Kristin Glotzbach
Nils Stamm2†
Andreas Faissner- 1Department of Cell Morphology and Molecular Neurobiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- 2Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
The increasing incidence of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease represents a significant burden for patients and national health systems. The conditions are primarily caused by the death of neurons and other neural cell types. One important aim of current stem cell research is to find a way to replace the lost cells. In this perspective, neural stem cells (NSCs) have been considered as a promising tool in the field of regenerative medicine. The behavior of NSCs is modulated by environmental influences, for example hormones, growth factors, cytokines, and extracellular matrix molecules or biomechanics. These factors can be studied by using well-defined hydrogels, which are polymeric networks of synthetic or natural origin with the ability to swell in water. These gels can be modified with a variety of molecules and optimized with regard to their mechanical properties to mimic the natural extracellular environment. In particular modifications applying distinct units such as functional domains and peptides can modulate the development of NSCs with regard to proliferation, differentiation and migration. One well-known peptide sequence that affects the behavior of NSCs is the integrin recognition sequence RGD that has originally been derived from fibronectin. In the present review we provide an overview concerning the applications of modified hydrogels with an emphasis on synthetic hydrogels based on poly(acrylamides), as modified with either cationic moieties or the peptide sequence RGD. This knowledge might be used in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine for the therapy of spinal cord injuries, neurodegenerative diseases and traumata.
Introduction
The loss of neural cells is followed by a dramatic dysfunction of the central nervous system with symptoms like memory loss, paralysis and ataxia. The various reasons for the loss of neural cells may be based in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and multiple sclerosis (Selkoe and Lansbury, 1999; Gironi et al., 2016; Grossman, 2019), as well as traumatic brain injuries or stroke. However, the mammalian brain has a limited regenerative capacity and is not able to cure the damage by replacing lost cells (Gage and Temple, 2013). Symptomatic pharmaceutical treatment for neurodegenerative diseases are available, but so far no effective causal treatments to cure the patients are available (Pandit and Murthy, 2011; Yacila and Sari, 2014; Folch et al., 2016). Therefore, there is a great interest in the research of new methods using stem cells in the field of regenerative medicine. One objective focuses on the opportunities to activate the self-renewal and differentiation abilities of intrinsic neural stem cells (NSCs) of the adult brain. Alternative strategies explore options to implant NSCs or progenitors derived from embryonic central nervous system (CNS) tissues or induced human pluripotent stem cells (hIPSCs) into the damaged CNS of diseased recipients. In this perspective, the work with stem cells constitutes a promising tool in the attempt to treat neurodegenerative diseases (Mahla, 2016; Napoli et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2019). Not only NSCs, but also mesenchymal and embryonic stem cells can be transdifferentiated or differentiated into neural cell types, e.g., neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes (Dhara and Stice, 2008; Jang et al., 2010; Selvaraj et al., 2012; Yan et al., 2013; Zemel’ko et al., 2013; Urrutia et al., 2019). One critical factor for the modulation of the behavior of NSCs of the CNS is the extracellular matrix (ECM; Gattazzo et al., 2014; Roll and Faissner, 2014; Faissner and Reinhard, 2015; Ahmed and ffrench-Constant, 2016). The ECM is composed of glycoproteins and proteoglycans that can be divided into heparan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans according to specific core proteins and attached glycosaminoglycan chains. About 300 distinct genes have been attributed to the core matrisome (Naba et al., 2016). The composition of the secreted macromolecules, which build a surrounding scaffold, influences the behavior and maturation of NSCs, as well as the adhesion and migration toward specific brain regions through the interaction of ECM molecules with cell surface receptors. These receptors activate intracellular signaling pathways to modulate the cytoskeleton, activate kinases or induce gene expression (Saghatelyan et al., 2004; Franco and Müller, 2011). Initially, numerous studies examined the ECM as modulating agents in two-dimensional (2-D) in vitro cell culture systems. Recently, the notion emerged that the three-dimensional (3-D) organization of the ECM exerts specific effects (Duval et al., 2017; Seidlits et al., 2019). In this perspective, a novel aim consisted of finding an appropriate 3-D scaffold for cultivating cells in what is considered a more natural environment. To this end the natural-derived and artificial hydrogels were developed. These polymers are designed to mimic the in vivo characteristics of the ECM, which renders them attractive biomaterials in regenerative engineering (Tibbitt and Anseth, 2009; Geckil et al., 2010; Hellmund and Koksch, 2019; Mantha et al., 2019). The combination of both particular ECM molecules and hydrogels represents a promising tool to regulate the differentiation of stem cells into specific cell types and can not only be used for in vitro culture systems, but also in regenerative medicine as implant in injured or diseased brains (Guan et al., 2017; Kim and Cho, 2018). In this mini review we intend to give an overview about the influence of the ECM on the development of NSCs, particularly in the context of modified hydrogels and their applicability in regenerative medicine.
Neural Stem Cell Fate Depends on Extracellular Matrix Composition
In the developing and adult CNS stem cells are located in so called stem cell niches. The stem cells and their descendants in these special compartments are surrounded by supporting cells, proximal blood vessels and a special composition of ECM molecules, which are called fractones (Kazanis and ffrench-Constant, 2011; Rojas-Ríos and González-Reyes, 2014; Theocharidis et al., 2014). The ECM environment comprises different glycoproteins, like tenascins and laminins, and proteoglycans, such as chondroitin or heparan sulfate proteoglycans, which have a major impact on the maintenance and development of NSCs (Faissner and Reinhard, 2015). Especially the expression pattern of the glycoprotein tenascin-C makes it an attractive molecule for neural stem cell research. It was found expressed in the developing brain, more precisely in the stem cell regions (Gates et al., 1995; Steindler et al., 1996; Fietz et al., 2012), as well as after injuries and in tumors (Roll and Faissner, 2019). Tenascin-C is a hexameric glycoprotein, whereby one monomer consists of EGF-like repeats, eight constant and six alternatively spliced fibronectin III domains in mice, resulting in a variety of isoforms. In the developing cerebellum 24 different variants of tenascin-C were found (Joester and Faissner, 1999, 2001; Theocharidis and Faissner, 2012), whereas neurospheres derived from NSCs express 20 isoforms (von Holst et al., 2007). Tenascin-C was found to interact with a diversity of ECM molecules, receptors and growth factors, which activate different signaling cascades. This indicates a great spectrum of functions based on the number of isoforms and the different cell types. Thus it can have repulsive, inhibitory or stimulatory effect on axon growth and guidance (Faissner, 1997; Joester and Faissner, 2001; Rigato et al., 2002; Michele and Faissner, 2009), as well as on cell migration, cell attachment, and cell spreading and cell survival (Giblin and Midwood, 2014). Other glycoproteins, which are prominent for the neural stem cell niche, are laminins (Mercier et al., 2002; Kerever et al., 2007). They are heterotrimeric molecules and are a major component of the basement membrane (Colognato and Yurchenco, 2000). They interact with a variety of molecules, like other matrix molecules, and cell surface receptors. Via the interplay with receptors, laminins may influence the behavior of the cells through the activation of intracellular signaling pathways and thus is responsible for differentiation, survival, and movement and maintenance of the cells (Colognato and Yurchenco, 2000). Laminins are important in the developing cortex and its disruption results in cortical disorganization (Halfter et al., 2002; Radner et al., 2013). The importance of laminin for NSCs can also be seen in vitro, where laminin is the preferred substrate of adult NSCs (Pollard et al., 2006), and promotes the proliferation of human NSCs (Hall et al., 2008). On the other hand, laminin is also important for the maturation of neural cells, for example for the differentiation of neural cells into neurons and astrocytes (Flanagan et al., 2006). In particular, it is a well-known neurite outgrowth inducing and neuron differentiation supporting substrate (Plantman et al., 2008). Another important protein of the ECM is fibronectin. It is expressed in the developing cortex and the subependymal niche, the location of adult NSCs (Letourneau et al., 1994; Morante-Redolat and Porlan, 2019). It is a dimer and has different isoforms, that arise from alternative splicing (ffrench-Constant, 1995), and therefore plays an important role in cell adhesion, migration and differentiation (Mosher, 2012; Carsons, 2018). Additionally it could be shown to promote neurite outgrowth (Tonge et al., 2012) and plays a major role in regeneration of peripheral nerves (Lefcort et al., 1992).
