Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis
- 1Faculty of Medicine, Experimental Medicine Department, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- 2Radiation Oncology Department, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- 3Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- 4Faculty of Medicine, Surgery Department, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- 5Oncology Department, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
Radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) is a major dose-limiting toxicity in head and neck cancer patients. It is a normal tissue injury caused by radiation/radiotherapy (RT), which has marked adverse effects on patient quality of life and cancer therapy continuity. It is a challenge for radiation oncologists since it leads to cancer therapy interruption, poor local tumor control, and changes in dose fractionation. RIOM occurs in 100% of altered fractionation radiotherapy head and neck cancer patients. In the United Sates, its economic cost was estimated to reach 17,000.00 USD per patient with head and neck cancers. This review will discuss RIOM definition, epidemiology, impact and side effects, pathogenesis, scoring scales, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.
Radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) (Figures 1, 4 and 5C) is one of the major ionizing radiation toxicities and normal tissue injuries that result from radiotherapy (1). RIOM was first termed in 1980 as a side effect of radiotherapy (RT) in cancer patients (2). RIOM is a normal tissue injury lasting between 7 and 98 days, which starts as an acute inflammation of oral mucosa, tongue, and pharynx after RT exposure (1, 3). This coincides with recruitment of various inflammatory cells and release of inflammatory cytokines, chemotactic mediators, and growth factors. RIOM can progress to an acute life-threatening stage as a result of severe physical obstruction of food and water intake with subsequent weight loss and septic complication due to lost protective epithelial and basement membrane barriers. This leads to limitations of local tumor control due to cancer treatment interruption and alterations in radiation dose fractionation (4–7). Studies suggested the stages of progression of RIOM as initial hyperemia and erythema during the preulcer phase, during which there is a release of various pro-inflammatory cytokines from epithelial, vascular, and connective tissue cells at the site of tissue injury. This is followed by the epithelial phase with various degrees of desquamation and basement membrane damage with loss of the protective barrier, which ends with the physical appearance of the ulceration. The postulcerative phase varies depending on the extent of the tissue toxicity. A secondary infection with Gram-negative bacteria or yeast may occur, with microcoagulation of the vasculature that worsens the inflammation by the local ischemia with more necrotic tissue yield. The final stage will be the healing phase and fibrosis (2, 8, 9).
Figure 1. Pathobiology of oral mucositis (OM) (10). Sonis has suggested five stages (phases) of OM injury induced by radiotherapy (RT) and/or chemotherapy (CT): initiation, signaling, amplification, ulceration, and healing. The pathogenesis of each phase is illustrated.
RIOM Epidemiology (Incidence, Predictors, and Risk Factors)
Radiation-induced oral mucositis occurs in up to 80% of head and neck cancer irradiated patients and reaches up to 100% in patients with altered fractionation head and neck cancer. RIOM of grade 3 and 4 have been recorded in 56% of head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy (1, 12).
Many risk factors have been identified for RIOM. These risk factors include concomitant chemotherapy (CT), bad oral hygiene, below average nutritional stratus, lack of antibiotic use at early stage mucositis, and smoking (13).
Table 1 shows the significant predictors for the prevalence of severe RIOM and the symptoms of RIOM in a longitudinal study of patients with oral cavity cancer among head and neck cancer outpatients of a radiation department at a major medical center in Taiwan (14). This study used the Generalized Estimating Equations to analyze the predictive factors of prevalence of severe RIOM and RIOM-related symptoms. They found that the significant predictors for the prevalence of severe RIOM included type of treatment [RT vs. concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT)], cumulative radiation dose, smoking, and body mass index (BMI). Patients who received CCRT (Coef. 0.145, p < 0.05), who have a higher cumulative radiation dose (Coef. 0.000, p < 0.01), who are smokers (Coef. 0.090, p < 0.01), and who have lower BMI (Coef. 0.005, p < 0.05) were at high risk to develop severe RIOM. RIOM-related symptoms were also predicted by type of treatment (RT vs. CCRT) (Coef. 1.618, p < 0.05), cumulative radiation dose (Coef. 0.003, p < 0.05), and smoking (Coef. 1.759, p < 0.001). These significant predictors are implemented by radiation oncologists to minimize and/or prevent the RIOM. June Eilers and Rita Million have summarized the patient-linked factors leading to increased risk for RIOM (Table 2) (15). They found that very young age, female gender, poor oral health and hygiene, decreased saliva secretion, low BMI, poor renal function with elevated serum creatinine level, smoking, and history of RIOM are risk factors predicting the development of RIOM in head and neck cancer patients (15).
Table 1. Data analysis for RIOM predictors using IBM SPSS version 21.0 (Armonk, NY, USA) (14).
Table 2. Patient-linked factors leading to increased risk for oral mucositis (OM) (15).
RIOM Impact and Side Effects
Radiation-induced oral mucositis side effects and sequels include oral pain in 69% of patients, dysphagia in 56% of patients, opioid use in 53% of patients, weight loss of 3–7 kg, feeding tube insertion and hospitalization (ICU admission) in 15% of patients, and modification or interruption of treatment in 11–16% of patients (1, 12, 16).
In the United States, RIOM may add up to 1,700.00–6,000.00 USD per patient depending on the inflammatory grade of the injury (12). RIOM treatment adds an economic cost that was estimated to increase up to 17,000.00 USD per patient treated for head and neck cancers (16).
Radiation-induced oral mucositis injury challenges radiation oncologists from many aspects, such as radiation dose limitations, changes in dose fractionation protocol, and dramatic negative effects on patients’ quality of life (1). The major clinical consequences of RIOM include hospital admission or extended hospitalization for total parenteral nutrition, intravenous (IV) analgesia, and IV antibiotics. Sixty-two percent of patients require hospitalization, and 70% of patients with grade 3–4 oral mucositis (OM) require feeding tube insertion. Reduction or cessation of cancer treatment occurs in 35% of patients due to the developed dose-limiting toxicity (17).
Pathogenesis and Suggested Mechanistic Pathways
The pathophysiology of RIOM is not fully understood. Recent studies proposed that the pathogenesis of RIOM is composed of four phases: an initial inflammatory/vascular phase, an epithelial phase, a (pseudomembranous) ulcerative/bacteriological phase, and a healing phase (2, 5).
At the inflammatory phase, the RT-induced tissue injury results in the release of inflammatory cytokines; e.g., interleukin (IL)-1β, prostaglandins (PGs), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) from the resident cells such as epithelial, endovascular, and connective tissue. These mediators might increase the damage by increasing the vascular permeability, leading to more infiltration and recruitment of inflammatory cells. Stem cells travel to the site of the tissue injury with other innate immunity components, e.g., MPO-positive leukocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils (18). On the other hand, there are some anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10 and IL-11, that work to minimize the injury (18).
The epithelial phase is initiated within a week by the apoptotic and cytotoxic effects of RT on the proliferating basal cells. This is why the recovery period is dependent on the rate of epithelial turnover, which could be enhanced by growth factors like epidermal growth factor and keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) (19).
After a week, the epithelial breakdown ends with the beginning of the ulceration. This occurs, when epithelial loss leads to disrupted basement membrane, formation of ulcer pseudomembrane, and inflammatory exudate. The ulceration stage is very painful, since the protective barrier that covers the nerve endings at the lamina propria is lost (19). The resulting microcoagulation and neutropenic state facilitate the Gram-negative bacteria and yeast colonization with the production of secondary infection. Bacterial exotoxins aggravate the inflammatory reaction by inducing mononuclear burst with the release of more IL-1β, TNF-α, and nitric oxide (8, 9, 16, 20).
Signaling pathways suggested to be involved in RIOM pathobiology include nitrogen metabolism, Toll-like receptor signaling, nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling, B-cell receptor signaling, P13K/AKT signaling, cell cycle: G2/M DNA damage checkpoint receptor, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, Wnt/B-catenin signaling, glutamate receptor signaling, integrin signaling, vascular endothelial growth factor signaling, IL-6 signaling, death receptor signaling, and SAPK/JNK signaling (Table 3) (10, 19).
Table 3. Signaling pathways involved in the development of mucositis (10).
In 2009, Redding summarized Sonis’ RIOM pathobiology phases (Figure 2). The initiation phase with RT and/or CT injury results in direct and lethal DNA damage with the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from epithelial and vascular endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and tissue macrophages. This is followed by amplification of this signal (11). During the primary damage response, the DNA damage and ROS act through three major pathways: (1) fibronectin breakdown, which stimulates the macrophages leading to activation of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), (2) nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation, which stimulates the gene expression and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, and (3) ceramide pathway through sphingomyelinase and ceramide synthase. The end result will be more tissue injury and stimulated apoptosis (11). During the signal amplification phase, there is restimulation of tissue damage and apoptosis by the major pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6), NF-κB-mediated gene expression, and ceramide and caspase pathways. The basement membrane protective barrier is lost during the ulceration phase. This leads to Gram-negative and yeast secondary infection potential, which adds more pro-inflammatory reactions and complicates the already existing inflammation. The healing phase starts by matrix signaling to basal epithelial cells to migrate, proliferate, and differentiate (11). Signal amplification during RIOM or CT-induced OM is a main step in this treatment-induced injury, according to Sonis et al. (17). RT and/or CT activate the transcription factor NF-κB in epithelial, endothelial, and mesenchymal cells and macrophages, resulting in upregulation of genes and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines: tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and IL-1β, which amplify the primary signal and activate NF-κB. This leads to transcription of genes responsible for MAPK, cyclooxegenase-2 (COX-2), and tyrosine kinase signaling molecules. These signaling pathways activate MMPs 1 and 3 in the epithelial and lamina propria cells, which collectively cause tissue injury (10) (Figure 3).
Figure 2. Redding’s summary of RT and/or chemotherapy (CT)-induced oral mucositis pathobiology (11). Redding has summarized the pathobiology phases of radiation-induced oral mucositis induced by RT and/or CT. In brief, initiation phase with RT and/or CT results in direct and lethal DNA damage, which leads to release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from epithelial, vascular endothelial, fibroblasts, and tissue macrophages with cycles of amplifications. Within such primary damage response, the DNA damage and ROS lead to three major steps: (1) fibronectin breakdown that activates macrophages ending with stimulation of matrix metalloproteinase; (2) nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activation that stimulates the gene expression and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, e.g., TNF-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6; and (3) ceramide pathway through sphingomyelinase and ceramide synthase. The result will be more tissue injury and stimulated apoptosis. During the signal amplification phase, there is restimulation of tissue damage and apoptosis by the major pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6), NF-κB-mediated gene expression, and ceramide and caspase pathways. During the ulceration and loss of the protective barrier, secondary infection adds more pro-inflammatory reactions and complicates the already existing inflammation before the healing phase starts by matrix signaling to basal epithelial cells to migrate, proliferate, and differentiate. Republished with the permission of Dr. Redding. (A) Initial phase, (B) primary damage phase, (C) signal amplification phase, and (D) ulcerative phase.
