Impact Factor 4.416

Frontiers journals are at the top of citation and impact metrics

Opinion ARTICLE

Front. Oncol., 10 September 2014 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00243

Prostate cancer and new insights in angiogenesis

  • Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia

Angiogenesis is considered one of the hallmarks of tumor initiation and progression therefore it is also the widely accepted therapeutic target. It has been shown that angiogenesis blockers prolong patient’s survival for several months (1). In order to progress, cancer cells acquire several distinct morphological alterations increasing their capacity to proliferate and independently sustain growth, and at the same time, inhibit homeostatic, physiologic signals from the microenvironment they are in, and under the control of which they should have remained. This is the main principle behind a tumor gaining the ability to metastasize (2). Till now, several agents have been approved by the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) but their efficacy is still limited and this observation is repeatedly proven by recurrence of more aggressive tumor after application of anti-angiogenic therapy (3).

So far stated is highly suggestive to back up and justify the existence of hyperplasia in the field of research for novel therapies, which would induce suppression of angiogenesis in carcinogenesis cascade and limit tumor progression. The complexity of angiogenesis becomes one of the greatest challenges in understanding various processes of inflammation, reparation, tumorigenesis, and metastases. In following paragraphs, we will try to express opinion where in near future we should probably search for the next generation of promising therapeutics for management of prostate cancer. It has been established that new blood vessel formation is required for tumor growth (4). The mutations, which predispose tissue to neoangiogenesis and induce tissue invasion, are reactivated genetic programs normally turned off in adult human especially those activated during reparation processes in the surrounding microenvironment, where pro-angiogenic factors play a key role in establishing a capillary network from the surrounding host tissues (5). The surrounding stromal cells, tumor-associated macrophages, and other components of the extracellular also actively constitute matrix chemical milieu, and not just the cancer cells alone as previously implied. To be more precise, angiogenic switch by its definition implies impaired angiogenesis and importance of high vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptor (VEGFR) levels holding responsible for PCA progression (6).

The level of oxygenation in prostate is important for estimation of its hypoxic state. Namely, hypoxic state is informative as relative tissue oxygenation status, which correlates with overall VEGF expression in prostate (710). Progressive induction of hypoxia influences metabolic changes at cellular level in prostate epithelial cells and their energetic demands are being modified accordingly. Impaired systems of cellular repair are not capable to restore in full sublethal cellular damage induced by hypoxia therefore pro-inflammatory cytokines are being increasingly secreted by prostate gland epithelia. This leads toward further promotion of immunologic response inducing chronic inflammation. From other tumor models it has been known that long lasting chronic inflammation stimulates cellular proliferation and favors fasten growing, which is often in hypoxic circumstances deranged at certain level. Oxygen delivery and consumption are regulated with hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) among other molecules, which also induce transcription of VEGF stimulating, in turn, tumor angiogenesis due to increased oxygen demand. Hypoxic cancer cells are stimulated to acquire invasive and metastatic properties and they are promptly developing resistance to chemotherapy too (11). Although significance of inflammation in cancer progression has been discussed and researched for a long time, till recently, research has extrapolated pathways directed to connection between inflammation and cancer evolution. Different studies strongly point out that chronic inflammation is involved in progression of chronic prostatic disease, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and consequent development of prostate cancer (12). The coincidence of chronic inflammation and tumorigenesis in the peripheral zone identified as so-called proliferative inflammatory atrophy is proposed as possible precursor of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasm. This can be explained since inflammatory microenvironment releases growth factors and cytokines that may influence the activation of the vascular endothelial cells and signal transduction in these cells. Continuous inflammatory stimuli as it have been previously shown result in endothelial sprouting. This links process of inflammation with angiogenesis, which predisposes preexisting endothelial cells to continuous activation and usually has its gene activation for consequence. Neovascularization includes also presence of dysfunctional endothelial cells, which is particularly present during chronic inflammation and among others related with sustained p38 MAP kinase pathway activity and increased levels of migration of cytokines. When observed, described gene changes reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels are elevated (13). The novel factors could possibly influence angiogenic switch consequently leading to progression from low-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) to high-grade PIN and beyond to prostate cancer or even more aggressive, poorly differentiated, and androgen-independent histological subtypes.

