The role of the serotonin receptor subtypes 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 and its interaction in emotional learning and memory
- 1Department of Functional Genomics, Behavioral Neuroscience Group, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam – VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 2Department of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Behavioral Neuroscience Group, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam –VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- 3Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)] is a multifunctional neurotransmitter innervating cortical and limbic areas involved in cognition and emotional regulation. Dysregulation of serotonergic transmission is associated with emotional and cognitive deficits in psychiatric patients and animal models. Drugs targeting the 5-HT system are widely used to treat mood disorders and anxiety-like behaviors. Among the fourteen 5-HT receptor (5-HTR) subtypes, the 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R are associated with the development of anxiety, depression and cognitive function linked to mechanisms of emotional learning and memory. In rodents fear conditioning and passive avoidance (PA) are associative learning paradigms to study emotional memory. This review assesses the role of 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R as well as their interplay at the molecular, neurochemical and behavioral level. Activation of postsynaptic 5-HT1ARs impairs emotional memory through attenuation of neuronal activity, whereas presynaptic 5-HT1AR activation reduces 5-HT release and exerts pro-cognitive effects on PA retention. Antagonism of the 5-HT1AR facilitates memory retention possibly via 5-HT7R activation and evidence is provided that 5HT7R can facilitate emotional memory upon reduced 5-HT1AR transmission. These findings highlight the differential role of these 5-HTRs in cognitive/emotional domains of behavior. Moreover, the results indicate that tonic and phasic 5-HT release can exert different and potentially opposing effects on emotional memory, depending on the states of 5-HT1ARs and 5-HT7Rs and their interaction. Consequently, individual differences due to genetic and/or epigenetic mechanisms play an essential role for the responsiveness to drug treatment, e.g., by SSRIs which increase intrasynaptic 5-HT levels thereby activating multiple pre- and postsynaptic 5-HTR subtypes.
Serotonin (5-HT) is a biogenic amine acting as a neurotransmitter and neuromodulator. The distribution of serotonin-containing neurons in the CNS have been studied in different species and have been found to be localized exclusively in the brainstem (Hunt and Lovick, 1982; Takahashi et al., 1986; Ishimura et al., 1988). The majority of the serotonergic cell bodies reside in the dorsal and median raphe nuclei but send axons almost to the entire brain, including cortical, limbic, midbrain, and hindbrain regions (Charnay and Léger, 2010). As expected from the wide projection pattern of the 5-HT neurons, serotonin modulates variable physiological functions, such as sleep, arousal, feeding, temperature regulation, pain, emotions, and cognition (Bradley et al., 1986; Barnes and Sharp, 1999; Ögren et al., 2008; Berger et al., 2009; Artigas, 2015).
The pleiotropic behavioral effects of 5-HT are mediated by a family of at least 14 5-HTR subtypes (Hoyer et al., 1994). These 5-HTR subtypes are distributed in a brain- and cell-specific manner and regulate distinct physiological processes, through different and sometimes opposing signaling pathways (Hoyer and Martin, 1997; Hoyer et al., 2002).
The 5-HT1AR is one of the best-studied 5-HTR subtypes due to its implication in anxiety-like behaviors (Heisler et al., 1998; Parks et al., 1998; Toth, 2003), in depression (Lucki, 1991) as well as in cognitive processes that are impaired in several psychiatric disorders (review by Ögren et al., 2008; Millan et al., 2012). Its potential role as a drug target has been also investigated (Tunnicliff, 1991; Den Boer et al., 2000; Blier and Ward, 2003). The most common antidepressants, the SSRIs, act by targeting the 5-HT1AR (Hervas and Artigas, 1998; Artigas, 2015), supporting the key role of the 5-HT1AR in the pathophysiology of mood disorders.
The 5-HT7Rs are implicated in depression and anxiety, and evidence has been provided for their role in learning and memory (reviewed by Leopoldo et al., 2011). Interestingly, the 5-HT7R and 5-HT1AR exert opposing roles in the modulation of fear learning (Eriksson et al., 2008, 2012), pointing at the importance of both 5-HTR subtypes and their signaling interaction in the regulation of emotional learning.
After a brief introduction about the characteristics of 5-HT1A and 5-HT7R (distribution, signaling, and ligands), this review will focus on the role of 5-HT1AR, 5-HT7R as well as its interplay in emotional learning processes. The interaction between the 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R signaling will be discussed and results of studies using different available 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R ligands on fear learning tasks are summarized. A considerable extent of this review will also be dedicated to describe the region-specific effects of 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R, via local rather than systemic administration. Overall, the aim of this review is to draw general conclusions about the role of both 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R in fear learning, which may contribute to our better understanding of the mechanisms underlying dysregulated learning and memory in affective disorders. The focus here is on fear learning because this one-trial learning task allows for exact timing of pharmacological manipulations to discriminate between different memory phases.
Characteristics of the 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 Receptors
All the 5-HTR subtypes belong to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily, with the exception of the 5-HT3R as ionotropic receptor (Hoyer et al., 2002). The metabotropic 5-HTR subtypes consist of seven transmembrane domains and are classified into four groups based on the type of G proteins to which they are coupled. The 5-HT1Rs (5-HT1AR, 5-HT1BR, 5-HT1DR, 5-HT1ER, 5-HT1FR) couple to Gαi/Gαo proteins, whereas the 5-HT2Rs (5-HT2AR, 5-HT2BR, 5-HT2C) couple to Gαq proteins, and the 5-HT4R, 5-HT6R, and 5-HT7R couple to Gαs proteins. For the 5-HT5Rs (5-HT5AR and 5-HT5BR) G-protein coupling is not established yet (Bockaert et al., 2006).
5-HT1A Receptor Localization
5-HT1AR was the first 5-HTR subtype to be cloned and is characterized by its high affinity for 5-HT (Nichols and Nichols, 2008). 5-HT1ARs are widely distributed throughout the CNS and are present in both pre- and postsynaptic sites. Presynaptically, 5-HT1ARs are exclusively located on the cell bodies and dendrites of 5-HT neurons in the dorsal and median raphe nuclei (Riad et al., 2000) and function as 5-HT1A autoreceptors which tightly regulate 5-HT neuronal activity.
Postsynaptically, the highest level of 5-HT1AR is found in the limbic system based on receptor autoradiography and mRNA expression. Both techniques showed the distribution of the 5-HT1AR in the lateral septum, cingulate and entorhinal cortices, with particularly high expression in the hippocampus (reviewed by Hannon and Hoyer, 2008). At the cellular level, the postsynaptic 5-HT1AR is expressed in cortical pyramidal neurons as well as pyramidal, GABAergic and granular cells of the hippocampus (Hannon and Hoyer, 2008). At least in the hippocampal formation, the 5-HT1AR is located on somata and dendrites of pyramidal and granular neurons, as well as on the dendritic spines of pyramidal neurons (Riad et al., 2000). Moreover, 5-HT1AR immunoreactivity has been demonstrated in different subgroups of neurons in the septal complex with GABAergic septohippocampal parvalbumin-containing projection neurons, GABAergic calbindin D-28-containing neurons as well as cholinergic septohippocampal neurons (Lüttgen et al., 2005a). This indicates that systemic administration of 5-HT1AR ligands can modify hippocampal function through effects on septohippocampal neurons that are responsible for the theta rhythm which plays an important role in memory functions (Elvander-Tottie et al., 2009).
5-HT1A Receptor Signaling
Activation of 5-HT1AR leads to neuronal hyperpolarization, an effect mediated by pertussis-toxin-sensitive Gαi/o proteins. Gαi/o proteins are negatively coupled with the signaling pathway of adenylyl cyclase and thereby decrease the cAMP formation (De Vivo and Maayani, 1986; Weiss et al., 1986). Despite their high density in the dorsal raphe nucleus, 5-HT1A autoreceptors do not seem to inhibit AC, but mediate neuronal inhibition through different signaling pathways (Clarke et al., 1996). Both post- and presynaptic 5-HT1ARs inhibit neuronal firing via the activation of G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels as well as the inhibition of Ca2+ channels (Sodickson and Bean, 1998; Bockaert et al., 2006). A multitude of other signaling pathways and effectors has been also linked to the activation of the 5-HT1AR (reviewed by Raymond et al., 2001; Bockaert et al., 2006).
The 5-HT7R was the last 5-HTR subtype to be cloned by using a targeted screening analysis of mammalian cDNA libraries and probes from already known receptors (Bard et al., 1993; Lovenberg et al., 1993; Ruat et al., 1993). Although 5-HT7Rs demonstrate a high interspecies homology (>90%; To et al., 1995), they share a low homology with the other 5-HTR subtypes (<50%; Bard et al., 1993). Northern blot analysis and in situ hybridization studies demonstrate high expression of 5-HT7R in the CNS and particularly in the hypothalamus (suprachiasmatic nucleus), thalamus, hippocampus, and cerebral cortex (Bard et al., 1993; Lovenberg et al., 1993; Ruat et al., 1993). Like 5-HT1AR, the 5-HT7R is also localized in the raphe nuclei in both rodent and human brain, which has raised questions about its role in the regulation of 5-HT levels (Martin-Cora and Pazos, 2004). At the neuronal level, 5-HT7R is expressed in hippocampal CA pyramidal neurons with a higher density in CA3 than in CA1 (Bonaventure et al., 2004) and a differential expression, with selective localization on the cell bodies in CA1 pyramidal neurons (Bickmeyer et al., 2002). Little is known, however, about the expression patterns of 5-HT7R in cortical neurons, where it is suggested that 5-HT7R may have a role during the developing stages of cortical circuits (Béïque et al., 2007; Celada et al., 2013).
5-HT7 Receptor Signaling
5-HT7R activation activates adenylyl cyclase signaling and consequently the conversion of ATP to cAMP through coupling to Gαs (Bard et al., 1993; Lovenberg et al., 1993; Ruat et al., 1993). Although cAMP activation is commonly mediated by the PKA, it has been demonstrated that Epac, a member of the cAMP-regulated guanine nucleotide exchange family, has a crucial role in PKA-independent signaling (Lin et al., 2003). For instance, 5-HT7Rs activate the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway (Errico et al., 2001; Norum et al., 2003) via the stimulation of the Epac factor (Lin et al., 2003). Binding of cAMP to Epac leads to the activation of several other signaling pathways (reviewed by Holz et al., 2006).
