Front. Oncol., 03 May 2018
Sec. Cancer Genetics

Investigation of Experimental Factors That Underlie BRCA1/2 mRNA Isoform Expression Variation: Recommendations for Utilizing Targeted RNA Sequencing to Evaluate Potential Spliceogenic Variants

imageVanessa L. Lattimore1*, imageJohn F. Pearson2,3, imageMargaret J. Currie1, imageAmanda B. Spurdle4, kConFab Investigators5, imageBridget A. Robinson1,6 and imageLogan C. Walker1
  • 1Mackenzie Cancer Research Group, Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • 2Biostatistics and Computational Biology Unit, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • 3Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • 4Genetics and Computational Biology Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  • 5Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
  • 6Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand

PCR-based RNA splicing assays are commonly used in diagnostic and research settings to assess the potential effects of variants of uncertain clinical significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2. The Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) consortium completed a multicentre investigation to evaluate differences in assay design and the integrity of published data, raising a number of methodological questions associated with cell culture conditions and PCR-based protocols. We utilized targeted RNA-seq to re-assess BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA isoform expression patterns in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) previously used in the multicentre ENIGMA study. Capture of the targeted cDNA sequences was carried out using 34 BRCA1 and 28 BRCA2 oligonucleotides from the Illumina Truseq Targeted RNA Expression platform. Our results show that targeted RNA-seq analysis of LCLs overcomes many of the methodology limitations associated with PCR-based assays leading us to make the following observations and recommendations: (1) technical replicates (n > 2) of variant carriers to capture methodology induced variability associated with RNA-seq assays, (2) LCLs can undergo multiple freeze/thaw cycles and can be cultured up to 2 weeks without noticeably influencing isoform expression levels, (3) nonsense-mediated decay inhibitors are essential prior to splicing assays for comprehensive mRNA isoform detection, (4) quantitative assessment of exon:exon junction levels across BRCA1 and BRCA2 can help distinguish between normal and aberrant isoform expression patterns. Experimentally derived recommendations from this study will facilitate the application of targeted RNA-seq platforms for the quantitation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA aberrations associated with sequence variants of uncertain clinical significance.


At least 20% of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer cases contain germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 (MIM #113705) or BRCA2 (MIM #600185) (1). Functioning as tumor suppressor genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2 repair single and double-stranded breaks in DNA, a process which can be compromised when variants that disrupt pre-mRNA splicing to create aberrant splice isoforms are present (24). These variants may directly disrupt splice sites or splicing regulatory regions, such as exonic splicing enhancers or exonic splicing silencers (5). Resulting splicing aberrations, such as major deletion/retention events and frame shifts, can lead to loss of function through the introduction of premature termination codons, leading to non-functional isoforms that are generally destroyed by nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), or via the production of truncated proteins (6). In addition, variants located at splicing regulatory regions, such as exonic splicing enhancers, have been shown to significantly alter the abundance of natural BRCA1/2 isoforms (7, 8). We and others have recently employed next-generation sequencing technologies to explore the expression of mRNA isoforms in BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant carriers (911). A better understanding of expression level changes that reflect normal variation in BRCA1/2 splicing patterns between individuals would improve our understanding of isoform regulation for identifying variability that is likely to be of clinical relevance.

In-depth qualitative data published for BRCA1 and BRCA2 allows for normally expressed mRNA isoforms to be distinguished more easily from aberrant isoforms (12, 13). The Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) consortium developed a 5-tier classification system, which uses mRNA splicing information to help interpret the pathogenicity of possible spliceogenic variants (14). Splicing assays for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA isoforms have historically employed a PCR-based qualitative (or semi-quantitative) approach, with only very recent work expanding into a quantitative analysis. To assess key elements for splicing assay design and the integrity of published splicing data, a multicentre quality control investigation was conducted by the ENIGMA Splicing Working Group (15). This study highlighted the need to standardize splicing protocols between laboratories after raising a number of methodological issues associated with current PCR-based protocols, including (1) primer design that encompasses only a subset of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 exons, (2) non-standardized use of NMD inhibitors, (3) isoforms infrequently confirmed by sequencing, and (4) a qualitative or semi-quantitative approach to assess mRNA expression patterns, as opposed to quantitative assessment (14, 15). Although this study demonstrated variation in analytical sensitivity between samples, and the same sample between participating laboratories, the impact of underlying experimental factors remained unclear.

