play roles in P. maydis susceptibility and resistance. Further research on these correlated and distinct microbiotas could elucidate the role of foliar microbiomes in causing or resisting P. maydis infection.

1 Introduction

Corn (maize; Zea mays subsp. mays) is one of the most widely grown crops in the world and is used for a wide range of food, feed and industrial applications. Among numerous risks to worldwide corn production, disease-related yield losses pose a serious threat to our capacity to attain long-term food and nutritional security, and inflict severe financial stresses to growers (Savary et al., 2019). Several foliar diseases, including northern leaf blight (NLB) caused by Exserohilum turcium (Hooker, 1976), southern leaf blight (SLB) caused by Bipolaris maydis (anamorph: Cochliobolus heterostrophus) (Ullstrup, 1972), gray leaf spot caused by Cercospora zeae-maydis and C. zeina (Tehon and Daniels, 1925; Crous et al., 2006), and common and southern rust caused by Puccinia sorghi and P. polysora (Cummins, 1941), respectively, can contribute to yield loss.

Another foliar disease, tar spot, has recently emerged as a major threat to corn production, causing yield losses of up to 25–50% on susceptible hybrids under favorable conditions (Rocco da Silva et al., 2021; Valle-Torres et al., 2020). Tar spot is caused by the obligately biotrophic fungal pathogen Phyllachora maydis Maubl and was first identified in Indiana and Illinois in 2015 (Bajet et al., 1994; Bissonnette, 2015; Ruhl et al., 2016). After infection, P. maydis produces black, glossy, elevated, round or oval stromata on the leaves and stems of corn. In some cases, a fish-eye symptom occurs when stromata are encircled by a tan-colored necrotic halo (Bajet et al., 1994; Hock et al., 1995; McCoy et al., 2019). Although P. maydis can infect corn at any stage of growth, the most severe symptoms develop during the silk (R1) and later stages (Singh et al., 2023).

Possible management strategies for tar spot include host resistance, biological control, and fungicidal chemicals. Host resistance should be the most effective, economical and environmentally benign strategy (Rocco da Silva et al., 2021; Valle-Torres et al., 2020) but is not widely available in commercial cultivars. A diverse panel of tropical and subtropical corn germplasm has been screened for tar spot resistance or tolerance with the intent to develop improved varieties (Cao et al., 2017; Lipps et al., 2022; Ren et al., 2022; Singh et al., 2023), but less is known about resistance in North American corn cultivars (Lipps et al., 2022; Singh et al., 2023). Biological control is also being investigated, and several taxa in the corn foliar microbiome have been found to inhibit specific pathogens (Singh and Goodwin, 2022). Thoroughly understanding the microbial response to P. maydis infection might reveal microbes associated with resistance that can suppress tar spot disease.

The phyllosphere contains diverse epiphytic and endophytic organisms that can exhibit commensal, parasitic, or mutualistic interactions with leaf tissue. Phyllospheric organisms can significantly affect their host and the ecosystem at large (Lindow and Brandl, 2003). Disease resistance and susceptibility have been linked to the phyllospheric microbiome in a variety of species, including tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), poplar (Populus), wheat (Triticum aestivum), rice (Oryza sativa), corn (Zea mays), citrus (Citrus sinensis) and Arabidopsis thaliana, and disease can be altered by manipulating phyllospheric microbes (Berg and Koskella, 2018; Busby et al., 2016; De Costa et al., 2006a, 2006b; Massart et al., 2015; Ritpitakphong et al., 2016; Li P. D. et al., 2022). Despite the importance of phyllospheric microorganisms for plant health, relatively little is known about their response to fungal foliar diseases. Only a few studies have probed the dynamics of microbial populations in the corn phyllosphere in response to fungal pathogens (Balint-Kurti et al., 2010; Manching et al., 2014; McCoy et al., 2019; Singh and Goodwin, 2022; Wagner et al., 2020; Wallace et al., 2018; Ferreira et al., 2025; Sic-Hernandez et al., 2025). For example, particular phyllospheric bacteria may boost resistance to Cochliobolus heterostrophus infection (Balint-Kurti et al., 2010). That study also correlated high bacterial diversity with Southern leaf blight (slb) susceptibility in the field. Manching et al. (2014) found that severe slb disease is correlated with decreased species richness of epiphytic bacteria. Phyllospheric fungal communities also have been analyzed in fish-eye and marginless tar spot lesions in corn (McCoy et al., 2019). Recent research has shown that fungal communities in symptomatic tissues where Phyllachora maydis dominated were more diverse than those from leaf samples without symptoms, revealing distinct co-occurrence networks involving key genera like Fusarium and Epicoccum, and confirming low genetic diversity within P. maydis populations in Florida (Ferreira et al., 2025).

Despite all these studies, it is not clear whether microbiome structure and disease resistance are directly related or independent processes. Extensive analysis of microbial variation and its correlation to disease, including functional characterization of beneficial microbes, is required to predict and mitigate disease progression. Host disease resistance could be enhanced by the action of antagonist species and/or the net competitiveness of a highly diverse microbiome. Beneficial and/or antagonistic microbes from the corn microbiome may contribute to host resistance by directly inhibiting or suppressing the growth of pathogens or by secreting antimicrobial secondary compounds (Morelli et al., 2020; Singh and Goodwin, 2022; Trivedi et al., 2020).

As mentioned above, the association of phyllosphere community diversity with disease resistance has been studied previously to some extent (Balint-Kurti et al., 2010; Manching et al., 2014; McCoy et al., 2019; Wagner et al., 2020; Wallace et al., 2018). However, connections between the phyllosphere microbiome and tar spot disease severity have never been investigated except for recent analyses showing differences in fungal community structure between symptomatic and asymptomatic corn tissues in Florida (Ferreira et al., 2025). Because the tar spot pathogen exists almost exclusively on the leaf, it and other biotrophic pathogens may be more affected by foliar microbiomes compared to pathogens that live inside host cells. The purpose of this research was to test the hypothesis that microbial community structure differs significantly between resistant and susceptible inbred lines of corn after infection by P. maydis. This was accomplished by using Illumina Miseq sequencing to characterize and census the bacteria and fungi associated with resistant and susceptible inbred lines by sequencing the bacterial 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene and the fungal 18S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. We also revealed the significant differential abundance of bacterial and fungal taxa between resistant and susceptible inbred lines. A thorough understanding of microbial diversity and its correlation to disease between resistant and susceptible inbred lines is potentially useful to identify microbes that affect disease progression. Overall, our findings reveal significant differences in community richness and abundance of bacterial and fungal taxa between resistant and susceptible inbred lines of corn after infection by P. maydis.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Corn lines and growth conditions

In this study, we analyzed the phyllosphere microbiome of 16 inbred corn lines that differed in severity of tar spot after the onset of symptoms under natural infection in field conditions. Among 16 inbred lines, five were parental lines of the Nested Association Mapping (NAM) population (CML52, CML69, CML103, TX303 and B97) (McMullen et al., 2009; Yu et al., 2008) and the remaining 11 lines (PI685788, PI658790, PI685806, PI685831, PI685836, PI685915, PI685918, PI685919, PI685920, PI685950, and 4,401,350) were from the Germplasm Enhancement of Maize (GEM) project (Pollak and Salhuana, 2001). Corn inbred lines were planted in three replicates at a research field trial located at the Pinney Purdue Agricultural Center, Wanatah, Indiana. This location was chosen for the experiment because of high tar spot disease pressure detected in prior years. Because of its obligately biotrophic nature, P. maydis cannot be cultured for inoculation, hence all field studies relied on natural infection. Plots were planted on June 8, 2019, with approximately 20 seeds per row with two rows for each line in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Experimental plots were 3.0 m (10ft) wide and 9.1 m (30ft) long, consisting of two rows for disease evaluation. At all locations, the previous crop was corn with a history of tar spot. Fungicide treatments were not applied during the experimental period to allow for natural infection. After the onset of tar spot symptoms, scoring was conducted at the late dent reproductive growth stage (R5) in early October and was conducted as described previously (Singh et al., 2023). This 0-to-100% disease severity scale at different growth stages has been used as a standard in numerous prior publications (Kleczewski and Bowman, 2020; Telenko et al., 2019, 2022; Singh et al., 2023). Four plants were rated from each line in two replicates, beginning 2 weeks after the first observed disease incidence. To capture whole-plant disease severity, ratings were taken from three parts of the canopy: lower leaf (defined as two leaves below the ear leaf), ear leaf, and upper leaf (defined as two leaves above the ear leaf). The means of these four ratings were used for calculating the disease severity for each plant.

2.2 Sample collection and processing

Leaves from corn lines that ranged from susceptible to tolerant to Phyllachora maydis were collected at 14 weeks after planting when plants were in the late dent reproductive growth stage (R5). In total, 48 samples were collected from 16 inbred lines including three replicates. For each replicate, five ear leaves were sampled. Sampled leaves were sprayed and wiped with 70% ethanol, and then dried between sterile paper towels. Six leaf discs uniformly spaced from the base to the tip of each leaf were excised using a sterilized cork borer (18 mm), avoiding the midrib and any dry tissue, so that each replication consisted of 30 leaf discs from 5 individual leaves. Excised leaf discs were immediately transferred to sterile microcentrifuge tubes using sterilized forceps and were stored at −80 °C until DNA extraction.

2.3 DNA extraction

DNA was extracted using the Synergy 2.0 Plant DNA Extraction Kit (OPS Diagnostics, Lebanon, NJ, USA) with some modifications. Briefly, leaf discs were ground in liquid nitrogen and homogenized with 500 μL of Plant Homogenization Buffer with a bead beater at its highest speed for 1 min. Homogenates were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 5 min at room temperature to pellet debris. Clear supernatant was transferred to a sterilized microcentrifuge tube and RNA was removed by adding 5 μL of RNase A solution, briefly vortexing to mix and incubating at 37 °C for 15 min. The extracted DNA was precipitated with isopropanol and transferred to a silica spin column followed by centrifugation at 8,000 × g for 1 min. The DNA samples were washed twice with 250 μL of ice-cold 70% ethanol followed by centrifugation at 8,000 × g for 1 min and dissolved in 50 μL of molecular biology-grade water.

2.4 MetaVx™ library preparation and Illumina MiSeq sequencing

Library preparations and Illumina MiSeq sequencing were conducted at GENEWIZ, Inc. (South Plainfield, NJ, USA). DNA samples were quantified using a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 30–50 ng of DNA were used to generate amplicons using a MetaVx™ Library Preparation kit (GENEWIZ, Inc., South Plainfield, NJ, USA).

2.5 16S method for bacteria

For bacterial microbiomes the V3, V4, and V5 hypervariable regions of prokaryotic 16S rDNA were selected for generating amplicons and subsequent taxonomy analysis. GENEWIZ designed a panel of proprietary primers aimed at relatively conserved regions bordering the V3, V4, and V5 hypervariable regions of bacteria and Archaea 16S rDNA. The V3 and V4 regions were amplified using forward primers containing the sequence (5′ to 3′) “CCTACGGRRBGCASCAGKVRVGAAT” and reverse primers containing the sequence “GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAATCC.” The V4 and V5 regions were amplified using forward primers containing the sequence “GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA” and reverse primers containing the sequence “CTTGTGCGGKCCCCCGYCAATTC.” First-round PCR products were used as templates for second-round amplicon-enrichment PCR. At the same time, adapters were added to the ends of the 16S rDNA amplicons to generate indexed libraries ready for downstream NGS sequencing on an Illumina Miseq machine.

