Immune and Metabolic Alterations in Liver Fibrosis: A Disruption of Oxygen Homeostasis?

Abstract

According to the WHO, “cirrhosis of the liver” was the 11th leading cause of death globally in 2019. Many kinds of liver diseases can develop into liver cirrhosis, and liver fibrosis is the main pathological presentation of different aetiologies, including toxic damage, viral infection, and metabolic and genetic diseases. It is characterized by excessive synthesis and decreased decomposition of extracellular matrix (ECM). Hepatocyte cell death, hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation, and inflammation are crucial incidences of liver fibrosis. The process of fibrosis is also closely related to metabolic and immune disorders, which are usually induced by the destruction of oxygen homeostasis, including mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and hypoxia pathway activation. Mitochondria are important organelles in energy generation and metabolism. Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) are key factors activated when hypoxia occurs. Both are considered essential factors of liver fibrosis. In this review, the authors highlight the impact of oxygen imbalance on metabolism and immunity in liver fibrosis as well as potential novel targets for antifibrotic therapies.

Background

Liver cirrhosis is an irreversible liver fibrosis and was the 11th leading cause of death worldwide from 2000 to 2019 according to the WHO (WHO, 2020). Liver fibrosis is a common pathological pathway for various liver diseases, including viral hepatitis, toxic hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and metabolic and genetic liver diseases (Iredale and Campana, 2017). It is a response to persistent liver injury and is characterized by excessive deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) (Alegre et al., 2017). In the end stage, most liver fibrosis progresses into liver cirrhosis, with the loss of normal function. Early liver fibrosis is reversible, but once it develops into cirrhosis, it is irreversible and leads to functional failure and many complications, such as portal hypertension. Therefore, the prevention and reversal of fibrosis is the main aim for the treatment of liver diseases (Schuppan et al., 2018).

The death of hepatocytes, activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), and inflammation are the main causes of the development of liver fibrosis (Alegre et al., 2017). An imbalance in oxygen supply can lead to injury to organ parenchymal cells to secrete various fibrotic and inflammatory cytokine factors and recruit inflammatory cells to the injured stroma in chronic diseases (Darby and Hewitson, 2016; Liu et al., 2017). Hypoxia is rather common in chronic liver diseases. There are several pathways regulating oxygen homeostasis, and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) is one of them. HIF-1α, activated in hypoxia, could regulate the transcription of many genes (Kietzmann, 2019). Increasing evidence shows the role of HIF-1α in the process of liver fibrosis (Strowitzki et al., 2018). On the other hand, it always shows excess oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and excessive inflammation in chronic liver diseases. Mitochondria are the center of metabolism. With mitochondrial dysfunction in liver disease, it not only releases mitochondrial danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) but also disrupts oxygen homeostasis. DAMPs are released during the condition of liver injury, activating inflammasomes. These injuries may activate HSCs, myofibroblasts, and other cells to synthesize ECM (Schuppan et al., 2018).

Here, we summarize the molecular mechanism of immune, metabolic, and oxygen homeostasis regulation in liver fibrosis to explore precise therapeutic targets and provide clinical treatment strategies.

The Molecular Mechanism of Oxygen Homeostasis Regulation

Mitochondrial Function

Mitochondria are important organelles in the generation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) from lipid, glucose, and amino acid metabolism. The Krebs cycle in the mitochondrial matrix and oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondrial inner membrane are important processes in energy production. Mitochondria also play a role in β-oxidation of fatty acids, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, cell apoptosis, autophagy, calcium homeostasis, and other biological processes (Boengler et al., 2017).

HIF Pathway

HIFs are key receptors for detecting cellular oxygen rates, consisting of an oxygen-labile α subunit (HIF1α, HIF2α or HIF3α) and a constitutively expressed β subunit (HIFβ) (Peek, 2020). HIFβ is expressed stably and continuously and does not participate in oxygen detection. HIFα subunits are regulated by oxygen at the posttranslational level. Under normal conditions, HIFα subunits are hydroxylated at specific proline residues by the prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) protein (Wong et al., 2013). Then, the von Hippel‐Lindau (VHL)/E3 ubiquitin ligase system recognizes the hydroxylated subunits that induce protein degradation and inactivation (Günter et al., 2017). In hypoxic environments, HIFα subunits are not hydroxylated, which mediates protein stabilization. HIFα subunits heterodimerize with HIFβ subunits to form a nuclear heterodimer, which drives target gene transcription by binding to the hypoxia response element (HRE) (Baik and Jain, 2020).

The Destruction of Oxygen Homeostasis in Liver Fibrosis

Role of the Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Liver Fibrosis

Mitochondrial Structure and Dynamics and Liver Fibrosis

Mitochondrial dysfunction can be detected in many kinds of liver diseases and is believed to be involved in liver fibrosis (Mansouri et al., 2018). It is characterized by ultrastructural mitochondrial lesions, respiratory chain activity reduction, ATP depletion, excessive ROS levels, and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damage. A recent article reported that mitochondrial dysfunction in peripheral cells along with alterations in metabolites of the urea cycle may act as biomarkers for the progression of fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (Ajaz et al., 2021). The mitochondrial quality control system is crucial for the maintenance of mitochondria, including mitochondrial biogenesis, fusion and fission, and mitophagy.

Mitochondrial biogenesis is regulated by peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐gamma (PPAR γ) coactivator‐1alpha (PGC‐1α) (Wu et al., 1999), which is a kind of transcriptional coactivator that regulates the expression of several transcription factors, such as nuclear respiratory factor (NRF)-1 and NRF-2 (Bhatti et al., 2017; Kiyama et al., 2018), and mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) (Kang et al., 2007). A recent study proved that astaxanthin attenuated hepatocyte damage and mitochondrial dysfunction in NAFLD by upregulating the FGF21/PGC‐1α pathway (Wu et al., 2020). PGC‐1α, NRF-1, and TFAM were also elevated after melatonin treatment in carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-treated rats. Melatonin protected against liver fibrosis by upregulation of mitochondrial biogenesis (Kang et al., 2016). Moreover, the antifibrotic effects of pomegranate seed oil (PSO), epoxyeicosatrienoic acid-agonist (EET-A), curcumin, liquiritigenin, and Solanum nigrum (AESN) may be related to the upregulation of PGC‐1α (Zhai et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015; Tai et al., 2016; Raffaele et al., 2019; Raffaele et al., 2020).

Mitochondrial fusion is regulated by the fusion proteins mitofusin 1 (Mfn1) and Mfn2 and optic atrophy 1 (OPA1), while mitochondrial fission in mammals is regulated by dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) (Ni et al., 2015). The role of PGC‐1α in mitochondrial dynamics has been reported. In oxidative stress-induced mitochondrial damage, the downregulation of PGC‐1α is related to abnormal mitochondrial fission. Hence, PGC-1α overexpression reduced Drp1 protein levels and prevented liver fibrosis (Zhang et al., 2020). Particulate matter ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5) also contributes to mitochondrial dynamics dysfunction by increasing Drp1 and decreasing PGC-1α levels (Wang et al., 2021). The overexpression of HK domain-containing 1 (HKDC1) in the liver induced a defect in mitochondrial function by increasing Drp1 (Pusec et al., 2019). The antifibrotic effect of lipoic acid (LA) may be related to the upregulation of Drp1 (Luo and Shen, 2020).

Impaired Mitophagy and Liver Fibrosis

Mitophagy refers to the removal of dysfunctional mitochondria through fusion with lysosomes (Yoo and Jung, 2018). It can be classified into Pink1–Parkin-mediated mitophagy and Parkin-independent mitophagy. Mitophagy mediated by Drp-1 was activated by PM2.5, leading to HSC activation and fibrosis. Chronic CCl4 exposure impaired mitophagy in the liver, and melatonin may attenuate liver fibrosis by elevating PINK1 and Parkin (Kang et al., 2016). Researchers have shown that mitochondrial depolarization (mtDepo) occurs early in mice fed a Western diet (high fat, fructose, and cholesterol) and increases mitophagic burden. Together with suppressed mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial depletion, mitochondrial damage promotes the progression of liver fibrosis (Krishnasamy et al., 2019). It is worth mentioning that Parkin-independent mediators, including Bcl2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa protein-interacting protein 3 (BNIP3) and NIX, can be regulated by HIF-1, thus removing damaged mitochondria and protecting against ROS accumulation.

