Impact Factor 4.137 | CiteScore 4.28
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE Provisionally accepted The full-text will be published soon. Notify me

Front. Oncol. | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00837

Indicators for measuring integrated quality of care for head and neck cancers: the experience of the European project RARECAREnet

 Annalisa Trama1*, Laura Botta1, Roberto Foschi1, Otto Visser2, Josep M. Borras3, Tina Zagar4,  Maja Primic-Žakelj4, Francesca Bella5, Nadya Dimitrova6,  gemma Gatta1 and  Lisa F. Licitra1, 7
  • 1National Tumor Institute (Italy), Italy
  • 2Integral Cancer Center Netherlands (IKNL), Netherlands
  • 3University of Barcelona, Spain
  • 4Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 5Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Mantova, Italy
  • 6National Hospital of Oncology, Bulgarian National Cancer Registry, Bulgaria
  • 7University of Milan, Italy

Monitoring and improving quality of cancer care has become pivotal today. This is especially relevant for head and neck cancers since the disease is complex, it needs multi therapy, patients tend to be older, they tend to have comorbidities and limited social support. However, information on quality of care for head and neck cancers is scarce. In the context of the project “Information Network on Rare Cancers” we aimed to identify indicators of quality of care specific for the head and neck cancers management and to measure the quality of care for head and neck cancers in different EU Member States.

We defined indicators of quality of care for head and neck cancers based on a multidisciplinary and expert-based consensus process at a European level. To test the proposed indicators, we performed an observational population-based retrospective study in four countries (Ireland, Italy, Netherlands and Slovenia) in the years 2009-2011.

The main quality indicators identified are: availability of formalised multidisciplinary team, participation in clinical and translational research; timeliness of care, high quality of surgery and radiotherapy and of pathological reporting.
For head and neck cancers, the quality of care did not reach the optimal standards in most of the countries analysed. A high proportion of patients was diagnosed at an advanced disease stage, showed delays in starting treatment (especially for radiotherapy), and there was only a very limited use of multi therapy.

According to the achieved consensus, indicators of quality of care for head and neck cancers have to cover the patient journey (i.e., diagnosis and treatment). Our results, showed suboptimal quality of care across countries and call for solutions for ensuring good quality of care for head and neck cancer patients in all EU countries. One possible option might be to refer head and neck cancer patients to specialised centres or to networks including specialised centres.

Keywords: head and neck cancers,, population based studies, quality of care, Quality indicators (health care), Integrated care and health

Received: 24 Apr 2019; Accepted: 13 Aug 2019.

Copyright: © 2019 Trama, Botta, Foschi, Visser, Borras, Zagar, Primic-Žakelj, Bella, Dimitrova, Gatta and Licitra. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dr. Annalisa Trama, National Tumor Institute (Italy), Milan, Italy,