Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 02 October 2025

Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1620677

This article is part of the Research TopicInvestigating the Role of Pollutants in the Spread of Antimicrobial ResistanceView all 5 articles

Evaluating the effects of hospital wastewater treatment on bacterial composition and antimicrobial resistome

Yan Meng&#x;Yan Meng1Yi Xu,,&#x;Yi Xu2,3,4Dongping Hu,,Dongping Hu2,3,4Qiuxiang Pan,,Qiuxiang Pan2,3,4Liangliang Weng,,Liangliang Weng2,3,4Weiyi Huang,,Weiyi Huang2,3,4Jin ZhaoJin Zhao5Wei Lan,,Wei Lan2,3,4Qiucheng Shi,,Qiucheng Shi2,3,4Yunsong Yu,,
Yunsong Yu2,3,4*Yan Jiang,,
Yan Jiang2,3,4*
  • 1Department of Clinical Laboratory, Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
  • 2Department of Infectious Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology and Bioinformatics of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
  • 4Regional Medical Center for National Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
  • 5Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China

Hospital wastewater treatment systems (HWTS) are crucial in reducing the spread of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) and antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens in hospital wastewater. This study aims to evaluate the impact of HWTS on the changes of bacterial composition and the relative abundance of ARGs. We collected wastewater samples from influent and effluent in a university hospital, and performed metagenomic sequencing. The results showed that HWTS altered the bacterial composition, with a decrease in the proportion of Gammaproteobacteria. However, phylogenetic analysis of metagenome-assembled genomes showed that Mycobacterium and Zoogloea from influent and effluent had a close relationship. A total of 140 non-redundant ARGs were identified based on open reading fragments analysis, with beta-lactam and aminoglycoside resistance genes being the most prevalent. The relative abundance of ARGs generally decreased after wastewater treatment (p < 0.0001), with 70.0% of genes that conferring resistance to “last-resort” antibiotics being undetectable in the effluent. However, the relative abundance of quaternary ammonium compounds resistance genes increased in the effluent. We identified that 66.4% of ARGs were located on plasmids, and 17.9% of ARGs were adjacent to mobile gene elements (MGEs), suggesting their potential for mobility. Subsequent analysis showed that ARGs originating from plasmids and adjacent to MGEs were negatively associated with their relative abundance reduction. In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of HWTS on composition of bacteria and the relative abundance of ARGs, highlighting the importance of effective wastewater treatment in combating the spread of antimicrobial resistance.

Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a public issue of global concern (Velazquez-Meza et al., 2022; Salam et al., 2023). The current situation indicates that AMR is responsible for approximately 700,000 deaths annually, and forecasts predict that AMR could lead to 10 million deaths per year, and 100 trillion dollars in economic losses by 2050 (O’Neill, 2016). Moreover, this issue not only has an impact on human health, but also poses a major threat to the ecosystem. AMR negatively impacts biodiversity, and the presence of antimicrobial residues in the environment promotes the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB). Therefore, effective control of AMR spreading is essential and urgently needed.

Except for the strict implementation of antimicrobial stewardship, controlling of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) needs multifaceted efforts worldwide, which is the major concept of “One Health” (Zinsstag et al., 2011). Healthcare facilities, such as hospitals, play an important role in the “One Health” approach. Hospitals require large amounts of water for their proper operation, and generate large volume of wastewater (Wen et al., 2004). Hospital wastewater (HWW) is characterized by the presence of various emerging contaminants, including antibiotic residues and ARBs (Zhang et al., 2020). Hospital wastewater effluents are usually discharged into the city sewer system, however, most of these plants are not designed to effectively manage biomedical wastes. Thus, HWW is the significant sources of released ARGs into the municipal environment (Kang et al., 2024), which makes the HWW treatment within hospital facilities particularly important (Majumder et al., 2021).