Impaired mtDNA Homeostasis and Liver Fibrosis

In the case of mitochondrial dysfunction, mitochondrial DAMPs (mtDAMPs) are released to the extracellular space. This can stimulate liver inflammation and promote liver fibrosis. A recent study reported that mtDAMPs released from impaired hepatocyte mitochondria could directly activate HSCs (An et al., 2020). The role of mtDAMPs in liver fibrosis will be discussed in detail later.

Reactive Oxygen Species Generation in Mitochondria

The mitochondrial respiratory chain is considered the main source of ROS production. ROS refer to oxygen free radicals and nonradical oxidants (Zorov et al., 2014). It can be produced in both the mitochondrial matrix and the intermembrane space (Bouchez and Devin, 2019). Under normal homeostasis, mitochondria can remove physiological ROS by antioxidant mechanisms and metabolic adaptations (Lee et al., 2019) and thus maintain a balance between ROS production and removal. The antioxidant system includes superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione (GSH), and other antioxidants (Bhatti et al., 2017).

However, the excessive level of ROS caused by increased ROS production and decreased ROS scavenging may lead to protein, DNA, and lipid damage to mitochondria (Zorov et al., 2014; Sorrentino et al., 2018). Additionally, ROS can activate several pathways. Under hypoxia, with low-intensity ROS, the HIF-1α pathway is activated, leading to metabolic adaptation and subsequently inhibiting ROS production (Finkel, 2012). With moderate intensity of ROS in hypoxia, it can regulate inflammatory reactions, such as NACHT, LRR, and PYD domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling (Win et al., 2018). With a high intensity of ROS, apoptosis and autophagy may occur, preventing more damage.

Considering that changes in mitochondrial physiological processes participate in the development and progression of liver diseases, mitochondria are believed to be a promising treatment target for liver fibrosis.

Role of the HIF Pathway in Liver Fibrosis

Hypoxia and HIFs have been acknowledged as important drivers of liver fibrosis (Strowitzki et al., 2018). In fact, hypoxia is involved in a variety of liver diseases. Hypoxia levels are elevated in liver cancer and may be involved in destroying the natural immune response and creating an immunosuppressive microenvironment (Yuen and Wong, 2020). In NAFLD, hypoxia may mediate hepatic steatosis and abnormal lipid metabolism (Mesarwi et al., 2019). Hypoxia-mediated abnormal immune and metabolic microenvironments are also key factors in the development of fibrosis and liver cirrhosis.

The interaction of HIF-1α and Rho-associated coiled-coil-forming kinase 1 (ROCK1) promotes cell proliferation and collagen synthesis in rat HSCs under hypoxia (Hu et al., 2018). A recent study also showed that activated HIF-1α or HIF-2α in hepatocytes stimulates upregulation of chemokine ligand 12 (Cxcl12) by converting latent transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) to active TGF-β (Strickland et al., 2020). Cxcl12 is involved in the process of liver fibrosis through chemotaxis and activation of HSCs (Li et al., 2020). These findings indicate that HIF acts as an important regulator of liver fibrosis-targeting HSCs (Tirosh, 2018).

During liver fibrosis, hepatic sinusoidal blood flow disorder and hypoxia lead to the secretion of angiogenic factors by liver intrinsic cells. Pathological angiogenesis destroys the hepatic architecture and aggravates liver fibrosis (Poisson et al., 2017). Recent studies identified that hedgehog signalling promoted prospero homeobox protein 1 (PROX1) expression in liver fibrosis, which inhibited HIF‐1α ubiquitination via a deubiquitinase called ubiquitin specific peptidase 19 (USP19). This hedgehog signalling-mediated hypoxia response participates in liver sinusoidal endothelial cell (LSEC) angiogenesis and the activation of HSCs (Feng et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2020). It has also been suggested that activated peroxisomal proliferator receptor γ (PPARγ) in HSCs could inhibit the expression of HIF-1α via an SMRT-dependent mechanism. The activation of PPARγ improved angiogenesis and vascular remodelling in carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced liver fibrosis in rats. A possible negative feedback loop was raised in which HIF-1α might induce PPARγ expression in response to hypoxia or pathological stress, and then overexpressed PPARγ would inhibit HIF-1α transcription to limit amplification (Zhang et al., 2018).

The Oxygen Imbalance Mediated-Immune and Metabolic Alterations in Liver Fibrosis

Mitochondrial Dysfunction Mediated-Immune Regulation in Liver Fibrosis

Sterile inflammation (SI) is a common response to stress and injury in liver disease (Chen et al., 2018). This is a major process in the development of fibrosis and carcinogenesis (Kubes and Mehal, 2012). In SI, DAMPs, which are usually in the intracellular space, are released to the local microenvironment when infections, metabolic disorders, and other stimuli result in hepatocyte cell death, leading to a wide range of immune responses (Iredale and Campana, 2017). Several DAMPs have been identified, including mtDNA and nuclear DNA, high mobility group box-1 (HMGB-1), ATP and other molecules. HMGB-1 is released mostly by hepatocytes and Kupffer cells (KCs). Recent research confirmed the role of HMGB1 in liver fibrosis. It has been reported that HMGB1 could increase collagen type I production in HSCs via the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), leading to liver fibrosis. The underlying mechanism was the pMEK1/2/pERK1/2/pcJun signalling pathway (Ge et al., 2018). Furthermore, HMGB1 also links hepatocyte injury to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (Hernandez et al., 2018).

MtDAMPs, including mtDNA and formyl peptides, are released to the extracellular space in the case of ROS-driven mitochondrial membrane permeability transition (Mihm, 2018). They recognize pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) on target cells to modulate the function of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), eosinophils, mast cells, and neutrophils (Krysko et al., 2011). For example, mtDNA recognizes Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) and NLRP3, and N-formyl peptides (NFPs) recognize TLR9 (Kubes and Mehal, 2012). Therefore, mitochondria are key stimuli of the innate immune response in liver diseases.

MtDNA is the major part of mtDAMP and is released into the cytosol when mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis occur. In different kinds of liver injury, the effects of mtDAMP on immune response is different. In patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), mtDNA levels have been reported to increase (Garcia-Martinez et al., 2016). Furthermore, it increased in patients with active NASH (NAS 4–8 versus NAS 0–3, p = 0.0334) (An et al., 2020). It can activate several pathways (Zhang et al., 2019). The first is NLRP3 inflammasomes. NLRP3 can directly activate HSCs, triggering liver fibrosis (Inzaugarat et al., 2019). Furthermore, it has been reported that in the mouse NASH model, mtDNA released by KCs bound and activated the NLRP3 inflammasome to induce interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18, triggering proinflammatory responses and resulting in liver fibrosis (Shimada et al., 2012; Pan et al., 2018; Hu et al., 2019). Likewise, KCs induced by palmitic acid (PA) induced mtDNA and activated the NLRP3 inflammasome (Pan et al., 2018). The second is TLR9. In a mouse model of NASH, the plasma level of mtDNA increased, and it could activate TLR9, leading to a proinflammatory response (Garcia-Martinez et al., 2016). Therefore, the activation of TLR9 by mtDNA is believed to play a role in the transition from steatosis to steatohepatitis (Garcia-Martinez et al., 2016). The use of the TLR7/9 antagonist IRS954 could block the ability of mtDNA, resulting in a decrease in steatosis, ballooning and inflammation, serum transaminases, and inflammatory cytokine transcript levels (Garcia-Martinez et al., 2016). This revealed the potential of TLR9 ligand therapies. In acute liver injury induced by acetaminophen (APAP), mtDNA, which binds to TLR9, can induce neutrophil activation and liver inflammation. The crucial mediator is microRNA-223 (miR-223), which acts as a negative feedback loop to limit neutrophil overactivation and liver injury (He et al., 2017). DNA-sensing pathways could induce type I interferon (IFN I) production in liver NPCs, which is related to hepatocyte necrosis (Araujo et al., 2018). The third is cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING). In a mouse model of NASH, STING deficiency attenuated steatosis, fibrosis, and inflammation in the liver; exposure to a STING agonist led to hepatic steatosis and inflammation in WT mice but not in STING-deficient mice (Yu et al., 2018). STING functions as a mtDNA sensor in KCs and increases the expression of TNF-α and IL-6 through the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signalling pathway in NASH (Yu et al., 2018). The activation of STING in macrophages is also related to liver fibrosis (Luo et al., 2018). Furthermore, other mediators related to mitochondria are formyl peptides. Formyl peptides are released from dysfunctional mitochondria and bind to formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) (Krysko et al., 2011). FPRs are expressed at high levels on neutrophil granulocytes and mononuclear phagocytes (Mihm, 2018). This binding leads to the migration of immune cells to the injured tissue, activating proinflammatory responses (Raoof et al., 2010). The role of formyl peptides has been revealed in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and ischaemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) (Zhang et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2015). However, the direct effect of formyl peptides on liver fibrosis has not been identified.

