Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 05 August 2025

Sec. Biology of Archaea

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1604265

This article is part of the Research TopicMolecular Biology of Archaea - 2024View all 5 articles

Enhancement of direct interspecies electron transfer and methane production by co-culture of dual Methanosarcina species and Geobacter metallireducens


Lu LiuLu Liu1Pengsong LiPengsong Li1He DongHe Dong1Chuanqi LiuChuanqi Liu1Haoyong LiHaoyong Li1Zihao MaZihao Ma2Ruoyu Li,*Ruoyu Li1,3*Yan Dang*Yan Dang1*
  • 1Beijing Key Laboratory for Source Control Technology of Water Pollution, Engineering Research Center for Water Pollution Source Control and Eco-Remediation, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
  • 2Beijing Hepingjie No.1 Middle School, Beijing, China
  • 3Laboratory and Facility Management Office, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China

Anaerobic digestion is a key technology for converting organic waste into methane, offering significant potential for renewable energy production and waste management. While the addition of conductive materials has been shown to improve direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET), their application faces challenges like biofouling, environmental risks, and increased operational costs. This study investigated the effects of co-culturing dual Methanosarcina (Methanosarcina barkeri and Methanosarcina acetivorans) and Geobacter metallireducens (DM-G) to enhance DIET and methane production without the addition of exogenous conductive materials. The performance of the DM-G co-culture system was comparable to that of the conductive material-amended single Methanosarcina and G. metallireducens (SM-G) co-culture systems, achieving a maximum methane concentration of 19.5 mM, following the consumption of 15.2 mM ethanol in the 1:1:1 biomass ratio system. This corresponds to a 3.8-fold increase over the SM-G co-culture system with M. barkeri and G. metallireducens, and a 3.0-fold increase over that with M. acetivorans and G. metallireducens. Transcriptomic analysis showed that in the DM-G co-culture system, M. barkeri up-regulated key genes related to methane metabolism and acetate utilization, while the core methanogenic pathway of M. acetivorans was down-regulated, but it could still effectively utilize the electron transfer pathway, indicating metabolic complementarity. These findings propose a novel strategy for enhancing DIET-driven methanogenesis through synergistic microbial consortia, advancing scalable, low-cost bioenergy solutions for organic waste valorization.

1 Introduction

Against the backdrop of the global clean energy transition, anaerobic digestion (AD), as a core technology for organic waste valorization and bioenergy production, plays a critical role in achieving the “double carbon” goals. However, anaerobic treatment of high-strength organic wastewater commonly faces imbalances between acidogenesis and methanogenesis, posing a risk of system acidification due to the accumulation of volatile fatty acids (VFA) (Van Kessel and Russell, 1996; Yu and Fang, 2003). Methanogens exhibit limited substrate utilization (e.g., reliance on inorganic CO2, formate, or methanol), relying on hydrogen as an electron carrier for methanogenesis. This process is constrained by diffusion distances and inevitably involves H2 loss during diffusion (de Bok et al., 2004), which collectively hinder electron transfer efficiency and utilization, thus limiting the efficient conversion of organic matter to methane in high-strength wastewater AD systems.

In 2010, scholars such as Summers (Summers et al., 2010) first verified the existence of DIET in the co-culture system of G. metallireducens and Geobacter sulfurreducens. The research pointed out that even if the hydrogenase of G. sulfurreducens was knocked out, making it lose the ability to utilize H2, it could still form a stable symbiotic relationship with G. metallireducens, indicating that the electron transfer between the two was not completely mediated by H2. In addition, the DIET mechanism may also exist in the methanogenic flora. Morita et al. (2011) found in the anaerobic sludge reactor of brewery waste that granular sludge could form highly conductive aggregates through DIET, and its electrical conductivity was even three times that of the Geobacter co-culture system.

In addition to the microbial structure itself, exogenous conductive materials can also significantly promote the DIET process (Kato et al., 2012b). Previous studies have shown that the supplementation of carbon-based (such as granular activated carbon, GAC) and iron-based conductive materials (such as magnetite) can serve as an electron conduction channel between Methanosarcina and electroactive bacteria such as G. metallireducens, thus enhancing DIET and further increasing methane production. Experiments have found that the addition of biochar can significantly increase the methane production rate of the co-culture system of G. metallireducens and Methanosarcina barkeri (Chen et al., 2014). Similarly, the addition of GAC can enhance the electron exchange between methanogens and syntrophic bacteria, thus accelerating methane production (Liu et al., 2014) In addition, Kato et al. (2012a) proposed that the introduction of iron oxide nanoparticles (such as magnetite) can enrich the methanogenic flora and enhance interspecies interactions, further optimizing the system performance. Although conductive materials have been proven to enhance DIET by simulating the electron transfer interface, their practical applications face problems such as efficiency attenuation caused by bio-attachment, environmental release risks, and high costs. There is an urgent need to develop sustainable solutions relying on the metabolic characteristics of microorganisms themselves.

Methanosarcina species can be classified into two methanogenic metabolic types: Type I, exemplified by M. barkeri, possesses hydrogenase activity, optimizes electron utilization via hydrogen cycling, and gains metabolic dominance in high electron flux environments. Type II, exemplified by Methanosarcina acetivorans relies on acetate as a carbon source, acquiring electrons through transmembrane cytochrome complexes, and depends on the Rnf complex for energy metabolism due to the absence of hydrogenase (Zhou et al., 2021). The differences in electron transport pathways and energy metabolic strategies between the two groups provide a theoretical basis for constructing functionally complementary co-culture systems. However, how their metabolic complementarity regulates electron allocation in DIET processes and enhances methane synthesis efficiency still requires in-depth investigation.

In this study, we investigated the potential of co-culturing M. barkeri and M. acetivorans in combination with G. metallireducens to enhance DIET and methane production, without the need for additional conductive materials. We aim to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of electron transfer and explore the feasibility of a microbial-based solution to improve AD processes, offering a more cost-effective and sustainable alternative for bioenergy production.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Microbial strains, media, and culture conditions

The study used two types of Methanosarcina, namely Type I M. barkeri and Type II M. acetivorans, as well as G. metallireducens, all of which were from the laboratory’s strain collection. The experiment was carried out under strict anaerobic culture conditions. The gas phase was maintained at an N2-CO2 ratio of 80:20, and the cultures were conducted in serum bottles sealed with thick butyl rubber stoppers.

Both types of Methanosarcina were grown in modified DSM 120 medium at a constant temperature of 37°C. The modifications to DSM 120 were as follows: 0.5 mM sulfide, 1 mM cysteine, 0.22 g/L CaCl2⋅2H2O, no yeast extract, no Casitone, no resazurin, and 2 g/L NaHCO3 (Rotaru et al., 2014). The medium for Type I M. barkeri contained 0.2% NaCl, while the medium for Type II M. acetivorans contained 0.5% NaCl. The substrates for the single cultures of the two bacteria were 100 mM methanol and 50 mM sodium acetate.

Geobacter metallireducens was typically cultured in ferric citrate medium (FC) supplemented with 10 mM acetate. The basic components of the medium were: 2.5 g/L NaHCO3, 0.1 g/L KCl, 0.25 g/L NH4Cl, 0.6 g/L sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate, as well as vitamin and trace element mixtures, with 13.7 g/L ferric citrate as the electron acceptor (Lovley et al., 1993; Tremblay et al., 2011). However, before coculturing with Methanosarcina, G. metallireducens needed to be sub-cultured 3–5 times (with an inoculum size of 10% each time) in ferric citrate medium where 20 mM ethanol was used to replace acetate, to fully adapt to ethanol as the substrate.