Huang et al. (2023) reported that the profiles of ARGs within HWW were diverse influenced by geographical location and hospital type. Aminoglycoside, beta-lactam, macrolide, sulfonamide, and tetracycline resistance genes were predominant categories of ARGs, and Pseudomonadota emerged as the principal ARG carrier in the HWW at the phylum level (Huang et al., 2023). Previous study has revealed that mobile gene elements (MGEs) are well-documented vectors for the transmission of ARGs (Ellabaan et al., 2021), and ARGs-harboring plasmids had a positive correlation with the prevalence of ARGs in the HWW (Huang et al., 2023; Zhu et al., 2023).

To have a comprehensive understanding of the changes in bacterial composition and ARGs abundance after wastewater treatment in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, we collected samples of the influent and effluent from the hospital wastewater treatment system (HWTS), and performed metagenomic sequencing. Then, the bacterial taxonomy composition and variation were determined, and the phylogenetic relationship of metagenome-assembled genomes between influent and effluent was analyzed. Moreover, the changes of ARGs relative abundance were evaluated between influent and effluent to assess the effectiveness of the HWW treatment. Overall, this study would enhance our understanding of the impact of HWW treatment on bacterial composition and ARGs abundance, thereby contributing to the advancement of HWW treatment process.

Materials and methods

Sample origin and collection

Hospital wastewater samples were collected in September, 2022 at a tertiary hospital, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (Hangzhou, Eastern China) under non-rainy conditions. The HWTS is a three-stage process, and processes approximately 10,000 tons of wastewater per week. The primary treatment consists of a screen and a regulation tank, the secondary treatment involves a biological contact oxidation tank, and the tertiary treatment includes a disinfection tank, where 10% NaClO is added with the dosage automatically controlled based on the residual chlorine in the effluent. After treatment, the wastewater is discharged to a municipal wastewater treatment plant.

Wastewater samples (500 mL) were collected through single-time sampling, with one sample from the influent and one sample from effluent, using sterile waster bags. The samples were transported to laboratory immediately at 4 °C. A 50 mL subset of each sample was then filtered using the FluidPrep Concentrating Pipette System (InnovaPrep, Drexel, United States) with 0.1 μm PES Flat Filter Concentrating Pipette Tips, and the filter membranes were stored at −80 °C.

Metagenomic sequencing, metagenomic assembly and open reading fragments prediction

DNA was extracted from sheared filter membranes using a DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), and the concentration and purity of DNA was determined by Nanodrop 2000 (Supplementary Table S1, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, United States). Sequencing libraries were generated using the TIANSeq Fragment/Repair/Tailing module and TIANSeq Fast Ligation module (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The kits employed a premixed enzyme module to fragment the DNA and simultaneously adds adapter. The prepared library was sequenced on Illumina NovaSeq (Illumina, San Diego, United States) with 150-bp paired-end strategy (Lan et al., 2023).

The raw reads were curated to obtain clean reads using SOAPnuke v1.5.0 (-l 15 -q 0.3 -n 0.05, Supplementary Table S2), and the clean reads were assembled using Megahit with K-mers ‘-k-list 45, 55, 67, 73’ (Li et al., 2015). The assembled scaffolds were broken from N linkage to obtain scaftigs (i.e., continuous sequences within scaffolds). The scaftigs shorter than 500 bp were removed (Hu et al., 2024). MetaGeneMark 2.10 was then used for open reading fragment (ORF) prediction (gene length >100 bp). CD-HIT 4.5.8 with parameters set at identity >95% and coverage >90% (-c 0.95, -G 0, -aS 0.9, -g 1, -d 0) was used to generate the initial non-redundant gene catalog (nrGC) (Fu et al., 2012). Subsequently, the clean reads were aligned to the nrGC using SOAPaligner 2.21 with parameters (-m 200, -x 400, identity ≥95%), and the ORFs abundance less than two were eliminated to create the unigenes (Perez-Prieto et al., 2024). A total of 289,983 scaftigs with an average length of 972.87 bps were obtained in the influent, which contained 462,594 ORFs. For the effluent, a total of 133,138 scaftigs with an average length of 1342.94 bps were obtained, containing 280,107 ORFs (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The assembly statistical information of each sample.