Moreover, mitochondria are the site of ATP production, and when in disease, high concentrations of ATP may be released extracellularly. ATP binds to P2X7 receptors on neutrophils, inducing NLRP3-ASC-caspase-1 inflammasome and IL-1β secretion (Schroder and Tschopp, 2010; Karmakar et al., 2016).

These studies revealed the crucial role of mtDAMPs in modulating the immune response and liver fibrosis, which are promising biomarkers and treatment targets.

HIF Mediated-Metabolic Regulation in Liver Fibrosis

An increasing number of studies have confirmed that HIF-1 acts as a crucial regulator in metabolic reprogramming in liver fibrosis (Corcoran and O’Neill, 2016). Glucose transporters 1 (GLUT1) and pyruvate kinase isozymes M2 (PKM2) are confirmed to be the target genes of HIF-1 and the key molecules of the Warburg effect (Wan et al., 2019). Wan et al. (2019) reported that HIF-1 upregulated GLUT1 and PKM2 expression in fibrotic liver and exosomes derived from activated HSCs. Interestingly, exosomes from activated HSCs were absorbed by KCs, LSECs, and quiescent HSCs, which enhanced glycolysis of these liver nonparenchymal cells. These findings represent a novel mechanism: upon injury of parenchymal hepatic cells, HIF-1 can regulate nonparenchymal cells (NPCs) to maintain synchronization of metabolic reprogramming.

In mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD), hepatic steatosis leads to liver tissue hypoxia. The HIF1-mediated PTEN/NF-kB-p65 pathway plays a critical role in the development of NAFLD to liver fibrosis (Han et al., 2019). In an apolipoprotein E-deficient (Apoe−/−) mouse model, the circadian locomotor output cycle kaput (CLOCK) protein indirectly regulates HIF1α expression by modulating PHD protein levels. In CLOCK deficiency, HIF1α binds to the Cd36 promoter, promoting CD36 expression and uptake of fatty acids in the liver. This regulatory link among hypoxia, metabolism, and circadian locomotor promotes cirrhosis in NAFLD (Pan et al., 2020). Studies of high cholesterol diet (HCD)-induced liver fibrosis revealed that inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-mediated enhancement of fibrosis was associated with HIF1α stabilization (Anavi et al., 2015). It has been suggested that cholesterol-mediated activation of HIF-1 is ROS- and nitric oxide (NO)-dependent. Cholesterol load increased mitochondrial dysfunction and NO levels, which promoted HIF-1 stabilization and transcriptional activity (Anavi et al., 2014). Succinate, an intermediate of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, accumulates in hepatocytes due to enhanced fatty acid oxidation in fibrosis. Accumulated succinate stabilizes and activates HIF-1α by impairing PHDs, which induces inflammation and HSC activation (Cho, 2018; She et al., 2018). We summarized the details of the mechanism above in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1

This evidence indicates that the oxygen balance in liver fibrosis is disrupted, which mediates metabolic disorders and the pathological accumulation of metabolic substances. There is no doubt that HIF-mediated oxygen balance control is a potential target for metabolic liver disease.

HIF Mediated-Immune Regulation in Liver Fibrosis

Although HIF-α is often activated in liver diseases, the roles of HIF-1 mediated-immune regulation in different liver injuries are different. In cholestatic liver disease, nuclear HIF-1α protein was present in hepatocytes, liver macrophages, and liver fibroblasts of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis (Copple et al., 2012). A study of cholestatic mice indicated that chronic liver injury activated HIF-1α in macrophages. Activated HIF in macrophages may regulate the expression of platelet-derived growth factor-B (PDGF-B) to promote fibrosis, which induces HSC proliferation, chemotaxis, and collagen production.

In NASH mice, the significant upregulation of HIF‐1α in hepatocytes increased proportion of M2 macrophages and promoted liver fibrosis and HCC (Ambade et al., 2016). Furthermore, HIF‐1α is not only upregulated in hepatocytes, where it induces steatosis, but also in macrophages of NASH patients (Wang et al., 2019). The role of HIF-1α in macrophages in NASH was explored in the methionine-choline-deficient (MCD) diet-fed mice. Mice with stabilized HIF-1α levels in macrophages showed higher steatosis and liver inflammation. HIF-1α impaired autophagic flux in macrophages and upregulated NF-κB activation and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) production, leading to MCD diet-induced NASH (Wang et al., 2019). At the same time, digoxin was reported to be protective in inflammasome activity in macrophages and hepatic oxidative stress response in hepatocytes in NASH (Zhao et al., 2019). The protective effect was related to the downregulation of HIF-1α transactivation (Ouyang et al., 2018).

A recent article has reported the role of HIF-1α in viral hepatitis type B that HIF-1α down-regulated apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 3B (APOBEC3B) and thus impaired the anti-HBV effect of A3B (Riedl et al., 2021). However, HIF-1α also induced deoxyribonucleases (DNases), which limited the duplication of hepadnaviruses (Hallez et al., 2019).

In contrast, the role of HIF-1α in chemicals-induced acute liver injury is different from its role in chronic liver diseases. Mochizuki et al. proposed a model in which liver necrotic cells could activate HIF-1α in HSCs through regional hypoxia or other mechanisms yet to be determined. HIF-1α then stimulated recruited macrophages to remove necrotic hepatocytes. In HSC-specific HIF-1α knockout, the levels of M1 macrophage activation markers and the percentage of Gr1^hi macrophages in the liver were reduced, which impaired the clearance of necrotic cells and promoted fibrosis (Mochizuki et al., 2014). In APAP-induced liver injury, T-cell-specific Hif-1α gene knockout mice sustained severe liver damage, which was related to the aggravated inflammatory responses by enhancing aberrant innate-like γδ T-cell recruitment and excessive neutrophil infiltration (Suzuki et al., 2018).

It has also been reported that hepatocyte-specific deletion of HIF‐2α improved NAFLD‐associated fibrosis through downregulated histidine‐rich glycoprotein (HRGP). The fraction of inflammatory Ly6C^high hepatic macrophages, its production of IL‐12, and the expression of M1 cytokines/chemokines were significantly decreased in HIF‐2α^–/– mice. These findings indicated that HIF‐2α/HRGP in parenchymal cells could promote proinflammatory responses of hepatic macrophages (Bartneck et al., 2016; Morello et al., 2018). These studies suggest that although liver injury is usually accompanied by the activation of HIF, different activated cells may have opposite effects on fibrosis. We summarized the oxygen imbalance mediated-immune alterations above in Figures 2A,C.

FIGURE 2

Therapeutic Significance of Oxygen Homeostasis in Liver Fibrosis

Therapies Targeting Mitochondrial Dysfunction to Alleviate Fibrosis

Since increasing evidence has proven the crucial role of mitochondria in liver fibrosis, several efforts have been made to assess the efficacy of pharmacologic therapies targeting mitochondria.

Attenuated mitochondrial dysfunction, increased mitochondrial fission, decreased HSC migration and activation, and decreased oxidative stress are involved in the protective role of augmenting liver regeneration (ALR) in liver fibrosis (Song et al., 2011; Ai et al., 2018). Ming Song et al. first reported the therapeutic effect of ALR gene therapy (Song et al., 2011). The underlying mechanisms were attenuating mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress and inhibiting the activation of HSCs. The results of Ai et al. (2018) were consistent with the former results. The inhibition of ALR expression aggravated liver fibrosis in mice that were administered CCl4 by promoting mitochondrial fusion and HSC migration. The inhibition of ALR may lead to increased mitochondrial Ca²⁺ influx in HSCs, resulting in HSC migration. ALR transfection inhibited F-actin assembly, retarded HSC migration, and promoted mitochondrial fission (Ai et al., 2018).