Functional Roles of 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7 Receptors
The expression of 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R in the limbic system (Hannon and Hoyer, 2008; Berumen et al., 2012) support a role in the modulation of functions like mood, memory processing as well as emotional association with memory. The 5-HT1AR has been proposed to modulate anxiety based on studies with 5-HT1AR knockout mice (Heisler et al., 1998; Parks et al., 1998; Toth, 2003) and the response to antidepressant drugs (Blier and Ward, 2003; Artigas, 2015). Several partial 5-HT1AR agonists, e.g., buspirone, have been used to treat anxiety and depression (Tunnicliff, 1991; Den Boer et al., 2000), whereas co-administration of pindolol (β-adrenergic and 5-HT1AR antagonist) with SSRIs enhances their therapeutic efficacy and shortens their onset of action (reviewed by Artigas et al., 2001). A considerable body of literature demonstrates the 5-HT1AR involvement in various hippocampus-dependent learning and memory tasks (reviewed by Ögren et al., 2008).
In contrast, the available data on the function of 5-HT7R is relatively limited, mainly due to the lack of selective agonists specific for this 5-HTR subtype (Misane and Ögren, 2000; Nichols and Nichols, 2008; Leopoldo et al., 2011). The physiological role of 5-HT7R has been closely linked with the regulation of sleep, circadian rhythm, pain and also mood (reviewed by Leopoldo et al., 2011). Accumulating data implicates the 5-HT7R in the action of antidepressant drugs, whereas the results from anxiety studies are contradictory (Leopoldo et al., 2011). Interestingly, studies using 5-HT7R knockout mice revealed the crucial role of this receptor in hippocampus-dependent memory (Roberts et al., 2004; Sarkisyan and Hedlund, 2009).
5-HT1A and 5-HT7 Receptor Ligands
General Receptor Ligand Principles
Agents that act as receptor ligands may be agonists or antagonists. Agonists initiate physiological changes by activating downstream signaling pathways, whereas antagonists bind to receptors without producing any effect (Rang et al., 2015). Ligands can be divided in three categories based on their function:
(1) Full agonists produce a maximal response equivalent to the endogenous agonist (here 5-HT). These agonists have high efficacy (i.e., the ability to initiate changes which leads to effects) for the binding receptor.
(2) Partial agonists are not capable of producing the maximal functional response even when they occupy the entire receptor population. These agonists present intermediate efficacy. Respectively, we could refer to partial antagonists that bind to the active site (competitive antagonism) but do not completely abolish the receptor-mediated effects.
(3) Mixed profile ligands that (appear to) act both as agonists and as antagonist in distinct receptor populations. More likely, they have different agonist profiles at different receptor sites (e.g., pre-versus postsynaptic 5-HT1AR) and therefore appear to exert antagonist function in the presence of a full agonist, while acting as weak (partial) agonist thereby lowering the efficacy of the full agonist.
The function of any ligand used to study the role of 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R is essential for the correct interpretation of the behavioral outcome. It is also important to mention that the intrinsic efficacy of a ligand is equally depended on the characteristics of response system; in our case the different brain populations of 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R and their downstream signaling pathways. Agonists acting on the same receptor can produce different effects depending on their physicochemical properties, brain distribution, full or partial agonism as well as the number of coupled receptors in a brain area. The specificity of the compounds used is another very important characteristic that should be always taken into consideration and is referred to the ligand’s specific binding to the targeted receptor. Ligands with low specificity cannot be used to clarify the functional role of 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R, since the produced effects can be also mediated via the binding to other proteins than the receptor of interest.
The physicochemical properties of compounds play an essential role for the drug uptake and diffusion with lipophilicity, solubility and molecular mass being among the most important properties (Waterhouse, 2003). The lipophilic nature of ligands is particularly important when they are administered locally. Increasing lipophilicity leads to enhanced blood–brain barrier diffusion, prevents the drug restriction in the area of interest and consequently produces wider effects, despite local application. This is evident from dorsohippocampal infusion of the blood–brain barrier penetrating drug 8-OH-DPAT, a full 5-HT1AR agonist, which impairs tone-dependent memory (Stiedl et al., 2000a), whereas this does not occur when the NMDAR antagonist APV (Stiedl et al., 2000b) and the GABAAR agonist muscimol are locally applied (Misane et al., 2013). The latter study is one of the few demonstrating the selective drug action in the dorsal hippocampus based on fluorescently labeled muscimol as bodipy conjugate. Besides the solubility of compounds and the applied dose, it is thus of high importance to consider other physico-chemical properties, such as half-life in vivo, to avoid misleading conclusions due to their wider spread (e.g., diffusion or potential active transport) in brain outside the target sites. The molecular weight of compounds can also provide valuable information about the diffusion capacity.
5-HT1A Receptor Agonists
The prototypic 5-HT1AR agonist 8-OH-DPAT was the first full agonist developed (Arvidsson et al., 1981; Gozlan et al., 1983) and is still the most widely used to study the functional role of 5-HT1AR in behavioral manipulations (Barnes and Sharp, 1999). Despite its high selectivity for the 5-HT1AR, 8-OH-DPAT also acts as a 5-HT7R agonist (Bickmeyer et al., 2002; Eriksson et al., 2008) and observed effects can be the result of an interplay between the two receptor subtypes (see below).
Additionally, several full and partial agonists have been synthesized (see Table 1), but only a few of them have been used in fear learning studies, such as the buspirone and tandospirone. Buspirone belongs to the arylpiperazine (partial) agonists (Hjorth and Carlsson, 1982) and acts also as antagonist with high specificity for the dopamine D2 receptor (Witkin and Barrett, 1986). Tandospirone (SM-3997) is a 5-HT1AR partial agonist and was initially studied for its anxiolytic properties in rats and mice (Shimizu et al., 1987). Similar to buspirone, tandospirone also exhibits dopamine antagonist action with a potency that is considerably lower than the one for the 5-HT1AR (Shimizu et al., 1987). An overview of currently available 5-HT1AR agonists is provided in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Selected overview on available 5-HT1A receptor agonists and ligands with mixed profile (reported function as presynaptic agonist and postsynaptic antagonist).
5-HT1A Receptor Antagonists
WAY-100635 and NAD-299 are the most commonly used selective antagonists in the study of the 5-HT1AR. Both ligands have high potencies and penetrate easily into the brain (Fletcher et al., 1996; Johansson et al., 1997; Stenfors et al., 1998). However, NAD-299 was found to have higher selectivity for the 5-HT1AR than WAY-100635 (Fletcher et al., 1996; Johansson et al., 1997).
The last years novel compounds have been used to assess the role of 5-HT1AR in emotional learning, such as the potent and selective 5-HT1AR antagonists SRA-333 (lecozotan; Skirzewski et al., 2010), MC18 fumarate and VP08/34 fumarate (Siracusa et al., 2008; Pittalà et al., 2015).
The agents that were initially used as 5-HT1AR antagonist were 2-methoxyphenylpiperazine derivatives with structural similarity to buspirone, such as BMY-7378 and NAN-190 (Greuel and Glaser, 1992). However, these ligands were characterized as partial 5-HT1AR antagonist with antagonist properties only at the postsynaptic HT1AR and lower affinity for the α-adrenergic receptors (Greuel and Glaser, 1992).
Finally, S-15535 is reported to act as a postsynaptic 5-HT1AR antagonist while also behaving as an agonist on presynaptic 5-HT1A autoreceptors, and therefore, it is characterized as a mixed profile ligand (Millan et al., 1993; Carli et al., 1999). However, a more recent study indicates predominantly weaker agonist activity of S-15535 at postsynaptic 5-HT1ARs (Youn et al., 2009). An overview of currently available 5-HT1AR antagonists is provided in Table 2.
5-HT7 Receptor Agonists
The lack of selective and potent 5-HT7R agonists (Misane and Ögren, 2000; Leopoldo, 2004; Leopoldo et al., 2011) is one of the major limitations to study the role of 5-HT7R in learning and memory. Currently, only a few selective 5-HT7R agonists exist and even less has been used in learning and memory studies. AS-19 and LP-44 are highly selective but low efficacy (partial) HT7R agonists whose functional role in fear learning was recently assessed (Eriksson et al., 2012). LP-211 is a novel highly selective 5-HT7R agonists (Leopoldo et al., 2008) but it has so far only been tested in an autoshaping Pavlovian/instrumental learning task (Meneses et al., 2015). An overview of currently available 5-HT7R agonists is provided in Table 3.
5-HT7 Receptor Antagonists
SB-258719 is the first selective 5-HT7R antagonist described (Forbes et al., 1998) but has not yet been used to investigate the role of 5-HT7R in the modulation of emotional learning. Both SB-656104-A and SB-269970 possess high potency and selectivity for 5-HT7R (Lovell et al., 2000; Thomas et al., 2002, 2003). These are the most commonly used 5-HT7R antagonists in behavior studies. An overview of currently available 5-HT7R antagonists is provided in Table 3.
Behavioral Tasks for the Assessment of Emotional Learning and Memory
The experimental studies on emotional learning and memory in animals are based originally on psychological analysis of conflict behavior involving approach and avoidance of conditioned stimuli. Traditionally, the assays used to investigate animal behavior are based on the association of pleasant (i.e., motivationally related reward like food) or aversive stimuli (i.e., conditions related to negative feelings like pain and danger) to environmental cues involving classical (Pavlovian) or instrumental conditioning (Ögren and Stiedl, 2015).
The FC and the PA tasks are the most commonly used associative learning paradigms based on contextual fear learning. This type of learning is dependent on the operation of neuronal circuits in the limbic system, such as hippocampus and amygdala (Cahill and McGaugh, 1998; LeDoux, 2000) as demonstrated by us in mice (e.g., Stiedl et al., 2000a,b; Baarendse et al., 2008). Unlike FC, PA also includes instrumental learning. In the step-through PA test, the animal needs to suppress its innate preference for the dark compartment (where it previously received a foot shock) and remain in the bright compartment. In the step-down PA paradigm, however, the retention is examined in the dark compartment, where the animal received the foot shock (unconditioned stimulus) after stepping down from an elevated platform. The PA test procedure can be modified to examine any facilitating effect of the treatment on PA retention (Madjid et al., 2006). More specific information on the PA task is provided elsewhere (Ögren and Stiedl, 2015). A refined version of this task may provide for better translational aspects to assess pathological fear states such as post-traumatic-like responses based on deliberate choice of mice (Hager et al., 2014).