Targeted RNA-seq technologies potentially address many of the difficulties currently associated with PCR-based assays. For example, RNA-seq platforms enable detection of mRNA isoforms both qualitatively and quantitatively (16, 17), thus producing comprehensive transcript profiles across the entire gene(s). Assessment of the analytical sensitivity of targeted RNA-seq to both qualitatively and quantitatively measure BRCA1/2 isoform expression in relation to experimental factors would provide a deeper understanding of the sources of mRNA isoform variation in these genes, but has yet to be evaluated.

In this study, we carried out targeted RNA-seq to assess BRCA1/2 mRNA isoform expression patterns in lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) previously utilized by the ENIGMA-led multicentre study (15). We describe a comprehensive assessment of naturally and aberrantly occurring BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA isoforms in relation to experimental factors. Our results show that quantitation of relative levels of naturally occurring transcripts is not significantly impacted by key elements of cell-storage and culture protocols, with the possible exception of NMD-inhibition. We provide recommendations for future use of targeted RNA-seq for the analysis of variants that may disrupt RNA splicing.

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the Southern Health and Disability Ethics Committee (12/STH/44).


27 LCLs derived from 17 BRCA1 or BRCA2 rare variant carriers, and 10 healthy controls (Figure S1 and Table S1 in Supplementary Material) were obtained from Kathleen Cuningham Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer. Eighteen of the cell lines (sample IDs LCL1–8 and LCL18–27) were previously used in a multi-center methods splicing analysis study coordinated through the ENIGMA consortium (15).

Variants included in this study are referred to by the recommended Human Genome Variation Society1 nomenclature, including use of A in the ATG translation initiation codon to start the nucleotide numbering for BRCA1 (GenBank accession—NM_007294.3) and BRCA2 (GenBank accession—NM_000059.3) (18).

Cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 media, with fetal calf serum (10%) and penicillin–streptomycin (1%), while incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. RNA was isolated from cycloheximide treated (4 h 100 µg/mL) and untreated cells using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit. RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using Superscript III First Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

RNA-seq Analysis

Targeted RNA-seq was undertaken on all cycloheximide treated and untreated LCLs using the Illumina Truseq Targeted RNA Expression kit. The targeted sequencing assay was custom designed in Illumina’s design studio using 34 BRCA1 and 28 BRCA2 oligonucleotides chosen from a database of validated predesigned probes (Tables S2 and S3 and Figures S2 and S3 in Supplementary Material). Capture of the targeted cDNA sequences was performed according to the manufacturer’s specifications (Figure S4 in Supplementary Material). Sequence analysis was carried out using the Illumina MiSeq platform.

Whole transcriptome sequencing analysis was also carried out for one control (LCL24). Using these data, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA isoform splicing expression patterns were also obtained. RNA from LCL24 was sequenced with and without cycloheximide treatment on a HiSeq2000 using the Truseq® Stranded mRNA kit (Illumina).

Read Mapping and Processing

Targeted RNA-seq and whole transcriptome read mapping was undertaken as previously described (19). Briefly, the Homo_sapiens.GRCh37.72 reference genome was downloaded from Ensembl2 and the chromosomes arranged into lexicographic order prior to mapping. Sequence reads were mapped using the two pass approach of the Spliced Transcripts Alignment to a Reference (STAR) aligner using the default settings unless specified otherwise (20). Maximum intron length was set to 100,000 nucleotides to accommodate for splice junctions that span the length of each gene. Detected splice junctions for each sample were extracted from STAR’s SJ.out file for further analysis. Sample-specific read counts are listed in Table S4 in Supplementary Material.