Figure 3. Signal amplification during OM induced by RT and/or CT (10). Signal amplification during RT- and/or CT-induced OM is mediated by activation of NF-κB that is reactivated by IL-1β. NF-κB induces the expression of genes responsible for the MAPK, COX-2, and tyrosine kinase pathways to finally activate the MMP1 and MMP3 signaling at the injured tissue cells. TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; COX-2, cyclooxegenase-2; MMP1, matrix metalloproteinase 1; MMP3, matrix metalloproteinase 3; OM, oral mucositis; CT, chemotherapy. Republished with the permission of Dr. Sonis.
RIOM Grading and Scoring Scales
World Health Organization Oral Toxicity Scale measures the anatomical, symptomatic, and functional elements of OM (Figure 4). The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) determined the acute radiation morbidity scoring criteria for mucous membranes. Finally, the Western Consortium for Cancer Nursing Research describes only the anatomical changes associated with OM (24).
Figure 4. World Health Organization’s Oral Toxicity Scale. Republished with the permission of Dr. Patrick Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group developed the Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria for the evaluation of RT effects (another criterion was generated for late effects of RT) (25). The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) scores CT-related side effects. The RTOG was gathered with the NCI-CTC to produce version 2.0, which has been used in all NCI clinical trials since March 1998 (Table 5) (2, 25, 26).
Table 5. Toxicity grading of oral mucositis (OM) according to World Health Organization (WHO) and National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) criteria (2)a.
The OM Index (OMI) scores the severity of OM by the erythema, ulceration, atrophy, and edema (a scale of 0–3 was designated for each element: 0 = none and 3 = severe). The OMI is considered internally consistent with high test–retest and interscorer reliability, and it shows solid validity (27).
The OM Assessment Scale (OMAS) is a highly reproducible scoring scale for RIOM, responsive over time, and accurate in detecting OM-associated elements (25). OMAS records the objective assessment of OM depending on the scoring of the presence and size of the ulceration or pseudomembrane (score 0–3: 0 = no lesion; 1 = lesion of <1 cm2; 2 = lesion of 1–3 cm2; 3 = lesion >3 cm2) and erythema (score 0–2: 0 = none; 1 = not severe; 2 = severe) on the upper and lower lips, right and left cheeks, right and left ventral and lateral tongue, floor of the mouth, soft palate, and hard palate (23, 28).
All these scoring scales are validated and are required in assessing RIOM and the therapeutic benefits of any new treatment of RIOM.
Diagnosis of RIOM
Radiation-induced oral mucositis can develop within or after 2 weeks from the beginning of RT. Oral assessment guide could be a useful tool for detection of early OM (Table 6) (20). Apart from the early clinical signs and symptoms, CBC with differential is considered the baseline to help radiation oncologists to determine the most susceptible time for developing OM or oral infection. Radiation oncologists can start the RT provided that there is no evidence of any periodontal disease. If at any point RIOM develops, oral lesion culture and antimicrobial therapy are recommended as soon as possible (29). Since renal diseases are considered contributing factors for OM (15), chemistry levels should be regularly monitored by the treating physician (29).
Table 6. Oral assessment guide (30).
Differential Diagnosis of RIOM
Because similar conditions can coexist in immunocompromised patients including cancer patients receiving RT and/or CT, differential diagnosis for RIOM is critical. Table 7 shows possible similar conditions (Figure 5) (20, 31).
Figure 5. Differential diagnosis of radiation-induced oral mucositis. Republished with the permission of Dr. Patrick Stiff, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA. (A) Local, denture-related lesion, (B) aphthous ulcer, (C) oral mucositis, and (D) oral thrush.
Prognosis of RIOM
The general long-term prognosis is reasonably good since most lesions resolve within 2–4 weeks after stopping the RT or CT. Although RIOM is considered a self-limited injury in some patients, it could be a lethal injury in moderately to severely ill patients, which could lead to ICU admission with obligatory cessation of RT. Patient losses are a common event under these circumstances (32).
Prevention of RIOM
Maintaining good oral care is the main preventive measure for RIOM to minimize the risk for candidiasis or secondary bacterial infection, especially in hyperfractionated radiotherapy, combined CCRT regimens, or RT combined with a targeted agent due to increased mucositis severity (3). We will summarize the most recent agents and measures to prevent RIOM.
1. Good oral hygiene
Good oral hygiene has been found to be one of the most effective ways to lower the risk of RIOM and minimize its progression. Pre-existing oral pathology, e.g., dental caries, periodontal lesions, pulpal disease, and oral xerostomia, has been linked with increased bacteria colonization and severe RIOM. It is recommended to do early oral examination before starting any mucosal toxic therapy for cancer patients. To help minimize the oral side effects of antineoplastic therapy, it is recommended to eliminate any oral pathology before the beginning of RT. This may be accomplished by performing early histological, cytological, microbiologic, and serologic examinations (2). The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and the International Society of Oral Oncology (ISOO) guidelines recommend the use of a standardized oral care protocol, e.g. brushing with a soft toothbrush, flossing and the use of non-medicated rinses (saline or sodium bicarbonate rinses) (Table 9) (33–36). The good oral care can be summarized as follows:
– Rinsing with a non-irritating solution, e.g., saline to increase the quality of saliva.
– Daily ultrasoft tooth brushing with fluoride toothpaste.
– Scaling and cleaning.
– Very soft diet with low sugar and non-acidic food and drinks (Table 8).
– Flossing is not recommended due to low platelet count.
– Minimize denture use.
– No smoking or alcohol.
– Other preventive procedures include minimizing the microbial load (will be discussed more in the treatment section) and educating the patient on good oral hygiene, which is mandatory.
2. Cryotherapy has been recommended for CT-induced OM, but no proven role in RIOM due to insufficient evidence (33).
3. Keratinocyte growth factor is an epithelial mitogen that reduces the levels of ROS by activating nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 and had been used in RIOM with promising results (37–53). It appears to be one of the promising treatment and prevention options for RIOM that has been investigated in clinical trials (39, 43). Palifermin (IV recombinant human KGF-1) had been approved by the US-FDA for minimizing OM in hematologic malignancies’ patients who receive myelotoxic therapies and require hematopoietic cell support after its reliable results in alleviating WHO grade 3 and 4 OM in these patients. Palifermin is delivered IV 3 days before of CT/RT and for 3 days after CT. Palifermin should be avoided on the same day of CT/RT (33).
4. Amifostine is a free-radical scavenger, antioxidant, and cytoprotective agent that was administered subcutaneously (SC) and IV in many clinical trials for RIOM. Amifostine is conventionally given IV before RT or CT. It is approved by the US-FDA to reduce the cumulative renal toxicity associated with repeated administration of cisplatin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. In addition, it was approved for by the US-FDA to reduce the incidence of moderate to severe xerostomia in patients undergoing postoperative RT for head and neck cancer, where the radiation port includes a substantial portion of the parotid glands (33, 54–62). Although there was a reduction in the pro-inflammatory cytokine production, its side effects, e.g., hypotension and nausea, were recorded, particularly with IV route. Nevertheless, SC injection 60 min before RT in head and neck cancer patients showed marked reduction of these side effects, unfortunately, with reduced efficacy and patient compliance. Only cutaneous toxicity was noted in SC route of amifostine delivery (54, 55). For moderate to severe RT-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients, the recommended dose of amifostine is 200 mg/m2 once daily over 3 min IV, starting 15–30 min before standard fraction RT (1.8–2.0 Gy). Blood pressure should be monitored before, during, and after the IV infusion. Oral 5-HT3 receptor antagonists with/without other antiemetics are recommended before amifostine therapy (63–65).
5. Radiation shields (intraoral devices), midline mucosa-sparing blocks, 3-D and RT field design, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and removal of separable prosthetics are shown in preclinical studies to reduce the radiation scatter and the RIOM injury (66–69).
6. Low-energy helium–neon laser applied before RT showed significant reduction in the duration and the severity of RIOM in head and neck cancer patients (70). MASCC/ISOO guidelines suggest the use of low-level laser therapy in CT-induced OM at centers that can provide the necessary technology and training (33).
Table 8. Diet recommended for RIOM patients (20).
Table 9. Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for oral mucositis (3).
Symptomatic Treatment of RIOM
No single agent has been approved by the US-FDA for the treatment of RIOM. Symptoms reduction and complications prevention of RIOM, including nutritional support, pain control, prophylaxis, and/or treatment of secondary infections, are considered the main cornerstone in the management of RIOM (34–36). Agents that were investigated and/or applied in RIOM treatment are discussed in the context of recently updated evidence-based preclinical and clinical studies.
I Locally applied agents
1. Glycyrrhetinic acid/povidone/sodium hyaluronate gel has mechanical action implemented in the relief of pain in RIOM. It adheres to the mucosal surface of the mouth, soothing oral lesions. Nevertheless, the preclinical studies are controversial, and only one clinical trial on unknown results was conducted to date (71).
2. l-Glutamine is a non-essential amino acid that counteracts RT-induced metabolic deficiencies (72). Locally applied l-glutamine reduced the RIOM in a randomized clinical trial (73). Glutamine powder for oral suspension was approved by the US-FDA for topical application in management of CT-induced OM, mainly IOMyet (74).
3. Manganese superoxide dismutase is a detoxifying agent that removes ROS. It was shown to have radioprotective effects against RT-induced colitis, esophagitis, hepatic cells apoptosis, and intestinal and eye injury (75–98). Phase I dose escalation study of GC4419 (manganese-containing macrocyclic ligand complex similar to naturally occurring superoxide dismutase enzymes) in combination with CT/RT for squamous cell cancer of the head and neck has just been completed waiting for results release (NCT01921426).
4. Local anesthetics, e.g., diphenhydramine, viscous xylocaine, lidocaine, and dyclonine hydrochloride, are used for short-term relief of pain associated with RIOM, despite the fact that they can interfere with the taste sensation leading to hypoalimentation (99, 100). Swishing and gargling the anesthetic viscous gel containing 2% lidocaine and holding 5 mL of it in mouth for 1 min then spitting it out before meals have been shown to be helpful for better alimentation (101). One clinical trial showed dyclonine hydrochloride to have a superior effect among all other agents without significant difference recorded (102). The most effective anesthetic agent is still to be determined. Benzocaine gel is another locally applied bioadhesive agent containing benzyl alcohol (10%) and is used to relieve pain and facilitate eating and drinking in mild and moderate RIOM (103). Benzocaine-containing lozenges are diluted to alleviate the pain sensation and mechanical sensitivity in mild to moderate OM (104, 105). The “magic mouthwash” (lidocaine, diphenhydramine, magnesium aluminum hydroxide) and morphine mouth washes are preferable and have been reported by patients to be effective in alleviating pain in RIOM (106–108).
5. The application of corticosteroids mouthwashes has shown promising results. The limited availability of a large-scale data is a gap that should be bridged through relevant clinical studies (109).
6. Allopurinol and uridine were shown to be effective in reducing 5-fluorouracil oral toxicity in preclinical studies (110–114). Despite these results, they were ineffective approaches in randomized clinical trials as a therapy to reduce the treatment-related oral toxicity (115, 116).
