- 1National Reference Laboratory of Antibiotic Resistances and Healthcare Associated Infections, Department of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge (INSA), Lisbon, Portugal
- 2Centre for the Studies of Animal Science, Institute of Agrarian and Agri-Food Sciences and Technologies, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- 3AL4AnimalS, Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Lisbon, Portugal
- 4Air Quality Laboratory, Department of Health Environmental Health, INSA, Lisbon, Portugal
- 5Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Infectious Diseases, INSA, Lisbon, Portugal
- 6Laboratory of Biology and Ecotoxicology, Department of Environmental Health, INSA, Lisbon, Portugal
- 7Strategic Research Unit for Animal Production and Health, National Institute of Agrarian and Veterinary Research, I.P. (INIAV), Pólo de Investigação da Fonte Boa, Lisbon, Portugal
- 8Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Department for Risk Assessment, Vienna, Austria
- 9Faculty of Food Technology, Food Safety and Ecology, University of Donja Gorica, Podgorica, Montenegro
- 10Department of Animal Health, Welfare and Food Safety, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Ås, Norway
- 11Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, CIISA, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
Interconnected reservoirs contribute to the global spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), including carbapenem- and colistin-resistant Enterobacterales, highlighting the need for a One Health approach. We assessed the genomic epidemiology, diversity and AMR mechanisms of Enterobacter spp. across interconnected human, animal, plant, and environmental reservoirs in a Portuguese Open Air Laboratory. Over a one year monitoring period, samples from 12 different compartments were collected and processed using selective media to isolate Enterobacter spp., which were subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing, whole-genome sequencing and subsequent analyses to identify AMR determinants, characterize plasmids and phylogenetic relationships. We established a collection of 61 Enterobacter isolates spanning nine species and 32 sequence types, including 16 novel ones, across nine compartments (river water, wastewater, soil, manure, feed, air, farmers, pigs, wild animals), reflecting the diversity and ubiquity of Enterobacter species. Core-genome analysis revealed eight genetic clusters, suggesting clonal transmission across compartments. In total, 29 antibiotic resistance genes were detected across all isolates. Notably, this is the first documentation of blaFRI-harbouring Enterobacterales in European environmental settings and the first to describe blaFRI, blaIMI and mcr-10 genes in Portugal. blaFRI-8 was detected in all E. vonholyi isolates (n = 17), located on four different IncFII(Yp) plasmids, and blaIMI-6 in an E. asburiae isolate, flanked by IS3 family transposases. E. vonholyi and the blaIMI-6-harbouring E. asburiae isolate were resistant to carbapenems. A mcr-10.1 gene was identified in an E. roggenkampii isolate on an IncFII(pECLA) plasmid. These plasmids exhibited high sequence similarity with global counterparts, indicating potential for horizontal gene transfer. Other antimicrobial resistance genes included qnrE1, sul1, and aadA2. Our findings underscore the importance of Enterobacter as vectors for AMR and the critical role of environmental compartments in its dissemination, reinforcing the importance of adopting a One Health approach to fully understand AMR dynamics.
1 Introduction
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) stands among the World Health Organization’s (WHO) top 10 global health threats (UNEP, 2023). In 2019, AMR was linked to 4.95 million deaths worldwide (Murray et al., 2022). This threat extends beyond clinical settings, prompting international organizations to adopt strategic One Health approaches to combat AMR (European Commission, 2017; UNEP, 2023). The environment serves as a reservoir and driver of AMR transmission and evolution (Larsson and Flach, 2021). Within this challenge, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) pose a major threat, classified by WHO as critical Bacterial Priority Pathogens List for activities related to surveillance and control of antibacterial resistance (World Health Organization, 2024). Moreover, CRE pervasive presence across diverse environmental compartments highlights the urgency of addressing their spread (Mills and Lee, 2019; Zhang et al., 2021). For instance, Wang and co-workers identified common NDM-positive Escherichia coli isolates shared among farms, flies, dogs and farmers in a Chinese poultry production, providing direct evidence of carbapenem- resistant E. coli transmission and environmental contamination (Wang et al., 2017). Additionally, two environmentally-sourced CRE infections which have been reported in literature, with CRE being transmitted from river water to humans (Laurens et al., 2018; Loucif et al., 2018).
The limited availability of effective antibiotic for CRE infections frequently leaves physicians to rely on older antibiotics such as colistin, despite their known toxicity (Binsker et al., 2022). The clinical efficacy of carbapenems and colistin is threatened mainly by the spread of carbapenemase-encoding plasmids and plasmid-mediated mobile colistin resistance (mcr) genes, respectively (Bush and Bradford, 2020; Ling et al., 2020). While the most prevalent carbapenemases (e.g., KPC, NDM, OXA-48, VIM) have long dominated discussions on AMR, lesser-known variants such as IMI and FRI, are becoming increasingly more frequent, particularly in Enterobacter spp. (Boyd et al., 2017; Gomi et al., 2022; Blanco-Martín et al., 2023; Emeraud et al., 2024). blaFRI and blaIMI genes are predominantly found within plasmid structures, along with other mobile-genetic elements (MGE), facilitating their dissemination (Boyd et al., 2017; Brouwer et al., 2019; Uwamino et al., 2019; Gomi et al., 2022; Blanco-Martín et al., 2023).
Enterobacter spp. are part of the ESKAPE pathogens; overall, they are of paramount importance due to their capacity to acquire antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs), which reduce the treatment options of serious infections (Rice, 2008; De Oliveira et al., 2020). Reports describing the prevalence of Enterobacter isolates harboring mcr and/or carbapenemase-encoding genes in both clinical (Hendrickx et al., 2021; Liao et al., 2022; Li et al., 2023) and environmental settings (Roschanski et al., 2019; Manageiro et al., 2020, 2022; Xu et al., 2021), underscore their serious threat to human health.
While the relevance of the environment in the context of AMR dissemination is well recognized, unraveling the complexities of the involved transmission networks and development mechanisms requires a multi-dimensional approach (Larsson et al., 2018; Larsson and Flach, 2021). Therefore, this study aimed to fill knowledge gaps in the genomic epidemiology and AMR mechanisms of Enterobacter spp. isolates collected within a Portuguese Open Air Laboratory (OAL) using Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS). By using this real experimental research facility, the study allowed to evaluate the dynamics of the environmental resistome and bacterial diversity across different, yet interconnected compartments.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study sites and sample collection
Samples were collected from July 2020 to May 2021 (4 seasons), from 12 different compartments (Figure 1), at an experimental agricultural and agri-food production station in Portugal - the Open Air Laboratory (OAL) catchment area - which is located in Santarém (Supplementary Figure S1). This OAL is located at the Portuguese Research Station for Animal Production (EZN-INIAV). The catchment area is 230 ha and is divided into: 17.6% arable land, 38.2% pasture, 13.2% forested, 30.9% paved area. The wastewater treatment is performed in three waste stabilization ponds.

Figure 1. Schematic view of all the compartments from which samples were collected and the environmental ecosystem barriers through which ARG dissemination can occur. Bold letters/arrows = compartments and pathways for ARG movement that are monitored on the OAL testing range. ARGs: antimicrobial resistance genes, ARBs: antimicrobial resistant bacteria. Animal compartments (pigs at stable; wild animals in OAL catchment area): gold. Human compartments (workers exposed to animal husbandry in OAL): red. Compartments associated to plants (crops, animal feed): green. Genuine environmental compartments (soil, water): blue. Other environmental compartments (air sampling, manure): white.
The samples collected for this study were obtained from the following compartments (Figure 1): C0, air of pig barns; C1, pigs from pig barns (feces); C2, manure (liquid and solid); C3, soils [soils without organic fertilization before crops cultivation, soils without organic fertilization (1 and 4 weeks) after crops cultivation; soils with organic fertilization (1 and 4 weeks) after crops cultivation; soils with or without organic fertilization before crops harvest; soils collected serving as controls: forest and meadow]; C4, crop [vetch with oats at a sowing density corresponding to 140 kg per hectare of sown land (120 kg:20 kg), obtained from manured or artificially fertilized soil]; C5, field drainage (drainage water from a borehole); C6, river (surface water); C7, drinking water (tap) and groundwater; C8, feed (on-site composed of corn, wheat, soybean bagasse, sunflower pomace, calcium carbonate, L-lysine, sea salt, wheat bran, soybean oil and vitamin supplements); C9, farmers (oral swabs and feces), C10, wastewater [effluent (prior to discharge into receiving waters), influent (wastewater from a collection tank), sedimentation tank, sewage sludge], and C11, wild animals (feces). Samples were collected at the same time each day according to the respective procedures.1 The initial test portion of soil or feces, manure, solid feed, and water were mixed with buffered peptone water and subsequently seeded on selective and differential medium, MacConkey and/or UriSelect™-4-agar (BioRad, France), with and without cefotaxime 2 mg/L or colistin 0.5 mg/L, to select Gram negative bacteria.2 Oral swabs from farmers were plated on the same culture medium and antibiotics, but also on chocolate agar with PolyViteX™ medium (BioRad, France). Additionally, the water samples were also plated on non-selective media such as R2A (Merck, Germany) and Nutrient agar (BioKar Diagnostics, France) with and without the same antibiotics. The determination of culturable bacteria suspended in air (n = 63) was carried out in accordance with Standard EN13098 using MAS 100 microbiological air sampler (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and in polycarbonate filter, 37 mm, 0.8 μm pore size (Pall Corporation, United States). The air samplers were fixed a height of 1.5 m above the floor (EN 13098:20193). Colonies with different morphology, from any of the medium above, were re-inoculated in simple agar medium (Oxoid, UK) to obtain pure cultures. Cultures were preserved at −80°C. The identification of bacterial isolates was carried out using a VITEK® MS mass spectrometer V3.2.0 (BioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France).
