Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Oncol., 02 October 2020
Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs
This article is part of the Research Topic Clinical Therapeutic Development Against Cancers Resistant to Targeted Therapies View all 31 articles

Efficacy of Pyrotinib in HER2-Overexpressing Salivary Duct Carcinoma With Lung Metastasis: A Case Report

\nZi-yan Yang,,&#x;Zi-yan Yang1,2,3Jia-huan Huang,&#x;Jia-huan Huang1,2Bo ChenBo Chen4Chun-wei XuChun-wei Xu5Lei Lei,
Lei Lei1,2*Xiao-jia Wang,
Xiao-jia Wang1,2*Mei-yu Fang
Mei-yu Fang6*
  • 1Department of Breast Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
  • 2Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
  • 3Department of Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
  • 4Department of Pathology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
  • 5Department of Respiratory, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
  • 6Department of General Oncology, Key Laboratory of Head and Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China

Background: Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), an aggressive and rare malignancy with poor prognosis, is mostly associated with the overexpression of the androgen receptor (AR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). However, limited data are available for the targeting of both HER2 and AR in advanced/metastatic SDC.

Case Presentation: A 62-year-old man with advanced SDC accompanied by lung and lymph node metastasis showed disease progression after two lines of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Metastatic lesions from the lung biopsy were obtained, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) indicated the overexpression of AR and HER2 (3+). The patient was administered pyrotinib (a pan-ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and bicalutamide (an androgen receptor antagonist) as a third-line treatment. During the ten months of follow-up, a durable partial response was achieved with this combination.

Conclusions: This is the first clinical study to report the successful application of pyrotinib in a patient with advanced SDC. We recommend that pyrotinib and bicalutamide be used as salvage therapy for AR and HER2-positive advanced metastases in SDC, given the favorable response and clinical benefit.

Introduction

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare malignancy, categorized into 22 subtypes with clearly different histological, genetic, and clinical characteristics (1). SDC is an uncommon type of salivary gland cancer (SGC), making up almost 1–3% of all SGCs (2). It is a disease with aggressive behavior and a tendency to recur and metastasize, usually in the lymph node, lungs, bone, or other visceral organs (3). Since SDC progresses rapidly, most patients die within three years of diagnosis (4). For resectable tumors, surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy is the main treatment. However, in the case of metastatic SDC, systemic chemotherapy has had disappointing outcomes (5). Importantly, the diagnosis and treatment of different subtypes of SGC depend on clinicopathology, emphasizing the importance of pathological examination. HER2 overexpression, which occurs in 29–46% of patients with SDC, is associated with poor prognosis (6). The characteristics of SDC are similar to those of breast cancer in terms of morphology and gene expression patterns. HER2-targeted therapy has been established as the standard therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. This suggests that HER2-targeted therapy may be an ideal choice for HER2-overexpressing SDC. Pyrotinib is an irreversible pan-ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with anti-EGFR/HER1, HER2, and HER4 activities. In China, it has proven to be successful as a second-line treatment or post-treatment therapy in advanced or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer and has shown a strong anti-tumor effect in clinical trials.

Here, we describe a case of a patient with overexpression of HER2 and advanced SDC who attained partial remission after third-line treatment with pyrotinib.

Case Report

A 62-year-old man presented with a right parotid mass in February 2018. He complained of pain but denied fever and weight loss. The patient was referred to our hospital for further examination, and a follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan showed a mass with a diameter of 2.3 cm × 1.8 cm on the right parotid with dual cervical, supraclavicular lymph nodes, and lung metastasis. No other remote abnormal lesions were found in the body. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the right parotid mass and neck lymph node (right side) confirmed SDC with a metastatic lymph node, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) results were positive for the expression of CK18, CK5/6, EMA, AR, and Ki-67, but negative for that of P40 and EBER. Based on the CT scan findings and pathological and molecular results, the patient was diagnosed with SDC along with metastasis in the lymph nodes and lung. Based on the above pathological results and clinical description, combined with the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), this patients tumor (T) lymph node (N) metastasis (M) staging is cT2N2M1 (stage IV).The patient had a family history of cancer and addiction to alcohol, but denied a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or coronary heart disease, or addiction to tobacco. On admission, the patient appeared to be in a good clinical condition and the performance status (PS) was 0. Routine blood tests, such as complete blood count (CBC) and biochemical indices were all within normal ranges, an electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm, echocardiography displayed slight mitral regurgitation, and left ventricular ejection fraction was (LVEF) was 76%. There was no fever or difficulty in breathing. There were no relevant comorbidities and no concomitant medications were administered. The patient was an office employee who had no history of carcinoma or exposure to environmental risk factors. Figure 1 illustrates the complete treatment procedure and the corresponding changes in the lesions on CT.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Review of treatment process (from March 2018 to May 2020). Treatment process and effect evaluation of the patient. PFS, progression-free survival; TFP, docetaxel, fluorouracil, cisplatin; T, docetaxel; GP, gemcitabine/cisplatin; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; mo, months.