The major receptor family for ECM molecules are the integrins, which are present in the human CNS in 23 different variants depending on their combination of their α- and β-subunit (Gardiner, 2011; Berezin et al., 2014; Senkov et al., 2014). Particularly the β1-integrin subunit is strongly represented in neural progenitor cells (NPCs), for example in neurospheres and inside the ventricular zone of the developing cortex, which is the location of the proliferating NSCs (Campos et al., 2004; Hall et al., 2006). It is important for neural stem cell maintenance and its inactivation or deletion caused process retraction and altered neurogenesis (Graus-Porta et al., 2001; Loulier et al., 2009; Radakovits et al., 2009; Fietz et al., 2010). Furthermore, integrins cooperate with growth factor receptors and affect the activation of several intracellular signaling pathways, like Erk and phosphoinositide 3-kinase through the activation of protein tyrosine kinases like the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and Src, as well as G-proteins like Cdc42, Rac and Rho, which influences the behavior of cells especially via the modulation of actin (see Figure 1; Dalby et al., 2014). The decision which pathway will be activated depends on different parameters, for example the stiffness of the environment. So it could be shown that the phosphoinositide 3-kinase and the Rho-associated–protein-kinase were two parallel signaling pathways, which were activated by the same input of the ECM to integrin, but have opposite effects regarding their protrusive activity. The outcome of the activation of this signaling depends on the balance between these two pathways, which is associated with the stiffness of the ECM environment (Park et al., 2018). These results support the conclusion that the interaction of ECM molecules with integrin receptors has an influence on the maintenance and development of NSCs (Campos et al., 2006; Alam et al., 2007; Rallis et al., 2010; Arora et al., 2012; Brizzi et al., 2012).
Figure 1. Integrin-mediated intracellular signaling activated by adhesion of cells to a RGD-modified hydrogel. The crosstalk of integrin to the peptide sequence RGD activates many signaling pathways, which are mostly initiated by the activation of the focal adhesion kinase (FAK). Together with the protein tyrosine kinase Src, FAK may regulate small GTPases of the RhoA subfamily like CDC42, Rac and Rho-A, which may modulate the actin cytoskeleton. Furthermore the cytoskeleton may be regulated by the activation of the focal adhesion core region, which is build by FAK and paxillin in the first stratum, followed by talin and vinculin, which interact with actin through molecules like α-actinin. The interaction with actin has influences on the adhesion and migration of cells, as well as on the gene expression via the organization of the nucleus, which is linked to the cytoskeleton. Additionally integrins may have direct influence on the gene expression through the shuttle of FAK into the nucleus. There FAK targets the ubiquitination of the cell cycle mediator p53 and may act as a transcription co-regulator. The differentiation, proliferation and survival of the cells may be influenced through integrins alone or in combination with growth factor receptors like the epidermal growth factor receptor and the platelet-derived growth factor via the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase/Erk, Jnk or phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt (Schwartz and Ginsberg, 2002; Yamada and Even-Ram, 2002; Giancotti and Tarone, 2003; Guarda et al., 2009; Ivaska and Heino, 2011; Dalby et al., 2014).
Remarkably, the receptor binding sites of the ECM glycoproteins can be attributed to short amino acid sequences such as Arg–Gly–Asp (RGD; Ruoslahti and Pierschbacher, 1987). This peptide was originally discovered in fibronectin but is also encoded in several other ECM molecules like vitronectin, collagens and fibrinogen. Along these lines, functionally active peptide sequences uncovered in other ECM molecules include IKVAV from laminin-1 and VSWRAPTA, and VFDNFVLK from tenascin-C glycoproteins (Tashiro et al., 1989; Mercado et al., 2004; Jarocki et al., 2018). These peptides are all known to support the attachment of cells and/or to promote the outgrowth of neurites. The discovery of these short functional peptides opened new doors for the researchers in two different ways. On the one hand the handling of short peptides compared to larger protein domains is more convenient. Especially the tethering of these sequences to substrates and materials by chemical coupling is more straightforward than the use of large glycoproteins. On the other hand, however, the small peptides are limited in their functional potential in contrast to the integral proteins they originate from, which may have more than one biologically active domain, and hence offer more receptor binding sites to interacting cellular partners. In view of the fact that the peptides target one distinct receptor they may be more specific for the regulation of the behavior of NSCs and represent a promising tool in regenerative medicine.
Hydrogels as Matrices for Cell Cultivation
Extracellular matrix molecules are often used in cell culture systems as coatings to create a natural cellular environment. However, it was found that the cells not only need the cell-cell- and cell-matrix-interaction, but also the mechanical support to adopt the behavior of cells inside the organism (Lopes et al., 2019). One modern approach for the cultivation of stem cells is the use of hydrogels as scaffolds with the ability to mimic the ECM of those cells. Hydrogels are three-dimensional hydrophilic polymeric networks that are insoluble in water due to their crosslinks which can be formed by covalent but also non-covalent bonds like hydrogen bonds or ionic bridges (Kloxin et al., 2009). Nowadays many different polymers are used as hydrogels such as natural derived polymers like Collagen (Trappmann et al., 2012), Hyaluronic acid (HA; Collins and Birkinshaw, 2013), Chitosan (Payne and Raghavan, 2007), or Gelatin (Nichol et al., 2010). But also different fully synthetic polymers like poly(ethylene glycol) (Slaughter et al., 2009), poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (Guiseppi-Elie, 2010), or more complex structures like block copolymers (Tokarev and Minko, 2009) are being tested. While natural polymers often have very good biocompatibilities and mechanical properties, they are also very expensive in their production, are often not very well characterized and display considerable batch-to-batch variation. On the other hand, fully synthetic hydrogels are cheap in their production and properties such as their mechanical stability, hydrophilicity, and biocompatibility can be easily adjusted to the needs of different cell types. Additionally, these gels can be modified with different moieties to influence the behavior of cells during the cultivation process, which is necessary if the cells are to be used to treat different diseases or disabilities. The most commonly used moieties which are known to influence the behavior of cells are cationic charges or peptide sequences like the very well-known Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence derived from fibronectin or laminin α1 and α5 chain (Tashiro et al., 1991; Sasaki and Timpl, 2001), Ile-Lys-Val-Ala-Val (IKVAV) derived from laminin-1 or Val-Phe-Asp-Asn-Phe-Val-Leu-Lys (VFDNFVLK) derived from tenascin-C (Zhu, 2010).