7. Chlorhexidine is a bisguanidine exhibiting broad-spectrum antibacterial and antimycotic activities. The clinical trials done with chlorhexidine concluded that it cannot be recommended for the prophylaxis or the treatment of RIOM (117–120). Alcohol-containing chlorhexidine mouth rinse should be avoided during clinical oral ulceration. Therefore, the MASCC/ISOO guidelines recommend against the use of chlorhexidine mouth rinse for prevention or treatment OM (33).
8. Artificial saliva spray is an over-the-counter agent frequently used to alleviate mucosal dryness in mild cases of RIOM (121).
9. Chamomile has anti-inflammatory, antipeptic, antispasmodic, and antibacterial effects. It was investigated with encouraging results as an emulsion therapy for CT-induced mucositis (122–126). Studies are needed for its application in RIOM to determine its efficacy.
10. Honey has been investigated in many preclinical studies due to its mucosal protective effect that was confirmed as a reduction in the incidence and severity of RIOM (127–132). However, the available clinical trial used only Manuka honey, and it appears to contradict the preclinical studies’ results (133). More studies are needed to confirm the therapeutic potential of honey in RIOM.
11. Sucralfate is a basic aluminum salt of sucrose sulfate that was used as mouthwash to reduce the intensity of RIOM and CCRT-induced mucositis as well (39, 100, 134–151). Despite its long application history, it is considered to have little effect in RIOM when compared to oral hygiene and symptomatic mucositis therapy (2). MASCC/ISOO Mucositis Guidelines did not find enough evidence for the beneficial application of sucralfate in OM (34).
12. Vitamin A and its derivatives have anti-inflammatory and epithelial proliferative effect (152). Topical tretinoin has been shown to reduce the oral complications during bone marrow (BM) transplantation (153).
13. Vitamin-E (tocopherol) has been shown to lower the oxidative damage of the oral mucosa and reduce the incidence of symptomatic RIOM in head and neck cancer patients in a randomized double-blind clinical trial (152, 154).
14. Sodium alginate was shown to reduce the discomfort and the severity of RIOM in a randomized clinical trial (155).
15. Benzydamine hydrochloride is a non-steroidal antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anesthetic, and analgesic agent that reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine production, scavenges the ROS, and acts as membrane stabilization and as an antimicrobial agent (118, 156, 157). When compared with chlorhexidine, patients with RIOM treated with benzydamine hydrochloride found more discomfort (118). Benzydamine hydrochloride failed to be approved by the US-FDA for OM management. Because of a negative interim analysis, a recent phase III trial for benzydamine hydrochloride therapy in RIOM was stopped (33).
16. Povidone-iodine is an antiviral, antibacterial, and antifungal agent. Randomized clinical study showed that povidone-iodine reduces the incidence, severity, and duration of CCRT-induced OM, in addition to its advantages of being cheap and easily applied (118, 158–160).
17. Capsaicin is an inhibitor of neutrophils that reduces the pain sensation. One clinical trial showed that orally applied capsaicin caused temporary relief of pain in mucositis caused by RT and CT (161). However, more studies are needed for optimization of its analgesic effect.
II Systemically applied agents
1. Cyclooxegenase-2 inhibitors that have different mechanisms of action were applied in the management of RIOM. They suppress NF-κB, reduce pro-inflammatory-cytokine production, and inhibit angiogenesis (162–164). A randomized placebo-controlled trial showed that prophylactic systemic administration of indomethacin, a COX-2 inhibitor, significantly lowered the severity and delayed the onset of RIOM (165). In addition, PG E1 and E2 showed improvement in OM induced by RT and CT in few studies; however, their application is still controversial (166–172).
2. N-acetylcysteine is an antioxidant that has been shown to suppress NF-κB activation (173, 174). Because of its proven radioprotective role in RT-induced dermatitis, bone injury, liver toxicity, and intestinal injury (173–188), N-acetylcysteine was recommended as a candidate for a trial in RIOM. In a placebo-controlled phase II trial of patients with head and neck cancer, N-acetylcysteine significantly reduced the severity of RIOM (33).
3. Colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) systemic therapy recruit neutrophils to the tissue injury site (189). Local application of GM-CSF mouthwash was shown marked alleviation of RIOM in several studies (2). Nevertheless, in clinical trials, its systemic application therapeutic value appears controversial (190, 191). SC GM-CSF reduced the severity of OM in patients treated with accelerated RT (192). In another randomized clinical study, systemic GM-CSF reduced the incidence of RIOM; however, another study did not show the same result (140, 193). Systemic GM-CSF therapeutic potential is still controversial and requires further investigation.
4. Transforming growth factor-β3 inhibits the oral basal cell proliferation. It was shown to reduce the incidence of CT-induced mucositis (194). However, a reliable clinical trial is needed to assess its therapeutic potential with RT.
6. Analgesics are strong candidates for alleviating the pain related to RIOM. A retrospective study showed that opioid therapy remains a corner stone for OM pain management in CCRT, as suggested by the MASCC/ISOO guidelines (33, 198).
7. Azelastine is a potent second-generation selective histamine antagonist that is used as an anti-inflammatory and antioxidant agent. One clinical trial showed significant reduction in the incidence and the severity of OM with CCRT (199).
8. Propantheline is an anticholinergic agent that reduces the salivary flow. One clinical trial showed that propantheline and oral cryotherapy may be feasible and effective in reducing mucosal toxicity in cancer patients receiving high-dose CT (200). However, studies are needed for RIOM.
9. Immunoglobulins have lower salivary and systemic levels in patient receiving antineoplastic therapy. They have immune-modulating and anti-inflammatory properties. Intravenous or intramuscular immunoglobulins are frequently applied as prophylactic and therapeutic options for RIOM (158, 201).
10. Systemic corticosteroids were used in RIOM management. A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial has shown a tendency toward reduced RT interruption in prednisone-treated relative to placebo-treated patient groups without evidence of reduced RIOM incidence or severity (202).
11. Pentoxifylline regulates endotoxin-induced production of TNF-α. Although the preclinical studies showed significant reduction in the severity of RIOM with pentoxifylline (203), the clinical trials show that it is not effective in reducing the antineoplastic oral toxicity (204–208).
13. Sphingomyelinase and ceramide synthase inhibitors can be a potential candidate for RIOM. They inhibit the ceramide pathway-mediated RT-induced apoptosis (209–216). No current clinical trials have been started for them yet.
III Oral microbial load reduction agents
1. Antimicrobial agents showed beneficial effect in prophylaxis and reduction of the severity of RIOM. RT injury leads to a change in the mucosal membrane barrier, salivary flow, and composition which favor the growth and colonization of different bacterial species, mainly Gram-negative bacteria. Many preclinical studies have investigated the therapeutic effect of different antimicrobial agents in RIOM (217–220). The FDA has granted fast track designation for brilacidin-OM, an oral rinse formulation of defensin-mimetic brilacidin (221–223), for the prevention of OM. There is a current phase II clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of brilacidin oral rinse in patients with head and neck cancer (NCT02324335).
2. Fungal infections are not involved directly in the development in RIOM, rather they can complicate the situation, especially in immunocompromised patients, and that is why the use of antifungal agents have been applied in RIOM treatment. A clinical study has shown that systemic fluconazole prophylaxis caused a significant beneficial effect on the severity of OM and on radiotherapy interruptions (224). The same effect was noted in randomized clinical trials investigating clotrimazole (2). Some oral mouthwashes containing amphotericin B have shown similar effects; however, due to carrier allergy, there might be a limitation in its application (225).
3. Antibacterial agents have been investigated in mucositis depending on a hypothesis stating that aerobic species (e.g., Pseudomonas spp. and Staphylococcus epidermidis), anaerobic bacteria (e.g., Bacteroides spp., and Veillonella spp.), and endotoxin of aerobic Gram-negative bacilli are considered a main contributor in the development of the secondary infection phase in RIOM (2, 226). Antibiotic lozenges with polymyxin-E and tobramycin have protected against severe mucositis when compared to placebo or chlorhexidine (227). In addition, ciprofloxacin- and ampicillin-containing mouthwashes showed similar effect (228, 229).
4. Antiviral agents against herpes simplex virus (HSV) type I and varicella zoster virus (VZV) were applied topically and systematically. HSV and VZV are the most common viral infections that aggravate RIOM in seropositive and myelo-suppressed patients (230–232). Systemic and topical acyclovir was investigated and applied in RIOM management and caused a reduction in the oral herpetic infections without an evident prophylactic role against OM itself (233–238).
Cellular Therapies for RIOM
Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (bmMSCs) therapy have been applied in fractionated radiation-induced OM where the administration of a systemic single dose of six million MSCs resulted in a significant decrease in ED50 (the RT dose that produces ulcer in 50% of irradiated mice) (239). The first MSCs therapy for RIOM was done in 2014 by Schmidt et al. (239). They concluded that transplantation of BM or bmMSCs could modulate RIOM in fractionated RT, depending on the time of transplantation (239). Nevertheless, in another study, the authors concluded that bmMSCs transplantation had no therapeutic benefits on RIOM in single-dose RT when compared to the therapeutic effect of mobilization of endogenous BM stem cells (240). More studies are needed in this field building on the initial studies, which showed significant and clinically relevant therapeutic gain of MSCs therapy for RIOM (Table 10).
Table 10. Radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) the clinical trials that have been done until 2001 (2)a.
Clinical Trials for RIOM
Table 10 summarizes the clinical trials that were done until 2001 for prevention (P) and treatment (T) of RIOM (2). The current clinical trials for RIOM are summarized in Table 11 and were found when searching the clinical trials website of the National Institute of Health for RIOM. We have documented 40 RIOM treatment and prevention clinical trials.
Table 11. Clinical trials for RIOM as listed on http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov when searched in November 2015.
Despite its high incidence, RIOM is a self-limited radiotherapy-induced normal tissue injury. It is a dose-limiting toxicity in most cases of head and neck cancer patients. However, in moderately to severely sick patients, it could be a lethal injury. Many preclinical and clinical studies have been conducted for the prevention and treatment of RIOM. Currently, there are numerous prevention and treatment strategies for RIOM. However, there is no single agent or management regimen that has been agreed upon between caregivers that significantly improves RIOM to a clinically relevant and satisfactory standard. Nevertheless, the current guidelines recommend good oral care, IMRT, radiation shields, palifermin, amifostine, and cryotherapy for RIOM prevention. RIOM treatment focuses on palliative measures and symptoms relief; e.g., pain management, nutritional support, good oral hygiene, and reduced oral microbial load. Interestingly, mesenchymal stromal cells therapy for RIOM shows promise for potential therapeutic and clinically relevant benefits. However, more studies are still needed to confirm such therapeutic potential.
OM: conception and design, collection and/or assembly of data, review writing, and final approval of the review. NE: conception, design, and final approval of the review. TM: conception and design, financial support, and final approval of the review.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
OM is an awardee of the Lady Davis Institute/Toronto-Dominion Bank studentship. This study was supported partially by Ride To Conquer Cancer (RTCC, Jewish General Hospital Foundation) and Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Santé (FRQS) grants. English language editing was done by Jenny Warrington.