Radical surgery was not available. The patient was initially treated with TFP chemotherapy (46 mg cisplatin, 7,600 mg fluorouracil, and 140 mg docetaxel). CT examinations showed stable disease after two cycles in both the lungs and lymph nodes. After six cycles, the regimen was changed with docetaxel as maintenance therapy until December 2018, when a chest CT scan showed progressive lesions in the lung. At the end of the treatment, the neck lesions had receded, and the symptoms were completely relieved. After the six-month-long docetaxel maintenance treatment, the patient presented to the outpatient clinic for cough and fever evaluation in January 2019. The results of the chest CT scan showed recurrent disease in the neck lymph nodes and lung metastasis. Subsequently, we performed IHC on the primary lesion, which showed that the HER2 receptor was overexpressed (+3). The patient underwent a new second-line treatment with four cycles of chemotherapy (1.9 g gemcitabine and 45 mg cisplatin) followed by apatinib as maintenance therapy. However, seven months later it was found that the disease had progressed. The pulmonary metastases had increased dramatically as evaluated by CT scan (August, 2019), according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. In August 2019, CT-guided lung mass biopsy was performed for further histopathological diagnosis. HE staining combined with IHC of the biopsy tissues (Figure 2; positive for AR [40%], HER2 [3+], Ki-67 [80%], CK5/6, and EGFR, but negative for ER, PR, S-100, CD117, P53, TTF, and napsinA) confirmed that the parotid adenocarcinoma had metastasized to the lung.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. (A) Cytological features of fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the right parotid mass: few poorly differentiated carcinomas with necrosis (×20 hematoxylin/eosin). (B) Histopathological features of CT-guided lung mass biopsy: cancer cells in the lung tissue grow invasively, with local necrosis (×20 hematoxylin/eosin) (C) Androgen receptor (AR) (+,40%) (×20 hematoxylin/eosin) (D) The human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER2) demonstrated 3+ reactivity to show positive (×20 hematoxylin/eosin) (E) NapsinA: cancer cells were negative, while remaining alveolar epithelial cells were positive (×20 hematoxylin/eosin) (F) TTF1: cancer cells were negative, while remaining alveolar epithelial cells were positive (×20 hematoxylin/eosin).

Based on the clinical history and pathological findings of the lung tissue, primary lung adenocarcinoma was excluded. The patient had a parotid ductal carcinoma with lung metastasis. It was determined that the patient would benefit from anti-HER2 therapy and endocrine therapy due to the overexpression of AR (+, 40%) and Her2 (3+). Thus, the patient received pyrotinib (400 mg QD) and bicalutamide (50 mg QD) from July 2019 to October 2019. The skin lesions on the neck disappeared after two cycles. CT scans performed after 3 months of treatment showed that the target pulmonary metastatic lesions completely disappeared, and the remaining lesions were significantly reduced, indicating a PR with a >30% decrease in the sum of the diameter compared with the previous examinations (Figure 3). The patient showed a significantly improved performance status and symptoms and never complained of cough and thoracalgia. The patient showed good compliance, took pyrotinib according to the instructions, and came to the hospital for review every 2 cycles. He tolerated the treatment with pyrotinib well. Grade 1 diarrhea with no additional adverse events was observed during the treatment with pyrotinib; this improved soon after the symptomatic treatment. The period of progression-free survival (PFS) was over 10.2 months.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. CT scans show: (A) The first time of pulmonary metastasis; (B) after chemotherapy treatment; (C) CT of the chest showed a complete response after months of pyrotinib treatment.

