Impact Factor 6.244 | CiteScore 3.9
More on impact ›


Front. Oncol., 18 March 2021 |

Extensive-Stage Small Cell Carcinoma Transformation From EGFR Del19-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma on Gefitinib at the Twelfth-Year Follow-Up Case Report

Victor C. Kok1,2*†, Chien-Kuan Lee3†, Yu-Hsin Chiang4, Ming-Chih Wang5, Yen-Te Lu5, Chiu-Chun Cherng6, Pei-Yu Lee7 and Ke-Bin Wang8
  • 1Division of Medical Oncology, KTGH Cancer Center, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 2Disease Informatics Research Group, Asia University Taiwan, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 3Department of Pathology, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 4Division of Chest Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 5Department of Radiation Oncology, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 6Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 7Department of Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 8Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Introduction: The acquired resistance mechanisms in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancer, particularly adenocarcinoma (ADC), following treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) have received extensive investigations. The phenotypic transformation to small cell carcinoma (SCCT) has been estimated to occur in approximately 3 to 10% of patients treated with an EGFR-TKI. The prognosis after SCCT is extremely poor.

Case Study: We report about SCCT that occurred 45 months after the initial diagnosis of ADC in an East Asian never-smoker woman with advanced-stage EGFR Del-19-mutant lung ADC treated with combined chemoradiotherapy before the era of insurance coverage for EGFR-TKIs in this country and subsequently gefitinib; deletion at codon 746–750 in exon 19 of the EGFR gene was ascertained in the original formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded lung biopsy tissue. Spinal cord compression at thoracic-12 level from SCCT was successfully relieved with neurosurgical treatment, chemotherapy with etoposide and cisplatin, and radiotherapy, while gefitinib treatment was maintained. Eleven months later, SCCT relapsed in the lung parenchyma, which was resected and was found to be sensitive to second-line weekly topotecan. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was subsequently administered. SCCT was confirmed by MALDI-TOF MS analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues demonstrating the same exon 19 deletion. At the 12th-year follow-up, the patient remains relapse free with very good performance status. The novelty of this case is the successful interdisciplinary team effort to correct the spinal cord compression by maintaining the patient in an ambulatory state, non-stop use of gefitinib justified by the presence of activating EGFR mutation in SCCT tumor cells, and aggressive dose-intensive chemotherapy and radiotherapy for the SCCT that leads to an unprecedented prolonged remission and survival. This case also supports the observation that SCCT is chemotherapy sensitive, and thus, re-biopsy or complete tumor excision is recommended to understand the mutation profiles of the current tumor. Aggressive prudent administration of systemic chemotherapy obtaining optimal dose intensity leads to the successful management of the patient.


According to the literature, small cell carcinoma transformation (SCCT) from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant adenocarcinoma (ADC) of the lung occurs at a rate of 3–10% (1). The prognosis of SCCT is very poor, with just one in 67 patients (1.5%) surviving to 80 months (1). For patients already in the extensive stage at the time of transformation, the prognosis is even worse because the administration of remissive treatment for SCCT is often less dose-intensive owing to several reasons such as clinical deterioration, organ dysfunctions, or pessimistic views held by the treatment team and the patient. Here, we report about a patient with histopathological and molecular genetic confirmation of SCCT in the extensive stage who holds a record-long durable remission and reasonably good performance status and quality of life.

