Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Oncol., 01 June 2022
Sec. Breast Cancer
This article is part of the Research Topic Breast Cancer in Young Women View all 18 articles

Editorial: Breast Cancer in Young Women: Dedicated Research Efforts Are Needed

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • 2Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
  • 3Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
  • 4Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, United States

Editorial on the Research Topic
Breast Cancer in Young Women

Manuscript

Caring for women with newly diagnosed breast cancer at a young age, defined according to international guidelines as ≤ 40 years, is particularly challenging due to its associated additional age-related issues (1). Breast cancer in young women represents approximately one third of the total cases of malignancies in women aged less than 40 years, being the most frequent malignancy and cause of cancer-related death in this group of patients (2) (Silva et al.). The negative prognostic implication of young age at diagnosis may be partially explained by both the lack of screening programs and the higher risk of unfavorable biological features as compared to breast cancer cases in older patients (3). While young age has long been considered a negative prognostic factor, recent data have shown that this seems to be restricted only to patients with hormone receptor-positive disease (4) (Cai et al.). The biological and clinical reasons behind these findings have not been elucidated yet, although suboptimal adjuvant endocrine treatment and lower therapeutic adherence may be considered among the potential explanations (5) (Lu et al.).

Breast cancer in young women is considered a public health problem considering its substantial morbidity and mortality as well as the burden of disparities existing in the care of these patients (6).

While a breast cancer diagnosis at any age can substantially impact on familial relationships and other domains, young women are at a life stage in which additional implications including career, employment and family issues are particularly important. Hence, the potential financial, psychosocial, and social impacts of a breast cancer diagnosis at a young age can be even more burdensome. Importantly, when managing young women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, specific age-related issues should be considered. Among them, genetic counseling, fertility preservation, management of long-term side effects, impact on social and couple relationships and employment are highly relevant. Therefore, the care of young women with breast cancer is particularly complex and a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory (1).

Young age at diagnosis is considered a criteria to refer patients for genetic testing (1). Among different breast cancer susceptibility genes (Wang et al.) and in addition to the implications in terms of screening and risk-reducing strategies (Shraga et al.), identifying a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes has clear therapeutic implications in both the early and advanced settings (1). Therefore, more attention is needed to better understand the behavior and outcomes of breast cancer in young women carrying germline BRCA pathogenic variants (7). Moreover, the clinical implications of carrying this genetic defect beyond cancer risk require a special focus. Among them, the impact of germline BRCA pathogenic variants on women’s ovarian function and fertility are acquiring importance considering their potential negative impact of these defects on the ovarian reserve (8). Considering the current and upcoming availability of new anticancer therapies for the care of these patients, these issues need to be urgently addressed.

Over the past years, increasing attention has been paid to the oncofertility care of young adult cancer patients. As advocated by all guidelines, proper counseling on the risk of anticancer treatment-induced gonadotoxicity is mandatory at diagnosis with all patients with any malignancy and stage diagnosed at reproductive age (9, 10). Being a hormonally-driven form of tumor, there were historically several concerns on the safety and feasibility of managing fertility and pregnancy-related issues in the specific cohort of breast cancer patients. Recent data have contributed to dispel these concerns supporting the safety of accessing fertility preservation strategies prior to starting (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (11) (Rothé et al.) and of having a pregnancy in women with prior history of breast cancer (12). Nevertheless, some special considerations are needed to manage oncofertility care in young women with breast cancer. Specifically, there are barriers for proper onco-fertility counseling including patients’ side of decision conflict, oncologists’ preference of referral to fertility specialists and standardized protocols of fertility preservation for women with breast cancer, including the preference for adding letrozole a part of controlled ovarian stimulation in order to reduce the rise in estradiol levels during the procedure (9, 10) (Bonardi et al.). The implementation of special oncofertility programs requiring a well organized network between oncology and fertility units are crucial to properly deal with fertility care in young women with breast cancer (Blondeaux et al. and Hours et al.).

The possible diagnosis of breast cancer during pregnancy is another additional possible situation to be considered when caring for young patients (13). This is a challenging condition characterized by several unique medical and psychological needs that require special attention (Costa et al.). Several advances have been made over the past years to better understand the biology of breast cancer arising during pregnancy (Korakiti et al. and Allouch et al.) as well as on the clinical management of this difficult situation (14, 15). Considering the current trend in delaying childbearing, a growing attention is needed to the possible occurrence of breast cancer during pregnancy.

In addition to the potential impact of anticancer therapies on fertility and chances of a subsequent pregnancy, other additional survivorship issues should be considered when caring for young women with breast cancer. Among them, the side effects of endocrine therapy (particularly for the need to administer ovarian function suppression in most of these patients) can be particularly impactful and require dedicated pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches to counteract them (16) (Choi et al.). Indeed, survivorship is becoming an area of crucial importance in the care of patients with cancer and ad hoc programs should be implemented for improving the quality of life of young survivors (17).

With a special series focused on breast cancer in young women (https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/13438/breast-cancer-in-young-women), Frontiers in Oncology aims at providing updates and news in this field with topics spanning from epidemiology to treatment and its long-term consequences in order to contribute in improving the care of these patients. Further dedicated research efforts are needed to support young women with breast cancer.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding

ML acknowledges support from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (“Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro”, AIRC; MFAG 2020 ID 24698) and the Italian Ministry of Health (5 x 1000 funds 2017) for supporting his research in the field of breast cancer in young women.

