Skip to main content

OPINION article

Front. Oncol., 24 March 2021
Sec. Head and Neck Cancer

Safety and Feasibility of Surgery for Oropharyngeal Cancers During the SARS-CoV-2-Pandemic

\nPhilippe GorphePhilippe Gorphe1Bruno GrandbastienBruno Grandbastien2Andreas DietzAndreas Dietz3Umamaheswar DuvvuriUmamaheswar Duvvuri4Robert L. FerrisRobert L. Ferris5Wojciech GolusinskiWojciech Golusinski6Floyd Christopher HolsingerFloyd Christopher Holsinger7Sefik HosalSefik Hosal8George LawsonGeorge Lawson9Hisham MehannaHisham Mehanna10Vinidh PaleriVinidh Paleri11Richard Shaw,Richard Shaw12,13Giovanni Succo,Giovanni Succo14,15C. Ren Leemans&#x;C. René Leemans16Christian Simon
&#x;Christian Simon17*
  • 1Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
  • 2Department of Hospital Preventive Medicine, CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • 3Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
  • 4Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
  • 5Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
  • 6Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, The Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
  • 7Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States
  • 8Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Atilim University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
  • 9ENT and Head and Neck Surgery Department, CHU UCL Namur- Site Godinne, Namur, Belgium
  • 10Institute for Head and Neck Studies and Education, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • 11Head and Neck Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • 12Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • 13Department of Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • 14Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  • 15Head and Neck Oncology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
  • 16Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Cancer Center, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 17Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Introduction

At the end of December 2019, Chinese public health authorities reported several cases of acute respiratory syndrome in Wuhan City, Hubei province in China (1). Since then, SARS-CoV-2, the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has spread across the globe, leading to the World Health Organization declaring a Public Health Emergency of international concern on 30th January 2020, declaring a pandemic (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200407-sitrep-78-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=bc43e1b_2). After a first wave between March and June in Europe followed by a gradual reduction of daily infections a second more significant wave emerged with daily case rates peaking in the beginning of November. Although rates reduced somewhat since, they remain high and well above the rates of the first wave. As of end of December 2020, more than 79 million people had been infected and more than 1.7 million patients died worldwide (https://covid19.who.int/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI76X8g4fx7QIVGqd3Ch2uyA92EAAYASAAEgJkxvD_BwE).

Early on in the pandemic, data from Wuhan emerged suggesting an increased mortality among surgical patients during the incubation period of a COVID 19 pneumonia. While a requirement of ICU care in 44% of patients was noted, the mortality amounted to 20.5% (2). Also, data emerged on the potential risk of infection of health care workers related to head and neck interventions (3). These concerns together with a mounting experience of resource constraints were taken into consideration, when consensus guidelines for head and neck cancer treatment were developed based on expert opinion and Delphi exercises for both radiation therapy (RT) and surgery (4, 5). In these guidelines it was strongly agreed on by experts that operations should be delayed until patients were negative on SARS-COV2 (repeat) tests. Also, for early-stage disease (i.e., T1, 2N0 oral cancers) a delay of up to 8 weeks with serial monitoring of the patient was found acceptable. To the contrary, for advanced-stage HNSCCs no delay was found to be acceptable. Early-stage oropharyngeal cancers were considered of lesser surgical priority and were ranking with that respect below advanced oral, laryngeal, and maxillary cancers, and also early-stage oral cancers. It was suggested that surgery for oropharyngeal cancer could be avoided as RT- and chemoradiation therapy (CRT) were considered to be alternative regimes that were comparably efficient in terms of cancer control with less risk for SARS-COV-2 related mortality (4).

We therefore thought it was critical to analyze the pertinent literature to determine the safety and feasibility of surgery, both open and by transoral approaches for oropharyngeal cancers during the ongoing pandemic.

Risk Factors, Increased Mortality, and Severity of a SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Twenty-two percent of patients hospitalized with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 are critically ill as shown in a prospective observational cohort study of 1,150 patients. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality were found to be advanced age (aHR 1.31), chronic cardiac disease (aHR 1.76), chronic pulmonary disease (aHR 2.94), and certain laboratory parameters i.e., d-dimers and interleukin 6 (6).

Genome wide association studies (GWAS) helped to identify certain genetic factors associated with severe COVID-19. Among them the 3p21.31 gene cluster as a genetic susceptibility locus and the AB0 blood group system emerged to be associated with a higher risk for severe COVID-19 with an OR 1,45 of group A vs. an OR 0.65 of group 0, thus being protective (7). The severity of the SARS-Cov-2 infection has been reported to be associated with the RT-qPCR cycle threshold, which correlates with the estimated viral load (8, 9).

One of the most important factors impacting on the severity of a SARS-CoV2 infection is the presence of cancer. In a retrospective study on 232 COVID-19 patients with various types of cancers and 519 without cancer that were matched statistically, patients with cancer had an OR 3.61 to develop a severe form of the disease (WHO guidelines) (10).

Surgery in SARS-COV2 positive patients is plagued with a 24% mortality rate. This mortality is associated with age, male gender, ASA-status, presence of a cancer, undertaking of an emergency procedure, and undertaking of a major procedure (11).