2.6 ITS method for fungi

From 50 to 100 ng of DNA were used to generate amplicons using a panel of primers designed by GENEWIZ (GENEWIZ, Inc., South Plainfield, NJ, USA). Multiple oligonucleotide primers were designed to anneal to the relatively conserved sequences spanning fungal ITS regions. The ITS2 region was amplified using a forward primer containing sequence “GTGAATCATCGARTC” and reverse primer containing sequence “TCCTCCGCTTATTGAT.” In addition to the ITS target-specific sequences, the primers also contain adaptor sequences allowing uniform amplification of the library with high complexity ready for downstream NGS sequencing on the Illumina Miseq platform.

DNA libraries were validated with an Agilent 2,100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA), and quantified using a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer. DNA libraries were multiplexed and loaded on an Illumina MiSeq instrument according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Sequencing was performed using a 2×300/250 paired-end (PE) configuration; image analysis and base calling were conducted by the MiSeq Control Software (MCS) embedded in the MiSeq instrument.

2.7 Data processing and analysis: construction of a database for microbial rDNA sequences

For fungi, the UNITE ITS database (Released on 07-18-2023) appended with sequences of Cladosporium (n = 4), Epicoccum nigrum (n = 5) and Alternaria (n = 3) was used for fungal classification. Files were transformed to Qiime2 artifacts and trained using the naive Bayes classifier method (Bolyen et al., 2019). For bacteria, SILVA v138.1 taxonomy files were retrieved and transformed to Qiime2 artifacts, then used to generate a SILVA fixed-rank taxonomy artifact. The non-redundant and unaligned (NR99) sequence file was also retrieved from the SILVA database and transformed to a Qiime2 artifact, then sequences were converted from RNA to DNA. Sequences containing five or more ambiguous bases were removed from the artifact file. Next, reference sequences were filtered by length and taxonomy: Bacterial (16S) sequences shorter than 1,200 bp, Archaeal (16S) sequences shorter than 900 bp, and Eukaryotic (18S) sequences shorter than 1,400 bp were removed. Redundant sequences were removed and only sequences with unique taxonomic affiliations were retained. The V3 to V4 amplicon region was extracted from the sequence file and used to create a classifier using the naïve Bayes classifier method.

2.8 Quality filtering

Quality-filtered ribosomal reads were obtained from Genewiz, Inc. (South Plainfield, NJ, USA). There were separate forward and reverse FASTQC files for each inbred. These FASTQ files were analyzed using Quantitative Insight into Microbial Ecology (QIIME2) v.2024.2. Using DADA2 (Callahan et al., 2016), which involved denoising, dereplicating and removing chimeras; fungal sequences were trimmed after 22 base pairs for forward reads and 21 base pairs for reverse reads, with truncation set to 190 base pairs for both to ensure that the sequences had a quality greater than Q20. Bacterial sequences were trimmed after 21 base pairs for forward reads and 23 base pairs for reverse reads and truncated to 248 and 233 base pairs for forward and reverse reads, respectively, to achieve the same quality threshold (Q > 20). DADA2 subsequently clustered the sequences into amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) with single-nucleotide resolution.

2.9 Taxonomic annotation and relative abundance analysis

ASVs were annotated with QIIME2 using the fitted classifier Sklearn and database classifiers previously created for fungi and bacteria. Sequences annotated as mitochondrial or chloroplast were removed for both fungal and bacterial datasets. Then sequences were rarified to 67,200 sequences per sample for fungi and 13,700 sequences per sample for bacteria. QIIME2 outputs were analyzed in R using the package “phyloseq” version 1.48.0. (McMurdie and Holmes, 2013) to create bar plots using the package “ggplot2” version 3.5.1 (Wickham, 2016). In R analysis if an ASV was not classified at a higher level (e.g., species), it was retained and assigned to the lowest taxonomic level for which classification was available (e.g., genus) to ensure it was not excluded from the analysis. As a result, family or genus bar plots may show taxon labels such as “uncl. Pleosporales,” which stands for unclassified Pleosporales. For both fungal and bacterial families, genera and species were filtered to show only the 30 most abundant; as a result bars do not reach the 100% of relative abundance.

2.10 Population diversity analysis (alpha and beta diversity)

Alpha and beta diversities were estimated in QIIME2 using the Faith’s PD (Faith, 1992), Shannon (Shannon, 1948) and Pielou evenness (Pielou, 1966) indexes for alpha and Bray-Curtis’ dissimilarity (Bray and Curtis, 1957) and Unweighted UniFrac (Lozupone and Knight, 2005) indexes for beta diversity. Alpha diversity indexes were used to compare the diversity between corn inbreds while beta diversity indexes were used to compare resistant and susceptible corn inbreds. Statistical analysis between resistant and susceptible corn inbred lines was performed by the QIIME2 plug in “diversity,” which performed a permutational multivariate analysis of variance test (PERMANOVA) of the Bray-Curtis and Unweighted UniFrac indexes. Statistical analysis between corn inbred lines also was obtained with Dunn’s test [results adjusted with the Benjamini and Hochberg method (BH)]. QIIME2 outputs were analyzed in R using the package “phyloseq” version 1.48.0 (McMurdie and Holmes, 2013) to create box plots using the package “ggplot2” version 3.5.1 (Wickham, 2016) for alpha indexes and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots for beta indexes.

2.11 Differential abundance analysis between resistant and susceptible corn inbred lines

The Analysis of Compositions of Microbiomes with Bias Correction (ANCOM-BC) algorithm (Lin and Peddada, 2020) was used to identify species that are differentially abundant between resistant and susceptible corn inbred lines. The analysis was conducted in QIIME2 using the plugin “q2-composition” version 2024.2.0. Bacterial species with relative abundance of less than 0.01% were discarded. The threshold for significance was set to a Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate-corrected p value of < 0.05. Species with significant differential abundance (p ≤ 0.05) between resistant and susceptible lines were presented in a bar plot.

2.12 Correlation analyses

Correlations between P. maydis and the 20 most abundant fungal or bacterial species were analyzed in R using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients, calculated with the cor() function. The statistical significance of the correlation matrix was assessed using the cor.mtest() function from the corrplot package, with a 95% confidence level. Pearson correlation coefficients between the relative frequencies of 20 most-abundant bacterial and fungal taxa with total counts of P. maydis reads were calculated by using the R function cor.test. The ASVs with the highest sequence read counts of the 20 most-abundant bacterial and fungal taxa were compared to sequences in the NCBI core nucleotide database to determine the percentage of identity and nucleotide differences. To identify species, we reported the species with the highest number of hits, even when multiple species within the same genus shared identical e-values, query coverages, and percentage identities. The objective was to find any significant change in the top 20 taxa that could indicate a response other than simple, physical displacement of other taxa by P. maydis.

3 Results

3.1 Inbred corn lines that varied for tar spot severity under natural infection were used for Miseq sequencing

Disease scoring data based on a previously published protocol as mentioned in the Materials and Methods showed that the inbreds PI685918 and TX303 were susceptible; inbreds PI685920, 4401350, B97, PI685836, and PI685915 were moderately susceptible; inbreds B97, PI685790, and PI685831 were moderately resistant; and inbreds PI685788, PI685950, PI685919, PI685806, CML103, CML69, and CML52 were resistant (Table 1). For downstream microbiome analysis, these categories were simplified: moderately susceptible and susceptible were combined into “susceptible,” and moderately resistant and resistant into “resistant.” As a result, inbreds PI685918, TX303, PI685920, 4401350, PI685836, and PI685915 were classified as susceptible, while inbreds B97, PI685790, PI685831, PI685788, PI685950, PI685919, PI685806, CML103, CML69, and CML52 were classified as resistant (Table 1). Representative images illustrate clear differences between resistant and susceptible corn lines (Supplementary Figure S1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Disease scores and percent Phyllachora maydis sequence reads for 16 inbred lines of corn (Zea mays ssp. mays) chosen from the parents of the Nested Association Mapping (NAM) and Germplasm Enhancement of Maize (GEM) genetic populations.

However, MiSeq sequencing revealed discrepancies between visual scoring and P. maydis read counts. Several lines initially classified as resistant based on visual scores (PI685950, PI685919, PI685788, PI685790, and B97) contained over 30% P. maydis reads (Table 1). Therefore, a combined analysis of visual and MiSeq data led to a reclassification with only PI685806, PI685831, CML103, CML52, and CML69 ultimately being considered resistant, while the remaining 11 lines were classified as susceptible. Notably, two lines, CML52 and TX303, presented a different discrepancy: while visual disease symptoms were observed, P. maydis sequence reads were not detected (0.00) (Table 1). This discrepancy was due to low-quality reverse sequencing reads that did not pass the quality filters during QIIME analysis, which prevented the necessary overlap with forward reads. As a result, the entire read pair (both forward and reverse) may have been discarded, causing the removal of those taxa from further analyses.

Samples PI685950 and TX303 were excluded from bacterial microbiome analysis due to having fewer than 5,000 MiSeq bacterial reads, below the 10,000-read threshold for this study (Supplementary Figure S2). Similarly, TX303 was excluded from further fungal microbiome analysis as it had fewer than 5,000 fungal reads (Supplementary Figure S3). To avoid potential bias from a low number of reads, PI685950 and TX303 were excluded from further bacterial microbiome analysis, and CML52 and TX303 were excluded from further fungal microbiome analysis. Finally, for downstream bacterial microbiome analysis, resistant inbred lines PI685806, PI685831, CML103, CML52, and CML69 and susceptible inbred lines PI685915, PI685790, PI685919, PI685836, PI685918, B97, 4401350, PI685788, and PI685920 were considered. For fungal microbiome analysis, resistant inbreds were PI685806, PI685831, CML103, and CML69, and susceptible inbreds were PI685915, PI685790, PI685919, PI685950, PI685836, PI685918, B97, 4,401,350, PI685788, and PI685920 (Table 1).

3.2 Alpha (α) and beta (β) diversities showed differences in bacterial and fungal communities between resistant and susceptible corn lines

When compared, resistant and susceptible corn lines showed some variation in alpha diversity for both bacterial and fungal communities; however, the patterns differed depending on the specific sample, the specific diversity metric, and the community type (Figures 1, 2).

Figure 1
Box plots comparing resistant and susceptible groups across three indices: Shannon index (A), Pielou’s Evenness (B), and Faith Phylogenetic Diversity (C). Each subplot shows variations in diversity measures with annotations for statistical significance based on letters. Additionally, each subplot lists sample names aligned horizontally, indicating their relative diversity scores.

Figure 1. Comparisons of bacterial alpha diversity indices (A) Shannon diversity, (B) Pielous’s Evenness and (C) Faith’s Phylogenetic Diversity observed in Phyllachora maydis resistant and susceptible corn lines. Significant differences between corn lines were assessed in pairwise comparisons using Dunn’s test following a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test. p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) method. A statistically significant difference was defined as a BH-adjusted p-value ≤ 0.05 (Supplementary Table S2).