Targeted RNA-seq Data Analysis: Normalization

Raw read counts of all alternative splicing events were normalized to measure the relative number of individual spliced exon/exon junctions in each sample. This was achieved by calculating the read depth of the full-length transcript (Figure 1). To normalize read depth, the total read count between two adjacent exons (exons 2 and 3 in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively) was used as the reference junction (RJ) (hereon referred to as “reference junction”) to calculate the relative expression of the full-length and alternative mRNA transcripts for both BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. To achieve this, the sum of all non-overlapping exon 2–3 alternative splicing events was deducted from the RJ for each gene independently. This leaves a proportion of reads that solely represent the full-length transcript (Figure 1Bi). To determine the relative proportion of each splice junction, the total number of reads for each sample was first calculated. This consisted of the sum of the reads encompassing the alternative splicing events together and the previously calculated full-length transcript (using RJ exons 2–3, see above) (Figure 1Bii). The relative proportion of the individual isoforms in each sample is determined by dividing its respective read count by the total number of reads for that sample (Figure 1Biii). These expression values were incorporated into a comparative expression analysis, using the mean and SE (95%) of each isoform across the controls. This approach does not account for the possibility that some of the detected alternative splicing events may occur concurrently. Relative expression ranges were calculated based on the criteria that at least two control samples expressed the transcript with more than 10 reads, each sample was represented by more than 10,000 reads per gene, and each sample expressed at least two minor transcripts for the studied gene.


Figure 1. Exemplar of how the relative expression of each splice junction was calculated from targeted RNA-seq data. (A) The shaded region indicates the alternative splicing events excluded from the full-length calculations. Solid lines indicate the exons directly involved with an exon skipping event. (B) Calculations used to determine the relative expression of each detected junction. Abbreviations: AJ, alternate junction; RJ, reference junction.

Alternative events were excluded from these calculations if they had questionable probe efficiency (such as was observed for BRCA1 Δ9–10) or were common NAG events (21). These are shown to commonly co-occur with the other events detected, and so are not deducted as separate alternative splicing events when calculating the full-length transcript. The resulting proportions were compared using complementary log–log confidence intervals (22).

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) Validation of Splicing Events

The expression levels observed for the BRCA1 exon 10–11, Δ10, and Δ9–10 junctions were assessed using Taqman qPCR assays and Roche LightCycler® 480 platform. Primers were designed to encompass each targeted junction type, with the corresponding probe spanning the junction (Table S5 in Supplementary Material). All qPCR assays were carried out in triplicate.


Identification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Isoforms From Targeted RNA-seq Data

Using targeted RNA-seq, we detected 40 BRCA1 and 17 BRCA2 alternate isoforms in LCLs from non-variant carrier controls cultured with or without a NMD inhibitor (Tables S6–S7 in Supplementary Material). These include 25/63 of the BRCA1 isoforms identified by Colombo et al. (12) and/or Davy et al. (10) (Table S6 in Supplementary Material), in addition to 5/22 BRCA2 isoforms identified by Fackenthal et al. (13) (Table S7 in Supplementary Material). In addition to these, six naturally occurring BRCA1 isoforms previously reported by Colombo et al. (12) were detected in variant carriers. Targeted RNA-seq also detected 13 BRCA1 and 11 BRCA2 isoforms that have not been reported previously in healthy controls. The novel transcripts identified here increases the total number of BRCA1 and BRCA2 splicing events observed in control samples to 70 and 34, respectively.

Of the previously reported naturally occurring isoforms not detected in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using targeted RNA-seq (12, 13), the majority (28/32 in BRCA1 and 13/17 in BRCA2) were due to target probe placement (restricted to the options predesigned by Illumina), while the remainder (11/32 BRCA1 and 4/17 BRCA2) were presumably not expressed at levels that were detectable in our cell lines (Tables S6 and S7 in Supplementary Material). From our observations, and those reported in previous publications (12), all BRCA1 mRNA exons have been shown to be spliced out in at least one naturally occurring alternative mRNA transcript. By contrast, six BRCA2 exons (8, 14, 21, and 24–27) were not found to be involved in an exon skipping event in this study or by Fackenthal et al. (13). Nineteen alternative transcripts (11 BRCA1 and eight BRCA2) were detected solely in the samples treated with a NMD inhibitor (Tables S6–S9 in Supplementary Material). Of the 19, 14 are out of frame.