The single-trial learning design of FC and PA, which is sufficient to establish long-term and remote memory, allows the exact timing of the drug treatment in relation to training and retention test. Thereby, unlike multi-session tasks, one-trial tasks provide a unique advantage to study learning mechanisms as well as drug effects (here 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R ligands) on the different phases of learning and memory, i.e., the acquisition phase that consists of encoding and early consolidation, consolidation, the recall (retrieval and expression) phase as well as the extinction phase and reconsolidation.
Effects of 5-HT1A Receptor Ligands in Emotional Learning and Memory
An overview of the behavioral effects of various 5-HT1AR ligands is provided in Table 4.
TABLE 4. Overview of the behavioral effects of 5-HT1A receptor agonists, ligands with mixed profile and antagonists in fear learning tasks.
Systemic 5-HT1A Receptor Ligand Effects
Despite the differences among the 5-HT1AR ligands in their chemical and pharmacological features (e.g., receptor selectivity and partial or full agonist properties; see Tables 1 and 2), there is strong evidence for the impairing effect of postsynaptic 5-HT1AR activation on fear memory. Systemic, pretraining administration of the full 5-HT1AR agonist 8-OH-DPAT shows a biphasic effect on PA performance, with the low dose range (0.01, 0.03 mg/kg) facilitating and the high dose range (0.1–1 mg/kg) impairing PA retention 24 h after training in both rats (Misane and Ögren, 2000; Lüttgen et al., 2005b) and mice (Madjid et al., 2006). The impairing dose of 8-OH-DPAT (0.2 and 0.3 mg/kg) also induces signs of the serotonin syndrome (Carli et al., 1992; Lüttgen et al., 2005b) linking the postsynaptic 5-HT1AR to the learning deficits. In line with these results, FC studies demonstrated that pretraining systemic injections of high doses (0.1–0.5 mg/kg) of 8-OH-DPAT impair fear learning (Stiedl et al., 2000a; Youn et al., 2009). Pretreatment with the selective 5-HT1AR antagonist WAY-100635 (0.03–1 mg/kg) blocked the impairment in freezing (FC) and transfer latency (PA), confirming and extending the detrimental role of the postsynaptic 5-HT1AR activation on memory acquisition.
The observed memory deficit was already present in short-term memory tests performed 1 h after training for FC retention (Stiedl et al., 2000a) and 5 min after PA training (Misane and Ögren, 2000). Thus, postsynaptic 5-HT1AR activation specifically impairs memory encoding of the aversive experience and not memory consolidation. In agreement to that observation, immediate 8-OH-DPAT post-training administration did not alter PA or FC retention (Misane and Ögren, 2000; Madjid et al., 2006).
Local 5-HT1A Receptor Ligand Effects
Intracranial administration of 5-HT1AR agonists and/or antagonists was used to further elucidate the distinct function of pre- versus postsynaptic 5-HT1ARs in fear learning. Pre- but not post-training intra-hippocampal infusion of 8-OH-DPAT impairs contextual FC (Stiedl et al., 2000a), pointing at the important role of the postsynaptic 5-HT1AR in acquisition processes as observed after systemic administration.
Effects of 5-HT1A Receptor Agonists and Antagonists on Memory Recall
Systemic 5-HT1A Receptor Ligand Effects
Unlike the unambiguous implication of the postsynaptic 5-HT1AR in memory acquisition, its role in fear retrieval and expression is less clear. The systemic 5-HT1AR agonist NDO-008 (0.5 mg/kg) administered before the retention test to rats impairs slightly PA performance (Misane et al., 1998). In contrast, systemic administration of buspirone at the dose of 1 and 3 mg/kg had no effect on fear expression in mice (Quartermain et al., 1993). These different effects may partly depend on the readouts and the side effects elicited by higher 5-HT1AR dosages, such as the hypolocomotion induced together with the serotonin syndrome (Stiedl et al., 2000a). The hypolocomotion confounds the interpretation of fear expression results in mice when based on freezing. Moreover, it also possible that differences exists between rats and mice, although our own data shows high similarity of results in these two species.
Therefore, a recent study tried to clarify the role of the 5-HT1AR in fear recall, by assessing the effect of 8-OH-DPAT on fear-conditioned HR responses (reviewed by Stiedl et al., 2009) upon training and 24 h after training, in mice (Youn et al., 2013). Systemic pretest administration reduced the conditioned maximum HR as a consequence of the significantly reduced baseline HR before the presentation of the conditioned stimulus (tone). However, the tone-induced HR increase was preserved during the retention of auditory fear in mice with similar magnitude as compared to that in controls. Additionally, 8-OH-DPAT reduced the unconditioned tachycardia elicited by novelty exposure as a consequence of altered HR dynamics indicating autonomic dysregulation with enhanced parasympathetic function through postsynaptic 5-HT1AR activation (Youn et al., 2013). Thus, the claims of anxiolytic actions of pretest injection of 5-HT1AR agonists as initially reported in human studies and partly in animal models cannot be supported unambiguously at least in learned fear experiments.
Local 5-HT1A Receptor Ligand Effects
Local administration approaches tried to distinguish the role of the post- versus the presynaptic 5-HT1AR in the different aspects of fear expression. Bilateral microinjections of a selective 5-HT1AR agonist flesinoxan decreased the expression of conditioned contextual freezing when injected into the hippocampus or amygdala but not in the medial prefrontal cortex (Li et al., 2006), as well as the fear-potentiated startle responses when infused into the central amygdala (Groenink et al., 2000).
The role of 5-HT1A autoreceptors in fear expression was also studied by pretest infusion of 8-OH-DPAT into the median raphe nuclei. This resulted in impaired contextual freezing responses (Borelli et al., 2005; Almada et al., 2009), but not fear-potentiated startle (Groenink et al., 2000; Almada et al., 2009) suggesting the existence of raphe-dependent serotonergic regulation that appears to modulate the freezing response to the aversive context. In contrast, hippocampal 8-OH-DPAT impaired the expression of both contextual freezing and fear-potentiated startle (Almada et al., 2009). However, 8-OH-DPAT mediates hyperlocomotion in rats (but hypolocomotion in mice) leading to a similar problem of potentially confounded interpretation of freezing performance during the drug state as mentioned before for mice.
Effects of 5-HT1A Receptor Agonists and Antagonists on Memory Extinction
In contrast to the well-studied implication of 5-HT1ARs on memory acquisition and recall, there is only one study with 5-HT1AR ligands on fear extinction. The systemic 5-HT1AR agonist buspirone abolishes the fear extinction in mice (Quartermain et al., 1993). Similarly, the systemic 5-HT1AR antagonist WAY-100635 before a second sampling trial impaired the extinction of object recognition memory in rats (Pitsikas et al., 2003). Further studies are needed to determine the precise role of 5-HT1ARs in memory extinction and/or reconsolidation in emotional learning tasks. Furthermore, local rather than systemic approaches are necessary to identify the neurocircuitry involved in these processes. The roles of other 5-HTRs in fear learning and the consequences of altered 5-HT neurotransmission on fear extinction are reviewed by Homberg (2012).
Effects of 5-HT7 Receptor Agonists and Antagonists on Emotional Learning
Systemic 5-HT7 Receptor Ligand Effects
The paucity of studies 5-HT7R functions on emotional learning is mainly due to the lack of selective ligands, especially agonists (Misane and Ögren, 2000; Leopoldo, 2004; Leopoldo et al., 2011; see Table 5 and text above). Recent data from an autoshaping task showing that the 5-HT7R agonist, LP-211, when administered systematically after the training session, reversed scolopamine-induced amnesia, in rats (Meneses et al., 2015). The same group also shows a facilitating effect on memory formation by the 5-HT7R agonist AS-19 administered after an autoshaping training session (Perez-García and Meneses, 2005). The enhancing effect of 5-HT7Rs on memory consolidation was blocked by pre-injection of the 5-HT7R antagonist SB-269970 (Perez-García and Meneses, 2005; Meneses et al., 2015) indicating the specific involvement of the 5-HT7R.
TABLE 5. Overview of the behavioral effects of 5-HT7 receptor agonists and antagonists in learning tasks (not restricted to fear learning).
Eriksson et al. (2008) investigated the role of 5-HT7R on emotional learning in mice using a step-through PA paradigm. Pretraining systemic administration of the 5-HT7R antagonist SB-269970 enhanced the impairing effect of low doses of 8-OH-DPAT (Eriksson et al., 2008). This result supports the notion that 5-HT7R activation has a beneficial modulatory role in learning opposing the function of 5-HT1AR activation. Accordingly, pretraining 5-HT7R activation by the combined use of the 5-HT1AR antagonist NAD-299 with the 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R agonist 8-OH-DPAT facilitated PA retention (Eriksson et al., 2012). This PA facilitation by NAD-299 together with 8-OH-DPAT was again blocked by the 5-HT7R antagonist SB-269970 indicating a procognitive effect of 5-HT7R activation by this drug combination. However, the 5-HT7R agonists LP-44 and AS-19 failed to mediate this PA facilitation, despite dose-dependent tests. Despite their high in vitro potency to stimulate intracellular signaling cascades (Eriksson et al., 2012), the 5-HT7R agonists LP-44 and AS-19 have moderate agonist efficacy in vivo. This finding is in agreement with previous pharmacological characterization (Monti et al., 2008; Bosker et al., 2009; Brenchat et al., 2009) in vivo and may explain why the facilitatory effect of NAD-299 with 8-OH-DPAT could not be mimicked by the putative agonists LP-44 and AS-19.
Local 5-HT7 Receptor Ligand Effects
To further address the role of 5-HT7Rs on emotional learning, Eriksson et al. (2012) performed hippocampal infusions with the 5-HT7R agonist AS-19 in mice. Since they failed to find clear facilitatory effects, as observed after systemic treatment, they concluded that “5-HT7Rs appear to facilitate memory processes in a broader cortico-limbic network and not the hippocampus alone.” The failure of the SB-269970 to enhance emotional memory, upon hippocampal infusions, may be the consequence of the low dose that can be locally infused due to the relatively poor solubility of SB-269970. However, systemic administration of this 5-HT7R antagonist fully blocked the PA facilitation observed after 5-HT1AR blockade. Hence, the hippocampus-dependent involvement of the 5-HT7Rs needs to be re-investigated with selective highly potent 5-HT7R agonists, because also the low potency of AS-19 (Eriksson et al., 2012) may have contributed to the lack of effects by dorsohippocampal 5-HT7R agonist application on PA. Finally, although the role of 5-HT7R in memory consolidation has been suggested, there are currently insufficient data supporting this view. More work is also required to clarify the role of 5-HT7R in memory extinction and reconsolidation, which are both essentially unexplored.