2.2 Establishment of co-culture systems

Two distinct co-culture systems were constructed to investigate DIET between Methanosarcina species and G. metallireducens under different biomass ratios: (1) single Methanosarcina with G. metallireducens (SM-G) co-culture systems, including M. acetivorans with G. metallireducens and M. barkeri with G. metallireducens, which were abbreviated as M. a+G. m and M. b+G. m, respectively; (2) dual Methanosarcina with G. metallireducens (DM-G) co-culture systems, consisting of M. acetivorans, M. barkeri, G. metallireducens at a biomass ratio of 1:1:1, which was abbreviated as M. a+M. b+G. m (1+1+1) and the other group is inoculated at a biomass ratio of 1:1:2, which was abbreviated as M. a+M. b+G. m (1+1+2).

All the co-culture experiments adopted DSM 120 medium, which contains specific components per liter. After sterilization, anaerobic and sterile solutions such as sodium bicarbonate need to be added (Holmes et al., 2021). To ensure the normal growth of G. metallireducens in the co-culture system, the salinity of the medium for pure culture of M. acetivorans was reduced from 0.5% to 0.2% (Rotaru et al., 2014; Holmes et al., 2018). In addition, G. metallireducens preconditioning involved three successive subcultures in ferric citrate medium with 5%–10% (v/v) inoculum transfer to ensure ethanol substrate adaptation. Under strict anaerobic conditions, when M. barkeri, M. acetivorans and G. metallireducens are all in the logarithmic growth phase (OD600≈0.4–0.6), they are respectively, inoculated into DSM 120 medium (10 mL/110 mL anaerobic vial) at a proportion of 30% (v/v) each. Using 20 mM ethanol as the substrate, the cultures are incubated at 30°C for 38–70 days, and three parallels are set for each group of experiments (Liu et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2014). Routine monitoring included headspace gas analysis and optical density measurements to track metabolic activity. All data obtained from the experiments were derived from three parallel groups and subjected to significance analysis using t-test.

2.3 Preparation and addition of conductive materials

In this experimental study, two conductive materials were used: GAC (particle size range of 2–3 mm, 6 mesh) and nano-magnetite (diameter: 20–50 nm). To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the experimental results and minimize the impact of microorganisms on the surface of GAC on the co-culture system, strict and meticulous pretreatment was carried out on the GAC before addition. First, the GAC was ultrasonically cleaned with acetone for 30 min. This process can effectively remove most of the organic impurities and dust adhering to the surface of GAC. Then, the acetone was poured out. Subsequently, it was ultrasonically cleaned with absolute ethanol for 30 min to further remove the remaining organic components, and then the absolute ethanol was poured out. Finally, the GAC was ultrasonically cleaned with deionized water several times until it was completely odorless, thoroughly removing any potentially remaining organic solution to ensure the purity of GAC. After cleaning, the GAC was placed in an oven at 60°C for drying. Before the sterilization of the medium, according to the experimental design requirements, 25 g/L of GAC with small size of 2–3 mm was added to the anaerobic vials of different SM-G co-culture groups (Liu et al., 2012).

Preparation of nano-magnetite (Lovley et al., 1987): 0.8 M FeCl3 and 0.4 M FeCl2 were slowly added to a 0.4 M HCl solution. The obtained acidic Fe (II) /Fe (III) solution was slowly added to a vigorously stirred 1.5 M NaOH solution for mixing. After centrifugal purification, it was suspended in deionized water to prepare nano-magnetite (Liu et al., 2014; Holmes et al., 2024). Before sterilizing the medium, 10 mM nano-magnetite was added, respectively. Each SM-G co-culture system with added nano-magnetite was set up with three parallel experimental groups.

2.4 Analytical methods

During the experiment, 1 mL syringes were used to sample the headspace gas, which was then injected into a gas chromatograph (Tianmei, GC7900, China) for gas composition detection and analysis. The gas chromatograph is equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID), which is widely used due to its high sensitivity. During the detection process, argon was used as the carrier gas, the injection volume was 1 mL, and the column temperature was 120°C. The determination method referred to the operation instructions of GC7900. Ethanol was determined by a gas chromatograph (Agilent GC 7800A). Its parameters are as follows: the detector is FID, the chromatographic column is Agilent 19095N-123, the detector temperature is 300°C; the hydrogen flow rate is 60 mL/min, the air flow rate is 400 mL/min, and the make-up gas flow rate is 35 mL/min; the injection volume is 1 μL (Dong et al., 2025). A high-performance liquid chromatograph (Scion LC6000) was used to determine the concentration of acetic acid, an intermediate metabolite of ethanol. Chromatographic analysis was carried out using an Aminex HPX-87X column (300 × 7.8 mm). The operating conditions of this liquid chromatograph are as follows: a 0.5 mM dilute sulfuric acid solution was used as the mobile phase, the flow rate was set at 0.6 mL/min, the injection volume was 20 μL, a UV spectrophotometric detector was used, the detection wavelength was 254 nm, and the column temperature was 35°C (Nevin et al., 2008). To ensure the accuracy and repeatability of the determination, the operation instructions of Scion LC6000 were strictly followed.

2.5 Transcriptomic analysis

During the logarithmic growth phase, cultures from all co-culture systems and three single-culture strains were harvested for transcriptome analysis. Specifically, when the methane concentration reached approximately 15 mM, the co-culture samples and cells of dual Methanosarcina were collected; when the ferrous ion concentration in the G. metallireducens culture reached 35 mM, its cells were collected (Holmes et al., 2021). Cell pellets of all samples were obtained by centrifugation at 4000 × g for 15 min at 4°C in 50 mL centrifuge tubes. After centrifugation, the pellets were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until RNA extraction (Holmes et al., 2014).

Total RNA was extracted from the sample pellets following a previously described method (Holmes et al., 2012). Metatranscriptomic pairedend sequencing was performed using Illumina HiSeq × Ten (2 × 150 bp). The raw data were subjected to quality checking with FASTQC, trimming with Trimmomatic (Bolger et al., 2014), and merging with FLASH (Magoč and Salzberg, 2011). Subsequently, ribosomal RNA (rRNA) reads were removed from the library using SortMeRNA (DNASTAR) (Kopylova et al., 2012). The trimmed mRNA reads were aligned to the genomes of G. metallireducens (CP000148), M. barkeri (WWM608), and M. acetivorans (NC_003552) using SeqMan NGen (DNAStar) software. The reads were then normalized using the edgeR package in Bioconductor (Robinson et al., 2009) for differential expression studies.

For another round of transcriptome analysis, early-to-mid stage co-culture cells were collected and centrifuged at 5000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, California, USA) as previously described. A directional library was prepared using the NEBNext® Ultra II™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs, Beijing, China). Paired end sequencing of mRNA was then carried out using an Illumina HiSeq/MiSeq platform. All raw sequencing data were quality-checked and filtered as described above. Reads matching the 16S and 23S rRNA genes were removed, and the remaining reads were aligned to the published genomes of G. metallireducens (e.g., ATCC 53774, or a similar genome if used in your study) and M. barkeri (NZ_CP009528.1). Normalization was performed using fragments per kilobase (FPKM) as previously reported (Huang et al., 2022).