Figure 2
Three box plots compare bacterial diversity measures across resistant and susceptible plant samples. Panel A shows Shannon Index values, Panel B presents Pielou's Evenness, and Panel C displays Faith Phylogenetic Diversity. Each plot includes various sample labels along the x-axis, with differing diversity values and significance indicators. Resistant samples generally exhibit higher diversity metrics than susceptible ones across all panels.

Figure 2. Comparisons of fungal alpha diversity indices (A) Shannon diversity, (B) Pielous’s Evenness and (C) Faith’s Phylogenetic Diversity observed in Phyllachora maydis resistant and susceptible corn lines. Significant differences between corn lines were assessed in pairwise comparisons using Dunn’s test following a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test. p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) method. A statistically significant difference was defined as a BH-adjusted p-value ≤ 0.05 (Supplementary Table S2).

For bacterial communities, there was no clear difference in diversity between the resistant and susceptible lines as shown by the Shannon and Pielou’s evenness indices (Figures 1A,B). Although some susceptible inbred lines (PI685788, 4401350, and PI685790) showed significant variation (p < 0.05, Supplementary Table S3), the remaining six lines exhibited similar levels of bacterial richness and evenness, suggesting a weak correlation between disease status and richness and evenness (Figures 1A,B). Notably, the resistant line PI685831 and susceptible line PI685918 displayed the highest Shannon diversities among all samples. While most other resistant and susceptible lines exhibited relatively the same level of Shannon diversity, susceptible lines, such as B97 and PI685788, showed notably lower Shannon diversities. For Faith phylogenetic diversity, while susceptible lines tended to have lower values compared to the resistant lines CML103 and CML69, the differences were not statistically significant across all lines tested. Interestingly, resistant lines PI685806, PI685831 and CML52 did not show a clear difference in Faith Phylogenetic diversity compared to the eight susceptible lines (Figure 1C).

In contrast to bacterial communities, fungal communities exhibited significantly higher richness, evenness, and phylogenetic diversity in the resistant lines CML103, CML69, PI685806, and PI685831 compared to ten of the susceptible lines (PI685915, PI685790, PI685919, PI685950, PI685836, PI685918, B97, 4401350, PI685788, and PI685920) (Figures 2AC). Faith phylogenetic diversity of fungal communities was also significantly lower in ten of the susceptible lines (PI685915, PI685790, PI685919, PI685950, PI685836, PI685918, B97, 4401350, PI685788, and PI685920) compared to the four resistant lines CML103, CML69, PI685806, and PI685831 (Figure 2C). These results indicate a clear difference in fungal community diversity between resistant and susceptible inbreds, with resistant lines CML103, CML69, PI685806, and PI685831 exhibiting greater richness, evenness, and phylogenetic diversity. However, no significant differences in richness, evenness and phylogeny of bacterial communities were observed between the resistant and susceptible lines, except for two susceptible lines, B97 and PI685788, that showed significantly lower richness and evenness (p < 0.05, Supplementary Table S3).

Estimates of beta diversity enable comparisons among microbial communities, considering both the number of distinct microorganisms in the sample and their phylogenetic relatedness, i.e., differences in their specific species compositions. The beta diversities of the microbial communities between the resistant and susceptible lines were compared using permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) (Anderson, 2001) with the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity (Bray and Curtis, 1957) and Unweighted UniFrac distance metrics. These analyses were visualized through Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) plots, offering complementary perspectives on community dissimilarities. The Bray-Curtis PCoA, which emphasizes differences in species relative abundances, revealed a clear separation between the resistant and susceptible groups that are statistically significant (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table S3). Resistant inbred lines clustered predominantly in the lower right quadrant, indicating a distinct community composition. Susceptible lines were distributed more broadly, mainly in the upper portion of the plot, suggesting a greater degree of variability in their microbial communities (Figure 3). However, the observed overlap, particularly in the center of the ordination space, indicates that some samples share similar community profiles regardless of resistance classification. This overlap could be attributed to several factors, including inherent biological variation, environmental influences not accounted for in the analysis, or the presence of other factors influencing community composition independently of resistance. The UnWeighted UniFrac PCoA, incorporating phylogenetic information and emphasizing differences in lineage presence or absence, corroborated the findings from the Bray-Curtis analysis, revealing a similar clustering pattern but with some key differences (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table S3). While resistant lines still clustered predominantly in the lower right quadrant and susceptible lines were more broadly distributed, the separation between the two groups was less pronounced compared to the Bray-Curtis ordination. This suggests that differences in community membership (i.e., which taxa are present) between resistant and susceptible lines are less distinct than differences in relative abundance. The greater degree of intermingling between groups in this ordination indicates that while resistant and susceptible lines share many of the same taxa, the proportions of these shared taxa differ substantially, as highlighted by the Bray-Curtis analysis.

Figure 3
Two scatter plots compare microbial communities using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and Unweighted UniFrac metrics. Green and orange dots represent susceptible and resistant samples, respectively, each with elliptical groupings. The left plot shows variation explained as twelve point one percent, while the right shows nine point one four percent.

Figure 3. Beta diversity analysis of bacterial communities by PCoA (Principal Coordinate Analysis) with Bray–Curtis dissimilarity values and Unweighted Unifrac observed in Phyllachora maydis resistant and susceptible corn lines. Color denotes disease severity pattern (resistant: yellow; susceptible: green). Bacterial communities that are associated with resistant corn lines were displayed as yellow dots and bacterial communities that are associated with susceptible corn lines were displayed as green dots. Ellipses are drawn at 95% confidence intervals for each disease severity pattern. Significant differences between corn lines were calculated by PERMANOVA with 999 permutations (p-value ≤0.05) and presented in Supplementary Table S3.

In contrast to the bacteria, fungal communities showed significant, distinct clustering between the resistant and susceptible lines (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S3). All four resistant lines clustered together in a group and the ten susceptible lines clustered together in a different group, showing a distinct clustering from the resistant lines using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity metric and Weighted Unifrac matrices (Figure 4). The high percentage of variation explained by PCoA1 in Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, indicates that this axis strongly captures the differences in relative abundance driving the separation between resistant and susceptible lines. Susceptible lines were more dispersed, primarily located on the left side of the plot, suggesting a greater degree of variability in their microbial communities. However, Unweighted Unifrac analysis, which emphasizes phylogenetic distances between communities, showed a similar trend but with some key differences. While resistant lines still clustered predominantly in the right side of the ordination space and susceptible lines were more broadly distributed, the separation between the two groups was less pronounced compared to the Bray-Curtis ordination (Figure 4). This suggests that while phylogenetic distances contribute to differences in fungal communities, relative abundance is the dominant factor. In conclusion, these results suggest that tar spot disease susceptibility significantly influences the structure and composition of fungal communities, with relative abundance playing a key role in these differences. Bacterial communities also showed some influence, though less pronounced.

Figure 4
Two scatter plots comparing Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and Unweighted UniFrac metrics. Both plots depict clusters of green and orange points with ellipses around them. The first plot explains 78.93% of variation on the x-axis and 9.33% on the y-axis. The second plot explains 37.45% of variation on the x-axis and 8.3% on the y-axis.

Figure 4. Beta diversity analysis of fungal communities by PCoA (Principal Coordinate Analysis) with Bray–Curtis dissimilarity values and Unweighted Unifrac observed in Phyllahora maydis resistant and susceptible corn lines. Color denotes disease severity pattern (resistant: yellow; susceptible: green). Fungal communities that are associated with resistant corn lines were displayed as yellow dots and fungal communities that are associated with susceptible corn lines were displayed as green dots. Ellipses are drawn at 95% confidence intervals for each disease severity pattern. Significant differences between corn lines were calculated by PERMANOVA with 999 permutations (p-value ≤ 0.05) and presented in Supplementary Table S3.

3.3 Structure and diversity of the bacterial and fungal communities in resistant and susceptible lines

Taxonomic profiling was performed by mapping bacterial and fungal reads to the reference databases (SILVA 16S v.8.3 for bacterial reads and UNITE fungal ITS v138.1 for fungal reads) to analyze the composition and diversity of microbial communities in tar spot-resistant and -susceptible samples. The Illumina Miseq sequencing of 45 samples including 3 replicates resulted in 10,868,490 bacterial reads and 16,217,432 fungal reads, with on average 113,213 bacterial reads per sample and 172,525 fungal reads per sample. In total, the reads could be characterized into 157 bacterial and 338 fungal genera across all corn lines (Table 2). The analysis of 16S rRNA and ITS region sequencing analyses revealed distinct differences in both bacterial (Figures 5A,B) and fungal (Figures 6A,B) community composition associated with P. maydis resistant and susceptible lines. The dominant bacterial families were Beijerinckiaceae in all inbred lines (Figure 5A). Additional families such as Erwiniaceae, Sphingomonadaceae, Kineosporiaceae, Spirosomaceae, Geodermatophilaceae, Hymenobacteraceae, Nocardioidaceae, Rhizobiaceae, Microbacteriaceae, Pseudomonadaceae and Deinococcaceae were also detected to some extent in all inbred lines (Figure 5A). Interestingly, a higher relative abundance of families Erwiniaceae, Spirosomaceae, Rhizobiaceae, Pseudomonaceae, and Deinococcaceae were detected in susceptible lines, while Sphingomonadaceae, Kineosporiaceae and Nocardioidaceae were more prevalent in resistant lines (Figure 5A). At the genus level, dominant bacterial genera were Methylobacterium, Erwiniaceae gen., and Sphingomonas (Figure 5B). Genera Methylobacterium, Erwiniaceae gen, Pseudomonas, and Deinococcus were highly abundant on most of the susceptible lines whereas Sphingomonas, Quadrisphaera, Klenkia, Nocardiodes, Aureimonas, Microbacterium, Roseomonas and Pseudokineococcus were abundant on resistant lines (Figure 5B). At the phylum level, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, and Bacteroidota were the dominant bacterial phyla on all lines (Supplementary Figure S4).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Numbers of prokaryotic and eukaryotic taxa that appeared in at least one sample of microbiome sequences from 14 inbred lines of corn that differed in resistance to tar spot caused by the fungal pathogen Phyllachora maydis, by taxonomic level.

Figure 5
Bar charts comparing bacterial communities in resistant and susceptible samples. Chart A sorts by family, showing varied distributions across samples. Chart B sorts by genus, also highlighting differences. Each color represents a different bacterial group.

Figure 5. The 30 most abundant bacterial families (A) and genera (B) in Phyllachora maydis resistant and susceptible corn lines. The values represent relative mean abundances (n = 3), and each color specifies a listed taxon.

Figure 6
Bar charts comparing fungal composition at family and genus levels in samples resistant and susceptible to a condition. Chart A shows family-level data, while Chart B shows genus-level data. Each bar represents the relative abundance of different taxa, with categories labeled along the y-axis and sample identifiers on the x-axis, split into resistant and susceptible groups.

Figure 6. The 30 most abundant fungal families (A) and genera (B) in Phyllachora maydis resistant and susceptible corn lines. The bars represent the relative mean abundances (n = 3), and each color specifies a listed taxon.