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) activation was found in patients with hepatic cirrhosis, and the inhibition of PARP had antifibrotic effects (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2017). PARP inhibition or genetic deletion of PARP1 was reported to attenuate alcohol-induced hepatic oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction by improving the activity of complexes I and IV (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2017). Xing Lin et al. reported that didymin could alleviate liver injury and fibrosis induced by CCl4 by inhibiting HSC proliferation and inducing apoptosis (Lin et al., 2016).

HSC apoptosis was partly mediated by MPTP opening. Didymin treatment led to cytochrome c release into the cytosol and decreased Bcl-2 expression, resulting in HSC apoptosis (Lin et al., 2016). Similarly, the curative effect of dihydroartemisinin (DHA) on liver fibrosis was also partly mediated by HSC apoptosis by releasing cytochrome c and activating the caspase pathway (Chen et al., 2016a).

Oxidative stress is a main stimulative factor of liver fibrosis, and it is a promising target. Melatonin may improve hepatic mitochondrial functions and thus reduce oxidative stress in some diseases (Coto-Montes et al., 2012; Jimenéz-Aranda et al., 2014; Agil et al., 2015). In CCl4-induced liver fibrosis rats, melatonin protected against liver fibrosis by attenuating mitochondrial dysfunction, which was manifested by improved mitophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis (Kang et al., 2016). Melatonin also attenuated lipid-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS generation in hepatocytes and improved mitochondrial respiratory functions, leading to decreased oxidative stress and inflammation and thus inhibition of HSC activation (Das et al., 2017). Another mitochondria-targeted antioxidant, mitoquinone, could attenuate liver fibrosis by reducing hepatic oxidative stress, preventing apoptosis, and promoting the removal of dysfunctional mitochondria (Turkseven et al., 2020).

It has been reported that adiponectin and its receptors enhanced fatty acid oxidation and glucose uptake and prevented the activation of HSCs induced by CCl4, thus alleviating NASH and fibrosis in mouse models (Xu et al., 2020).

Mitophagy is a selective form of autophagy that eliminates dysfunctional mitochondria (Williams et al., 2015a). It protects the liver from both acute and chronic ethanol consumption (Ma et al., 2020). Targeting mitophagy may protect the liver from acetaminophen and alcohol injury (Williams et al., 2015b). Interestingly, chronic deletion (KO) of Parkin alleviated APAP-induced liver injury, but acute knockdown of Parkin exacerbated injury (Williams et al., 2015a). This result suggested other protective pathways in the liver.

Therapies Targeting the HIF Pathway to Alleviate Fibrosis

Since hypoxia and HIFs are considered to be important drivers of liver fibrosis, targeting HIF may be an effective treatment for fibrosis (Strowitzki et al., 2018). In mice fed with HFD, curcumin can inhibit succinate-induced HSC activation by blocking the HIF-1α signalling pathway in mouse primary HSCs (She et al., 2018). In acute liver injury Tamoxifen, an agonist of the G protein-coupled oestrogen receptor (GPER), has been confirmed to inhibit the HIF1α pathway and prevent HSC activation by a mechanical mechanism (Cortes et al., 2019). In a rat model of CCl4-induced liver fibrosis, ligustrazine alleviated hepatic injury, angiogenesis, and vascular remodelling by decreasing the level of HIF-1α (Zhang et al., 2018). The combination of celecoxib and octreotide decreased thioacetamide-induced liver fibrosis in rats by inhibiting the phosphorylation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK)/HIF-1α/vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway (Gao et al., 2016). MicroRNA-122 can protect the liver from ethanol-induced injury and fibrosis by inhibiting HIF-1α expression (Satishchandran et al., 2018). In cholestatic liver fibrosis, it has also been reported that EW-7197, a TGF-β Type I receptor kinase inhibitor, can inhibit HIF1α-induced epithelial mesenchymal transition to alleviate cholestatic liver fibrosis (Kim et al., 2016). In NASH, isochlorogenic acid B was reported to have anti-fibrosis effects by inhibiting HSC activation, attenuating oxidative stress via Nrf2, and suppressing multiple profibrogenic factors through miR-122/HIF-1α signalling pathway (Liu et al., 2019). The protective role of digoxin in steatohepatitis was related to the inhibition of PKM2/HIF-1α signalling pathway (Ouyang et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2019).

MSCs Act as a Bridge to Link Immunometabolism, Oxygen Homeostasis, and Fibrosis

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are pluripotent stem cells that can be induced to differentiate into several tissue cells (Chen et al., 2016b). MSC sources are diverse, such as in bone marrow, adipose tissue, placenta, amniotic tissue, cord, lung, liver, and skin (Zhuang et al., 2019). Existing studies have shown that MSC therapy is prominently effective in hepatic fibrotic diseases indirectly by regulating the immune metabolism microenvironment (El Agha et al., 2017). The secretion of IL-17A from Th17 cells can promote fibrosis by activating fibroblasts (Huang et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2020). BM-MSCs inhibited liver fibrosis by decreasing the expression of IL-17A and IL-17RA and the serum levels of IL-17 in the liver (Farouk et al., 2018). Milosavljevic et al. also confirmed that MSC-conditioned medium (MSC-CM) promoted the expansion of CD4⁺-FoxP3⁺-IL-10⁺-T regulatory cells and suppressed the proliferation of Th17 cells, which attenuated liver fibrosis (Dong et al., 2020).

Furthermore, BM-MSC transplantation promoted the activation of M2 macrophages expressing matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13) and inhibited M1 macrophage activation. Meanwhile, MSCs reduced the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and increased the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines (van der Helm et al., 2018; Luo et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2019). Increasing mitophagy and reducing mitochondrial ROS to restrict the inflammatory activation of macrophages may be critical mechanisms by which MSCs inhibit inflammation (Li et al., 2018). In response to oxidative stress, MSCs can transport depolarized mitochondria to macrophages through extracellular vesicles (Phinney et al., 2015). Mitochondrial transfer also promotes an anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotype by enhancing oxidative phosphorylation (Morrison et al., 2017). Existing studies also confirmed that hypoxia preconditioning and HIF-1 overexpression significantly improved MSC therapy (Martinez et al., 2017). MSCs cultured under hypoxic conditions presented an enhanced therapeutic effect on liver cirrhosis, which promoted macrophage polarity to an anti-inflammatory phenotype via prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) expression (Kojima et al., 2019). In summary, MSC treatment is emerging as a connecting bridge to drive immune and metabolic regulation and oxygen balance in the fibrotic microenvironment. We summarized the details of mechanism above in Figure 2B.

Conclusion and Future Perspectives

Mitochondrial dysfunction, hypoxia, inflammation, and metabolic reprogramming are widespread in fibrotic diseases. Here, we have reviewed the regulatory mechanism for immunometabolism and oxygen homeostasis in liver fibrosis (Figure 3) as well as potential novel targets for antifibrotic therapies. A special metabolic immune microenvironment mediated by oxygen is described, which deeply affects the balance of tissue damage and repair. The process of fibrosis is closely related to metabolic and immune disorders, which are usually induced by the destruction of oxygen homeostasis, including mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and hypoxia signalling pathway activation. On the one hand, destruction of oxygen homeostasis promotes oxidative stress and releases inflammatory mediators, forming a loop with an inflammatory response and cell damage. On the other hand, cell metabolic reprogramming affects the activation of immune cells and fibroblasts, epithelial mesenchymal transformation, and angiogenesis and further promotes the development of fibrosis. Furthermore, we noticed that hypoxia-induced metabolic reprogramming of immune cells and other fibrosis-related cells is an emerging research direction, but there is still a gap to be filled in the liver fibrosis field. In summary, as immunometabolism and oxygen homeostasis are relatively new research directions, the mechanism, function, and potential clinical application in liver fibrosis need and deserve further investigation.