2.2 Antibiotic susceptibility testing
The phenotypic determination of the susceptibility of the 61 isolates under study was carried out by disk diffusion, against 20 antibiotics belonging to six classes: aztreonam (30 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20 μg + 10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), ceftazidime (10 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (36 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), sulfamethxazole-trimethoprim (25 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), ceftiofur (30 μg), enrofloxacin (5 μg), streptomycin (10 μg) and chloramphenicol (30 μg) (BioRad, France) (Supplementary Table S2). The results obtained were interpreted according to the critical diameters defined by EUCAST v.2021 (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; EUCAST, 2021), except for the antibiotics streptomycin/tetracycline and ceftiofur/enrofloxacin whose interpretation was carried out taking into account the values defined by CLSI (2021).4
The determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for colistin was carried out using the microdilution method, with in-house 96-well broth microdilution plates prepared at the National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge (INSA); it followed the EUCAST guidelines, as well as the “MIC testing” according to EN/ISO 17025. The strains E. coli ATCC 25922 and E. coli NCTC 13846 were used as susceptibility and resistance controls, respectively. Isolates were classified as susceptible or resistant to colistin according to the critical concentrations defined by EUCAST guidelines (2021) for E. cloacae (susceptible ≤2 mg/L; resistant >2 mg/L).5
2.3 WGS and in silico analyses
2.3.1 Illumina short-read sequencing
The collection of 61 isolates identified as Enterobacter spp. were subjected to WGS and subsequent analysis. First, genomic DNA was extracted using the Magna Pure 96 system (Roche, Germany), in line with the manufacturer’s instructions, and quantified using Qubit™ 4 fluorometer (Thermo Scientific, United States). Sequencing libraries were prepared using a Nextera XT library preparation kit (Illumina, United States) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq (Illumina, United States) with 150 bp paired-end reads. Raw reads quality control and de novo assembly were performed using INNUca (v4.2.2).6 Shortly, assessment of the read’s quality and trimming was performed using FastQC (v0.11.5)7 and Trimmomatic (v0.38) (Bolger et al., 2014), respectively. Genomes were assembled with SPAdes (v3.14.0) (Bankevich et al., 2012) and then improved with Pilon v1.23 (Walker et al., 2014).
2.3.2 Nanopore long-read sequencing and hybrid assembly
Isolates selected for plasmid assembly (n = 5) were subjected to long-read MinION sequencing (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) using the following criteria: isolates harboring blaFRI-8 and exhibiting plasmid sequences distinct from each other (n = 4) and the single mcr-10.1 harboring isolate. DNA library was prepared using the SQK-RBK114.24 Rapid Barcoding Kit, loaded in a MinION R10.4.1 flowcell and sequenced for 20 h on an Mk1C device. Basecalling and barcode trimming was performed during the sequencing run with Guppy v7.1.4 and the Fast model options selected on the MinKNOW v23.07.12 software. Subsequently, overall read quality was inspected with pycoQC v2.5.2. and de novo hybrid assembly was carried using Unicycler v0.5.0 (Wick et al., 2017).
2.3.3 In silico analysis for species identification, AMR determinants and plasmids characterization
Draft genome sequences were annotated using the automated Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP-6.7) (Tatusova et al., 2016). Species identification was determined by calculating the average nucleotide identity (ANI) using FastANI (v1.33) against complete assembled reference genomes of Enterobacter spp. type strains downloaded from NCBI Genbank database,8 using an ANI value of 95% as cut-off (Jain et al., 2018). ARGs were screened using abriTAMR v1.0.14 and ABRicate (v1.0.1)9 (Sherry et al., 2023). The latter incorporates Resfinder (16.11.22) (Bortolaia et al., 2020), CARD (16.11.22) (Alcock et al., 2023), while specifically employing PlasmidFinder (16.11.22) (Carattoli et al., 2014) for the replicon typing of plasmid incompatibility groups. Furthermore, abriTAMR “plus” database was used to screen for virulence genes.
Plasmid sequences were aligned and visualized using BLAST Ring Generator (BRIG) v0.95, with the standard parameters (50% lower – 70% upper cut-off for identity and E-value of 10) using the pF4100 and pF821 plasmids as template for the blaFRI-8 and mcr-10.1 comparisons, respectively (Alikhan et al., 2011). Genetic contexts of blaFRI-8, blaIMI-6 and mcr-10.1 were analyzed with pyGenomeViz (v0.4.4).10 pJBIWA005_1 (CP074160) and p3442-FRI-1 (CP033467) were included for blaFRI-8 comparison, pAR_0072 (CP026851) and pEk72 (CP088230) for mcr-10.1, pIMI-6 (KX786187) for blaIMI-6 and pRHBSTW-00016_2 (CP058188) for class 1 integron.
2.3.4 Phylogenetic analyses
In silico multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) prediction was performed using the PubMLST database for E. cloacae and new sequence types (STs) were submitted (Jolley et al., 2018). The phylogeny of Enterobacter spp. isolates was also evaluated using core genome MLST (cgMLST) and core genome single nucleotide polymorphism (cgSNP) analysis. The tool chewBBACA v.3.3.011 was employed to create a cgMLST schema for a collection of 6,586 Enterobacter genomes annotated by NCBI RefSeq (619 complete genomes and 5,967 draft genome assemblies deposited on the NCBI databases, downloaded on September 18th, 2024) (Silva et al., 2018). For reference-based mapping and SNP/InDel analysis, Snippy v4.6.012 was used, with the NCBI RefSeq E. cloacae 1,382 complete genome (NZ_OW968328.1) serving as the reference. Putative repetitive sections and recombination events were filtered using Gubbins v.3.313 (Croucher et al., 2015). Pairwise cgSNP differences between isolates were determined under SNP-dists v0.7.0.14
The resulting cgMLST allelic profile and cgSNP matrix output files, containing only the subset of genes or SNPs present in all isolates, were used by ReporTree v.2.1.215 to: (i) identify potential genetic clusters based on the generated MSTreeV2, with the number of shared cgMLST alleles; (ii) conduct a phylogenetic analysis, using unique profiles with a hierarchical single-linkage clustering criterion. Finally, the phylogenetic tree was constructed by using the Maximum Likelihood method and Jukes-Cantor model in FastTree v2.1.11, incorporating 1,000 random bootstrap replicates to assess node support within the tree (Price et al., 2010). All constructed trees were exported to GrapeTree v1.5.016 for visualization (Zhou et al., 2018). The threshold of 0.0035 dissimilarity (Kluytmans-van den Bergh et al., 2016), was applied for inferring genetic relatedness among Enterobacter spp. isolates. For cgMLST analysis, we considered ≤11 allelic differences, related; 12 to 20 allelic differences (including), possibly related; and >20 allelic differences, unrelated (Hoffmann et al., 2023). For the cgSNP phylogenetic tree, we considered a group of isolates to form a clade if they shared a common ancestor and were supported by a bootstrap value of at least 95%.
2.4 Data availability
The genomes of the 61 bacterial isolates included in this study were deposited in GenBank under BioProject number PRJNA1142223. More information regarding accession numbers, contigs, consensus length and average coverage is available in Supplementary Table S1. New alleles numbering for β-lactamases-encoding genes were requested at NCBI17 and are the following:blaACT-125 (OR880573), blaACT-126 (OR880574), blaACT-127 (OR880575), blaACT-128 (OR880576), blaACT-129 (OR880577), blaACT-130 (OR880578), blaACT-131 (OR880579), blaACT-132 (OR880580), blaACT-133 (OR880581), blaACT-134 (OR880582), blaACT-135 (OR880583), blaACT-136 (OR880584), blaACT-137 (OR880585), blaACT-138 (OR880586), blaACT-139 (OR880587) and blaMIR-26 (OR880572).
3 Results
3.1 Diversity of Enterobacter spp. in environmental compartments and antibiotic susceptibility
Over the annual longitudinal study covering a crop growing period, we identified 61 Enterobacter isolates recovered from 9 out of 12 compartments within human [farmers feces and oral swabs (C9)], animal [pig (C1) and wild animals (C11) feces], plant-associated [feed (C8)], and environmental [air of pig barns (C0), manure (C2), soil (C3) and water (C6 and C10)] reservoirs. The majority of the collection was obtained from wastewater C10 (17/61), soil C3 (15/61) and river water C6 (10/61) (Figure 1; Supplementary Figure S2; Supplementary Table S2). Taxonomic affiliation of these isolates was distributed among nine different Enterobacter species, with E. vonholyi (17/61) and E. ludwigii (15/61) being the most predominant (Figure 2; Supplementary Table S2). ANI analysis clarified the affiliation of the E. vonholyi isolates, previously identified as E. cloacae by the VITEK® MS mass spectrometer (Supplementary Table S2). Two different E. hormaechei subspecies were also identified, namely E. hormaechei subsp. hoffmannii and xiangfangensis. MLST analysis of the 61 isolates revealed notable diversity, identifying 32 different STs, including 16 newly assigned ones (Figure 2; Supplementary Table S2; Supplementary Figure S3). ST1688 was consistently assigned to all E. vonholyi isolates, while ST833 was associated with all E. kobei isolates.