Case Description

A 65-year-old never-smoker woman weighing 62 kg presented to our hospital in July 2009 with persistent severe mid-back pain. Bone scan on July 6, 2009 showed increased 99mTc-labeled methylene diphosphonate uptake at the thoracic 12 level and the third right rib, in addition to the hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthropathy (HPOA) of bilateral femurs and tibias, which were compatible with bone metastases. Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed a huge lobulated lung mass measuring up to 6.87 cm in the right lower lobe, with a daughter nodule in the same lung lobe (Figure 1, upper panel, leftmost). Right pleural malignant effusion was apparent. The original lung biopsy showed atypical glands with lepidic and acinar architecture and enlarged and hyperchromatic nuclei (Figure 2A). A diagnosis of moderately differentiated pulmonary ADC, cT4 N2 M1b Stage IV, was made. EGFR analysis performed using targeted exon sequencing identified the deletion of codon 746–750 in exon 19, resulting in the deletion of the amino acids ELREA (Figure 2B). The first-line use of gefitinib was not authorized under the national health insurance program in this country until June 2011, whereas second-line gefitinib after failing prior chemotherapy was allowed since November 2007. From July 20 until September 21, 2009, three cycles of full-dose paclitaxel + cisplatin were administered and then discontinued because of grade III sensory neuropathy by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). For the 4th cycle of chemotherapy, the regimen was switched to gemcitabine + cisplatin. Follow-up chest CT showed partial remission. Three cycles of paclitaxel + cisplatin and two cycles of gemcitabine + cisplatin were administered. Gradual improvement of the sensory neuropathy down to CTCAE grade I was noted. The patient then started receiving gefitinib as second-line therapy on November 2, 2009, a treatment that currently ongoing. With persistent disease despite a partial remission, we prescribed gefitinib for tumor control. In addition, from October 19, 2009 to September 5, 2011, up to 25 cycles of 4-weekly pamidronate were administered aiming to mitigate the risk of any skeletal events. When bone metastases were stabilized, we delivered a course of radiotherapy with radical intent for the lung tumor as for locally advanced lung cancer. From December 29, 2010 to February 16, 2011, a course of palliative radiotherapy with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) (66 Gy/33 fractions/50 days) was administered to the RLL lung tumor. Chest CT on July 7, 2012 revealed complete regression of the lung ADC with fibrotic changes.


Figure 1 A series of imaging studies shown here are CT scans of the chest in either soft tissue or lung windows, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine, and a bone scan obtained spanning 10 years period. The patient had an EGFR Del-19-mutant ADC (2009/07/09). The ADC showed excellent tumor regression after five cycles of induction chemotherapy and three months of gefitinib (2010/02/09 and 2010/06/01). During effective gefitinib treatment, the patient developed an uneventful transitory pneumonitis documented on 2011/04/26. She received the same treatment until 2013/04/05, when she developed extensive-stage SCCT, causing impending spinal cord compression. There was a relapse of small cell carcinoma in the lung parenchyma (2014/03/26) after combined chemoradiotherapy with etoposide–cisplatin and prophylactic cranial irradiation. However, after lung tumor resection and second-line weekly topotecan treatment, the SCCT went into complete remission. Follow-up scans (2018/04/25 through 2019/07/27) demonstrate a quiescent bone scan and fibrotic changes at the previous ADC site.


Figure 2 Histomorphology and mutation analysis of the EGFR gene. (A) The original lung biopsy showing ADC arranged in an acinar architecture. (B) Deletion at codon 746–750 in exon 19 of the EGFR gene in the original lung biopsy. The DNA, extracted from paraffin sections, was subjected to PCR amplification for exons 18, 19, 20, and 21 of the EGFR gene. These amplicons were then sequenced. The result shows codon 756–750 deletion in exon 19, resulting in deletion amino acids ELREA. (C) Repeat lung biopsy revealing the transformation of small cell carcinoma, which is demonstrated by sheets of crushed, small sized tumor cells, with high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio, smudged chromatin and minimal cytoplasm. (D) MALDI-TOF MS of repeat lung biopsy indicating that the deletion in codon 746–750 in exon 19 of the EGFR gene was retained. The quality and quantity of extracted DNAs (concentration: 4.85 ng/ul) are measured by NanoDrop (ND-1000), and the mutation detection is measured by the MassARRAY genotyping (SEQUENOM) incorporating a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer. Result confirmed the presence of Type 1 Exon 19 deletion: c.2235_2249del p (Glu746_Ala750del). (D) shows the spectrogram, mass (X-axis) versus intensity (Y-axis), and the diagnostic mass peaks from 5,354 to 5,400.