FIGURE 3

References

• 1

  AgilA.El-HammadiM.Jiménez-ArandaA.TassiM.AbdoW.Fernández-VázquezG.et al (2015). Melatonin Reduces Hepatic Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Diabetic Obese Rats. J. Pineal Res.59, 70–79. 10.1111/jpi.12241

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AiW.-L.DongL.-y.WangJ.LiZ.-w.WangX.GaoJ.et al (2018). Deficiency in Augmenter of Liver Regeneration Accelerates Liver Fibrosis by Promoting Migration of Hepatic Stellate Cell. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Bba) - Mol. Basis Dis.1864, 3780–3791. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.09.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AjazS.McPhailM. J.GnudiL.TrovatoF. M.MujibS.NapoliS.et al (2021). Mitochondrial Dysfunction as a Mechanistic Biomarker in Patients with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Mitochondrion57, 119–130. 10.1016/j.mito.2020.12.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AlegreF.PelegrinP.FeldsteinA. (2017). Inflammasomes in Liver Fibrosis. Semin. Liver Dis.37, 119–127. 10.1055/s-0037-1601350

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  AmbadeA.SatishchandranA.SahaB.GyongyosiB.LoweP.KodysK.et al (2016). Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Accelerated by NASH Involving M2 Macrophage Polarization Mediated by Hif-1αinduced IL-10. Oncoimmunology5, e1221557. 10.1080/2162402x.2016.1221557

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  AnP.WeiL.-L.ZhaoS.SverdlovD. Y.VaidK. A.MiyamotoM.et al (2020). Hepatocyte Mitochondria-Derived Danger Signals Directly Activate Hepatic Stellate Cells and Drive Progression of Liver Fibrosis. Nat. Commun.11, 2362. 10.1038/s41467-020-16092-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  AnaviS.Eisenberg-BordM.Hahn-ObercygerM.GeninO.PinesM.TiroshO. (2015). The Role of iNOS in Cholesterol-Induced Liver Fibrosis. Lab. Invest.95, 914–924. 10.1038/labinvest.2015.67

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  AnaviS.Hahn-ObercygerM.MadarZ.TiroshO. (2014). Mechanism for HIF-1 Activation by Cholesterol under Normoxia: A Redox Signaling Pathway for Liver Damage. Free Radic. Biol. Med.71, 61–69. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.03.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  AraujoA.AntunesM.MattosM.DinizA.AlvarengaD.NakagakiB.et al (2018). Liver Immune Cells Release Type 1 Interferon Due to DNA Sensing and Amplify Liver Injury from Acetaminophen Overdose. Cells7, 88. 10.3390/cells7080088

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  BaikA. H.JainI. H. (2020). Turning the Oxygen Dial: Balancing the Highs and Lows. Trends Cell Biology30, 516–536. 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.04.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  BartneckM.FechV.EhlingJ.GovaereO.WarzechaK. T.HittatiyaK.et al (2016). Histidine-rich Glycoprotein Promotes Macrophage Activation and Inflammation in Chronic Liver Disease. Hepatology63, 1310–1324. 10.1002/hep.28418

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BhattiJ. S.BhattiG. K.ReddyP. H. (2017). Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress in Metabolic Disorders - A Step towards Mitochondria Based Therapeutic Strategies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Bba) - Mol. Basis Dis.1863, 1066–1077. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.11.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BoenglerK.KosiolM.MayrM.SchulzR.RohrbachS. (2017). Mitochondria and Ageing: Role in Heart, Skeletal Muscle and Adipose Tissue. J. Cachexia, Sarcopenia Muscle8, 349–369. 10.1002/jcsm.12178

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  BouchezC.DevinA. (2019). Mitochondrial Biogenesis and Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS): A Complex Relationship Regulated by the cAMP/PKA Signaling Pathway. Cells8, 287. 10.3390/cells8040287

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  ChenQ.ChenL.WuX.ZhangF.JinH.LuC.et al (2016). Dihydroartemisinin Prevents Liver Fibrosis in Bile Duct Ligated Rats by Inducing Hepatic Stellate Cell Apoptosis through Modulating the PI3K/Akt Pathway. IUBMB Life68, 220–231. 10.1002/iub.1478

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  ChenQ.ShouP.ZhengC.JiangM.CaoG.YangQ.et al (2016). Fate Decision of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Adipocytes or Osteoblasts?Cell Death Differ23, 1128–1139. 10.1038/cdd.2015.168

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  ChenY.YousafM. N.MehalW. Z. (2018). Role of Sterile Inflammation in Fatty Liver Diseases. Liver Res.2, 21–29. 10.1016/j.livres.2018.02.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  ChoE.-H. (2018). Succinate as a Regulator of Hepatic Stellate Cells in Liver Fibrosis. Front. Endocrinol.9, 455. 10.3389/fendo.2018.00455

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  CoppleB. L.KaskaS.WentlingC. (2012). Hypoxia-inducible Factor Activation in Myeloid Cells Contributes to the Development of Liver Fibrosis in Cholestatic Mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.341, 307–316. 10.1124/jpet.111.189340

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  CorcoranS. E.O’NeillL. A. J. (2016). HIF1α and Metabolic Reprogramming in Inflammation. J. Clin. Invest.126, 3699–3707. 10.1172/jci84431

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  CortesE.LachowskiD.RiceA.ThorpeS. D.RobinsonB.YeldagG.et al (2019). Tamoxifen Mechanically Deactivates Hepatic Stellate Cells via the G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor. Oncogene38, 2910–2922. 10.1038/s41388-018-0631-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  Coto-MontesA.BogaJ. A.Rosales-CorralS.Fuentes-BrotoL.TanD. X.ReiterR. J.(2012). Role of Melatonin in the Regulation of Autophagy and Mitophagy: a Review. Mol. Cell Endocrinol.361, 12–23. 10.1016/j.mce.2012.04.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  DarbyI. A.HewitsonT. D. (2016). Hypoxia in Tissue Repair and Fibrosis. Cell Tissue Res365, 553–562. 10.1007/s00441-016-2461-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  DasN.MandalaA.NaazS.GiriS.JainM.BandyopadhyayD.et al (2017). Melatonin Protects against Lipid-Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Hepatocytes and Inhibits Stellate Cell Activation during Hepatic Fibrosis in Mice. J. Pineal Res.62, e12404. 10.1111/jpi.12404

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  DongL.PuY.ChenX.QiX.ZhangL.XuL.et al (2020). hUCMSC-extracellular Vesicles Downregulated Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Reduced Liver Injury in S. Japonicum-Infected Mice. Stem Cell Res Ther11, 21. 10.1186/s13287-019-1539-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  El AghaE.KramannR.SchneiderR. K.LiX.SeegerW.HumphreysB. D.et al (2017). Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Fibrotic Disease. Cell stem cell21, 166–177. 10.1016/j.stem.2017.07.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  FaroukS.SabetS.Abu ZahraF. A.El-GhorA. A. (2018). Bone Marrow Derived-Mesenchymal Stem Cells Downregulate IL17A Dependent IL6/STAT3 Signaling Pathway in CCl4-Induced Rat Liver Fibrosis. PloS one13, e0206130. 10.1371/journal.pone.0206130

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  FengJ.WangC.LiuT.LiJ.WuL.YuQ.et al (2019). Procyanidin B2 Inhibits the Activation of Hepatic Stellate Cells and Angiogenesis via the Hedgehog Pathway during Liver Fibrosis. J. Cell Mol Med23, 6479–6493. 10.1111/jcmm.14543

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  FinkelT. (2012). Signal Transduction by Mitochondrial Oxidants. J. Biol. Chem.287, 4434–4440. 10.1074/jbc.R111.271999

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  GaoJ.-H.WenS.-L.FengS.YangW.-J.LuY.-Y.TongH.et al (2016). Celecoxib and Octreotide Synergistically Ameliorate portal Hypertension via Inhibition of Angiogenesis in Cirrhotic Rats. Angiogenesis19, 501–511. 10.1007/s10456-016-9522-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  Garcia-MartinezI.SantoroN.ChenY.HoqueR.OuyangX.CaprioS.et al (2016). Hepatocyte Mitochondrial DNA Drives Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis by Activation of TLR9. J. Clin. Invest.126, 859–864. 10.1172/jci83885

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  GeX.ArriazuE.MagdalenoF.AntoineD. J.dela CruzR.TheiseN.et al (2018). High Mobility Group Box-1 Drives Fibrosis Progression Signaling via the Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products in Mice. Hepatology68, 2380–2404. 10.1002/hep.30093

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  GünterJ.Ruiz-SerranoA.PickelC.WengerR. H.ScholzC. C. (2017). The Functional Interplay between the HIF Pathway and the Ubiquitin System - More Than a One-Way Road. Exp. Cel. Res.356, 152–159. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.03.027