Until the submission of this case draft, the patient has survived for over 27 months and now continues to receive the combination treatment of pyrotinib and bicalutamide; at the time of writing this case, the patient's condition was stable.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant for the publication of this case report and any potentially identifying images or information.

Discussion

The treatment of SDC is different in various studies; however, most SDCs are surgically removed from the primary site by dissection, and the patient then undergoes adjuvant treatment (7). Traditionally, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin have been used in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic SGC (8), whereas HER-2 targeted therapy and androgen deprivation therapy have been documented in clinical studies of SDC. Our case study shows the excellent results of using pyrotinib in combination with bicalutamide in treating a patient with SDC who had lung metastasis with HER2- and AR-positivity.

SDC is a rare and highly aggressive type of salivary gland carcinoma that is associated with a high rate of local recurrence and metastasis; thus, treatment options have been to date rather limited. The response to standard management of the disease through systemic chemotherapy for metastatic SDC has been disappointing. SDC is similar to high-grade ductal breast carcinoma, both in morphologic and molecular features. In particular, several characteristic findings have been exploited wherein one-third of the patients with SDC demonstrated HER2 protein expression and/or ERBB2 amplification; thus, the treatment is guided by what is known about breast cancer with HER2 overexpression. In several studies the activity of various anti-HER2 drugs, alone or with chemotherapy, in individual patients with HER2-positive SDC has been investigated (9, 10). In a multi-center, nonrandom, open, multi-cohort basket trial of the Mypathway study (11), five patients with HER2-amplified SDC—four of which were PR, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 80% were effectively treated with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab. This is evidence that targeted therapy is effective for SDC. However, in another study, Chiosea et al. (12) pointed out that trastuzumab is used to treat patients with HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer, accompanied by PIK3CA mutation or PTEN deletion. The efficacy may be limited. Despite the progress in targeted therapy for SDC, it has not been standardized or clinically validated, and the inevitable drug resistance requires irreversible drug options.

In the present study, out of consideration of cost, toxic reactions, and ease of use, a new-generation, targeted drug, pyrotinib, was given to the patient, and this drug was still effective after two lines of treatment. Pyrotinib is an oral, irreversible, pan-ErbB TKI that potently blocks downstream pathways that are activated by EGFR/HER1, HER2, and HER4. Preclinical and phase I studies demonstrated that multiple HER receptors can inhibit HER2 overexpression both in vivo and in vitro (13). In a retrospective phase II study that included 128 patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with pyrotinib in combination with capecitabine, the ORR of the patients significantly increased (78.5 vs. 57.1%) and PFS was prolonged (18.1 vs. 7.0 months) compared to those treated with lapatinib in combination with capecitabine (14, 15). Furthermore, a phase III study (PHOEBE) showed that pyrotinib plus capecitabine significantly prolonged PFS by 5.7 months (12.5 vs. 6.8 months) compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine. Accordingly, pyrotinib was approved in China as a second-line standard regimen for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer (16). In a clinical study in which the effectiveness of three anti-HER2 drugs—afatinib, T-DM1, and pyrotinib—were compared, it was found that all were able to significantly block HER2 downstream signaling pathways. Of the three drugs, pyrotinib had the best anti-tumor activity at a reasonable dose (17).

According to relevant literature (18, 19), pyrotinib also has an excellent effect on other HER2-positive overexpressing solid tumors. Gastric and breast cancers, especially the HER2-positive type, have a poor prognosis. For patients who have developed resistance to trastuzumab, pyrotinib is a promising new agent. In the case that we report here, the tumor shrank markedly with the combination therapy of bicalutamide and pyrotinib.

