Abstract
Patients with advanced duodenal carcinoma usually have a poor prognosis due to limited effective chemotherapy options. The study for genotype-directed therapy in patients with duodenal carcinoma is progressing. However, no clinical data assessing the efficacy of molecularly targeted therapy are presently available. We report the case of a 64-year-old woman who was diagnosed with anaplastic lymphocyte kinase (ALK) fusion-positive advanced duodenal carcinoma. Echinoderm microtubule associated protein like-4 (EML4)-ALK rearrangement was detected by comprehensive genomic profiling after resistance to first-line chemotherapy. The patient received alectinib, an ALK inhibitor, with marked shrinkage in primary tumor and liver metastases. She is currently being treated with alectinib for 6 months or more. This is the first report of the efficacy of alectinib in a patient with duodenal carcinoma harboring ALK fusion. Additionally, this case report suggests that the practical use of next-generation sequencing may expand optimal treatment choices in rare solid tumors, including duodenal carcinoma.
1 Introduction
Small intestine cancer is a rare disease with a global incidence of less than 1 per 100,000 people (1). Duodenal carcinoma is the most common subtype of small intestine cancer, constituting more than 50% of small intestine cancers; it has the worst prognosis among small intestine cancers, with a one-year overall survival rate of approximately 20% (2). Although oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based systemic therapy is recommended for the treatment of the cancer in its advanced stages, there is limited evidence supporting the use of systemic therapy (3).
Multigene panel-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is widely used for the treatment of patients with malignant solid tumors. CGP enables the identification of patients with targetable alterations who may benefit from targeted therapies. A CGP study of small intestine cancer showed potentially targetable genomic alterations in the majority (91%) of cases, such as alterations in KRAS, BRAF, and ERBB2 (4). Nevertheless, no targeted therapies have been established for the treatment of advanced small intestine cancer, excluding tumor-agnostic indications, such as pembrolizumab for microsatellite instability-high or tumor mutational burden-high tumors and TRK inhibitors for NTRK fusion-positive tumors. Therefore, presenting the efficacy of target therapies for patient-specific alterations is necessary for the development of effective targeted therapies for small intestine cancer, even if only one case has been reported.
Herein, we report a patient with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion-positive duodenal carcinoma who achieved an exceptional response to alectinib. The patient provided informed consent for the presentation of anonymized clinical information.
2 Case description
A 62-year-old female patient presenting with epigastric pain and weight loss for several weeks was referred to the Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center. The patient had a medical history of diabetes mellitus and bronchial asthma. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed Borrmann type 2 duodenal carcinoma in the descending part of the duodenum (Figure 1A). A biopsy specimen of the primary tumor revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Computed tomography (CT) revealed multiple lymph nodes, liver metastases, and lung metastases (Figures 1B, C). The patient was diagnosed with stage IV duodenal carcinoma (clinical stage T3N2M1, according to the TNM classification, 8th edition). She received first-line chemotherapy with modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) regimen every 2 weeks: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2, and continuous infusion of 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h.
Figure 1
However, after four cycles of mFOLFOX6, the patient was admitted to the hospital for fever and abdominal pain. Laboratory findings showed elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (4.34 mg/dL) and liver enzyme levels (aspartate aminotransferase [AST], 284 IU/L; alanine aminotransferase [ALT], 133 IU/L; total bilirubin, 5.67 mg/dL). Abdominal CT revealed biliary tract obstruction due to the progression of duodenal carcinoma and enlargement of liver metastases. The patient was diagnosed with acute cholangitis and administered antibiotics (4/0.5g of piperacillin-tazobactam 4 times daily). Thereafter, she underwent endoscopic ultrasonography-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) for biliary drainage. Guide wire was inserted through the duodenal bulb into the common bile duct and a metallic biliary stent (fully covered metallic stent 6cm) was placed using EUS-CDS (Figures 1D, E). The patient’s fever went down, and her general condition gradually improved after the drainage procedure. The laboratory data, such as CRP and liver enzyme levels, were normalized (CRP, 0.24 IU/L; AST, 31 IU/L; ALT, 15 IU/L; total bilirubin, 0.84 mg/dL).