However, the patient developed bilateral leg weakness resulting from spinal cord compression in April 2013 (Figure 1, upper series, rightmost panel). She underwent emergent laminectomy of thoracic-11-lumbar-1 and curettage of thoracic-12 vertebra on April 15, 2013. Lung and metastatic bone lesion biopsies revealed small tumor cells forming a sheet-like growth pattern with scant cytoplasm, finely granular chromatin, nuclear molding, necrosis, and frequent mitosis. Immunohistochemical staining showed positivity for neuroendocrine markers, including synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and CD56. The original primary lung biopsy was retrieved for retrospective review and showed only adenocarcinoma with no evidence of combined histologies. Two additional pathologists independently confirmed the final pathological diagnosis of SCCT (Figure 2C). A course of IMRT with 30 Gy/10 fractions/13 days was administered to the T-11 to L1 spinal metastases from April 25 to May 7, 2013. From May 6 to July 11, 2013, four cycles of etoposide–cisplatin regimens were completed. Complete remission occurred with no tumor activity, normal lactate dehydrogenase level, and improving performance status. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was performed with IMRT (25 Gy/10 fractions/12 days) from August 12 to August 23, 2013.

On March 26, 2014, a subcentimeter nodule was noted in the right upper lung lobe (Figure 1, lower panel, second left). Thoracoscopic wedge resection was performed, which revealed SCLC relapse. We considered recurrent cancer as a failure to the first-line etoposide–cisplatin; hence, we prescribed topotecan as the second-line treatment for recurrent SCLC. From April 21 to August 8, 2014, six weekly cycles of single-agent topotecan at 4 mg/m2 were administered. EGFR mutation analysis using matrix-assisted-laser-desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for SCLC identified the same deletion in exon 19 (Figure 2D). The patient continued to receive treatment with gefitinib. The justification for continuing gefitinib was the presence of the activating EGFR mutation in the transformed histology cancer. On August 8, 2018, the patient met with a traffic accident that resulted in a right pelvic bone fracture and left distal radial bone fracture. She developed lumbar-3 benign compression fracture + L4-5 spinal stenosis, for which L3 vertebroplasty and L4–5 decompression laminectomy were performed on April 30, 2018. She recovered nicely thereafter. The patient currently to receive treatment with gefitinib was with tolerable adverse reactions such as mild intermittent diarrhea (CTCAE grade I), acne-form rash (grade I), and paronychia (grade I). We assessed the evolution of the HPOA through serial images of whole-body bone scans using technetium-99m with methylene diphosphonate, which were performed on July 7, 2009, March 5, 2013, April 2, 2018, and July 18, 2018, respectively. The increased methylene diphosphonate uptake at the bilateral femurs and tibias was compatible with the HPOA, also known as Pierre Marie–Bamberger syndrome (2). The serial whole-body bone scans demonstrated stabilized disease with neither cortical destruction nor pathological fractures over the years. As compared with the initial scan images, there was no new lesion during follow-up. Figure 3 illustrates a series of CT scans at regular follow-ups after the induction treatment for SCCT over the years. As of February 22, 2021, she has an excellent performance status and can take care of her grandchildren at home.


Figure 3 Post-SCCT induction treatment monitoring and long-term follow-up with CT scans over the years. The schema diagram illustrates a series of computerized tomography coronal sections through the right lower lobe primary adenocarcinoma, which has turned into post-treatment fibrosis and recently asymptomatic bronchiectatic change. Through these non-progressive CT scans, one can be confident post-hoc that a complete response was attained in 2014 after complete treatment for SCCT. There is no evidence of SCCT recurrence over time.


We performed a retrospective analysis of the primary tumor to see if it could have been a combined adenocarcinoma with de novo small cell carcinoma at the outset. The original biopsy had been reviewed and showed only adenocarcinoma. Two additional pathologists independently confirmed the final pathological diagnosis. However, to completely exclude a de novo small cell carcinoma component, it would require complete resection of the primary tumor, which was not performed considering that patient’s clinical status which was not suitable for operation. There was a slim chance, if any, that the original tumor might be a combined adenocarcinoma and de novo small cell carcinoma.