1. Muanza TM, Cotrim AP, McAuliffe M, Sowers AL, Baum BJ, Cook JA, et al. Evaluation of radiation-induced oral mucositis by optical coherence tomography. Clin Cancer Res (2005) 11(14):5121–7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0403
2. Köstler WJ, Hejna M, Wenzel C, Zielinski CC. Oral mucositis complicating chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy: options for prevention and treatment. CA Cancer J Clin (2001) 51(5):290–315. doi:10.3322/canjclin.51.5.290
4. Karthaus M, Rosenthal C, Ganser A. Prophylaxis and treatment of chemo- and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis – are there new strategies? Bone Marrow Transplant (1999) 24(10):1095–108. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1702024
5. Naidu MU, Ramana GV, Rani PU, Mohan IK, Suman A, Roy P. Chemotherapy-induced and/or radiation therapy-induced oral mucositis—complicating the treatment of cancer. Neoplasia (2004) 6(5):423–31. doi:10.1593/neo.04169
12. Elting LS, Cooksley CD, Chambers MS, Garden AS. Risk, outcomes, and costs of radiation-induced oral mucositis among patients with head-and-neck malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2007) 68(4):1110–20. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.053
13. Luo DH, Hong MH, Guo L, Cao KJ, Deng MQ, Mo HY. [Analysis of oral mucositis risk factors during radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and establishment of a discriminant model]. Ai Zheng (2005) 24(7):850–4.
14. Chen SC, Lai YH, Huang BS, Lin CY, Fan KH, Chang JT. Changes and predictors of radiation-induced oral mucositis in patients with oral cavity cancer during active treatment. Eur J Oncol Nurs (2015) 19(3):214–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2014.12.001
18. Chamberlain G, Fox J, Ashton B, Middleton J. Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: their phenotype, differentiation capacity, immunological features, and potential for homing. Stem Cells (2007) 25(11):2739–49. doi:10.1634/stemcells.2007-0197
20. Scully C, Epstein J, Sonis S. Oral mucositis: a challenging complication of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiochemotherapy. Part 2: diagnosis and management of mucositis. Head Neck (2004) 26(1):77–84. doi:10.1002/hed.10326
23. Sonis ST, Eilers JP, Epstein JB, LeVeque FG, Liggett WH Jr, Mulagha MT, et al. Validation of a new scoring system for the assessment of clinical trial research of oral mucositis induced by radiation or chemotherapy. Mucositis Study Group. Cancer (1999) 85(10):2103–13. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990515)85:10<2103::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO;2-0
25. Trotti A, Byhardt R, Stetz J, Gwede C, Corn B, Fu K, et al. Common toxicity criteria: version 2.0. An improved reference for grading the acute effects of cancer treatment: impact on radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2000) 47:13–47. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00559-3
26. National Cancer Institute. Common Toxicity Criteria. Version 2.0. (1999). Available from: https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcv20_4-30-992.pdf
27. McGuire DB, Peterson DE, Muller S, Owen DC, Slemmons MF, Schubert MM. The 20 item oral mucositis index: reliability and validity in bone marrow and stem cell transplant patients. Cancer Invest (2002) 20:893–903. doi:10.1081/CNV-120005902
28. Sonis ST, Oster G, Fuchs F, Bellm L, Bradford WZ, Edelsberg J, et al. Oral mucositis and the clinical and economic outcomes of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol (2001) 19:2201–5. doi:10.1200/JCO.2001.19.8.2201
30. Quinn B, Potting CM, Stone R, Blijlevens NM, Fliedner M, Margulies A, et al. Guidelines for the assessment of oral mucositis in adult chemotherapy, radiotherapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Eur J Cancer (2008) 44(1):61–72. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2007.09.014
31. Uçüncü H, Ertekin MV, Yörük O, Sezen O, Ozkan A, Erdoğan F, et al. Vitamin E and l-carnitine, separately or in combination, in the prevention of radiation-induced oral mucositis and myelosuppression: a controlled study in a rat model. J Radiat Res (2006) 47(1):91–102. doi:10.1269/jrr.47.91
32. Schmidt W, Rainville LC, McEneff G, Sheehan D, Quinn B. A proteomic evaluation of the effects of the pharmaceuticals diclofenac and gemfibrozil on marine mussels (Mytilus spp.): evidence for chronic sublethal effects on stress-response proteins. Drug Test Anal (2014) 6(3):210–9. doi:10.1002/dta.1463
34. Lalla RV, Bowen J, Barasch A, Elting L, Epstein J, Keefe DM, et al. MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy. Cancer (2014) 120(10):1453–61. doi:10.1002/cncr.28592
37. Watanabe S, Suemaru K, Nakanishi M, Nakajima N, Tanaka M, Tanaka A, et al. Assessment of the hamster cheek pouch as a model for radiation-induced oral mucositis, and evaluation of the protective effects of keratinocyte growth factor using this model. Int J Radiat Biol (2014) 90(10):884–91. doi:10.3109/09553002.2014.922716
38. Zheng C, Cotrim AP, Sunshine AN, Sugito T, Liu L, Sowers A, et al. Prevention of radiation-induced oral mucositis after adenoviral vector-mediated transfer of the keratinocyte growth factor cDNA to mouse submandibular glands. Clin Cancer Res (2009) 15(14):4641–8. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0819
39. Kanuga S. Cryotherapy and keratinocyte growth factor may be beneficial in preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer, and sucralfate is effective in reducing its severity. J Am Dent Assoc (2013) 144(8):928–9. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0211
41. Tsirigotis P, Triantafyllou K, Girkas K, Giannopoulou V, Ioannidou E, Chondropoulos S, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor is effective in the prevention of intestinal mucositis in patients with hematological malignancies treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic SCT: a video-capsule endoscopy study. Bone Marrow Transplant (2008) 42(5):337–43. doi:10.1038/bmt.2008.168
42. Blijlevens N, Sonis S. Palifermin (recombinant keratinocyte growth factor-1): a pleiotropic growth factor with multiple biological activities in preventing chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced mucositis. Ann Oncol (2007) 18(5):817–26. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl332
43. Beaven AW, Shea TC. Recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor palifermin reduces oral mucositis and improves patient outcomes after stem cell transplant. Drugs Today (Barc) (2007) 43(7):461–73. doi:10.1358/dot.2007.43.7.1119723
44. Borges L, Rex KL, Chen JN, Wei P, Kaufman S, Scully S, et al. A protective role for keratinocyte growth factor in a murine model of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced mucositis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2006) 66(1):254–62. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.025
45. Beaven AW, Shea TC. Palifermin: a keratinocyte growth factor that reduces oral mucositis after stem cell transplant for haematological malignancies. Expert Opin Pharmacother (2006) 7(16):2287–99. doi:10.1517/146565184.108.40.2067
46. Dorr W, Reichel S, Spekl K. Effects of keratinocyte growth factor (palifermin) administration protocols on oral mucositis (mouse) induced by fractionated irradiation. Radiother Oncol (2005) 75(1):99–105. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.006
47. Dörr W, Bässler S, Reichel S, Spekl K. Reduction of radiochemotherapy-induced early oral mucositis by recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor (palifermin): experimental studies in mice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2005) 62(3):881–7. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.050
48. Lee D, Jain VK. The use of recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor (palifermin) to ameliorate treatment-induced mucositis. Support Cancer Ther (2003) 1(1):20–2. doi:10.1016/S1543-2912(13)60075-2
49. Potten CS, Booth D, Cragg NJ, Tudor GL, O’Shea JA, Booth C, et al. Cell kinetic studies in the murine ventral tongue epithelium: mucositis induced by radiation and its protection by pretreatment with keratinocyte growth factor (KGF). Cell Prolif (2002) 35(Suppl 1):32–47. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2184.35.s1.3.x
50. Gibson RJ, Keefe DM, Clarke JM, Regester GO, Thompson FM, Goland GJ, et al. The effect of keratinocyte growth factor on tumour growth and small intestinal mucositis after chemotherapy in the rat with breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2002) 50(1):53–8. doi:10.1007/s00280-002-0460-4
51. Farrell CL, Rex KL, Chen JN, Bready JV, DiPalma CR, Kaufman SA, et al. The effects of keratinocyte growth factor in preclinical models of mucositis. Cell Prolif (2002) 35(Suppl 1):78–85. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2184.35.s1.8.x
52. Dorr W, Spekl K, Farrell CL. Amelioration of acute oral mucositis by keratinocyte growth factor: fractionated irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2002) 54(1):245–51. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02918-8
54. Bardet E, Martin L, Calais G, Alfonsi M, Feham NE, Tuchais C, et al. Subcutaneous compared with intravenous administration of amifostine in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy: final results of the GORTEC2000-02 phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol (2011) 29(2):127–33. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.25.5638
55. Wasserman TH, Brizel DM, Henke M, Monnier A, Eschwege F, Sauer R, et al. Influence of intravenous amifostine on xerostomia, tumor control, and survival after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: 2-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized, phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2005) 63(4):985–90. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.966
56. Amrein PC, Clark JR, Supko JG, Fabian RL, Wang CC, Colevas AD, et al. Phase I trial and pharmacokinetics of escalating doses of paclitaxel and concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy with or without amifostine in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma. Cancer (2005) 104(7):1418–27. doi:10.1002/cncr.21312
57. Komaki R, Lee JS, Milas L, Lee HK, Fossella FV, Herbst RS, et al. Effects of amifostine on acute toxicity from concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: report of a randomized comparative trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2004) 58(5):1369–77. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.005
59. Athanassiou H, Antonadou D, Coliarakis N, Kouveli A, Synodinou M, Paraskevaidis M, et al. Protective effect of amifostine during fractionated radiotherapy in patients with pelvic carcinomas: results of a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2003) 56(4):1154–60. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00187-1
60. Bardet E, Martin L, Calais G, Tuchais C, Bourhis J, Rhein B, et al. Preliminary data of the GORTEC 2000-02 phase III trial comparing intravenous and subcutaneous administration of amifostine for head and neck tumors treated by external radiotherapy. Semin Oncol (2002) 29(6 Suppl 19):57–60. doi:10.1053/sonc.2002.37348
61. Li CJ, Wang SZ, Wang SY, Zhang YP. Assessment of the effect of local application of amifostine on acute radiation-induced oral mucositis in guinea pigs. J Radiat Res (2014) 55(5):847–54. doi:10.1093/jrr/rru024
64. Eisbruch A. Amifostine in the treatment of head and neck cancer: intravenous administration, subcutaneous administration, or none of the above. J Clin Oncol (2011) 29(2):119–21. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.31.5051
65. Gu J, Zhu S, Li X, Wu H, Li Y, Hua F. Effect of amifostine in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. PLoS One (2014) 9(5):e95968. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095968
66. Keus R, Noach P, de Boer R, Lebesque J. The effect of customized beam shaping on normal tissue complications in radiation therapy of parotid gland tumors. Radiother Oncol (1991) 21(3):211–7. doi:10.1016/0167-8140(91)90039-J
68. Perch SJ, Machtay M, Markiewicz DA, Kligerman MM. Decreased acute toxicity by using midline mucosa-sparing blocks during radiation therapy for carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and nasopharynx. Radiology (1995) 197(3):863–6. doi:10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480771