Figure 2. Core genome SNP (cgSNP)-based phylogenetic tree constructed with the maximum-likelihood method based on cgSNP (202,166 SNPs) alignment of 61 Enterobacter spp. isolates, using the E. cloacae 1,382 complete genome (NZ_OW968328.1) as a reference. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site, and with the representation of the 7-gene MLST after the designation of each isolate. *New STs identified in this study. Isolates derived from different environmental compartments are depicted in different colors. ARGs are denoted by gray-filled squares for presence and empty squares for absence, while the number of plasmid replicons of each isolate is expressed by a color gradient (1–3). Dark triangles at branch points indicate bootstraps percentages greater than 80%. Tip color of each isolate indicate sampling year: white represents isolates from 2020, while transparent (no color) denotes isolates from 2021.
Most Enterobacter isolates exhibited resistance to both amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (59/61) and cefoxitin (57/61) (Supplementary Table S2), which is an expected resistant phenotype.18 In contrast, all isolates were susceptible to fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, aminoglycosides (gentamicin), chloramphenicol and most of the β-lactams tested, including cefotaxime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftiofur. Species-specific trends in susceptibility were also observed. Notably, all E. chuandaensis (n = 2), and E. vonholyi (n = 17) isolates, along with most of the E. asburiae isolates (8/9) were resistant to colistin, as well as two E. roggenkampii isolates and one E. kobei isolate, accounting for nearly half of the Enterobacter collection (30/61). Furthermore, all E. vonholyi isolates showed resistance to ertapenem and resistance or reduced susceptible to meropenem and imipenem (Supplementary Table S2). Additionally, E. asburiae isolate F544 exhibited resistance to all tested carbapenems while isolate F3124 displayed resistance to aztreonam, ceftazidime and ertapenem.
3.2 Phylogenetic and core-genome analysis
cgMLST analysis identified 2,534 core genes that were present in at least 95% of the 61 Enterobacter spp. genomes, revealing eight clusters characterized by isolates genetically related with 11 or less alleles in difference (Figure 3; Supplementary Figures S2–S4).

Figure 3. Minimum spanning tree of Enterobacter spp. isolates (n = 61), colored by specie, showing the identified clusters (from I to VIII in roman numerals) constructed based on the cgMLST analysis of 2,659 core genes. The numerical values assigned to the branches indicate the allelic distance between the isolates. Solid lines represent a distance of ≤ 11 loci (closely related). Branches longer than 20 alleles different were shortened and are indicated with a hashed line.
Cluster I encompassed all ST1688 E. vonholyi isolates, except F486. They exhibited a maximum allelic difference of 11 loci when each isolate within the cluster is directly compared. This cluster included only water-associated isolates, derived from wastewater ([C10] effluent, sedimentation tank, and sewage sludge) and river samples (C6), collected in two different seasons.
Cluster II consisted of four E. asburiae belonging to ST2144, exhibiting a maximum allelic difference of 10 loci within the cluster. These isolates were obtained from different environmental compartments, specifically air and wastewater (including sedimentation tank and sewage sludge) collected in different seasons during a one-year crop-growing period. Cluster III included the two E. chuandensis isolates (four loci difference), belonging to ST2805 and isolated from feed samples.
Cluster IV contained the isolate F3741 E. hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis and E. hormaechei F3737, both belonging to ST2148 (seven loci difference). Cluster V comprised all three ST2631 E. hormaechei subsp. hoffmannii isolates, with a maximum allelic difference across the cluster of eight loci, while Cluster VI encompassed the two ST90 E. hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis isolates (two locus difference). All E. hormaechei isolates comprised in Clusters IV, V and VI were obtained from the farmer’s oral swabs or feces. Two cgMLST clusters of E. kobei (Cluster VII) and E. ludwigii (Cluster VIII) isolates were observed (two isolates in each cluster), with a maximum allelic difference across the clusters of six and one loci, respectively. E. ludwigii F1897 and F3213 isolates, obtained from distinct soil samples, were considered possibly related, exhibiting 20 allelic differences. Specifically, isolate F1973 was collected from soil without organic fertilization sampled 4 weeks after corn cultivation while isolate F3212 was collected from soil with organic fertilization collected before corn harvest.
The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree grouped isolates into nine clades, each representing different Enterobacter species (Figure 2). cgSNP-calling analysis resulted in an alignment of 202,166 cgSNPs, with 46.8% average of core genome alignment. The cgSNP matrix (Supplementary Table S3) displays the pairwise SNP distances among the isolates’ genomes, ranging from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 85,835 SNPs. cgMLST identified closely related E. vonholyi isolates in Cluster I, with 3-11 allelic differences, which was further supported by the 1-11 cgSNP variation. The E. vonholyi F486 differed from other E. vonholyi isolates by 11-18 SNPs, classifying it as possibly related.
Overall, Enterobacter isolates within cgMLST Clusters II and III exhibited an average difference of 6 and 16 SNPs, respectively, whereas E. hormaechei isolates across Clusters IV, V and VI displayed an average difference of 31 to 41 SNPs within their clusters (Supplementary Table S3). Isolates from clusters VII and VIII showed 33 and 14 cgSNPs difference, respectively while the E. ludwigii isolates F1897 and F3213 differed by 8 SNPs (Supplementary Table S3).
Our phylogenetic analysis of Enterobacter spp. employed both cgMLST and cgSNP. The cgMLST analysis identified 2,534 core genes present in at least 95% of the 61 Enterobacter spp. genomes, comparable to the cgMLST schemes for E. coli (2,513 loci) and several Klebsiella spp. (2,536 loci) (Jolley et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2020). Complementing this, the cgSNP analysis revealed a 46.8% core-genome alignment across nine different Enterobacter species. This percentage represents a significant proportion of shared genomic content at the genus level, particularly when compared to studies on other genera such as Pseudomonas, which found a very narrow core genome comprising only 65 genes out of a total of 19,056,667 coding sequences analyzed across 3,274 genomes (Saati-Santamaría et al., 2022).
While species-specific cut-offs for cgMLST and cgSNP are unlikely to be universally applicable, we utilized both approaches to provide a comprehensive view of genomic relationships within this diverse genus (Schürch et al., 2018).
3.3 Prevalence and distribution of ARGs, virulence factor-encoding genes and plasmids
The genomic analysis of Enterobacter spp. isolates revealed 29 different ARGs, conferring resistance to six antibiotic classes (Figure 2; Supplementary Table S4). All Enterobacter isolates exhibited a common resistome marked by the expression of a chromosomally encoded ampC-type gene. Indeed, a blaACT gene was identified in all species except in E. roggenkampii isolates, which carried a blaMIR gene instead. Fourteen new blaACT variants and one novel blaMIR variant were identified (Supplementary Table S4). Furthermore, except for E. roggenkampii F821 and E. hormaechei subsp. hoffmannii F427, all isolates harbored a chromosomally encoded fosA-like gene that conferred resistance to fosfomycin. Notably, two carbapenemase-encoding genes (blaFRI-8 and blaIMI-6) were identified, along with resistance genes for colistin (mcr-10.1), quinolone (qnrE1), sulfonamide (sul1) and streptomycin (aadA2). blaFRI-8 was present in all E. vonholyi isolates, blaIMI-6 in one E. asburiae ST1727 isolate, mcr-10.1 in E. roggenkampii ST2809 and qnrE1 in three E. mori isolates, while both sul1 and aadA2 genes were present in the three E. hormaechei subsp. hoffmannii isolates (Figure 2). Additionally, most isolates exhibited membrane-associated resistance mechanisms, including efflux pumps and reduced outer-membrane permeability (Supplementary Table S4).
The distribution of virulence factor-encoding genes (VFs), plasmid replicons, as well as the presence of metal, heat and biocides resistance-encoding genes were also investigated (Supplementary Table S4). The fieF gene, associated with flagellum biosynthesis, was detected in all Enterobacter isolates. Additionally, siderophore-encoding genes (iroB, iroC, iroN) were found in four E. hormaechei subsp. xiangfangensis (Supplementary Table S4). Gene clusters encoding resistance to arsenic, cobalt, nickel, copper, silver and tellurite were present in isolates from six different Enterobacter species. Moreover, a locus associated with heat shock response was detected in all three E. hormaechei subsp. hoffmannii isolates and in one E. roggenkampii (Supplementary Table S4). Most Enterobacter species harbored at least two different plasmid replicons, except for E. ludwigii, for which replicons were only detected in one isolate (Figure 2). Additionally, the same plasmid profile was detected in all E. vonholyi isolates, consisting of two IncFII(Yp) replicons and a Col(pHAD28) (Figure 2).