To assess the targeted RNA-seq method for evaluating transcript profiles in rare variant carriers (LCL1–8), we compared our data with those previously reported from the PCR-based ENIGMA multicentre study (15) (Table S10 in Supplementary Material). In this study, a total of 37 BRCA1 and 11 BRCA2 alternative splicing events were identified by targeted RNA-seq in addition to those detected by reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) from the multicentre study (Table S10 in Supplementary Material). We found that 33/37 BRCA1 and all 11 BRCA2 of these events fell outside the region targeted by the RT-PCR assays. By comparison, 26 BRCA1 and 12 BRCA2 splicing events were exclusively detected in these samples in the multicentre study. However, 21 of these events were not detected by the Truseq Targeted RNA Expression platform due to the absence of probes targeting those regions, while 11 were due to the events involving multiple separate regions, which are not detectable together using this platform. Of the remaining six events not detected by Targeted RNA-seq (BRCA1, Δ5–6, Δ9, Δ9–11, Δ9–12, Δ11–12, Δ22), three (Δ9, Δ22, and Δ9–11) were respectively identified by three laboratories, which always included the two laboratories utilizing capillary electrophoresis for detection. Further to this, BRCA1 Δ5–6 was identified solely by laboratories utilizing capillary electrophoresis, which was the most sensitive detection method used in the multi-center study (15).

Targeted RNA-seq identified another five splicing events described by Whiley et al. (15) that were solely present in four out of the eight LCLs each carrying a known spliceogenic rare variant (Table S10 in Supplementary Material, BRCA1 c.671−2A>G − Δ9–11 and Δ10–11; BRCA1 c.5467+5G>C − Δ23; BRCA2 c.8632+1G>A − Δ19–20; BRCA2 c.9501+3A>T − Δ25). In contrast to the multicentre study, targeted RNA-seq was unable to detect the Δ5 event associated with the pathogenic variant BRCA1 c.135−1G>T, likely as a result of a low read count (Table S10 in Supplementary Material). These data further highlight the complexity associated with detection and interpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 splicing patterns when assays are designed across the whole transcript.

Quantitative Assessment of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Transcripts

To derive quantitative information from the targeted RNA-seq data, we separately calculated the relative expression range for BRCA1 (n = 25) and BRCA2 (n = 14) transcripts from the study LCLs that did not contain known splice disrupting variants in the respective gene assayed. The number of alternative splicing events detectable across multiple LCLs was double in cycloheximide treated cell lines compared to that found in non-treated cells (Figures 2A,B), thus the following quantitative data corresponds to treated cells only. A correlation was observed between the number of detected alternative events and the total read count per sample for BRCA1 (R2 = 0.68) and BRCA2 (R2 = 0.69) (Figure S5 in Supplementary Material). The questionable probe efficiency observed for alternative event BRCA1 Δ9–10 using targeted RNA-seq was confirmed with qPCR to be overinflated (Table S11 in Supplementary Material) and so was excluded from the normalization calculations.


Figure 2. Relative expression of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA isoforms in rare variant samples compared to controls. (A) Natural expression ranges of mRNA splice isoforms calculated from lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) not containing any known spliceogenic variants in BRCA1 (A) and BRCA2 (C). Colored symbols overlaid indicate the relative mRNA isoform expression in LCLs containing known BRCA1 (B) or BRCA2 (D) splice disrupting variants. Only mRNA splice isoforms that were detected by more than 10 reads in at least two controls were included. Mean and upper and lower limits shown for each isoform [SE (95%)].

The full-length transcripts were found to be the most highly expressed mRNA isoforms for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 when comparing the relative levels of all mRNA isoforms expressed for each gene, while they also had the greatest expression variability (Figure 2). No BRCA1 splicing events were expressed above 20% of the total number of detected transcripts, whereas the expression ranges of BRCA2 Δ9–10, Δ12, and ▾20 exceeded this level.

Despite a high mRNA expression variability detected for natural isoforms, results still highlighted notable isoform expression differences between variant carrier and control LCLs not measured by PCR-based methods in the ENIGMA multi-center study (15). The most significant difference was for Δ10 in LCL5 (BRCA1 c.[594−2A>C; 641A>G]), which expressed an 8.8-fold increase compared to controls. The isoforms Δ15 and ▾21 were also upregulated in this sample (2.8- and 5.0-fold increase, respectively). Expression differences were also found for ▾25 (4.5-fold increase) for LCL8 (BRCA2 c.8632+1G>A); ▾20 (2.3-fold increase) and ▾25 (2.4-fold increase) for LCL1 (BRCA2 c.426-12_426-_8delGTTTT); and ▾21 and Δ11 (1.3-fold increase) for LCL4 (BRCA1 c.671−2A>G) (Figures 2B,D).