There are several distinct mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors, including the acquisition of an additional somatic mutation in EGFR (T790M mutation) and amplification of the MET proto-oncogene or the ERBB2 proto-oncogene (3, 4). Histological transformation of EGFR-mutant ADC to SCLC is another mechanism of acquired resistance (3, 5). In the first described case that was treated with erlotinib, repeat biopsy showed SCLC with the original EGFR exon 19 deletion (6). In several reported case series, the diagnosis of SCLC in repeat biopsies was confirmed based on morphology and immunohistochemical staining for synaptophysin, chromogranin, or NCAM (5). Mutation analysis of EGFR from both the original and repeat biopsy specimens at the time of resistance showed that SCCT tumor samples retained their original EGFR-activating mutation (3), suggesting that the transformed tumor phenotype is a mechanism of resistance to treatment.

The transformation from ADC to SCLC can occur independently of the EGFR mutational status and is not exclusively the result of EGFR inhibition (7). Current data suggest that SCCT is more common in EGFR-mutant ADC treated with EGFR inhibitors than in wild-type ADC. However, this observation could be biased because biopsy at progression in NSCLC is not generally feasible and a greater number of repeat biopsy samples are performed in patients with EGFR-mutant cancers than in those with non-EGFR-mutant ADC. Larger studies will be needed to identify which subsets of NSCLC are the most prone to SCCT.

The uniqueness of this case report rests upon the MALDI-TOF MS confirmation of the same EGFR Del-19 mutation in SCCT; aggressive combined modality chemoradiotherapy, including PCI; and continuation of gefitinib treatment to control susceptible cancer cells. Without concrete evidence to guide management and some anecdotal reports had observed that gefitinib could be useful in EGFR-mutant small cell carcinoma (810), we adopted the strategy of gefitinib maintenance for the patient. Nevertheless, this case report’s unique outcome cannot justify the necessity of maintaining gefitinib in all the patients with transformed carcinoma harboring an activating EGFR mutation. Suppose we could be sure of the EGFR-mutant residual disease status and the EGFR TKI-refractoriness after combined chemoirradiation, can we only be able to decide the timing of gefitinib discontinuation. For example, it is tempting to think that perhaps a series of high-sensitivity liquid biopsies to detect EGFR mutation in peripheral circulation might guide the appropriate timing of discontinuation. This case also strongly supports evidence that SCCT is chemotherapy sensitive even after relapse from the first-line chemotherapy. Would EGFR mutation associate with chemosensitivity in transformed small cell carcinoma? Two retrospective cohort studies (11, 12) suggested that EGFR mutation may predict a greater likelihood of response to cytotoxic chemotherapy in NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy as a front-line treatment. Whether EGFR mutation also predicts greater cytotoxic chemosensitivity in transformed small cell carcinoma is a valid research question to pursue.

For classical small cell lung cancer having no EGFR mutation, the current standard systemic regimen is immunochemotherapy targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway with efficacy as demonstrated in two large prospective randomized controlled trials (1315). It could be another story for non-classical EGFR-mutant transformed small cell carcinoma since some research data do not support the use of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors for SCCT owing to the lack of efficacy observed in retrospective series (1, 16).

In this case report, MALDI-TOF MS was performed to diagnose the EGFR mutation in SCCT. The turn-around time for MALDI-TOF MS to deliver a quick diagnosis of EGFR mutation is as short as 4 days, and when compared with Sanger sequencing, both analytical sensitivity and specificity are 100% (17).

In East Asia such as Taiwan, the prevalence of EGFR Del-19 mutation in lung cancer is approximately 23.1% (17). Patients with Del-19 mutation respond very well to EGFR-TKI. Interestingly, 70–93% of SCCT harbor the Del-19 mutation (1, 18). Therefore, we propose that whenever acquired resistance develops during EGFR-TKI treatment in patients with the Del-19 mutation, re-biopsy should be indicated because SCCT can be swiftly discovered and chemotherapy can be administered sooner.