The Interplay of the 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 for Emotional Learning
The interaction of the two 5-HTR subtypes in emotional learning has been studied by using 8-OH-DPAT, which exerts agonistic effects for both 5-HT1ARs and 5-HT7Rs. To dissect the function of these 5-HTRs, pre-treatment with selective 5-HT1AR antagonists is used to exclusively activate 5-HT7R. Eriksson et al. (2008) were the first to suggest the functional interplay between the two 5-HTRs on the behavioral level as the activation of 5-HT7R counteracted the 5-HT1AR-mediated impairments in PA performance. The interaction between the two 5-HTRs and their functional antagonism was then extended by experiments in mice, demonstrating that 5-HT7R activation and concomitant 5-HT1AR blockade leads to PA facilitation (Eriksson et al., 2012). The facilitatory effect on emotional memory by the 5-HT1A antagonist NAD-299 was related to stimulation of 5-HT7Rs under conditions with reduced 5-HT1AR transmission. These findings suggest that the states of 5-HT1ARs and 5-HT7Rs play a critical role for 5-HT effects on emotional memory. Consequently, the elevation of endogenous 5-HT via SSRIs will most likely result in differential cognitive/emotional effects depending on genetic and/or epigenetic regulation and occupancy of these two 5-HTRs in health and disease. This condition will affect the expression of the 5-HT1AR and change the relative balance between 5-HTR subtypes, which together will eventually determine the physiological actions of 5-HT and the clinical efficacy of SSRI treatment.
Mechanisms Underlying the Functional Interaction of 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R
As described above, 5-HT1ARs and 5-HT7Rs mediate opposing effects regarding the neuronal excitability. 5-HT1AR activation reduces the activity of adenyl cyclase, whereas 5-HT7R activation stimulates adenyl cyclase activity and thereby increases intracellular cAMP thereby increasing neuronal excitability (Bockaert et al., 2006; Nichols and Nichols, 2008; Berumen et al., 2012). Accordingly, 5-HT7R stimulation in the hippocampus was found to activate pyramidal neurons, unlike 5-HT1AR activation which inhibited pyramidal neurons (Bickmeyer et al., 2002). Both 5-HTRs are expressed in glutamatergic hippocampal pyramidal neurons (Bockaert et al., 2006; Nichols and Nichols, 2008; Berumen et al., 2012). Therefore, it is likely that 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R stimulation decreases and increases glutamate release in the hippocampus, respectively. In line with these results, 5-HT7R activation enhances the AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic currents on CA1 pyramidal neurons, whereas 5-HT1AR activation inhibits the AMPA receptor-mediated transmission between CA3 and CA1 pyramidal neurons in both pre- and postsynaptic sites (Costa et al., 2012). However, the 5-HT1AR-mediated inhibitory effect on glutamatergic neurotransmission was stronger than the 5-HT7R-mediated facilitatory effect (Costa et al., 2012). One explanation for the increased effectiveness of 5-HT1AR in controlling the input from the Schaffer collaterals may stem from the different localization of the two receptors on the CA1 pyramidal neurons: 5-HT7Rs are found on the cell bodies (Bickmeyer et al., 2002), whereas the 5-HT1ARs appear to be mainly localized on dendrites (Kia et al., 1996).
Differences in the expression of the receptors could also play an essential role in their distinct activation pattern from the endogenous 5-HT. The progressive reduction of post-synaptic 5-HT7R levels during postnatal development, together with the maintenance of the expression level of 5-HT1AR (Kobe et al., 2012; Renner et al., 2012), could increase the ratio of membrane 5-HT1ARs over 5-HT7Rs. Consequently, a model has been proposed regarding the molecular mechanisms that underlie the regulation of the 5-HT1ARs and 5-HT7Rs. 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R form heterodimers both in vitro and in vivo (Renner et al., 2012). This heterodimerization plays a functional role by decreasing Gi protein coupling of the 5-HT1AR and by reducing the ability of 5-HT1AR to activate potassium channels, without affecting the Gs protein coupling of the 5-HT7R. The heterodimerization additionally contributes to the desensitization of the 5-HT1AR through facilitated internalization (Renner et al., 2012).
5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R are co-localized in the cell membrane of hippocampal neurons, where their heterodimerization induces an inhibitory effect on the 5-HT1AR-mediated activation of potassium channels in hippocampal neurons (Renner et al., 2012). As mentioned above the post-synaptic levels of 5-HT7R are lower compared to the expression levels of post-synaptic 5-HT1AR, whereas this is not the case for the pre-synaptic 5-HT7R (Renner et al., 2012). These regional differences in the 5-HT7R levels and therefore in the concentration of the heterodimers, can explain the preferential desensitization of 5-HT1A autoreceptors by SSRIs and more generally the region- and cell- specific differences in the signaling pathway mediated by the 5-HT1AR activation (see Naumenko et al., 2014). In summary, the above data suggest that the positive or negative consequences of a drug on emotional memory and cognition depend on the relative level of 5-HTR expression and, its efficacy in activating different receptors with their downstream signaling pathways.
Genetic and Epigenetic Effects on 5-HT Transmission and Receptor Expression
Genetic and/or epigenetic effects regulate the receptor’s state and eventually define the physiological actions of endogenous 5-HT. A characteristic example is the Ala50Val variant of the 5-HT1AR, located in the transmembrane region 1, that leads to loss of response to 5-HT and consequently to the interruption of 5-HT signaling (Del Tredici et al., 2004). Moreover, the human polymorphism Gly22Ser attenuates the downregulating effect induced by long-term 8-OH-DPAT stimulation in comparison to the Val28 variant and wild-type without effect on the ligand binding capacity (Rotondo et al., 1997). It is suggested that individuals with the Ser22 variant have higher sensitivity to SSRIs treatment since its serotonergic effect depends on the efficiency of 5-HT1AR transmission (Rotondo et al., 1997). Furthermore, carriers of the short (s) allele of the 5-HT transporter promotor region possess behavioral abnormalities, such as increased levels of anxiety and FC as well as stronger fear potentiated startle (Bauer, 2014) in comparison to long (l) allele carriers. Accordingly, the therapeutic efficacy of SSRIs is reduced in patients homozygous for the s-allele when compared with heterozygous or l-allele carriers (Tomita et al., 2014).
The epigenetic regulation of 5-HTR subtypes is also implicated in the differential emotional and cognitive modulation induced by the serotonergic signaling. It is widely accepted that 5-HT1AR binding is reduced in the brain of depressed humans (e.g., Savitz et al., 2009) as well as in stressed rats (e.g., Choi et al., 2014) as indication of epigenetic modulation. 5-HT1AR activation in the basolateral amygdala and the prelimbic area of the prefrontal cortex in low-anxious rats reduced fear potentiated startle, whereas 5-HT1AR activation in the periaqueductal gray of high-anxious rats had the opposite effect (Ferreira and Nobre, 2014). These findings highlight how environmental conditions can contribute to individual differences in 5-HT1AR-mediated response differences. In line with this, single-housed mice display a stronger hypothermic effect upon 5-HT1AR activation by 8-OH-DPAT, which is associated with an increased depressive-like state, in comparison to their group-housed counterparts (Kalliokoski et al., 2014). However, the mechanisms underlying the inter-individual differences in serotonergic signaling and consequently in cognitive and emotional modulation are not clear yet.
A linkage disequilibrium study identified two polymorphisms (rs3808932 and rs12412496) in the human HTR7 suggesting that it is a schizophrenia susceptibility gene (Ikeda et al., 2006). However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no evidence for the effect of 5-HT7R polymorphisms on serotonergic signaling or the interaction between polymorphisms of 5-HT7 and 5-HT1ARs. Therefore, to elucidate the functional interaction between 5HT1AR and 5-HT7R, it is of high importance to understand which polymorphisms influence the expression of those 5-HTRs and how these changes affect emotional and cognitive functions. This knowledge could potentially reveal the polymorphisms that modulate the endophenotypes of different affective disorders, closely linked with the function of 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R, such as anxiety and depression.
Neurochemical Effects in the Hippocampus
In contrast to the above electrophysiological results, in vivo microdialysis in awake rats showed that the local blockade of 5-HT1AR increased extracellular acetylcholine (ACh) levels (Madjid et al., 2006; Hirst et al., 2008; Kehr et al., 2010) but failed to show changes in hippocampal glutamate release in the ventral hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex (Kehr et al., 2010). The result with ACh is consistent with the pro-cognitive effect of (postsynaptic) 5-HT1AR blockade in PA (Madjid et al., 2006). However, the expected glutamate increase may not be detectable because of the limited capacity of microdialysis to detect small transmitter changes restricted to the synaptic cleft. More sensitive techniques are required such as enzyme-based microelectrode amperometry, which is selective for the detection of extracellular glutamate with (1) spatial resolution in the μm level, (2) sub-second temporal resolution and (3) sensitivity in the μm range of glutamate (Day et al., 2006; Konradsson-Geuken et al., 2009; Mishra et al., 2015). This novel technology is suited to provide evidence for the expected enhancement of glutamatergic transmission in the hippocampus by both 5-HT1AR inhibition and 5-HT7R activation.