To compare targeted RNA-seq and qPCR-derived expression levels, the relative expression of BRCA1 Δ9–10, Δ10, and the exon 10–11 junction was calculated using a RJ (BRCA1 exons 2–3) in LCL5 (BRCA1 c.594−2A>C) and compared to controls. Consistent with recent findings (9), both targeted RNA-seq and qPCR assays measured a significant increase in expression levels of Δ10 (28.688-foldRNA-seq – 16.262-foldqPCR), similar levels of Δ9–10 (0.869-foldRNA-seq – 1.150-foldqPCR), and reduced 10–11 junction levels (0.718-foldRNA-seq – 0.427-foldqPCR) in LCL5 compared to the controls (Table S11 in Supplementary Material).

The Effect of LCL Storage and Culture Conditions on BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA Isoform Expression

A key observation from the ENIGMA multicentre study was the variability in BRCA1 and BRCA2 isoform detection between laboratories using different cell processing and assay protocols (15). However, it was unclear whether these inter-laboratory differences are due to untested aspects of the laboratory protocol. To explore this possibility, we assessed the effect of cell culture and storage conditions on BRCA1 and BRCA2 isoform expression in RNA extracted at six time points from LCL7 with fortnightly freeze/thaw cycles. RNA was sequenced using targeted RNA-seq with technical triplicates (Figure 3).


Figure 3. BRCA1 mRNA isoforms detected at six time points in an lymphoblastoid cell line (sample #7, Table S1 in Supplementary Material) treated with an nonsense-mediated decay inhibitor. A freeze–thaw process was undertaken after time points two and four. Three technical replicates are listed under each time point.

Detection of the more prominently expressed alternative splicing events (for example, BRCA1 Δ9–10 and Δ1Aq) was more consistent across time points and between technical replicates than it was for the minor events (Figures 3 and 4). Testing for significant isoform expression differences by time point using the linear model found no consistent effect for BRCA1 and BRCA2 in either NMD inhibitor treated or untreated samples (Figures S6–S9 in Supplementary Material). Together these results suggest that expression variability does exist at the intra-laboratory level and this variability is greatest for mRNA isoforms detected at low levels, such as the samples not treated with NMD inhibitors (Figures 3 and 4; Figures S10 and S11 in Supplementary Material). However, there was no evidence for systematic effects relating to the number of freeze/thaw storage cycles or whether the cells have been analyzed after 1 or 2 weeks growth.


Figure 4. BRCA2 mRNA isoforms detected at six time points in an lymphoblastoid cell line (sample #7, Table S1 in Supplementary Material) treated with an nonsense-mediated decay inhibitor. A freeze–thaw process was undertaken after time points two and four. Three technical replicates are listed under each time point.


BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA splicing assays are often carried out in a diagnostic and research setting to assess the effects of variants of uncertain clinical significance. To date, PCR-based mRNA splicing assays have been the method of choice to assess mRNA transcripts qualitatively. While genetic variation has been suggested to induce abnormal isoform expression changes (23), such aberrations are not easy to detect using non-quantitative or semi-quantitative techniques. Here, we have utilized a targeted RNA-seq approach to qualitatively and quantitatively assess the expression profile of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA isoforms in LCLs previously assayed in a multicentre study (15). This whole-gene approach is much more comprehensive than traditional PCR-based splicing assays, as evidenced by the detection of 55 mRNA isoforms (30 known and 25 novel) using only a small fraction of the samples used for the reported catalog of 80 BRCA1/2 isoforms (12, 13). Several transcripts were not detectible due to limitations with the capture design and/or reduced sensitivity, however, lowly expressed BRCA1 and BRCA2 isoforms that have not been identified by previous studies were able to be detected using this platform (12, 13). Additional splicing events may be present, but at very low levels, requiring a much higher sequencing depth for detection. Further work is required to determine if such transcripts are clinically important, and so establish whether their detection is required for an understanding of breast cancer risk.