3.4 Plasmid analysis and genomic context of ARGs
Hybrid genome assembly analysis of four blaFRI-8 positive Enterobacter isolates (F271, F504, F4079 and F4100) identified four IncFII(Yp) plasmids, the plasmids pF271 (PQ133128), pF504 (PQ133129), pF4079 (PQ133130) and pF4100 (PQ133131), ranging from 120 to 272 to kb in size (Figure 4A). Beforehand, short-read sequencing analysis strongly indicated that in all the remaining E. vonholyi isolates, the blaFRI-8 gene was located on IncFII(Yp) plasmids in regions identical to pF271. While F504, F4079, F4080 and F4100 exhibited unique sequences absent from pF271, the plasmids in F4080 and F4100 showed such a high degree of similarity that they were considered potentially identical. Furthermore, pF271 exhibits a 99.9% nucleotide sequence similarity to pF4079, excluding the 21 kb segment present in pF4079 but absent from pF271 approximately in the region between 132 and 152 kb (Figure 4A), which harbors several MGEs including insertion sequences and transposase coding genes.

Figure 4. Mapping and circular comparison of blaFRI-8- (A) and mcr-10 (B) carrying plasmid sequences displaying the genomic location of ARGs, MGEs, VFs, genes associated with plasmid conjugation and also heat and metal resistance genes. The pF4100 and pF821 plasmids were used as reference for the blaFRI-8 and mcr-10.1 comparisons, respectively. The ring color gradients correspond to varying degrees of identity of BLAST matches. Circular genomic maps also include information on GC Skew and GC content. Plasmids used for sequence comparison are the closest plasmid sequences obtained using NCBI BLAST analysis.
Despite size and structure differences among plasmids carrying blaFRI-8, the region around this carbapenemase-encoding gene is highly conserved (Figure 5A). In each plasmid, blaFRI-8 and the transcription regulator (friR) were flanked upstream and downstream by IS3 family transposase-encoding genes (Figures 4A, 5A). Additionally, proteins associated with type VI secretion systems were detected in all four plasmids.

Figure 5. Genetic environment and comparative linear analysis of blaFRI-8 (A), mcr-10 (B), blaIMI-6 (C) and the class 1 integron (D) identified in Enterobacter isolates performed and visualized with pyGenomeViz. pJBIWA005_1 (CP074160) and p3442-FRI-1 (CP033467) were included in the blaFRI-8 comparison, pAR_0072 and pEk72 for mcr-10.1, pIMI-6 (KX786187) for blaIMI-6 and pRHBSTW-00016_2 (CP058188) for the class 1 integron. Arrows indicate the directions of transcription of the genes, and different genes are shown in different colors according to their function (detailed in the legend). Regions of homology are depicted using gray and red gradients, with red signalizing inversions. Arrows are drawn to scale.
The pF504 and pF4100 are larger plasmids with a high degree of similarity to each other but show less resemblance to other blaFRI-harboring plasmids. These two plasmids shared a CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas (CRISPR associated proteins) system, although located in a different genetic context (Figure 5A).
Hybrid genome assembly analysis of isolate F821 identified a 122 kb IncFII(pECLA) plasmid pF821 (PQ133132) harboring the mcr-10.1 gene (Figure 4B). The xerC recombinase is located downstream a gene encoding an efflux RND transporter permease subunit and two transposases (Figures 4B, 5B). In addition to several genes encoding MGEs, pF821 also encompasses genes encoding for heat-shock proteins identically to the pAR_0072 plasmid (Figures 4B, 5B), but in this case located upstream the xerC - mcr-10.1 region. Furthermore, it contains a pgaABCD operon, which is responsible for the synthesis, modification and export of poly-β-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, an adhesin crucial for biofilm formation (Itoh et al., 2008). Additionally, pF821 encompasses two operon systems conferring resistance to copper and silver (Figure 4B).
Short-read sequencing analysis of F544 revealed that both the blaIMI-6 and the transcription regulator gene imiR were flanked by two IS3 family transposases (Figure 5C). In E. hormaechei subsp. hoffmannii isolates F3531, F4479 and F4480, the analysis of the genetic context of an aadA2 gene revealed its location in a class 1 integron with the respective structural genes of this class, sul1 and qacEdelta1 (Figure 5D). Moreover, the contig containing the 5’CS: IntI1|aadA2|qacEdelta1|sul1 gene cassette exhibited 100% nucleotide sequence similarity with pRHBSTW-00016 plasmid (CP058188.1), which was also described in an E. hormaechei isolate.
4 Discussion
In this work, we explored the genomic epidemiology and AMR genetic portfolio of Enterobacter isolates obtained from a Portuguese OAL, emphasizing on AMR dynamics across interconnected environmental compartments. The collection of Enterobacter isolates underscores the complexity of this genus, highlighting its diversity through the identification of numerous different species (n = 9) and previously unrecognized STs (n = 16) (Davin-Regli et al., 2019). The nine different compartments including environment [water (C6 and C10), soil (C3), manure (C2), and air (C0)], human (C9) and animal [(C1, C8, and C11)] from which these isolates were recovered also reflect the ubiquity of Enterobacter species. In fact, these organisms are commonly found in diverse environments and can also act as commensals and opportunistic pathogens, causing nosocomial and community-acquired infections (Gomi et al., 2018; Brouwer et al., 2019; Liao et al., 2022; Manageiro et al., 2022; Furuichi et al., 2024). Moreover, investigating diverse compartments within the One Health framework provides a holistic view of AMR transmission routes and can help uncover the complex pathways through which ARGs disseminate.
Animal production farms, like our simulated OAL area, have been recognized as significant reservoirs of AMR, harboring bacteria resistant to last-resort antibiotics such as carbapenems and colistin (Wang et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2022).
The global increase in environmental Enterobacterales resistant to these antibiotics underscores the urgent need to comprehend emerging resistance mechanisms. Thus, investigating less common or emerging ARGs is critical for anticipating new potential AMR threats.
The identification of a diverse ARGs alongside MGEs in our samples reinforces the role of these species as vectors for AMR transmission and dissemination (De Oliveira et al., 2020). The co-occurrence of antibiotic and metal resistance genes on the same bacterial isolates is expected, as these genes are often governed by shared genetic mechanisms and can be encoded by the same MGEs (Roberto et al., 2019). Furthermore, these environments are frequently contaminated with metals, which can lead to co-selection of resistant isolates (Silva et al., 2021). Notably, this study has documented new ARG variants (blaACT-25 to blaACT-39 and blaMIR-26) and highlighted the prevalence of ARGs conferring resistance to last resort antibiotics within Enterobacter species, including mcr and carbapenemase-coding genes, thereby supporting and complementing previous findings (Peirano et al., 2018; Manageiro et al., 2022; Teixeira et al., 2022).
FRI class A carbapenemases were first described in an E. cloacae strain isolated from a hospitalized patient in Paris, sharing closest amino acid identity with chromosome-encoded Ambler class A carbapenemases NMC-A and IMI-1 (Dortet et al., 2015). FRI-1 significantly hydrolyzes carbapenems, conferring resistance to aztreonam, but not to broad-spectrum cephalosporins (Dortet et al., 2015). This phenotype aligns with previous reports of blaFRI-8-harboring Enterobacter isolates and matches the resistance profile of most blaFRI-8-harboring E. vonholyi isolates described here.
Currently, 12 different blaFRI variants have been described, with all except blaFRI-10 (found in E. coli) detected in Enterobacter species. Additionally, Enterobacter isolates with blaFRI have been detected in both environmental and clinical settings, indicating potential transmission events (Gomi et al., 2022; Mataseje et al., 2023). In Europe, blaFRI has exclusively been reported in clinical Enterobacter strains, although most reports come from Asian countries (Dortet et al., 2015; Meunier et al., 2017; Schauer et al., 2019; Gomi et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2023). This report represents, to the best of our knowledge, the first documentation of blaFRI-harboring Enterobacterales in environmental settings in Europe and overall, in Portugal. The association of blaFRI with E. vonholyi has been recently described by Cho et al. (2021). Prior to this, blaFRI genes were primarily linked to various Enterobacter species. Notably blaFRI-6 and blaFRI-8 have been identified in E. vonholyi isolates previously classified as Enterobacter spp. (Boyd et al., 2020; Gomi et al., 2022). This reclassification underscores the importance of ongoing taxonomic revisions in understanding ARGs distribution across bacterial species.
The blaFRI-8-harboring plasmids described here share a high homology with each other and with other blaFRI-harboring plasmids described previously in Enterobacter isolates (Brouwer et al., 2019; Adachi et al., 2021; Gomi et al., 2022; Mataseje et al., 2023) (Figure 4A). Notably, plasmids pF271 and pF4079 exhibit approximately 99% sequence similarities with 87 to 90% of the pJBIWA003 nucleotide sequence, a plasmid identified in an E. quasiroggenkampii isolate recovered from surface water in Japan (Gomi et al., 2022).