The most abundant fungal families were Phyllachoraceae, Cladosporiaceae, Pleosporaceae, and Didymellaceae, while Coniothyriaceae, Phaeosphaeriaceae, Bulleribasidiaceae, Spiculogloeaceae, and Massarinceae were also detected in lower numbers (Figure 6A). Interestingly, families Cladosporiaceae, Pleosporaceae, Didymellaceae, Phaeosphaeriaceae, Coniothyriaceae, unidentified family in order Pleosporales, Spiculogloeaceae, Rhynchogastremataceae, and Mycosphaerellaceae were more abundant in resistant lines, while Phyllachoraceae, Didymosphaeriaceae, Massarinceae, and Leptosphaeriaceae were more prevalent in susceptible lines (Figure 6A). At the genus level, Cladosporium, Coniothyrium, Alternaria, Epicoccum, Bipolaris, unknown genus from Pleosporales, Phyllozyma, Papiliotrema, Cercospora, Stagonospora and Symmetrospora were notably most abundant in resistant lines, whereas Phyllachora, Paraphaeosphaeria, and Sphaerellopsis showed higher relative abundance in susceptible lines (Figure 6B). Interestingly, family Phyllachoraceae and genus Phyllachora were detected in all inbreds. Numbers of Phyllachora reads mostly corresponded to the disease score exhibited by the inbred lines, with PI685920, B97, PI685788, 4401350, PI685918, PI685836, PI685950, PI685919, PI685790, and PI685915 having more than 30% Phyllachora reads and PI685806, PI685831, CML69 and CML103 having reads lower than 30% (Figures 6A,B and Table 1). In contrast, Phyllachora read percents in inbred lines PI685950, PI685919, PI685788, PI685790 and B97 were not consistent with the visual disease assessment (Table 1). Furthermore, the family Leptosphaeriaceae was most abundant on the inbred lines PI685915 and B97 whereas family Didymosphaeriaceae was most abundant on susceptible inbred lines PI685836, PI685918, 4,401,350 and PI685788 (Figure 6A). Interestingly, the family Massarinaceae was detected only on PI685836 and PI685918. At the genus level, Fusarium was predominant only on the line PI685831, Bipolaris was the most-abundant genus on the line PI685915, whereas Sphaerellopsis was most abundant on inbreds PI685915, and B97 (Figure 6B). The fungal phyla Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were the dominant fungi on all inbred lines (Supplementary Figure S5). These findings indicate that the phyllosphere microbiome of the fourteen inbred corn lines evaluated had low diversity in terms of bacterial and fungal distribution, with only a few dominant taxa identified. Although sample-to-sample variability is still high, the distribution of dominant bacterial and fungal taxa in all inbreds followed the same basic trend.

3.4 Identification of differential taxon abundance between resistant and susceptible lines

Differential abundance analysis using ANCOM-BC revealed significant differences in the relative abundance of several key bacterial taxa between resistant and susceptible lines (Figure 7). The family Erwiniaceae and the order Enterobacterales, particularly the genus Amnibacterium, were significantly enriched in susceptible lines. Conversely, multiple genera within the family Microbacteriaceae, including Klenkia, Aureimonas, Roseomonas, Sphingomonas, Microbacterium, Nocardioides, and Pseudokineococcus, were the most abundant prokaryotic taxa in the resistant inbred lines (Figure 7).

Figure 7
Bar chart showing log fold change for bacterial taxa. Orange bars represent enrichment in resistant lines, with high values for taxa like Microbacteriaceae and Pseudokineococcus. Blue bars represent enrichment in susceptible lines, with negative values for taxa like Klenkia and Erwinaceae. A legend indicates color coding.

Figure 7. Differential abundance of bacterial taxa based on the ANCOM-BC (Analysis of composition of microbiomes analysis with bias correction) in resistant and susceptible corn lines. Taxa that differ significantly between the resistant and susceptible lines are displayed with log fold change (LFC) and 95% confidence error bars. Taxa showing positive LFC values were enriched in the resistant lines, whereas taxa with negative LFC values were enriched in the susceptible lines. The threshold for significance was set to a Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate-corrected p-value of 0.001.

Additionally, fungal community analysis using ANCOM-BC identified several fungal genera that were differentially abundant between resistant and susceptible lines (Figure 8). Several Ascomycota, including Neosetophoma, Sarocladium strictum, Phaeosphaeria microscopica, Alternaria oregonensis, Oohiosphaerella aquatica, Leptospora sp., Bipolaris, Papiliotrema, Sporobolomyces roseus, Nigrospora sphaerica, and Coniothyrium sp. showed marked enrichment in resistant lines (Figure 8). In contrast, several other species, such as Ganoderma applanatum, Lophiostoma japonicum, and Bannoa tropicalis, were more abundant in susceptible lines. Overall, these results demonstrate that both bacterial and fungal communities are distinct in resistant compared to susceptible lines, suggesting a complex interplay of microbial taxa associated with the observed phenotypes.

Figure 8
Bar chart showing log fold change (LFC) values for different fungal species, indicating enrichment in resistant lines (orange) and susceptible lines (blue). The y-axis represents LFC, ranging from negative three to positive three. Each bar corresponds to a specific fungal species labeled above, with resistant species mostly having positive LFC values, and susceptible species having negative LFC values.

Figure 8. Differential abundance of fungal taxa based on the ANCOM-BC (Analysis of composition of microbiomes analysis with bias correction) in resistant and susceptible lines. Genera that differentiate significantly between the resistant and susceptible lines are displayed with log fold change and 95% confidence error bars. Taxa showing positive LFC values were enriched in the resistant lines, whereas taxa with negative LFC values were enriched in the susceptible lines. The threshold for significance was set to a Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate-corrected p-value of 0.001.

3.5 Tar spot disease severity level altered the phyllosphere microbiome

Phyllachora maydis reads were observed in all inbred lines irrespective of their severity level. To highlight potential links between the bacterial and fungal taxa with increasing P. maydis reads, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the relative abundances of the 20 most abundant bacterial (Table 3) and fungal (Table 4) taxa. Positive correlations suggest that species tend to co-occur within the same sample and their abundances tend to increase or decrease simultaneously. Conversely, negative correlations indicate that an increase in one species’ abundance within a sample is associated with a decrease in another’s. Intriguingly, correlation analysis revealed a predominance of negative correlations, at least for the most abundant taxa in the bacterial and fungal communities, suggesting a tendency toward mutual exclusivity or an inverse relationship in their occurrence.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. The 20 most common bacterial taxa over all inbred lines and replications identified to most likely taxon, and their correlations with the percent of Phyllachora maydis reads.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. The 20 most abundant fungal species encountered over all inbreds.

Among the 20 most abundant bacterial taxa, only four species, Pantoea ananatis (Pearson correlation: 0.335, p < 0.001), Pseudomonas syringae (Pearson correlation: 0.141, p < 0.01), Deinococcus citri (Pearson correlation: 0.262, p < 0.05), and Nakamurella deserti (Pearson correlation: 0.124, p < 0.05), were statistically and positively correlated with P. maydis reads, while 16 bacterial taxa were significantly negatively correlated with P. maydis reads (Table 3). Pseudokineococcus sp. showed the strongest negative correlation (Pearson correlation: −0.409, p < 0.001). Other notable negatively correlated taxa included Quadrisphaera sp. (Pearson correlation: −0.374, p < 0.001), Nocardioides lentus (Pearson correlation: −0.345, p < 0.001), Microbacterium zeae (Pearson correlation: −0.326, p < 0.001), Methylobacterium komagatae (Pearson correlation: −0.287, p < 0.001), Spirosoma radiotolerans (Pearson correlation: −0.258, p < 0.001) and Aureimonas pseudogalii (Pearson correlation: −0.259, p < 0.001) (Table 3). Some taxa, such as Sphingomonas sp. and Curtobacterium sp., showed correlations with P. maydis but these were not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.

In addition, for fungal species, only Paraphaeosphaeria neglecta (Pearson correlation: 0.378, p < 0.001), and Sphaerellopsis filum (Pearson correlation: 0.234, p < 0.01), were positively correlated with P. maydis reads, suggesting a potential synergistic relationship or a shared preference for similar environmental conditions (Table 4). Both of these genera contain mycoparasites which would likely increase in proportion to their food source. Papiliotrema flavescens (Pearson correlation: −0.571, p < 0.001) showed the strongest negative correlation suggesting a potential antagonistic relationship or a strong preference for different ecological niches. Additionally, Alternaria alternata (Pearson correlation: −0.505, p < 0.001), Cladosporium sp. (Pearson correlation: −0.486, p < 0.001), Unclassified Pleosporales (Pearson correlation: −0.455, p < 0.001), Symmetrospora symmetrica (Pearson correlation: −0.445, p < 0.001), Coniothyrium sp. (Pearson correlation: −0.444, p < 0.001), Didymella pomorum (Pearson correlation: −0.407, p < 0.001), Epicoccum nigrum (Pearson correlation: −0.379, p < 0.001), Neosetophoma sp. (Pearson correlation: −0.376, p < 0.001), Stagonospora sp. (Pearson correlation: −0.334, p < 0.001), Phaeosphaeriopsis sp. (Pearson correlation: −0.319, p < 0.001), Fungi sp. (Pearson correlation: −0.311, p < 0.001), Phyllozyma linderae (Pearson correlation: −0.268, p < 0.001), Bullera alba (Pearson correlation: −0.237, p < 0.001), Didymocyrtis pini (Pearson correlation: −0.223, p < 0.001) and Cercospora zeae-maydis (Pearson correlation: −0.213, p < 0.001), were statistically and negatively correlated with P. maydis reads (Table 4). Bipolaris zeicola (Pearson correlation: −0.161, p < 0.01) and Hannaella zeae (Pearson correlation: −0.153, p < 0.01) also showed negative correlations with P. maydis reads but these were less statistically significant. The overall findings showing more negative correlations with P. maydis reads indicate a high possibility for increased ecologic niche differentiation because of a high proportion of competition among bacterial and fungal communities.

In addition to tar spot, the sequence data also indicated corn lines that were susceptible to other common fungal pathogens. For example, inbreds PI685831, PI685915 and PI685806 were susceptible to northern corn leaf spot caused by Bipolaris zeicola, and line PI685920 to gray leaf spot (Cercospora zeae-maydis) (Figure 6B). Interestingly, the inbreds with high read numbers from Phyllachora maydis had low sequence reads for Coniothyrium sp., a possible mycoparasite of Phyllachora maydis. Therefore, the microbiome sequences provided a good overall picture of the fungi interacting with each other and their host substrate in the corn phyllosphere.

4 Discussion

The phyllosphere can contain a wide variety of beneficial, pathogenic, and commensal microbes (Lindow and Brandl, 2003). Although phyllospheric microbial communities in corn have been studied to some extent (Ferreira et al., 2025; McCoy et al., 2019; Singh and Goodwin, 2022), comparatively little is known about the structure, diversity, and community dynamics of this microbiome or its interactions with the host (Peñuelas and Terradas, 2014; Singh and Goodwin, 2022). Further analysis of the foliar microbiome is critical for understanding the types of pathogens present and evaluating the potential of other microbes to predict or prevent disease progression.

To test the hypothesis that microbiome composition varies in response to P. maydis infection in resistant and susceptible lines, we sequenced rRNA amplicons to investigate bacterial and fungal populations in 16 corn inbreds that varied in tar spot severity. Our findings revealed that fungal taxa and populations exhibited a more pronounced response to increasing P. maydis sequence counts compared to bacteria.