69. Kouloulias V, Thalassinou S, Platoni K, Zygogianni A, Kouvaris J, Antypas C, et al. The treatment outcome and radiation-induced toxicity for patients with head and neck carcinoma in the IMRT era: a systematic review with dosimetric and clinical parameters. Biomed Res Int (2013) 2013:401261. doi:10.1155/2013/401261
70. Bensadoun RJ, Franquin JC, Ciais G, Darcourt V, Schubert MM, Viot M, et al. Low-energy He/Ne laser in the prevention of radiation-induced mucositis. A multicenter phase III randomized study in patients with head and neck cancer. Support Care Cancer (1999) 7(4):244–52. doi:10.1007/s005200050256
71. Barber C, Powell R, Ellis A, Hewett J. Comparing pain control and ability to eat and drink with standard therapy vs Gelclair: a preliminary, double centre, randomised controlled trial on patients with radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Support Care Cancer (2007) 15(4):427–40. doi:10.1007/s00520-006-0171-1
72. Klimberg VS, Souba WW, Dolson DJ, Salloum RM, Hautamaki RD, Plumley DA, et al. Prophylactic glutamine protects the intestinal mucosa from radiation injury. Cancer (1990) 66(1):62–8. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19900701)66:1<62::AID-CNCR2820660113>3.0.CO;2-E
73. Huang EY, Leung SW, Wang CJ, Chen HC, Sun LM, Fang FM, et al. Oral glutamine to alleviate radiation-induced oral mucositis: a pilot randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2000) 46(3):535–9. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00402-2
74. Peterson DE, Jones JB, Petit RG II. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of Saforis for prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Cancer (2007) 109(2):322–31. doi:10.1002/cncr.22384
75. Grumetto L, Del Prete A, Ortosecco G, Barbato F, Del Prete S, Borrelli A, et al. Study on the protective effect of a new manganese superoxide dismutase on the microvilli of rabbit eyes exposed to UV radiation. Biomed Res Int (2015) 2015:973197. doi:10.1155/2015/973197
76. Eldridge A, Fan M, Woloschak G, Grdina DJ, Chromy BA, Li JJ. Manganese superoxide dismutase interacts with a large scale of cellular and mitochondrial proteins in low-dose radiation-induced adaptive radioprotection. Free Radic Biol Med (2012) 53(10):1838–47. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.08.589
77. Rajagopalan MS, Stone B, Rwigema JC, Salimi U, Epperly MW, Goff J, et al. Intraesophageal manganese superoxide dismutase-plasmid liposomes ameliorates novel total-body and thoracic radiation sensitivity of NOS1−/− mice. Radiat Res (2010) 174(3):297–312. doi:10.1667/RR2019.1
78. Holley AK, Xu Y, St Clair DK, St Clair WH. RelB regulates manganese superoxide dismutase gene and resistance to ionizing radiation of prostate cancer cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2010) 1201:129–36. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05613.x
79. dos Santos Montagner GF, Sagrillo M, Machado MM, Almeida RC, Mostardeiro CP, Duarte MM, et al. Toxicological effects of ultraviolet radiation on lymphocyte cells with different manganese superoxide dismutase Ala16Val polymorphism genotypes. Toxicol In Vitro (2010) 24(5):1410–6. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2010.04.010
80. Holley AK, St Clair DK. Preventing Dr. Jekyll from becoming Mr. Hyde: is manganese superoxide dismutase the key to prevent radiation-induced neoplastic transformation? Cancer Biol Ther (2009) 8(20):1972–3. doi:10.4161/cbt.8.20.9941
81. Josson S, Xu Y, Fang F, Dhar SK, St Clair DK, St Clair WH. RelB regulates manganese superoxide dismutase gene and resistance to ionizing radiation of prostate cancer cells. Oncogene (2006) 25(10):1554–9. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209186
82. Guo HL, Zhao HW, Xu ZF, Ma H, Song XL, Guan J, et al. [Manganese superoxide dismutase gene transfection of mouse small intestinal epithelial cells protects them from radiation injury]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi (2005) 27(11):672–5.
83. Guo HL, Wolfe D, Epperly MW, Huang S, Liu K, Glorioso JC, et al. Gene transfer of human manganese superoxide dismutase protects small intestinal villi from radiation injury. J Gastrointest Surg (2003) 7(2):229–35; discussion 235–6.
84. Guo H, Seixas-Silva JA Jr, Epperly MW, Gretton JE, Shin DM, Bar-Sagi D, et al. Prevention of radiation-induced oral cavity mucositis by plasmid/liposome delivery of the human manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2) transgene. Radiat Res (2003) 159(3):361–70. doi:10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0361:PORIOC]2.0.CO;2
85. Guo G, Yan-Sanders Y, Lyn-Cook BD, Wang T, Tamae D, Ogi J, et al. Manganese superoxide dismutase-mediated gene expression in radiation-induced adaptive responses. Mol Cell Biol (2003) 23(7):2362–78. doi:10.1128/MCB.23.7.2362-2378.2003
86. Epperly MW, Bernarding M, Gretton J, Jefferson M, Nie S, Greenberger JS. Overexpression of the transgene for manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) in 32D cl 3 cells prevents apoptosis induction by TNF-alpha, IL-3 withdrawal, and ionizing radiation. Exp Hematol (2003) 31(6):465–74. doi:10.1016/S0301-472X(03)00041-9
87. Epperly MW, Sikora CA, DeFilippi SJ, Gretton JA, Zhan Q, Kufe DW, et al. Manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2) inhibits radiation-induced apoptosis by stabilization of the mitochondrial membrane. Radiat Res (2002) 157(5):568–77. doi:10.1667/0033-7587(2002)157[0568:MSDSIR]2.0.CO;2
88. Motoori S, Majima HJ, Ebara M, Kato H, Hirai F, Kakinuma S, et al. Overexpression of mitochondrial manganese superoxide dismutase protects against radiation-induced cell death in the human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HLE. Cancer Res (2001) 61(14):5382–8.
89. Epperly MW, Kagan VE, Sikora CA, Gretton JE, Defilippi SJ, Bar-Sagi D, et al. Manganese superoxide dismutase-plasmid/liposome (MnSOD-PL) administration protects mice from esophagitis associated with fractionated radiation. Int J Cancer (2001) 96(4):221–31. doi:10.1002/ijc.1023
90. Epperly MW, Gretton JA, DeFilippi SJ, Greenberger JS, Sikora CA, Liggitt D, et al. Modulation of radiation-induced cytokine elevation associated with esophagitis and esophageal stricture by manganese superoxide dismutase-plasmid/liposome (SOD2-PL) gene therapy. Radiat Res (2001) 155(1 Pt 1):2–14. doi:10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0002:MORICE]2.0.CO;2
91. Kuninaka S, Ichinose Y, Koja K, Toh Y. Suppression of manganese superoxide dismutase augments sensitivity to radiation, hyperthermia and doxorubicin in colon cancer cell lines by inducing apoptosis. Br J Cancer (2000) 83(7):928–34. doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1367
92. Epperly MW, Epstein CJ, Travis EL, Greenberger JS. Decreased pulmonary radiation resistance of manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD)-deficient mice is corrected by human manganese superoxide dismutase-plasmid/liposome (SOD2-PL) intratracheal gene therapy. Radiat Res (2000) 154(4):365–74. doi:10.1667/0033-7587(2000)154[0365:DPRROM]2.0.CO;2
93. Sasaki H, Akamatsu H, Horio T. Effects of a single exposure to UVB radiation on the activities and protein levels of copper-zinc and manganese superoxide dismutase in cultured human keratinocytes. Photochem Photobiol (1997) 65(4):707–13. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb01914.x
94. Otero G, Avila MA, Emfietzoglou D, Clerch LB, Massaro D, Notario V. Increased manganese superoxide dismutase activity, protein, and mRNA levels and concurrent induction of tumor necrosis factor alpha in radiation-initiated Syrian hamster cells. Mol Carcinog (1996) 17(4):175–80. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2744(199612)17:4<175::AID-MC1>3.0.CO;2-D
95. Nakano T, Oka K, Taniguchi N. Manganese superoxide dismutase expression correlates with p53 status and local recurrence of cervical carcinoma treated with radiation therapy. Cancer Res (1996) 56(12):2771–5.
97. Lin PS, Ho KC, Sung SJ, Tsai S. Cytotoxicity and manganese superoxide dismutase induction by tumor necrosis factor-alpha and ionizing radiation in MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells. Lymphokine Cytokine Res (1993) 12(5):303–8.
98. Hirose K, Longo DL, Oppenheim JJ, Matsushima K. Overexpression of mitochondrial manganese superoxide dismutase promotes the survival of tumor cells exposed to interleukin-1, tumor necrosis factor, selected anticancer drugs, and ionizing radiation. FASEB J (1993) 7(2):361–8.
99. LeVeque FG, Parzuchowski JB, Farinacci GC, Redding SW, Rodu B, Johnson JT, et al. Clinical evaluation of MGI 209, an anesthetic, film-forming agent for relief from painful oral ulcers associated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol (1992) 10(12):1963–8. doi:10.1200/JCO.19220.127.116.113
100. Barker G, Loftus L, Cuddy P, Barker B. The effects of sucralfate suspension and diphenhydramine syrup plus kaolin-pectin on radiotherapy-induced mucositis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol (1991) 71(3):288–93. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(91)90301-R
101. Su YX, Benedek GA, Sieg P, Liao GQ, Dendorfer A, Meller B, et al. Radioprotective effect of lidocaine on neurotransmitter agonist-induced secretion in irradiated salivary glands. PLoS One (2013) 8(3):e60256. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060256
104. Sung L, Robinson P, Treister N, Baggott T, Gibson P, Tissing W, et al. Guideline for the prevention of oral and oropharyngeal mucositis in children receiving treatment for cancer or undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. BMJ Support Palliat Care (2017) 7(1):7–16. doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000804
107. Sarvizadeh M, Hemati S, Meidani M, Ashouri M, Roayaei M, Shahsanai A. Morphine mouthwash for the management of oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer. Adv Biomed Res (2015) 4:44. doi:10.4103/2277-9175.151254
108. Vayne-Bossert P, Escher M, de Vautibault CG, Dulguerov P, Allal A, Desmeules J, et al. Effect of topical morphine (mouthwash) on oral pain due to chemotherapy- and/or radiotherapy-induced mucositis: a randomized double-blinded study. J Palliat Med (2010) 13(2):125–8. doi:10.1089/jpm.2009.0195
110. Murata Y, Kofuji K, Nishida N, Kamaguchi R. Development of film dosage form containing allopurinol for prevention and treatment of oral mucositis. ISRN Pharm (2012) 2012:764510. doi:10.5402/2012/764510
111. Tomoda K, Asahiyama M, Ohtsuki E, Nakajima T, Terada H, Kanebako M, et al. Preparation and properties of carrageenan microspheres containing allopurinol and local anesthetic agents for the treatment of oral mucositis. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces (2009) 71(1):27–35. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.01.003
114. Renck D, Santos AA Jr, Machado P, Petersen GO, Lopes TG, Santos DS, et al. Human uridine phosphorylase-1 inhibitors: a new approach to ameliorate 5-fluorouracil-induced intestinal mucositis. Invest New Drugs (2014) 32(6):1301–7. doi:10.1007/s10637-014-0135-0
115. Panahi Y, Ala S, Saeedi M, Okhovatian A, Bazzaz N, Naghizadeh MM. Allopurinol mouth rinse for prophylaxis of fluorouracil-induced mucositis. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) (2010) 19(3):308–12. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.01042.x
116. Seiter K, Kemeny N, Martin D, Schneider A, Williams L, Colofiore J, et al. Uridine allows dose escalation of 5-fluorouracil when given with N-phosphonacetyl-l-aspartate, methotrexate, and leucovorin. Cancer (1993) 71(5):1875–81. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19930301)71:5<1875::AID-CNCR2820710526>3.0.CO;2-9
117. Foote RL, Loprinzi CL, Frank AR, O’Fallon JR, Gulavita S, Tewfik HH, et al. Randomized trial of a chlorhexidine mouthwash for alleviation of radiation-induced mucositis. J Clin Oncol (1994) 12(12):2630–3. doi:10.1200/JCO.1918.104.22.16830
118. Roopashri G, Jayanthi K, Guruprasad R. Efficacy of benzydamine hydrochloride, chlorhexidine, and povidone iodine in the treatment of oral mucositis among patients undergoing radiotherapy in head and neck malignancies: a drug trail. Contemp Clin Dent (2011) 2(1):8–12. doi:10.4103/0976-237X.79292
119. Dodd MJ, Larson PJ, Dibble SL, Miaskowski C, Greenspan D, MacPhail L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of chlorhexidine versus placebo for prevention of oral mucositis in patients receiving chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum (1996) 23(6):921–7.