From morphological point of view, it is important to recognize the presence of even small amount of microscopic patterns, which may be responsible for prompt tumor progression, advancement, and transition from low-grade lesion to the high grade one.

Today, we are aware of their importance and connection with different molecular pathways, which prevail in interplay among tumor cells and environment interaction. Recently, it has been shown that the p38-MAPK pathway can be activated under continuous extensive anti-androgen exposure in prostatic cancer cells, and that the p38-MAPK pathway has a critical role in the induction of resistance, as well as in the acquisition of a more aggressive and invasive phenotype (13). This observation is at least interesting if we would not exaggerate since it offers potentially new therapeutic escape window. Namely, proposed role of p38 in controlling the phosphorylation and activity of transcription factors that has been established would regulate tumor and stromal cells proliferation and the expression and release of multiple tumor-derived cytokines. Cytokines may in turn promote tumor angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, thereby favoring the establishment of a permissive tumor microenvironment. The prostate microenvironment appears relatively simple in comparison with some other milieus (i.e., bone marrow for instance) since it consists of the components of supporting stromal elements’ extracellular matrices, and predominantly, carcinoma-associated fibroblasts. Activation and increased expression of several adhesion molecules correlate with a progression of malignant tumors. CD44 has been recognized to recruit and accumulate matrix metalloproteinase on the cell surface, enabling indirectly tumor cell angiogenesis and invasion (14). CD44 is also recognized as a potential target for cells gained pre-metastatic phenotype and entering process of epithelial–mesenchimal transition (15). Understanding a different expression of CD44s marks and metalloproteinase in the field of invasion may help in recognizing patients with more aggressive forms of prostate tumors, who should be treated surgically and also additionally. Fibroblast actively participates in extracellular matrix remodeling thereby promoting actively carcinogenesis and stimulating prostate cancer cell proliferation and angiogenesis (15, 16). From this concept, two options of therapeutic actions are deriving one targeting reactive stroma and other is aiming inflammatory, stromal and circulating cells (17). There is a constant need of new anticancer agents, in general oncologic therapy. Though exact molecular events enabling prostate cell malignant transformation and the ability to gain aggressive metastatic phenotype remain elusive, it is important not to overlook the importance that new therapeutic agents should be able to provide a therapeutic solution for both local and metastatic prostate cancer. As previously mentioned, as agents capable of disrupting MAPK signaling pathway and inducing irreversible inhibition of tumor proliferation, angiogenesis and metastatic potential, and as moderators of expression and function of adhesion molecules, molecule CD44 would probably be the next generation of promising therapeutics for management of prostate cancer.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM, Szczylik C, Oudard S, Siebels M, et al. Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med (2007) 356:125–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060655

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

2. Ravenna L, Principessa L, Verdina A, Salvatori L, Russo MA, Petrangeli E. Distinct phenotypes of human prostate cancer cells associate with different adaptation to hypoxia and pro-inflammatory gene expression. PLoS One (2014) 9:e96250. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096250

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

3. Ebos JM, Lee CR, Cruz-Munoz W, Bjarnason GA, Christensen JG, Kerbel RS. Accelerated metastasis after short-term treatment with a potent inhibitor of tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Cell (2009) 15:232–9. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.01.021

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

4. Sfanos KS, De Marzo AM. Prostate cancer and inflammation: the evidence. Histopathology (2012) 60:199–215. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04033.x

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

5. Pertega-Gomes N, Vizcaino JR, Attig J, Jurmeister S, Lopes C, Baltazar F. A lactate shuttle system between tumour and stromal cells is associated with poor prognosis in prostate cancer. BMC Cancer (2014) 14:352. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-352