Risk Factors for Higher Morbidity of a SARS-CoV-2-Infection in Cancer Patients

A more severe SARS-CoV2 infection in cancer patients is associated with age, ECOG-status, cancer stage, and the application of targeted/immunotherapy (10).

As an independent risk factor for death a positive smoking history emerged from a register of 200 patients with thoracic malignancies (12). Other factors associated with increased 30 days mortality in a cancer population with a SARS-CoV2 infection were found to be increased age, male gender, smoking status, number of comorbidities, ECOG performance status 2 or higher, active cancer, receipt of azithromycin plus hydroxychloroquine (13).

Looking at various treatment modalities for cancers and contributing risks a retrospective multi-center study on 205 cancer patients with laboratory-proven SARS-CoV2 infections revealed that receiving chemotherapy within 4 weeks before onset of symptoms was an independent risk factor for death during admission to the hospital (14).

However, within the UK Coronavirus Cancer Monitoring Project (UKCCMP) it was demonstrated that after adjusting for age, gender, and comorbidities, chemotherapy had NO effect on mortality, neither had immunotherapy, hormonal therapy, targeted therapy, or radiotherapy all within the past 4 weeks (15).

Treatment Considerations for Oropharyngeal Cancer (OPC) During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic

The treatment of OPCs should under normal circumstances not be delayed. A delay of 3 months would create a reduction of net survival by 16.8% in the age group between 50 and 59 and even 18.3% in the age group between 60 and 69 (16). Patients usually undergoing surgery for OPCs are often early-stage cancer patients and/or patients with early T-stages. Early stage HNSCC is particularly sensitive to a delay of treatment in terms of mortality risk as is OPC in comparison to oral cavity cancer (17).

Taken the risk of additional mortality from a SARS-COV2 infection into account, older patients rather not benefit from an immediate treatment of their OPCs. In fact, in case of a nosocomial SARS-CoV2 infection rate of 5% patients above an age of 60 have an overall higher mortality, if immediately taken for a treatment vs. waiting for 2 months, until the infection rate reduces (16).

Typically, early-stage OPCs are surgically removed using transoral robotic surgery (TORS) or transoral laser microsurgery (TLM). Both are endoscopic surgical techniques. Alternative treatments for oropharyngeal cancers consist of radiotherapy with or without cisplatin. Treatment usually depends on patient and institutional factors. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy seem not to increase the risk of mortality of cancer patients with a SARS-CoV2 infection and thus are reasonable treatment options (15). Surgery however may confer a significant risk of 30-days mortality in the range of 24% in case of a SARS-CoV2-infection, if extended surgery is performed and done in an emergency setting (11). However, a prospective international cohort study comprising 1,137 patients treated with surgery for HNSCCs during the first wave SARS-CoV2 pandemic demonstrated a 30-day mortality of only 1, 2%. In this cohort the rate of SARS-CoV2 infections was only 3% suggesting that head and neck surgery can be undertaken safely during the pandemic as a consequence of preoperative testing and proper safety precautions in the hospital (18). In a study at a tertiary care center in NYC including 11,540 patients prior undergoing surgery in an area of low COVID19 community rates, only 4,3% were found positive during the peak of the first wave declining to 0,3% (19). Finally, COVID-19-free “hubs” created to deliver cancer surgery during the pandemic have shown that cancer surgery after screening is a safe practice; in an international multicenter cohort study comprising 9,171 patients, COVID-19-free surgical pathways were shown to reduce the pulmonary complication rate from 4.9 to 2.2% consistent with rates seen in SARS-COV2 negative patients (20).

There remain reasonable concerns about the possible contamination of health care workers during rare head and neck surgery in SARS-COV2 -positive patients. Treating 29 of such patients out of 1,137 with head and neck cancers, health care workers developed COVID-19 in 24% of cases, which was significantly elevated (18). Comparing surgical techniques in terms of droplet counts known to greatly contribute to the transmission of SARS-COV2 during different types of procedures, the highest counts were found during osteotomies and no droplets were identified during i.e., TORS (21).

Discussion

Surgery for oropharyngeal cancers during the pandemic seems feasible and safe. Delays should be in general avoided in particular for early-stage disease. An exception constitutes advanced age and high nosocomial SARS-COV2 infection rates, which should prompt a delay of treatment. SARS-CoV2 screening prior surgery and sanitary precautions taken by hospitals seem sufficient to maintain an acceptably low complication rate and mortality. TORS may confer an advantage as being a technique with less droplet distribution than open surgical techniques.