2.6 16S rRNA gene sequencing for microbial community analysis

Subsequent high-throughput sequencing is required for the DNA extraction of three single bacteria. For archaea and bacteria, the PCR technique is used to amplify their 16S rRNA gene fragments. The primers for archaea and bacteria are (Arch524F/Arch958R) and (338F/806R), respectively (Peiffer et al., 2013). High-throughput sequencing is carried out on the Illumina Hiseq 2000 platform (Illumia, San Diego, USA) by Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Major Biotechnology Co. Ltd.). Following sequencing, sequences were classified into different Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) using Pyrosequencing Pipeline software.

2.7 Fluorescence in situ hybridization

This study employed triple-probe Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to analyze the spatial interactions of M. barkeri, M. acetivorans, and G. metallireducens in DM-G co-culture systems. Co-culture samples at the logarithmic growth phase were fixed in 50 mM PIPES buffer (pH = 6.8) containing 0.5% glutaraldehyde and 1% paraformaldehyde for 2 h, followed by sequential ethanol dehydration at 4°C. Tissues were embedded in paraffin, and 4 μm sections were prepared using a microtome. After dewaxing in xylene and rehydration through graded ethanol series, sections were rinsed with DEPC-treated water and PBS. Pre-hybridization was performed at 37°C for 1 h using a hybridization buffer, followed by overnight incubation at 40°C with species-specific probes: FAM-labeled M. barkeri probe (5′-GTGCTCCCCCGCCAATTCCT-3′) (Huang et al., 2022), Cy3-labeled M. acetivorans probe (5′-GTAGTCCCAGCCGTAAACGA-3′) (Holmes et al., 2021), and Cy5-labeled G. metallireducens probe (5′-AGAATCCAAGGACTCCGT-3′) (Nevin and Lovley, 2002). After post-hybridization washing, the sections were imaged using a NIKON ECLIPSE TI confocal microscope at excitation wavelengths of 488 nm (for FAM, emitting green fluorescence), 552 nm (for Cy3, emitting red fluorescence), and 638 nm (for Cy5, emitting far-yellow fluorescence) Additionally, microbial morphology (cocci/rods) was used to validate the species identification.

2.8 Morphological analysis of microorganisms

In order to visually present the binding and attachment of Methanosarcina and Geobacter on conductive materials, as well as the fine morphology of microorganisms, we conducted scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations on GAC and nano-magnetite, which showed good methane producing effects in the enhanced DIET system.

Before the SEM observation, the conductive materials were pretreated as follows: The conductive materials were taken out from the co-culture system that had been cultured to the late logarithmic growth phase and washed several times with ultrapure water to remove impurities such as leachate and humus. After discarding the supernatant, 2.5% glutaraldehyde (pH = 6.8) was added, and the samples were fixed at 4°C for 1.5 h. The fixed samples were rinsed 3 times with 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH = 6.8), and then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min to discard the supernatant. Subsequently, gradient dehydration was carried out with ethanol at concentrations of 50%, 70%, 80% and 90% for 10 min each time, followed by dehydration with 100% ethanol 3 times, 10 min each time. Finally, the samples were placed in a desiccator and dried for 24–48 h (Rotaru et al., 2014). The dried samples were pasted onto the sample stage, coated with a layer of Au film on the surface using an ion sputtering coater, and then observed with an s-4700 scanning electron microscope.

2.9 Statistical analysis

Gene Ontology enrichment analysis was performed using Goatools (Gene Ontology ATtainment, v1.2.0). The Rich factor for each GO term was calculated as the ratio of significantly enriched differentially expressed genes (DEGs) within the term to the total number of genes annotated to that term in the reference genome (Background number). A higher Rich factor indicates a greater degree of functional enrichment. Statistical significance was assessed by Fisher’s exact test to generate raw P-values, followed by Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) correction for false discovery rate (FDR) control. A lower P-adjust denotes stronger statistical significance. GO terms with adjusted P-value (P-adjust) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 Enhanced methane production in DM-G co-culture systems

This study examined the synergistic effects of co-culturing M. barkeri, M. acetivorans, and G. metallireducens on methane production. The results showed that methane production was significantly enhanced in DIET co-cultures inoculated with two Methanosarcina species and G. metallireducens (DM-G) compared to DIET with only one Methanosarcina species and G. metallireducens (SM-G). Previous research indicated a lag phase of approximately 30–39 days when a single Methanosarcina is co-cultured with G. metallireducens (Rotaru et al., 2014; Yee and Rotaru, 2020; Holmes et al., 2021), a 35 days lag period was observed for the SM-G co-cultures (Figures 1B, C). However, when both Methanosarcina species were cultured together with G. metallireducens, methane production started after only 15 days of cultivation. Ethanol was rapidly oxidized to acetate, which reached its highest concentration before being completely converted into methane. After 35 days, in the DM-G co-culture systems of 1:1:1 and 1:1:2, the substrate ethanol was consumed by 15.2 mM and 13.1 mM respectively, the methane concentrations reached 19.5 mM and 16.7 mM. Compared with the co-culture of M. barkeri with G. metallireducens, they increased by 3.8-fold and 3.1-fold respectively; compared with the co-culture of M. acetivorans with G. metallireducens, they increased by 3.0-fold and 2.6-fold, respectively (Figure 1A). These results indicate that a synergistic mechanism was occurring that better facilitated DIET.

FIGURE 1
Three line graphs labeled A, B, and C, depict changes in concentrations over time in days. Graph A shows CH4 levels rising across different treatments. Graph B shows CH3CH2OH levels, with most treatments displaying a decline after an initial peak. Graph C depicts CH3COOH levels peaking significantly around 15 to 20 days before declining. Each graph includes multiple lines representing different experimental conditions.

Figure 1. Methane production, ethanol metabolism, and acetic acid metabolism in SM-G and DM-G co-culture systems with or without GAC. (A) Methane production. (B) Ethanol metabolism. (C) Acetic acid metabolism. Data are presented as mean values with standard errors from three replicate cultures. Error bars represent the range of standard errors.

In this study, GAC and nano-magnetite were added to co-culture systems of M. barkeri and G. metallireducens, as well as M. acetivorans and G. metallireducens, with a 35-days observation period. Furthermore, it can be discerned from the SEM that Methanosarcina and Geobacter are in mutual contact and adhere to the two materials. There are differences that GAC demonstrates a pronounced propensity to promote the close attachment and collaborative behavior of microorganisms. Microbial cells can be deeply embedded within its nanopores, with cells being in close proximity to each other (Supplementary Figures 1A–C). This close-range contact significantly facilitates the direct contact between cells, thereby substantially accelerating the rate of metabolite exchange. Microorganisms attach tightly and in large numbers to the surface of GAC, while on the surface of nano-magnetite, the attachment is relatively uniform and can form a stable biofilm (Liu et al., 2014). While GAC supports the attachment of microbial cells, nano-magnetite, due to its smaller diameter, tends to aggregate bacterial cells, making it difficult for Methanosarcina and Geobacter to establish direct contact (Supplementary Figures 1D–F). Despite this, nano-magnetite still enhances DIET due to its conductive properties.