Bacterial taxonomy analysis, metagenome binning and phylogeny of metagenome-assembled genomes

For bacterial taxonomy analysis, DIAMOND 0.8.1 was employed to align unigenes against bacterial sequences extracted from the NCBI NR database using BLASTP with an E-value cutoff of 1 × 10−5 (Buchfink et al., 2015). For each unigene, the significant matches which were defined by E-values <10 × E-value of the top hit, were retained for taxonomic classification using lowest common ancestor (LCA) algorithm (Qin et al., 2010). Finally, sunburst illustration of relative abundance was performed to visualize bacterial taxonomy composition.

Metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) were assembled by metaWRAP-Binning module with three binning methods metaBAT2, MaxBin2 and CONCOCT, and the other parameters were set at default (Uritskiy et al., 2018). The MAGs were retained with completion >50, and contamination <10 (-c 50 -x 10). The taxonomy of recovered MAGs was determined by GTDB-Tk classify_wf. Phylogenetic analysis of these MAGs was performed using Fasttree, based on the 120 ubiquitous bacterial genes from GTDB (Chaumeil et al., 2019). And the tree was illustrated and annotated by iTol.1

Detection of antimicrobial resistance genes, mobile gene elements, and plasmids

The ARGs were identified by BLAST (E-value <1 × 10−4) against the National Database of Antibiotic-Resistant Organisms (NDARO), with amino acid identity >90% and coverage >60% (Lan et al., 2023). “Last-resort” antibiotics including tigecycline, colistin, daptomycin, vancomycin, and linezolid are the last line of defence against antibiotic resistant pathogen infections (Li et al., 2022). A total of 26,065 and 7,819 16S rRNA reads were detected in the influent and effluent, respectively, according to the analysis using ARGs-OAP v3.2.4 (Li et al., 2024). The relative abundance of ARGs was calculated by normalizing read abundance against the length of each gene and 16S rRNA. Then, the maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees of the beta-lactam and aminoglycoside resistance genes were constructed by CLC genomics workbench.

Scaftigs containing ARGs were extracted with parameters of identity >90% and coverage >40%. The origin of these scaftigs, whether plasmid- or chromosome-derived, was predicted using RFPlasmid, which offers high specificity and sensitivity (up to 99%) based on short-read assemblies (van der Graaf-van Bloois et al., 2021). Insertion sequences (IS), integrons, and transposons are MGEs found in bacteria, and canonical MGEs (IS, integrons, and transposons) within 10-kb of the flanking sequence of ARGs were detected using BacAnt with identity >90% and coverage >40% (Hua et al., 2021). The connection network among ARGs, plasmids, and MGEs was visualized using Cytoscape v3.10.3.

Statistical analysis

The relative abundance of ARGs was log-transformed and tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The difference in relative abundance of ARGs between influent and effluent was then analyzed using non-parametric paired test (Wilcoxon matched-pairs test). The changes in relative abundance of ARGs in relation to their locations or adjacent MGEs, were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test. The statistical analyses were performed using R 4.4.1, and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Bacterial community composition variation in hospital wastewater

To examine the distribution of bacteria in the HWW, the bacterial taxonomy analysis was performed based on scaftigs (Figures 1A,B). The results showed that Proteobacteria had the highest abundance at the phylum level in the influent and effluent, with a relative percentage of 64.3 and 82.6%, respectively. Bacteroidetes represented the second most abundant phylum in the influent (17.0%), while Actinobacteria ranked second in the effluent (7.9%). Within the Proteobacteria phylum, Gammaproteobacteria were the predominant class in the influent (74.8%), however, Betaproteobacteria were the most prevalent class in the effluent (70.9%), which indicated that the HWTS could effectively change the bacterial composition.

Figure 1
Image showing two pie charts and a phylogenetic tree. Chart (A) displays the composition of influents with dominant phyla: Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes. Chart (B) shows effluents with a higher percentage of Proteobacteria. The tree (C) illustrates the phylogenetic relationships among microbial bins, with phylum color coding: green for Firmicutes, blue for Actinobacteria, red for Bacteroidetes, and yellow for Proteobacteria.

Figure 1. Bacterial composition in the influent (A) and the effluent (B) of hospital wastewater. The inner circle represents classification by phylum, and the outer circle represents classification by class. (C) Phylogenetic tree of MAGs in the influent and effluent.

Then, to evaluate the bacterial residue after wastewater treatment, we performed phylogenetic analysis of MAGs (Figure 1C). We identified 28 qualified MAGs, including 13 MAGs from the influent, and 15 MAGs from the effluent, which belonged to five phyla (Supplementary Table S3). The results showed that some bacteria from the effluent were genetically closely related to those in the influent. For example, Inf_bin_9 from the influent and Eff_bin_16 from the effluent were closely related, and both belonged to Mycobacterium at the genus level. Inf_bin_5 from the influent and Eff_bin_13 from the effluent were closely related, and both were classified as Zoogloea at the genus level. These results indicated that some residual bacteria could not be eliminated by HWTS.

Identification of ARGs in hospital wastewater

We identified 140 non-redundant ARGs from both samples (Supplementary Table S4), with genes conferring beta-lactam resistance being the most prevalent (40/140). These beta-lactam resistance genes were further subdivided into those encoding extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (n = 5), such as blaCTX-M, blaPER, and cfxA3; and carbapenemases (n = 9), such as blaKPC, blaVIM, blaNDM, and blaIMP. Genes conferring aminoglycoside resistance were the second prevalent ARGs in the HWW (27/140), followed by genes conferring resistance to macrolides, phenicols, tetracyclines, and others. Then, we calculated the normalized relative abundance of these ARGs in both samples, and the results showed that the relative abundance of ARGs in the effluent was significantly lower than those in the influent (Figure 2A, p < 0.0001). Among these ARGs, 77.9% (109/140) decreased in the effluent compared to the influent, with 35.0% (49/140) undetectable in the effluent, indicating that the HWTS effectively reduced the prevalence of ARGs in the discharged wastewater (Supplementary Table S5). Moreover, the genes conferring resistance to beta-lactam, macrolide, and tetracycline significantly decreased in the effluent (p < 0.05, Supplementary Figure S1).

Figure 2
(A) A scatter plot showing relative abundance of various entities in influent versus effluent samples, with connections indicating changes; p-value less than 0.0001. (B) A phylogenetic tree illustrating the clustering of various genes with a heatmap showing their abundance in influent and effluent. (C) Another phylogenetic tree and heatmap for different genes showing their abundance in influent and effluent. Both heatmaps use a color gradient from red to white, indicating normalized relative abundance from 1E-7 to 0.

Figure 2. (A) Changes in the relative abundance of ARGs after wastewater treatment. Phylogenetic relationship of beta-lactam (B) and aminoglycoside (C) resistance genes in the HWW. The relative abundance of each gene was illustrated on the right.

Among these ARGs, we identified 10 genes related to the “last-resort” antibiotic resistance. For example, vancomycin resistance genes, including vanH-M, vanX-M, and vanM, were identified, with vanM being considered a newly acquired glycopeptide resistance gene. Linezolid resistance genes cfr(C) and optrA, colistin resistance genes mcr-4.3 and mcr-5.1, and tigecycline resistance genes toprJ, toprJ1, and tet(X2) were also identified. The normalized relative abundance of these genes significantly decreased in the effluent (Supplementary Figure S1, p = 0.002), and seven genes (7/10) could not be detected in the effluent, indicating that the HWTS could reduce the contamination of genes in association with “last-resort” antibiotic resistance. Notably, the relative abundance of two quaternary ammonium compound resistance genes, qacF and qacG2, increased in the effluent, suggesting that bacteria harboring these genes may survive the treatment process (Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The relative abundance of genes conferring “last-resort” antibiotic resistance and qac genes in the influent and effluent.

Phylogenetic relationship of beta-lactams and aminoglycosides resistance genes in hospital wastewater

Since the beta-lactam and aminoglycoside resistance genes were prevalent, we performed the phylogenetic analysis of them (Figures 2B,C). The result showed that all the beta-lactams and aminoglycosides resistance genes could be found in the influent, however, 22.5% (9/40) of beta-lactam resistance genes and 48.1% (13/27) of aminoglycosides resistance genes were undetectable in the effluent. We also found some ARGs exhibited an elevated relative abundance in the effluent, such as aadA and blaOXA-10, which indicated that these ARGs were persistent in the sewage.

Identification of ARG locations and their linkage with mobile genetic elements

To understand the potential mobility of ARGs, we analyzed the origin of ARG-harboring scaftigs, and identified adjacent MGEs (Table 3, Figure 3A and Supplementary Table S6). We found that 95.7% (134/140) of the ARGs had the identical origins in both samples. By excluding inconsistent results, the results showed that 66.4% (89/134) of ARGs were located on plasmids, and the rest were located on chromosomes. Moreover, we compared changes in the relative abundance of ARGs based on their genomic location. The results showed that ARGs located on plasmids exhibited a significantly smaller reduction in relative abundance than those located on chromosomes (Figure 3B and Supplementary Table S7, p = 0.01). In addition, 17.9% (24/134) of ARGs were adjacent to MGEs, encompassing nine classes of ARGs, and the majority (21/24) of these MGEs were associated with plasmid-derived scaftigs. We compared changes in the relative abundance of ARGs based on their surrounding genetic environments. The results showed that ARGs adjacent to MGEs exhibited a significantly smaller reduction in relative abundance than those not adjacent to MGEs (Figure 3C and Supplementary Table S8, p = 0.02). These results revealed that the ARGs originating from plasmids or adjacent to MGEs were negatively correlated with the reduction in relative abundance after HWTS treatment.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. The detailed connection between ARGs and MGEs.

Figure 3
Diagram illustrating antibiotic resistance transfer. (A) Network showing connections between mobile genetic elements (transposon, insertion sequence, integron) and antibiotic classes (e.g., rifamycin, beta-lactam). (B) Sankey diagram depicting antibiotic transfer through plasmids and chromosomes, indicating increases and decreases in resistance. (C) Sankey diagram showing resistance changes with mobile genetic elements, highlighting increases and decreases in various antibiotic classes.

Figure 3. (A) Relationship among AGRs, ARGs locations, and ARGs surrounding environments. Red nodes represent the resistance gene types, grey node represents ARGs were located on plasmids, and blue nodes represent ARGs were adjacent to MGEs. The thickness of edge represents the number of interactions between nodes. (B) Distribution and linkages among ARGs, ARGs locations, and relative abundance changes in the effluent. (C) Distribution and linkages among ARGs, ARGs surrounding environments, and relative abundance changes in the effluent.

Discussion

This study has some limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. First, the samples were collected at a single time point, which may not accurately represent the environmental effects at the site of collection. Second, culture-based methods were not used to screen for bacteria harboring specific ARGs, making it impossible to determine whether the ARGs were carried by bacteria or existed extracellularly.

Asfaw et al. (2017) has isolated numerous ARB species of clinical relevance in HWW, such as Klebsiella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Salmonella spp., and it was found that the HWTS could reduce bacterial counts by more than 104-fold. Limayem et al. (2019) determined that the proportion of Gammaproteobacteria decreased from 36.18 to 3.17% after wastewater treatment, highlighting the important role of HWTS in reducing the dissemination of potential pathogens, as many human bacterial pathogens belong to Gammaproteobacteria class. MAG analysis revealed the presence of strains with a close relationship between influent and effluent, such as Mycobacterium and Zoogloea, suggesting that these isolates might persist through treatment.