Author Contributions

PG, BG, CL, and CS designed the study and collected the data. PG, BG, CL, CS, HM, VP, and RS interpreted the data. CS supervised the project. All authors drafted the manuscript and contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. (2020) 395:507–13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Lei S, Jiang F, Su W, Chen C, Chen J, Mei W, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing surgeries during the incubation period of COVID-19 infection. E Clin Med. (2020) 23:100331. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100331

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

3. Mick P, Murphy R. Aerosol-generating otolaryngology procedures and the need for enhanced PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic: a literature review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (2020) 49:29. doi: 10.1186/s40463-020-00424-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Mehanna H, Hardman JC, Shenson JA, Abou-Foul AK, Topf MC, Alfalasi M, et al. Recommendations for head and neck surgical oncology practice in a setting of acute severe resource constraint during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. (2020) 21:e350–9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30334-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Thomson DJ, Palma D, Guckenberger M, Balermpas P, Beitler JJ, Blanchard P, et al. Practice recommendations for risk-adapted head and neck cancer radiation therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ASTRO-ESTRO consensus statement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2020) 107:618–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.04.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, Jacobson SD, Meyer BJ, Balough EM, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. (2020) 395:1763–70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31189-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Ellinghaus D, Degenhardt F, Bujanda L, Buti M, Albillos A, Invernizzi P, et al. Genomewide association study of severe Covid-19 with respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383:1522–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2020283

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

8. Domeracki S, Clapp RN, Taylor K, Lu CM, Lampiris H, Blanc PD. Cycle threshold to test positivity in COVID-19 for return to work clearance in health care workers. J Occup Environ Med. (2020) 62:889–91. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001996

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Rao SN, Manissero D, Steele VR, Pareja J. A systematic review of the clinical utility of cycle threshold values in the context of COVID-19. Infect Dis Ther. (2020) 9:573–86. doi: 10.1007/s40121-020-00324-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Tian J, Yuan X, Xiao J, Zhong Q, Yang C, Liu B, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with COVID-19 disease severity in patients with cancer in Wuhan, China: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. (2020) 21:893–903. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30309-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative, SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study. Lancet. (2020) 396:27–38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31182-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Garassino MC, Whisenant JG, Huang LC, Trama A, Torri V, Agustoni F, et al. COVID-19 in patients with thoracic malignancies (TERAVOLT): first results of an international, registry-based, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. (2020) 21:914–22. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30314-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Kuderer NM, Choueiri TK, Shah DP, Shyr Y, Rubinstein SM, Rivera DR, et al. Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer (CCC19): a cohort study. Lancet. (2020) 395:1907–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31187-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Yang K, Sheng Y, Huang C, Jin Y, Xiong N, Jiang K, et al. Clinical characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors for mortality in patients with cancer and COVID-19 in Hubei, China: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. (2020) 21:904–13. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30310-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Lee LYW, Cazier JB, Starkey T, Turnbull CD, Kerr R, Middleton G. COVID-19 mortality in patients with cancer on chemotherapy or other anticancer treatments: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. (2020) 395:1919–26. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31173-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Sud A, Torr B, Jones ME, Broggio J, Scott S, Loveday C, et al. Effect of delays in the 2-week-wait cancer referral pathway during the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer survival in the UK: a modelling study. Lancet Oncol. (2020) 21:1035–44. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30392-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Murphy CT, Galloway TJ, Handorf EA, Egleston BL, Wang LS, Mehra R, et al. Survival impact of increasing time to treatment initiation for patients with head and neck cancer in the United States. J Clin Oncol. (2016) 34:169–78. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5906

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Head and neck cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international, multicenter, observational cohort study. Cancer. (2020). doi: 10.1002/cncr.3332019. [Epub ahead of print].

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Aslam A, Singh J, Robilotti E, Chow K, Bist T, Reidy-Lagunes D, et al. SARS CoV-2 surveillance and exposure in the perioperative setting with universal testing and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) policies. Clin Infect Dis. (2020). doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1607. [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Glasbey JC, Nepogodiev D, Simoes JFF, Omar O, Li E, Venn ML, et al. Elective cancer surgery in COVID-19-free surgical pathways during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an international, multicenter, comparative cohort study. J Clin Oncol. (2021) 39:66–78. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01933

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Chow VLY, Chan JYW, Ho VWY, Lee GCC, Wong MMK, Wong STS, et al. Conservation of personal protective equipment for head and neck cancer surgery during COVID-19 pandemic. Head Neck. (2020) 42:1187–93. doi: 10.1002/hed.26215

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: oropahryngeal cancer, transoral robotic, head and neck cancer, SARS–CoV−2, COVID-19, head and neck surgery

Citation: Gorphe P, Grandbastien B, Dietz A, Duvvuri U, Ferris RL, Golusinski W, Holsinger FC, Hosal S, Lawson G, Mehanna H, Paleri V, Shaw R, Succo G, Leemans CR and Simon C (2021) Safety and Feasibility of Surgery for Oropharyngeal Cancers During the SARS-CoV-2-Pandemic. Front. Oncol. 11:651123. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.651123

Received: 08 January 2021; Accepted: 22 February 2021;
Published: 24 March 2021.

Edited by:

Piero Nicolai, University of Padua, Italy

Reviewed by:

Petri Koivunen, Oulu University Hospital, Finland

Copyright © 2021 Gorphe, Grandbastien, Dietz, Duvvuri, Ferris, Golusinski, Holsinger, Hosal, Lawson, Mehanna, Paleri, Shaw, Succo, Leemans and Simon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Christian Simon, Christian.Simon@chuv.ch

These authors share senior authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.