Among the four enhanced co-culture systems with conductive materials, GAC had the most significant effect on methane production. In co-cultures of M. barkeri and G. metallireducens, ethanol consumption reached 14.7 mM, with final methane production peaking at 22.1 mM (Figure 1A). This represents a 4.4-fold increase over controls. Although nano-magnetite also promotes methane generation, the final methane concentration was lower than that achieved with GAC. In this case, 12.0 mM of ethanol was consumed, and the methane concentration reached 18.0 mM, representing a 3.4-fold increase (Supplementary Figure 2A). In the co-culture of M. acetivorans and G. metallireducens, the addition of GAC enabled the system to consume 8.7 mM of ethanol, with the methane concentration reaching 13.0 mM, a 1.7-fold increase (Figure 1A). Nano-magnetite also significantly enhanced the co-culture system, where 9.2 mM of ethanol was consumed, and 14.5 mM of methane was produced, corresponding to a 2.0-fold increase. Moreover, the ethanol-derived acetate was rapidly converted to methane (Supplementary Figure 2).

In these co-culture systems, ethanol was first metabolized to acetate (Figures 1B, C), which was then quickly converted into methane, with minimal lag time. This suggests that DIET was efficient, and the addition of conductive materials improved ethanol metabolism efficiency, supporting stable microbial interactions (Wu Y. et al., 2020). Both methane production and ethanol consumption followed the chemical equation: 2C2H6O→3CH4 + CO2. In this experiment, ethanol consumption generally adhered to the theoretical ratio that for every mole of ethanol consumed, 1.5 moles of methane are produced (Rotaru et al., 2014).

Additionally, in the DIET process, M. acetivorans produced higher concentrations of acetate than M. barkeri. This may be because M. acetivorans belongs to Type II Methanosarcina, which primarily utilizes acetate and electrons for metabolism. Due to the absence of hydrogenase, M. acetivorans has a lower efficiency in utilizing electrons for acetate metabolism, leading to slower acetate oxidation and more accumulation of acetate. In contrast, M. barkeri possesses hydrogenase, enabling it to more efficiently accept and utilize electrons transferred from G. metallireducens. The presence of hydrogenase accelerates acetate oxidation through the hydrogen cycle, facilitating the rapid conversion of acetate into methane (Zhou et al., 2021). Furthermore, the efficient electron transfer mechanism allows M. barkeri to exhibit stronger metabolic activity in high electron flux environments, further enhancing methane production.

Comparative analysis of the two systems demonstrates that the DM-G systems enhanced methane production, efficient electron transfer, and optimized metabolic pathways highlight its advantages over the SM-G systems. From an electron transfer perspective, DM-G system may achieve efficient electron transfer and utilization through different pathways or mechanisms, compensating for the limitations of SM-G system and enhancing the overall DIET efficiency. In terms of metabolic pathways, the synergistic effect of M. barkeri and M. acetivorans may have created new metabolic pathways or optimized existing ones, allowing ethanol to be converted into methane more quickly and thoroughly, thereby improving substrate utilization efficiency.

3.2 Microbial community shifts in DM-G co-culture system

In the DM-G co-culture systems, before inoculation, both Methanosarcina and G. metallireducens were cultured to the logarithmic growth phase to ensure relatively stable physiological states and similar growth activities. The inoculation volumes of M. acetivorans and M. barkeri were 30% (v/v), but the volume of G. metallireducens was 30% (v/v) and 60% (v/v) in the 1:1:1 and 1:1:2 systems, respectively.

Absolute quantification at the Amplicon Sequence Variant (ASV) level was carried out to precisely analyze the relative abundances of the three strains at the initial inoculation stage (Day 0). The results showed that in the 1:1:1 system, the relative abundances of ASV of M. acetivorans, M. barkeri and G. metallireducens were 31.7%, 33.3% and 35.3%, respectively. In the 1:1:2 system, the relative abundances of M. acetivorans, M. barkeri and G. metallireducens were 21.4%, 23.4% and 55.3%, respectively (Figure 2). These results were highly consistent with the theoretical inoculation ratios designed in the experiment (p < 0.05), indicating that the sequencing method could accurately reflect the characteristics of the initial microbial community composition.

FIGURE 2
Bar chart showing the relative abundance percentages of three species: G. metallireducens (blue), M. barkeri (orange), and M. acetivorans (green) at different ratios and days. Top two bars (1:1:2 and 1:1:1) are measured at 35 days. Bottom two bars (1:1:2 and 1:1:1) are measured at 0 days. Each bar sums to 100 percent.

Figure 2. Distribution changes of three strains (M. barkeri: M. acetivorans: G. metallireducens) in two DM-G co-culture systems at the initial stage (0 day) and on the 35th day of cultivation under two inoculation ratios.

After 35 days of cultivation, the same method as that used in the initial inoculation stage was adopted to analyze the relative abundances of the three strains in DM-G systems. The results showed that in the 1:1:1 system, the relative abundances of ASV of M. acetivorans, M. barkeri and G. metallireducens were 0.6%, 39.7% and 59.8%, respectively. In the 1:1:2 system, the relative abundances of M. acetivorans, M. barkeri and G. metallireducens were 0.2%, 35.4% and 64.4%, respectively (Figure 2). Meanwhile, to verify the existence of aggregates, FISH analysis was also conducted on the two DM-G co-culture systems after 35 days of cultivation (Figure 3). G. metallireducens cells appeared as yellow rods, while M. barkeri cells were green spheres and M. acetivorans cells were red spheres. In aggregates, it was difficult to differentiate between individual Methanosarcina cells because when the signals overlapped, they turned a blue-violet hue. This made it difficult to use FISH to analyze the relative proportions of Methanosarcina. However, it could be concluded that in regions that appeared blue-violet, cells were in close contact with each other (Supplementary Figure 3). These findings indicate that the higher the inoculation amount of G. metallireducens in two DM-G co-culture systems.

FIGURE 3
Diagram illustrating metabolic pathways and gene expression levels. It includes gene clusters with colored heatmaps indicating expression differences under four conditions. Pathways for carbon monoxide reduction, carbon monoxide metabolism, and acetate metabolism are highlighted with colored arrows. Components like Ech, Vht, Rnf, and Hdr in the electron transport chain are shown within a cell membrane. Legends explain heatmap interpretations, and color-coded pathways are labeled for clarity.

Figure 3. Transcriptomic analysis: Differential expression of carbon metabolism genes. Arrows represent fold up or down regulation of various genes, and only statistically significant values are presented (p-values < 0.05). Further details regarding fold differences and p-values are available in Supplementary Interactive Plot Data.

3.3 Gene expression changes induced by conductive material-enhanced SM-G co-culture systems

Transcriptomic comparisons were made between co-cultures with M. acetivorans and G. metallireducens or M. barkeri and G. metallireducens in the presence or absence of GAC.

For the GAC-amended M. barkeri co-culture, 901 genes were significantly up-regulated (log2FC > 2, p < 0.05) and 210 genes were significantly down-regulated (log2FC < −2, p < 0.05) (Supplementary Figure 4A). Analysis of the GAC-amended M. acetivorans co-culture revealed that 3,483 genes were significantly up-regulated (log2FC > 2, p < 0.05) and 123 genes were down-regulated (log2FC < −2, p < 0.05) (Supplementary Figure 4B).