The molecular mechanisms underlying SCCT are beginning to be understood. A study by researchers of the Massachusetts General Hospital identified that every case of SCCT has loss of the tumor suppressor RB before transformation (19). The nature of the universal genetic loss of RB1 implies that this may be a necessary event for SCCT to emerge (19, 20). Hence, theoretically, if this RB loss can be detected by liquid biopsy during patient treatment monitoring, we may be able to start appropriate treatment early after transformation.

Implementation of precision oncology improves patients’ prospects after being diagnosed with EGFR-mutant ADC and even in the stage of the rare occurrence of histologic SCCT. Appropriate dose intensity salvage chemotherapy, prophylactic cranial irradiation, plus good dose radiotherapy should always be the number one option for fit patients. This case report lends strong support to the practice that should always consider rendering the most durable remission as the treatment goal while treating a patient with EGFR-mutant lung cancer having SCCT as the acquired resistance from EGFR-TKI therapy.

Patient Perspective

‘It was disastrous to know that I got lung cancer in so late the stage. I trust my doctor and whose medical team from the very beginning, and I receive all the treatment plans they devise for me. I don’t think I can understand why I needed to receive those complex treatments, although the doctor has told me from time to time. I never thought that I could accompany and watch my grandson grow up for the past twelve years. I feel very happy to be able to take care of him personally. Now I can walk and prepare food for the family and perform other necessary activities of daily living. The remaining tingling sensation in my fingers and toes is negligible most of the time.’

Ethics Statement

The patient provided written informed consent for academic publishing of her case.

Author Contributions

All the authors took part in taking care of the patient. VCK and CKL drafted the manuscript. VCK prepared Figures 1 and 3. C-KL made Figure 2. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


The authors would like to thank the patient mentioned in this case report who personally signed us a written informed consent on releasing her formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue block for further molecular testing and on academic publishing of her case.


1. Marcoux N, Gettinger SN, O’Kane G, Arbour KC, Neal JW, Husain H, et al. EGFR-Mutant Adenocarcinomas That Transform to Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Other Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: Clinical Outcomes. J Clin Oncol (2019) 37(4):278–85. doi: 10.1200/jco.18.01585

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Armstrong DJ, McCausland EM, Wright GD. Hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthropathy (HPOA) (Pierre Marie-Bamberger syndrome): two cases presenting as acute inflammatory arthritis. Description and review of the literature. Rheumatol Int (2007) 27(4):399–402. doi: 10.1007/s00296-006-0224-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Sequist LV, Waltman BA, Dias-Santagata D, Digumarthy S, Turke AB, Fidias P, et al. Genotypic and Histological Evolution of Lung Cancers Acquiring Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors. Sci Trans Med (2011) 3:75ra26–6. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Yang CY, Yang JC, Yang PC. Precision Management of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Annu Rev Med (2020) 71:117–36. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-051718-013524

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Oser MG, Niederst MJ, Sequist LV, Engelman JA. Transformation from non-small-cell lung cancer to small-cell lung cancer: molecular drivers and cells of origin. Lancet Oncol (2015) 16(4):e165–72. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)71180-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zakowski MF, Ladanyi M, Kris MG. EGFR mutations in small-cell lung cancers in patients who have never smoked. N Engl J Med (2006) 355(2):213–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc053610

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Norkowski E, Ghigna MR, Lacroix L, Le Chevalier T, Fadel E, Dartevelle P, et al. Small-cell carcinoma in the setting of pulmonary adenocarcinoma: new insights in the era of molecular pathology. J Thorac Oncol (2013) 8(10):1265–71. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182a407fa