4.1 Impact of P. maydis infection on microbial alpha diversity

Alpha-diversity indices for bacterial and fungal microbiomes differ between resistant and most of the susceptible corn inbreds. For bacterial communities, we found no significant variation in species richness or evenness between resistant and most susceptible inbreds, suggesting similar species richness and similar distribution of species among these lines (Figures 1A,B). However, susceptible inbreds B97 and PI685788 were exceptions, with significantly lower Shannon diversities than the resistant lines, suggesting presence of a less diverse community with either fewer species or an uneven abundance of species in these lines (Figure 1A). While Faith’s phylogenetic diversity of bacterial communities was initially observed to be lower in the most susceptible lines compared to the two resistant lines (CML103 and CML69), this difference was not statistically significant across all lines tested (Figure 1C). This suggests that while there might be a trend toward lower phylogenetic diversity in susceptible lines, the evidence is not strong enough to draw a definitive conclusion. The lack of clear and consistent patterns across all alpha diversity metrics for bacterial communities suggests the possibility that specific bacterial taxa, rather than overall diversity, are crucial for influencing disease status, or that bacterial communities interact with other factors, such as the fungal microbiome or the host’s immune system, or the environmental factors in a more complex manner.

In contrast, fungal alpha diversity metrics showed a significant difference in fungal community diversity between resistant and susceptible lines (Figures 2AC), a pattern not consistently observed for bacterial diversity (Figures 1AC). Higher species richness was observed in most of the resistant lines compared to susceptible inbreds, suggesting that tar spot disease severity (excessive pathogen load) has a negative impact on bacterial and fungal community richness (Figures 1, 2). This also can be explained by the possibility that beneficial microbes may lose their selective advantage when pathogen load is excessive. Our findings align with a previous study on Southern leaf blight-susceptible plants, which also showed decreased leaf epiphytic bacterial species richness (Manching et al., 2014).

We did not see a clear difference in bacterial community diversities between the resistant and susceptible lines (Figures 1A,B). Except for the susceptible inbred lines B97 and PI685788, which were significantly lower, the other seven susceptible lines showed similar levels of bacterial community diversities (Figures 1A,B). The overlap in diversity metrices between resistant and susceptible lines, along with the presence of susceptible lines with low diversity, suggests that diversity alone is not the sole determinant of resistance. Other factors, such as specific microbial taxa, functional capabilities, or host genetics, likely play important roles. The higher Faith’s phylogenetic diversity in resistant lines, especially CML103 and CML69, indicates that a more diverse and phylogenetically rich community may be associated with enhanced resistance (Figure 1C). However, there was a significant difference in fungal community diversity between resistant and susceptible lines depending on the sample; the ten most-susceptible lines (PI685915, PI685790, PI685919, PI685950, PI685836, PI685918, B97, 4401350, PI685788, and PI685920) had significantly lower fungal community diversities compared to those of the resistant lines CML103, CML69, PI685806, and PI685831 (Figures 2AC). These findings suggest that P. maydis infection might have a significant impact primarily on the richness of the phyllosphere microbiome and its fungal diversity, but not on bacterial diversity when including evenness.

4.2 Distinct microbial community structures (beta diversity) in resistant and susceptible maize

Both Bray-Curtis and Unweighted UniFrac analyses demonstrated distinct clustering patterns for both bacterial and fungal communities in resistant and susceptible maize inbred lines (Figures 3, 4). Fungal communities showed a strong association with disease resistance, particularly in terms of relative abundance, as evidenced by the clear separation in the Bray-Curtis ordination and the high percentage of variation explained. In contrast, bacterial communities show a much weaker association, with substantial overlap between resistant and susceptible lines in both ordinations. The strong correlation between fungal community structure, particularly relative abundance, and resistance suggests that specific fungal taxa may be key mediators of the resistance phenotype. The weaker association observed for bacterial communities suggests a more complex interplay with resistance, potentially involving specific taxa or functional groups not captured by overall diversity measures. Further research is needed to identify the specific taxa driving the observed patterns and to elucidate their functional roles in resistance. A deeper understanding of these complex interactions could lead to the development of novel microbiome-based strategies for enhancing disease resistance in maize (Singh and Goodwin, 2022).

Our experiment was designed to compare the corn phyllospheric microbiomes between resistant and susceptible inbred lines after natural infection with P. maydis. Relying on natural infection was necessary because P. maydis has not been successfully cultured in vitro and appears to be obligately biotrophic. Although the life cycle of P. maydis is not known completely, it has been shown to overwinter on corn residue, and spores can be dispersed by rain splash or wind (Groves et al., 2020; Kleczewski et al., 2019; Parbery, 1963). The field plot for this experiment is only 14 miles from Lake Michigan and has an excellent environment for the development of tar spot (Telenko et al., 2020). The field plot had been heavily infected with P. maydis during the previous year (Telenko et al., 2020), and the conditions yielded a consistent difference in disease severity between resistant and susceptible lines (Table 1). Consistent with our results, a previous study identified a strong correlation between disease resistance and the phyllosphere microbiome of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) after natural infection (Masenya et al., 2021) in South Africa.

4.3 Key bacterial taxa associated with resistance and susceptibility

The most abundant bacterial and fungal taxa fell into three likely categories: beneficial, pathogenic, or commensal. Although amplification yielded fewer bacterial reads than fungal, this is not proof that fungal cells outnumbered bacterial cells. Fungi have more rRNA genes per genome, and the fungal and bacterial rDNA fragments were amplified in separate reactions with different primers. Bacterial taxa in both resistant and susceptible lines were dominated by potentially plant-beneficial families Beijerinckiaceae, Erwiniaceae and Sphingomonadaceae, and genera like Methylobacterium, unknown genus from Erwiniaceae, Sphingomonas and Quadrisphaera. This is consistent with the finding of Wallace et al. (2018) that the vast majority of bacterial reads in corn microbiomes came from only two groups: Sphingomonads and the Methylobacteria. However, specific bacterial genera showed differential abundances. Resistant lines were enriched with genera such as Sphingomonas, Quadrisphaera, Klenkia, Nocardioides, Aureimonas, Microbacterium, Roseomonas, and Pseudokineococcus (Figures 5, 7). These beneficial genera promote stress tolerance and potentially improve overall plant growth, as illustrated by the following examples. Nocardioides thermolilacinus, a potential biocontrol agent in tomato, reduces disease severity due to foliar fungal pathogens Alternaria solani and Corynespora cassiicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogens Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, in both laboratory and field trials (Filho et al., 2008; Carrer Filho et al., 2008). Some species of Sphingomonas have been reported to enhance disease resistance in rice (Matsumoto et al., 2021). Additionally, some species of Quadrisphaera are enriched in the microbiome of healthy plants and may offer protection against soilborne pathogens (Wang et al., 2024). Isolates of Nocardioides promoted stress tolerance and exhibited antimicrobial activity against a variety of pathogens (Jiang et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2015) and may be of interest for controlling tar spot of corn.

In contrast, some bacteria promote plant disease directly as pathogens or indirectly by enhancing susceptibility to other pathogens. Methylobacterium, unknown genus of Erwiniaceae, Pseudomonas, Deinococcus, and Amnibacterium were elevated in the susceptible lines (Figures 5B, 7). Erwiniaceae and Pseudomonas include opportunistic pathogens that have been reported to cause disease in corn (Hinton and Bacon, 1995; Roper, 2011; Vidaver and Carlson, 1978). Abundant genera Methylobacterium, and Sphingomonas and Klenkia were associated with both resistant and susceptible lines, and they have been frequently observed in the phyllosphere of corn.

It is important to acknowledge the taxonomic limitations we faced. Some microbes were identified only as an “unknown genus” because they were either novel or unrepresented in current reference databases. This lack of resolution can obscure important biological relationships and presents several challenges for drawing definitive conclusions. For example, it can lead to an underestimation of the true community diversity and an incomplete understanding of microbial functions. Therefore, future research must incorporate more comprehensive sequencing techniques and expanded databases to bridge this knowledge gap.

4.4 Key fungal taxa associated with resistance and susceptibility

Fungal microbial communities were dominated by the families Phyllachoraceae, Cladosporiaceae, Pleosporaceae, and Didymellaceae and the genera Phyllachora, Cladosporium, Coniothyrium and Alternaria. Phyllachora reads were detected in all inbred lines, even those that were rated the most resistant, and disease severity generally increased with increasing percentage of Phyllachora sequences among fungal reads. Exceptions were inbreds PI685919, PI685790, PI685950, PI685788, and B97, which were scored as resistant to moderately resistant based on disease phenotype with ratings in the range of 0.0 to 5% for resistant and >5 to 11% for moderately resistant, but had very high (69 to 90%) Phyllachora sequence reads and thus were considered as susceptible for our analyses. This highlights the importance of considering both phenotypic and molecular data when assessing disease resistance and underscores potential limitations in both phenotypic and molecular detection methods due to factors such as scoring error or read quality. This finding is supported by a recent study that also identified Phyllachora reads in asymptomatic tissue with no visible symptoms (Ferreira et al., 2025).

If the lack of symptoms with relatively high P. maydis reads is not a reflection of experimental error, it suggests that stroma development can be suppressed in some corn genotypes or microbial environments that otherwise may permit infection. The most-abundant fungal genera in the resistant lines were Cladosporium, Coniothyrium, Alternaria, Papiliotrema, Epicoccum, Bipolaris, Phyllozyma, Pleosporales genus, Didymellaceae genus, Cercospora, Stagonospora, and Symmetrospora. These genera also predominated in resistant lines and have been found to be abundant in symptomatic leaves in other studies of tar spot infection (Ferreira et al., 2025; Inácio et al., 2002; McCoy et al., 2019; Singh and Goodwin, 2022; Wagner et al., 2019). Other possible explanations for why some lines showed few visible symptoms but had high Phyllachora reads could be that those were latent infections that would show symptoms later, or that the inbreds are tolerant to P. maydis so can support a relatively high level of infection with little disease. Additional experiments are required to test these alternative hypotheses.

Fungal genera such as Cladosporium, Coniothyrium, Alternaria, Epicoccum, Bipolaris, unknown genus from Pleosporales, Phyllozyma, Papiliotrema, Cercospora, Acremonium, Stagonospora, Symmetrospora, Neosetophoma, Sarocladium strictum, Phaeosphaeria microscopica, Oohiosphaerella aquatica, Leptospora, Sporobolomyces roseus, and Nigrospora sphaerica were more prevalent in resistant lines (Figures 6B, 8). Members of these genera have been demonstrated to exhibit biocontrol properties against various plant pests and diseases. For example, Cladosporium species suppressed whiteflies and aphids (Abdel-Baky and Abdel-Salam, 2003), Bipolaris species exhibited a potential biocontrol against Microstegium vimineum (Kleczewski and Flory, 2010) and Epicoccum nigrum has antagonistic effects on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Pythium irregulare, Monilinia spp., and Fusarium graminearum (Taguiam et al., 2021; Zhou and Reeleder, 1989; Koutb and Ali, 2010; Li T. et al., 2022). Additionally, Papiliotrema spp. have controlled postharvest pathogens and fungal diseases of apple (Castoria et al., 2021; Palmieri et al., 2021) and P. flavescens has been pursued as a biocontrol agent of Fusarium graminearum in wheat (Shude et al., 2022). Volatile organic compounds produced by this species have been shown to increase systemic resistance in Arabidopsis (Liu et al., 2024), showing that various elements of microbiomes may affect plants through multiple mechanisms. These findings suggest that these fungal genera may be excellent candidates for further investigation into tar spot disease prevention. On the other hand, in addition to Phyllachora itself, Paraphaeosphaeria, Sphaerellopsis, Polyporales sp., Bannoa tropicalis, Lophiostoma japonicum, Ganoderma applanatum and Didymella increased relatively in the susceptible inbreds, suggesting that these taxa may have contributed to tar spot susceptibility or disease progression (Figure 6B), or that they could be mycoparasites that increase in frequency with greater availability of their food source. The latter idea is supported by a study from Caldwell et al. (2024), which found Paraphaeosphaeria sp. only in tar spot samples. However, more investigation is required to confirm this hypothesis.