As early as in 1974 Yavin and Yavin demonstrated that the polycationic polymer polylysine enhanced the adhesion of cells to the surface of petri dishes through ionic interactions of the positively charged amine side chain of the lysine and the negatively charged cell membrane (Yavin and Yavin, 1974). It was shown that 75% of brain cells readily adhered to the surface in only 15 minutes and afterwards proliferate and differentiate. Comparing the results of polylysine to different other amino acid coatings containing thiols or carboxylic acids, they could attribute the enhanced adhesion of the cells to the present free amine group of lysine. Several years later Cai et al. (2012) reported a hydrogel system comprised of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate and poly(L-lysine) or [2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]-trimethylammonium chloride, which enhances proliferation, differentiation, and survival of encapsulated NPCs (Cai et al., 2012). It was demonstrated that compared to a neutral reference the viability of cells on hydrogels bearing cationic charges was significantly higher after day 1 and day 7. Furthermore, the proliferation on these gels was also much faster and an enhanced differentiation could be observed in both gels bearing cationic charges. Some differences between the two gels were visible which indicated a difference of the cationic moieties in lysine bearing a primary amine group and in [2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]-trimethylammonium chloride gels bearing a quaternary ammonium group (Cai et al., 2012). The differentiation was also dependent on the stiffness of the hydrogel in that softer gels that are closer to natural brain tissue were favored. It turned out that poly(L-lysine) is superior to gels bearing quaternary ammonium ions and is therefore a promising material for the regeneration of the CNS (Cai et al., 2012). Hynes et al. (2009) reported that lateral concentrations of amines ranging from 0.1 to 3.0 μmol mg–1 are sufficient to promote the survival and proliferation of NSCs on hydrogels without further modifications (Hynes et al., 2009). The best results regarding migration and formation of neurons were obtained from gels with an elastic modulus of 3800 to 5300 Pa and a lateral concentration of 0.32–0.60 μmol mg–1. While these results already show that hydrogels containing cationic charges are promising tools to influence the behavior of NSCs, many researchers focus their interest on hydrogels with peptide sequences derived from natural proteins from the ECM (Sun et al., 2017; Stukel and Willits, 2018).
One of the most intensively investigated peptide sequences for cell cultivation is the RGD sequence. Saha et al. (2007) established a fully synthetic hydrogel network with different layers, a so called interpenetrating polymer network, with poly(ethylene glycol), and poly(acrylamide) as their main component and an RGD functionalized upper layer (Saha et al., 2007). With this hydrogel system they could demonstrate that a lateral peptide concentration greater than 5.3 pmol/cm2 on the surface was sufficient to support adhesion of NSCs to the gel via integrin receptors. It was shown that the RGD sequence used in this study provided comparable results as the glycoprotein laminin-1 with respect to cell adhesion, differentiation and morphology. Also, a concentration dependent increase in cell proliferation could be shown. In contrast to these observations cells did not adhere on gels containing the peptide IKVAV that is derived from laminin-1 and no difference in cell differentiation or proliferation was observed. This indicates that RGD alone can substitute laminin-1 with regard to some aspects of cell differentiation. Furthermore, the data emphasizes that the different peptide sequences contained in ECM glycoproteins have different functions and effects on neural stem cell behavior. In a subsequent paper Saha et al. (2008) further described the importance of the substrate modulus on the behavior of NSCs (Saha et al., 2008). They studied the influence of the substrate modulus in a range of 10 Pa to 10 kPa with the same hydrogel system mentioned before. The adult NSCs proliferated and differentiated on all gels with a modulus greater than 100 Pa and a peak level of the neuronal marker β-III tubulin was observed on gels with a modulus of around 500 Pa which resembles the stiffness of brain tissue. Also the neurite outgrowth was increased in hydrogels with a similar stiffness of 400 Pa in a HA based RGD-modified hydrogel (Tarus et al., 2016) and in a PEGDA-RGD-based hydrogels the neurite outgrowth was increased at a stiffness of 0.1 and 0.8 kPa, which were the lowest consistence tested (Stukel and Willits, 2018). Together this indicates that neurites preferentially grow toward an environment that is less stiff (Long and Huttner, 2019). Additionally Stukel and Willits (2018) carried out adhesion studies with the 2-D modified PEGDA hydrogels and could show that the concentration of the peptide and the cell density are important for the adhesion effect of RGD. More precisely they exposed that a high concentration of 2.5 mM RGD decreased the adhesion at a cell density of 50 × 103 cells cm–2, whereas a concentration of 0.1 and 1 mM, as well as a lower cell density of 10 × 103 cm–2, exhibited a better result. Another 3-D artificial hydrogel based on PEG was modified with RGD in combination with tenascin-C (Naghdi et al., 2016). This hydrogel promoted the viability of NSCs and provoked an increased differentiation of NSCs into a neuronal phenotype (Table 1).
Table 1. Different modified hydrogels with their effect on NSC.
While cationic charges, substrate modulus and peptides on their own are promising tools to influence the behavior of NSCs, they are very often not combined in a single hydrogel (Jaiswal et al., 2013; Macková et al., 2016). Therefore, Sallouh et al. (2017) investigated the effect of both the cationic charge and the peptide sequence GRGDSF in a cross-linked hydrogel system based on poly(acrylamide). In total the effect of three different hydrogels, namely a neutral gel bearing the peptide GRGDSF, a gel with cationic charges based on 2-aminoethylmethacrylate and a gel bearing both cationic charges and the peptide GRGDSF, on the behavior of NSCs were analyzed (see Figure 2).
Figure 2. Exemplary synthesis of a synthetic hydrogel system and examples for hydrogels bearing cationic moieties and the RGD sequence.
The analysis of neural stem cell adhesion showed a 10.8-fold increase in the number of adherent cells for the cationic gel and a 22-fold increase for the gel that combined cationic charges with the RGD peptide compared to the pure RGD-functionalized gel with a RGD-concentration well below the threshold concentration of Saha et al. (2007). These results suggest that early cell adhesion is mediated by the electrostatic interaction of cationic charges with the negatively charged pericellular matrix of the cell membrane. The importance of the pericellular matrix for early cell adhesion has also been reported for other cell types such as osteoblasts, chondrocytes or epithelial cells (Cohen et al., 2003; Fotia et al., 2013; Scrimgeour et al., 2017). RGD-integrin interaction and focal adhesion formation take place in a second step when the cell-substrate distance is in a range of 25–50 nm leading again to a doubling in adherent cells compared to the cationic gel whereas the pure RGD-functionalized gel did not show any cell adhesive properties. The results suggest a synergistic effect of the cationic moieties (non-specific electrostatic interactions with the pericellular matrix) and the RGD-peptides (specific interactions with integrins) that take place on a different distance and time scale.
Although the majority of studies using hydrogels investigated cell behavior in two dimensions (2-D) on top of a hydrogel film 3-D cell encapsulation has gained significant interest in the past years since 3-D hydrogel constructs may mimic the tissue environment of the cells more accurately (Caliari and Burdick, 2016). Moreover, 3-D cell encapsulation has become an important tool for cell delivery and therapy based on 3-D bioprinting or injectable hydrogels (Thomas and Willerth, 2017; Liang et al., 2019).