The targeted RNA-seq platform utilized in this work was able to overcome previously reported limitations of PCR-based assays (14, 15) by providing multiple exon coverage across BRCA1 or BRCA2 for each assay, sequence confirmation of splicing event, and quantitative assessment of isoform expression patterns. Moreover, our study demonstrated that the use of NMD inhibitors is important for obtaining detectable levels of full length and alternative splicing events using the Illumina Truseq Targeted RNA Expression platform.

We show the utility of targeted RNA-seq to quantitatively identify previously reported upregulated splicing events, such as Δ10 (BRCA1 c.[594−2A>C; 641A>G]) and Δ11 (BRCA1 c.671−2A>G) (Figure 2), while the expression levels of many of the other isoforms in the variant carriers were within the range seen in controls. Our study also identified higher levels of Δ15 and ▾21 for LCL4 (BRCA1c.[594−2A>C; 641A>G]) than expected in controls, which have not previously been reported, likely because these small differences are not easily observable with semi-quantitative technologies. However, these changes are not associated with pathogenicity in BRCA1 c.[594−2A>C; 641A>G] carriers (9), and any association between the variant and each splicing event remains unclear. It is possible that future research with additional control samples may show that these small expression changes are within the natural expression range. Interestingly, the relative expression ranges observed for all alternative events appeared to be more tightly regulated in BRCA1 than BRCA2. While they do not appear to overlap any important domains, three BRCA2 mRNA isoforms were expressed at greater levels than those associated with BRCA1 (Figure 2). These differences suggest that greater variability in expression for some BRCA2 isoforms is tolerated in LCLs, however, further research is required to established BRCA1 and BRCA2 isoform expression patterns in cancer specific tissue, such as normal breast and ovarian epithelia.

Splicing data from this study, in addition to those from recent reports (1013), show that every exon in BRCA1 and 20/27 exons for BRCA2 are skipped in at least one natural isoform. This highlights how quantitative assessment of aberrant splicing would be very beneficial in these highly variable genes as it would provide a more comprehensive detection method of the splicing changes present. It also suggests that seven BRCA2 exons are likely to be highly conserved, so any changes involving these exons are likely to be detrimental in the cell.

To identify technical factors that also contribute BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA expression differences between samples, we assessed the effect of cell culture and storage conditions on BRCA1 and BRCA2 isoform expression across the six experimental time points. Our results showed variability in the isoforms expressed at any given time, irrespective of the number of storage events and culture time. Moreover, variability is greater when RNA-seq assays generate relatively low number of sequence reads (Figures 3 and 4; Table S12 in Supplementary Material).

Targeted RNA-seq platform utilize short fragmented library reads to detect mRNA splicing events. Such platforms are, therefore, limited in their ability to determine whether multiple events occur on the same transcript. Recently, we carried out a study using the MinION™ (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) long read sequencer and obtained whole transcript information for BRCA1 in a normal sample, which showed evidence of co-occurring splice events in BRCA1 (24). Further work involving long read sequencing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 would help to further distinguish transcript exon structure regarding all deletion and retention events for variant carriers. Results from such research will also accurately define out-of-frame transcripts which are prone to NMD.

Here, we utilize targeted RNA-seq technology to provide a comprehensive review and quantitative assessment of naturally occurring mRNA isoforms in BRCA1 and BRCA2. While qualitative analysis alone has been assumed to be sufficient for identifying aberrant events, the more quantitative RNA-seq offers improvements to the accuracy and capabilities of PCR-based assays, overcoming many of the detection limitations presented by the earlier technologies. These results lead us to make the following recommendations: (1) technical replicates (n > 2) of the variant carrier are necessary to capture methodology induced variability associated with RNA-seq assays, (2) LCLs can undergo multiple freeze/thaw cycles and can be cultured up to 2 weeks without noticeably influencing isoform expression levels, (3) NMD inhibitors are essential prior to splicing assays for comprehensive mRNA isoform detection, (4) quantitative assessment of exon:exon junction levels across BRCA1 and BRCA2 can help distinguish between normal and aberrant isoform expression patterns. While advances in probe design, and possibly the uptake of long read sequencers, are essential to allow detection of all expressed mRNA isoforms using this platform, the decreasing costs of RNA-seq technology, alongside an increasing understanding of bioinformatics capabilities, will likely increase the progression away from PCR-based assessment of gene expression, as evidenced by recent work by Davy et al. (10). In addition, the advanced capabilities of RNA-seq promise to aid in evaluating the clinical significance of variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, but further exploration is required to determine whether these variants are influencing expression. Quantitative assessment of BRCA1/2 isoforms in a greater number of control samples using other RNA-seq platforms will further improve our understanding of “normal” expression and provide an invaluable reference for establishing the occurrence of aberrant splicing when assessing genetic variants. Furthermore, careful assay design will be crucial for obtaining data across the gene, thus enabling an interpretation of splicing changes for the entire transcript as opposed to selected regions.