Previous work has shown that blaFRI-carrying plasmids are not self-transmissible, except for blaFRI-6, also detected in E. vonholyi (Dortet et al., 2015; Kubota et al., 2018; Schauer et al., 2019; Uwamino et al., 2019; Boyd et al., 2020). Analysis of the blaFRI-8 associated plasmids sequences described here unveiled that only pF504 and pF4100 harbor a conjugation module comprising tra and trb genes (Figure 4A). This module shares the same overall gene structure as the one the present in the self-transmissible blaFRI-6-carrying plasmid (CP034768), potentially enablingpF504 and pF4100 be transferred between hosts (Boyd et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2023). The incomplete conjugation module in most blaFRI-carrying plasmids might explain their low prevalence and nearly exclusive association with Enterobacter species. Nonetheless, the abundance of other MGE within these plasmids, particularly transposase-coding genes and insertion sequences, could eventually potentiate the transfer of both blaFRI and the transcriptional regulator friR to highly transmissible plasmids, potentially facilitating their widespread dissemination.
Along with FRI, IMI β-lactamases are classified as “minor” carbapenemases, sporadically described across different continents (Bonnin et al., 2021). IMI-1 was initially reported in the USA in an E. cloacae strain and to date 24 different variants have been described, mostly in Enterobacter species (Rasmussen et al., 1996). IMI-6, first identified on an IncFII-type plasmid originating from a clinical E. cloacae isolate from Canada, and has since been exclusively detected in these species (Boyd et al., 2017; Blanco-Martín et al., 2023). Similar to blaFRI-8, this represents the first description of blaIMI in Portugal. The genomic context containing these genes shares 99.2% nucleotide identity with the corresponding region of the pIMI-6 plasmid from the ST283 E. asburiae clinical isolate obtained from a Canadian hospital, suggesting that this gene is likely present within a pIMI-6-like plasmid (Boyd et al., 2017). In addition to the high nucleotide identity, the presence of genes associated with pilus biogenesis in the same region, as well as genes associated with copper resistance and an IncFII replicon further supports this possibility (Boyd et al., 2017). Furthermore, E. asburiae isolate F544 exhibited resistance to carbapenems, but not to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, consistent with previously descriptions of Enterobacter isolates harboring blaIMI (Sugawara et al., 2019; Blanco-Martín et al., 2023).
Colistin-resistance poses an emerging threat to public and environmental health. Among 10 currently described mcr variants, mcr-1 exhibits the highest prevalence, particularly in E. coli (Zhang et al., 2021; Hu et al., 2023). mcr-10 was first described in 2020, detected on a IncFIA plasmid of a clinical E. roggenkampii isolate in China (Wang et al., 2020). Since then, mcr-10 has been identified in various Enterobacterales species in many countries, indicating its widespread dissemination (Biggel et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2022). In Portugal, mcr-1-harboring Enterobacterales have been extensively reported across various matrices, including clinical settings (Beyrouthy et al., 2017; Tacão et al., 2017), livestock (Clemente et al., 2019; Manageiro et al., 2019; Palmeira et al., 2021; Ribeiro et al., 2021), wild animals (Ahlstrom et al., 2019; Torres et al., 2021; Dantas Palmeira et al., 2022) and vegetables (Manageiro et al., 2020). In Portugal, besides mcr-1, two other variants have been reported; mcr-9 gene has been detected in diverse settings: in an E. ludwigii isolate recovered from a fish farm, an environmental Klebsiella quasipneumoniae isolate, and in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and its monophasic variant clinical isolates (Manageiro et al., 2022; Silveira and Pista, 2023; Silva et al., 2024). Additionally, mcr-4 has been detected on E. coli isolates recovered from pigs (Amaro et al., 2023). Hence, to the extent of our knowledge, this corresponds to the first publication of mcr-10 in Portugal. The hybrid genome assembly analysis of pF821 plasmid revealed high similarity with other IncFIB(pECLA) plasmids also previously identified in Enterobacter species, although only pEk72-1 (CP088230) harbored mcr-10.1 (Figure 4B). On both plasmids, a tyrosine-type recombinase gene xerC was located upstream of mcr-10.1 (Figures 4B, 5B). The region encompassing both xerC and mcr-10.1, along with the downstream segment, exhibits a 99.9% nucleotide identity with the corresponding region of pEk72, a plasmid described in a clinical E. kobei strain isolated in a Chinese hospital (CP088230). The occurrence of mcr-10 in association with a xerC tyrosine recombinase and in close proximity to diverse ISs, reinforces previous studies indicating that this structure is highly conserved and prone for the mobilization of the mcr-10 gene (Xu et al., 2021, 2022; Yang et al., 2021). Furthermore, pF821 harbors additional genes that could confer an adaptability advantage to its host, potentially enhancing its virulence. These genes include those implicated in biofilm formation (pgaABCD operon) as well as resistance to heat (e.g., psiE-GI, kefB-GI, trx-GI) and metals (e.g., pcoE, pcoS, pcoD). These genetic elements are often associated with plasmids that carry ARGs (Teixeira et al., 2016; Papagiannitsis et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2020). Despite harboring the mcr-10 gene, isolate F821 remained susceptible to colistin. This is not unusual, as mcr genes have been identified in colistin-susceptible Enterobacterales (Terveer et al., 2017; Manageiro et al., 2020, 2022; Bertelloni et al., 2022). The colistin-resistant phenotype of Enterobacter isolates observed in this study may be linked to the overexpression of acrA in the acrAB-tolC efflux pump, potentially in combination with decreased affinity between colistin and the outer membrane due to lipid A modification, as previously reported in Enterobacter species (Telke et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2021).
The occurrence of E. hormaechei harboring a class 1 integron with sul1 and aadA2 isolated from farmer’s feces highlights the need for a One Health approach in tackling AMR.
While no transmission events involving these isolates were tracked between environmental compartments, we cannot rule out this hypothesis as the transmission of antibiotic resistant bacteria between farmers, animals and farm environment has been previously documented (Wang et al., 2017). Additionally, the same MGEs harboring ARGs could also be circulating between different bacterial species and compartments. Putative clonal transmission events were observed among E. vonholyi isolates between the stabilization pond (C10) and the river (C6), as well as among E. asburiae ST2144 isolates between the stabilization pond (C10) and the air of pig barns (C0). The occurrence of two Enterobacter isolates (F579 and F3419) isolated from the air of pig barns (C0) highlights this often-overlooked environmental reservoir, which has been previously recognized as a hotspot of antibiotic resistant bacteria (He et al., 2020; Rossi et al., 2023).
The detection of an mcr-10 harboring Enterobacter isolate isolated from pig manure (C2) aligns with recent findings in Portugal describing a high rate of mcr harboring Enterobacterales isolated from pigs (Kieffer et al., 2017; Manageiro et al., 2019; Fournier et al., 2020; Amaro et al., 2023). This is particularly concerning, as the potential use of manure in farming soil can potentiate the transmission of this mcr harboring Enterobacter to crops and water meant for human consumption.
Furthermore, this study indicates that the blaFRI-8 harboring E. vonholyi isolates can persist in the stabilization pond for at least a period of 6 months, from summer to winter, suggesting the existence of a persistent source of contamination. Likewise, E. asburiae ST2144 isolates within cluster II (Supplementary Figure S4) were also isolated in different seasons, namely winter and spring. Our observation that all Enterobacter isolates harboring carbapenemase encoding genes were isolated from aquatic environments also confirms the well-recognized importance of these environments in the dissemination of carbapenem resistance (Manageiro et al., 2014; Hooban et al., 2020; Teixeira et al., 2022).
5 Conclusion
In this study, we investigated the dynamics of AMR in a Portuguese OAL testing ground. We identified diverse Enterobacter species across various compartments, highlighting their role as vectors for AMR dissemination. The presence of carbapenemase-encoding genes such as blaFRI-8 and blaIMI-6, along with the emerging plasmid mediated colistin resistance such as mcr-10.1 gene, poses significant challenges to public health. Our findings emphasize the interconnected nature of AMR, elucidating the MGE contributing to the dissemination of these concerning rare and emerging ARGs. The detection of highly similar Enterobacter isolates across environmental compartments suggests possible transmission events and the presence of persistent reservoirs of antibiotic resistant bacteria. This highlights how essential it is to monitor the spread and emergence of ARGs, in parallel with the development of preventive measures and interventions against AMR bacteria in different environmental compartments.
Data availability statement
The genomes of the bacterial isolates included in this study were deposited in GenBank under BioProject number PRJNA1142223.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by European Parliament and Council decisions on the epidemiological surveillance and control of communicable disease in the European Community (Eur-Lex-31998D2119, 1998; Eur-Lex-32000D0096, 2000). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
PT: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation. MR: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. RR: Writing – review & editing. MA: Writing – review & editing. MF: Writing – review & editing. MMC: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. PV: Writing – review & editing, Methodology. LR: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. RM: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. JR: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. CM: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. TR: Writing – review & editing, Methodology. AS: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. OM: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. WR: Visualization, Validation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. AC-R: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. SM: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. ED: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. MW: Validation, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Visualization. MC: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Conceptualization. VM: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Validation.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. PT, MR, and RR were granted by Agendas/Alianças mobilizadoras para a Reindustrialização (no. 5, SMARTgNOSTICS project). This work was supported by funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under grant agreement no 773830: One Health European Joint Programme (FED-AMR project), and from Agendas/Alianças mobilizadoras para a Reindustrialização (no. 5, SMARTgNOSTICS project).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1593872/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure S1 | Aerial view of the Portuguese OAL in Santarém, with the location of the pig farm (C1), manure collection tank (C2), crops (C4), waste stabilization ponds (C10), drainage water from borehole (C5), irrigation tank (C6), and the river’s water line (C6) marked in orange squares.
Supplementary Figure S2 | Minimum spanning tree of Enterobacter spp. isolates (n = 61), by environmental compartment, showing the identified clusters (from I to VIII in roman numerals) constructed based on the cgMLSTanalysis of 2,659 core genes.
Supplementary Figure S3 | Minimum spanning tree of Enterobacter spp. isolates (n = 61), by MLST, showing the identified clusters (from I to VIII in roman numerals) constructed based on the cgMLST analysis of 2,659 core genes.
Supplementary Figure S4 | Minimum spanning tree of Enterobacter spp. isolates (n = 61), by season, showing the identified clusters (from I to VIII in roman numerals) constructed based on the cgMLST analysis of 2,659 core genes.
Footnotes
1. ^https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5378535; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5381388; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5376614; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5381592; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5377559; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5380213; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5380081
2. ^https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5381927
3. ^https://www.inrs.fr/publications/bdd/metropol/fiche.html?refINRS=METROPOL_147
4. ^https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m100/
5. ^http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/
6. ^https://github.com/B-UMMI/INNUca
7. ^http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
8. ^https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/?taxon=547; December 11th, 2023.
9. ^http://github.com/tseemann/abricate
10. ^https://github.com/moshi4/pyGenomeViz
11. ^https://github.com/B-UMMI/chewBBACA
12. ^https://github.com/tseemann/snippy
13. ^https://github.com/nickjcroucher/gubbins
14. ^https://github.com/tseemann/snp-dists
15. ^https://github.com/insapathogenomics/ReporTree
16. ^https://github.com/achtman-lab/GrapeTree
17. ^https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pathogens/submit-beta-lactamase/
18. ^https://www.eucast.org/expert_rules_and_expected_phenotypes/
References
Adachi, F., Sekizuka, T., Yamato, M., Fukuoka, K., Yamaguchi, N., Kuroda, M., et al. (2021). Characterization of FRI carbapenemase-producing Enterobacter spp. isolated from a hospital and the environment in Osaka, Japan. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 76, 3061–3062. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab284
Ahlstrom, C. A., Ramey, A. M., Woksepp, H., and Bonnedahl, J. (2019). Early emergence of mcr-1-positive Enterobacteriaceae in gulls from Spain and Portugal. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 11, 669–671. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12779
Alcock, B. P., Huynh, W., Chalil, R., Smith, K. W., Raphenya, A. R., Wlodarski, M. A., et al. (2023). CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D690–D699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac920
Alikhan, N. F., Petty, N. K., Ben Zakour, N. L., and Beatson, S. A. (2011). BLAST ring image generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 12:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402
Amaro, A., Leão, C., Guerra, V., Albuquerque, T., and Clemente, L. (2023). Plasmid-mediated Colistin resistance genes mcr-1 and mcr-4 in multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli strains isolated from a healthy pig in Portugal. Microb. Drug Resist. 29, 78–84. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2022.0228
Bankevich, A., Nurk, S., Antipov, D., Gurevich, A. A., Dvorkin, M., Kulikov, A. S., et al. (2012). SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021
Bertelloni, F., Cagnoli, G., Turchi, B., and Ebani, V. V. (2022). Low level of Colistin resistance and mcr genes presence in Salmonella spp.: evaluation of isolates collected between 2000 and 2020 from animals and environment. Antibiotics 11:272. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11020272
Beyrouthy, R., Robin, F., Lessene, A., Lacombat, I., Dortet, L., Naas, T., et al. (2017). MCR-1 and OXA-48 in vivo acquisition in KPC-producing Escherichia coli after colistin treatment. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61:e02540-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02540-16
Biggel, M., Zurfluh, K., Hoehn, S., Schmitt, K., Frei, A., Jans, C., et al. (2022). Complete genome sequence of colistin-resistant, mcr-10- harboring, Enterobacter cloacae isolate AVS0889, recovered from river water in Switzerland. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 11:e0016522. doi: 10.1128/mra.00165-22
Binsker, U., Käsbohrer, A., and Hammerl, J. A. (2022). Global colistin use: a review of the emergence of resistant Enterobacterales and the impact on their genetic basis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 46:fuab049. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuab049
Blanco-Martín, T., Guzmán-Puche, J., Riazzo, C., Gasca-Santiyán, M., Hernández-García, M., Cantón, R., et al. (2023). Phenotypic and molecular characterization of an Enterobacter ludwigii clinical isolate carrying a plasmid-mediated blaIMI-6 gene. Microbiol. Spectr. 11, 8–11. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04620-22
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M., and Usadel, B. (2014). Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Bonnin, R. A., Jousset, A. B., Emeraud, C., Oueslati, S., Dortet, L., and Naas, T. (2021). Genetic diversity, biochemical properties, and detection methods of minor carbapenemases in Enterobacterales. Front. Med. 7, 1–20. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.616490
Bortolaia, V., Kaas, R. S., Ruppe, E., Roberts, M. C., Schwarz, S., Cattoir, V., et al. (2020). ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 75, 3491–3500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345
Boyd, D. A., Lefebvre, B., Mataseje, L. F., Gagnon, S., Roger, M., Savard, P., et al. (2020). Enterobacter sp. N18-03635 harbouring blaFRI-6 class a carbapenemase, Canada. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 75, 486–488. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz438
Boyd, D. A., Mataseje, L. F., Davidson, R., Delport, J. A., Fuller, J., Hoang, L., et al. (2017). Enterobacter cloacae complex isolates harboring blaNMC-A or blaIMI-type class a carbapenemase genes on novel chromosomal integrative elements and plasmids. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61:1128. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02578-16
Brouwer, M. S. M., Tehrani, K. H. M. E., Rapallini, M., Geurts, Y., Kant, A., Harders, F., et al. (2019). Novel carbapenemases FLC-1 and IMI-2 encoded by an Enterobacter cloacae complex isolated from food products. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63:e02338-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02338-18
Bush, K., and Bradford, P. (2020). Epidemiology of β-lactamase-producing pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 33:e00047-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00047-19
Carattoli, A., Zankari, E., Garciá-Fernández, A., Larsen, M. V., Lund, O., Villa, L., et al. (2014). In silico detection and typing of plasmids using plasmidfinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14
Cho, G. S., Stein, M., Fiedler, G., Igbinosa, E. O., Koll, L. P., Brinks, E., et al. (2021). Polyphasic study of antibiotic-resistant enterobacteria isolated from fresh produce in Germany and description of Enterobacter vonholyi sp. nov. isolated from marjoram and Enterobacter dykesii sp. nov. isolated from mung bean sprout. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 44:126174. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2020.126174
Clemente, L., Manageiro, V., Correia, I., Amaro, A., Albuquerque, T., Themudo, P., et al. (2019). Revealing mcr-1-positive ESBL-producing Escherichia coli strains among Enterobacteriaceae from food-producing animals (bovine, swine and poultry) and meat (bovine and swine), Portugal, 2010–2015. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 296, 37–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.02.006
Croucher, N. J., Page, A. J., Connor, T. R., Delaney, A. J., Keane, J. A., Bentley, S. D., et al. (2015). Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:e15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1196
Dantas Palmeira, J., Cunha, M. V., Ferreira, H., Fonseca, C., and Tinoco Torres, R. (2022). Worldwide disseminated IncX4 plasmid carrying mcr-1 arrives to wild mammal in Portugal. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, 1–5. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01245-22
Davin-Regli, A., Lavigne, J. P., and Pagès, J. M. (2019). Enterobacter spp.: update on taxonomy, clinical aspects, and emerging antimicrobial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 32:e00002. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-19
De Oliveira, D. M. P., Forde, B. M., Kidd, T. J., Harris, P. N. A., Schembri, M. A., Beatson, S. A., et al. (2020). Antimicrobial resistance in ESKAPE pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 33, 1–49. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00181-19
Dortet, L., Poirel, L., Abbas, S., Oueslati, S., and Nordmann, P. (2015). Genetic and biochemical characterization of FRI-1, a Carbapenem-hydrolyzing class Beta-lactamase from Enterobacter cloacae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 7420–7425. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01636-15
Emeraud, C., Girlich, D., Deschamps, M., Rezzoug, I., Jacquemin, A., Jousset, A. B., et al. (2024). IMI-type Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacter cloacae Complex, France and overseas regions, 2012–2022. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 30, 1279–1282. doi: 10.3201/eid3006.231525
European Commission (2017). A European one health action plan against antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
Fournier, C., Aires-de-Sousa, M., Nordmann, P., and Poirel, L. (2020). Occurrence of CTX-M-15- and MCR-1-producing Enterobacterales in pigs in Portugal: evidence of direct links with antibiotic selective pressure. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 55:105802. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.09.006
Furuichi, M., Kawaguchi, T., Pust, M.-M., Yasuma-Mitobe, K., Plichta, D. R., Hasegawa, N., et al. (2024). Commensal consortia decolonize Enterobacteriaceae via ecological control. Nature 633, 878–886. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07960-6