One hydrogel system that has been used for 3-D applications is based on self-assembling peptides (SAP). The components of these hydrogels, for example the RADA16 peptide, may also be modified with peptide sequences like RGD or IKVAV (Table 1; Zhang et al., 2010; Cunha et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2017). It could be shown that the cells cultured in RGD-functionalized SAP proliferate and differentiate, for example into neurons, and more than in unmodified hydrogels (Cunha et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2017). The modification with IKVAV promotes beside the proliferation of NSCs also the migration of the NSCs into the SAP hydrogel to form a 3-D culture in comparison to defunctionalized SAPs (Zhang et al., 2010). Furthermore, the differentiation into neurons was promoted by IKVAV-modified SAPs, whereas the differentiation into astrocytes was decreased.
An often used hydrogel system are the HA based hydrogels (Table 1; Tarus et al., 2016; Adil et al., 2017; Perera et al., 2019; Seidlits et al., 2019). The HA based 3-D hydrogel alone shows an increased differentiation of human NSCs into oligodendrocytes and neurons and a decreased formation of reactive astrocytes compared to a 2-D laminin-coated culture (Seidlits et al., 2019). Additionally, the modification with RGD increased the viability of the human NSCs. Furthermore the modification with RGD exhibits the neurite outgrowth into the soft hydrogel of NPC (Tarus et al., 2016; Adil et al., 2017). Moreover 3-D HA based hydrogels, which were modified with RGD and heparin, were used in transplantation studies (Adil et al., 2017). These hydrogels support the neuronal differentiation of midbrain dopaminergic neuronal progenitors and enhance the survival of implanted midbrain dopaminergic neurons after injection into the adult striatum of rats. Another class of bioactive materials for cell encapsulation is based on elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs; Lampe et al., 2013). These materials were fabricated by protein engineering and studied the effect of RGD-concentration and biomechanics on neurite outgrowth from dorsal root ganglia. Greatest neurite outgrowth was found for ELP gels with elastic moduli between 0.5 and 2.1 kPa and identical RGD-concentrations. In a more recent study, they could show that the stemness of a NPC culture within a 3-D ELP gel modified with RGD-peptides and protease degradation sites is correlated with gel degradability and showed that matrix remodeling is required for NPC stemness maintenance in 3-D gels (Madl et al., 2017). This matrix remodeling was also necessary to enable NPC differentiation into astrocytes and neurons (Madl et al., 2019). This study shows the importance of 3-D hydrogels for regenerative medicine.
While some hydrogels are already used for medical applications such as wound treatments, many challenges have to be overcome for them to be used in patients for different applications. Using human embryonal stem cells for research is associated with ethical problems. In this respect, adult stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells circumvent these problems and are the main target in clinical trials for hydrogels. Using patient-derived cells reduces immune responses of the body to the hydrogel implant. Furthermore, endogenous stem cells inside the injured tissue may be stimulated by the implanted modified hydrogel to proliferate and differentiate into the required cell types (Liu et al., 2020). On the other hand, the patient-derived cells may be burdened by the same neuropathological deficits that cause the neurodegenerative disease. Another major challenge is the vascularization of the newly built tissue, which is important to provide transportation of nutrients. Mainly two different approaches are used at the moment to overcome this latter challenge. The first one is a cell-based strategy which uses endothelial cells to induce neo-angiogenesis and the second one is a scaffold-based strategy which focuses on providing vessel like structures in the scaffold (Novosel et al., 2011). Other issues refer to the ease of handling the hydrogel during the application and the cost efficiency. Depending on the cells the scaffolds need different mechanical properties, but surgeons need a durable and easy to handle implant for the application. One solution might be the injection of fluid gels with subsequent in situ-gelation inside the injury (Yang et al., 2014). Depending on the injury or disease type the hydrogels have to be stable or degradable (Li et al., 2012; Lim et al., 2018). The degradability is particularly important for the invasion and the repopulation of the hydrogel by invading cells. Therefore, the hydrogel has to be modified with biodegradable groups like esters that can be broken by enzymes secreted by the cells of interest, for example matrix metalloproteases. Another problem of most hydrogels is the orientation of the structure inside the hydrogel, because many tissues have an ordered structure and provide cells a direction to grow and migrate (Rose et al., 2020). In addition, natural and synthetic hydrogels are often subject to numerous modification steps and therefore not very cost efficient. Overcoming these challenges may eventually lead to competence to generate fully functional implants, or even full organs using hydrogels as a matrix.
In summary, the great interest in regenerative medicine to cure neurodegenerative diseases resulted in an expansion on research concerning the development of the nervous system. Soon it became obvious that ECM molecules, like laminins, tenascins, and fibronectins, are important for normal brain development. Single domains and peptides of these molecules have specific functions regarding the behavior of NSCs by activating intracellular signaling pathways via binding to cell surface receptors, like integrins. Nevertheless, in vitro experiments using distinct ECM molecules generate impressive results, but are limited in their abilty to mirror the in vivo situation in an organism. In order to create a more natural environment artificial and natural-derived hydrogels are investigated. Recent advances in materials science have led to innovative biomaterials for use in stem cell research. While in the beginning the research effort was mainly focused on a better understanding of the influencing parameters such as topological cues, biomechanics or bioactive components on neural stem cell behavior in 2-D hydrogel films, there is a clear shift toward the development and application of 3-D cell encapsulation materials that resemble the natural environment of NSCs more closely. Synthetic 3-D hydrogels with multiple functionalities such as peptides or growth factors have been demonstrated to support very efficiently the differentiation of human NSCs into neurons and the formation of neural networks (Marchini et al., 2019). Therefore, the development of synthetic or natural materials that are able to mimic important features of the ECM and can be utilized for 2-D and 3-D cell experiments remains a topic of high priority in stem cell research.
Author Contributions
KG, NS, RW, and AF wrote and revised the manuscript. KG and NS designed the figures.
Funding
The authors acknowledge grant support by the German Research Foundation (DFG, Fa 159/23-1 to AF and WE2508/4-1 to RW) and Mercur-Research Foundation to RW and AF (PR-2011-0010).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Adil, M. M., Vazin, T., Ananthanarayanan, B., Rodrigues, G. M. C., Rao, A. T., Kulkarni, R. U., et al. (2017). Engineered hydrogels increase the post-transplantation survival of encapsulated hESC-derived midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Biomaterials 136, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.008
Ahmed, M., and ffrench-Constant, C. (2016). Extracellular matrix regulation of stem cell behavior. Curr. Stem Cell Rep. 2, 197–206. doi: 10.1007/s40778-016-0056-2
Alam, N., Goel, H. L., Zarif, M. J., Butterfield, J. E., Perkins, H. M., Sansoucy, B. G., et al. (2007). The integrin—growth factor receptor duet. J. Cell. Physiol. 213, 649–653.