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  HallezC.LiX.SuspèneR.ThiersV.BouzidiM. S.M DorobantuC.et al (2019). Hypoxia-induced Human Deoxyribonuclease I Is a Cellular Restriction Factor of Hepatitis B Virus. Nat. Microbiol.4, 1196–1207. 10.1038/s41564-019-0405-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  HanJ.HeY.ZhaoH.XuX. (2019). Hypoxia Inducible Factor‐1 Promotes Liver Fibrosis in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease by Activating PTEN/p65 Signaling Pathway. J. Cell Biochem120, 14735–14744. 10.1002/jcb.28734

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  HeY.FengD.LiM.GaoY.RamirezT.CaoH.et al (2017). Hepatic Mitochondrial DNA/Toll-like Receptor 9/MicroRNA-223 Forms a Negative Feedback Loop to Limit Neutrophil Overactivation and Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity in Mice. Hepatology66, 220–234. 10.1002/hep.29153

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  HernandezC.HuebenerP.PradereJ.-P.AntoineD. J.FriedmanR. A.SchwabeR. F. (2018). HMGB1 Links Chronic Liver Injury to Progenitor Responses and Hepatocarcinogenesis. J. Clin. Invest.128, 2436–2451. 10.1172/jci91786

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  HuC.WuZ.LiL. (2020). Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Promote Liver Regeneration through Regulation of Immune Cells. Int. J. Biol. Sci.16, 893–903. 10.7150/ijbs.39725

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  HuQ.WoodC. R.CimenS.VenkatachalamA. B.AlwaynI. P. J. (2015). Mitochondrial Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (MTDs) Are Released during Hepatic Ischemia Reperfusion and Induce Inflammatory Responses. PloS one10, e0140105. 10.1371/journal.pone.0140105

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  HuQ.ZhouQ.WuJ.WuX.RenJ. (2019). The Role of Mitochondrial DNA in the Development of Ischemia Reperfusion Injury. Shock (Augusta, Ga.)51, 52–59. 10.1097/shk.0000000000001190

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  HuY.HuD.YuH.XuW.FuR. (2018). Hypoxia-inducible F-actor 1α and ROCK1 R-egulate P-roliferation and C-ollagen S-ynthesis in H-epatic S-tellate C-ells under H-ypoxia. Mol. Med. Rep.18, 3997–4003. 10.3892/mmr.2018.9397

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  HuangK.-C.ChuangM.-H.LinZ.-S.LinY.-C.ChenC.-H.ChangC.-L.et al (2019). Transplantation with GXHPC1 for Liver Cirrhosis: Phase 1 Trial. Cell Transpl.28, 100s–111s. 10.1177/0963689719884885

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  InzaugaratM. E.JohnsonC. D.HoltmannT. M.McGeoughM. D.TrautweinC.PapouchadoB. G.et al (2019). NLR Family Pyrin Domain‐Containing 3 Inflammasome Activation in Hepatic Stellate Cells Induces Liver Fibrosis in Mice. Hepatology69, 845–859. 10.1002/hep.30252

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  IredaleJ.CampanaL. (2017). Regression of Liver Fibrosis. Semin. Liver Dis.37, 001–010. 10.1055/s-0036-1597816

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  Jimenéz-ArandaA.Fernández-VázquezG.Mohammad A-SerranoM.ReiterR. J.AgilA. (2014). Melatonin Improves Mitochondrial Function in Inguinal white Adipose Tissue of Zücker Diabetic Fatty Rats. J. Pineal Res.57, 103–109. 10.1111/jpi.12147

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  KangD.KimS. H.HamasakiN. (2007). Mitochondrial Transcription Factor A (TFAM): Roles in Maintenance of mtDNA and Cellular Functions. Mitochondrion7, 39–44. 10.1016/j.mito.2006.11.017

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  KangJ.-W.HongJ.-M.LeeS.-M. (2016). Melatonin Enhances Mitophagy and Mitochondrial Biogenesis in Rats with Carbon Tetrachloride-Induced Liver Fibrosis. J. Pineal Res.60, 383–393. 10.1111/jpi.12319

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  KarmakarM.KatsnelsonM. A.DubyakG. R.PearlmanE. (2016). Neutrophil P2X7 Receptors Mediate NLRP3 Inflammasome-dependent IL-1β Secretion in Response to ATP. Nat. Commun.7, 10555. 10.1038/ncomms10555

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  KietzmannT. (2019). Liver Zonation in Health and Disease: Hypoxia and Hypoxia-Inducible Transcription Factors as Concert Masters. Ijms20, 2347. 10.3390/ijms20092347

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  KimM.-J.ParkS.-A.KimC. H.ParkS.-Y.KimJ.-S.KimD.-K.et al (2016). TGF-β Type I Receptor Kinase Inhibitor EW-7197 Suppresses Cholestatic Liver Fibrosis by Inhibiting HIF1α-Induced Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition. Cell Physiol Biochem38, 571–588. 10.1159/000438651

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  KiyamaT.ChenC.-K.WangS. W.PanP.JuZ.WangJ.et al (2018). Essential Roles of Mitochondrial Biogenesis Regulator Nrf1 in Retinal Development and Homeostasis. Mol. Neurodegeneration13, 56. 10.1186/s13024-018-0287-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  KojimaY.TsuchiyaA.OgawaM.NojiriS.TakeuchiS.WatanabeT.et al (2019). Mesenchymal Stem Cells Cultured under Hypoxic Conditions Had a Greater Therapeutic Effect on Mice with Liver Cirrhosis Compared to Those Cultured under normal Oxygen Conditions. Regenerative Ther.11, 269–281. 10.1016/j.reth.2019.08.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  KrishnasamyY.GoozM.LiL.LemastersJ. J.ZhongZ. (2019). Role of Mitochondrial Depolarization and Disrupted Mitochondrial Homeostasis in Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis and Fibrosis in Mice. Int. J. Physiol. Pathophysiol Pharmacol.11, 190–204. 10.1016/s0016-5085(18)33646-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  KryskoD. V.AgostinisP.KryskoO.GargA. D.BachertC.LambrechtB. N.et al (2011). Emerging Role of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns Derived from Mitochondria in Inflammation. Trends Immunol.32, 157–164. 10.1016/j.it.2011.01.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  KubesP.MehalW. Z. (2012). Sterile Inflammation in the Liver. Gastroenterology143, 1158–1172. 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  LeeJ.ParkJ.-S.RohY. S. (2019). Molecular Insights into the Role of Mitochondria in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Arch. Pharm. Res.42, 935–946. 10.1007/s12272-019-01178-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  LiF.XuX.GengJ.WanX.DaiH. (2020). The Autocrine CXCR4/CXCL12 axis Contributes to Lung Fibrosis through Modulation of Lung Fibroblast Activity. Exp. Ther. Med.19, 1844–1854. 10.3892/etm.2020.8433

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  LiS.WuH.HanD.MaS.FanW.WangY.et al (2018). A Novel Mechanism of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Mediated Protection against Sepsis: Restricting Inflammasome Activation in Macrophages by Increasing Mitophagy and Decreasing Mitochondrial ROS. Oxidative Med. Cell Longevity2018, 1–15. 10.1155/2018/3537609

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  LinX.BaiF.NieJ.LuS.LuC.ZhuX.et al (2016). Didymin Alleviates Hepatic Fibrosis through Inhibiting ERK and PI3K/Akt Pathways via Regulation of Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein. Cell Physiol Biochem40, 1422–1432. 10.1159/000453194

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  LiuM.NingX.LiR.YangZ.YangX.SunS.et al (2017). Signalling Pathways Involved in Hypoxia-Induced Renal Fibrosis. J. Cell. Mol. Med.21, 1248–1259. 10.1111/jcmm.13060

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  LiuX.HuangK.NiuZ.MeiD.ZhangB. (2019). Protective Effect of Isochlorogenic Acid B on Liver Fibrosis in Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis of Mice. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol.124, 144–153. 10.1111/bcpt.13122

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  LuoJ.ShenS. (2020). Lipoic Acid Alleviates Schistosomiasis-Induced Liver Fibrosis by Upregulating Drp1 Phosphorylation. Acta tropica206, 105449. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105449