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) metabolic pathway analysis showed that many of the highly expressed genes in M. barkeri were related to methane metabolism, redox proteins, cytochrome synthesis and sulfur metabolism. For example, transcripts from cydB, which encodes cytochrome bd ubiquinol oxidase subunit II and cysH, which encodes a protein involved in sulfur assimilation were 21 and 64-times more highly expressed in GAC-amended cells (Supplementary Figure 5A). Several genes from the CO2 reduction pathway were also significantly up-regulated in the GAC-amended co-cultures, including formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase subunits (fwdABCDF), methylenetetrahydromethanopterin dehydrogenase (mtd) and methenyltetrahydromethanopterin cyclohydrolase (mch). During the co-culture process, M. barkeri utilizes the produced acetate. In the acetate metabolism pathway, the genes cdhCDE (acetyl-CoA decarbonylase/synthase), pta (phosphate acetyltransferase), and ackA (acetate kinase) were all up-regulated. Additionally, the expression levels of cdhAB, the genes encoding carbon monoxide dehydrogenase that catalyze the conversion of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide, were more than 1.6-fold higher in the co-culture system compared to the system without conductive materials. The up regulation of cytochrome synthesis related genes, and the activation of sulfur metabolism genes may promote the synthesis of coenzyme M (CoM) and coenzyme B (CoB), providing substrates for heterodisulfide reductase (Hdr). At the same time, the coordinated up-regulation of methane metabolism genes (such as cdhC and mtaC) indicates an improved coupling efficiency between the acetyl CoA pathway and the methyl transfer pathway, further driving the flow of carbon toward methane synthesis. The results of this study are consistent with the previously reported mechanism of granular activated carbon promoting DIET (Dang et al., 2016), that is, conductive materials enhance the efficiency of interspecies electron transfer by constructing electron transfer pathways (Figure 3).

Key methanogenesis-related genes were strongly induced, particularly those involved in the CO2 reduction pathway, formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase subunits (fwdABCDEF); the general methanogenesis pathway (tetrahydromethanopterin S-methyltransferase, mtrA); the CO metabolism related metabolic pathway genes were significantly upregulated, including the genes cdhAB (acetyl-CoA decarbonylase/synthase), cooS (anaerobic carbon-monoxide dehydrogenase catalytic subunit) and frhABD (coenzyme F420 hydrogenase subunit) and the acetate metabolism (acetyl-CoA decarbonylase/synthase cdhCDE). Concurrently, genes critical for electron transfer processes exhibited marked activation, including the Rnf complex (rnfABCDEG) for DIET and hydrogenases (frhABD, vhtACDG) for hydrogen cycling. These findings collectively highlight the coordinated metabolic and electron transport adaptations driving enhanced syntrophic activity in GAC-amended systems (Figure 3) These findings suggest that GAC-mediated DIET boosts carbon fixation in M. acetivorans. This might be due to better intracellular redox balance and energy conservation, ramping up carbon assimilation for methanogenesis. This aligns with prior studies on conductive material-mediated DIET (Wang et al., 2024). The notable upregulation of redox-related genes implies GAC alters intracellular redox balance, potentially maintaining methane-metabolism enzyme activity, as these enzymes often need a particular redox environment to work well (Supplementary Figure 5B).

This indicates that GAC amendments enhanced methanogenesis via the CO2 reduction pathway and increased expression of proteins involved in the maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis. The significant up-regulation of genes related to redox regulation indicates that the intracellular redox balance may have been altered in the presence of GAC.

Based on GO enrichment analysis, methane metabolism, biosynthetic, organic substance biosynthetic pathways were enriched in GAC-amended M. barkeri DIET co-cultures (Figure 4A). This result indicates that the introduction of GAC had a stimulatory effect on the expression of genes related to carbon metabolism and the biosynthesis of cellular material. Similarly, in the GAC-amended M. acetivorans co-culture, many genes coding for proteins involved in carbon fixation via the reductive acetyl-CoA pathway and methane metabolism via the CO2 reduction pathway were highly expressed (Figure 4B). Among them, the enrichment of the carbon fixation pathway highlights the enhanced ability of M. acetivorans to fix inorganic carbon such as CO2. It realizes the conversion of carbon sources into cellular biomass through pathways, providing substrate support for methane metabolism. The enhancement of the methane metabolism pathway directly improves its methane-producing efficiency. These results highlight the regulation of the core pathways of carbon fixation and methane metabolism, directly enhancing the utilization efficiency of carbon sources.

FIGURE 4
Scatter plots labeled A and B display enriched metabolic pathways. Both charts have pathways on the y-axis and rich factor on the x-axis. Dot size indicates the number associated with each pathway, and color represents adjusted p-values, ranging from red for low to blue for high. Chart A features pathways like methane metabolism and biosynthetic processes, while B includes carbon fixation and cellular anatomical entities.

Figure 4. Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs in co-culture systems. Rich factor indicates the ratio of DEGs in a pathway to the total annotated genes in that pathway. Padjust denotes the Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value. (A) GO enrichment analysis for the DEGs between the M. barkeri+G. metallireducens+GAC and M. barkeri+G. metallireducens co-culture systems; (B) GO enrichment analysis for the DEGs between the M. acetivorans+G. metallireducens+GAC and M. acetivorans+G. metallireducens co-culture systems.

3.4 Gene expression changes induced by DM-G co-culture

Transcriptomic comparisons were also made between the dual Methanosarcina and G. metallireducens co-culture system (M. acetivorans+M. barkeri+G. metallireducens, 1:1:1) and the SM-G control groups. The 1:1:1 ratio was chosen for its optimal methane production (Figure 1A), ecological balance, and robust identification of DIET-associated DEGs, enabling comparative analysis of metabolic complementarity between dual and single Methanosarcina systems. A total of 799 genes were up-regulated (log2FC > 2, p < 0.05) and 297 genes were down regulated (log2FC < −2, p < 0.05) in M. barkeri within the DM-G co-culture system (Supplementary Figure 6A).

The most highly expressed genes coded for proteins involved in methane metabolism, pyruvate metabolism, coenzyme A biosynthesis, and carbon fixation. Some of the most highly expressed methane metabolism genes included formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase (fwdBDF) and methenyltetrahydromethanopterin cyclohydrolase (mch), from the CO2 reduction pathway and tetrahydromethanopterin S-methyltransferase (mtrBGH) from the general methanogenesis pathway. Additionally, several genes involved in stress response such as hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolase (gloB), carbon metabolism such as NADP+-dependent malic enzyme (sfcA), and amino acid biosynthesis such as acetolactate synthase (ilvB) were significantly up regulated. In addition, acetate metabolism genes including cdhCD (acetyl-CoA decarbonylase/synthase) and ackA (acetate kinase) were 4.6 and 3.5 times more highly expressed in the DM-G system than the SM-G system (Figure 3, Supplementary Figure 7A). These results suggest that the tri-culture system was conducive to the growth of M. barkeri.

Contrary to results from analysis of the M. barkeri transcriptome, the tri-culture system had an inhibitory effect on expression of many of the genes in M. acetivorans. A total of 1,366 genes were significantly down regulated (log2FC < −2, p < 0.05), while only 63 genes were up regulated (log2FC > 2, p < 0.05) (Supplementary Figure 6B).