Arora, N., Mainali, D., and Smith, E. A. (2012). Unraveling the role of membrane proteins Notch, Pvr, and EGFR in altering integrin diffusion and clustering. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 404, 2339–2348. doi: 10.1007/s00216-012-6362-3
Berezin, V., Walmod, P. S., Filippov, M., and Dityatev, A. (2014). Targeting of ECM molecules and their metabolizing enzymes and receptors for the treatment of CNS diseases. Prog. Brain Res. 214, 353–388. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63486-3.00015-3
Brizzi, M. F., Tarone, G., and Defilippi, P. (2012). Extracellular matrix, integrins, and growth factors as tailors of the stem cell niche. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 645–651. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.07.001
Cai, L., Lu, J., Sheen, V., and Wang, S. (2012). Promoting nerve cell functions on hydrogels grafted with Poly(l-lysine). Biomacromolecules 13, 342–349. doi: 10.1021/bm201763n
Caliari, S. R., and Burdick, J. A. (2016). A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture. Nat. Methods 13, 405–414. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3839
Campos, L. S., Decker, L., Taylor, V., and Skarnes, W. (2006). Notch, epidermal growth factor receptor, and β1-integrin pathways are coordinated in neural stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 5300–5309. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M511886200
Campos, L. S., Leone, D. P., Relvas, J. B., Brakebusch, C., Fässler, R., Suter, U., et al. (2004). β1 integrins activate a MAPK signalling pathway in neural stem cells that contributes to their maintenance. Development 131, 3433–3444. doi: 10.1242/dev.01199
Cohen, M., Klein, E., Geiger, B., and Addadi, L. (2003). Organization and adhesive properties of the hyaluronan pericellular coat of chondrocytes and epithelial cells. Biophys. J. 85, 1996–2005. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74627-X
Collins, M. N., and Birkinshaw, C. (2013). Hyaluronic acid based scaffolds for tissue engineering—A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 92, 1262–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.028
Colognato, H., and Yurchenco, P. D. (2000). Form and function: the laminin family of heterotrimers. Dev. Dyn. 218, 213–234. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(200006)218:2<213::AID-DVDY1>3.0.CO;2-R
Cunha, C., Panseri, S., Villa, O., Silva, D., and Gelain, F. (2011). 3D culture of adult mouse neural stem cells within functionalized self-assembling peptide scaffolds. Int. J. Nanomed. 6, 943–955. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S17292
Dalby, M. J., Gadegaard, N., and Oreffo, R. O. C. (2014). Harnessing nanotopography and integrin–matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate. Nat. Mater. 13, 558–569. doi: 10.1038/nmat3980
Dhara, S. K., and Stice, S. L. (2008). Neural differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 105, 633–640. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21891
Duval, K., Grover, H., Han, L.-H., Mou, Y., Pegoraro, A. F., Fredberg, J., et al. (2017). Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture. Physiology 32, 266–277. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00036.2016
Faissner, A. (1997). The tenascin gene family in axon growth and guidance. Cell Tissue Res. 290, 331–341. doi: 10.1007/s004410050938
Faissner, A., and Reinhard, J. (2015). The extracellular matrix compartment of neural stem and glial progenitor cells. Glia 63, 1330–1349. doi: 10.1002/glia.22839
Farrukh, A., Ortega, F., Fan, W., Marichal, N., Paez, J. I., Berninger, B., et al. (2017). Bifunctional hydrogels containing the Laminin Motif IKVAV promote neurogenesis. Stem Cell Rep. 9, 1432–1440. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.09.002
ffrench-Constant, C. (1995). Alternative splicing of fibronectin–many different proteins but few different functions. Exp. Cell Res. 221, 261–271. doi: 10.1006/excr.1995.1374
Fietz, S. A., Kelava, I., Vogt, J., Wilsch-Bräuninger, M., Stenzel, D., Fish, J. L., et al. (2010). OSVZ progenitors of human and ferret neocortex are epithelial-like and expand by integrin signaling. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 690–699. doi: 10.1038/nn.2553
Fietz, S. A., Lachmann, R., Brandl, H., Kircher, M., Samusik, N., Schröder, R., et al. (2012). Transcriptomes of germinal zones of human and mouse fetal neocortex suggest a role of extracellular matrix in progenitor self-renewal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 11836–11841. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209647109
Flanagan, L. A., Rebaza, L. M., Derzic, S., Schwartz, P. H., and Monuki, E. S. (2006). Regulation of human neural precursor cells by laminin and integrins. J. Neurosci. Res. 83, 845–856. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20778
Folch, J., Petrov, D., Ettcheto, M., Abad, S., Sánchez-López, E., García, M. L., et al. (2016). Current research therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer’s disease treatment. Neural Plast. 2016:8501693. doi: 10.1155/2016/8501693
Fotia, C., Messina, G. M. L., Marletta, G., Baldini, N., and Ciapetti, G. (2013). Hyaluronan-based pericellular matrix: substrate electrostatic charges and early cell adhesion events. Eur. Cells Mater. 26, 133–149. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v026a10
Franco, S. J., and Müller, U. (2011). ECM functions during neuronal migration and lamination in the mammalian central nervous system. Dev. Neurobiol. 71, 889–900. doi: 10.1002/dneu.20946
Gage, F. H., and Temple, S. (2013). Neural stem cells: generating and regenerating the brain. Neuron 80, 588–601. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.037
Gao, M., Tao, H., Wang, T., Wei, A., and He, B. (2017). Functionalized self-assembly polypeptide hydrogel scaffold applied in modulation of neural progenitor cell behavior. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 32, 45–60.
Gardiner, N. J. (2011). Integrins and the extracellular matrix: key mediators of development and regeneration of the sensory nervous system. Dev. Neurobiol. 71, 1054–1072. doi: 10.1002/dneu.20950
Gates, M. A., Thomas, L. B., Howard, E. M., Laywell, E. D., Sajin, B., Faissner, A., et al. (1995). Cell and molecular analysis of the developing and adult mouse subventricular zone of the cerebral hemispheres. J. Comp. Neurol. 361, 249–266. doi: 10.1002/cne.903610205
Gattazzo, F., Urciuolo, A., and Bonaldo, P. (2014). Extracellular matrix: a dynamic microenvironment for stem cell niche. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1840, 2506–2519. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.01.010
Geckil, H., Xu, F., Zhang, X., Moon, S., and Demirci, U. (2010). Engineering hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics. Nanomedicine 5, 469–484. doi: 10.2217/nnm.10.12
Giancotti, F. G., and Tarone, G. (2003). Positional control of cell fate through joint integrin/receptor protein kinase signaling. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19, 173–206. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.031103.133334
Giblin, S. P., and Midwood, K. S. (2014). Tenascin-C: form versus function. Cell Adhes. Migr. 9, 48–82. doi: 10.4161/19336918.2014.987587
Gironi, M., Arnò, C., Comi, G., Penton-Rol, G., and Furlan, R. (2016). “Multiple sclerosis and neurodegenerative diseases,” in Immune Rebalancing, eds D. Boraschi and G. Penton-Rol (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press), 63–84.
Graus-Porta, D., Blaess, S., Senften, M., Littlewood-Evans, A., Damsky, C., Huang, Z., et al. (2001). β1-Class integrins regulate the development of laminae and folia in the cerebral and cerebellar cortex. Neuron 31, 367–379. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00374-9
Grossman, M. (2019). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis — a multisystem neurodegenerative disorder. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 5–6. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0103-y
Guan, X., Avci-Adali, M., Alarçin, E., Cheng, H., Kashaf, S. S., Li, Y., et al. (2017). Development of hydrogels for regenerative engineering. Biotechnol. J. 12:10.1002/biot.201600394. doi: 10.1002/biot.201600394
Guarda, A., Bolognese, F., Bonapace, I. M., and Badaracco, G. (2009). Interaction between the inner nuclear membrane lamin B receptor and the heterochromatic methyl binding protein, MeCP2. Exp. Cell Res. 315, 1895–1903. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.01.019
Guiseppi-Elie, A. (2010). Electroconductive hydrogels: synthesis, characterization and biomedical applications. Biomaterials 31, 2701–2716. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.052
Halfter, W., Dong, S., Yip, Y.-P., Willem, M., and Mayer, U. (2002). A critical function of the pial basement membrane in cortical histogenesis. J. Neurosci. 22, 6029–6040. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-14-06029.2002
Hall, P. E., Lathia, J. D., Caldwell, M. A., and ffrench-Constant, C. (2008). Laminin enhances the growth of human neural stem cells in defined culture media. BMC Neurosci. 9:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-9-71
Hall, P. E., Lathia, J. D., Miller, N. G. A., Caldwell, M. A., and Ffrench-Constant, C. (2006). Integrins are markers of human neural stem cells. Stem Cells 24, 2078–2084. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0595
Hellmund, K. S., and Koksch, B. (2019). Self-assembling peptides as extracellular matrix mimics to influence stem cell’s fate. Front. Chem. 7:172. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00172
Hynes, S. R., Rauch, M. F., Bertram, J. P., and Lavik, E. B. (2009). A library of tunable poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(L-lysine) hydrogels to investigate the material cues that influence neural stem cell differentiation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 89A, 499–509. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31987
Ivaska, J., and Heino, J. (2011). Cooperation between integrins and growth factor receptors in signaling and endocytosis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 291–320. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154017
Jaiswal, M., Lale, S., Ramesh, N. G., and Koul, V. (2013). Synthesis and characterization of positively charged interpenetrating double-network hydrogel matrices for biomedical applications. React. Funct. Polym. 73, 1493–1499.
Jang, S., Cho, H.-H., Cho, Y.-B., Park, J.-S., and Jeong, H.-S. (2010). Functional neural differentiation of human adipose tissue-derived stem cells using bFGF and forskolin. BMC Cell Biol. 11:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-11-25
Jarocki, M., Sallouh, O., Weberskirch, R., and Faissner, A. (2018). The Tenascin-C-Derived Peptide VSWRAPTA promotes neuronal branching via transcellular activation of the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and the ERK1/2 signaling pathway in vitro. Mol. Neurobiol. 56, 632–647. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1108-7
Joester, A., and Faissner, A. (1999). Evidence for combinatorial variability of Tenascin-C isoforms and developmental regulation in the mouse central nervous system. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 17144–17151. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.24.17144
Joester, A., and Faissner, A. (2001). The structure and function of tenascins in the nervous system. Matrix Biol. 20, 13–22. doi: 10.1016/s0945-053x(00)00136-0
Kazanis, I., and ffrench-Constant, C. (2011). Extracellular matrix and the neural stem cell niche. Dev. Neurobiol. 71, 1006–1017. doi: 10.1002/dneu.20970
Kerever, A., Schnack, J., Vellinga, D., Ichikawa, N., Moon, C., Arikawa-Hirasawa, E., et al. (2007). Novel extracellular matrix structures in the neural stem cell niche capture the neurogenic factor fibroblast growth factor 2 from the extracellular milieu. Stem Cells 25, 2146–2157. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0082
Kim, B.-S., and Cho, C.-S. (2018). Injectable hydrogels for regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 15, 511–512.
Kloxin, A. M., Kasko, A. M., Salinas, C. N., and Anseth, K. S. (2009). Photodegradable hydrogels for dynamic tuning of physical and chemical properties. Science 324, 59–63. doi: 10.1126/science.1169494
Lampe, K. J., Antaris, A. L., and Heilshorn, S. C. (2013). Design of three-dimensional engineered protein hydrogels for tailored control of neurite growth. Acta Biomater. 9, 5590–5599. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.033
Lefcort, F., Venstrom, K., McDonald, J. A., and Reichardt, L. F. (1992). Regulation of expression of fibronectin and its receptor, alpha 5 beta 1, during development and regeneration of peripheral nerve. Development 116, 767–782.
Letourneau, P. C., Condic, M. L., and Snow, D. M. (1994). Interactions of developing neurons with the extracellular matrix. J. Neurosci. 14, 915–928. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-03-00915.1994
Li, Y., Rodrigues, J., and Tomás, H. (2012). Injectable and biodegradable hydrogels: gelation, biodegradation and biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 2193–2221. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15203c
Liang, K., Bae, K. H., and Kurisawa, M. (2019). Recent advances in the design of injectable hydrogels for stem cell-based therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 7, 3775–3791.
Lim, H. J., Khan, Z., Lu, X., Perera, T. H., Wilems, T. S., Ravivarapu, K. T., et al. (2018). Mechanical stabilization of proteolytically degradable polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate hydrogels through peptide interaction. Acta Biomater. 71, 271–278. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.001
Liu, H., Xu, X., Tu, Y., Chen, K., Song, L., Zhai, J., et al. (2020). Engineering microenvironment for endogenous neural regeneration after spinal cord injury by reassembling extracellular matrix. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 17207–17219. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b19638
Long, K. R., and Huttner, W. B. (2019). How the extracellular matrix shapes neural development. Open Biol. 9:180216. doi: 10.1098/rsob.180216
Lopes, D., Fernandes, C., Nóbrega, J. M., Patrício, S. G., Oliveira, M. B., and Mano, J. F. (2019). Screening of perfused combinatorial 3D microenvironments for cell culture. Acta Biomater. 96, 222–236. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.047
Loulier, K., Lathia, J. D., Marthiens, V., Relucio, J., Mughal, M. R., Tang, S.-C., et al. (2009). β1 integrin maintains integrity of the embryonic neocortical stem cell niche. PLoS Biol. 7:e1000176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000176
Macková, H., Plichta, Z., Proks, V., Kotelnikov, I., Kučka, J., Hlídková, H., et al. (2016). RGDS- and SIKVAVS-Modified Superporous Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Macromol. Biosci. 16, 1621–1631. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201600159
Madl, C. M., LeSavage, B. L., Dewi, R. E., Dinh, C. B., Stowers, R. S., Khariton, M., et al. (2017). Maintenance of neural progenitor cell stemness in 3D hydrogels requires matrix remodelling. Nat. Mater. 16, 1233–1242. doi: 10.1038/nmat5020
Madl, C. M., LeSavage, B. L., Dewi, R. E., Lampe, K. J., and Heilshorn, S. C. (2019). Matrix remodeling enhances the differentiation capacity of neural progenitor cells in 3D hydrogels. Adv. Sci. 6:1801716. doi: 10.1002/advs.201801716
Mahla, R. S. (2016). Stem cells applications in regenerative medicine and disease therapeutics. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2016:6940283. doi: 10.1155/2016/6940283
Mantha, S., Pillai, S., Khayambashi, P., Upadhyay, A., Zhang, Y., Tao, O., et al. (2019). Smart hydrogels in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Materials 12:3323. doi: 10.3390/ma12203323
Marchini, A., Raspa, A., Pugliese, R., Malek, M. A. E., Pastori, V., Lecchi, M., et al. (2019). Multifunctionalized hydrogels foster hNSC maturation in 3D cultures and neural regeneration in spinal cord injuries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 7483–7492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818392116
Mauri, E., Sacchetti, A., Vicario, N., Peruzzotti-Jametti, L., Rossi, F., and Pluchino, S. (2018). Evaluation of RGD functionalization in hybrid hydrogels as 3D neural stem cell culture systems. Biomater. Sci. 6, 501–510. doi: 10.1039/c7bm01056g
Mercado, M. L. T., Nur-e-Kamal, A., Liu, H.-Y., Gross, S. R., Movahed, R., and Meiners, S. (2004). Neurite outgrowth by the alternatively spliced region of human tenascin-C is mediated by neuronal alpha7beta1 integrin. J. Neurosci. 24, 238–247. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4519-03.2004
Mercier, F., Kitasako, J. T., and Hatton, G. I. (2002). Anatomy of the brain neurogenic zones revisited: fractones and the fibroblast/macrophage network. J. Comp. Neurol. 451, 170–188. doi: 10.1002/cne.10342
Michele, M., and Faissner, A. (2009). Tenascin-C stimulates contactin-dependent neurite outgrowth via activation of phospholipase C. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 41, 397–408. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2009.04.004
Morante-Redolat, J. M., and Porlan, E. (2019). Neural stem cell regulation by adhesion molecules within the Subependymal Niche. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 7:102. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00102
Naba, A., Clauser, K. R., Ding, H., Whittaker, C. A., Carr, S. A., and Hynes, R. O. (2016). The extracellular matrix: tools and insights for the “omics” era. Matrix Biol. 49, 10–24. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.06.003
Naghdi, P., Tiraihi, T., Ganji, F., Darabi, S., Taheri, T., and Kazemi, H. (2016). Survival, proliferation and differentiation enhancement of neural stem cells cultured in three-dimensional polyethylene glycol–RGD hydrogel with tenascin. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 10, 199–208. doi: 10.1002/term.1958
Napoli, E., Lippert, T., and Borlongan, C. V. (2018). Stem cell therapy: repurposing cell-based regenerative medicine beyond cell replacement. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1079, 87–91. doi: 10.1007/5584_2018_174
Nichol, J. W., Koshy, S. T., Bae, H., Hwang, C. M., Yamanlar, S., and Khademhosseini, A. (2010). Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials 31, 5536–5544. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064
Novosel, E. C., Kleinhans, C., and Kluger, P. J. (2011). Vascularization is the key challenge in tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 63, 300–311. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.004
Pandit, L., and Murthy, J. M. K. (2011). Treatment of multiple sclerosis. Ann. Indian Acad. Neurol. 14, S65–S69.
Park, J., Kim, D.-H., and Levchenko, A. (2018). Topotaxis: a new mechanism of directed cell migration in topographic ECM gradients. Biophys. J. 114, 1257–1263. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.3813
Payne, G. F., and Raghavan, S. R. (2007). Chitosan: a soft interconnect for hierarchical assembly of nano-scale components. Soft Matter. 3, 521–527.
Perera, T. H., Howell, S. M., and Smith Callahan, L. A. (2019). Manipulation of extracellular matrix remodeling and neurite extension by mouse embryonic stem cells using IKVAV and LRE peptide tethering in hyaluronic acid matrices. Biomacromolecules 20, 3009–3020. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b00578
Plantman, S., Patarroyo, M., Fried, K., Domogatskaya, A., Tryggvason, K., Hammarberg, H., et al. (2008). Integrin-laminin interactions controlling neurite outgrowth from adult DRG neurons in vitro. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 39, 50–62. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2008.05.015
Pollard, S. M., Conti, L., Sun, Y., Goffredo, D., and Smith, A. (2006). Adherent neural stem (NS) cells from fetal and adult forebrain. Cereb. Cortex 16, i112–i120. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj167
Radakovits, R., Barros, C. S., Belvindrah, R., Patton, B., and Müller, U. (2009). Regulation of radial glial survival by signals from the meninges. J. Neurosci. 29, 7694–7705. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5537-08.2009
Radner, S., Banos, C., Bachay, G., Li, Y. N., Hunter, D. D., Brunken, W. J., et al. (2013). β2 and γ3 laminins are critical cortical basement membrane components: ablation of Lamb2 and Lamc3 genes disrupts cortical lamination and produces dysplasia. Dev. Neurobiol. 73, 209–229. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22057
Rallis, C., Pinchin, S. M., and Ish-Horowicz, D. (2010). Cell-autonomous integrin control of Wnt and Notch signalling during somitogenesis. Development 137, 3591–3601. doi: 10.1242/dev.050070
Rigato, F., Garwood, J., Calco, V., Heck, N., Faivre-Sarrailh, C., and Faissner, A. (2002). Tenascin-C promotes neurite outgrowth of embryonic hippocampal neurons through the alternatively spliced fibronectin type III BD domains via activation of the cell adhesion molecule F3/Contactin. J. Neurosci. 22, 6596–6609. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-15-06596.2002
Rojas-Ríos, P., and González-Reyes, A. (2014). Concise review: the plasticity of stem cell niches: a general property behind tissue homeostasis and repair. Stem Cells 32, 852–859. doi: 10.1002/stem.1621
Roll, L., and Faissner, A. (2014). Influence of the extracellular matrix on endogenous and transplanted stem cells after brain damage. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 8:219. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00219
Roll, L., and Faissner, A. (2019). Tenascins in CNS lesions. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 89, 118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.09.012
Rose, J. C., Fölster, M., Kivilip, L., Gerardo-Nava, J. L., Jaekel, E. E., Gehlen, B. D., et al. (2020). Predicting the orientation of magnetic microgel rods for soft anisotropic biomimetic hydrogels. Polym. Chem. 11, 496–507.
Ruoslahti, E., and Pierschbacher, M. D. (1987). New perspectives in cell adhesion: RGD and integrins. Science 238, 491–497. doi: 10.1126/science.2821619
Saghatelyan, A., de Chevigny, A., Schachner, M., and Lledo, P.-M. (2004). Tenascin-R mediates activity-dependent recruitment of neuroblasts in the adult mouse forebrain. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 347–356. doi: 10.1038/nn1211
Saha, K., Irwin, E. F., Kozhukh, J., Schaffer, D. V., and Healy, K. E. (2007). Biomimetic interfacial interpenetrating polymer networks control neural stem cell behavior. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 81A, 240–249. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30986
Saha, K., Keung, A. J., Irwin, E. F., Li, Y., Little, L., Schaffer, D. V., et al. (2008). Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. Biophys. J. 95, 4426–4438. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.108.132217
Sallouh, M., Jarocki, M., Sallouh, O., Degen, P., Faissner, A., and Weberskirch, R. (2017). The synergistic effect of cationic moieties and GRGDSF-peptides in hydrogels on neural stem cell behavior. Macromol. Biosci. 17:1600178. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201600178
Sasaki, T., and Timpl, R. (2001). Domain IVa of laminin alpha5 chain is cell-adhesive and binds beta1 and alphaVbeta3 integrins through Arg-Gly-Asp. FEBS Lett. 509, 181–185. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)03167-2
Schwartz, M. A., and Ginsberg, M. H. (2002). Networks and crosstalk: integrin signalling spreads. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, E65–E68. doi: 10.1038/ncb0402-e65
Scrimgeour, J., McLane, L. T., Chang, P. S., and Curtis, J. E. (2017). Single-molecule imaging of proteoglycans in the pericellular matrix. Biophys. J. 113, 2316–2320. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.030
Seidlits, S. K., Liang, J., Bierman, R. D., Sohrabi, A., Karam, J., Holley, S. M., et al. (2019). Peptide-modified, hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels as a 3D culture platform for neural stem/progenitor cell engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 107, 704–718. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36603
Selkoe, D. J., and Lansbury, P. J. Jr. (1999). “Alzheimer’s Disease is the most common neurodegenerative disorder. Chapter 46,” in Basic Neurochemistry, Molecular, Cellular and Medical Aspects, 6th Edn, eds G. J. Siegel, B. W. Agranoff, R. W. Albers, et al. (Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven), 949.