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  LuoX.-Y.MengX.-J.CaoD.-C.WangW.ZhouK.LiL.et al (2019). Transplantation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Attenuates Liver Fibrosis in Mice by Regulating Macrophage Subtypes. Stem Cell Res Ther10, 16. 10.1186/s13287-018-1122-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  LuoX.LiH.MaL.ZhouJ.GuoX.WooS.-L.et al (2018). Expression of STING Is Increased in Liver Tissues from Patients with NAFLD and Promotes Macrophage-Mediated Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis in Mice. Gastroenterology155, 1971–1984. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  MaX.McKeenT.ZhangJ.DingW.-X. (2020). Role and Mechanisms of Mitophagy in Liver Diseases. Cells9, 837. 10.3390/cells9040837

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  MansouriA.GattolliatC.-H.AsselahT. (2018). Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Signaling in Chronic Liver Diseases. Gastroenterology155, 629–647. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.083

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  MartinezV. G.Ontoria-OviedoI.RicardoC. P.HardingS. E.SacedonR.VarasA.et al (2017). Overexpression of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 Alpha Improves Immunomodulation by Dental Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cell Res Ther8, 208. 10.1186/s13287-017-0659-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  MesarwiO. A.LoombaR.MalhotraA. (2019). Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Hypoxia, and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.199, 830–841. 10.1164/rccm.201806-1109TR

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  MihmS. (2018). Danger-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs): Molecular Triggers for Sterile Inflammation in the Liver. Ijms19, 3104. 10.3390/ijms19103104

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  MochizukiA.PaceA.RockwellC. E.RothK. J.ChowA.O’BrienK. M.et al (2014). Hepatic Stellate Cells Orchestrate Clearance of Necrotic Cells in a Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α-dependent Manner by Modulating Macrophage Phenotype in Mice. J. Immunol.192, 3847–3857. 10.4049/jimmunol.1303195

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  MorelloE.SuttiS.FogliaB.NovoE.CannitoS.BoccaC.et al (2018). Hypoxia-inducible Factor 2α Drives Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Progression by Triggering Hepatocyte Release of Histidine-Rich Glycoprotein. Hepatology67, 2196–2214. 10.1002/hep.29754

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  MorrisonT. J.JacksonM. V.CunninghamE. K.KissenpfennigA.McAuleyD. F.O’KaneC. M.et al (2017). Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Modulate Macrophages in Clinically Relevant Lung Injury Models by Extracellular Vesicle Mitochondrial Transfer. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.196, 1275–1286. 10.1164/rccm.201701-0170OC

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  MukhopadhyayP.HorváthB.RajeshM.VargaZ. V.GarianiK.RyuD.et al (2017). PARP Inhibition Protects against Alcoholic and Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis. J. Hepatol.66, 589–600. 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.10.023

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  NiH.-M.WilliamsJ. A.DingW.-X. (2015). Mitochondrial Dynamics and Mitochondrial Quality Control. Redox Biol.4, 6–13. 10.1016/j.redox.2014.11.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  OuyangX.HanS.-N.ZhangJ.-Y.DioletisE.NemethB. T.PacherP.et al (2018). Digoxin Suppresses Pyruvate Kinase M2-Promoted HIF-1α Transactivation in Steatohepatitis. Cell Metab.27, 339–350. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.01.007

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  PanJ.OuZ.CaiC.LiP.GongJ.RuanX. Z.et al (2018). Fatty Acid Activates NLRP3 Inflammasomes in Mouse Kupffer Cells through Mitochondrial DNA Release. Cell Immunol.332, 111–120. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.08.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  PanX.QueirozJ.HussainM. M. (2020). Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in CLOCK Mutant Mice. J. Clin. Invest.130, 4282–4300. 10.1172/jci132765

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  PeekC. B. (2020). Metabolic Implications of Circadian-HIF Crosstalk. Trends Endocrinol. Metab.31, 459–468. 10.1016/j.tem.2020.02.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  PhinneyD. G.Di GiuseppeM.NjahJ.SalaE.ShivaS.St CroixC. M.et al (2015). Mesenchymal Stem Cells Use Extracellular Vesicles to Outsource Mitophagy and Shuttle microRNAs. Nat. Commun.6, 8472. 10.1038/ncomms9472

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  PoissonJ.LemoinneS.BoulangerC.DurandF.MoreauR.VallaD.et al (2017). Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells: Physiology and Role in Liver Diseases. J. Hepatol.66, 212–227. 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.07.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  PusecC. M.De JesusA.KhanM. W.TerryA. R.LudvikA. E.XuK.et al (2019). Hepatic HKDC1 Expression Contributes to Liver Metabolism. Endocrinology160, 313–330. 10.1210/en.2018-00887

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  RaffaeleM.BellnerL.SinghS. P.FaveroG.RezzaniR.RodellaL. F.et al (2019). Epoxyeicosatrienoic Intervention Improves NAFLD in Leptin Receptor Deficient Mice by an Increase in HO-1-Pgc1α Mitochondrial Signaling. Exp. Cel. Res.380, 180–187. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.04.029

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  RaffaeleM.LicariM.AminS.AlexR.ShenH.-h.SinghS. P.et al (2020). Cold Press Pomegranate Seed Oil Attenuates Dietary-Obesity Induced Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis through Antioxidant and Mitochondrial Pathways in Obese Mice. Ijms21, 5469. 10.3390/ijms21155469

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  RaoofM.ZhangQ.ItagakiK.HauserC. J. (2010). Mitochondrial Peptides Are Potent Immune Activators that Activate Human Neutrophils via FPR-1. J. Trauma68, 1328–1334. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181dcd28d

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  RiedlT.Faure‐DupuyS.RollandM.SchuehleS.HizirZ.CalderazzoS.et al (2021). Hypoxia‐Inducible Factor 1 Alpha-Mediated RelB/APOBEC3B Down‐regulation Allows Hepatitis B Virus Persistence. Hepatology74, 1766–1781. 10.1002/hep.31902

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  SatishchandranA.AmbadeA.RaoS.HsuehY.-C.Iracheta-VellveA.TornaiD.et al (2018). MicroRNA 122, Regulated by GRLH2, Protects Livers of Mice and Patients from Ethanol-Induced Liver Disease. Gastroenterology154, 238–252. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  SchroderK.TschoppJ. (2010). The Inflammasomes. Cell140, 821–832. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.040

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  SchuppanD.Ashfaq-KhanM.YangA. T.KimY. O. (2018). Liver Fibrosis: Direct Antifibrotic Agents and Targeted Therapies. Matrix Biol.68-69, 435–451. 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.04.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  SheL.XuD.WangZ.ZhangY.WeiQ.AaJ.et al (2018). Curcumin Inhibits Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation via Suppression of Succinate-Associated HIF-1α Induction. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.476, 129–138. 10.1016/j.mce.2018.05.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  ShimadaK.CrotherT. R.KarlinJ.DagvadorjJ.ChibaN.ChenS.et al (2012). Oxidized Mitochondrial DNA Activates the NLRP3 Inflammasome during Apoptosis. Immunity36, 401–414. 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.01.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 91

  SongM.YiX.ChenW.YuanY.ZhangX.LiJ.et al (2011). Augmenter of Liver Regeneration (ALR) Gene Therapy Attenuates CCl4-Induced Liver Injury and Fibrosis in Rats. Biochem. biophysical Res. Commun.415, 152–156. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.10.039

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  SorrentinoV.MenziesK. J.AuwerxJ. (2018). Repairing Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Disease. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.58, 353–389. 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010716-104908

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  StricklandJ.GarrisonD.CoppleB. L. (2020). Hypoxia Upregulates Cxcl12 in Hepatocytes by a Complex Mechanism Involving Hypoxia-Inducible Factors and Transforming Growth Factor-β. Cytokine127, 154986. 10.1016/j.cyto.2020.154986

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  StrowitzkiM. J.KirchbergJ.TuffsC.SchiedeckM.RitterA. S.BillerM.et al (2018). Loss of Prolyl-Hydroxylase 1 Protects against Biliary Fibrosis via Attenuated Activation of Hepatic Stellate Cells. Am. J. Pathol.188, 2826–2838. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.08.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  SuzukiT.MinagawaS.YamazakiT.AraiT.KanaiM.ShinjoS.et al (2018). Loss of Hypoxia Inducible Factor‐1α Aggravates γδ T‐cell‐mediated Inflammation during Acetaminophen‐induced Liver Injury. Hepatol. Commun.2, 571–581. 10.1002/hep4.1175