Moreover, HWW serves as a hotspot reservoir of ARGs, and previous studies have shown that the profiles of ARGs in HWW were highly diverse (Huang et al., 2023). For example, Yao et al. (2021) revealed that blaGES-1 had the highest relative abundance among beta-lactam resistance genes. In the current study, we found that blaKPC-2 exhibited the highest relative abundance among the beta-lactam resistance genes in the HWW. Plasmids and MGEs play crucial roles in the spread of ARGs, facilitating the rapid dissemination of resistance determinants among bacteria (Peterson and Kaur, 2018). Our finding indicated that 66.4% of ARGs were located on plasmids, and 17.9% were adjacent to MGEs, suggesting the potential mobility of these ARGs. We found 80.0% (4/5) of genes encoding extended-spectrum beta-lactamases were located on plasmids, with blaCTX-M-14 associated with Tn602. Additionally, 66.7% (6/9) of carbapenemase genes were located on plasmids, with blaKPC-2 adjacent to ISKpn6 and blaIMP located in integron In829, a core structure commonly reported in previous studies (Zhao and Hu, 2011; Zhang et al., 2017; Dong et al., 2018). The increased ARGs, along with the persistent strains, warrant further investigation. Notably, previous studies have shown that water chlorination could facilitate the transformation and conjugation of plasmid-encoded ARGs, thereby elevating ARG abundance (Zhang et al., 2021).

According to national standards, hospital wastewater treatment in China is generally carried out using a three-stage treatment process. In the HWTS investigated in this study, the primary treatment method is biological contact oxidation, while other methods, such as the activated sludge process and membrane bioreactor, are also commonly employed in hospital wastewater treatment. They had a similar biological treatment based on biodegrading of pollutants through bacterial respiration (Majumder et al., 2021). The bio-oxidation process leads to antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) cell lysis and partially degrades their genetic material. Furthermore, the released extracellular DNA can adsorb onto sludge or sediment (Zhang et al., 2024). However, none of these methods have a mechanism specifically designed to remove ARGs. Zhu et al. (2023) found that certain types of ARGs, such as beta-lactam and aminoglycoside resistance genes, were more abundant in effluent, indicating these ARGs could not be significantly removed by chlorination. Thus, a lot of novel methods have been developed to remove ARGs in the wastewater. Hsiao et al. (2023) reported that ozone micron bubble pretreatment showed superior efficiency in ARGs degradation, which could reduce the abundance of sul1, tetA, blaTEM-1, and mcr-1 in 20 min reaction time. Zhang et al. (2016) reported that advanced oxidation process including Fenton oxidation and UV/H2O2 process could reduce ARGs effectively. However, novel hospital wastewater treatment technologies are still in the developmental stage, and most existing studies have been conducted at the lab scale using synthetic wastewater.

Conclusion

This study provided an evaluation of the impact of HWTS, which changed the bacterial composition, reduced ARGs abundance, and notably blocked the spread of the genes conferring “last-resort” antibiotics resistance. Future studies should focus on active monitoring of HWW effluents and the development of improved HWW treatment processes.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, PRJNA1087003.

Author contributions

YM: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YX: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Writing – review & editing. QP: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. LW: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. WH: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. JZ: Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. WL: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. QS: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. YY: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. YJ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. DH: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Key Research Program of the Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (No. 2021C03179).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1620677/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

References

Asfaw, T., Negash, L., Kahsay, A., and Weldu, Y. (2017). Antibiotic resistant bacteria from treated and untreated hospital waste water at Ayder Referral Hospital, Mekelle, North Ethiopia. Adv. Microbiol. 7, 871–886. doi: 10.4236/aim.2017.712067

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Buchfink, B., Xie, C., and Huson, D. H. (2015). Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12, 59–60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chaumeil, P. A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P., and Parks, D. H. (2019). GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 36, 1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, N., Zhang, R., Liu, L., Li, R., Lin, D., Chan, E. W., et al. (2018). Genome analysis of clinical multilocus sequence type 11 Klebsiella pneumoniae from China. Microb. Genom. 4:e000149. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000149