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

6. Su WH, Hildesheim A, Chang YS. Human leukocyte antigens and epstein-barr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma: old associations offer new clues into the role of immunity in infection-associated cancers. Front Oncol (2013) 3:299. doi:10.3389/fonc.2013.00299

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

7. Kote-Jarai Z, Olama AA, Giles GG, Severi G, Schleutker J, Weischer M, et al. Seven prostate cancer susceptibility loci identified by a multi-stage genome-wide association study. Nat Genet (2011) 43:785–91. doi:10.1038/ng.882

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

8. Eeles RA, Olama AA, Benlloch S, Saunders EJ, Leongamornlert DA, Tymrakiewicz M, et al. Identification of 23 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci using the iCOGS custom genotyping array. Nat Genet (2013) 45:385–91. doi:10.1038/ng.2560 (391e1-2)

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

9. Oktem G, Bilir A, Uslu R, Inan SV, Demiray SB, Atmaca H, et al. Expression profiling of stem cell signaling alters with spheroid formation in CD133/CD44 prostate cancer stem cells. Oncol Lett (2014) 7:2103–9. doi:10.3892/ol.2014.1992

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

10. Anderson KM, Guinan P, Rubenstein M. Normoxic or hypoxic CD44/CD41 a(2) B(1) integrin-positive prostate PC3 cell side fractions and cancer stem cells. Med Oncol (2014) 31:779. doi:10.1007/s12032-013-0779-1

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

11. Ma B, Wells A. The mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases p38 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) are involved in hepatocyte-mediated phenotypic switching in prostate cancer cells. J Biol Chem (2014) 289:11153–61. doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.540237

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

12. Tei H, Miyake H, Harada K, Fujisawa M. Expression profile of CD44s, CD44v6, and CD44v10 in localized prostate cancer: effect on prognostic outcomes following radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol (2014) 32:694–700. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.12.002

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

13. Thakur N, Gudey SK, Marcusson A, Fu JY, Bergh A, Heldin CH, et al. TGFbeta-induced invasion of prostate cancer cells is promoted by c-Jun-dependent transcriptional activation of snail 1. Cell Cycle (2014) 13:2400–14. doi:10.4161/cc.29339

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

14. Rajashekhar G, Willuweit A, Patterson CE, Sun P, Hilbig A, Breier G, et al. Continuous endothelial cell activation increases angiogenesis: evidence for the direct role of endothelium linking angiogenesis and inflammation. J Vasc Res (2006) 43:193–204. doi:10.1159/000090949

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

15. Marin-Aguilera M, Codony-Servat J, Reig O, Lozano JJ, Fernandez PL, Pereira MV, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition mediates docetaxel resistance and high risk of relapse in prostate cancer. Mol Cancer Ther (2014) 13:1270–84. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0775

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

16. Shi X, Gipp J, Dries M, Bushman W. Prostate progenitor cells proliferate in response to castration. Stem Cell Res (2014) 13:154–63. doi:10.1016/j.scr.2014.04.005

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

17. Moura CM, Pontes J, Reis ST, Viana NI, Morais DR, Dip N, et al. Expression profile of standard and variants forms of CD44 related to prostate cancer behavior. Int J Biol Markers (2014). doi:10.5301/jbm.5000091

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Keywords: prostate, cancer, angiogenesis

Citation: Štifter S and Đorđević G (2014) Prostate cancer and new insights in angiogenesis. Front. Oncol. 4:243. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00243

Received: 18 July 2014; Paper pending published: 31 July 2014;
Accepted: 21 August 2014; Published online: 10 September 2014.

Edited by:

Fabio Grizzi, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Italy

Reviewed by:

Jonas Busch, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany

Copyright: © 2014 Štifter and Đorđević. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: stiftersanja@gmail.com