The composition and frequency of sequence reads provided an indication of other interactions between corn and its associated microbes. For example, although we did not score the inbreds for other diseases, lines that were susceptible could be identified by high numbers of reads for the pathogens that cause northern corn leaf spot (Bipolaris zeicola), and gray leaf spot (Cercospora zeae-maydis or C. zeina) (Figure 6B). Distribution of sequence reads also indicated more complex relationships. Reads from Sphaerellopsis were rare in inbreds that were resistant to tar spot but were common in two of the more susceptible lines (PI685915, and B97), the two lines that were clearly susceptible to rust. Sphaerellopsis filum is a known mycoparasite of Puccinia species (Gordon and Pfender, 2012; Trakunyingcharoen et al., 2014) and its frequency most clearly tracked that of its Puccinia hosts; it was virtually undetectable in lines that did not also seem to be susceptible to rust. While Puccinia was initially detected in rust-susceptible lines from raw reads, it was not detected in the same inbreds after quality filtering (Figure 2B). Our findings showed that most bacterial and fungal reads were mapped into only a few families and genera, in agreement with a previous study and confirming the relatively low diversity of the corn foliar microbiome (Wallace et al., 2018). While low diversity is consistent with leaf microbiome data from other species (Delmotte et al., 2009), it contrasts sharply with the high diversity generally found in the corn rhizosphere (Peiffer et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2017).

A diverse community could provide several benefits, such as increased competition for resources, a greater capacity to produce antimicrobial compounds, or a strong ability to induce host defense responses (Figure 2). Nevertheless, we cannot ignore the likelihood of host genetic influences and environmental effects on community diversity. Previously, it was shown that the genetic composition of the host structured the phyllosphere microbiome (da Silva et al., 2016; Wagner et al., 2019; Wallace et al., 2018). Additionally, corn recombinant inbred lines (RILs) revealed a major link between plant genetics, community diversity, and disease resistance (Balint-Kurti et al., 2010). Furthermore, high bacterial diversity in maize lines was linked to SLB susceptibility in the field (Balint-Kurti et al., 2010). Our findings contrast with those of Wallace et al. (2018), who found that corn genotype did not affect diversity of the foliar microbial community in an RIL population. Possibly the genetic diversity in the population analyzed by Wallace et al. (2018) was lower than those in our panel of inbreds or the RIL population analyzed by Balint-Kurti et al. (2010). It is also possible that environmental heterogeneity was great enough to obscure any genetic effects in the Wallace et al. (2018) study. The composition of the phyllosphere microbiome and the resulting disease status are significantly influenced by a range of environmental variables, such as temperature, humidity, and geographic location (Singh and Goodwin, 2022). Previous studies supported this, showing that the fungal microbiomes associated with tar spot vary significantly by geographic location (Caldwell et al., 2024; Sic-Hernandez et al., 2025). This indicates that regional environmental factors including climate, soil, and agricultural practice are powerful drivers of a microbiome’s composition.

The significant differentiation observed between the microbial communities of resistant and susceptible maize lines suggests a strong association between microbial composition and disease resistance as shown by beta diversity analysis. The distinct clustering patterns in both bacterial and fungal communities, as visualized by Bray-Curtis and Weighted Unifrac distances, underscore the unique microbial profiles of resistant and susceptible lines (Figures 3, 4). While some exceptions were noted, such as certain susceptible lines clustering with resistant lines, the overall trend indicates a clear divergence in microbial communities. Both Bray-Curtis and Weighted UniFrac analyses demonstrated distinct clustering patterns for both bacterial and fungal communities in resistant and susceptible maize lines with a stronger driver of separation due to phylogenetic differences (Figures 3, 4). This suggests that specific microbial taxa may play a role in conferring resistance to Phyllachora maydis.

4.5 Complex interactions and potential mechanisms driving microbiome shifts

Potentially beneficial bacterial and fungal taxa declined in susceptible lines in response to increased P. maydis load, implying that tar spot severity affects the bacterial and fungal communities. As the disease progresses, P. maydis might displace or inhibit these beneficial microbial taxa for its own advantage, further aggravating the disease. Previously, Manching et al. (2014) demonstrated that disease status shapes phyllospheric microbiome composition and structure. Meanwhile, other plant-pathogenic bacterial and fungal taxa increased in susceptible lines with increased P. maydis reads, indicating that these microbes might be associated with tar spot disease progression.

In general, host genotype, weather, availability of inoculum and other unknown factors may affect variation in the foliar microbiome. At least six specific relationships can operate within these limits:

1. Phyllachora invasion might physically displace a pre-existing microflora without changing its composition. In this case, reduced richness would reflect decreasing sample size of non-Phyllachora reads.

2. Phyllachora might compete with a co-existing microflora for water and nutrients from host cells, and the less-proficient competitors die out.

3. Phyllachora might produce soluble compounds, for example antibiotics, that directly antagonize other taxa.

4. Phyllachora might trigger host defense responses that differentially affect other organisms.

5. The corn inbreds vary in genotype for receptors that might allow Phyllachora to detect and attack host cells. Possibly these receptors also differentially affect other taxa.

6. Other organisms could chemically antagonize Phyllachora, and their antibacterials or antifungals could collaterally inhibit other microbes.

While physical displacement obviously occurs, our data suggest that one or more of the other mechanisms also might operate in tar spot disease.

4.6 Broader implications and future directions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analysis to investigate the bacterial and fungal microbiomes in the phyllospere of corn in relation to natural infection with P. maydis in both resistant and susceptible lines. We found that infection with P. maydis results in distinct microbial communities. Taxa that are differentially abundant between resistant and susceptible lines might be of interest for their potential in controlling tar spot of corn (Figures 7, 8). For example, susceptible lines were enriched in Erwiniaceae bacteria (especially Amnibacterium), while resistant lines showed greater abundance of Microbacteriaceae genera, suggesting potential roles in susceptibility and resistance, respectively. Resistant lines were also enriched in several Ascomycota fungi (e.g., Neosetophoma, Fusarium, Alternaria), possibly contributing to resistance, while susceptible lines showed greater abundance of other fungi (e.g., Ganoderma, Lophiostoma, Bannoa), potentially indicating a less robust environment against the pathogen. These distinct bacterial and fungal communities highlight a complex interplay of microbial taxa influencing tar spot development.

Correlation analysis revealed a complex relationship between P. maydis and the corn microbiome, with a predominance of negative correlations suggesting potential competition and niche differentiation within the microbial community (Tables 3, 4). Organisms with strong positive correlations with Phyllachora reads could be possible mycoparasites, which increase in abundance with greater availability of their food supply (Table 4). For example, Sphaerellopsis filum, which is positively correlated with P. maydis reads, is a known mycoparasite of rust fungi, suggesting it could potentially regulate other fungal populations in the maize microbiome (Gómez-Zapata et al., 2024). Additionally, Paraphaeosphaeria neglecta, which was positively correlated with P. maydis, is described as a “likely saprobe,” suggesting a potential synergistic relationship or a shared preference for similar environmental conditions (Verkley et al., 2014). Conversely, organisms that are highly negatively correlated with Phyllachora reads could be antagonists that compete directly or produce compounds that inhibit tar spot development (Table 4). Either group could be a source of organisms for possible biocontrol of P. maydis. For example, Epicoccum nigrum, which showed a negative correlation, is known to have antagonistic effects on various plant pathogens, supporting the hypothesis that E. nigrum may suppress P. maydis growth (Taguiam et al., 2021; Zhou and Reeleder, 1989; Koutb and Ali, 2010; Li T. et al., 2022). Additionally, Alternaria alternata, also negatively correlated, is a known mycoparasite, potentially acting as a natural control agent against other fungi, including P. maydis (Zheng et al., 2017) and Papiliotrema flavescens, showing the strongest negative correlation, is a known saprobe and yeast having antagonistic activity that could be due to competition for resources or the production of inhibitory compounds (Palmieri et al., 2021). This species also produces VOCs that can stimulate systemic resistance in Arabidopsis; if a similar response occurs in corn then it might make the plants more resistant to P. maydis. The basidiomycetous yeast Bullera alba produces a compound that has strong antifungal activity (Golubev et al., 1997), which may explain its negative correlation with P. maydis reads. Functional characterization of these potentially beneficial, differentially abundant taxa might elucidate important details of their interactions with P. maydis that could indicate how they might be deployed to mitigate tar spot disease in the future, such as the development of microbial-based biocontrol agents or the application of beneficial microbes to enhance plant health. The potential utility of these microbes for practical agricultural applications requires further validation through field-level experiments to support the development of sustainable practices.

The microbiome associated with tar spot has the potential to influence host defense and could be used for future microbiome-based management strategies. However, a significant gap remains in our understanding of microbial functionality, which is crucial for determining how microbes influence host health. This gap can be addressed using advanced approaches like metagenomics, metaproteomics, and metabolomics to gain deeper insights into microbial functions and connect them to host phenotypes (Guo et al., 2024). Recently, microbiome engineering has emerged as a promising strategy for directly manipulating functionally important microbes to improve overall plant fitness and productivity (Kaul et al., 2021; Batool et al., 2024). However, effective microbiome engineering requires a systems-level understanding of the corn microbiome, including microbe-microbe interaction networks and host–microbe interactions. This will allow us to successfully manipulate beneficial microbes (synthetic community) to improve plant resistance, fitness, and overall productivity.

Code availability

The source code for this study is available on GitHub and can be accessed at the following link (https://github.com/wilysic/Tar-spot-microbiome-and-corn-lines).

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.

Author contributions

RS: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. WS-H: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. CC: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SS: Formal analysis, Resources, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. DT: Resources, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Visualization. SG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by USDA-ARS research project 5020–21220-014-00D.