It is clear that the impairing effects of low dose NMDA receptor antagonists (e.g., MK-801) and cholinergic antagonist (e.g., scopolamine) can be prevented by serotonergic manipulations (Ögren et al., 2008). Thus, these two pharmacological models of cognitive impairment relevant for Alzheimer’s disease are both alleviated by 5-HT1AR inhibition demonstrating a role for both enhanced glutamatergic and cholinergic transmission for improved cognitive function (e.g., Schechter et al., 2005; Madjid et al., 2006). An overview of these modulatory effects is provided in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1. Simplified overview of 5-HT1AR- and 5-HT7R-mediated modulation of fear learning in pre- and postsynaptic neurons under conditions of high (A) and low presynaptic 5-HT1AR activation (B), resulting in low and high postsynaptic 5-HT release, respectively. This in turn causes increased and decreased acetylcholine (ACh) release in the hippocampus (and also the medial septum). A similar effect on hippocampal glutamate (Glu) levels is hypothesized (as shown in the medial septum). When high postsynaptic 5-HT levels are biased to 5-HT7R activation (C), e.g., by 8-OH-DPAT at the postsynaptic dose of 1 mg/kg in combination with the 5-HT1AR antagonist NAD-299 at 0.3 mg/kg, a pro-cognitive effect in fear learning is observed. Thus, emotional learning and memory depend on intrasynaptic 5-HT levels, receptor availability and occupancy, genetic and epigenetic factors for 5-HTR regulation and its short- and long-term mechanisms underlying altered synaptic transmission via ACh and glutamate (Glu) release. Under conditions of higher (postsynaptic) 5-HT release, the cognitive consequences depend on the availability and occupancy of 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7Rs with so far unknown conditions that bias toward impaired (B) or facilitated fear memory (C). The specific functions of GABAergic interneurons in 5-HT1AR and 5-HT7R-mediated fear memory modulation are currently not understood.
Conclusion and Future Perspectives
During the last three decades many studies have indicated important regulatory functions of 5-HT signaling for emotional and cognitive functions. However, the complexity of the serotonergic signaling due to the existence of at least 14 pre- and postsynaptic 5-HTRs subtypes with multiple transduction mechanisms makes it exceedingly difficult to assign unambiguously the physiological and behavioral role of a single 5-HTR subtype. However, the use of specific ligands in combination with systemic and intrahippocampal administration, receptor autoradiography and in vivo neurochemical measurements are powerful tools in identifying the action of specific ligands in local networks of the brain including subareas of the hippocampus. This approach, combined with in vivo electrophysiology and genetic tools, can also better define the functional role of 5-HT in the neuronal circuitry underlying cognitive function.
Overall a number of open questions need to be answered to further improve our understanding of the role of serotonergic signaling via the different 5-HTRs in health and disease:
(1) How do 5-HTRs modulate hippocampal and cortical glutamatergic transmission with a focus on activation and inhibition of 5-HT1ARs and 5-HT7Rs? This needs to be determined with newly developed amperometry methods in in vivo recordings.
(2) What are the roles of 5-HT1ARs and 5-HT7Rs in defined hippocampal subregions for emotional and cognitive functions? This requires the development of new ligands with low lipophilicity for local actions tested in vivo. Alternatively, is should be possible to shut down the second messenger coupling of neurons selectively expressing 5-HT1ARs and 5-HT7Rs by Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADD) technology.
(3) What are the roles of 5-HT1ARs and 5-HT7Rs in different memory phases? As indicated there are considerable inconsistencies about the role of 5-HT1ARs and 5-HT7Rs in the consolidation process. In addition, extinction and reconsolidation are so far poorly explored.
(4) The regulation of 5-HTR expression has so far focused on the 5-HT1AR. This needs to be extended to other 5-HTRs including the 5-HT7R. Besides the use of radio-ligands in imaging studies, the subcellular immunohistochemical analyses of 5-HTR protein levels requires the development of specific antibodies.
(5) Finally, despite the evidence of the beneficial effects of 5-HT1AR antagonists in preclinical models, the therapeutic potential to facilitate cholingergic and/or glutamatergic neurotransmission for improved cognitive function in human neuropathology (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease) or in aging is so far not explored.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
This work was supported by the Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research and the Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam (OS, EP) and by the Swedish Research Council (SÖ).
5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HTR, 5-HT receptor; cAMP, cyclic AMP; CNS, central nervous system; Epac, exchange proteins directly activated by cAMP; ERK, extracellular signal-related kinase; FC, fear conditioning; HR, heart rate; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PA, passive avoidance; PKA, protein kinase A; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
Ahlenius, S., Larsson, K., and Wijkström, A. (1991). Behavioral and biochemical effects of the 5-HT1A receptor agonists flesinoxan and 8-OH-DPAT in the rat. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 200, 259–266. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(91)90580-J
Allen, A. R., Singh, A., Zhuang, Z. P., Kung, M. P., Kung, H. F., and Lucki, I. (1997). The 5-HT1A receptor antagonist p-MPPI blocks responses mediated by postsynaptic and presynaptic 5-HT1A receptors. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 57, 301–307. doi: 10.1016/S0091-3057(96)00339-5
Almada, R. C., Borelli, K. G., Albrechet-Souza, L., and Brandão, M. L. (2009). Serotonergic mechanisms of the median raphe nucleus-dorsal hippocampus in conditioned fear: output circuit involves the prefrontal cortex and amygdale. Behav. Brain Res. 203, 279–287. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.05.017
Arvidsson, L. E., Hacksell, U., Nilsson, J. L., Hjorth, S., Carlsson, A., Lindberg, P., et al. (1981). 8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin, a new centrally acting 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor agonist. J. Med. Chem. 24, 9219–9223. doi: 10.1021/jm00140a002
Assié, M. B., Lomenech, H., Ravailhe, V., Faucillon, V., and Newman-Tancredi, A. (2006). Rapid desensitization of somatodendritic 5-HT1A receptors by chronic administration of the high-efficacy 5-HT1A agonist, F13714: a microdialysis study in the rat. Br. J. Pharmacol. 149, 170–178. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706859
Baarendse, P. J. J., van Grootheest, G., Jansen, R. F., Pieneman, A. W., Ögren, S. O., Verhage, M., et al. (2008). Differential involvement of the dorsal hippocampus in passive avoidance in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice. Hippocampus 18, 11–19. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20356
Bard, J. A., Zgombick, J., Adham, N., Vaysse, P., Branchek, T. A., and Weinshank, R. L. (1993). Cloning of a novel human serotonin receptor (5-HT7) positively linked to adenylate cyclase. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23422–23426.
Becker, O. M., Dhanoa, D. S., Marantz, Y., Chen, D., Shacham, S., Cheruku, S., et al. (2006). An integrated in silico 3D model-driven discovery of a novel, potent, and selective amidosulfonamide 5-HT1A agonist (PRX-00023) for the treatment of anxiety and depression. J. Med. Chem. 49, 3116–3135. doi: 10.1021/jm0508641
Béïque, J. C., Imad, M., Mladenovic, L., Gingrich, J. A., and Andrade, R. (2007). Mechanism of the 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptor-mediated facilitation of synaptic activity in prefrontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 9870–9875. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700436104
Bertrand, F., Lehmann, O., Galani, R., Lazarus, C., Jeltsch, H., and Cassel, J. C. (2001). Effects of MDL 73005 on water-maze performances and locomotor activity in scopolamine-treated rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 68, 647–660. doi: 10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00448-8
Bickmeyer, U., Heine, M., Manzke, T., and Richter, D. W. (2002). Differential modulation of Ih by 5-HT receptors in mouse CA1 hippocampal neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 16, 209–218. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02072.x
Bockaert, J., Claeysen, S., Bécamel, C., Dumuis, A., and Marin, P. (2006). Neuronal 5-HT metabotropic receptors: fine-tuning of their structure, signaling, and roles in synaptic modulation. Cell Tiss. Res. 326, 553–572. doi: 10.1007/s00441-006-0286-1
Bonaventure, P., Nepomuceno, D., Hein, L., Sutcliffe, J. G., Lovenberg, T., and Hedlund, P. B. (2004). Radioligand binding analysis of knockout mice reveals 5-hydroxytryptamine7 receptor distribution and uncovers 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin interaction with 2 adrenergic receptors. Neuroscience 124, 901–911. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.01.014
Borelli, K. G., Gárgaro, A. C., dos Santos, J. M., and Brandão, M. L. (2005). Effects of inactivation of serotonergic neurons of the median raphe nucleus on learning and performance of contextual fear conditioning. Neurosci. Lett. 387, 105–110. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.07.031
Bosker, F. J., Folgering, J. H., Gladkevich, A. V., Schmidt, A., van der Hart, M. C., Sprouse, J., et al. (2009). Antagonism of 5-HT1A receptors uncovers an excitatory effect of SSRIs on 5-HT neuronal activity, an action probably mediated by 5-HT7 receptors. J. Neurochem. 108, 1126–1135. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05850.x
Bradley, P. B., Engle, G., Feniuk, W., Fozard, J. R., Humphrey, P. P. A., Middlemis, D. N., et al. (1986). Proposals for the classification and nomenclature of functional receptors of 5-hydroxytryptamine. Neuropharmacology 25, 563–576. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(86)90207-8
Brenchat, A., Romero, L., García, M., Pujol, M., Burgueño, J., Torrens, A., et al. (2009). 5-HT7 receptor activation inhibits mechanical hypersensitivity secondary to capsaicin sensitization in mice. Pain 141, 239–247. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.11.009
Carli, M., Balducci, C., Millan, M. J., Bonalumi, P., and Samanin, R. (1999). S 15535, a benzodioxopiperazine acting as presynaptic agonist and postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, prevents the impairment of spatial learning caused by intrahippocampal scopolamine. Br. J. Pharmacol. 128, 1207–1214. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701632
Carli, M., Lazarova, M., Tatarczynska, E., and Samanin, R. (1992). Stimulation of 5-HT1A receptors in the dorsal hippocampus impairs acquisition and performance of a spatial task in a water maze. Brain Res. 595, 50–56. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)91451-J
Choi, J. Y., Shin, S., Lee, M., Jeon, T. J., Seo, Y., Kim, C. H., et al. (2014). Acute physical stress induces the alteration of the serotonin 1A receptor density in the hippocampus. Synapse 68, 363–368. doi: 10.1002/syn.21748
Clarke, W. P., Yocca, F. D., and Maayani, S. (1996). Lack of 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase in dorsal raphe of male and female rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 277, 1259–1266.