Good results have been obtained from the use of bicalutamide as an androgen deprivation drug, together with nilotinib. In one study in which 98% of SDC patients had AR expression, the researchers treated the AR-positive patients with androgen receptor antagonist, and the results showed that it was effective in ~50% of the patients (20). Patients with high AR expression have a better prognosis than AR-negative patients, whose 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) had significantly increased (59.0 vs. 28.6%) (21). Although the mechanism is not clear, it may be due to the activation of the downstream gene phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) of HER-2, which promotes the combination of AR and androgens downstream of the PI3K/mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) pathway to form AR homodimers transferred to the nucleus. Therefore, AR homodimers binds to the cis-acting element of the upstream deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) of the promoter and interacts with other co-activators to regulate the transcription function of genes, thereby inhibiting the proliferation of SDC tumors. In general, AR can regulate the transcription of multiple effector genes by binding to DNA or interacting with other transcription factors, and can inhibit the growth, differentiation, and survival of tumor cells.

As shown in this case study, HER2 amplification and/or HER2 overexpression testing should be considered in the diagnosis of advanced SDC, given that anti-HER2 therapy, such as pyrotinib, can promote good clinical outcomes. Additionally, in this case, the patient expressed AR (78–96% of the cases), which is a defining feature of SDC (22). However, in this study, the patient was not select for conventional targeted therapy of trastuzumab, so the effectiveness cannot be compared with targeted therapy with pyrotinib. This is the limitation of treatment in this case. For advanced tumors, treatment strategies need to be individualized, and a combination of IHC and imaging diagnosis can further confirm the diagnosis and prognosis as well as guide treatment. Multiple studies have shown that AR and HER-2 may be potential biomarkers of SDC, providing a molecular basis for individual stratification of SDC and new targeted multi-drug combination therapy.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report describing the successful and efficacious use of pyrotinib combined with bicalutamide in an SDC patient with HER2 and AR overexpression. Because a favorable response to this therapy has been observed, other SGC patients with HER2 expression should be maintained on an HER2 blockade even after second-line progression.

Ethics Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author Contributions

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. ZY and JH wrote the manuscript. BC undertook the pathological diagnosis. MF, LL, and XW carried out the clinical management of the patient. CX collected the patient's clinical data and analyzed the data.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

References

1. Sarradin V, Siegfried A, Uro-Coste E, Delord JP. WHO classification of head and neck tumours 2017: main novelties and update of diagnostic methods. Bull Cancer. (2018) 105:596–602. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2018.04.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Jayaprakash V, Merzianu M, Warren GW, Arshad H, Hicks WL, Rigual NR, et al. Survival rates and prognostic factors for infiltrating salivary duct carcinoma: analysis of 228 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Head Neck. (2014) 36:694–701. doi: 10.1002/hed.23350

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Glisson B, Colevas AD, Haddad R, Krane J, El-Naggar A, Kies M, et al. HER2 expression in salivary gland carcinomas: dependence on histological subtype. Clin Cancer Res. (2004) 10:944–6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0253

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Gilbert MR, Sharma A, Schmitt NC, Johnson JT, Ferris RL, Duvvuri U, et al. A 20-year review of 75 cases of salivary duct carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (2016) 142:489–95. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3930

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Sood S, McGurk M, Vaz F. Management of salivary gland tumours: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. (2016) 130:S142–S9. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116000566

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Boon E, Bel M, van Boxtel W, van der Graaf WTA, van Es RJJ, Eerenstein SEJ, et al. A clinicopathological study and prognostic factor analysis of 177 salivary duct carcinoma patients from The Netherlands. Int J Cancer. (2018) 143:758–66. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31353

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Breinholt H, Elhakim MT, Godballe C, Andersen LJ, Primdahl H, Kristensen CA, et al. Salivary duct carcinoma: a Danish national study. J Oral Pathol Med. (2016) 45:664–71. doi: 10.1111/jop.12426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Lagha A, Chraiet N, Ayadi M, Krimi S, Allani B, Rifi H, et al. RETRACTED: systemic therapy in the management of metastatic or advanced salivary gland cancers. Oral Oncol. (2018) 78:229. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.01.034

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Corrêa TS, Matos GDR, Segura M, Dos Anjos CH. Second-line treatment of HER2-positive salivary gland tumor: ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) after progression on trastuzumab. Case Rep Oncol. (2018) 11:252–7. doi: 10.1159/000488669