The patient was considered to be refractory to mFOLFOX6 treatment. Subsequently, multigene panel-based CGP using FoundationOne CDx (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA) was performed on the tumor tissue from the primary duodenal carcinoma. ALK fusion and echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK rearrangement intron 19 were detected as actionable genomic alterations. Alterations in CDKN2A/B and TP53 P151R were also detected; however, both were of unknown clinical significance. Immunohistochemistry analysis showed strong ALK expression in over 80% of tumor cells (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Based on the result of multigene panel-based CGP, the therapeutic strategy was discussed by an intra-institutional molecular tumor board, called an expert panel, and treatment with an ALK inhibitor was recommended. the patient started 300 mg of alectinib twice daily by participating in the BELIEVE trial (NCCH1901, jRCTs031190104) according to the expert panel’s recommendation. Several days after treatment initiation, there was a gradual improvement in the patient’s general condition with an associated reduction in the severity of abdominal pain. In addition, her performance status (PS) score improved from 1 to 0. The patient had grade 1 constipation and dysgeusia due to alectinib but tolerated the dose. A CT scan on day 49 showed a significant tumor reduction of liver lesions and lymph nodes, exhibiting a partial response (57% reduction), according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (Figure 3). Furthermore, the patient’s serum carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels markedly decreased. The 2-month follow-up CT imaging, the second assessment of response to alectinib, showed continuing partial response. The patient returned to her weight before she got duodenal carcinoma. As of December 2022, the patient was still being treated with alectinib without tumor progression.
Figure 3
3 Discussion
We present the case of a patient with ALK fusion-positive duodenal carcinoma treated with alectinib. Our patient responded remarkably to alectinib treatment. ALK is located on chromosome 2p23 and encodes a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor. ALK rearrangements occur in the form of a translocation with another partner gene, leading to ALK activation. This fusion activates downstream signaling pathways, such as PI3K–Akt, MEKK2/3/MEK5/ERK5, RAS-MAPK, CRKL-C3G-RAP1, JAK-STAT, and JUN (5). Most ALK alterations account for EML4-ALK fusion. In addition, other ALK fusion partners include STRN, KCNQ, KLC1, KIF5B, PPM1B, and TGF (6). ALK inhibitors, including alectinib, have shown a significant survival benefit and have been approved for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring ALK fusions. Alectinib is one of the most active ALK inhibitor showing a significant improvement of progression-free survival compared to crizotinib (7).
ALK translocations have been detected in other cancer types such as glioblastoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and breast cancer (8, 9). However, the role of EML4-ALK as a therapeutic target in these non-NSCLC cancers, including gastrointestinal cancers, is not well understood. From our extensive literature search, we summarize in Table 1 the case series of patients with gastrointestinal cancer who were treated with ALK inhibitors (10–17). A total of 23 patients with gastrointestinal cancer and ALK fusion were treated with ALK inhibitors. The median age was 50 years (range 32–87 years), and 13 patients (57%) were male. The cancer types included pancreatic (n = 10), colorectal (n = 8), gallbladder (n = 2), esophageal (n = 1), and gastric (n = 1), and only one patient with duodenal carcinoma was included. Crizotinib and alectinib were administered to 10 and 9 patients, respectively. The objective response rate to ALK inhibitors was 43.5%, and the median PFS was 6 months in patients in this literature review. The efficacy in these patients tended to be inferior to that in clinical trials involving patients with NSCLC harboring ALK fusions (7). One patient switched from crizotinib to ceritinib due to neutropenia, and no other serious adverse events were reported. Similar to our patient, the patient with duodenal carcinoma was treated with alectinib. Although the best response was stable disease, the patient achieved a PFS of 7.8 months.