Costa, L., Trovato, C., Musumeci, S. A., Catania, M. V., and Ciranna, L. (2012). 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 receptors differently modulate AMPA receptor-mediated hippocampal synaptic transmission. Hippocampus 22, 790–801. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20940
Day, B. K., Pomerleau, F., Burmeister, J. J., Huettl, P., and Gerhardt, G. A. (2006). Microelectrode array studies of basal and potassium-evoked release of L-glutamate in the anesthetized rat brain. J. Neurochem. 96, 1626–1635. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03673.x
De Vivo, M., and Maayani, S. (1986). Characterization of the 5-hydroxytryptamine1A receptor-mediated inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in guinea pig and rat hippocampal membranes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 238, 248–253.
De Vry, J., Schohe-Loop, R., Heine, H. G., Greuel, J. M., Mauler, F., Schmidt, B., et al. (1998). Characterization of the aminomethylchroman derivative BAY×3702 as a highly potent 5-hydroxytryptamine1A receptor agonist. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 284, 1082–1094.
Del Tredici, A. L., Schiffer, H. H., Burstein, E. S., Lameh, J., Mohell, N., Hacksell, U., et al. (2004). Pharmacology of polymorphic variants of the human 5-HT1A receptor. Biochem. Pharmacol. 67, 479–490. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705576
Den Boer, J. A., Bosker, F. J., and Slaap, B. R. (2000). Serotonergic drugs in the treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 15, 315–336. doi: 10.1002/1099-1077(200007)15:5<315::AID-HUP204>3.0.CO;2-Y
Deseure, K., Koek, W., Colpaert, F. C., and Adriaensen, H. (2002). The 5-HT1A receptor agonist F 13640 attenuates mechanical allodynia in a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 456, 51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2003.09.030
Elvander-Tottie, E., Eriksson, T. M., Sandin, J., and Ögren, S. O. (2009). 5-HT1A and NMDA receptors interact in the rat medial septum and modulate hippocampal-dependent spatial learning. Hippocampus 19, 1187–1198. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20596
Eriksson, T. M., Holst, S., Stan, T. L., Hager, T., Sjögren, B., Ögren, S. O., et al. (2012). 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 receptor crosstalk in the regulation of emotional memory: implications for effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Neuropharmacology 63, 1150–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.06.061
Eriksson, T. M., Golkar, A., Ekström, J. C., Svenningsson, P., and Ögren, S. O. (2008). 5-HT7 receptor stimulation by 8-OH-DPAT counteracts the impairing effect of 5-HT1A receptor stimulation on contextual learning in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 596, 107–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.08.026
Errico, M., Crozier, R. A., Plummer, M. R., and Cowen, D. S. (2001). 5-HT7 receptors activate the mitogen activated protein kinase extracellular signal related kinase in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Neuroscience 102, 361–367. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00460-7
Ferreira, R., and Nobre, M. J. (2014). Conditioned fear in low- and high-anxious rats is differentially regulated by cortical subcortical and midbrain 5-HT receptors. Neuroscience 268, 159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.03.005
Fletcher, A., Forster, E. A., Bill, D. J., Brown, G., Cliffe, I. A., Hartley, J. E., et al. (1996). Electrophysiological, biochemical, neurohormonal and behavioural studies with WAY-100635, a potent, selective and silent 5 HT1A receptor antagonist. Behav. Brain Res. 73, 337–353. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(96)00118-0
Forbes, I. T., Dabbs, S., Duckworth, D. M., Jennings, A. J., King, F. D., Lovell, P. J., et al. (1998). (R)-3,N-dimethyl-N-[1-methyl-3-(4-methyl-piperidin-1-yl) propyl]benzenesulfonamide: the first selective 5-HT7 receptor antagonist. J. Med. Chem. 41, 655–657. doi: 10.1021/jm970519e
Gozlan, H., El Mestikawy, S., Pichat, L., Glowinski, J., and Hamon, M. (1983). Identification of presynaptic serotonin autoreceptors using a new ligand: 3H-PAT. Nature 305, 140–142. doi: 10.1038/305140a0
Grasby, P. M., Sharp, T., Allen, T., and Grahame-Smith, D. G. (1992). The putative 5-HT1A antagonist BMY 7378 blocks 8-OH-DPAT-induced changes in local cerebral glucose utilization in the conscious rat. Neuropharmacology 31, 547–551. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(92)90186-S
Greuel, J. M., and Glaser, T. (1992). The putative 5-HT1A receptor antagonists NAN-190 and BMY 7378 are partial agonists in the rat dorsal raphe nucleus in vitro. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 211, 211–219. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(92)90531-8
Griebel, G., Misslin, R., Pawlowski, M., Guardiola Lemaitre, B., Guillaumet, G., and Bizot- Espiard, J. (1992). Anxiolytic-like effects of a selective 5-HT1A agonist, S20244, and its enantiomers in mice. NeuroReport 3, 84–86. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199201000-00022
Groenink, L., Joordens, R. J., Hijzen, T. H., Dirks, A., and Olivier, B. (2000). Infusion of flesinoxan into the amygdala blocks the fear-potentiated startle. NeuroReport 11, 2285–2288. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200007140-00043
Hadrava, V., Blier, P., Dennis, T., Ortemann, C., and de Montigny, C. (1995). Characterization of 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A properties of flesinoxan: in vivo electrophysiology and hypothermia study. Neuropharmacology 34, 1311–1326. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(95)00098-Q
Hager, T., Jansen, R. F., Pieneman, A. W., Manivannan, S. N., Golani, I., van der Sluis, S., et al. (2014). Display of individuality in avoidance behavior and risk assessment of inbred mice. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8:314. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00314
Hajós-Korcsok, E., McQuade, R., and Sharp, T. (1999). Influence of 5-HT1A receptors on central noradrenergic activity: microdialysis studies using (±)-MDL 73005EF and its enantiomers. Neuropharmacology 38, 299–306. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3908(98)00175-0
Heisler, L. K., Chu, H. M., Brennan, T. J., Danao, J. A., Bajwa, P., Parsons, L. H., et al. (1998). Elevated anxiety and antidepressant-like responses in serotonin 5-HT1A receptor mutant mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 15049–15054. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.25.15049
Hervas, I., and Artigas, F. (1998). Effect of fluoxetine on extracellular 5-hydroxytryptamine in rat brain. Role of 5-HT autoreceptors. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 358, 9–18. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2999(98)00579-2
Heusler, P., Palmier, C., Tardif, S., Bernois, S., Colpaert, F. C., and Cussac, D. (2010). [3H]-F13640, a novel, selective and high-efficacy serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist radioligand. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 382, 321–330. doi: 10.1007/s00210-010-0551-4
Hirst, W. D., Andree, T. H., Aschmies, S., Childers, W. E., Comery, T. A., Dawson, L. A., et al. (2008). Correlating efficacy in rodent cognition models with in vivo 5-hydroxytryptamine1a receptor occupancy by a novel antagonist, (R)-N-(2-methyl-(4-indolyl-1-piperazinyl)ethyl)-N-(2-pyridinyl)-cyclohexane carboxamide (WAY-101405). J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 325, 134–145. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.133082
Hjorth, S., and Carlsson, A. (1982). Buspirone: effects on central monoaminergic transmission -possible relevance to animal experimental and clinical findings. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 83, 299–303. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(82)90265-5
Horisawa, T., Ishibashi, T., Nishikawa, H., Enomoto, T., Toma, S., Ishiyama, T., et al. (2011). The effects of selective antagonists of serotonin 5-HT7 and 5-HT1A receptors on MK-801-induced impairment of learning and memory in the passive avoidance and Morris water maze tests in rats: mechanistic implications for the beneficial effects of the novel atypical antipsychotic lurasidone. Behav. Brain Res. 220, 83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.01.034
Hoyer, D., Clarke, D. E., Fozard, J. R., Hartig, P. R., Martin, G. R., Mylecharane, E. J., et al. (1994). International union of pharmacology classification of receptors for 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin). Pharmacol. Rev. 46, 157–203.
Hunt, S. P., and Lovick, T. A. (1982). The distribution of serotonin, met-enkephalin and beta-lipotropin-like immunoreactivity in neuronal perikarya of the cat brainstem. Neurosci. Lett. 30, 139–145. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(82)90286-5
Ikeda, M., Iwata, N., Kitajima, T., Suzuki, T., Yamanouchi, Y., Kinoshita, Y., et al. (2006). Positive association of the serotonin 5-HT7 receptor gene with schizophrenia in a Japanese population. Neuropsychopharmacology 31, 866–871. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300901
Ishimura, K., Takeuchi, Y., Fujiwara, K., Tominaga, M., Yoshioka, H., and Sawada, T. (1988). Quantitative analysis of the distribution of serotonin-immunoreactive cell bodies in the mouse brain. Neurosci. Lett. 91, 265–270. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(88)90691-X
Jackson, D. M., Bengtsson, A., Johansson, C., Cortizo, L., and Ross, S. B. (1994). Development of tolerance to 8-OH-DPAT induced blockade of acquisition of a passive avoidance response. Neuropharmacology 33, 1003–1009. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(94)90159-7
Johansson, L., Sohn, D., Thorberg, S. O., Jackson, D. M., Kelder, D., Larsson, L. G., et al. (1997). The pharmacological characterization of a novel selective 5-hydroxytryptamine1A receptor antagonist, NAD-299. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 283, 216–225.