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  TaiC.-J.ChoongC.-Y.ShiY.-C.LinY.-C.WangC.-W.LeeB.-H.et al (2016). Solanum nigrum Protects against Hepatic Fibrosis via Suppression of Hyperglycemia in High-Fat/Ethanol Diet-Induced Rats. Molecules21, 269. 10.3390/molecules21030269

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  TiroshO. (2018). Hypoxic Signaling and Cholesterol Lipotoxicity in Fatty Liver Disease Progression. Oxidative Med. Cell Longevity2018, 1–15. 10.1155/2018/2548154

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  TurksevenS.BolognesiM.BroccaA.PesceP.AngeliP.Di PascoliM. (2020). Mitochondria-targeted Antioxidant Mitoquinone Attenuates Liver Inflammation and Fibrosis in Cirrhotic Rats. Am. J. Physiology-Gastrointestinal Liver Physiol.318, G298–g304. 10.1152/ajpgi.00135.2019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  van der HelmD.GroenewoudA.de Jonge-MullerE. S. M.BarnhoornM. C.SchoonderwoerdM. J. A.CoenraadM. J.et al (2018). Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Prevent Progression of Liver Fibrosis in a Novel Zebrafish Embryo Model. Sci. Rep.8, 16005. 10.1038/s41598-018-34351-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  WanL.XiaT.DuY.LiuJ.XieY.ZhangY.et al (2019). Exosomes from Activated Hepatic Stellate Cells Contain GLUT1 and PKM2: a Role for Exosomes in Metabolic Switch of Liver Nonparenchymal Cells. FASEB j.33, 8530–8542. 10.1096/fj.201802675R

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  WangX.de Carvalho RibeiroM.Iracheta‐VellveA.LoweP.AmbadeA.SatishchandranA.et al (2019). Macrophage‐Specific Hypoxia‐Inducible Factor‐1α Contributes to Impaired Autophagic Flux in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Hepatology69, 545–563. 10.1002/hep.30215

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  WangZ.-J.YuH.HaoJ.-J.PengY.YinT.-T.QiuY.-N. (2021). PM2.5 Promotes Drp1-Mediated Mitophagy to Induce Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Hepatic Fibrosis via Regulating miR-411. Exp. Cel. Res.407, 112828. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2021.112828

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  WHO (2020). Global Health Estimates 2020: Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000-2019. Available at: https://www.who.int/data/global-health-estimates.

  • Google Scholar

• 104

  WilliamsJ. A.NiH.-M.DingY.DingW.-X. (2015). Parkin Regulates Mitophagy and Mitochondrial Function to Protect against Alcohol-Induced Liver Injury and Steatosis in Mice. Am. J. Physiology-Gastrointestinal Liver Physiol.309, G324–G340. 10.1152/ajpgi.00108.2015

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  WilliamsJ. A.NiH.-M.HaynesA.ManleyS.LiY.JaeschkeH.et al (2015). Chronic Deletion and Acute Knockdown of Parkin Have Differential Responses to Acetaminophen-Induced Mitophagy and Liver Injury in Mice. J. Biol. Chem.290, 10934–10946. 10.1074/jbc.M114.602284

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  WinS.ThanT. A.ZhangJ.OoC.MinR. W. M.KaplowitzN. (2018). New Insights into the Role and Mechanism of C-Jun-N-Terminal Kinase Signaling in the Pathobiology of Liver Diseases. Hepatology67, 2013–2024. 10.1002/hep.29689

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  WongB. W.KuchnioA.BruningU.CarmelietP. (2013). Emerging Novel Functions of the Oxygen-Sensing Prolyl Hydroxylase Domain Enzymes. Trends Biochemical Sciences38, 3–11. 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.10.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  WuL.MoW.FengJ.LiJ.YuQ.LiS.et al (2020). Astaxanthin Attenuates Hepatic Damage and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Non‐alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease by Up‐regulating the FGF21/PGC‐1α Pathway. Br. J. Pharmacol.177, 3760–3777. 10.1111/bph.15099

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  WuZ.PuigserverP.AnderssonU.ZhangC.AdelmantG.MoothaV.et al (1999). Mechanisms Controlling Mitochondrial Biogenesis and Respiration through the Thermogenic Coactivator PGC-1. Cell98, 115–124. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80611-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  XuH.ZhaoQ.SongN.YanZ.LinR.WuS.et al (2020). AdipoR1/AdipoR2 Dual Agonist Recovers Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Related Fibrosis via Endoplasmic Reticulum-Mitochondria axis. Nat. Commun.11, 5807. 10.1038/s41467-020-19668-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  YangX.WangZ.KaiJ.WangF.JiaY.WangS.et al (2020). Curcumol Attenuates Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cell Angiogenesis via Regulating Glis‐PROX1‐HIF‐1α in Liver Fibrosis. Cell Prolif53, e12762. 10.1111/cpr.12762

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  YooS. M.JungY. K. (2018). A Molecular Approach to Mitophagy and Mitochondrial Dynamics. Mol. Cell41, 18–26. 10.14348/molcells.2018.2277

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  YuS.ChengY.ZhangL.YinY.XueJ.LiB.et al (2019). Treatment with Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Exerts Anti-diabetic Effects, Improves Long-Term Complications, and Attenuates Inflammation in Type 2 Diabetic Rats. Stem Cell Res Ther10, 333. 10.1186/s13287-019-1474-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  YuY.LiuY.AnW.SongJ.ZhangY.ZhaoX. (2018). STING-mediated Inflammation in Kupffer Cells Contributes to Progression of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. J. Clin. Invest.129, 546–555. 10.1172/jci121842

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  YuenV. W.-H.WongC. C.-L. (2020). Hypoxia-inducible Factors and Innate Immunity in Liver Cancer. J. Clin. Invest.130, 5052–5062. 10.1172/jci137553

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  ZhaiX.QiaoH.GuanW.LiZ.ChengY.JiaX.et al (2015). Curcumin Regulates Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ Coactivator-1α Expression by AMPK Pathway in Hepatic Stellate Cells In Vitro. Eur. J. Pharmacol.746, 56–62. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.10.055

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  ZhangF.LuS.HeJ.JinH.WangF.WuL.et al (2018). Ligand Activation of PPARγ by Ligustrazine Suppresses Pericyte Functions of Hepatic Stellate Cells via SMRT-Mediated Transrepression of HIF-1α. Theranostics8, 610–626. 10.7150/thno.22237

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  ZhangL.ZhangY.ChangX.ZhangX. (2020). Imbalance in Mitochondrial Dynamics Induced by Low PGC-1α Expression Contributes to Hepatocyte EMT and Liver Fibrosis. Cell Death Dis11, 226. 10.1038/s41419-020-2429-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  ZhangQ.RaoofM.ChenY.SumiY.SursalT.JungerW.et al (2010). Circulating Mitochondrial DAMPs Cause Inflammatory Responses to Injury. Nature464, 104–107. 10.1038/nature08780

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  ZhangX.WuX.HuQ.WuJ.WangG.HongZ.et al (2019). Mitochondrial DNA in Liver Inflammation and Oxidative Stress. Life Sci.236, 116464. 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.05.020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  ZhangY.HeY.YuH.MaF.WuJ.ZhangX. (2015). Liquiritigenin Protects Rats from Carbon Tetrachloride Induced Hepatic Injury through PGC-1αPathway. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med.2015, 1–9. 10.1155/2015/649568

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  ZhaoP.HanS.-N.ArumugamS.YousafM. N.QinY.JiangJ. X.et al (2019). Digoxin Improves Steatohepatitis with Differential Involvement of Liver Cell Subsets in Mice through Inhibition of PKM2 Transactivation. Am. J. Physiology-Gastrointestinal Liver Physiol.317, G387–g397. 10.1152/ajpgi.00054.2019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  ZhuangQ.MaR.YinY.LanT.YuM.MingY. (2019). Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Renal Fibrosis: The Flame of Cytotherapy. Stem Cell Int.2019, 1–18. 10.1155/2019/8387350

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  ZorovD. B.JuhaszovaM.SollottS. J. (2014). Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and ROS-Induced ROS Release. Physiol. Rev.94, 909–950. 10.1152/physrev.00026.2013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar