Radiotherapy for thymic carcinoma: adjuvant, inductive, and definitive
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Although historically thymoma and thymic carcinoma have been treated surgically, radiation therapy also has an important role, either as postoperative therapy to reduce the risk of mediastinal recurrence or as part of definitive treatment for patients who cannot undergo surgery. Induction chemotherapy and molecular targeted agents may also be appropriate for thymic carcinoma, the behavior of which resembles non-small-cell lung carcinoma more than that of thymoma or invasive thymoma and is increasingly being treated like lung cancer. We present here a review of current therapies for thymic malignancies and briefly discuss the potential benefits from novel technologies for such treatment.
Thymic malignancies, although the most common primary neoplasms of the anterior mediastinum, are relatively rare. The course of disease can range from indolent to quite aggressive, making the choice of treatment and analysis of outcomes challenging. The few prospective trials that have included patients with advanced-stage disease involved heterogeneous treatments (1). Retrospective and prospective analyses have demonstrated promising survival rates for patients undergoing trimodality therapy (chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy) for advanced invasive thymoma (2–5) or thymic carcinoma (6–8). However, investigations that include large numbers of patients from several institutions are sparse, particularly those that compare patients who received different types of treatments.
Indications for Adjuvant (Postoperative) Radiation Therapy
R0 (Completely Resected) Thymic Malignancies
In general, radiation should be considered more strongly as the risk of recurrence increases. Therefore, for patients with the lowest likelihood of recurrence (i.e., completely resected Masaoka stage I thymoma), radiation can be safely omitted (9–11). For those at intermediate risk of local recurrence after complete resection, i.e., those with aggressive tumor histologies (such as thymic carcinoma) or Masaoka stage II and stage III disease, retrospective evidence exists both to support (9, 12) and contradict (13–15) claims of benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy after complete resection. In general, our institutional practice includes postoperative radiation for completely resected Masaoka-Koga stage III thymoma and stage II or III thymic carcinoma. Risk assessment and stratification is usually done in a multidisciplinary setting and drives the choice of adjuvant treatment. The International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) published a set of definitions and reporting guidelines for the use of radiation therapy for thymic malignancies in 2011 (16). Pertinent recommendations for postoperative therapy are as follows. First, the term “postoperative” should be used for situations in which the tumor is resected and no residual disease is evident on imaging. If gross disease is present on postoperative imaging, then the disease should be defined as “recurrent” and the intent as “radiation for postoperative disease.” Second, the minimum acceptable dose for postoperative R0 disease is 50 Gy in 5 weeks. Finally, radiation to elective nodal regions is not recommended, and the extent of malignancy before surgery should be used as a guide for designing the treatment fields.
Microscopic Positive Margins (R1) and Gross Disease (R2)
Radiation for R1 or R2 thymic malignancies should be started within 3 months of surgical resection. Doses between 40 and 64 Gy are most appropriate for microscopically positive margins, whereas doses of 54 Gy or higher should be used for gross disease; both should be given in standard fractions of 1.8–2.0 Gy (16). Patients with positive margins should be considered for concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy, especially patients with thymic carcinoma.
Indications for Induction (Preoperative) Radiation Therapy
Some patients with thymoma and thymic carcinoma present with disease that is unresectable at diagnosis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can increase the likelihood of resectable disease for patients who are otherwise eligible for surgery. Potential induction regimens include chemotherapy alone (17, 18), radiation alone (19, 20), and combined chemotherapy and radiation (3). Chemotherapeutic regimens are generally cisplatin-based; regimens used in prior studies have included cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and prednisone or cisplatin and etoposide (18, 21). In some cases, patients undergo preoperative radiation therapy and then, after surgical resection, are considered for adjuvant treatment. Radiation therapy in this context can be difficult to deliver without exceeding dose constraints, and the cumulative radiation dose should be considered carefully. As is true for postoperative therapy, preoperative therapy should not include elective nodal regions but rather should encompass the gross area of involvement with an appropriate margin.
Indications for Definitive Radiation Therapy
Definitive radiation therapy is generally used for patients who are not candidates for surgery because of either the extent of disease at diagnosis or other medical conditions. Because chemotherapy is a known radiation sensitizer, the combination of chemotherapy and radiation is considered most likely to control disease in these circumstances (5, 22–24). A multimodality approach such as trimodality therapy or definitive concurrent chemoradiation in unresectable cases is recommended for thymic carcinoma regardless of disease stage (25). Notably, only one-third of patients with thymic carcinoma are able to undergo a complete resection after such therapy (26). Definitive radiation therapy for unresectable disease is considered analogous to radiation therapy for disease that recurs after surgical resection; for such cases, we recommend radiation doses of 60–66 Gy to encompass gross disease plus a margin for microscopic regions at risk. The corresponding radiation dose when radiation is to be given with chemotherapy as definitive therapy is 54 Gy.
Induction Chemotherapy and Molecular Targeted Therapies
Induction chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of thymic carcinoma and invasive thymoma have typically involved three cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and prednisone, to be followed by surgery. However, the advent of targeted therapies over the past decade has led to a variety of approaches being tested for their ability to improve disease control. Molecular characterization of thymomas and thymic carcinoma have shown that cKIT (CD117) is overexpressed in thymic carcinomas but not in thymomas (27, 28), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A and the VEGF receptor (VEGFR) are often overexpressed in thymic carcinomas (29). In contrast, mutations in the epithelial growth factor receptor are quite uncommon in thymic malignancies and seem to be limited to a small proportion of Asian patients (30, 31). These and other findings have led to several trials to test the safety and efficacy of targeted agents for thymic malignancies, including cKIT inhibitors, anti-EGFR therapies, and histone deacetylase inhibitors. To date, the results of these trials have been disappointing (30, 32). However, as more data on the molecular characteristics of thymic carcinoma are collected through multi-institutional tumor registries and databases, clinical trials of individualized care based on the molecular makeup of each individual tumor could lead to substantial breakthroughs in the treatment of this disease.
Because of the central location of thymic malignancies and the relatively high doses used in radiation therapy, we strongly recommend the use of conformal techniques, such as three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), or, if available, proton beam therapy because of the physical properties of the proton particles, which lead to lower doses being deposited both proximal and distal to the target volume. In addition, because tumors can show substantial changes in shape or size over the course of several weeks of radiation therapy, we recommend that when radiation is to be used as definitive therapy, adaptive replanning should be considered (33). Adaptive replanning involves obtaining additional CT scans at approximately halfway through treatment and evaluating tumor coverage to determine if the treatment plans should be modified. Several studies have shown that adaptive replanning can significantly minimize the radiation dose to normal tissues (34, 35).
For locally advanced disease, standard radiation treatment fields would include the tumor plus a margin if the radiation is to be given before surgery or as definitive therapy, and the tumor bed plus a margin if the radiation is to be given after surgery. Because lymph node metastases are rare, elective nodal coverage is not routinely recommended. Previous studies have examined the role of hemithoracic radiation therapy to prevent pleural dissemination. However, the doses that could be achieved while simultaneously meeting normal tissue constraints (10–20 Gy) were lower than are typically used for microscopic disease (36–38). Although this method has been reported to be safe and perhaps to lead to modest reductions in pleural recurrences, these findings are provocative at best, and these doses may well be ineffective for adequately controlling disease. The advent of conformal techniques, particularly IMRT, may enable the delivery of higher doses of radiation, which would increase the probability of disease control, while still limiting the dose to the surrounding esophagus, spinal cord, heart, and contralateral lung. Indeed, IMRT has been used to treat mesothelioma with promising results (39, 40).
Long-Term Consequences of Radiation on the Heart and Vasculature
Abundant evidence suggests that long-term survivors of mediastinal radiation therapy are at risk of both acute and chronic cardiac sequelae. With regard to acute effects, the dose and fractionation of the radiation and the volume of heart irradiated all affect the risk of pericarditis and pericardial effusion (41). Given the close physiologic association between perfusion and ventilation, one might expect that radiation to the heart could affect lung function and vice versa. In one clinical study, investigators found that several heart dose-volume variables predicted radiation pneumonitis and that the fit of a model predicting pneumonitis was improved by the incorporation of cardiac variables (42). The risk of cardiac and other side effects is also affected by the exact location of the irradiated field. Short-term surrogates of long-term toxicity such as findings on cardiovascular imaging or biomarker correlates would be helpful for identifying which patients at greatest risk for cardiac events. In the meantime, we recommend the continued use of advanced radiation therapy technologies such as IMRT, proton beam therapy, use of 4D CT-based imaging and treatment planning, and adaptive planning when possible to minimize the dose to mediastinal structures for patients with thymic disease, many of whom will survive for several decades and thus will live to see the long-term consequences of irradiation of these vital organs.
Effects of Radiation Therapy on Survival and Disease Control
Studies evaluating whether the inclusion of radiation therapy affects disease control and survival in thymic carcinoma are sparse because of the rarity of the disease; indeed, to the best of our knowledge no prospective trials have been done that compare outcomes between patients who have or have not received radiation therapy. Most published retrospective reports have focused on invasive thymoma, with some studies indicating that radiation is beneficial for locally advanced disease after surgery (8, 43–45) and others not demonstrating a clear advantage (46–48). Thymic carcinoma is often analyzed together with locally advanced invasive thymoma in an attempt to increase patient numbers and statistical power. In perhaps the best analysis of this type, a study of 1,320 patients from Japan with thymic malignancies, the authors compared adjuvant regimens in patients with completely resected stage III-IV thymoma and thymic carcinoma (14). They found no significant differences in survival between patients who received adjuvant radiation and those who received no further treatment. A subanalysis of only patients with thymic carcinoma also showed no difference in survival between those who received radiation versus no further treatment; however, that subanalysis did show that patients who received adjuvant chemoradiation for thymic carcinoma had worse outcomes than patients who received either radiation alone or observation. Notably, however, the size of these subgroups was small, with 24 receiving chemoradiation, 33 receiving radiation, and 16 receiving observation. A multivariate analysis of factors predicting survival among 290 patients with thymic carcinoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database revealed that the extent of surgical excision, Masaoka stage, and race were associated with survival but receipt of radiation was not (49). In a much smaller study of 26 patients, investigators from Taiwan found that surgery and postoperative radiation achieved 5-year local control rates of 77%, but nearly 50% of patients experienced distant metastases (6). Finally, in a study of 14 patients with thymic carcinoma treated at the Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center in Japan, patients who received radiation had better outcomes than those who did not, and those investigators concluded that radiation has an important role in the treatment of thymic carcinoma (50). Clearly large prospective studies are needed to definitively answer this question.
As is true of studies of survival, analyses of patterns of failure after treatment for thymic carcinoma have generally been small and retrospective. In general, thymic carcinoma tends to recur distantly rather than locally, and pleural and extrathoracic metastases tend to drive overall survival (51, 52). For this reason, the development of effective targeted agents will be important in improving treatment outcomes in this disease. However, significant local invasion such as that into the great vessels or heart portends worse locoregional control and progression-free survival (53, 54). Further, both early-stage disease and achievement of complete resection have been shown to be associated with improved prognosis (55, 56), highlighting the role of radiation therapy in maximizing the likelihood of local control and optimizing survival outcomes.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
1. Falkson CB, Bezjak A, Darling G, Gregg R, Malthaner R, Maziak DE, et al. Lung cancer disease site group of cancer care Ontario’s Program in evidence-based care. The management of thymoma: a systematic review and practice guideline. J Thorac Oncol (2009) 4:911–9. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181a4b8e0
2. Okereke IC, Kesler KA, Morad MH, Mi D, Rieger KM, Birdas TJ, et al. Prognostic indicators after surgery for thymoma. Ann Thorac Surg (2010) 89:1071–7. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.01.026 discussion 7–9,
3. Wright CD, Choi NC, Wain JC, Mathisen DJ, Lynch TJ, Fidias P. Induction chemoradiotherapy followed by resection for locally advanced Masaoka stage III and IVA thymic tumors. Ann Thorac Surg (2008) 85:385–9. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.08.051
4. Shin DM, Walsh GL, Komaki R, Putnam JB, Nesbitt J, Ro JY, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to therapy for unresectable malignant thymoma. Ann Intern Med (1998) 129:100–4. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-129-2-199807150-00006
5. Venuta F, Rendina EA, Pescarmona EO, De Giacomo T, Vegna ML, Fazi P, et al. Multimodality treatment of thymoma: a prospective study. Ann Thorac Surg (1997) 64:1585–91. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00629-2 discussion 91–2,
6. Hsu HC, Huang EY, Wang CJ, Sun LM, Chen HC. Postoperative radiotherapy in thymic carcinoma: treatment results and prognostic factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2002) 52:801–5. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02656-6
7. Magois E, Guigay J, Blancard PS, Margery J, Milleron B, Lher P, et al. Multimodal treatment of thymic carcinoma: report of nine cases. Lung Cancer (2008) 59:126–32. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.05.016
12. Ogawa K, Uno T, Toita T, Onishi H, Yoshida H, Kakinohana Y, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy for patients with completely resected thymoma: a multi-institutional, retrospective review of 103 patients. Cancer (2002) 94:1405–13. doi:10.1002/cncr.10373
15. Chen YD, Feng QF, Lu HZ, Mao YS, Zhou ZM, Ou GF, et al. Role of adjuvant radiotherapy for stage II thymoma after complete tumor resection. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2010) 78(5):1400–6. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.066
17. Loehrer PJ Sr, Chen M, Kim K, Aisner SC, Einhorn LH, Livingston R, et al. Cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide plus thoracic radiation therapy for limited-stage unresectable thymoma: an intergroup trial. J Clin Oncol (1997) 15:3093–9.
18. Kim ES, Putnam JB, Komaki R, Walsh GL, Ro JY, Shin HJ, et al. Phase II study of a multidisciplinary approach with induction chemotherapy, followed by surgical resection, radiation therapy, and consolidation chemotherapy for unresectable malignant thymomas: final report. Lung Cancer (2004) 44:369–79. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2003.12.010
19. Akaogi E, Ohara K, Mitsui K, Onizuka M, Ishikawa S, Mitsui T, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy and surgery for advanced thymoma with invasion to the great vessels. J Surg Oncol (1996) 63:17–22. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199609)63:1<17::AID-JSO4>3.3.CO;2-X
21. Lucchi M, Ambrogi MC, Duranti L, Basolo F, Fontanini G, Angeletti CA, et al. Advanced stage thymomas and thymic carcinomas: results of multimodality treatments. Ann Thorac Surg (2005) 79:1840–4. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.12.047
24. Yokoi K, Matsuguma H, Nakahara R, Kondo T, Kamiyama Y, Mori K, et al. Multidisciplinary treatment for advanced invasive thymoma with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and methylprednisolone. J Thorac Oncol (2007) 2:73–8. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e31802bafc8
29. Sasaki H, Yukiue H, Kobayashi Y, Nakashima Y, Moriyama S, Kaji M, et al. Elevated serum vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor levels in patients with thymic epithelial neoplasms. Surg Today (2001) 31(11):1038–40. doi:10.1007/s005950170021
31. Yamaguchi H, Soda H, Kitazaki T, Tsukamoto K, Hayashi T, Kohno S. Thymic carcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations. Lung Cancer (2006) 52(2):261–2. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.01.009
33. Liao ZX, Komaki RR, Thames HD Jr, Liu HH, Tucker SL, Mohan R, et al. Influence of technologic advances on outcomes in patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2010) 76:775–81. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.032
34. Britton KR, Starkschall G, Liu H, Chang JY, Bilton S, Ezhil M, et al. Consequences of anatomic changes and respiratory motion on radiation dose distributions in conformal radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2009) 73:94–102. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.016
35. Spoelstra FO, Pantarotto JR, van Sornsen de Koste JR, Slotman BJ, Senan S. Role of adaptive radiotherapy during concomitant chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer: analysis of data from a prospective clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2009) 75:1092–7. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.027
36. Sugie C, Shibamoto Y, Ikeya-Hashizume C, Ogino H, Ayakawa S, Tomita N, et al. Invasive thymoma: postoperative mediastinal irradiation, and low-dose entire hemithorax irradiation in patients with pleural dissemination. J Thorac Oncol (2008) 3(1):75–81. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e31815e8b73