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ellabaan, M. M. H., Munck, C., Porse, A., Imamovic, L., and Sommer, M. O. A. (2021). Forecasting the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes across bacterial genomes. Nat. Commun. 12:2435. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22757-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S., and Li, W. (2012). CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hsiao, S.-S., Hsu, C.-Y., Ananthakrishnan, B., Hsu, M.-H., Chien, Y.-T., Wang, L.-P., et al. (2023). Ozone micron bubble pretreatment for antibiotic resistance genes reduction in hospital wastewater treatment. Sustain. Environ. Res. 33:40. doi: 10.1186/s42834-023-00203-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, L., Xue, J., and Wu, H. (2024). Composition and distribution of bacteria, pathogens, and antibiotic resistance genes at Shanghai Port, China. Water 16:2569. doi: 10.3390/w16182569

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hua, X., Liang, Q., Deng, M., He, J., Wang, M., Hong, W., et al. (2021). BacAnt: a combination annotation server for bacterial DNA sequences to identify antibiotic resistance genes, integrons, and transposable elements. Front. Microbiol. 12:649969. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.649969

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, J., Wang, Z., Chen, Z., Liang, H., Li, X., and Li, B. (2023). Occurrence and removal of antibiotic resistance in nationwide hospital wastewater deciphered by metagenomics approach—China, 2018–2022. China CDC Wkly. 5, 1023–1028. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2023.193

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kang, Y., Wang, J., and Li, Z. (2024). Meta-analysis addressing the characterization of antibiotic resistome in global hospital wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 466:133577. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133577

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lan, W., Liu, H., Weng, R., Zeng, Y., Lou, J., Xu, H., et al. (2023). Microbial community of municipal drinking water in Hangzhou using metagenomic sequencing. Environ. Pollut. 342:123066. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123066

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Fu, S., Klein, M. S., and Wang, H. (2024). High prevalence of antibiotic resistance in traditionally fermented foods as a critical risk factor for host gut antibiotic resistome. Microorganisms 12:1433. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12071433

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, D., Liu, C. M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K., and Lam, T. W. (2015). MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, W., Yang, Z., Hu, J., Wang, B., Rong, H., Li, Z., et al. (2022). Evaluation of culturable ‘last-resort’ antibiotic resistant pathogens in hospital wastewater and implications on the risks of nosocomial antimicrobial resistance prevalence. J. Hazard. Mater. 438:129477. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129477

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Limayem, A., Wasson, S., Mehta, M., Pokhrel, A. R., Patil, S., Nguyen, M., et al. (2019). High-throughput detection of bacterial community and its drug-resistance profiling from local reclaimed wastewater plants. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 9:303. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00303

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Majumder, A., Gupta, A. K., Ghosal, P. S., and Varma, M. (2021). A review on hospital wastewater treatment: a special emphasis on occurrence and removal of pharmaceutically active compounds, resistant microorganisms, and SARS-CoV-2. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9:104812. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104812

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

O’Neill, J. (2016). Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. Available online at: https://apo.org.au/node/63983 (accessed May 23, 2025).

Google Scholar

Perez-Prieto, I., Vargas, E., Salas-Espejo, E., Lull, K., Canha-Gouveia, A., Perez, L. A., et al. (2024). Gut microbiome in endometriosis: a cohort study on 1000 individuals. BMC Med. 22:294. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03503-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Peterson, E., and Kaur, P. (2018). Antibiotic resistance mechanisms in bacteria: relationships between resistance determinants of antibiotic producers, environmental bacteria, and clinical pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 9:2928. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02928

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, J., Li, R., Raes, J., Arumugam, M., Burgdorf, K. S., Manichanh, C., et al. (2010). A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464, 59–65. doi: 10.1038/nature08821

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Salam, M. A., Al-Amin, M. Y., Salam, M. T., Pawar, J. S., Akhter, N., Rabaan, A. A., et al. (2023). Antimicrobial resistance: a growing serious threat for global public health. Healthcare 11:1946. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131946