Key genes coding for proteins involved in methanogenesis, such as cdhA, frhB, fwdB, hdrD, and mtrA were all significantly down regulated (Supplementary Figure 7B). M. acetivorans also had significantly lower expression of cdhCDE (acetyl-CoA decarbonylase/synthase) and ackA (acetate kinase) from the acetoclastic pathway in the DM-G system compared to the SM-G system. The rnfABCDEG gene cluster, which encodes a sodium-translocating electron transport complex essential for aceticlastic methanogensis (Ferry, 2020) and DIET (Holmes et al., 2021) by M. acetivorans was also significantly down-regulated in the DM-G system (Figure 3).

According to GO enrichment analysis, the DEGs of M. barkeri are enriched in molecular functions such as Adenyl nucleotide binding, Purine nucleotide binding, and ATP binding, metabolic pathways such as Methane metabolism and Carbon fixation, as well as biological processes such as Cellular biosynthetic process. By strengthening the Methane metabolism pathway, upregulating the expression of key enzyme genes such as methyl coenzyme M reductase, and combining with molecular functions such as ATP binding, it provides support for the energy conversion in the methanogenesis process. At the same time, the Carbon fixation pathway is activated, and inorganic carbon is fixed through pathways such as acetyl coenzyme A, which not only generates cellular biomass but also supplies intermediate substrates for methanogenic metabolism. Moreover, biological processes such as Cellular biosynthetic process are active, ensuring the synthesis of enzyme systems related to methanogenesis and carbon fixation (Figure 5A). In the DM-G systems, the functional enrichment analysis of M. acetivorans, shows that core pathways such as methane metabolism and sulfur metabolism are significantly enriched (Figure 5B). However, gene expression confirms that the key genes of these pathways are overall downregulated. Specifically, the efficient capture of electrons by M. barkeri creates substrate competition with M. acetivorans, directly leading to the suppression of the expression of methane metabolism pathways (such as Methane metabolism and Sulfur metabolism). Essentially, the functional demand of the pathways still exists, but the competition among bacterial populations causes M. acetivorans to lose its metabolic dominance. At the same time, the genes of the organic nitrogen compound metabolism pathway are downregulated. This is not an active optimization of carbon-nitrogen synergy, but rather that M. acetivorans is forced to reduce its nitrogen metabolic activity when M. barkeri competes for nitrogen sources. Moreover, the redox enzyme activity pathway is enriched, which only corresponds to M. acetivorans up-regulating a small number of emergency genes to maintain the basic functions of the electron transport chain (such as the Rnf complex and iron-sulfur proteins), but the core energy conversion efficiency (such as ATP production and methane yield) has not been improved.

FIGURE 5
Two bubble plots labeled A and B represent different biological processes. Plot A shows terms like “Adenyl nucleotide binding” and “MAPK signaling” against the x-axis labeled “Rich factor.” Colors range from red to blue, indicating p-adjustment values, with larger circles representing higher numbers. Plot B displays terms such as “Methane metabolism” and “Ribosome” with similar axes and color coding. Both plots provide information on the significance and impact of these processes.

Figure 5. Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs in co-culture systems. Rich factor indicates the ratio of DEGs in a pathway to the total annotated genes in that pathway. Padjust denotes the Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value. (A) GO enrichment analysis for the DEGs between the M. acetivorans+M. barkeri+G. metallireducens (1+1+1) and M. barkeri+ G. metallireducens co-culture systems; (B) GO enrichment analysis for the DEGs between the M. acetivorans+M. barkeri+G. metallireducens (1+1+1) and M. acetivorans+G. metallireducens (1+1+1) co-culture systems.

3.5 Comparison of transcriptomes between DM-G co-culture and conductive material-enhanced SM-G co-culture systems

To determine whether similar pathways were induced in the DM-G system and the GAC-amended SM-G co-culture systems, further transcriptomic comparisons were made. The M. barkeri+G. metallireducens+GAC co-culture system had 467 unique DEGs, while the M. acetivorans+M. barkeri+G. metallireducens (1+1+1) system had 452 unique DEGs, with 644 shared DEGs between them (Supplementary Figure 8A). For the M. acetivorans+G. metallireducens+GAC and M. acetivorans+M. barkeri+ G. metallireducens (1+1+1) systems, the number of unique DEGs in M. acetivorans+G. metallireducens+GAC was 262, and in M. acetivorans+M. barkeri+ G. metallireducens (1+1+1) was 2439, with 1167 shared DEGs (Supplementary Figure 8B). These differences in DEGs indicate that there were differences in metabolism between the tri-culture and GAC-amended systems.

Gene enrichment analysis revealed that genes involved in cellular biosynthesis, aromatic amino acid biosynthesis, and methane metabolism were highly expressed by Methanosarcina in both enhanced systems (Figure 6A). The up-regulation of these biosysnthesis genes supports the finding that cells were growing better in the enhanced systems. Methane metabolism was the most prominently enriched pathway, but carbon fixation pathways were also significantly enriched. The concurrent enrichment of small molecule metabolism, pyruvate metabolism, and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathways suggests that cells were growing and generating biomass (Figure 6B). Furthermore, carbon fixation pathways were significantly enriched in both M. barkeri+G. metallireducens+GAC and M. acetivorans+M. barkeri+G. metallireducens (1:1:1), indicative of enhanced carbon assimilation and its integration into biomass synthesis, potentially accelerating substrate turnover (Figure 6A).

FIGURE 6
Two bubble plots labeled A and B compare pathways based on rich factor, padjust values, and number of genes. Plot A shows pathways like “MAPK signaling” and “RNA polymerase,” while plot B includes “Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis” and “DNA replication.” Bubble sizes indicate the number of genes, with color gradients representing padjust values.

Figure 6. Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs in co-culture systems. Rich factor indicates the ratio of DEGs in a pathway to the total annotated genes in that pathway. Padjust denotes the Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value. (A) GO enrichment analysis for the DEGs between the M. barkeri+G. metallireducens+GAC and M. acetivorans+M. barkeri+G. metallireducens (1+1+1) co-culture systems; (B) GO enrichment analysis for the DEGs between the M. acetivorans+G. metallireducens+GAC and M. acetivorans+M. barkeri+G. metallireducens (1+1+1) co-culture systems.

The enrichment analysis of DEGs in the M. acetivorans+G. metallireducens+GAC and M. acetivorans+M. barkeri+G. metallireducens (1:1:1) identified methane metabolism as the most significantly enriched pathway. This result highlights the conserved role of methanogenesis-related genes across different microbial consortia. The concurrent enrichment of small molecule metabolism, pyruvate metabolism, and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathways suggests a metabolic shift toward core energy conservation and biosynthetic processes, which are essential for microbial growth and proliferation. These enriched pathways collectively enhance ATP production and the redistribution of carbon flux, thereby sustaining cellular growth and facilitating methanogenic activity (Figure 6B).

4 Discussion

This study systematically investigated the synergy within DM-G co-culture systems for enhancing DIET and methane production. The results provide novel insights into microbial competition dynamics, metabolic pathway regulation, and the functional implications of DIET-driven syntrophy.