Gomi, R., Matsuda, T., Yamamoto, M., Chou, P. H., Tanaka, M., Ichiyama, S., et al. (2018). Characteristics of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in wastewater revealed by genomic analysis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 62:e02501. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02501-17
Gomi, R., Matsumura, Y., Tanaka, M., Ihara, M., Sugie, Y., Matsuda, T., et al. (2022). Emergence of rare carbapenemases (FRI, GES-5, IMI, SFC and SFH-1) in Enterobacterales isolated from surface waters in Japan. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 77, 1237–1246. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac029
He, P., Wu, Y., Huang, W., Wu, X., Lv, J., Liu, P., et al. (2020). Characteristics of and variation in airborne ARGs among urban hospitals and adjacent urban and suburban communities: a metagenomic approach. Environ. Int. 139:105625. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105625
Hendrickx, A. P. A., Debast, S., Pérez-Vázquez, M., Schoffelen, A. F., Notermans, D. W., Landman, F., et al. (2021). A genetic cluster of MDR Enterobacter cloacae complex ST78 harbouring a plasmid containing blaVIM-1 and mcr-9 in the Netherlands. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 3:dlab046. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab046
Hoffmann, M., Fischer, M. A., Neumann, B., Kiesewetter, K., Hoffmann, I., Werner, G., et al. (2023). Carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteria in hospital wastewater, wastewater treatment plants and surface waters in a metropolitan area in Germany, 2020. Sci. Total Environ. 890:164179. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164179
Hooban, B., Joyce, A., Fitzhenry, K., Chique, C., and Morris, D. (2020). The role of the natural aquatic environment in the dissemination of extended spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemase encoding genes: a scoping review. Water Res. 180:115880. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115880
Hu, X., Chen, Y., Xu, H., Qiao, J., Ge, H., Liu, R., et al. (2023). Genomic epidemiology and transmission characteristics of mcr1-positive colistin-resistant Escherichia coli strains circulating at natural environment. Sci. Total Environ. 882:163600. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163600
Itoh, Y., Rice, J. D., Goller, C., Pannuri, A., Taylor, J., Meisner, J., et al. (2008). Roles of pgaABCD genes in synthesis, modification, and export of the Escherichia coli biofilm adhesin poly-β-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. J. Bacteriol. 190, 3670–3680. doi: 10.1128/JB.01920-07
Jain, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Phillippy, A. M., Konstantinidis, K. T., and Aluru, S. (2018). High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9
Jolley, K. A., Bray, J. E., and Maiden, M. C. J. (2018). Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 3:124. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1
Kieffer, N., Aires-de-Sousa, M., Nordmann, P., and Poirel, L. (2017). High rate of MCR-1–producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae among pigs, Portugal. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 23, 2023–2029. doi: 10.3201/eid2312.170883
Kluytmans-van den Bergh, M. F. Q., Rossen, J. W. A., Bruijning-Verhagen, P. C. J., Bonten, M. J. M., Friedrich, A. W., Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C. M. J. E., et al. (2016). Whole-genome multilocus sequence typing of extended-Spectrum- Beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 54, 2919–2927. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01648-16
Kubota, H., Uwamino, Y., Matsui, M., Sekizuka, T., Suzuki, Y., Okuno, R., et al. (2018). FRI-4 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacter cloacae complex isolated in Tokyo, Japan. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 73, 2969–2972. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky291
Larsson, D. G. J., Andremont, A., Bengtsson-Palme, J., Brandt, K. K., de Roda Husman, A. M., Fagerstedt, P., et al. (2018). Critical knowledge gaps and research needs related to the environmental dimensions of antibiotic resistance. Environ. Int. 117, 132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.041
Larsson, D. G. J., and Flach, C.-F. (2021). Antibiotic resistance in the environment. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 257–269. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00649-x
Laurens, C., Jean-Pierre, H., Licznar-Fajardo, P., Hantova, S., Godreuil, S., Martinez, O., et al. (2018). Transmission of IMI-2 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from river water to human. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 15, 88–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.06.022
Li, X., Jiang, T., Wu, C., Kong, Y., Ma, Y., Wu, J., et al. (2023). Molecular epidemiology and genomic characterization of a plasmid-mediated mcr-10 and blaNDM-1 co-harboring multidrug-resistant Enterobacter asburiae. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 21, 3885–3893. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.08.004
Liao, W., Cui, Y., Quan, J., Zhao, D., Han, X., Shi, Q., et al. (2022). High prevalence of colistin resistance and mcr-9/10 genes in Enterobacter spp. in a tertiary hospital over a decade. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 59:106573. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2022.106573
Lin, D., Chen, K., Guo, J., Ye, L., Li, R., Chan, E. W. C., et al. (2020). Contribution of biofilm formation genetic locus, pgaABCD, to antibiotic resistance development in gut microbiome. Gut Microbes 12:e1842992, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1842992
Ling, Z., Yin, W., Shen, Z., Wang, Y., Shen, J., and Walsh, T. R. (2020). Epidemiology of mobile colistin resistance genes mcr-1 to mcr-9. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 75, 3087–3095. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa205
Liu, S., Fang, R., Zhang, Y., Chen, L., Huang, N., Yu, K., et al. (2021). Characterization of resistance mechanisms of Enterobacter cloacae Complex co-resistant to carbapenem and colistin. BMC Microbiol. 21:208. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02250-x
Loucif, L., Chelaghma, W., Helis, Y., Sebaa, F., Baoune, R. D., Zaatout, W., et al. (2018). First detection of OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in community-acquired urinary tract infection in Algeria. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 12, 115–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.12.017
Manageiro, V., Clemente, L., Romão, R., Silva, C., Vieira, L., Ferreira, E., et al. (2019). IncX4 plasmid carrying the new mcr-1.9 gene variant in a CTX-M-8-producing Escherichia coli isolate recovered from swine. Front. Microbiol. 10:367. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00367
Manageiro, V., Ferreira, E., Caniça, M., and Manaia, C. M. (2014). GES-5 among the β-lactamases detected in ubiquitous bacteria isolated from aquatic environment samples. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 351, 64–69. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12340
Manageiro, V., Jones-dias, D., Ferreira, E., and Caniça, M. (2020). Plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (mcr-1) in Escherichia coli from non-imported fresh vegetables for human consumption in Portugal. Microorganisms 8, 4–10. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8030429
Manageiro, V., Salgueiro, V., Rosado, T., Bandarra, N. M., Ferreira, E., Smith, T., et al. (2022). Genomic analysis of a mcr-9.1-Harbouring IncHI2-ST1 plasmid from Enterobacter ludwigii isolated in fish farming. Antibiotics 11:1232. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11091232
Mataseje, L. F., Doualla-Bell, F., Boyd, D. A., Fakharuddin, K., Jeldes, H. F. G., Plante, V., et al. (2023). Genetic and phenotypic characterization of the first Canadian case of ambler class A Carbapenemase FRI-8. Microb. Drug Resist. 29, 47–50. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2022.0123
Meunier, D., Findlay, J., Doumith, M., Godoy, D., Perry, C., Pike, R., et al. (2017). FRI-2 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacter cloacae complex in the UK. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 72, 2478–2482. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx173
Mills, M. C., and Lee, J. (2019). The threat of carbapenem-resistant bacteria in the environment: evidence of widespread contamination of reservoirs at a global scale. Environ. Pollut. 255:113143. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113143
Murray, C. J., Ikuta, K. S., Sharara, F., Swetschinski, L., Robles Aguilar, G., Gray, A., et al. (2022). Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 399, 629–655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0
Palmeira, J. D., Haenni, M., Madec, J. Y., and Ferreira, H. M. N. (2021). First global report of plasmid-mediated mcr-1 and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli from sheep in Portugal. Antibiotics 10:1403. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10111403
Papagiannitsis, C. C., Kutilova, I., Medvecky, M., Hrabak, J., and Dolejska, M. (2017). Characterization of the complete nucleotide sequences of IncA/C2 plasmids carrying In809-like integrons from Enterobacteriaceae isolates of wildlife origin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61:e01093-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01093-17
Peirano, G., Matsumura, Y., Adams, M. D., Bradford, P., Motyl, M., Chen, L., et al. (2018). Genomic epidemiology of global carbapenemase-producing Enterobacter spp., 2008–2014. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 24, 1010–1019. doi: 10.3201/eid2406.171648
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., and Arkin, A. P. (2010). FastTree 2 - approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490
Rasmussen, B. A., Bush, K., Keeney, D., Yang, Y., Hare, R., O’Gara, C., et al. (1996). Characterization of IMI-1 β-lactamase, a class a carbapenem- hydrolizing enzyme from Enterobacter cloacae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40, 2080–2086. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.9.2080