120. de Boer-Dennert MM, Batchelor D. [“Randomized clinical trial of chlorhexidine versus placebo for prevention of oral mucositis in patients receiving chemotherapy”. Marylin J. Dodd et al. Report of discussion of this article in the IKA Nursing Research Utilization Board]. Oncologica (1997) 14(3):16–8.
122. Dos Reis PE, Ciol MA, de Melo NS, Figueiredo PT, Leite AF, Manzi Nde M. Chamomile infusion cryotherapy to prevent oral mucositis induced by chemotherapy: a pilot study. Support Care Cancer (2016) 24(10):4393–8. doi:10.1007/s00520-016-3279-y
123. Curra M, Martins MA, Lauxen IS, Pellicioli AC, Sant’Ana Filho M, Pavesi VC, et al. Effect of topical chamomile on immunohistochemical levels of IL-1beta and TNF-alpha in 5-fluorouracil-induced oral mucositis in hamsters. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2013) 71(2):293–9. doi:10.1007/s00280-012-2013-9
124. Pavesi VC, Lopez TC, Martins MA, Sant’Ana Filho M, Bussadori SK, Fernandes KP, et al. Healing action of topical chamomile on 5-fluoracil induced oral mucositis in hamster. Support Care Cancer (2011) 19(5):639–46. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0875-0
125. Mazokopakis EE, Vrentzos GE, Papadakis JA, Babalis DE, Ganotakis ES. Wild chamomile (Matricaria recutita L.) mouthwashes in methotrexate-induced oral mucositis. Phytomedicine (2005) 12(1–2):25–7. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2003.11.003
126. Fidler P, Loprinzi CL, O’Fallon JR, Leitch JM, Lee JK, Hayes DL, et al. Prospective evaluation of a chamomile mouthwash for prevention of 5-FU-induced oral mucositis. Cancer (1996) 77(3):522–5. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960201)77:3<522::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-6
127. Van den Wyngaert T. Topical honey application to reduce radiation-induced oral mucositis: a therapy too sweet to ignore? J Evid Based Dent Pract (2012) 12(4):203–5. doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.09.011
128. Song JJ, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Salcido R. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of honey to protect from the effects of radiation-induced oral mucositis. Adv Skin Wound Care (2012) 25(1):23–8. doi:10.1097/01.ASW.0000410687.14363.a3
129. Khanal B, Baliga M, Uppal N. Effect of topical honey on limitation of radiation-induced oral mucositis: an intervention study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2010) 39(12):1181–5. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2010.05.014
130. Bardy J, Molassiotis A, Ryder WD, Mais K, Sykes A, Yap B, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial of active manuka honey and standard oral care for radiation-induced oral mucositis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2012) 50(3):221–6. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.03.005
131. Santos-Silva AR, Rosa GB, Eduardo CP, Dias RB, Brandao TB. Increased risk for radiation-related caries in cancer patients using topical honey for the prevention of oral mucositis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2011) 40(11):1335–6; author reply 1235. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2011.05.006
132. Arora H, Pai KM, Maiya A, Vidyasagar MS, Rajeev A. Efficacy of He-Ne laser in the prevention and treatment of radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in oral cancer patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod (2008) 105(2):180–6, 186.e1. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.07.043
133. Hawley P, Hovan A, McGahan CE, Saunders D. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of manuka honey for radiation-induced oral mucositis. Support Care Cancer (2014) 22(3):751–61. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-2031-0
134. Ala S, Saeedi M, Janbabai G, Ganji R, Azhdari E, Shiva A. Efficacy of sucralfate mouth wash in prevention of 5-fluorouracil induced oral mucositis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Nutr Cancer (2016) 68(3):456–63. doi:10.1080/01635581.2016.1153666
135. Nottage M, McLachlan SA, Brittain MA, Oza A, Hedley D, Feld R, et al. Sucralfate mouthwash for prevention and treatment of 5-fluorouracil-induced mucositis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Support Care Cancer (2003) 11(1):41–7. doi:10.1007/s00520-002-0378-8
136. Dodd MJ, Miaskowski C, Greenspan D, MacPhail L, Shih AS, Shiba G, et al. Radiation-induced mucositis: a randomized clinical trial of micronized sucralfate versus salt & soda mouthwashes. Cancer Invest (2003) 21(1):21–33. doi:10.1081/CNV-120016400
137. Saarilahti K, Kajanti M, Joensuu T, Kouri M, Joensuu H. Comparison of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and sucralfate mouthwashes in the prevention of radiation-induced mucositis: a double-blind prospective randomized phase III study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2002) 54(2):479–85. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02935-8
138. Kilic D, Akcali Z. Comment on: granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and sucralfate in prevention of radiation-induced mucositis: a prospective randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2001) 50(5):1373–4. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01587-5
139. Castagna L, Benhamou E, Pedraza E, Luboinski M, Forni M, Brandes I, et al. Prevention of mucositis in bone marrow transplantation: a double blind randomised controlled trial of sucralfate. Ann Oncol (2001) 12(7):953–5. doi:10.1023/A:1011119721267
140. Makkonen TA, Minn H, Jekunen A, Vilja P, Tuominen J, Joensuu H. Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and sucralfate in prevention of radiation-induced mucositis: a prospective randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2000) 46(3):525–34. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00452-6
141. Etiz D, Erkal HS, Serin M, Küçük B, Hepari A, Elhan AH, et al. Clinical and histopathological evaluation of sucralfate in prevention of oral mucositis induced by radiation therapy in patients with head and neck malignancies. Oral Oncol (2000) 36(1):116–20. doi:10.1016/S1368-8375(99)00075-5
142. Cengiz M, Ozyar E, Oztürk D, Akyol F, Atahan IL, Hayran M. Sucralfate in the prevention of radiation-induced oral mucositis. J Clin Gastroenterol (1999) 28(1):40–3. doi:10.1097/00004836-199901000-00009
144. Meredith R, Salter M, Kim R, Spencer S, Weppelmann B, Rodu B, et al. Sucralfate for radiation mucositis: results of a double-blind randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (1997) 37(2):275–9. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00531-7
145. Franzén L, Henriksson R, Littbrand B, Zackrisson B. Effects of sucralfate on mucositis during and following radiotherapy of malignancies in the head and neck region. A double-blind placebo-controlled study. Acta Oncol (1995) 34(2):219–23. doi:10.3109/02841869509093959
146. Allison RR, Vongtama V, Vaughan J, Shin KH. Symptomatic acute mucositis can be minimized or prophylaxed by the combination of sucralfate and fluconazole. Cancer Invest (1995) 13(1):16–22. doi:10.3109/07357909509024890
147. Makkonen TA, Boström P, Vilja P, Joensuu H. Sucralfate mouth washing in the prevention of radiation-induced mucositis: a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (1994) 30(1):177–82. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(94)90533-9
148. Epstein JB, Wong FL. The efficacy of sucralfate suspension in the prevention of oral mucositis due to radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (1994) 28(3):693–8. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(94)90195-3
149. Shenep JL, Kalwinsky DK, Hutson PR, George SL, Dodge RK, Blankenship KR, et al. Efficacy of oral sucralfate suspension in prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced mucositis. J Pediatr (1988) 113(4):758–63. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(88)80397-4
152. High KP, Legault C, Sinclair JA, Cruz J, Hill K, Hurd DD. Low plasma concentrations of retinol and alpha-tocopherol in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: the effect of mucositis and the risk of infection. Am J Clin Nutr (2002) 76(6):1358–66.
153. Cohen G, Elad S, Or R, Galili D, Garfunkel AA. The use of tretinoin as oral mucositis prophylaxis in bone marrow transplantation patients: a preliminary study. Oral Dis (1997) 3(4):243–6. doi:10.1111/j.1601-0825.1997.tb00049.x
154. Ferreira PR, Fleck JF, Diehl A, Barletta D, Braga-Filho A, Barletta A, et al. Protective effect of alpha-tocopherol in head and neck cancer radiation-induced mucositis: a double-blind randomized trial. Head Neck (2004) 26(4):313–21. doi:10.1002/hed.10382
155. Oshitani T, Okada K, Kushima T, Suematsu T, Obayashi K, Hirata Y, et al. [Clinical evaluation of sodium alginate on oral mucositis associated with radiotherapy]. Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi (1990) 25(6):1129–37.