Acknowledgments

We thank Tiffany Jamann at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign and Gurmukh Johal at Purdue University, for providing seeds of the GEM and NAM population parents, respectively, and Jeffrey Ravellette at Purdue University for assistance with field trial establishment and maintenance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1581312/full#supplementary-material

References

Abdel-Baky, N. F., and Abdel-Salam, A. H. (2003). Natural incidence of Cladosporium spp. as a bio-control agent against whiteflies and aphids in Egypt. J. Appl. Entomol. 127, 228–235. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0418.2003.00662.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ahmad, A. A., Askora, A., Kawasaki, T., Fujie, M., and Yamada, T. (2014). The filamentous phage XacF1 causes loss of virulence in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. Citri, the causative agent of citrus canker disease. Front. Microbiol. 5:321. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00321

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Anderson, M. J. (2001). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 26, 32–46. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bai, F. Y., and Wang, Q. M. (2004). Sporobolomyces symmetricus sp. nov., a red yeast isolated from a marine sponge in the South China Sea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54, 2379–2382. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.03154-0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bajet, N. B., Renfro, B. L., and Valdez Carrasco, J. M. (1994). Control of tar spot of maize and its effect on yield. Int. J. Pest Manag. 40, 121–125. doi: 10.1080/09670879409371868

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Balint-Kurti, P., Simmons, S. J., Blum, J. E., Ballaré, C. L., and Stapleton, A. E. (2010). Maize leaf epiphytic bacteria diversity patterns are genetically correlated with resistance to fungal pathogen infection. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 23, 473–484. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-23-4-0473

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Batool, M., Carvalhais, L. C., Fu, B., and Schenk, P. M. (2024). Customized plant microbiome engineering for food security. Trends Plant Sci. 29, 482–494. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2023.10.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Berg, M., and Koskella, B. (2018). Nutrient- and dose-dependent microbiome-mediated protection against a plant pathogen. Curr. Biol. 28, 2487–2492.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.085

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bissonnette, S. (2015). Corn disease alert: new fungal leaf disease “tar spot” Phyllachora maydis identified in 3 northern Illinois counties. Bulletin.

Google Scholar

Bolyen, E., Rideout, J. R., Dillon, M. R., Bokulich, N. A., Abnet, C. C., Al-Ghalith, G. A., et al. (2019). Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bray, J. R., and Curtis, J. T. (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27, 325–349. doi: 10.2307/1942268

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Busby, P. E., Peay, K. G., and Newcombe, G. (2016). Common foliar fungi of Populus trichocarpa modify Melampsora rust disease severity. New Phytol. 209, 1681–1692. doi: 10.1111/nph.13742

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, S., Loladze, A., Yuan, Y., Wu, Y., Zhang, A., Chen, J., et al. (2017). Genome-wide analysis of tar spot complex resistance in maize using genotype-by-sequencing SNPs and whole genome prediction. Plant Genome 10, 1–14. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2016.10.0099

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Caldwell, D. L., da Silva, C. R., McCoy, A. G., Avila, H., Bonkowski, J. C., Chilvers, M. I., et al. (2024). Uncovering the infection strategy of Phyllachora maydis during maize colonization: a comprehensive analysis. Phytopathology 114, 1075–1087. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-08-23-0298-KC

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J. A., and Holmes, S. P. (2016). DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Carrer Filho, R., Romeiro, R., and Garcia, F. (2008). Biocontrol of foliar disease of tomato plants by Nocardioides thermolilacinus. Trop. Plant Pathol. 33, 457–460. doi: 10.1590/S1982−56762008000600008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Castoria, R., Miccoli, C., Barone, G., Palmieri, D., De Curtis, F., Lima, G., et al. (2021). Molecular tools for the yeast Papiliotrema terrestris LS28 and identification of Yap1 as a transcription factor involved in biocontrol activity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 87, e02910–20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02910-20

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Crous, P. W., Groenewald, J. Z., Groenewald, M., Caldwell, P., Braun, U., and Harrington, T. C. (2006). Species of Cercospora associated with grey leaf spot of maize. Stud. Mycol. 55, 189–197. doi: 10.3114/sim.55.1.189

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cummins, G. B. (1941). Identity and distribution of three corn rusts. Phytopathology 31, 856–857. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-31-856

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

De Costa, D. M., Pinto, M. T., Geethanjalee, H. D. N., and Dissanayake, N. (2006a). Suppression of rice pathogens by phyllosphere associated microflora of different rice varieties in Sri Lanka. Trop. Sci. 46, 97–104. doi: 10.1002/ts.63

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

De Costa, D. M., Rathnayake, R. M. P. S., De Costa, W. A. J. M., Kumari, W. M. D., and Dissanayake, D. M. N. (2006b). Variation of phyllosphere microflora of different rice varieties in Sri Lanka and its relationship to leaf anatomical and physiological characters. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 192, 209–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2006.00207.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Delmotte, N., Knief, C., Chaffron, S., Innerebner, G., Roschitzki, B., Schlapbach, R., et al. (2009). Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16428–16433. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905922106

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

da Silva, K. J., de Armas, R. D., Soares, C. R., and Ogliari, J. B. (2016). Communities of endophytic microorganisms in different developmental stages from a local variety as well as transgenic and conventional isogenic hybrids of maize. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 32:189. doi: 10.1007/s11274-016-2149-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Faith, D. P. (1992). Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferreira, L. C., de Moura, V. A. S., Resende, M. F. R. Jr., and Xavier, K. V. (2025). Pathobiome analyses reveal structural changes in maize microbiomes associated with Phyllachora maydis and the tar spot disease. Phytobiomes J. 9. doi: 10.1094/PBIOMES-12-24-0118-R

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Filho, R. C., Romeiro, R. S., and Garcia, F. A. O. (2008). Biocontrol of foliar disease of tomato plants by Nocardioides thermolilacinus. Tropical Plant Pathology 33, 464–467. doi: 10.1590/S1982-56762008000600010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Golubev, W. I., Ikeda, R., Shinoda, T., and Nakase, T. (1997). Antifungal activity of Bullera alba (Hanna) Derx. Mycoscience 38, 25–29. doi: 10.1007/BF02464965

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gómez-Zapata, P. A., Díaz-Valderrama, J. R., Fatemi, S., Ruiz-Castro, C. O., and Aime, M. C. (2024). Characterization of the fungal genus Sphaerellopsis associated with rust fungi: species diversity, host-specificity, biogeography, and in-vitro mycoparasitic events of S. Macroconidialis on the southern corn rust, Puccinia polysora. IMA Fungus 15:18. doi: 10.1186/s43008-024-00145-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gordon, T. C., and Pfender, W. F. (2012). Effects of the mycoparasite Sphaerellopsis filum on overwintering survival of stem rust in perennial ryegrass. Plant Dis. 96, 1471–1481. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-10-11-0837-RE

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Groves, C. L., Kleczewski, N. M., Telenko, D. E. P., Chilvers, M. I., and Smith, D. L. (2020). Phyllachora maydis ascospore release and germination from overwintered corn residue. Plant Health Prog. 21, 26–30. doi: 10.1094/PHP-10-19-0077-RS

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, J. W., Mohamad, O. A. A., Wang, X., Egamberdieva, D., and Tian, B. (2024). Editorial: microbiome associated with plant pathogens, pathogenesis, and their applications in developing sustainable agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 15:1423961. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1423961

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hinton, D. M., and Bacon, C. W. (1995). Enterobacter cloacae is an endophytic symbiont of corn. Mycopathologia 129, 117–125. doi: 10.1007/BF01103471

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hock, J., Kranz, J., and Renfo, B. L. (1995). Studies on the epidemiology of the tar spot disease complex of maize in Mexico. Plant Pathol. 44, 490–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1995.tb02334.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hooker, A. l. (1976). New developments in the corn leaf and stalk disease picture. Proc. Annu. Corn Sorghum Conf. 28, 62–72.

Google Scholar

Inácio, J., Pereira, P., Carvalho, D. M., Fonseca, A., Amaral-Collaço, M. T., and Spencer-Martins, I. (2002). Estimation and diversity of phylloplane mycobiota on selected plants in a Mediterranean-type ecosystem in Portugal. Microb. Ecol. 44, 344–353. doi: 10.1007/s00248-002-2022-z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Janisiewicz, W. J., and Jeffers, S. N. (1997). Efficacy of commercial formulation of two biofungicides for control of blue mold and grey mold of apples in cold storage. Crop Prot. 16, 629–633. doi: 10.1016/S0261-2194(97)00048-3

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Janisiewicz, W. J., and Marchi, A. (1992). Control of storage rots on various pear cultivars with saprophytic strain of Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Dis. 76, 555–560. doi: 10.1094/PD-76-0555

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, Z. K., Tuo, L., Huang, D. l., Osterman, I. A., Tyurin, A. P., Liu, S. W., et al. (2018). Diversity, novelty, and antimicrobial activity of endophytic Actinobacteria from mangrove plants in Beilun estuary National Nature Reserve of Guangxi, China. Front. Microbiol. 9:868. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00868

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaul, S., Choudhary, M., Gupta, S., and Dhar, M. K. (2021). Engineering host microbiome for crop improvement and sustainable agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 12:635917. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.635917

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kleczewski, N. M., and Bowman, N. D. (2020). An observation of corn tar spot dispersal from agricultural fields to an isolated urban plot. Plant Health Prog. 22, 69–71. doi: 10.1094/PHP-10-20-0082-BR

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kleczewski, N. M., Donnelly, J., and Higgins, R. (2019). Phyllachora maydis, causal agent of tar spot on corn, can overwinter in northern Illinois. Plant Health Prog. 20:178. doi: 10.1094/PHP-04-19-0030-BR

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kleczewski, N. M., and Flory, S. L. (2010). Leaf blight disease on the invasive grass Microstegium vimineum caused by a Bipolaris sp. Plant Dis. 94, 807–811. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-94-7-0807

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Koutb, M., and Ali, E. H. (2010). Potential of Epicoccum purpurascens strain 5615 AUMC as a biocontrol agent of Pythium irregulare root rot in three leguminous plants. Mycobiology 38, 286–294. doi: 10.4489/MYCO.2010.38.4.286

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, P. D., Zhu, Z. R., Zhang, Y., and Wang, S. G. (2022). The phyllosphere microbiome shifts toward combating melanose pathogen. Microbiome 10:56. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01234-x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, T., Im, J., and Lee, J. (2022). Genetic diversity of Epicoccum nigrum and its effects on Fusarium graminearum. Mycobiology 50, 457–466. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2022.2148394

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, H., and Peddada, S. D. (2020). Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17041-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lindow, S. E., and Brandl, M. T. (2003). Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 1875–1883. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.4.1875-1883.2003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lipps, S., Smith, D., Telenko, D., Paul, P., Kleczewski, N., and Jamann, T. (2022). Identification of resistance for Phyllachora maydis of maize in exotic-derived germplasm. Crop Sci. 62, 859–866. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20709

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, S., Xie, J., Luan, W., Liu, C., Chen, X., and Chen, D. (2024). Papiliotrema flavescens, a plant growth-promoting fungus, alters root system architecture and induces systemic resistance through its volatile organic compounds in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 208:108474. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108474

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lozupone, C., and Knight, R. (2005). UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 8228–8235. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Manching, H. C., Balint-Kurti, P., and Stapleton, A. E. (2014). Southern leaf blight disease severity is correlated with decreased maize leaf epiphytic bacterial species richness and the phyllosphere bacterial diversity decline is enhanced by nitrogen fertilization. Front. Plant Sci. 5:403. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00403