Kalliokoski, O., Teilmann, A. C., Jacobsen, K. R., Abelson, K. S., and Hau, J. (2014). The lonely mouse - single housing affects serotonergic signaling integrity measured by 8-OH-DPAT-induced hypothermia in male mice. PLoS ONE 9:e111065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111065
Kehr, J., Hu, X. J., Yoshitake, T., Wang, F. H., Osborne, P., Stenfors, C., et al. (2010). The selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist NAD-299 increases acetylocholine release but not the extracellular glutamate levels in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of awake rat. Eur. Neupsychopharmacol. 20, 487–500. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.03.003
Kia, H. K., Brisorgueil, M. J., Hamon, M., Calas, A., and Verge, D. (1996). Ultrastructural localization of 5-hydroxytryptamine1A receptors in the rat brain. J. Neurosci. Res. 46, 697–708. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19961215)46:6<697::AID-JNR7>3.0.CO;2-A
Kobe, F., Guseva, D., Jensen, T. P., Wirth, A., Renner, U., Hess, D., et al. (2012). 5-HT7R/G12 signaling regulates neuronal morphology and function in an age-dependent manner. J. Neurosci. 32, 2915–2930. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2765-11.2012
Konradsson-Geuken, A., Gash, C. R., Alexander, K., Pomerleau, F., Huettl, P., Gerhardt, G. A., et al. (2009). Second-by-second analysis of alpha 7 nicotine receptor regulation of glutamate release in the prefrontal cortex of awake rats. Synapse 63, 1069–1082. doi: 10.1002/syn.20693
Kung, H. F., Stevenson, D. A., Zhuang, Z. P., Kung, M. P., Frederick, D., and Hurt, S. D. (1996). New 5-HT1A receptor antagonist: [3H]p-MPPF. Synapse 23, 344–346. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199608)23:4<344::AID-SYN13>3.0.CO;2-X
Leopoldo, M., Lacivita, E., Berardi, F., Perrone, R., and Hedlund, P. B. (2011). Serotonin 5-HT7 receptor agents: structure-activity relationships and potential therapeutic applications in central nervous system disorders. Pharmacol. Ther. 129, 120–148. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.08.013
Leopoldo, M., Lacivita, E., De Giorgio, P., Fracasso, C., Guzzetti, S., Caccia, S., et al. (2008). Structural modifications of N-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl)-4-aryl-1-piperazinehexanamides: influence on lipophilicity and 5-HT7 receptor activity. Part III J. Med. Chem. 51, 5813–5822. doi: 10.1021/jm800615e
Li, X., Inoue, T., Abekawa, T., Weng, S., Nakagawa, S., Izumi, T., et al. (2006). 5-HT1A receptor agonist affects fear conditioning through stimulations of the postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors in the hippocampus and amygdala. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 532, 74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.12.008
Lin, S. L., Johnson-Farley, N. N., Lubinsky, D. R., and Cowen, D. S. (2003). Coupling of neuronal 5-HT7 receptors to activation of extracellular-regulated kinase through a protein kinase A-independent pathway that can utilize Epac. J. Neurochem. 87, 1076–1085. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02076.x
Lovell, P. J., Bromidge, S. M., Dabbs, S., Duckworth, D. M., Forbes, I. T., Jennings, A. J., et al. (2000). A novel, potent, and selective 5-HT7 antagonist: (R)-3-(2-(2-(4-methylpiperidin-1-yl)ethyl)pyrrolidine-1-sulfonyl)phenol (SB-269970). J. Med. Chem. 10, 342–345. doi: 10.1021/jm990412m
Lovenberg, T. W., Baron, B. M., de Lecea, L., Miller, J. D., Prosser, R. A., Rea, M. A., et al. (1993). A novel adenylyl cyclase-activating serotonin receptor (5-HT7) implicated in the regulation of mammalian circadian rhythms. Neuron 11, 449–458. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90149-L
Lüttgen, M., Ögren, S. O., and Meister, B. (2005a). 5-HT1A receptor mRNA and immunoreactivity in the rat medial septum/diagonal band of Broca - relationships to GABAergic and cholinergic neurons. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 29, 93–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2004.09.001
Lüttgen, M., Elvander, E., Madjid, N., and Ögren, S. O. (2005b). Analysis of the role of 5-HT1A receptors in spatial and aversive learning in the rat. Neuropharmacology 48, 830–852. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.01.007
Madjid, N., Tottie, E. E., Lüttgen, M., Meister, B., Sandin, J., Kuzmin, A., et al. (2006). 5-Hydroxytryptamine 1A receptor blockade facilitates aversive learning in mice: interactions with cholinergic and glutamatergic mechanisms. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 316, 581–591. doi: 10.1124/jpet.105.092262
Mahé, C., Loetscher, E., Feuerbach, D., Müller, W., Seiler, M. P., and Schoeffter, P. (2004). Differential inverse agonist efficacies of SB-258719, SB-258741 and SB-269970 at human recombinant serotonin 5-HT7 receptors. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 495, 97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.05.033
Martin-Cora, F. J., and Pazos, A. (2004). Autoradiographic distribution of 5-HT7 receptors in the human brain using [3H]mesulergine: comparison to other mammalian species. Br. J. Pharmacol. 141, 92–104. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705576
Matsuda, T., Yoshikawa, T., Suzuki, M., Asano, S., Somboonthum, P., Takuma, K., et al. (1995). Novel benzodioxan derivative, 5-(3-[((2S)-1,4-benzodioxan-2-ylmethyl)amino]propoxy)-1,3-benzodioxole HCl (MKC-242), with a highly potent and selective agonist activity at rat central serotonin1A receptors. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 69, 357–366. doi: 10.1254/jjp.69.357
Maurel, J. L., Autin, J. M., Funes, P., Newman-Tancredi, A., Colpaert, F., and Vacher, B. (2007). High-efficacy 5-HT1A agonists for antidepressant treatment: a renewed opportunity. J. Med. Chem. 50, 5024–5033. doi: 10.1021/jm070714l
Mendelson, S. D., Quartermain, D., Francisco, T., and Shemer, A. (1993). 5-HT1A receptor agonists induce anterograde amnesia in mice through a postsynaptic mechanism. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 236, 177–182. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(93)90587-8
Meneses, A., Perez-García, G., Liy-Salmeron, G., Ponce-López, T., Lacivita, E., and Leopoldo, M. (2015). 5-HT7 receptor activation: procognitive and antiamnesic effects. Psychopharmacology 232, 595–603. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3693-0
Millan, M. J., Agid, Y., Brüne, M., Bullmore, E. T., Carter, C. S., Clayton, N. S., et al. (2012). Cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders: characteristics, causes and the quest for improved therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 11, 141–168. doi: 10.1038/nrd3628
Millan, M. J., Rivet, J. M., Canton, H., Lejeune, F., Gobert, A., Widdowson, P., et al. (1993). S 15535, a highly selective benzodioxopiperazine 5-HT1A receptor ligand which acts as an agonist and an antagonist at presynaptic and postsynaptic sites respectively. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 230, 99–102. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(93)90416-F
Minabe, Y., Schechter, L., Hashimoto, K., Shirayama, Y., and Ashby, C. R. Jr. (2003). Acute and chronic administration of the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-405 significantly alters the activity of midbrain dopamine neurons in rats: an in vivo electrophysiological study. Synapse 50, 181–190. doi: 10.1002/syn.10255
Misane, I., Kruis, A., Pieneman, A. W., Ögren, S. O., and Stiedl, O. (2013). GABAA receptor activation in the CA1 area of the dorsal hippocampus impairs consolidation of conditioned contextual fear in C57BL/6J mice. Behav. Brain Res. 238, 160–169. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.10.027
Misane, I., and Ögren, S. O. (2000). Multiple 5-HT receptors in passive avoidance: comparative studies of p-chloroamphetamine and 8-OH-DPAT. Neuropsychopharmacology 22, 168–190. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(99)00109-8
Mishra, D., Harrison, N. R., Gonzales, C. B., Schilström, B., and Konradsson-Geuken, Å. (2015). Effects of age and acute ethanol on glutamatergic neurotransmission in the medial prefrontal cortex of freely moving rats using enzyme-based microelectrode amperometry. PLoS ONE 10:e0125567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125567
Monti, J. M., Leopoldo, M., and Jantos, H. (2008). The serotonin 5-HT7 receptor agonist LP-44 microinjected into the dorsal raphe nucleus suppresses REM sleep in the rat. Behav. Brain Res. 191, 184–189. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.03.025
Moreau, J. L., Griebel, G., Jenck, F., Martin, J. R., Widmer, U., and Haefely, W. E. (1992). Behavioral profile of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist (S)-UH-301 in rodents and monkeys. Brain Res. Bull. 29, 901–904. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(92)90163-R
Naumenko, V. S., Popova, N. K., Lacivita, E., Leopoldo, M., and Ponimaskin, E. G. (2014). Interplay between serotonin 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 receptors in depressive disorders. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 20, 582–590. doi: 10.1111/cns.12247
Newman-Tancredi, A., Martel, J. C., Assié, M. B., Buritova, J., Lauressergues, E., Cosi, C., et al. (2009). Signal transduction and functional selectivity of F15599, a preferential post-synaptic 5-HT1A receptor agonist. Br. J. Pharmacol. 156, 338–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2008.00001.x
Norum, J. H., Hart, K., and Levy, F. O. (2003). Ras-dependent ERK activation by the human Gs-coupled serotonin receptors 5-HT4(b) and 5-HT7(a). J. Biol. Chem. 278, 3098–3104. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206237200
Ögren, S. O., Eriksson, T. M., Elvander-Tottie, E., D’Addario, C., Ekström, J. C., Svenningsson, P., et al. (2008). The role of 5-HT1A receptors in learning and memory. Behav. Brain Res. 195, 54–77. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.023
Ögren, S. O., and Stiedl, O. (2015). “Passive avoidance,” in Encyclopedia of Psychopharmacology, 2nd Edn, eds I. P. Stolerman, H. Lawrence, and L. H. Price (Berlin: Springer), 1220–1228. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-36172-2_160
Parks, C. L., Robinson, P. S., Sibille, E., Shenk, T., and Toth, M. (1998). Increased anxiety of mice lacking the serotonin 1A receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 10734–10739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10734
Passchier, J., van Waarde, A., Pieterman, R. M., Elsinga, P. H., Pruim, J., Hendrikse, H. N., et al. (2000). In vivo delineation of 5-HT1A receptors in human brain with [18F]MPPF. J. Nucl. Med. 41, 1830–1835.
Pike, V. W., McCarron, J. A., Lammertsma, A. A., Osman, S., Hume, S. P., Sargent, P. A., et al. (1996). Exquisite delineation of 5-HT1A receptors in human brain with PET and [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 301, R5–R7. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(96)00079-9
Pitsikas, N., Rigamonti, A. E., Cella, S. G., and Muller, E. E. (2003). The 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635 improves rats performance in different models of amnesia evaluated by the object recognition task. Brain Res. 983, 215–222. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(03)03091-9
Pittalà, V., Siracusa, M. A., Salerno, L., Romeo, G., Modica, M. N., Madjid, N., et al. (2015). Analysis of mechanisms for memory enhancement using novel and potent 5-HT1A receptor ligands. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.04.017 [Epub ahead of print].