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Park JC, Ma TM. Exceptional responses to pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 high expressing salivary duct carcinomas. Head Neck. (2018) 40:E100–E6. doi: 10.1002/hed.25392

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Hainsworth JD, Meric-Bernstam F, Swanton C, Hurwitz H, Spigel DR, Sweeney C, et al. Targeted therapy for advanced solid tumors on the basis of molecular profiles: results from mypathway, an Open-Label, Phase IIa Multiple Basket Study. J Clin Oncol. (2018) 36:536–42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.3780

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Chiosea SI, Williams L, Griffith CC, Thompson LD, Weinreb I, Bauman JE, et al. Molecular characterization of apocrine salivary duct carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. (2015) 39:744–52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000410

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Li X, Yang C, Wan H, Zhang G, Feng J, Zhang L, et al. Discovery and development of pyrotinib: a novel irreversible EGFR/HER2 dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor with favorable safety profiles for the treatment of breast cancer. Eur J Pharm Sci. (2017) 110:51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.01.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Jiang Z, Yan M, Hu X, Zhang Q, Ouyang Q, Feng J, et al. Pyrotinib combined with capecitabine in women with HER2+metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and taxanes: a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. (2019) 37:1001. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.1001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Ma F, Ouyang Q, Li W, Jiang Z, Tong Z, Liu Y, et al. Pyrotinib or lapatinib combined with capecitabine in HER2-Positive metastatic breast cancer with prior taxanes, anthracyclines, and/or trastuzumab: a randomized, phase II study. J Clin Oncol. (2019) 37:2610–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00108

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Xu B, Yan M, Ma F, Hu X-C, Feng JF, Ouyang Q, et al. Pyrotinib or lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (PHOEBE): a randomized phase III trial. (2020) J Clin Oncol. 38:1003. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.1003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Costa DB, Jorge SE, Moran JP, Freed JA, Zerillo JA, Huberman MS, et al. Pulse afatinib for ERBB2 exon 20 insertion-mutated lung adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Oncol. (2016) 11:918–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.02.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Huang LT, Ma JT, Zhang SL, Li XH, Sun L, Jing W, et al. Durable clinical response to pyrotinib after resistance to prior anti-HER2 therapy for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer: a case report. Front Oncol. (2019) 9:1453. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01453

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Jing W, Ma JT, Han CB. Metastatic breast cancer coexisting with HER-2 amplification and EGFR exon 19 deletion benefits from EGFR-TKI therapy: a case report. Front Oncol. (2020) 10:771. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Williams L, Thompson LD, Seethala RR, Weinreb I, Assaad AM, Tuluc M, et al. Salivary duct carcinoma: the predominance of apocrine morphology, prevalence of histologic variants, and androgen receptor expression. Am J Surg Pathol. (2015) 39:705–13. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000413

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Masubuchi T, Tada Y, Maruya S, Osamura Y, Kamata SE, Miura K, et al. Clinicopathological significance of androgen receptor, HER2, Ki-67 and EGFR expressions in salivary duct carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. (2015) 20:35–44. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0674-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Schmitt NC, Kang H, Sharma A. Salivary duct carcinoma: an aggressive salivary gland malignancy with opportunities for targeted therapy. Oral Oncol. (2017) 74:40–8. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.09.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: salivary duct carcinoma, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, pyrotinib, HER2 positive, targeted

Citation: Yang Z-y, Huang J-h, Chen B, Xu C-w, Lei L, Wang X-j and Fang M-y (2020) Efficacy of Pyrotinib in HER2-Overexpressing Salivary Duct Carcinoma With Lung Metastasis: A Case Report. Front. Oncol. 10:559057. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.559057

Received: 05 May 2020; Accepted: 27 August 2020;
Published: 02 October 2020.

Edited by:

Hong Zhu, Zhejiang University, China

Reviewed by:

Hany Omar, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Diwakar Bastihalli Tukaramrao, University of Toledo, United States

Copyright © 2020 Yang, Huang, Chen, Xu, Lei, Wang and Fang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Mei-yu Fang, fangmy@zjcc.org.cn; Lei Lei, leilei1241@gmail.com; Xiao-jia Wang, wxiaojia0803@163.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.