Author Contributions

Conception or design of the work—VL, LW, JP, BR, MC, and AS. Resources—kI and LW. Data collection and drafting the article—VL and LW. Data analysis and interpretation—VL, JP, and LW. Critical revision of the article and final approval of the version to be published—all authors.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The handling Editor declared past co-authorship with the authors AS and LW.


We thank all members of the ENIGMA consortium Splicing Working Group for the useful suggestions relating to the study execution and interpretation. We would also like to thank Aaron Jeffs at the Otago Bioinformatics and Genomics Facility, University of Otago, for generating the sequencing data.


VL is funded by the Otago University Ph.D. scholarship, LW by the HRC Sir Charles Hercus Health Research Fellowship, and the research was supported by the Mackenzie Charitable Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2018.00140/full#supplementary-material.



1. Antoniou AC, Cunningham AP, Peto J, Evans DG, Lalloo F, Narod SA, et al. The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers: updates and extensions. Br J Cancer (2008) 98(8):1457–66. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Sanz DJ, Acedo A, Infante M, Duran M, Perez-Cabornero L, Esteban-Cardenosa E, et al. A high proportion of DNA variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 is associated with aberrant splicing in breast/ovarian cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res (2010) 16(6):1957–67. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2564

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Whiley PJ, Guidugli L, Walker LC, Healey S, Thompson BA, Lakhani SR, et al. Splicing and multifactorial analysis of intronic BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence variants identifies clinically significant splicing aberrations up to 12 nucleotides from the intron/exon boundary. Hum Mutat (2011) 32(6):678–87. doi:10.1002/humu.21495

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Ahlborn LB, Dandanell M, Steffensen AY, Jonson L, Nielsen FC, Hansen TV. Splicing analysis of 14 BRCA1 missense variants classifies nine variants as pathogenic. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2015) 150(2):289–98. doi:10.1007/s10549-015-3313-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Gaildrat P, Krieger S, Thery JC, Killian A, Rousselin A, Berthet P, et al. The BRCA1 c.5434C->G (p.Pro1812Ala) variant induces a deleterious exon 23 skipping by affecting exonic splicing regulatory elements. J Med Genet (2010) 47(6):398–403. doi:10.1136/jmg.2009.074047

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Jung H, Lee D, Lee J, Park D, Kim YJ, Park WY, et al. Intron retention is a widespread mechanism of tumor-suppressor inactivation. Nat Genet (2015) 47(11):1242–8. doi:10.1038/ng.3414

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Walker LC, Whiley PJ, Couch FJ, Farrugia DJ, Healey S, Eccles DM, et al. Detection of splicing aberrations caused by BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence variants encoding missense substitutions: implications for prediction of pathogenicity. Hum Mutat (2010) 31(6):E1484–505. doi:10.1002/humu.21267

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Tammaro C, Raponi M, Wilson DI, Baralle D. BRCA1 EXON 11, a CERES (composite regulatory element of splicing) element involved in splice regulation. Int J Mol Sci (2014) 15(7):13045–59. doi:10.3390/ijms150713045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. de la Hoya M, Soukarieh O, Lopez-Peroliom IEA, Vega A, Walker LC, van Ierland Y, et al. Combined genetic and splicing analysis of BRCA1 c.[594-2A>C; 641A>G] highlights the relevance of naturally occurring in-frame transcripts for developing disease gene variant classification algorithms. Hum Mol Genet (2016) 25(11):2256–68. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddw094