Ribeiro, S., Mourão, J., Novais, Â., Campos, J., Peixe, L., and Antunes, P. (2021). From farm to fork: Colistin voluntary withdrawal in Portuguese farms reflected in decreasing occurrence of mcr-1-carrying Enterobacteriaceae from chicken meat. Environ. Microbiol. 23, 7563–7577. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15689
Rice, L. B. (2008). Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: no ESKAPE. J. Infect. Dis. 197, 1079–1081. doi: 10.1086/533452
Roberto, A. A., Van Gray, J. B., Engohang-Ndong, J., and Leff, L. G. (2019). Distribution and co-occurrence of antibiotic and metal resistance genes in biofilms of an anthropogenically impacted stream. Sci. Total Environ. 688, 437–449. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.053
Roschanski, N., Sead, H., Borowiak, M., Malorny, B., Tenhagen, B. A., Projahn, M., et al. (2019). Detection of VIM-1-producing Enterobacter cloacae and Salmonella enterica serovars Infantis and Goldcoast at a breeding pig farm in Germany in 2017 and their molecular relationship to former VIM-1-producing S. infantis isolates in German livestock product. mSphere 4:e00089-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00089-19
Rossi, F., Péguilhan, R., Turgeon, N., Veillette, M., Baray, J. L., Deguillaume, L., et al. (2023). Quantification of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in clouds at a mountain site (puy de Dôme, Central France). Sci. Total Environ. 865:161264. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161264
Saati-Santamaría, Z., Baroncelli, R., Rivas, R., and García-Fraile, P. (2022). Comparative genomics of the genus Pseudomonas reveals host- and environment-specific evolution. Microbiol. Spectr. 10:e0237022. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02370-22
Schauer, J., Gatermann, S. G., Marschal, M., and Pfennigwerth, N. (2019). Genetic and biochemical characterization of FRI-3, a novel variant of the ambler class a carbapenemase FRI-1. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 74, 2891–2894. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz295
Schürch, A. C., Arredondo-Alonso, S., Willems, R. J. L., and Goering, R. V. (2018). Whole genome sequencing options for bacterial strain typing and epidemiologic analysis based on single nucleotide polymorphism versus gene-by-gene–based approaches. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 24, 350–354. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.016
Sherry, N. L., Horan, K. A., Ballard, S. A., Gonҫalves da Silva, A., Gorrie, C. L., Schultz, M. B., et al. (2023). An ISO-certified genomics workflow for identification and surveillance of antimicrobial resistance. Nat. Commun. 14:60. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35713-4
Silva, M., Machado, M. P., Silva, D. N., Rossi, M., Moran-Gilad, J., Santos, S., et al. (2018). ChewBBACA: a complete suite for gene-by-gene schema creation and strain identification. Microb. Genom. 4, 1–7. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000166
Silva, I., Tacão, M., and Henriques, I. (2021). Selection of antibiotic resistance by metals in a riverine bacterial community. Chemosphere 263:127936. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127936
Silva, I., Tacão, M., and Henriques, I. (2024). Hidden threats in the plastisphere: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales colonizing microplastics in river water. Sci. Total Environ. 922:171268. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171268
Silveira, L., and Pista, Ã. (2023). First report of Salmonella Serovar typhimurium and monophasic typhimurium clinical isolates harboring mcr-9 in Portugal. Acta Medica Port. 36, 605–614. doi: 10.20344/amp.20111
Sugawara, Y., Hagiya, H., Akeda, Y., Aye, M. M., Myo Win, H. P., Sakamoto, N., et al. (2019). Dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae harbouring blaNDM or blaIMI in local market foods of Yangon, Myanmar. Sci. Rep. 9:14455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51002-5
Tacão, M., Tavares, R., Teixeira, P., Roxo, I., Ramalheira, E., Ferreira, S., et al. (2017). Mcr-1 and blaKPC-3 in Escherichia coli sequence type 744 after Meropenem and Colistin therapy, Portugal. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 23, 1419–1421. doi: 10.3201/eid2308.170162
Tatusova, T., Dicuccio, M., Badretdin, A., Chetvernin, V., Nawrocki, E. P., Zaslavsky, L., et al. (2016). NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569
Teixeira, P., Pinto, N., Henriques, I., and Tacão, M. (2022). KPC-3-, GES-5-, and VIM-1-producing Enterobacterales isolated from urban ponds. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19:5848. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105848
Teixeira, P., Tacão, M., Alves, A., and Henriques, I. (2016). Antibiotic and metal resistance in a ST395 Pseudomonas aeruginosa environmental isolate: a genomics approach. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 110, 75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.086
Telke, A. A., Olaitan, A. O., Morand, S., and Rolain, J. M. (2017). SoxRS induces colistin hetero-resistance in Enterobacter asburiae and Enterobacter cloacae by regulating the acrAB-tolC efflux pump. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 72, 2715–2721. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx215
Terveer, E. M., Nijhuis, R. H. T., Crobach, M. J. T., Knetsch, C. W., Veldkamp, K. E., Gooskens, J., et al. (2017). Prevalence of colistin resistance gene (mcr-1) containing Enterobacteriaceae in feces of patients attending a tertiary care hospital and detection of a mcr-1 containing, colistin susceptible E. coli. PLoS One 12:e0178598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178598
Torres, R. T., Cunha, M. V., Araujo, D., Ferreira, H., Fonseca, C., and Palmeira, J. D. (2021). Emergence of colistin resistance genes (mcr-1) in Escherichia coli among widely distributed wild ungulates. Environ. Pollut. 291:118136. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118136
UNEP (2023). Bracing for superbugs: Strengthening environmental action in the one health response to antimicrobial resistance. Geneva: UNEP.
Uwamino, Y., Kubota, H., Sasaki, T., Kosaka, A., Furuhashi, M., Uno, S., et al. (2019). Recovery of FRI-5 carbapenemase at a Japanese hospital where FRI-4 carbapenemase was discovered. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 74, 3390–3392. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz336
Walker, B. J., Abeel, T., Shea, T., Priest, M., Abouelliel, A., Sakthikumar, S., et al. (2014). Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963
Wang, C., Feng, Y., Liu, L., Kang, M., and Zong, Z. (2020). Identification of novel mobile colistin resistance gene mcr-10. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 9, 508–516. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1732231
Wang, Y., Zhang, R., Li, J., Wu, Z., Yin, W., Schwarz, S., et al. (2017). Comprehensive resistome analysis reveals the prevalence of NDM and MCR-1 in Chinese poultry production. Nat. Microbiol. 2:16260. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.260
Wick, R. R., Judd, L. M., Gorrie, C. L., and Holt, K. E. (2017). Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595
World Health Organization (2024). WHO bacterial priority pathogens list, 2024: Bacterial pathogens of public health importance to guide research, development and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Wu, S., He, Y., Feng, Y., and Zong, Z. (2023). A rare class a carbapenemase FRI-11 in Enterobacter clinical strain. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 42, 513–517. doi: 10.1007/s10096-023-04565-1
Xu, L., Wan, F., Fu, H., Tang, B., Ruan, Z., Xiao, Y., et al. (2022). Emergence of colistin resistance gene mcr-10 in Enterobacterales isolates recovered from fecal samples of chickens, slaughterhouse workers, and a nearby resident. Microbiol. Spectr. 10:e00418-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00418-22
Xu, T., Zhang, C., Ji, Y., Song, J., Liu, Y., Guo, Y., et al. (2021). Identification of mcr-10 carried by self-transmissible plasmids and chromosome in Enterobacter roggenkampii strains isolated from hospital sewage water. Environ. Pollut. 268:115706. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115706
Yang, J., Liu, L., Feng, Y., He, D., Wang, C., and Zong, Z. (2021). Potential mobilization of mcr-10 by an integrative mobile element via site-specific recombination in Cronobacter sakazakii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 65:e01717-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01717-20
Yang, C., Han, J., Berglund, B., Zou, H., Gu, C., Zhao, L., et al. (2022). Dissemination of blaNDM-5 and mcr-8.1 in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella quasipneumoniae in an animal breeding area in Eastern China. Front. Microbiol. 13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1030490
Zhang, S., Abbas, M., Rehman, M. U., Wang, M., Jia, R., Chen, S., et al. (2021). Updates on the global dissemination of colistin-resistant Escherichia coli: an emerging threat to public health. Sci. Total Environ. 799:149280. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149280
Zhou, Z., Alikhan, N. F., Mohamed, K., Fan, Y., and Achtman, M. (2020). The enteroBase user’s guide, with case studies on Salmonella transmissions, Yersinia pestis phylogeny, and Escherichia core genomic diversity. Genome Res. 30, 138–152. doi: 10.1101/gr.251678.119
Keywords: Enterobacter vonholyi, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, colistin-resistance, FRI-8 and IMI-6 carbapenemases, MCR-10, one health
Citation: Teixeira P, Ramos M, Rivière R, Azevedo M, Ferreira M, Cano MM, Vieira P, Reis L, Matias R, Rodrigues J, Menezes C, Rosado T, Sequeira A, Moreira O, Ruppitsch W, Cabal-Rosel A, Mo SS, Dias E, Woegerbauer M, Caniça M and Manageiro V (2025) Genomic epidemiology and resistome dynamics of Enterobacter species in a Portuguese Open Air Laboratory: the emergence of the FRI-8 carbapenemase. Front. Microbiol. 16:1593872. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1593872
Edited by:
Fabrizio Damiano, University of Salento, ItalyReviewed by:
Salome N. Seiffert, Zentrum für Labormedizin (ZLM), SwitzerlandSwapnil Prakash Doijad, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Germany
Copyright © 2025 Teixeira, Ramos, Rivière, Azevedo, Ferreira, Cano, Vieira, Reis, Matias, Rodrigues, Menezes, Rosado, Sequeira, Moreira, Ruppitsch, Cabal-Rosel, Mo, Dias, Woegerbauer, Caniça and Manageiro. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Manuela Caniça, bWFudWVsYS5jYW5pY2FAaW5zYS5taW4tc2F1ZGUucHQ=