The DM-G co-culture systems demonstrated marked improvements in DIET efficiency and methane yield compared to SM-G systems. Mechanistically, M. acetivorans exhibited slower acetate oxidation due to its lack of hydrogenase activity, leading to elevated acetate accumulation. In contrast, M. barkeri efficiently utilized electrons from G. metallireducens via hydrogenase-mediated pathways, accelerating acetate conversion to methane through hydrogen cycling (Zhou et al., 2021). Two Methanosarcina species may achieve efficient electron transfer and utilization through distinct pathways or mechanisms, compensating for the limitations of a single Methanosarcina and enhancing DIET efficiency. In terms of metabolic pathways, the synergistic effect of M. barkeri and M. acetivorans may have created new metabolic pathways or optimized existing ones, allowing ethanol to be converted into methane more quickly and thoroughly, thereby improving substrate utilization efficiency. This divergence in metabolic strategies highlights the complementary roles of the two Methanosarcina in optimizing substrate utilization and electron flux regulation during syntrophic ethanol oxidation (Schöne et al., 2023).

Microbial community analysis revealed that in the DM-G co-culture system, as the cultivation time extended, M. barkeri gradually became dominant, while the relative abundance of M. acetivorans gradually decreased. This change in the community structure indicates that under high electron flux conditions, Methanosarcina with hydrogenase may have a greater competitive advantage. Such ecological succession may redirect the metabolic flux toward hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, thereby altering the stability of the system and the substrate utilization patterns (Zhou et al., 2021). Additionally, the persistent presence of G. metallireducens throughout the cultivation process demonstrates its crucial role in maintaining the function of DIET despite changes in the community structure (Thauer et al., 2008). These findings highlight the necessity of evaluating the long-term stability of syntrophic relationships in engineered systems.

Metabolic pathway analysis revealed the metabolic interaction mechanisms in the co-culture system of dual Methanosarcina and G. metallireducens. In the DM-G system, the gene expression of M. barkeri showed a significant up-regulation trend, especially the high expression of genes related to acetate metabolism and methane production (such as cdhCD and ackA), indicating that it had a functional advantage in acetate utilization and could efficiently convert acetate into methane. This phenomenon might be attributed to the introduction of M. acetivorans, which intensified the electron competition and promoted niche differentiation, prompting M. barkeri to strengthen the acetate metabolic pathway. In contrast, the gene expression of M. acetivorans was generally inhibited. The core genes of its methane metabolism (cdhA, frhB) and genes related to carbon fixation (mrtF) were significantly downregulated, but the methane production pathway dependent on electron transfer remained active (Figure 3). Specifically, the expression pattern of rnfABCDE cluster encoding the Rnf electron transfer complex in the co-culture system showed that the electron transfer process was regulated by the microbial interaction environment, suggesting that it obtained exogenous electrons through interaction with G. metallireducens and shifted to the synthesis of methane via the carbon dioxide reduction pathway. The above results are consistent with the previous research conclusions, M. acetivorans is more efficient in methane production dependent on DIET, while M. barkeri exhibits stronger aceticlastic methanogenic activity (Zhou et al., 2021). Through metabolic pathway differentiation (acetate decomposition and electron-dependent CO2 reduction) and niche complementarity, the two bacteria form a synergistic metabolic network in the conductive material-mediated co-culture system, ultimately improving the methanogenic efficiency.

From an application perspective, DM-G co-culture systems offer significant advantages over conductive material-based approaches. By eliminating exogenous material requirements, these systems avoid associated economic costs and environmental risks (de Bok et al., 2004; Wu B. et al., 2020). The natural metabolic coupling between Methanosarcina species and G. metallireducens provides a cost-effective and sustainable alternative that maintains process stability while reducing reliance on external inputs (McInerney et al., 2008). DM-G co-culture systems demonstrate scalability potential for biogas production, combining operational simplicity with environmental compatibility–key factors for industrial adoption (Bochuan et al., 2014; Thakur et al., 2022).

5 Conclusion

This study explored the enhancement of methane production through co-culturing two Methanosarcina species (M. barkeri and M. acetivorans) and G. metallireducens during ethanol consumption. The DM-G co-culture systems demonstrated efficient methane production without the need for exogenous conductive materials. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that the synergistic interaction between the two Methanosarcina species optimized electron transfer and metabolic pathways, leading to enhanced methane production. M. barkeri exhibited a competitive advantage, with upregulated genes related to methane metabolism and electron transfer, while M. acetivorans displayed downregulation of methanogenic pathway genes, indicating metabolic complementarity. The DM-G co-culture system offers a sustainable and cost-effective alternative for bioenergy production, with potential applications in organic waste treatment and renewable energy generation.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

LL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. PL: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. HD: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. CL: Methodology, Writing – original draft. HL: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. ZM: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft. RL: Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft. YD: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52270023), the China Baowu Low Carbon Metallurgy Innovation Foundation (No. BWLCF202214), and the Engineering Research & Innovation Team Project of Beijing Forestry University (No. BLRC2023B04).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1604265/full#supplementary-material

References

Bochuan, W. V., Hoong, Y. J. K., Song-Lin, C., Qichun, Z., Bin, C., Say, C. J. L., et al. (2014). Synergistic microbial consortium for bioenergy generation from complex natural energy sources. Sci. World J. 2014, 139653–139653. doi: 10.1155/2014/139653

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M., and Usadel, B. (2014). Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, S., Rotaru, A. E., Shrestha, P. M., Malvankar, N. S., Liu, F., Fan, W., et al. (2014). Promoting interspecies electron transfer with biochar. Sci. Rep. 4:5019. doi: 10.1038/srep05019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dang, Y., Holmes, D. E., Zhao, Z., Woodard, T. L., Zhang, Y., Sun, D., et al. (2016). Enhancing anaerobic digestion of complex organic waste with carbon-based conductive materials. Bioresour. Technol. 220, 516–522. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.114

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

de Bok, F. A., Plugge, C. M., and Stams, A. J. (2004). Interspecies electron transfer in methanogenic propionate degrading consortia. Water Res. 38, 1368–1375. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.11.028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, H., Zhang, H., Li, H., Zhang, H., Lu, W., Sun, D., et al. (2025). Hybridization of photoanode and biocathode enables biogas upgrading via Methanosarcina barkeri. Renewable Energy 241:122310. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.122310

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferry, J. G. (2020). Methanosarcina acetivorans: A model for mechanistic understanding of aceticlastic and reverse methanogenesis. Front. Microbiol. 11:1806. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01806

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Holmes, D. E., Giloteaux, L., Orellana, R., Williams, K. H., Robbins, M. J., and Lovley, D. R. (2014). Methane production from protozoan endosymbionts following stimulation of microbial metabolism within subsurface sediments. Front. Microbiol. 5:366. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00366

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Holmes, D. E., Risso, C., Smith, J. A., and Lovley, D. R. (2012). Genome-scale analysis of anaerobic benzoate and phenol metabolism in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Ferroglobus placidus. ISME J. 6, 146–157. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.88

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Holmes, D. E., Rotaru, A. E., Ueki, T., Shrestha, P. M., Ferry, J. G., and Lovley, D. R. (2018). Electron and proton flux for carbon dioxide reduction in Methanosarcina barkeri during direct interspecies electron transfer. Front. Microbiol. 9:3109. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03109

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Holmes, D. E., Woodard, T. L., Smith, J. A., Musat, F., and Lovley, D. R. (2024). Electrobiocorrosion by microbes without outer-surface cytochromes. mLife 3, 110–118. doi: 10.1002/mlf2.12111