37. Uematsu M, Yoshida H, Kondo M, Itami J, Hatano K, Isobe K, et al. Entire hemithorax irradiation following complete resection in patients with stage II-III invasive thymoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (1996) 35(2):357–60. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(96)00086-7
39. Rosenzweig KE, Zauderer MG, Laser B, Krug LM, Yorke E, Sima CS, et al. Pleural intensity-modulated radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2012) 83(4):1278–83. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.027
40. Feigen M, Lee ST, Lawford C, Churcher K, Zupan E, Scott AM, et al. Establishing locoregional control of malignant pleural mesothelioma using high-dose radiotherapy and (18) F-FDG PET/CT scan correlation. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol (2011) 55(3):320–32. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9485.2011.02274.x
41. Wei X, Liu HH, Tucker SL, Wang S, Mohan R, Cox JD, et al. Risk factors for pericardial effusion in inoperable esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2008) 70:707–14. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.056
43. Weksler B, Shende M, Nason KS, Gallagher A, Ferson PF, Pennathur A. The role of adjuvant radiation therapy for resected stage III thymoma: a population-based study. Ann Thorac Surg (2012) 93(6):1822–8. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.03.004 discussion 1828–9,
44. Patel S, MacDonald OK, Nagda S, Bittner N, Suntharalingam M. Evaluation of the role of radiation therapy in the management of malignant thymoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2012) 82(5):1797–801. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.010
46. Mangi AA, Wain JC, Donahue DM, Grillo HC, Mathisen DJ, Wright CD. Adjuvant radiation of stage III thymoma: is it necessary? Ann Thorac Surg (2005) 79(6):1834–9. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.12.051
47. Singhal S, Shrager JB, Rosenthal DI, LiVolsi VA, Kaiser LR. Comparison of stages I-II thymoma treated by complete resection with or without adjuvant radiation. Ann Thorac Surg (2003) 76(5):1635–41. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00819-1 discussion 1641–2,
48. Utsumi T, Shiono H, Kadota Y, Matsumura A, Maeda H, Ohta M, et al. Postoperative radiation therapy after complete resection of thymoma has little impact on survival. Cancer (2009) 115(23):5413–20. doi:10.1002/cncr.24618
49. Weksler B, Dhupar R, Parikh V, Nason KS, Pennathur A, Ferson PF. Thymic carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of factors predictive of survival in 290 patients. Ann Thorac Surg (2013) 95(1):299–303. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.09.006
51. Okereke IC, Kesler KA, Freeman RK, Rieger KM, Birdas TJ, Ascioti AJ, et al. Thymic carcinoma: outcomes after surgical resection. Ann Thorac Surg (2012) 93(5):1668–72. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.014 discussion 1672–3,
53. Eom KY, Kim HJ, Wu HG, Kim YT, Heo DS, Kim YW. Invasion of the great vessels or atrium predicts worse prognosis in thymic carcinoma. Radiat Oncol J (2013) 31(3):131–7. doi:10.3857/roj.2013.31.3.131
55. Lee CY, Bae MK, Park IK, Kim DJ, Lee JG, Chung KY. Early Masaoka stage and complete resection is important for prognosis of thymic carcinoma: a 20-year experience at a single institution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg (2009) 36(1):159–62. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.02.019 discussion 163,
Keywords: postoperative radiation therapy, concurrent chemoradiation therapy, proton therapy, tumor histology, cardiac toxicity
Citation: Komaki R and Gomez DR (2014) Radiotherapy for thymic carcinoma: adjuvant, inductive, and definitive. Front. Oncol. 3:330. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00330
Received: 26 September 2013; Accepted: 25 December 2013;
Published online: 10 January 2014.
Edited by:Giuseppe Giaccone, Georgetown University, USA
Reviewed by:Lorenzo Spaggiari, European Institute of Oncology, Italy
David Ball, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia
Copyright: © 2014 Komaki and Gomez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ritsuko Komaki, Department of Radiation Oncology, Unit 97, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA e-mail: email@example.com
Portions of this review were presented in abstract form at the Fourth International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group Annual Meeting, September 6–7, 2013, Bethesda, MD, USA.