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Davy G, Rousselin A, Goardon N, Castera L, Harter V, Legros A, et al. Detecting splicing patterns in genes involved in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Eur J Hum Genet (2017) 25(10):1147–54. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2017.116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Hojny J, Zemankova P, Lhota F, Sevcik J, Stranecky V, Hartmannova H, et al. Multiplex PCR and NGS-based identification of mRNA splicing variants: analysis of BRCA1 splicing pattern as a model. Gene (2017) 637:41–9. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2017.09.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Colombo M, Blok MJ, Whiley P, Santamarina M, Gutierrez-Enriquez S, Romero A, et al. Comprehensive annotation of splice junctions supports pervasive alternative splicing at the BRCA1 locus: a report from the ENIGMA consortium. Hum Mol Genet (2014) 23(14):3666–80. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddu075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Fackenthal JD, Yoshimatsu T, Zhang B, de Garibay GR, Colombo M, De Vecchi G, et al. Naturally occurring BRCA2 alternative mRNA splicing events in clinically relevant samples. J Med Genet (2016) 53(8):548–58. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103570

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Walker LC, Whiley PJ, Houdayer C, Hansen TV, Vega A, Santamarina M, et al. Evaluation of a 5-tier scheme proposed for classification of sequence variants using bioinformatic and splicing assay data: inter-reviewer variability and promotion of minimum reporting guidelines. Hum Mutat (2013) 34(10):1424–31. doi:10.1002/humu.22388

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Whiley P, de la Hoya M, Thomassen M, Becker A, Brandao R, Pedersen IS, et al. Comparison of mRNA splicing assay protocols across multiple laboratories: recommendations for best practice in standardized clinical testing. Clin Chem (2014) 60(2):341–52. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2013.210658

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet (2009) 10:57–63. doi:10.1038/nrg2484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol (2010) 28(5):511–5. doi:10.1038/nbt.1621

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. den Dunnen JT, Antonarakis SE. Mutation nomenclature extensions and suggestions to describe complex mutations: a discussion. Hum Mutat (2000) 15(1):7–12. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(200001)15:1<7::AID-HUMU4>3.0.CO;2-N

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Lattimore V. Genetic Variation and mRNA Splicing in Familial Breast Cancer Genes. University of Otago, Christchurch (2017).

Google Scholar

20. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics (2013) 29(1):15–21. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Hiller M, Huse K, Szafranski K, Jahn N, Hampe J, Schreiber S, et al. Widespread occurrence of alternative splicing at NAGNAG acceptors contributes to proteome plasticity. Nat Genet (2004) 36(12):1255–7. doi:10.1038/ng1469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Brown LD, Cai TT, DasGupta A. Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Stat Sci (2001) 16(2):101–17. doi:10.1214/ss/1009213285

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Thery JC, Krieger S, Gaildrat P, Revillion F, Buisine MP, Killian A, et al. Contribution of bioinformatics predictions and functional splicing assays to the interpretation of unclassified variants of the BRCA genes. Eur J Hum Genet (2011) 19(10):1052–8. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2011.100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. de Jong LC, Cree S, Lattimore V, Wiggins GAR, Spurdle AB, kConFab Investigators, et al. Nanopore sequencing of full-length BRCA1 mRNA transcripts reveals co-occurrence of known exon skipping events. Breast Cancer Res (2017) 19(1):127. doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0919-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: BRCA1, BRCA2, mRNA, quantitative, splicing, next-generation sequencing, targeted next-generation sequencing, mRNA isoforms

Citation: Lattimore VL, Pearson JF, Currie MJ, Spurdle AB, KConFab Investigators, Robinson BA and Walker LC (2018) Investigation of Experimental Factors That Underlie BRCA1/2 mRNA Isoform Expression Variation: Recommendations for Utilizing Targeted RNA Sequencing to Evaluate Potential Spliceogenic Variants. Front. Oncol. 8:140. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00140

Received: 27 November 2017; Accepted: 16 April 2018;
Published: 03 May 2018

Edited by:

Paolo Peterlongo, IFOM – The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Italy

Reviewed by:

Parvin Mehdipour, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran
Steve Donald Wilton, Murdoch University, Australia

Copyright: © 2018 Lattimore, Pearson, Currie, Spurdle, KConFab Investigators, Robinson and Walker. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Vanessa L. Lattimore, vanessa.lattimore@otago.ac.nz