Conflict of Interest

ML reports advisory role for Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Astrazeneca, MSD, Seagen, Exact Sciences, Gilead and speaker honoraria from Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Ipsen, Libbs, Knight, Takeda outside the submitted work.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

HJK acknowledges support from the Korean goverment for supporting her research in the field of breast cancer in young women.

References

1. Paluch-Shimon S, Cardoso F, Partridge AH, Abulkhair O, Azim HA, Bianchi-Micheli G, et al. ESO-ESMO 4th International Consensus Guidelines for Breast Cancer in Young Women (Bcy4). Ann Oncol (2020) 31(6):674–96. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.284

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Fidler MM, Gupta S, Soerjomataram I, Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Bray F. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Among Young Adults Aged 20-39 Years Worldwide in 2012: A Population-Based Study. Lancet Oncol (2017) 18(12):1579–89. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30677-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Villarreal-Garza C, Ferrigno AS, de la Garza-Ramos C, Barragan-Carrillo R, Lambertini M, Azim HA. Clinical Utility of Genomic Signatures in Young Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. NPJ Breast Cancer (2020) 6:46. doi: 10.1038/s41523-020-00188-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kim HJ, Kim S, Freedman RA, Partridge AH. The Impact of Young Age at Diagnosis (Age <40 Years) on Prognosis Varies by Breast Cancer Subtype: A U.S. SEER Database Analysis. Breast (2022) 61:77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.12.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lambertini M, Blondeaux E, Perrone F, Del Mastro L. Improving Adjuvant Endocrine Treatment Tailoring in Premenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol (2020) 38(12):1258–67. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02242

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Rosenberg SM, Newman LA, Partridge AH. Breast Cancer in Young Women: Rare Disease or Public Health Problem? JAMA Oncol (2015) 1(7):877–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Lambertini M, Ceppi M, Hamy A-S, Caron O, Poorvu PD, Carrasco E, et al. Clinical Behavior and Outcomes of Breast Cancer in Young Women With Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variants. NPJ Breast Cancer (2021) 7(1):16. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00224-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Turan V, Lambertini M, Lee D-Y, Wang E, Clatot F, Karlan BY, et al. Association of Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variants With Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient-Level Data. J Clin Oncol (2021) 39(18):2016–24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02880

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Lambertini M, Peccatori FA, Demeestere I, Amant F, Wyns C, Stukenborg J-B, et al. Fertility Preservation and Post-Treatment Pregnancies in Post-Pubertal Cancer Patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines†. Ann Oncol (2020) 31(12):1664–78. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. ESHRE Guideline Group on Female Fertility Preservation, Anderson RA, Amant F, Braat D, D’Angelo A, Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM, et al. ESHRE Guideline: Female Fertility Preservation. Hum Reprod Open (2020) 2020(4):hoaa052. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Arecco L, Blondeaux E, Bruzzone M, Ceppi M, Latocca MM, Marrocco C, et al. Safety of Fertility Preservation Techniques Before and After Anticancer Treatments in Young Women With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hum Reprod (2022) 37(5):954–68. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Lambertini M, Blondeaux E, Bruzzone M, Perachino M, Anderson RA, de Azambuja E, et al. Pregnancy After Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol (2021) 39(29):3293–305. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00535

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Amant F, Lefrère H, Borges VF, Cardonick E, Lambertini M, Loibl S, et al. The Definition of Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer is Outdated and Should No Longer be Used. Lancet Oncol (2021) 22(6):753–4. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00183-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Loibl S, Schmidt A, Gentilini O, Kaufman B, Kuhl C, Denkert C, et al. Breast Cancer Diagnosed During Pregnancy: Adapting Recent Advances in Breast Cancer Care for Pregnant Patients. JAMA Oncol (2015) 1(8):1145–53. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2413

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Poggio F, Tagliamento M, Pirrone C, Soldato D, Conte B, Molinelli C, et al. Update on the Management of Breast Cancer During Pregnancy. Cancers (Basel) (2020) 12(12):E3616. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123616

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Franzoi MA, Agostinetto E, Perachino M, Del Mastro L, de Azambuja E, Vaz-Luis I, et al. Evidence-Based Approaches for the Management of Side-Effects of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer. Lancet Oncol (2021) 22(7):e303–13. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30666-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Partridge AH, Ruddy KJ, Barry WT, Greaney ML, Ligibel JA, Sprunck-Harrild KM, et al. A Randomized Study to Improve Care for Young Women With Breast Cancer at Community and Academic Medical Oncology Practices in the United States: The Young and Strong Study. Cancer (2019) 125(11):1799–806. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31984

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: breast cancer, young women, BRCA, fertility, pregnancy

Citation: Lambertini M, Kim HJ and Poorvu P (2022) Editorial: Breast Cancer in Young Women: Dedicated Research Efforts Are Needed. Front. Oncol. 12:913167. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.913167

Received: 05 April 2022; Accepted: 04 May 2022;
Published: 01 June 2022.

Edited by:

Nicola Fusco, University of Milan, Italy

Reviewed by:

Caterina Marchiò, University of Turin, Italy
Carmen Criscitiello, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Italy

Copyright © 2022 Lambertini, Kim and Poorvu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Matteo Lambertini, matteo.lambertini@unige.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.