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Uritskiy, G. V., DiRuggiero, J., and Taylor, J. (2018). MetaWRAP-a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis. Microbiome 6:158. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0541-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

van der Graaf-van Bloois, L., Wagenaar, J. A., and Zomer, A. L. (2021). RFPlasmid: predicting plasmid sequences from short-read assembly data using machine learning. Microb. Genom. 7:000683. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000683

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Velazquez-Meza, M. E., Galarde-Lopez, M., Carrillo-Quiroz, B., and Alpuche-Aranda, C. M. (2022). Antimicrobial resistance: One Health approach. Vet. World 15, 743–749. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.743-749

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wen, X., Ding, H., Huang, X., and Liu, R. (2004). Treatment of hospital wastewater using a submerged membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem. 39, 1427–1431. doi: 10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00277-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, S., Ye, J., Yang, Q., Hu, Y., Zhang, T., Jiang, L., et al. (2021). Occurrence and removal of antibiotics, antibiotic resistance genes, and bacterial communities in hospital wastewater. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 28, 57321–57333. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14735-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Cui, T., Liu, X., Zhan, M., Song, X., Xu, Y., et al. (2024). Sludge biolysis pretreatment to reduce antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs): insight into the relationship between potential ARGs hosts and BALOs’ preferred prey. Water Res. 260:121949. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121949

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Huang, J., Zhao, Z., Cao, Y., and Li, B. (2020). Hospital wastewater as a reservoir for antibiotic resistance genes: a meta-analysis. Front. Public Health 8:574968. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.574968

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, R., Liu, L., Zhou, H., Chan, E. W., Li, J., Fang, Y., et al. (2017). Nationwide surveillance of clinical Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) strains in China. EBioMedicine 19, 98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.04.032

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Wang, Y., Lu, J., Yu, Z., Song, H., Bond, P. L., et al. (2021). Chlorine disinfection facilitates natural transformation through ROS-mediated oxidative stress. ISME J. 15, 2969–2985. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00980-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Zhuang, Y., Geng, J., Ren, H., Xu, K., and Ding, L. (2016). Reduction of antibiotic resistance genes in municipal wastewater effluent by advanced oxidation processes. Sci. Total Environ. 550, 184–191. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.078

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, W. H., and Hu, Z. Q. (2011). IMP-type metallo-beta-lactamases in Gram-negative bacilli: distribution, phylogeny, and association with integrons. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 37, 214–226. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2011.559944

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, L., Yuan, L., Shuai, X. Y., Lin, Z. J., Sun, Y. J., Zhou, Z. C., et al. (2023). Deciphering basic and key traits of antibiotic resistome in influent and effluent of hospital wastewater treatment systems. Water Res. 231:119614. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.119614

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zinsstag, J., Schelling, E., Waltner-Toews, D., and Tanner, M. (2011). From “one medicine” to “one health” and systemic approaches to health and well-being. Prev. Vet. Med. 101, 148–156. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.07.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: hospital wastewater treatment, antimicrobial resistance gene, metagenomic sequencing, mobile genetic elements, wastewater treatment effectiveness

Citation: Meng Y, Xu Y, Hu D, Pan Q, Weng L, Huang W, Zhao J, Lan W, Shi Q, Yu Y and Jiang Y (2025) Evaluating the effects of hospital wastewater treatment on bacterial composition and antimicrobial resistome. Front. Microbiol. 16:1620677. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1620677

Received: 30 April 2025; Accepted: 18 September 2025;
Published: 02 October 2025.

Edited by:

Xiaoliang Ba, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Yili Chen, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, China
Nafiu Abdulkadir, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Germany

Copyright © 2025 Meng, Xu, Hu, Pan, Weng, Huang, Zhao, Lan, Shi, Yu and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yunsong Yu, eXZ5czExOUB6anUuZWR1LmNu; Yan Jiang, amlhbmd5QHpqdS5lZHUuY24=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.