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Holmes, D. E., Zhou, J., Ueki, T., Woodard, T., and Lovley, D. R. (2021). Mechanisms for electron uptake by Methanosarcina acetivorans during direct interspecies electron transfer. mBio 12:e02344-21. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02344-21

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, L., Liu, X., Zhang, Z., Ye, J., Rensing, C., Zhou, S., et al. (2022). Light-driven carbon dioxide reduction to methane by Methanosarcina barkeri in an electric syntrophic coculture. ISME J. 16, 370–377. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01078-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kato, S., Hashimoto, K., and Watanabe, K. (2012a). Methanogenesis facilitated by electric syntrophy via (semi) conductive iron-oxide minerals. Environ. Microbiol. 14, 1646–1654. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02611.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kato, S., Hashimoto, K., and Watanabe, K. (2012b). Microbial interspecies electron transfer via electric currents through conductive minerals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 10042–10046. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117592109

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kopylova, E., Noé, L., and Touzet, H. (2012). SortMeRNA: Fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatics 28, 3211–3217. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts611

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, F., Rotaru, A.-E., Shrestha, P. M., Malvankar, N. S., Nevin, K. P., and Lovley, D. R. (2012). Promoting direct interspecies electron transfer with activated carbon. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 8982–8989. doi: 10.1039/c2ee22459c

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, F., Rotaru, A. E., Shrestha, P. M., Malvankar, N. S., Nevin, K. P., and Lovley, D. R. (2014). Magnetite compensates for the lack of a pilin-associated c-type cytochrome in extracellular electron exchange. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 648–655. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12485

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lovley, D. R., Giovannoni, S. J., White, D. C., Champine, J. E., Phillips, E. J. P., Gorby, Y. A., et al. (1993). Geobacter metallireducens gen. nov. sp. nov., a microorganism capable of coupling the complete oxidation of organic compounds to the reduction of iron and other metals. Arch. Microbiol. 159, 336–344. doi: 10.1007/BF00290916

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lovley, D. R., Stolz, J. F., Nord, G. L., and Phillips, E. J. P. (1987). Anaerobic production of magnetite by a dissimilatory iron-reducing microorganism. Nature 330, 252–254. doi: 10.1038/330252a0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Magoč, T., and Salzberg, S. L. (2011). FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

McInerney, M. J., Struchtemeyer, C. G., Sieber, J., Mouttaki, H., Stams, A. J., Schink, B., et al. (2008). Physiology, ecology, phylogeny, and genomics of microorganisms capable of syntrophic metabolism. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1125, 58–72. doi: 10.1196/annals.1419.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Morita, M., Malvankar, N. S., Franks, A. E., Summers, Z. M., Giloteaux, L., Rotaru, A. E., et al. (2011). Potential for direct interspecies electron transfer in methanogenic wastewater digester aggregates. mBio 2:e00159-11. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00159-11

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nevin, K. P., and Lovley, D. R. (2002). Mechanisms for accessing insoluble Fe (III) oxide during dissimilatory Fe (III) reduction by Geothrix fermentans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 2294–2299. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.5.2294-2299.2002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nevin, K. P., Richter, H., Covalla, S., Johnson, J., Woodard, T., Orloff, A., et al. (2008). Power output and columbic efficiencies from biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens comparable to mixed community microbial fuel cells. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 2505–2514. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01675.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Peiffer, J. A., Spor, A., Koren, O., Jin, Z., Tringe, S. G., Dangl, J. L., et al. (2013). Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, 6548–6553. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302837110

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., and Smyth, G. K. (2009). edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rotaru, A.-E., Shrestha, P. M., Liu, F., Markovaite, B., Chen, S., Nevin, K. P., et al. (2014). Direct interspecies electron transfer between Geobacter metallireducens and Methanosarcina barkeri. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 4599–4605. doi: 10.1128/aem.00895-14

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schöne, C., Poehlein, A., and Rother, M. (2023). Genetic and physiological probing of cytoplasmic bypasses for the energy-converting methyltransferase Mtr in Methanosarcina acetivorans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 89:e0216122 doi: 10.1128/aem.02161-22

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Summers, Z. M., Fogarty, H. E., Leang, C., Franks, A. E., Malvankar, N. S., and Lovley, D. R. (2010). Direct exchange of electrons within aggregates of an evolved syntrophic coculture of anaerobic bacteria. Science 330, 1413–1415. doi: 10.1126/science.1196526

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Thakur, N., Singh, S. P., and Zhang, C. (2022). Microorganisms under extreme environments and their applications. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 3:100141. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2022.100141

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Thauer, R. K., Kaster, A.-K., Seedorf, H., Buckel, W., and Hedderich, R. J. N. R. M. (2008). Methanogenic archaea: Ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 579–591. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1931

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tremblay, P. L., Aklujkar, M., Leang, C., Nevin, K. P., and Lovley, D. (2011). A genetic system for Geobacter metallireducens: Role of the flagellin and pilin in the reduction of Fe(III) oxide. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 4, 82–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00305.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Kessel, J. A. S., and Russell, J. B. (1996). The effect of pH on ruminal methanogenesis. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 20, 205–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1996.tb00319.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, S., Cheng, S., Zhang, K., Liu, F., Liu, R., Gao, X., et al. (2024). Comparing the effects and mechanisms of granular activated carbon and magnetite nanoparticles in dry anaerobic digestion: Focusing on microbial electron transfer and metagenomic evidence. Chem. Eng. J. 497:155705. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.155705

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, B., Lin, R., Kang, X., Deng, C., Xia, A., Dobson, A. D. W., et al. (2020). Graphene addition to digestion of thin stillage can alleviate acidic shock and improve biomethane production. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8, 13248–13260. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03484

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, Y., Wang, S., Liang, D., and Li, N. (2020). Conductive materials in anaerobic digestion: From mechanism to application. Bioresour. Technol. 298:122403. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122403

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yee, M. O., and Rotaru, A. E. (2020). Extracellular electron uptake in Methanosarcinales is independent of multiheme c-type cytochromes. Sci. Rep. 10:372. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57206-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, H. Q., and Fang, H. H. (2003). Acidogenesis of gelatin-rich wastewater in an upflow anaerobic reactor: Influence of pH and temperature. Water Res. 37, 55–66. doi: 10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00256-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, J., Holmes, D. E., Tang, H.-Y., and Lovley, D. R. (2021). Correlation of key physiological properties of Methanosarcina isolates with environment of origin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 87:e0073121. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00731-21

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: direct interspecies electron transfer, Methanosarcina, G. metallireducens, conductive materials, anaerobic digestion, microbial synergy

Citation: Liu L, Li P, Dong H, Liu C, Li H, Ma Z, Li R and Dang Y (2025) Enhancement of direct interspecies electron transfer and methane production by co-culture of dual Methanosarcina species and Geobacter metallireducens. Front. Microbiol. 16:1604265. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1604265

Received: 01 April 2025; Accepted: 21 July 2025;
Published: 05 August 2025.

Edited by:

Marleen van Wolferen, University of Freiburg, Germany

Reviewed by:

Jingyang Luo, Hohai University, China
Souichiro Kato, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan

Copyright © 2025 Liu, Li, Dong, Liu, Li, Ma, Li and Dang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ruoyu Li, YmpmdWxpcnlAMTYzLmNvbQ==; Yan Dang, eWFuZGFuZ0BiamZ1LmVkdS5jbg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.