Selvaraj, V., Jiang, P., Chechneva, O., Lo, U.-G., and Deng, W. (2012). Differentiating human stem cells into neurons and glial cells for neural repair. Front. Biosci. Landmark Ed. 17, 65–89. doi: 10.2741/3916
Senkov, O., Andjus, P., Radenovic, L., Soriano, E., and Dityatev, A. (2014). Neural ECM molecules in synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory. Prog. Brain Res. 214, 53–80. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63486-3.00003-7
Silva, N. A., Cooke, M. J., Tam, R. Y., Sousa, N., Salgado, A. J., Reis, R. L., et al. (2012). The effects of peptide modified gellan gum and olfactory ensheathing glia cells on neural stem/progenitor cell fate. Biomaterials 33, 6345–6354. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.050
Slaughter, B. V., Khurshid, S. S., Fisher, O. Z., Khademhosseini, A., and Peppas, N. A. (2009). Hydrogels in regenerative medicine. Adv. Mater. 21, 3307–3329. doi: 10.1002/adma.200802106
Steindler, D. A., Kadrie, T., Fillmore, H., and Brannon Thomas, L. (1996). The subependymal zone: “brain marrow. Prog. Brain Res. 108, 349–363.
Stukel, J. M., and Willits, R. K. (2018). The interplay of peptide affinity and scaffold stiffness on neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells. Biomed. Mater. 13:024102. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aa9a4b
Sun, W., Incitti, T., Migliaresi, C., Quattrone, A., Casarosa, S., and Motta, A. (2017). Viability and neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells encapsulated in silk fibroin hydrogel functionalized with an IKVAV peptide. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 11, 1532–1541. doi: 10.1002/term.2053
Tarus, D., Hamard, L., Caraguel, F., Wion, D., Szarpak-Jankowska, A., van der Sanden, B., et al. (2016). Design of hyaluronic acid hydrogels to promote neurite outgrowth in three dimensions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 25051–25059. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b06446
Tashiro, K., Sephel, G. C., Greatorex, D., Sasaki, M., Shirashi, N., Martin, G. R., et al. (1991). The RGD containing site of the mouse laminin A chain is active for cell attachment, spreading, migration and neurite outgrowth. J. Cell. Physiol. 146, 451–459. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041460316
Tashiro, K., Sephel, G. C., Weeks, B., Sasaki, M., Martin, G. R., Kleinman, H. K., et al. (1989). A synthetic peptide containing the IKVAV sequence from the A chain of laminin mediates cell attachment, migration, and neurite outgrowth. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 16174–16182.
Theocharidis, U., and Faissner, A. (2012). “Analysis of alternatively spliced domains in multimodular gene products - the extracellular matrix glycoprotein tenascin C,” in Polymerase Chain Reaction, eds P. Hernandez-Rodriguez and A. P. Ramirez Gomez (Rijeka: IntechOpen).
Theocharidis, U., Long, K., French-Constant, C., and Faissner, A. (2014). Regulation of the neural stem cell compartment by extracellular matrix constituents. Prog. Brain Res. 214, 3–28. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-444-63486-3.00001-3
Thomas, M., and Willerth, S. M. (2017). 3-D bioprinting of neural tissue for applications in cell therapy and drug screening. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 5:69. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00069
Tibbitt, M. W., and Anseth, K. S. (2009). Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 103, 655–663. doi: 10.1002/bit.22361
Tonge, D. A., de Burgh, H. T., Docherty, R., Humphries, M. J., Craig, S. E., and Pizzey, J. (2012). Fibronectin supports neurite outgrowth and axonal regeneration of adult brain neurons in vitro. Brain Res. 1453, 8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.024
Trappmann, B., Gautrot, J. E., Connelly, J. T., Strange, D. G. T., Li, Y., Oyen, M. L., et al. (2012). Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nat. Mater. 11, 642–649. doi: 10.1038/nmat3339
Urrutia, D. N., Caviedes, P., Mardones, R., Minguell, J. J., Vega-Letter, A. M., and Jofre, C. M. (2019). Comparative study of the neural differentiation capacity of mesenchymal stromal cells from different tissue sources: an approach for their use in neural regeneration therapies. PLoS One 14:e0213032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213032
von Holst, A., Egbers, U., Prochiantz, A., and Faissner, A. (2007). Neural stem/progenitor cells express 20 tenascin c isoforms that are differentially regulated by Pax6. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 9172–9181. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608067200
Yacila, G., and Sari, Y. (2014). Potential therapeutic drugs and methods for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Curr. Med. Chem. 21, 3583–3593. doi: 10.2174/0929867321666140601162710
Yamada, K. M., and Even-Ram, S. (2002). Integrin regulation of growth factor receptors. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, E75–E76. doi: 10.1038/ncb0402-e75
Yan, Z.-J., Hu, Y.-Q., Zhang, H.-T., Zhang, P., Xiao, Z.-Y., Sun, X.-L., et al. (2013). Comparison of the neural differentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells from amniotic fluid and adult bone marrow. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 33, 465–475. doi: 10.1007/s10571-013-9922-y
Yang, J.-A., Yeom, J., Hwang, B. W., Hoffman, A. S., and Hahn, S. K. (2014). In situ-forming injectable hydrogels for regenerative medicine. Prog. Polym. Sci. 39, 1973–1986.
Yavin, E., and Yavin, Z. (1974). Attachment and culture of dissociated cells from rat embryo cerebral hemispheres on polylysine-coated surface. J. Cell Biol. 62, 540–546. doi: 10.1083/jcb.62.2.540
Zemel’ko, V. I., Kozhukharova, I. B., Alekseenko, L. L., Domnina, A. P., Reshetnikova, G. F., Puzanov, M. V., et al. (2013). [Neurogenic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells isolated from bone marrow, adipose tissue and endometrium: a comparative study]. Tsitologiia 55, 101–110.
Zhang, Z. X., Zheng, Q. X., Wu, Y. C., and Hao, D. J. (2010). Compatibility of neural stem cells with functionalized self-assembling peptide scaffold in vitro. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 15, 545–551.
Zhou, Y., Shao, A., Xu, W., Wu, H., and Deng, Y. (2019). Advance of stem cell treatment for traumatic brain injury. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 13:301. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00301
Keywords: cationic moieties, extracellular matrix, functional peptides, hydrogels, integrin, neural stem cells, RGD
Citation: Glotzbach K, Stamm N, Weberskirch R and Faissner A (2020) Hydrogels Derivatized With Cationic Moieties or Functional Peptides as Efficient Supports for Neural Stem Cells. Front. Neurosci. 14:475. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00475
Received: 19 December 2019; Accepted: 16 April 2020;
Published: 20 May 2020.
Edited by:
Fabrizio Gelain, Center for Nanomedicine and Tissue Engineering (nanomed3D), ItalyReviewed by:
Filippo Rossi, Politecnico di Milano, ItalyDong-Wook Han, Pusan National University, South Korea
Copyright © 2020 Glotzbach, Stamm, Weberskirch and Faissner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ralf Weberskirch, ralf.weberskirch@tu-dortmund.de; Andreas Faissner, andreas.faissner@rub.de
†These authors have contributed equally to this work