156. Epstein JB, Stevenson-Moore P, Jackson S, Mohamed JH, Spinelli JJ. Prevention of oral mucositis in radiation therapy: a controlled study with benzydamine hydrochloride rinse. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (1989) 16(6):1571–5. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(89)90964-4
157. Epstein JB, Stevenson-Moore P. Benzydamine hydrochloride in prevention and management of pain in oral mucositis associated with radiation therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol (1986) 62(2):145–8. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(86)90035-6
158. Rahn R, Adamietz IA, Boettcher HD, Schaefer V, Reimer K, Fleischer W. Povidone-iodine to prevent mucositis in patients during antineoplastic radiochemotherapy. Dermatology (1997) 195(Suppl 2):57–61. doi:10.1159/000246032
159. Adamietz IA, Rahn R, Böttcher HD, Schäfer V, Reimer K, Fleischer W. Prophylaxis with povidone-iodine against induction of oral mucositis by radiochemotherapy. Support Care Cancer (1998) 6(4):373–7. doi:10.1007/s005200050179
160. Vokurka S, Bystricka E, Koza V, Scudlova J, Pavlicova V, Valentova D, et al. The comparative effects of povidone-iodine and normal saline mouthwashes on oral mucositis in patients after high-dose chemotherapy and APBSCT – results of a randomized multicentre study. Support Care Cancer (2005) 13(7):554–8. doi:10.1007/s00520-005-0792-9
161. Berger A, Henderson M, Nadoolman W, Duffy V, Cooper D, Saberski L, et al. Oral capsaicin provides temporary relief for oral mucositis pain secondary to chemotherapy/radiation therapy. J Pain Symptom Manage (1995) 10(3):243–8. doi:10.1016/0885-3924(94)00130-D
162. Lalla RV, Pilbeam CC, Walsh SJ, Sonis ST, Keefe DM, Peterson DE. Role of the cyclooxygenase pathway in chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis: a pilot study. Support Care Cancer (2010) 18(1):95–103. doi:10.1007/s00520-009-0635-1
163. Lopes NN, Plapler H, Chavantes MC, Lalla RV, Yoshimura EM, Alves MT. Cyclooxygenase-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in 5-fluorouracil-induced oral mucositis in hamsters: evaluation of two low-intensity laser protocols. Support Care Cancer (2009) 17(11):1409–15. doi:10.1007/s00520-009-0603-9
164. Sonis ST, O’Donnell KE, Popat R, Bragdon C, Phelan S, Cocks D, et al. The relationship between mucosal cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression and experimental radiation-induced mucositis. Oral Oncol (2004) 40(2):170–6. doi:10.1016/S1368-8375(03)00148-9
165. Pillsbury HC III, Webster WP, Rosenman J. Prostaglandin inhibitor and radiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancers. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1986) 112(5):552–3. doi:10.1001/archotol.1986.03780050076013
166. Kono T, Kaneko A, Matsumoto C, Miyagi C, Ohbuchi K, Mizuhara Y, et al. Multitargeted effects of hangeshashinto for treatment of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis on inducible prostaglandin E2 production in human oral keratinocytes. Integr Cancer Ther (2014) 13(5):435–45. doi:10.1177/1534735413520035
167. Hanson WR, Marks JE, Reddy SP, Simon S, Mihalo WE, Tova Y. Protection from radiation-induced oral mucositis by a mouth rinse containing the prostaglandin E1 analog, misoprostol: a placebo controlled double blind clinical trial. Adv Exp Med Biol (1997) 400B:811–8.
169. Hanson WR, Marks JE, Reddy SP, Simon S, Mihalo WE, Tova Y. Protection from radiation-induced oral mucositis by misoprostol, a prostaglandin E(1) analog: a placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Am J Ther (1995) 2(11):850–7. doi:10.1097/00045391-199511000-00005
171. Matejka M, Nell A, Kment G, Schein A, Leukauf M, Porteder H, et al. Local benefit of prostaglandin E2 in radiochemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg (1990) 28(2):89–91. doi:10.1016/0266-4356(90)90128-8
172. Pretnar J, Glazar D, Mlakar U, Modic M. Prostaglandin E2 in the treatment of oral mucositis due to radiochemotherapy in patients with haematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant (1989) 4(Suppl 3):106.
173. He D, Behar S, Roberts JE, Lim HW. The effect of l-cysteine and N-acetylcysteine on porphyrin/heme biosynthetic pathway in cells treated with 5-aminolevulinic acid and exposed to radiation. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed (1996) 12(5):194–9. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0781.1996.tb00199.x
175. Ozgur E, Sahin D, Tomruk A, Guler G, Sepici Dinçel A, Altan N, et al. The effects of N-acetylcysteine and epigallocatechin-3-gallate on liver tissue protein oxidation and antioxidant enzyme levels after the exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Int J Radiat Biol (2015) 91(2):187–93. doi:10.3109/09553002.2015.966210
176. Li J, Meng Z, Zhang G, Xing Y, Feng L, Fan S, et al. N-acetylcysteine relieves oxidative stress and protects hippocampus of rat from radiation-induced apoptosis by inhibiting caspase-3. Biomed Pharmacother (2015) 70:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2014.12.029
178. Demirel C, Kilciksiz S, Gurgul S, Erdal N, Yildiz A. N-acetylcysteine ameliorates gamma-radiation-induced deterioration of bone quality in the rat femur. J Int Med Res (2011) 39(6):2393–401. doi:10.1177/147323001103900640
179. Wang Y, Zhang ZZ, Chen SQ, Zou ZD, Tu XH, Wang L. [Protective effect of N-acetylcysteine on the intestinal barrier dysfunction after radiation injury in rats]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi (2010) 13(3):219–22.
181. Demirel C, Kilçiksiz S, Ay OI, Gürgül S, Ay ME, Erdal N. Effect of N-acetylcysteine on radiation-induced genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in rat bone marrow. J Radiat Res (2009) 50(1):43–50. doi:10.1269/jrr.08066
182. Wu W, Abraham L, Ogony J, Matthews R, Goldstein G, Ercal N. Effects of N-acetylcysteine amide (NACA), a thiol antioxidant on radiation-induced cytotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Life Sci (2008) 82(21–22):1122–30. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2008.03.016
183. Mansour HH, Hafez HF, Fahmy NM, Hanafi N. Protective effect of N-acetylcysteine against radiation induced DNA damage and hepatic toxicity in rats. Biochem Pharmacol (2008) 75(3):773–80. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2007.09.018
184. Low WK, Sun L, Tan MG, Chua AW, Wang DY. l-N-acetylcysteine protects against radiation-induced apoptosis in a cochlear cell line. Acta Otolaryngol (2008) 128(4):440–5. doi:10.1080/00016480701762490
185. Kilciksiz S, Demirel C, Erdal N, Gürgül S, Tamer L, Ayaz L, et al. The effect of N-acetylcysteine on biomarkers for radiation-induced oxidative damage in a rat model. Acta Med Okayama (2008) 62(6):403–9.
186. Sminia P, van der Kracht AH, Frederiks WM, Jansen W. Hyperthermia, radiation carcinogenesis and the protective potential of vitamin A and N-acetylcysteine. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol (1996) 122(6):343–50. doi:10.1007/BF01220801
187. Tarbell NJ, Rosenblatt M, Amato DA, Hellman S. The effect of N-acetylcysteine inhalation on the tolerance to thoracic radiation in mice. Radiother Oncol (1986) 7(1):77–80. doi:10.1016/S0167-8140(86)80126-8
189. Lieschke GJ, Ramenghi U, O’Connor MP, Sheridan W, Szer J, Morstyn G. Studies of oral neutrophil levels in patients receiving G-CSF after autologous marrow transplantation. Br J Haematol (1992) 82(3):589–95. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.1992.tb06472.x
190. Dazzi C, Cariello A, Giovanis P, Monti M, Vertogen B, Leoni M, et al. Prophylaxis with GM-CSF mouthwashes does not reduce frequency and duration of severe oral mucositis in patients with solid tumors undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation rescue: a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Ann Oncol (2003) 14(4):559–63.
191. Cartee L, Petros WP, Rosner GL, Gilbert C, Moore S, Affronti ML, et al. Evaluation of GM-CSF mouthwash for prevention of chemotherapy-induced mucositis: a randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study. Cytokine (1995) 7(5):471–7. doi:10.1006/cyto.1995.0064
192. McAleese JJ, Bishop KM, A’Hern R, Henk JM. Randomized phase II study of GM-CSF to reduce mucositis caused by accelerated radiotherapy of laryngeal cancer. Br J Radiol (2006) 79(943):608–13. doi:10.1259/bjr/55190439
193. Kannan V, Bapsy PP, Anantha N, Doval DC, Vaithianathan H, Banumathy G, et al. Efficacy and safety of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on the frequency and severity of radiation mucositis in patients with head and neck carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (1997) 37(5):1005–10. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(97)00105-3
195. El-Habit OH, Saada HN, Azab KS, Abdel-Rahman M, El-Malah DF. The modifying effect of beta-carotene on gamma radiation-induced elevation of oxidative reactions and genotoxicity in male rats. Mutat Res (2000) 466(2):179–86. doi:10.1016/S1383-5718(00)00010-3
196. Konopacka M, Widel M, Rzeszowska-Wolny J. Modifying effect of vitamins C, E and beta-carotene against gamma-ray-induced DNA damage in mouse cells. Mutat Res (1998) 417(2–3):85–94. doi:10.1016/S1383-5718(98)00095-3
198. Alfieri S, Ripamonti CI, Marceglia S, Orlandi E, Iacovelli NA, Granata R, et al. Temporal course and predictive factors of analgesic opioid requirement for chemoradiation-induced oral mucositis in oropharyngeal cancer. Head Neck (2016) 38(Suppl 1):E1521–7. doi:10.1002/hed.24272
199. Osaki T, Ueta E, Yoneda K, Hirota J, Yamamoto T. Prophylaxis of oral mucositis associated with chemoradiotherapy for oral carcinoma by azelastine hydrochloride (azelastine) with other antioxidants. Head Neck (1994) 16(4):331–9. doi:10.1002/hed.2880160407
200. Sato A, Saisho-Hattori T, Koizumi Y, Minegishi M, Iinuma K, Imaizumi M. Prophylaxis of mucosal toxicity by oral propantheline and cryotherapy in children with malignancies undergoing myeloablative chemo-radiotherapy. Tohoku J Exp Med (2006) 210(4):315–20. doi:10.1620/tjem.210.315
201. Mose S, Adamietz IA, Saran F, Thilmann C, Heyd R, Knecht R, et al. Can prophylactic application of immunoglobulin decrease radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis? Am J Clin Oncol (1997) 20(4):407–11. doi:10.1097/00000421-199708000-00018
202. Leborgne JH, Leborgne F, Zubizarreta E, Ortega B, Mezzera J. Corticosteroids and radiation mucositis in head and neck cancer. A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Radiother Oncol (1998) 47(2):145–8. doi:10.1016/S0167-8140(97)00174-6
203. Gruber S, Schmidt M, Bozsaky E, Wolfram K, Haagen J, Habelt B, et al. Modulation of radiation-induced oral mucositis by pentoxifylline: preclinical studies. Strahlenther Onkol (2015) 191(3):242–7. doi:10.1007/s00066-014-0775-1
204. Verdi CJ, Garewal HS, Koenig LM, Vaughn B, Burkhead T. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of pentoxifylline for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod (1995) 80(1):36–42. doi:10.1016/S1079-2104(95)80014-X
205. Ferrà C, de Sanjosé S, Lastra CF, Martí F, Mariño EL, Sureda A, et al. Pentoxifylline, ciprofloxacin and prednisone failed to prevent transplant-related toxicities in bone marrow transplant recipients and were associated with an increased incidence of infectious complications. Bone Marrow Transplant (1997) 20(12):1075–80. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1701023
206. Lopez-Jimenez J, Cancelas JA, Valino JM, Garcia-Larana J, Garcia-Avello A, Arranz MI, et al. Effects of oral pentoxifylline on TNF-alpha levels, transplant-related toxicities and engraftment after bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant (1994) 14(6):1011–2.