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Masenya, K., Thompson, G. D., Tekere, M., Makhalanyane, T. P., Pierneef, R. E., and Rees, D. J. G. (2021). Pathogen infection influences a distinct microbial community composition in sorghum RILs. Plant Soil 463, 555–572. doi: 10.1007/s11104-021-04990-0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Massart, S., Martinez-Medina, M., and Haissam, J. M. (2015). Biological control in the microbiome era: challenges and opportunities. Biol. Control 89, 98–108. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.05.001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Matsumoto, H., Fan, X., Wang, Y., Kusstatscher, P., Duan, J., Wu, S., et al. (2021). Bacterial seed endophyte shapes disease resistance in rice. Nat Plants 7, 60–72. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-00856-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

McCoy, A. G., Roth, M. G., Shay, R., Noel, Z. A., Jayawardana, M. A., Longley, R. W., et al. (2019). Identification of fungal communities within the tar spot complex of corn in Michigan via next-generation sequencing. Phytobiomes J. 3, 235–243. doi: 10.1094/PBIOMES-03-19-0017-R

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

McMullen, M. D., Kresovich, S., Villeda, H. S., Bradbury, P., Li, H., Sun, Q., et al. (2009). Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 325, 737–740. doi: 10.1126/science.1174320

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

McMurdie, P. J., and Holmes, S. (2013). Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Morelli, M., Bahar, O., Papadopoulou, K. K., Hopkins, D. L., and Obradovic, A. (2020). Role of endophytes in plant health and defense against pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 11:1312. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.1312

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Palmieri, D., Barone, G., Cigliano, R. A., De, C. F., Lima, G., Castoria, R., et al. (2021). Complete genome sequence of the biocontrol yeast Papiliotrema terrestris strain LS28. G3 11:jkab332. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab332

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Parbery, D. G. (1963). Studies on graminicolous species of Phyllachora Fckl. i. ascospores – their liberation and germinations. Aust. J. Bot. 11, 117–130. doi: 10.1071/BT9630117

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Peiffer, J. A., Spor, A., Koren, O., Jin, Z., Tringe, S. G., Dangl, J. L., et al. (2013). Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6548–6553. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222625

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Peñuelas, J., and Terradas, J. (2014). The foliar microbiome. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 278–280. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.12.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pielou, E. C. (1966). The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 13, 131–144. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pollak, L. M., and Salhuana, W. (2001). “The germplasm enhancement of maize (GEM) project: private and public sector collaboration” in Broadening the Genetic Base of crop production. eds. H. D. Cooper, C. Spillane, and T. Hodgkin (New York: CABI Publishing), 319–330.

Google Scholar

Ren, J., Wu, P., Huestis, G. M., Zhang, A., Qu, J., Liu, Y., et al. (2022). Identification and fine mapping of a major QTL (qRtsc8-1) conferring resistance to maize tar spot complex and validation of production markers in breeding lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 135, 1551–1563. doi: 10.1007/s00122-022-04053-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ritpitakphong, U., Falquet, L., Vimoltust, A., Berger, A., Metraux, J. P., and L’Haridon, F. (2016). The microbiome of the leaf surface of Arabidopsis protects against a fungal pathogen. New Phytol. 210, 1033–1043. doi: 10.1111/nph.13863

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rocco da Silva, C., Check, J., MacCready, J. S., Alakonya, A. E., Beiriger, R., Bissonnette, K. M., et al. (2021). Recovery plan for tar spot of corn, caused by Phyllachora maydis. Plant Health Progress 22, 596–616. doi: 10.1094/PHP-04-21-0074-RP

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Roper, M. C. (2011). Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii: lessons learned from a xylem-dwelling pathogen of sweet corn. Mol. Plant Pathol. 12, 628–637. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00698.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ruhl, G., Romberg, M. K., Bissonnette, S., Plewa, D., Creswell, T., and Wise, K. A. (2016). First report of tar spot on corn caused by Phyllachora maydis in the United States. Plant Dis. 100:1496. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-15-1506-PDN

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Savary, S., Willocquet, L., Pethybridge, S. J., Esker, P., McRoberts, N., and Nelson, A. (2019). The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 430–439. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shude, S. P. N., Mbili, N. C., and Yobo, K. S. (2022). Epiphytic yeasts as potential antagonists against Fusarium head blight of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) caused by Fusarium graminearum sensu stricto. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 21, 404–411. doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2021.11.001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sic-Hernandez, W. R., Gribskov, M., Acosta, A. G., Cruz, A., Zambrano, J. L., Coyoy, A. J. R., et al. (2025). Differences among fungal microbiomes associated with tar spot of corn in Ecuador, Guatemala, and Indiana, USA. bioRxiv :2025.02.07.637150. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.07.637150

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, R. S., and Goodwin, S. B. (2022). Exploring the corn microbiome: a detailed review on current knowledge, techniques, and future direction. Phytofrontiers 2, 158–175. doi: 10.1094/PHYTOFR-04-21-0026-RV

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, R. S., Shim, S., Telenko, D. E. P., and Goodwin, S. B. (2023). The parental inbred lines of the nested association mapping (NAM) population of corn show sources of resistance to tar spots in northern Indiana. Plant Dis. 107, 262–266. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-22-0314-SC

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, H. M., Zhang, T., Yu, L. Y., Sen, K., and Zhang, Y. Q. (2015). Ubiquity, diversity and physiological characteristics of Geodermatophilaceae in Shapotou National Desert Ecological Reserve. Front. Microbiol. 6:1059. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01059

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Taguiam, J. D., Evallo, E., and Balendres, M. A. (2021). Epicoccum species: ubiquitous plant pathogens and effective biological control agents. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 159, 713–725. doi: 10.1007/s10658-021-02207-w

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tehon, L. R., and Daniels, e. (1925). Notes on the parasitic fungi of Illinois. Mycologia 17, 240–249. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1925.12020479

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Telenko, D. E. P., Ross, T. J., Shim, S., Wang, Q., and Singh, R. (2020). Draft genome sequence resource for Phyllachora maydis—an obligate pathogen that causes tar spot of corn with recent economic impacts in the United States. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 33, 884–887. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-03-20-0075-A

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Telenko, D. E. P., Chilvers, M. I., Byrne, A. M., Check, J. C., Da Silva, C. R., Kleczewski, N. M., et al. (2022). Fungicide efficacy on tar spot and yield of corn in the midwestern United States. Plant Health Prog. 23, 281–287. doi: 10.1094/PHP-03-22-0027-RS

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Telenko, D. E. P., Chilvers, M. I., Kleczewski, N., Smith, D. L., Byrne, A. M., Devillez, P., et al. (2019). How tar spot of corn impacted hybrid yields during the 2018 Midwest epidemic. Crop Protection Network. doi: 10.31274/cpn-20190729-002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Trakunyingcharoen, T., Lombard, L., Groenewald, J. Z., Cheewangkoon, R., To-Anun CAlfenas, A. C., et al. (2014). Mycoparasitic species of Sphaerellopsis, and allied lichenicolous and other genera. IMA Fungus 5, 391–414. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2014.05.02.05

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Trivedi, P., Leach, J. E., Tringe, S. G., Sa, T., and Singh, B. K. (2020). Plant-microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 607–621. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ullstrup, A. J. (1972). The impacts of the southern corn leaf blight epidemics of 1970-1971. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 10, 37–50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.10.090172.000345

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Valle-Torres, J., Ross, T. J., Plewa, D., Avellaneda, M. C., Check, J., Chilvers, M. I., et al. (2020). Tar spot: an understudied disease threatening corn production in the Americas. Plant Dis. 104, 2541–2550. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-20-0449-FE

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Verkley, G. J., Dukik, K., Renfurm, R., Göker, M., and Stielow, J. B. (2014). Novel genera and species of coniothyrium-like fungi in Montagnulaceae (Ascomycota). Persoonia 32, 25–51. doi: 10.3767/003158514X679191

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Vidaver, A. K., and Carlson, R. R. (1978). Leaf spot of field corn caused by Pseudomonas andropogonis. Plant Disease Reporter 62, 213–216. Available online at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bpdfpub/5.

Google Scholar

Wagner, M. R., Roberts, J. H., Balint-Kurti, P., and Holland, J. B. (2020). Heterosis of leaf and rhizosphere microbiomes in field-grown maize. New Phytol. 228, 1055–1069. doi: 10.1111/nph.16730

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wagner, M. R., Busby, P. E., and Balint-Kurti, P. (2019). Analysis of leaf microbiome composition of near-isogenic maize lines differing in broad-spectrum disease resistance. New Phytol. 225, 2152–2165. doi: 10.1111/nph.16284

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wallace, J. G., Kremling, K. A., Kovar, L. L., and Buckler, E. S. (2018). Quantitative genetics of the maize leaf microbiome. Phytobiomes Journal 2, 208–224. doi: 10.1094/PBIOMES-02-18-0008-R

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Q. M., and Bai, F. Y. (2004). Four new yeast species of the genus Sporobolomyces from plant leaves. FEMS Yeast Res. 4, 579–586. doi: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2003.11.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, W., Portal-Gonzalez, N., Wang, X., Li, J., Li, H., Portieles, R., et al. (2024). Metabolome-driven microbiome assembly determining the health of ginger crop (Zingiber officinale L. roscoe) against rhizome rot. Microbiome 12:167. doi: 10.1186/s40168-024-01885-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Google Scholar

Yang, J. H., Liu, H. X., Zhu, G. M., Pan, Y. L., Xu, L. P., and Guo, J. H. (2008). Diversity analysis of antagonists from rice-associated bacteria and their application in biocontrol of rice diseases. J. Appl. Microbiol. 104, 91–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03534.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Wang, N., Guo, X., Zhang, Y., and Ye, B. (2017). Comparative analysis of bacterial community structure in the rhizosphere of maize by high-throughput pyrosequencing. PLoS One 12:e0178425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178425

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, J., Holland, J. B., McMullen, M. D., and Buckler, E. S. (2008). Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics 178, 539–551. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.074245

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, L., Zhao, J., Liang, X., Zhan, G., Jiang, S., and Kang, Z. (2017). Identification of a novel Alternaria alternata strain able to Hyperparasitize Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, the causal agent of wheat stripe rust. Front. Microbiol. 8:71. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00071

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, T., and Reeleder, R. D. (1989). Application of Epicoccum purpurascens spores to control white mold of snap bean. Plant Disease 73:639–642. doi: 10.1094/PD-73-0639

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: maize, microbial diversity, microbiome, Phyllachora maydis, phyllosphere, tar spot

Citation: Singh R, Sic-Hernandez WR, Crane CF, Shim S, Telenko DEP and Goodwin SB (2025) Tar spot susceptibility of corn influences phyllosphere-associated bacterial and fungal microbiomes. Front. Microbiol. 16:1581312. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1581312

Received: 21 February 2025; Accepted: 08 September 2025;
Published: 07 October 2025.

Edited by:

Guanghai Ji, Yunnan Agricultural University, China

Reviewed by:

Florentin Constancias, ETH Zürich, Switzerland
Jian-Wei Guo, Kunming University, China

Copyright © 2025 Singh, Sic-Hernandez, Crane, Shim, Telenko and Goodwin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Raksha Singh, UmFrc2hhLlNpbmdoQFVTREEuR09W; c2luZ2g2OTlAcHVyZHVlLmVkdQ==; Stephen B. Goodwin, U3RldmUuR29vZHdpbkBVU0RBLkdPVg==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.