Pouzet, B., Didriksen, M., and Arnt, J. (2002). Effects of the 5-HT7 receptor antagonist SB-258741 in animal models for schizophrenia. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 71, 655–665. doi: 10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00744-4
Raghupathi, R. K., Rydelek-Fitzgerald, L., Teitler, M., and Glennon, R. A. (1991). Analogues of the 5-HT1A serotonin antagonist 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-[4-(2-phthalimido) butyl]piperazine with reduced alpha 1-adrenergic affinity. J. Med. Chem. 34, 2633–2638. doi: 10.1021/jm00112a043
Rasmussen, K., Calligaro, D. O., Czachura, J. F., Dreshfield-Ahmad, L. J., Evans, D. C., Hemrick-Luecke, S. K., et al. (2000). The novel 5-hydroxytryptamine1A antagonist LY426965: effects on nicotine withdrawal and interactions with fluoxetine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 294, 688–700.
Raymond, J. R., Mukhin, Y. V., Gelasco, A., Turner, J., Collinsworth, G., Gettys, T. W., et al. (2001). Multiplicity of mechanisms of serotonin receptor signal transduction. Pharmacol. Ther. 92, 179–212. doi: 10.1016/S0163-7258(01)00169-3
Renner, U., Zeug, A., Woehler, A., Niebert, M., Dityatev, A., Dityateva, G., et al. (2012). Heterodimerization of serotonin receptors 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 differentially regulates receptor signalling and trafficking. Cell Sci. 15, 2486–2499. doi: 10.1242/jcs.101337
Riad, M., Garcia, S., Watkins, K. C., Jodoin, N., Doucet, E., Langlois, X., et al. (2000). Somatodendritic localization of 5-HT1A and preterminal axonal localization of 5-HT1B serotonin receptors in adult rat brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 417, 181–194. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(20000207)417:2<181::AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-A
Roberts, A. J., Krucker, T., Levy, C. L., Slanina, K. A., Sutcliffe, J. G., and Hedlund, P. B. (2004). Mice lacking 5-HT receptors show specific impairments in contextual learning. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 1913–1922. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03288.x
Rotondo, A., Nielsen, D. A., Nakhai, B., Hulihan-Giblin, B., Bolos, A., and Goldman, D. (1997). Agonist promoted down-regulation and functional desensitization in two naturally occurring variants of the human serotonin1A receptor. Neuropsychopharmacology 17, 18–26. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(97)00021-3
Ruat, M., Traiffort, E., Leurs, R., Tardivel-Lacombe, J., Diaz, J., and Arrang, J. M. (1993). Molecular cloning, characterization, and localization of a high-affinity serotonin receptor (5-HT7) activating cAMP formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 8547–8551. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.18.8547
Sakaue, M., Ago, Y., Baba, A., and Matsuda, T. (2003). The 5-HT1A receptor agonist MKC-242 reverses isolation rearing-induced deficits of prepulse inhibition in mice. Psychopharmacology 170, 73–79. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1515-x
Schechter, L. E., Smith, D. L., Rosenzweig-Lipson, S., Sukoff, S. J., Dawson, L. A., Marquis, K., et al. (2005). Lecozotan (SRA-333): a selective serotonin 1A receptor antagonist that enhances the stimulated release of glutamate and acetylcholine in the hippocampus and possesses cognitive-enhancing properties. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 314, 1274–1289. doi: 10.1124/jpet.105.086363
Schwarz, T., Beckermann, B., Buehner, K., Mauler, F., Schuhmacher, J., Seidel, D., et al. (2005). Pharmacokinetics of repinotan in healthy and brain injured animals. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 26, 259–268. doi: 10.1002/bdd.458
Shimizu, H., Hirose, A., Tatsuno, T., Nakamura, M., and Katsube, J. (1987). Pharmacological properties of SM-3997: a new anxioselective anxiolytic candidate. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 45, 493–500. doi: 10.1254/jjp.45.493
Siracusa, M. A., Salerno, L., Modica, M. N., Pittalà, V., Romeo, G., Amato, M. E., et al. (2008). Synthesis of new arylpiperazinylalkylthiobenzimidazole, benzothiazole, or benzoxazole derivatives as potent and selective 5-HT1A serotonin receptor ligands. J. Med. Chem. 51, 4529–4538. doi: 10.1021/jm800176x
Skirzewski, M., Hernandez, L., Schechter, L. E., and Rada, P. (2010). Acute lecozotan administration increases learning and memory in rats without affecting anxiety or behavioral depression. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 95, 325–330. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.02.008
Sodickson, D. L., and Bean, B. P. (1998). Neurotransmitter activation of inwardly rectifying potassium current in dissociated hippocampal CA3 neurons: interactions among multiple receptors. J. Neurosci. 18, 8153–8162.
Starr, K. R., Price, G. W., Watson, J. M., Atkinson, P. J., Arban, R., Melotto, S., et al. (2007). SB-649915-B, a novel 5-HT1A/B autoreceptor antagonist and serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is anxiolytic and displays fast onset activity in the rat high light social interaction test. Neuropsychopharmacology 32, 2163–2172. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301341
Stenfors, C., Werner, T., and Ross, S. B. (1998). In vivo labelling of the mouse brain 5-hydroxytryptamine1A receptor with the novel selective antagonist 3H-NAD-299. N.-S. Arch. Pharmacol. 357, 500–507. doi: 10.1007/PL00005199
Stiedl, O., Jansen, R. F., Pieneman, A. W., Ögren, S. O., and Meyer, M. (2009). Assessing aversive emotional states through the heart in mice: implications for cardiovascular dysregulation in affective disorders. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 33, 181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.015
Stiedl, O., Birkenfeld, K., Palve, M., and Spiess, J. (2000b). Impairment of conditioned contextual fear of C57BL/6J mice by intracerebral injections of the NMDA receptor antagonist APV. Behav. Brain Res. 116, 157–168. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00269-2
Takahashi, H., Nakashima, S., Ohama, E., Takeda, S., and Ikuta, F. (1986). Distribution of serotonin-containing cell bodies in the brainstem of the human fetus determined with immunohistochemistry using antiserotonin serum. Brain Dev. 8, 355–365. doi: 10.1016/S0387-7604(86)80055-9
Thomas, D. R., Atkinson, P. J., Hastie, P. G., Roberts, J. C., Middlemiss, D. N., and Price, G. W. (2002). [3H]-SB-269970 radiolabels 5-HT7 receptors in rodent, pig and primate brain tissues. Neuropharmacology 42, 74–81. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3908(01)00151-4
Thomas, D. R., Melotto, S., Massagrande, M., Gribble, A. D., Jeffrey, P., Stevens, A. J., et al. (2003). B-656104-A, a novel selective 5-HT7 receptor antagonist, modulates REM sleep in rats. Br. J. Pharmacol. 139, 705–714. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705290
Thomson, C. G., Beer, M. S., Curtis, N. R., Diggle, H. J., Handford, E., and Kulagowski, J. J. (2004). Thiazoles and thiopyridines: novel series of high affinity h5HT7 ligands. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14, 677–680. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2003.11.050
To, Z. P., Bonhaus, D. W., Eglen, R. M., and Jakeman, L. B. (1995). Characterization and distribution of putative 5-HT7 receptors in guinea-pig brain. Br. J. Pharmacol. 115, 107–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb16327.x
Tomita, T., Yasui-Furukori, N., Nakagami, T., Tsuchimine, S., Ishioka, M., Kaneda, A., et al. (2014). The influence of 5-HTTLPR genotype on the association between the plasma concentration and therapeutic effect of paroxetine in patients with major depressive disorder. PLoS ONE 9:e98099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098099
Traber, J., Davies, M. A., Dompert, W. U., Glaser, T., Schuurman, T., and Seidel, P. R. (1984). Brain serotonin receptors as a target for the putative anxiolytic TVX Q 7821. Brain Res. Bull. 12, 741–744. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(84)90155-2
Villalobos-Molina, R., Orozco-Mendez, M., Lopez-Guerrero, J. J., and Gallardo-Ortiz, I. A. (2005). WAY 405, a new silent 5-HT1A receptor antagonist with low affinity for vascular alpha1-adrenoceptors. Auton. Autacoid. Pharmacol. 25, 185–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-8673.2005.00350.x
Waterhouse, R. N. (2003). Determination of lipophilicity and its use as a predictor of blood-brain barrier penetration of molecular imaging agents. Mol. Imaging Biol. 5, 376–389. doi: 10.1016/j.mibio.2003.09.014
Weiss, S., Pin, J. P., Sebben, M., Kemp, D., Sladeczek, F., Gabrion, J., et al. (1986). Synaptogenesis of cultured striatal neurones in serum-free medium: a morphological and biochemical study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 2238–2242. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.7.2238
Wesolowska, A., Nikiforuk, A., Stachowicz, K., and Tatarczynska, E. (2006). Effect of the selective 5-HT7 receptor antagonist SB 269970 in animal models of anxiety and depression. Neuropharmacology 51, 578–586. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.04.017
Youn, J., Hager, T., Misane, I., Pieneman, A. W., Jansen, R. F., Ögren, S. O., et al. (2013). Central 5-HT1A receptor-mediated modulation of heart rate dynamics and its adjustment by conditioned and unconditioned fear in mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 170, 859–870. doi: 10.1111/bph.12325
Youn, J., Misane, I., Eriksson, T. M., Millan, M. J., Ögren, S. O., Meyer, M., et al. (2009). Bidirectional modulation of classical fear conditioning in mice by 5-HT1A receptor ligands with contrasting intrinsic activities. Neuropharmacology 57, 567–576. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.07.011
Keywords: emotional learning, fear conditioning, fear memory, 5-HT1A receptor ligands, 5-HT7 receptor ligands, passive avoidance, serotonin
Citation: Stiedl O, Pappa E, Konradsson-Geuken Å and Ögren SO (2015) The role of the serotonin receptor subtypes 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 and its interaction in emotional learning and memory. Front. Pharmacol. 6:162. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00162
Received: 30 June 2015; Accepted: 20 July 2015;
Published: 07 August 2015.
Edited by:Alfredo Meneses, Center for Research and Advanced Studies, Mexico
Reviewed by:Agnieszka Nikiforuk, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland
Antonella Gasbarri, University of l’Aquila, Italy
Copyright © 2015 Stiedl, Pappa, Konradsson-Geuken and Ögren. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Oliver Stiedl, Department of Functional Genomics, and Department of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Behavioral Neuroscience Group, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam – VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, Room A-062, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands, firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com