207. Stockschläder M, Kalhs P, Peters S, Zeller W, Krüger W, Kabisch H, et al. Intravenous pentoxifylline failed to prevent transplant-related toxicities in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant (1993) 12(4):357–62.
208. Kalhs P, Lechner K, Stockschlader M, Kruger W, Peters S, Zander A. Pentoxifylline did not prevent transplant-related toxicity in 31 consecutive allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients. Blood (1992) 80(10):2683–4.
209. Sathishkumar S, Boyanovsky B, Karakashian AA, Rozenova K, Giltiay NV, Kudrimoti M, et al. Elevated sphingomyelinase activity and ceramide concentration in serum of patients undergoing high dose spatially fractionated radiation treatment: implications for endothelial apoptosis. Cancer Biol Ther (2005) 4(9):979–86. doi:10.4161/cbt.4.9.1915
211. Pena LA, Fuks Z, Kolesnick RN. Radiation-induced apoptosis of endothelial cells in the murine central nervous system: protection by fibroblast growth factor and sphingomyelinase deficiency. Cancer Res (2000) 60(2):321–7.
212. Miranda SR, Erlich S, Visser JW, Gatt S, Dagan A, Friedrich VL Jr, et al. Bone marrow transplantation in acid sphingomyelinase-deficient mice: engraftment and cell migration into the brain as a function of radiation, age, and phenotype. Blood (1997) 90(1):444–52.
213. Chmura SJ, Mauceri HJ, Advani S, Heimann R, Beckett MA, Nodzenski E, et al. Decreasing the apoptotic threshold of tumor cells through protein kinase C inhibition and sphingomyelinase activation increases tumor killing by ionizing radiation. Cancer Res (1997) 57(19):4340–7.
214. Santana P, Peña LA, Haimovitz-Friedman A, Martin S, Green D, McLoughlin M, et al. Acid sphingomyelinase-deficient human lymphoblasts and mice are defective in radiation-induced apoptosis. Cell (1996) 86(2):189–99. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80091-4
215. Levade T, Salvayre R, Potier M, Douste-Blazy L. Interindividual heterogeneity of molecular weight of human brain neutral sphingomyelinase determined by radiation inactivation method. Neurochem Res (1986) 11(8):1131–8. doi:10.1007/BF00965942
216. Levade T, Potier M, Salvayre R, Douste-Blazy L. Molecular weight of human brain neutral sphingomyelinase determined in situ by the radiation inactivation method. J Neurochem (1985) 45(2):630–2. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1985.tb04033.x
217. Cruz Éde P, Campos L, Pereira Fda S, Magliano GC, Benites BM, Arana-Chavez VE, et al. Clinical, biochemical and histological study of the effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on oral mucositis induced by 5-fluorouracil in hamsters. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther (2015) 12(2):298–309. doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2014.12.007
219. Loury D, Embree JR, Steinberg DA, Sonis ST, Fiddes JC. Effect of local application of the antimicrobial peptide IB-367 on the incidence and severity of oral mucositis in hamsters. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod (1999) 87(5):544–51. doi:10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70131-9
220. Bondi E, Baroni C, Prete A, Gatti M, Carrassi A, Lodi G, et al. Local antimicrobial therapy of oral mucositis in paediatric patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Oral Oncol (1997) 33(5):322–6. doi:10.1016/S1368-8375(97)00039-0
222. Takahashi H, Palermo EF, Yasuhara K, Caputo GA, Kuroda K. Molecular design, structures, and activity of antimicrobial peptide-mimetic polymers. Macromol Biosci (2013) 13(10):1285–99. doi:10.1002/mabi.201300126
224. Nicolatou-Galitis O, Velegraki A, Sotiropoulou-Lontou A, Dardoufas K, Kouloulias V, Kyprianou K, et al. Effect of fluconazole antifungal prophylaxis on oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer (2006) 14(1):44–51. doi:10.1007/s00520-005-0835-2
225. Lefebvre JL, Domenge C; Study Group of Mucositis. A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of fluconazole oral suspension and amphotericin B oral suspension in cancer patients with mucositis. Oral Oncol (2002) 38(4):337–42. doi:10.1016/S1368-8375(01)00063-X
227. Spijkervet FK, Van Saene HK, Van Saene JJ, Panders AK, Vermey A, Mehta DM, et al. Effect of selective elimination of the oral flora on mucositis in irradiated head and neck cancer patients. J Surg Oncol (1991) 46(3):167–73. doi:10.1002/jso.2930460309
229. Spijkervet FK, van Saene HK, van Saene JJ, Panders AK, Vermey A, Mehta DM. Mucositis prevention by selective elimination of oral flora in irradiated head and neck cancer patients. J Oral Pathol Med (1990) 19(10):486–9. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0714.1990.tb00792.x
231. Prelack MS, Patterson KR, Berger JR. Varicella zoster virus rhombencephalomyelitis following radiation therapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Neurosci (2016) 25:164–6. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2015.09.009
232. Vaughan G, Rodríguez-Castillo A, Cruz-Rivera MY, Ruiz-Tovar K, Ramírez-González JE, Rivera-Osorio P, et al. Is ultra-violet radiation the main force shaping molecular evolution of varicella-zoster virus? Virol J (2011) 8:370. doi:10.1186/1743-422X-8-370
233. Evans TG, Bernstein DI, Raborn GW, Harmenberg J, Kowalski J, Spruance SL. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of topical 5% acyclovir-1% hydrocortisone cream (ME-609) for treatment of UV radiation-induced herpes labialis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (2002) 46(6):1870–4. doi:10.1128/AAC.46.6.1870-1874.2002
236. Bubley GJ, Chapman B, Chapman SK, Crumpacker CS, Schnipper LE. Effect of acyclovir on radiation- and chemotherapy-induced mouth lesions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (1989) 33(6):862–5. doi:10.1128/AAC.33.6.862
238. Sougawa M, Akagi K, Murata T, Kawasaki S, Sawada S, Yoshii G, et al. Enhancement of radiation effects by acyclovir. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (1986) 12(8):1537–40. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(86)90211-7
239. Schmidt M, Haagen J, Noack R, Siegemund A, Gabriel P, Dörr W. Effects of bone marrow or mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on oral mucositis (mouse) induced by fractionated irradiation. Strahlenther Onkol (2014) 190(4):399–404. doi:10.1007/s00066-013-0510-3
240. Schmidt M, Piro-Hussong A, Siegemund A, Gabriel P, Dörr W. Modification of radiation-induced oral mucositis (mouse) by adult stem cell therapy: single-dose irradiation. Radiat Environ Biophys (2014) 53(4):629–34. doi:10.1007/s00411-014-0552-7
244. Carter DL, Hebert ME, Smink K, Leopold KA, Clough RL, Brizel DM. Double blind randomized trial of sucralfate vs placebo during radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. Head Neck (1999) 21(8):760–6.
246. Spijkervet FK, van Saene HK, Panders AK, Vermey A, van Saene JJ, Mehta DM, et al. Effect of chlorhexidine rinsing on the oropharyngeal ecology in patients with head and neck cancer who have irradiation mucositis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol (1989) 67(2):154–61.
247. Ferretti GA, Raybould TP, Brown AT, Macdonald JS, Greenwood M, Maruyama Y, et al. Chlorhexidine prophylaxis for chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced stomatitis: a randomized double-blind trial. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol (1990) 69(3):331–8.
248. Hasenau C, Clasen BP, Roettger D. [Use of standardized oral hygiene in the prevention and therapy of mucositis in patients treated with radiochemotherapy of head and neck neoplasms]. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg) (1988) 67(11):576–9.
249. Symonds RP, McIlroy P, Khorrami J, Paul J, Pyper E, Alcock SR, et al. The reduction of radiation mucositis by selective decontamination antibiotic pastilles: a placebo-controlled double-blind trial. Br J Cancer (1996) 74(2):312–7.
250. Okuno SH, Foote RL, Loprinzi CL, Gulavita S, Sloan JA, Earle J, et al. A randomized trial of a nonabsorbable antibiotic lozenge given to alleviate radiation-induced mucositis. Cancer (1997) 79(11):2193–9.
254. Samaranayake LP, Robertson AG, MacFarlane TW, Hunter IP, MacFarlane G, Soutar DS, et al. The effect of chlorhexidine and benzydamine mouthwashes on mucositis induced by therapeutic irradiation. Clin Radiol (1988) 39(3):291–4.
256. Porteder H, Rausch E, Kment G, Watzek G, Matejka M, Sinzinger H. Local prostaglandin E2 in patients with oral malignancies undergoing chemo- and radiotherapy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg (1988) 16(8):371–4.
257. Maciejewski B, Zajusz A, Pilecki B, Swiatnicka J, Skladowski K, Dorr W, et al. Acute mucositis in the stimulated oral mucosa of patients during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol (1991) 22(1):7–11.
258. Bourhis J, De Crevoisier R, Abdulkarim B, Deutsch E, Lusinchi A, Luboinski B, et al. A randomized study of very accelerated radiotherapy with and without amifostine in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2000) 46(5):1105–8.
259. Koukourakis MI, Kyrias G, Kakolyris S, Kouroussis C, Frangiadaki C, Giatromanolaki A, et al. Subcutaneous administration of amifostine during fractionated radiotherapy: a randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol (2000) 18(11):2226–33. doi:10.1200/JCO.2000.18.11.2226
263. Peters K, Mucke R, Hamann D, Ziegler PG, Fietkau R. Supportive use of amifostine in patients with head and neck tumors undergoing radio-chemotherapy. Is it possible to limit the duration of the application of amifostine? Strahlenther Onkol (1999) 175(Suppl 4):23–6.
264. Vacha P, Marx M, Engel A, Richter E, Feyerabend T. [Side effects of postoperative radiochemotherapy with amifostine versus radiochemotherapy alone in head and neck tumors. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial]. Strahlenther Onkol (1999) 175(Suppl 4):18–22.
266. Rosso M, Blasi G, Gherlone E, Rosso R. Effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on prevention of mucositis in head and neck cancer patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy. J Chemother (1997) 9(5):382–5. doi:10.1179/joc.1922.214.171.1242
267. Mascarin M, Franchin G, Minatel E, Gobitti C, Talamini R, De Maria D, et al. The effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients treated with hyperfractionated radiotherapy. Oral Oncol (1999) 35(2):203–8.
268. Schneider SB, Nishimura RD, Zimmerman RP, Tran L, Shiplacoff J, Tormey M, et al. Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) and its potential use in the reduction of radiation-induced oropharyngeal mucositis: an interim look at a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Cytokines Cell Mol Ther (1999) 5(3):175–80.
Keywords: chemotherapy, oral mucositis, radiation, radiotherapy, normal tissue injury, pathobiology, mesenchymal stromal/stem cells
Citation: Maria OM, Eliopoulos N and Muanza T (2017) Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis. Front. Oncol. 7:89. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00089
Received: 10 June 2016; Accepted: 21 April 2017;
Published: 22 May 2017
Edited by:Issam El Naqa, University of Michigan, USA
Copyright: © 2017 Maria, Eliopoulos and Muanza. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Thierry Muanza, email@example.com