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Tanno S, Ohsaki Y, Nakanishi K, Toyoshima E, Kikuchi K. Small cell lung cancer cells express EGFR and tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR is inhibited by gefitinib (“Iressa”, ZD1839). Oncol Rep (2004) 12(5):1053–7. doi: 10.3892/or.12.5.1053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Okamoto I, Araki J, Suto R, Shimada M, Nakagawa K, Fukuoka M. EGFR mutation in gefitinib-responsive small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol (2006) 17(6):1028–9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdj114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Araki J, Okamoto I, Suto R, Ichikawa Y, Sasaki J. Efficacy of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in a patient with metastatic small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer (2005) 48(1):141–4. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.10.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Hotta K, Kiura K, Toyooka S, Takigawa N, Soh J, Fujiwara Y, et al. Clinical significance of epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations on treatment outcome after first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol (2007) 2(7):632–7. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318074bc0d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Eberhard DA, Johnson BE, Amler LC, Goddard AD, Heldens SL, Herbst RS, et al. Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor and in KRAS are predictive and prognostic indicators in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy alone and in combination with erlotinib. J Clin Oncol (2005) 23(25):5900–9. doi: 10.1200/jco.2005.02.857

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Paz-Ares L, Dvorkin M, Chen Y, Reinmuth N, Hotta K, Trukhin D, et al. Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet (2019) 394(10212):1929–39. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32222-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Nishio M, Sugawara S, Atagi S, Akamatsu H, Sakai H, Okamoto I, et al. Subgroup Analysis of Japanese Patients in a Phase III Study of Atezolizumab in Extensive-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer (IMpower133). Clin Lung Cancer (2019) 20(6):469–76.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.07.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Horn L, Mansfield AS, Szczęsna A, Havel L, Krzakowski M, Hochmair MJ, et al. First-Line Atezolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med (2018) 379(23):2220–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Tokaca N, Wotherspoon A, Nicholson AG, Fotiadis N, Thompson L, Popat S. Lack of response to nivolumab in a patient with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer adenocarcinoma sub-type transformed to small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer (2017) 111:65–8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.07.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Su KY, Kao JT, Ho BC, Chen HY, Chang GC, Ho CC, et al. Implementation and Quality Control of Lung Cancer EGFR Genetic Testing by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry in Taiwan Clinical Practice. Sci Rep (2016) 6:30944. doi: 10.1038/srep30944

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Han J, Zhang Q, Wang B, Zhou Q, Yan L, Zhang ZZ, et al. Molecular Mechanism of Transformation from Adenocarcinoma to Small-Cell Lung Cancer after EGFR-TKI. J Thorac Oncol (2017) 12(1):S1263–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.1784

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Niederst MJ, Sequist LV, Poirier JT, Mermel CH, Lockerman EL, Garcia AR, et al. RB loss in resistant EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinomas that transform to small-cell lung cancer. Nat Commun (2015) 6:6377. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7377

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Pros E, Saigi M, Alameda D, Gomez-Mariano G, Martinez-Delgado B, Alburquerque-Bejar JJ, et al. Genome-wide profiling of non-smoking-related lung cancer cells reveals common RB1 rearrangements associated with histopathologic transformation in EGFR-mutant tumors. Ann Oncol (2020) 31(2):274–82. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.09.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: small cell carcinoma transformation, EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, Del-19 mutation, topotecan (PubChem CID: 60700), case report

Citation: Kok VC, Lee C-K, Chiang Y-H, Wang M-C, Lu Y-T, Cherng C-C, Lee P-Y and Wang K-B (2021) Extensive-Stage Small Cell Carcinoma Transformation From EGFR Del19-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma on Gefitinib at the Twelfth-Year Follow-Up Case Report. Front. Oncol. 11:564799. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.564799

Received: 22 May 2020; Accepted: 01 March 2021;
Published: 18 March 2021.

Edited by:

Olivier Feron, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium

Reviewed by:

Emmanuel Seront, Catholic University of Louvain, Belgium
Léo Aubert, Montreal University, Canada

Copyright © 2021 Kok, Lee, Chiang, Wang, Lu, Cherng, Lee and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Victor C. Kok,;

†These authors share first authorship