Table 1
| Reference | Age | Sex | Primary tumor site | ALK fusion partner/breakpoint | First-line ALKi agent | TKI response | First-line ALKi PFS (month) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gower A, 2020 | 41 | F | Pancreas cancer | PPFIBP1 | Alectinib | SD | 5.0 |
| Singhi AD, 2017 | 35 | M | Pancreas cancer | EML4 | Ceritinib | PR | 7.0 |
| Singhi AD, 2017 | 32 | F | Pancreas cancer | EML4 | Crizotinib | SD | 17.0 |
| Singhi AD, 2017 | 34 | M | Pancreas cancer | STRN | Crizotinib | SD | 10.0 |
| Singhi AD, 2017 | 46 | M | Pancreas cancer | EML4 | Crizotinib | PD | 2.0 |
| Margherita A, 2022 | 75 | M | Pancreas cancer | Intron 19 rearrangement | Alectinib | PD | 0.9 |
| Margherita A, 2022 | 34 | M | Pancreas cancer | STRN | Crizotinib | PR | 28.4 |
| Margherita A, 2022 | 41 | F | Pancreas cancer | PPFIBP1 | Alectinib | PR | 5.0 |
| Margherita A, 2022 | 63 | M | Pancreas cancer | EML4 | Alectinib | SD | 5.4 |
| Margherita A, 2022 | 72 | M | Pancreas cancer | EML4 | Alectinib | NA | 1.6 |
| Hsiao SY, 2021 | 56 | M | Colorectal cancer | EML4 | Alectinib | PR | 8.0 |
| Amatu A, 2015 | 53 | F | Colorectal cancer | CAD | Entrectinib | PR | 4.5 |
| Yakirevich E, 2016 | 87 | F | Colorectal cancer | STRN | Ceritinib | SD | 9.0 |
| Margherita A, 2022 | 46 | M | Colorectal cancer | EML4 | Crizotinib | PD | 2.3 |
| Margherita A, 2022 | 45 | M | Colorectal cancer | EML4 | Crizotinib | PR | 9.1 |
| Margherita A, 2022 | 51 | F | Colorectal cancer | CAD | Crizotinib | SD | 3.7 |
| Margherita A, 2022 | 50 | F | Colorectal cancer | CAD | Entrecctinib | PR | 4.6 |
| Margherita A, 2022 | 67 | M | Colorectal cancer | STRN | Alectinib | SD | 13.6 |
| Zhou Y, 2020 | 58 | F | Gallbladder cancer | AMBRA1 | Crizotinib | PR | 7.0 |
| Margherita A, 2022 | 58 | F | Bile duct cancer | Unknown | Crizotinib | SD | 3.9 |
| Zhang X, 2021 | 36 | M | Esophageal cancer | STRN | Crizotinib | PR | 22.0 |
| Margherita A, 2022 | 50 | F | Gastric cancer | HMBOX1 | Alectinib | PR | 6.0 |
| Margherita A, 2022 | 70 | M | Duodenum cancer | KIF5B | Alectinib | SD | 7.8 |
Review of ALK inhibitors for patients with gastrointestinal cancers.
ALKi, anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors; NA, not applicable; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; PFS, progression-free survival.
CGP studies for rare tumors identified targetable alterations, suggesting that the addition of CGP to management adds a potential line of therapy for tumors that have little or no standard of care (18). In addition, emergence of tumor-agnostic biomarkers, such as microsatellite instability-high, tumor mutational burden-high, and NTRK1/2/3 fusions, supports the use of NGS for rare tumors. Since there is no randomized trial of systemic chemotherapy in patients with duodenal carcinoma due to its rarity, the choice of chemotherapy in duodenal carcinoma is also currently limited in clinical practice. With the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS), several meaningful oncogenic pathways have been found to be altered in duodenal carcinoma. In a CGP study, alterations in ERBB2/HER2 and BRAF, microsatellite instability, and high tumor mutational burden were more frequently enriched in 317 small bowel cancers than that in gastric and colorectal cancers, and EML4-ALK fusion was identified in only one patient (0.3%) (4). Our case report encourages the use of NGS-based CGP for patients with small bowel cancers, including duodenal carcinoma, which potentially provides an opportunity of an appropriate precision medicine for these patients.
In conclusion, to our knowledge, this is the first report of an exceptional response to alectinib treatment in a patient with duodenal carcinoma harboring ALK fusion. The use of NGS to explore potentially actionable mutations in our patient paved the way for administering alectinib, which improved our patient’s quality of life and prolonged her survival after traditional chemotherapy failure. Therefore, NGS should be considered as a treatment option for patients with duodenal carcinoma. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ALK inhibitors in patients with cancers other than NSCLC.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
YI, AkinS, and YN designed the study, collected data, performed data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. YM and YA were involved in data interpretation and critically reviewing the manuscript. AkirS was involved in testing tumor tissue as well as critically reviewing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
Providing alectinib from the CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD is gratefully acknowledged.
Conflict of interest
YN reports honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Merck Biopharma, and Guardant Health AMEA and research grants from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Guardant Health, Genomedia, Daiichi Sankyo, Seagen, and Roche Diagnostics.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Abbreviations
ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; ALKi, anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors; BRAF, b-Raf proto-oncogene; CGP, comprehensive genomic profiling; EML4, echinoderm microtubule associated protein like-4; ERBB2, epidermal growth factor receptor 2; KRAS, Kirsten rat sarcoma; NA, not applicable; NGS, next-generation sequencing; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; NTRK, Neurotropic tropomyosin receptor kinase; ORR, objective response rate; PD, progressive disease;
PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; TRK, tropomyosin receptor kinase.
References
1
SchottenfeldDBeebe-DimmerJLVigneauFD. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of neoplasia in the small intestine. Ann Epidemiol (2009) 19:58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.10.004
2
BojesenRDAnderssonMRiisLBNielsenOHJessT. Incidence of, phenotypes of and survival from small bowel cancer in Denmark, 1994–2010: A population-based study. J Gastroenterol (2016) 51:891–9. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1171-7
3
AlBAPPedersonKMahmoudM. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (2022) (Accessed March 9).
4
SchrockABDevoeCEMcWilliamsRSunJAparicioTStephensPJet al. Genomic profiling of small-bowel adenocarcinoma. JAMA Oncol (2017) 3:1546–53. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1051
5
HallbergBPalmerRH. The role of the ALK receptor in cancer biology. Ann Oncol (2016) 27 Suppl 3:iii4–iii15. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw301
6
Della CorteCMViscardiGDi LielloRFasanoMMartinelliETroianiTet al. Role and targeting of anaplastic lymphoma kinase in cancer. Mol Cancer (2018) 17:30. doi:Â 10.1186/s12943-018-0776-2
7
PetersSCamidgeDRShawATGadgeelSAhnJSKimDWet al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive non-small-Cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med (2017) 377:829–38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704795
8
MorrisSWKirsteinMNValentineMBDittmerKGShapiroDNSaltmanDLet al. Fusion of a kinase gene, ALK, to a nucleolar protein gene, NPM, in non-hodgkin’s lymphoma. Science (1994) 263:1281–4. doi: 10.1126/science.8122112
9
LinELiLGuanYSorianoRRiversCSMohanSet al. Exon array profiling detects EML4-ALK fusion in breast, colorectal, and non-small cell lung cancers. Mol Cancer Res (2009) 7:1466–76. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0522
10
GowerAGolestanyBGongJSinghiADHendifarAE. Novel ALK fusion, PPFIBP1-ALK, in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma responsive to alectinib and lorlatinib. JCO Precis Oncol (2020) 4:865–870. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00365
11
SinghiADAliSMLacyJHendifarANguyenKKooJet al. Identification of targetable ALK rearrangements in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2017) 15:555–62. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0058
12
HsiaoSYHeHLWengTSLinCYChaoCMHuangWTet al. Colorectal cancer with EML4-ALK fusion gene response to alectinib: A case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Oncol (2021) 14:232–8. doi: 10.1159/000511069
13
AmatuASomaschiniACereaGBosottiRValtortaEBuonandiPet al. Novel CAD-ALK gene rearrangement is drugable by entrectinib in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer (2015) 113:1730–4. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.401
14
YakirevichEResnickMBMangraySWheelerMJacksonCLLombardoKAet al. Oncogenic ALK fusion in rare and aggressive subtype of colorectal adenocarcinoma as a potential therapeutic target. Clin Cancer Res (2016) 22:3831–40. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-3000
15
ZhouYLizasoAMaoXYangNZhangY. Novel AMBRA1-ALK fusion identified by next-generation sequencing in advanced gallbladder cancer responds to crizotinib: A case report. Ann Transl Med (2020) 8:1099. doi:Â 10.21037/atm-20-1007
16
ZhangXXiaoXCZhaoKZhaoW. A case of a rare STRN-ALK fusion in esophagus adenocarcinoma exhibits excellent response to crizotinib. Clin Oncol Case Rep (2021) 4:2.
17
AmbrosiniMDel ReMMancaPHendifarADrilonAHaradaGet al. ALK inhibitors in patients with ALK fusion-positive GI cancers: An international data set and a molecular case series. JCO Precis Oncol (2022) 6:e2200015. doi:Â 10.1200/PO.22.00015
18
RomanGDavidSHJasonRFilipJApostoliaMTMilindJet al. Clinical next-generation sequencing for precision oncology in rare cancers. Mol Cancer Ther (2018) 17:1595–601. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-1107
Summary
Keywords
duodenal cancer, EML4-ALK rearrangement, alectinib, next-generation sequencing, gastrointestinal cancer
Citation
Isaka Y, Sasaki A, Saito A, Motomura Y, Ando Y and Nakamura Y (2023) Exceptional response to alectinib for duodenal carcinoma with ALK fusion: A case report and literature review. Front. Oncol. 12:1064944. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1064944
Received
09 October 2022
Accepted
20 December 2022
Published
12 January 2023
Volume
12 - 2022
Edited by
Massimo Broggini, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IRCCS), Italy
Reviewed by
Ingrid Garajova, University Hospital of Parma, Italy; Bofang Wang, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, China; Khalil Saleh, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, France
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Isaka, Sasaki, Saito, Motomura, Ando and Nakamura.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yoshiaki Nakamura, yoshinak@east.ncc.go.jp
This article was submitted to Cancer Molecular Targets and Therapeutics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.